Speaker 1: Welcome to the three Stories version of the Todd Herman Shows.
Story number one, what was Stephen Colbert's actual job? I
guess still is that he's not officially fired yet. Story
number two, Juries without Souls It's closer than you think.
And story number three. When nothing is forbidden, everything is allowed.
We'll talk about this with the help of Know Your
Risk podcast dot com and of course, God Almighty.
Speaker 2: The Todd Herman Show is one hundred percent disapproved by
big pharma technocrats and tyrants everywhere. From the high mountains
of Free America. Here's the Emerald City exile Todd Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made, and these
are the times to which God has decided we shall live.
Speaker 3: Now the Todd Herman Show. We need to ask a question, but.
Speaker 1: It's one been asking for well about eight or nine years.
As we've been looking at the business model of the
Mockingbird Media. We've seen the decline in viewership. We've seen
the sinking ratings of MSNBC and many of the so
called comedy shows. This isn't the first time we've asked
this question. We've asked it continually. How are they getting
propped up? How are they continuing to operate. Stephen Colbert's
program was apparently losing forty million dollars a year, and
it was one hundred million per year to produce the show,
which is effectively a dude sitting at a desk talking.
Speaker 3: To people after he tells jokes one.
Speaker 1: Hundred million a year. And when this cancelation came about
and it's been announced that this is the last season
of Colbert's program, then of course came what we have
been told or conspiracy theories because you don't have proof.
Speaker 3: This is a true, true.
Speaker 1: Do nothing. Senator who has a whole theory about this,
and he posted this proudly on Twitter, which is a
of course, white supremacist outfit, Senator Chris Murphy.
Speaker 4: So I want to tell you why the cancelation of
Stephen Colbert's show matters so much. We are on the
precipice of entering a censorship state in which Donald Trump
is using the powers of the federal government in order
to erase criticism from the airwaves. This is a really,
really dangerous moment. Stephen Colbert didn't get thrown off the
air because he wasn't doing well.
Speaker 5: He was the highest rated show on TV in late night.
He was canceled very likely because Paramount and its owners
are trying to get rich off of this merger, and
Donald Trump has made it clear to them and everybody
else in the media space that if you want any
favors from me, then you have to silence my critics
on your platforms.
Speaker 1: You are on x a platform saying that you can
go get on any platform to say that because you
get to call yourself the United States senator, although you
don't do much senatoring. There have been countless calls for
President Trump to be unalived by Hollywood actors on platforms.
Politicians have called for him to be unlived on platforms.
Karen Bass, the leaguereds and corrupt mayor of Los Angeles,
has called for him to be taken out on platforms.
There is no indication that this has anything to do
with other than the fact that Colbert is losing forty
million per year. Brian Stelter has a platform where he
gets to speak his view of this. Is he being silenced?
Is he being taken off the screens? Or is Brian
Stelter a brave truth teller? If you want to be
a brave truth teller, understand this the truth.
Speaker 3: That's the ultimate thing.
Speaker 1: To tell is the truth of Jesus Christ. And the
thing that you most ultimately need to share is the
revelation of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. And there's
a great series now called Testament. Testament is from Angel Studios,
and it is not a soft look at the Book
of Acts. It takes the Book of Acts and updates
it into our era, a surveillance state, a state that
hates truth, a censorship state, a real one, not Chris
Murphy's version of it. It's a great opportunity to ask
yourself a question, will you stand for Jesus when your
back is against the wall. You can stream Testaments today.
Just go join the Angel Guild a angel dot com
slash todd. Premium members receive two free tickets to every
Angel theatrical release. That's angel dot com slash todd. To
stream Testament and support bold faith driven content. That's Angel
dot com slash Todd. So Chris Murphy says that we
are living in this era of censorship, or leaning into
one of government censorship. Of course we can give them
some examples and we can and will rather of real
censorship that was not questioned that we know the government
work to censor people. We know they use the power
of the intelligence services to censor Americans on social media.
