Speaker 1: Get ready all right, September twenty five, twenty twenty five, allegedly,
Speaker 1: according to that thing we call a calendar, And just
Speaker 1: for the record, here is just after five thirty am
Speaker 1: Eastern in what we used to call America, according to
Speaker 1: the thing we call a clock. Anyway, you know, I
Speaker 1: was sitting here staring at the screen and thinking I
Speaker 1: should do a news report at two AM, because I
Speaker 1: had a ton of news already set for a possible
Speaker 1: Thursday night. And by the time I got done with
Speaker 1: it a couple hours later, I said to myself, I'm
Speaker 1: still awake, and I'm usually awake all night, so why
Speaker 1: the hell not just do an early morning news broadcast.
Speaker 1: So if you are hearing me on the stream, it
Speaker 1: might be lot if it's just after, you know, five
Speaker 1: point thirty am and you're in the Eastern time zone.
Speaker 1: But then again, maybe you're not, and most of you aren't.
Speaker 1: You'll get the podcast later, the o'celli effect. That's what
Speaker 1: we are, and I gotta do the news man. I
Speaker 1: gotta do it because it's just gotta get done, okay.
Speaker 1: I gotta get ahead of tomorrow's shorts, X mess fire
Speaker 1: store meltdowns and nervous attacks that people are gonna have
Speaker 1: excuse me, panic attacks, let me use the proper name
Speaker 1: that people are gonna have over the various things that
Speaker 1: occurred they believe occurred and they've been told occurred on
Speaker 1: the overnight and going into the day, and then god knows,
Speaker 1: Trump will start, you know, true thing or tweeting or
Speaker 1: puking or xing or whatever, and it'll get weirder. And
Speaker 1: then somebody will you know, Charlie Kirk, and all lives
Speaker 1: matter and screw you, and the fight begins again as
Speaker 1: nobody ever sleeps. You know, I used to live in
Speaker 1: New York where the city never slept, but now nobody
Speaker 1: actually sleeps. Nobody thinks. I'm thinking zombie apocalypse is becoming
Speaker 1: more and more inappropriate. Trope, metaphor and reality all rolled
Speaker 1: into one. And if I can Mandela my ass out
Speaker 1: of here, I'm willing to go. Aliens come get me,
Speaker 1: and whoever else wants to come get me, but either
Speaker 1: kill me or get me off this rock. That's all
Speaker 1: I got to say. Anyway, Let's start with a typical
Speaker 1: America's target, right, something that makes no sense, And I'm
Speaker 1: gonna take you back a little bit because I'm watching
Speaker 1: other things make no sense according to the narratives. But
Speaker 1: let's go back a little bit in time when the
Speaker 1: MSM agreed about something and I saw it on the
Speaker 1: left and the right, and I can sample it, and
Speaker 1: I don't even care how they settled the case, because
Speaker 1: you know, the newest and best best mantra for the
Speaker 1: MSM should be, Okay, we repeat it, report it, and
Speaker 1: we decide. Then we report it, and then you keep
Speaker 1: buying it, because that's what they're doing. Some months ago,
Speaker 1: Weymo vehicles right were allegedly being torched because it was
Speaker 1: part of the anti ice uprising. So let me get
Speaker 1: this straight. Not only were they torching police cars and
Speaker 1: this and that and the third thing, but they were
Speaker 1: writing anti ice messages on the wayward weymos that are
Speaker 1: driverless vehicles in LA. That was a specific target, not
Speaker 1: because people hated the Weaymos and it happened to go
Speaker 1: along with it, or somebody wanted to falsely attribute it
Speaker 1: to the ice riots and ice uprisings and ice resistance
Speaker 1: that was going on in La in the whole two
Speaker 1: blocks of it that we had to hear about worldwide.
Speaker 1: But they wanted to make sure you knew that they
Speaker 1: were targeting the poor driverless vehicles, and you bought it
Speaker 1: left and right. It's a beautiful thing. The headline right
Speaker 1: from one of the Fox one of the many Fox
Speaker 1: outlets have carried it, is way Moo cars set on
Speaker 1: fire as Los Angeles immigration raids protests continue. Now, that's
Speaker 1: one of the nicest headlines out of Fox at that time,
Speaker 1: one of the nicest headlines out of left wing media
Speaker 1: from the NBC universe at the time. This is back
Speaker 1: in June of this year. By the way, photos show
Speaker 1: Waymo vehicles on fire during LA protests as company cuts
Speaker 1: downtown service. Okay, because they wanted to make sure that
Speaker 1: you who could afford the driverless vehicles will not be
Speaker 1: getting service there in LA for those couple of blocks
Speaker 1: that are on fire at the moment. Because this is
Speaker 1: like the LA riots, except a microcosm, a micro riot,
Speaker 1: if you will, And it's not a riot. It's a protest,
Speaker 1: and it's all good and there's no real reason for
Speaker 1: any of this. So we'll just argue over the insignificant.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, why do I bring this up? Because headline
Speaker 1: Dallas right yesterday, But they're going to be talking about
Speaker 1: it all day and what are we going to hear about? Well,
Speaker 1: the FBI wanted to make sure and publish that there
Speaker 1: was some unused rounds from the alleged sniper who fired
Speaker 1: upon an ICE facility somewhere near Dallas, but you know,
Speaker 1: not quite in Dallas exactly. Uh, but anyway, it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter the headline right according to Reuters, even is gunman
Speaker 1: wrote anti ICE in quotes on unused bullet in fatal
Speaker 1: attack on Dallas Immigration office. Now, there's a lot to
Speaker 1: be known and a lot of early reports. And looking
Speaker 1: at the kid that only ever had a previous arrest
Speaker 1: for what cannabis, okay and all that good stuff, he
Speaker 1: looks like a lefty. Believe me, they're going to be
Speaker 1: calling him a lefty by the end of the day,
Speaker 1: even though even though and they're saying it was indiscriminate
Speaker 1: firing at the ICE. Now, he wasn't as good a
Speaker 1: shot as some other people recently examined, but the only
Speaker 1: people he struck were detainees. They're the only three one
Speaker 1: killed and two wounded in the attack where the guy
Speaker 1: was taking intentional sniper shots like ten seconds apart. According
Speaker 1: to the initial witnesses that I'm sure are going to
Speaker 1: disappear because it was clearly intentionally done. And oh, by
Speaker 1: the bye, the shooter took his own life, so we're
Speaker 1: not going to get the benefit of the circus and
Speaker 1: show trial. Okay, but here's the common weird link once again,
Speaker 1: and I want you to hear from a local Dallas
Speaker 1: affiliate about it, if you don't mind, because I'm going
Speaker 1: to let them report about it. One of those things
Speaker 1: that you know, if you've gone through the JFK audio
Speaker 1: files over the years and the media collections over the years,
Speaker 1: you might recognize television station w u FAA, which is
Speaker 1: a fort Worth I believe, you know, I gotta remember
Speaker 1: is it ABC or is it CBS? I you know what,
Speaker 1: I can't remember, but it's a network station that was
Speaker 1: in existence at the time of the JFK assassination. And
Speaker 1: here's how they reported. And I'm pretty sure it's an
Speaker 1: ABC affiliate. But anyway, it doesn't matter, let's.
Speaker 2: Go through it.
Speaker 1: They've been great neighbors.
Speaker 3: This family's Collin County neighbors told us they keep to
Speaker 3: themselves but are always cordial.
Speaker 1: I've had lovely interactions with their family, so I'm so
Speaker 1: horrified to hear about all this.
Speaker 3: No one on them.
Speaker 1: Okay, so a lady from her car is commenting they
Speaker 1: were great neighbors. I don't know, they were really nice.
Speaker 1: And that's because they went and you know, rated a
Speaker 1: couple of houses that are in another state. Actually that
Speaker 1: well one of them is in another state. Let's let's
Speaker 1: get the accuracy on this. Okay, let's try and be careful.
Speaker 1: But anyway, this is, you know, the shooting of Dallas.
Speaker 1: Team coverage from our ABC affiliate there, WFAA, And you know,
Speaker 1: but he was a quiet boy. He was always a
Speaker 1: quiet boy, and he was a good family. They were
Speaker 1: kind of cool. They kind of kept to themselves, you know,
Speaker 1: like most people do. And these two properties. The guy's
Speaker 1: name is Joshua John. He's apparently twenty nine, so he's
Speaker 1: not as young. But I'm going to get to the
Speaker 1: punchline in a minute. Let's hear a little more WFAA
Speaker 1: initial coverage on this.
