1
00:00:00,280 --> 00:00:01,360
Speaker 1: That's why Q dot com.

2
00:00:01,520 --> 00:00:04,839
Speaker 2: You're tuned to Cougar Sports on kov O, probo k

3
00:00:05,040 --> 00:00:07,599
U d d HD two one O three, nine and

4
00:00:07,839 --> 00:00:13,119
ninety eight three ESPN the Van. It's time to celebrate

5
00:00:13,199 --> 00:00:16,480
the breggest team sport known to man, where modern day

6
00:00:16,480 --> 00:00:19,480
gladiators collide for all the glory on the grid. I

7
00:00:19,879 --> 00:00:24,079
let's talk some college football on Cougar Sports with Ben Credit.

8
00:00:26,480 --> 00:00:28,359
Speaker 3: Welcome backer for sports one on three, nine ninety eight

9
00:00:28,399 --> 00:00:30,800
point three ESPN The ban I've been rettal broadcasting from

10
00:00:30,800 --> 00:00:33,240
our band or Wealth Studios Banderwealth dot com. Get on

11
00:00:33,280 --> 00:00:35,200
that free Q and A no obligation to invest Q

12
00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:37,079
and A with our tax small wealth advisors or sort

13
00:00:37,079 --> 00:00:38,200
off I financial planners.

14
00:00:38,439 --> 00:00:39,439
Speaker 1: They're the best in the business.

15
00:00:39,479 --> 00:00:41,399
Speaker 3: Trust me on that they've been aiding and supporting the

16
00:00:41,359 --> 00:00:43,159
BU student athletes for the last five years now. They

17
00:00:43,159 --> 00:00:45,119
want to eat and support Cougar Nation in their quest

18
00:00:45,159 --> 00:00:48,280
for financial stability and sustainability. Called Vanderwealth Banterwealth dot com

19
00:00:48,280 --> 00:00:50,799
today and let them know. I Sancho, let's get into

20
00:00:50,880 --> 00:00:53,399
a college football on Cougar Sports segment.

21
00:00:53,439 --> 00:00:54,840
Speaker 1: I want to get in some some metrics.

22
00:00:54,880 --> 00:00:57,479
Speaker 3: I want to know who this Cougar football team has

23
00:00:57,600 --> 00:00:59,240
been over the last three years?

24
00:00:59,399 --> 00:01:00,439
Speaker 1: What if they done well?

25
00:01:00,479 --> 00:01:03,520
Speaker 3: I always say one of my favorite lines from Three

26
00:01:03,560 --> 00:01:04,400
Amigos is.

27
00:01:04,400 --> 00:01:06,480
Speaker 1: What is it that the people have sent the PoCA.

28
00:01:06,280 --> 00:01:08,599
Speaker 3: Really does well? What is it that BYU has really

29
00:01:08,640 --> 00:01:10,799
done well over the last three years? And what do

30
00:01:10,840 --> 00:01:14,000
they need to improve from the last couple of years

31
00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:17,519
to next year? What are we expecting from BAU in

32
00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:19,840
twenty twenty six and beyond. The segment's going to be

33
00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:22,040
brought to you by Dental Pros of Utah and American Fork.

34
00:01:22,079 --> 00:01:25,799
If you're looking to maybe evaluate a new dentist, check

35
00:01:25,840 --> 00:01:28,640
out the Google reviews. They utilize Bibo metic techniques as

36
00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:31,799
are minimally invasive techniques to rebuild your teeth layer by

37
00:01:31,879 --> 00:01:34,040
layers that you don't have to settle for fake teeth

38
00:01:34,159 --> 00:01:37,319
later on in life. Doctor Schofield, doctor White, doctor Crittle,

39
00:01:37,359 --> 00:01:38,239
They're going to take care of you.

40
00:01:38,359 --> 00:01:39,840
Speaker 1: No ifs answered, buts about it. Let him know. I

41
00:01:39,959 --> 00:01:43,200
Sancha for the VP Products, VPP service, VP discounts.