We know that Chris Murphy was fine with that because
he never called it out. He was a senator, then
he's a senator now. He could have called it out
then and now he didn't. We know that the ridiculous
DOJ under President Trump and the part time Attorney generaler
Pambondi hasn't yet dismissed or got offered to pay Alex
Berenson the Berenson suit proceeds. She hasn't offered to settle
this thing. Berenson was censored by the government through social media.
He has his account taken down because the government and well, Frankly,
a pharma executive acting on behalf of government and Pharma
insisted that it be taken down. And this was under
the previous ownership group, Jack Dorsey's group of Twitter. So
here's how Fox News reported this a platform. Colbert's Late
Show is reportedly losing CBS forty million a year as
critics speculate politics sture of cancelation. Liber critics cry foul,
but CBS Late Night show reportedly had a budget north
of one hundred million dollars. We just said that on
Fox News. President Trump has been criticized. On the Twitter platform,
President Trump has been criticized. Tucker Crauston has done it,
Elon Musk has done it. Is it getting shut down
or is that impossible? Trump has no power there.
Speaker 3: Brian Steltz of.
Speaker 1: CNN Fame, he weighed into this with his analysis, A.
Speaker 6: Country where you can't lampoon a sitting president is not
a free country. A country where you can't publish editorial
cartoons or have late night monologues or have satires about
the president is not a democratic country. Of course, We're
not there. We're not there at all.
Speaker 3: Right now, there are right now.
Speaker 6: And lots of figures who are famous for mocking and
deriding President Trump. But the idea that Colbert might be
taken off the air, that his voice might be silenced,
it certainly is creating a little bit of a chill
in the air today.
Speaker 3: Anna you see him super chilled?
Speaker 1: Brian, You're in a network that continues to insist that
President Trump was not not targeted by the Intelligent Services.
The same week that Gabby Untilsa, Gabbert released this data
that now is what the young people would call the
receipts showing that in fact, Susan Rice and brock Usin
Obama and the entire cadre of those people, the Intelligent Services,
the FBI, they all targeted a president elect in a
rolling coup attempt. And you guys at CNN have yet
to really report on this. You work at a network
that carried water for Biden, the figureheads as he was
clearly mentally declined, and you pretended otherwise. You worked at
that network, you still do. You took a break and
he came back, he got fired and rehired. Were you
fired because of the people who ran Joe Biden or
because you were ineffective? You don't have anyone show, But
now you're a commentator. So this is a very scary
vision where you can't, let's say, be an entertainer or
let's just say this a rodeo clown. One of the
advantages of being an old guy who's worked in media
long time is you can have a memory of things
because they're funny. Daniel Arkin and Aaron mcclamm and NBC
News the rodeo clown at the Missouri State Fair who
on Saturday, wore a mask of President Barack Obama has
been permanently banned from performing at the fair.
Speaker 3: Ever again, according to.
Speaker 1: Fair officials, why because he's black and it was racism,
that's why. So this guy's a rodeo clown, not a platform.
And you don't remember this, do you remember when the
White House used the power of their money, of their position,
and the Democratic National Committee in concert with them. This
clearly came from Brock husein Obama. This was clearly an
olynskicck tactic, a Lynsky tactic, pick a target, isolated, cut
it off from a support base. This comes from again,
an NBC News article out of Washington, d C. Dems
released finalists for anti Rush billboard slogan. The Democrat National
Committee chosen final slogans in its anti Limbaugh billboard contest,
one of which trash talk radio host Rush Limbaugh on
a giant slap in the face from the DNC while
posting the conservative's hometown. The DNC sent a letter to
its members last week asking for phrases if ten words
or less, to splash across a billboard the displayed in
Limba's hometown of West Pomb's Florida as close to Limba's
backyard as they can get. The five slogans the DNZA
chose are in no particular order. America didn't vote for
rush to fail. Hope and change cannot be rushed. Failure
is not an option for America's future. We can fix America.
