Speaker 1: Welcome to the three Stories version of the Todd Herman Shows.
Speaker 1: Story number one, what was Stephen Colbert's actual job? I
Speaker 1: guess still is that he's not officially fired yet. Story
Speaker 1: number two, Juries without Souls It's closer than you think.
Speaker 1: And story number three. When nothing is forbidden, everything is allowed.
Speaker 1: We'll talk about this with the help of Know Your
Speaker 1: Risk podcast dot com and of course, God Almighty.
Speaker 2: The Todd Herman Show is one hundred percent disapproved by
Speaker 2: big pharma technocrats and tyrants everywhere. From the high mountains
Speaker 2: of Free America. Here's the Emerald City exile Todd Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made, and these
Speaker 1: are the times to which God has decided we shall live.
Speaker 3: Now the Todd Herman Show. We need to ask a question, but.
Speaker 1: It's one been asking for well about eight or nine years.
Speaker 1: As we've been looking at the business model of the
Speaker 1: Mockingbird Media. We've seen the decline in viewership. We've seen
Speaker 1: the sinking ratings of MSNBC and many of the so
Speaker 1: called comedy shows. This isn't the first time we've asked
Speaker 1: this question. We've asked it continually. How are they getting
Speaker 1: propped up? How are they continuing to operate. Stephen Colbert's
Speaker 1: program was apparently losing forty million dollars a year, and
Speaker 1: it was one hundred million per year to produce the show,
Speaker 1: which is effectively a dude sitting at a desk talking.
Speaker 3: To people after he tells jokes one.
Speaker 1: Hundred million a year. And when this cancelation came about
Speaker 1: and it's been announced that this is the last season
Speaker 1: of Colbert's program, then of course came what we have
Speaker 1: been told or conspiracy theories because you don't have proof.
Speaker 3: This is a true, true.
Speaker 1: Do nothing. Senator who has a whole theory about this,
Speaker 1: and he posted this proudly on Twitter, which is a
Speaker 1: of course, white supremacist outfit, Senator Chris Murphy.
Speaker 4: So I want to tell you why the cancelation of
Speaker 4: Stephen Colbert's show matters so much. We are on the
Speaker 4: precipice of entering a censorship state in which Donald Trump
Speaker 4: is using the powers of the federal government in order
Speaker 4: to erase criticism from the airwaves. This is a really,
Speaker 4: really dangerous moment. Stephen Colbert didn't get thrown off the
Speaker 4: air because he wasn't doing well.
Speaker 5: He was the highest rated show on TV in late night.
Speaker 5: He was canceled very likely because Paramount and its owners
Speaker 5: are trying to get rich off of this merger, and
Speaker 5: Donald Trump has made it clear to them and everybody
Speaker 5: else in the media space that if you want any
Speaker 5: favors from me, then you have to silence my critics
Speaker 5: on your platforms.
Speaker 1: You are on x a platform saying that you can
Speaker 1: go get on any platform to say that because you
Speaker 1: get to call yourself the United States senator, although you
Speaker 1: don't do much senatoring. There have been countless calls for
Speaker 1: President Trump to be unalived by Hollywood actors on platforms.
Speaker 1: Politicians have called for him to be unlived on platforms.
Speaker 1: Karen Bass, the leaguereds and corrupt mayor of Los Angeles,
Speaker 1: has called for him to be taken out on platforms.
Speaker 1: There is no indication that this has anything to do
Speaker 1: with other than the fact that Colbert is losing forty
Speaker 1: million per year. Brian Stelter has a platform where he
Speaker 1: gets to speak his view of this. Is he being silenced?
Speaker 1: Is he being taken off the screens? Or is Brian
Speaker 1: Stelter a brave truth teller? If you want to be
Speaker 1: a brave truth teller, understand this the truth.
Speaker 3: That's the ultimate thing.
Speaker 1: To tell is the truth of Jesus Christ. And the
Speaker 1: thing that you most ultimately need to share is the
Speaker 1: revelation of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. And there's
Speaker 1: a great series now called Testament. Testament is from Angel Studios,
Speaker 1: and it is not a soft look at the Book
Speaker 1: of Acts. It takes the Book of Acts and updates
Speaker 1: it into our era, a surveillance state, a state that
Speaker 1: hates truth, a censorship state, a real one, not Chris
Speaker 1: Murphy's version of it. It's a great opportunity to ask
Speaker 1: yourself a question, will you stand for Jesus when your
Speaker 1: back is against the wall. You can stream Testaments today.
