WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.159 --> 00:00:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, Ladies and gentlemen, brothers and sisters, comrades and friends.

2
00:00:04.839 --> 00:00:06.440
<v Speaker 2>I haven't said that in a while. I don't think.

3
00:00:06.879 --> 00:00:08.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't really have an intro for you here. This

4
00:00:08.919 --> 00:00:12.919
<v Speaker 1>is more of a straight up audio version of something

5
00:00:12.960 --> 00:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I've written, an essay that has been published by the

6
00:00:17.039 --> 00:00:21.359
<v Speaker 1>very good people over at Marion West, which I recommend

7
00:00:21.519 --> 00:00:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you all go check out. I will leave a link

8
00:00:24.399 --> 00:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in the show notes, but I wanted to make sure

9
00:00:26.679 --> 00:00:29.079
<v Speaker 1>this message got out to as many people as possible

10
00:00:29.760 --> 00:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>because given the I don't want to call it drama,

11
00:00:33.240 --> 00:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but I can't really think of anything else to call it.

12
00:00:35.039 --> 00:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>That is kind of broken out in the history content

13
00:00:39.320 --> 00:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>creation community of sorts that I find myself in, I

14
00:00:44.600 --> 00:00:46.719
<v Speaker 1>figured it would be time for me to say something

15
00:00:46.719 --> 00:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>about it. And because it directly impacts me to a

16
00:00:53.200 --> 00:00:55.479
<v Speaker 1>much less degree than other people I know, thankfully, but

17
00:00:55.560 --> 00:00:57.679
<v Speaker 1>it does impact me, and it has impacted a number

18
00:00:57.679 --> 00:01:02.079
<v Speaker 1>of people that I know. So without further ado, let's

19
00:01:02.119 --> 00:01:11.799
<v Speaker 1>get into it. I have for many years recommended Daryl

20
00:01:11.840 --> 00:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Cooper's hit podcast Martyrmaid to the relative handful of people

21
00:01:16.120 --> 00:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>kind enough to listen to my own show and read

22
00:01:18.799 --> 00:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>my thoughts on various publications, including my own substack and

23
00:01:24.079 --> 00:01:27.519
<v Speaker 1>not to fully bury the lead. I still do recommend Martyrmaid,

24
00:01:27.959 --> 00:01:31.439
<v Speaker 1>though admittedly with a little more reservation than I might

25
00:01:31.680 --> 00:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>otherwise have only a month earlier. The reason why there

26
00:01:36.519 --> 00:01:39.439
<v Speaker 1>is any reservation on my part can actually be summed

27
00:01:39.519 --> 00:01:42.719
<v Speaker 1>up in the following email I received just a few

28
00:01:42.799 --> 00:01:48.159
<v Speaker 1>days before writing this essay. You've previously recommended The Fear

29
00:01:48.159 --> 00:01:51.079
<v Speaker 1>and Loathing, a new Jerusalem series by the Martyr Maaide

30
00:01:51.159 --> 00:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast is a good resource for learning about the Israel

31
00:01:54.079 --> 00:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Palestine conflict. In light of Daryl Cooper's recent Holocaust denial,

32
00:01:59.079 --> 00:02:04.439
<v Speaker 1>would you still recommend that podcast? This is one among

33
00:02:04.560 --> 00:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>several messages that I have been receiving in the past

34
00:02:07.079 --> 00:02:10.759
<v Speaker 1>week or two. I was not surprised when they started

35
00:02:10.759 --> 00:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>coming in. I've been producing a historical podcast since twenty

36
00:02:13.919 --> 00:02:17.319
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and occupied a similar space at least until twenty

37
00:02:17.360 --> 00:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty one as Daryl Cooper for just as long, a

38
00:02:21.159 --> 00:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>space that we might presumptuously call the Dan Carlin school

39
00:02:24.800 --> 00:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of podcasting. You know, the long form episodes lasting from

40
00:02:28.360 --> 00:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from two to six hours. In case people forgot,

41
00:02:33.000 --> 00:02:37.319
<v Speaker 1>I even have collaborated with Darryl once in twenty twenty,

42
00:02:37.400 --> 00:02:39.319
<v Speaker 1>and he and I had developed something of a friendly

43
00:02:39.360 --> 00:02:46.319
<v Speaker 1>relationship and occasionally but playfully antagonistic banter online. This friendly

44
00:02:46.360 --> 00:02:49.599
<v Speaker 1>relationship was actually solidified when he offered to fly me

45
00:02:49.719 --> 00:02:53.599
<v Speaker 1>back across the country to my hometown of Minneapolis in

46
00:02:53.639 --> 00:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the wake of George Floyd's death to be with my

47
00:02:56.199 --> 00:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>mother while what they were calling neighborhood incursions were taking

48
00:03:00.439 --> 00:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>place in my childhood homes immediate vicinity. For context, in

49
00:03:04.159 --> 00:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>case some of you haven't heard me talk about this elsewhere,

50
00:03:07.319 --> 00:03:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I actually grew up five blocks from where George Floyd

51
00:03:10.360 --> 00:03:12.199
<v Speaker 1>was killed. I know exactly where it is.

52
00:03:13.599 --> 00:03:13.759
<v Speaker 2>Now.

53
00:03:13.759 --> 00:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, by then, when Daryl made this offer to me

54
00:03:18.080 --> 00:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to fly me out, I knew he and his work

55
00:03:21.400 --> 00:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>were controversial. I had recommended it, but I knew that

56
00:03:24.039 --> 00:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>he was considered controversial. But as best I could and

57
00:03:29.080 --> 00:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>can tell, does that not matter less than someone who

58
00:03:33.000 --> 00:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>would offer a kindness like he did that he had

59
00:03:36.599 --> 00:03:42.319
<v Speaker 1>no obligation to offer. Now, thanks to this experience, I

60
00:03:42.439 --> 00:03:45.919
<v Speaker 1>find myself as a historical podcaster with at least some

61
00:03:46.159 --> 00:03:50.599
<v Speaker 1>audience crossover with Cooper's in a bit of a strange space,

62
00:03:52.199 --> 00:03:57.479
<v Speaker 1>namely after Tucker Carlson's now infamous interview with Cooper has

63
00:03:57.479 --> 00:04:02.759
<v Speaker 1>been given time to gestate and be reacted again. I

64
00:04:02.840 --> 00:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>had known that Daryl was going to discuss World War

65
00:04:06.719 --> 00:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Two from the German perspective for some time at that

66
00:04:09.919 --> 00:04:12.879
<v Speaker 1>point when that interview went up, and while I thought

67
00:04:12.919 --> 00:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a potentially interesting and illuminating angle on which

68
00:04:16.079 --> 00:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to tackle our world's most infamous conflict, one that I'm

69
00:04:19.199 --> 00:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>covering myself at least the corners of it, I immediately knew

70
00:04:23.160 --> 00:04:27.759
<v Speaker 1>this would not go over smoothly whenever it happened. Fast

71
00:04:27.759 --> 00:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>forward to September two, twenty twenty four. It did, indeed happen,

72
00:04:32.040 --> 00:04:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and not in a way that I believe Daryl necessarily

73
00:04:35.680 --> 00:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted or was fully prepared for, at least in the

74
00:04:41.079 --> 00:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Free Press on September fifth, only three days later, Barry

75
00:04:45.800 --> 00:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Weiss referred to Cooper as a quote unquote pseudohistorian with

76
00:04:49.519 --> 00:04:52.759
<v Speaker 1>quote a disgust toward Judaism that has inspired him to

77
00:04:52.800 --> 00:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>turn Hitler into a misunderstood figure unquote. On the same

78
00:04:57.759 --> 00:05:01.639
<v Speaker 1>day and in the same publication, so Rabbamari wrote that

79
00:05:01.759 --> 00:05:04.519
<v Speaker 1>Cooper was someone who had long since quote made known

80
00:05:04.560 --> 00:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>his nutty views about the Jews, as well as his

81
00:05:07.360 --> 00:05:10.519
<v Speaker 1>sympathy for the Third Reich unquote, and linked him to

82
00:05:10.680 --> 00:05:14.759
<v Speaker 1>what he called the barbarian rite catch you name, regardless

83
00:05:14.759 --> 00:05:18.199
<v Speaker 1>of what you think, which enjoys membership of figures and

84
00:05:18.240 --> 00:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>groups as diverse and unlikable as Nick fuentes Is, Grouper's

85
00:05:21.879 --> 00:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>movement and Ray science peddlers like Steve Sailor. Similarly, and

86
00:05:27.360 --> 00:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>perhaps most harshly, historian Neil Ferguson called Cooper quote a

87
00:05:31.720 --> 00:05:35.879
<v Speaker 1>nasty little Nazi apologist unquote that engages in quote unquote

88
00:05:35.920 --> 00:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>anti history. Joshua Trevigno, writing in Armas, didn't even directly

89
00:05:42.839 --> 00:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>reference Cooper or Carlson, but said very plainly that he

90
00:05:46.800 --> 00:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>believed we were living through end quote abrupt resurgence of

91
00:05:50.720 --> 00:05:54.879
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitism unquote, relating to quote the generation that experienced

92
00:05:54.879 --> 00:06:00.639
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitism's most horrific episode in the Holocaust being mostly gone.

93
00:06:02.000 --> 00:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Constantine Kissin wrote on his substack that this whole affair

94
00:06:05.319 --> 00:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>confirmed his thesis on a new quote unquote woke right,

95
00:06:08.879 --> 00:06:12.519
<v Speaker 1>while referring to Cooper's interview as quote so historically illiterate

96
00:06:12.600 --> 00:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that every major claim he made was debunked on ex

97
00:06:15.079 --> 00:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>itself within hours, with community notes and in articles published

98
00:06:18.920 --> 00:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>by prominent historians. Some criticisms were less sweeping, but no

99
00:06:24.839 --> 00:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>less seemingly damning, including Winston Churchill scholar Andreas Correas tweeting

100
00:06:29.079 --> 00:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that quote Cooper knows nothing about Winston Churchill unquote, followed

101
00:06:32.800 --> 00:06:36.079
<v Speaker 1>by several points of refutation against some of Cooper's subsequent claims.

102
00:06:38.120 --> 00:06:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Even the White House chimed in, calling the interview quote

103
00:06:41.399 --> 00:06:46.439
<v Speaker 1>unquote Nazi propaganda that was quote disgusting and a sadistic insult.

104
00:06:47.160 --> 00:06:47.439
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

105
00:06:50.519 --> 00:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So with all that context in mind, it has become

106
00:06:53.680 --> 00:06:57.959
<v Speaker 1>quite obvious that Darrell's claims are full of interpretations that

107
00:06:58.480 --> 00:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>many reputable historians of the Second World War, Winston Churchill

108
00:07:02.240 --> 00:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Third Reich and the Holocaust would consider inaccurate,

109
00:07:06.160 --> 00:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and that his use of sources is questionable at best. Now,

110
00:07:13.279 --> 00:07:16.439
<v Speaker 1>I still consider Daryl a friend, and I do not

111
00:07:16.560 --> 00:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>believe that he is some rank bigot like some of

112
00:07:19.279 --> 00:07:22.959
<v Speaker 1>his detractors have claimed. And I do not even believe

113
00:07:23.040 --> 00:07:25.959
<v Speaker 1>that we are living through some era of Hitler reappraisal

114
00:07:26.519 --> 00:07:29.399
<v Speaker 1>just because Darryl is being lumped in with the insanity,

115
00:07:29.720 --> 00:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the objective insanity that is Candice Owens's recent obsession with

116
00:07:34.160 --> 00:07:35.279
<v Speaker 1>the Francis.

117
00:07:35.000 --> 00:07:36.759
<v Speaker 2>Or whatever it is that she was talking about.

118
00:07:39.279 --> 00:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>However, I also believe that it is not unreasonable for

119
00:07:42.480 --> 00:07:45.279
<v Speaker 1>someone who does not know him, or especially is not

120
00:07:45.319 --> 00:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>familiar with his previous work, as many of his critics

121
00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>have stated about themselves admitted might be a better way

122
00:07:51.199 --> 00:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of putting it, it's not unreasonable for people like that

123
00:07:54.000 --> 00:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to feel differently. And this was thanks to how he

124
00:07:56.759 --> 00:08:00.399
<v Speaker 1>presented his claims both on Tucker Carlson's show and in

125
00:08:00.439 --> 00:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>his immediate response following. He has since added more clarity

126
00:08:05.040 --> 00:08:07.319
<v Speaker 1>to his approach on the Martyr Made substack, which is

127
00:08:07.319 --> 00:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>worth reading for a fuller picture. However, his initial claims

128
00:08:12.360 --> 00:08:15.079
<v Speaker 1>are always going to be his first impression on this

129
00:08:15.199 --> 00:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>particular topic, and thus they require challenging, especially on their

130
00:08:20.199 --> 00:08:25.519
<v Speaker 1>merits and more importantly, on their sourcing. This will help

131
00:08:25.560 --> 00:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>provide the necessary context or grain of salt, however you

132
00:08:28.639 --> 00:08:31.279
<v Speaker 1>want to look at it for when he actually finishes

133
00:08:31.399 --> 00:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and releases the work that he has now officially announced.

134
00:08:37.120 --> 00:08:37.600
<v Speaker 2>To begin.

135
00:08:38.279 --> 00:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>While the interpretations of Winston Churchill's quality as a leader

136
00:08:41.960 --> 00:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>are certainly up for debate, some of Cooper's significant contentions

137
00:08:46.039 --> 00:08:48.799
<v Speaker 1>that arose in his follow up thread to the interview

138
00:08:48.879 --> 00:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>on X have been directly refuted by scholars of the

139
00:08:52.120 --> 00:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Old Lion and the Second World War. One relatively minor

140
00:08:57.279 --> 00:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>example was Cooper's claim that Churchill quote unquote in insisted

141
00:09:01.000 --> 00:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>on the use of mustard gas on the quote unquote

142
00:09:03.200 --> 00:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>uncivilized tribes of Iraq, which in nineteen nineteen to nineteen

143
00:09:06.519 --> 00:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty the British Empire was at work pacifying. The problem

144
00:09:12.200 --> 00:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is that this quote is inaccurate. Now, Churchill did indeed

145
00:09:16.519 --> 00:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>refer to Iraqi tribes as uncivilized and in need of gasing,

146
00:09:20.960 --> 00:09:24.519
<v Speaker 1>but in the departmental minutes presented by the International Churchill

147
00:09:24.519 --> 00:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Society revealed that Churchill advocated for the use of lacrymatory.

148
00:09:28.960 --> 00:09:31.519
<v Speaker 2>Gas, that is, tear gas, and.

149
00:09:31.480 --> 00:09:34.639
<v Speaker 1>That quote it is not necessary to use only the

150
00:09:34.639 --> 00:09:40.519
<v Speaker 1>most deadly gases un quote. This is a fundamental error

151
00:09:40.519 --> 00:09:44.159
<v Speaker 1>of context that while small harms the overall picture attempting

152
00:09:44.200 --> 00:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to be painted of Churchill as someone possessed with bloodthirstiness,

153
00:09:48.600 --> 00:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>are there not better examples? Well, Cooper seems to believe so,

154
00:09:53.679 --> 00:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and yet those examples have their own issues in explaining

155
00:09:59.519 --> 00:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>how wretched conditions became in Germany during and especially after

156
00:10:03.279 --> 00:10:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the First World War, which did indeed contribute to the

157
00:10:05.879 --> 00:10:09.559
<v Speaker 1>conditions that would allow for such a reactionary populist movement

158
00:10:09.600 --> 00:10:14.039
<v Speaker 1>as national socialism to gain ground. Cooper also claimed that

159
00:10:14.080 --> 00:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this was due to a long, unprecedented tactic of starving

160
00:10:17.879 --> 00:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>out Germany's civilians with naval blockades. Now, he is right

161
00:10:22.879 --> 00:10:25.879
<v Speaker 1>to point out that quote unquote, up to seven hundred

162
00:10:25.919 --> 00:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and fifty thousand Germans would starve to death, and scholars

163
00:10:29.360 --> 00:10:33.399
<v Speaker 1>agree typically that the number is likely lower, but Daryl's

164
00:10:33.440 --> 00:10:38.519
<v Speaker 1>phrasing is appropriately careful here. But it's basically reasonable to

165
00:10:38.559 --> 00:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>say that hundreds of thousands of Germans starved to death

166
00:10:41.879 --> 00:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>thanks to blockade. However, Cooper's framing is wrong with his

167
00:10:47.480 --> 00:10:50.919
<v Speaker 1>use of Churchill's explanation that quote the blockade treated the

168
00:10:50.919 --> 00:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>whole of Germany as if it were a beleaguered fortress

169
00:10:53.679 --> 00:10:57.879
<v Speaker 1>and avowedly sought to starve the whole population unquote, serving

170
00:10:57.919 --> 00:11:00.639
<v Speaker 1>as evidence for the then First Lord of the Admiralty's

171
00:11:00.759 --> 00:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>unique cruelty. Cooper was not necessarily incorrect in pointing out

172
00:11:05.399 --> 00:11:09.799
<v Speaker 1>that this tactic was problematic at best, But the problem

173
00:11:09.879 --> 00:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is that this tactic was not unique Germany's own infamous

174
00:11:14.279 --> 00:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>U boat campaign, which frequently sank unaligned and civilian ships,

175
00:11:19.240 --> 00:11:22.519
<v Speaker 1>was in response to the blockade, but its goal was

176
00:11:22.600 --> 00:11:26.039
<v Speaker 1>also to starve out the British before the blockade devastated

177
00:11:26.080 --> 00:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Germany the way it ultimately did. Therefore, the only thing

178
00:11:30.519 --> 00:11:32.799
<v Speaker 1>that makes Britain appear more like a villain in this

179
00:11:32.919 --> 00:11:35.879
<v Speaker 1>case is the fact that they won World War One

180
00:11:36.519 --> 00:11:42.399
<v Speaker 1>and Germany lost. In other words, had Germany won, there

181
00:11:42.399 --> 00:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>would be people doing revisionism, likely making the opposite claim,

182
00:11:46.639 --> 00:11:50.919
<v Speaker 1>which ultimately reveals equally little about moral complicity, except that

183
00:11:51.000 --> 00:11:56.399
<v Speaker 1>everyone involved in warfare is complicit in their intentions. Now

184
00:11:56.519 --> 00:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>likely anticipating this, Cooper dismissed the argument that quote unquote

185
00:11:59.559 --> 00:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>wars he had in order to make his broader point

186
00:12:02.480 --> 00:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that Churchill and the British were uniquely nefarious in this regard,

187
00:12:06.840 --> 00:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>by claiming that quote for two and a half centuries,

188
00:12:09.879 --> 00:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Europeans had refrained from tactics like mass starvation and other

189
00:12:13.559 --> 00:12:16.279
<v Speaker 1>means of targeting civilian populations when they fought each other.