Speaker 3: The street knew much about Joshua John, and while the
Speaker 3: FBI director called what happened a politically motivated attack, one
Speaker 3: of John's childhood friends described him to ABC as quote,
Speaker 3: the least political out of all the people I knew
Speaker 3: in high school. John's friends said he was a gamer,
Speaker 3: mainly interested in internet culture. His profile pick had been
Speaker 3: a meme of a man with a Soviet flag. It's
Speaker 3: not a political thing, a friend told ABC, It's just
Speaker 3: being on the computer too much. Those friends said they
Speaker 3: hadn't spoken with John in ten years, but we've confirmed
Speaker 3: in the decade that passed he briefly attended the University
Speaker 3: of Texas at Dallas and at times Colin College polisse A.
Speaker 3: John died of a self inflicted gunshot lond The FBI
Speaker 3: left this home in Fairview tonight with a trunkload of evidence,
Speaker 3: including at least one computer in Fairview. I'm Teresa Wardard.
Speaker 4: Unfortunately, today's shooty is at the first threat against immigration
Speaker 4: facilities in Texas this year. On the fourth of July,
Speaker 4: su Spekes, addressed in black military gear, open fire outside
Speaker 4: the Prairie Land Detention Center in Albaredo.
Speaker 1: Okay. Now, they're going to bring up a bunch of
Speaker 1: unrelated events that happened to have occurred in or near
Speaker 1: ICE facilities, and they're going to amp up the idea
Speaker 1: that ICE is definitely under siege, especially given Gavin Newsom's
Speaker 1: recently signing that law after the House handled it in
Speaker 1: California about we don't want masks on the ice agents
Speaker 1: and you get in the picture here. But also I
Speaker 1: want you to note that this is very similar to
Speaker 1: the story, except you got a ten year age gap
Speaker 1: here regarding the alleged and probable shooter in the Charlie kirkcase.
Speaker 1: Anybody catch that. You know, he was a quiet boy.
Speaker 1: He attended college briefly, and then he seemed to dive
Speaker 1: way too much into the internet in games, and he
Speaker 1: said ironic things, and he was never actually political. And look, man,
Speaker 1: I can't help you if all you're gonna do is
Speaker 1: yell at me. It's the left, it's the right. It's
Speaker 1: only the gun toting people, you know, the wooses that
Speaker 1: we said couldn't do anything unless they decide to join Antifa,
Speaker 1: which is an organization that doesn't actually exist, you know,
Speaker 1: is a communication hub and is literally named for being
Speaker 1: anti fascist and after a European group. As per usual.
Speaker 1: It's sort of like being mad at Beatlemania for having
Speaker 1: written she loves you. Yeah, yeah, yeah. This is beyond
Speaker 1: the pale. And I don't know how people are not
Speaker 1: seen what this is. I'm not gonna give you the
Speaker 1: full punchline, or maybe I did already. Does it matter
Speaker 1: because you're gonna take this and run with it anyway? Uh?
Speaker 1: And oh, by the bye, let's just move forward because
Speaker 1: they're slipping by you. What in the thailanol wars? Now, okay,
Speaker 1: coke versus pepsi? It was cola wars. But you know
Speaker 1: they put cyanide in the tailandol, so you better go
Speaker 1: chew on a pod name tide anyway. Well, idiots argue
Speaker 1: over how effective or destructive? Uh tailanol is? Right? The
Speaker 1: new quid pro or quid that is a brand new
Speaker 1: shiny FDA approval for legacy drug company that changed its
Speaker 1: names and mergers and with murderers. Right, yeah, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: mumble too through these things. Why not? The president can
Speaker 1: do it. I can do it too. I'm gonna use
Speaker 1: him as my inspiration. Gsk Okay PLC is a publicly
Speaker 1: traded company. It's owned by its shareholders, obviously, but major
Speaker 1: shareholders include institutional investors like the Vanguard Group, Blackrock, and
Speaker 1: Schroeder Investment Management Limited. Anyway, if you want to follow
Speaker 1: the money, go ahead, but you don't really need to
Speaker 1: because it's an English company. It's headquartered in London. And
Speaker 1: guess what, when you go to sell the souls of
Speaker 1: others and the blood of others, you must meet in person.
Speaker 1: Where was Trump last week and therefore carrying the people
Speaker 1: that are really in charge while he was on his
Speaker 1: playdate with King Charles in the Land of Make Believe?
Speaker 1: They were over there doing their thing while Epstein images
Speaker 1: bounced off the walls like sugar plum fairies being projected
Speaker 1: from a hotel by protesters across the street, allegedly to
Speaker 1: double the distract. Of course, anyway, the FDA, in an
Speaker 1: unusual step, aims to repurpose old GSX drug as an
Speaker 1: autism treatment surprise surprise, after reviewing existing published literature. This
Speaker 1: is headline. By the way, the agency initiated the approval
Speaker 1: of well korvin. I guess that's the new name for it,
Speaker 1: which GSX stopped selling more than two decades ago for
Speaker 1: a condition associated with autism, so somebody had to get
Speaker 1: rid of their vitamins. It looks like to me. And
Speaker 1: if you check, I mean, I'll have links to the
Speaker 1: information where you can read some of the interesting part
Speaker 1: of it. And you know it is what it is.
Speaker 1: But that's the new approval that came along with Tylanol's
Speaker 1: band for you, even though I argue it's not much
Speaker 1: of anything for you except maybe a mild fever reducer
Speaker 1: and a placebo meant so that you can convince yourself
Speaker 1: you don't have a headache anymore after you take that crap.
Speaker 1: Sure it has an effect after you take a toxic
Speaker 1: level of it, but autism not buying it. Also not
Speaker 1: backed by any actual study. Okay, you can find a
Speaker 1: study to back anything, but any legitimate study I've ever seen,
Speaker 1: there's no evidence for this. Again, why pay attention to that?
Speaker 1: Because you think you're going to win on vaccines anti
Speaker 1: vax people, but you're not. And this is the sad part.
Speaker 1: I liked RFK Junior, I really did. But as the
Speaker 1: worm turns in his brain and he sits there, he's
Speaker 1: turning in different colors than Trump is behind him. Take
Speaker 1: a look at the video. Don't take my word for
Speaker 1: it anyway. In other sports and wweer the world highlights
Speaker 1: just to get off of politics, and God help us
Speaker 1: not mention Trump for five seconds. MLB is now going
Speaker 1: to the video game style ABS system for making sure
Speaker 1: balls and strikes get called without having a factor in
Speaker 1: umpire bias. Right, too bad they are about thirty years.
Speaker 1: It's late on that because you know, if you notice
Speaker 1: in sports they show you something on a video game,
Speaker 1: you get accustomed to it. There, they find out if
Speaker 1: it works to you know, make it so that you've
Speaker 1: got a good heads up on your little players that
Speaker 1: you control on your screen, whether it's Nintendo, Xbox or
Speaker 1: PlayStation or whatever, doesn't matter, online gaming. And then they
Speaker 1: do it in real life, putting the little numbers under people,
Speaker 1: you know, streaking the ball, watching a puck and hockey whatever.
Speaker 1: Major League Baseball has been really resistant to implementing the
Speaker 1: video game style of television broadcast. They just don't do well.
Speaker 1: I mean, we might as well create random number generators
Speaker 1: that create athletes that we can root for and turn
Speaker 1: around and either go with the odds or defy the odds.
Speaker 1: Base them on real people and never have them play
Speaker 1: another game again. We can simulate them. Let me know
Speaker 1: when you figure out which parts of what I'm saying
Speaker 1: or sarcastic. But in twenty twenty six they're going to
Speaker 1: create an ABS challenge system and league Baseball, so that
Speaker 1: there might be a button somebody will push when they
Speaker 1: want to argue as to whether that was actually a
Speaker 1: ball or a strike, because umpires do increase and decrease
Speaker 1: the size of their strike zone quite often completely arbitrarily,
Speaker 1: based on their mood, their attitude toward the team or
Speaker 1: for the team, or the particular player or pitcher, you know,
Speaker 1: the player at bat or the pitcher throwing the ball
Speaker 1: at him. And I've seen that my whole life. So
Speaker 1: I got to say, I like this use of technology,
Speaker 1: but Major League Baseball should have done this thirty years
Speaker 1: ago when they still had some popularity to cash in on,
Speaker 1: because it's not looking good anyway. If you can't accept fedbook,
Speaker 1: I know you'll accept Fox News. On my next story,
Speaker 1: Fox News host Jesse Waters says the US should bomb
Speaker 1: the UN over Trump's broken escalator and a few other things.