Don't rush it and rush say yes to America, the
conservative Limbo said List said last week that he hoped
Barack Obama's administration will fail and blasted Obama administration since
the president took office in January. It didn't stop there.
They took these billboards out at the same time as
Media Matters for America, which is a leftist funded group.
It has big money, dark money backgrounds. They took the
billboard approach and they jumped onto this and they began
to call Russia Limbas advertisers, and they began to threaten them.
They began to threaten them with mass boycotts. They created
an attempt to threaten the affiliates. There was an FCC
attempt to reach out to the affiliates to pressure them
to take Rush off the air. They did this or
attempted to do this to the world's most successful radio
talk show, host in history. There will never be another Limbaugh.
Rogan and Tucker Carlson are the now Limbaughs of podcasting,
but they'll never be another guy like Russian Live radio.
So how did Limbaugh respond to this? Oh, he carped.
He said it was government sent. What Rush Limbas said
was one of the most monumental moments in radio. And
despite having filled in for Rush, not one hundred and
fifty times, we never were able to find the audio
of this or isolated, although everybody remembers Rush saying it.
When this effort began and they were trying to get
Rush taken off the air, trying to separate him from
his advertisers, Rush went to the air and he said
this roughly paraphrasing, you know a President Obama. I don't
fear you. I've been preparing.
Speaker 3: My whole life for a person like you.
Speaker 1: If I decide this gets serious enough, I have a
place I can go where you can't touch me. But
that's not going to happen. You're using an Olinsky tactic,
pick a target, isolated, cut it off from a support base.
But you don't understand. My support base is not my advertisers.
My support base is my audience, and you cannot separate us.
There's nothing you can do to affect that. I have
an idea. I have an idea. Why don't why don't
you fly down on air Force one and no, let
me take that back. I will dispatch EIB one to
come and pick you up and fly you down because
it's a nicer airplane. In fact, I'll fly up, we'll
fly down together, and that way I can tell you
what it's like to own your own airplane rather than
having one provided for you at taxpayer expense. We can
come down here and talk about all the ways. I
am not afraid of you. There's nothing you can take
from me. I'm prepared my whole life for someone like you.
The Ulinsky tactics won't work with me because my audience
is my support base, not my advertisers. Within at most
a week, the billboards were gone, the phone calls to
radio stations were gone, the threatening of advertisers was over,
and they tried this again later in Russia's career, when
Rush spoke about one of the most vicious obvious setups
in the history of the Mockingbird media that Brian Stelter says,
is being threatened with being shut down by President Trump.
When they set up the Sandra Fluck herrings. If you
don't know who Sandra Fluck is, she was a trust
fund baby who was, as I recall, she was engaged
to be married to another trust fund baby.
Speaker 3: They did a fake.
Speaker 1: Hearing on Capitol Hill. They pretended it was a hearing,
but it wasn't because there weren't Republicans there. They did
it in a hearing room, and Sandra Fluck pretended she
had to choose between eating dinner and having birth control.
Fact is, there's free birth control all around Washington, DC,
provided by taxpayers. She didn't need that to make that decision,
but she said it in the next day George Stefanopolis
or sometime that week. The next step that week, George
Stefanopolis asked the hapless Mett Romney, do you agree with
some of your Republican colleagues that women shouldn't have access
to birth control or prophylactics, And poor hapless met Romney said, George,
I don't know what you're talking about.
Speaker 3: He didn't laugh at his face. It was a setup,
and Rush.
Speaker 1: Limbaugh called Sandra Fluck a very rude name that one
I would call a woman, and it embarrassed me that
Rush did it. They tried to take him out again
and again they failed. And they tried that at the
governmental level, and again it failed. This was an obvious attempt.