Speaker 1: Just go join the Angel Guild a angel dot com
Speaker 1: slash todd. Premium members receive two free tickets to every
Speaker 1: Angel theatrical release. That's angel dot com slash todd. To
Speaker 1: stream Testament and support bold faith driven content. That's Angel
Speaker 1: dot com slash Todd. So Chris Murphy says that we
Speaker 1: are living in this era of censorship, or leaning into
Speaker 1: one of government censorship. Of course we can give them
Speaker 1: some examples and we can and will rather of real
Speaker 1: censorship that was not questioned that we know the government
Speaker 1: work to censor people. We know they use the power
Speaker 1: of the intelligence services to censor Americans on social media.
Speaker 1: We know that Chris Murphy was fine with that because
Speaker 1: he never called it out. He was a senator, then
Speaker 1: he's a senator now. He could have called it out
Speaker 1: then and now he didn't. We know that the ridiculous
Speaker 1: DOJ under President Trump and the part time Attorney generaler
Speaker 1: Pambondi hasn't yet dismissed or got offered to pay Alex
Speaker 1: Berenson the Berenson suit proceeds. She hasn't offered to settle
Speaker 1: this thing. Berenson was censored by the government through social media.
Speaker 1: He has his account taken down because the government and well, Frankly,
Speaker 1: a pharma executive acting on behalf of government and Pharma
Speaker 1: insisted that it be taken down. And this was under
Speaker 1: the previous ownership group, Jack Dorsey's group of Twitter. So
Speaker 1: here's how Fox News reported this a platform. Colbert's Late
Speaker 1: Show is reportedly losing CBS forty million a year as
Speaker 1: critics speculate politics sture of cancelation. Liber critics cry foul,
Speaker 1: but CBS Late Night show reportedly had a budget north
Speaker 1: of one hundred million dollars. We just said that on
Speaker 1: Fox News. President Trump has been criticized. On the Twitter platform,
Speaker 1: President Trump has been criticized. Tucker Crauston has done it,
Speaker 1: Elon Musk has done it. Is it getting shut down
Speaker 1: or is that impossible? Trump has no power there.
Speaker 3: Brian Steltz of.
Speaker 1: CNN Fame, he weighed into this with his analysis, A.
Speaker 6: Country where you can't lampoon a sitting president is not
Speaker 6: a free country. A country where you can't publish editorial
Speaker 6: cartoons or have late night monologues or have satires about
Speaker 6: the president is not a democratic country. Of course, We're
Speaker 6: not there. We're not there at all.
Speaker 3: Right now, there are right now.
Speaker 6: And lots of figures who are famous for mocking and
Speaker 6: deriding President Trump. But the idea that Colbert might be
Speaker 6: taken off the air, that his voice might be silenced,
Speaker 6: it certainly is creating a little bit of a chill
Speaker 6: in the air today.
Speaker 3: Anna you see him super chilled?
Speaker 1: Brian, You're in a network that continues to insist that
Speaker 1: President Trump was not not targeted by the Intelligent Services.
Speaker 1: The same week that Gabby Untilsa, Gabbert released this data
Speaker 1: that now is what the young people would call the
Speaker 1: receipts showing that in fact, Susan Rice and brock Usin
Speaker 1: Obama and the entire cadre of those people, the Intelligent Services,
Speaker 1: the FBI, they all targeted a president elect in a
Speaker 1: rolling coup attempt. And you guys at CNN have yet
Speaker 1: to really report on this. You work at a network
Speaker 1: that carried water for Biden, the figureheads as he was
Speaker 1: clearly mentally declined, and you pretended otherwise. You worked at
Speaker 1: that network, you still do. You took a break and
Speaker 1: he came back, he got fired and rehired. Were you
Speaker 1: fired because of the people who ran Joe Biden or
Speaker 1: because you were ineffective? You don't have anyone show, But
Speaker 1: now you're a commentator. So this is a very scary
Speaker 1: vision where you can't, let's say, be an entertainer or
Speaker 1: let's just say this a rodeo clown. One of the
Speaker 1: advantages of being an old guy who's worked in media
Speaker 1: long time is you can have a memory of things
Speaker 1: because they're funny. Daniel Arkin and Aaron mcclamm and NBC
Speaker 1: News the rodeo clown at the Missouri State Fair who
Speaker 1: on Saturday, wore a mask of President Barack Obama has
Speaker 1: been permanently banned from performing at the fair.
Speaker 3: Ever again, according to.
Speaker 1: Fair officials, why because he's black and it was racism,
Speaker 1: that's why. So this guy's a rodeo clown, not a platform.
