Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen,
Speaker 2: it's thirsty. The eighteenth of December, he're of our lord,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five. Today may be the day that war
Speaker 2: kicks off in Venezuela. Of course, Congress is finally getting
Speaker 2: around to talking about it, but only three Republicans even
Speaker 2: want to talk about it. The rest of them would
Speaker 2: rather go to war with Venezuela than go to war
Speaker 2: with Trump. And he's finally telling us the truth about
Speaker 2: what the war is about. They have put a total
Speaker 2: block eighty said, and as of last night they announced,
Speaker 2: and I believe it had started this morning. The Venezuelan
Speaker 2: Navy is escorting these tankers. So we'll see what happens.
Speaker 2: But at least Trump is finally telling us the truth,
Speaker 2: still telling us lies about it, telling us the truth
Speaker 2: that it's a war of colonialism. And then, of course
Speaker 2: you have Homeland Security that decided in laterally that they're
Speaker 2: going to start taking DNA from all visitors from friendly
Speaker 2: countries and allies. If you want to come here as
Speaker 2: a tourist. Five years of social media and DNA and
Speaker 2: who decided this? Did Congress know is decided by the bureaucracy.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back. Well, let's begin with the stupid wars,
Speaker 2: because they are stupid, and as I mentioned here at
Speaker 2: the beginning, we have total blockade. But the House is
Speaker 2: going to vote this week on a bill to block
Speaker 2: Trump from launching a war with Venezuela day eight dollars short, perhaps,
Speaker 2: but they may do it today. They may not do
Speaker 2: it today. Maybe they'll do it after it's already started.
Speaker 2: The House could vote as soon as Thursday on a
Speaker 2: bipartisan war powers resolution aimed at blocking Trump from launching
Speaker 2: an attack on Venezuela, met a major US military build
Speaker 2: up in the Caribbean and thought and threats of regime
Speaker 2: change of Austin Maduro. The bill is introduced by a Democrat,
Speaker 2: has thirty one co sponsors, including three Republicans, Thomas Massey,
Speaker 2: Marjorie Taylor Green, and Don Bacon, all of whom, well,
Speaker 2: Massey is running again, but you know he's got the
Speaker 2: zionist billionaires who want to get him out as well
Speaker 2: as Trump. But the other two have said, bora, we're
Speaker 2: not going to have that fight. And most of The
Speaker 2: GOP would rather go to war with anyone and kill
Speaker 2: anyone rather than go to war with Trump, because they're
Speaker 2: all about themselves. They don't care about anybody else. They
Speaker 2: don't care about the Constitution. He's wore up Uldu. They're despicable.
Speaker 2: The Constitution does not permit the executive branch to unilaterally
Speaker 2: commit an act of war against the sovereign nation that
Speaker 2: hasn't attacked the US, said Thomas Massey in a statement
Speaker 2: when the bill was introduced. Congress has the sole power
Speaker 2: to declare war against Venezuela, and Congress must decide such
Speaker 2: matters according to our Constitution. Well, clearly Trump knows when
Speaker 2: this vote is going to come up, because he's got
Speaker 2: his little weasel, Mike Johnson, who's basically scheduling and controlling
Speaker 2: that stuff. So maybe that has something to do with
Speaker 2: the timing of the total blockade that is there. This
Speaker 2: is go ahead, knock that chip off of my shoulder
Speaker 2: type of thing. Another War Powers resolution that was introduced
Speaker 2: in the House by Representative Gregory Meeks, Democrat New York
Speaker 2: aims to stop Trump's bombing campaign against alleged drug boats
Speaker 2: in Latin America, and that was expected to be brought
Speaker 2: to a vote yesterday. I didn't see whether that happened
Speaker 2: or not. But it also had thirty one co sponsors,
Speaker 2: but not a single Republican, not Massy, not Marjorie Taylor Green.
Speaker 2: Why is that? To me? That is as outrageous. That
Speaker 2: is an act of war. There is a war crime
Speaker 2: the way they have conducted it. Something needs to be
Speaker 2: done about that. Meanwhile, Julian Assange has filed a criminal
Speaker 2: complaint in Sweden, where the Nobel Foundation is headquartered, and
Speaker 2: he accuses the Nobel Foundation the people give out the
Speaker 2: Nobel Peace Prize, accuse them of misusing the peace prize
Speaker 2: funds by awarding them to Venezuelan opposition figure Maria Carina Machado,
Speaker 2: who is publicly called on the US to attack her
Speaker 2: own country. Yeah, she's the one that gave the peace
Speaker 2: prize to. And when you look at this, it's like
Speaker 2: as absurd as it seems that Trump thinks that he
Speaker 2: deserves a Nobel Peace Prize. Perhaps this is why, Hey,
Speaker 2: if Maria can get one, I guess I should be
Speaker 2: able to get one. She's calling for war against her
Speaker 2: own country. The complaint dated on Wednesday and submitted to
Speaker 2: Sweden's Economic Crime Authority and War Crimes Unit, where the
Speaker 2: Nobel Foundation is based, argues that Alfred Nobel's will legally
Speaker 2: restricts the Peace Prize funds to purpose is that promote
Speaker 2: peace and bars their use to advance war or foreign
Speaker 2: military intervention. And he is spot on because it's her
Speaker 2: party and the people affiliated with her that Trump is
Speaker 2: trying to install there and giving her a Nobel Peace
Speaker 2: Prize is a pr move that is being done by
Speaker 2: this committee diverse. Disbursing prize money to Machado violates the
Speaker 2: mandate and could constitute a crime under Swedish law, Assange says,
Speaker 2: while warning that the Nobel Peace Prize could be used
Speaker 2: as an instrument of war. Interesting because it exists because
Speaker 2: offered Nobel created dynamite, and then when he saw how
Speaker 2: it was being used in war, he took the money
Speaker 2: that he made from it and set up this peace prize. Yes,
Speaker 2: and now we come full circle again. Now they're using
Speaker 2: it to create war. The complaint sites a series of
Speaker 2: public sayments in which Machado endorsed potential US military intervention
Speaker 2: in Venezuela while defending Washington's use of force amid its
Speaker 2: heavy military build up in the Caribbean. Assane pointed out
Speaker 2: that she had that she had justified US strikes on
Speaker 2: boats off of Venezuela's coasts, which have killed ninety five
Speaker 2: people to date. The US maintains that it is targeting
Speaker 2: Narco terrace, while the UN has condemned the strikes as
Speaker 2: extra judicial killings, and that's what they are. But now
Speaker 2: Trump is telling us the truth about the purpose of this,
Speaker 2: as we'll get to in a second. Here, Trump boasted
Speaker 2: that Venezuela surrounded by the largest armada ever assembled in
Speaker 2: the history of South America, while promising to tighten the
Speaker 2: screws on Caracas until they quote return all of the oil,
Speaker 2: the land, and other assets that they previously stole from us.
Speaker 2: Now he's starting to get to the truth of the matter.
Speaker 2: It's about oil always, and you know it's about regime change.
Speaker 2: But the regime change is the penultimate cause of this.
Speaker 2: Oil is the primary cause of it, as it is
Speaker 2: over and over again with our wars Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan
Speaker 2: and things like that. In Afghanistan, I think they're really
Speaker 2: there there after the opium and the lithium, But you
Speaker 2: just have to ask the Cia while we're having these
Speaker 2: wars because they're the ones that are starting it right,
Speaker 2: Russian Foreign Minister Sergei lavrav said, the US actions off
Speaker 2: of Venezuela's coast undermine hopes that an agreement can be
Speaker 2: reached with Washington. How can we deal with these pirates here?
Speaker 2: It's kind of interesting. We had that young woman who
Speaker 2: has been the pr point for the European Union and
Speaker 2: pushing war, and she said, we can't trust Russia. In
Speaker 2: the last one hundred years, they have started nineteen wars. Really,
Speaker 2: I don't remember that I looked it up. I mean,
Speaker 2: you count them up best. I can come up with
Speaker 2: this ten to fourteen, depending on how you break these
Speaker 2: actions down. I mean, they've had some actions they count
Speaker 2: if you count World War Two. In the last one
Speaker 2: hundred years, everybody was going to war with everybody else.
Speaker 2: And at the beginning of that Russia was allied with Germany,
Speaker 2: so you could say that they were the aggressors in
Speaker 2: that war. But then there were the situations where they
Speaker 2: invaded Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Georgia, Chechen things that were in their sphere.
Speaker 2: You know, like, we say we can do that. Trump
Speaker 2: says we can do that in South America. They were
Speaker 2: also in Afghanistan and Syria. We also in Afghanistan and
Speaker 2: Syria and Iraq. We can throw that in there as well.
Speaker 2: So how do we measure up with all this stuff?
Speaker 2: You know, we've also been in Grenada, in Cuba and Venezuela,
Speaker 2: We've attacked them and so forth. I mean, we've got
Speaker 2: a much longer list. Panama could just keep going. Who's
Speaker 2: the threat here? Yeah, who's the domino theory applied to?
Speaker 2: I mean, we're like the ones who set up the
Speaker 2: dominoes and we're knocked them down, you know, everywhere I look,
Speaker 2: that's what I see. So anyway, Trump has declared a
Speaker 2: total and complete blockade of sanctioned oil tankers in and
Speaker 2: out of Venezuela, and as of last night, Venezuela was
Speaker 2: saying that they were going to escort it with naval vessels,
Speaker 2: and there's a lot of news articles about that that
Speaker 2: came out just this morning, may kickoff today. Trump on
Speaker 2: Tuesday said a total and complete blockade of all sanctioned
Speaker 2: oil tankers. Venezuela is completely surrounded by the largest armada
Speaker 2: ever assembled in the history of South America's I just quoted,
Speaker 2: and it'll only get bigger, and the shock to them
Speaker 2: will be like nothing they've ever seen before. I'm just
Speaker 2: sick and tired of these war sellers, these warmongers boasting
Speaker 2: about their power. I don't want to see a bunch
Speaker 2: of Americans get killed, but I'm just sick and tired
Speaker 2: of the American military and the Pentagon makes me want
Speaker 2: to throw up. I despise them, just like I despise
Speaker 2: Israeli government. The president, and the blockade, an action that's
Speaker 2: generally considered an act of war under international law, would
Speaker 2: continue until Venezuela quote returns our oil. Think about that.
Speaker 2: Of course, he only said the same thing Siria said,
Speaker 2: you take the oil? What claim do we have in
Speaker 2: Syria for oil? And of course they're still there, and
Speaker 2: of course they still had, you know, just had in
Speaker 2: the last couple of days three Americans killed there, and
Speaker 2: the Pentagon says they're not going to change anything about
Speaker 2: their policies there in Syria. They don't care. It doesn't
Speaker 2: matter to them. Law, morality, the death of their own troops,
Speaker 2: none of that matters to these people. It's just amazing.
Speaker 2: So finally Trump is telling the truth, even if it's
Speaker 2: ugly and of course, especially the way he puts it here,
Speaker 2: the president appears to be referring to the nationalization of
Speaker 2: all projects under Hugo Chavez, who forced foreign run companies
Speaker 2: to be converted into joint ventures in which Venezuela's state
Speaker 2: oil company held a majority state. Isn't that what Trump
Speaker 2: is doing with TikTok? Same thing? And Maduro might want
Speaker 2: to take a look at what we did to another
Speaker 2: country that did that, Iran. Most of day was elected,
Speaker 2: he wanted to do the same thing that Hugo Chavez did,
Speaker 2: so there was the CIA coup against him. They put
Speaker 2: in the shaw of Iran. They trained his secret police
Speaker 2: to brutally repress the people that are there. That's the pattern.
Speaker 2: Western wall companies accepted Chavez his terms, including Chevron, which
Speaker 2: continues to operate in Venezuela today, while others rejected the
Speaker 2: deal out of hand, most notably Exxon Mobile. They exited
Speaker 2: the country. They sued the Venezuelan government and international arbitration
Speaker 2: over the expropriations, but the oil remains the property of
Speaker 2: the Venezuelan state and is unclear what Trump means when
Speaker 2: he claims that Venezuelan land was stolen from the US. Again,
Speaker 2: what claim do we have over Syrian oil? And why
Speaker 2: are we there? Trump also claimed that Maduro's government was
Speaker 2: a foreign terrorist organization, referring to his administration as we
Speaker 2: heard this over and over again, the non existent cartel
Speaker 2: the Sons. Now, this article from Anti Walla's the first
Speaker 2: time I have seen this. I said, the term cartel
Speaker 2: the Sons was first to use in the early nineteen
Speaker 2: nineties to describe some Venezuelan generals who had sun and
Speaker 2: insignias on their uniforms. Why because they were involved in
Speaker 2: cocaine trafficking, not VENTONYL Ventnol didn't even exist then, in
Speaker 2: cocaine trafficking, and they were actually working with the CIA
Speaker 2: at the time. If you want to shut down the
Speaker 2: world's worst drug cartel, shut down the CIA. They're the
Speaker 2: ones who are the worst, the most powerful of all
Speaker 2: these cartels. They are worst. They're worse than the Sinaloa cartel,
Speaker 2: l Chopping and the rest of them. But they just
Speaker 2: keep going and going, unlimited amounts of money, and the murders,
Speaker 2: the assassinations, the coups, the wars that they start everywhere,
Speaker 2: just disgusting or discuss me. The US War Department says, now,
Speaker 2: no force posture changes. That's the way they put it.
Speaker 2: They're not going to make any adjustments here because we
Speaker 2: had some Americans killed in Syria doing things which we
Speaker 2: have no legal right to be doing, no justification. It's
Speaker 2: nothing but piracy. But we got a thousand US troops
Speaker 2: in Syria? Why are they there? I'm going to ask yourself.
Speaker 2: I mean, didn't we have this discussion under Obama? And
Speaker 2: under Obama he kept itching to put US boots on
Speaker 2: the ground. And I don't know if he did it
Speaker 2: or Trump did it, or Biden did it. They didn't
Speaker 2: tell us even when they did it. They did it.
Speaker 2: They helped to establish and put in charge of Syria
Speaker 2: ISIS and the people that we were fighting in Afghanistan,
Speaker 2: and then we put them in charge of Syria. Why
Speaker 2: because of oil and because of geopolitical competition with Russia.
Speaker 2: As Henry Kissinger said, we have no permanent allies. We
Speaker 2: have permanent interests, and those are interests. And so we
Speaker 2: will fight al Qaeda in Afghanistan in a rock and
Speaker 2: say that's what we're doing there, and then we will
Speaker 2: put al Qaeda and isis in charge in Syria. It's
Speaker 2: always about the oil. It's always about the big corporations.
Speaker 2: It's just never changes, never changes. And so Haig Seth says,
Speaker 2: in terms of the video of the strike, the second
Speaker 2: strike on the drug boat survivors, of course I'm not
Speaker 2: going to release the full video. We knew that as well.
Speaker 2: The one video that you're not going to see. They
Speaker 2: will put out video of every single strike against boats.
Speaker 2: They're not in conflict with them, they're not fighting them,
Speaker 2: they aren't shooting back or shooting at them, and that
Speaker 2: they have not verified have drugs. They will put every
Speaker 2: single one of those videos up. They will put up
Speaker 2: videos of them and their piracy taking a tanker with
Speaker 2: one to two million gallons of oil, barrels of oil.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, barrels. I think a barrel is like fifty
Speaker 2: gallons or something. But they will put those videos out.
Speaker 2: That's the only video they won't put out. And I
Speaker 2: guarantee you that if this thing turns into a shooting war,
Speaker 2: they're going to put out tons and tons of video,
Speaker 2: but they're not going to put out video of their
Speaker 2: clear war crimes. I say the whole thing is a
Speaker 2: war crime, and I've said that from the very beginning,
Speaker 2: but this one is something that even people who want
Speaker 2: to support their action have a real issue trying to
Speaker 2: explain that away. So of course he's not going to
Speaker 2: put it out. We all know that they're going to
Speaker 2: read it. It's top secret, top secret. Cannot see that.
Speaker 2: And I said for the longest time that classification things
Speaker 2: are done more to protect them than to protect the nation,
Speaker 2: And the whole idea of national security is really to
Speaker 2: protect them and not the nation, especially when you look
Speaker 2: at the fact that our government by becoming the policeman
Speaker 2: of the world. This all happened under Truman. Truman creates
Speaker 2: the CIA, he creates the NSA, he creates a national
Speaker 2: security state, He turns the military into the world's policeman.
Speaker 2: All that stuff goes together, and now we look at
Speaker 2: NATO and look at Mark Ruta, the guy who tried
Speaker 2: to destroy all of the farms, the small farms in
Speaker 2: the Netherlands, the most productive farms in the world, and
Speaker 2: he wanted to put them out of business, criminalizing fertilizer
Speaker 2: of all things. Because he's got a system set up
Speaker 2: with Picnic and family members that are partnering with Bill gates.
Speaker 2: They want to manufacture the food and deliver the food,
Speaker 2: and they don't want any competition from farmers. So the
Speaker 2: people in the Netherlands woke up to what was going on.
Speaker 2: Some of the things are starting to happen now in
Speaker 2: France as well. They're going around in France with this
Speaker 2: mass culling program that is happening there, just like they
Speaker 2: did with chickens here in this country. We're going to
Speaker 2: do a PCR test and oh, we've got one positive
Speaker 2: here for some disease that we claim we're looking for,
Speaker 2: so we're gonna have to kill your entire herd of cattle.
Speaker 2: It's like going to kill a million chickens because we
Speaker 2: got one positive PCR test. It's absurd. But rather than
Speaker 2: roll over and die for the government, like the poultry
Speaker 2: farms dead here and again, most of it was being
Speaker 2: done with the cooperation of the really big egg farms
Speaker 2: because it worked out for them. They made a lot
Speaker 2: more money if they reduced the number of eggs. But
Speaker 2: they're in France. The farmers are pushing back and the
Speaker 2: veterinarians that are going in there and doing the tests
Speaker 2: have to have armored cars and military aid because they're
Speaker 2: ready to fight. These people want to starve us, they
Speaker 2: want to kill us in war, because that's what Mark
Speaker 2: Ruda is doing. After trying to destroy the farms and
Speaker 2: the Netherlands, the people kicked him out. So where'd you go?
Speaker 2: He went to NATO and he's now saying that Trump
Speaker 2: has been very good for NATO. And I said this
Speaker 2: myself when he was in his first term. I said,
Speaker 2: he's not going to get out of NATO. What he's
Speaker 2: doing is he's threatening to do that as a prod
Speaker 2: to get the NATO countries as a reason for them
Speaker 2: to go to the people in their country and say, hey,
Speaker 2: we're going to have to up our defense spending because
Speaker 2: it's going to be on us. Trump was there as
Speaker 2: a prod to get them to up their defense spending
Speaker 2: because they all knew that the Ukraine War was going
Speaker 2: to be happening. I mean, if Alexey Restovich and Ukraine
Speaker 2: knew that, of course they knew it too. There's an
Speaker 2: open secret for everybody on both sides of this. Russia
Speaker 2: as well even knew exactly when going to attend. So
Speaker 2: as I said, you know, so many times you see
Speaker 2: Trump positions himself out there as a foil against the
Speaker 2: globalist when in reality he's doing their work for them.
Speaker 2: He did it at NATO, he did it with the lockdowns,
Speaker 2: leading the lockdowns and developing the poison mRNA for everybody.
Speaker 2: He is a manchurion candidate of the globalist and the technocrats.
Speaker 2: He's the guy that is pratting around telling you how
Speaker 2: he opposes them, how he hates him. He's opposed to
Speaker 2: the CIA right, the deep state. And then what does
Speaker 2: he do, And he's opposed to George Bush's Iraq war
Speaker 2: based on lies about weapons and master destruction. What does
Speaker 2: he do? He takes the person Gena Haspell, who sold
Speaker 2: those lies, who produced those lies about weapons of mass
Speaker 2: destruction by torturing people, and there were lies. She's the
Speaker 2: one who did the torture, who covered up the torture,
Speaker 2: who gave them the lies, and he puts her in
Speaker 2: charge of CIA his entire first term because Pompeo was
Speaker 2: a figurehead. She was a number two there until they
Speaker 2: just said, we don't need a disguise anymore. We'll just
Speaker 2: make her number one. Over and over again. He talks
Speaker 2: about these issues from the perspective of people who love
Speaker 2: this country and loved the Constitution, and yet he does
Speaker 2: just the opposite. He does what is in the interest
Speaker 2: of NATO and the UN. Well, let's talk about the
Speaker 2: other stupid war, and that is Ukraine before we take
Speaker 2: a break. Here John Mehersheimer Meerscheimer is talking about why
Speaker 2: diplomacy is going nowhere in the Ukraine Russian War, and
Speaker 2: as a consequence, he says Ukraine is doomed. And he's
Speaker 2: absolutely right. And I've said this before. I said, Alexey
Speaker 2: Arrostovich a guy who basically doesn't really have a filter.
Speaker 2: He just tells you the way it is, you know.
