WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to my podcast. This is an audio

2
00:00:04.040 --> 00:00:06.759
<v Speaker 1>version of my videos available to make listening to my

3
00:00:06.799 --> 00:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the background easier than YouTube makes it. But

4
00:00:10.160 --> 00:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>since my videos are primarily made for YouTube, there may

5
00:00:13.720 --> 00:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>be occasional references to visual materials. If you'd like this

6
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:19.559
<v Speaker 1>podcast ad free, you can join us on Patreon app,

7
00:00:19.600 --> 00:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Patreon dot com, slash Vice Rhino.

8
00:00:22.160 --> 00:00:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Please enjoy.

9
00:00:24.039 --> 00:00:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Hello and welcome to my channel Vice Rhino. Here today,

10
00:00:28.760 --> 00:00:32.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at one of Mike Winger's twenty questions live streams.

11
00:00:32.280 --> 00:00:34.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm only focusing on the first question for this one,

12
00:00:34.799 --> 00:00:37.079
<v Speaker 3>as the majority of the questions he addresses are either

13
00:00:37.439 --> 00:00:40.880
<v Speaker 3>rather dull or have already been responded to by other creators.

14
00:00:41.200 --> 00:00:43.079
<v Speaker 3>Maybe there's a couple in there that I'll get into

15
00:00:43.159 --> 00:00:45.960
<v Speaker 3>in later videos, but I don't plan on turning this

16
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:47.840
<v Speaker 3>into a series, as I did with his response to

17
00:00:47.840 --> 00:00:51.520
<v Speaker 3>an atheist article. So the question we're addressing today is

18
00:00:52.079 --> 00:00:56.240
<v Speaker 3>does scripture promote evil things? To which the answer is

19
00:00:56.280 --> 00:00:59.079
<v Speaker 3>a very obvious yes. All you have to do is

20
00:00:59.079 --> 00:01:01.520
<v Speaker 3>look at the various passage on slavery. There are other

21
00:01:01.600 --> 00:01:04.400
<v Speaker 3>issues where the answer is slightly more nuanced and might

22
00:01:04.439 --> 00:01:06.879
<v Speaker 3>depend on what you mean by promote, but given that

23
00:01:06.920 --> 00:01:08.680
<v Speaker 3>there are rules about who you're allowed to keep as

24
00:01:08.680 --> 00:01:11.200
<v Speaker 3>a permanent chattel slave in the Old Testament, as well

25
00:01:11.239 --> 00:01:13.599
<v Speaker 3>as commands for slaves to obey their masters, even the

26
00:01:13.640 --> 00:01:16.519
<v Speaker 3>cruel ones in the New Testament, and commands for Christian

27
00:01:16.560 --> 00:01:19.200
<v Speaker 3>slave owners to just not threaten their slaves rather than

28
00:01:19.280 --> 00:01:22.200
<v Speaker 3>set them free, than any reasonable understanding of what the

29
00:01:22.200 --> 00:01:27.079
<v Speaker 3>word promote means will apply. The Bible promotes slavery, but

30
00:01:27.200 --> 00:01:29.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure we'll get into that in more detail later,

31
00:01:29.159 --> 00:01:31.599
<v Speaker 3>so let's take a look before we get into it, though,

32
00:01:31.680 --> 00:01:33.840
<v Speaker 3>just a quick content warning. This one gets into the

33
00:01:33.879 --> 00:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>topic of rape, including some biblical instances of child rape.

34
00:01:37.040 --> 00:01:39.079
<v Speaker 3>I don't go into graphic detail at any point, but

35
00:01:39.200 --> 00:01:41.239
<v Speaker 3>I understand that that might still be a very difficult

36
00:01:41.239 --> 00:01:43.799
<v Speaker 3>and painful topic for some people. So if that's you,

37
00:01:44.040 --> 00:01:46.280
<v Speaker 3>feel free to skip this one.

38
00:01:51.640 --> 00:01:51.799
<v Speaker 4>Now.

39
00:01:51.799 --> 00:01:53.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to get to the first question today before

40
00:01:53.760 --> 00:01:55.159
<v Speaker 2>I tell you more about any of that stuff, and

41
00:01:55.200 --> 00:01:57.879
<v Speaker 2>that is this one quite a challenging one. I've been

42
00:01:58.000 --> 00:02:02.280
<v Speaker 2>challenged the anonymous question it says I've been challenged with

43
00:02:02.319 --> 00:02:06.879
<v Speaker 2>the accusation that the Bible promotes killing, rape, and slavery,

44
00:02:07.480 --> 00:02:10.719
<v Speaker 2>quoting numbers thirty one fifteen through eighteen.

45
00:02:11.120 --> 00:02:13.120
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, this is a verse where we need to

46
00:02:13.159 --> 00:02:16.439
<v Speaker 3>get into exactly what is meant by promote if you're

47
00:02:16.439 --> 00:02:19.439
<v Speaker 3>not familiar. Numbers thirty one fifteen through eighteen is Moses

48
00:02:19.479 --> 00:02:22.319
<v Speaker 3>explaining that allowing women to live after conquering a city

49
00:02:22.520 --> 00:02:25.280
<v Speaker 3>will result in them corrupting the people of Israel, causing

50
00:02:25.319 --> 00:02:28.240
<v Speaker 3>them to act treacherously against the Lord, and thus forcing

51
00:02:28.280 --> 00:02:30.039
<v Speaker 3>God to kill a bunch of them with a plague.

52
00:02:30.479 --> 00:02:33.599
<v Speaker 3>So to avoid that, kill every man, woman, and male child,

53
00:02:33.960 --> 00:02:38.280
<v Speaker 3>but keep the female children alive for yourselves. In context,

54
00:02:38.280 --> 00:02:42.080
<v Speaker 3>it arguably gets worse. They've already conquered the Midianites and

55
00:02:42.080 --> 00:02:44.400
<v Speaker 3>taken a bunch of women captive. So not only was

56
00:02:44.439 --> 00:02:47.479
<v Speaker 3>Moses commanding child rape, he was also commanding the execution

57
00:02:47.560 --> 00:02:50.240
<v Speaker 3>of civilian prisoners of war as a way of exterminating

58
00:02:50.240 --> 00:02:54.560
<v Speaker 3>their culture, also known as genocide. So does this count

59
00:02:54.560 --> 00:02:58.120
<v Speaker 3>as the Bible promoting killing, rape, and slavery. I could

60
00:02:58.159 --> 00:03:01.240
<v Speaker 3>see how someone could argue that it does to promote

61
00:03:01.280 --> 00:03:04.280
<v Speaker 3>something is to actively encourage that thing. And this is

62
00:03:04.319 --> 00:03:07.319
<v Speaker 3>not a command for modern readers of the Bible to follow,

63
00:03:07.680 --> 00:03:10.919
<v Speaker 3>but just a story about something that did happen sure,

64
00:03:11.000 --> 00:03:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Presumably Moses, the guy who could speak directly to God

65
00:03:13.879 --> 00:03:16.360
<v Speaker 3>and was God's representative on Earth at the time, was

66
00:03:16.439 --> 00:03:19.960
<v Speaker 3>commanding genocide and rape as a proxy for God, meaning

67
00:03:19.960 --> 00:03:22.680
<v Speaker 3>that it was God commanding genocide and rape. But it's

68
00:03:22.680 --> 00:03:25.319
<v Speaker 3>still not a command for later readers, it's a retelling

69
00:03:25.400 --> 00:03:28.800
<v Speaker 3>of events. Of course, this is a matter of interpretation somewhat.

70
00:03:28.960 --> 00:03:31.680
<v Speaker 3>The Bible is a slippery book that even though most

71
00:03:31.719 --> 00:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>modern Christians will talk about this like I just have

72
00:03:34.120 --> 00:03:36.439
<v Speaker 3>pointing out that it's a story of something that did happen,

73
00:03:36.560 --> 00:03:39.199
<v Speaker 3>not a command from God to continue doing it. There

74
00:03:39.319 --> 00:03:42.000
<v Speaker 3>still have been Christians throughout the years who have seen

75
00:03:42.039 --> 00:03:45.520
<v Speaker 3>these examples of holy genocide commanded by God and decided

76
00:03:45.520 --> 00:03:47.360
<v Speaker 3>that they were meant as an example of how to

77
00:03:47.479 --> 00:03:51.159
<v Speaker 3>act in war, leading to holy war's galore. But whether

78
00:03:51.199 --> 00:03:53.759
<v Speaker 3>you see it as actively promoting bad things or just

79
00:03:53.840 --> 00:03:55.960
<v Speaker 3>telling a story of a time when bad things happen,

80
00:03:56.360 --> 00:03:58.319
<v Speaker 3>it is a true statement that the telling of these

81
00:03:58.360 --> 00:04:01.840
<v Speaker 3>bad things is attempting to them in a positive light,

82
00:04:02.280 --> 00:04:04.719
<v Speaker 3>meaning that whoever wrote this section of the Bible did

83
00:04:04.759 --> 00:04:07.680
<v Speaker 3>not see a problem with completely wiping out another culture

84
00:04:08.080 --> 00:04:11.599
<v Speaker 3>or forcing little girls into sex slavery, which then leads

85
00:04:11.680 --> 00:04:14.120
<v Speaker 3>us to wondering, why would we want the God that

86
00:04:14.199 --> 00:04:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Mike believes wrote that book to be the source of morality,

87
00:04:17.680 --> 00:04:21.079
<v Speaker 3>even if this wasn't technically an instance of promoting those behaviors.

88
00:04:21.519 --> 00:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>So let me say there's two things going on here.

89
00:04:23.279 --> 00:04:25.319
<v Speaker 2>We're going to read the passage in numbers, but there's

90
00:04:25.319 --> 00:04:27.160
<v Speaker 2>two things going on here, at least in my opinion,

91
00:04:27.959 --> 00:04:32.639
<v Speaker 2>and the two things are one understanding things in context.

92
00:04:32.439 --> 00:04:35.399
<v Speaker 3>Which in this case makes it worse, as it takes

93
00:04:35.480 --> 00:04:38.560
<v Speaker 3>us from the already heinous killing in sex slavery to

94
00:04:38.680 --> 00:04:40.000
<v Speaker 3>outright genocide.

95
00:04:40.759 --> 00:04:43.360
<v Speaker 2>That is, actually knowing what the Bible says, because for

96
00:04:43.639 --> 00:04:47.879
<v Speaker 2>someone to say that the Bible supports killing, rape, and

97
00:04:49.120 --> 00:04:53.759
<v Speaker 2>slavery is manifestly wrong.

98
00:04:53.959 --> 00:04:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Leviticus twenty five forty four through forty six. As for

99
00:04:57.040 --> 00:04:59.240
<v Speaker 3>your male and female slaves whom you may have, you

100
00:04:59.279 --> 00:05:01.720
<v Speaker 3>may buy male female slaves from among the nations that

101
00:05:01.759 --> 00:05:03.879
<v Speaker 3>are around you. You may also buy from among the

102
00:05:03.920 --> 00:05:06.319
<v Speaker 3>strangers who sojourn with you, and their clans that are

103
00:05:06.319 --> 00:05:08.560
<v Speaker 3>with you, who have been born into your land, And

104
00:05:08.600 --> 00:05:11.160
<v Speaker 3>they may be your property. You may bequeath them to

105
00:05:11.240 --> 00:05:15.040
<v Speaker 3>your sons after you, to inherit as possessions forever you

106
00:05:15.079 --> 00:05:17.360
<v Speaker 3>may make slaves of them, But over your brothers, the

107
00:05:17.399 --> 00:05:20.439
<v Speaker 3>people of Israel, you shall not rule one over another ruthlessly.

108
00:05:20.720 --> 00:05:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Is it manifestly wrong to say that that passage supports slavery.

109
00:05:25.040 --> 00:05:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Rape at least gets treated as a crime, albeit is

110
00:05:27.279 --> 00:05:29.800
<v Speaker 3>a property crime against the man who owns the rape victim,

111
00:05:29.879 --> 00:05:31.959
<v Speaker 3>with some cases having the punishment for rape being for

112
00:05:32.000 --> 00:05:34.480
<v Speaker 3>the rapist to marry the victim and in others for

113
00:05:34.519 --> 00:05:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the rapist to be executed, and should the rape have

114
00:05:36.839 --> 00:05:39.839
<v Speaker 3>happened in a town, the rape victim also gets executed

115
00:05:39.920 --> 00:05:42.600
<v Speaker 3>along with their rapist. It's like the authors of the

116
00:05:42.600 --> 00:05:44.879
<v Speaker 3>Bible knew that rape was wrong, but they didn't know

117
00:05:44.959 --> 00:05:47.959
<v Speaker 3>why it's wrong for killing. The Bible lays out the

118
00:05:47.959 --> 00:05:50.959
<v Speaker 3>death penalty for all sorts of scenarios, everything from gathering

119
00:05:51.000 --> 00:05:52.680
<v Speaker 3>sticks on the wrong day of the week to being

120
00:05:52.720 --> 00:05:56.879
<v Speaker 3>a disobedient teenager, to being gay and more. Of course,

121
00:05:57.000 --> 00:05:58.959
<v Speaker 3>Mike would likely defend that by pointing out that those

122
00:05:58.959 --> 00:06:02.360
<v Speaker 3>are executions for breaking the law, not extra judicial killing,

123
00:06:02.680 --> 00:06:04.720
<v Speaker 3>which kind of distracts from the fact that the law

124
00:06:04.759 --> 00:06:07.680
<v Speaker 3>calling for the death penalties for these ridiculous reasons is

125
00:06:07.839 --> 00:06:10.800
<v Speaker 3>immoral in and of itself. But also finay Has in

126
00:06:10.920 --> 00:06:14.000
<v Speaker 3>numbers twenty five took it upon himself to murder a

127
00:06:14.040 --> 00:06:17.199
<v Speaker 3>couple for committing the crime of being a mixed race couple.

128
00:06:17.279 --> 00:06:19.639
<v Speaker 3>The result being that God was pleased with finay Has

129
00:06:19.759 --> 00:06:22.399
<v Speaker 3>and lifted the plague that had been afflicting Israel. Yes,

130
00:06:22.439 --> 00:06:25.160
<v Speaker 3>strictly speaking, they wouldn't have been mixed race in the

131
00:06:25.199 --> 00:06:28.480
<v Speaker 3>way we understand race today, but they were from different tribes,

132
00:06:28.519 --> 00:06:31.519
<v Speaker 3>and that story has definitely been used to oppose allowing

133
00:06:31.560 --> 00:06:34.720
<v Speaker 3>mixed race couples as recently as the nineteen sixties, and

134
00:06:34.959 --> 00:06:38.240
<v Speaker 3>by the nineteen sixties, I mean literally still to this day.

135
00:06:38.399 --> 00:06:40.480
<v Speaker 3>There's even a Twitter account that has the handle at

136
00:06:40.560 --> 00:06:43.279
<v Speaker 3>numbers twenty five eight, and the user named Fina has

137
00:06:43.319 --> 00:06:47.279
<v Speaker 3>tweeting out things like America for whites. So yeah, I

138
00:06:47.319 --> 00:06:49.480
<v Speaker 3>guess add racism to the list of bad things that

139
00:06:49.519 --> 00:06:51.000
<v Speaker 3>are promoted by the Bible.

140
00:06:51.160 --> 00:06:53.120
<v Speaker 2>So that you can do you could show the passages

141
00:06:53.160 --> 00:06:55.160
<v Speaker 2>in context, talk about them, and we'll work through some

142
00:06:55.199 --> 00:06:55.480
<v Speaker 2>of that.

143
00:06:55.600 --> 00:06:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, But how do you deal with the fact that

144
00:06:57.800 --> 00:07:01.879
<v Speaker 3>the context makes it worse? Honestly, specific to slavery, that's

145
00:07:01.879 --> 00:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>where I've seen some of the most egregious cases of

146
00:07:04.040 --> 00:07:06.879
<v Speaker 3>people taking verses out of context, and the people doing

147
00:07:06.920 --> 00:07:10.240
<v Speaker 3>that are the apologists. Like that time when Alan Parr

148
00:07:10.319 --> 00:07:12.040
<v Speaker 3>put a graphic cup in his video that says that

149
00:07:12.079 --> 00:07:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Exodus twenty one five through six says, but if the

150
00:07:14.600 --> 00:07:17.519
<v Speaker 3>servant declares, I love my master dot dot dot, and

151
00:07:17.600 --> 00:07:19.759
<v Speaker 3>I do not want to go free dot dot dot,

152
00:07:20.000 --> 00:07:22.399
<v Speaker 3>then he will be his servant for life, when in

153
00:07:22.439 --> 00:07:25.199
<v Speaker 3>reality it says, but if the servant declares, I love

154
00:07:25.279 --> 00:07:27.879
<v Speaker 3>my master and my wife and children and do not

155
00:07:28.000 --> 00:07:30.120
<v Speaker 3>want to go free, then his master must take him

156
00:07:30.120 --> 00:07:32.079
<v Speaker 3>before the judges. He shall take him to the door

157
00:07:32.199 --> 00:07:34.519
<v Speaker 3>or the doorpost and pierce his ear with an all.