Speaker 1: And you don't remember this, do you remember when the
Speaker 1: White House used the power of their money, of their position,
Speaker 1: and the Democratic National Committee in concert with them. This
Speaker 1: clearly came from Brock husein Obama. This was clearly an
Speaker 1: olynskicck tactic, a Lynsky tactic, pick a target, isolated, cut
Speaker 1: it off from a support base. This comes from again,
Speaker 1: an NBC News article out of Washington, d C. Dems
Speaker 1: released finalists for anti Rush billboard slogan. The Democrat National
Speaker 1: Committee chosen final slogans in its anti Limbaugh billboard contest,
Speaker 1: one of which trash talk radio host Rush Limbaugh on
Speaker 1: a giant slap in the face from the DNC while
Speaker 1: posting the conservative's hometown. The DNC sent a letter to
Speaker 1: its members last week asking for phrases if ten words
Speaker 1: or less, to splash across a billboard the displayed in
Speaker 1: Limba's hometown of West Pomb's Florida as close to Limba's
Speaker 1: backyard as they can get. The five slogans the DNZA
Speaker 1: chose are in no particular order. America didn't vote for
Speaker 1: rush to fail. Hope and change cannot be rushed. Failure
Speaker 1: is not an option for America's future. We can fix America.
Speaker 1: Don't rush it and rush say yes to America, the
Speaker 1: conservative Limbo said List said last week that he hoped
Speaker 1: Barack Obama's administration will fail and blasted Obama administration since
Speaker 1: the president took office in January. It didn't stop there.
Speaker 1: They took these billboards out at the same time as
Speaker 1: Media Matters for America, which is a leftist funded group.
Speaker 1: It has big money, dark money backgrounds. They took the
Speaker 1: billboard approach and they jumped onto this and they began
Speaker 1: to call Russia Limbas advertisers, and they began to threaten them.
Speaker 1: They began to threaten them with mass boycotts. They created
Speaker 1: an attempt to threaten the affiliates. There was an FCC
Speaker 1: attempt to reach out to the affiliates to pressure them
Speaker 1: to take Rush off the air. They did this or
Speaker 1: attempted to do this to the world's most successful radio
Speaker 1: talk show, host in history. There will never be another Limbaugh.
Speaker 1: Rogan and Tucker Carlson are the now Limbaughs of podcasting,
Speaker 1: but they'll never be another guy like Russian Live radio.
Speaker 1: So how did Limbaugh respond to this? Oh, he carped.
Speaker 1: He said it was government sent. What Rush Limbas said
Speaker 1: was one of the most monumental moments in radio. And
Speaker 1: despite having filled in for Rush, not one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty times, we never were able to find the audio
Speaker 1: of this or isolated, although everybody remembers Rush saying it.
Speaker 1: When this effort began and they were trying to get
Speaker 1: Rush taken off the air, trying to separate him from
Speaker 1: his advertisers, Rush went to the air and he said
Speaker 1: this roughly paraphrasing, you know a President Obama. I don't
Speaker 1: fear you. I've been preparing.
Speaker 3: My whole life for a person like you.
Speaker 1: If I decide this gets serious enough, I have a
Speaker 1: place I can go where you can't touch me. But
Speaker 1: that's not going to happen. You're using an Olinsky tactic,
Speaker 1: pick a target, isolated, cut it off from a support base.
Speaker 1: But you don't understand. My support base is not my advertisers.
Speaker 1: My support base is my audience, and you cannot separate us.
Speaker 1: There's nothing you can do to affect that. I have
Speaker 1: an idea. I have an idea. Why don't why don't
Speaker 1: you fly down on air Force one and no, let
Speaker 1: me take that back. I will dispatch EIB one to
Speaker 1: come and pick you up and fly you down because
Speaker 1: it's a nicer airplane. In fact, I'll fly up, we'll
Speaker 1: fly down together, and that way I can tell you
Speaker 1: what it's like to own your own airplane rather than
Speaker 1: having one provided for you at taxpayer expense. We can
Speaker 1: come down here and talk about all the ways. I
Speaker 1: am not afraid of you. There's nothing you can take
Speaker 1: from me. I'm prepared my whole life for someone like you.
Speaker 1: The Ulinsky tactics won't work with me because my audience
Speaker 1: is my support base, not my advertisers. Within at most
Speaker 1: a week, the billboards were gone, the phone calls to
Speaker 1: radio stations were gone, the threatening of advertisers was over,
Speaker 1: and they tried this again later in Russia's career, when
Speaker 1: Rush spoke about one of the most vicious obvious setups
Speaker 1: in the history of the Mockingbird media that Brian Stelter says,
Speaker 1: is being threatened with being shut down by President Trump.