Speaker 2: And he said, now is the time that we need
Speaker 2: to try to arrange to have peace on some terms
Speaker 2: so we can preserve Ukraine as a country instead of
Speaker 2: being a region of Russia as it has been for
Speaker 2: four hundred years. With Silenski having much belatedly dropped aspirations
Speaker 2: for Ukraine's NATO membership, European officials are now openly admitting
Speaker 2: that what pretty much everyone knew but was afraid to say.
Speaker 2: The U High Representative acknowledged in fresh remarks that Ukraine's
Speaker 2: membership in NATO is quote out of the question. However,
Speaker 2: said at the same time, the European Union now needs
Speaker 2: to provide concrete security guarantees. So the reality is that I say,
Speaker 2: all right, you're not going to be a NATO, we're
Speaker 2: not going to give you formal status, but we're still
Speaker 2: going to have the essence of what NATO was about,
Speaker 2: the Article five protections to say that if you were attacked,
Speaker 2: we view that as an attack on all of us.
Speaker 2: And so they use them as a cat's pause, a provocation,
Speaker 2: and then if they are attacked, that's their excuse to
Speaker 2: go to war with Russia. That's what this is all about.
Speaker 2: You know. The whole purpose of NATO was as a
Speaker 2: mutual defense agreement the way it was sold everybody, and
Speaker 2: it is a trip wire to draw us into wars.
Speaker 2: If this Ukraine NATO membership is not in question, if
Speaker 2: this is out of the question, then we need to
Speaker 2: see what the security guarantees are that are tangible. They
Speaker 2: can't be just papers or promises. They have to be
Speaker 2: real troops and real capabilities. So they're reactivating the draft
Speaker 2: in several European countries and they're spending inordinate amounts of
Speaker 2: money on weapons of war to destroy their countries and
Speaker 2: other countries. It's absolutely insane. The world is going crazy.
Speaker 2: So this is Kaja Kallis, and you've seen her, you know,
Speaker 2: she's like thirty something and she has been their spokesperson
Speaker 2: for war. She's the one who said, in the last
Speaker 2: one hundred years, Russia has attacked at least nineteen countries.
Speaker 2: As I said before and again I look that up
Speaker 2: and it's like, okay, you know, there's the countries of
Speaker 2: World War Two, and then there's things under the Soviet
Speaker 2: Union when there were the uprisings in Hungary and Czechoslovakia
Speaker 2: and then later on uprisings in Georgia. But the only
Speaker 2: count that I could come up with was ten to fourteen.
Speaker 2: But she says nineteen. You know, you can also throw
Speaker 2: in Afghanistan in Syria, but we were there as well,
Speaker 2: and we had no reason to be there either. Plus
Speaker 2: we can also throw it on our side Iraq, Panama, Cuba, Vietnam, Venezuela, Grenada, Libya, Somalia, Yemen.
Speaker 2: We have done this year. I think something bombing runs
Speaker 2: in Somalia. Why is that? Who talks about that? Nobody cares.
Speaker 2: So Europe is still going to propose some scheme such
Speaker 2: as Article five security guarantees, things just short of formal
Speaker 2: NATO membership. But the Russian leaders are going to see
Speaker 2: this for what it is a recipe for future war
Speaker 2: euros is Chicago professor John Meerscheimer. So there's virtually no
Speaker 2: reason to think that a peace agreement can be stuck
Speaker 2: to struck rather to end the war, despite all the
Speaker 2: diplomatic maneuvering that has been taking place in recent months.
Speaker 2: For sure, diplomacy is a good thing and principle, but
Speaker 2: in practice in this case, it's going nowhere. Russian demands
Speaker 2: are completely at odds with Ukrainian and European demands. Neither
Speaker 2: side is willing to budge an inch. Moreover, many seem
Speaker 2: to think that the proposal of the Trump administration is
Speaker 2: pushing is a joint US Russia plan, one that both
Speaker 2: Moscow and Washington support, when in fact, there is no
Speaker 2: evidence that the Russians have accepted Trump's twenty seven point plan.
Speaker 2: And you know, when we look at this, Lindsey Graham
Speaker 2: has admitted repeatedly before and throughout this war that the
Speaker 2: purpose is to go after Russia. Well, I think this
Speaker 2: is working really good. I think how many Russians we killed,
Speaker 2: how much of the equipment we've taken out. This is
Speaker 2: exactly what we wanted, you know, before the war. It's like, well,
Speaker 2: next year we're going to go act Putin. He's telling
Speaker 2: the people in Ukraine what were they doing that year? Well,
Speaker 2: that year they were going after Ukrainians. The Ukrainian army
Speaker 2: was attacking other Ukrainians because the government that we put in. Indeed,
Speaker 2: the proposal is unacceptable to the Russians, as they made
Speaker 2: clear on December. The fourth Diplomacy will not only become relative,
Speaker 2: will only become relevant when there is a major development
Speaker 2: on the battlefield that tells both sides that it's time
Speaker 2: to negotiate an armistice, turning the hot war into a
Speaker 2: frozen conflict. And I don't think that that's going to
Speaker 2: happen if Selensky's not gone. And of course the US
Speaker 2: under Trump is pushing for elections there. Urte's take on
Speaker 2: it is that Zelensky is stealing the election before it's
Speaker 2: even been announced. His preconditions make a mockery of it.
Speaker 2: They said, first of all, Ukrainians have a right to
Speaker 2: finally be released from their perverse bondage to what is
Speaker 2: in effect a long ago failed Western proxy war against Russia,
Speaker 2: just as I said, Lindsey Graham has admitted that over
Speaker 2: and over again. He doesn't even have any shame about that.
Speaker 2: The former Biden administration policy official Amanda Sloat has casually
Speaker 2: admitted that much now as well. Why then did the US,
Speaker 2: Why then did the West want war in order to
Speaker 2: diminish Russia by using the Ukraine as a battering ram
Speaker 2: and Ukrainians as cannon fodder, and everybody except the military
Speaker 2: industrial complex the warmongers have said this from the very beginning,
Speaker 2: and many of the warmongers, like Lindsey Graham has said
Speaker 2: it from the very beginning as well. No peace will
Speaker 2: last without an end to Ukraine's ultra corrupt current authoritarian regime.
Speaker 2: And you talk about defending democracy in Ukraine as absurd
Speaker 2: under Zelenski, there is no such thing left Now Even
Speaker 2: some Western mainstream commentators are starting to admit Zelensky's authoritarianism.
Speaker 2: Yet the former entertainment producer and vulgar comedian stated systematically, rather,
Speaker 2: it started systematically undermining what little democracy that Ukraine used
Speaker 2: to have well before the election of February twenty twenty two,
Speaker 2: as Ukrainian observers and critics at the time widely discussed
Speaker 2: and deplored after their political institutions, their religious institutions, you
Speaker 2: name it, and even Bill Gates said it was the
Speaker 2: most corrupt country on Earth and had been for a
Speaker 2: long time. Zelensky's regime is so corrupt that he has
Speaker 2: sold out its own people so badly to the West
Speaker 2: that a lasting peace threatens, not only with them losing power,
Speaker 2: which they certainly would, but also with a wave of
Speaker 2: prosecutions starting with Selensky himself and rolling down like an avalanche.
Speaker 2: Put differently, this is a regime that would always be
Speaker 2: tempted to restart the war in order to distract from
Speaker 2: the retribution that it fears. This is why Trump is
Speaker 2: right to call for presidential elections in Ukraine. Zelensky has
Speaker 2: extended his mandate on flimsy grounds and usurped power even formally.
Speaker 2: In reality, the Ukrainian constitution does not prohibit elections, as
Speaker 2: he's been saying. It only prohibits parliamentary elections. They can
Speaker 2: still have an election for president, So even the election
Speaker 2: for the presiden's eas he's putting it out there, is
Speaker 2: already rigged to fail. They are planning to shift the
Speaker 2: whole presidential election online so they can rig it. It's
Speaker 2: kind of what happened with Trump. Remember when he when
Speaker 2: he shut down the country and we had to do
Speaker 2: a vote by mail election. I was saying that all
Speaker 2: through the summer, said, if you're going to do that,
Speaker 2: we know how that's going to be rigged. That's why,
Speaker 2: to me, the whole election stolen thing never even passed
Speaker 2: the sniff test. I believed, and I said it then
Speaker 2: that I think this was the whole thing, the lockdown election,
Speaker 2: the vote by mail stuff, that was all done to
Speaker 2: hand over power to Biden deliberately because they want to
Speaker 2: have this plausibility. They don't want to have a situation
Speaker 2: where does both the vaccine and the mandates. Let's split
Speaker 2: this so that one group can get upset about the vaccines,
Speaker 2: but then hold Trump harmless and say, yeah, but you know,
Speaker 2: Biden made us take that poison that Trump made us
Speaker 2: pay for and gave billions, hundreds of billions of dollars
Speaker 2: to these criminals, the pharmaceutical people. So meanwhile, Slunsky and
Speaker 2: NATO are playing a very dangerous game of brinksmanship. They're
Speaker 2: very excited about the fact that they were just able
Speaker 2: to sink a Russian submarine that was at dock using
Speaker 2: a sea drone and put it out of action. And
Speaker 2: this is a sea drone rather than an aerial drone.
Speaker 2: We've seen a similar situation done with very expensive I
Speaker 2: think they're bombers, weren't they. It's like five or six
Speaker 2: bombers or something that were parked on an airfield and
Speaker 2: they took them out with an aerial drone attack. I
Speaker 2: want to put that out there as if this is
Speaker 2: evidence that they can win the war. This is not
Speaker 2: the battlefield, folks, This is sabotage. Sabotage is like espionage, right,
Speaker 2: you go around, you sneak around, and you blow something up.
Speaker 2: That's what this is like. I mean they just the
Speaker 2: fact that it was delivered by drone, ariel or sea
Speaker 2: drone doesn't change the fact this was not done in
Speaker 2: a battle. It's sabotage. And you're not going to be
Speaker 2: able to win the war if you can't win any battles.
Speaker 2: Sabotage isn't going to do it alone. Well, that's the
Speaker 2: insanity of where we are at this moment. Let's take
Speaker 2: some of the comments here, Travis, are you there. Okay,
Speaker 2: I think Travis stepped out. I think he had to
Speaker 2: go the rest of it. So we're going to let's
Speaker 2: do some Christmas here.
Speaker 3: Oh okay, the button wasn't working for a second. Oh okay,
Speaker 3: we have North American House hippo. Thank you very much.
Speaker 3: That is very generous, and he links a Rumble video
Speaker 3: talking about the high beef price is because a migrants. Says,
Speaker 3: this is my first thought regarding migrants and their cows.
Speaker 2: It's migrant cows. Yeah, that's it. They're taking the market
Speaker 2: down again. I've got a beef with Bessent. This guy
Speaker 2: is a How do the Republicans manage this? Double think? Again?
Speaker 2: It's it's mad as an insane, make America double think?
Speaker 2: You know you can say, look at every time something happens,
Speaker 2: it's sorrow. Stu's behind this. Sauruces on it. And then
Speaker 2: Trump puts in Sorous's right hand man as his treachery secretary.
Speaker 2: And he's okay, no matter how many times he lies
Speaker 2: to us or what he does, it's okay.
Speaker 3: And we have I'm Marty.
Speaker 2: You want to thank Mary, Yes, thank you, thank you, Marty.
Speaker 2: Appreciate that, and he.
Speaker 3: Says I'll match you're twenty five North American hosip, thank
Speaker 3: you very much to thank you, thank you so much.
Speaker 3: And then we have m Sellers says thank you to
Speaker 3: miss Karen for mailing my package so quickly. The David
Speaker 3: Night Shoe Journal is beautiful and the page marker so cool.
Speaker 3: My husband is going to love this. Merry Christmas, hopefully
Speaker 3: reacheking that out that it spoil the surprise.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and don't let him watch the program.
Speaker 3: Yeah, send him out of the room, Bronx stopper one
Speaker 3: one one, Come on, David. You know that the United
Speaker 3: States is the greatest empire in the world, some say
Speaker 3: greatest ever. We're the police of the world and therefore
Speaker 3: everything is ours.
Speaker 2: That's right, Yeah, agree, Yes. How long does it take
Speaker 2: if we're going to have we're going to be policeman
Speaker 2: of the world and we can do anything that we
Speaker 2: wish as the policeman of the world, How long does
Speaker 2: it take before those weapons of quote unquote defense abroad
Speaker 2: become instruments of tyranny at home? You know, the founders
Speaker 2: of this country understood human nature, and they understood politics
Speaker 2: and how these two things interplay with each other.
Speaker 3: They saw this coming and Gie Oswald says, in a decade,
Speaker 3: we'll go to war for solar panel fields. Why are
Speaker 3: we going to war for oil when we're trying to
Speaker 3: go green?
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right.
Speaker 3: President Ovonte seventeen seventy six says NATO means neocon aggressor
Speaker 3: terrorist organization.
Speaker 2: That's a good one. I like that.
Speaker 3: And KWD sixty eight says we need the one trillion
Speaker 3: dollar military budget to replace that we gave Ukraine and Israel.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it so much.
Speaker 2: That's right. Well, we're gonna take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 2: we'll be right back.
Speaker 4: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 4: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 4: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 4: And I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 4: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 4: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue.
Speaker 3: But he told me to get lost.
Speaker 4: Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some
Speaker 4: at the David Knightshow dot com. You should be able
Speaker 4: to buy me several hundred those amazing sand colored microphone
Speaker 4: hoodies are so beautiful. I'd wear something other than green
Speaker 4: military cosplay.
Speaker 3: To my various galas and social events.
Speaker 4: If you want to save on shipping, just put it
Speaker 4: in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from
Speaker 4: the USA.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show. This is the
Speaker 1: David Night Show.
Speaker 5: Here news now at apsradionews dot com or get the
Speaker 5: APS radio app and never miss another story.
Speaker 2: Earlier. It is interesting to see how the police state
Speaker 2: is really ratcheting up in our own country. It's not
Speaker 2: just flock cameras everywhere, but are paranoid, overreaching overlords who
Speaker 2: wished to be omnipotent, omnipresent and let's see what's the
Speaker 2: other one. Anyway, they're doing it again. They're doing it
Speaker 2: at the border. The US is proposing collecting DNA from
Speaker 2: foreign tourists. Now just getting like Hitchhiger's guy at the Galaxy, Travis,
Speaker 2: where you know they measure exactly how how much you
Speaker 2: What was it about the fat or something going on
Speaker 2: to a particular planet. Do you remember that Travis has
Speaker 2: gone again? I guess I don't know. He's not working.
Speaker 2: He was telling me that he had some issues with
Speaker 2: his fat fingers. She's still having fat finger issues. Just
Speaker 2: waved to me.
Speaker 3: I'm here, sorry, I'm trying to work on something on
Speaker 3: the back end, having some issues.
Speaker 2: Okay, we got a live program going on here right now.
Speaker 2: He's trying to do live repairs as we're trying to
Speaker 2: do a live program. I think, yeah, yeah, okay, good.
Speaker 2: But what was that? Do you remember that Hitchhiker's guy
Speaker 2: of the Galaxy? You guys are all over that, you
Speaker 2: and Lance Man. But anyway, you had to as you
Speaker 2: were leaving, you had they had to make sure that
Speaker 2: you didn't weigh more than you did when you're coming in,
Speaker 2: or they'd have to cut it out of your body,
Speaker 2: you know. So the Trump administration is now considering a
Speaker 2: dramatic expansion of data collection on foreign tourists, including a
Speaker 2: proposal that would allow authorities to collect DNA from people
Speaker 2: entering America. Is it a free country? No, it isn't.
Speaker 2: It's the country. It's one country under technocrats, government buy
Speaker 2: and for the technocrats. These are countries under the visa
Speaker 2: waiver program. So these are travelers who are coming from
Speaker 2: friendly allied nations that have a long standing visa free agreement.
Speaker 2: The proposal appears in a new Department of Homeland Security
Speaker 2: notice that seeks public comment on the revisions to the
Speaker 2: electronic system for travel authorization and the I ninety four
Speaker 2: arrival and departure records. So again, this is the way
Speaker 2: government operates.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 2: We don't forget the Schoolhouse rock thing and I'm a bill,
Speaker 2: I'm a bill on Capitol Hill thing. That's not the
Speaker 2: way it works. Forget the constitution. The way this works
Speaker 2: is the executive branch deep state that supposedly we're going
Speaker 2: to get rid of. They're free to do anything that
Speaker 2: they want. These types of things are supposed to come
Speaker 2: from our elected representatives in Congress, but they don't. They
Speaker 2: don't even come from the Senate. They are things that
Speaker 2: are You have the bureaucracies that they create, and then
Speaker 2: they have abdicated their power to those bureaucracies to do
Speaker 2: whatever they wish, and then the bureaucracies in most cases
Speaker 2: will wind up and force the rules. They have their
Speaker 2: own little police forces that are out there as well
Speaker 2: as adjudicate whether or not you have broken the rules
Speaker 2: that they created that they are enforcing. Talk about a
Speaker 2: consolidation of government. We've taken all three of the branches,
Speaker 2: and we've combined them now into an unlikeed bureaucracy. And
Speaker 2: this is just the latest example of it. Just like
Speaker 2: they said, well we're going to require we're going to
Speaker 2: require real ID or we're going to charge you eighteen dollars.
Speaker 2: And then they didn't get any comments, I guess, so
Speaker 2: they said, well, no, we decided to make it forty five.
Speaker 2: They just do it. Then they said, well, we're going
Speaker 2: to require five years of social media history from anybody
Speaker 2: coming to this country as a visitor. And now you've
Speaker 2: got to give your DNA. Do you go see the
Speaker 2: happiest place on Earth?
Speaker 6: Right?
Speaker 2: Well, this is going to do to Disney World tourism.
Speaker 2: I think they're having a difficult time. Certainly Vegas is
Speaker 2: having a big issue with that. So a broad set
Speaker 2: of new data elements that they're going to collect, and
Speaker 2: they just decided they're going to do it, and they
Speaker 2: tell people try to stop us. I say, the way
Speaker 2: the whole executive branch operates, from Trump down to these
Speaker 2: other organizations and the other organizations, bureocracies, the unconstitutional bureaucracies
Speaker 2: that shouldn't even exist, have been doing this for quite
Speaker 2: some time. And you could see this pretty much with
Speaker 2: the IRS that really kind of set up the pattern
Speaker 2: a law under themselves. They would write the tax code,
Speaker 2: they would adjudicate where they violated their tax code. They
Speaker 2: would drag you into their courts, they had their police
Speaker 2: and so forth and so on. Now this is being
Speaker 2: adopted by all of them because it works so well
Speaker 2: for the IRS. Among the elements that they will collect
Speaker 2: is DNA, alongside facial images, fingerprints, IRIS scans. What do
Speaker 2: you think our government that is this paranoid, this much
Speaker 2: focused on a control being omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient, knowing
Speaker 2: everything about everybody. What do you think they're going to
Speaker 2: do to us? Their fatherland security administration from the very beginning,
Speaker 2: you know, that's really what this is about. The Nazis
Speaker 2: called it their fatherland. We call it the homeland. Same thing, folks,
Speaker 2: same ideas. This is represent the most extreme biometric data
Speaker 2: collection regime anywhere in the world. Yeah, the US already
Speaker 2: had the most extreme security measures after nine to eleven.
Speaker 2: Like I said, when we were in China, there were
Speaker 2: these announcements as we were leaving. If you're going to
Speaker 2: the United States, you have to get there extra early,
Speaker 2: but you know, because we've got to go through all
Speaker 2: kinds of extra security procedures, and now they're still ramping
Speaker 2: it up. The US has collected fingerprints from most foreign
Speaker 2: visitors for years, but this significantly expanded after September eleventh.
Speaker 2: So right now they're just doing fingerprints and photographs, but
Speaker 2: now they're going to do social Next, they're going to
Speaker 2: do social media and DNA fingerprints. While intrusive are generally
Speaker 2: used to identify verifications and law enforcement matching, DNA, by contrast,
Speaker 2: contains vastly more information, including genetic relationships, health predispositions, and
Speaker 2: biological traits that extend far beyond identity confirmation. The proposal
Speaker 2: is particularly notable because it would apply even two applicants
Speaker 2: coming from friendly countries. These agreements that have been there
Speaker 2: as part of the visa waiver program are based on
Speaker 2: mutual trust in order to streamline travel. You know, it
Speaker 2: used to be that if you want to go to
Speaker 2: the UK, you didn't have to get a separate visa
Speaker 2: because they were countries that were friendly to each other
Speaker 2: and trusted each other. But now it's not going to
Speaker 2: be the case for people coming from the UK to here,
Speaker 2: so again they're making this social media disclosure and now
Speaker 2: they're proposing DNA, making it all mandatory to come to America.
