Speaker 1: What's going on. Thank you so much for listening to
this podcast. It is heard live every day from noon
to three on WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you
want exclusive content like invitations to events, the weekly live stream,
my daily show prep with all the links, become a patron,
go to dpekclendershow dot com. Make sure you hit the
subscribe button. Get every episode for free right to your
smartphone or tablet. And again, thank you so much for
your support.
Speaker 2: It might be a chance of from now now.
Speaker 3: I almost said it, didn't I And if you say it,
you kind of curse it if you're down at the
coaster about anywhere North Carolina lore as my friend JOBASTARTI
would say. And he's a fascinating weather scientist.
Speaker 2: He's a North count law.
Speaker 3: If you hear thunder in the winter, then nine ten
days later or something like that, you get snow.
Speaker 2: My mother used to say that, oh, there was thunder
the beach. We're gonna get snow.
Speaker 3: Probably not, mom, it's the beach, Probably not gonna, but
sometimes it does. So if you look at weather forecasting,
which is akin to no Stradamian crystal ball looking in things,
it's witchcraft in a way. I'll say that because I can.
It's witchcraft.
Speaker 2: Then there are some weather enzombs.
Speaker 3: There are European models, and there are US models, and
there are model models, and there are lots of models
and no models that walk down catwalks in weather, but
lots of models that try to get it right but
they don't. They are kind of congruous that it's going
to get very, very cold in the Charlotte Mecklenburg area.
In fact, all the way down into Florida. They're looking
at the potential of a frieze for the citrus crops
in Florida. It could be very damaging. Now, in addition
to that, there are several ensembles, for lack of a
better word, you know, the spaghetti models you see when
you see the hurricanes.
Speaker 2: Everybody has a prediction about which the storm is gonna do.
Speaker 3: There are spaghetti adjacent models that show quite a bit
of wind tree stuff heading into the area in that timeframe,
so somewhere after the eighth of January, and that that
cold weather pattern could persist as nineteen eighty five or
eighty three in the Tennessee, are even that a lot
of cold The way the jet stream is that a
lot of different things are going to come together and
we would have a real winter here.
Speaker 2: In North Carolina. Just throwing that out there. I'm not
going to read a lot of details. There's a lot
you can look for yourself.
Speaker 3: Look at it and go check things out for yourself
and find it. Now I get a little I get
a little happy about that. I love winter weather. If
you could put me on skis and throw me out there,
I would love, love, love to have a good time.
But we'll see, I don't get that opportunity much because
of where I live, and so I and look, I
grew up in Puerto Rico. You know when we had
snow never, you know, we had below freezing never. You
know when he got into the fifties, never, never when
I was there, did again. I remember we would go
to the beach in the you know, in December, January,
February and now the perto Ricans would look at us
like we were crazy, and it was just lovely. Well
for Puerto Ricans, it was like upper seventies. That's too cold.
Speaker 2: Too cold.
Speaker 3: Is now turning our attention back to Jimmy Carter for
a minute. We had talked last week about Obama receiving
the Nobel Prize just upon being elected. So the trivia
question for you and that Carter received the a Nobel
Peace Prize for looking at international conflicts.
Speaker 2: And you want to.
Speaker 3: Believe that things like the World Health Organization are not political.
You want to believe that places like the UN are
not political.
Speaker 2: They are, And you want to believe that the Nobel
Peace Prize. You want to believe in.
Speaker 3: You know, when you're a kid and you're coming along
and you hear that that's such a great thing, the
Nobel Peace Prize. I guess the guy who invented dynamite
gets a prize named after him, and it rewards great
achievements in humankind. These wonderful, upright primates that communicate with
written and verbal languages, that record history, that are capable
of such horrid things, are also capable of greatness. And
you want to believe that a the Nobel Committee when
it's looking at arts and sciences, and that it really
takes into account all of these things and awards prizes.