190
00:12:18.600 --> 00:12:21.519
<v Speaker 1>This is likely in reference to the modernizing efforts taken

191
00:12:21.600 --> 00:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>up by the Prussian military in the mid seventeenth century,

192
00:12:25.440 --> 00:12:29.159
<v Speaker 1>in which Elector Frederick William of Brandenburg deemphasized the use

193
00:12:29.200 --> 00:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of mercenary soldiers and tried to professionalize the military. According

194
00:12:34.360 --> 00:12:39.399
<v Speaker 1>to historian HW Coch, quote one innovation finding general approval

195
00:12:39.480 --> 00:12:42.559
<v Speaker 1>was the introduction of severe discipline in the army, in

196
00:12:42.600 --> 00:12:45.799
<v Speaker 1>which quote any act of plundering would be punished by hanging,

197
00:12:46.840 --> 00:12:50.039
<v Speaker 1>and quote any officer who physically attacked a civilian will

198
00:12:50.080 --> 00:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>be stripped of his rank for a year and have

199
00:12:52.240 --> 00:12:57.879
<v Speaker 1>to carry the musket as a common soldier. This frames

200
00:12:57.919 --> 00:13:02.039
<v Speaker 1>the Prussian military and thus early modern European military standards

201
00:13:02.559 --> 00:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>as being both noble and disciplined, too morally upstanding to

202
00:13:06.240 --> 00:13:08.879
<v Speaker 1>engage in anything resembling a war crime, or, more to

203
00:13:08.919 --> 00:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the point, a hunger blockade. Now noble as this was.

204
00:13:14.399 --> 00:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Naval blockades occurred in Europe well after this time, the

205
00:13:18.159 --> 00:13:20.879
<v Speaker 1>one I just spoke of, and well before the British

206
00:13:20.919 --> 00:13:23.279
<v Speaker 1>blockade of Germany during World War One, to say nothing

207
00:13:23.279 --> 00:13:28.879
<v Speaker 1>of Germany's aforementioned unrestricted U boat warfare. Napoleon engaged in

208
00:13:28.919 --> 00:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>wartime blockades of Britain known as the Continental System, in

209
00:13:32.600 --> 00:13:36.519
<v Speaker 1>which English industries were harmed in the process. While one

210
00:13:36.519 --> 00:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>can quibble with the intent behind such blockades, being different,

211
00:13:40.120 --> 00:13:42.759
<v Speaker 1>It's simply not accurate to claim that these blockades were

212
00:13:42.799 --> 00:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>not designed to put pressure on warring nations civilian populations,

213
00:13:46.440 --> 00:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>whether through starvation or unemployment. In addition, during the Franco

214
00:13:51.399 --> 00:13:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Prussian War of eighteen seventy, the siege of Paris by

215
00:13:54.639 --> 00:13:58.039
<v Speaker 1>Prussian forces was in essence a blockade against the city,

216
00:13:58.159 --> 00:14:02.039
<v Speaker 1>resulting in a massive death to ward of civilians. According

217
00:14:02.039 --> 00:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to historian Jeffrey warrou quote, in three weeks of firing,

218
00:14:06.080 --> 00:14:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the German gunners that hit hospitals, schools, churches, prisons and

219
00:14:09.919 --> 00:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>apartment houses, but were still far behind the death toll

220
00:14:13.039 --> 00:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>wrought by cold and hunger, which were killing three thousand

221
00:14:16.240 --> 00:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to four thousand Parisians every week in January. The blockade

222
00:14:23.440 --> 00:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>against Germany by Great Britain in the First World War

223
00:14:26.320 --> 00:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>was no doubt significant in its effects and arguably cruelty.

224
00:14:29.519 --> 00:14:32.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that that can necessarily be disputed, at

225
00:14:32.120 --> 00:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>least not that much. But it was by no means

226
00:14:34.519 --> 00:14:39.879
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented in European history. In fact, to my eyes, it

227
00:14:39.960 --> 00:14:45.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of seems like the norm the framing cooper engaged

228
00:14:45.440 --> 00:14:48.879
<v Speaker 1>in also neglected to reckon with the German airship bombing

229
00:14:48.919 --> 00:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>campaigns of the First World War against England, specifically, which

230
00:14:52.639 --> 00:14:56.159
<v Speaker 1>began before the British blockade of Germany and Austria Hungary

231
00:14:56.200 --> 00:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>started this framing involving Germany's late war misery. We also

232
00:15:00.519 --> 00:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>neglected one of the largest blind spots in the history

233
00:15:03.440 --> 00:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of the First World War and its effects. And I

234
00:15:05.600 --> 00:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily blame Darryl for missing this because a lot

235
00:15:08.360 --> 00:15:10.559
<v Speaker 1>of people have missed it, and it gives me a

236
00:15:10.639 --> 00:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>chance to sort of gloat a little about my own

237
00:15:13.240 --> 00:15:16.159
<v Speaker 1>work that I've done on this very subject, which was

238
00:15:16.240 --> 00:15:19.759
<v Speaker 1>ultimately the devastation wrought by the so called Spanish Flu.

239
00:15:21.000 --> 00:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>If a recall, the Spanish Flu ultimately killed German soldiers

240
00:15:24.840 --> 00:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>at far higher rates than British or French troops. It

241
00:15:28.279 --> 00:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>arguably cost them the war and its effects in Germany

242
00:15:32.200 --> 00:15:36.039
<v Speaker 1>at home even correlated with later support for the National Socialists,

243
00:15:36.360 --> 00:15:38.879
<v Speaker 1>as shown by the scholar Andrew Price Smith in his

244
00:15:39.039 --> 00:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>excellent book Contation and Chaos. These areas of neglect and

245
00:15:44.360 --> 00:15:48.519
<v Speaker 1>others just sort of demonstrate a deeper issue with Cooper's

246
00:15:48.519 --> 00:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>initial framing, a skewed perception of historical agency in favor

247
00:15:55.000 --> 00:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of motivated reasoning, in which Churchill the chief villain of

248
00:15:58.480 --> 00:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>his framing was given full agency, and later on Adolf Hitler,

249
00:16:02.840 --> 00:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>his nemesis, was given none. We can see this with

250
00:16:07.440 --> 00:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>how Cooper explained the relationship between Churchill and Hitler as

251
00:16:10.279 --> 00:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>late as nineteen thirty seven, which he characterized as quote

252
00:16:14.159 --> 00:16:17.879
<v Speaker 1>unquote not hostile because Churchill said, of the dictator quote

253
00:16:18.279 --> 00:16:20.759
<v Speaker 1>those who have met Hitler face to face have found

254
00:16:20.759 --> 00:16:25.559
<v Speaker 1>a highly competent, cool, well informed functionary with an agreeable manner,

255
00:16:25.840 --> 00:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a disarming smile, and few have been unaffected by a

256
00:16:29.360 --> 00:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>subtle personal magnetism. Now this is actually a selective quotation,

257
00:16:36.279 --> 00:16:39.799
<v Speaker 1>and one likely derived from the paleoconservative writer Pat Buchanan

258
00:16:40.200 --> 00:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>in his own two thousand and eight revisionist book Churchill,

259
00:16:43.000 --> 00:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Hitler and the quote unquote Unnecessary War, How Britain lost

260
00:16:46.480 --> 00:16:48.799
<v Speaker 1>its empire in the West lost the World, which Cooper

261
00:16:48.840 --> 00:16:52.559
<v Speaker 1>has since happily admitted is one of his sources. It's

262
00:16:52.600 --> 00:16:56.879
<v Speaker 1>also worth pointing out that Darryl has since done some

263
00:16:57.000 --> 00:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>deeper digging into his sources and has admitted that this

264
00:17:01.120 --> 00:17:04.279
<v Speaker 1>quote was not put in the proper context when he

265
00:17:04.319 --> 00:17:07.799
<v Speaker 1>found it and used it, so credit where credits due,

266
00:17:07.839 --> 00:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, but the full context of this quote in

267
00:17:11.559 --> 00:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Buchanan's book was missing from his account, in which Churchill

268
00:17:14.920 --> 00:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>was expressing, as Scott Manning puts it, quote awe and

269
00:17:17.720 --> 00:17:22.839
<v Speaker 1>caution unquote, not reverence or respect. Bu canon claim that

270
00:17:22.920 --> 00:17:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Churchill ended his analysis of the Fure on a quote

271
00:17:25.319 --> 00:17:28.279
<v Speaker 1>unquote hopeful note when nothing could be further from the truth.

272
00:17:29.599 --> 00:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Churchill ended his essay with a note of caution, if

273
00:17:32.720 --> 00:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>not outright fear, for what Hitler's Germany was coming to

274
00:17:36.519 --> 00:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>mean for Europe. As Churchill wrote, quote, the great wheels

275
00:17:41.480 --> 00:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>revolve the rifles, the canon, the tanks, the shot and shells,

276
00:17:45.359 --> 00:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the air bombs, the poison gas cylinders, the aeroplanes, the submarines,

277
00:17:50.119 --> 00:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and now the beginnings of a fleet flow in ever

278
00:17:52.480 --> 00:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>broadening streams from the already largely war mobilized arsenals and

279
00:17:56.200 --> 00:18:03.079
<v Speaker 1>factories of Germany. Quote now, was this not hostile? Well,

280
00:18:03.119 --> 00:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps not, but it was certainly not friendly. And letting

281
00:18:07.039 --> 00:18:13.319
<v Speaker 1>not hostile do the heavy lifting certainly implies such now.

282
00:18:13.359 --> 00:18:16.759
<v Speaker 1>This led to Cooper's implication that Churchill's anti Semitism was

283
00:18:16.839 --> 00:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>little different than Hitler's, which he accomplishes by claiming that, quote,

284
00:18:20.720 --> 00:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>like Hitler, Churchill blamed Jews for communism. While it certainly

285
00:18:26.240 --> 00:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is true that Churchill trafficked in what we would today

286
00:18:29.039 --> 00:18:32.279
<v Speaker 1>consider anti semitism once writing that quote, they have been

287
00:18:32.279 --> 00:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>partly responsible for the antagonism from which they suffer unquote,

288
00:18:37.000 --> 00:18:39.599
<v Speaker 1>this made him a little different than many world leaders

289
00:18:39.640 --> 00:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>at the time, especially in the West. As you guys

290
00:18:42.759 --> 00:18:45.279
<v Speaker 1>might remember, I've made the case that Franklin Roosevelt was

291
00:18:45.279 --> 00:18:49.839
<v Speaker 1>a little different. However, as Churchill scholar Andreas Careis explains,

292
00:18:50.319 --> 00:18:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Churchill's contention quote was that though many many Bolsheviks were Jews,

293
00:18:54.759 --> 00:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>few Jews were Bolsheviks unquote. Though certainly politically incorrect to

294
00:19:00.160 --> 00:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>such sweeping statements today, Churchill also stated that quote, some

295
00:19:04.200 --> 00:19:06.599
<v Speaker 1>people like Jews and some do not, but a not

296
00:19:06.720 --> 00:19:09.279
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are, beyond

297
00:19:09.359 --> 00:19:12.599
<v Speaker 1>all question, the most formidable and most remarkable race that

298
00:19:12.680 --> 00:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>has ever appeared in the world. Frankly, this sounds remarkably

299
00:19:19.400 --> 00:19:22.799
<v Speaker 1>unlike Hitler's quote from around that same time, where he

300
00:19:22.839 --> 00:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>called Jews a quote race tuberculosis of the people's quote.

301
00:19:29.480 --> 00:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Churchill's feelings on the Jews visa VI. Hitler's treatment of

302
00:19:32.160 --> 00:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>them also contradicts any idea or even implication that Hitler

303
00:19:37.200 --> 00:19:41.279
<v Speaker 1>did not have any problems with him or England with

304
00:19:41.359 --> 00:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>how he reacted to what ultimately was a snub from

305
00:19:45.519 --> 00:19:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Churchill over the so called Jewish question. In August of

306
00:19:49.599 --> 00:19:52.559
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty two, he ran into Hitler's press secretary Ernst

307
00:19:52.599 --> 00:19:56.039
<v Speaker 1>Putzi Hunpstengel, who asked if Churchill would meet with Hitler.

308
00:19:56.839 --> 00:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>In response, Churchill stated, quote, why is her chief so

309
00:20:00.559 --> 00:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>violent about the Jews? I can quite understand being angry

310
00:20:03.720 --> 00:20:05.839
<v Speaker 1>with Jews who have done wrong or who are against

311
00:20:05.880 --> 00:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the country, and I understand resisting them if they try

312
00:20:08.400 --> 00:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to monopolize power in any walk of life. But what

313
00:20:11.559 --> 00:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>is the sense of being against a man simply because

314
00:20:13.680 --> 00:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of his birth quote? In response to Churchill's challenge, Hitler

315
00:20:18.680 --> 00:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>refused to meet with him that day, and Churchill later

316
00:20:21.920 --> 00:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>stated that quote Hitler then lost his only chance of

317
00:20:24.960 --> 00:20:28.079
<v Speaker 1>meeting with me later on, when he was all powerful.

318
00:20:28.359 --> 00:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>I was to receive several invitations from him, but by

319
00:20:31.160 --> 00:20:36.319
<v Speaker 1>that time a lot had happened, and I excused myself. Now,

320
00:20:36.400 --> 00:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Cooper's implication of Winston Churchill as an anti Semite of

321
00:20:39.000 --> 00:20:43.279
<v Speaker 1>similar caliber as Hitler was self evidently problematic. Thanks to hindsight,

322
00:20:43.720 --> 00:20:47.839
<v Speaker 1>but it is also demonstrable of selective application of historical agency.

323
00:20:47.920 --> 00:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>To bring that up again, the problem is that this

324
00:20:51.759 --> 00:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be applying agency based on, like I was saying,

325
00:20:54.680 --> 00:20:58.319
<v Speaker 1>motivated reasoning, rather than a more coherent view of human

326
00:20:58.319 --> 00:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>motivation and interaction. Churchill and Hitler made their own choices,

327
00:21:03.000 --> 00:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>both in response to one another and independent of one another.

328
00:21:06.559 --> 00:21:10.079
<v Speaker 1>It is a deterministic fallacy to believe, as Cooper seemed

329
00:21:10.119 --> 00:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>to be doing in his assessment, that Hitler was pushed

330
00:21:13.119 --> 00:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>into the choices that he made by the choices that

331
00:21:15.799 --> 00:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Churchill made. That is, that Churchill possessed all the agency

332
00:21:19.359 --> 00:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in the world and that Hitler possessed none, or at

333
00:21:22.079 --> 00:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>least significantly less. This framing can be seen from Cooper's

334
00:21:27.119 --> 00:21:30.559
<v Speaker 1>original claim in the Carlson interview that quote Churchill wanted

335
00:21:30.559 --> 00:21:33.599
<v Speaker 1>a war, he wanted to fight Germany unquote, while claiming

336
00:21:33.640 --> 00:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in his follow up thread that quote Hitler said.

337
00:21:36.039 --> 00:21:37.599
<v Speaker 2>He did not want war unquote.