42
00:01:43,280 --> 00:01:45,079
Speaker 3: Let's get out to the hotline. Welcome in one of

43
00:01:45,079 --> 00:01:47,200
my favorite guests. He is a man of metrics. He

44
00:01:47,239 --> 00:01:50,159
gets into the data, He delves into the data to

45
00:01:50,280 --> 00:01:53,599
give us the truth of all things in college football.

46
00:01:53,640 --> 00:01:56,920
Let's welcome at Bill Connley, the creator of sp plus

47
00:01:57,000 --> 00:02:03,319
representing ESPN. What's up, Billing, I'm doing fantastic, Happy off

48
00:02:03,359 --> 00:02:04,159
season to you.

49
00:02:04,599 --> 00:02:06,519
Speaker 1: How is the offseason treated you thus far?

50
00:02:06,560 --> 00:02:10,520
Speaker 4: Bill, Well, I've an updated rosters for sp plus projections,

51
00:02:10,520 --> 00:02:13,120
so it's really there isn't really an off season here,

52
00:02:13,159 --> 00:02:15,719
but certainly not the most demanding work in the world.

53
00:02:16,159 --> 00:02:19,960
Speaker 3: At least there's not like an additional aperture opening of

54
00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:21,919
the transferportal in April, right.

55
00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:25,080
Speaker 4: Right, Yeah, So basically it's more work now, but then

56
00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:27,240
in May I won't really have nearly as much as

57
00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:28,120
I did last year.

58
00:02:28,960 --> 00:02:30,639
Speaker 3: That's a good thing. You can go on vacation. To me,

59
00:02:30,759 --> 00:02:32,159
that's a good time to go on vacation.

60
00:02:32,240 --> 00:02:35,319
Speaker 5: In fact, that's where coach that's where coaches go on vacation.

61
00:02:35,400 --> 00:02:35,840
Speaker 6: I know that.

62
00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:38,560
Speaker 1: Yep, that's exactly when they go on vacation.

63
00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:45,039
Speaker 3: So what can we surmise from the two thy twenty

64
00:02:45,639 --> 00:02:49,240
five I know it ended in twenty twenty six final

65
00:02:49,800 --> 00:02:53,159
College Football sp plus rankings for all one hundred and

66
00:02:53,199 --> 00:02:55,719
thirty six FBS teams.

67
00:02:55,759 --> 00:02:57,439
Speaker 1: What takeaways?

68
00:02:57,520 --> 00:03:01,800
Speaker 3: What gems can you derive from the data this year.

69
00:03:03,439 --> 00:03:06,919
Speaker 4: Well, that's possible to recruit at a top forty level

70
00:03:06,919 --> 00:03:08,759
and produce the best team in college football. I think

71
00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:12,000
that was pretty interesting. Yeah, I'm curious when it's time

72
00:03:12,039 --> 00:03:15,000
to kind of update how the projections work. I'm really curious,

73
00:03:15,120 --> 00:03:17,560
you know, having Indiana as high as they were and

74
00:03:17,560 --> 00:03:21,719
then having plenty of other schools Utah, BYU Vanderbilt, just

75
00:03:21,759 --> 00:03:24,759
a ton of schools that aren't necessarily you know, top

76
00:03:24,800 --> 00:03:27,439
ten recruiting powerhouses, but figured out a way to build

77
00:03:27,439 --> 00:03:29,319
a really good team. I think that's really Texas Tech

78
00:03:29,439 --> 00:03:30,280
was in the.

79
00:03:30,159 --> 00:03:31,120
Speaker 6: Top five of US.

80
00:03:31,159 --> 00:03:34,639
Speaker 4: People are so really really interesting things. It's a fun

81
00:03:34,639 --> 00:03:36,560
time to talk about the sport. I know coaches aren't

82
00:03:36,560 --> 00:03:39,599
really enjoying themselves all that much and trying to renegotiate

83
00:03:39,639 --> 00:03:43,240
contracts every other day, but from a pure watching how

84
00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:46,319
guys are going about building rosters, it's really really interesting.

