Speaker 1: What's up everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Epstein Chronicles. Andrew Lowney, who is a historian and an author,
offered up some information about Prince Andrew's alleged criminal behavior
to the authorities in the UK. And even after that
evidence was offered up, the authorities in the UK decided,
after what appears to be a cursory glance at the evidence,
to shut down any investigation into former Prince Andrew and
any of his alleged crimes when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein.
So today we have an article from Newsweek getting into
the weeds a bit. So I'll keep the winging to
a minimum here and we'll just dive right in headline
Former Prince Andrew author offered new evidence to National Crime Agency.
This article was authored by Jack Royston. Andrew Lowney, author
of best selling biography of Andrew Mountbatten. Windsor, said he
offered new material about the former Prince to the UK
National Crime Agency and told Newsweek he is concerned that
no one's come forward to speak to him. I mean,
at the very least, you'd think somebody would come forward
and be like, hey, we got this information, do you
want to sit down and give us a statement that
would seem to be the right way to go right
under normal circumstances. But as we all know, nothing about
this shit is normal. It's about as abnormal as abnormal gets.
It's about as normal as Norman Bates. Mount Baton Winsor
was stripped of his prince titles in October over his
friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and allegations from Virginia Roberts, who
sued the royal in twenty twenty one. Roberts said that
she was trafficked by Epstein and Glenn Maxwell to London,
New York and the US Virgin Islands in two thousand
and one and made to have sex with Mount Baton Winsor,
the Joe Exotic of the Windsor family, who has always
denied the allegations. Oh yeah, what's he going to do?
Admit it? Well, you see what happened there, lad was
I was chewing on my stiff up a lip and
I happened to fall into this situation where I was
with Glenn Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. I mean, come on, man,
nobody buys any of your bullshit. Oh, I was at
the pizza joint and woking. I was here. I was there. No,
you were exactly where that picture said you were in
that Belgravia home with an underage Virginia Roberts. Them's the
facts only, and no matter how much you try and
hide from the facts or the truth, the truth is
the truth. He settled Robert's lawsuit, in which he was
accused of rape in twenty twenty two for an undisclosed
sum without admitting liability. Roberts died in April after what
her family described as a suicide. So without admitting liability,
that's certainly a lot to swallow. We're not talking about
somebody that was in a car crash here. We're not
talking about somebody you know that just wants this to
go away and everybody's gonna forget that he was ever
in a lawsuit. We're talking about the rape and trafficking
of an underage girl. Bro, And you're you're just going
to settle out of court. You're not going to fight that.
You're not gonna come out swinging, You're not gonna sue
everybody who says something about you. Well, that tells me
everything I need to know. Now. Of course I'm not
going to sit here and tell you that he's one
hundred percent guilty. We didn't have a trial, but his actions,
his behavior leads me to believe that he's guilty, and
of course the fact that we have a ton of
evidence pointing in that direction. And I think when you
add all of that up, there's no other destination to
arrive at. Lowney's book, entitled The Rise and Fall of
the House of York, caused a wave of news stories
about mount Batten Winsor's relationship with Epstein, his time as
UK Trade Envoy, and his ex wife Sarah Ferguson's lavish
spending habits, among other subjects. The book was published in August,
and there's no doubt that it brought Andrew back to
the forefront of the Epstein conversation, exactly where he belongs.
But there's no way in hell that Andrew himself should
be the only one that feels the burn. Bill Clinton,
Donald Trump, everybody, everybody that was adjacent to this dude
that was hanging out with this dude that has gone
on to lie about this dude and their relationship with them.
Those are the people that we should really be zeroing
in on, because in my opinion, they're the ones with
the most to hide. Not everything he uncovered made it
into the final version. However, for legal reasons, it's commonplace
for lawyers to request changes to books about high profile
public figures, and Epstein is a particularly sensitive subject, which
is crazy on its face. There is so much evidence
backing up a lot of the rumor and innuendo. But
the truth is a lot of people aren't hip to
that because they've never been exposed to it. A lot
of it has to do with core documents, and, as
you know, not exactly the most glamorous or enjoyable things
to dive into. But if you really want to wrap
your mind around what really happened, if you really want
to hear from people who experienced the suffering at the
hands of Epstein and Maxwell, then you're going to have
to dive into those core documents. And each every day
is like an ongoing saga, right a new update, a
new episode, and if you miss one, you're out of
the loop. That's how much information there is when it
comes to Jeffrey Epstein in his crimes. But the truth
is a lot of it isn't the salacious kind of
information that gets clicks or drives entertainment value. So that's
why a lot of people haven't been familiar with a
lot of this stuff until recently. And even now, not
everybody is talking about core documents. Not everybody is talking
about the actual nexus of where all this information is.