338
00:21:38.839 --> 00:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Now, taking the notoriously dishonest Hitler at his word, especially

339
00:21:42.160 --> 00:21:44.799
<v Speaker 1>with the benefit of hindsight, is a curious choice. But again,

340
00:21:46.079 --> 00:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the real point is that it suggests motivated reasoning at

341
00:21:48.720 --> 00:21:54.319
<v Speaker 1>work rather than an examination of the evidence from the history,

342
00:21:54.799 --> 00:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it's quite clear that Hitler wanted war, but just not

343
00:21:59.079 --> 00:22:03.400
<v Speaker 1>with Britain, at least not right away. Churchill also likely

344
00:22:03.400 --> 00:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted war, but as we have seen, it was thanks

345
00:22:06.160 --> 00:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to a growing distrust of the then obviously dishonest dictator's

346
00:22:09.279 --> 00:22:14.559
<v Speaker 1>motives and openly admitted desire for more Laban's realm. What

347
00:22:14.680 --> 00:22:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Churchill understood then, just as many of us more clearly

348
00:22:18.359 --> 00:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>understand now, is that a push for territorial acquisition is

349
00:22:22.799 --> 00:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>never going to be peaceful, not really, especially when it

350
00:22:27.400 --> 00:22:31.559
<v Speaker 1>involves people that you frequently and loudly designated as undesirable

351
00:22:31.559 --> 00:22:33.759
<v Speaker 1>at best and subhuman at worst.

352
00:22:34.720 --> 00:22:35.680
<v Speaker 2>One might point to the.

353
00:22:35.640 --> 00:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Fact that the head Nazi racial theorist Alfred Rosenberg didn't

354
00:22:39.359 --> 00:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>speak very ill of the Slavic peoples to the east,

355
00:22:42.720 --> 00:22:46.559
<v Speaker 1>but he was constantly made fun of and criticized for

356
00:22:46.680 --> 00:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that view by who else, Adolf Hitler. Now, you could

357
00:22:50.680 --> 00:22:54.039
<v Speaker 1>be your average aristocratic anti Semite like Churchill supposedly was,

358
00:22:54.559 --> 00:22:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and still understand the potential for monstrous consequences at appeasing

359
00:22:58.200 --> 00:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>such a regime's actions. However, according to Cooper, the British

360
00:23:03.519 --> 00:23:06.279
<v Speaker 1>essentially involving themselves in the affairs of Poland after it

361
00:23:06.319 --> 00:23:10.079
<v Speaker 1>was invaded and ripped apart by Europe's reigning totalitarian forces

362
00:23:10.119 --> 00:23:13.759
<v Speaker 1>that is Nazism and Stalinism. That was their biggest crime.

363
00:23:15.039 --> 00:23:18.799
<v Speaker 1>This is because by the British guaranteeing war that is

364
00:23:18.880 --> 00:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>World War this was really what placed the crosshairs on

365
00:23:23.240 --> 00:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the backs of Jews and millions of other civilians in

366
00:23:25.720 --> 00:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern territories. It does not take the responsibility off

367
00:23:31.200 --> 00:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of Hitler for doing so, and Cooper does not make

368
00:23:33.240 --> 00:23:36.319
<v Speaker 1>that argument. He actually makes it very clear was Hitler's responsibility,

369
00:23:36.880 --> 00:23:40.279
<v Speaker 1>But he still makes a causal claim, a deterministic claim

370
00:23:40.400 --> 00:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that had it not been for the behavior of Winston Churchill,

371
00:23:44.839 --> 00:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>none of that would have happened. By linking Britain's involvement

372
00:23:48.960 --> 00:23:52.279
<v Speaker 1>in churchills supposed bloodthirstiness to how the Second World War

373
00:23:52.319 --> 00:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>and thus the Holocaust turned out in the East, Cooper

374
00:23:56.200 --> 00:23:59.279
<v Speaker 1>revealed not just another in my opinion, major blind spot

375
00:23:59.319 --> 00:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the conflict, but also let himself

376
00:24:02.519 --> 00:24:05.279
<v Speaker 1>get sucked into the most controversial part of his analysis.

377
00:24:08.160 --> 00:24:13.279
<v Speaker 1>In the interview with Carlson, Cooper claimed the following, you.

378
00:24:13.200 --> 00:24:18.759
<v Speaker 3>Know Germany, look, they put themselves into a position, and

379
00:24:18.759 --> 00:24:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Adolf Hitler is chiefly responsible for this, but his old

380
00:24:21.279 --> 00:24:23.839
<v Speaker 3>regime is responsible for it that when they went into

381
00:24:23.839 --> 00:24:28.559
<v Speaker 3>the East in nineteen forty one, they launched a war

382
00:24:28.880 --> 00:24:33.599
<v Speaker 3>where they were completely unprepared to deal with the millions

383
00:24:33.599 --> 00:24:38.920
<v Speaker 3>and millions of prisoners of war, of local political prisoners

384
00:24:38.960 --> 00:24:40.960
<v Speaker 3>and so forth that they were going to have to handle.

385
00:24:41.000 --> 00:24:43.519
<v Speaker 3>They went in with no plan for that, and they

386
00:24:43.599 --> 00:24:46.640
<v Speaker 3>just threw these people into camps and millions of people

387
00:24:46.759 --> 00:24:47.519
<v Speaker 3>ended up dead there.

388
00:24:47.559 --> 00:24:47.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, you.

389
00:24:49.319 --> 00:24:53.279
<v Speaker 3>Have like letters as early as July August nineteen forty

390
00:24:53.319 --> 00:24:57.119
<v Speaker 3>one from commandants of these makeshift camps that they're setting

391
00:24:57.200 --> 00:24:59.279
<v Speaker 3>up for these millions of people who were surrendering or

392
00:24:59.279 --> 00:25:02.359
<v Speaker 3>people that round it up and there, so it's two

393
00:25:02.519 --> 00:25:05.759
<v Speaker 3>months after month or two after Barbara Rooscha was launched,

394
00:25:06.240 --> 00:25:08.960
<v Speaker 3>and they're writing back to the high command in Berlin saying,

395
00:25:09.559 --> 00:25:12.920
<v Speaker 3>we can't feed these people. We don't have the food

396
00:25:12.960 --> 00:25:15.279
<v Speaker 3>to feed these people. And one of them actually says,

397
00:25:16.160 --> 00:25:19.000
<v Speaker 3>rather than wait for them all to slowly starve this winter,

398
00:25:19.079 --> 00:25:21.640
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't it be more humane to just finish them off

399
00:25:21.720 --> 00:25:24.920
<v Speaker 3>quickly now? And so this is like two months into

400
00:25:24.960 --> 00:25:29.319
<v Speaker 3>the invasion, right, and like my view, on this. You know,

401
00:25:29.400 --> 00:25:33.279
<v Speaker 3>I argue with my Zionist interlocutors about this all the

402
00:25:33.279 --> 00:25:36.839
<v Speaker 3>time with regard to the current war in Gaza. Book man, like,

403
00:25:37.880 --> 00:25:40.319
<v Speaker 3>maybe you, as the you know, the Germans, you felt

404
00:25:40.319 --> 00:25:42.960
<v Speaker 3>like you had to invade to the east. Maybe you

405
00:25:42.960 --> 00:25:45.519
<v Speaker 3>thought that Stalin was such a threat, or that if

406
00:25:45.559 --> 00:25:48.759
<v Speaker 3>he wants a surprise attack and sees the oil fields

407
00:25:48.759 --> 00:25:51.240
<v Speaker 3>in Romania, that you would now not have the fuel

408
00:25:51.279 --> 00:25:53.440
<v Speaker 3>to actually respond and you'd be crippled and all of

409
00:25:53.480 --> 00:25:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Europe would be under threat, and whatever it was, whatever

410
00:25:56.440 --> 00:25:58.480
<v Speaker 3>it was that like, maybe you thought you had to

411
00:25:58.480 --> 00:26:00.519
<v Speaker 3>do that. But at the end the end of the day,

412
00:26:00.519 --> 00:26:03.759
<v Speaker 3>you launched that war with no plan to care for

413
00:26:03.839 --> 00:26:06.359
<v Speaker 3>the millions and millions of civilians and prisoners of war

414
00:26:06.400 --> 00:26:08.720
<v Speaker 3>that were going to come under your control, and millions

415
00:26:08.720 --> 00:26:10.119
<v Speaker 3>of people died because of that.

416
00:26:10.920 --> 00:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>The characterization there was, to put it, mildly striking, and

417
00:26:16.079 --> 00:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it was understandable that, along with the comments that Cooper

418
00:26:19.799 --> 00:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>made about Churchill, that many observers were so offended by

419
00:26:24.240 --> 00:26:29.559
<v Speaker 1>this because it seemed to demonstrate a willingness to offer

420
00:26:29.599 --> 00:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the Nazis the benefit of the doubt, where it has

421
00:26:32.240 --> 00:26:34.599
<v Speaker 1>long been agreed that there is no evidence to support that.

422
00:26:37.000 --> 00:26:39.839
<v Speaker 1>The open ended phrasing also allowed people to easily use

423
00:26:39.880 --> 00:26:43.839
<v Speaker 1>their imaginations on what was being implied, since it sounded

424
00:26:43.960 --> 00:26:47.559
<v Speaker 1>very similar to things that had been stated by people

425
00:26:47.640 --> 00:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>like David Irving, the famous British historian of World War

426
00:26:50.480 --> 00:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Two who was eventually outed as an outright Holocaust denier. However,

427
00:26:57.039 --> 00:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>what Cooper was saying was spoken off the cuff, and

428
00:27:00.160 --> 00:27:02.920
<v Speaker 1>he elaborated a little further in its response over on X,

429
00:27:03.200 --> 00:27:07.839
<v Speaker 1>writing that quote. Would Germany have eventually attacked the Soviet Union, perhaps,

430
00:27:08.599 --> 00:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>but they would not have done so in June of

431
00:27:10.519 --> 00:27:12.839
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty one if England had agreed to end a

432
00:27:12.920 --> 00:27:15.559
<v Speaker 1>war which had no hope of victory, short of expanding

433
00:27:15.599 --> 00:27:18.559
<v Speaker 1>it into a much larger conflict by bringing in the USA,

434
00:27:18.759 --> 00:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>USSR or both. That's a little better in terms of clarification,

435
00:27:24.680 --> 00:27:27.799
<v Speaker 1>but the claim is still very broad, as it remains

436
00:27:27.839 --> 00:27:31.039
<v Speaker 1>in Cooper's much more fleshed out explanation on his sub stack.

437
00:27:31.799 --> 00:27:34.839
<v Speaker 1>He concludes his explanation there in a similar way, arguing

438
00:27:34.880 --> 00:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that quote. The second objection is that Hitler had always

439
00:27:38.279 --> 00:27:40.839
<v Speaker 1>had his eyes set on the East and would have

440
00:27:40.880 --> 00:27:44.519
<v Speaker 1>eventually invaded regardless of what the allies did, and that

441
00:27:44.599 --> 00:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>may be true. Jim Jones and the hostage taking father

442
00:27:48.119 --> 00:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>may have killed their families no matter how much they

443
00:27:50.759 --> 00:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>were appeased, but maybe not, and agree or disagree that

444
00:27:55.319 --> 00:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe is worthy of discussion. While Cooper is certainly entitled

445
00:28:01.400 --> 00:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to his own open mindedness on this question, specifically related

446
00:28:04.680 --> 00:28:07.039
<v Speaker 1>to Hitler's intentions, and I do respect him for that,

447
00:28:07.759 --> 00:28:11.759
<v Speaker 1>unless he's actively avoiding the vast majority of available evidence

448
00:28:11.759 --> 00:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that exists on this subject while doing the main research

449
00:28:14.480 --> 00:28:17.799
<v Speaker 1>for this series he's working on, he's not likely going

450
00:28:17.839 --> 00:28:20.759
<v Speaker 1>to come away with a much different conclusion than that

451
00:28:20.799 --> 00:28:23.519
<v Speaker 1>of the mainstream once he stacks up all of that

452
00:28:23.599 --> 00:28:30.039
<v Speaker 1>available evidence. This is because there is less evidence suggesting

453
00:28:30.480 --> 00:28:33.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe or maybe not about what Hitler planned for the

454
00:28:33.599 --> 00:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>East than there is the amount of evidence suggesting that

455
00:28:37.160 --> 00:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Hitler absolutely knew what.

456
00:28:39.160 --> 00:28:40.480
<v Speaker 2>He was going to do with the East.

457
00:28:41.799 --> 00:28:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Similarly, there is no evidence suggesting that there was no

458
00:28:44.920 --> 00:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>plan for what to do with the people who already

459
00:28:46.960 --> 00:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>live there.

460
00:28:49.160 --> 00:28:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Now.

461
00:28:49.480 --> 00:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>The context that Daryl provided in his follow up post

462
00:28:52.920 --> 00:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>was welcome, and his speaking off the cufftering the Tucker

463
00:28:55.680 --> 00:28:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Carlson interview is not going to be the best representation

464
00:28:58.839 --> 00:29:04.039
<v Speaker 1>of his interpretations. However, because that phrasing is what set

465
00:29:04.039 --> 00:29:07.359
<v Speaker 1>this controversy off to begin with, it really is worth

466
00:29:07.440 --> 00:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>unpacking with as much clarity as possible. To imply that

467
00:29:12.240 --> 00:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Nazi Germany's invasion of Poland and then later the Soviet

468
00:29:15.319 --> 00:29:18.559
<v Speaker 1>Union was carried out with no plan and done only

469
00:29:18.599 --> 00:29:23.559
<v Speaker 1>because of Britain's in transigence is simply untrue. Obviously, that

470
00:29:23.640 --> 00:29:29.079
<v Speaker 1>is an oversimplified presentation of what Daryl was saying, but

471
00:29:29.119 --> 00:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that is the essence of how most people interpreted it

472
00:29:31.680 --> 00:29:35.359
<v Speaker 1>because of how it was phrased. The thing that needs

473
00:29:35.359 --> 00:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to be understood and was not clearly understood based on

474
00:29:39.319 --> 00:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>how Daryl phrased everything when he was talking about this stuff,

475
00:29:42.559 --> 00:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is that the Nazis from Hitler on down always had

476
00:29:45.920 --> 00:29:49.519
<v Speaker 1>a plan, and one that was largely independent of anything

477
00:29:49.559 --> 00:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Great Britain set or did. That doesn't mean they weren't

478
00:29:52.920 --> 00:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>impacted by what Great Britain set or did, but their

479
00:29:55.920 --> 00:30:00.359
<v Speaker 1>plan was independent of that, and the problem for them

480
00:30:00.799 --> 00:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>was not that there was no plan, it was that

481
00:30:03.519 --> 00:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>their plan kept changing, thanks largely to circumstances created by

482
00:30:07.519 --> 00:30:12.599
<v Speaker 1>the choices made by the Nazi leadership. It is important

483
00:30:12.599 --> 00:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to reiterate here that These choices made by the Nazi

484
00:30:15.279 --> 00:30:19.559
<v Speaker 1>leadership were not merely made as reactions to other leaders choices,

485
00:30:19.640 --> 00:30:23.519
<v Speaker 1>as Cooper suggests with his claims about Winston Churchill like

486
00:30:23.559 --> 00:30:28.559
<v Speaker 1>I was saying, they made their own choices. The best

487
00:30:28.559 --> 00:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>example of this was something we talked about on History

488
00:30:32.960 --> 00:30:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Impossible in one of the episodes of the Balkan Inferno trilogy,

489
00:30:37.640 --> 00:30:41.599
<v Speaker 1>specifically about the decision by Hitler to send thousands of

490
00:30:41.640 --> 00:30:45.599
<v Speaker 1>troops and aircraft into Yugoslavia on April sixth, nineteen forty one,

491
00:30:46.039 --> 00:30:49.079
<v Speaker 1>and subsequently partitioning the kingdom and divving it up among

492
00:30:49.119 --> 00:30:53.759
<v Speaker 1>the Axis powers. Hitler was not compelled to issue Feodor

493
00:30:53.839 --> 00:30:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Directive number twenty five on March twenty seventh, nineteen forty

494
00:30:56.839 --> 00:31:01.079
<v Speaker 1>one by Winston Churchill's belligerence or desire to spill German blood.

495
00:31:01.960 --> 00:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it was because he was so enraged by

496
00:31:05.480 --> 00:31:08.759
<v Speaker 1>a poorly executed and badly planned coup de ta that

497
00:31:08.839 --> 00:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>had been launched by Yugoslav military leaders opposed to the

498
00:31:11.440 --> 00:31:15.519
<v Speaker 1>absolutist Serb monarchy that had been making promises to the Germans.

499
00:31:17.279 --> 00:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You might remember this quote from that episode where we

500
00:31:19.960 --> 00:31:23.119
<v Speaker 1>talked about that from William Shire's The Rise involved the

501
00:31:23.119 --> 00:31:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Third Reich, where he wrote of the Furi's reaction as

502
00:31:26.599 --> 00:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>follows quote. The coup in Belgrade threw Adolf Hitler into

503
00:31:31.440 --> 00:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the wildest rages of his entire life. He

504
00:31:34.480 --> 00:31:37.079
<v Speaker 1>took it as a personal affront, and in his fury

505
00:31:37.119 --> 00:31:40.599
<v Speaker 1>made sudden decisions which would prove utterly disastrous to the

506
00:31:40.599 --> 00:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>fortunes of the Third Reich. He hurriedly summoned his military

507
00:31:44.039 --> 00:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>chieftains to the Chancellery in Berlin on March twenty seventh,

508
00:31:47.440 --> 00:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and raged about the revenge he would take on the Yugoslavs.