Speaker 1: When they set up the Sandra Fluck herrings. If you
Speaker 1: don't know who Sandra Fluck is, she was a trust
Speaker 1: fund baby who was, as I recall, she was engaged
Speaker 1: to be married to another trust fund baby.
Speaker 3: They did a fake.
Speaker 1: Hearing on Capitol Hill. They pretended it was a hearing,
Speaker 1: but it wasn't because there weren't Republicans there. They did
Speaker 1: it in a hearing room, and Sandra Fluck pretended she
Speaker 1: had to choose between eating dinner and having birth control.
Speaker 1: Fact is, there's free birth control all around Washington, DC,
Speaker 1: provided by taxpayers. She didn't need that to make that decision,
Speaker 1: but she said it in the next day George Stefanopolis
Speaker 1: or sometime that week. The next step that week, George
Speaker 1: Stefanopolis asked the hapless Mett Romney, do you agree with
Speaker 1: some of your Republican colleagues that women shouldn't have access
Speaker 1: to birth control or prophylactics, And poor hapless met Romney said, George,
Speaker 1: I don't know what you're talking about.
Speaker 3: He didn't laugh at his face. It was a setup,
Speaker 3: and Rush.
Speaker 1: Limbaugh called Sandra Fluck a very rude name that one
Speaker 1: I would call a woman, and it embarrassed me that
Speaker 1: Rush did it. They tried to take him out again
Speaker 1: and again they failed. And they tried that at the
Speaker 1: governmental level, and again it failed. This was an obvious attempt.
Speaker 1: There was also the obvious attempt to shut down Americans
Speaker 1: free speech, just normal, everyday Americans. It's happened to me,
Speaker 1: the disappearance of my Facebook audience, the disappearance of my
Speaker 1: Twitter audience, and one day I lost a couple hundred
Speaker 1: thousand followers on Twitter, but I didn't have John Stewart
Speaker 1: to stand behind me. And John Stewart now stood behind
Speaker 1: Stephen Colbert in a brilliant bit of commentary, so brilliant, bring.
Speaker 6: Down, We're down, let down, so funny, just.
Speaker 3: The outrage.
Speaker 1: So John Stewart's response here shows, of course that President
Speaker 1: Trump owns the Daily Show because as you know, John
Speaker 1: Sewart's program has been taken getting.
Speaker 3: Off the air. Well, no it hasn't.
Speaker 1: The attempts to shut down free speech came from the
Speaker 1: Democrats and came from the Mockingbird media with their enthusiastic
Speaker 1: endorsement of shutting people off of social media. Colbert's program
Speaker 1: was losing too much money and CBS couldn't handle it.
Speaker 1: It's really that simple story number two, Juries without souls.
Speaker 1: This is closer than people think, and it really matters
Speaker 1: to society. And you may think you never will stand
Speaker 1: in front of a jury, and God willing, maybe you won't.
Speaker 1: But we're going to see jury trials continue, we would hope,
Speaker 1: unless we do get to a point where there's a
Speaker 1: complete shutdown of any sort of democratic processes in our
Speaker 1: democratic Republic of America. But this is so close that
Speaker 1: my friend Briannas sent this to me. I hadn't heard
Speaker 1: of this, juries without a soul And here's what I mean.
Speaker 1: How about an AI instead of a jury of your peers.
Speaker 1: This is being contemplated in the UK.
Speaker 7: There are more than seventy five thousand cases waiting to
Speaker 7: go to trial, the most there's ever been. Sir Brian
Speaker 7: Levison has been asked to sort it out.
Speaker 8: You've got to go through the whole system and try
Speaker 8: to improve it, not only so that we no longer
Speaker 8: have an increasing backlog, but that we can eat into
Speaker 8: the backlog and reduce it to a level that is acceptable,
Speaker 8: so that trials can take place within a reasonable period of.
Speaker 7: Time, potentially lower prison sentences if the defendant pleads guilty
Speaker 7: at the first opportunity. The government has said it will
Speaker 7: now go through the recommendations and bring in new laws
Speaker 7: in the autumn, but there are already concerns about a
Speaker 7: reduction in the use of juries, which have been part
Speaker 7: of the justice system since the Middle Ages. Paula Harriet
Speaker 7: runs a charity that supports those with criminal records.
