Speaker 1: Billy cunning in the Great America. Of course, the election
Speaker 1: now is eight or nine weeks away.
Speaker 2: We're close.
Speaker 1: The election is hot and heavy, the great debates coming up,
Speaker 1: and we'll see what happens on September the tenth. But
Speaker 1: as I've said before, lawfair is a principle employed by
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party because when you want to manipulate election
Speaker 1: results and you want to accuse the other side of
Speaker 1: ruining democracy a threat to democracy, you're the ones engaging
Speaker 1: in the threat to democracy. So accuse the other side
Speaker 1: of engaging in your behavior, which is a wonderful thing
Speaker 1: to do if you're a Democrat. And Craig Yuey, who's
Speaker 1: written many books, but he's got a blog posting under
Speaker 1: the Radar twenty twenty four election alert, and the amount
Speaker 1: of money is being raised as we speak to contest
Speaker 1: the election by Democrats is unbridled. And Craig Huey, welcome
Speaker 1: again to the Bill Cunningham Show. And first of all,
Speaker 1: can you tell the American people what is lawfair and
Speaker 1: why is it weakening election integrity, which is the opposite
Speaker 1: of what the Democrats intend at which they discussed. But
Speaker 1: of course it's a real thing explain the rise of
Speaker 1: lawfare and what it means to the American people.
Speaker 3: Well, Bill, you know, people may have heard this term,
Speaker 3: but it really is huge.
Speaker 4: It deals with election integrity, It deals with interfering with
Speaker 4: the election itself.
Speaker 3: And right now we're.
Speaker 4: In a time of this law there that if people
Speaker 4: have an idea, they can't think of that temp Remember
Speaker 4: the attempt to try to have Trump remove.
Speaker 3: Bus from the ballot.
Speaker 4: There were lawsuits and the states were they were trying
Speaker 4: to take them off the ballot, they wouldn't let them
Speaker 4: even be on the ballot.
Speaker 3: Well, that's using the legal system to.
Speaker 4: Be able to be weaponized against the political opponent. And
Speaker 4: that's exactly what's going on now. It's under the radar.
Speaker 3: You don't see what's happening.
Speaker 4: But right now, Kamala Harris has hired a super attorney
Speaker 4: named Mark Elias. Right now, Mark Elias, we could cover
Speaker 4: him if you want, but he basically is charged the
Speaker 4: lawfare of the Harris campaign. He's worked as the architect
Speaker 4: back when they started this in twenty eighteen, twenty twenty two,
Speaker 4: and twenty four.
Speaker 3: And here's the thing. He has hundreds of staff lawyers. Yes,
Speaker 3: he has.
Speaker 4: Over a thousand lawyers as volunteers one thousand, and they're
Speaker 4: following lawsuits in the swing states to change the election,
Speaker 4: and it.
Speaker 1: Got going back in time. Mark Elias is the one
Speaker 1: who was involved with perkins Coe, that was involved in
Speaker 1: the twenty sixteen campaign, the Russian collusion delusion, that of
Speaker 1: course was a lie, and then that was also employing
Speaker 1: social media, which has come out recently with Mark Zuckerberg
Speaker 1: saying that he was wrong and listening to what he
Speaker 1: was told about the Russian collusion delusion. He was wrong
Speaker 1: about the Hunter Biden laptop, he was wrong about suppressing
Speaker 1: information about COVID and the vaccine. So that these lawyers
Speaker 1: there are literally hundreds, and you make a point that
Speaker 1: something in the range of one point seven billion dollars
Speaker 1: was donated to Democratic campaigns, etc. And Mark Elias has
Speaker 1: the lawyers like a spring ready to be sprung. Should
Speaker 1: Trump win a state, here comes the pest of lawyers,
Speaker 1: and god knows, I'm one and I love lawyers, but
Speaker 1: here they come in mass to make sure that the
Speaker 1: law fair is used instead of voter integrity, and the
Speaker 1: opposite is what the Democrats include. And so when it
Speaker 1: comes to just who gets on the ballot. You pointed
Speaker 1: out the state of Colorado and the state of Maine
Speaker 1: are two states dominated on the Supreme Court by the Democrats.