Speaker 2: The agency wants to collect extensive family information, including names, dates,
Speaker 2: places of birth, contact details, residences for parents, spouses, siblings,
Speaker 2: and children. This is your tutalitarian technocrat Trump regime, always
Speaker 2: looking for more data that they can put in there. Yeah,
Speaker 2: missus Robinson, we'd like to know a little bit about
Speaker 2: you for our finals social map of millions of travelers
Speaker 2: each year the technocracy. The document links the expanded data
Speaker 2: collection to a January twenty twenty five executive order as
Speaker 2: well as another executive order of April twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: So again, this is rule by fiat by Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: and this is the kind of stuff that we see
Speaker 2: when we have a king as aar. It doesn't, however,
Speaker 2: explain how DNA collection will be operationalized, stored, shared, or
Speaker 2: protected from misuse. I'm sure they're going to turn it
Speaker 2: over to Musk and Altman to do with it what
Speaker 2: they wish. Unlike fingerprints, DNA can be used to infer
Speaker 2: familial connections, the meaning that the data of one traveler
Speaker 2: could effectively place their relatives under ndirect genetic surveillance, even
Speaker 2: if those relatives never even travel to the US. It
Speaker 2: also raises international implications. Many visa waiver programmed countries have
Speaker 2: strong data protection laws, including restrictions on genetic data collection,
Speaker 2: so put some at odds, but they'll be more than
Speaker 2: happy to do the same thing to those of US
Speaker 2: going to their country, as well as to their own
Speaker 2: people as well. CBP is currently seeking public comment. The
Speaker 2: agency describes changes as part of an effort to enhance security,
Speaker 2: to reduce fraud, to modernize traveler vetting. You know, we
Speaker 2: have been working on enhancing security since the end of
Speaker 2: World War Two. Why have we never achieved It seems
Speaker 2: like the more we work to enhance security about everything,
Speaker 2: the less security we have. Certainly, the less liberty we have,
Speaker 2: the less rule of law we have. This is the
Speaker 2: security state. The DNA provision would place the US far
Speaker 2: beyond existing global norms for border screening, transforming short term
Speaker 2: travel into one of the most invasive data collection exercises
Speaker 2: any democratically elected government has ever imposed on visitors. There
Speaker 2: is a public comment on this proposal that is opened
Speaker 2: for sixty days, So tell them what you think. If
Speaker 2: you want it won't matter. They're going to do whatever
Speaker 2: they wish. Constitution doesn't matter. Remember when the CIA tried
Speaker 2: to unlock mind control of this article from Reason talking
Speaker 2: about mk ultra. They have a very limited take on
Speaker 2: mk ULTRA. The reason they're bringing it up is because
Speaker 2: the University of Texas historian John Lyle has just done
Speaker 2: a book about this, and so they talked about it
Speaker 2: in the context of that book. And of course it
Speaker 2: was Sidney Gottlieb if I remember correctly, I think there
Speaker 2: was somebody that I interviewed called him the Poisoner in Chief.
Speaker 2: I think, wasn't it. I think that was Sidney gottlib
Speaker 2: I think it ran for him.
Speaker 3: That sounds right.
Speaker 2: So they say mk ULTRA ran from fifty three to
Speaker 2: seventy five, that we think that's true. I don't know.
Speaker 2: You know, there was an excellent book by Annie Jacobson
Speaker 2: about DARPA, and you know the take that most of
Speaker 2: these people do, especially because they're going in and have
Speaker 2: access to the people who've done these crimes. Right, So
Speaker 2: they get access to these government officials and they make
Speaker 2: sure they keep their access to them. And so even
Speaker 2: when they go in and talk about the abuse of
Speaker 2: the CIA MK Ultra program and you know LSD and
Speaker 2: other things like that, or they talk about DARPA as well.
Speaker 2: They'll say, yeah, you know, this is really horrible, wasn't it.
Speaker 2: You know, but don't it. I'm glad they're not doing
Speaker 2: this anymore. You know. That was part of the book
Speaker 2: Raven Rock, the plan to save themselves and let the
Speaker 2: rest of us die, And he was in that. He
Speaker 2: very explicitly said it over and over again. Well this
Speaker 2: is the way things were back in the fifties and sixties.
Speaker 2: Good thing they've changed now. You know, our government's not
Speaker 2: like that at all. A couple looking it's like, you
Speaker 2: have no idea. They are so much worse than they
Speaker 2: were then. So Lala is careful not to speculate beyond
Speaker 2: the available evidence that he could collect, even though he
Speaker 2: acknowledges that the CIA destroyed most of the evidence. Just
Speaker 2: go with what they wanted you to see. But what
Speaker 2: is on the record is bad enough, they said the CIA.
Speaker 2: Of course, you powerful drugs such as LSD, on fellow agents,
Speaker 2: on prisoners, on mental patients.
Speaker 7: And.
Speaker 2: The whole book about that they made into a short
Speaker 2: film actually WORMWD about one of the guys who was
Speaker 2: with the program and how he had some issues with it,
Speaker 2: so he wound up being defenestrated through a closed window
Speaker 2: after he started blowing the whistle on it. Anyway, they
Speaker 2: would also use it on people who are sucked into
Speaker 2: prostitution honeypots in San Francisco. Yeah, you see this whole
Speaker 2: thing about Epstein and Masad and see how it's the
Speaker 2: way to operate all the time prostitution honeypots. There were
Speaker 2: some genuine volunteers. Even Gottlieb mournfully concluded that LSD was
Speaker 2: quote in fact, not a reliable way to get information
Speaker 2: from people. You know, if it was, he would have
Speaker 2: no problem doing it. I mean he stopped it because
Speaker 2: he didn't get out of it exactly what he wanted.
Speaker 2: They are all kinds of things. Dumping it in the
Speaker 2: water supply of a French town, you know, they were
Speaker 2: looking at it as a way to confuse and disorient
Speaker 2: the people at war. It's what they said. These people
Speaker 2: have been very much into Satanism and other things like that,
Speaker 2: and it's their obsession with reading people's minds and controlling
Speaker 2: people's minds is something that has been about the only
Speaker 2: constant that's there the tactics that they use are constantly changing.
Speaker 2: They try to do it through chemicals. They've decided that
Speaker 2: they can do it better through EMF and that's where
Speaker 2: we are today.
Speaker 3: Briefly, A very interesting book is Chaos by Tom O'Neill.
Speaker 3: It's about the Manson murders and it dovetails in with
Speaker 3: MK ultra in places. It's very interesting. There's some fairly compelling,
Speaker 3: circumstantial evidence to argue that Charles Manson may have had
Speaker 3: some contact with people involved with MK Ultra, such as
Speaker 3: doctor Jolly West.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, there's just so few degrees of separation all
Speaker 2: that stuff, right, Kenkesy and his band of Mary pranksters.
Speaker 2: There were some of the volunteers with the LSD program,
Speaker 2: and so you know, you can draw the lines very
Speaker 2: quickly to all this kind of stuff. But again, the
Speaker 2: CIA is not just evil and satanic in terms of
Speaker 2: its wars and its honey pot prostitution rings to blackmail people.
Speaker 2: They have been actively involved in subverting our society in
Speaker 2: so many different ways. I mean, we could talk about
Speaker 2: and we did talk about yesterday, and it's absolutely true.
Speaker 2: You know, you have the Fabian socialists that are out there,
Speaker 2: and you have who are doing it very subtly, and
Speaker 2: so forth, the Marxist who are trying to set us
Speaker 2: against each other for a violent conflict and revolution. You've
Speaker 2: got a CIA and people like that trying to undermine
Speaker 2: our society's values with drugs, with art, with music and
Speaker 2: all these other They're very deliberate in those processes. In
Speaker 2: the mid twentieth century, it truly is amazing. It's almost
Speaker 2: like there's all these different demonic forces out there. They've
Speaker 2: all got their own tactic and strategy, and they're all
Speaker 2: hitting us at once. It's a multi pronged war, spiritual war.
Speaker 2: In addition to its LSD efforts, it funded such dangerously
Speaker 2: absurd psychology psychology experience experiments as forcing people to listen
Speaker 2: to constant negative statements continuously through headphones. I hope you
Speaker 2: don't consider this broadcast. I try to give you positive news. Yeah,
Speaker 2: this is what these people are about, and that's its
Speaker 2: constant negative news. However, there is the good news of
Speaker 2: the Lord Jesus Christ, and this time of year that
Speaker 2: we celebrate is coming into darkness, and that is what
Speaker 2: transcends all this. Don't ever forget that.
Speaker 3: No matter how bleak the world may seem this too
Speaker 3: shall pass, But we don't.
Speaker 2: I want to be Pollyanna about things, and we want
Speaker 2: to understand where the threats are. But we also need
Speaker 2: to know what our refuge in our foundation is. You know,
Speaker 2: when you look at the psalms David over and over again,
Speaker 2: you know God is his refuge, his high tower. That
Speaker 2: should be years as well. So they worked on week
Speaker 2: long sensory deprivation investigating the knockout potential of tick saliva.
Speaker 2: Is this not kind of almost a smoking gun for
Speaker 2: lyme disease and Plumb Island and all the rest of
Speaker 2: that stuff truly is amazing. Well, meanwhile, Trump is cause
Speaker 2: playing as a victim in this lawsuit with the BBC.
Speaker 2: That's the take headline from Raws story, and that's what
Speaker 2: the British was saying about it. Trump received sharp criticism
Speaker 2: from the Guardian's editorial board on Tuesday after he sued
Speaker 2: the BBC for defamation. Trump filed a thirty three page
Speaker 2: complaint in a court on Florida on Monday, alleging that
Speaker 2: the BBC deceptively edited a portion of a documentary The
Speaker 2: Details January sixth, twenty twenty one. The lawsuit seeks to
Speaker 2: recoup ten billion dollars in damages. Absolutely absurd. The BBC
Speaker 2: has said that it will defend itself in the case.
Speaker 2: By the way, it just reminds me, you know, the
Speaker 2: way Trump and Milania have threatened people. You know, don't
Speaker 2: talk about the decades that I spent with Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 2: all or I'll sue you for defamation. Actually, it's definition
Speaker 2: of character is what it is. But Fox News is
Speaker 2: putting out trailers of Milania. She's got this new and
Speaker 2: in it it's amazing. They make her look like she's
Speaker 2: some badass high fashion model or something. It's just it's disgusting,
Speaker 2: I think, you know. And at the same time, it's like,
Speaker 2: you know, look at me. Here I am with my
Speaker 2: you know, ten thousand dollars purse, in my twenty thousand
Speaker 2: dollars shoes and everything, and you know, telling Trump, well,
Speaker 2: I'll be there later. Maybe you take care of it yourself.
Speaker 2: You know, I'm the ultimate queen. So you know, we
Speaker 2: got a king and now we got a queen. And
Speaker 2: they're celebrating this. This is this is what the Trump
Speaker 2: people are doing. They're normalizing the things that decent people
Speaker 2: have always looked to skew at that's their role.
Speaker 3: One thing that strikes me is that in the early
Speaker 3: and even to mid thousands, you had all those worthless
Speaker 3: tabloids at the grocery store, and you were kind of
Speaker 3: looked down on in society if you were one of
Speaker 3: those people that followed celebrities religiously. You know, you weren't
Speaker 3: necessarily shunned, but people thought you were kind of a
Speaker 3: senseless goof.
Speaker 2: And now, well that was in our family, but I
Speaker 2: don't know that was universal.
Speaker 3: I like to think that it was a more universal sentiment.
Speaker 3: But now everyone is continually caught up on everything, their
Speaker 3: celebrity of choices. Doing people have done that with Donald
Speaker 3: Trump and Millennia.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know. I don't know that it's it's
Speaker 2: I don't know, it's not unusual. I mean, I've seen
Speaker 2: that all my life. Pretty much. Everybody was amazed in
Speaker 2: the middle of the twentieth century how teenage girls would
Speaker 2: react to first Frank Sinatra, then Elvis Presley, then the
Speaker 2: Beatles and so forth, and that kind.
Speaker 3: Of the entire country has become teenage girls.
Speaker 2: That's pretty good. Now, that's accurate, that's absolutely accurate. Yeah,
Speaker 2: the Republicans have become democrats, Democrats have become open Marxists,
Speaker 2: and the country in general has become OCD teenage girls.
Speaker 3: That's right, swooning over whichever politician they like at the moment.
Speaker 2: That's right. A terse BBC statement in response to the
Speaker 2: lawsuit suggested that there would be no backing down in
Speaker 2: the face of Trump's bullying. That is the right response
Speaker 2: to an absurd claim of overwhelming financial and reputational harm
Speaker 2: caused to the US president and a fantastical request for
Speaker 2: damages amounting to ten billion dollars. The Guardian said a
Speaker 2: serious era of judgment was made in the editing process,
Speaker 2: though the House of Representatives January sixth committee concluded that
Speaker 2: Trump did use his speech to incite an insurrection, but
Speaker 2: the claim that a program that was not even broadcast
Speaker 2: in the US was part of a malicious plan to
Speaker 2: defame mister Trump and subvert the Democrat process ahead of
Speaker 2: last year's election is utterly specious. So what I just
Speaker 2: said earlier, I think the most important subversion of the
Speaker 2: election was the vote by mail stuff this particular time around,
Speaker 2: And that's one hundred percent Trump's responsibility. It's his fault.
Speaker 2: By relentlessly targeting the USA legacy media and now the
Speaker 2: BBC while cause playing the role of victim. Trump is
Speaker 2: seeking to galvanize his base and to narrow the parameters
Speaker 2: of acceptable scrutiny and judgment. Well, what he's trying to
Speaker 2: do is he's trying to destroy the free press of
Speaker 2: speech by intimidation by law fair. He doesn't dislike lawfair,
Speaker 2: he wants to use it his health. So the population
Speaker 2: of vaccination and movement restrictions. This is what's going on
Speaker 2: in France. As I said before, the farmers there realize
Speaker 2: how revolting government is and they're about to revolt themselves.
Speaker 2: The slaughter of entire herds of cattle in order to
Speaker 2: combat a supposed disease outbreak in France has sparked widespread
Speaker 2: protests and farmers revolt and made comparisons to the draconian
Speaker 2: COVID measures. And again, this is what it's all about.
Speaker 2: This is the PCR test, and it will be used
Speaker 2: to create one fantasy pandemic after the other. So it
Speaker 2: was necessary for Carrie Mullis to have died before all
Speaker 2: this stuff kicked off. I'm not so sure that was coincidence.
Speaker 2: After two nights of clashes, counts, and tear gas, a
Speaker 2: group of veterinarians finally stepped out of an armored police
Speaker 2: vehicle their task to euthanize cattle, hundreds of them at
Speaker 2: a time, in order to stop a contagious disease engulfing
Speaker 2: southern France. We have to kill you in order to
Speaker 2: save you. That's the insanity of this. And we talked
Speaker 2: about all this over and over again. The insanity that, Okay,
Speaker 2: so you've got a million chickens. You got one chicken
Speaker 2: that maybe isn't even sick, doesn't have any symptoms. But
Speaker 2: even if it were sick, and the others are not sick,
Speaker 2: that's how according to their contagion theory, which I no
Speaker 2: longer subscribe to. By the way, I just put that
Speaker 2: in as a footnote. It prove it scientifically, they don't.
Speaker 2: But if the contagion thing were legitimate science the theory,
Speaker 2: their theory that they violate their theory is that you
Speaker 2: would the other animals that were there would either have
Speaker 2: a be genetically predispose not to get that disease, or
Speaker 2: they would have the immune system that would be able
Speaker 2: to handle it and subvert it. And now they would
Speaker 2: have immunity. That's how you would get heard immunity. But
Speaker 2: now as part of the COVID thing, they sold the lie. Well,
Speaker 2: the only way that you can get heard immunity is
Speaker 2: not by natural immunity. The only way that you can
Speaker 2: get heard immunity is by vaccines. And again that is
Speaker 2: such an absurd thing. Their theory of immunity and virology
Speaker 2: and all the rest of that is that the vaccine
Speaker 2: is there to train your immune system to identify something
Speaker 2: so the one it encounter is a real thing, you'll
Speaker 2: know how to fight it. So this is like people
Speaker 2: who are fighter pilots training on simulators so they'll be
Speaker 2: able to do it in the real dogfight, which they
Speaker 2: don't have anymore. But anyway, the bottom line is that, well,
Speaker 2: if you can survive the real battle, you don't need
Speaker 2: to have the simulator, right, and the real battle is
Speaker 2: much more of a test. People who do well in
Speaker 2: a simulator may not survive in a real battle. And
Speaker 2: so that's the nonsense behind all this, the idea of
Speaker 2: this phony science of virology that how immunity works, and
Speaker 2: the contagion all the rest of the stuff. They just
Speaker 2: threw all that stuff out the window during COVID and
Speaker 2: now it's all about, no, we don't do any challenge
Speaker 2: never have done any challenge tests. In other words, they
Speaker 2: never have checked their vaccine theories, their virology theories by
Speaker 2: vaccinating people and then exposing them to the disease that
Speaker 2: they were vaccinated for to see if they catch the disease,
Speaker 2: because they haven't isolated the disease and they don't test
Speaker 2: the vaccines. Folks, it is such a sham and it's
Speaker 2: absolutely unbelievable. What a sham and what a lie. This
Speaker 2: whole thing is. It's just like thing, your vaccine, your
Speaker 2: mass doesn't protect you, somebody else's does. Well, that's how
Speaker 2: they get to this point. But this is the absurdity.
Speaker 2: They're doing it with the animals. They're doing it now
Speaker 2: with cattle, as they did it here with the chickens.
Speaker 2: And of course Trump gets in it's like, well, we're
Speaker 2: going to stop killing all the chickens. But the way
Speaker 2: that you stop it is you have your chickens vaccinated
Speaker 2: with MR and A. That's what Brooke Crawlin's at the
Speaker 2: USDA did. So, Okay, just get everything vaccinated and we'll
Speaker 2: leave you alone. Otherwise we'll kill all your livestock if
Speaker 2: you don't get them vaccinated. How corrupt. Yet, for many farmers,
Speaker 2: the vets are the sharp end of an over zealous
Speaker 2: tool of quote total slaughter unquote reminiscent of the COVID error.
Speaker 2: I would say error e r the regulatory overkill, and
Speaker 2: they are galvanized to take extreme action to stop it.
Speaker 2: So unlike America, we just passively go along because we
Speaker 2: are the cattle Right National Veterinary Order said, and intervening
Speaker 2: under police escort with hundreds of angry people waiting is
Speaker 2: something we have never experienced at this level. We need
Speaker 2: to stop making yourself tools of this tyranny. We're going
Speaker 2: to experience worse. Online abuse has escalated. Some vets are
Speaker 2: being told keep going like this and we'll put your
Speaker 2: heads on pikes. The standoff has left Macron already an
Speaker 2: embattled president and his soldier monk Prime Minister Sebastian Lacorna
Speaker 2: scrambling to avert a Christmas of discontent. Now is the
Speaker 2: winter of our discontent, right, and poor Emmanuel Macron is
Speaker 2: cast in this article as the victim. He's a victim,
Speaker 2: you know, like poor Fauci. So again we've seen all
Speaker 2: of this. We saw it with COVID. They saw it
Speaker 2: with COVID, and they came up with these absurd premises
Speaker 2: and they're going to keep them because nobody has pushed back.
Speaker 2: Nobody has said, nobody has paid a price for this,
Speaker 2: not in any single country. They all did the same thing,
Speaker 2: and they all got away with it. And now they're
Speaker 2: doing it to our food supply, and they're going to
Speaker 2: do it to us again with some made up disease
Speaker 2: that they come along with. Next the A sixty three
Speaker 2: motorway near it, brother farmers dismantled a speed camera they
Speaker 2: said was blocking tractors and they dumped it into a bonfire,
Speaker 2: and the footage went online and went viral online. You know,
Speaker 2: once you start realizing what this is really about, people
Speaker 2: get the big picture. Right. They think we don't know,
Speaker 2: but we do. And just as Oliver Anthony said, the
Speaker 2: people north Richmond, they think we don't understand what they're
Speaker 2: doing to us, but we understand what they're doing. The
Speaker 2: question is how long are we going to take it? Elsewhere?
Speaker 2: Measures have been hurled at prefectures, slurry sprayed on state buildings,
Speaker 2: and tires set on fire beneath motorway bridges as tractors
Speaker 2: tore up barriers and turned infrastructure itself into a weapon
Speaker 2: of protest. Now, the heart of the unrest is a
Speaker 2: lumpy skin disease, that's what they call it. It's harmless
Speaker 2: to humans. But you know, we're going to have to
Speaker 2: kill all the cattle to save the cattle from this
Speaker 2: disease that is harmless to humans. In response, authorities have
Speaker 2: imposed a strict eradication strategy, a systematic culling of infected herds,
Speaker 2: bands on livestock movements, emergency vaccinations. Again, they tried their
Speaker 2: hand at that here in the United States with a
Speaker 2: bird flu. Remember what they did all we're going to
Speaker 2: go test milk. Now, why would you test milk if
Speaker 2: you got bird flu? Right? None of this stuff makes
Speaker 2: any logical sense. You know that they're just making this up.