85
00:03:46,800 --> 00:03:48,159
Speaker 1: Yeah, you look at the top twenty five.

86
00:03:48,199 --> 00:03:51,240
Speaker 3: I was in Indiana is like this this outlier, Right,

87
00:03:51,280 --> 00:03:52,199
they don't recruit.

88
00:03:52,840 --> 00:03:55,319
Speaker 1: I think they're like they're twenty four to seven.

89
00:03:55,360 --> 00:03:59,719
Speaker 3: Composite talent rating was like seventy second in the nation, right,

90
00:04:00,240 --> 00:04:04,879
A talented team per se who else stands out to

91
00:04:04,879 --> 00:04:10,080
you with like maybe an underrated, maybe recruiting talent, baseline

92
00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:12,840
talent that overachieved in the top twenty five.

93
00:04:13,639 --> 00:04:15,280
Speaker 4: Well, I will say, I mean as far as Texas

94
00:04:15,280 --> 00:04:17,240
techause everybody knows, you know, how much they spent on

95
00:04:17,240 --> 00:04:19,319
that transfer class, but I think it was really noteworthy

96
00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:22,480
with both Tech and Indiana that yeah, I mean they

97
00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:26,399
brought in talented guys, but everybody produced better at Tech

98
00:04:26,560 --> 00:04:28,600
or at Indiana than in previous stop Tech.

99
00:04:28,759 --> 00:04:29,759
Speaker 5: Like obviously David.

100
00:04:29,519 --> 00:04:31,120
Speaker 4: Bailey was always going to be awesome, but they had

101
00:04:31,160 --> 00:04:33,040
a lot of Romelo height.

102
00:04:32,879 --> 00:04:34,560
Speaker 6: Style guys on their Lee Hunter.

103
00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:38,279
Speaker 4: Guys who had been solid, you know, just sturdy, you know,

104
00:04:38,399 --> 00:04:41,319
college high level college football players, but then they go

105
00:04:41,439 --> 00:04:43,920
to Texas Tech and they were awesome. So I think,

106
00:04:44,240 --> 00:04:48,839
you know, the ability to identify talent, deploy it correctly,

107
00:04:49,199 --> 00:04:50,720
you know, get the most out of it, it still

108
00:04:50,759 --> 00:04:53,560
matters a ton even if they spent twenty whatever a

109
00:04:53,639 --> 00:04:56,319
million dollars on that class, and again this year, they

110
00:04:56,319 --> 00:04:58,839
still got the right guys and that was an immensely

111
00:04:58,879 --> 00:05:00,879
impressive I.

112
00:05:00,839 --> 00:05:02,839
Speaker 3: Got to say that, you know, I feel pretty good

113
00:05:02,839 --> 00:05:05,360
about where BYU's at too. They end up eighteenth in

114
00:05:05,360 --> 00:05:09,879
the sp plus metric. Obviously eight people was pretty high.

115
00:05:09,879 --> 00:05:12,759
I mean, I can't remember where Sagarin had them and

116
00:05:12,800 --> 00:05:15,319
where some of the other metrics had them ranked overall

117
00:05:15,319 --> 00:05:18,399
from an efficiency standpoint, but a great season twelve and two.

118
00:05:18,920 --> 00:05:22,199
They overachieve, it seems every single year, versus the recruiting

119
00:05:22,399 --> 00:05:23,720
and talent pool.

120
00:05:23,720 --> 00:05:24,959
Speaker 1: Why use that, do you think.