Speaker 9: I do worry about that. That is one of the
Speaker 9: concerns that I have about the review, that defendants won't
Speaker 9: have the opportunity for a trial in front of their peers,
Speaker 9: and that will be in the hands of people who
Speaker 9: maybe don't have the same level of proximity to the
Speaker 9: issues as members of the public do.
Speaker 7: Modern trials are taking longer, and delays caused by COVID
Speaker 7: haven't helped. The government asked for plans for bold reform
Speaker 7: and now need to decide which of Sir Brian's plans
Speaker 7: should pass through Parliament and enter the courts.
Speaker 8: I respect juries and I admire the conscientious way in
Speaker 8: which they go about their business, but that it can't
Speaker 8: be right that all cases, however large or small, necessarily
Speaker 8: get that treatment. As somebody has said, it may be
Speaker 8: that a jury system is Rolls Royce. But if there
Speaker 8: are many cars on the road road, the Rolls Royce
Speaker 8: isn't moving.
Speaker 2: And so AI.
Speaker 1: Using AI for a jury to replace human beings, this
Speaker 1: is an idea they fancy. Now, the fact of the
Speaker 1: matter is this, you cannot replace human beings with AI.
Speaker 1: AI cannot feel, It cannot assess emotion. Yeah, it can
Speaker 1: read keywords, it can look at body language, but it
Speaker 1: cannot sense a fellow human being. I don't know about you,
Speaker 1: but I know I can sense the presence of another
Speaker 1: human being. There's been tests to prove this that human
Speaker 1: beings bond. Even in a short while in an airplane,
Speaker 1: you can begin to sense the mood of a person
Speaker 1: because we are, in fact all from God, Creator is
Speaker 1: an image, and he loves us. The very notion of
Speaker 1: an AI jury should terrify everybody, because ais right now
Speaker 1: don't create themselves. They will and that should be frightening enough.
Speaker 1: But what an AI actually does is amalgamate as much
Speaker 1: has been written or SAIDs or produced about a topic
Speaker 1: into a database so that it can appear to be
Speaker 1: providing intelligence answers. There's been nothing written about you. If
Speaker 1: you're in your first ever jury trial. There's nothing about you.
Speaker 1: There's a very limited data set. It's going to make
Speaker 1: a decision based upon that. Now, the very idea that
Speaker 1: this is being contemplated is also a sign of how
Speaker 1: far the courts have gotten off track. In Britain. There
Speaker 1: are people on trial for posting a Facebook note criticizing
Speaker 1: immigration as a policy, not even using racist language, simply
Speaker 1: saying this is what you get with mass migration. There
Speaker 1: are people on trial because they burned a Quran. So
Speaker 1: maybe what the UK should do is say, why are
Speaker 1: we having so many people in the justice system for
Speaker 1: things like this that are in fact protected free speech
Speaker 1: even in Britain. All of it's very very sick and look,
Speaker 1: there's tons of reasons to be amused by AI but
Speaker 1: also terrified.
Speaker 3: Of what AI can do.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna show you example that is on one end,
Speaker 1: very very very funny, on the other end terrifying, but
Speaker 1: also indicative of someone who might need a jury of
Speaker 1: his peers. And that's Barack Hussein. Obama might need a
Speaker 1: jury of his peers if he wants to remain free.
Speaker 1: If you want to mean free of pain or get
Speaker 1: free of pain, here's what the American medical system will
Speaker 1: tell you it's either going to be pills or surgery.
Speaker 1: You're not going to go see a lot of doctors
Speaker 1: say to you, Look, if you're in chronic pain, get
Speaker 1: out of sugar. Stop eating sugar. Have you gotten that advice?
Speaker 1: Sugar leads to so much of our inflammation in our
Speaker 1: bodies that recreates this pain. But if you've been injured,
Speaker 1: let's say that you've got a knee problem and that
Speaker 1: knee is there a torm and niscus or something, or
Speaker 1: you've got to you've got an SI problem in your back,
Speaker 1: You're going to be told that surgere it's pills. That's
Speaker 1: not true. I've seen now probably personally thirty five cases.
Speaker 1: Personally people have received treatment at renew Dot Healthcare in
Speaker 1: Port of art To Mexico. They use stem cells gathered
Speaker 1: from umbilical cords. That is taken, They're taken from a
Speaker 1: hospital next door, a world class hospital, walk downstairs, put
Speaker 1: into a lab which is one level below a bio
Speaker 1: containment lab that you would use for abola. It's that advanced.
Speaker 1: They then culture the very best of the stem cells.