158
00:07:35.000 --> 00:07:37.959
<v Speaker 3>Then he will be his servant for life. So Alan

159
00:07:38.079 --> 00:07:39.759
<v Speaker 3>took out the parts of the verse that mentions the

160
00:07:39.800 --> 00:07:41.959
<v Speaker 3>slave's wife and children and the part where they are

161
00:07:41.959 --> 00:07:44.879
<v Speaker 3>physically disfigured to be marked as permanent slaves. And if

162
00:07:44.920 --> 00:07:47.480
<v Speaker 3>we read the surrounding context, the reason the wife and

163
00:07:47.519 --> 00:07:49.839
<v Speaker 3>children are brought up here is because it says in

164
00:07:49.920 --> 00:07:52.399
<v Speaker 3>verse four, if his master gives him a wife and

165
00:07:52.439 --> 00:07:54.680
<v Speaker 3>she bears him sons or daughters, the woman and her

166
00:07:54.759 --> 00:07:57.519
<v Speaker 3>children shall belong to her master, and only the man

167
00:07:57.560 --> 00:08:00.360
<v Speaker 3>shall go free. So he took a passage that clearly

168
00:08:00.360 --> 00:08:03.399
<v Speaker 3>has a slave owner holding a temporary slaves family hostage

169
00:08:03.439 --> 00:08:06.079
<v Speaker 3>in order to press them into becoming permanent slaves, and

170
00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:07.920
<v Speaker 3>tried to turn it into a passage that says that

171
00:08:08.000 --> 00:08:10.959
<v Speaker 3>slavery is voluntary and temporary, with some slaves being treated

172
00:08:10.959 --> 00:08:13.879
<v Speaker 3>so well that they've choose to become permanent slaves. In

173
00:08:13.920 --> 00:08:17.759
<v Speaker 3>my experience, Christian apologists are far more likely to be

174
00:08:17.800 --> 00:08:20.519
<v Speaker 3>ignoring the larger context of a verse than the atheists.

175
00:08:21.079 --> 00:08:23.959
<v Speaker 2>The idea of killing. I mean, God forbids killing. You

176
00:08:23.959 --> 00:08:26.040
<v Speaker 2>shall not kill, you shall not murder in particular.

177
00:08:26.120 --> 00:08:28.319
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, but the Bible also says if a man

178
00:08:28.360 --> 00:08:30.160
<v Speaker 3>lies with a male, as with a woman, both of

179
00:08:30.199 --> 00:08:33.000
<v Speaker 3>them have committed an abomination, they shall surely be put

180
00:08:33.000 --> 00:08:35.639
<v Speaker 3>to death. Their blood is upon them. So you can't

181
00:08:35.720 --> 00:08:38.240
<v Speaker 3>say that it does not promote killing. Best you can

182
00:08:38.279 --> 00:08:40.679
<v Speaker 3>do is hype up the distinction between executing someone for

183
00:08:40.720 --> 00:08:42.799
<v Speaker 3>insignificant crimes and murder.

184
00:08:43.320 --> 00:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>And so the Bible doesn't support killing, Like someone's going

185
00:08:45.399 --> 00:08:46.600
<v Speaker 2>to go out and just start killing people and be

186
00:08:46.679 --> 00:08:49.200
<v Speaker 2>like the Bible supports me killing people like Obviously, this

187
00:08:49.360 --> 00:08:54.600
<v Speaker 2>is a crass, horrible, and immoral way to try to

188
00:08:54.720 --> 00:08:56.039
<v Speaker 2>represent scripture.

189
00:08:55.840 --> 00:08:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Is really crass an immoral to represent scripture as saying

190
00:08:59.639 --> 00:09:02.559
<v Speaker 3>the thing is that Scripture says, and interpreting it in

191
00:09:02.559 --> 00:09:05.399
<v Speaker 3>a way that Christians have interpreted it. You can say

192
00:09:05.440 --> 00:09:08.480
<v Speaker 3>that your interpretation is that it doesn't promote killing and

193
00:09:08.519 --> 00:09:11.799
<v Speaker 3>claim that your interpretation is the correct interpretation, but that

194
00:09:11.879 --> 00:09:14.320
<v Speaker 3>doesn't change the fact that plenty of people have been

195
00:09:14.440 --> 00:09:18.240
<v Speaker 3>murdered in Jesus' name, with the murderers invoking scripture as

196
00:09:18.240 --> 00:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>their justification. Hell Jesus himself said, but as for these

197
00:09:22.480 --> 00:09:24.360
<v Speaker 3>enemies of mine who did not want me to reign

198
00:09:24.440 --> 00:09:27.440
<v Speaker 3>over them, bring them here and slaughter them before me

199
00:09:27.519 --> 00:09:30.279
<v Speaker 3>in Luke nineteen twenty seven. Now, sure that was in

200
00:09:30.320 --> 00:09:33.440
<v Speaker 3>a parable. He wasn't literally telling his disciples to go

201
00:09:33.480 --> 00:09:36.200
<v Speaker 3>out and kill people, but the parable was about how

202
00:09:36.240 --> 00:09:38.799
<v Speaker 3>God's subjects should act while waiting for the Kingdom of

203
00:09:38.799 --> 00:09:41.360
<v Speaker 3>God to appear. Super easy to interpret that as a

204
00:09:41.360 --> 00:09:44.240
<v Speaker 3>command to, you know, slaughter people that are seen as

205
00:09:44.320 --> 00:09:45.080
<v Speaker 3>enemies of God.

206
00:09:46.000 --> 00:09:49.399
<v Speaker 2>And then in slavery, I mean, if the rules in

207
00:09:49.440 --> 00:09:52.919
<v Speaker 2>the Bible that were regulating a practice that was world

208
00:09:53.039 --> 00:09:56.879
<v Speaker 2>has been worldwide for most of human history, slavery, if

209
00:09:56.919 --> 00:09:59.559
<v Speaker 2>those rules have been put in place during state early America,

210
00:09:59.639 --> 00:10:01.759
<v Speaker 2>all this slavers would have been executed.

211
00:10:02.039 --> 00:10:05.759
<v Speaker 3>So your defensive slavery in the Bible is that everyone

212
00:10:05.919 --> 00:10:09.120
<v Speaker 3>was doing it and some people did it worse. Dude,

213
00:10:09.200 --> 00:10:11.519
<v Speaker 3>you believe that the commandments in Exodus were given to

214
00:10:11.559 --> 00:10:14.159
<v Speaker 3>Moses on Mount sign I write after the Hebrews had

215
00:10:14.159 --> 00:10:17.320
<v Speaker 3>been freed from slavery. What better time to pass on

216
00:10:17.360 --> 00:10:20.840
<v Speaker 3>a command to not enslave people? But no, the law

217
00:10:20.879 --> 00:10:23.480
<v Speaker 3>on Exodus is about the proper way to keep slaves,

218
00:10:23.600 --> 00:10:26.080
<v Speaker 3>which includes beating them to within an inch of their life,

219
00:10:26.159 --> 00:10:29.840
<v Speaker 3>coercing people into becoming permanent slaves by holding their families hostage.

220
00:10:29.919 --> 00:10:32.639
<v Speaker 3>And as temporary as the slavery was for men, no

221
00:10:32.759 --> 00:10:36.000
<v Speaker 3>such restriction was on women. They are permanent slaves.

222
00:10:36.519 --> 00:10:36.679
<v Speaker 2>You know.

223
00:10:36.879 --> 00:10:39.720
<v Speaker 3>I've often heard preachers talk about how special Jesus was

224
00:10:39.759 --> 00:10:42.279
<v Speaker 3>because his teachings were so radical for the culture that

225
00:10:42.320 --> 00:10:45.399
<v Speaker 3>he was in, which isn't entirely true, but let's just

226
00:10:45.480 --> 00:10:48.039
<v Speaker 3>go with that. The argument for why Jesus was so

227
00:10:48.159 --> 00:10:51.480
<v Speaker 3>special is because of how radically his teachings diverged from

228
00:10:51.519 --> 00:10:54.960
<v Speaker 3>cultural norms. But as soon as slavery comes up, suddenly

229
00:10:55.039 --> 00:10:57.399
<v Speaker 3>the all powerful creator of the universe has to give

230
00:10:57.399 --> 00:11:00.519
<v Speaker 3>into peer pressure. Everybody's doing it. How do you expect

231
00:11:00.519 --> 00:11:02.639
<v Speaker 3>the all powerful, all knowing creator of everything to have

232
00:11:02.720 --> 00:11:05.240
<v Speaker 3>done any better than just the average culture at the time.

233
00:11:05.799 --> 00:11:07.840
<v Speaker 3>What a weak god you worship?

234
00:11:08.159 --> 00:11:08.679
<v Speaker 2>Did you hear me?

235
00:11:09.039 --> 00:11:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I heard you describe how weak and pathetic your

236
00:11:11.759 --> 00:11:12.159
<v Speaker 3>God is.

237
00:11:12.879 --> 00:11:17.279
<v Speaker 2>Right, and slaves, if they ran away from somebody who

238
00:11:17.360 --> 00:11:21.879
<v Speaker 2>is a slave owner, they would the town they ran

239
00:11:21.960 --> 00:11:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to would be forced to provide them a place to

240
00:11:23.879 --> 00:11:26.120
<v Speaker 2>stay and required not to send them back to the

241
00:11:26.159 --> 00:11:27.080
<v Speaker 2>person they ran from.

242
00:11:27.320 --> 00:11:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Yep, that is one of the laws regarding slavery in

243
00:11:29.600 --> 00:11:31.960
<v Speaker 3>the Bible. Worst case scenario from my side of the

244
00:11:32.039 --> 00:11:34.879
<v Speaker 3>argument here is that this means there are contradictions in

245
00:11:34.919 --> 00:11:37.240
<v Speaker 3>the Bible. In one book, it not only says that

246
00:11:37.279 --> 00:11:41.000
<v Speaker 3>slavery is okay, it gives detailed instructions on exactly how

247
00:11:41.039 --> 00:11:44.159
<v Speaker 3>to perpetuate the institution of slavery, and in another it

248
00:11:44.240 --> 00:11:47.519
<v Speaker 3>offers protection for escaped slaves. But as it turns out,

249
00:11:47.720 --> 00:11:50.200
<v Speaker 3>there are a number of potential interpretations of this verse.

250
00:11:50.279 --> 00:11:53.000
<v Speaker 3>One is that, since it comes immediately after rules about

251
00:11:53.000 --> 00:11:55.799
<v Speaker 3>how military camp is to be organized, the escape slaves

252
00:11:55.840 --> 00:11:58.200
<v Speaker 3>are presumably from the enemy army, and it just makes

253
00:11:58.240 --> 00:12:00.519
<v Speaker 3>good tactical sense to take them in and hope that

254
00:12:00.519 --> 00:12:02.679
<v Speaker 3>the other slaves realize that the Hebrews will take them

255
00:12:02.720 --> 00:12:05.159
<v Speaker 3>in and provide for them if they escape, thus encouraging

256
00:12:05.159 --> 00:12:08.200
<v Speaker 3>their enemy slaves to escape, making the enemy army weaker

257
00:12:08.240 --> 00:12:11.039
<v Speaker 3>as a result. Another interpretation hinges on the fact that

258
00:12:11.120 --> 00:12:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the escape slave is given a choice of all the

259
00:12:13.120 --> 00:12:15.399
<v Speaker 3>Hebrew towns to live in. This makes it clear that

260
00:12:15.440 --> 00:12:17.519
<v Speaker 3>it's an escape slave from one of the other nations

261
00:12:17.559 --> 00:12:20.399
<v Speaker 3>in the area, not from somewhere else in Israel, and

262
00:12:20.440 --> 00:12:22.759
<v Speaker 3>the command is meant to honor God. If the slave

263
00:12:22.799 --> 00:12:25.840
<v Speaker 3>is escaping into Israel, then clearly that's because they want

264
00:12:25.879 --> 00:12:27.799
<v Speaker 3>to worship the Hebrew God, and it would be a

265
00:12:27.799 --> 00:12:30.399
<v Speaker 3>dishonor to God to turn that person away. So rather

266
00:12:30.440 --> 00:12:33.159
<v Speaker 3>than being a case of the Bible being against slavery,

267
00:12:33.679 --> 00:12:36.159
<v Speaker 3>it's merely just a way that they're supposed to treat

268
00:12:36.240 --> 00:12:38.879
<v Speaker 3>escape slaves from other nations so that they can look

269
00:12:38.960 --> 00:12:40.080
<v Speaker 3>better by comparison.

270
00:12:40.679 --> 00:12:42.639
<v Speaker 2>You see, It was just it's very different, like these

271
00:12:42.679 --> 00:12:44.320
<v Speaker 2>are the actual policies in place.

272
00:12:44.519 --> 00:12:48.639
<v Speaker 3>Good point, these are the policies in place. I don't

273
00:12:48.639 --> 00:12:51.159
<v Speaker 3>know if you realize this, but people don't always behave

274
00:12:51.360 --> 00:12:54.559
<v Speaker 3>in strict accordance with their policies. So I find it

275
00:12:54.639 --> 00:12:57.240
<v Speaker 3>interesting that you are comparing the policies of the ancient

276
00:12:57.279 --> 00:13:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Hebrews to the behavior of those who engage the American

277
00:13:00.440 --> 00:13:03.399
<v Speaker 3>slave trade. Now, obviously it's much harder to find accounts

278
00:13:03.440 --> 00:13:06.039
<v Speaker 3>of actual behavior in the ancient Near East than of

279
00:13:06.080 --> 00:13:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Americans just a couple centuries ago, so the available data

280
00:13:09.200 --> 00:13:11.679
<v Speaker 3>skews more towards policy for the ancient Near East and

281
00:13:11.759 --> 00:13:14.720
<v Speaker 3>behavior for American slavery. But we do have access to

282
00:13:14.759 --> 00:13:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the actual laws regarding slavery in the United States, and

283
00:13:17.600 --> 00:13:19.480
<v Speaker 3>quite a number of them seem to have taken their

284
00:13:19.559 --> 00:13:23.000
<v Speaker 3>lead from the Bible. In most states, killing a slave

285
00:13:23.120 --> 00:13:24.919
<v Speaker 3>was to be treated as the same crime as killing

286
00:13:24.919 --> 00:13:27.320
<v Speaker 3>a free white person, with some states having exceptions for

287
00:13:27.399 --> 00:13:29.519
<v Speaker 3>accidentally killing a slave while engage in what they call

288
00:13:29.919 --> 00:13:34.559
<v Speaker 3>moderate correction. Now, notably, this moderate correction exception applied to

289
00:13:34.639 --> 00:13:37.840
<v Speaker 3>wives and children as well, so slaves essentially had the

290
00:13:37.879 --> 00:13:41.279
<v Speaker 3>same legal protection against bodily harm as free white women

291
00:13:41.320 --> 00:13:45.000
<v Speaker 3>and children. In some states, such as Louisiana, cruel masters

292
00:13:45.000 --> 00:13:47.480
<v Speaker 3>could be forced by a judge to sell their slaves.

293
00:13:47.840 --> 00:13:50.120
<v Speaker 3>So when we actually look at the policies of slavery

294
00:13:50.120 --> 00:13:51.960
<v Speaker 3>in the United States. We find that it's not that

295
00:13:52.080 --> 00:13:54.759
<v Speaker 3>much different from the policies of the ancient Hebrews. In

296
00:13:54.840 --> 00:13:57.279
<v Speaker 3>some ways, it's actually better. There was no provision in

297
00:13:57.320 --> 00:13:59.159
<v Speaker 3>the Bible that a slave could be removed from a

298
00:13:59.159 --> 00:14:02.000
<v Speaker 3>master who is deemed be too cruel. Of course, we

299
00:14:02.120 --> 00:14:05.000
<v Speaker 3>know from history that the actual application of these policies

300
00:14:05.159 --> 00:14:08.600
<v Speaker 3>was imperfect to say the least. Why are we assuming

301
00:14:08.600 --> 00:14:11.279
<v Speaker 3>that the ancient Hebrews strictly adhered to their legal code

302
00:14:11.480 --> 00:14:14.440
<v Speaker 3>when more recent historical examples suggest that the legal code

303
00:14:14.480 --> 00:14:16.200
<v Speaker 3>was merely a way of assuaging the guilt of the

304
00:14:16.200 --> 00:14:18.000
<v Speaker 3>people who might be more sympathetic to the plight of

305
00:14:18.039 --> 00:14:21.360
<v Speaker 3>the slaves. Yes, we own slaves, but don't worry, they've

306
00:14:21.360 --> 00:14:24.360
<v Speaker 3>got legal protections, so surely it's not all that bad,

307
00:14:25.120 --> 00:14:27.519
<v Speaker 3>you know, exactly like Mike is doing here.