Speaker 2: It's any kind of a pretense. It's as ridiculous as
Speaker 2: Trump's Canada is shipping Fitanel to us, or Venezuela's shipping
Speaker 2: fitanel to us. All this stuff that they were doing
Speaker 2: with cattle, with milk and everything trying to tie together
Speaker 2: with a bird flu was every bit as absurd as
Speaker 2: all the nonsense that Trump is doing about fentanyl coming
Speaker 2: from all these different places. So wiping out entire herds
Speaker 2: for a single confirmed case has become unbearable. And again
Speaker 2: we're talking about a case that means that this is PCR.
Speaker 2: That means that there's not necessarily a sick animal. That's
Speaker 2: certainly not a death, but even of an animal for
Speaker 2: them to wipe out an entire herd. But this is
Speaker 2: a little bit different. People. These these are much more
Speaker 2: valuable animals, and they're much more relatable than chickens. Chickens
Speaker 2: don't have eyebrows, as they say, right, you got something
Speaker 2: that's got an eyebrow. You got a friendly cow or
Speaker 2: something that They give them names. They say the cows
Speaker 2: have names, they have character, they have history. One farmer said,
Speaker 2: for them at night. I work seven days a week
Speaker 2: with them, and I'll fight to the end for mi cows.
Speaker 2: If they solder or heard, we won't be able to
Speaker 2: start again. It'll be the end of a lifetime of work,
Speaker 2: said another farmer. The genetics the work of our parents
Speaker 2: and our grandparents. In other words, they worked on optimizing
Speaker 2: their herd genetically over a very long period of time,
Speaker 2: and they're going to end all that, and why well,
Speaker 2: because they want you to be forced to buy their
Speaker 2: lab meat that Bill Gates is going to make, and
Speaker 2: that people like Mark Ruda, now the head of NATO,
Speaker 2: wanted to have a monopoly on the distribution of the
Speaker 2: lab meat from Bill Gates. Left wing Union has branded
Speaker 2: the eradication policy has quote more frightening than the illness itself.
Speaker 2: It usually is urging an end to the calls and
Speaker 2: calling for blockades to put an end to this madness.
Speaker 2: The anger is being fueled by a broader set of
Speaker 2: factors vo collapsing farm incomes just like here, regulatory fatigue
Speaker 2: just like here, and fear of cuts to the agricultural budget.
Speaker 2: On Monday, the revolt spread beyond farmers themselves. More than
Speaker 2: two hundred mayors and elected officials gathered outside the prefecture
Speaker 2: and FOI in one area, calling on the state to
Speaker 2: urgently listen and a reopen dialogue with the farmers, and
Speaker 2: demanding a rethinking of the total culling protocol in favor
Speaker 2: of more targeted slaughter of infected animals. This is what
Speaker 2: is needed and what we have not seen in reaction
Speaker 2: to any of this stuff here in America. Local elected
Speaker 2: officials standing with the people whose lives and livelihoods are
Speaker 2: being destroyed by unnecessary tyranny from our government, pretending that
Speaker 2: they're protecting us from a disease. The French agriculture minister, however,
Speaker 2: insisted that she had no alternative. She said, to save
Speaker 2: the entire industry, slaughter is the only solution. Kill them all,
Speaker 2: to save them all. And just like Brooke Rawlings and
Speaker 2: she said, there are three non negotiable pillars. Listen to
Speaker 2: three pillars of this stuff. Depopulation, vaccination and movement restrictions.
Speaker 2: What this has always been about. The lockdown and restricting
Speaker 2: movement that they did to us with COVID, that they
Speaker 2: did with birds and cattle and all the rest of
Speaker 2: this stuff. Those two things go together. They've been practicing
Speaker 2: and wargaming that stuff since two months before nine to eleven.
Speaker 2: And in the long term, folks, it's not about depopulation
Speaker 2: of cattle or birds or pigs. It's about depopulation of people.
Speaker 2: That's the most effective way for them to control the
Speaker 2: people who are left, and that's through making sure there's
Speaker 2: not that many of us. Go ahead, Travis pick up.
Speaker 3: We've gotten quite a lot of comment here we've got
Speaker 3: Pesidanovante seventeen seventy six says over one hundred bombing runs
Speaker 3: in Somalia. In twenty twenty five, carried out by Africom
Speaker 3: M Wally Wallrace says, you invest one million in a
Speaker 3: politician and get one billion back. It's the best return
Speaker 3: on investment you can get.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it usually works out about one thousand to one
Speaker 2: that you get.
Speaker 3: North American House Hippo says the TSA and I don't
Speaker 3: get along, don't get along.
Speaker 2: With many people. That's right, Yeah, I both Yeah.
Speaker 3: Nivoodoo twenty twenty nine says it will start with foreign
Speaker 3: travelers then soon become mandatory for everyone traveling by air.
Speaker 3: Show them your DNA app on your smartphone.
Speaker 2: Your master's smartphone. Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 3: North American House Hippo again says every Friday when I
Speaker 3: get paid, every time I go shopping, and every April
Speaker 3: fifteenth as well, I'm just totally filled with joy and
Speaker 3: how rich the federal government has become. Isn't it wonderful?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Yeah. Trump is bragging about that about how you know,
Speaker 2: eighteen trillion dollars. It's ridiculous the numbers that he's coming up.
Speaker 2: But it's just like his Ventanyl stories.
Speaker 3: Don't frag me, bro says, Doctor Jolly West is a
Speaker 3: CIA literal mad scientist wanted create Frankenstein and Doctor Jekyl.
Speaker 3: He was a very interesting character. Even people that knew
Speaker 3: him at best could describe him as a benevolent psychopath,
Speaker 3: which there is no such thing, Jerry Alatalo says, sadly,
Speaker 3: mind control freak scientist Jolly West never experienced a holly
Speaker 3: jolly Christmas. Allegedly, allegedly, his own son helped him commit
Speaker 3: suicide at the end of his life. There you go,
Speaker 3: that's a fun fact, fitting not very fun in fact.
Speaker 3: Jerry Altalo lewis jolly on. Jolly West was an American
Speaker 3: psychiatrist known for his research on brainwashing and mind control. Yeah,
Speaker 3: he was involved in a lot of different things. He
Speaker 3: would crop up randomly in strange places. What's he doing here?
Speaker 3: And Birdhouse Blue says, is your dad moonlighting? Is Santa
Speaker 3: Claus on the weekends?
Speaker 2: Who knows? Maybe I could?
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 1: It's like.
Speaker 2: I got the white beard here and need to let
Speaker 2: it grond a little bit longer. They've got a guy
Speaker 2: with a real beard down in Pigeon Forge, they got
Speaker 2: a Christmas store there and they have a Santa Claus.
Speaker 2: It's there most of the year around, But not me.
Speaker 2: I bet those guys make pretty good money. I remember
Speaker 2: a few years ago there was a guy they would
Speaker 2: he played Santa Claus, but he went to like the UAE,
Speaker 2: where they've got tons and tons of money, and they
Speaker 2: thought it would be amusing to have an American Santa
Speaker 2: Claus or whatever. They'd make like fifty thousand dollars in
Speaker 2: just one month going to the UAE and being Santa Claus.
Speaker 2: But yeah, I think I would probably wind up committing suicide.
Speaker 2: Like colleag.
Speaker 3: Anta Claus allowed to have his hoes in the UAE.
Speaker 3: I don't know. They might think that's haram.
Speaker 2: Yeah that's right. I don't know. Yeah, I would not
Speaker 2: want to take a chance going to that country where
Speaker 2: anything talk about different places.
Speaker 3: Yeah, might not make it out. There's routine these stories
Speaker 3: of American tourists getting thrown in prison over there because you.
Speaker 2: Know, they don't care, never know when they have done
Speaker 2: a haram social taboo or.
Speaker 3: Some got a ton of different rules and laws and
Speaker 3: they've got enough money that they don't have to bow
Speaker 3: and scrape to America's foreign policy. So if you get
Speaker 3: thrown in prison, there's no guarantee the United States government
Speaker 3: is going to make any sort of effort to get
Speaker 3: you back.
Speaker 2: They US government doesn't care about that at all. No,
Speaker 2: they don't have any loyalty to any citizens. We're gonna
Speaker 2: take a quick break, folks. We'll be right back.
Speaker 3: M h.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show and now the
Speaker 1: David Knight Show.
Speaker 8: Even take a photo on a phone, there is machine
Speaker 8: learning in the background.
Speaker 7: Highest quality video capture ever in a smartphone.
Speaker 8: In the metaverse, we're going to need AI that is
Speaker 8: build around helping people navigate virtual worlds as well as
Speaker 8: our physical world with augmented reality. Augmented reality is a
Speaker 8: profound technology that include it's like your position in three
Speaker 8: D space, your body language, facial gestures, and we invented
Speaker 8: new intimate ways to connect and communicate directly from your
Speaker 8: rist everything from virtual reality to designing our own data centers.
Speaker 3: Describing what's coming even it's just so different in you.
Speaker 3: I've been in this infrastructure business for you know.
Speaker 1: Three decades.
Speaker 2: No one has ever seen industry.
Speaker 8: Yeah, and now I expect that these trends will only
Speaker 8: increase in the future.
Speaker 9: And in the last few months we launched voice and
Speaker 9: vision capabilities so that chat ept can now.
Speaker 8: See here and speak.
Speaker 9: Courts up to one hundred and twenty eight thousand tokens
Speaker 9: of contexts. That's three hundred pages of a standard book.
Speaker 2: That's all AI generated.
Speaker 8: Actually, let's add some alto Cumulus funds.
Speaker 10: All right, break free the technocratic Night mayor this Christmas
Speaker 10: and go back to basics. Whether David Night showed bookmark
Speaker 10: and notebook, This high quality and boss metal bookmark with
Speaker 10: a full color design on the back is guaranteed to
Speaker 10: be cross compatible with all physical books, and the beautiful
Speaker 10: Foe leather notebook is one hacking proof. An ideal gift
Speaker 10: for fans of The David Knight Show or anyone looking
Speaker 10: to start a journaling or prayer journal habit.
Speaker 2: No bells, no whistles, just pen and paper. Available at
Speaker 2: Davidknight dot News. Merry Christmas. List of these guys say
Speaker 2: it's so new, it's so different, It's a wonder you
Speaker 2: love it. It's like I'm so over their technology. I
Speaker 2: just I really don't care what they do anymore. I
Speaker 2: used to be on top of that stuff. I've really
Speaker 2: outgrown it quite frankly, but yeah, opportunity for you to
Speaker 2: it's a nice looking bookmark. Learn to think Ryan Forthy
Speaker 2: did this as well as the commemorative medallions that are there,
Speaker 2: and that's that's what the bookmark is based on. And
Speaker 2: then of course the book itself is the way that
Speaker 2: you can do journalism. It's always good to do not
Speaker 2: just journalism, but to journal your life and to keep
Speaker 2: a record of what is happening to you. It's always
Speaker 2: nice to go back and look at especially if you
Speaker 2: look at it from a spiritual standpoint. If you make
Speaker 2: that part of your journaling, it's interesting even if you
Speaker 2: just go back and record the everyday things that are
Speaker 2: happening to you at a given period of time, you know,
Speaker 2: to we forget some of those things. We remember them
Speaker 2: differently than the way we're experiencing them at the time.
Speaker 2: So it's always good to do that a life of reflection.
Speaker 2: So regular people are starting to rise up against AI
Speaker 2: S right, I let you go on.
Speaker 3: I have to break in and remind people that they
Speaker 3: like to support us, they can also support the people
Speaker 3: that sponsor the show, and then go to Homestead Products
Speaker 3: Dot Shop on sale right now. They have their seasoning blend.
Speaker 3: It's normally eight dollars, but right now it's six ninety nine.
Speaker 3: It's all purpose seasoning. You can see it here.
Speaker 2: Because it's the seasoning to be blending here exactly.
Speaker 3: You can see it there. They work very hard to
Speaker 3: make sure that their products are high quality, made in America.
Speaker 3: This is going to be on GMO. It is going
Speaker 3: to taste delicious, I'm sure.
Speaker 2: Yeah. They got great products and like the hot sauce
Speaker 2: that you had, you really love that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And the ingredients are onion, black pepper, garlic, salt,
Speaker 3: and cayenne pepper. There's nothing weird, there's no strange chemicals
Speaker 3: you can't pronounce.
Speaker 2: That's right. That's the key thing.
Speaker 3: High quality grown in America.
Speaker 2: And that's what you see over and over again from them.
Speaker 2: You know, you want to start your start your barbecue
Speaker 2: grills with tumbleweed stuff rather than using charcoal and wider
Speaker 2: fluid and all the rest of the stuff that's going
Speaker 2: to outgas on your meat. It's a lot of very
Speaker 2: good natural stuff.
Speaker 3: And of course you can get ten percent off everything
Speaker 3: at their store by using promo code Night. And when
Speaker 3: you shop there, you are shopping with the good guys. Yeah,
Speaker 3: Homestead Products dot Shop, Yes very much. And before we
Speaker 3: go on, you just got a couple of comments. I'm
Speaker 3: Marty says, please no more Zuckerberg for torturing the fans.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well at a short commercial and we will probably
Speaker 2: change that up after Christmas because that was just a
Speaker 2: quick one there. That was one of the things. Last says,
Speaker 2: I think I might have too much that Zuckerberg gets
Speaker 2: kind of grading you to have them in there, But
Speaker 2: the same thing with Lenski. Of course, those are actual
Speaker 2: clips from Zuckerberg and Tim Cook and I don't remember
Speaker 2: the CEOs of these other companies, but those are actual clips.
Speaker 2: Those aren't deep fakes that are there. But the only
Speaker 2: deep fake thing that's in there is the AI generated
Speaker 2: FBI and CIA or an say or whatever listening to people.
Speaker 2: But you know they don't take pictures themselves and put
Speaker 2: it out on the internet doing that.
Speaker 3: So, yeah, we know they can't hack your books. Yet
Speaker 3: maybe if you're writing in your journal, they can listen
Speaker 3: by the sounds of the scratching on the page figure
Speaker 3: out what you're writing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they do that with the keyboards on your computer. Right,
Speaker 2: So if you journal on your computer. They can they
Speaker 2: can pick that up even if they're not inside your computer.
Speaker 2: They can do it just eve dropping. That's been there
Speaker 2: for forty five years. When I first got into first
Speaker 2: jobs and engineering, part of it was tempesting, they called
Speaker 2: it because you know, they were spying on each other
Speaker 2: and they could they could electronically eavedrop on the keyboards
Speaker 2: and figure out which keys you were pressing, even if
Speaker 2: they couldn't actually get into your computer. It was a
Speaker 2: much bigger deal back then, actually, because they didn't have
Speaker 2: internet access or Wi Fi or other things like that
Speaker 2: that are much easier to surveil than the way they
Speaker 2: were doing it with the I forget what they called
Speaker 2: the Actually the defense program was called tempest, and that
Speaker 2: was where you went through and you made sure that
Speaker 2: you didn't have the that your physical devices didn't emit
Speaker 2: those kind of clues to them. But I forget what
Speaker 2: they actually called the the Survellan's part of it anyway.
Speaker 3: And lastly, Ratisborough, thank you.
Speaker 2: That is very thank you very much. I appreciate it,
Speaker 2: really do appreciate it, he says.
Speaker 3: Merry Christmas from an American mailman enjoying Vivek's Christmas crash
Speaker 3: out a new American tradition. Well, it is apparently the
Speaker 3: season to crash out. It's going around, whether you're Tim Poole,
Speaker 3: the Quartering Candice Owens.
Speaker 2: Well, what is that about Ivek's crash out? I don't
Speaker 2: know what I haven't.
Speaker 3: I don't pay any attention to Ramaswami.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I try to avoid him.
Speaker 3: He doesn't exist when I don't.
Speaker 2: Ratis bro maybe in Ohio. If he is, I'm sorry,
Speaker 2: but we hope you are not Land of the the
Speaker 2: enhanced MRA bio boys. That's JD Vance and Rama slimy.
Speaker 2: So yeah, but thank you very much. I really do
Speaker 2: appreciate that. It's a busy time of year for you.
Speaker 2: If it's if you're doing mail. Yes, well, well, regular
Speaker 2: people are rising up against AI surveillance, cameras, the flock stuff,
Speaker 2: as I point out the other day, privacy violations, false positives,
Speaker 2: and the abuse of power. Some individuals have taken matters
Speaker 2: into their own hands, removing cameras or creating data bases
Speaker 2: to track their presence. That's right, there's not too much
Speaker 2: of that happening here in the US. We've become very pacified,
Speaker 2: haven't we. I mean you see this type of thing
Speaker 2: happening more in the UK and in France. AI surveillance
Speaker 2: company pushing back against them is what I mean, taking
Speaker 2: down the cameras. AI surveillance company. Flock Safety might be
Speaker 2: having a banner year as it aggressively expands it, strigging
Speaker 2: it across the US, but ordinary people are not impressed.
Speaker 2: For four hours on Tuesday, residents of Longmont, Colorado, where
Speaker 2: flock has at least twenty three AI powered cameras and
Speaker 2: licensed readers, express their outrage to city councilors over the
Speaker 2: city's contract with the company. According to local magazine, nearly
Speaker 2: every seat at the hearing was full and ninety percent
Speaker 2: of the attendees were there to express their transparency and
Speaker 2: privacy concerns over Flock. Longmont's website states that the committee's
Speaker 2: safety cameras do not perform predictive analytics or facial recognition.
Speaker 2: They said, call the council. That same assurance is absent
Speaker 2: from the Flock page, leaving me to believe that this
Speaker 2: privacy standard may have been quietly discarded with Flock's adoptions. So,
Speaker 2: in other words, this is the shell game. They play
Speaker 2: plausible deniability. Well, the Government of Longmont would never resort
Speaker 2: to the kind of creepy surveillance that you're talking about.
Speaker 2: That's we leave that up to our subcontractors who can
Speaker 2: do it and hand the stuff to us, and we
Speaker 2: can claim that we're not doing it. This is the
Speaker 2: oldest game in the book. As a matter of fact.
Speaker 2: This is a lot of what's going on with the
Speaker 2: Five Eyes, the five intelligence agencies that are constantly looking
Speaker 2: at us, the US, Canada, Britain, UK and Australia New Zealand,
Speaker 2: and what they'll do. In many cases, you know, they're
Speaker 2: spying on their own citizens. But if it's something that
Speaker 2: is there's a little bit of a legal issue with
Speaker 2: that they think they might get in trouble. They have
Speaker 2: their partners do it, so you know, hey, the British
Speaker 2: spy on the Americans, the Americans spy on the British,
Speaker 2: and then they hand that over to them, and so
Speaker 2: they do the same thing with the corporations as partnership
Speaker 2: as well, and then cross their fingers and say, well,
Speaker 2: we're not actually spying on you, No they are. Flox's
Speaker 2: retention policy doubles the length of data retention used for
Speaker 2: community canvas from fourteen days to thirty days, once again
Speaker 2: signaling to me that the flock standard has been a
Speaker 2: convenient way to stretch the existing privacy standard, said one
Speaker 2: person speaking at the meeting. And again, I don't know
Speaker 2: the population of Long Want, Colorado. I've not heard of
Speaker 2: it before. Imagine it's a pretty small town. We've got
Speaker 2: a lot of small towns around here in this general
Speaker 2: vicinity in Tennessee that are buying into this stuff. Where
Speaker 2: are they get the money for that? Why are they
Speaker 2: spending the money to spy on us? That's the real issue.
Speaker 2: And it's at these small communities where we can have
Speaker 2: a say in this, if we get enough people to
Speaker 2: understand what is really being done to them. That's the
Speaker 2: key thing. People don't understand it. The city council voted
Speaker 2: then five to one in favor of rejecting any future
Speaker 2: expansion of the flock cameras. But it's not clear what's
Speaker 2: going to be done with the twenty three existing ones.
Speaker 2: May we'll keep them there, right, it's this ratcheting effect.
Speaker 2: It's pretty decisive when however, for the critics of the
Speaker 2: tech and a suburb of Boulder, Colorado. So there's where
Speaker 2: it is all throughout the country. Communities and activists are
Speaker 2: rising up in anger against the cameras, which have been
Speaker 2: installed largely at the behest of municipal police departments. And
Speaker 2: so the police department says that we need it. And
Speaker 2: of course, you know, it's kind of like the military
Speaker 2: and the federal government. The military says they want something,
Speaker 2: it's like, okay, you know, the government jomps and gives
Speaker 2: them whatever they want. Same thing as true of the police.
Speaker 2: In most places. The company's untested AI recognition program has
Speaker 2: led to numerous false positives, But just as troubling as
Speaker 2: the false positives are the cases where it does work,
Speaker 2: like those of the Atlanta police chief who used Flock's
Speaker 2: automated license plate reader to stalk and to harass people,
Speaker 2: or the Texas cop who used data from eighty three
Speaker 2: thousand automated license plate readers to track a woman suspected
Speaker 2: of seeking an out of state abortion. This is coming
Speaker 2: from futurism, and so this guy is going to track
Speaker 2: people down for doing out of state abortions. But they can.