509
00:31:51.400 --> 00:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>The Belgrade coup, he said, had endangered both the planned

510
00:31:54.240 --> 00:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>invasion of Greece and even more the planned invasion of

511
00:31:57.440 --> 00:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union. He was therefore determined, without waiting for

512
00:32:01.799 --> 00:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>possible declarations of loyalty of the new government, to destroy

513
00:32:05.480 --> 00:32:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Yugoslavia militarily as a nation. No diplomatic inquiries will be made,

514
00:32:10.160 --> 00:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>he ordered, and no ultimatums presented. Yugoslavia, he added, would

515
00:32:14.680 --> 00:32:22.519
<v Speaker 1>be crushed with unmerciful harshness unquote. It is important to

516
00:32:22.599 --> 00:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>note that Hitler did accuse Britain of quote unquote pulling

517
00:32:26.480 --> 00:32:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the strings with this coup and it would actually turn

518
00:32:29.359 --> 00:32:31.519
<v Speaker 1>out that they did play a role in setting the

519
00:32:31.559 --> 00:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>tone for the coup to happen. As you might recall,

520
00:32:34.519 --> 00:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we covered a bit in the first episode of the

521
00:32:37.200 --> 00:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Bulkan Inferno trilogy. But here's the thing. In nineteen forty one,

522
00:32:42.680 --> 00:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Hitler had already been at war with Britain for nearly

523
00:32:45.000 --> 00:32:48.799
<v Speaker 1>two years, and ultimately he took his rage out on

524
00:32:48.839 --> 00:32:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the Yugoslavs, whose coup plotters were already planning on making

525
00:32:53.400 --> 00:32:56.559
<v Speaker 1>a deal with the Axis, which they had made pretty clear.

526
00:32:58.240 --> 00:33:02.559
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately it was Yugoslav citizens who would suffer tens

527
00:33:02.599 --> 00:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of casualties in Germany's initial invasion, never mind

528
00:33:07.000 --> 00:33:10.519
<v Speaker 1>the chaos that was unleashed by the subsequent partition of

529
00:33:10.599 --> 00:33:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the Old Kingdom. The point remains that Hitler made his

530
00:33:15.200 --> 00:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>own choice and was based on rage and wounded pride,

531
00:33:20.279 --> 00:33:22.599
<v Speaker 1>and it was not one that he had to make

532
00:33:22.680 --> 00:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, and he could have simply continued his

533
00:33:25.759 --> 00:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>plan to unleash Operation Barbarossa in May of nineteen forty one,

534
00:33:30.039 --> 00:33:35.319
<v Speaker 1>not altering the timetable as his Yugoslav adventures ultimately did.

535
00:33:36.759 --> 00:33:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Now it has been claimed by some historians, including by

536
00:33:39.359 --> 00:33:43.079
<v Speaker 1>William Shire, that the Yugoslav partition operation is what caused

537
00:33:43.160 --> 00:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Nazi Germany the ability to make the necessary headway for

538
00:33:46.000 --> 00:33:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Operation Barbarossa to be a success. That is certainly debatable,

539
00:33:50.599 --> 00:33:53.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not here to weigh in one way or

540
00:33:53.119 --> 00:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the other, but what this demonstrates is quite the opposite

541
00:33:57.680 --> 00:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of what Cooper appeared to be claiming in the Tucker

542
00:33:59.680 --> 00:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Carls interview that instead of there being no plan, there

543
00:34:04.000 --> 00:34:07.759
<v Speaker 1>were actually many plans, and oftentimes they were changing at

544
00:34:07.799 --> 00:34:10.599
<v Speaker 1>a rapid pace and at the whim of one out

545
00:34:10.599 --> 00:34:15.199
<v Speaker 1>of control man. The fact that there were plenty of

546
00:34:15.199 --> 00:34:17.119
<v Speaker 1>plans in place when it came to the invasion of

547
00:34:17.159 --> 00:34:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union is also very well known, refuting the

548
00:34:20.320 --> 00:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>implication that Nazi Germany simply threw together an invasion with

549
00:34:23.400 --> 00:34:25.559
<v Speaker 1>no notion of what kind of actions would be quote

550
00:34:25.599 --> 00:34:28.599
<v Speaker 1>unquote necessary when it came to their ultimate goal of

551
00:34:28.679 --> 00:34:33.639
<v Speaker 1>territorial expansion, and as a consequence, what ultimately became millions

552
00:34:33.639 --> 00:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of civilians and prisoners of war.

553
00:34:35.440 --> 00:34:38.119
<v Speaker 2>Quote unquote ending up dead.

554
00:34:38.840 --> 00:34:42.760
<v Speaker 1>That phrasing that Cooper used, ending up dead, also carries

555
00:34:42.800 --> 00:34:46.760
<v Speaker 1>with it a pretty obvious moral error, but there was

556
00:34:46.880 --> 00:34:49.760
<v Speaker 1>very careful, especially in his follow up posts to make

557
00:34:49.800 --> 00:34:53.119
<v Speaker 1>it clear that the Nazis did not just basically accident

558
00:34:53.199 --> 00:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>their way into the Holocaust. That was not what he

559
00:34:55.440 --> 00:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was saying. However, the emphasis on a lack of preparedness,

560
00:35:00.719 --> 00:35:03.320
<v Speaker 1>as well as the idea of the Nazis believing that

561
00:35:03.360 --> 00:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>summary execution was a mercy given that lack of preparedness,

562
00:35:07.840 --> 00:35:10.039
<v Speaker 1>just does not track with the multitudes of evidence that

563
00:35:10.159 --> 00:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>is available. The evidence that Cooper used does support this

564
00:35:15.360 --> 00:35:19.519
<v Speaker 1>framing to be fair, namely the letter from SS administrator

565
00:35:19.599 --> 00:35:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Rolf Heinz Hoopner to Adolf Eichmann that Cooper quoted both

566
00:35:23.719 --> 00:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>in his response thread and his follow up post. In fact,

567
00:35:29.159 --> 00:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the celebrated historian Christopher Browning wrote that he believed this

568
00:35:32.880 --> 00:35:37.039
<v Speaker 1>memo from Hoopner was among the first pre vancie confirmations

569
00:35:37.039 --> 00:35:39.639
<v Speaker 1>of what would ultimately be the fate of Europe's Jews.

570
00:35:40.880 --> 00:35:44.679
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, that is not completely at odds with Cooper's interpretation, since,

571
00:35:44.760 --> 00:35:47.639
<v Speaker 1>as he wrote in his follow up post, quote lack

572
00:35:47.679 --> 00:35:50.159
<v Speaker 1>of food was at the very least used as an

573
00:35:50.159 --> 00:35:53.320
<v Speaker 1>excuse for murder, one which may have helped overcome the

574
00:35:53.400 --> 00:35:56.280
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty of men like this Hoopner, who did not seem

575
00:35:56.320 --> 00:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>overjoyed at the prospect of mass killing.

576
00:35:58.679 --> 00:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

577
00:36:00.159 --> 00:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>However, even with the at the very least qualifier, there

578
00:36:04.559 --> 00:36:07.280
<v Speaker 1>still does appear to be an implication that mass killing

579
00:36:07.360 --> 00:36:10.599
<v Speaker 1>was not necessarily part of the original plan, and if

580
00:36:10.639 --> 00:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, that simply does not hold water. As

581
00:36:14.960 --> 00:36:19.039
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Browning also notes, quote, immediately after the invasion of

582
00:36:19.079 --> 00:36:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the USSR, Himmler and Hedrick traveled together behind the advancing

583
00:36:23.360 --> 00:36:27.199
<v Speaker 1>German lines, inciting and sanctioning the execution of Jews and

584
00:36:27.239 --> 00:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>recruiting killing units beyond the Einsatzgrup, And for this task

585
00:36:31.360 --> 00:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>after Midsummer, both Hadrick and Himmler gave instructions to different

586
00:36:35.000 --> 00:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>units to now target Jewish women and children. Although the

587
00:36:38.519 --> 00:36:41.679
<v Speaker 1>onset of the Final Solution in Soviet territory Midsummer nineteen

588
00:36:41.719 --> 00:36:45.280
<v Speaker 1>forty one sealed the fate of Soviet Jews, the fate

589
00:36:45.320 --> 00:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of the rest of European Jewry remained undecided. Hadrik did

590
00:36:49.039 --> 00:36:51.760
<v Speaker 1>not need a new authorization to continue his previous planning.

591
00:36:52.320 --> 00:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>He procured one from Gourring on July thirty one to

592
00:36:54.920 --> 00:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>submit a plan for a final solution for the Jews

593
00:36:57.400 --> 00:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the German sphere in Europe. Precisely

594
00:37:00.480 --> 00:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>because he faced a new task determining if and how

595
00:37:03.440 --> 00:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the final Solution underway on Soviet territory could be extended

596
00:37:06.920 --> 00:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of Europe. Cooper was right to point

597
00:37:13.960 --> 00:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>out that Hupner did not like what was being implied

598
00:37:16.480 --> 00:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>by the realities staring at him in the face. In

599
00:37:18.440 --> 00:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the summer of nineteen forty one, however, as Browning points out,

600
00:37:23.000 --> 00:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>mass executions were already taking place, primarily from the infamous

601
00:37:26.960 --> 00:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>ss Einstotskropen squads. These forces were indeed set in directly

602
00:37:31.960 --> 00:37:35.320
<v Speaker 1>behind the Wehrmacht, specifically with the orders to massacre what

603
00:37:35.440 --> 00:37:38.119
<v Speaker 1>ultimately became about a million and a half people, a

604
00:37:38.199 --> 00:37:42.159
<v Speaker 1>third of which were killed within six months, and they

605
00:37:42.159 --> 00:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>were eventually done with the help of the reserve police

606
00:37:44.440 --> 00:37:48.079
<v Speaker 1>battalions that Browning covered in his masterpiece Ordinary Men Reserve

607
00:37:48.119 --> 00:37:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Police Battalion one oh one. In The Final Solution in Poland,

608
00:37:51.760 --> 00:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Browning explains that he believes consensus on the so called

609
00:37:55.519 --> 00:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Jewish question was reached in October of nineteen forty one,

610
00:37:59.559 --> 00:38:04.280
<v Speaker 1>but that is merely consensus. As we have seen, there

611
00:38:04.360 --> 00:38:07.559
<v Speaker 1>was already plenty of clarity among Hitler's inner circle on

612
00:38:07.639 --> 00:38:10.039
<v Speaker 1>what must be done with the broad category of quote

613
00:38:10.119 --> 00:38:12.880
<v Speaker 1>unquote enemies of the Reich that the Nazi forces came

614
00:38:12.880 --> 00:38:14.039
<v Speaker 1>across and their pushed.

615
00:38:13.760 --> 00:38:14.320
<v Speaker 2>To the east.

616
00:38:15.559 --> 00:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>As Berleg and Hipperman point out in their monograph on

617
00:38:18.000 --> 00:38:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Nazi racial policies, Hitler ordered the execution of Soviet functionaries

618
00:38:22.280 --> 00:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>who were quote less valuable Asiatics, Gypsies and Jews quote

619
00:38:27.000 --> 00:38:30.719
<v Speaker 1>by the insets good open squads. There is no doubt

620
00:38:31.119 --> 00:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>about the intentions of such orders, and as Neil Ferguson

621
00:38:35.320 --> 00:38:37.159
<v Speaker 1>pointed out in his two thousand and six book War

622
00:38:37.199 --> 00:38:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of the World, quote from the outset, Hitler had determined

623
00:38:40.800 --> 00:38:43.559
<v Speaker 1>that his campaign against the Soviet Union would be fought

624
00:38:43.559 --> 00:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>according to new rules, or rather without rules at all.

625
00:38:47.920 --> 00:38:50.079
<v Speaker 1>It was to be, as he told his generals on

626
00:38:50.119 --> 00:38:53.880
<v Speaker 1>March thirtieth, a quote unquote war of extermination in which

627
00:38:53.920 --> 00:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea of soldierly comradeship would have no place. This

628
00:38:58.519 --> 00:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>meant the quote destruct of the Bolshevik kammissars and the

629
00:39:01.719 --> 00:39:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Communist intelligentsiaquote. The decision systematically to shoot certain Red Army prisoners,

630
00:39:08.320 --> 00:39:10.880
<v Speaker 1>foreshadowed by the brutal way the war in Poland had

631
00:39:10.920 --> 00:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>been fought, was taken on the eve of Operation Barbarosa

632
00:39:14.760 --> 00:39:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and subsequently elaborated on during the campaign. The Guidelines for

633
00:39:18.840 --> 00:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the conduct of Troops in Russia issued on May nineteenth,

634
00:39:21.960 --> 00:39:25.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty one, called for quote ruthless and vigorous measures

635
00:39:26.039 --> 00:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>against the Bolshevik insiders, gorillas, saboteurs and Jews, as implied

636
00:39:35.360 --> 00:39:38.159
<v Speaker 1>by what was being stated in that quote from Neil Ferguson.

637
00:39:38.960 --> 00:39:41.639
<v Speaker 1>But important to really dwell on for a moment. The

638
00:39:41.679 --> 00:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>atrocities against civilians were already occurring well before Operation Barbarosa,

639
00:39:47.079 --> 00:39:50.039
<v Speaker 1>mere days into the invasion of Poland on September one,

640
00:39:50.239 --> 00:39:55.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty nine. These atrocities had already been set into

641
00:39:55.360 --> 00:39:59.280
<v Speaker 1>motion before the invasion thanks to the quote unquote famously

642
00:39:59.400 --> 00:40:03.079
<v Speaker 1>thorough SS practices put in place by Heinrich Himmler and

643
00:40:03.119 --> 00:40:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Reinhardt Hadrich. To use the words of historian Richard Rhodes

644
00:40:08.039 --> 00:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in his book Masters of Death, the s S Einsatzgruppen

645
00:40:11.119 --> 00:40:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and the Invention of the Holocaust, Rhoades quotes from an

646
00:40:14.159 --> 00:40:17.760
<v Speaker 1>SS officer who explained their indexing system as quote a

647
00:40:17.880 --> 00:40:21.199
<v Speaker 1>series of lists including the names of every active member

648
00:40:21.199 --> 00:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>of the Communist Party, as well as quote all of

649
00:40:24.760 --> 00:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the non party intelligentsia and listings of scholars, teachers, writers

650
00:40:29.920 --> 00:40:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and journalists, priests, public officials, upwardly mobile peasants, and the

651
00:40:34.360 --> 00:40:39.519
<v Speaker 1>most prominent industrialists in bankers. And it also listed quote

652
00:40:39.719 --> 00:40:45.119
<v Speaker 1>relatives and friends in case any subversive scum tried to hide.

653
00:40:47.360 --> 00:40:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Given the Nazi's propensity for collective punishment measures even in

654
00:40:51.440 --> 00:40:54.760
<v Speaker 1>response to mere suspicion, one can see what the policy

655
00:40:54.800 --> 00:40:58.639
<v Speaker 1>would lead to if it was not yet clear enough. However,

656
00:41:00.039 --> 00:41:02.599
<v Speaker 1>Quotes from an englishwoman eye witness to one of the

657
00:41:02.639 --> 00:41:06.119
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred and fourteen mass executions that occurred after the

658
00:41:06.119 --> 00:41:10.039
<v Speaker 1>German invasion of Poland, this one in the town of

659
00:41:10.480 --> 00:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>bid Gushed, which would come to be known as the

660
00:41:13.480 --> 00:41:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Valley of Death.

661
00:41:15.400 --> 00:41:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

662
00:41:16.880 --> 00:41:19.519
<v Speaker 1>The first victims of the campaign were a number of

663
00:41:19.559 --> 00:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>boy scouts from twelve to sixteen years of age, who

664
00:41:23.440 --> 00:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>were set up in the marketplace against a wall and shot.

665
00:41:27.280 --> 00:41:31.039
<v Speaker 1>No reason was given. A devoted priest who rushed to

666
00:41:31.079 --> 00:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>administer the last sacrament, was shot too. He received five wounds.

667
00:41:37.559 --> 00:41:40.320
<v Speaker 1>A pole said afterwards that the sight of those children

668
00:41:40.480 --> 00:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>lying dead was the most piteous of all the horrors

669
00:41:43.760 --> 00:41:44.679
<v Speaker 1>that he saw.

670
00:41:45.920 --> 00:41:46.440
<v Speaker 2>That week.

671
00:41:46.679 --> 00:41:50.639
<v Speaker 1>The murders continued thirty four of the leading tradespeople and

672
00:41:50.760 --> 00:41:54.679
<v Speaker 1>merchants of the town were shot, and many other leading citizens.