So the question for you, if you were to look
back in history from the time the Nobels are created
of any president of any Republican president or vice president,
I don't care. I'm not going to be picky that
ever received the Nobel Peace Prize.
Speaker 2: And it's and you don't. You can google it. It's
obviously easy to google it. But if I were to
just ask you, you wouldn't probably be able to name one.
Speaker 3: And if I were to say how many presidents or
vice presidents received the Nobel Prize, you I've named two
because you knew that Jimmy Carter bec as we mentioned
that in his passing, And you knew Barack Obama because well,
you got elected.
Speaker 2: He didn't do anything for peace?
Speaker 3: Did the Afghan War escalator get did Was there anything
marginally better from a peace standpoint because of Obama's existence.
Speaker 2: In the White House? No, but he got the prize anyway.
But there were other people? Were there any.
Speaker 3: Republicans ever given the Peace Prize since its founding in
nineteen o six? So Theodore Roosevelt got it. First president
to win a Nobel Prize since then.
Speaker 2: I don't know. If he's bull Moose then I think
he may have been.
Speaker 3: But Woodrow Wilson gets it. Democrat Woodrow Wilson for his
efforts in ending the First World War and helping to
create the League of Nations, Which where is that now?
President Jimmy Carter gets it in two thousand and two.
So if you look at the two thousands, is where
it really takes off for the Democrats. Vice President Al
Gore got the Nobel Peace Prize in two thousand and
seven for climate change and his efforts there by the way,
the predictions he made in two thousand and seven were
all wrong, still wrong, even Greta Thunberg, all wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong,
We're supposed to be much worse off than we are.
And then President Barack Obama in two thousand and nine.
So Wilson, Carter, Gore, and Obama get the prize and
that's it. No, No Republicans. No. You would have thought
that maybe Reagan could have for his great I mean
one of the greatest proponents of Pete Peace through Strength,
that was his m His policies directly led to the
tearing down of the Berlin Wall. You would think that
that brought East and West together in a way that
reunited Germany in a way and advanced the cause of
peace in a way that none of those people combined.
Speaker 2: Did none of those did no Bell recognize.
Speaker 3: That, did the committee come together and say, oh, Reagan,
I don't know, did a pretty good job.
Speaker 2: Nope, nothing like that. You would have thought. You would
have thought, or you know, ending Vietnam, I don't know,
they didn't. And that's what makes That's.
Speaker 3: What unfortunately for our children and for history, is that
you want to believe there are these great altruistic groups
out there that recognize humanity's efforts without the ale of
political ideology at work. And it is unfortunate that we
don't because there are a lot of folks on both
sides of the aisle that really do have the interest
of peace. I mean, I would say Ran Paul wanting
to end endless wars and stopping the funding of these
and pointing out the waste of America's resources on endeavors
that have nothing to do with government. The Festivus Report
every year. He's one of the greatest purveyors of peace
in Congress right now. Even on the public health side
of things. This is someone who constantly pushes back against
you know, Fauci and Berks and these people who've been
fundamentally wrong about where the virus came from, how the
money went and got to the Wuhn Institute, what did
Fauci do that benefited himself. All of these things He's
done a remarkable persistent in the face of withering criticism.
In the face of withering criticism, these people persist.
Speaker 2: It's going to be interesting to see.
Speaker 3: I don't know what Trump second term we I know
what he wants it to be, but you will history
allow him to be thought.
Speaker 2: Of fondly or kindly.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: I really don't know.
Speaker 3: I wish, I wish we'll see. I mean, there were
already at the beatification of Obama. They're trying to be
autify Roy Cooper. It's your democrat.
Speaker 2: You know. The road is paved with gold for you.
It is the media loves you. You just have to say,
I'm a Democrat.
Speaker 3: I believe in giving everything away to all causes, all
at once, and you'll be rewarded. You don't have to
be successful at it.