They're still talking about salatious nonsense that really doesn't move
the needle when all is said and done. But when
you dive into those core documents and you start looking
at some of the motions and you start looking at
what was said, I have zero doubt that Prince Andrew
knew that he was cooked, and that's why he accepted
that deal. Lowney said that he's ready to give the
unused material to the NCAA, a law enforcement it that
target serious organized crime. I've also offered my material to
the National Crime Agency about some of Mount Batten Windsor's
activities as special Trade Envoy for stuff we couldn't put
in the book for legal reasons, and no one's come forward,
Lowney told Newsweek, I don't know who to go to.
It doesn't sound like they're very enthusiastic about going there. Oh,
there's no way. Did people really think that the Royals
were going to let Prince Andrew be prosecuted, no chance.
Exile is the best we could hope for. That's what
I've said from the jump, that exile is the best
we could hope for when it comes to Andrew, and
I still believe that today. I don't think he's going
to prison, certainly, not anytime soon, and certainly not for
anything he was doing while he was with Epstein. Now
some of this other stuff, maybe at some point they
might find something that they can't ignore, but as of
right now, that's a pipe dream. I think the most
we're going to see from Andrew is exile. And I
think that exile could be anywhere, honestly. But my guess
is if things go real south for him, he's going
to end up at some Shike's house in insert Middle
Eastern country here. But prison, I think that's a step
way too far. Lowney later explained that he made the
offer publicly and anticipated the NCAA would get in touch
with him. An NCAA spokesperson told Newsweek the NCAA does
not take direct public crime reports. We urge anyone with
information about criminal activity to contact police. Imagine, aren't you
the police? What does that even mean. And if I
was in charge of whatever unit that is, and that
was the commentary that I saw that they were giving
to people about reporting crimes, yeah there'd be some problems now,
I bet you if you went to the NCAA and said, hey,
look so and so is making horrible tweets about so
and so, they'd be there in a minute. But Jeffrey
Epstein his crimes Prince Andrew Ah, no need to get
to that. Nothing to see here for keep it moving.
On Saturday, the Metro Police Service announced it will not
be investigating reports in the Mail on Sunday about an
email Mount Bountain Windsor sent to Buckingham Palace press officer
in twenty eleven, the day before Robert's first newspaper interview
was published. I'm sure it was just a coincidence of
the timing, right. Oh, he had no idea who Virginia was,
but the article was about to be published, and of
course he was contacted by Deli Mal for comment and whatever,
so he knew it was coming. So we tried to
get ahead of it. Hey, let me get a little
bit of dirt on Virginia because this piece is coming
out and I'm going to be outed as the scumbag
I am. So in light of that, I'd like to
get some dirt on this woman, this girl, so that
I can try and destroy her credibility so nobody believes her.
That was the whole point. That was what he wanted
to do. The question is did it happen. Well, We're
never gonna know because the police in London they decided
no investigation is needed. The former Prince's message read, I
would also seem SI Virginia Roberts as a criminal record
in the States. I have given her DOB, date of
birth and social Security number for investigation with redacted. The
Duty Ppo Personal Protection Officer the NPS, commonly referred to
as the MET, is a primary police force for Greater London,
covering all thirty two boroughs except for the City of London,
which has its own force. Its core jurisdiction is local policing,
crime prevention and public order within London, but it also
has national responsibility, including counter terrorism, protection of high profile individuals,
and specialist operations across England and Wales when required. Some
had argued Mountbatten Windsor's request amounted to the criminal offense
of misconduct in a public office and that should face
a full criminal investigation. The NPS initially said in October
when the email was first published they were actively looking
into the reports. Well that was just to you know,
placate people. Oh yeah, we're looking into this. Don't worry,
we're on top of it. We're gonna see what's going
on here. Meanwhile, they're busy sitting back, eating some crumpets
and having some tea. I think it's pretty clear cut,
Lowney said. To just dismiss it so quickly is pretty shocking.