673
00:41:56.840 --> 00:41:57.639
<v Speaker 2>End quote.

674
00:42:00.199 --> 00:42:04.039
<v Speaker 1>Tosses water on any notion that there was any sense

675
00:42:04.039 --> 00:42:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of necessity or a lack of proper planning in place.

676
00:42:09.599 --> 00:42:15.840
<v Speaker 1>This is clearly the thirst for blood. There are other reasons,

677
00:42:15.960 --> 00:42:20.519
<v Speaker 1>more specific reasons that the idea of there being no

678
00:42:20.719 --> 00:42:23.760
<v Speaker 1>plan or poor planning, even when it comes to the

679
00:42:23.880 --> 00:42:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union, simply do not stack

680
00:42:27.360 --> 00:42:31.639
<v Speaker 1>up in the face of the historical record. For one

681
00:42:31.679 --> 00:42:36.199
<v Speaker 1>of those specific reasons, the basis of Operation Barbarossa's territorial acquisitions,

682
00:42:36.599 --> 00:42:40.599
<v Speaker 1>known as the AA line referring to Archangelskan the North

683
00:42:40.960 --> 00:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>an Ostra Khan in the South, was put forth by

684
00:42:43.960 --> 00:42:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Hitler on December eighteenth, nineteen forty, under the name Feuire

685
00:42:47.679 --> 00:42:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Directive twenty one, a full six months before the actual

686
00:42:51.360 --> 00:42:54.079
<v Speaker 1>invasion was set to take place, and even longer after

687
00:42:54.159 --> 00:42:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the delay that was caused by the invasion of Yugoslavia.

688
00:42:58.159 --> 00:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>The AA line in that directive can be traced even

689
00:43:01.039 --> 00:43:04.360
<v Speaker 1>further back to a military study drafted by General Eric

690
00:43:04.440 --> 00:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Marx published in the summer of nineteen forty, a full

691
00:43:07.960 --> 00:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>year before Operation Barbarossa was supposed to take place. However,

692
00:43:12.639 --> 00:43:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it is clear that there were already plans for an

693
00:43:15.320 --> 00:43:18.519
<v Speaker 1>invasion of the Soviet Union in place, with it also

694
00:43:18.559 --> 00:43:22.079
<v Speaker 1>being made clear, at the very least through strong implication

695
00:43:22.880 --> 00:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that it would be a war of extermination. In nineteen

696
00:43:27.000 --> 00:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine, Hitler spoke to his generals of engaging in

697
00:43:30.039 --> 00:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a racial war with the Soviets, as we've covered, while

698
00:43:32.960 --> 00:43:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels's propaganda machine was putting out NonStop

699
00:43:37.760 --> 00:43:41.159
<v Speaker 1>content depicting the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe as a

700
00:43:41.239 --> 00:43:46.800
<v Speaker 1>land populated with racial undesirables. The propaganda film that Iviga

701
00:43:46.840 --> 00:43:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Yuda the Eternal Jew was released on November twenty eighth,

702
00:43:50.360 --> 00:43:54.079
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty, and contained the now infamous visual comparisons of

703
00:43:54.159 --> 00:43:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Jews and vermin. A Nazi reviewer of the film even

704
00:43:58.360 --> 00:44:01.159
<v Speaker 1>wrote that the film made it clear that quote we

705
00:44:01.199 --> 00:44:04.599
<v Speaker 1>are the initiators of the fight against world Jewry, which

706
00:44:04.639 --> 00:44:07.719
<v Speaker 1>now directs its hate, its brutal, greed, and destructive will

707
00:44:07.800 --> 00:44:11.800
<v Speaker 1>toward us. We must win this battle for ourselves, for Europe,

708
00:44:12.000 --> 00:44:12.639
<v Speaker 1>for the world.

709
00:44:13.360 --> 00:44:13.679
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

710
00:44:16.119 --> 00:44:19.679
<v Speaker 1>This was merely one film and one reviewer's interpretation of it,

711
00:44:19.760 --> 00:44:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but both were one among many. The strong implication of

712
00:44:24.800 --> 00:44:27.920
<v Speaker 1>what the Nazis must do in response to their so

713
00:44:28.039 --> 00:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>called Jewish problem could not be clearer. What seems to

714
00:44:33.920 --> 00:44:40.360
<v Speaker 1>be a constant in Cooper's skepticism is the idea that

715
00:44:40.400 --> 00:44:45.280
<v Speaker 1>there was preemptive intentionality when it came to the destruction

716
00:44:45.360 --> 00:44:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of Europe's Jews. In other words, he seems to want

717
00:44:50.440 --> 00:44:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to avoid saying that that it was intended, especially from

718
00:44:54.000 --> 00:44:58.880
<v Speaker 1>early on. This is actually at root why I do

719
00:44:58.920 --> 00:45:03.000
<v Speaker 1>not believe he is a Holocaust denier, as has been accused.

720
00:45:04.119 --> 00:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>He has not and still does not deny that the

721
00:45:07.320 --> 00:45:10.079
<v Speaker 1>Nazis killed the Jews in the numbers that they did,

722
00:45:10.480 --> 00:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and that they hated the Jews. He made that very clear,

723
00:45:14.000 --> 00:45:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and not just his response to this, but in past

724
00:45:16.280 --> 00:45:19.920
<v Speaker 1>episodes he has talked about this. It is his connection

725
00:45:20.079 --> 00:45:23.760
<v Speaker 1>between that hatred and that killing that comes across as

726
00:45:23.760 --> 00:45:26.599
<v Speaker 1>weak to me, though, because, like I was saying, he

727
00:45:26.679 --> 00:45:29.840
<v Speaker 1>has shown no indication that he believes the Nazis set

728
00:45:29.840 --> 00:45:32.199
<v Speaker 1>out to eliminate the Jews from Europe by any means

729
00:45:32.239 --> 00:45:35.599
<v Speaker 1>necessary from day one, or at least before the war

730
00:45:35.639 --> 00:45:40.400
<v Speaker 1>even started. This is the old functionalist versus intentionalist argument,

731
00:45:40.519 --> 00:45:43.159
<v Speaker 1>though I don't think there's really much debate left to

732
00:45:43.199 --> 00:45:48.119
<v Speaker 1>be had about that. Now, this could be construed as

733
00:45:48.159 --> 00:45:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a type of revisionist prudence, but given the problems with

734
00:45:51.880 --> 00:45:55.079
<v Speaker 1>his interpretations, combined with the evidence that is already available

735
00:45:55.119 --> 00:45:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and well known by scholars, I believe that his skepticism

736
00:45:58.559 --> 00:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>or prudence, whatever you want to frame it as on

737
00:46:01.440 --> 00:46:08.159
<v Speaker 1>this point is unwarranted. It also requires some unpacking. A

738
00:46:08.159 --> 00:46:12.719
<v Speaker 1>frequent argument brought into this conversation with anyone who wants

739
00:46:12.760 --> 00:46:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to revise the history of the Second World War is

740
00:46:15.360 --> 00:46:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the so called Madagascar Plan, in which the Nazis would

741
00:46:18.679 --> 00:46:21.519
<v Speaker 1>ship Jews under their sphere of control to Madagascar in

742
00:46:21.639 --> 00:46:25.159
<v Speaker 1>order to be rid of them. While this is obviously

743
00:46:25.159 --> 00:46:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a form of ethnic cleansing on paper, it also does

744
00:46:29.280 --> 00:46:32.559
<v Speaker 1>not come across as monstrous as what eventually happened in

745
00:46:32.599 --> 00:46:35.880
<v Speaker 1>places like Auschwitz, and of course that comes across as

746
00:46:35.920 --> 00:46:40.840
<v Speaker 1>significantly less terrible. Those who wish to blame Great Britain

747
00:46:40.920 --> 00:46:43.440
<v Speaker 1>for the jews ultimate fate will also point to the

748
00:46:43.480 --> 00:46:46.039
<v Speaker 1>fact that had Britain not gunn for war in nineteen

749
00:46:46.079 --> 00:46:49.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine, their control of Mediterranean Sea lanes, which the

750
00:46:49.920 --> 00:46:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Germans expected to have taken by nineteen forty would not

751
00:46:53.280 --> 00:46:56.199
<v Speaker 1>have prevented the Madagascar Plan from being dead in its

752
00:46:56.199 --> 00:47:03.039
<v Speaker 1>crib and thus prevent the necessity of the gas chambers. However,

753
00:47:03.639 --> 00:47:06.199
<v Speaker 1>this is a simplistic interpretation that, like a lot of

754
00:47:06.280 --> 00:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>things in this controversy, places far to which charity in

755
00:47:09.280 --> 00:47:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the minds of the Nazi leadership. According to historian David Blackburn,

756
00:47:16.079 --> 00:47:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the Madagascar Plan was welcomed across the board by just

757
00:47:18.719 --> 00:47:24.599
<v Speaker 1>about everybody, including Eichmann, Headrich Himmler and Hitler himself. However,

758
00:47:24.719 --> 00:47:27.800
<v Speaker 1>as Blackburn writes, quote, it hardly needs to be said

759
00:47:27.840 --> 00:47:31.159
<v Speaker 1>that implementation of the Madagascar Plan would have meant high

760
00:47:31.239 --> 00:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>death rates by attrition, and it was intended to. After

761
00:47:37.280 --> 00:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the abortion of the Madagascar Plan, places like the Pripet

762
00:47:40.440 --> 00:47:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Marshes and even the Arctic Circle were suggested. The former

763
00:47:44.519 --> 00:47:47.800
<v Speaker 1>was considered quote arable land yet to be cultivated unquote.

764
00:47:47.880 --> 00:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>According to a Reich Office of Regional Planning report discussing

765
00:47:51.000 --> 00:47:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the use of forced labor, which had been implemented into law,

766
00:47:54.320 --> 00:47:57.199
<v Speaker 1>it should be noted in nineteen thirty nine, and the latter,

767
00:47:57.880 --> 00:48:01.039
<v Speaker 1>given the environs of the Arctic Circle was little different

768
00:48:01.039 --> 00:48:03.159
<v Speaker 1>than the Turk sending the Armenians into the desert in

769
00:48:03.239 --> 00:48:09.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifteen, As Blackburn writes, quote, there is no doubt that,

770
00:48:09.960 --> 00:48:13.039
<v Speaker 1>like the Madagascar Plan before it, the idea of forcing

771
00:48:13.119 --> 00:48:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Jews to quote unquote settle and perform forced labor here

772
00:48:16.920 --> 00:48:22.039
<v Speaker 1>or in the Arctic Circle was an intentionally genocidal proposal unquote.

773
00:48:23.920 --> 00:48:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Genocide by expulsion to inhospitable land, genocide through attrition, or

774
00:48:28.960 --> 00:48:32.559
<v Speaker 1>genocide by gas chamber, all with the purpose of eliminating

775
00:48:32.639 --> 00:48:37.079
<v Speaker 1>a so called racist people. Genocide is genocide, especially when

776
00:48:37.119 --> 00:48:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of complete elimination is as clear as it was.

777
00:48:43.159 --> 00:48:45.719
<v Speaker 1>This attitude can be seen in a speech given at

778
00:48:45.760 --> 00:48:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a Nazi Party reception given in Lublin in January of

779
00:48:48.880 --> 00:48:52.719
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty one, where to raucus laughter, the head of

780
00:48:52.760 --> 00:48:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the German General Government and occupied Poland, Hans Frank said, quote,

781
00:48:56.760 --> 00:48:59.840
<v Speaker 1>whether they go to Madagascar or somewhere else, none of

782
00:48:59.840 --> 00:49:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that that interests us. We are clear that the best

783
00:49:02.880 --> 00:49:05.840
<v Speaker 1>thing for this mismash of Asiatic progeny is that they

784
00:49:05.880 --> 00:49:13.920
<v Speaker 1>slouched back to Asia where they have come from. The

785
00:49:13.960 --> 00:49:16.760
<v Speaker 1>plan to take the lands in the east and replace

786
00:49:16.760 --> 00:49:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the people who existed in those lands came long before

787
00:49:20.400 --> 00:49:25.440
<v Speaker 1>war was even declared in nineteen thirty nine. Adolf Hitler

788
00:49:25.480 --> 00:49:28.599
<v Speaker 1>himself had been speaking of invading and taking the lands

789
00:49:28.639 --> 00:49:31.639
<v Speaker 1>to the east, namely Russia, for over a decade and

790
00:49:31.719 --> 00:49:37.159
<v Speaker 1>a half by the time Operation Barbarossa began and analyzing

791
00:49:37.239 --> 00:49:41.519
<v Speaker 1>mine Kampf Rodrik Stackelberg explained in his nineteen ninety nine

792
00:49:41.559 --> 00:49:46.559
<v Speaker 1>book Hitler's Germany Origins Interpretations Legacies that Hitler's designs for

793
00:49:46.639 --> 00:49:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Russia were quite clear by nineteen twenty five, especially when

794
00:49:50.559 --> 00:49:53.360
<v Speaker 1>he spoke of the need for adrang nach Austen or

795
00:49:53.480 --> 00:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>drive to the East, writing to mine Kampf that quote,

796
00:49:57.159 --> 00:50:01.159
<v Speaker 1>it is eastwards only and always eastward, that the veins

797
00:50:01.159 --> 00:50:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of our race must expand. It is the direction which

798
00:50:04.559 --> 00:50:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Nature herself has decreed for the expansion of the German peoples.

799
00:50:10.920 --> 00:50:15.239
<v Speaker 1>It is therefore extremely doubtful that this meant simply stopping

800
00:50:15.280 --> 00:50:19.119
<v Speaker 1>in Poland when General Plan ost placed the Ural Mountains

801
00:50:19.480 --> 00:50:22.119
<v Speaker 1>as the natural border against which the new Third Reich

802
00:50:22.119 --> 00:50:26.440
<v Speaker 1>would abut. And this view that he was expressing as

803
00:50:26.480 --> 00:50:30.119
<v Speaker 1>early as nineteen twenty five was not some fringe view.

804
00:50:30.119 --> 00:50:34.960
<v Speaker 1>In isolation, the German geographer Martin Buergener was instrumental in

805
00:50:35.000 --> 00:50:39.119
<v Speaker 1>providing quote unquote natural justifications to Germany taking these lands,

806
00:50:39.679 --> 00:50:42.519
<v Speaker 1>particularly when describing them in his travels there in the

807
00:50:42.519 --> 00:50:45.480
<v Speaker 1>mid nineteen thirties as a quote unquote gray dark wilderness

808
00:50:45.920 --> 00:50:49.480
<v Speaker 1>where the masses that is, Slavs and Jews were quote

809
00:50:49.599 --> 00:50:56.679
<v Speaker 1>vegetating in hopeless apathy. According to Burgener, the main impediment

810
00:50:56.719 --> 00:50:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to developing these lands were the Jews and Slavs living

811
00:50:59.719 --> 00:51:00.559
<v Speaker 1>on them.

812
00:51:00.880 --> 00:51:01.320
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

813
00:51:02.480 --> 00:51:05.400
<v Speaker 1>They were the reason the lands were so fettied and disgusting,

814
00:51:05.519 --> 00:51:09.440
<v Speaker 1>as he saw them, Thus their removal and replacement with

815
00:51:09.519 --> 00:51:14.199
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote healthier Germans would be necessary. This was all

816
00:51:14.280 --> 00:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>derived from German naturalistic explanations that have been circulating through

817
00:51:17.960 --> 00:51:21.079
<v Speaker 1>the German academies for nearly a century by then, and

818
00:51:21.119 --> 00:51:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they were enthusiastically incorporated into what David Blackburn describes as

819
00:51:24.840 --> 00:51:29.519
<v Speaker 1>quote the national socialist vocabulary of blood, soil, living space,

820
00:51:29.639 --> 00:51:36.199
<v Speaker 1>and above all race unquote. Given all this and much

821
00:51:36.199 --> 00:51:39.679
<v Speaker 1>more that exists in the scholarship, there is plenty of

822
00:51:39.760 --> 00:51:43.800
<v Speaker 1>evidence to suggest that something, and it's quite clear what

823
00:51:44.119 --> 00:51:47.800
<v Speaker 1>if you ask me, was always in the works regarding

824
00:51:47.840 --> 00:51:51.039
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern territories at some level within the Nazi leadership.