There was also the obvious attempt to shut down Americans
free speech, just normal, everyday Americans. It's happened to me,
the disappearance of my Facebook audience, the disappearance of my
Twitter audience, and one day I lost a couple hundred
thousand followers on Twitter, but I didn't have John Stewart
to stand behind me. And John Stewart now stood behind
Stephen Colbert in a brilliant bit of commentary, so brilliant, bring.
Speaker 6: Down, We're down, let down, so funny, just.
Speaker 3: The outrage.
Speaker 1: So John Stewart's response here shows, of course that President
Trump owns the Daily Show because as you know, John
Sewart's program has been taken getting.
Speaker 3: Off the air. Well, no it hasn't.
Speaker 1: The attempts to shut down free speech came from the
Democrats and came from the Mockingbird media with their enthusiastic
endorsement of shutting people off of social media. Colbert's program
was losing too much money and CBS couldn't handle it.
It's really that simple story number two, Juries without souls.
This is closer than people think, and it really matters
to society. And you may think you never will stand
in front of a jury, and God willing, maybe you won't.
But we're going to see jury trials continue, we would hope,
unless we do get to a point where there's a
complete shutdown of any sort of democratic processes in our
democratic Republic of America. But this is so close that
my friend Briannas sent this to me. I hadn't heard
of this, juries without a soul And here's what I mean.
How about an AI instead of a jury of your peers.
This is being contemplated in the UK.
Speaker 7: There are more than seventy five thousand cases waiting to
go to trial, the most there's ever been. Sir Brian
Levison has been asked to sort it out.
Speaker 8: You've got to go through the whole system and try
to improve it, not only so that we no longer
have an increasing backlog, but that we can eat into
the backlog and reduce it to a level that is acceptable,
so that trials can take place within a reasonable period of.
Speaker 7: Time, potentially lower prison sentences if the defendant pleads guilty
at the first opportunity. The government has said it will
now go through the recommendations and bring in new laws
in the autumn, but there are already concerns about a
reduction in the use of juries, which have been part
of the justice system since the Middle Ages. Paula Harriet
runs a charity that supports those with criminal records.
Speaker 9: I do worry about that. That is one of the
concerns that I have about the review, that defendants won't
have the opportunity for a trial in front of their peers,
and that will be in the hands of people who
maybe don't have the same level of proximity to the
issues as members of the public do.
Speaker 7: Modern trials are taking longer, and delays caused by COVID
haven't helped. The government asked for plans for bold reform
and now need to decide which of Sir Brian's plans
should pass through Parliament and enter the courts.
Speaker 8: I respect juries and I admire the conscientious way in
which they go about their business, but that it can't
be right that all cases, however large or small, necessarily
get that treatment. As somebody has said, it may be
that a jury system is Rolls Royce. But if there
are many cars on the road road, the Rolls Royce
isn't moving.
Speaker 2: And so AI.
Speaker 1: Using AI for a jury to replace human beings, this
is an idea they fancy. Now, the fact of the
matter is this, you cannot replace human beings with AI.
AI cannot feel, It cannot assess emotion. Yeah, it can
read keywords, it can look at body language, but it
cannot sense a fellow human being. I don't know about you,
but I know I can sense the presence of another
human being. There's been tests to prove this that human
beings bond. Even in a short while in an airplane,
you can begin to sense the mood of a person
because we are, in fact all from God, Creator is
an image, and he loves us. The very notion of
an AI jury should terrify everybody, because ais right now
don't create themselves. They will and that should be frightening enough.
But what an AI actually does is amalgamate as much
has been written or SAIDs or produced about a topic
into a database so that it can appear to be
providing intelligence answers. There's been nothing written about you. If
you're in your first ever jury trial. There's nothing about you.