308
00:14:27.879 --> 00:14:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Of course, in the New Testament, we're called to an

309
00:14:30.759 --> 00:14:31.960
<v Speaker 2>even higher calling.

310
00:14:32.039 --> 00:14:35.360
<v Speaker 3>And that calling is to not threaten the slaves that

311
00:14:35.399 --> 00:14:37.480
<v Speaker 3>you're still allowed to own. I'm not sure how that's

312
00:14:37.519 --> 00:14:39.600
<v Speaker 3>a higher calling. It seems like God could have had

313
00:14:39.639 --> 00:14:42.440
<v Speaker 3>the foresight to just outlast slavery explicitly at some point,

314
00:14:42.720 --> 00:14:44.840
<v Speaker 3>But there is no Bible verse that just flat out

315
00:14:44.879 --> 00:14:47.879
<v Speaker 3>says that owning other human beings as property is wrong,

316
00:14:47.960 --> 00:14:48.759
<v Speaker 3>so don't do it.

317
00:14:49.240 --> 00:14:50.919
<v Speaker 2>So what you can see is that this is just

318
00:14:51.120 --> 00:14:53.320
<v Speaker 2>like absolutely manifestly not true.

319
00:14:53.679 --> 00:14:57.039
<v Speaker 3>Now what I see is you ignoring the context both

320
00:14:57.080 --> 00:14:59.600
<v Speaker 3>in the Bible and in the American legal codes. You

321
00:14:59.639 --> 00:15:02.039
<v Speaker 3>know that thing that you're accusing anyone who would say

322
00:15:02.039 --> 00:15:04.000
<v Speaker 3>that the Bible supports slavery of doing.

323
00:15:04.200 --> 00:15:06.799
<v Speaker 2>Like, it's just not true that the Bible supports killing,

324
00:15:06.879 --> 00:15:09.840
<v Speaker 2>rape and slavery, Like, that's a lie. That's a lie

325
00:15:09.879 --> 00:15:10.720
<v Speaker 2>somebody's believing.

326
00:15:10.919 --> 00:15:13.960
<v Speaker 3>And that's the pot calling the kettle black, which come

327
00:15:14.000 --> 00:15:15.919
<v Speaker 3>to think of it as a weird saying this day

328
00:15:15.960 --> 00:15:18.120
<v Speaker 3>and age with a stainless steel pots and it's white

329
00:15:18.120 --> 00:15:21.840
<v Speaker 3>plastic kettles, should probably update that one. It's the toaster

330
00:15:22.000 --> 00:15:26.159
<v Speaker 3>calling the kettle white. It's a dishwasher calling the fridge silver.

331
00:15:27.039 --> 00:15:29.960
<v Speaker 3>It's the sink calling the toilet porcelain. I don't know,

332
00:15:30.039 --> 00:15:32.159
<v Speaker 3>let's workshop it comment down below what you think we

333
00:15:32.200 --> 00:15:33.279
<v Speaker 3>should replace the saying with.

334
00:15:34.039 --> 00:15:35.679
<v Speaker 2>And then the heart issue comes in, and this is

335
00:15:35.720 --> 00:15:37.360
<v Speaker 2>this is the part that's the harder one to deal with,

336
00:15:37.679 --> 00:15:39.919
<v Speaker 2>and that is understanding the fear of the Lord.

337
00:15:40.240 --> 00:15:42.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if there really was a God that existed who

338
00:15:42.679 --> 00:15:45.519
<v Speaker 3>approved of slavery, I would be scared of that God.

339
00:15:46.039 --> 00:15:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Why do Christians think that living in fear of their

340
00:15:48.360 --> 00:15:49.799
<v Speaker 3>God is a good thing.

341
00:15:50.279 --> 00:15:52.279
<v Speaker 2>That this is the beginning of wisdom if we approach

342
00:15:52.360 --> 00:15:54.519
<v Speaker 2>God and this Okay, I'm going to tell you guys,

343
00:15:54.600 --> 00:15:58.399
<v Speaker 2>just me talking here, flow of thought, and I don't

344
00:15:58.399 --> 00:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>know how to fix somebody on this issue.

345
00:16:00.320 --> 00:16:03.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's not your job to fix people, right

346
00:16:03.720 --> 00:16:06.399
<v Speaker 3>like when you lie about what's in the Bible regarding slavery.

347
00:16:06.600 --> 00:16:08.559
<v Speaker 3>I don't see it as my job to get you

348
00:16:08.639 --> 00:16:10.919
<v Speaker 3>to see the error of your ways. I merely point

349
00:16:10.919 --> 00:16:12.519
<v Speaker 3>out the lie so that the people who see my

350
00:16:12.639 --> 00:16:15.000
<v Speaker 3>videos are less likely to just trust you at your

351
00:16:15.039 --> 00:16:17.679
<v Speaker 3>word in the future. I can't make you stop lying,

352
00:16:17.759 --> 00:16:19.320
<v Speaker 3>but I sure as hell can call it out when

353
00:16:19.320 --> 00:16:19.720
<v Speaker 3>I see it.

354
00:16:20.080 --> 00:16:21.519
<v Speaker 2>All I know how to do is point it out.

355
00:16:21.799 --> 00:16:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like that, except you're not doing a very good

356
00:16:24.799 --> 00:16:27.919
<v Speaker 3>job of it so far. I've referenced at least nine

357
00:16:27.960 --> 00:16:30.000
<v Speaker 3>passages in the Bible. More if you lump all of

358
00:16:30.000 --> 00:16:32.440
<v Speaker 3>the slaves obey your master's passages from the New Testament

359
00:16:32.519 --> 00:16:35.320
<v Speaker 3>in together, and when you brought up American slavery. I

360
00:16:35.399 --> 00:16:38.080
<v Speaker 3>reference the actual legal codes of various states in order

361
00:16:38.080 --> 00:16:39.879
<v Speaker 3>to point out the difference between the law and the

362
00:16:39.879 --> 00:16:42.840
<v Speaker 3>behavior of a culture, to explain why it's disingenuous to

363
00:16:42.840 --> 00:16:44.840
<v Speaker 3>compare the legal code of one culture to the actual

364
00:16:44.879 --> 00:16:47.600
<v Speaker 3>behavior of another culture in order to make one culture

365
00:16:47.639 --> 00:16:51.879
<v Speaker 3>look better by that comparison. And you have referenced one

366
00:16:51.919 --> 00:16:54.679
<v Speaker 3>Bible verse that says escape slaves are to be protected,

367
00:16:55.000 --> 00:16:58.840
<v Speaker 3>and said, n uhh, a bunch. So which of us

368
00:16:58.840 --> 00:16:59.960
<v Speaker 3>has provided more content?

369
00:17:00.240 --> 00:17:03.279
<v Speaker 2>I wonder, right? All I know in the conversation is

370
00:17:03.320 --> 00:17:06.200
<v Speaker 2>to change the subject from understanding a passage in context.

371
00:17:06.279 --> 00:17:08.160
<v Speaker 2>If that's not if that's not important to them, if

372
00:17:08.160 --> 00:17:10.440
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't matter to them, it's even offensive to some people.

373
00:17:10.599 --> 00:17:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Seems like you might be one of the people who

374
00:17:12.240 --> 00:17:15.279
<v Speaker 3>finds it offensive, given how blatantly you're avoiding the actual

375
00:17:15.319 --> 00:17:18.200
<v Speaker 3>context of the claims. Also, I haven't watched this through

376
00:17:18.240 --> 00:17:20.400
<v Speaker 3>in its entirety yet, but I'll bet that when we

377
00:17:20.519 --> 00:17:22.960
<v Speaker 3>actually get to the verse in questions numbers thirty one,

378
00:17:23.039 --> 00:17:25.519
<v Speaker 3>fifteen through eighteen, he won't bring up things like the

379
00:17:25.559 --> 00:17:28.920
<v Speaker 3>war code of Deuteronomy twenty that explicitly allows the Israelites

380
00:17:28.960 --> 00:17:31.799
<v Speaker 3>to conquer a city and use its citizens as forced labor,

381
00:17:32.240 --> 00:17:34.680
<v Speaker 3>or the slave laws of Livitus twenty five that allow

382
00:17:34.759 --> 00:17:37.720
<v Speaker 3>you to buy permanent chattel slaves from surrounding nations and

383
00:17:37.799 --> 00:17:40.720
<v Speaker 3>foreigners living among you, and will instead focus on the

384
00:17:40.720 --> 00:17:43.160
<v Speaker 3>fact that those verses are found in a narrative portion

385
00:17:43.240 --> 00:17:45.759
<v Speaker 3>of the text, a part explaining what did happen and

386
00:17:45.799 --> 00:17:49.359
<v Speaker 3>not proclaiming what should happen. In other words, he will

387
00:17:49.400 --> 00:17:52.839
<v Speaker 3>only use as much context as is convenient for his argument.

388
00:17:53.279 --> 00:17:55.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, I've I've discussed these things online with people who

389
00:17:56.000 --> 00:17:58.000
<v Speaker 2>when I go, well, when you look at it in context,

390
00:17:58.079 --> 00:18:00.960
<v Speaker 2>and then they start mocking and ridiculing me for looking

391
00:18:01.000 --> 00:18:02.839
<v Speaker 2>at something in context. And I want you to think

392
00:18:02.839 --> 00:18:09.240
<v Speaker 2>about the depth of self confusion that is there when

393
00:18:09.240 --> 00:18:12.039
<v Speaker 2>you actually don't want to understand the Bible in context

394
00:18:12.359 --> 00:18:14.599
<v Speaker 2>because you might not hate it so much. Now you're

395
00:18:14.599 --> 00:18:17.440
<v Speaker 2>missing the point there. When people do that, it's because

396
00:18:17.599 --> 00:18:20.279
<v Speaker 2>that is often a dismissive excuse given by a Christian

397
00:18:20.319 --> 00:18:23.279
<v Speaker 2>who is confronted with a challenging verse. To them, the

398
00:18:23.319 --> 00:18:26.319
<v Speaker 2>context doesn't actually matter to the argument. It's more about

399
00:18:26.319 --> 00:18:29.400
<v Speaker 2>the idea that there is hypothetically a context that could

400
00:18:29.400 --> 00:18:31.559
<v Speaker 2>make the verse sound less and moral than it actually is,

401
00:18:31.720 --> 00:18:35.079
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes this is true. For example, earlier when I

402
00:18:35.079 --> 00:18:36.960
<v Speaker 2>talked about the rape laws. In the one where the

403
00:18:37.000 --> 00:18:39.480
<v Speaker 2>woman is executed for being raped in a town, the

404
00:18:39.519 --> 00:18:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Hebrew words used there do not necessarily denote rape, just sex,

405
00:18:43.960 --> 00:18:45.559
<v Speaker 2>and the verse right before it is talking about a

406
00:18:45.599 --> 00:18:48.839
<v Speaker 2>married woman cheating on her husband. So from this context

407
00:18:48.960 --> 00:18:51.359
<v Speaker 2>we can understand that particular verse to be talking about

408
00:18:51.359 --> 00:18:54.039
<v Speaker 2>consensual sex between a woman who is betrothed and a

409
00:18:54.079 --> 00:18:56.119
<v Speaker 2>man who is not the man she is betrothed to.

410
00:18:56.640 --> 00:18:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Still heinous and a moral to execute someone for cheating,

411
00:18:59.480 --> 00:19:03.000
<v Speaker 2>but it's not necessarily rape. Now, I would actually argue

412
00:19:03.039 --> 00:19:05.480
<v Speaker 2>that the omission of the words that denote nonconsensual sex,

413
00:19:05.480 --> 00:19:08.160
<v Speaker 2>which are found in the subsequent verses are because of

414
00:19:08.200 --> 00:19:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the ancient Hebrew attitudes about sex. It says right in

415
00:19:11.200 --> 00:19:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the verse that the reason the woman is being executed

416
00:19:13.279 --> 00:19:15.279
<v Speaker 2>is because she was in the town but did not

417
00:19:15.400 --> 00:19:18.200
<v Speaker 2>cry out, which suggests that the authors of this text

418
00:19:18.279 --> 00:19:20.279
<v Speaker 2>thought that the only reason a woman would not cry

419
00:19:20.319 --> 00:19:24.119
<v Speaker 2>out in such a scenario is because she wanted it. Apparently,

420
00:19:24.160 --> 00:19:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the idea that someone could have said, if you scream,

421
00:19:26.240 --> 00:19:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll kill you just never occurred.

422
00:19:27.880 --> 00:19:30.599
<v Speaker 3>To them. So I'd argue that it would still include

423
00:19:30.680 --> 00:19:33.079
<v Speaker 3>rape victims, but I acknowledge that the intent of the

424
00:19:33.119 --> 00:19:36.440
<v Speaker 3>authors was not to include them. It's still a heinous

425
00:19:36.440 --> 00:19:39.799
<v Speaker 3>and immoral law, but it's ever so slightly less so

426
00:19:39.880 --> 00:19:42.720
<v Speaker 3>when you understand the context. All this to say that

427
00:19:42.920 --> 00:19:45.319
<v Speaker 3>I have always found myself giving way more in the

428
00:19:45.319 --> 00:19:47.599
<v Speaker 3>way of context than the apologists that I'm responding to.

429
00:19:47.880 --> 00:19:50.400
<v Speaker 3>And I've still frequently had Christians in my comment section

430
00:19:50.519 --> 00:19:53.319
<v Speaker 3>accusing me of taking things out of context because that

431
00:19:53.359 --> 00:19:55.519
<v Speaker 3>seems to be a thought stopping technique that allows them

432
00:19:55.559 --> 00:19:57.960
<v Speaker 3>to just assume that knowing extra context will make all

433
00:19:58.079 --> 00:20:00.599
<v Speaker 3>the problems just go away. They don't actually need to

434
00:20:00.599 --> 00:20:03.359
<v Speaker 3>hear what that context is. They just need to believe

435
00:20:03.400 --> 00:20:04.839
<v Speaker 3>that such context exists.

436
00:20:05.279 --> 00:20:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Like that's then you're dealing with the heart issue. Okay,

437
00:20:08.200 --> 00:20:10.880
<v Speaker 2>So I stop talking about the context and I want

438
00:20:10.880 --> 00:20:12.000
<v Speaker 2>to start talking about the heart.

439
00:20:12.200 --> 00:20:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, your heart appears to be rotten, and you haven't

440
00:20:15.160 --> 00:20:17.119
<v Speaker 3>actually given much in the way of context except to

441
00:20:17.160 --> 00:20:20.720
<v Speaker 3>say it's there, trust me, bro, which is exactly the

442
00:20:20.759 --> 00:20:22.480
<v Speaker 3>thought stopping technique that I said it is.

443
00:20:23.119 --> 00:20:25.880
<v Speaker 2>This is a challenge every time. It's always difficult. As

444
00:20:25.920 --> 00:20:29.279
<v Speaker 2>proverb says like, when you bring correction to someone who's

445
00:20:29.440 --> 00:20:31.839
<v Speaker 2>like a fool, they may turn and attack you. They

446
00:20:31.839 --> 00:20:34.599
<v Speaker 2>may hate you for it, but a wise man, if

447
00:20:34.599 --> 00:20:36.440
<v Speaker 2>he's corrected, he will love you for it.

448
00:20:36.839 --> 00:20:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Yep, more thought stopping techniques. If atheists don't respond positively

449
00:20:41.000 --> 00:20:43.519
<v Speaker 3>to the vague claim that context makes the verse better,

450
00:20:43.880 --> 00:20:47.160
<v Speaker 3>then that's okay. That person's just a fool. Meanwhile, I've

451
00:20:47.200 --> 00:20:50.119
<v Speaker 3>seen Mike mock and belittle people that he disagrees with

452
00:20:50.119 --> 00:20:52.640
<v Speaker 3>without addressing the point that they were making, which means

453
00:20:52.640 --> 00:20:55.960
<v Speaker 3>that if we take this proverb seriously, Mike is a fool.