Speaker 1: But maybe I should go to some other audio oh
Speaker 1: here and cover what happened. All right, Let's let other
Speaker 1: people do the talking, because hey, it's you know, early
Speaker 1: early morning, and nobody really wants to hear from me
Speaker 1: too much. And I have a couple of inspiring messages.
Speaker 1: This isn't all bitching in the morning, by the way,
Speaker 1: just so you know, and comedy coming up too, But
Speaker 1: let's handle the Fox News host thing before we even
Speaker 1: break down the reason why they reacted, or maybe we'll
Speaker 1: do a little of both in this audio. Let's see
Speaker 1: where it goes. How about that? All right?
Speaker 5: And so they just ended up walking up, though it
Speaker 5: outraged a lot of people, including Press Secretary Caroline Levitt,
Speaker 5: who wrote if someone at the UN intentionally stopped the
Speaker 5: escalator as the President and First Lady were stepping on,
Speaker 5: they need to be fired and investigated immediately, then sharing
Speaker 5: a screenshot from a UK newspaper claiming that UN staff
Speaker 5: members had previously joked about turning the escalator off on
Speaker 5: him and saying they ran out of money. That said, reportedly,
Speaker 5: right now, there is no evidence supporting that they actually
Speaker 5: did this. Still, let it had more shit to talk
Speaker 5: about with this escalator, as well as the teleprompter glitch
Speaker 5: that Trump dealt with during his speech.
Speaker 1: Anyway, before we get to Press Secretary Levity here, I
Speaker 1: just want you to know that information is out there
Speaker 1: saying that it is possible that the people that were
Speaker 1: photographing Trump might have actually had control of guess what
Speaker 1: the escalator and might have made that decision to capture
Speaker 1: certain pictures or whatever. But either way, if the Secret
Speaker 1: Service wasn't in control of something that could have shut
Speaker 1: off the escalator, that's a different issue from what we're
Speaker 1: dealing with here, and un sabotage is highly unlikely. But anyway,
Speaker 1: putting that aside, guess who had control over Trump's audio
Speaker 1: while he was giving his speech where he gets pissed
Speaker 1: at that, And also because they're going to make a
Speaker 1: point about the audio in a minute, that's part of
Speaker 1: the triple sabotage. But also the teleprompter was not in
Speaker 1: the control of UN personnel. It was actually handed over
Speaker 1: to some other people. But pay no attention to facts.
Speaker 1: Let's get back to Carolyn Levitt and how she needs
Speaker 1: to get people fired and investigated and deported. And who knows,
Speaker 1: maybe also involuntari I mean, she's on Fox News, so
Speaker 1: maybe involuntarily lethal injected or something too. Maybe maybe first
Speaker 1: it was.
Speaker 6: The escalator, then it was the teleprompter, and then Katie
Speaker 6: Pavlich from town Hall, who we offered a seat in
Speaker 6: the press pool to cover the president's historic speech today,
Speaker 6: noticed that the audio inside of the room was much
Speaker 6: lower and different for the President of the United States
Speaker 6: than the previous speakers. So when you put all of
Speaker 6: this together, it doesn't look like a coincidence to me.
Speaker 6: And I know that we have people, including the United
Speaker 6: States Secret Service, who are looking into this to try
Speaker 6: to get to the bottom of it. And if we
Speaker 6: find that these were you and staffers who were purposefully
Speaker 6: trying to trip up literally trip up the presidents and
Speaker 6: the First Lady of the United States, well there better
Speaker 6: be accountability for those people.
Speaker 5: And Levi it was not lonely, especially with the Fox newsgrowth.
Speaker 1: They sabotaged them. Yeah, and they could have hurt the
Speaker 1: First Lady.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Trump would have fallen in and.
Speaker 1: Would have gotten back up.
Speaker 7: I mean, this isn't This is an insurrection, and what
Speaker 7: we need to do is either.
Speaker 8: Leave the UN or we need to vomit. It is
Speaker 8: in New York though, right, Yeah, could there some fall
Speaker 8: out there?
Speaker 9: All right?
Speaker 10: Maybe gas it?
Speaker 5: No it, okay, but we need to destroy it. Maybe
Speaker 5: just can we demolished?
Speaker 7: They get to know this is absolutely unacceptable.
Speaker 1: Okay, So that is what Jesse Waters is calling for.
Speaker 1: Let's gas the UN people or demolish it or vombit. Oh,
Speaker 1: wait a minute, it is in New York, right, let
Speaker 1: me check. Oh New York, that's kind of close to
Speaker 1: where I'm sitting. Now, let's not do that. Let's just
Speaker 1: gas them like roaches. Now, look, I'm not exactly friendly
Speaker 1: to the UN But here we go again. I can
Speaker 1: tell you what went wrong with Trump's audio being different
Speaker 1: and low. And if you check the speech, and you
Speaker 1: also take a look at where the old man is
Speaker 1: not using proper mic technique because he's not accustomed to
Speaker 1: an external microphone on elect turn. He's accustomed to a
Speaker 1: boom mic over his head that somebody will adjust for
Speaker 1: him personally. And he is also used to guess what
Speaker 1: those little clip on mics or double triple coverage in
Speaker 1: this way so that his audio is absolutely without flaw
Speaker 1: and with double backups when he's in the White House,
Speaker 1: because that's his people managing it. Now, to my understanding,
Speaker 1: they were supposed to be managing the audio for him
Speaker 1: as well while he was speaking. Because they do that,
Speaker 1: they'll let you in the control room of a building
Speaker 1: like this where there is a multimedia projection and all
Speaker 1: these kind of things just reality speaking here. And the
Speaker 1: fact is, sorry to say, you know, the old man's
Speaker 1: not used to using just a mic on a elect turn.
Speaker 1: You can see where inconsistent sound has occurred before, where
Speaker 1: he doesn't realize he's turning his mouth away from the
Speaker 1: mic like I'm doing, and things like that when he's
Speaker 1: having to double check things. Problem here is now it's
Speaker 1: another conspiracy, and let's bomb the UN because we can
Speaker 1: make all sorts of irrational statements on the Fox News
Speaker 1: propaganda machine. Kill the homeless, bomb the UN. Maybe we
Speaker 1: can just gass them. Let's do something. Let's just demolish
Speaker 1: the building, like as if it was a settlement in Gaza, right,
Speaker 1: just just go in there with a bulldozer, and doesn't
Speaker 1: matter if there's people in there or whatever. Let him
Speaker 1: get out of the way. If they don't want to
Speaker 1: get bulldozed, let them go to home, let them get deported.
Speaker 1: Why not just deport him. Screw diplomatic community. Let's do that.
Speaker 1: That'll be good, and then we can pull all of
Speaker 1: our diplomats out. Hey, you can doze the entire diplomatic core.
Speaker 1: We don't need representatives elsewhere, and we certainly don't need
Speaker 1: to be the home of the place where these people
Speaker 1: should be safe and have diplomatic community, no matter what
Speaker 1: what s whole country they came from, because hey, screw it.
Speaker 1: You know, the UN is a fairly good idea, but
Speaker 1: they do a lot of stupid things because guess what,
Speaker 1: when you get enough people together, the aggregate IQ drops
Speaker 1: and that's the way it is. And also when you
Speaker 1: send people from countries, because you're giving them a plum
Speaker 1: position and a plum job to be abroad and have
Speaker 1: an adventure, you know, especially in places where you got
Speaker 1: dictators in charge and literal oligarchs running your country and
Speaker 1: people that are robbing the part of death in other places,
Speaker 1: I mean, all over the globe. Who do you think
Speaker 1: they're gonna send there? The best? Who do we send there?
Speaker 1: People that you know absolutely showed their loyalty. We have
Speaker 1: an ambassador to the UN. Two's kind of quiet right now.
Speaker 1: But anyway, this is the newest outrage, and yet we
Speaker 1: don't have to be normal about any of it. I mean,
Speaker 1: we could talk about the speech he actually gave if
Speaker 1: you want, where he repeated the whole I ended seven
Speaker 1: wars even though literally speaking, Here's what we could really
Speaker 1: say is that you know he had a hand Trump
Speaker 1: did in deals that eased conflicts between Cambodi and Thailand,
Speaker 1: Israel and Iran, India and Pakistan. That's really what he
Speaker 1: had a hand in, though some of those countries' leaders
Speaker 1: dispute his role as anything significant, just saying US was
Speaker 1: involved in a temporary peace deal between the Democratic Republic
Speaker 1: of Congo and Rwanda that experts said is significant but
Speaker 1: remains shaky. Maybe that's four things disputable but possible. Maybe
Speaker 1: then again maybe not because peace deals, you know, or
Speaker 1: deals that end conflicts or whatever, those things are seen
Speaker 1: in hindsight, if they hold Russian Ukraine killing anywhere from
Speaker 1: five thousand to seven thousand young soldiers, mostly soldiers on
Speaker 1: both sides every single week, not quite accurate. Truth is
Speaker 1: that body counts are difficult during conflicts, and I don't
Speaker 1: really trust anybody's anybody's estimates. But since the invasion in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two, what the estimates are that are out there?