There's a very limited data set. It's going to make
a decision based upon that. Now, the very idea that
this is being contemplated is also a sign of how
far the courts have gotten off track. In Britain. There
are people on trial for posting a Facebook note criticizing
immigration as a policy, not even using racist language, simply
saying this is what you get with mass migration. There
are people on trial because they burned a Quran. So
maybe what the UK should do is say, why are
we having so many people in the justice system for
things like this that are in fact protected free speech
even in Britain. All of it's very very sick and look,
there's tons of reasons to be amused by AI but
also terrified.
Speaker 3: Of what AI can do.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna show you example that is on one end,
very very very funny, on the other end terrifying, but
also indicative of someone who might need a jury of
his peers. And that's Barack Hussein. Obama might need a
jury of his peers if he wants to remain free.
If you want to mean free of pain or get
free of pain, here's what the American medical system will
tell you it's either going to be pills or surgery.
You're not going to go see a lot of doctors
say to you, Look, if you're in chronic pain, get
out of sugar. Stop eating sugar. Have you gotten that advice?
Sugar leads to so much of our inflammation in our
bodies that recreates this pain. But if you've been injured,
let's say that you've got a knee problem and that
knee is there a torm and niscus or something, or
you've got to you've got an SI problem in your back,
You're going to be told that surgere it's pills. That's
not true. I've seen now probably personally thirty five cases.
Personally people have received treatment at renew Dot Healthcare in
Port of art To Mexico. They use stem cells gathered
from umbilical cords. That is taken, They're taken from a
hospital next door, a world class hospital, walk downstairs, put
into a lab which is one level below a bio
containment lab that you would use for abola. It's that advanced.
They then culture the very best of the stem cells.
They reject any stem cells that don't work. I've seen
people's ability to use their hands restored, people's ability to
walk restored. I've seen an als patient get what appears
to be a doubling of our lifespan. I've sent my
closest friends there and received stellar results from them, and
I've done it three times for different body parts. It's
renewed R E n U E dot Healthcare. Do not
put up with the lives of the American medical system,
telling me a part of the Todd Herman Show family
renew R E n U E dot Healthcare. Sure they
embrace tech right at renew They can't do what they
do without tech. Tech is not our enemy, it's how
it's used.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: This is on one hand, very very amusing. In another hand,
it's definitely a warning shot to Barack Hosain Obama, but
it's also a reason that people might need juries, even
someone like Barack Hussain Obama, the future.
Speaker 2: Of mag.
Speaker 3: Who's come into.
Speaker 2: The h This is so well done.
Speaker 1: They're handcuffing the fact that AI can create. This is
just frightening. At b I agents appear to be handcuffing
Barack Obama. And there's Trump laughing by now President Trump
in a cell now.
Speaker 3: We don't do this to presidents. We never arrest presidents.
Speaker 1: So well done, and it's AI driven now number one
that should in fact put a great big warning sign
in our hearts. If it can be made about Obama,
it can be made about you, and it can be
made about you, it can be made about anybody. But
if Barack Obama went to trial, if he was arrested
and actually chose to go to trial or actually didn't settle,
would you want him to be heard by an AI
or would you want actual human beings involved in hearing
that case and making that decision? For me, I would
never put up with an AI jury. I mean, maybe
don't have a choice except this. It's just a temporary jury.
They can create all the AI juries they want. The
only jury that matters in a trinity is the most intelligence,
intelligence that has ever existed and ever will exist, because
it's always existed and always will. That is God Almighty. So,
though the times get scary, though this looks again like
end time stuff, though this looks again like Book of Revelation,
let's rest in this. We know the ultimate judge, and
we know his character because God character is perfect and
loving and just so let's take that to heart story
number three. There's an old saying, when nothing is forbidden,
everything is allowed. And this is one of the reasons
why we though it's societally painful, though it can lose
us friends, it can lose us access to family. We
have to stand.
Speaker 3: By the word of God.
Speaker 1: We need to do it compassionately, tell truth wrapped in grace.
But when you start to depart from the word of
God on a selective basis such as this scripture, is
very hard. This hurts my friend's feelings, so I cannot
apply it. You've opened the door to everything being allowed.