121
00:05:25,600 --> 00:05:27,560
Speaker 4: Well, I think, I mean a couple of years ago

122
00:05:27,560 --> 00:05:30,759
they didn't. Obviously they've been swings and sways through the years,

123
00:05:30,759 --> 00:05:32,639
but these last couple of years, yeah, I mean, whatever

124
00:05:32,720 --> 00:05:35,240
it might be, whether it's just really really strong line

125
00:05:35,279 --> 00:05:37,360
play that's been a life hack for the best BYU

126
00:05:37,439 --> 00:05:41,199
teams for a long time. You know, they the defense

127
00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:44,160
held steady. It was twenty first in a defensive sp

128
00:05:44,240 --> 00:05:47,120
plus in twenty twenty four and then twenty second last year.

129
00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:50,079
And the offense, I mean that was, you know, for

130
00:05:50,240 --> 00:05:53,000
very obvious reasons, with a quarterback change over the summer

131
00:05:53,040 --> 00:05:55,560
and bringing in a freshman who hadn't you know, had

132
00:05:55,560 --> 00:05:56,639
started at another.

133
00:05:56,399 --> 00:05:57,600
Speaker 6: School and all that stuff.

134
00:05:57,720 --> 00:05:59,160
Speaker 4: But the fact that you know, the fact that they

135
00:05:59,199 --> 00:06:03,079
improved from thirty to twenty fourth with that with a

136
00:06:03,120 --> 00:06:05,759
young quarterback who they weren't asking to throw down field

137
00:06:05,759 --> 00:06:08,639
a time. They're trying to play a very controlled game,

138
00:06:08,720 --> 00:06:11,560
and it worked and they improved offensively. I think that

139
00:06:11,720 --> 00:06:13,000
was pretty incredible.

140
00:06:13,639 --> 00:06:16,199
Speaker 3: Yeah, it is pretty cool to see that, no doubt

141
00:06:16,199 --> 00:06:19,839
about it. And you know, where what is this season

142
00:06:19,959 --> 00:06:23,959
rank all time in BAU football history for their best seasons?

143
00:06:24,040 --> 00:06:24,959
Speaker 1: Would you say.

144
00:06:26,879 --> 00:06:30,959
Speaker 4: They were slightly below where they were in twenty four, which, again,

145
00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:32,959
when you have a freshman quarterback, that's not the.

146
00:06:33,480 --> 00:06:36,000
Speaker 5: You know, that's not a damning thing by any means.

147
00:06:36,040 --> 00:06:38,000
But let's see, let me pull up.

148
00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:40,120
Speaker 3: So what you say, So you think twenty twenty four

149
00:06:40,240 --> 00:06:42,720
was a better team than the twenty twenty five team

150
00:06:42,720 --> 00:06:44,519
per sp plus is what you're saying.

151
00:06:44,480 --> 00:06:45,319
Speaker 6: Per spe plus?

152
00:06:45,399 --> 00:06:48,160
Speaker 4: Yeah, you know, for all time now we're looking at

153
00:06:48,160 --> 00:06:50,439
a team, the twenty twenty four team. I have them

154
00:06:50,480 --> 00:06:54,279
as the twelfth best BAU team and then twenty twenty

155
00:06:54,279 --> 00:06:56,800
five was a little bit behind that. But no, no, no, no, sorry,

156
00:06:56,839 --> 00:06:58,800
in terms of percent al writings, it was basically tied.

157
00:06:59,079 --> 00:07:02,360
Speaker 6: So they were both in the top twelve overall.

158
00:07:02,399 --> 00:07:04,759
Speaker 4: And you know, Kilane has now had three teams in

159
00:07:04,800 --> 00:07:07,240
the top twelve, including the twenty twenty team, So.

160
00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:09,240
Speaker 5: He's started a little ways to make up there with

161
00:07:09,480 --> 00:07:11,319
on Lavelle Edwards, but he's doing his best.

162
00:07:11,920 --> 00:07:12,879
Speaker 1: Yeah, no doubt about it.

163
00:07:12,959 --> 00:07:18,360
Speaker 3: Over the last three years, which unit of the BYU

164
00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:21,800
football team has been the best unit? Would you say,

165
00:07:21,800 --> 00:07:25,120
per recipe plus offense, defense or special teams?

