Speaker 1: The Rush Hour with James Golden entertaining and informative.
Speaker 2: On the Red Apple podcast network.
Speaker 3: Tomorrow, the Secretary of Homeland Security will hold a briefing
to outline his department's recent work confirming cyber vulnerabilities in
our electronic voting systems.
Speaker 4: They are bad.
Speaker 3: We're in the process of informing governors, senators, and members
of Congress of potential issues in their states. If you
look at voting today, it's in such bad shape in
so many states, and we are committing to fix it.
And we're also committing to be working with those states
and local jurisdictions to help them fix and patch known
technical vulnerabilities before the midterm elections. We have very important
elections coming up. We want those elections to be honest.
I've also ordered DHS to notify every state about non
citizens on their voter rolls and direct them to remove
all ineligible voters from the lists immediately. But most importantly,
addressing this crisis of election security, demands that Congress must
pass the Save America Act.
Speaker 4: That, of course from the speech last night President Donald J. Trump.
Several networks did not carry it, two of them that
do not own the public airwaves. Do not own the
airwaves that they broadcast from. ABC and NBC chose not
to air CNN didn't. But CNN is not governed by
FCC rules concerning on air over transmits because their cable
outlet rules are different. ABC Network, Television Network, and NBC
Network act as if they own the public airwaves and
they get to decide for the public what's going to happen.
We shall see if there will be any pushback, real
deep pushback beyond words from the administration. Welcome to the
I can't believe it's already Friday edition of both Stanly's
Rush Hour Fastest hour in American media. Ladies and gentlemen.
We have a lot from the Trump speech. We have
a lot from the presser today with DHS Secretary Mark
Wayne Mullen. Also reaction now we knew the reaction was coming.
There's nothing from the hysterical reaction that we're getting from
the mainsteam press. There's nothing from the slanted coverage that
is coming out of the mainstream media. And when I
say slanted, it is full of criticism for Trump. And
but if you read very carefully, the criticism doesn't say,
you know, he lied about it. There's little evidence uses
free just like that little evidence to support. Well, if
there's evidence, and there's some evidence, it would be just
disasy to say there's some evidence that this has taking place,
as it is to say there's little evidence, because what
they're doing is arguing over the quantity of what they perceive,
is the quantity of evidence that they are aware of. So,
for instance, there's a story today and The Hill isn't
among the worst. You have to go to the coverage
from New York Times, Washington Post is the usual suspects
from the Hill. Mullen threatened states as DHS launches widespread
review of elections and they go down, he went, According
to The Hill, Mullen went further than Trump and address
in his address, asserting that foreign adversaries could hack voting machines,
threatening states that refused to partner with his department, and
saying he would use maximum pressure to root out illegally
cast votes. What's wrong with that, By the way, he's
head of Homeland Security. He called Trump said, you heard
the quote that the machines are vulnerable. Mullin, ray's the
specter of hackers entering in systems to manually change votes.
Something the US intelligence community has concluded has never happened.
Voting machines are not connected to the Internet and are
not backed up by paper ballots, according to the Hill,
who apparently has examined every single voting machine in the
country the way that they've been deployed in every single election.
He also said that election officials will pay a price
if they refuse to cooperate with DHS. We're not trying
to get into anything else. Well, you know, we have Mullen.
We can listen to his own words if the states participate.