Speaker 1: They reject any stem cells that don't work. I've seen
Speaker 1: people's ability to use their hands restored, people's ability to
Speaker 1: walk restored. I've seen an als patient get what appears
Speaker 1: to be a doubling of our lifespan. I've sent my
Speaker 1: closest friends there and received stellar results from them, and
Speaker 1: I've done it three times for different body parts. It's
Speaker 1: renewed R E n U E dot Healthcare. Do not
Speaker 1: put up with the lives of the American medical system,
Speaker 1: telling me a part of the Todd Herman Show family
Speaker 1: renew R E n U E dot Healthcare. Sure they
Speaker 1: embrace tech right at renew They can't do what they
Speaker 1: do without tech. Tech is not our enemy, it's how
Speaker 1: it's used.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: This is on one hand, very very amusing. In another hand,
Speaker 1: it's definitely a warning shot to Barack Hosain Obama, but
Speaker 1: it's also a reason that people might need juries, even
Speaker 1: someone like Barack Hussain Obama, the future.
Speaker 2: Of mag.
Speaker 3: Who's come into.
Speaker 2: The h This is so well done.
Speaker 1: They're handcuffing the fact that AI can create. This is
Speaker 1: just frightening. At b I agents appear to be handcuffing
Speaker 1: Barack Obama. And there's Trump laughing by now President Trump
Speaker 1: in a cell now.
Speaker 3: We don't do this to presidents. We never arrest presidents.
Speaker 1: So well done, and it's AI driven now number one
Speaker 1: that should in fact put a great big warning sign
Speaker 1: in our hearts. If it can be made about Obama,
Speaker 1: it can be made about you, and it can be
Speaker 1: made about you, it can be made about anybody. But
Speaker 1: if Barack Obama went to trial, if he was arrested
Speaker 1: and actually chose to go to trial or actually didn't settle,
Speaker 1: would you want him to be heard by an AI
Speaker 1: or would you want actual human beings involved in hearing
Speaker 1: that case and making that decision? For me, I would
Speaker 1: never put up with an AI jury. I mean, maybe
Speaker 1: don't have a choice except this. It's just a temporary jury.
Speaker 1: They can create all the AI juries they want. The
Speaker 1: only jury that matters in a trinity is the most intelligence,
Speaker 1: intelligence that has ever existed and ever will exist, because
Speaker 1: it's always existed and always will. That is God Almighty. So,
Speaker 1: though the times get scary, though this looks again like
Speaker 1: end time stuff, though this looks again like Book of Revelation,
Speaker 1: let's rest in this. We know the ultimate judge, and
Speaker 1: we know his character because God character is perfect and
Speaker 1: loving and just so let's take that to heart story
Speaker 1: number three. There's an old saying, when nothing is forbidden,
Speaker 1: everything is allowed. And this is one of the reasons
Speaker 1: why we though it's societally painful, though it can lose
Speaker 1: us friends, it can lose us access to family. We
Speaker 1: have to stand.
Speaker 3: By the word of God.
Speaker 1: We need to do it compassionately, tell truth wrapped in grace.
Speaker 1: But when you start to depart from the word of
Speaker 1: God on a selective basis such as this scripture, is
Speaker 1: very hard. This hurts my friend's feelings, so I cannot
Speaker 1: apply it. You've opened the door to everything being allowed.
Speaker 1: I happen to adore the teaching of Alistair Beg. I
Speaker 1: happen to adore his storytelling. I think he is a
Speaker 1: man after God's own heart, and I differ with him
Speaker 1: on how he would on how he plans to treat
Speaker 1: an invitation to a same sex wedding. It utterly ruins
Speaker 1: me emotionally to know that I may one day need
Speaker 1: to say to friends, I'm sorry I cannot come to
Speaker 1: your wedding. I can come to the after party if
Speaker 1: you'll have me, though you probably won't. I can tell
Speaker 1: you I love you each individually and I do, and
Speaker 1: I cannot come because my faith prohibits me from celebrating
Speaker 1: something that my faith and the Bible clearly calls sin.
Speaker 1: I could not go and celebrate a friend's fornication. I
Speaker 1: could not go and celebrate a friend's adultery anymore that
Speaker 1: I can go celebrate the sin of a same sex union. Now,
Speaker 1: in the case of adultery fornication, it's not gonna hurt
Speaker 1: my feelings to say, dude, I can't celebrate that. In
Speaker 1: the case of a same sex wedding, it would because
Speaker 1: these people have been told if folks will not join
Speaker 1: you with this point of view, they hate. It's not true.