Speaker 1: And again I don't necessarily trust these. But he doesn't
Speaker 1: have a verifiable source unless you're talking about some sort
Speaker 1: of secret that he's actually leaking out there that nobody
Speaker 1: else has. The fact sheet on he got two hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty thousand Russian military debts over the course of
Speaker 1: now nearly three years, right, So that doesn't amount exactly
Speaker 1: to five thousand or seven thousand a week. Also, you've
Speaker 1: got eighty thousand military deaths in the Ukraine and fourteen
Speaker 1: thousand civilians. This is not adding up to the numbers, okay,
Speaker 1: because all together you got three hundred and forty five thousand,
Speaker 1: one hundred deaths since the start of the conflict. With
Speaker 1: generally accepted numbers out there. The war began in February
Speaker 1: of twenty two, right, so that accounts to roughly two
Speaker 1: hundred and sixty deaths per day something like that, or
Speaker 1: eight hundred and forty eight deaths per week, which is
Speaker 1: many thousands short of Trump's declaration. You know, the US
Speaker 1: bombing of nuclear facilities in Iran. I don't expect that
Speaker 1: we've gotten the truth about that from anybody, so be
Speaker 1: fair to Trump. Trump touted efforts to thwart Venezuelan's rug trafficking, right,
Speaker 1: and how did he do it? He blew boats out
Speaker 1: of the water. The military has struck at least three
Speaker 1: boats off of Venezuela's coast since the beginning of the month,
Speaker 1: killing at least seventeen people, but there isn't any evidence
Speaker 1: that the government has engaged in organized drug trafficking, which
Speaker 1: he also claimed, because he said, we recently began using
Speaker 1: the supreme power of the United States military. This is
Speaker 1: a quote to destroy Venezuela terrorists and trafficking networks led
Speaker 1: by Nicholas Maduro. So the kingpin is the president and
Speaker 1: not saying I deny that. But we don't even have
Speaker 1: evidence except the stuff they said floated up afterwards. Anyway,
Speaker 1: how about this, Under the Biden administration, there were millions
Speaker 1: and millions of people pouring in from all over the
Speaker 1: world from prisons for mental institutions, drug dealers all over
Speaker 1: the world. Well, look, millions and millions and millions a
Speaker 1: little bit difficult. Plus, can anybody show me the evidence
Speaker 1: for this repeated claim about opening the mental awards and
Speaker 1: prisons and all that. I mean, we had one prison
Speaker 1: that was left open. Also, you know, when Trump was
Speaker 1: cutting a deal before the disastrous withdrawal out of Afghanistan
Speaker 1: that Biden presided over, Trump kind of set bad things
Speaker 1: in motion by releasing a whole bunch of tally bands
Speaker 1: all over the place so they could get themselves all
Speaker 1: good and ready to retake that country in quick time.
Speaker 1: He released a bunch of prisoners before that disaster took place,
Speaker 1: and no wonder, but hey, it's not like we did
Speaker 1: anything right in Afghanistan, seems like to me. But that
Speaker 1: started when oh yeah, under Bush, and then survived the
Speaker 1: mistake continuing through Obama, then survived the continuing mistake through Trump.
Speaker 1: Then Biden finally pulled out a bit badly. And that
Speaker 1: is a real serious way to look at things subjectively.
Speaker 1: In my mind, we have a whole disaster and it's
Speaker 1: called the conflict in Afghanistan. How about this, The Biden administration,
Speaker 1: right quote, lost more than three hundred thousand children, little
Speaker 1: children who were trafficked into the United States. They're lost
Speaker 1: or they're dead. Federal data, federal data, you know, the
Speaker 1: government he's running, shows that thirty two thousand unaccompanied migrant
Speaker 1: children failed to appear for immigration court dates. That happened
Speaker 1: from October eighteenth through September twenty twenty three, which includes
Speaker 1: some of Trump's first term. Right But you know, again,
Speaker 1: the narrative is more important than the reality and truth.
Speaker 1: It is when you're totally undocumented and really hidden and
Speaker 1: you don't get caught, then they don't know how many
Speaker 1: people cross the border. And oh, by the way, this
Speaker 1: is something that neither side of the equation has ever
Speaker 1: bothered to fix. And even with deportations, there's going to
Speaker 1: be exceptions, and there's going to be new ghost re emergencies.
Speaker 1: And really all you got now is people that are
Speaker 1: more desperate and more crafty going to figure out a
Speaker 1: way to beat that system and be coyotes. So that's that.
Speaker 1: And they're still not carrying giant packs of fentanyl on
Speaker 1: their back, just so you know. And the giant gains
Speaker 1: we are rapidly reversing the economic calamity we inherited from
Speaker 1: the previous administration. Yeah, well a mildly increased. This is
Speaker 1: always funny too, because no politician, here's the beginning and
Speaker 1: end of that whole thing. And you know, we've secured
Speaker 1: commitments about money already paid for the seve trillion and investments.
Speaker 1: Let's again try to calm down with our emotional reactions
Speaker 1: and who we want to defend right away. And I
Speaker 1: don't care if you're a defender of Orange Jesus or
Speaker 1: you think you're defending the rest of the thirty two flavors.
Speaker 1: At the insanity shop of American politics now, which is
Speaker 1: a whole confused mess they call the left. I don't
Speaker 1: care which side you think you're defending or you think
Speaker 1: is right. Here's the problem. They never tell us the
Speaker 1: truth about the real unemployment rate. There is never any
Speaker 1: truth about There will always be a spin. In fact,
Speaker 1: when you ask somebody who is on your town council
Speaker 1: and you say, hey, the town council says we're broke
Speaker 1: and you guys are raising property taxes, they will turn
Speaker 1: around and twist things and try and explain to you
Speaker 1: that even though you're paying more in your property taxes,
Speaker 1: it's actually a discount. Okay, it's your crazy girlfriend who
Speaker 1: comes home and spends three hundred bucks and tells you
Speaker 1: how much money she saved when you try and tell her,
Speaker 1: if you didn't spend the three hundred bucks, we could
Speaker 1: have saved what three hundred bucks? Except they do this
Speaker 1: for a living. They will justify their existence and tell
Speaker 1: you how great they've done, especially if their name is
Speaker 1: attached to something and they want to take credit for it. Now,
Speaker 1: they used to do this for electioneering, but Trump is
Speaker 1: a bit of a glutton on this. So that's the
Speaker 1: only difference there, he'll constantly tell you about his achievements
Speaker 1: instead of bawling them all up in one massive lie
Speaker 1: for campaign season, because his campaign season never ends. Even
Speaker 1: if he doesn't realistically have another office to campaign for,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. Ever, since he got into politics, he
Speaker 1: figured out he's pretty good at keeping simple minded people
Speaker 1: distracted and entertained, so he does rallies all the time.
Speaker 1: I also love how the Fox News guy goes here
Speaker 1: well Maloney and Trump there, even though she's younger and
Speaker 1: clearly looks like she's in better shape. Trump would have
Speaker 1: fallen down and gotten back up of Bulania could have
Speaker 1: got hurt. I show my concern for Milaonnia, I mean
Speaker 1: disingenuous squared? How do you do that? Watchbox news? Anyway,
Speaker 1: I think I'm gonna take a quick break before we
Speaker 1: again try and drift away from the constant, you know,
Speaker 1: Trump dumpster fire that keeps us distracted at all times,
Speaker 1: because if you gaslight the gaslight, how fires does a
Speaker 1: gaslight or how many fires does a gaslight light? If
Speaker 1: a light could be bright? Italy sent warships to accompany
Speaker 1: Gaza flotilla following the Israeli attack, But you know what
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get into other news and the rest of
Speaker 1: the wide world of sports and a few other things.
Speaker 7: This is James Corbett coorpor Report dot com and you're
Speaker 7: listening to the Ocelli Affected o'celly dot com.
Speaker 2: Do you like history? Real history that you were never
Speaker 2: taught in schools? Why the Vietnam War, Nuclear Bombs and
Speaker 2: nation Building in Southeast Asia by author Mike Swanson, with
Speaker 2: new documentation never seen before that'll open your eyes to
Speaker 2: events that led up to this. Why the Vietnam War,
Speaker 2: Nuclear Bombs in nation Building in Southeast Asia nineteen forty
Speaker 2: five through nineteen sixty one. Get your copy today at
Speaker 2: Amazon dot com. Why the Vietnam War by author Mike Swanson.