I happen to adore the teaching of Alistair Beg. I
happen to adore his storytelling. I think he is a
man after God's own heart, and I differ with him
on how he would on how he plans to treat
an invitation to a same sex wedding. It utterly ruins
me emotionally to know that I may one day need
to say to friends, I'm sorry I cannot come to
your wedding. I can come to the after party if
you'll have me, though you probably won't. I can tell
you I love you each individually and I do, and
I cannot come because my faith prohibits me from celebrating
something that my faith and the Bible clearly calls sin.
I could not go and celebrate a friend's fornication. I
could not go and celebrate a friend's adultery anymore that
I can go celebrate the sin of a same sex union. Now,
in the case of adultery fornication, it's not gonna hurt
my feelings to say, dude, I can't celebrate that. In
the case of a same sex wedding, it would because
these people have been told if folks will not join
you with this point of view, they hate. It's not true.
Speaker 3: It's a savage lie, it's a gross lie.
Speaker 1: It's a lie straight from the enemy. Because God does
not hate humanity. God loves us and is creating these
rules for own good. So Alister bag weighed in on
this controversy around the Christians. What do they chip and
join the gains They invited a same sex so called
married couple to be on their family show.
Speaker 10: Alister bag I said, well, here's the thing you're not
going to. Your love for them may catch them off Ghart,
but your absence will simply reinforce the fact that they said,
these people are what I always thought judgmental, critical, unprepared
to count and and sanity thing. And it is a fancy.
It is a fine line, isn't it. It really is,
And people need to work out their own salvation with
fear and trembling.
Speaker 3: But I think we're gonna take that risk.
Speaker 10: We're gonna have to take that risk a lot more
if we want to build bridges into the hearts and
lives of those who don't understand Jesus and don't understand
that he is a king.
Speaker 1: Would Jesus attend the wedding? I mean, that's a great question.
Would Jesus attend the wedding? And if he did, and
they said, Rabbi, come and come and bless our union,
would he.
Speaker 4: Would he?
Speaker 1: I mean, he attended the wedding. He's sitting in the
front row, in the seat of honor. And now the
same sex couple says, Rabbi, Jesus, come stand up here
and bless our union. Kenny. It is therefore that a
man leaves his mother and father and clings to his wife,
and they become one flesh. Jesus had all the opportunity
in the world to say, it is therefore that a
person leaves his mom and dad and clings to his
partner or her partner all the opportunity of the world.
Just as Jesus said to the Pharisees, it's not what
goes in the body that defiles it, but what comes
out to speaking of the words, the words of condemnation,
the words of taking the law and using it as
a cudgel to hit people to be served, as the
Pharisees were served, make way.
Speaker 3: The satassee the Pharisees.
Speaker 1: Coming through the crowds, taxing people to enter the temple
in a financial swindle. Jesus had the opportunity to point
to them and say, look, that enters.
Speaker 3: The body, it's what leaves it.
Speaker 1: He had all sorts of opportunity to stand and say, hey, guys,
everything in the New Testament or the Old Testament, everything
you were taught about same sex unions is wrong.
Speaker 3: It is allowed, it is to be blessed. He didn't.
Speaker 1: There's not an instance of him doing that, nor is
there an instance of him acting hatefully towards people sinning.
The closest representation you can get of that is, of course,
the woman of the well who was living in a
marriage that was not an actual marriage, in other words,
a sin state.
Speaker 3: He called that out, and.
Speaker 1: He treated her respectfully, in fact, various, so respectfully that
he spoke to her alone as a Rabbi and a
Jewish man. That was not to be done. The woman
who is about to be stoned. And Jesus went and said,
he that he is without sin, cast the first stone.
And then he told her to go and sin no more.