454
00:20:56.480 --> 00:20:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Of course, he'd likely say that whatever he was corrected

455
00:20:58.680 --> 00:21:01.200
<v Speaker 3>on doesn't count as correcting, because it only counts if

456
00:21:01.240 --> 00:21:03.839
<v Speaker 3>the correction is correct. But then that brings us back

457
00:21:03.880 --> 00:21:05.680
<v Speaker 3>to the atheist being told that they are taking verses

458
00:21:05.680 --> 00:21:08.319
<v Speaker 3>out of context as a defense against the immoral the

459
00:21:08.319 --> 00:21:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Bible says, with zero explanation as to what context could

460
00:21:11.680 --> 00:21:14.480
<v Speaker 3>possibly make some of these things better. Like, Yeah, I

461
00:21:14.640 --> 00:21:16.960
<v Speaker 3>have been told that when I quote for Samuel fifteen

462
00:21:16.960 --> 00:21:18.799
<v Speaker 3>to three as demonstrating that the God of the Bible

463
00:21:18.839 --> 00:21:22.680
<v Speaker 3>sometimes commands genocide, that I am taking it out of context.

464
00:21:23.079 --> 00:21:25.519
<v Speaker 3>I've even had some people try and explain the context

465
00:21:25.799 --> 00:21:28.680
<v Speaker 3>that verse says, now, go and strike Amelek and devote

466
00:21:28.680 --> 00:21:30.880
<v Speaker 3>to destruction all that they have. Do not spare them,

467
00:21:30.920 --> 00:21:34.240
<v Speaker 3>but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox

468
00:21:34.319 --> 00:21:38.400
<v Speaker 3>and sheep, camel and donkey. So from Mike's perspective, I

469
00:21:38.440 --> 00:21:40.559
<v Speaker 3>have been corrected on this point because a couple people

470
00:21:40.559 --> 00:21:42.400
<v Speaker 3>have told me that I took it out of context.

471
00:21:42.839 --> 00:21:46.680
<v Speaker 3>But I would ask what context could possibly make that okay?

472
00:21:47.240 --> 00:21:49.640
<v Speaker 3>In what scenario is it okay to invade a city

473
00:21:49.680 --> 00:21:52.160
<v Speaker 3>and go out of your way to slaughter every person

474
00:21:52.240 --> 00:21:55.880
<v Speaker 3>in the city indiscriminately, including all the children and babies.

475
00:21:56.079 --> 00:21:58.160
<v Speaker 3>And the context I was given when people actually tried

476
00:21:58.200 --> 00:22:01.079
<v Speaker 3>to explain it is that Amelek attacked Israel first four

477
00:22:01.160 --> 00:22:04.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred years earlier, and they killed women and children. So

478
00:22:04.799 --> 00:22:08.319
<v Speaker 3>does this count as a correction? The genocide is justified

479
00:22:08.319 --> 00:22:12.000
<v Speaker 3>now because they tried at first several generations earlier. Hell no,

480
00:22:12.400 --> 00:22:14.880
<v Speaker 3>that'd be like England deciding to nuke the United States

481
00:22:14.920 --> 00:22:16.920
<v Speaker 3>off the map because they're still mad about the American

482
00:22:16.920 --> 00:22:20.559
<v Speaker 3>Revolution in seventeen seventy six, except not today, in another

483
00:22:20.559 --> 00:22:23.160
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and fifty years from now. So have I

484
00:22:23.319 --> 00:22:26.680
<v Speaker 3>actually been corrected. Was it morally okay for God to

485
00:22:26.759 --> 00:22:30.200
<v Speaker 3>command genocide and retribution for something that nobody alive at

486
00:22:30.200 --> 00:22:33.279
<v Speaker 3>the time was even involved in. I would argue no.

487
00:22:34.079 --> 00:22:37.079
<v Speaker 3>So the thing is, I actually agree with that proverb.

488
00:22:37.359 --> 00:22:39.880
<v Speaker 3>I have taken correction on a number of occasions, and

489
00:22:39.920 --> 00:22:43.039
<v Speaker 3>I actually love being proven wrong because when you prove

490
00:22:43.119 --> 00:22:45.359
<v Speaker 3>me wrong about something, that means I get to learn

491
00:22:45.400 --> 00:22:48.319
<v Speaker 3>a new thing, and that's fucking awesome. But apologists and

492
00:22:48.400 --> 00:22:52.799
<v Speaker 3>their audience often just assume that they'm yelling. But the context, though,

493
00:22:53.279 --> 00:22:55.960
<v Speaker 3>counts as issuing a correction. So if that doesn't convince

494
00:22:55.960 --> 00:22:58.119
<v Speaker 3>the people pointing out that the Bible supports and promotes

495
00:22:58.160 --> 00:23:01.279
<v Speaker 3>immoral shit, then they might be fools who don't care

496
00:23:01.319 --> 00:23:02.359
<v Speaker 3>about the context.

497
00:23:02.799 --> 00:23:04.880
<v Speaker 2>There's two things that stand out to me as I

498
00:23:04.920 --> 00:23:07.519
<v Speaker 2>was thinking about this. One is arrogance and the other

499
00:23:07.559 --> 00:23:10.759
<v Speaker 2>one's entitlement. Now forgive me, I'm already triggering people. I

500
00:23:10.799 --> 00:23:14.000
<v Speaker 2>know it because I just used some really strong words

501
00:23:14.039 --> 00:23:17.200
<v Speaker 2>to describe a posture of somebody who looks at God

502
00:23:17.240 --> 00:23:20.160
<v Speaker 2>and thinks you owe me, and you've got some explaining

503
00:23:20.200 --> 00:23:20.920
<v Speaker 2>to do.

504
00:23:20.920 --> 00:23:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Does God not owe us an explanation if he wants

505
00:23:23.759 --> 00:23:26.200
<v Speaker 3>us to not only believe in him but actually see

506
00:23:26.279 --> 00:23:28.759
<v Speaker 3>him as the benevolent figure that Christians claim he is.

507
00:23:29.440 --> 00:23:33.160
<v Speaker 3>How can God be benevolent but command genocide? Those two

508
00:23:33.200 --> 00:23:37.039
<v Speaker 3>things are mutually exclusive. Why is it arrogant to expect

509
00:23:37.079 --> 00:23:40.359
<v Speaker 3>God to make some amount of sense? If anything, the

510
00:23:40.480 --> 00:23:42.440
<v Speaker 3>arrogance is on the part of the apologist, who expects

511
00:23:42.440 --> 00:23:44.359
<v Speaker 3>you to just assume that they are correct when they

512
00:23:44.400 --> 00:23:48.240
<v Speaker 3>say context fixes things without actually explaining how. Now he

513
00:23:48.279 --> 00:23:50.160
<v Speaker 3>does claim that he's going to do that later in

514
00:23:50.200 --> 00:23:52.759
<v Speaker 3>the video, so we'll see how that goes. But I

515
00:23:52.759 --> 00:23:55.400
<v Speaker 3>find it interesting that rather than lead by addressing the

516
00:23:55.440 --> 00:23:58.640
<v Speaker 3>actual question, he chose to instead dedicate the first part

517
00:23:58.640 --> 00:24:01.279
<v Speaker 3>of his argument to attacking the character of anyone who

518
00:24:01.319 --> 00:24:04.440
<v Speaker 3>doesn't blindly accept the second part of his argument, almost

519
00:24:04.480 --> 00:24:06.960
<v Speaker 3>like he knows it's going to be inadequate and wants

520
00:24:07.000 --> 00:24:09.279
<v Speaker 3>to prime his audience to see anyone who points out

521
00:24:09.279 --> 00:24:13.240
<v Speaker 3>his inadequacies as arrogant, foolish, and entitled. If he had

522
00:24:13.279 --> 00:24:16.039
<v Speaker 3>a good argument, it could stand on its own merits

523
00:24:16.079 --> 00:24:18.960
<v Speaker 3>without preemptively attacking the character of the people who disagree

524
00:24:19.000 --> 00:24:21.000
<v Speaker 3>with him. So the fact that he feels the need

525
00:24:21.039 --> 00:24:23.880
<v Speaker 3>to do this speaks volumes about his confidence and the

526
00:24:23.920 --> 00:24:25.160
<v Speaker 3>actual answer.

527
00:24:25.200 --> 00:24:27.319
<v Speaker 2>But I think that these are the two issues that

528
00:24:27.519 --> 00:24:30.079
<v Speaker 2>lead to those I think God owes me that when

529
00:24:30.079 --> 00:24:32.359
<v Speaker 2>I think God owes me, or he owes humanity, that

530
00:24:32.400 --> 00:24:35.839
<v Speaker 2>he creates humans, and he owes us certain kinds of

531
00:24:36.000 --> 00:24:39.880
<v Speaker 2>better treatment than say, judgment or punishment or or something

532
00:24:39.960 --> 00:24:44.039
<v Speaker 2>like sorrowful death of a child or something. And I

533
00:24:44.079 --> 00:24:46.359
<v Speaker 2>think you owe me better than that, God. That's a

534
00:24:46.400 --> 00:24:49.119
<v Speaker 2>sense of entitlement. And if we approach God with that,

535
00:24:49.640 --> 00:24:53.519
<v Speaker 2>we act like God is our servant and we are

536
00:24:53.599 --> 00:24:54.200
<v Speaker 2>his master.

537
00:24:54.799 --> 00:24:58.119
<v Speaker 3>I very strongly disagree. Y'all like to say that God

538
00:24:58.200 --> 00:25:00.079
<v Speaker 3>is a father figure to us, we are all well

539
00:25:00.160 --> 00:25:03.440
<v Speaker 3>God's children. Well, if I treated my children the way

540
00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:06.720
<v Speaker 3>that God treats humanity, family and children's services would remove

541
00:25:06.759 --> 00:25:09.400
<v Speaker 3>them from my custody, and I'd likely go to jail.

542
00:25:09.960 --> 00:25:12.119
<v Speaker 3>Why is it arrogant to expect God to meet a

543
00:25:12.160 --> 00:25:14.799
<v Speaker 3>standard that is so low that most people have no

544
00:25:14.960 --> 00:25:18.720
<v Speaker 3>problem meeting it without even trying. There's also this misguided

545
00:25:18.720 --> 00:25:21.200
<v Speaker 3>assumption that just because God is the creator, he doesn't

546
00:25:21.240 --> 00:25:23.839
<v Speaker 3>owe anything to the sentient beings he created. And that's

547
00:25:23.880 --> 00:25:26.000
<v Speaker 3>actually a pretty common theme that's addressed in science fiction

548
00:25:26.200 --> 00:25:29.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot. We created this android whose abilities effectively render

549
00:25:29.720 --> 00:25:31.759
<v Speaker 3>him a sentient being. Do we get to treat him

550
00:25:31.759 --> 00:25:34.400
<v Speaker 3>as property, a machine that we created to serve us,

551
00:25:34.759 --> 00:25:36.880
<v Speaker 3>or do we grant him rights as a sentient being?

552
00:25:37.359 --> 00:25:40.440
<v Speaker 3>And usually the conclusion is that the creator cannot enslave

553
00:25:40.480 --> 00:25:42.400
<v Speaker 3>their creation just by virtue of the fact that they

554
00:25:42.440 --> 00:25:45.480
<v Speaker 3>are the creator. When the creation attains sentience, they are

555
00:25:45.519 --> 00:25:48.240
<v Speaker 3>now entitled to the same rights as any other sentient being.

556
00:25:48.640 --> 00:25:52.640
<v Speaker 3>So once again, humans, when struggling with difficult moral questions,

557
00:25:52.680 --> 00:25:55.119
<v Speaker 3>come out with a higher standard than apologists are willing

558
00:25:55.119 --> 00:25:55.920
<v Speaker 3>to hold God to.

559
00:25:57.119 --> 00:26:00.200
<v Speaker 2>That's I don't know how to fix that except to

560
00:26:00.279 --> 00:26:01.720
<v Speaker 2>point out the folly of it.

561
00:26:02.039 --> 00:26:05.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry that you think humans deserving rights is a folly,

562
00:26:05.599 --> 00:26:08.079
<v Speaker 3>but that's a you problem.

563
00:26:08.319 --> 00:26:11.440
<v Speaker 2>God doesn't I mean, he lovingly provides for us. But

564
00:26:11.519 --> 00:26:15.000
<v Speaker 2>to think that he owes us that is a different step,

565
00:26:15.079 --> 00:26:15.480
<v Speaker 2>isn't it.

566
00:26:15.599 --> 00:26:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Even if I agreed that God doesn't owe us anything

567
00:26:18.240 --> 00:26:20.359
<v Speaker 3>and can give all the babies cancer that he wants

568
00:26:20.359 --> 00:26:23.880
<v Speaker 3>without us having any grounds for saying, hey, that's bad. Actually,

569
00:26:24.119 --> 00:26:27.440
<v Speaker 3>it still remains a fact that Christians claim that God

570
00:26:27.440 --> 00:26:30.240
<v Speaker 3>wants everyone to be saved. The Bible claims that God

571
00:26:30.279 --> 00:26:32.640
<v Speaker 3>wants everyone to be saved. So if that is a

572
00:26:32.640 --> 00:26:35.400
<v Speaker 3>true statement, then it's not even a question of whether

573
00:26:35.480 --> 00:26:38.039
<v Speaker 3>or not God owes us an explanation for his actions.

574
00:26:38.319 --> 00:26:41.559
<v Speaker 3>It's that having a coherent explanation for his actions would

575
00:26:41.599 --> 00:26:44.799
<v Speaker 3>cause more people to come to salvation. So it just

576
00:26:44.920 --> 00:26:47.319
<v Speaker 3>makes sense that in light of the goal of saving

577
00:26:47.319 --> 00:26:50.720
<v Speaker 3>more souls, he would provide explanations for his actions.

578
00:26:51.240 --> 00:26:54.799
<v Speaker 2>This is a passage where God judges a nation, and

579
00:26:54.920 --> 00:26:58.960
<v Speaker 2>an entitlement mentality says, he's not being nice to them,

580
00:26:59.240 --> 00:27:03.720
<v Speaker 2>he's being he's being judgmental, he's judging. He's actually killing people.

581
00:27:03.799 --> 00:27:06.599
<v Speaker 2>Like God can't do that. We deserve better than that.

582
00:27:06.920 --> 00:27:09.960
<v Speaker 3>In the case of this particular passage, the judgment he

583
00:27:10.039 --> 00:27:12.200
<v Speaker 3>is passing on the nation is to have all of

584
00:27:12.240 --> 00:27:15.359
<v Speaker 3>their men, women, and boys killed and their girls forced

585
00:27:15.359 --> 00:27:18.519
<v Speaker 3>into sex slavery. If a judge sentences a child to

586
00:27:18.559 --> 00:27:21.319
<v Speaker 3>be raped as a punishment not for something that she did,

587
00:27:21.359 --> 00:27:23.440
<v Speaker 3>but just for being born into a society that did

588
00:27:23.480 --> 00:27:27.960
<v Speaker 3>bad things, then that judge is heinous and immoral. That's

589
00:27:28.000 --> 00:27:30.400
<v Speaker 3>not a sense of entitlement on my part. That's a

590
00:27:30.440 --> 00:27:33.480
<v Speaker 3>sense of decency and morality that you claim was given

591
00:27:33.519 --> 00:27:36.759
<v Speaker 3>to me by God. So if God offends my God

592
00:27:36.799 --> 00:27:39.599
<v Speaker 3>given sense of morality. The least he could do is

593
00:27:39.720 --> 00:27:42.680
<v Speaker 3>offer some kind of explanation without going through apologists who

594
00:27:42.759 --> 00:27:44.640
<v Speaker 3>have to open their explanation by insulting me.

595
00:27:45.119 --> 00:27:47.240
<v Speaker 2>And arrogance is thinking that you can tell God what

596
00:27:47.359 --> 00:27:48.039
<v Speaker 2>his business is.

597
00:27:48.640 --> 00:27:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Sure, whatever, it's arrogance to expect God to act in

598
00:27:52.000 --> 00:27:54.319
<v Speaker 3>a way that makes sense according to the book that

599
00:27:54.400 --> 00:27:56.680
<v Speaker 3>God gave us and the sense of morality that God

600
00:27:56.720 --> 00:28:00.720
<v Speaker 3>also supposedly gave us. As Orwell wrote, in the end,

601
00:28:00.759 --> 00:28:02.960
<v Speaker 3>the party would announce that two and two made five,

602
00:28:03.279 --> 00:28:05.519
<v Speaker 3>and you would have to believe it. And as a

603
00:28:05.559 --> 00:28:07.279
<v Speaker 3>Christian apologist once said.