I mean, they're not even going through the motions. And
I think all along we felt that he Andrew has
been protected. I've been on the record saying I thought
he was toast because I thought they would do stuff.
So I'm pretty shocked by this. I can't say too
much more, but I know that one policeman who has
spoken up is under a lot of pressure now and
being sent cease and desist letters by his bosses not
to speak out because he could kind of knowe this. Well,
there's always going to be that kind of pressure, right
If they don't want the story to come out, they're
going to lean on people and they're going to pressure
them to play ball. Newsweek has approached the NPS for comment.
The Crown Prosecution Service, Britain's prosecuting authority, offers an explanation
of misconduct in a public office on its website. The
offense concerned serious wilful abuse or neglect of the power
or responsibilities of the public office held. There must be
a direct link between the misconduct and an abuse of
those powers or responsibilities. The Court of Appeal has made
it clear that the offense should be strictly confined and
it can also raise complex and sometimes sensitive issues. Trying
to get one of your paid flunkies to go after
Virginia is not a bad thing, not something that's criminal,
especially considering he had her Social Security number? How did
he get that? Probably a good question, asked no Day. Davies,
the former head of Royal Protection at the Metropolitan Police,
told mel On Sunday in October, it's time for Scotland
Yard to launch a full criminal investigation into Prince Andrew.
Asking a police officer to investigate an alleged victim is
outside of their due whether that is calling the FBI,
your mates in the US, or searching out themselves to
find out whether someone has a criminal offense that is
in my view a criminal offense. Well, I would say so,
maybe not. You know, a serious crime if you will,
but something that needs to be investigated. Asking a public
servant that includes anyone from the Palace or police to
commit those inquiries is inciting them, aiding and abetting them
to commit misconduct in public office. It should be investigated
and he should be interviewed under caution. Thousand percent Will
it ever happen? Zero chance. Ella Marriott, the NPS Central
Specialist Crime Commander, said in a statement, our thoughts will
always be with Miss Robert's family and friends. Following her death.
In twenty fifteen, the Metropolitan Police Service received allegations relating
to non recent trafficking for sexual exploitation involving Jeffrey Epstein
and Glenn Maxwell. These allegations prime arly concerned events outside
the United Kingdom, with one allegation of trafficking to Central
London in March of two thousand and one. Officers assessed
all available evidence at the time, interviewed the complaintant, Miss
Virginia Roberts, as well as contacting several other potential victims.
This did not result in any allegation of criminal conduct
against any UK based nationals. The mp sought advice from
the Crown Prosecution Service and liaised with United States authorities
who were leading investigation into related matters involving US nationals.
Following this legal advice, it was clear that any investigation
into human trafficking would be largely focused on activities outside
the UK and perpetrators based overseas. Officers therefore concluded in
consultation with CPS that other international authorities were best placed
to progress these allegations. Officers maintained close relations with the
U S and other relevant authorities throughout their investigation to
ensure or any UK matters would be identified and to
consider any support requested. A decision was made in November
of twenty sixteen not to proceed to a full criminal investigation.
That decision was reviewed in August of twenty nineteen and
again in twenty twenty one and twenty twenty two. In
each instance the position remained unchanged and Miss Roberts and
her legal representation were informed. Following recent reportings suggesting that
mister Andrew mount Batten Winsor asked his Met Police Close
Protection officer to carry out checks on Miss Roberts. In
twenty eleven, the NPS has carried out further assessment. This
assessment has not revealed any additional evidence of criminal acts
or a misconduct. The met remains committed to thoroughly assessing
any new information that could assist in this matter. To date,
we have not received any additional evidence that would support
reopening the investigation. In the absence of any further information,
we will be taking no further actions. If any other matter,
should new and relevant information be brought to our attention,
including in any information resulting from the release of material
in the US, we will assess it. So that was
the statement by the police force and the translation, there's
nothing to see here, keep it moving. But the truth
is there's a lot to see here. But in order
to see what's going on, you have to open up
your eyes and actually look. And according to these reports,
that's something that the Metropolitan Police Department has no desire
to do. All right, folks, that's going to do it
for this one. All of the information that goes with
this episode can be found in the description box. What's up, everyone,
and welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. One
of the researchers. Who has done a fantastic job when
it comes to Prince Andrew is author and historian Andrew Lowney,
And of course he's the author of the book entitled
The Rise and Fall of the House of York, and
he has some very very interesting things to say about
Prince Andrew, but a whole host of things Epstein related,
including Malania Trump and how she met Donald. Now, to
be clear, Milania Trump has completely denied the allegations that
she met her husband Donald Trump through Jeffrey Epstein, but
Andrew Lowney and Michael Wolfe, they're pretty adamant about it.