825
00:51:52.559 --> 00:51:54.920
<v Speaker 1>It is also extremely doubtful that there was not an

826
00:51:54.960 --> 00:51:58.360
<v Speaker 1>awareness of who was already living in these places, what

827
00:51:58.519 --> 00:52:01.360
<v Speaker 1>was already thought about them as a people, and what

828
00:52:01.400 --> 00:52:04.320
<v Speaker 1>would be necessary in order for the long held dream

829
00:52:04.360 --> 00:52:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of Dragnach Austin to be completed. There is simply no

830
00:52:09.519 --> 00:52:12.480
<v Speaker 1>evidence for a lack of a plan, and there is

831
00:52:12.519 --> 00:52:16.039
<v Speaker 1>a wealth of evidence for their being perhaps an overabundance

832
00:52:16.360 --> 00:52:21.159
<v Speaker 1>of plans. There is also no evidence that avoiding war

833
00:52:21.199 --> 00:52:24.840
<v Speaker 1>with Britain and France would have somehow quelled such savage

834
00:52:24.920 --> 00:52:28.119
<v Speaker 1>violence to be unleashed on the men, women and children

835
00:52:28.559 --> 00:52:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that the Wehrmacht, the SS and Reserve Police battalions came

836
00:52:32.480 --> 00:52:35.880
<v Speaker 1>across when they pushed east, not when the evidence that

837
00:52:36.039 --> 00:52:42.639
<v Speaker 1>is available suggests the exact opposite. It is important to

838
00:52:42.679 --> 00:52:44.559
<v Speaker 1>point out that there is an element of truth in

839
00:52:44.599 --> 00:52:47.840
<v Speaker 1>discussing the lack of appropriate preparation the Nazis had when

840
00:52:47.880 --> 00:52:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it came to their quote unquote Eastern operations, but it

841
00:52:51.960 --> 00:52:55.119
<v Speaker 1>was not necessarily in the way that Cooper had described it.

842
00:52:56.079 --> 00:52:58.840
<v Speaker 1>The problem that the Nazi leadership was not prepared for

843
00:52:59.320 --> 00:53:02.280
<v Speaker 1>was a psychologue told that such mass murder was going

844
00:53:02.320 --> 00:53:08.199
<v Speaker 1>to take on soldiers, both volunteers and especially conscripts. Christopher

845
00:53:08.199 --> 00:53:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Browning's famous work that I mentioned earlier, Ordinary Men, paint

846
00:53:11.519 --> 00:53:14.679
<v Speaker 1>an incredible picture of this. Hence why I recommend it

847
00:53:14.840 --> 00:53:18.440
<v Speaker 1>among many other books about this subject, because it illustrates

848
00:53:18.480 --> 00:53:23.119
<v Speaker 1>both the horror that many of these men felt and

849
00:53:23.199 --> 00:53:26.880
<v Speaker 1>more to the point, the eventual resignation that they experienced

850
00:53:27.119 --> 00:53:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and taking part in such ghastly atrocities thanks to the

851
00:53:30.760 --> 00:53:37.079
<v Speaker 1>simple brutal realities of self imposed social pressure. In this

852
00:53:37.280 --> 00:53:41.800
<v Speaker 1>narrow sense, the Nazis were not prepared for anything like

853
00:53:41.840 --> 00:53:46.639
<v Speaker 1>that Battalion and obviously many others experienced as they butchered Jews,

854
00:53:46.760 --> 00:53:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Polls and Russian POWs by the hundreds of thousands. This was,

855
00:53:50.880 --> 00:53:53.559
<v Speaker 1>in large part, along with a push for efficiency and

856
00:53:53.599 --> 00:53:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a desire for slave labor, what led to the construction

857
00:53:56.559 --> 00:54:02.679
<v Speaker 1>of extermination factories like Auschwitz, Treblinka, helm No Sobibor Belzek.

858
00:54:02.360 --> 00:54:03.079
<v Speaker 2>And my Dank.

859
00:54:04.519 --> 00:54:06.880
<v Speaker 1>The thinking went that it would be much easier to

860
00:54:06.960 --> 00:54:10.400
<v Speaker 1>kill multitudes of unwanted civilians by shoving them behind a

861
00:54:10.440 --> 00:54:13.760
<v Speaker 1>sealed door and letting them be gassed, and then having

862
00:54:13.800 --> 00:54:17.039
<v Speaker 1>more slaves disposed of the bodies, rather than shooting them

863
00:54:17.039 --> 00:54:21.519
<v Speaker 1>all in the back of the head into open pits. However,

864
00:54:22.280 --> 00:54:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the point remains the same. Even if there is an

865
00:54:25.039 --> 00:54:31.559
<v Speaker 1>element of poor planning in that regard the plan or

866
00:54:31.639 --> 00:54:36.159
<v Speaker 1>plans changed, that does not mean there was no plan

867
00:54:36.679 --> 00:54:39.519
<v Speaker 1>or even poor planning, and that does not mean that

868
00:54:39.559 --> 00:54:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the Nazis were not operating with literal genocidal intent. That

869
00:54:45.159 --> 00:54:49.760
<v Speaker 1>has been proven in every way possible. However, imperfectly the

870
00:54:49.800 --> 00:54:53.760
<v Speaker 1>plans to accomplish this outcome are what changed. As Victor

871
00:54:53.840 --> 00:54:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Davis Hansen has written that even though quote some of

872
00:54:57.000 --> 00:55:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the invading Wehrmacht officers may have been disturbed, the sheer

873
00:55:00.559 --> 00:55:03.039
<v Speaker 1>mass of captives and Germans inability to offer even the

874
00:55:03.079 --> 00:55:06.840
<v Speaker 1>bare essentials of humane treatment their deaths were consistent with

875
00:55:06.920 --> 00:55:13.400
<v Speaker 1>prior Feurier directives for the future resettling of Western Russia.

876
00:55:14.000 --> 00:55:17.840
<v Speaker 1>What never changed, unlike the plans that were put in place,

877
00:55:18.639 --> 00:55:21.960
<v Speaker 1>was what came to be known colloquially as Hitler's prophecy

878
00:55:22.400 --> 00:55:26.079
<v Speaker 1>that appeared in his speech before the Reichstag on January thirtieth,

879
00:55:26.199 --> 00:55:30.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty nine. In his speech, he made it clear

880
00:55:30.480 --> 00:55:33.480
<v Speaker 1>who he was blaming for the coming conflagration that he

881
00:55:33.519 --> 00:55:36.039
<v Speaker 1>already knew was going to happen, and it was not

882
00:55:36.119 --> 00:55:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Winston Churchill or the British Empire quote. If international finance

883
00:55:42.079 --> 00:55:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Jewry inside and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the

884
00:55:46.440 --> 00:55:49.719
<v Speaker 1>nations once more into a world war, the result will

885
00:55:49.719 --> 00:55:52.840
<v Speaker 1>not be the bolshevisation of the Earth and thereby the

886
00:55:52.920 --> 00:55:56.679
<v Speaker 1>victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race

887
00:55:56.679 --> 00:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. Now one may ask, why do we take

888
00:56:04.559 --> 00:56:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Hitler and by extension, the Third Reich itself at his

889
00:56:08.639 --> 00:56:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and their word here and not when he was supposedly

890
00:56:12.280 --> 00:56:17.519
<v Speaker 1>making his overtures toward peace, Because what he said here

891
00:56:18.079 --> 00:56:20.840
<v Speaker 1>lines up with what led up to and happened in

892
00:56:20.880 --> 00:56:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the Second World War in the Holocaust, and what he

893
00:56:23.920 --> 00:56:28.599
<v Speaker 1>said in his peace overtures did not, both obviously after

894
00:56:28.639 --> 00:56:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact as well as before, along with the multitudes

895
00:56:33.039 --> 00:56:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of other evidence of what Hitler's long term intentions for

896
00:56:35.960 --> 00:56:39.599
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern territories clearly were, and along with the propaganda

897
00:56:39.639 --> 00:56:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and rhetoric that he was engaging in. He was not

898
00:56:42.480 --> 00:56:44.840
<v Speaker 1>simply saying the Jews would be to blame for another

899
00:56:44.880 --> 00:56:47.400
<v Speaker 1>World war for the first time or the last time.

900
00:56:48.760 --> 00:56:51.079
<v Speaker 1>He had reportedly said it in private meetings in the

901
00:56:51.119 --> 00:56:54.519
<v Speaker 1>wake of Christallnacht in nineteen thirty eight, and he continued

902
00:56:54.519 --> 00:56:57.679
<v Speaker 1>to say it in the years that followed. As Jeffrey

903
00:56:57.719 --> 00:57:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Hurf noted in his own monograph on the subject, the

904
00:57:00.280 --> 00:57:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Jewish enemy Nazi propaganda during World War II. In the Holocaust,

905
00:57:04.320 --> 00:57:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Hitler was very upfront about how he felt about what

906
00:57:07.519 --> 00:57:09.719
<v Speaker 1>was happening to the Jews, stating in a speech on

907
00:57:09.760 --> 00:57:13.880
<v Speaker 1>September thirtieth, nineteen forty two, quote, the Jews in Germany

908
00:57:13.920 --> 00:57:16.880
<v Speaker 1>once laughed about my prophecies. I don't know if they

909
00:57:16.920 --> 00:57:19.239
<v Speaker 1>are laughing today or if the laughter has already gone

910
00:57:19.239 --> 00:57:22.400
<v Speaker 1>out of them. I can promise only one thing, they

911
00:57:22.400 --> 00:57:26.400
<v Speaker 1>will stop laughing everywhere, and with this prophecy as well,

912
00:57:26.559 --> 00:57:32.199
<v Speaker 1>I will be proved right unquote. The fact that there

913
00:57:32.239 --> 00:57:35.159
<v Speaker 1>are still people questioning whether or not the Holocaust would

914
00:57:35.159 --> 00:57:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have happened as it did is not necessarily an indictment

915
00:57:38.800 --> 00:57:43.559
<v Speaker 1>on them or their questions. I think that assumption is unfair,

916
00:57:43.920 --> 00:57:49.519
<v Speaker 1>because the Holocaust, with its deliberate industrialized nature and sheer

917
00:57:49.599 --> 00:57:53.480
<v Speaker 1>scale and cruelty, along with its fundamental tether to the

918
00:57:53.519 --> 00:57:59.960
<v Speaker 1>ideology of national socialism itself, is truly unthinkable. It's unimagined.

919
00:58:01.719 --> 00:58:06.159
<v Speaker 1>It's not capitulation to a corrupt establishment or the marvel

920
00:58:06.159 --> 00:58:08.280
<v Speaker 1>cinematic universification of history.

921
00:58:08.280 --> 00:58:09.079
<v Speaker 2>To state this.

922
00:58:10.960 --> 00:58:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Now that the throat clearing like that might be irritating

923
00:58:14.239 --> 00:58:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and a waste of time, as Cooper suggested in his

924
00:58:16.719 --> 00:58:19.719
<v Speaker 1>substack post from September seventh, twenty twenty four, explaining this

925
00:58:19.760 --> 00:58:24.280
<v Speaker 1>whole thing and fair enough, but asking such questions about

926
00:58:24.280 --> 00:58:26.559
<v Speaker 1>the motives at work in the Holocaust in a way

927
00:58:26.599 --> 00:58:30.639
<v Speaker 1>that diminishes the obvious villainy of Adolph Hitler, in my opinion,

928
00:58:31.199 --> 00:58:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is not nuance, nor is it even forbidden. All it

929
00:58:36.400 --> 00:58:41.519
<v Speaker 1>really does is it tends toward basic moral contrarianism that

930
00:58:41.639 --> 00:58:45.400
<v Speaker 1>is already very familiar, and it continues to have fundamental

931
00:58:45.440 --> 00:58:50.800
<v Speaker 1>problems with its sourcing. If the problems with Cooper's analysis

932
00:58:50.800 --> 00:58:55.519
<v Speaker 1>of Churchill, the Second World Wars causes, and the intention

933
00:58:55.679 --> 00:58:58.360
<v Speaker 1>behind the treatment of the Eastern peoples under the boot

934
00:58:58.400 --> 00:59:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Third Reich were frustrating, than the sourcing he

935
00:59:01.880 --> 00:59:04.920
<v Speaker 1>seemed to have used for such claims initially was even

936
00:59:04.960 --> 00:59:09.639
<v Speaker 1>more so. As already mentioned, he admitted that he found

937
00:59:09.639 --> 00:59:15.800
<v Speaker 1>inspiration in Pat Buchanan's work on the subject. However, it's

938
00:59:15.840 --> 00:59:19.599
<v Speaker 1>important to point out that most scholars and critics seemed

939
00:59:19.599 --> 00:59:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to be attributing Cooper's claim in the Tucker Carlson interview,

940
00:59:22.480 --> 00:59:25.239
<v Speaker 1>which he has since somewhat walked back. I should note

941
00:59:25.280 --> 00:59:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that is Cooper has that Churchill was in debt and

942
00:59:28.840 --> 00:59:31.280
<v Speaker 1>had Zionist backers willing to bail him out as a

943
00:59:31.280 --> 00:59:35.760
<v Speaker 1>potential quid pro quo on the Israel question, that claim

944
00:59:36.320 --> 00:59:39.360
<v Speaker 1>these scholars and critics have been pointing out is most

945
00:59:39.440 --> 00:59:44.039
<v Speaker 1>likely attributed to David Irving. Now, so I was complete

946
00:59:44.039 --> 00:59:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in my research on this. I did my own digging,

947
00:59:47.239 --> 00:59:50.119
<v Speaker 1>even making use of pro level AI to see where

948
00:59:50.159 --> 00:59:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Cooper's comment about some people having made this claim, which

949
00:59:53.400 --> 00:59:55.719
<v Speaker 1>is I believe the phrasing he used in the interview

950
00:59:56.079 --> 00:59:59.440
<v Speaker 1>where it actually came from, and the original source actually

951
00:59:59.519 --> 01:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>seems to be Joseph Goebbels himself and the propaganda he

952
01:00:02.840 --> 01:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>had produced during the war. Now, I don't have any

953
01:00:06.280 --> 01:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of David Irving's books myself, so I couldn't confirm or

954
01:00:09.360 --> 01:00:12.559
<v Speaker 1>refute this. But considering he has a seven hundred plus

955
01:00:12.639 --> 01:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>page biography of Goebbels, it is not unreasonable to assume

956
01:00:17.000 --> 01:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the main secondary source where this claim gets repeated. However,

957
01:00:21.639 --> 01:00:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Daryl did not cite Irving directly he could well be

958
01:00:24.559 --> 01:00:28.199
<v Speaker 1>planning to cover this controversy, this claim in this series

959
01:00:28.239 --> 01:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and in a critical way. We just don't know, so

960
01:00:31.639 --> 01:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's necessarily fair, at least for me

961
01:00:34.079 --> 01:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>at this stage to outright claim or agree that he

962
01:00:38.239 --> 01:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is getting his information from Irving, which, by the way,

963
01:00:41.280 --> 01:00:45.079
<v Speaker 1>it's worth noting, is not necessarily a bad thing. It

964
01:00:45.239 --> 01:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>just depends on how you approach it information that is,

965
01:00:49.880 --> 01:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>with the appropriate amount of skepticism. The same goes for

966
01:00:52.639 --> 01:00:58.679
<v Speaker 1>citing Goebbels or any historical figure directly, Regardless, until Darryl

967
01:00:58.760 --> 01:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>starts citing the notorious historian known more for his Holocaust

968
01:01:02.760 --> 01:01:05.559
<v Speaker 1>denial than the admittedly good work he had done in

969
01:01:05.599 --> 01:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the past, a lot of historians did use him because

970
01:01:08.000 --> 01:01:12.159
<v Speaker 1>he provided value. But until Darrell starts citing him directly,

971
01:01:12.920 --> 01:01:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I see no reason to make such bad faith implications

972
01:01:16.000 --> 01:01:20.599
<v Speaker 1>or claims. However, the citation of Buchanan does seem to

973
01:01:20.599 --> 01:01:25.159
<v Speaker 1>be indicative of a trend seemingly present in this interpretation

974
01:01:25.400 --> 01:01:28.159
<v Speaker 1>of the secondary sources from which Cooper was initially pulling.

975
01:01:29.559 --> 01:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>His other main secondary source, which he cited both in

976
01:01:32.079 --> 01:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>his ex response thread and in his follow up post. Thus,

977
01:01:35.480 --> 01:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>reasonably suggesting its importance in coming to the conclusions that

978
01:01:38.880 --> 01:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>he has come to this far is the book Human Smoke,

979
01:01:42.480 --> 01:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>The Beginnings of World War II The End of Civilization,

980
01:01:45.599 --> 01:01:50.239
<v Speaker 1>written by the erotic novelist and self described pacifist Nicholson Baker.