166
00:07:25,560 --> 00:07:27,839
Speaker 4: In terms of average rankings, it would be Special teams

167
00:07:27,959 --> 00:07:30,519
had they were eleventh two year, in twenty three they

168
00:07:30,560 --> 00:07:32,439
were fourth, and last year they fell the forty fifth.

169
00:07:32,439 --> 00:07:34,279
Speaker 6: But that's still overall.

170
00:07:33,879 --> 00:07:35,040
Speaker 5: A really nice average.

171
00:07:35,920 --> 00:07:38,439
Speaker 4: And if we're looking at three years, both the offense

172
00:07:38,480 --> 00:07:40,639
and defense were dragged down by twenty three. That was

173
00:07:40,680 --> 00:07:44,160
a pretty shaky year overall, obviously not only moving to

174
00:07:44,160 --> 00:07:46,480
the Big twelve, but then obviously you know, just not

175
00:07:46,879 --> 00:07:49,480
having a team and trying to figure out your way

176
00:07:49,480 --> 00:07:52,639
through that. But then both units improved the last two years.

177
00:07:52,639 --> 00:07:55,360
The offense went from seventy fifth to thirty six to

178
00:07:55,399 --> 00:07:57,600
twenty fourth, and like I said, the defense has been

179
00:07:57,600 --> 00:08:00,639
top twenty two straight years. So especially it's just been nice,

180
00:08:00,800 --> 00:08:02,920
you know, to carry the weight a little bit, and

181
00:08:02,920 --> 00:08:05,439
then it regressed the hair last year, but nothing major.

182
00:08:06,160 --> 00:08:08,000
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's kind of interesting to see that.

183
00:08:08,360 --> 00:08:14,199
Speaker 3: How in how does a win loss record right, how

184
00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:17,240
is it influenced by like elite special teams play. Would

185
00:08:17,240 --> 00:08:19,680
you say, is you have any opinion on that on

186
00:08:19,759 --> 00:08:22,959
how what role special teams plays in that win loss column.

187
00:08:23,639 --> 00:08:25,439
Speaker 4: You know, I think my general theory has just been

188
00:08:25,480 --> 00:08:27,639
for a while that like close games is where you

189
00:08:27,680 --> 00:08:29,759
know you're going to see that. You know your close

190
00:08:29,800 --> 00:08:31,839
games record, if you have a good quarterback play, you

191
00:08:31,920 --> 00:08:34,559
know how to master a four minute drill, you can

192
00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:36,919
and you can make forty five yard field goals or

193
00:08:36,960 --> 00:08:38,799
you know, penn an opponent deep at a key time.

194
00:08:38,879 --> 00:08:41,159
Speaker 5: That's going to be how you win close games.

195
00:08:41,159 --> 00:08:43,360
Speaker 4: And you know BYU last I checked one of quite

196
00:08:43,360 --> 00:08:45,120
a few close games these last couple of seasons.

197
00:08:45,159 --> 00:08:47,320
Speaker 5: So maybe that theory checks out.

198
00:08:47,840 --> 00:08:48,080
Speaker 6: Yeah.

199
00:08:48,120 --> 00:08:50,960
Speaker 3: So that being said, it's like we looked at that

200
00:08:51,360 --> 00:08:54,039
over the last few years, and even in twenty twenty three, right,

201
00:08:54,080 --> 00:08:56,559
they they took Oklahoma and Oklahoma States with the.

202
00:08:56,480 --> 00:08:59,159
Speaker 1: Wire at the end of the year to get Bowl eligible.

203
00:08:59,200 --> 00:09:02,039
Speaker 3: They came short, but those were two top twenty five

204
00:09:02,080 --> 00:09:03,799
teams double as you win teams.

205
00:09:04,200 --> 00:09:06,039
Speaker 1: They fell short.

206
00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:10,360
Speaker 3: But it does seem that BYU has won many more

207
00:09:10,399 --> 00:09:13,960
games in these then they've lost. When it's like a

208
00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:14,960
one score game.