So it's going to be interesting to see which way
that goes. I don't really have an opinion one way
or the other because I don't know. I wasn't there.
I have no idea. Do I find it plausible? Look,
nothing is out of the realm a plausibility here, So
I'm certainly interested to see what they have to offer
as far as evidence moving forward. But as far as
this episode goes, we're going to talk more about Prince
Andrew and what Andrew Lowney had to say in an
interview he gave to USA Today, Like I said today's
article from USA Today and the headline future Epstein files
could spell more trouble for ex Prince Andrew. Yeah, I
would think so, considering how tight these two were. There's
gonna be more. There's always more, right, there's always something
else that hasn't been released yet, another witness, another person
who's willing to come forward. And I think that when
we get more emails, we're gonna have more receipts about
Prince Andrew being breaking news an absolute liar. Like I
told you from the very beginning, this man's a liar.
You have to really be out to lunch to believe
anything that this guy has to say. This article was
authored by Wendy Nagle. When King Charles announced that his
brother Andrew would be stripped of his royal titles and
pushed out of his plush home at Royal Lodge because
of his association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, it
marked an incredible fall from grace. It started well before that,
well before that, anyone paying attention to that Prince Andrew,
or should I say disgrace. Prince Andrew was an absolute chum,
and not just because of his Epstein dalliances, but just
the way that he manipulated the system, the way that
he used tax payer money to live this lavish life
while the English people are lucky to have their heat on.
And remember the people over in the UK, they're paying
a shit ton of money in taxes, so that money
is being spent on Prince Andrew to go to New Mexico,
to go to Zoro Ranch and hang out with Bill
Richardson and the boys. Yeah, people are going to be pissed.
Well known as Queen Elizabeth's favorite son, the former prince
has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, but the repercussions of his
behavior continue. On Monday, December first, the King's directive, Andrew
Moultbouten Winsor's name was erased from the prestigious Order of
the Garter and Royal Victorian Order Honors. Ah, poor guy
lost his little cost playing roles. Now look in the
old days, I could understand, right, these dudes are going
out to war, you know, going to fucking France to
fight whatever. It might be cool give them their titles.
But this absolute clown, he doesn't deserve to be in
the Order of the trash picker Uppers never mind the
fucking royal order of this or that? But will this
erase the stain on the Royal family? USA Today spoke
to Andrew Lowney, a historian and author of the new
book entitled The Rise and Fall of the House York,
to find out what's next for the Royal family. The
Epstein Files Transparency Act passed, requiring the Department of Justice
to release documents in the Epstein case by December nineteenth.
What do you expect might be revealed about the former Prince?
Andrew Lowney, Well, we don't know. I understand that there's
a lot of material on him. I think there's a
danger that a lot of material won't be released. We've
already seen quite a few revelations, particularly the length of
his association with Epstein. Another lie. So when you have
somebody out here that's just lying out of both sides
of their mouth about everything, why should can we believe
him about anything? We have to be slightly cautious about
him leaving Royal Lodge. He's been given a year to
go out. He's basically digging his heels in to say
that he wants to have a pretty large house on
the Sandringham estate. He wants to have servants, a driver,
a gardener, a housekeeper. So it's not going to be
this fall from grace that everyone's assumed. He's making the
point that he's got a cast iron lease and therefore
he needs to be compensated. Imagine telling the King that
real lucky, I'm not the King. I'd be shown up
over at his house with a goon squad. Hey, boys,
time for him to go pack this motherfucker up right
to the Tower of London. I've had my fill. So
what's been said in public and actually what's happening in
private are two different things. In your book, you detail
that Andrew was photographed with Epstein and Glenn Maxwell at
Donald Trump's mar A Lago and Palm Beach in February
of two thousand. He also played golf with Trump. What
do you think the relationship was between the two men
and how do you think Andrew's fall could ultimately impact
the president. Well, the relationship is good. I mean they
have three common interests, women, golf, and making money. And
Andrew was actually deputized to take care of Trump when
he came on a previous day visit. Trump claims now
that he doesn't know Andrew or who he is. But
there's plenty of evidence to show that they were very close.