981
01:01:51.280 --> 01:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Now this is not to say that Cooper has not

982
01:01:53.440 --> 01:01:56.639
<v Speaker 1>used other secondary sources in his research or looked directly

983
01:01:56.679 --> 01:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>at many of the primary sources he's used that are

984
01:01:58.840 --> 01:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>also found in Baker's book book. However, given the importance

985
01:02:03.079 --> 01:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that Baker's work took in Cooper's later explanations of his comments,

986
01:02:07.760 --> 01:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we are forced to assume that Baker's work is one

987
01:02:10.280 --> 01:02:15.519
<v Speaker 1>of the main sources of information that he was using. Now,

988
01:02:15.599 --> 01:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, even though I highlighted the fact that

989
01:02:18.519 --> 01:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Nicholson Baker is an erotic novelist and pacifist rather than

990
01:02:21.840 --> 01:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a historian, citing a non historian is not a crime,

991
01:02:26.519 --> 01:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>nor is it even completely pointless. The celebrated British novelist

992
01:02:31.440 --> 01:02:34.039
<v Speaker 1>Martin Amos wrote a book called Cooba The Dread Laughter

993
01:02:34.079 --> 01:02:36.119
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty million, and, for all of its historical

994
01:02:36.199 --> 01:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>faults and the riff that it caused between Amos and

995
01:02:38.679 --> 01:02:41.519
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Hitchins, for a little, while it's still a very

996
01:02:41.519 --> 01:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>good book, and as far as I'm concerned, Nicholson Baker's

997
01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>work is no different. As a piece of nonfiction literature,

998
01:02:48.039 --> 01:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it often tugs at the heartstrings, even in its clinical

999
01:02:50.559 --> 01:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>use of primary source documents. However, if one source has

1000
01:02:55.960 --> 01:03:00.719
<v Speaker 1>been criticized by multiple historians and journalists one month, at

1001
01:03:00.760 --> 01:03:05.039
<v Speaker 1>the very least acknowledge such controversy for the sake of transparency,

1002
01:03:05.480 --> 01:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>especially if it's the only source one is actively citing.

1003
01:03:09.039 --> 01:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's how I see it. At least, and

1004
01:03:12.000 --> 01:03:15.559
<v Speaker 1>at most, one should perhaps cite the criticisms and counter

1005
01:03:15.679 --> 01:03:19.199
<v Speaker 1>arguments themselves and let the reader or listener decide on

1006
01:03:19.239 --> 01:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>their own. Now, it is impossible to say whether or

1007
01:03:22.440 --> 01:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>not Cooper plans to do this with his upcoming podcast

1008
01:03:24.840 --> 01:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>series on the subjects, so we shouldn't assume too much.

1009
01:03:28.960 --> 01:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But working with what we do have, the use of

1010
01:03:31.960 --> 01:03:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Baker's Human Smoke as the source to support the claims

1011
01:03:35.280 --> 01:03:39.239
<v Speaker 1>being made suggests a fundamental weakness in the scholarship at work.

1012
01:03:41.119 --> 01:03:43.199
<v Speaker 1>When Human Smoke was released in two thousand and eight,

1013
01:03:43.559 --> 01:03:47.159
<v Speaker 1>it faced an avalanche of criticism. Most pointed among them

1014
01:03:47.280 --> 01:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>was the aforementioned Christopher Hitchins, who wrote The New Statesman

1015
01:03:51.039 --> 01:03:53.519
<v Speaker 1>that the title of the book alone was either quote

1016
01:03:53.800 --> 01:03:58.559
<v Speaker 1>very courageous or very tasteless, or conceivably both unquote. And

1017
01:03:58.639 --> 01:04:01.199
<v Speaker 1>this was not a compliment, because, as he continues, quote,

1018
01:04:01.599 --> 01:04:05.079
<v Speaker 1>I myself grew increasingly impatient with Baker's assumption of his

1019
01:04:05.079 --> 01:04:09.519
<v Speaker 1>own transgressiveness quote because quote I still detect something smug

1020
01:04:09.559 --> 01:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and vacant in the superior attitude struck by the peace lover.

1021
01:04:16.039 --> 01:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Hitchins's ultimate criticism, and one that I think resonates most

1022
01:04:19.360 --> 01:04:23.559
<v Speaker 1>relevantly to the current controversy, is this that those in

1023
01:04:23.599 --> 01:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>the anti war faction quote underestimate and understate the radical

1024
01:04:27.599 --> 01:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>evil of Nazism and fascism. They forget that many peace

1025
01:04:31.320 --> 01:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>loving forces did the same at the time, and they

1026
01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:43.239
<v Speaker 1>are absolutist in their ahistoricism unquote. However, Hitchins, as a journalist,

1027
01:04:43.360 --> 01:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was not alone in his criticisms. Historians like Noel Malcolm,

1028
01:04:48.079 --> 01:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>who people might recall I use a fair bit in

1029
01:04:50.440 --> 01:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>my Bosnia related episode, as well as Piers Brandon, Dominic Sandbrooke,

1030
01:04:55.199 --> 01:04:57.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the co hosts of the Rest Is History podcasts,

1031
01:04:57.239 --> 01:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I should add, and Lewis Minand all had very strong

1032
01:05:00.960 --> 01:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and in my opinion, fair criticisms of the book's selective

1033
01:05:04.039 --> 01:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>use of primary sources in order to promote a self

1034
01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>described pacifist agenda. Noel Malcolm even went so far as

1035
01:05:12.280 --> 01:05:15.119
<v Speaker 1>to write for The Telegraph that Baker either engaged in

1036
01:05:15.199 --> 01:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote, incompetence or malice, but that quote so far

1037
01:05:19.559 --> 01:05:23.199
<v Speaker 1>as the reliability of this strangely childish book is concerned,

1038
01:05:23.639 --> 01:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>it hardly matters which unquote. And Similarly, Sambrook expressed frustration

1039
01:05:30.320 --> 01:05:34.199
<v Speaker 1>in the same publication because while he quote dearly wanted

1040
01:05:34.239 --> 01:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>to like this book because quote it is right and

1041
01:05:37.239 --> 01:05:40.079
<v Speaker 1>healthy for historians to puncture the patriotic myths of the

1042
01:05:40.079 --> 01:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Second World War, quote, he found it to be a

1043
01:05:42.920 --> 01:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>quote self righteous book that cheapens the serious moral arguments

1044
01:05:46.679 --> 01:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Baker tries to make. Peers Brandon and Lewis Minand were

1045
01:05:52.480 --> 01:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>both slightly less harsh, but no less pointed in their

1046
01:05:55.920 --> 01:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>criticism that Baker had made some pretty serious errors in

1047
01:05:58.920 --> 01:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>his sourcing, to the point that it had become fair

1048
01:06:01.440 --> 01:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>to question his motives when writing the book in.

1049
01:06:03.559 --> 01:06:04.239
<v Speaker 2>The first place.

1050
01:06:06.079 --> 01:06:11.239
<v Speaker 1>As Minand wrote, quote, Baker's presentation may seem empirical. These

1051
01:06:11.280 --> 01:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>things happened. You can look them up. No varnish has

1052
01:06:14.039 --> 01:06:18.119
<v Speaker 1>been applied, but the effect is entirely emotional because there

1053
01:06:18.159 --> 01:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is no nesting argument, no narrative to give events a context.

1054
01:06:25.440 --> 01:06:28.639
<v Speaker 1>This can be seen most I don't want to use

1055
01:06:28.639 --> 01:06:33.079
<v Speaker 1>the word devastatingly, but it's pretty bad. In Baker's selective

1056
01:06:33.159 --> 01:06:35.119
<v Speaker 1>use of a quote that Cooper also used in his

1057
01:06:35.199 --> 01:06:39.679
<v Speaker 1>response threat on X about Winston Churchill or Churchill stated

1058
01:06:39.760 --> 01:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that Leon Trotsky, in the end quote was still a Jew.

1059
01:06:43.280 --> 01:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Nothing could get over that quote. This was almost certainly

1060
01:06:48.320 --> 01:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>meant by Baker to suggest that Churchill was as virulent

1061
01:06:51.079 --> 01:06:54.239
<v Speaker 1>an anti Semite as Hitler, or at least untrustworthy as

1062
01:06:54.280 --> 01:06:56.679
<v Speaker 1>a figure to be venerated as a friend of the Jews.

1063
01:06:56.719 --> 01:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And yet when looking at the full quote Baker used,

1064
01:07:00.840 --> 01:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it was clearly Churchill suggesting something different. Quote in nineteen

1065
01:07:06.039 --> 01:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, so great was the appreciation among the military

1066
01:07:09.360 --> 01:07:13.039
<v Speaker 1>for Trotsky's personal attitude and system that he might well

1067
01:07:13.119 --> 01:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have been made dictator of Russia by the armed forces,

1068
01:07:16.079 --> 01:07:19.599
<v Speaker 1>but for one fatal obstacle. He was a Jew. He

1069
01:07:19.719 --> 01:07:23.639
<v Speaker 1>was still a Jew. Nothing could get over that hard fortune.

1070
01:07:23.840 --> 01:07:27.239
<v Speaker 1>When you have deserted your family repudiated your race, spat

1071
01:07:27.320 --> 01:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>upon the religion of your father's, and lapped Jew and

1072
01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:33.239
<v Speaker 1>gentile in a common malignity. To be bulked of so

1073
01:07:33.360 --> 01:07:37.239
<v Speaker 1>great a prize for so narrow minded a reason, such intolerance,

1074
01:07:37.280 --> 01:07:43.079
<v Speaker 1>such pettiness, such bigotry, were indeed hard to bear unquote.

1075
01:07:43.760 --> 01:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>This suggests not a malice towards Trotsky for being a Jew,

1076
01:07:47.360 --> 01:07:50.679
<v Speaker 1>but rather a broader appreciation of the circumstances in which

1077
01:07:50.719 --> 01:07:55.159
<v Speaker 1>Trotsky found himself. That is a notoriously anti Semitic Russian empire.

1078
01:07:56.800 --> 01:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>The robbery of context in the original quote from Baker is,

1079
01:08:00.639 --> 01:08:06.159
<v Speaker 1>to put it bluntly galling. This is all to say

1080
01:08:06.320 --> 01:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that sourcing does matter. As Compact writer Jeff Schullenberger wrote

1081
01:08:10.559 --> 01:08:13.119
<v Speaker 1>in his own reaction to this affair, quote, this is

1082
01:08:13.159 --> 01:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a good illustration of why certain scholarly standards exist, even

1083
01:08:16.920 --> 01:08:20.239
<v Speaker 1>if they're often not well respected in current academia unquote,

1084
01:08:20.560 --> 01:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and that there is a broader pattern of quote the

1085
01:08:22.640 --> 01:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>person who repudiates institutions only to reproduce the same errors

1086
01:08:25.960 --> 01:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>he finds there mythmaking on a grand scale, and without

1087
01:08:29.600 --> 01:08:36.560
<v Speaker 1>any of their self correction mechanisms. As of right now,

1088
01:08:37.079 --> 01:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it is not clear how much of Cooper's sourcing is

1089
01:08:39.880 --> 01:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>up to snuff, at least when it comes to making

1090
01:08:42.840 --> 01:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the claims that he has made publicly, and thus is

1091
01:08:45.640 --> 01:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>running the risk of becoming what he is repudiating. Until

1092
01:08:50.720 --> 01:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>he makes it perfectly clear what all of his sources

1093
01:08:53.600 --> 01:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>are on this subject, what he ultimately claims will need

1094
01:08:57.640 --> 01:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to be taken with a very large grain of salt.

1095
01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Taking the word of a noted paleoconservative politician like Buchanan,

1096
01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>or again an erotic novelist at Nicholson Baker simply is

1097
01:09:09.840 --> 01:09:12.359
<v Speaker 1>just not going to cut it, no matter how compellingly

1098
01:09:12.399 --> 01:09:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the points are made or the stories are being told,

1099
01:09:15.640 --> 01:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>especially when it's clear both have engaged in selective quotation

1100
01:09:19.760 --> 01:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>for their motivated reasoning. This is also because there are

1101
01:09:24.920 --> 01:09:28.159
<v Speaker 1>many other, far more reputable books that have been written

1102
01:09:28.199 --> 01:09:32.159
<v Speaker 1>about the Second World War from the German perspective. These

1103
01:09:32.159 --> 01:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>include several memoirs that have been translated into English, some

1104
01:09:35.800 --> 01:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>being controversial but definitely worth looking at, including the famous

1105
01:09:39.720 --> 01:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>The Forgotten Soldier by Gie Mumino, Blood and Soil, the

1106
01:09:43.560 --> 01:09:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Memoir of a Third reich Brandenberger by Sep the Gianpietro,

1107
01:09:47.720 --> 01:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or Blood, Red Snow, The Memoirs of a German Soldier

1108
01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:53.279
<v Speaker 1>on the Eastern Front by Gunter Korscherrek and sol Dot

1109
01:09:53.760 --> 01:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Reflections of a German Soldier in nineteen thirty six to

1110
01:09:56.000 --> 01:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty nine by Zigfried Nappa. There's also no shortage

1111
01:09:59.720 --> 01:10:03.039
<v Speaker 1>of second andary sources, including Jonathan Triggs through the GERMANI

1112
01:10:03.239 --> 01:10:06.159
<v Speaker 1>series of books, An Aftermath Life in the Fallout of

1113
01:10:06.159 --> 01:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the Third righte nineteen forty five to nineteen fifty five

1114
01:10:08.680 --> 01:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>by Harold Yanner. They're even broader cultural and social histories

1115
01:10:13.600 --> 01:10:17.079
<v Speaker 1>like Conrad yarro Ush's Broken Lives How Ordinary Germans Experienced

1116
01:10:17.079 --> 01:10:20.479
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth Century, which pulls together dozens of memoirs by

1117
01:10:20.479 --> 01:10:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Germans born in the nineteen twenties, and then, for an

1118
01:10:23.239 --> 01:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>added twist of complexity, the memoirs that I used for

1119
01:10:26.800 --> 01:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>one of my own episodes of Afro German Hans Massaqua

1120
01:10:30.079 --> 01:10:34.399
<v Speaker 1>destined to witness growing up black and Nazi Germany. If

1121
01:10:34.399 --> 01:10:37.279
<v Speaker 1>one wants to understand why Germans did what they did

1122
01:10:37.520 --> 01:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and why so many Germans believed in the nobility of

1123
01:10:39.880 --> 01:10:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the national socialists, all without the baggage of hindsight, modern

1124
01:10:43.359 --> 01:10:48.479
<v Speaker 1>contrarianism and motivated reasoning. This is where you start. You

1125
01:10:48.560 --> 01:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>gather the leads found within all of these pages, and

1126
01:10:51.720 --> 01:10:54.399
<v Speaker 1>then connect them to further evidence that might have otherwise

1127
01:10:54.439 --> 01:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>been missed as part of a larger picture. I find

1128
01:10:58.760 --> 01:11:02.279
<v Speaker 1>it very hard to believe that Daryl doesn't understand this process,

1129
01:11:02.880 --> 01:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>or even that he has not already accumulated these sources

1130
01:11:06.039 --> 01:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>as part of his research. He's obviously very smart and

1131
01:11:09.840 --> 01:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a well storced storyteller, but he has not yet demonstrated

1132
01:11:13.560 --> 01:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this with this particular story, and has instead taken a

1133
01:11:16.920 --> 01:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>more zoomed out generalist view of the conflict that has

1134
01:11:20.640 --> 01:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>already been discussed and described by previous authors who have

1135
01:11:23.800 --> 01:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a questionable at best credibility. It is therefore not completely

1136
01:11:29.039 --> 01:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>fair to judge what has yet to come out, namely

1137
01:11:31.760 --> 01:11:35.119
<v Speaker 1>his planned podcast series, but it is fair to wonder

1138
01:11:35.239 --> 01:11:38.359
<v Speaker 1>where he will be getting his information and its overall quality,

1139
01:11:38.560 --> 01:11:42.119
<v Speaker 1>given what he has shown so far. It's worth mentioning

1140
01:11:42.159 --> 01:11:45.119
<v Speaker 1>that he has since said that he's using Nicholas Stargart's

1141
01:11:45.119 --> 01:11:48.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen work The German War, A Nation under Arms

1142
01:11:48.399 --> 01:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty nine to nineteen forty five, John Tolin's nineteen

1143
01:11:51.840 --> 01:11:55.319
<v Speaker 1>seventy six home Adolf Hitler and Thomas Fleming's two thousand

1144
01:11:55.359 --> 01:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and one book The New Dealer's War Franklin D. Roosevelt

1145
01:11:58.039 --> 01:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in the War within World War Two, and the use

1146
01:12:00.800 --> 01:12:04.119
<v Speaker 1>of these sources suggests that despite Buchanan and Baker still

1147
01:12:04.119 --> 01:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>topping his list of must reads, which they are in

1148
01:12:07.880 --> 01:12:10.319
<v Speaker 1>the list that included these three books that I just mentioned,

1149
01:12:11.039 --> 01:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and despite the fact that Buchanan and Baker are the

1150
01:12:13.680 --> 01:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>only ones who he has cited directly for the things

1151
01:12:16.600 --> 01:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that he has said, he is pulling from some higher

1152
01:12:20.000 --> 01:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>quality secondary sources than it initially seemed. However, if he

1153
01:12:24.880 --> 01:12:28.039
<v Speaker 1>was to follow my advice, which he has no obligation

1154
01:12:28.119 --> 01:12:31.159
<v Speaker 1>to do, he would be even better suited if he

1155
01:12:31.239 --> 01:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>hired a research assistant, perhaps a graduate student of history

1156
01:12:34.880 --> 01:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>over in Germany, who has direct access to the archival

1157
01:12:37.960 --> 01:12:42.239
<v Speaker 1>material and most importantly, a fluency in German. If you

1158
01:12:42.279 --> 01:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>ask me, this is not a tall ask, especially considering

1159
01:12:46.479 --> 01:12:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the financial enrichment that he has achieved from all of

1160
01:12:49.279 --> 01:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>his work that he's done, especially from this incident alone,

1161
01:12:53.920 --> 01:12:56.319
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps he is already planning to do something like that.