209
00:09:16,080 --> 00:09:16,320
Speaker 5: Yeah.

210
00:09:16,360 --> 00:09:18,879
Speaker 4: I mean, obviously both of the losses from twenty five

211
00:09:18,960 --> 00:09:21,960
were multi score games and they won all the close ones.

212
00:09:22,000 --> 00:09:23,399
Speaker 5: And you know, year before.

213
00:09:23,240 --> 00:09:25,080
Speaker 4: Had a couple dropped a couple close ones at the end,

214
00:09:25,120 --> 00:09:26,919
but one of them elsewhere. You're right, I mean, I

215
00:09:26,919 --> 00:09:28,720
think those last two games of twenty three is where

216
00:09:28,720 --> 00:09:30,879
the ship started to turn around a little bit. There

217
00:09:30,879 --> 00:09:32,960
were some blowouts there in the middle of that season,

218
00:09:33,360 --> 00:09:35,159
but you know, finishing the year almost you know, staying

219
00:09:35,159 --> 00:09:37,679
within one score of Oklahoma and then probably should have

220
00:09:37,720 --> 00:09:40,759
beatn Oklahoma State in that last game. You know, that

221
00:09:41,000 --> 00:09:43,799
was if nothing else, to sign up what they were

222
00:09:43,879 --> 00:09:44,480
capable of.

223
00:09:44,519 --> 00:09:47,159
Speaker 5: And you know twenty three and four since then.

224
00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:50,679
Speaker 3: Yeah, what does BUYU need to improve upon if they

225
00:09:50,679 --> 00:09:53,080
want to get over the hump? Would you say, get

226
00:09:53,080 --> 00:09:57,080
into the CSP They were close, but no cigars this year?

227
00:09:58,200 --> 00:09:58,720
Speaker 5: Yeah, I think.

228
00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:02,399
Speaker 4: I mean, the biggest weakness from a pure ranking perspective

229
00:10:02,600 --> 00:10:06,039
is big plays on offense. You know, they were far

230
00:10:06,080 --> 00:10:08,559
more efficient than their their opponents in terms of you know,

231
00:10:08,600 --> 00:10:11,320
success rate, and they went three and out far less,

232
00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:12,919
and so they were able to kind of you know,

233
00:10:13,519 --> 00:10:15,559
when you're when you're going to three.

234
00:10:15,360 --> 00:10:16,480
Speaker 5: And out far less than your opponent.

235
00:10:16,480 --> 00:10:18,840
Speaker 4: You're probably winning the field position battle, and that rang

236
00:10:18,919 --> 00:10:22,240
true by all means, but just the easy points, that's

237
00:10:22,480 --> 00:10:25,840
the biggest way that by you can improve is just

238
00:10:26,080 --> 00:10:28,519
you know, big play or two here and that sets

239
00:10:28,559 --> 00:10:31,360
up a few more easy points. And you know, obviously

240
00:10:31,399 --> 00:10:33,799
Texas Tech was was in a different strategy of this year,

241
00:10:33,799 --> 00:10:35,120
and BYU fans that know.

242
00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:38,159
Speaker 5: That as well as anybody, but you know, they wouldn't.

243
00:10:37,840 --> 00:10:39,919
Speaker 4: Have had to work quite as hard against Utah or

244
00:10:39,960 --> 00:10:43,279
Arizona or something like that that they've gotten or Colorado especially,

245
00:10:43,559 --> 00:10:45,559
you know, get an easy touchdown earlier in the game

246
00:10:45,639 --> 00:10:48,600
and distance yourself. That's probably the biggest opportunity.

247
00:10:48,080 --> 00:10:51,399
Speaker 3: There, Yeah, no doubt about it. What's interesting about SP plus.