Speaker 1: They wanted to keep number one Trump can't even be
Speaker 1: on the ballot, and number two r IFK Junior and
Speaker 1: other Democrats have been kept from the ballots in many
Speaker 1: states in the primary. Explain how that process worked.
Speaker 3: So, Bill, here's the thing. They're prepared for the election.
Speaker 3: Just like you stated, there's.
Speaker 4: Going to be lawsuit after lawsuit, but they've been working
Speaker 4: behind the scenes. Now, now you mentioned RFK, they were fighting.
Speaker 4: The Democrat Party was fighting state after state not to
Speaker 4: have him beyond the ballot because they were afraid he
Speaker 4: was hurt Harris, and it was incredibly wrong, incredibly expensive,
Speaker 4: and in some states incredibly successful in keeping RFK Junior
Speaker 4: off the ballot.
Speaker 3: Now he is endorsed Frump.
Speaker 4: He said he's going to he is so mad at
Speaker 4: the Democratic Party of the dirty tricks they used against them,
Speaker 4: of the lives and manipulation and the censorship, that he
Speaker 4: was going to.
Speaker 3: Take his name off the ballot only in.
Speaker 4: The states that are the swing states, the swing states
Speaker 4: that will determine the upcoming election and So what what
Speaker 4: basically has happened is that uh, the Democrats under Mark
Speaker 4: Elias and in this law fair what they have done
Speaker 4: is now they're fighting to keep RFK.
Speaker 3: Junior on the ballot, on.
Speaker 4: The ballot and they yes, they won in Michigan, they
Speaker 4: won in North Carolina and uh, and it looks like
Speaker 4: they're going to win at least one, if not two
Speaker 4: other states. And and of course now that uh he
Speaker 4: has endorsed Trump and if he's on the state and
Speaker 4: in Michigan. In Michigan, uh, you know, you're talking about
Speaker 4: two percent of the people who could vote with swing
Speaker 4: to Trump.
Speaker 3: If if he.
Speaker 4: Wasn't on the baut out otherwise they're going to vote
Speaker 4: for RFK Junior. Well, that two percent is all the
Speaker 4: difference in the world between Trump winning Michigan and none.
Speaker 4: And that's why they're so spending so much money and
Speaker 4: time in these lawsuits. So they're doing lawsuits, hundreds of
Speaker 4: lawsuits local county, state to help the Democrats. They had
Speaker 4: major victories in Arizona, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Michigan, and they're shooting
Speaker 4: to push mail in ballots, ballot harvesting, stopping voter id
Speaker 4: looking at every pool Watcher, It is insane.
Speaker 2: Craig Uey.
Speaker 1: When you think about the party complaining about election integrity,
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party about Trump being a threat to democracy.
Speaker 1: Every voter's got account. They spent millions and millions of
Speaker 1: dollars with hundreds of lawyers to fashion the Democratic ballot
Speaker 1: to make sure that Joe Biden was the nominee, and
Speaker 1: once his mental frail toy became public and then quickly
Speaker 1: substitute it. And so the party about calling Trump a
Speaker 1: threat to democracy, they're the threat to democracy. And now
Speaker 1: having spent months and months keeping Kennedy off the ballot,
Speaker 1: they're now spending millions and millions of dollars in front
Speaker 1: of friendly democratic courts in these states to keep them
Speaker 1: on the ballot. So one point, keep them off, Now
Speaker 1: keep them on. It's not about voter integrity. It's not
Speaker 1: about honoring what the voters want in the Democrat primary
Speaker 1: or come November the fifth.
Speaker 2: It's about electing a certain person.
Speaker 1: And you have something in your blog that talks about
Speaker 1: the sixty five project dismandling conservative legal talent. Radical lawyers
Speaker 1: are having a tough time against Republican conservative lawyers.
Speaker 2: So they're trying to disbar them and silence them.
Speaker 1: Explain that aspect of the democratic legal machine to disbar
Speaker 1: conservative attorneys.