And all of that's true, one hundred percent true. And
another lie on Donald Trump's part. This man lies about
everything that has to do with Epstein. Everything. Andrew is
the Queen's favorite son. In your book, you site reporting
that in January of twenty fifteen, three officials put their
concerns about him in writing to the queen. Do you
think those concerns ever really reached the queen or do
you think that she was knowingly protecting her son. I
think the concerns did reach the Queen. They were of
course made by the Private Secretary at the time, and
he kind of told them, actually, there's no point making
these complaints because she's not interested. She just had this
complete blind spot. And I know people didn't want to
hear it at the time, but I told everybody that
the Queen was enabling Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein's bullshit
THEO proxy, and well, here we are. The Queen definitely
holds some responsibility here. She could have stopped Prince Andrew's bullshit.
She could have reigned him in, she could have forced
him to tow the line. But no, she kept protecting
him and kept letting him do whatever he wanted to do.
And so you think the Queen knew the details about
Epstein well before she died and still protected Andrew. Yes,
I have no doubt the Queen was very well informed.
The Queen's household is filled, or the King's household is
filled with former intelligence officials. The private secretary had been
a former military intelligence officer. There are good reasons why
they picked these people. They're discreet and they will know
a lot of secrets, one hundred percent. And if you
think these people around the Queen weren't telling her that
her son was an absolute scumbag, you're crazy. They did.
She heard the rumors. The queen wasn't a lot of
things I could say about the Queen Elizabeth, but dumb
isn't one of them. And she thought she was protecting
the brand when she was protecting Andrew. But the truth
is she did serious damage to the brand. King Charles
formally stripped the titles from his brother, erased his name
from prestigious royal honors. Why do you think it took
Charles so long to act? You're talking about the honors
that have been taken away from him, but they were
actually often given to him after the scandal broke and
nothing was done. Both the Queen and Charles have kind
of got the heads in the sand that the belief
is that the problem will go away, that the news
agenda will move on. That's what they always think. That's
the playbook, right, head to the bunker and wait for
the storm to blow over. Well, this storm is not
blowing over. It's either transparency or we keep going. William
has seen the reputational damage that's been done and that
he needs to get ahead of the story. And that's
why just over a month ago they realize public opinion
was demanding something to happen. And it does tie into Trump.
There's a sense that the elites have operated in their
own interest for far too long and people in power
need to be held to account. I would say that
that's certainly the way people are feeling right now. Enough
is enough, and I think that's what they're so scared of,
because if you take a look around at people who
are you know, finally understanding the true scope of what
Epstein was up to and the people he was doing
it with, it's always the same thing. We had no idea.
We always thought that people were just bullshitting when they
talked about the masters of the universe. Well guess what,
that's what they wanted you to believe. That's why there
was all the confusion. That's why they always have these
countersyops that they run. Oh, this one's the villain, this
one's the bad guy. It's like Pizzagate. That whole entire
thing was put into action to make people fall off
the trail when it comes to Epstein. Start talking about
crazy nonsense, and well everybody get slumped in. Right then
they can call everybody crazy and anybody talking about Epstein
and this cabal if you will, Well, those people are
lumped in with the crazies, and that's how they kill
real discussion around the topic that they don't want people
talking about. In your book, you write about how there
have been tensions between Prince William, Prince Harry and their uncle.
What do you think the boys do about Andrew Epstein
and Virginia. I think certainly William knows a lot. As
the heir of the throne, he would have been briefed.
I've seen documents of briefings, so I don't think there's
a doubt that they were aware of what was going on.
We can see what William's feelings are towards his uncle
just from the Duchess of Kent's funeral. Well, yeah, William
hates Prince Andrew. There is no doubt about it. That
has been well documented for years. Nobody wants uncle touchy
around their kids. There is always hope that Prince William
and Harry will reunite. Do you think that there's any
chance that having this common shared enemy and Andrew might
somehow bring the boys back together. Think there's going to
be anything to bring them back together. They're both very
stubborn and a lot of things have been said that
can't be unsaid. The scandal also swept up Sarah Ferguson.
You detail how he racked up millions in debt and
suggests that Andrew or the Queen pay those debts off.