Speaker 11: Relation conversation, you I fact revelation, conations, game revelation, bas.
Speaker 2: The effect.
Speaker 1: Season.
Speaker 12: Go ahead, call it about the day of hay assassination.
Speaker 1: Right, Well, what do you want to know?
Speaker 12: Baker's wild claim Oswal girlfriends he knew? Ruby and Barry
Speaker 12: answer weapons?
Speaker 1: Really, I imagine I could claim I have four wheels. It
Speaker 1: doesn't make me a wagon.
Speaker 12: But okay, bility and trying to prevent the murder of
Speaker 12: John Kennedy. Come on, now, has a real effort on
Speaker 12: the day of hay assassination.
Speaker 1: Go to Amazon dot com enter Judith Baker in her
Speaker 1: own words. You'll get the results for a digital copy
Speaker 1: of a book where Walt Brown utilizes her own words
Speaker 1: and the known evidence in the case to get at
Speaker 1: well a different let's say, you can get Judith Ary
Speaker 1: Baker in her own words from the author himself, signed
Speaker 1: if you request it by contacting doctor Brown at k
Speaker 1: I A S JFK at aol dot com. It's a
Speaker 1: fun book and it actually dissects the many, many fantastic
Speaker 1: claims Judith very Baker in her own words information Chili
Speaker 1: dot com. All right, so back to it as quick
Speaker 1: as I could get to it. And that was forced
Speaker 1: multiplier there, bringing us back in from the break. Want
Speaker 1: to remind you that, yeah, we do this over here,
Speaker 1: and I'm not even going to bring up Lancer because
Speaker 1: I'm going to try and kill this in an hour
Speaker 1: and I've already used over thirty five minutes. So let's
Speaker 1: go from here. Uh, no article or reference in the
Speaker 1: show notes is gonna be necessary because I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: give it a quick glance. I mean, jay Z has
Speaker 1: a lot of rumored issues man, allegations flying about paternity,
Speaker 1: connections to puppy underage partners, hush money divorce and maybe
Speaker 1: getting too much destiny out of Beyonce's child or children
Speaker 1: there and Bestie's in Destiny's child and all that. So
Speaker 1: plenty of drama that maybe has an in law mama
Speaker 1: keeping the facade of a hip hop empire intact. You know,
Speaker 1: from the bottom of my heart, even though I see
Speaker 1: black Twitter and respect fifty cent, I just can't bother
Speaker 1: to care. I really can't, and I miss when this
Speaker 1: might have been the scandal that was the wise America,
Speaker 1: so stupid international press theme of the month, the week,
Speaker 1: the year. I just can't muster the energy to give
Speaker 1: a full crap. I'm sorry. What else is happening in
Speaker 1: the wide world of sports or thee are the world
Speaker 1: of sports? That belts was actually well timed? Excuse me
Speaker 1: by the way government shut down September thirty. Maybe that'll happen,
Speaker 1: maybe not, And this time allegedly it's the Democrats that
Speaker 1: are causing it. So here we go again. Somebody will
Speaker 1: use it, and somebody will screw things up and cost
Speaker 1: a lot of money. Trump is preparing to fire some
Speaker 1: more people. So maybe we'll get a little more doze
Speaker 1: out of this. Maybe it'll be the return of Elon
Speaker 1: Musk while the government's shut down so nobody can watch
Speaker 1: what he's doing. Maybe maybe, but I speculate, and therefore
Speaker 1: shouldn't moving forward. What about the Jimmy Kimmel thing. Huh?
Speaker 1: Trump is not happy about this, I gotta say, And
Speaker 1: let's go to his own words, Okay, because he put
Speaker 1: out a truth or truth out there or whatever it
Speaker 1: is you call it, on his own personal social media network.
Speaker 1: President of the United States owns a social media network.
Speaker 1: Keep that in mind. And this is exact quote his
Speaker 1: big giant truth here is. I can't believe ABC, fake
Speaker 1: news gave Jimmy Kimmel back his or his job back.
Speaker 1: Excuse me? The White House was told by ABC that
Speaker 1: his show was canceled exclamation point. Something happened between then
Speaker 1: and now because his audience is gone and his talent
Speaker 1: was never there. Why would they want someone back who
Speaker 1: does so poorly, who's not funny, and who puts the
Speaker 1: network in jeopardy by playing ninety nine percent Democrat garbage
Speaker 1: all caps. He is yet another arm of the DNC
Speaker 1: and to the best of my knowledge, that would be
Speaker 1: a major illegal campaign contribution. Pausing priority, I think we're
Speaker 1: going to test ABC out on this. Let's see how
Speaker 1: we do. Last time I went after them and they
Speaker 1: gave me sixteen million dollars. That sounds this excuse me
Speaker 1: one sounds even more lucrative. A true bunch of losers.
Speaker 1: Let Jimmy kimil Rot and his bad ratings. It's really
Speaker 1: the ratings thing that does drive Trump crazy. Okay, cause, yeah,
Speaker 1: I have some notes on that, and I might have
Speaker 1: just accidentally closed them. So let's see if I can
Speaker 1: reopen them real fast. And if I can, it'll be
Speaker 1: lots of fun. And let's see if we can get there.
Speaker 1: But I may have just lost them all. I don't know.
Speaker 1: If that's the case, I might not be able to
Speaker 1: get the show notes out quickly enough, but I will
Speaker 1: do my level best, I promise you. Anyway, Kimmell actually
Speaker 1: normally had about a million viewers or something like that,
Speaker 1: which is pretty good because who the hell watches you know,
Speaker 1: broadcast TV anymore. I don't know. I don't really know
Speaker 1: people that do, but apparently they still do somewhere. But anyway,
Speaker 1: it's a weird sity situation. Okay. And the funny thing
Speaker 1: to me again is that this time he got like
Speaker 1: something like six point seven million or whatever during the broadcast.
Speaker 1: So that's not you know, the whole thing, that's just
Speaker 1: during the broadcast. That doesn't give you how many people
Speaker 1: decided to watch it on YouTube and everything else. And
Speaker 1: you know exactly what happens after the alleged supposed rapture
Speaker 1: that was supposed to occur. By the way, there was
Speaker 1: a whole like TikTok movement that was telling you the
Speaker 1: world was coming to an end this week. You didn't notice,
Speaker 1: which I didn't. But anyway, beside the point, the overall
Speaker 1: issue is much larger. I think maybe he's jealous of
Speaker 1: Kimmel's you know, of Kimmel's deal. He got, you know,
Speaker 1: something like a two hundred and fifty percent increase and
Speaker 1: a greater amount of viewers, okay, on his first run
Speaker 1: on the broadcast. Then he's gotten virtually since his first show.
Speaker 1: Any large guest doesn't matter. He beat it all with
Speaker 1: this return. So what has happened here is that for
Speaker 1: a guy that a lot of people weren't paying attention
Speaker 1: to at all, Jimmy Kimmel, you know, yeah, okay, a
Speaker 1: million viewers. He was doing good and I'm not begrudging him.
Speaker 1: But now it's you know, six point seven on a
Speaker 1: night when people can't even figure it out, and people
Speaker 1: were googling like mad. By the way, in the analytics,
Speaker 1: what time is Jimmy Kimmel on? You just gave worldwide
Speaker 1: attention to a guy and also bolstered the ratings as
Speaker 1: somebody you said had no ratings, and believe me, he
Speaker 1: had some. And a million people tuning in is a
Speaker 1: viable TV show. It's not the greatest, but a million
Speaker 1: people tuning in for something that's lukewarm at best because
Speaker 1: the guy wasn't even really harsh or crazy with his stuff,
Speaker 1: none of it. But you know, you got to remember
Speaker 1: the character of the person you're dealing with. And I'm
Speaker 1: going to end this whole thing on two misrepresentations of character,
Speaker 1: one of them being one that you need corrected. And
Speaker 1: I didn't ever think I could say in my entire lifetime,
Speaker 1: outside of the fact that he occasionally wears black T shirts,
Speaker 1: that I would ever have anything in common with Mark
Speaker 1: Cuban in my way of basically explaining or summing up
Speaker 1: a very key element regarding the personality traits of the
Speaker 1: alleged leader of the alleged free and definitely world he's
Speaker 1: ripped off.
Speaker 8: I can't even tell you how many people, right, people
Speaker 8: I know right that he's ripped off.