Speaker 2: Whenever you have this kind of power, power is always
Speaker 2: going to be used by these people, and they have
Speaker 2: the power, they will use it. That's why they want it.
Speaker 2: Citizens in areas like Yacama, Washington, and Cleveland, Ohio and Eugene,
Speaker 2: Oregon have mounted municipal these municipal cameras, each of them
Speaker 2: functioning as nodes in an interconnect network. Others have organized
Speaker 2: public protests, ironically enough, becoming the likely subject of police
Speaker 2: surveillance by Flock's AI facial recognition cameras. So it does
Speaker 2: automated license plate reading facial recognition, but also builds a.
Speaker 1: Kind of a.
Speaker 2: Idiosyncratic profile of your vehicle, like a biometric thing, except
Speaker 2: it's not alive anyway. Looks at the scratches, the dance
Speaker 2: bumper stickers, that type of thing. So nor is anyone
Speaker 2: going to go through official channels either. Earlier this week,
Speaker 2: a man was accused of using vice scripts to rip
Speaker 2: down thirteen of them throughout Suffolk, Virginia. Meanwhile, an open
Speaker 2: source project called dflock, which we've talked about before, that's
Speaker 2: de flock, has taken a crowd sourcing approach to map
Speaker 2: these things across the country. Flock sent the activist behind
Speaker 2: deflock a cease and desist order, but he is so
Speaker 2: far defied the legal threat with help from the Electronic
Speaker 2: Frontier Foundation, Well, good for him. Why is that got
Speaker 2: to be a secret? Right? Put that up? And if
Speaker 2: it isn't public. The whole basis of their business is
Speaker 2: that if you're operating, if you're walking around or driving
Speaker 2: in public, hey, we can take your picture and we
Speaker 2: can send it to the police and we can do
Speaker 2: all these other things with it. So on what basis
Speaker 2: can they argue that you can't put up a map
Speaker 2: of where their cameras are. That's absurd. I mean, for
Speaker 2: the longest time, you've had a lot of driving apps
Speaker 2: and other things like that that warn you where there
Speaker 2: are cameras, speed cameras or red light cameras or things
Speaker 2: like that. We've all got apps on our program on
Speaker 2: our phones that'll tell us that type of thing. AI
Speaker 2: industry insiders are living in fear of what they are creating.
Speaker 2: Futurism says that must be hard, right at least they
Speaker 2: feel just as paranoid and miserable about where all the
Speaker 2: rest of where this is going as the rest of
Speaker 2: us do. At Newer ips on the big AI research
Speaker 2: conferences hell this year in San Diego Convention, visions of
Speaker 2: AI doom were clearly on the mind of many scientists
Speaker 2: and attendance. But as one guy who wrote for The
Speaker 2: Atlantic pointed out, he said, these people aren't seeing the
Speaker 2: forest for the trees, right. I mean, there's a lot
Speaker 2: of things that they're talking about, these hypothetical doomsday scenarios,
Speaker 2: and again, artificial general intelligence is still hypothetical, not clear
Speaker 2: that they're going to achieve that at all or anything
Speaker 2: close to it. Nevertheless, you know, they say, well, it's
Speaker 2: going to become a super intelligent thing. This is the
Speaker 2: premise of Hugo de Garrison, and he saw the negative
Speaker 2: consequences of it. Of course, Ray Kurzweil thinks that's a
Speaker 2: great thing if we create some horrific thinking machine. But
Speaker 2: that's not a given at all. But they think about
Speaker 2: the they think about that these imagined problems, but they
Speaker 2: ignore the things that are right there in front of
Speaker 2: us right now, in terms of how can be misused
Speaker 2: for political advantage, how it can influence public opinion, how
Speaker 2: it can influence children and other people who are already
Speaker 2: disturbed in many different ways, you know, like Rob Bryer's
Speaker 2: son or something that we've seen many cases where it
Speaker 2: is intensified the demons that people are struggling with So
Speaker 2: they didn't mention how fake videos already affecting public debate,
Speaker 2: or meaningfully address the chatbot mental health crisis, or the
Speaker 2: fact that it's stealing copyright that stuff from many people
Speaker 2: in the arts and humanities. So this guy who was
Speaker 2: writing for The Atlantic wasn't the only one to notice
Speaker 2: how this disconnected. You had a keynote speech said, are
Speaker 2: we having the wrong nightmares about aie. Part of the
Speaker 2: reason that you have people like Sam Altman sell this
Speaker 2: fear and paranoia about this science fiction take on all
Speaker 2: this stuff is because he wants to get money from
Speaker 2: the people he's talking to in Congress in the White House.
Speaker 2: And you better clear the tests because this thing is
Speaker 2: going to be so huge, it's going to take over
Speaker 2: the world. And you want to be the one controlling
Speaker 2: this monster. That's great. So you want to build a
Speaker 2: monster and have it under your control. And so it
Speaker 2: is self serving for them to do this, So they
Speaker 2: ignore all of the immediate issues that we're already seeing,
Speaker 2: the ones that are here, the ones that are imminent,
Speaker 2: they ignore those and they focus on these massive science
Speaker 2: fiction scenarios. Sociologists warned that the researchers are missing the
Speaker 2: forest for the trees by focusing so much on the
Speaker 2: risk posed by artificial general intelligence, a technology that we
Speaker 2: don't don't even know will be possible to create and
Speaker 2: for which there is no agreed upon definition. After someone
Speaker 2: in the audience complained that the immediate risks were raised
Speaker 2: like chatbot addition that were already known, he said, well,
Speaker 2: I don't really see these discussions here. I keep seeing
Speaker 2: people discussing mass unemployment versus human extinction, and so the
Speaker 2: discourse around AI safety is often dominated by these apocalyptic
Speaker 2: predictions in rhetoric. One guy who is considered to be
Speaker 2: one of the three Godfathers of the AI. His name
Speaker 2: is Bengeo. I think if I'm pronouncing that quickly. Who
Speaker 2: also Jeffrey Hinton is another one, and the two of
Speaker 2: them are talking about, oh, we're so sorry that we
Speaker 2: created this thing, you know, and pushing this apocalyptic version
Speaker 2: the end of the world type of deal. Benchio has
Speaker 2: cast himself as an Oppenheimer like figure in the field, which,
Speaker 2: just like Venheimer, regretted that he had participated in creation
Speaker 2: of the nuclear bomb. In twenty twenty three, Benjo famously
Speaker 2: said that he regretted his life's work after he quit
Speaker 2: his role at Google. He said, it includes jobs, destruction,
Speaker 2: and militarized AI systems that will further empire. And so
Speaker 2: the Atlantic writer said that when you look at this
Speaker 2: organization NeurIPS, he said it short for neural information processing systems,
Speaker 2: it hearkens back to a time when scientists vastly underestimated
Speaker 2: the complexity of our brains neurons and compared them to
Speaker 2: the processing that was done by computers. And we're going
Speaker 2: to take a break, and when we come back, that's
Speaker 2: one of the things we're going to talk about. We've
Speaker 2: got more general news to talk about when we come back,
Speaker 2: but we're going to take a quick break. Do you
Speaker 2: want to cover the comments traps before we go to breaker?
Speaker 2: We can do when we come back.
Speaker 3: Yes, let's cover him right now as a miller one
Speaker 3: two three.
Speaker 2: Thank you very much, so much.
Speaker 3: That is so generous, says Merry Christmas from a previous
Speaker 3: FedEx driver. Lol. I hope your family feels the peace
Speaker 3: and joy of Christ, the real meaning of the season.
Speaker 3: Thank you for and I've got a scroll. Thank you
Speaker 3: for your faithfulness, David and family.
Speaker 2: Well, thank you, thank you for your faithfulness. We see
Speaker 2: the same people over and over again who support the program.
Speaker 2: We really do appreciate our producers because they are the
Speaker 2: ones who really produce this program. We couldn't do it
Speaker 2: without their help, and so it's just a few people
Speaker 2: who who help a lot like that. So thank you
Speaker 2: very much.
Speaker 3: Yes, Nora, cal Country gallasys Anderson, California, population ten k
Speaker 3: six point four square miles nine flock cameras and don't
Speaker 3: frag me bro says Candice Owens were a CIA baseball
Speaker 3: cap for an entire show. They flaunded in your face
Speaker 3: and laugh at you.
Speaker 2: I just can't get into all of this prom queen
Speaker 2: stuff that's going on between her and Erica Kirk and
Speaker 2: the like. You know, I'm sure there's some things under
Speaker 2: all of that. It's all politics, is all connected to
Speaker 2: governments and everything, and it's all connected to setting up narratives.
Speaker 2: There's big money, there's big agendas behind all this stuff.
Speaker 2: But I am just so disgusted at what I see
Speaker 2: with all of these influencers out there. I just don't
Speaker 2: understand why people are hanging on every word of it.
Speaker 2: And I got people who are upset with us because
Speaker 2: of what we said about Candice Owen and again with
Speaker 2: everything that's happening, you're going to focus on your own
Speaker 2: internal you know, he said, she said stuff. I really
Speaker 2: couldn't care less.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the right wing grift sphere has been having it's
Speaker 3: been having a big.
Speaker 2: Fourth quarter a yeah, yeah, it's amazing.
Speaker 3: It's been nothing but infighting and backbiting and backstabbing and
Speaker 3: a bunch of shady characters yelling at each other.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, yeah, from Nick finn Taste to Tucker Carlson
Speaker 2: and Megan Kellen that I've got to use for any
Speaker 2: of them, Steve Mannon, you know, it's just amazing to me.
Speaker 3: And we have Jim's seven. A local attorney, Tim Anderson
Speaker 3: in Suffolk, Virginia has been winning cases where Suffolk has
Speaker 3: been handing out tickets and work zones using cameras where
Speaker 3: no work was taking place. So if you're in that
Speaker 3: area of Suffolk, Virginia and you end up in some
Speaker 3: sort of traffic dispute, maybe look up Tim Anderson.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's good. Yeah, and it's amazing too. The troll
Speaker 2: roads Keith and going through as the state and everything,
Speaker 2: something's really been not only difficult but time consuming for
Speaker 2: caring to do. He had a couple of toll road
Speaker 2: tickets that he had. They do it all by camera.
Speaker 2: They don't have the toll boosts anymore, and so because
Speaker 2: he died, they got they were late, and so they're
Speaker 2: escalating the imily like fifty bucks to go on a
Speaker 2: road or something. That's absolutely insane. It's just absolutely crazy.
Speaker 2: It's why it made me so upset to see Tillis
Speaker 2: do that in North Carolina. North Carolina didn't have any
Speaker 2: toll roads until he became Speaker of the House, and
Speaker 2: he leapfrogged the people that had been head of the
Speaker 2: Republican Party, a good guy that was out of the
Speaker 2: Republican Party there for a long time, the minority leader,
Speaker 2: and Tom Tillis came out of nowhere LeapFrog's this guy.
Speaker 2: And then when they get the majority in twenty ten,
Speaker 2: after the voters remorse of putting Obama in, he had
Speaker 2: a big change in North Carolina. They've put this guy,
Speaker 2: Tom Tillis in and Speaker of the House, and he
Speaker 2: starts on all these toll roads for foreign country, foreign
Speaker 2: government corporations that are running these toll roads, and the
Speaker 2: next thing you know, they're running him for Senate, and
Speaker 2: he's been a senator now for a while. He's going
Speaker 2: to retire this year. But all that toll roads. So
Speaker 2: that's why the same thing's happening here in Tennessee. Frank
Speaker 2: Nicely was pushing back against that. That's Bill Lee that's
Speaker 2: doing that here. So you can imagine that Billy is
Speaker 2: going to get some kind of a payoff down the
Speaker 2: road politically and economically. We're doing that type of thing.
Speaker 2: We're gonna take a quick break, folks. We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: And you're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 11: In m h.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 5: Whether you're feeling like the Boos or bluegrass ads radio
Speaker 5: has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels
Speaker 5: on our app at aps radio dot com.
Speaker 7: That's right, boys and girls, there's a post election sale
Speaker 7: on silver and gold. Trump euphoria has caused a tip
Speaker 7: in silver and gold. It's time to buy some medals
Speaker 7: with viat doors before they come to there. Since is
Speaker 7: go to David Knight dot gold to get in touch
Speaker 7: with the wise wolf himself, Tony Harterburn. He knows where
Speaker 7: to look to find silver and gold.
Speaker 1: A little little.
Speaker 2: Yug fiot. Yeah, now I look at this from a
Speaker 2: year ago. You know, when they come to their sense,
Speaker 2: says and of gourse, isn't that interesting that Trump banned
Speaker 2: the penny. You know he's gonna kill the penny. So yeah,
Speaker 2: I guess we won't be coming to our sense as
Speaker 2: But gold is loading at all time highs while volatility sleeps.
Speaker 2: This is how squeezes start, says zero hedge. Again, this
Speaker 2: is not zero hedge is not doesn't push gold because
Speaker 2: they sell gold. I mean there's some you know, there's
Speaker 2: there's websites out there that talk about bitcoin and all
Speaker 2: this stuff is about bitcoin and crypto and things like that.
Speaker 2: There's other sites like kitko that talk about gold and
Speaker 2: silver all the time. But zero hedge is just looking
Speaker 2: at investments, and as they look at it, they're looking
Speaker 2: at at this as if it were chart which can
Speaker 2: reflect the general consensus of people. But again, I don't
Speaker 2: look at silver and gold because of that. I look
Speaker 2: at it because of what's happening geopolitically economically, the massive
Speaker 2: financial resets that are happening, the uncertainty, the end of
Speaker 2: a fourth turning that is upon us, all of those things.
Speaker 2: I think are the underlying factors of this, and so
Speaker 2: they will look at this and saying, well, it's breaking
Speaker 2: above the flag from early December. The all time high
Speaker 2: is the obvious magnet. And we have seen the trend
Speaker 2: line remain intact as well over the twenty one and
Speaker 2: the fifty day intervals and so forth. Again, I don't
Speaker 2: I'm not a chartist. Some people do that and they
Speaker 2: make a lot of money doing that. I'm saying it
Speaker 2: can't be done, but I'm just looking at the bigger
Speaker 2: factors that are there. And we saw these factors last year,
Speaker 2: even though everybody was the trend at the time, the
Speaker 2: fad was we're going to get into crypto because look
Speaker 2: at what Trump's going to do to make crypto sore.
Speaker 2: I can tell you they're not talking about it, but
Speaker 2: Trump is going to make gold sore because he's going
Speaker 2: to He's going to make the he's going to make
Speaker 2: the dollar sore sore. George Washington is going to be
Speaker 2: hurting because he's going to put in a new Federal
Speaker 2: Reserve chair and he's gonna start manipulating things the way
Speaker 2: Trump wants them to be manipulated, which means that they're
Speaker 2: going to do things like quantitative easing and cutting interest
Speaker 2: rates and other games that they're going to play, which
Speaker 2: is only going to accelerate the demise of the dollar
Speaker 2: and increase inflation and increase interest rates. You know, every
Speaker 2: time that they have by FIAT lowered interest rates, the
Speaker 2: market reacts in the opposite direction. They say, well, that's
Speaker 2: going to be inflationary. So the longer term interest rates
Speaker 2: like automobile loans and especially home loans, we're going to
Speaker 2: go up on the interest rates on those because people
Speaker 2: are going to be paying us back with cheaper dollars.
Speaker 2: So all this stuff backfires on them, and that's the
Speaker 2: real thing to look at. By the way, this is
Speaker 2: another interesting story, and it's an interesting story and a warning.
Speaker 2: Although I don't think I'm not going to insulter intelligence
Speaker 2: say that you would fall for the scam, but some
Speaker 2: people do. You just need to always be careful, understand
Speaker 2: that people always coming after you. But I think it
Speaker 2: something else about gold, even versus cash. In this story,
Speaker 2: an elderly man gave away his gold after a fake
Speaker 2: US Marshall called, and he's not the only one. This
Speaker 2: is a story from Epic Times. The coin shop owner
Speaker 2: had seen his share of hefty deals, but this call
Speaker 2: caught him off guard. An elderly man from nearby Snowflake,
Speaker 2: Arizona wanted to purchase gold coins valued in the tens
Speaker 2: of thousands. Did they call these people snowflakes who lived there? Anyway?
Speaker 2: The next day, when the man walked into the shop
Speaker 2: and show Low that's the name of the town, show
Speaker 2: Low in I guess our district or something, his nervousness
Speaker 2: was obvious. A man was clutching his phone, hanging on
Speaker 2: to every word from a woman's voice that seemed to
Speaker 2: be directing him. Before we sat down and talked about
Speaker 2: the price or the product or anything else, he showed
Speaker 2: me a one hundred and eighty thousand dollars cashier check
Speaker 2: that he had already made out to me. And so
Speaker 2: the shop owner thought, this is all kind of strange.
Speaker 2: I haven't even talked about price or anything like that.
Speaker 2: One hundred and eighty thousand dollars. You get into cashiers check,
Speaker 2: and you're going to walk out here with that kind
Speaker 2: of stuff. The man stumbled over basic questions. He was
Speaker 2: anxious to speed through the sale. The shop owner's unease grew.
Speaker 2: Was this overly customer being manipulated by some scammer. Taking
Speaker 2: care not to alert the woman on the line, he
Speaker 2: discreetly slipped the man a note asking if he needed help.
Speaker 2: Certain now that something was amiss, he reached out to
Speaker 2: the police. The FBI and other agencies quickly took up
Speaker 2: the case. Two weeks later, they arrested a suspect and
Speaker 2: they uncovered a complex scheme that had already stolen one
Speaker 2: hundred thousand dollars in gold coins from the seventy nine
Speaker 2: year old man. And this dealer, because he saw he
Speaker 2: was suspicious something was happening, gave him a line, well,
Speaker 2: it's going to take me a little bit of time
Speaker 2: to get all that together because it's so large an order,
Speaker 2: and that's probably what happened anyway. Known as the gold bar,
Speaker 2: is a government impersonation scam. The scheme draws in unsuspecting elderly,
Speaker 2: retirement age and vulnerable people. You should know if it's
Speaker 2: somebody saying the calling from the government and they want
Speaker 2: you to give them payment in gold, that might be
Speaker 2: a tip off, because our government doesn't have any use
Speaker 2: for real money. The scam often begins with people pretending
Speaker 2: to be US government workers or law enforcement officers going
Speaker 2: to the Ohio Department of Commerce, and January, local media
Speaker 2: paid or rather said than an eighty nine year old
Speaker 2: woman from Sylvania, Ohio lost more than a million dollars
Speaker 2: in a similar scheme would have been cheaper for if
Speaker 2: she had been a supporter of the show and listened
Speaker 2: to the show anyway. A letter in the mail, an email,
Speaker 2: or a phone call informs a victim that their identity
Speaker 2: has been stolen and their bank or investment accounts are
Speaker 2: in danger. Then the victim may be told that the
Speaker 2: agency can protect their money for a short time if
Speaker 2: they act fast. Again, this is a con game, very
Speaker 2: similar to what the government does to us anyway. So yeah,
Speaker 2: we'll protect you, don't worry about it. Where they're the scameras.
Speaker 2: The scammers then convinced the person to buy gold, silver,
Speaker 2: or other valuable metals and arrange for a courier to
Speaker 2: pick them up, claiming that it will help to keep
Speaker 2: them safe from theft. So, your identity has been stolen,
Speaker 2: so get all your money out of the bank, convert
Speaker 2: it to gold, and then give it to us for safekeeping.
Speaker 2: That's the bottom line. Again, it's not very plausible. It's
Speaker 2: not maybe as implausible as the scam where they told
Speaker 2: the lady that she had to give them money because
Speaker 2: an astronaut was running out of air stranded space station
Speaker 2: and needed to buy oxygen. Remember that one tra having.
Speaker 2: I don't know how that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm not exactly sure what the plan was there.
Speaker 2: I was they gonna, where's he going to get the
Speaker 2: occident from in space? He's running out of out of area,
Speaker 2: He's got to buy some accident.
Speaker 3: We're going to send him a really long tube up.
Speaker 2: Send him some cans of Perry air. Remember that from spaceballs. Anyway,
Speaker 2: scammers warned the victims, don't talk to anybody, the bank
Speaker 2: or anybody else about what's happening, and you're threatening them
Speaker 2: with legal trouble if they do. A single scheme might
Speaker 2: utilize several different scammers to manipulate a victim, each of
Speaker 2: them playing a different role, such as an employee at
Speaker 2: a tech company, or a bank representative or a government worker.
Speaker 2: In some cases, victims may be asked for funds to
Speaker 2: avoid criminal charges or to prove good faith. Basically, this
Speaker 2: is a very common scam, said the Snowflake police detective
Speaker 2: Amity Tooth. Again, I would like to be idle to
Speaker 2: fight as a snowflake police that theyctive that's the town
Speaker 2: that he lives in.