What's an issue here, folks, are the assertions that have
been made by both Trump and Mark Wayne Mullen. The
Hill goes on to say, for instance, Mullen spent much
of the press conference exploring the possibility that non citizens
might vote in elections, even though studies have found instances
are incredibly rare. Once again, the argument is not that
it doesn't happen, that there is no evience. According to
the Hill, it's incredibly rare. As if the Hill and
those reporting from the Hill know for a fact what
has happened in every single state in every single election,
to conclude that it is rare and they don't know
because we have never had the kind of once over
of all the election that has taking place. On a
forensic level, it has not happened. So they may surmise,
and by the way, they may be right, but they
don't know with certainty that that is rare. The left
leaning Brennan Center for Justice found thirty instances of non
citizen voting out a two point three million votes after
it when it reviewed the twenty sixteen election many Meanwhile,
the conservative Heritage Foundation found twenty four instances voting over
twenty four a twenty year period between two thousand and
three and twenty twenty three. However, even as Mullen argued
that two hundred and eighty seven thousand non citizens may
be registered to vote, a figure for which Trump officials
have provided little evidence, and there we go to little evidence,
that number was eclipsed by the number of dead voters
four hundred thousand, he claimed, are still on the road. Well,
wait a minute. This organization can tell us what has
happened with certainty something, but they can't tell us for
sure what is happening with dead voters. And as for
this non citizens voting, I will remind you that are
there is a push among Democrats to register non citizens
to vote in municipal elections. With the way that registrations
are conducted, who has vetted every single registration that has
come through who, what one organization, what one government entity?
Where you send out all these people alleging I will
also remind you of motive voter, motive voter, which the
Democrats implemented over the objections of people who at the
time said this is going to lead to voter fraud.
I was there when it would happen. We were discussing
it on the Russian The Bar Show, and it was happened.
Rush talked about motive voter and the potential for voter
fraud over twenty years ago, and it was a big
deal as more and more push states pushed for motive
voter because we understood then the potential. And here's what
some states have done. Some states have issued driver's license
to people without specifying on those driver's licenses that they
are not citizens of the United States, that they are
here illegally. And at the same time that you get
your driver's license, the state pushes you to register to vote.
So how many are there, we don't know. And this
why isn't this fact. Why aren't these things that I
just laid out here about motive voter, Why the suspicions?
Why do all of these mainstreams so called journalists never
discuss why people are really concerned and the history of
the concern over American elections. The Hill didn't do it here,
The New York Times doesn't do it, the Washington Post.
How does a guy on talk radio remember these details
about what happened? And not a single person from the
New York Times, apparently, not a single person from the
Washington Post, not a single person that works at the
Hill remembers what the arguments were about when these programs
were implemented. Now, when you talk about Mark Wayne Mullen
and all of this, cut three, go ahead and just
let it five from his pressure today.
Speaker 5: So, first of all, Department Homeme Security, we've identified two
hundred and fifty thousand non citizens registered to vote in
just four states. Mind you, we have forty six other states,
and just four states. We've identified two hundred and fifty
thousand non citizens registered to vote in California, in Pennsylvania,
New Jersey, and Nevada. We also worked with Proactive States
to identify twenty eight thousand non citizens on their voter rolls,
plus four hundred thousand individuals that are still registered to
vote that are deceased. Now those twenty are these twenty
three states they proactively work with us on the same program.
That's Georgia, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, North Carolina, Idaho, Alabama, Missouri, Louisiana, Kansas, Arkansas, Wyoming, Montana, Iowa, Florida,
South Dakota, Indiana, Arizona, South Carolina, Utah, Nebraska, Michigan, and
my great home state of Oklahoma.
Speaker 4: Now here's the thing, and this also isn't being amplified.
Those numbers two hundred a quarter million people in just
four states, four of the fifty states, including California Pennsylvania.
Why are they import California's biggest electoral college state in
the country. Pennsylvania all ways, a state that ends up
in court because of their because of their Democrat system,
where judges step in to overturn what was election law
and decide that people can send in ballots well after
the election and over the objections of the legislature who
wrote election law. In Pennsylvania, Democrat elected judges ignore election law.
Something else. The New York Times doesn't mention something else.
The Hill doesn't mention something else. The Washington Post doesn't
mention the history of Democrats who run these states and
the way that they have acted in elections. Something that
people on talk radio discuss, but not something that's discussed
in the mainstream outlets. You're certainly not going to hear
it on the ABC television network because they won't even
air the president's speech. You won't hear it on the
NBC television network because they won't air the president's speech.
You're not gonna get it on CE and N because
they may not even know we're gonna take a break.