Speaker 1: For over a month now, I have been reminding you
to preserve your precious photos and slides, films and tapes
with creative video. Based in mint Hill, these family heirlooms
hold priceless stories, moments from years past that are irreplaceable.
If you've thought about saving these memories before they fade away.
You are not alone. This is Creative Video's busiest season,
and with the holidays fast approaching, there is no better
time than right now, so you need to hurry imagine
the perfect holiday gift. Memories from past family events captured forever.
Creative Videos Guild Team will professionally transfer your family stories
onto easy to use USB drives or DVDs that won't
deteriorate over time, like the old photos and tapes are
doing right now. Picture it sitting together after a holiday meal,
watching these family favorites, sharing laughs, shedding a few tears,
and telling the stories that make your family uniquely yours.
Get your memories in now and beat the holiday rush.
Visit create a Video dot Com to learn more. That's
create a video dot Com.
Speaker 2: Don't know what your productivity looks like this week.
Speaker 3: I still postulate this is one of the least productive
weeks of the year, following probably the least productive week
of the year. But I hope whatever you're doing, you're
taking stock of where you are, where you're going, and
have some hopes and aspirations and can reflect fondly in
some way upon the past year and think about what's ahead.
I do want to imagine that the news media I love,
and I say that with a little tongue in cheek,
because news meetia is remarkably predictable.
Speaker 2: In the way that it portrays things. If I were
to say, hey, does the.
Speaker 3: News media really project a pro Christian standpoint in any
way ever? And you would say, well no, And I
would say, but but there are times that would When
would it project any kind of pro Christian sentiment?
Speaker 2: Uh? When President Jimmy Carter died? Why? Because President Jimmy
Carter was a Baptist.
Speaker 3: And as much as the news media doesn't really like
Baptist unless they can portray them negatively, they can portray
Jimmy Carter. And NBC News did this just shortly ago.
It says former President Jimmy Carter. Now, let me read
the headline the way it would normally be written. President
Jimmy Carter, a Southern Democrat, stood out for his early
support for pro gay legislation and his embrace of LGBTQ advocates,
according to storians. But that's not the way NBC News
portrayed it. What they did say was former President Jimmy Carter,
a Southern Democrat and devout Baptist stood out for his
early support for pro gay legislation and embrace of LGBTQ.
That's important to them because they want to castigate any
kind of believers, any Christians. They want to castigate them
for not being that. And you can absolutely be a
libertarian and embrace equality for all without embracing special legislation
for special groups.
Speaker 2: That doesn't make you a homophobe. It doesn't make you
a bigot.
Speaker 3: If you say equal rights for all, special privileges for none,
you're actually embracing equality in a way that you see.
Speaker 2: You just don't see much these days.
Speaker 3: But that's the way NBC News had to portray Jimmy Carter.
He was a Baptist, and even a Baptist can be
all of these things, and squaring those things up is
not the easiest task to do.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: One of the other things that I want to get
to that there's a couple of montage. There's a montage
I want to play for you so badly. In fact,
I might send it to the staff and see if
we can play this now. It's two minutes and forty
six seconds, but it's gold, It's absolute gold, and I
think I'll try it in the brain. I'm gonna send it.
In fact, I tell you what I'm gonna do. I'm
gonna send this. I'm gonna send the link and see
if we can get this thing queued up at all,
because they've just done a remarkable job of trying to
make it all work. And we'll see if again. But
the link, and I don't again. I don't know when
they'll be able to tell me. I just send it
to them. So it is two minutes and forty six seconds,
and it is a montage of the Biden team telling
us that he is sharper than ever mentally and yet
even CBS. So we're jumping from NBC, who wants to
extol the virtues of Carter because he's a Baptist that
embraced LGBTQ legislation, as opposed to the CBS News got caught,
didn't get caught, But they were very honest for a moment,
and the left is really upset about that. What was
the largest most underreported story of twenty twenty four, because
we're going to see a lot of these, and a
CBS News journalist reported that it was Biden's obvious decline
cognitively veteran CBS News reporter Jan Crawford dinged news organizations
for not thoroughly covering President Biden's quote obvious cognitive decline
this year until it became unavoidable during his disastrous debate
with Trump. Crawford, the network's chief legal correspondent, insisted stronger
reporting on the topic could have changed the entire election,
as she responded to a question from Face the Nation
moderator Major Garrett about the most underreported story of twenty
four undercovered and underreported. That would be, to me, Joe
Biden's obvious cognitive decline that became undeniable in the televised debate,
she said on the Sunday Morning Show. Subsequent to that,
by the way, a lot of people have said he's
been in decline for years, even prior to being elected.