Speaker 10: A lot of alleged issues with condo I'm telling you about.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I'm telling you people I know, right, Like Barbara
Speaker 8: Cark when she said something about this from Shark Tank.
Speaker 1: Right, he.
Speaker 8: Tired her or asked her to sell a bunch of
Speaker 8: condos in a new building that he'd put up, and
Speaker 8: she did, sold everything she asked. He offered her four
Speaker 8: million dollars. He wouldn't pay her. She had to sue
Speaker 8: him just to get her money.
Speaker 7: But how does somebody benefit by behaving like that, like
Speaker 7: as a when that's.
Speaker 8: The only way, you know, I mean, he was born rich, right,
Speaker 8: He's never had to find his you know, Damon Joy.
Speaker 7: Yeah, he's always had good hair, dude, Rich people always
Speaker 7: have clean hair.
Speaker 1: I don't know about that.
Speaker 8: But Trump University, Trump Foundation, Trump soho, just example after
Speaker 8: example where he ripped off hard working Americans again and
Speaker 8: again and again, and to think all of a sudden
Speaker 8: he just changed who he is. Just not the case like,
Speaker 8: look what he's doing fucking now right amid Silver Co
Speaker 8: pripped off.
Speaker 1: Anyway, It's just amazing that people think that there's something
Speaker 1: different outside of the real estate hustler who would go
Speaker 1: through bankruptcy and bust people out and turn around and
Speaker 1: not pay anybody from a drywall contractor to you know,
Speaker 1: the black dealers in his place, or you know, pull
Speaker 1: immigrants that came to do construction on his casinos. He
Speaker 1: stiffs everybody. Even Rudy Giuliani was complaining about it not
Speaker 1: too long ago. Because he stiffs a lot of lawyers too.
Speaker 1: That's why he goes through so many of them. And
Speaker 1: loyalty only runs one way. But somehow there's a lot
Speaker 1: of people out there that think he's their savior because
Speaker 1: he speaks like a three year old and when you're
Speaker 1: IQ's low, it makes tons of sense. And the funny
Speaker 1: thing is they cherry pick the hell out of Charlie
Speaker 1: Kirk and they've tried to saint him and everything else.
Speaker 1: I Oh, he was so open and honest and this
Speaker 1: and that. I gotta tell you something, he said a
Speaker 1: lot of despicable, ridiculous things. I would never want to
Speaker 1: even shut this guy up. Because yeah, despicable speech is
Speaker 1: something you're supposed to protect. And even though he really
Speaker 1: didn't practice necessarily what he preached, but utilized the leverage
Speaker 1: of grieving and outrage and clickbait and rage bait out
Speaker 1: there in order to prop it and prop up his
Speaker 1: you know, turning point USA or whatever the hell his
Speaker 1: wife nts now inherited. And you know, I'm not going
Speaker 1: to comment on the memorial service or Jimmy Kimmel myself here,
Speaker 1: not at all, but I find it fascinating that if
Speaker 1: you pick through, if you want, you can find stuff
Speaker 1: that makes a lot of sense and still contains the
Speaker 1: brash a whole vibe and keeps it all together. Because
Speaker 1: the guy was in England once more than once probably,
Speaker 1: but one time when he was in England, I think
Speaker 1: he had a debate at Oxford and this kid really
Speaker 1: bagged him up. But they made it look good on
Speaker 1: the little short reels out there and everything. And that's
Speaker 1: what he did too, is he definitely went out to
Speaker 1: create the same vibe and the same template with different
Speaker 1: faces on it. And then of course you got to
Speaker 1: have people sign, you know, talent agreements so that they'll
Speaker 1: release their image for use so you can broadcast them
Speaker 1: and blast them everywhere. And you know, Charlie Kirk probably
Speaker 1: got the permission of every single person that he put,
Speaker 1: you know, at his debates with and you know, tell
Speaker 1: me what is a woman? Tell me what is a woman?
Speaker 1: Prove me wrong? All right? I get the stick, But
Speaker 1: every once in a while, even through the stick, he
Speaker 1: had to hit something that was right. Even though it's
Speaker 1: under the guise of telling off the English people to
Speaker 1: their faces. I know I'm a guest in your country,
Speaker 1: but I'm going to tell you screw yous. You people
Speaker 1: are stupid basically, and even though you inspired certain things,
Speaker 1: you are a terrible example and your terrible people and
Speaker 1: your country's turn into hell. You know, pretty much like
Speaker 1: Trump said to the UN, all the countries that going
Speaker 1: to hell. Other pieces of unspeak, so the brash and
Speaker 1: privilege continue to tell other people exactly how their lives
Speaker 1: are supposed to be run. And simultaneously he can make
Speaker 1: a good point with that. And I found this piece
Speaker 1: of audio extremely interesting. And I'm gonna let Charlie Kirk
Speaker 1: speak in his own words from beyond because I think
Speaker 1: some of you need to hear this. When we're going
Speaker 1: back and forth about Jimmy Kimmel, of all things, which
Speaker 1: is not a paragon of free speech, but should have
Speaker 1: been left alone. And you could have left his lukewarm
Speaker 1: ass just sitting there with his million viewers, and he'd
Speaker 1: be nothing but part of the static background noise if
Speaker 1: you were a truly good strategic thinker. But it got
Speaker 1: under his skin that ABC dared defy him, even though
Speaker 1: it's not like a corporation has loyalty, okay, or despite
Speaker 1: the fact that the Supreme Court says, you know, they
Speaker 1: have free speech like people. Yeah, they don't have any
Speaker 1: level of integrity negative or positive. They have no spines
Speaker 1: because again, you'd have to be a living creature to
Speaker 1: have a spine or book, and they are neither. And
Speaker 1: they cook all those things that even represent books anyway,
Speaker 1: in order to do what extract the most for the
Speaker 1: least and do it with other people's money, other people's souls.
Speaker 1: Who cares who gets hurt because they're corporations, but even
Speaker 1: they have people working for them that have protections under
Speaker 1: our constitution, whether you like it or not. And it's
Speaker 1: not a campaign contribution to spout your opinions somewhere. See
Speaker 1: my opinions don't become a campaign contribution to I don't know,
Speaker 1: Ron Paul next time, or you know, or the hologram
Speaker 1: that is going to become Bernie Sanders. These are not
Speaker 1: campaign contributions. When you just speak your mind and it
Speaker 1: turns out your mind is not exactly with Ildouche or
Speaker 1: Orange Jesus or whatever you want to call that guy
Speaker 1: who is which cracks me up. I've sat and listened
Speaker 1: to the left wing version of Charlie Kirk and there's
Speaker 1: about one hundred of them, and there's another hundred Charlie
Speaker 1: Kirks out there. They just didn't pull it off as well.
Speaker 1: He did it well anyway. Just take a listen to
Speaker 1: what he had to say.
Speaker 2: Free speech is a liberal value.
Speaker 7: It is not a left wing value.
Speaker 2: It is wrong and.
Speaker 7: I'm sure we'll talk about this in the Q and A,
Speaker 7: But as of today, Lucy Connelly is going to jail
Speaker 7: for two and a half years in this country for
Speaker 7: a social media post that she apologized and deleted about
Speaker 7: a migrant hotel. That is not a free speech value
Speaker 7: at all. You should be allowed to say outrageous things,
Speaker 7: You should be allowed.
Speaker 1: To say contrarian things.
Speaker 7: Free speech is a birthright that you gave us, and
Speaker 7: you guys decided not to codify it, and now.
Speaker 2: It's poof, It's basically gone.
Speaker 1: And I think there's.
Speaker 7: Something really troubling about that, because I want you to
Speaker 7: imagine one day that reform might take over this government.
Speaker 7: You guys can laugh, but they're winning elections in downtown London.
Speaker 7: Farage is ascendant. There is asylum majority in this country.
Speaker 7: I see this how I'm going to really scare you.
Speaker 7: I see the same themes that let to Trump's rise
Speaker 7: in this country. I see it with the working class
Speaker 7: in the streets of London. I see the muscular class.
Speaker 7: I see people coming up to me. It's the same vibe.
Speaker 7: You guys are about to see a political revolution. If
Speaker 7: the stars aligned, that could mirror what happened in America.
Speaker 8: So when that.
Speaker 7: Happens, do you want Nigel Farage prime Minister to be
Speaker 7: able to lock you up if you criticize his governments?
Speaker 7: If your answer is no, then you have a moral
Speaker 7: obligation to make sure that your Prime Minister and the
Speaker 7: MP's advocate for a value neutral free speech policy. So
Speaker 7: regardless of who is in power in this country, you
Speaker 7: guys can challenge and you guys can speak over the
Speaker 7: moment that is the bedrock of a liberal democrasy.