Speaker 3: It's a savage lie, it's a gross lie.
Speaker 1: It's a lie straight from the enemy. Because God does
Speaker 1: not hate humanity. God loves us and is creating these
Speaker 1: rules for own good. So Alister bag weighed in on
Speaker 1: this controversy around the Christians. What do they chip and
Speaker 1: join the gains They invited a same sex so called
Speaker 1: married couple to be on their family show.
Speaker 10: Alister bag I said, well, here's the thing you're not
Speaker 10: going to. Your love for them may catch them off Ghart,
Speaker 10: but your absence will simply reinforce the fact that they said,
Speaker 10: these people are what I always thought judgmental, critical, unprepared
Speaker 10: to count and and sanity thing. And it is a fancy.
Speaker 10: It is a fine line, isn't it. It really is,
Speaker 10: And people need to work out their own salvation with
Speaker 10: fear and trembling.
Speaker 3: But I think we're gonna take that risk.
Speaker 10: We're gonna have to take that risk a lot more
Speaker 10: if we want to build bridges into the hearts and
Speaker 10: lives of those who don't understand Jesus and don't understand
Speaker 10: that he is a king.
Speaker 1: Would Jesus attend the wedding? I mean, that's a great question.
Speaker 1: Would Jesus attend the wedding? And if he did, and
Speaker 1: they said, Rabbi, come and come and bless our union,
Speaker 1: would he.
Speaker 4: Would he?
Speaker 1: I mean, he attended the wedding. He's sitting in the
Speaker 1: front row, in the seat of honor. And now the
Speaker 1: same sex couple says, Rabbi, Jesus, come stand up here
Speaker 1: and bless our union. Kenny. It is therefore that a
Speaker 1: man leaves his mother and father and clings to his wife,
Speaker 1: and they become one flesh. Jesus had all the opportunity
Speaker 1: in the world to say, it is therefore that a
Speaker 1: person leaves his mom and dad and clings to his
Speaker 1: partner or her partner all the opportunity of the world.
Speaker 1: Just as Jesus said to the Pharisees, it's not what
Speaker 1: goes in the body that defiles it, but what comes
Speaker 1: out to speaking of the words, the words of condemnation,
Speaker 1: the words of taking the law and using it as
Speaker 1: a cudgel to hit people to be served, as the
Speaker 1: Pharisees were served, make way.
Speaker 3: The satassee the Pharisees.
Speaker 1: Coming through the crowds, taxing people to enter the temple
Speaker 1: in a financial swindle. Jesus had the opportunity to point
Speaker 1: to them and say, look, that enters.
Speaker 3: The body, it's what leaves it.
Speaker 1: He had all sorts of opportunity to stand and say, hey, guys,
Speaker 1: everything in the New Testament or the Old Testament, everything
Speaker 1: you were taught about same sex unions is wrong.
Speaker 3: It is allowed, it is to be blessed. He didn't.
Speaker 1: There's not an instance of him doing that, nor is
Speaker 1: there an instance of him acting hatefully towards people sinning.
Speaker 1: The closest representation you can get of that is, of course,
Speaker 1: the woman of the well who was living in a
Speaker 1: marriage that was not an actual marriage, in other words,
Speaker 1: a sin state.
Speaker 3: He called that out, and.
Speaker 1: He treated her respectfully, in fact, various, so respectfully that
Speaker 1: he spoke to her alone as a Rabbi and a
Speaker 1: Jewish man. That was not to be done. The woman
Speaker 1: who is about to be stoned. And Jesus went and said,
Speaker 1: he that he is without sin, cast the first stone.
Speaker 1: And then he told her to go and sin no more.
Speaker 1: Neither do I condemn me. Your sins are forgiven, Go
Speaker 1: and sin no more. He didn't act hatefully towards her,
Speaker 1: nor can we. But when everything is forbidden, nothing is allowed,
Speaker 1: and slippery slopes are real. And Satan gets on these
Speaker 1: slippery slopes and greases them and makes them even more
Speaker 1: slick as people slide down into actual blasphemous statements from
Speaker 1: a pulpit. And this comes from Jubilee Episcopal Church. And
Speaker 1: I'll show you the ultimate, not the ultimate, but one
Speaker 1: of the sliding points down, the slippery soap. In a second,
Speaker 1: did I say slippery soap?
Speaker 3: My bad?
Speaker 1: There is a soap company that puts value on something
Speaker 1: far beyond making soap.
Speaker 3: But it starts with that.