She then noted that recent reporting by The Wall Stjournal
that detailed how White House aids have covered up his
mental decline over the.
Speaker 2: Past four years.
Speaker 3: Not the past year, not the past two years, but
the past four years. The explosive report says that staffers
formed a tight circle around the eighty two year old
Democrat in to limit any kind of interpersonal actions he
had interactions with people, and yet he insisted that he
could still run for president. We should have much more
forcefully questioned whether he was fit for office for another
four years, which could have led to a primary for
the Democrats. It should have changed the scope of the
entire election. Now, the interesting thing about that admission, I think,
and it's an honest own, by the way, it's an
absolutely honest own. And oh wow, they've got it ready,
so we'll not play it yet. We will play it coming,
we'll talk about it. Thank you so much, you folks
are amazing. Thanks for pulling that stuff up. So the
interesting thing about it, now, think about what the media
is telling on itself, the media that should have been
asking the questions. Had it been a Republican, had it
been Trump, had it been anyone anywhere, the media would
have been ruthless. It would have been blood and water.
It would have been a frenzy, it would have been
I mean, they went after Reagan actively for years on
this stuff, and they gave Biden a pass. If anything,
forget all of the other forget any other bias that
you might think of, and just look at that single
the Hunter Biden stuff. Fifty one spies who lie. Look
at the covering of the Russia collusion stuff. Look at
all of these things, all of these absolute media mistakes,
and forget them, and look at the one. Look at
the absolute and only one, and the only one that
absolutely obliterates any objectivity from the media across the board
is Biden's decline. I mean Newsmax mentioned it, Fox News
Date on it, but nobody else in the media. I mean,
well in New York Posts, and there was anothers but
by and large, the mainstream, the three, the Big Three
and MSNBC and CNN ignored it. Are now admitting that
they should have done more. But they covered. They provided
propaganda cover for an obvious decline. Now, for the folks
on the right, that led directly to Trump's victory because
it allowed the Democrats to not be democratic in the
way they selected their nominee. It allowed the Democrats to
basically show what an inside coup looks like. They showed
that the you, the American people, don't matter to them.
It illustrated a vacancy, a mental desire to make you irrelevant.
That showed that they were a bunch of self serving
at the trough DC insiders When they conducted a coup
and made the voters irrelevant.
Speaker 2: So in a way, you could.
Speaker 3: Thank the media for being kind of the can I
have another to the Democrats that the media is like
fealty to the Democrat Party because had they done it, it
would have been a much more robust Biden would have
not been able to run. They would have had a
robust feel out there trying to knew some Shapiro, these
people might have been out there. Kamala would not have
won that there's no way, as much as people wanted
to promote, or she would not have won the primary.
She did terrible when she ran the primary and gets.
Speaker 2: By, she didn't get any better. I'd arguably worse.
Speaker 3: They tried to pay people off, They tried to buy
the election, which is ironic because that's what the Democrats
want to say that the Trump people did. But that
one admission, and she was the first to say it
over CBS News mentioned it, and that the aids have
known it. The people in Congress knew it. So if
you think about all those people, General Millie who went
on sixty minutes and said, oh no, the President's good.
Speaker 2: He lied.