Speaker 1: Okay, is he right? Yes? He is. Do you understand it?
Speaker 1: Chances are ninety percent of you if you live in America. No,
Speaker 1: you don't get it. You don't get the consequences. And
Speaker 1: just like we talked about with Larry Hancock last night,
Speaker 1: nuance is dead and the ability to communicate properly or
Speaker 1: anything else is dead. Because here it is left and
Speaker 1: right share some interesting values. If it doesn't make me
Speaker 1: feel good, I need to break it. If I'm upset
Speaker 1: by it. It should not be there, whether it's microaggressions
Speaker 1: or not bowing to the martyrdom of a podcaster, whether
Speaker 1: it's you didn't use the proper pronoun or you're gonna
Speaker 1: try and take my gun even though you never said
Speaker 1: anything about taking my gun, or yeah, try and think
Speaker 1: before you speak. I remember that being an anthrax lyric,
Speaker 1: that's for sure, but ooh, it would be so good
Speaker 1: in practice. And realizing that the fact that you're surrounded
Speaker 1: by a mob is not a good sign when you
Speaker 1: have a mob mentality, and it's you know, one of
Speaker 1: those things that's relatable and they don't talk like there's
Speaker 1: somebody who was in that position before. There might be
Speaker 1: a reason why they don't sound that way. And if
Speaker 1: you take an honest look at somebody's track record, by
Speaker 1: the time they get to be damn near eighty years
Speaker 1: old or whatever, they've shown you who they are. And
Speaker 1: if that's your savior, you can't be saved. Just saying,
Speaker 1: but with all that in mind, my opinion doesn't really matter,
Speaker 1: and neither does yours. See, opinions are not facts either,
Speaker 1: And without doing die wrecked harm with your speech, you
Speaker 1: don't need to be charged, penalized, fired, or anything else.
Speaker 1: But we've now gone back and forth somehow. This person
Speaker 1: called me sir when I'm a man or I'm a
Speaker 1: day and them I want them fired. Is the same
Speaker 1: as you didn't sympathize with my martyr. It's the same,
Speaker 1: the same issue, just like the fact that we can
Speaker 1: murder certain people if we justify it just right. And
Speaker 1: by the way, that's an all sides issue, because everybody
Speaker 1: seems to have a murder line one way or another.
Speaker 1: It's okay to kill them of this, it's okay to
Speaker 1: kill them with that. Ooh, that's rough. But gassing the
Speaker 1: people at the un like, what are they gonna do?
Speaker 1: Throw a tentho like your you know, human getting cockroaches.
Speaker 1: That's all cool. Murder the homeless because they're inconvenient. Let's
Speaker 1: give them involuntary lethal injections or something, kill them, and
Speaker 1: nobody loses their job on that side. Why because they're winning.
Speaker 1: And on the other side you could say ridiculous things
Speaker 1: when they were winning and you got away with a
Speaker 1: lot of pushing people around, and now people want to
Speaker 1: push back, and that's right, we should push back, and
Speaker 1: idiot Joe Rogan says, Oh, you guys are so stupid
Speaker 1: because they're going to use it against you, when that's
Speaker 1: not the friggin point. If you're exercising corrupt power, face
Speaker 1: that fact first, not that the same corrupt power can
Speaker 1: be turned against you. That's how you explain it to
Speaker 1: a four year old. Don't hit people because they might
Speaker 1: hit you. Johnny, Jimmy, Jane, whatever, pick another j. Trump's
Speaker 1: middle name begins with a J. Went on. You don't
Speaker 1: want them to do it to you, speak nothing of
Speaker 1: You shouldn't just harm people because they have a value
Speaker 1: of right, a space to be in, to exist, to
Speaker 1: be stupid, to be outlandish, to be offensive. They don't
Speaker 1: have a right to use their free speech to order,
Speaker 1: or to compel, or to encourage others to do actual harm.
Speaker 1: Different stories. And as we look at the Ice shooting
Speaker 1: that's going to now be bandied about until the next
Speaker 1: blood is spilled, remember that the only three people hit
Speaker 1: were the detainees. In case you missed it, That means
Speaker 1: no law enforcement was actually injured. So a guy took
Speaker 1: his time in targeting people. I mean, what is he
Speaker 1: a bad shot or did he actually hit people he
Speaker 1: intended to hit because he's somebody who thinks it's ironic
Speaker 1: and nihilistic to attack people because he's actually a groy bar.
Speaker 1: Check their logic. They're so right wing they think Trump
Speaker 1: and others are not right wing enough. They declared Groyper
Speaker 1: wars against Charlie Kirk. Recently, they declared groper wars against
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, and I dare you to sort out the
Speaker 1: logic because they don't need it anymore, and neither do
Speaker 1: the people in power. They sit there and talk about
Speaker 1: the greatness of the country while demonizing half of it,
Speaker 1: telling you that Antifa is a terrorist organization when it's
Speaker 1: not even an organization. Let's tell you about these other things. Hey,
Speaker 1: they were obviously attacking driverless cars because Letty's hate driverless
Speaker 1: cars and had to make a point about ice on them,
Speaker 1: And the same loan shooter template is used. Also convenient,
Speaker 1: much more convenient when they kill themselves, so you don't
Speaker 1: end up with this Bryan Ruth or whoever he is
Speaker 1: that you know allegedly was lying in wait to shoot Trump.
Speaker 1: His interesting trial. Hey, he tried to stab himself in
Speaker 1: the neck. Boy, these people are suicidal, interesting, isn't it?
Speaker 1: Also can't figure out why that guy's daughter was storming
Speaker 1: away from the courthouse, That was interesting. Fox tried yelling
Speaker 1: at her but didn't work out. And I got to
Speaker 1: tell you, it is much more convenient when you can
Speaker 1: make up the story any which way you want. For disaffected, disconnected,
Speaker 1: not at all empathetic or remotely related to anybody outside
Speaker 1: of who they meet in the virtual world, online and
Speaker 1: video game reality becomes more real than the dark room
Speaker 1: you find yourself cowering in all the time. It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter that he had half a semester out of college
Speaker 1: or what, because if that radicalized him, damn must have
Speaker 1: been something that was an easy switch on him before
Speaker 1: he got there. But also this one took until twenty nine.
Speaker 1: He wasn't just a young kid that was stupid. These
Speaker 1: people marinade in internet culture that is meaningless, that is
Speaker 1: double meaning, that has its own language. And I'm sorry
Speaker 1: all you grandpa's do not understand who you're looking at.
Speaker 1: And this bloodshed's going to continue because first of all,
Speaker 1: it's America, and somehow the American violence quotient is out
Speaker 1: of hand. And I'm not even bitching about the guns
Speaker 1: here because I believe in gun ownership and I believe
Speaker 1: in responsibly owning anything that you could use responsibly. You know,
Speaker 1: I don't think I have a right to have a
Speaker 1: nuclear weapon in my backyard. It really don't. And I
Speaker 1: would understand if somebody wanted to clip me with a
Speaker 1: drone if I had one, but guns, especially simple guns, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, if our government really you know, because
Speaker 1: I got this in case the government goes Tyrannico like Kamal, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that gun ain't gonna help you if they send the army,
Speaker 1: and if they send real trained people who know how
Speaker 1: to shoot you, and anybody in your house is done,
Speaker 1: you know, ask David koresh about that. Ask Randy Weaver
Speaker 1: about that. Ask any of your friends who thought they
Speaker 1: had rights until they got stuffed somewhere and magically committed suicide,
Speaker 1: et cetera. Everybody except Galaine, who seems to be doing
Speaker 1: pretty well because she's keeping her mouth shut. But ask
Speaker 1: anybody who actually knows something, they don't last. And if
Speaker 1: they try to tell anybody, they really don't last. And
Speaker 1: then there's a bunch of these disaffected zombies that nobody
Speaker 1: paid attention to for a long time, who are steeped
Speaker 1: in well, you know what, I should just go and
Speaker 1: punch people in the face for the lulls and all that.
Speaker 1: And everybody said, oh, the face punch game. That's the
Speaker 1: black Guys's this that has disaffected people who do not
Speaker 1: understand that there's value to human life because they've lived
Speaker 1: in an unreal situation and they've now adapted to it,
Speaker 1: and when they get anywhere near another living, breathing thing,
Speaker 1: they don't know how to behave. And it's not all
Speaker 1: black guys. It is a new subculture that I don't
Speaker 1: think we're going to understand for another couple of decades.