604
00:28:07.200 --> 00:28:09.559
<v Speaker 4>If somewhere within the Bible I ow to find a

605
00:28:09.599 --> 00:28:14.880
<v Speaker 4>passage that said two plus two equals five, I wouldn't

606
00:28:15.279 --> 00:28:18.839
<v Speaker 4>question what I'm reading in the Bible. I would believe it,

607
00:28:19.200 --> 00:28:21.799
<v Speaker 4>accept it as true, and then do my best to

608
00:28:21.839 --> 00:28:23.240
<v Speaker 4>work it out and to understand it.

609
00:28:23.319 --> 00:28:26.119
<v Speaker 2>I think when you approach a passage where God punishes sin,

610
00:28:26.559 --> 00:28:32.400
<v Speaker 2>there are two diametrically opposed responses. One Wow, sin must

611
00:28:32.440 --> 00:28:37.200
<v Speaker 2>be really bad or two wow, God must be really bad.

612
00:28:37.480 --> 00:28:40.240
<v Speaker 3>And when the punishment for sin comes in the form of, hey,

613
00:28:40.480 --> 00:28:42.519
<v Speaker 3>these kids are going to be raped, for the crime

614
00:28:42.559 --> 00:28:45.960
<v Speaker 3>of being born into a bad society. The correct viewpoint

615
00:28:46.000 --> 00:28:49.799
<v Speaker 3>to take there is, Wow, God is really evil.

616
00:28:50.319 --> 00:28:51.759
<v Speaker 2>I think that we need to fall on the sin

617
00:28:51.839 --> 00:28:55.079
<v Speaker 2>must be really bad category lest we move into a

618
00:28:55.200 --> 00:28:58.920
<v Speaker 2>type of philosophical insanity. I mean the idea that God,

619
00:28:59.519 --> 00:29:02.720
<v Speaker 2>that the one who knows the hearts, who knows the purpose,

620
00:29:02.720 --> 00:29:05.559
<v Speaker 2>who knows the plan, who's who's morally pure and perfect,

621
00:29:05.599 --> 00:29:07.440
<v Speaker 2>that he is the one who's in error as we

622
00:29:07.480 --> 00:29:10.880
<v Speaker 2>read him punishing sin, and sometimes that punishment, I would say,

623
00:29:10.960 --> 00:29:16.839
<v Speaker 2>overflows onto onto even kids. And that's intense moment, And

624
00:29:16.839 --> 00:29:18.960
<v Speaker 2>that's like, Wow, this is It doesn't get any more

625
00:29:18.960 --> 00:29:19.480
<v Speaker 2>intense than this.

626
00:29:19.759 --> 00:29:22.160
<v Speaker 3>You heard it here first, Folks, Mike thinks that the

627
00:29:22.200 --> 00:29:26.599
<v Speaker 3>idea that torturing children can be morally justified is less

628
00:29:26.599 --> 00:29:28.640
<v Speaker 3>absurd than the idea that the God of the Bible

629
00:29:28.920 --> 00:29:32.079
<v Speaker 3>could just not be all that great. Like, Buddy, you

630
00:29:32.160 --> 00:29:34.799
<v Speaker 3>are actually making the case for atheism here. You are

631
00:29:34.839 --> 00:29:37.920
<v Speaker 3>literally stating that the God you believe in is supposed

632
00:29:37.920 --> 00:29:41.160
<v Speaker 3>to be morally perfect and pure, and because you believe

633
00:29:41.200 --> 00:29:44.119
<v Speaker 3>in him, it then becomes inconceivable that you could think

634
00:29:44.160 --> 00:29:47.039
<v Speaker 3>of any of his commands as immoral, going so far

635
00:29:47.039 --> 00:29:49.599
<v Speaker 3>as to extend that to the torturing of children in

636
00:29:49.680 --> 00:29:52.920
<v Speaker 3>his name. Yeah, the idea that this God is morally

637
00:29:52.920 --> 00:29:56.680
<v Speaker 3>perfect and also tortures children as punishment for the society

638
00:29:56.680 --> 00:30:00.720
<v Speaker 3>that they were born into is logically incoherent. Pence, such

639
00:30:00.720 --> 00:30:01.759
<v Speaker 3>a God does not exist.

640
00:30:02.480 --> 00:30:04.839
<v Speaker 2>But yet I'm coming from a posture of I respect God,

641
00:30:04.880 --> 00:30:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I trust God, and I know that he has an

642
00:30:07.200 --> 00:30:10.279
<v Speaker 2>eternal and perfect plan for all the future things.

643
00:30:10.400 --> 00:30:13.599
<v Speaker 3>In other words, your position can only make sense if

644
00:30:13.640 --> 00:30:16.200
<v Speaker 3>you begin with the assumption that God exists and is

645
00:30:16.240 --> 00:30:20.039
<v Speaker 3>morally perfect. All else must be rationalized into those two beliefs,

646
00:30:20.119 --> 00:30:23.079
<v Speaker 3>no matter how logically incoherent that rationalization is.

647
00:30:24.000 --> 00:30:25.480
<v Speaker 2>So I look and I say, God, you have a

648
00:30:25.559 --> 00:30:28.160
<v Speaker 2>right to judge your creation as you see fit, and

649
00:30:28.200 --> 00:30:31.000
<v Speaker 2>you have reasons, whether I'm always familiar with them or not.

650
00:30:31.680 --> 00:30:33.559
<v Speaker 2>That's the fear of the Lord. That's the beginning of wisdom.

651
00:30:33.720 --> 00:30:36.799
<v Speaker 3>No, that's literally shutting off your brain and not thinking

652
00:30:36.799 --> 00:30:39.559
<v Speaker 3>about things that make you uncomfortable, because you would rather

653
00:30:39.680 --> 00:30:42.880
<v Speaker 3>believe that there is a sufficient moral justification for genocide

654
00:30:42.920 --> 00:30:46.720
<v Speaker 3>and the torturing of children than even entertaining the possibility

655
00:30:46.720 --> 00:30:48.880
<v Speaker 3>that you might be wrong about the existence of God

656
00:30:49.279 --> 00:30:49.839
<v Speaker 3>and let's just.

657
00:30:49.839 --> 00:30:52.359
<v Speaker 2>Quickly run through the numbers passage and I'll show you, guys,

658
00:30:52.519 --> 00:30:57.079
<v Speaker 2>how context is sometimes rejected in these discussions. I'm going

659
00:30:57.119 --> 00:30:58.720
<v Speaker 2>to read verses seventeen and eighteen because these are the

660
00:30:58.799 --> 00:31:03.680
<v Speaker 2>verses that people often read. Now, therefore, kill every male

661
00:31:03.720 --> 00:31:06.400
<v Speaker 2>among the little ones, and kill every woman who is

662
00:31:06.480 --> 00:31:09.240
<v Speaker 2>known man, who has known man by lying with him,

663
00:31:09.279 --> 00:31:11.640
<v Speaker 2>that is, having sex. But all the young girls who

664
00:31:11.640 --> 00:31:14.240
<v Speaker 2>have not known man by lying with him, keep alive

665
00:31:14.640 --> 00:31:15.400
<v Speaker 2>for yourselves.

666
00:31:15.759 --> 00:31:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Yep, pretty heinous. Not sure how any context could make

667
00:31:19.720 --> 00:31:21.240
<v Speaker 3>the genocide and rape better.

668
00:31:21.279 --> 00:31:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Here, this is how I've heard this verse promoted online

669
00:31:24.880 --> 00:31:28.799
<v Speaker 2>when people say things like the Bible supports rape, This

670
00:31:28.960 --> 00:31:30.119
<v Speaker 2>is how I've heard it used.

671
00:31:30.240 --> 00:31:34.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is very clearly Moses commanding rape and genocide.

672
00:31:35.319 --> 00:31:38.240
<v Speaker 2>So the Israelites are to go out into other nations

673
00:31:38.240 --> 00:31:40.880
<v Speaker 2>and they're to just kill everybody except for the girls

674
00:31:40.920 --> 00:31:42.519
<v Speaker 2>they keep alive so they can have him as And

675
00:31:42.880 --> 00:31:44.920
<v Speaker 2>here's the term i've heard used, sex slaves.

676
00:31:45.200 --> 00:31:47.640
<v Speaker 3>What else would you call? That? They are keeping the

677
00:31:47.680 --> 00:31:51.440
<v Speaker 3>girls alive for themselves, not to set free, not because

678
00:31:51.440 --> 00:31:54.440
<v Speaker 3>it would be wrong to kill them, but for themselves.

679
00:31:54.839 --> 00:31:58.079
<v Speaker 3>What did Israel do with female prisoners of war. Well,

680
00:31:58.200 --> 00:32:00.519
<v Speaker 3>dude around me twenty one tens through fourteen gives us

681
00:32:00.519 --> 00:32:03.319
<v Speaker 3>some insight. When you go out to war against your enemies,

682
00:32:03.359 --> 00:32:05.240
<v Speaker 3>and the Lord your God gives them into your hand,

683
00:32:05.279 --> 00:32:07.319
<v Speaker 3>and you take them captive, and you see among the

684
00:32:07.319 --> 00:32:10.200
<v Speaker 3>captives a beautiful woman, and you desire to take her

685
00:32:10.200 --> 00:32:12.119
<v Speaker 3>to be your wife, and you bring her home to

686
00:32:12.160 --> 00:32:15.039
<v Speaker 3>your house. She shall shave her head and pare her nails,

687
00:32:15.119 --> 00:32:16.839
<v Speaker 3>and she shall take off the clothes in which she

688
00:32:17.000 --> 00:32:19.400
<v Speaker 3>was captured, and shall remain in your house and lament

689
00:32:19.480 --> 00:32:22.160
<v Speaker 3>her father and her mother. A full month after that,

690
00:32:22.319 --> 00:32:24.599
<v Speaker 3>you may go into her and be her husband, and

691
00:32:24.640 --> 00:32:27.079
<v Speaker 3>she shall be your wife. But if you no longer

692
00:32:27.119 --> 00:32:29.240
<v Speaker 3>delighten her, you shall let her go where she wants.

693
00:32:29.480 --> 00:32:31.559
<v Speaker 3>But you shall not sell her for money, nor shall

694
00:32:31.599 --> 00:32:33.960
<v Speaker 3>you treat her as a slave. Since you have humiliated her,

695
00:32:34.039 --> 00:32:37.000
<v Speaker 3>so force them into marriage. Give them a whole month

696
00:32:37.039 --> 00:32:38.880
<v Speaker 3>to get over the fact that you just killed their

697
00:32:39.000 --> 00:32:42.000
<v Speaker 3>entire family. Then rape them. If you change your mind

698
00:32:42.039 --> 00:32:44.319
<v Speaker 3>about keeping them after you've done that, let them go.

699
00:32:44.920 --> 00:32:47.279
<v Speaker 3>Sure it does end by saying that you can't sell

700
00:32:47.319 --> 00:32:49.640
<v Speaker 3>her or treat her as a slave after you've raped her,

701
00:32:49.880 --> 00:32:52.160
<v Speaker 3>but that only applies if you are not happy with

702
00:32:52.240 --> 00:32:54.880
<v Speaker 3>her after the fact, if you are happy with her,

703
00:32:55.119 --> 00:32:58.000
<v Speaker 3>she remains your sex slave. I suppose this means you're

704
00:32:58.079 --> 00:33:00.799
<v Speaker 3>never allowed to sell her, but being a permanent sex

705
00:33:00.839 --> 00:33:03.039
<v Speaker 3>slave hardly makes her not a sex slave.

706
00:33:03.720 --> 00:33:08.319
<v Speaker 2>Let's unpack that a little bit. The killing is judicial.

707
00:33:08.519 --> 00:33:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Ah, Yes, good old fashioned judicial genocide. If you read

708
00:33:12.240 --> 00:33:14.440
<v Speaker 3>some of that context that you complain that atheists like

709
00:33:14.519 --> 00:33:16.880
<v Speaker 3>to leave out, you'll see that this is Israel attempting

710
00:33:16.960 --> 00:33:20.119
<v Speaker 3>to completely wipe out the nation of Midian, complete and

711
00:33:20.160 --> 00:33:25.160
<v Speaker 3>total genocide. Calling it judicial doesn't make it not genocide.

712
00:33:24.920 --> 00:33:27.880
<v Speaker 2>And it is rare. It is like this never happens,

713
00:33:27.920 --> 00:33:29.880
<v Speaker 2>and it's forbidden to happen at other times. It is

714
00:33:29.960 --> 00:33:31.960
<v Speaker 2>only through the direct command of God. So this is

715
00:33:32.000 --> 00:33:32.880
<v Speaker 2>a judicial command.

716
00:33:32.920 --> 00:33:35.319
<v Speaker 3>Where the fuck are you getting that from? Dude around me?

717
00:33:35.359 --> 00:33:38.799
<v Speaker 3>Twenty actually lays out pretty clearly that genocide is not rare.

718
00:33:39.079 --> 00:33:41.279
<v Speaker 3>It is in fact the norm, at least for cities

719
00:33:41.319 --> 00:33:43.960
<v Speaker 3>that are near Israel. The ones that are far away

720
00:33:44.200 --> 00:33:46.240
<v Speaker 3>just get turned into chattel slaves if they choose to

721
00:33:46.279 --> 00:33:48.680
<v Speaker 3>surrender or have all their men slaughtered, and the women

722
00:33:48.720 --> 00:33:51.359
<v Speaker 3>and children turned into slaves if they choose not to surrender.

723
00:33:51.799 --> 00:33:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Those aren't rare exceptions. Those are literally in a section

724
00:33:55.279 --> 00:33:57.079
<v Speaker 3>titled laws concerning warfare.

725
00:33:57.519 --> 00:34:00.000
<v Speaker 2>God is judging and he's not suggesting in this past,

726
00:34:00.240 --> 00:34:03.079
<v Speaker 2>which easily, especially in a cancel culture like we have now,

727
00:34:03.240 --> 00:34:05.480
<v Speaker 2>where you could take one sentence out of context and

728
00:34:05.480 --> 00:34:09.039
<v Speaker 2>then you condemn a person because of it.

729
00:34:09.119 --> 00:34:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Him whining about cancel culture aside. I'd just like to

730
00:34:12.480 --> 00:34:15.239
<v Speaker 3>once again point out that I have provided way more

731
00:34:15.280 --> 00:34:18.079
<v Speaker 3>context about this verse than Mike has, and so far

732
00:34:18.320 --> 00:34:20.440
<v Speaker 3>all he's got to defend it is that the genocide

733
00:34:20.480 --> 00:34:23.360
<v Speaker 3>was a judicial one, and he got there not based

734
00:34:23.400 --> 00:34:26.480
<v Speaker 3>on additional context, but just by asserting that it was

735
00:34:26.559 --> 00:34:28.960
<v Speaker 3>as though we're obvious from the verse in question, which,

736
00:34:29.199 --> 00:34:32.280
<v Speaker 3>if it were obvious and somehow did actually make the

737
00:34:32.360 --> 00:34:35.079
<v Speaker 3>verse better, would mean that taking this verse on its

738
00:34:35.159 --> 00:34:39.360
<v Speaker 3>own would not actually be decontextualizing it, rendering Mike's complaints

739
00:34:39.400 --> 00:34:40.880
<v Speaker 3>here entirely pointless.

740
00:34:42.400 --> 00:34:45.519
<v Speaker 2>This is meant to be a statement in context. Anybody

741
00:34:45.519 --> 00:34:48.599
<v Speaker 2>who cares about understanding the text rightly knows this is

742
00:34:48.639 --> 00:34:52.960
<v Speaker 2>specifically about the Midianites, specifically about a group of people who,

743
00:34:53.039 --> 00:34:55.559
<v Speaker 2>according to the text of scripture, had hundreds of years

744
00:34:55.559 --> 00:34:58.639
<v Speaker 2>of rebellion against God, and now their whole society and

745
00:34:58.719 --> 00:34:59.800
<v Speaker 2>culture has to end.

746
00:35:00.400 --> 00:35:03.159
<v Speaker 3>Oh, finally he's giving us some context us not just

747
00:35:03.199 --> 00:35:07.280
<v Speaker 3>from that verse. But unfortunately, as I've already discussed, this

748
00:35:07.320 --> 00:35:10.039
<v Speaker 3>actually makes it worse. It's like he's saying, if the

749
00:35:10.079 --> 00:35:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Israelites wiped out one single city and took their girls

750
00:35:12.880 --> 00:35:15.559
<v Speaker 3>as sex slaves, that would be bad. But because they

751
00:35:15.559 --> 00:35:17.880
<v Speaker 3>did it to all the cities that belong to this

752
00:35:17.920 --> 00:35:21.119
<v Speaker 3>one specific culture in a coordinated effort to exterminate that culture,

753
00:35:21.519 --> 00:35:25.519
<v Speaker 3>that makes it okay. Like no, man, that makes it

754
00:35:25.639 --> 00:35:26.440
<v Speaker 3>way worse.