Something else that came up that a real quick line
real ID isn't sufficient, you know why, because Democrats have
fooled around and made real ID incapable of telling you
whether the person that has it is an illeal alien
or not in some states. Something else the press doesn't
tell you. James Goldin's thirty fastest hour in American media,
Keep it right here, don't go away.
Speaker 1: The Rush Hour with James Golden entertaining and informative on
the Red Apple podcast Network. The Rush Hour with James Golden,
entertaining and informative, on.
Speaker 2: The Red Apple Cast Network.
Speaker 4: Ladies and gentlemen, this is again Mark Wayne Mullin, and
this will go directly to something that I just discussed here.
You go.
Speaker 5: Real ID does not prove citizenship and does not give
you the right to vote. You must be a US
citizen and you must be eligible to vote. Before and
after the election, we will scrub all election records looking
for illegal aliens and those who are an eligible to vote,
including those that somehow voted yet they were deceased. If
you're illegal, an attempted to vote, or you tried to
vote illegally for someone else, we will find you and
we will charge you illegal voter restoration and illegal voting.
Both carried penalties up to five years in prison and
up to two hundred and fifty thousand dollars in fine.
We will pursue maximum pressure on this to let you
know we will be proactively looking at early voting, and
then after post election we will continue to scrub all.
Speaker 4: Those that did vote.
Speaker 5: Those states that don't participate with us, they have public
records of those that voted, which is where we found
the two hundred and fifty thousand from the four states
that don't participate with us. We will go through those
records one by one and we will pursue everybody. We
will make sure that people know they can trust our elections.
Speaker 4: This is one of the things it has people upset.
But I want to go back to that opening statement.
Real ID doesn't tell if you're a citizen. Real ID
doesn't give you the right to vote folks. Real ID,
the idea came after the attacks of nine eleven, two
thousand and one. We are now two thouy twenty six
and this is the first year that supposed real ID
went into effect and real ID still isn't real because
it doesn't biometrically tell people who you are. It doesn't
tell you, it doesn't use the latest in technology. Twenty
five years after nine to eleven, real ID is still
not one hundred percent real. And this is because Democrats
don't want it to be real for a reason.
Speaker 1: The Rush Hour with James Golden entertaining and informative on
the Red Apple podcast Network. The Rush Hour with James
Golden entertaining and informative on the.
Speaker 2: Red Apple podcast Network.
Speaker 4: The critics, of course, were out there, including gasm the Great,
Gavin Newsom Well.
Speaker 6: The only thing missing tonight, Donald Trump's speech was tinfoil.
This was a legitimate twenty fifth Amendment moment, the ramblings
of a mad king.
Speaker 4: Don't get me wrong.
Speaker 6: Foreign interference in our elections. That's the real thing. Nothing
about what you watched tonight, though.
Speaker 4: Was real. It's make believe.
Speaker 6: He wants to rig the election in twenty twenty six.
He knows he's going to lose. He needs to rig
the election before one vote was cast. That's what that
whole thing was about tonight. This is a serious and
profound moment where we can either fall pray to cynicism, fear,
and anxiety, or we can step up and step in,
mobilize organized, not agonized, and turn on and record numbers
this November, and end Donald Trump's presidency as we know it.
Speaker 4: We could do that together. This was the ramblings of
a mad king. Don't get me wrong. There is interference
in elections. There could for an interference. Well, wait a minute,
if there's flid don't get me wrong. Don't get me wrong.
He was right, but he's rambling. Good grief. James Gunlan
is thirting with the hair fastest hour in American media.
So Gavin Newsom wasn't the only one. Now, let's go
to the newscasters Jonathan Carl from the network that did
not bother to carry this speech, yet found their way
to criticize the speech. ABC News cut eleven Jonathan Carl, and.
Speaker 7: The President made some extraordinary allegations. I mean, he said
that our election system, our security is astrophically short. It
dangerously exposes exposed to hacking. When you have no trust,
there is no greatness, and we can't trust our election systems.