Speaker 1: If this country survives that Long because we are being
Speaker 1: intentionally pitted against one another for our feelings. Yes, right winger,
Speaker 1: it's all about your feelings because you don't have evidence
Speaker 1: to back stuff up, and you parrot crap that has
Speaker 1: sped to you by the media, just like you say
Speaker 1: the left wing does. And guess what, left wing, you're
Speaker 1: just as guilty of being stupid and not thinking for
Speaker 1: yourself as you say the right wing is. You're calling
Speaker 1: you know, kettle pot, black scarred charcoal. It's all one color,
Speaker 1: and it's the color of law, which is being thrown
Speaker 1: over top of that thing we called the Constitution that
Speaker 1: anybody abuses as if it was the three block long
Speaker 1: town slot that everybody gets a turn with. That's how
Speaker 1: power is being treated in America. And this is where
Speaker 1: we're at and it ain't going to turn out good
Speaker 1: for any of us who has enough sense to realize
Speaker 1: what's happening. I know it's a low percentage, and out
Speaker 1: of my ten listeners, probably two of you actually get
Speaker 1: what I'm telling you at this moment. Are you right,
Speaker 1: are you wrong? Or do you want to live to
Speaker 1: see another day? And by the way, do you want
Speaker 1: to take control of that day or do you want
Speaker 1: to leave it up to the one drooling old man
Speaker 1: or another can't say tyl and all and one who
Speaker 1: sat there staring blankly during a debate. Hey, you got
Speaker 1: to pick a side. And JD Vance, the PayPal mafia
Speaker 1: Peter Thiele representative is not going to be a good fit.
Speaker 1: But don't worry. Don Junior will come in because he's
Speaker 1: a freaking genius. Yeah and no, and oh, by the way,
Speaker 1: if I was you, I would go back and question
Speaker 1: some of those attacks on Tesla's because I don't think
Speaker 1: they were attacking Tesla's for political reasons. There have been
Speaker 1: other people who did vandalism to Tesla's and all kinds
Speaker 1: of stuff before that. But they amped it up to
Speaker 1: tell you, look at how poor Elon is under attack.
Speaker 1: The richest man in the world is under attack, and
Speaker 1: they convince you to root for the richest possible people.
Speaker 1: And by the way, you don't get to a billion
Speaker 1: dollars at all unless some blood was spilled somewhere. Even
Speaker 1: if you didn't spill it, your I guarantee you profited
Speaker 1: off of it. And that is the one thing that
Speaker 1: kept me from actually signing onto the Sicilian mob. Oops.
Speaker 1: Did I just say that out loud? Yeah. I didn't
Speaker 1: want to feed my children with the blood of others.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, killing a man is not an
Speaker 1: issue for me. Killing women or children that would be
Speaker 1: an issue for me. But I gotta say feeding my
Speaker 1: potential children at that time, I didn't have any yet,
Speaker 1: but I wanted one. I never wanted them to be
Speaker 1: fed in a spiritual sense from the profits made off
Speaker 1: of other people's blood. I mean, if I had to
Speaker 1: bleed a little to get it, that's up to me.
Speaker 1: But bleeding society or people directly, not society, because society
Speaker 1: is an artificial construct, but directly profiting off of the blood,
Speaker 1: suffering and misery of others, It's just something I cannot
Speaker 1: do for long and did not want to feed my
Speaker 1: children with. So maybe some of you don't have those values,
Speaker 1: maybe some of you don't think of it, and maybe
Speaker 1: some of you don't give a crap about what I
Speaker 1: gotta say. Because God, Chuck, you got to pick a side.
Speaker 1: Let's go, you know, get on the Trump train so
Speaker 1: you can get dropped off somewhere else and we can
Speaker 1: spread the MAGA message because that's the only way we're
Speaker 1: gonna win. Look, Chuck, they're gonna go against the vaccines
Speaker 1: for you while they meanwhile make other deals with big
Speaker 1: pharma and sell us out. They're gonna tell us that
Speaker 1: we have peace, even though no wars have actually ended.
Speaker 1: They're gonna tell us that everything is great and the
Speaker 1: economy has gone up, even though you and I both
Speaker 1: know because we got to eat on a daily basis
Speaker 1: that that's a friggin lie. And oh, by the way,
Speaker 1: even before I had a show, a blog, or even
Speaker 1: the internet at my disposal, if you would have talked
Speaker 1: to me, I would have told you. The politicians lie
Speaker 1: about every financial number possible, because all they do is
Speaker 1: spin to say, no, well, what you gotta realize because
Speaker 1: of the index, Actually, even though you're paying triple the
Speaker 1: amount of money that you would have paid when I
Speaker 1: wasn't in office before I got here, guess what I
Speaker 1: made it so that you didn't have to pay seven
Speaker 1: times that amount instead of triple. So triple's actually a discount.
Speaker 1: And they've been doing that my whole life. So all
Speaker 1: of them lie about that because they're politicians, Like, how
Speaker 1: do you know if politicians lying? His mouths moving, and
Speaker 1: Trump is a politician and sower is alleged opponents, and
Speaker 1: you are not part of that class. You're not part
Speaker 1: of that game. You're not a WWE wrestler. No matter
Speaker 1: how much you love John Cena. It's just not happening.
Speaker 1: But we all got to start acting like we have
Speaker 1: some sense and we have some constituency where we can
Speaker 1: unify based on mutual understandings of the world around us.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, by the way, they're adomizing that as best
Speaker 1: they can. Wonder why wrongful death lawsuits are going to
Speaker 1: come out about that first helicopter crash during the early
Speaker 1: part of you know, Trump's administration where he started off
Speaker 1: by saying, do I did it? Wait until you find
Speaker 1: out how that's got nothing to do with nothing, And
Speaker 1: it's all about cutting back on things and trying to
Speaker 1: get higher profits, because scumbags will do that no matter
Speaker 1: how many lives it costs. And if they can prop
Speaker 1: it off of the death while they're costing lives and
Speaker 1: get it both ways, they'll do that too. Sell you
Speaker 1: the gun and sell you all the equipment to try
Speaker 1: and you know, stitch up and embomb your dead and
Speaker 1: everything else, and also charge you to ship the caskets.
Speaker 1: One way, or another. Even if it's done on a
Speaker 1: military aircraft, somebody paid for it, and also they got
Speaker 1: to buy fuel somewhere, and your friends at Haliburton or
Speaker 1: whatever conglomerate it is. Now we'll also supply the body
Speaker 1: bags and caskets at a discount just for the government,
Speaker 1: because we're so patriotic anyway, Military industrial complexity for all
Speaker 1: in the Age of Orange Jesus, Praise him, Praise him,
Speaker 1: or I will take your job.
Speaker 2: Revelation through Conversation.
Speaker 10: In Denial The Secret Wars with air Strikes and Tanks
Speaker 10: by Larry Hancock. Secret wars became a staple of US
Speaker 10: covert operations and are still happening today. Larry Hancock's book
Speaker 10: In Denial rips the cover off many of them, using
Speaker 10: new files.
Speaker 9: It exposes things about the Bay of Pigs that no
Speaker 9: one has ever written about before. It shows why it
Speaker 9: really failed and why the United States did not.
Speaker 1: Earn from it.
Speaker 9: It also shows why other countries today are doing secret
Speaker 9: operations with more success. This is the book that puts
Speaker 9: what some want to deny into the light. In Denial,
Speaker 9: Secret Wars with air Strikes and Tanks Larry Hancock. For
Speaker 9: more information, go to Larry hyphen Handcock dot com. Pick
Speaker 9: up your copy of In Denial at Amazon dot com
Speaker 9: in digital or physical.
Speaker 1: For media, dot com, radio net.
Speaker 13: The War State by Michael Swanson explains the great national
Speaker 13: transformation that took place and put the Kennedy presidency in
Speaker 13: the context of the times and reveals never before published
Speaker 13: information about the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would not
Speaker 13: have been assassinated if he had been president two hundred
Speaker 13: years ago. His assassination took place in the context of
Speaker 13: the Cold War and the rise of the national security state.
Speaker 13: Before World War II, the United States was a continent republic.
Speaker 13: In the decade that followed, it became an imperial superpower.
Speaker 13: Generals such as Curtis LeMay not only wanted to invade Cuba,
Speaker 13: but knew that there were short range missiles on the
Speaker 13: island armed with nuclear warheads that they could not destroy
Speaker 13: because they were on mobile launchers. Their invasion could have
Speaker 13: led to a Third World War, and they wanted to
Speaker 13: go to war anyway. The War State by Michael Swanson
Speaker 13: reveals why and will show you what President Kennedy was
Speaker 13: up against. For more information, The Warstate dot Com