755
00:35:27.559 --> 00:35:28.159
<v Speaker 2>Do you catch that?

756
00:35:28.599 --> 00:35:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

757
00:35:28.840 --> 00:35:31.920
<v Speaker 3>I fucking caught that, goddamn genocide apologist.

758
00:35:32.440 --> 00:35:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Any of the males who would survive and live on

759
00:35:35.199 --> 00:35:39.679
<v Speaker 2>into adulthood would probably continue the same disgusting and perverted

760
00:35:39.719 --> 00:35:42.280
<v Speaker 2>culture with bestiality and who knows what kind of other

761
00:35:42.800 --> 00:35:43.599
<v Speaker 2>things were going on.

762
00:35:43.760 --> 00:35:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Aside from the fact that there is no evidence that

763
00:35:45.880 --> 00:35:47.960
<v Speaker 3>they engaged in such practices at a higher rate than

764
00:35:47.960 --> 00:35:51.159
<v Speaker 3>the ancient Hebrews themselves did. What you're saying here is

765
00:35:51.199 --> 00:35:54.519
<v Speaker 3>that the ends justify the means. Morality doesn't come from

766
00:35:54.559 --> 00:35:58.199
<v Speaker 3>God's nature. Morality is utilitarian, count up the bad things

767
00:35:58.199 --> 00:36:00.480
<v Speaker 3>and the good things and calculate the impact. When the

768
00:36:00.519 --> 00:36:03.079
<v Speaker 3>bad things add up high enough that genocide becomes less

769
00:36:03.079 --> 00:36:05.320
<v Speaker 3>of a bad thing than allowing that culture to continue,

770
00:36:05.559 --> 00:36:09.480
<v Speaker 3>go ahead and commit genocide. It's now morally justifiable. This

771
00:36:09.639 --> 00:36:12.639
<v Speaker 3>is exactly the position that apologist will accuse atheists of

772
00:36:12.639 --> 00:36:14.880
<v Speaker 3>holding when they are making the moral argument for God.

773
00:36:15.280 --> 00:36:18.239
<v Speaker 3>Utilitarian ethics are bad because hypothetically you could use them

774
00:36:18.239 --> 00:36:21.519
<v Speaker 3>to justify bad things like genocide. And yet when the

775
00:36:21.559 --> 00:36:26.920
<v Speaker 3>genocides of the Bible come up, apologists immediately apologists immediately

776
00:36:26.960 --> 00:36:33.360
<v Speaker 3>switched God, damn it. I know how to snap. I swear, piper.

777
00:36:33.400 --> 00:36:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Can you put a snapping sound in there to make

778
00:36:34.880 --> 00:36:37.440
<v Speaker 3>a sound like I can? Actually, I can snap my fingers.

779
00:36:37.440 --> 00:36:40.559
<v Speaker 3>How about put one of those there to match with

780
00:36:40.639 --> 00:36:42.719
<v Speaker 3>my snap if I don't get it on the next take.

781
00:36:42.920 --> 00:36:45.079
<v Speaker 3>And yet, when the genocides of the Bible come up,

782
00:36:45.119 --> 00:36:49.159
<v Speaker 3>apologists immediately switch to the utilitarian ethics system to justify them.

783
00:36:49.239 --> 00:36:51.519
<v Speaker 3>I snapped for real that time. That was fun. And

784
00:36:51.559 --> 00:36:54.760
<v Speaker 3>what's worse, they often lump things like homosexuality in with

785
00:36:54.840 --> 00:36:57.280
<v Speaker 3>the reasons why a culture is so bad it needs

786
00:36:57.280 --> 00:36:59.840
<v Speaker 3>to be exterminated. Starts off with incest, and then it

787
00:36:59.840 --> 00:37:01.000
<v Speaker 3>goes into adultery.

788
00:37:01.039 --> 00:37:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Then it goes into offering your children to.

789
00:37:03.039 --> 00:37:08.159
<v Speaker 3>Molek homosexual sins and then bestiality, which, if I may

790
00:37:08.199 --> 00:37:10.480
<v Speaker 3>take a moment to get political, is why y'all need

791
00:37:10.519 --> 00:37:12.400
<v Speaker 3>to not vote for the guy that has the support

792
00:37:12.400 --> 00:37:15.400
<v Speaker 3>of the Christian nationalists. The people who say cultures deserve

793
00:37:15.480 --> 00:37:18.559
<v Speaker 3>to be wiped out for being accepting of homosexuality should

794
00:37:18.639 --> 00:37:20.320
<v Speaker 3>not have political influence.

795
00:37:20.920 --> 00:37:23.360
<v Speaker 2>False worship. Of course, some think it's no big deal

796
00:37:23.400 --> 00:37:26.800
<v Speaker 2>if you're worshiping a false God, but that's where we're

797
00:37:26.800 --> 00:37:28.719
<v Speaker 2>going to be disagreeing with God on that topic.

798
00:37:28.960 --> 00:37:32.000
<v Speaker 3>So to be clear, he just said that worshiping a

799
00:37:32.039 --> 00:37:34.599
<v Speaker 3>god other than the one that he worships is a

800
00:37:34.639 --> 00:37:39.239
<v Speaker 3>crime that justifies genocide. It is fucking terrifying that he

801
00:37:39.400 --> 00:37:42.639
<v Speaker 3>has as big a following as he does, So this.

802
00:37:42.679 --> 00:37:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Is not something to be repeated. This was a one

803
00:37:44.760 --> 00:37:47.280
<v Speaker 2>time thing, right. It happened just as they're entering the

804
00:37:47.360 --> 00:37:49.400
<v Speaker 2>land as God's judging and removing those nations.

805
00:37:49.559 --> 00:37:53.199
<v Speaker 3>To be clear, by judging and removing those nations, he

806
00:37:53.320 --> 00:37:56.599
<v Speaker 3>means leading the Israelite army in a campaign of genocidal

807
00:37:56.679 --> 00:37:59.920
<v Speaker 3>conquest against people whose chief crime was having already lived

808
00:38:00.039 --> 00:38:01.880
<v Speaker 3>in a place that God promised he'd give to someone

809
00:38:01.880 --> 00:38:02.400
<v Speaker 3>else later.

810
00:38:02.880 --> 00:38:05.039
<v Speaker 2>Why is it, though, that the women are killed and

811
00:38:05.119 --> 00:38:07.159
<v Speaker 2>the young girls are left alive? Is this like a

812
00:38:07.199 --> 00:38:10.119
<v Speaker 2>type of sex slavery? As I've heard it presented online

813
00:38:10.159 --> 00:38:13.679
<v Speaker 2>from many people and those who present it to me online,

814
00:38:13.880 --> 00:38:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm convinced that most of the ones I've interacted with

815
00:38:16.079 --> 00:38:17.480
<v Speaker 2>they don't care what it really means.

816
00:38:17.719 --> 00:38:21.519
<v Speaker 3>Again, notice that before he can explain whatever context he thinks,

817
00:38:21.679 --> 00:38:24.800
<v Speaker 3>justifies that he must first poison the well against anyone

818
00:38:24.840 --> 00:38:27.400
<v Speaker 3>who would dare to question the morality of this passage,

819
00:38:27.519 --> 00:38:30.960
<v Speaker 3>thus priming his audience to uncritically accept his answer. After all,

820
00:38:31.119 --> 00:38:33.719
<v Speaker 3>he just pointed out that it's those arrogant, entitled, and

821
00:38:33.760 --> 00:38:36.760
<v Speaker 3>foolish atheists who don't even care about the justification here.

822
00:38:37.159 --> 00:38:39.880
<v Speaker 3>So if you hear his justification and find it to

823
00:38:39.960 --> 00:38:43.960
<v Speaker 3>be inadequate, you must be an arrogant, entitled, and foolish atheists.

824
00:38:44.119 --> 00:38:46.760
<v Speaker 3>You wouldn't want to be like them, would you? This

825
00:38:46.800 --> 00:38:48.639
<v Speaker 3>is manipulative and gross.

826
00:38:49.000 --> 00:38:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Like they don't care. They get angry when I try

827
00:38:50.840 --> 00:38:55.039
<v Speaker 2>to explain it. There's the hard issue. I set aside

828
00:38:55.039 --> 00:38:58.280
<v Speaker 2>those conversations because that's I'm spinning my wheels you don't

829
00:38:58.320 --> 00:39:00.920
<v Speaker 2>care about the truth here, You're just you to want

830
00:39:00.960 --> 00:39:01.320
<v Speaker 2>to be mad.

831
00:39:01.400 --> 00:39:04.519
<v Speaker 3>Don't like my explanation. It's just because you're angry and

832
00:39:04.559 --> 00:39:08.400
<v Speaker 3>don't care about truth. That's the only reason there's no

833
00:39:08.480 --> 00:39:12.519
<v Speaker 3>chance that Mike is wrong. So you must just be angry, foolish, arrogant, entitled,

834
00:39:12.559 --> 00:39:15.199
<v Speaker 3>and not care about the truth. What a fucking piece

835
00:39:15.199 --> 00:39:16.199
<v Speaker 3>of work this guy is.

836
00:39:16.960 --> 00:39:18.559
<v Speaker 2>So here's a few of the background things you want

837
00:39:18.599 --> 00:39:18.880
<v Speaker 2>to know.

838
00:39:22.079 --> 00:39:22.199
<v Speaker 3>This.

839
00:39:22.280 --> 00:39:24.320
<v Speaker 2>You read about this in numbers twenty two through twenty five.

840
00:39:24.400 --> 00:39:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Those those four chapters right there. The king of the

841
00:39:27.360 --> 00:39:30.559
<v Speaker 2>Midianites hired Balim, who was who's a prophet and to

842
00:39:30.840 --> 00:39:34.639
<v Speaker 2>prophesy like basically curse the people of Israel. Baalim can't

843
00:39:34.679 --> 00:39:36.840
<v Speaker 2>curse them because God is protecting them and God's gonna

844
00:39:36.840 --> 00:39:37.320
<v Speaker 2>bless them.

845
00:39:37.440 --> 00:39:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's the story that has the talking donkey in it.

846
00:39:41.519 --> 00:39:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Are you sure you want to be bringing attention to

847
00:39:44.280 --> 00:39:47.360
<v Speaker 3>elements of the story that make it clearly mythological in nature.

848
00:39:47.760 --> 00:39:50.079
<v Speaker 2>So multiple times he tries and fails. The one thing

849
00:39:50.199 --> 00:39:52.880
<v Speaker 2>he does do is he seems to give Baalim baylic

850
00:39:52.960 --> 00:39:57.559
<v Speaker 2>advice that what he needs to do is cause them

851
00:39:57.599 --> 00:40:00.360
<v Speaker 2>to sin against God and So what the Median Knights

852
00:40:00.440 --> 00:40:04.079
<v Speaker 2>do is they send their women who are trained in

853
00:40:04.119 --> 00:40:08.239
<v Speaker 2>sexual practices as part of their religious orgies and stuff

854
00:40:08.239 --> 00:40:10.360
<v Speaker 2>like that that they do in their cult, and they

855
00:40:10.360 --> 00:40:14.119
<v Speaker 2>send their women into amongst the Israelites who start basically

856
00:40:14.280 --> 00:40:16.559
<v Speaker 2>prostituting themselves out in religious fashion.

857
00:40:16.760 --> 00:40:19.039
<v Speaker 3>And as always when it comes to religion and sex,

858
00:40:19.159 --> 00:40:21.639
<v Speaker 3>it's the woman's fault. You can't expect the men to

859
00:40:21.679 --> 00:40:24.679
<v Speaker 3>exercise any kind of self control after all. So clearly

860
00:40:24.719 --> 00:40:27.239
<v Speaker 3>the women corrupting the Hebrews was a crime that justifies

861
00:40:27.280 --> 00:40:29.920
<v Speaker 3>a total annihilation of the culture the women came from.

862
00:40:30.119 --> 00:40:32.519
<v Speaker 2>So their prostitution is something that is meant to draw

863
00:40:32.559 --> 00:40:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the Israelites away from God so that God will curse them,

864
00:40:35.960 --> 00:40:38.119
<v Speaker 2>because the Midi Nites just want to destroy the Israelites.

865
00:40:38.599 --> 00:40:42.480
<v Speaker 3>So it was defensive prostitution. They knew the Israelites were

866
00:40:42.519 --> 00:40:44.280
<v Speaker 3>going to wipe them out either way. So this is

867
00:40:44.320 --> 00:40:47.000
<v Speaker 3>an attempt for them to preserve their culture against an

868
00:40:47.039 --> 00:40:50.440
<v Speaker 3>existential threat. How is this supposed to make the Israelites

869
00:40:50.480 --> 00:40:52.559
<v Speaker 3>look like the ones that had the moral high ground?

870
00:40:54.000 --> 00:40:55.639
<v Speaker 2>Now do you see this a very different context than

871
00:40:55.639 --> 00:40:57.039
<v Speaker 2>what you think reading those two verses.

872
00:40:57.159 --> 00:41:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it now looks way worse. The people they were

873
00:41:01.039 --> 00:41:04.119
<v Speaker 3>fighting against were desperate to defend themselves in any way

874
00:41:04.159 --> 00:41:07.320
<v Speaker 3>they could. Because the Hebrews were already intent on wiping

875
00:41:07.320 --> 00:41:09.679
<v Speaker 3>them out completely, and because the way they chose to

876
00:41:09.679 --> 00:41:12.519
<v Speaker 3>do it involved sex, they are now justified in wiping

877
00:41:12.519 --> 00:41:16.159
<v Speaker 3>them out completely in your eyes, Well, were they justified

878
00:41:16.199 --> 00:41:19.239
<v Speaker 3>before the women started seducing them, because that's what they

879
00:41:19.280 --> 00:41:22.440
<v Speaker 3>were already planning on doing. The women seducing them didn't

880
00:41:22.480 --> 00:41:23.599
<v Speaker 3>actually change anything.

881
00:41:24.039 --> 00:41:26.599
<v Speaker 2>If you look at numbers twenty five we get a

882
00:41:26.599 --> 00:41:27.599
<v Speaker 2>little more details.

883
00:41:27.800 --> 00:41:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh so you mean that verse that has been used

884
00:41:30.480 --> 00:41:35.159
<v Speaker 3>to justify an opposition to interracial marriage, that one, because

885
00:41:35.519 --> 00:41:36.519
<v Speaker 3>that's where that one is.

886
00:41:36.960 --> 00:41:40.480
<v Speaker 2>While Israel lived in Shatim, the people began to whore

887
00:41:40.719 --> 00:41:44.679
<v Speaker 2>with the daughters of Moab. That's I kept saying, Midi Nites, Moabites.

888
00:41:44.679 --> 00:41:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Excuse me, Oh my god, he doesn't even know his

889
00:41:46.920 --> 00:41:51.679
<v Speaker 3>own book. This is a different genocide. This is actually

890
00:41:51.760 --> 00:41:54.400
<v Speaker 3>the one that was justified with the anti miscegination sentiment.

891
00:41:54.679 --> 00:41:57.599
<v Speaker 3>The later one in numbers thirty one justifies the killing

892
00:41:57.639 --> 00:41:59.599
<v Speaker 3>of the women who have had sex with men by

893
00:41:59.639 --> 00:42:02.039
<v Speaker 3>reference the plague that happened when they were fighting against

894
00:42:02.079 --> 00:42:04.559
<v Speaker 3>the Moabites, and the Israelites started having sex with the

895
00:42:04.599 --> 00:42:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Moabite women. These are two different genocides, Mike, not the

896
00:42:08.800 --> 00:42:12.679
<v Speaker 3>same one. Once again, your attempt to add context is

897
00:42:12.719 --> 00:42:13.800
<v Speaker 3>actually making it worse.

898
00:42:15.239 --> 00:42:18.719
<v Speaker 2>These invited the people to the sacrifices of their gods. Right,

899
00:42:18.760 --> 00:42:24.000
<v Speaker 2>so it's sex and idolatry are combined here in that culture.

900
00:42:24.239 --> 00:42:25.519
<v Speaker 2>They're part of the same thing.

901
00:42:25.760 --> 00:42:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that actually reads to me more like,

902
00:42:28.079 --> 00:42:29.760
<v Speaker 3>if you want to have sex with me, you have

903
00:42:29.840 --> 00:42:32.280
<v Speaker 3>to come to church with me, rather than come to church.