Speaker 4: They have taken attorneys that are conservative like John Eastman,
Speaker 4: disbarred him, have put fear in the lives of conservative
Speaker 4: and libertarian attorneys that they better not get involved in politics.
Speaker 4: And it's a way to suppress people standing up or
Speaker 4: in the legal profession to help conservatives, Libertarians, Christians, Republicans.
Speaker 4: They know that this group will target them for being disbarred.
Speaker 4: This is dirty and nasty. So Bill, it comes back
Speaker 4: to this you ad mentioned about judges and the second
Speaker 4: let me just tell you this election, everybody who should
Speaker 4: be outraged by this, this travesty of justice, they need
Speaker 4: to vote for a Secretary of State that won't put
Speaker 4: up for it. If they vote for register of voters,
Speaker 4: they need to make sure who that person is judges.
Speaker 4: You know, they need to use judge voter guide dot
Speaker 4: com or a site that tells them who's the judicial
Speaker 4: activists and who's the strict constructionists and know how to
Speaker 4: make sure because as this goes to the judges, if
Speaker 4: they're a radical liberal judicial activist legislating from the bench,
Speaker 4: they're going to vote in favor of Mark Elias and
Speaker 4: his legal team. If they're a strict constructionist, if they're
Speaker 4: a conservative judge, they're not going to take nonsense. They're
Speaker 4: going to look at the Constitution, they're going to look
Speaker 4: at the law, and they're not going to vote beast
Speaker 4: upon their own opinion.
Speaker 1: This is another important matter that it appears, whether it's
Speaker 1: ALEXA today, if you speak to your Alexis speaker and
Speaker 1: you say tell me about Donald Trump and nothing comes out.
Speaker 1: If you tell me, tell me about Kamala Harris, you
Speaker 1: got a long die tribe, how great she is. Big
Speaker 1: Tech has now confessed to the idea that government attorneys
Speaker 1: at the FBI and the DOJ intimidated Mark Zuckerberg and
Speaker 1: others in the not supplying to the American people truthful
Speaker 1: information about the Hunter laptop and about the COVID. And
Speaker 1: they now concede that that government employees manipulated the outcome
Speaker 1: of the twenty twenty election to help Joe Biden and
Speaker 1: hurt Donald Trump. Now isn't that a little bit about
Speaker 1: election interference? At least a lot more than Donald Trump
Speaker 1: not putting on a form payment to a porn star
Speaker 1: for which he was convicted of thirty four counts in
Speaker 1: this case from Mark Zuckerberg about a week or ten
Speaker 1: days ago, he admitted the election interference came from the
Speaker 1: government attorneys coercing and bullying social media companies to not
Speaker 1: put out negative information about Joe Biden and all negative
Speaker 1: information about Donald Trump. Isn't that more election interference than
Speaker 1: payments to a porn star?
Speaker 3: Oh, my gosh, bill is total injustice. It's not right.
Speaker 4: Yes, these attorneys, they get their training ground with the
Speaker 4: Department of Justice, and then they go out into the
Speaker 4: private sector.
Speaker 3: They go out into the political.
Speaker 4: World and the wreck havoc. And for those who are
Speaker 4: in government. One of the things that started under Obama
Speaker 4: and then just went on steroids under Biden was using
Speaker 4: these lawyers to put pressure on big tech to censor,
Speaker 4: to be able to silence opposition, to silence issues that
Speaker 4: was embarrassment or they.
Speaker 3: Didn't want to have brought up.
Speaker 4: And so we you know, it's a collusion between government
Speaker 4: and the private sector. And that's where.
Speaker 3: Really it is not right.
Speaker 4: It should not happen. It's a danger to our republic,
Speaker 4: it's a danger to the elections. And all this is
Speaker 4: election interference. If you go on Google right now and
Speaker 4: you typed in Trump's position on Israel. Every article that
Speaker 4: comes up on the first page, which eighty nine percent
Speaker 4: of the people will never go below page one.
Speaker 3: Is anti Trump.