But I looking through these that we have a lot
more to look through, I don't see anything that comes
anywhere near making that case. What I see is documents
presented that are intended to raise doubts about our security,
but nothing that suggests there is actually a security issue
with our elections.
Speaker 4: And step right there, step right there, and just hear
what this guy is saying. Number One, he hasn't reviewed
all the documents, but he does have an opinion. His
opinion is on the speech. We didn't carry because we
didn't want to have to. We didn't want to country
to hear it so they could make up their own minds.
So let me, Jonathan Carl, give you my opinion. And
the opinion of ABC News because we will tell you
what to think for their audience rather then let you
hear the news yourself and come to your own conclusions.
And so what he said, well, I didn't see anything
that just says I didn't in the documents that I read,
I didn't see anything that comes near to making the case. Well,
you're saying that comes near. There are things that he
said tell us exactly what would make the case for you,
But you don't do that, and you won't do that.
You will summarize what he said and said, Oh it's
not enough. By the way, I haven't looked at everything yet,
haven't looked at all the documents. But I'm here laying
down for you that this is not worth looking at
it because I haven't examined everything yet like a good newscaster,
I haven't like a good journalist these days. I haven't
looked at the whole case. But here's my opinion on
the case. It's not anything that can even though I've
only read a few of the documents and haven't researched
the damn thing in the documents to tell whether they're
valued or not. It's nothing. This is utter nonsense. This
is not journalism. This is political hackery. And that's what
ABC Television Network has been doing, total political hackery. The
face of the network is Clinton's war room hack George Stephanopolis.
They are achieving network devoted to Democrat Party politics. That's
who they are. They are a Disney news network devoted
to hating Republicans, hating Trump, and making sure that they
don't give you news that would be beneficial toward anybody
that has an opinion other than the Democrat Party. They
are not a trusted source of news. You gotta this guy, Well,
I haven't gone through all of it yet, the data
that was presented, but I can tell you there's nothing here.
Then shut up. And then you have Mark Warner. Well, wa,
whoa whoa. CBS they're the network that did actually cover it.
But before they covered it, the guy made a big
speech about, well, you know, Prince falls claimed blah blah blah,
but we're gonna cover anyway. They covered it, so I'm
gonna limit my criticism of them. But this is their
report from Ed o'keef afterwards, cut fourteen afterwards, ladies and gentlemen,
and here you go.
Speaker 8: One of the questions many Americans will have at home
tonight is when so much is going on in the country,
with prices, with war and Iran, with wildfire smoke. People
can hardly breathe across multiple states of this hour, and
the President is drawing the nation's attention to.
Speaker 4: Step right there, stuff right there. There is always news
going on. So this guy comes up his opening with
so much going on in the word. That's your damn
job to report all the stuff that's going on. So
if all the other stuff is going on, then the
president shouldn't talk about what he's talking about. Elections don't
matter because we've got wildfire because Canada is trying to
burn up and send us their smoke, so we shouldn't
talk about our elections. By the way, World Cup game
might be affected by the smoke. And I just saw
a post that was sent to me a text I
didn't have time to read it that Donald Trump is
talking to go about additional tariffs on Canada if they
don't start controlling their wildfires and the smoke coming over here,
which I just love. I had to read that one
later anyway, So Ed O'Keefe, we do everything going on,
this damn president chooses to talk about an election. How
dare he We've got wildfires going on. Really, you guys
managed to do a bunch of news stories, not just one.
Because one thing is going on, you talk about other things.
With all the stuff going on, Why can't the president
of the United States, and let's continue this subject?
Speaker 9: Why, especially with a fresh violence is tonight and fast
the Middle East? There are a few reasons for this, Tony,
according to the White let can stap it again.
Speaker 4: I'm sorry, that's right, especially with fresh violence across the
Middle East. Why is he talking about elections?
Speaker 10: We've got violence in the Middle We have had violence
in the Middle East for two thousand plus years. We
shouldn't talk about anything because there's violence going on in
the Middle East.