How much taxpayer money do you think has been spent
supporting Andrew and Fergie's lifestyle over the years. The payments
for Sarah's debts and the payment to Roberts came out
of the private funds, So I don't think that was
taxpayer's money, But I think over the years, it had
been difficult to quantify what has been spent on their security,
on taking jets when they could have gone commercial flights,
taking helicopters when they could have gone by car. Well,
that's typical, unfortunately to say, but that's typical of politicians
and the elite, while the rest of us grind take
the subway, uber walk, ride a bike, whatever, they're taking
helicopters for a five minute drive. Oh and by the way,
as the taxpayer, you're on the hook for that. But
the truth is most of us are willing to overlook that.
What we're not willing to overlook is the fact that
you know, you're allegedly abusing traffic girls. That's pretty much
where the whole entire civilized world draws the line. This
is why there needs to be more transparency about royal finances.
We need to know what the costs are. But I
think the Palace realizes it would lead to a revolt
because there is a concern that the royals are not
providing value for the money. Some like Princess and work
extremely hard. Others are not, and that is affecting their popularity. Well,
let's be real, work really hard. As a royal What
going to appearances, showing up somewhere and waving make them
pretend you care about people enough already with the whole
royal thing, Andrew no longer has palace protection. What does
that mean? Can he actually be investigated, charged or even imprisoned.
He has been cut loose because they're worried that charges
might be brought against him. They don't want the reputational damage.
He was the kind of infected limb that was affecting
the rest of the body. There are two grounds on
which he could be charged. One on the sexual trafficking,
which was looked at three times by the Metropolitan Police.
Thought there was nothing there to be seen, and I
think there's a strong case being made that this needs
to be looked at again. Well, look, if you look
at something and don't want to find something, you're not
going to find it. That's why when people bring up
the investigation into Epstein it makes me laugh. The investigation
was tailored to not find anything. So people like Alan
Dershowitz that rely on that stupid ass investigation that occurred, bro,
come on. That might work with your base and people stupid,
but that doesn't work with normal people who understand how
this all goes down. And I don't know about you,
but I've had my fill of these so called elites
trying to bullshit me. There's also the financial misdemeanors. Emails
have been found that he tried to get information on
Roberts and Smerr. That is an offense under the miscondom
in public office, with life imprisonment as one of the penalties. Jeez,
that's pretty crazy. I doubt that'll happen. And frankly, I
don't think Prince Andrew is going to be tried at all,
but the fact that the conversation's even happening certainly progress,
so I think that he may well be charged. I
don't think he's ever going to spend any time in prison.
I think rather like Juan Carlos of Spain, the former
king who fled to Abu Dhabi following corruption allegations. He'll
make a midnight flight to the Middle East and there
are no extradition treaties between Baran and Britain. Imagine he
did that shit. This dude actually bounced and went to
a different country because he was scared that he was
going to be extradited. Tell me you're guilty without telling
me you're guilty. It does seem that if you were
to flee the country, it would be an admission of guilt.
And he has always denied any wrongdoing. We've got to
say that he denies the allegations, but the fact is
that he's not cooperated with any of the victim's lawyers
or law enforcement agencies for the last fifteen years. And
that's true. If you were innocent, if you had something
to say, you would have set it by now. This
man is not innocent in my opinion, Do you think
that the palace can recover? Can Prince William start his
reign with a clean slate? Yes? I think as long
as they deal with this problem, cut Andrew loose and
the public is satisfied that justice is being served. William,
Kate and the young family are very popular. I think
people are very much in step with what they want
to do, which is much more focused monarchy, working on
a few good deeds rather than more pomp and ceremony. Well,
that would be nice, do something for the English people
instead of them doing everything for you. We want the monarchy.
We've seen how effective it can be in bringing the
nation together. The soft power for example when Donald Trump
was over. There's broad support for the monarchy, but it
does need to reform. Ironically, Andrew may be the person
to bring that change. Well, look, I hope so for
the monarchy's sake, but as far as I'm concerned, I
don't see a need for it. Again, I'm just some
American idiot, though, and you know it's not my tradition,
So I'm not gonna sit here and say, oh, the
monarchy should go away tomorrow. That's a decision for the
English people. But in my personal opinion, I don't know
why anybody looks at anyone who calls themselves royals or
whatever and thinks they're any better than the rest of us.
Cool story, bro, you hit the genetic lottery by being
born into that family. Great. They act like that's some
kind of flex, like they earned it. But the truth
is all Prince Andrew has ever earned is a disgrace
that he now finds himself in. All of the information
that goes with this episode can be found in the
description box.