248
00:10:51,480 --> 00:10:54,840
I was looking at Kirk Signetti's rankings. I don't know

249
00:10:54,840 --> 00:10:57,039
if you looked at his like ap pole ranking, and

250
00:10:57,039 --> 00:11:00,159
I know the SID may have something to say about

251
00:11:00,159 --> 00:11:04,320
these rankings, but I had like Iowa ranked very high,

252
00:11:04,759 --> 00:11:07,840
very high, like almost I think top twelve, maybe like

253
00:11:07,919 --> 00:11:08,919
tenth or something like that.

254
00:11:09,000 --> 00:11:10,919
Speaker 1: To pull about back up, and I was looking at

255
00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:11,600
sp plus.

256
00:11:11,759 --> 00:11:14,559
Speaker 3: You got Iowa at nine and four as the twelve

257
00:11:15,440 --> 00:11:16,879
best team in college football.

258
00:11:17,639 --> 00:11:20,039
Speaker 4: Yeah, that was they kind of well, and I was

259
00:11:20,039 --> 00:11:22,320
annoyed because I kind of had them as an underrated

260
00:11:22,320 --> 00:11:24,919
team this year and I thought they were primed should

261
00:11:24,919 --> 00:11:26,480
be pretty good, and then they dropped a bunch of

262
00:11:26,480 --> 00:11:28,639
close games, and so nobody really noticed how good they were,

263
00:11:28,679 --> 00:11:30,120
even though you know, they almost.

264
00:11:29,879 --> 00:11:31,240
Speaker 5: Beat they almost beat Indiana.

265
00:11:31,279 --> 00:11:33,240
Speaker 4: Maybe that was part of his rationale for it, but

266
00:11:33,960 --> 00:11:36,759
you know, dropping off by three in Iowa State, five

267
00:11:36,840 --> 00:11:39,399
to Indiana, two to Oregon. I mean that's two of

268
00:11:39,440 --> 00:11:41,600
the four semi final teams where they had the game,

269
00:11:42,399 --> 00:11:44,480
you know, to win in the last two minutes. So

270
00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:46,960
they were really, really, really good football team, but they

271
00:11:47,039 --> 00:11:49,240
just were on the wrong side of the close games.

272
00:11:49,639 --> 00:11:52,120
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's like, you know, so that.

273
00:11:53,600 --> 00:11:56,120
Speaker 3: You know, this is an interesting situation, right because Indian

274
00:11:56,159 --> 00:11:57,840
ended up winning the national championship.

275
00:11:57,879 --> 00:11:59,639
Speaker 1: You look at the College Football.

276
00:11:59,200 --> 00:12:04,919
Speaker 3: Playoff Committee choices and obviously, you know, certain teams off

277
00:12:04,960 --> 00:12:09,679
of merit probably shouldn't have got in, but due to contracts,

278
00:12:09,759 --> 00:12:10,480
they did get in.

279
00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:12,080
Speaker 1: If you would have had.

280
00:12:11,919 --> 00:12:15,480
Speaker 3: Your your brothers, what should have the top twelve been

281
00:12:15,519 --> 00:12:18,080
if it was based off of sp plus, what would

282
00:12:18,080 --> 00:12:20,480
have been the top twelve teams to get into the

283
00:12:20,519 --> 00:12:21,399
COLF Football Playoff.

284
00:12:22,159 --> 00:12:24,320
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, I think first of all, Miami and

285
00:12:24,399 --> 00:12:26,440
Notre Dame get in if i'm because one of the

286
00:12:26,480 --> 00:12:29,200
things I was doing late in the season was just

287
00:12:29,279 --> 00:12:31,360
you know, I was I lost complete faith in the

288
00:12:31,360 --> 00:12:33,840
committee once you realized they were doing there, you know,

289
00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:35,919
the way they were playing the head to head game,

290
00:12:35,960 --> 00:12:38,720
where you know, Notre Dames and over Miami unless there

291
00:12:38,720 --> 00:12:41,480
as long as byus separating them, and if BYU's not there,

292
00:12:41,519 --> 00:12:43,519
then suddenly Miami is better than Notre Dame. But they