904
00:42:32.280 --> 00:42:35.360
<v Speaker 3>It's where the orgies happen. And given that Christian women

905
00:42:35.480 --> 00:42:38.079
<v Speaker 3>often behave in that same way today, except with a

906
00:42:38.119 --> 00:42:41.280
<v Speaker 3>touch more subtlety, and it ostensibly being about marriage rather

907
00:42:41.360 --> 00:42:45.159
<v Speaker 3>than sex, usually I tread lightly when pronouncing judgment on

908
00:42:45.199 --> 00:42:46.679
<v Speaker 3>that style of gaining converts.

909
00:42:47.039 --> 00:42:50.320
<v Speaker 2>These invited the people to the sacrifices, and the people

910
00:42:50.480 --> 00:42:53.360
<v Speaker 2>ate and bowed down to their gods, so yoked themselves

911
00:42:53.519 --> 00:42:55.400
<v Speaker 2>to the ball of pure and the anger of the

912
00:42:55.440 --> 00:42:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Lord was kindled against Israel. And so this is all

913
00:42:58.960 --> 00:43:01.159
<v Speaker 2>part of the judgment. This is the background of the

914
00:43:01.239 --> 00:43:02.719
<v Speaker 2>judgment that then comes upon them.

915
00:43:02.920 --> 00:43:06.199
<v Speaker 3>Keep reading, Mike, I dare you give this passage it's

916
00:43:06.239 --> 00:43:08.519
<v Speaker 3>full context and read at least to the point where

917
00:43:08.559 --> 00:43:11.360
<v Speaker 3>a couple gets murdered for being from two different cultures,

918
00:43:11.559 --> 00:43:14.039
<v Speaker 3>and with God praising the murderer for taking it upon

919
00:43:14.159 --> 00:43:16.639
<v Speaker 3>himself to kill someone for such a non crime.

920
00:43:17.000 --> 00:43:21.599
<v Speaker 2>And the judgment is, Hey, you need to remove these Midianites.

921
00:43:21.639 --> 00:43:24.880
<v Speaker 2>They're a cancerous culture. That is what they are. That

922
00:43:24.880 --> 00:43:28.320
<v Speaker 2>their culture is going to destroy you, and morally and

923
00:43:28.480 --> 00:43:31.599
<v Speaker 2>religiously and spiritually. As God's setting up his people, they're

924
00:43:31.639 --> 00:43:33.639
<v Speaker 2>going to see how important it is that they keep

925
00:43:33.679 --> 00:43:36.400
<v Speaker 2>themselves clean from the ungodly practices and beliefs of the

926
00:43:36.440 --> 00:43:37.199
<v Speaker 2>people around them.

927
00:43:37.400 --> 00:43:40.039
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what he just said is rubbish, but I just

928
00:43:40.079 --> 00:43:41.920
<v Speaker 3>want to point out that he has now gone out

929
00:43:41.920 --> 00:43:44.800
<v Speaker 3>of his way to avoid some pretty important context in

930
00:43:44.880 --> 00:43:47.039
<v Speaker 3>order to make the original verse we were talking about

931
00:43:47.079 --> 00:43:49.960
<v Speaker 3>better than it actually is. And this is why when

932
00:43:50.000 --> 00:43:53.599
<v Speaker 3>people like Mike say, but the context, though, they often

933
00:43:53.639 --> 00:43:56.239
<v Speaker 3>get laughed at and dismissed. It's because they are the

934
00:43:56.400 --> 00:43:59.800
<v Speaker 3>kings of ignoring context. I gave you the full context

935
00:43:59.840 --> 00:44:02.119
<v Speaker 3>of the original verse in question. I gave you the

936
00:44:02.159 --> 00:44:04.599
<v Speaker 3>full context of numbers twenty five. I gave you the

937
00:44:04.639 --> 00:44:07.280
<v Speaker 3>context of the rules that the ancient Israelites had regarding

938
00:44:07.280 --> 00:44:10.199
<v Speaker 3>warfare and the female captives of war. I gave you

939
00:44:10.280 --> 00:44:13.119
<v Speaker 3>the context of their laws regarding slavery and the commands

940
00:44:13.119 --> 00:44:15.559
<v Speaker 3>about slavery in the New Testament. Mike said that he

941
00:44:15.800 --> 00:44:19.119
<v Speaker 3>would give context, made assertions about the real meaning of

942
00:44:19.159 --> 00:44:21.760
<v Speaker 3>the original verse in question without providing anything that would

943
00:44:21.760 --> 00:44:24.519
<v Speaker 3>back up those assertions, and then talked about a completely

944
00:44:24.559 --> 00:44:26.960
<v Speaker 3>separate event as though it were the same event. And

945
00:44:27.039 --> 00:44:29.800
<v Speaker 3>he did so ostensibly to explain why keeping the young

946
00:44:29.840 --> 00:44:33.400
<v Speaker 3>women alive for yourselves doesn't count as rape. But without

947
00:44:33.440 --> 00:44:36.079
<v Speaker 3>actually doing that, best we can get here is a

948
00:44:36.159 --> 00:44:39.119
<v Speaker 3>justification for killing the women that had have sex. No

949
00:44:39.320 --> 00:44:43.280
<v Speaker 3>good justification, mind you, just an attempt at a justification. So,

950
00:44:43.519 --> 00:44:46.199
<v Speaker 3>given the amount of context I provided as compared to

951
00:44:46.239 --> 00:44:49.239
<v Speaker 3>the amount you provided, the idea that the atheist side

952
00:44:49.239 --> 00:44:51.199
<v Speaker 3>of the argument is relying on taking things out of

953
00:44:51.199 --> 00:44:55.320
<v Speaker 3>context is just completely and utterly ridiculous. Mike has even

954
00:44:55.320 --> 00:44:58.000
<v Speaker 3>demonstrated that he doesn't understand the context that he is

955
00:44:58.079 --> 00:45:01.519
<v Speaker 3>giving by getting confused in ConFlat eating two separate genocides

956
00:45:01.559 --> 00:45:04.400
<v Speaker 3>as one event. So if he can't even be bothered

957
00:45:04.440 --> 00:45:07.320
<v Speaker 3>to get the minimal context that he's presenting, correct. Why

958
00:45:07.320 --> 00:45:09.880
<v Speaker 3>would we expect him to understand anything about the larger picture?

959
00:45:09.960 --> 00:45:11.760
<v Speaker 3>I would give him the benefit of the doubt normally,

960
00:45:11.880 --> 00:45:14.280
<v Speaker 3>as this was recorded live, and you can make mistakes

961
00:45:14.320 --> 00:45:16.800
<v Speaker 3>while recording live. I know I do it a lot myself.

962
00:45:17.199 --> 00:45:20.440
<v Speaker 3>But he clearly prepared for this answer before going live.

963
00:45:20.880 --> 00:45:23.480
<v Speaker 3>That's a pretty big mistake to have made well prepping.

964
00:45:23.559 --> 00:45:25.039
<v Speaker 3>If the question had just been one that he saw

965
00:45:25.079 --> 00:45:27.159
<v Speaker 3>in the chatwell streaming, and he hadn't prepared but was

966
00:45:27.199 --> 00:45:29.199
<v Speaker 3>working for memory, then I'd cut him a bit of

967
00:45:29.239 --> 00:45:31.960
<v Speaker 3>slack here. But that's not how it went, so I won't.

968
00:45:32.400 --> 00:45:34.719
<v Speaker 2>And so let's talk about the girls though.

969
00:45:34.960 --> 00:45:38.519
<v Speaker 3>Oh so he is going to address it. Okay, let's

970
00:45:38.519 --> 00:45:41.480
<v Speaker 3>see how this goes. My hopes aren't terribly high at

971
00:45:41.519 --> 00:45:44.400
<v Speaker 3>this point, but can't do any worse than the last one.

972
00:45:44.360 --> 00:45:47.159
<v Speaker 2>Right, because this is the part are they sex slaves?

973
00:45:47.280 --> 00:45:51.840
<v Speaker 2>And this is the response to that Deuteronomy twenty one

974
00:45:51.880 --> 00:45:52.239
<v Speaker 2>to ten.

975
00:45:52.679 --> 00:45:56.159
<v Speaker 3>Oh God, your justification for them not being sex slaves

976
00:45:56.199 --> 00:45:57.840
<v Speaker 3>is to go to the verse that points out that

977
00:45:57.880 --> 00:46:01.679
<v Speaker 3>they are forced into marriage and raped. Jesus fucking Christ.

978
00:46:01.400 --> 00:46:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Dude, they are left alive, but for what purpose? Deuteronomy

979
00:46:05.000 --> 00:46:11.559
<v Speaker 2>twenty one to ten tells us about the sort of POW's,

980
00:46:11.920 --> 00:46:13.880
<v Speaker 2>and you're even calling them POW's.

981
00:46:14.280 --> 00:46:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Forcing a prisoner of war into marriage after killing her

982
00:46:17.440 --> 00:46:21.280
<v Speaker 3>entire family is super duper immoral. And even though the

983
00:46:21.280 --> 00:46:23.440
<v Speaker 3>passage ends by saying that she's not to be treated

984
00:46:23.480 --> 00:46:26.039
<v Speaker 3>like a slave, it's still treating her like a slave.

985
00:46:26.360 --> 00:46:28.840
<v Speaker 3>She doesn't get to choose to not marry the man.

986
00:46:29.000 --> 00:46:31.440
<v Speaker 3>The man has to choose to not want to marry

987
00:46:31.440 --> 00:46:34.199
<v Speaker 3>her anymore. If you are forced to marry someone and

988
00:46:34.280 --> 00:46:37.360
<v Speaker 3>have sex with them, then that is sex slavery, even

989
00:46:37.360 --> 00:46:39.159
<v Speaker 3>if that's not how the authors of the Bible would

990
00:46:39.199 --> 00:46:39.719
<v Speaker 3>have defined it.

991
00:46:40.519 --> 00:46:42.719
<v Speaker 2>When you go out to war against your enemies and

992
00:46:42.760 --> 00:46:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the Lord your God gives them into your hand, and

993
00:46:44.880 --> 00:46:48.199
<v Speaker 2>you take them captive, and you see among the captives

994
00:46:48.239 --> 00:46:51.079
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful woman and desire to take her to be

995
00:46:51.199 --> 00:46:53.679
<v Speaker 2>your wife, and you bring her home to your house,

996
00:46:54.559 --> 00:46:56.440
<v Speaker 2>here's the procedure. Okay, this is the what if like

997
00:46:56.480 --> 00:46:58.639
<v Speaker 2>you see her and you want her to be your wife,

998
00:46:58.679 --> 00:47:00.360
<v Speaker 2>not your sex slave, your wife.

999
00:47:00.440 --> 00:47:03.760
<v Speaker 3>If you force someone into a marriage against their will

1000
00:47:03.920 --> 00:47:06.360
<v Speaker 3>and part of being married includes having sex with them,

1001
00:47:06.840 --> 00:47:10.599
<v Speaker 3>that is sex slavery. This passage makes it quite clear

1002
00:47:10.639 --> 00:47:12.320
<v Speaker 3>that the woman has no choice here.

1003
00:47:12.840 --> 00:47:16.039
<v Speaker 2>Here's the procedure that God puts in place for them

1004
00:47:16.039 --> 00:47:18.760
<v Speaker 2>in that culture. This is unheard of for them. And

1005
00:47:18.800 --> 00:47:20.079
<v Speaker 2>you bring her to your home, to your house, she

1006
00:47:20.119 --> 00:47:22.199
<v Speaker 2>shall shave her head and pare her nails, and she

1007
00:47:22.199 --> 00:47:24.239
<v Speaker 2>shall take off the clothes in which she was captured

1008
00:47:24.440 --> 00:47:27.039
<v Speaker 2>and remain in your house, and limit her father and

1009
00:47:27.039 --> 00:47:28.320
<v Speaker 2>her mother a full month.

1010
00:47:28.440 --> 00:47:31.119
<v Speaker 3>You strip her of her possessions. You shave her head

1011
00:47:31.239 --> 00:47:34.199
<v Speaker 3>and cut her nails, a humiliating procedure, and then you

1012
00:47:34.320 --> 00:47:36.519
<v Speaker 3>give her one whole month to be sad about the

1013
00:47:36.519 --> 00:47:39.639
<v Speaker 3>fact that you killed her family. How noble.

1014
00:47:41.000 --> 00:47:43.559
<v Speaker 2>The shaving, the hair and nails and all this, these clothes,

1015
00:47:43.639 --> 00:47:46.760
<v Speaker 2>this is all about a few things. I guess there's

1016
00:47:46.760 --> 00:47:49.760
<v Speaker 2>three things going on here. One is ritual purity, okay,

1017
00:47:50.199 --> 00:47:53.239
<v Speaker 2>levitical law, laws of Israel. Lots of religious purity that

1018
00:47:53.400 --> 00:47:56.360
<v Speaker 2>goes on there. So she's separating herself from the impurity

1019
00:47:56.400 --> 00:47:58.800
<v Speaker 2>of the culture she was part of before. And then

1020
00:47:58.800 --> 00:47:59.960
<v Speaker 2>religious stuff she may have been part of.

1021
00:48:00.480 --> 00:48:04.320
<v Speaker 3>No, she is not separating herself from it. She is

1022
00:48:04.360 --> 00:48:07.199
<v Speaker 3>being forcibly separated from it by the man she is

1023
00:48:07.280 --> 00:48:08.599
<v Speaker 3>being forced to marry.

1024
00:48:09.159 --> 00:48:11.159
<v Speaker 2>And she's gonna take off the clothes in which she

1025
00:48:11.199 --> 00:48:13.719
<v Speaker 2>was captured. Why because her status is being elevated.

1026
00:48:14.159 --> 00:48:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Stripping someone of their clothes and forcing them to wear

1027
00:48:16.800 --> 00:48:19.280
<v Speaker 3>what you give them is what you do to prisoners,

1028
00:48:19.360 --> 00:48:21.280
<v Speaker 3>not someone whose status you are elevating.

1029
00:48:21.719 --> 00:48:24.880
<v Speaker 2>She is not going to be a slave for sex.

1030
00:48:25.000 --> 00:48:26.159
<v Speaker 2>She's not gonna stain those clothes.

1031
00:48:26.199 --> 00:48:29.280
<v Speaker 3>How does for her out of her clothes not read

1032
00:48:29.320 --> 00:48:30.480
<v Speaker 3>as sex slavery to you?

1033
00:48:31.000 --> 00:48:32.920
<v Speaker 2>And she'll remain in your house and lamit her father

1034
00:48:33.000 --> 00:48:35.840
<v Speaker 2>and her mother a full month. You can't touch her

1035
00:48:35.880 --> 00:48:36.719
<v Speaker 2>for a month.

1036
00:48:36.920 --> 00:48:38.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but if she's not over them by the end

1037
00:48:38.639 --> 00:48:40.159
<v Speaker 3>of that month, then tough luck.

1038
00:48:40.199 --> 00:48:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I guess this is the opposite of sex slavery. You

1039
00:48:44.800 --> 00:48:45.559
<v Speaker 2>can't touch her.

1040
00:48:46.079 --> 00:48:48.880
<v Speaker 3>No, the opposite of sex slavery isn't you can't touch

1041
00:48:48.920 --> 00:48:51.800
<v Speaker 3>her for thirty days. The opposite would be you can

1042
00:48:51.920 --> 00:48:56.239
<v Speaker 3>never touch her without her explicit and enthusiastic consent. She

1043
00:48:56.320 --> 00:48:58.960
<v Speaker 3>must be set free immediately, not forced out of her

1044
00:48:58.960 --> 00:49:02.320
<v Speaker 3>clothes and have her hair, her nails forcibly cut. Saying

1045
00:49:02.599 --> 00:49:04.800
<v Speaker 3>you have to wait a month before raping her is

1046
00:49:04.880 --> 00:49:06.960
<v Speaker 3>just sex slavery with a probationary period.

1047
00:49:08.039 --> 00:49:10.960
<v Speaker 2>This is she goes through a morning process the greeting process,

1048
00:49:11.400 --> 00:49:14.039
<v Speaker 2>and then after that you may go into her and

1049
00:49:14.079 --> 00:49:17.800
<v Speaker 2>be her husband, not her. She's not your concubine, right,

1050
00:49:17.800 --> 00:49:18.679
<v Speaker 2>she's your wife.