Speaker 4: Guess what, pal There's violence going on in New York
City every freaking day. Have you been to Chicago on
a weekend, there's violence. Have you been out to ghetto
Los Angeles on the weekend, there's violence. Have you been
out to ghetto Hot Atlanta on the weekend, there's violence.
Have you been up the ghetto Philly on the weekends
and during the week there's violence continued? Please?
Speaker 9: Oh, it's a classic political base building exercise. Presidents do
this in even number of years to try to bring
out their base. And while it has been, as you said,
a personal concern of the president's he talks about on
a regular basis, it also is for his most loyal supporters,
and he's trying to remind them that it remains a
concern of his and that he's trying to do things
to address those concerns. Part of that is pushing Congress
to pass a national voting standards law that would establish
federal voter ID and citizenship verification, despite the fact the
Constitution calls on states to manage and carry out elections.
Critics of the presidents, some who used to work for
him and Democrats, especially over the last several months, but
especially again today, are saying this is also designed to
start laying the groundwork for the possible deployment of federal agents,
military troops, or other federal intervention at polling sites across
the country or in key states that are holding some
of the most competitive elections. We'll see if the President
addresses that in his remarks tonight, Tony.
Speaker 4: That was before the speech, and so which here's what
you have, it's you chaff, he's what you have. Here's
a chaff a conspiracy theory on CBS News before they
go full conspiracy. Here's what Maney credits. Do they think
he's gonna send them federal troops in to the elections
And this is all lay on the groundwork. He just
why don't you just go ahead and say for martial
law because that's what the rest of the kop sett believes. Man,
these guys have have these guys have They're off the
deep end in the mainstream. They are off on the
deep end. But here's the one. Here's the thing, folks,
with all the stuff, and I don't mean to get
so hot and bothered about it, but this so called journalism,
this is just ugly non journalist journalism, non journalism journalism.
It's ugly. But here's the thing that isn't ugly. Everybody
with common sense. Look, eighty percent of Americans, over eighty
percent Americans just want yeah, yeah, we should have voter ID.
It's not a complicated. It's not a complicated argument for them.
They don't need all this stuff. They understand we should
have voter ID. They get it. The people get it.
The only ones that don't get it, the only ones
that don't want it, are elected Democrats and all these
people in the news media, and that's it. And these
people are hell bent. You hear the lens. They go
to every single one of these networks. They are going
to obscene lens to make Trump out to be some
crazy and by extension, they're trying to make you out
to be some crazy. You're crazy to want voter ID.
You're crazy because maybe you think that a month is
too long to have an election going on, and some
of you remember election days, so you must be crazy.
You're crazy to think that that us mail them all
these people with their hands on ballots isn't a good idea.
But no, it's not them. You're the one that's crazy,
according to them. But every one of you knows that
this stuff doesn't make any sense. That no country that
wanted to tell us people we have the most secure elections,
and yeah, we cut down on every way possible to
think that people can't cheat. Everybody knows that if you
want to make sure that people can't cheat, you typen
up the rules to make sure the cheaters can't cheat.
Everybody knows, except these people pretend they don't know. The
people at ABC Television network pretend they don't know. The
journalists over at c CBS are pretending they don't know
even though they covered the speech. Got to hand it
to them. The people at NBC hopeless, cause that's a
network that I see going back to to NBC in
my mind, because that was a network that I started
watching election coverage with with Jet Huntley and David Brinkley,
and I guarantee you that both of those journalists would
be appalled at what their network has become, and they'd
be a pall that we're even arguing about something so
stupid as having voter ID in this climate. I would
believe that based on the kind of people that they were,
NBC has totally destroyed what used to be you know,
I mean, CBS was the Tiffany network, NBC was was
a credible network, and ABC at the time was a
young upstart, but they were whatever, and then they went
through their period of you know, you can trust may.