Speaker 3: Do you really want a military general at the highest
levels of the Pentagon lying to you.
Speaker 2: You don't.
Speaker 3: It is the DC swamp at work, and nothing illustrates
how far out of touch they are like this, and
there are people in Raleigh.
Speaker 2: We have our own Raleigh swamp. But this was bad. Still,
the fact that he's still president is terrible.
Speaker 1: All right, Hey, real quick, if you would like to
get your product or service in front of about ten
thousand people multiple times a day, send me an email
at Pete at the Pete calendarshow dot com and ask
me about advertising. It's super affordable, it's baked into this
podcast forever, and podcasts have a higher conversion rate than
other social media platforms, making it the best bang for
your buck. Send me a message Pete at Thepetecalnarshow dot
com and I can show you how it works. Run
the numbers with you again. That's Pete at the Petecalnarsshow
dot com.
Speaker 2: Chat out.
Speaker 3: I'm sitting in for Pete Calendar here on new Stock
eleven ten ninety nine.
Speaker 2: Three wbt you.
Speaker 3: We're tracking the death of Jimmy Carter, the longest lived
ex president. He died one hundred years of age more
than nineteen twenty four. What an amazing amount of information
to have lived through the human activity, to live through.
Speaker 2: The past one hundred years.
Speaker 3: At the same time, you know, the biggest underreported story
of the year was the diminishment of Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: We do have something we're going to get through on that.
By the way, the Jimmy Carter.
Speaker 3: This is a little known thing that always has irked
me about most news sources, the larger ones, especially the
New York Times, is they often they pre write someone's
obituary because they want it to be nice or flowery,
some famous build. They'll pre write the obituary, and then
when the person dies, they just kind of put it
out there so it looks like, oh wow, this is
amazingly put this together so fast. And that's what the
New York Times and the Washington both did for Jimmy Carter.
The reality, though, is what they didn't tell you was
that those were written by folks who have been dead
for years. In both instances, they have joint to the
New York Times. In Washington Post obituaries have joint bylines,
including writers who have been dead for years. The Guardian
ran and oh bit with a single byeline, and yes,
the writer has been dead since twenty twenty one. And and
that's the kind of stuff you.
Speaker 2: You know, they don't have to do that.
Speaker 3: It's okay to take your time write something current that
includes you know, current events things like that. You literally
have an obituary written by people who have already had
their obituaries written.
Speaker 2: And it's just lazy journalism. It's just lazy.
Speaker 3: You can, you know, talk creatives, timely and topical. We
can talk about these things. There's no reason The New
York Times, one of.
Speaker 2: The largest, most powerful.
Speaker 3: Legacy medias in the nation, couldn't have taken an extra
twenty to thirty minutes, done some research and written a
current obituary instead of plowing one up.
Speaker 2: You know, hey, oh what do we have on?
Speaker 3: Oh, let's put that one. I mean it's almost disrespectful.
Speaker 2: Well, it is disrespectful, that's my opinion.
Speaker 3: That's just one of the things about journalism today that
irks me.
Speaker 2: I guess I would say it just is irking irksome
in the process of being irked. Now, I do want
to add one thing.
Speaker 3: A listener who was listening about the Christianity thing, the
assertion I made, and you can call and do this
or you can write, I appreciate the folks on x
formerly known as Twitter that reach out on that platform.
At Chad Adam's perspective, that's mine. If in case you
want to look at that is that the media portrays
Christian in a negative light. But at the same time,
it is and I've said this on the show many times,
when when there's a horrific event anywhere on the planet,
it is mostly Christians in this country.
Speaker 2: That step up and go to it. They run to it,
they go to help no matter what.
Speaker 3: This particular person went to Puerto Rico after the hurricanes,
Baptist or mission flag to Puerto Rico and went and
helped out. And I'm days my childhood home, knew a
lot of people that did that, and these people make
a huge difference. I'm looking at western North Carolina right
now and what Samaritans Purse has done that is a
saintly organization. What it's doing in North Kahin here today
the Biden administration announced another two point five billion with
a bee to Ukraine.