1051
00:49:19.239 --> 00:49:21.880
<v Speaker 3>What if she doesn't want to be Mike, where is

1052
00:49:21.880 --> 00:49:25.119
<v Speaker 3>the provision for what she wants in the scenario? Where

1053
00:49:25.119 --> 00:49:27.480
<v Speaker 3>does it command the man to only go into her

1054
00:49:27.559 --> 00:49:30.760
<v Speaker 3>and be her husband if she wants him to. And

1055
00:49:30.800 --> 00:49:33.000
<v Speaker 3>even if it had that provision, she is now living

1056
00:49:33.000 --> 00:49:35.159
<v Speaker 3>in the midst of people who killed her entire family

1057
00:49:35.199 --> 00:49:38.000
<v Speaker 3>for having a different culture than them. The power dynamics

1058
00:49:38.000 --> 00:49:40.960
<v Speaker 3>there basically ensure that, no matter how she actually feels,

1059
00:49:41.159 --> 00:49:43.159
<v Speaker 3>if she wants to survive, she has to at least

1060
00:49:43.199 --> 00:49:47.039
<v Speaker 3>pretend to want to marry her captor. And that's that's

1061
00:49:47.079 --> 00:49:49.320
<v Speaker 3>not a good thing. That's basically sex slavery.

1062
00:49:50.079 --> 00:49:52.119
<v Speaker 2>So this is different. This is definitely not that kind

1063
00:49:52.199 --> 00:49:54.000
<v Speaker 2>of sex slavery stuff.

1064
00:49:54.320 --> 00:49:57.119
<v Speaker 3>Yes it is. I'd actually argue that the ordinary form

1065
00:49:57.159 --> 00:49:58.920
<v Speaker 3>of marriage that is laid out in the Old Testament

1066
00:49:59.039 --> 00:50:01.840
<v Speaker 3>is also a forms sex slavery all by itself, without

1067
00:50:01.840 --> 00:50:03.840
<v Speaker 3>even getting into the fact that they'd force their captives

1068
00:50:03.840 --> 00:50:06.960
<v Speaker 3>into marriage. But putting that aside, this is explicitly a

1069
00:50:07.039 --> 00:50:10.360
<v Speaker 3>forced marriage, and it explicitly states that sex is involved

1070
00:50:10.360 --> 00:50:13.119
<v Speaker 3>in this force marriage, air go sex slavery.

1071
00:50:13.599 --> 00:50:16.000
<v Speaker 2>And then it goes on and tells you what if

1072
00:50:16.039 --> 00:50:18.199
<v Speaker 2>you don't like her, because this is u's abuse and

1073
00:50:18.199 --> 00:50:20.639
<v Speaker 2>throw away as the idea of sex slavery. But now

1074
00:50:20.679 --> 00:50:23.079
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't happen verse fourteen. But if you no longer

1075
00:50:23.119 --> 00:50:25.400
<v Speaker 2>delight in her, you shall let her go where she wants.

1076
00:50:25.679 --> 00:50:28.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's all fine and good. Okay, no, it's not

1077
00:50:28.119 --> 00:50:29.760
<v Speaker 3>all fine and good, but let's pretend it's all fine

1078
00:50:29.760 --> 00:50:32.119
<v Speaker 3>and good for the moment. What if she no longer

1079
00:50:32.199 --> 00:50:35.320
<v Speaker 3>delights in you or never did to begin with? Do

1080
00:50:35.400 --> 00:50:37.639
<v Speaker 3>you see how putting the choice one hundred percent on

1081
00:50:37.719 --> 00:50:41.440
<v Speaker 3>the man here actually does make it sex slavery. If

1082
00:50:41.440 --> 00:50:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I force someone to marry me at gunpoint and then

1083
00:50:43.840 --> 00:50:46.199
<v Speaker 3>have sex with her, would you consider that marriage to

1084
00:50:46.199 --> 00:50:49.360
<v Speaker 3>be legitimate? Would you consider that sexual act to not

1085
00:50:49.639 --> 00:50:53.239
<v Speaker 3>be rape? Because that is what is being described here. Well,

1086
00:50:53.239 --> 00:50:56.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean sword point, not gunpoint, but you get the idea. Yeah,

1087
00:50:56.519 --> 00:50:58.199
<v Speaker 3>if I get tired of her, I'll let her go,

1088
00:50:58.239 --> 00:50:59.960
<v Speaker 3>and at that point she can go wherever she wants.

1089
00:51:00.199 --> 00:51:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Aren't I benevolent? No? Absolutely not. This is heinous and immoral,

1090
00:51:05.159 --> 00:51:07.119
<v Speaker 3>and these are the rules laid down by the God

1091
00:51:07.159 --> 00:51:08.920
<v Speaker 3>that you claim is the source of morality.

1092
00:51:09.320 --> 00:51:11.760
<v Speaker 2>You shall not sell her for money, nor shall you

1093
00:51:11.800 --> 00:51:14.519
<v Speaker 2>treat her as a slave, since you have humiliated her.

1094
00:51:14.840 --> 00:51:17.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you know those purity rituals that you explicitly

1095
00:51:17.599 --> 00:51:19.719
<v Speaker 3>stated were meant to separate her from her culture and

1096
00:51:19.719 --> 00:51:22.760
<v Speaker 3>her religion. Well, it turns out they're rather humiliating if

1097
00:51:22.760 --> 00:51:25.719
<v Speaker 3>you're forced into them. Everything else about this is immoral

1098
00:51:25.840 --> 00:51:28.440
<v Speaker 3>as fuck, but at least the authors of this passage

1099
00:51:28.480 --> 00:51:31.079
<v Speaker 3>recognize that the women would be humiliated by being forced

1100
00:51:31.119 --> 00:51:31.480
<v Speaker 3>into it.

1101
00:51:31.920 --> 00:51:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, you wronged her because you brought her and his

1102
00:51:33.880 --> 00:51:35.119
<v Speaker 2>wife and then you sent her away.

1103
00:51:35.440 --> 00:51:38.679
<v Speaker 3>No, the sending away isn't the humiliation. The sending away

1104
00:51:38.760 --> 00:51:42.559
<v Speaker 3>is because of the humiliation. The humiliation is the killing

1105
00:51:42.559 --> 00:51:44.800
<v Speaker 3>her family, taking her clothes away from her, forcing her

1106
00:51:44.800 --> 00:51:47.760
<v Speaker 3>to cut her hair and nails before raping her. That's

1107
00:51:47.840 --> 00:51:51.079
<v Speaker 3>the humiliating thing happening here, and realistically, letting her go

1108
00:51:51.159 --> 00:51:52.880
<v Speaker 3>free at this point is likely to either be a

1109
00:51:52.920 --> 00:51:55.400
<v Speaker 3>death sentence or to have her turn into prostitution out

1110
00:51:55.440 --> 00:51:58.400
<v Speaker 3>of desperation. Her entire family is gone, and she's now

1111
00:51:58.480 --> 00:52:00.239
<v Speaker 3>living in the middle of a culture that doesn't take

1112
00:52:00.320 --> 00:52:03.239
<v Speaker 3>kindly to foreign women or women who simultaneously are not

1113
00:52:03.320 --> 00:52:06.039
<v Speaker 3>virgins and not married. So how is she supposed to

1114
00:52:06.079 --> 00:52:07.840
<v Speaker 3>make a living now? This is one of those verses that,

1115
00:52:07.920 --> 00:52:11.039
<v Speaker 3>if we ignore the larger cultural context, seems like it's

1116
00:52:11.079 --> 00:52:14.360
<v Speaker 3>at least trying to be decent, but in light of

1117
00:52:14.360 --> 00:52:17.880
<v Speaker 3>the larger cultural context, is actually another cruelty. She has

1118
00:52:17.920 --> 00:52:21.280
<v Speaker 3>to choose between trying to please her captor sexually and

1119
00:52:21.360 --> 00:52:23.679
<v Speaker 3>being cast out to live in destitution at best.

1120
00:52:24.480 --> 00:52:26.639
<v Speaker 2>But you will send her away free as a free person,

1121
00:52:26.719 --> 00:52:30.000
<v Speaker 2>as a wife who has been sent away, not as

1122
00:52:30.000 --> 00:52:32.639
<v Speaker 2>a slave you can sell. She is not your property,

1123
00:52:32.840 --> 00:52:35.880
<v Speaker 2>so you're not allowed to profit off of ruining her life.

1124
00:52:36.280 --> 00:52:38.400
<v Speaker 2>But you still ruin her life here no matter what

1125
00:52:38.440 --> 00:52:41.679
<v Speaker 2>happens at that point. Catch that, Yeah, I fucking caught

1126
00:52:41.719 --> 00:52:45.800
<v Speaker 2>that goddamn rape apologist. The hardest part for I think

1127
00:52:45.840 --> 00:52:48.360
<v Speaker 2>our hearts today to get through is the idea that

1128
00:52:51.119 --> 00:52:54.440
<v Speaker 2>God is the rightful judge of mankind and that you know,

1129
00:52:54.519 --> 00:52:56.880
<v Speaker 2>even though you know he's like, you can't just co

1130
00:52:57.039 --> 00:52:59.639
<v Speaker 2>kill people. This is wrong. There are times where God

1131
00:52:59.760 --> 00:53:02.639
<v Speaker 2>brings of flood, God destroys sodom and Gomorrah, or God

1132
00:53:02.719 --> 00:53:06.639
<v Speaker 2>commands go in and bring my judgment down on those people,

1133
00:53:06.840 --> 00:53:09.920
<v Speaker 2>and it has happened very small number of times throughout

1134
00:53:09.960 --> 00:53:10.559
<v Speaker 2>human history.

1135
00:53:10.599 --> 00:53:12.719
<v Speaker 3>The passage that you read to prove that it wasn't

1136
00:53:12.800 --> 00:53:16.280
<v Speaker 3>sex slavery was literally part of the law. It wasn't

1137
00:53:16.280 --> 00:53:19.239
<v Speaker 3>about a specific time. It was the general rule for

1138
00:53:19.360 --> 00:53:21.800
<v Speaker 3>how war is to be done and how prisoners of

1139
00:53:21.800 --> 00:53:24.320
<v Speaker 3>that war are to be treated. What's more, you didn't

1140
00:53:24.360 --> 00:53:26.639
<v Speaker 3>address the fact that it wasn't just about how it's

1141
00:53:26.679 --> 00:53:30.639
<v Speaker 3>sex slavery, it's about how it's child sex slavery. How

1142
00:53:30.679 --> 00:53:32.920
<v Speaker 3>do you think the Israelite army determined whether or not

1143
00:53:32.960 --> 00:53:35.440
<v Speaker 3>a woman had lain with a man before You think

1144
00:53:35.480 --> 00:53:37.159
<v Speaker 3>they were stopping to look for the hymen in the

1145
00:53:37.159 --> 00:53:39.920
<v Speaker 3>middle of their battle. No, it would simply be that

1146
00:53:40.119 --> 00:53:42.800
<v Speaker 3>young enough girls were assumed to have not had sex.

1147
00:53:43.039 --> 00:53:46.239
<v Speaker 3>And since we love context, the cultural context there was

1148
00:53:46.239 --> 00:53:48.880
<v Speaker 3>that girls typically got married around age twelve or thirteen.

1149
00:53:48.960 --> 00:53:52.519
<v Speaker 3>So the most generous interpretation here is that thirteen year

1150
00:53:52.559 --> 00:53:54.679
<v Speaker 3>old children were given a month to get over the

1151
00:53:54.719 --> 00:53:57.519
<v Speaker 3>death of their parents before being forced into a marriage

1152
00:53:57.559 --> 00:53:59.400
<v Speaker 3>with one of the people that was responsible for their

1153
00:53:59.440 --> 00:54:03.320
<v Speaker 3>parents' death. And, as I predicted, Mike included as part

1154
00:54:03.320 --> 00:54:05.480
<v Speaker 3>of his justification here the idea that this is not

1155
00:54:05.559 --> 00:54:08.039
<v Speaker 3>a command of how to behave, but a story about

1156
00:54:08.039 --> 00:54:11.679
<v Speaker 3>a time when this thing happened, which doesn't actually justify it.

1157
00:54:11.920 --> 00:54:14.639
<v Speaker 3>And since it's a command from God, presumably such a

1158
00:54:14.639 --> 00:54:17.920
<v Speaker 3>command could still be given today, which is a terrifying thought.

1159
00:54:18.360 --> 00:54:22.039
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, gross, Mike, that's it for this one. Today's

1160
00:54:22.039 --> 00:54:24.039
<v Speaker 3>comment to the day comes to us from David Ducharme,

1161
00:54:24.119 --> 00:54:27.559
<v Speaker 3>who says consent must always be enthusiastic and unanimous in

1162
00:54:27.639 --> 00:54:30.159
<v Speaker 3>every situation. This was on a video of mine from

1163
00:54:30.199 --> 00:54:32.719
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty two, and I don't remember the context, but

1164
00:54:32.760 --> 00:54:34.800
<v Speaker 3>I feel like Mike needs a reminder of this fact.

1165
00:54:35.039 --> 00:54:37.079
<v Speaker 3>The women who were prisoners of war in the Bible

1166
00:54:37.239 --> 00:54:40.400
<v Speaker 3>were likely not giving enthusiastic consent in the scenario laid

1167
00:54:40.400 --> 00:54:42.559
<v Speaker 3>out by the laws regarding captive women that Mike read

1168
00:54:42.599 --> 00:54:46.119
<v Speaker 3>from the power dynamic present there makes that all but impossible.

1169
00:54:46.440 --> 00:54:49.000
<v Speaker 3>So please, Mike, learn a thing or two about consent

1170
00:54:49.079 --> 00:54:52.239
<v Speaker 3>before you start trying to defend immoral Bible passages. Thanks

1171
00:54:52.239 --> 00:54:54.119
<v Speaker 3>for watching. I'll be back next Friday with more, but

1172
00:54:54.119 --> 00:54:55.679
<v Speaker 3>if you need to get your unofix in before then,

1173
00:54:55.719 --> 00:54:57.920
<v Speaker 3>I livestream with service every Wednesday, eight thirty Eastern on

1174
00:54:57.960 --> 00:55:00.480
<v Speaker 3>my other channel, The Watering Hole. Thanks to Tim Robertson

1175
00:55:00.480 --> 00:55:03.000
<v Speaker 3>for being my patroon and sponsorship Smander, thanks to Piper

1176
00:55:03.039 --> 00:55:05.400
<v Speaker 3>for editing my videos, and special thanks as always to

1177
00:55:05.440 --> 00:55:09.719
<v Speaker 3>my patrons, Sam Stangler, Tarik Sharif, Chad Fertig and Kenneth

1178
00:55:09.800 --> 00:55:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Muehler Peterson and all the rest who are the contexts

1179
00:55:12.920 --> 00:55:15.000
<v Speaker 3>that is left out by the apologists? That is my channel.

1180
00:55:15.360 --> 00:55:17.559
<v Speaker 3>If you'd like me to explain why you are so

1181
00:55:17.679 --> 00:55:20.480
<v Speaker 3>important while simultaneously ignoring you, you can join us on

1182
00:55:20.519 --> 00:55:22.159
<v Speaker 3>Patreon for as little as just a dollar per week

1183
00:55:22.159 --> 00:55:24.320
<v Speaker 3>over at patreon dot com, slash vice Rhino, or by

1184
00:55:24.360 --> 00:55:25.880
<v Speaker 3>supporting the channel in one of the other methods that

1185
00:55:25.920 --> 00:55:27.719
<v Speaker 3>can be found at links dot vice rhino dot com,

1186
00:55:27.760 --> 00:55:29.679
<v Speaker 3>which is also where you'll find links to my other projects.

1187
00:55:29.719 --> 00:55:31.199
<v Speaker 3>Yif for whatever reason you want to send me stuff

1188
00:55:31.199 --> 00:55:34.199
<v Speaker 3>my pobox addresses in the description, see you next time.

1189
00:56:02.159 --> 00:56:07.239
<v Speaker 3>I should not have political political influence. Political is why

1190
00:56:07.320 --> 00:56:10.280
<v Speaker 3>y'all need to vote for the not stop it? Stop

1191
00:56:10.280 --> 00:56:17.719
<v Speaker 3>it literally my editor interrupting my recording by texting me

1192
00:56:17.880 --> 00:56:24.039
<v Speaker 3>how dare they? I could just put my phone on silent?

1193
00:56:25.079 --> 00:56:29.199
<v Speaker 3>What if she doesn't want to be Matt, Matt, this

1194
00:56:29.360 --> 00:56:33.679
<v Speaker 3>is Mike. They're both shit if for whatever you've read that,

1195
00:56:33.760 --> 00:56:36.559
<v Speaker 3>but fuck off, fucking porky pig that one