Speaker 3: I'd have to vote to change the town name at
Speaker 3: that point, I think.
Speaker 2: So, he said. Victims often go along with a scam
Speaker 2: out of fear of arrest or false accusation, or because
Speaker 2: they lack knowledge of the law. Now this is always
Speaker 2: the case, right We get caught into these scams, like
Speaker 2: the COVID scam or whatever, out of fear, out of
Speaker 2: ignorance of the law. It's very easy for the real
Speaker 2: government to intimidate us. Isn't it interesting that these scammers
Speaker 2: would see that and then put on the moniker of
Speaker 2: government because government is always scaring us, intimidating us, and
Speaker 2: praying on our ignorance. So as they're investigating it, they said,
Speaker 2: there was a woman with a foreign accent who identified
Speaker 2: herself as Holly O'Brien. Yes, I am Holley, yes away
Speaker 2: sounding kind of like a man too, I don't know,
Speaker 2: but anyway, she told him that someone had stolen his
Speaker 2: identity and used it to rent a car, which was
Speaker 2: later left in El Paso, Texas. The caller then claimed
Speaker 2: that police had found illegal drugs and blood in the
Speaker 2: driver's seat of the car that belonged to him and
Speaker 2: was that they rented in his name, and she warned
Speaker 2: the men that he would be charged with a crime
Speaker 2: unless he could prove his identity by sharing details about
Speaker 2: his possessions, and so he did as he was asked.
Speaker 2: Then he then he agreed to hand over one hundred
Speaker 2: thousand dollars in gold coins from his private collection to
Speaker 2: a courier on October twenty seventh. But they weren't finished yet.
Speaker 2: They wanted to clean out his bank account, so they
Speaker 2: told him to withdraw one hundred and eighty thousand dollars
Speaker 2: out of his bank and buy more gold coins and
Speaker 2: we'll come by and pick them up. I think that
Speaker 2: they would have stopped at nothing. They would have ruined him.
Speaker 2: They would have found some other way to continue to
Speaker 2: extort money from the victim. The scams are a significant
Speaker 2: national problems of the detective. These cash for gold scammers
Speaker 2: often choose their victims at random. They cast a wide net,
Speaker 2: They do thousands of coal calls, and finally they get
Speaker 2: somebody who bites on it. Most people hang up or
Speaker 2: don't answer, but one out of a thousand people believes them.
Speaker 2: They're told to turn their assets into cash or to
Speaker 2: buy gold, silver, or other valuable medals for safe keeping.
Speaker 2: See scammers want gold. It's even more untraceable than cash.
Speaker 2: You know, the cash some of it' Scott numbers on it.
Speaker 2: The gold doesn't. In June, an Indian national living in
Speaker 2: the US on a student visa pleaded guilty in a
Speaker 2: case in which elderly victims lose hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 2: dollars in cash and gold. According to a release from
Speaker 2: the US Attorney's Office for the Western District of Texas,
Speaker 2: Groove rashish Hi Mongoo Kiya, twenty one, I guess was sentenced.
Speaker 2: I don't know. I'm probably murdering the pronounci of his
Speaker 2: but that's fine. He's a crook, twenty one years old
Speaker 2: here on a student visa, and he pleaded guilty in
Speaker 2: Austin more and he's getting more than eight years in prison.
Speaker 2: Pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering. And he
Speaker 2: was ordered to pay more than two and a half
Speaker 2: million dollars in restitution, which is unusual. Usually you don't
Speaker 2: see restitution in these cases. That's one of the big
Speaker 2: problems of our system. Another guy was Kashan Patel, not
Speaker 2: Cash Patel. They don't like cash, they like gold. Speaking
Speaker 2: of which, Bongino is packing his bags. He's going to
Speaker 2: go back, they said, he's going to go back and
Speaker 2: do a show again. But anyway, that's been in the
Speaker 2: works for a while. Rumored about that for quite a while,
Speaker 2: but now the rumors have become substantiate. He's gonna leave
Speaker 2: as at the beginning of January. So this non cash
Speaker 2: Pattel twenty years old, conspired with the same guy and
Speaker 2: with others in the multimillion dollar twenty twenty four scheme.
Speaker 2: According to the Department of Justice, he also pleaded guilty
Speaker 2: and it is going to be serving more than five
Speaker 2: years in prison. The group sent fake online messages and
Speaker 2: imperson aided US government officials, while Patel, not the cash
Speaker 2: matel who's impersonading an FBI director, collected cash and gold
Speaker 2: from the victims, passed some of it to others in
Speaker 2: the group, and kept some of it for himself. Again
Speaker 2: the gold Patel. So I sat with the victim multiple times.
Speaker 2: When he was on the phone with her. She would
Speaker 2: talk to him and it was pretty noisy in the background.
Speaker 2: So my assumption is that she works in a call center,
Speaker 2: and the likelihood of the call center being in the
Speaker 2: US is slim to none. I guess those are people
Speaker 2: on the call center that are waiting for their H
Speaker 2: one B visus to come through, so locally here. Well,
Speaker 2: the OCC says that nine big banks took part and
Speaker 2: approa debanking practices. Yeah, there are some risks in putting
Speaker 2: your money in the bank at PayPal is now the
Speaker 2: people who debanked me PayPal, now I want to be
Speaker 2: a bank as that I should probably file a report
Speaker 2: with the people who are reviewing them to give them
Speaker 2: access to FDIC insurance. Because this is actually the Office
Speaker 2: of the Control of the Currency. The OCC and the
Speaker 2: Trump administration is looking at this because I mean, they
Speaker 2: have personally suffered from this, so this is something that
Speaker 2: is in their sites. On Wednesday, the Office of the
Speaker 2: Control of the Currency released its report saying that it
Speaker 2: had found conclusive proof that nine large banks and these
Speaker 2: are the big banks, these are the big banks that
Speaker 2: are too big to fail, too big to jail, that
Speaker 2: they had policies that either refused services to some industries
Speaker 2: or required higher levels of screw utiny that exceeded the
Speaker 2: actual financial risk between twenty twenty and twenty twenty three.
Speaker 2: And I'm telling you that this is not just industry wide,
Speaker 2: this is individuals because I have suffered from it as well.
Speaker 2: One of the banks on it was Bank of America.
Speaker 2: They nearly cost us the ability to get this house
Speaker 2: finance because it nearly ran out of time because of
Speaker 2: the games that they were playing. You know, we'd had
Speaker 2: a credit card playing with them for quite some time. Again,
Speaker 2: we went back to our dealings with them, went back
Speaker 2: to before the big merger when there was Nation's Make
Speaker 2: in North Carolina and Bank of America California, and that
Speaker 2: was rubber stamped during the Clinton administration made this really
Speaker 2: big bank, and that was the thing that kicked off
Speaker 2: all the big bank mergers. Even at the time that
Speaker 2: people are pushing back against it, said you can't authorize that.
Speaker 2: That's going to kick off a rash of mergers of
Speaker 2: the biggest banks, and you're going to wind up with
Speaker 2: a half dozen big banks, which we did and which
Speaker 2: they then bailed out. But anyway, they played games with us.
Speaker 2: In the course, we've seen that Bank of America doing
Speaker 2: that to the people who were there on January the sixth,
Speaker 2: Proud of the fact that they were giving the information
Speaker 2: about where these people were based on their use of
Speaker 2: their credit cards, gave it to the FBI to try
Speaker 2: to indict these people, and then even going back and saying,
Speaker 2: and we noticed in our history that these people have
Speaker 2: also purchased guns in the pass. So these are people
Speaker 2: who exercise their right to redress their grievances peacefully, and
Speaker 2: they also under the First Amendment, and they also exercise
Speaker 2: their liberties as recognized under the Second Amendment. So you
Speaker 2: should go round these people up, said Bank of America,
Speaker 2: absolutely reprehensible, but it's also JP Morgan as well as
Speaker 2: Bank of America, City Bank, Wells Fargo, US Bank, Capital One,
Speaker 2: pn C Bank, and TD Bank US. They're restricting access,
Speaker 2: says the OCC the Office of Control of the Currency.
Speaker 2: They're restricting access in numerous sectors including oil and gas exploration,
Speaker 2: coal mining, firearms, private pensions, payday lending, tobacco and e
Speaker 2: cigarette manufacturers, adult entertainment, and political action committees, as well
Speaker 2: as digital assets. So if you're involved in these activities,
Speaker 2: and or if you're involved in telling the truth about government,
Speaker 2: big pharmaceutical companies and the lockdowns and stuff like that,
Speaker 2: they'll also come after you for that. They've got a
Speaker 2: long list of things they don't like and industries that
Speaker 2: they don't like. Those that I just mentioned there. Most
Speaker 2: of those fall into the ESG stuff, the environmental and
Speaker 2: social governance. We don't like oil, we don't like firearms,
Speaker 2: that type of thing. It's unfortunate that the nation's largest
Speaker 2: banks thought that these debanking policies were in appropriate use
Speaker 2: of their government granted charter and market power. While many
Speaker 2: of these policies were undertaken in plain sight and even
Speaker 2: announced publicly, certain banks have continued to insist that they're
Speaker 2: not doing it. And of course we saw this famously
Speaker 2: in the UK with Nigel Faraj when he got debanked,
Speaker 2: and they kept denying that they did it until some
Speaker 2: of the evidence turned up and it went all the
Speaker 2: way up to the President of the Bank. The Bank
Speaker 2: Policy Institute, which advocates for these banks, reacted to the
Speaker 2: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and said it's
Speaker 2: in the bank's best interest to take deposits to lend
Speaker 2: and to support as many consumers and businesses as possible.
Speaker 2: But the industry supports fair access to banking and as
Speaker 2: already working together with Congress and administration to ensure banks
Speaker 2: are able to serve law abiding customers. Well, that's just
Speaker 2: not the case, is it. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: even with this stuff being exposed, Jamie Demon, the CEO
Speaker 2: of JP Morgan, was really arrogant about the whole thing.
Speaker 2: He told Fox News that the issue was mostly made
Speaker 2: up and that the people concerned about it needed to
Speaker 2: quote grow up. These bankers are scammers, just like the
Speaker 2: government that works with them and their scammers. Just like
Speaker 2: these people I talked about before. Look at what they
Speaker 2: charge people with credit card. I mean talking about Christmas
Speaker 2: time here, look at the credit card rates. It is
Speaker 2: so criminal, it really is. I've said many times in
Speaker 2: the past if I was going to run for office,
Speaker 2: I would run. I would make that my lead issue.
Speaker 2: Just like Andrew Yang made Universal Basic Income his lead issue.
Speaker 2: I would make usury bank income that UBI. I would
Speaker 2: make that my lead issue. I'm just outraged at when
Speaker 2: I see this stuff, and you know, don't get in
Speaker 2: a situation where you got to where you can't pay
Speaker 2: the balance off each month. It's just insane. And that
Speaker 2: they would be allowed to, you know, play charge twenty
Speaker 2: thirty more, you know, whatever their rates are. They're really
Speaker 2: high on these on these cards, and at the same time,
Speaker 2: the banks will typically pay you a tiny fraction of
Speaker 2: one percent interest. You talk about a skewed system like that.
Speaker 2: It's absolutely criminal, and it used to be criminal. It's
Speaker 2: criminal until we had that big wave of inflation that
Speaker 2: happened in the late seventies. And at that time, interest
Speaker 2: rates got up so high and inflation was high and
Speaker 2: all the rest of stuff. So they swept away the
Speaker 2: usery laws that had capped things at ten percent. Rather
Speaker 2: than tying it to inflation rates or interest rates or anything,
Speaker 2: they just got rid of it altogether. And that's why
Speaker 2: you wind up with this K shaped interest rate. You know,
Speaker 2: one of them being the rate that they pay you,
Speaker 2: the other one being the rate that they charge you.
Speaker 2: It is truly userss what they're doing, and it is
Speaker 2: a criminal I think well, Americans could see up to
Speaker 2: two thousand dollars refund next year, says the Soros soy
Speaker 2: boy Scott Bessant. Our Treasury Secretary's not talking about stimulus check.
Speaker 2: This is all based on the fact that, oh, yeah,
Speaker 2: we cut taxes this year and most people haven't cut
Speaker 2: their withholding, so they're going to get a tax refund
Speaker 2: next year. So yeah, and that good news, I made
Speaker 2: a government made the government an interest free loan an admission.
Speaker 2: Really that Trump and Bestent are trying to make a
Speaker 2: case about the economy. If the economy is as strong
Speaker 2: as they're talking about, why do we need to have
Speaker 2: a two thousand dollars tax refund or these other things
Speaker 2: that they're promising us. They did promise that they might
Speaker 2: throughout two thousand dollars in terms of rebates from the tariffs.
Speaker 2: Wait a minute, so you're saying that the tariffs are
Speaker 2: taxes and we need to be partially reimbursed with that.
Speaker 2: What is all that about? And if the economy is
Speaker 2: as strong as they're saying, I mean, nobody really needs
Speaker 2: the money, do we. Treasurey Secretary of Scott Besson said
Speaker 2: that working Americans are set to get very large refunds
Speaker 2: next year as tax cuts were enabled and the Republican
Speaker 2: backed one big beautiful bill, one big BS bill is
Speaker 2: what this is set to go into effect. And what
Speaker 2: he's saying is that if you're one of these categories
Speaker 2: where they don't have taxes on tips or overtime, once
Speaker 2: they remove that, you're going to see that you're going
Speaker 2: to get some money back. Well, how many people fall
Speaker 2: into that category anyway, after the refunds, they're worth holdings.
Speaker 2: He's sort of likely to change next year, so they'll
Speaker 2: see that they had they'll see a real increase in
Speaker 2: wages as well as getting some money back. They will
Speaker 2: change the withholding. So it's going to be great. The
Speaker 2: bill was passed in July. Working Americans didn't change their withholding,
Speaker 2: so they're going to be getting very large refunds in
Speaker 2: the first quarter next year. Talk about pipe dreams, you know,
Speaker 2: will taxes really go down now? Trump said his economic policies,
Speaker 2: including his widespread tariffs on imports, are creating jobs, the
Speaker 2: stock market, and attracting increased investment in the US. And
Speaker 2: none of that is true. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: it's not reducing imports in the United States. The imports
Speaker 2: from China have gone up by twenty nine percent versus
Speaker 2: a year ago. Last month, the Trump administration officials floated
Speaker 2: the idea of sending out a two thousand dollars payment
Speaker 2: to lower middle income workers that would be taken from
Speaker 2: some of their windfall tariff income. Well, yeah, you're going
Speaker 2: to see that right now. It's not needed though, because
Speaker 2: now we've got an imaginary projected tax refund. All this
Speaker 2: stuff is smoke, mirrors and lies. That's the reality. Got
Speaker 2: a couple of comments, Sir Travis, Yes we do.
Speaker 3: James faith Way says, Hey, David, I was wondering when
Speaker 3: are you going to have Tony Ardeburn back on to
Speaker 3: talk about precious metals and the rise of silver. I
Speaker 3: shop with your link, which is night Dot Gold.
Speaker 2: Yes, and Tony, we're still linked up and think Tony
Speaker 2: is going to be back, and he's taking a little
Speaker 2: bit of time because it's been you know, a lot
Speaker 2: of stress and everything on his business terms of everything
Speaker 2: changing so rapidly, so he's trying to get some things organized.
Speaker 2: He's taken a little bit of a sabbatical, so he'll
Speaker 2: be joining us again after the in the new year,
Speaker 2: So in January, he's going to be back on the
Speaker 2: regular schedule, and we hope to have him even do
Speaker 2: the show some more because I like it when Tony hosts.
Speaker 2: We got some good backup hosts that come on, so yes, yeah, he'll.
Speaker 3: Be pay in guard built too. Fantastic jobs when they
Speaker 3: host and North American House Hippo says Highway four oh
Speaker 3: seven in suburban Toronto probably cost Canadian fifty dollars to
Speaker 3: drive the sixty or so miles at the rush hour.
Speaker 3: That's fifty dollars Canadian per trip each time. Every time
Speaker 3: round trip is Canadian one hundred dollars, no exaggeration.
Speaker 2: Yeah, once you start down this path and the usually
Speaker 2: they'll put the tolls on and their small amount, right,
Speaker 2: it's just a nuisance. And then they they make it
Speaker 2: easier because we're just doing an automated license plate reader
Speaker 2: thing or something. But I remember when they first put
Speaker 2: the automated license plate readers out and they had toll
Speaker 2: roads in the Netherlands, and the people in the Netherlands
Speaker 2: were pushing back on it because they said, this is
Speaker 2: a privacy violation. I mean, just this is you know,
Speaker 2: where we have gone in the last thirty years, so
Speaker 2: this is the early nineties, and think about how they
Speaker 2: have rapidly normalized this and moved the overton windows so
Speaker 2: that people accept all these types of things. The people
Speaker 2: in Netherlands said, we don't want that kind of information
Speaker 2: being kept on us. We don't want you knowing where
Speaker 2: we're going and when we're going, and the basis of
Speaker 2: them saying that was what had happened in World War
Speaker 2: Two when the Germans came in. They came in so
Speaker 2: quickly with blitzkrieg right that they were not able to
Speaker 2: destroy records. The Dutch, you know, in the Netherlands, they
Speaker 2: were so big on keeping records on everybody just because
Speaker 2: they can. I guess, you know, it's what bureaucrats like
Speaker 2: to do. They had the stuff on three by five
Speaker 2: cards and they had them packed solid into drawers, and
Speaker 2: so the Germans come in very quickly. They want to
Speaker 2: destroy this stuff, so they don't know things about people ethnically, politically,
Speaker 2: religiously and that type of thing. And they couldn't set
Speaker 2: things on fire because it's like trying to light a log.
Speaker 2: They were packed together so closely. So I say, we
Speaker 2: don't want that, and they don't realize it. But the
Speaker 2: Nazis that we have today, the technocrats have much easier
Speaker 2: way to sort through all this stuff. I mean, even
Speaker 2: when the Nazis got those three by five cards, they
Speaker 2: had to set their manually go through it, and now
Speaker 2: you can do it in an instant. That's what AI
Speaker 2: superpower really is. So we're going to take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 2: We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 11: Gods you Mogan to me, no Lord them just nomember critise.
Speaker 2: I have you lost? Remember Christisa?
Speaker 3: You Ki.
Speaker 11: You gouesmaspose my reliverant all of the gold Jesses skin.
Speaker 5: APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
Speaker 5: mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen
Speaker 5: wherever you go.
Speaker 12: I wish I had a Christmas Night album. You can
Speaker 12: get the Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow dot Com
Speaker 12: for just thirteen ninety nine. There's right in the second
Speaker 12: floor there, say would you wish, George, Well, not just
Speaker 12: one wish your.
Speaker 2: Whole hat flog.
Speaker 12: First, I'm going to the Davidnightshow dot Com and purchase
Speaker 12: the Christmas Night Album. Then I'm gonna listen to Christmas
Speaker 12: classics like who are you Gonna Throw It Up?
Speaker 7: I want the Christmas Night Album too.
Speaker 2: That's pretty good.
Speaker 12: Hello girls, can't you come out tonight?
Speaker 3: Can't you come on?
Speaker 12: David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
Speaker 12: like God Rest You, Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and is
Speaker 12: all New I'll be Home for Christmas?
Speaker 2: What do you want?
Speaker 12: You want the moon? Just say the word and I'll
Speaker 12: throw a glasshole around it, pull it down, I'll take
Speaker 12: it in what and.
Speaker 6: Then I'll buy you your own download of David Knight's
Speaker 6: Christmas Night album.
Speaker 2: Well, we talk about how the government is constantly dinging
Speaker 2: us with fines and constantly surveilling us, and of course
Speaker 2: I think part of that has always been speed cameras
Speaker 2: and tickets on the highway and everything. There's a little
Speaker 2: glimmer of hope here in Arizona. You got a state Rep.
Speaker 2: Nick Kupper, retired Air Force veteran has An introduced a
Speaker 2: bill that he calls the RAPID Act. They get acting
Speaker 2: that for it, the Reasonable and Prudent Interstate Driving Act,
Speaker 2: In other words, to take speed limits off on a
Speaker 2: trial basis in certain areas. The legislation would allow higher
Speaker 2: speeds on designated rural, interstate or intrastate segments while maintaining
Speaker 2: tough penalties for dangerous driving. Again their version of the
Speaker 2: Audubon Highway that might be more popular than Route sixty
Speaker 2: six if they were to do that. The Rapid Act
Speaker 2: accounts for that difference. He said. Most drivers can tell
Speaker 2: the difference between a crowded city freeway and a wide
Speaker 2: open stretch of rural interstate, and you can tell the
Speaker 2: difference it. Let us raise speeds where it is safe,
Speaker 2: and keep tough penalties for reckless driving, and update our
Speaker 2: laws to reflect how people actually use the roads. He said.
Speaker 2: When you look at Montana, they did this in nineteen nineties.