Speaker 2: And it's really the.
Speaker 3: Sad reality is watching people that are putting video of
I'm just referring to one, but there are many videos.
Speaker 2: I've just seen.
Speaker 3: I've seen about ten of them that are showing here's
what my community looks like today.
Speaker 2: And in western North Carolina, and it's tough.
Speaker 3: I mean, they've had some additional flooding, they've had additional
damage that's happened. They're in for the next couple of
weeks is going to be rough from a heating and
cooling standpoint, or heating standpoint, I should say. And it
looks like a third world country. Many parts of western
North Gona still will look like a third world country.
And yet we've got an extra two and a half
billion to give to Ukraine. And my criticism of the
Ukrainian stuff is not as political as you may think.
It is that I don't like.
Speaker 2: It when there's no objective.
Speaker 3: The Ukrainians have never come and said, okay, when we
get this, here is our expectation. We're going to take
back region, We're gonna put the Russians back, We're gonna
solve this, We're gonna win, and this is what it's
going to take to win that war. It's never that
it's just hey, we need more stuff, We need more stuff.
You guys are wealthy, give us more stuff, please you
know we're the ones stopping the Russians from invading Europe,
and it's it's not they're not stopping them.
Speaker 2: It hasn't stopped. We've now escalated.
Speaker 3: We now have North Koreans on the battlefield in Ukraine.
Now we have it's a mess, and Europe is still
buying oil from Russia. If you wanted to stop this,
you cut the Russian economy off at the knees. But
the Europeans are so and the one hand, US taxpayers
are giving money to the Ukrainians and the Europeans are
funding the arms purchases by by buying natural gas and
oil from the Russians. Seems kind of it's just a
gravy train, and it's an absurd gravy train. So that's
the criticism is today the Biden administration two points, and
you wonder how they just keep funneling this as much
as they want to ask, say, Trump is a dictator,
Biden's act, Well, no, he's not. His staff on his
behalf or that. I don't know, and I don't know
what the end goal is that, nor have they announced.
Speaker 2: What the end goal is. They've just said, hey, this
is what we're doing.
Speaker 3: This is what we're doing, so that things it Now,
we need to take a break here in a few seconds,
and we will, and when we come back, I will
play that clip, and it is a montage of how
bad the Biden folks were at telling us he was fine.
We know now from the Wall Street Journal, we know
now from additional journalists that have said, yes, we've interviewed staff.
That's been bad since day one, since before he took office,
when he was running for office, it was bad. It's
been horrific the entire time. It's been a giant lie
and every day that goes by we find out more.
But at the same time, they lied to the American people.
Now here's the interesting thing. Whether it's Pelosi, there's zero
consequence to these people for lie to the American people. Now,
this is a montage we're gonna I will ask them
to leave my mic up because I want you to
hear what was being told to the American people that
now we know to all be not true. So go
ahead and start playing that clip.
Speaker 2: Please.
Speaker 4: Does a president have the stamina physically and mentally do
you think to continue on even after twenty twenty four?
Speaker 2: Don you're asking me this question? Oh, my gosh, he's
the president of the United States.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 2: I can't even keep up with it.
Speaker 4: The most difficult part about a meeting with President Biden
is preparing for it, because he is mars intensely probing
and detail oriented and focused.
Speaker 3: I can testify because I've been working very closely with
this president for the past two years.
Speaker 2: I've been knowing it for thirty years, and.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, this guy's tough, he's smart, he's on
his game.
Speaker 2: Jill Biden has vision, he has knowledge.
Speaker 3: Felosi, he has a strategic thinker.
Speaker 1: The president is focused, he's detail oriented, he's always thinking
about the big picture.
Speaker 2: Is engaging, he is capable. He has an incredible president and.