1162
01:12:56.439 --> 01:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, none of us have any way of knowing,

1163
01:13:00.359 --> 01:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>but one like me can still hope When I reached

1164
01:13:07.720 --> 01:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>out to Daryl for comment, he explained that, given all

1165
01:13:11.600 --> 01:13:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the noise that this is created, he would prefer to

1166
01:13:14.279 --> 01:13:17.079
<v Speaker 1>let his work speak for itself when it is finally finished,

1167
01:13:17.560 --> 01:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>so that a proper debate on the subject can be had. Now,

1168
01:13:22.039 --> 01:13:25.239
<v Speaker 1>it is reasonable to be frustrated at this, since that

1169
01:13:25.439 --> 01:13:28.119
<v Speaker 1>was arguably a more advisable course of action to begin with,

1170
01:13:28.319 --> 01:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>especially given the topic we're talking about here. However, the past,

1171
01:13:33.479 --> 01:13:36.479
<v Speaker 1>as they say, is the past, and his overall point

1172
01:13:36.880 --> 01:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>in saying letting his work speak for itself is sound.

1173
01:13:41.840 --> 01:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>We can only wait for his final word on this,

1174
01:13:44.279 --> 01:13:47.359
<v Speaker 1>while treating his now immortalized comments as the proper grain

1175
01:13:47.439 --> 01:13:53.159
<v Speaker 1>of salt that they are. When it comes to Daryl's comments,

1176
01:13:54.199 --> 01:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe it is vitally important and fair to someone

1177
01:13:57.960 --> 01:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>who I consider to be a good person, and who

1178
01:13:59.800 --> 01:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I am glad to know at least somewhat to be

1179
01:14:02.680 --> 01:14:05.479
<v Speaker 1>as charitable as possible with the way he initially expressed

1180
01:14:05.560 --> 01:14:10.399
<v Speaker 1>himself as critical as I have been. Thankfully, he has

1181
01:14:10.439 --> 01:14:13.399
<v Speaker 1>a deed elaborated on his thinking and has stated the

1182
01:14:13.439 --> 01:14:18.279
<v Speaker 1>following in his aforementioned substack post quote. Even if the

1183
01:14:18.359 --> 01:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>deaths were largely the result of resource deficiencies in poor planning.

1184
01:14:22.920 --> 01:14:25.239
<v Speaker 1>It does not change the fact that the Jews were

1185
01:14:25.279 --> 01:14:30.199
<v Speaker 1>targeted for death under circumstances that forced a choice between

1186
01:14:30.199 --> 01:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>those who would eat and those who would starve. The

1187
01:14:32.960 --> 01:14:36.039
<v Speaker 1>built in anti semitism of the Third Reich guaranteed that

1188
01:14:36.119 --> 01:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Jews would be among the last in line. That is

1189
01:14:39.640 --> 01:14:42.359
<v Speaker 1>not to say that Jews were not massacred. Of course,

1190
01:14:42.439 --> 01:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Jews were massacred. People of all ethnicities were massacred, and

1191
01:14:45.920 --> 01:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it would have been quite a mystery if the Jews

1192
01:14:47.920 --> 01:14:51.279
<v Speaker 1>were an exception, doubly so given the Third reces unique

1193
01:14:51.279 --> 01:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>antipathy toward them. This is a far cry from the

1194
01:14:59.039 --> 01:15:04.119
<v Speaker 1>implications many people saw in the Tucker Carlson interview because, frankly,

1195
01:15:04.359 --> 01:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the way Darryl communicated his ideas there were deeply disturbing

1196
01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:12.119
<v Speaker 1>to many people. While the attempts to make this interview

1197
01:15:12.119 --> 01:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a facet of a growing trend of Holocaust visionism and

1198
01:15:15.920 --> 01:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>anti semitism are crude and unfair, the topic does remain

1199
01:15:19.880 --> 01:15:24.479
<v Speaker 1>hot button, and people's propensity to misread things poorly expressed

1200
01:15:25.159 --> 01:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is understandable. It's frustrating, but it's understandable to wit using

1201
01:15:30.760 --> 01:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>phrasing like no plan or people ended up dead while

1202
01:15:34.800 --> 01:15:38.079
<v Speaker 1>never once saying the word holocaust or genocide or even

1203
01:15:38.159 --> 01:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>murder unless you're claiming that Vladimir Selinsky has had his

1204
01:15:41.600 --> 01:15:45.479
<v Speaker 1>political opponents murdered, is inevitably going to create tension, to

1205
01:15:45.520 --> 01:15:49.439
<v Speaker 1>put it mildly, And never mind the fact that the

1206
01:15:49.479 --> 01:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>person interviewing Daryl, that is Tucker Carlson himself, and really

1207
01:15:53.239 --> 01:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the main reason this whole story became such a firestorm

1208
01:15:55.600 --> 01:15:58.479
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, kept saying and implying that you're

1209
01:15:58.520 --> 01:16:01.359
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to talk about this because apparently you can

1210
01:16:01.399 --> 01:16:04.279
<v Speaker 1>get arrested even in the United States for such talk.

1211
01:16:05.239 --> 01:16:10.319
<v Speaker 1>But such talk about what exactly what is it that

1212
01:16:10.399 --> 01:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>gets you arrested in other countries? Which does happen and

1213
01:16:13.960 --> 01:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe should happen, But that's another country that's

1214
01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>not the United States. But what is it that gets

1215
01:16:20.560 --> 01:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you arrested in those other countries for discussing? Frankly and

1216
01:16:23.800 --> 01:16:29.359
<v Speaker 1>in the open, that unanswered question, paired with the lack

1217
01:16:29.439 --> 01:16:33.319
<v Speaker 1>of ever saying the word holocaust or genocide, is just

1218
01:16:33.359 --> 01:16:36.399
<v Speaker 1>going to stick out, and it would be naive to

1219
01:16:36.439 --> 01:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>pretend it would not. While it has always been Carlson's style,

1220
01:16:42.720 --> 01:16:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the fact that He never once pushed back or even

1221
01:16:45.399 --> 01:16:49.039
<v Speaker 1>asked more difficult follow up questions than why would they

1222
01:16:49.079 --> 01:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>do that, and just merely nodded along. Was just going

1223
01:16:52.760 --> 01:16:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to make the backlash all the more inevitable. That doesn't

1224
01:16:56.359 --> 01:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>make it deserved, but it does make it inevitable. Now,

1225
01:17:01.880 --> 01:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it is because of my own bias toward Cooper

1226
01:17:05.600 --> 01:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>as somebody I think is a good dude, But the

1227
01:17:08.039 --> 01:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for such imprecise talk is something I placed on

1228
01:17:11.920 --> 01:17:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Tucker Carlson, not on his interview subject. Anyone who knows

1229
01:17:17.279 --> 01:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Daryl Cooper will tell you that he is unfailingly polite and,

1230
01:17:20.920 --> 01:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>as I suggested from the outset, someone who does sincerely

1231
01:17:24.239 --> 01:17:27.319
<v Speaker 1>care about the people in his life, even people he

1232
01:17:27.359 --> 01:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>does not know very well, and he shows it through action,

1233
01:17:30.840 --> 01:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>not words. Tucker Carlson is the reason Darryl's as famous

1234
01:17:36.560 --> 01:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>as he is. While I believe Daryl deserves his success

1235
01:17:40.399 --> 01:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>for his storytelling abilities on extremely complicated and controversial subjects,

1236
01:17:45.239 --> 01:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the fact remains that had Carlson not read Daryl's viral

1237
01:17:49.439 --> 01:17:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Twitter thread from twenty twenty one about why so many

1238
01:17:52.279 --> 01:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Americans believe to stop the steel narratives, which, by the way,

1239
01:17:55.600 --> 01:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>in case anyone missed. It led to former President Donald

1240
01:17:58.159 --> 01:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump actually name checking Daryl of his speeches. Daryl just

1241
01:18:02.119 --> 01:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>would not have the scale of reach that he does,

1242
01:18:06.079 --> 01:18:09.279
<v Speaker 1>and he knows that and likely considers Tucker Carlson a

1243
01:18:09.359 --> 01:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>friend and someone to whom he owes everything he currently

1244
01:18:12.039 --> 01:18:17.479
<v Speaker 1>has and enjoys. So why jeopardize that or make it

1245
01:18:17.520 --> 01:18:22.479
<v Speaker 1>awkward by pushing back against Carlson's lack of pushing back.

1246
01:18:23.479 --> 01:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>There is certainly something honorable in that, but it is

1247
01:18:26.239 --> 01:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>also frustrating, especially when discussing controversial interpretations of history in

1248
01:18:31.439 --> 01:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>such a public way. Darryl's strength is not in off

1249
01:18:37.920 --> 01:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the cuff interviews, as he himself has admitted more than once.

1250
01:18:42.720 --> 01:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>His strength is in well written, well considered long form storytelling.

1251
01:18:46.960 --> 01:18:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Putting aside the quality of some of his conclusions, but

1252
01:18:50.159 --> 01:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we're not obligated to agree with everyone all the time.

1253
01:18:53.920 --> 01:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>I think he is a brilliant and unique storyteller, and

1254
01:18:56.479 --> 01:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>his podcasts, when they are at their best, offer us

1255
01:18:59.880 --> 01:19:02.039
<v Speaker 1>one of the best entry points to some of the

1256
01:19:02.039 --> 01:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>most difficult historical topics of our time, from the Israeli

1257
01:19:05.920 --> 01:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Palestinian conflict to the Jonestown massacre to Dostoyevsky his episode

1258
01:19:11.760 --> 01:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>The Underground Spirit is really my favorite episode he's ever done,

1259
01:19:15.159 --> 01:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and probably one of my favorite podcasts I've ever heard.

1260
01:19:18.399 --> 01:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I would even wager that had he not been speaking

1261
01:19:21.520 --> 01:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>off the cuff in this interview with Tucker Carlson and

1262
01:19:24.039 --> 01:19:28.479
<v Speaker 1>simply letting this upcoming project speak for itself, it might

1263
01:19:28.479 --> 01:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>have served that purpose admirably. However, until he demonstrates a

1264
01:19:33.840 --> 01:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>better and more transparentability at sourcing and drawing reasonable, non motivated,

1265
01:19:38.800 --> 01:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>non overtly provocative conclusions, it is unlikely that as many

1266
01:19:43.000 --> 01:19:46.319
<v Speaker 1>people will take this project as seriously as they perhaps

1267
01:19:46.319 --> 01:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>should have, and that's too bad. There's also a greater scrutiny,

1268
01:19:52.520 --> 01:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>which is not necessarily a bad thing facing historical podcasters

1269
01:19:56.800 --> 01:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, but given how it has been framed, especially

1270
01:20:00.560 --> 01:20:04.279
<v Speaker 1>in places like The Atlantic, where they had the patently

1271
01:20:04.359 --> 01:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous headline the Dangerous Rise of the podcast Historians, this

1272
01:20:09.560 --> 01:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of scrutiny could just as easily become a type

1273
01:20:11.920 --> 01:20:17.239
<v Speaker 1>of delegitimization of the entire medium. That's something that hasn't

1274
01:20:17.239 --> 01:20:22.279
<v Speaker 1>really been talked about since all this happened. One might

1275
01:20:22.319 --> 01:20:26.039
<v Speaker 1>call this growing scrutiny and criticism elitist, but frankly that

1276
01:20:26.159 --> 01:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is small comfort to the creators who do not make

1277
01:20:28.880 --> 01:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars a year, and it's not much comfort

1278
01:20:31.840 --> 01:20:34.079
<v Speaker 1>to those who do probably either. I have it on

1279
01:20:34.159 --> 01:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>good authority that Dan Carlin isn't too happy about this

1280
01:20:36.600 --> 01:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>headline either. Nevertheless, calling Daryl Cooper an unabashed Holocaust denier,

1281
01:20:44.760 --> 01:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>as the Wall Street Journal did, is just not true.

1282
01:20:48.600 --> 01:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It helps nobody, and frankly, it's really insulting and it

1283
01:20:54.720 --> 01:21:00.319
<v Speaker 1>just makes things worse for everyone in historical podcasting. A

1284
01:21:00.359 --> 01:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>final note, Darryl Cooper is known for encouraging empathy with

1285
01:21:05.199 --> 01:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>his listeners and has spoken many times about how that

1286
01:21:07.960 --> 01:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>is his goal. At his best, he demonstrates that we

1287
01:21:13.439 --> 01:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>can have some measure of empathy for monsters, like someone

1288
01:21:17.560 --> 01:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>like Jim Jones, for example. He reminds us that we

1289
01:21:22.439 --> 01:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>can even try and live in the heads of monsters

1290
01:21:25.039 --> 01:21:30.279
<v Speaker 1>in order to better understand them. Now, this can be

1291
01:21:30.319 --> 01:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>a noble goal, but I've always had problems with this

1292
01:21:34.479 --> 01:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>way of doing things, and that's just me. I'm not

1293
01:21:37.199 --> 01:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>saying he should be doing things differently. I'm just explaining

1294
01:21:39.720 --> 01:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>my perspective. I do believe this can be a noble goal,

1295
01:21:44.199 --> 01:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>but that does not mean that we have to try

1296
01:21:47.239 --> 01:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>and prove or even imply, that these people were not

1297
01:21:52.560 --> 01:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>actually monsters, which is a risk that comes with empathy,

1298
01:21:57.279 --> 01:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that in and of itself proves the limitations of what

1299
01:22:01.039 --> 01:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>we call empathy. In my opinion, if the empathy we

1300
01:22:06.239 --> 01:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>feel is merely to serve the contrarian impulses so many

1301
01:22:09.680 --> 01:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of us possess, and I'm speaking from experience here, then

1302
01:22:13.800 --> 01:22:18.279
<v Speaker 1>what kind of empathy is that it certainly does not

1303
01:22:18.359 --> 01:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>appear to foster a greater, more complex understanding of the

1304
01:22:21.960 --> 01:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>human condition. In fact, to me, it really just sounds

1305
01:22:28.680 --> 01:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>like a typical way to shift loyalties from one narrative

1306
01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>over to another. We have seen this happen many times before,

1307
01:22:37.920 --> 01:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>especially with the likes of the Gnome Chomsky's and the

1308
01:22:40.439 --> 01:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Howard Zins of the world, just reflexively believing that the

1309
01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>supposedly oppressed can do no wrong because oppressors were the

1310
01:22:47.960 --> 01:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>ones who wrote the history. This is not just a

1311
01:22:53.800 --> 01:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>wrongheaded way to approach history and simply not true. There's

1312
01:22:58.399 --> 01:23:02.319
<v Speaker 1>plenty of quote unquote losers of history who have written

1313
01:23:02.359 --> 01:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>their views of things, But I also believe it's a

1314
01:23:06.119 --> 01:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>wrongheaded way to perceive the world in general, and simply

1315
01:23:09.479 --> 01:23:15.439
<v Speaker 1>breeds distrust and paranoia. While an honest examination of power

1316
01:23:15.479 --> 01:23:18.239
<v Speaker 1>imbalances in both the past and present can be illuminating,

1317
01:23:18.319 --> 01:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>especially if they're counterintuitive, it is a far too reductive

1318
01:23:23.119 --> 01:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>way to look at the world as far as I'm concerned,

1319
01:23:25.640 --> 01:23:31.439
<v Speaker 1>to say nothing of complex historical processes. That is what

1320
01:23:31.479 --> 01:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>creates a selective application of agency that I was bemoaning

1321
01:23:34.960 --> 01:23:41.039
<v Speaker 1>earlier on. In all this, ultimately, that is not history,

1322
01:23:41.960 --> 01:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that is politics. This is not to say history cannot

1323
01:23:46.359 --> 01:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>be political in nature or should not inform political positions today,

1324
01:23:49.920 --> 01:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>not at all, but pushing politics, especially without the utmost

1325
01:23:54.560 --> 01:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>transparency while discussing history, is skipping a step politics blinds

1326
01:24:01.760 --> 01:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>human beings to the truth of the present, even more

1327
01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>so when it comes to our interpretations of the past.

1328
01:24:10.439 --> 01:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>We would and have said the same thing about the

1329
01:24:13.920 --> 01:24:19.039
<v Speaker 1>motivated reasoning that fuels the decolonialist crowd. We have yet

1330
01:24:19.079 --> 01:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to see what Daryl Cooper will produce with his finished product,

1331
01:24:23.800 --> 01:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>so we must withhold full judgment, and I would hope

1332
01:24:27.520 --> 01:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>stop impugny motives on him that no one can possibly know.

1333
01:24:33.039 --> 01:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Despite my significant reservations with the early interpretations that he

1334
01:24:36.640 --> 01:24:40.279
<v Speaker 1>has shared, I look forward to seeing what he creates,

1335
01:24:41.680 --> 01:24:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I sincerely hope that my concerns are proven wrong.