Speaker 2: In Germany that has done this for ninety years, you
Speaker 2: see a pattern. Most drivers tend to drive around eighty
Speaker 2: miles an hour on their own when not presented with
Speaker 2: a speed limit. The bill limits nighttime speeds to only
Speaker 2: eighty miles per hour. You know, it used to be that.
Speaker 2: I think they put speed limits on in Montana used
Speaker 2: to not be there. And I remember when we about
Speaker 2: twenty five years or so ago, we were driving through
Speaker 2: there and I took a break and let Karen drive,
Speaker 2: and she was going over one hundred miles an hour.
Speaker 2: This cop pulls up, motions get over, you know, and
Speaker 2: so it's like, she said, you told me there's no
Speaker 2: speed limits here. And it's like, yeah, I didn't think
Speaker 2: there was any speed limits. So we get pulled over
Speaker 2: and he comes up, and I think it was because
Speaker 2: of the car that we were driving. He thought maybe,
Speaker 2: you know, it was out of state. The license said
Speaker 2: it was. It was a Mercedes that we had at
Speaker 2: the time, and I think he thought, well, these you know,
Speaker 2: are these people legit? Are they criminals? Because I've had
Speaker 2: a situation like that when we were moving my mom
Speaker 2: and my sister. They both had Toyota cameras, and I
Speaker 2: guess the guy thought it was unusual for there'd be
Speaker 2: two cars driving late at night. They were exactly the same.
Speaker 2: So he pulled us over just to kind of sniff around.
Speaker 2: And of course there was nothing, and there was anything
Speaker 2: with this guy, but he said, no, there's some construction
Speaker 2: up I've had. You might want to saw it down
Speaker 2: a little bit, you know, And he looked in the
Speaker 2: back and Travison Lance were in the back and car
Speaker 2: seats and stuff like that. But yeah, it was not dangerous.
Speaker 2: You know, maybe you're a gas listening to the radio,
Speaker 2: but it really wasn't. I mean, you know, it didn't
Speaker 2: really even realize that she was going one hundred miles
Speaker 2: an hour until the cop pulled up, and then she
Speaker 2: looks at it as like, uh, oh, so anyway, but
Speaker 2: now they do have a speed limit, but maybe Arizona
Speaker 2: will wise up. The data out of Montana showed that
Speaker 2: there were actually fewer fatalities in the D restricted speed
Speaker 2: zones than in the speed limited zones out of an
Speaker 2: abundance of caution. He said, I propose a one year
Speaker 2: pilot on a segment of Interstate eight. They will be
Speaker 2: chosen by the Arizona Department of Transportation Director and subject
Speaker 2: to annual safety audits. Coupper City anticipates a decrease on
Speaker 2: cash and crash and fatality rates, as it's been shown
Speaker 2: that driver behavior such as seat belt use has a
Speaker 2: more significant influence on these matters than the speed at
Speaker 2: which drivers travel. And the Arizona legislature section opens on
Speaker 2: January twelfth, so we'll see what happens with it. But
Speaker 2: again that allow us to do that. I think we can.
Speaker 2: I think we can handle it. PayPal is, as I
Speaker 2: mentioned before, planning to launch a bank serving small businesses
Speaker 2: around the US. And when I see this, I hear
Speaker 2: Admiral Ackbar saying it's a trap and be very careful.
Speaker 2: They're going to push this ESG or whatever the government
Speaker 2: agenda du jour of the day is. They will use
Speaker 2: that to debank you don't fall for it, but they
Speaker 2: are going to pay people interest. They're going to have
Speaker 2: interest bearing savings accounts. Imagine that a bank that will
Speaker 2: actually pay people interest. They filed documents with the Utah
Speaker 2: Department of Financial Institutions and with the FDIC in order
Speaker 2: to launch the PayPal bank. And again, if they get
Speaker 2: thea FDIC insurance coverage, they will get protection for It's
Speaker 2: now up to two hundred and fifty thousand dollars per
Speaker 2: depositor per bank account, so that'll be covered in case
Speaker 2: they fall. But Trump is expected to sign an order
Speaker 2: reclassifying marijuana as a Schedule three drug safe sources. So
Speaker 2: it's interesting, you know, as he's pushing claiming that he's
Speaker 2: got to have a war with Venezuela over drugs, he's
Speaker 2: now moving to reschedule marijuana now. Of course, to put
Speaker 2: it as a Schedule three drug is not to remove
Speaker 2: prohibitions of it. Those are still controlled sub And the
Speaker 2: other question people should be asking themselves is where did
Speaker 2: these schedules come from. You may think that they came
Speaker 2: from Richard Nixon, but they didn't. The drug war came
Speaker 2: from Richard Nixon.
Speaker 4: But the.
Speaker 2: Drugs that we have that was produced by the UN.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, this whole war on drugs
Speaker 2: is a globalist agenda. Richard Nixon was not a conservative.
Speaker 2: He was a globalist. For crying out loud, he had
Speaker 2: Henry Kissinger was a guy that was basically running his
Speaker 2: administration and he opened everything up to China. Doesn't that
Speaker 2: tell people something about Richard Nixon. While the plan is
Speaker 2: for the order to be signed today, the timing could shift.
Speaker 2: The order is expected to reclassify marijuana from Schedule one
Speaker 2: to Schedule three drug. Schedule one drugs apply to substances
Speaker 2: with no quote currently accepted medical use and something that
Speaker 2: has a high potential for abuse. That includes other Schedule
Speaker 2: one drugs are there are heroin, LSD and ecstasy in
Speaker 2: addition to marijuana, And so you know, we look at
Speaker 2: heroin and LSD. Wait a minute, that's all CIA is
Speaker 2: all over that stuff. I don't know anything to do
Speaker 2: with ecstasy. But when you look at heroin and these
Speaker 2: other things, LSD that's there. You know, going back to
Speaker 2: to Sydney Gottlieb, maybe we should prohibit the CIA instead
Speaker 2: of drugs. The biggest drug gang that's out there. Schedule
Speaker 2: three for substances with moderate to low potential for physical
Speaker 2: and psychological dependence. That would lump in marijuana with things
Speaker 2: like codeine. You know, because when you go pick up
Speaker 2: some cough syrup that has codine in it, you have
Speaker 2: to give them your ID and all the rest of
Speaker 2: the stuff and they have to report it to the government.
Speaker 2: Testosteron anabolic steroids and ketamine. So I don't know. I
Speaker 2: guess maybe if the ketamine is controlled like that. I
Speaker 2: don't know anything about it. I just know that it's
Speaker 2: a favorite of elon musk. Moving the drug to a
Speaker 2: lower schedule would not change the fact that it remains
Speaker 2: illegal for recreational use at the federal level, but it
Speaker 2: could open up the door to more research into marijuana
Speaker 2: and expanded medical uses that might also lower the tax
Speaker 2: burden for state licensed marijuana dispensaries and dozens of states
Speaker 2: where it is legal, and it is dozens of states.
Speaker 2: Medical marijuana is now legal in forty states and the
Speaker 2: District of Columbia. And so this is done. And here's
Speaker 2: the interesting thing you should think about. Marijuana legalization is
Speaker 2: one of the best examples of states using their Tenth
Speaker 2: Amendment recognized powers. The Tenth Amendment doesn't give states powers. No,
Speaker 2: it recognizes the fact that the federal government was a
Speaker 2: creation of the states.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: Our rights don't come from the Bill Rights. Our rights
Speaker 2: don't come from government. If they did, they be called privileges.
Speaker 2: Our rights come from God. There are is on the
Speaker 2: basis of us being humans, not even on the basis
Speaker 2: of us being citizens. And the powers that the federal
Speaker 2: government has are delegated to it by the states, not
Speaker 2: the other way around. That's what Trump and the current
Speaker 2: politicians of both parties are trying to convince you that
Speaker 2: all power belongs to the federal government and they allow
Speaker 2: the states to have certain powers. That's not true at all.
Speaker 2: And this is a good example of it, in defiance
Speaker 2: of the federal War on drugs, which again they're just
Speaker 2: a surrogate for the UN agenda. And I remember when
Speaker 2: I didn't know that for the longest time, and I
Speaker 2: thought it was outrageous and intrusive that the UN would
Speaker 2: get very upset. It's like California, one of the first
Speaker 2: states that legalized medical marijuana, got the UN very upset
Speaker 2: and they put out a statement about it. It's none
Speaker 2: of their business. They can't enforce any of this stuff.
Speaker 2: And then when I was talking to law enforcement against phibition,
Speaker 2: they pointed out that, yeah, it came from the UN
Speaker 2: in the first place, and so this whole drug war
Speaker 2: is a UN program. That's enough reason right there to
Speaker 2: push back against the drug war. But we have a
Speaker 2: lot more reasons as well. And so you have forty
Speaker 2: states that didn't just reclassify it to Schedule three drug.
Speaker 2: They just said no, you know, you can use it
Speaker 2: for medical use. And I don't know how many states
Speaker 2: have legalized it now for recreational use, but that is
Speaker 2: a nullification of state law of federal law rather, and
Speaker 2: one of the reasons why the federal government has not
Speaker 2: had this legal fight with them is they're running this
Speaker 2: entire drug war on a bluff. They don't have the
Speaker 2: legal authority on the constitutions. You've heard me say many times.
Speaker 2: The eighteenth Amendment in the Constitution testifies to the fact
Speaker 2: that everybody in the country realized that they needed to
Speaker 2: go through the extra steps of amending the Constitution in
Speaker 2: order to prohibit alcohol, and so we have the eighteenth
Speaker 2: and the twenty first Amendment to prohibit it, to relegalize
Speaker 2: it testify to the fact that it's not something that
Speaker 2: the Commerce Department can do, and so Iriwana has been
Speaker 2: deemed a Schedule one drug since classifications were created in
Speaker 2: nineteen seventy, created by whom by the UN. However, most
Speaker 2: states have approved the drug for certain medical uses, and
Speaker 2: twenty four states have legalized the drug recreationally. There we go,
Speaker 2: twenty four states. The state policies technically clash with federal law.
Speaker 2: This article from CBS is not going to point out
Speaker 2: that this is nullification. They're not going to point out
Speaker 2: the constitutional issues of this. They're not going to point
Speaker 2: out the powers that the states have retained. None of
Speaker 2: that's going to be pointed out with any of this stuff.
Speaker 2: And you know, when we look at Texas, Texas is
Speaker 2: a good example. There was a great state Rep in Texas.
Speaker 2: I interviewed him several times, David Simpson. He was the
Speaker 2: guy who pushed back against the TSA. And he was
Speaker 2: the one who came up when the TSA started doing
Speaker 2: the body scanners and the pat downs the kids and
Speaker 2: everybody else. He pushed back on that. And in the
Speaker 2: state House where he introduced the bill, they unanimously said,
Speaker 2: we want the TSA to stop that in Texas, and
Speaker 2: then it went to the Senate and it was stopped
Speaker 2: in the Senate by the Lieutenant governor who used to
Speaker 2: work for the CIA, and then the CIA set him
Speaker 2: up and made him a billionaire in the oil business.
Speaker 2: And he had spent more money to buy his way
Speaker 2: into that office than anybody ever had in Texas. And
Speaker 2: so he stopped it in the Senate. And then David
Speaker 2: Simpson tried it again, and again it passed in the House,
Speaker 2: but not with as many votes. It wasn't unanimous that
Speaker 2: the second time, and they stopped it in the Senate again.
Speaker 2: The reason I bring that up is because he was
Speaker 2: the real deal. This guy was a real conservative menium,
Speaker 2: short hair, clean cut guy, always wore a cowboy hat.
Speaker 2: He was a seventh generation Texan. I really admired him,
Speaker 2: a great guy. And he also brought up the bill
Speaker 2: to allow certain medical condition one particular medical condition, and
Speaker 2: that is uncontrolled seizures. And you had some families in
Speaker 2: his jurisdiction that had tried everything that you know, Rockefeller
Speaker 2: Medicine had for these seizures, these uncontrollable seizures. Nothing were
Speaker 2: and the pharmaceutical companies sell an extract from marijuana that
Speaker 2: supposedly helps and maybe it does help some people, but
Speaker 2: it wasn't helping these kids. Colorado had legalized it for
Speaker 2: medical use, and so they could go to Colorado and
Speaker 2: they could get it, but if they brought it back
Speaker 2: to Texas, where they lived and where they were not
Speaker 2: ready to move to Colorado, if they brought it back
Speaker 2: to Texas, they were in danger of going to jail
Speaker 2: for a very very long time because it's a Class
Speaker 2: one drug. And so he got an exception put in
Speaker 2: for that, and he in Texas where they didn't I
Speaker 2: don't know if they've legalized medical marijuana now or not,
Speaker 2: but at the time they didn't recognize. They didn't have
Speaker 2: marijuana legalized medically except for that one thing. And they said,
Speaker 2: if you've tried all of these other things, and you've
Speaker 2: got a doctor's note saying that you've tried all these
Speaker 2: other things and your kid still is having these uncontrolled caeizures,
Speaker 2: then will allow you to go through all the burdensome
Speaker 2: steps to be able to get this stuff. So that
Speaker 2: was something of a victory. Later on, he just went
Speaker 2: through and he said, he put up a billity he said,
Speaker 2: let's just strike marijuana. This is a bill to strike
Speaker 2: marijuana from being mentioned anywhere in Texas law. He said,
Speaker 2: God created it and we should not be regulating it.
Speaker 2: Any natural substance like that shouldn't be prohibited by Again,
Speaker 2: this is not something that's being brewed or distilled or
Speaker 2: anything like that. It's just a natural substances there. And
Speaker 2: that did not pass. But I really admired him for
Speaker 2: his principles. He's another one of these guys like Frank Nicely.
Speaker 2: Every once in a while you find a state rep.
Speaker 2: That that's a good guy. I believe it's time to
Speaker 2: end the needless arrests and the incarceration of adults for
Speaker 2: small amounts of marijuana for personal use. We must also
Speaker 2: implement smart regulations while providing access for adults to safe
Speaker 2: tested product, said the Trump administration in a statement. Well,
Speaker 2: I think it's also time maybe that you stop murdering
Speaker 2: people the pretense that they are carrying drugs off the
Speaker 2: coast of Venezuela. How about that, you know that's where
Speaker 2: this we're on drug eventually is going to lead or
Speaker 2: been saying it for the longest time. That is the
Speaker 2: natural progression of all this stuff. Your phony drug war,
Speaker 2: and so when you look at it, they said, well,
Speaker 2: it's going to allow them to do some research on
Speaker 2: this that we couldn't do before because the universities or
Speaker 2: other companies, of course, they don't have any financial incentive
Speaker 2: to show that marijuana works for these types of things.
Speaker 2: And one of the things that was really bad about
Speaker 2: that whole situation was, at the same time reporting on
Speaker 2: the fact that these children could not get any help
Speaker 2: from their constant seizure. I'm also aware of in reporting
Speaker 2: the fact that that happens to many kids as a
Speaker 2: reaction to vaccines. So the pharmaceutical industry out there vaccinates
Speaker 2: the kids, they wind up some of them having these
Speaker 2: uncontrolled seizures, and then if the parents try to use
Speaker 2: something that's natural, that grows naturally, then they get locked up.
Speaker 2: What an injustice that is. And you know most of
Speaker 2: that is still in place, but many people so well,
Speaker 2: you haven't proved, you haven't done any tests, and so forth.
Speaker 2: It's like, oh, yeah, you mean, like your pharmaceutical tests
Speaker 2: of vaccines, they're supposed to tell us how safe and
Speaker 2: effective they are. These fraudulent studies that you run, Well,
Speaker 2: nobody's going to spend the money to do a study
Speaker 2: on marijuana because there's no profit in it for them.
Speaker 2: They only do that if it's something that they can patent,
Speaker 2: and so there's no center for it. But any academic
Speaker 2: organizations that might do it out of purely academic interest
Speaker 2: because it was a Schedule one drug, it's very difficult
Speaker 2: for them to do that anyway. And so they're saying
Speaker 2: that might help for them to determine some of these
Speaker 2: things as to whether or not they are safe or effective.
Speaker 2: So we shall see. Well, Donald Trump was offered two
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty million dollars to run for a third term,
Speaker 2: reports Newsweek. Guess who it was. It was Miriam Addelson
Speaker 2: and the same one who flew back Jonathan Pollard, the
Speaker 2: trader that Trump pardoned, and she flew him back on
Speaker 2: her plane. He got out and kissed the ground in
Speaker 2: Israel and he was met by nt Yahu. And so
Speaker 2: this was at a ceremony around Hanukkah and Trump called
Speaker 2: on her to address the guests that were gathered there
Speaker 2: during the speech. The billionaire Millam Addelson again a billionaire
Speaker 2: just like Trump, well not like Trump, I mean, Sheldon
Speaker 2: Adilson was able to run a casino for a profit.
Speaker 2: He didn't bankrupt six casinos. He became a multi billionaire
Speaker 2: by running his casinos. So he's obviously smarter than Trump.
Speaker 2: And Trump is now his lackey, his employee. Although he's dead,
Speaker 2: it's his widow. He's got his money. During her speech,
Speaker 2: the billionaire said that she had discussed the legality of
Speaker 2: Trump's third term with Alan Dershowitz, and then the people
Speaker 2: in the audience started chanting four more years. Then the
Speaker 2: pair embraced Trump and Miriam Maddelson before Trump returned to
Speaker 2: the microphone and said she said, think about it. I'll
Speaker 2: give you two hundred and fifty million dollars, and the
Speaker 2: audience began to laugh, and then Adilson said, I will
Speaker 2: give it.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 2: Imagine this. Imagine if Trump was speaking at a trade organization,
Speaker 2: let's say, Pharmaceutical bit or something. Right, We'll give you
Speaker 2: two undred fifty million dollars if you run again. You've
Speaker 2: been so good for our business and all the rest
Speaker 2: of this stuff. People would say, wait a minute, why
Speaker 2: are the corporations buying presidents like that? Isn't there something
Speaker 2: wrong with that? And yet it's not the CEO of
Speaker 2: a large corporation. It is somebody who is supporting a
Speaker 2: foreign government, somebody who supported one of the worst traders
Speaker 2: we've ever had in this country. And so when you
Speaker 2: look at it, this is not just a bribery. It's
Speaker 2: not just that President Trump is actually a little puppet
Speaker 2: for these people. He actively courted that he's such a
Speaker 2: prostitute that he was soliciting all of this stuff when
Speaker 2: he ran for office. Remember when he said, you know,
Speaker 2: it used to be that Israel owned Congress, and rightfully so,
Speaker 2: he said, rightfully so, why should any foreign nation own Congress.
Speaker 2: It's supposed to be owned by the American people. And
Speaker 2: so he said, remember when Israel owned Congress? And rightfully so.
Speaker 2: But they don't anymore. You need me, I'll do it
Speaker 2: for you. Right He's out there prostituting himself. He's soliciting
Speaker 2: money from these people who are more than willing to
Speaker 2: give him the money. He just says the open part
Speaker 2: right out loud, and he absolutely is a prostitute. Steve
Speaker 2: Bannon has repeatedly claimed that there is a plan to
Speaker 2: get him to remain in the White House. In the election.
Speaker 2: In twenty twenty eight, forty five percent of Trump voters
Speaker 2: do not want him to take office again forty three
Speaker 2: percent do Another eleven percent of the Trump voters said
Speaker 2: they weren't sure about it at all. Well, I think
Speaker 2: the constitution is pretty clear. Steve Bannon, however, says, well,
Speaker 2: he's going to get a third term. Trump is going
Speaker 2: to be president in twenty twenty eight, and people just
Speaker 2: ought to get accommodated to that. Again, these are people
Speaker 2: who have absolutely no regard for what the constitution or
Speaker 2: the rule of law says. So I can understand why
Speaker 2: he would say that and why it might be a thing, right,
Speaker 2: because Trump's mode of operation this is just to do
Speaker 2: whatever he wishes and to defy people. He defies the Constitution,
Speaker 2: then he defies you to stop him somehow, and so
Speaker 2: I could see that he would do that. And they
Speaker 2: have a political science professor that Newsweek quoted who said, well,
Speaker 2: the truth is that there is some technical ambiguity in
Speaker 2: the constitutional statutes, potentially some way to circumvent the restriction.
Speaker 2: But the intention, especially when the twenty second and the
Speaker 2: twelfth amendments are taken together, the intention is clear presidential
Speaker 2: terms should be limited to two and even if Trump
Speaker 2: can find some pack to allow him to seek a
Speaker 2: third term, it'll be controversial. He better believe it will be.
Speaker 2: But maybe he'll just declare an emergency and say it's
Speaker 2: an emergency, I can do whatever I wish, because he
Speaker 2: defies the Constitution that way over and over again and
Speaker 2: dares you to stop him. The reality is, though, is
Speaker 2: that he is going to be term limited by God.