Speaker 1: I'm often with his foreign trips.
Speaker 2: He's at the top of his game. So he has
a vision, he has knowledge, he has judgment, he has
a strategic thinking.
Speaker 1: I met with the President I don't know five or
six weeks ago, but he seemed fine. To make half
complete confidence in the President, I waged him expertly guide
meetings of staff and cabinet members.
Speaker 2: I could not have more confidence in the President. I
would tell you that generals, and every single time I'm
meew him. He is just fine. But he is again knowledgeable.
Speaker 4: Wise, incredibly sharp, incredibly improving, incredible command of the details.
Speaker 1: He is sharp, He is on top of things. There
is nothing to these challenges, these suggestions that somehow he's notable.
Speaker 3: We see Joe Biden.
Speaker 4: Of course, we know how attuned he oughts to the issue.
Speaker 2: And you're going to see how smart he is. And
Joe experience he has. I say his age is an asset.
Speaker 1: Yes, he's wise, he has wisdom, he has experiences, and.
Speaker 2: His experience because of old age, and his wisdom has
been invaluable to this country.
Speaker 4: A lot of countries, people who bask off this a
longer period of time are praised for their wisdom.
Speaker 1: I have seen a lot of seventy.
Speaker 3: Two ye old James Cliburn not as capable as this
eighty year old.
Speaker 1: It is hard for us to keep up with this president.
Speaker 2: Okay, he stop the clip. He can stop the clip.
That's Chuck Schumer.
Speaker 3: What you see is this cabinet, not cabinet, You see
this this assembly. There's one of two things. They're either
just morons, just incapable of the elevator going to the
top floor. You know they're definitely a couple of sandwiches
short of a full picnic, or they're lying.
Speaker 2: There's there's no two ways, no halfway.
Speaker 3: You're not you know, they're not halfway pregnant in this thing.
They're going to the American peace on national media, Milly
in sixty minutes is one of the worst. If that's
his assessment of Biden. This is a guy that's supposed
to be able to assess every one of our military
enemies around the world and give a correct assignation of
what we should do. He can't even tell that the
guy he's working for isn't mentally all there. We know
he's not all there. So Millie's either lying in which
he's committed an active treason, or he's dumb and he
doesn't need to be in that post. But he can't
be He can't be exonerated here. Karine Jean Pierre, she
knew she's you know, I want to believe that if
almost any of you were in that position, if I
was in a position where I knew the person I
was working for was not capable, I mean, one of
the highest things, one of the best things you can
do for your country is be truthful about where we are.
The people around Biden have told us everything they need
to know about their character in the way they've conducted
their affairs over the past four years. They knew he
was in decline, and they lied to the American people consistently,
not just once, not just twice, but dozens, if not
hundreds of times. That's just a small collection of what
these people have done. Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Mark Milly, KJP,
Daniel Goldman, Jill Biden, the wife. I mean, there's nothing
honorable about what any of these people did.
Speaker 2: The one thing, you can say what you want. A
lot of people have criticize Donald Trump for.
Speaker 3: The way he's conducted things, he said, things acted, and
those are those criticisms are fine. But to sit here
this level.
Speaker 2: Of cover up tells you.
Speaker 3: It also tells you how these people would act in
another situation. Imagine, imagine for a second that Kamala Harris
had won. So let's just say she won and these
same people are in power, that Schumer's still there in
the Senate, that Mark Milly is still in charge of
things over the Pentagon, that KJP remains should she desire to,
they would continue to lie as vehemently about Kamala Harris's abilities,
they would continue to lie about the condition of things.