Neither do I condemn me. Your sins are forgiven, Go
and sin no more. He didn't act hatefully towards her,
nor can we. But when everything is forbidden, nothing is allowed,
and slippery slopes are real. And Satan gets on these
slippery slopes and greases them and makes them even more
slick as people slide down into actual blasphemous statements from
a pulpit. And this comes from Jubilee Episcopal Church. And
I'll show you the ultimate, not the ultimate, but one
of the sliding points down, the slippery soap. In a second,
did I say slippery soap?
Speaker 3: My bad?
Speaker 1: There is a soap company that puts value on something
far beyond making soap.
Speaker 3: But it starts with that.
Speaker 1: The soap that Alan Soaps make is made in America.
It's it is fashioned and crafted in small batches by
a family with three generations of soap making expertise. It
is an artists and soap. It's not made in a lab.
It contains no chemicals. It's all natural. It is absolutely
gentle and comes in very unique fragrances or no fragrance.
They're unique because they come from the mind of young Alan.
Alan as about fourteen. He's been through eighteen operations. He's
nonverbal effectively because of autism, and he is employed at
the soap company not just to help invent soaps but
packaging quality control, and his dad John runs it to
employ Allen and Ian, also impacted by autism. Alan's brother
oh and Amy, who got autism late in life in
her late teens and early twenties. She had to be
taken out of school. School wouldn't have her there. People
told her you're not going to ount to anything. Well,
she thrives doing social media for Alan's Go to Alan
Soaps dot com slash todd get tempercent off all the
products there. It's Allan's cam slash tod and demonstrates every
day you wash your body, that all lives matter to
you ounce soaps dot com, slash tod, when everything when brother,
when nothing is forbidden, everything is allowed. And when you
start taking bits of God's word and saying this is
inconvenient and hurtful, I'm not going to speak it, I'm
not going to follow it, you can end up in
positions like this. This comes from Jubilee Episcopal Church.
Speaker 11: God does not call me by name. There is no
bright white light beaming out of the heavens and booming
voice bellowing out my parents' words. No, God does not
call me by name. She calls me baby, or love
or sweetheart. Low and slow, like golden honey dripping out
of a beehive, soft like late afternoon sun over Texas fields,
southern and drawling and home. God calls me like the
old woman in the gay club, hunched over at the
end of the bar, watching all the boys and queens
twirl from a distance. Lines etched into her face from
too much life, hair crop shore, and men's clothes growing
threadbare across her back. God is an old old school butch.
Speaker 1: God is an old school butch, the God of the universe,
who has always existed and always will exist.
Speaker 3: Who created all.
Speaker 1: Things, including the quantum.
Speaker 3: Physics rules that we observe.
Speaker 1: Including DNA and how it works, the computer code, if
you will, that constructs our bodies and constructs everything else,
the glory of the heavens that the planets move as
they should in these insane orbits. He designed all of this,
and he left his word, his word written by men
inspired by God.
Speaker 2: And in that.
Speaker 3: Word he described to us how we.
Speaker 1: Are to love one another. We're to love our family
members different than we are, our husbands or our wives.
We're to love our friends different from them.
Speaker 3: And there is a love.
Speaker 1: Obtainable by very very few, but givable by God because
He embodies it. Those lines are not to be crossed.
God is not an old school butch God is that
order the universe, the creator of all mankind everything in it.
And God does not allow the end result of sin.
In the New Heaven and the New Earth. There will
be no disagreement, there will be no desertion of God's
word in the New Heaven and New Earth, because God
will not have the New Heaven and the New Earth
polluted the way it had been by the human sin problem.
Speaker 3: That's at the core of this horrible.
Speaker 1: Thing that happens when people start taking bits of God's
word and saying that part hurts, so I'm not going
to follow it. You can end up committing blasphemy like
that young boan just did. So guard yourself against it
by standing on the firm foundation of God's Word, even
the hard parts. This is the Todd Hermanshaw. Please go,
be well, be strong, be kind, and please make a
decision to walk in the light of Christ and join
me in celebrating that I get to go home and
see my beloved wife.