Speaker 2: All of us are actually, but you know, kind of
Speaker 2: like Darth Vader Ginsburg, or you had Diane Frankenstein or
Speaker 2: Glitch McConnell. These people who have to be carried out
Speaker 2: feet first out of government. That's the way that Trump is.
Speaker 2: That is a real tell. I think it is not
Speaker 2: the spirit of George Washington, who when he willingly set
Speaker 2: the example by just two terms that I'm out. I'm
Speaker 2: going to go back to the real world. Here. He
Speaker 2: was hailed by the King of England as the greatest
Speaker 2: man alive for doing that. I can't say that about Trump,
Speaker 2: can you? For all the terrorist stuff that he's doing.
Speaker 2: Just take a look at this article from Reason. Thanks
Speaker 2: thanks to anti trust officials, I robot will now be
Speaker 2: acquired by a Chinese robotics firm instead of by Amazon.
Speaker 2: So you have a trust officials in the US and
Speaker 2: in the EU said we're not going to prove that,
Speaker 2: and so it's better for China to have all manufacturing,
Speaker 2: which is what these people have been doing. Everything has
Speaker 2: been handed to them on a silver platter, I should say,
Speaker 2: a lump of coal. They're allowed to build the cheap
Speaker 2: energy facilities that they need to do manufacturing. And if
Speaker 2: you can't be competitive on energy costs, you can't be
Speaker 2: competitive on manufacturing. And that's just one aspect of what
Speaker 2: has been handed to China on a silver platter. The
Speaker 2: only thing the FTC and the European Commission succeeded in
Speaker 2: doing was to transfer ownership of I robot from an
Speaker 2: American company to a Chinese one. So think about that,
Speaker 2: and that's really what is happening now with the tariffs.
Speaker 2: The tariffs are not working the way Trump and his
Speaker 2: failed Democrat politician Peter Navarro thought that they would. I robot,
Speaker 2: the creator of Rumba, filed for bankruptcy on Sunday. If
Speaker 2: Amazon had been allowed to acquire the company in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty two, consumers likely would have enjoyed improved quality and
Speaker 2: lower prices. But now, thanks to anti trust regulators, I
Speaker 2: robot will be acquired by a massive Chinese robot vacuum
Speaker 2: manufacturer instead of by American owned Amazon, and so I
Speaker 2: guess that sucks, right, Yeah, Power horbes a vacuum. So
Speaker 2: I guess you could explain it that way with these
Speaker 2: the federal government the EU power abhors a vacuum, and
Speaker 2: they certainly did abhoor the Roombo vacuum. The deal alarmed
Speaker 2: anti trust regulators in the US and the EU, however
Speaker 2: not in the UK. They declared that the transaction would
Speaker 2: be okay and it wouldn't be a competitive concern in
Speaker 2: the markets. And again it was already a very competitive market.
Speaker 2: I mean, there's a lot of competitors to the room
Speaker 2: but Robot and have been for some time. The British economy, however,
Speaker 2: is only about a tenth the size the American economy
Speaker 2: and only a fifth the size of the EU's economy,
Speaker 2: so it was not viable if they can only do business,
Speaker 2: for example, in the UK. So again you want to
Speaker 2: talk about monopoly, Our governments have handed the monopoly of
Speaker 2: basically all manufacturing to China. When you look at the
Speaker 2: China price of intellectual property, theft of cheap slave labor,
Speaker 2: and now they've added to it, and then currency manipulation,
Speaker 2: but then they've now added to it. I think the
Speaker 2: most important factor, and that is very cheap available energy.
Speaker 2: So as we're looking at these failed policies, Customs and
Speaker 2: Border Patrol has brought in a record two hundred billion
Speaker 2: dollars from terrifts. Now, this in and of itself, I
Speaker 2: think is outrageous because when I went back and looked
Speaker 2: at if I remember correctly, it's a couple of weeks ago,
Speaker 2: I went back and looked at what the biggest tax
Speaker 2: increases in history were. FDR had the biggest tax increases
Speaker 2: you could imagine, and if it was adjusted into today's
Speaker 2: devalued dollars, it will be about two hundred billion. And
Speaker 2: that's what the tariffs have done. So these are FDR
Speaker 2: level tax increases that Trump is imposed on us. And
Speaker 2: besides that, though it's even worse. It's not just the
Speaker 2: monetary aspect of it or the money. This is creating
Speaker 2: chaos and havoc for businesses small and large in America,
Speaker 2: and it has raised prices for consumers as well. This
Speaker 2: on again, off again, the constantly changing and shifting tax parties,
Speaker 2: because he's just putting them on in whatever mood he's in.
Speaker 2: If he gets upset with some government one evening, then
Speaker 2: the next day they got tariffs slapped on him. We've
Speaker 2: seen this happen over and over again. And according to UCBP,
Speaker 2: the revenue was collected from January twentieth to December of
Speaker 2: the fifteenth, after the implementation of more than forty executive orders.
Speaker 2: This is not the way it's supposed to work. Congress
Speaker 2: has the power to tax, and of course they're not
Speaker 2: going to call Trump on this because they are afraid
Speaker 2: of him in the Republican Party. And so the lucky
Speaker 2: loser who bankrupted six casinos in his failed Democrat Soros advisor,
Speaker 2: you know, the his Soros advisor Besset and his failed
Speaker 2: Democrat Peter Navarro. This is a scheme that they've come
Speaker 2: up with. But as bad as that is, raising taxes
Speaker 2: by two hundred billion dollars and then boasting about it
Speaker 2: like it's better for the government to have that money
Speaker 2: than for the consumers and the businesses to have that money. Great, well,
Speaker 2: Trump is now saying it's eighteen trillion, and Reason says
Speaker 2: there's absolutely no way that that is possible. I mean,
Speaker 2: first of all, I just told you his slightly over
Speaker 2: two hundred billion and slightly over it's like two and
Speaker 2: thirty six billion, So thirty six billion is not anything
Speaker 2: to ignore. But still rounding out these numbers. But that's
Speaker 2: a long way from eighteen trillion. He's telling people it's
Speaker 2: about one hundred times bigger than it really is. It
Speaker 2: is the big lie. And how do you get people
Speaker 2: to believe the big lie? Well, you repeat it over
Speaker 2: and over and over again. And as a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: he has repeated it over and over again. As Reason
Speaker 2: points out, he has given this eighteen trillion dollar figure.
Speaker 2: He has repeated that now at least five times, and
Speaker 2: they give the dates on which he said it. He
Speaker 2: first used the eighteen trillion dollar figure during a cabinet
Speaker 2: meeting in December the second, then he repeated it during
Speaker 2: comments to reporters December the third, Then in an interview
Speaker 2: with on December the eighth. He also brought it up,
Speaker 2: unprompted and somewhat bizarrely during the announcement on December fourth
Speaker 2: of a new peace treaty that aimed to end hostilities
Speaker 2: between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. On Sunday,
Speaker 2: Trump brought it up again while speaking to reporters in
Speaker 2: the White House. He said, because of the tariffs, we've
Speaker 2: taken in more than eighteen think of this, more than
Speaker 2: eighteen trillion. There's never been anything like it, And then
Speaker 2: moments later he repeated the claim, we took in more
Speaker 2: than eighteen trillion and ten months. Well, the reality is
Speaker 2: is that if this is somebody who's going to lie
Speaker 2: about the number of people that he killed with the
Speaker 2: Trump shots, if he's going to boast about the Trump shots,
Speaker 2: and if he's going to take tens of millions of
Speaker 2: people that he killed and even more that he disabled
Speaker 2: and then say that he saved millions of lives, he'll
Speaker 2: lie about anything, And of course it doesn't have to
Speaker 2: even be close to the truth. So this is factually
Speaker 2: wrong and it is logically absurd, they pointed out. And
Speaker 2: yet you've got some conservative media personalities out there who
Speaker 2: are trying to make excuses for him and say that, well, no,
Speaker 2: what are you saying is actually true? So how are
Speaker 2: they doing that? What kind of lies are they telling
Speaker 2: you to try to make a case that there's eighteen
Speaker 2: trillion dollars of stuff here? Well, they said, over the
Speaker 2: first eleven months of this year, the federal government collected
Speaker 2: two hundred and thirty six billion in tariffs and duties.
Speaker 2: And that's what the Treasury Department is saying, that's what
Speaker 2: the Customs and Border Patrol people are saying in their
Speaker 2: monthly reports. That is a huge difference two and thirty
Speaker 2: six billion versus eighteen trillion, but it still represents the
Speaker 2: biggest tax increase since nineteen ninety three, denominated in dollars,
Speaker 2: not denominated in purchase price, if you account for the
Speaker 2: devaluation of the dollar. It goes back to FDR and
Speaker 2: Trump's tariffs are expected to generate about two point three
Speaker 2: trillion dollars over the next decade. That's the Trump administration's figures.
Speaker 2: What he's basically saying is that if these tariffs were
Speaker 2: to stay in effect, you know, for the next decade,
Speaker 2: two point three trillion, Well, he's talking about ten times that.
Speaker 2: So what he's saying is that he took in the
Speaker 2: amount that they project they would take in over a century,
Speaker 2: not a decade, but over one hundred years, because it's
Speaker 2: ten times that amount. But getting eighteen trillion dollars in
Speaker 2: tariff revenue in a single year is impossible. The US
Speaker 2: only imported about three point three trillion dollars of goods
Speaker 2: last year, and you'd have to tax those imports at
Speaker 2: six hundred percent in order to get eighteen trillion dollars
Speaker 2: in new tariff revenue. Of course, if you taxed imports
Speaker 2: at that level, you would end up with roughly the
Speaker 2: same amount of imports as tariff revenue, which is zero.
Speaker 2: You would bring it all to a stop. Part of
Speaker 2: the confusion here lies in the carelessness with which the
Speaker 2: President uses phrases like we took in. I don't think
Speaker 2: that's careless at all. I think it's a very deliberate
Speaker 2: and studied ambiguity that he's pushing out on people. We
Speaker 2: took an end seems to be referring not to tax
Speaker 2: revenue from the tariffs, but a combination of tax revenue
Speaker 2: and various investment deals that have been promised by private
Speaker 2: businesses and by foreign governments. And understand that even that
Speaker 2: doesn't get you there. But understand that these promises have
Speaker 2: been laughable in the extreme. Remember when he was talking
Speaker 2: to the European Union, and I think it was Ursula
Speaker 2: fond of lying, who strung him along, and he was
Speaker 2: happy to go along with it, talking about how much
Speaker 2: investment the EU is going to make in the US, Well,
Speaker 2: the EU doesn't have anything that it makes Those that
Speaker 2: all be private companies in the eupa union. And if
Speaker 2: you looked at the dollar figure that was thrown out there,
Speaker 2: it was patently absurd. It was more than these companies
Speaker 2: had to invest in a given year.
Speaker 1: So all a lie.
Speaker 2: Everything about it was a lie. Audi is absolutely right,
Speaker 2: it's all a lie, and that's the name of this podcast.
Speaker 2: But there was absolutely no way that A she was
Speaker 2: gonna she had the control of those it was nothing
Speaker 2: under her control. And b it was more than all
Speaker 2: of these private companies invest I think in all their
Speaker 2: foreign investments combined, and more than they had to invest.
Speaker 2: So none of that was going to happen. And that's
Speaker 2: the point they make, is that a lot of these
Speaker 2: things are just promised by big businesses or by foreign
Speaker 2: governments and they haven't taken in anything they've been taken
Speaker 2: if they weren't willingly going along with it. The only
Speaker 2: people have been taken in have been the MAGA people
Speaker 2: listening to these MAGA influencers. So most of these funds
Speaker 2: have not been received by the federal government in any way.
Speaker 2: If they are to be invested, they are fully private,
Speaker 2: and these foreign governments don't have any more control over
Speaker 2: that kind of investment than Trump does, and so they
Speaker 2: were absurd multiples of reality anyway. And then in April,
Speaker 2: the White House launched a website tracking the Trump Effect.
Speaker 2: So here we are. So if you're going to make
Speaker 2: that case, and you're going to say, well, that includes
Speaker 2: all the tariff revenue, but it also includes all the
Speaker 2: investment promises that are going to happen here. They're going
Speaker 2: to build all these different factories there which haven't been
Speaker 2: built and haven't been started yet, so it hasn't been
Speaker 2: taken in. But even if you include that, and they
Speaker 2: do have on their website, they are tracking what they
Speaker 2: want to call the Trump Effect, meant to track the
Speaker 2: quote new investment in US manufacturing, technology, and infrastructure since
Speaker 2: Trump returned off US and by their own tally, by
Speaker 2: their own inflated tallly, that comes up to nine point
Speaker 2: six trillion, So it's still double what his own website says.
Speaker 2: Absolutely amazing. The guy is the most childish liar. I
Speaker 2: just take a look at his new ballroom right that
Speaker 2: ballroom project how long ago did that happen? Was that
Speaker 2: like two or three months ago? It began as a
Speaker 2: two hundred million dollar.
Speaker 3: Construction, not too long before the Kirk shooting, because you remember.
Speaker 2: He so was that in September. I don't remember when
Speaker 2: the Kirk It might.
Speaker 3: Have started in August, but maybe September, because you remember
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk got shot and he said, oh, yes, Verry said,
Speaker 3: look at my ballroom where it's going to go.
Speaker 2: Yeah, thank you for reminding me. Yeah. So you know,
Speaker 2: it's just a couple of months ago it was two
Speaker 2: hundred million, and then it was about a month ago
Speaker 2: it was three hundred million. Now he's just said it's
Speaker 2: four hundred million. This thing is starting to look like
Speaker 2: a California mass transit project. So now four hundred million.
Speaker 2: And he says, for one hundred and fifty years, they
Speaker 2: wanted a ballroom, and we're giving.
Speaker 1: It to them.
Speaker 2: Who is the they who wanted this? I don't ever
Speaker 2: recall any of the founding fathers. I guess it was
Speaker 2: a Madison. After he did the Bill rights, he said, yeah,
Speaker 2: well I got the bill rights through, but what we
Speaker 2: really wanted was a ballroom.
Speaker 3: I don't know, maybe isn't some of those lesser known
Speaker 3: Jeffersonian letters or something like that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but Trump I was able to get rid of
Speaker 3: the tax man, but sadly we weren't able to put
Speaker 3: a ballroom onto the White House. It's my greatest regret.
Speaker 2: That's right. Well, he is a one man party, isn't he.
Speaker 2: I mean, he's taking over the GOP and they do
Speaker 2: whatever he wishes. Nobody talks back to him, So he's
Speaker 2: the one man party.
Speaker 3: But well, with Jeffy Epstein gone, there's no one to
Speaker 3: party with.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: It really is a one man party. So he's got
Speaker 2: to have a ballroom. Maybe he can find another Jeffrey
Speaker 2: Epstein and one of these balls that they're having. But
Speaker 2: to show you what a childish idiot he is, he
Speaker 2: set up this Walk of fame he called it, where
Speaker 2: he put up portraits of the president's right and now
Speaker 2: he has spent your tax money making what looks to
Speaker 2: be metal plaques. And the stuff that he's put on
Speaker 2: these plaques is just a joke. It's foolishness, it's clownish stuff.
Speaker 2: Maybe he's going to do some mocking sculptures of them
Speaker 2: next who knows, but he put it out there in metal,
Speaker 2: and it is pure idiocracy. White House staff updated the
Speaker 2: so called Presidential Walk of Fame Wednesday by adding lengthy
Speaker 2: descriptions of each former president and rhetoric. The lines are trumps,
Speaker 2: such as calling Joe Biden the worst president in American
Speaker 2: history and calling him sleepy Joe. Trump set his well
Speaker 2: known opinions of each of the former presidents in stone,
Speaker 2: actually in metal, I think by adding these plaques underneath
Speaker 2: the portraits that now hang along the colonnade where he
Speaker 2: put up a picture of the autopen instead of of
Speaker 2: Joe Biden, that kind of, you know, childish meme trolling.
Speaker 2: It's not even funny, really, Caroline Love. It's always left
Speaker 2: to her to try to cover up for this clown
Speaker 2: and make him sound reasonable in some way, she said.
Speaker 2: The plaques are eloquently written descriptions of each president and
Speaker 2: the legacy that they left behind. As a student of history,
Speaker 2: many were written directly by the president himself. I wonder
Speaker 2: what grade he got in history. So here's an example.
Speaker 2: Sleepy Joe was by far the worst president in American history.
Speaker 2: Puts us on a plaque taking office As a result,
Speaker 2: of the most corrupt election ever seen in the United States.
Speaker 2: In Obama's description, he says he passed the highly ineffective
Speaker 2: Unaffordable Care Act, resulting in his party losing control at
Speaker 2: both Houses of Congress and the election in the largest
Speaker 2: House Republican majority since nineteen forty six. For Bill Clinton,
Speaker 2: he writes, he attributed the legislative successes to through Republicans
Speaker 2: in Congress quote unquote, and he boasted that Trump terminated
Speaker 2: the North American Free Trade Agreement, the trade deal that
Speaker 2: was struck under Clinton. He said, also included a line
Speaker 2: about how Hillary Clinton lost to him in the twenty
Speaker 2: sixteen election a clown, a narcissist. What a joke this
Speaker 2: all is. And again he doesn't have any criticism, interestingly
Speaker 2: enough of George H. W. Bush, who if you remember
Speaker 2: both Bush and Bush the first and Bill Clinton wanted NAFTA.
Speaker 2: It was only Ross Prow that was pushing back against
Speaker 2: it at the time. Reagan, known as the Great Communicator,
Speaker 2: said he was re elected in a landslide in eighty
Speaker 2: four and left office with high approval. He was a
Speaker 2: fan of President Donald J. Trump long before President Trump's
Speaker 2: historic run for the White House. Likewise, President Trump was
Speaker 2: a fan of his quote unquote, this is the kind
Speaker 2: of idiotic dribble that he had put on metal plaque,
Speaker 2: and he's got hanging there on that walkway there. Under Nixon,
Speaker 2: he wrote one of the greatest political comebacks in American history,
Speaker 2: and he won the largest popular vote history victory and
Speaker 2: American history. He left out the part that he created EPA,
Speaker 2: that he ended gold, that he had wage and price controls,
Speaker 2: that he opened up to China, that he imposed a
Speaker 2: fifty five mile hours speed limit on everybody, and that
Speaker 2: he created that started the drug war. Yeah, how about
Speaker 2: all that stuff? And then he gave props to Gerald
Speaker 2: Ford for his quote brave pardon of Richard Nixon, the
Speaker 2: kind of thing that Trump was not brave enough to
Speaker 2: do for the January six people. He knew, you know,
Speaker 2: it was brave because gerald Ford knew he's going to
Speaker 2: take a lot of political heat for it. Trump didn't
Speaker 2: want to take the political heat for the j sixers
Speaker 2: that he had used and thrown under the bell.
Speaker 1: Brave for pottering that crook Richard Nixon.
Speaker 3: So you January six ers going to prison?
Speaker 11: Strange?
Speaker 2: Yeah, So this is what he's doing with all this
Speaker 2: stuff he talked about President Bush, George W. Bush said
Speaker 2: he created the Department of Homeland Security, but he started
Speaker 2: wars in Afghanistan, I Rock, both of which should not
Speaker 2: have happened. Shortly before the end of his administration, a
Speaker 2: global financial crisis and major recession took place. So Trump
Speaker 2: likes homeland security because he's an authoritarian, right, But he doesn't.
Speaker 2: But he criticizes him for the rest of the stuff
Speaker 2: that he did. And under JFK's plaque, he said he
Speaker 2: had the failed Bay of Pigs, invasion of Vietnam War.
Speaker 2: Can you imagine how long the list of failures will
Speaker 2: be for Donald Trump when he finally gets his plaque.
Speaker 2: Maybe what we would put under it just a quote
Speaker 2: attributed to Buzz Lightyear, the former astronaut, to stupidity and beyond.
Speaker 2: That's really the Trump administration. So that's it for today.
Speaker 2: Thank you for joining. Yes, have a good day. I
Speaker 2: wish I had a Christmas Night album.
Speaker 12: You can get the Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow
Speaker 12: dot com for just thirteen ninety nine. There's right in
Speaker 12: the second floor there. Say what'd you wish, George, Well,
Speaker 12: not just one wish, your whole hat flow. First, I'm
Speaker 12: going to the Davidnightshow dot com and purchase the Christmas
Speaker 12: Night Album. Then I'm gonna listen to Christmas classics like
Speaker 12: are you gonna throw a rock?
Speaker 7: I want the Christmas Night Album too.
Speaker 6: Yeah, that's pretty good.
Speaker 12: Hello girls, can't you come out to me?
Speaker 5: Can't you come old?
Speaker 12: David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
Speaker 12: like God Rest You, Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and It's
Speaker 12: all new. I'll be home for Christmas.
Speaker 3: What do you want?
Speaker 12: You want the moon? Just say the word and I'll
Speaker 12: throw a glasshole around and pull it down.
Speaker 6: I'll take it and what and then I'll buy you
Speaker 6: your own download of David Knight's Christmas Night Album