These people are in caple But again I digress because
the other aspect, they're either lying or they're not mentally
with it at all, And that's dangerous as well. If
these people are not mentally capable of doing the job,
why are they there? So Karine Jean Pierre is either
you know, dumb as a bag of rice, or she's
lying coach, intentionally lying and not only lying. But if
you'll remember the kind of back and forth that Steve
Doucy had with her and some other members of the
media that made she talked down to them, She made
accusations about them that were untrue when they questioned Biden's
because she talked down with them, How dare they how
indignant she became? And that is one thing I don't
care Democratic Republican They've got to stop that. Loyalty has
a limit. I mean, if you're working, I mean think
about if if Biden so you have to trust that
if he was involved in criminal enterprises with Hunter, they
would cover that up too. The cocaine in the White
House story, you have to look at that in a
different light, don't you. You have to look back at the
Hunter Biden laptop story and what they knew the entire
time they knew about it. They knew it was true,
and they lied about it. They probably know more about
the more about the cocaine story than they're admitting. There's
a lot now that you have to go back and
look at everything they said and did.
Speaker 2: Under the auspices that it was just a total fabrication.
Speaker 3: And furthermore, you go over to Congress and you look
at Pelosi and Schumer. If they're lying on that, that's
it's a relatively minor reality, isn't it that they're lying
about that?
Speaker 2: What else are they lying about?
Speaker 3: So when people make accusation that the January sixth committee
was rigged, well we know they'd lie about the president's health.
Speaker 2: Would they lie about the stuff there? Of course they would.
Speaker 3: It makes if you Democrats wanted to assert that January
sixth was exactly the way you portray it, about it
being this attempt to overthrow the government, that it was
all of these horrible things. You undermine your own argument
by asserting that you can't even get Biden's sanility right.
And it sounds like I'm being brutal on this, but
you have to so we should believe you, because why
what about you established credibility before the American people. I mean,
the January sixth committee is now suspect because even Liz
Channing and.
Speaker 2: Others asserted that Biden was mentally all there, they all
look bad. And so.
Speaker 3: When I look at this, when anyone says, hey, you
have to look at the other things they were saying
and do it during this entire time. You have to
When Adam Shift says Biden's fine, well everything else and
Adam Shift, you have to believe he's astute enough to
recognize that Biden isn't fine, and wasn't fine and hasn't
been fine. So if he would go to the American
people and just say, hey, he's great, he's sharp, he's
sharp as attack. At the same time, the next question,
you say that January sixth, people sayll yeah, well Trump
Trump orchestrated that and Trump didn't. Now which one would
he know more about? Would he know more about the
actions of the president than the actions of his political enemy, Yes,
he would. We know he lied about the thing he
knew the most about. So it's not hard to figure
out that he was just exaggerating on the thing he
knew less about.
Speaker 2: All of these people knew far more.
Speaker 3: About Biden's cognitive decline and a lot less about their
political enemies.
Speaker 2: But we're supposed to.
Speaker 3: Believe them on Oh well, now we know, well, you know,
I was just being political. I was just, hey, is
my guy, I'm defending him. No, you committed an active
treason against the American people.
Speaker 2: I mean, you now have to these And again, I know,
I'm kind.
Speaker 3: Of surprised that more people aren't upset about this because
if you think about it, at any time, at any
given point in time over the past four years, there
could have been a massive assault on our troops. There
could have been an active war against the US. There
could have been any number of things that required someone
in someone that was an elected office to make decisions
for the American people. And you had a bunch of
Democrats telling us that the guy that was in that
position was capable of doing it.
Speaker 2: We now know he wasn't. What did he miss probably
a lot.
Speaker 3: So they were willing to sacrifice the safety of the
entire country for the political lie that our president was fine,
Which makes you think if he was in a coma,
they would.
Speaker 2: Have covered for him anyway. That's just sad, all right.
Speaker 1: That'll do it for this episode. Thank you so much
for listening. I could not do the show without your
support and the support of the businesses that advertise on
the pod, so if you'd like, please support them too
and tell them you heard it here. You can also
become a patron at my Patreon page or go to
dpetecleanershow dot com. Again, thank you so much for listening,
and don't break anything while I'm gone.