Speaker 4: You do that with Harris on Israel, and everything is
Speaker 4: a positive from the liberal press like New York Times
Speaker 4: and MSNBC.
Speaker 3: And the Washington Post.
Speaker 4: And you cannot find conservative commentary unless you go down ten,
Speaker 4: fifteen to twenty pages, and even then.
Speaker 3: It's very sparse. It's censored.
Speaker 4: They have set up an algorithm to basically censor alternative
Speaker 4: points of view, and so this affects the persuadables, This
Speaker 4: affects the low information of voter, This affects those people
Speaker 4: who aren't listening to your program. It is a danger
Speaker 4: to a free, open and fear alone.
Speaker 1: And this election interference is conducted by government employees on
Speaker 1: government time, using their law degree to intimidate tech companies
Speaker 1: that they're under the duty to regulate. And there have
Speaker 1: been numerous examples of the FBI top Echelon and doj
Speaker 1: Echelon leaving their jobs then going to work for big
Speaker 1: tech with big stock options. And to me, that is
Speaker 1: election interference. But it's not well reported now lastly, philanthropic
Speaker 1: consultancy supplying dark money. You have this on your blog
Speaker 1: received one point seven billion dollars and twenty twenty alone.
Speaker 1: Mark Elias heads the largest law firm focused on representing
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party. Elias was crucial to the party's legal
Speaker 1: strategy during the twenty twenty election and he built democratic organizations.
Speaker 1: His fee was twenty seven million dollars in order to work.
Speaker 1: And I've seen him on MSNBC and I watched that channel,
Speaker 1: so you don't have to. And he's repeatedly on MSNBC
Speaker 1: talking about the lawsuits ready to be sprung on the
Speaker 1: Trump administration. They have a hundreds of lawyers if Trump
Speaker 1: is elected, beginning on January twentieth, to file mountains of
Speaker 1: injunctions against whatever Trump wants to do. Let's hope the
Speaker 1: greatness occurs and Trump takes office again in January of
Speaker 1: next year. What are they prepared to do to stop
Speaker 1: the Trump agenda? At that point, and on top of
Speaker 1: the election in interference already going on, if we see
Speaker 1: through to know what's going on, how will they stop
Speaker 1: the Trump administration?
Speaker 4: They basically have a plan to do everything they can
Speaker 4: legally to stop Trump from becoming president. And if he
Speaker 4: wins the election, and they will challenge the votes, they
Speaker 4: will challenge the procedures, they will challenge the Electoral College votes.
Speaker 4: They will do everything they can. And if he does
Speaker 4: become president, well, what happened in two thousand, sixteen twenty.
Speaker 3: Twenty was the deep state resistance.
Speaker 4: That resistance destroyed any policies that Trump tried to initiate.
Speaker 3: Everything was leaked to the press.
Speaker 4: The bureau ideologically driven bureaucasts refuse to carry out orders
Speaker 4: from the Trump administration.
Speaker 3: Now what's going to happen.
Speaker 4: Is that the lawsues will be one hundred times more
Speaker 4: on anything and all things Trump does to try to
Speaker 4: drain the swamp, to try to make significant changes away
Speaker 4: from our road to socialism.
Speaker 1: Now, the party that worries about threats to democracy and
Speaker 1: election infairs are conducting exactly that behavior. Craig Ueie, the
Speaker 1: blog article is under the radar twenty twenty four election Alert.
Speaker 1: Craig Uey, once again, you're a great American. Let's keep
Speaker 1: informing the American people and I hope the majority figure
Speaker 1: it out. But once again, thank you for coming on
Speaker 1: the Bill Cunningham Show. Craig Huiy Thank you very much.
Speaker 3: Thanks Bill.
Speaker 2: Right, let's continue. There's the truth.
Speaker 1: The party that complains about threats to the democracy are
Speaker 1: the threat, and the party that complains about election and
Speaker 1: interference are engaging in an interference in the election. Can
Speaker 1: you smell when I'm cooking? Bill cunning and the Great
Speaker 1: American with you every day. You're home of the Reds
Speaker 1: and the Bengals. News Radio seven hundred WLW