All American journalism is from the mainstream television networks is
in the crapper. These people do not deserve to be
watched with the sense that they are presenting credible news,
because they are not. When you can get more factual
information from people that have no degree in journalism, who
just follow the news and talk about it, but yet
can give you a firmer basis of history and how
these things came to be. Then you get from your
so called experts in mainstream journalism, you know that journalism
in this country is in the crapper. When we get back,
it's time for Clip of the day, and you're gonna
want to be here for Clip of the day. Don't
go away.
Speaker 1: The Rush Hour with James entertaining and informative on the
Red Apple Podcast Network. The Rush Hour with James Golden
entertaining and informative on the Red Apple Podcast Network.
Speaker 2: The clip of the day you want to hear it.
Speaker 1: Is the clip of the day.
Speaker 4: Ladies and gentlemen, the search may be over for the
replacement for Graham Platinum now. If they had a debate
in Maine last night and one candidate stole the show.
The candidate's name is Ashley Webb. I urge you, ladies
and gentlemen, to look at the picture if you have
access to Internet, that Ashley Webb put out of herself
or and what she looked like in the debate. If
she is the appropriate word to use here. The candidate
was asked the questions. The clip of the day is
actually a combination of various clips that we are going
to run together. Here is possibly the replacement for Graham Platner,
transgendered candidate Democrat Ashley Webb.
Speaker 9: Actually, Web, what qualifications do you have to serve in
the US Senate?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 11: I ran for office several times, didn't win, but they
didn't run. And then I'm a songwriter and then I
write my own books, and then I suppose my transparent
and see it, I wouldn't lie to the people, and
I wouldn't deceive the people like we're being deceived right now.
Speaker 4: Like let's think of that the web mate, she would
not deceive people.
Speaker 11: I'm a songwriter and then I write my own books
and then suppose my transparent, and see, I wouldn't lie
to the people and I wouldn't deceive the people like
we're being deceived right now, Like we get light smoke,
smoking mirrors, like what's going on with ice? Pretend like
pretending like these victims did something wrong, Like that's unacceptable.
And I suppose the biggest thing is like I'm just
an angry citizen now and if I got elected, I'd
be an angry senator and I think that would probably
be their worst nightmare.
Speaker 4: From more from the hopeful replacement for Platmir Ashley Webb,
and then what with.
Speaker 11: The trans community, like we're being dehumanized. They say that
we want to hurt people. I don't want to hurt anybody.
I just want to use the bathroom and it and
if they want me to use the men's room, I will.
I don't want to be assaulted. I believe they called
it fork bellying. Got out the pork bellying from all
the bills. I'm sure that would say a lot of
money as well.
Speaker 4: But right day come so pork bellying, I think they
call it. And he would get rid of she would
get rid of pork bellying. Oh man, Yeah, Democrats have
a winner there. On this day. In nineteen fifty nine,
ladies and gentlemen, the great iconic Billy Holiday passed away
in New York City cirrhosis of the liver, so only
forty three years old, swindled out of her earnings, had
seventy cent in the bank when she died. One of
the greatest jazz singers ever, Lady Day Billie Holiday on
this day. In nineteen sixty seven, one of the greatest
musicians of the twentieth century passed away, the one, the only,
John Coltrane. He died from liver cancer Huntington Hospital in Huntington,
Long Island, New York, forty years old. His career. So
many people we gotta go. May God bless protect each
and every single one of you, your family's, your loved ones.
Love and gratitude my friends who are being here with me,
allowing me to be with you. God willing back in
the morning at seven am for the Saturday Morning Extravaganza
and help You're with us until then, my friends, I
bid you adieu bye.
Speaker 2: Thanks for listening to bo Strdley's Rush Hour. You can
hear bos Nerdley's Rush Hour weekdays at four on seventy
seven WABC.
Speaker 4: If you like the.
Speaker 8: Podcast, share it with your friends and listen anytime at
WABC radio dot com and download the WABC Radio app.
Speaker 1: Subscribe on all major podcasts platforms, Plus follow WABC on
social on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and X
Speaker 2: See you next time for a new episode, so you
never have to wonder what the heck is going on
here