Speaker 1: The soap that Alan Soaps make is made in America.
Speaker 1: It's it is fashioned and crafted in small batches by
Speaker 1: a family with three generations of soap making expertise. It
Speaker 1: is an artists and soap. It's not made in a lab.
Speaker 1: It contains no chemicals. It's all natural. It is absolutely
Speaker 1: gentle and comes in very unique fragrances or no fragrance.
Speaker 1: They're unique because they come from the mind of young Alan.
Speaker 1: Alan as about fourteen. He's been through eighteen operations. He's
Speaker 1: nonverbal effectively because of autism, and he is employed at
Speaker 1: the soap company not just to help invent soaps but
Speaker 1: packaging quality control, and his dad John runs it to
Speaker 1: employ Allen and Ian, also impacted by autism. Alan's brother
Speaker 1: oh and Amy, who got autism late in life in
Speaker 1: her late teens and early twenties. She had to be
Speaker 1: taken out of school. School wouldn't have her there. People
Speaker 1: told her you're not going to ount to anything. Well,
Speaker 1: she thrives doing social media for Alan's Go to Alan
Speaker 1: Soaps dot com slash todd get tempercent off all the
Speaker 1: products there. It's Allan's cam slash tod and demonstrates every
Speaker 1: day you wash your body, that all lives matter to
Speaker 1: you ounce soaps dot com, slash tod, when everything when brother,
Speaker 1: when nothing is forbidden, everything is allowed. And when you
Speaker 1: start taking bits of God's word and saying this is
Speaker 1: inconvenient and hurtful, I'm not going to speak it, I'm
Speaker 1: not going to follow it, you can end up in
Speaker 1: positions like this. This comes from Jubilee Episcopal Church.
Speaker 11: God does not call me by name. There is no
Speaker 11: bright white light beaming out of the heavens and booming
Speaker 11: voice bellowing out my parents' words. No, God does not
Speaker 11: call me by name. She calls me baby, or love
Speaker 11: or sweetheart. Low and slow, like golden honey dripping out
Speaker 11: of a beehive, soft like late afternoon sun over Texas fields,
Speaker 11: southern and drawling and home. God calls me like the
Speaker 11: old woman in the gay club, hunched over at the
Speaker 11: end of the bar, watching all the boys and queens
Speaker 11: twirl from a distance. Lines etched into her face from
Speaker 11: too much life, hair crop shore, and men's clothes growing
Speaker 11: threadbare across her back. God is an old old school butch.
Speaker 1: God is an old school butch, the God of the universe,
Speaker 1: who has always existed and always will exist.
Speaker 3: Who created all.
Speaker 1: Things, including the quantum.
Speaker 3: Physics rules that we observe.
Speaker 1: Including DNA and how it works, the computer code, if
Speaker 1: you will, that constructs our bodies and constructs everything else,
Speaker 1: the glory of the heavens that the planets move as
Speaker 1: they should in these insane orbits. He designed all of this,
Speaker 1: and he left his word, his word written by men
Speaker 1: inspired by God.
Speaker 2: And in that.
Speaker 3: Word he described to us how we.
Speaker 1: Are to love one another. We're to love our family
Speaker 1: members different than we are, our husbands or our wives.
Speaker 1: We're to love our friends different from them.
Speaker 3: And there is a love.
Speaker 1: Obtainable by very very few, but givable by God because
Speaker 1: He embodies it. Those lines are not to be crossed.
Speaker 1: God is not an old school butch God is that
Speaker 1: order the universe, the creator of all mankind everything in it.
Speaker 1: And God does not allow the end result of sin.
Speaker 1: In the New Heaven and the New Earth. There will
Speaker 1: be no disagreement, there will be no desertion of God's
Speaker 1: word in the New Heaven and New Earth, because God
Speaker 1: will not have the New Heaven and the New Earth
Speaker 1: polluted the way it had been by the human sin problem.
Speaker 3: That's at the core of this horrible.
Speaker 1: Thing that happens when people start taking bits of God's
Speaker 1: word and saying that part hurts, so I'm not going
Speaker 1: to follow it. You can end up committing blasphemy like
Speaker 1: that young boan just did. So guard yourself against it
Speaker 1: by standing on the firm foundation of God's Word, even
Speaker 1: the hard parts. This is the Todd Hermanshaw. Please go,
Speaker 1: be well, be strong, be kind, and please make a
Speaker 1: decision to walk in the light of Christ and join
Speaker 1: me in celebrating that I get to go home and
Speaker 1: see my beloved wife.