293
00:12:43,519 --> 00:12:46,279
weren't before, and all the different ways, and the fact

294
00:12:46,279 --> 00:12:49,039
that Oklahoma had to be ahead of Alabama because they're

295
00:12:49,039 --> 00:12:51,559
better than Alabama in one game even though they had

296
00:12:51,600 --> 00:12:53,440
a bunch of turnovers in that game, they weren't actually

297
00:12:53,440 --> 00:12:55,279
better in that game either. I just I kind of

298
00:12:55,279 --> 00:12:57,440
lost faith entirely in that system. And I was just

299
00:12:57,440 --> 00:13:03,480
playing with pure spplus resume SP plus FPI and strinth

300
00:13:03,559 --> 00:13:06,759
the record and just went with a full computer system

301
00:13:06,759 --> 00:13:09,200
there to see what it would come up with. And

302
00:13:09,360 --> 00:13:11,440
it had both Notre Dame and Miami, and it had

303
00:13:11,480 --> 00:13:15,360
Alabama just out had Oklahoma out by quite a bit. So,

304
00:13:15,360 --> 00:13:17,840
so it was a weird year in terms of judging

305
00:13:17,879 --> 00:13:20,679
the SEC because in terms of average sp plus writing

306
00:13:20,679 --> 00:13:22,960
and they're still but comfortably the best conference. They had,

307
00:13:23,200 --> 00:13:26,159
their worst team was better than seven Big ten teams.

308
00:13:26,440 --> 00:13:29,480
Big ten team was extremely vertical, where the SEC was

309
00:13:29,559 --> 00:13:32,399
kind of horizontal in all the teams being really close together.

310
00:13:33,240 --> 00:13:37,240
But you know, the strongest conference or not. Oklahoma shouldn't

311
00:13:37,240 --> 00:13:40,279
have been there and Alabama probably shouldn't have been there either,

312
00:13:40,360 --> 00:13:43,919
and they just tied themselves in knots and I just

313
00:13:43,960 --> 00:13:45,759
hated it. I hated the way that all played out.

314
00:13:45,759 --> 00:13:48,559
And you know, as it turned out, Alabama it could

315
00:13:48,559 --> 00:13:50,759
only beat Oklahoma and they got crushed by a real team.

316
00:13:50,879 --> 00:13:52,960
So you know, it is what it is, I guess,

317
00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:55,440
but I kind of lost. The committee lost me this year.

318
00:13:56,480 --> 00:13:59,399
Speaker 3: Yeah, how far out was How far away was BYU

319
00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:00,120
from getting in?

320
00:14:00,960 --> 00:14:02,679
Speaker 4: They were close, I mean obviously they would have been.

321
00:14:02,720 --> 00:14:04,799
I think they were first team out before the Big

322
00:14:04,799 --> 00:14:09,519
twelve championship and then I don't remember, Alabama was probably

323
00:14:09,519 --> 00:14:12,279
still ahead of them when both teams fell. But yeah,

324
00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:14,120
they were right on the border for obvious reasons. I mean,

325
00:14:14,120 --> 00:14:16,360
they only they'd only lost to a top four team

326
00:14:16,559 --> 00:14:18,039
and beating everybody else.

327
00:14:18,759 --> 00:14:20,039
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's unfortunate.

328
00:14:20,120 --> 00:14:22,440
Speaker 3: That would have been nice not to play Texas Tech

329
00:14:23,080 --> 00:14:25,480
and the regular season, going to the Big twelve championship

330
00:14:25,519 --> 00:14:28,799
undefeated and then lose, even if it was in convincing fashion.

331
00:14:28,840 --> 00:14:33,000
Maybe you get in then with only one loss. So

332
00:14:34,559 --> 00:14:38,919
give me your ideal scenario, right if you had, if

333
00:14:38,919 --> 00:14:42,519
you were a power broker of college football, what's the

334
00:14:42,600 --> 00:14:49,000
right number of teams to having a playoff? And should

335
00:14:49,120 --> 00:14:53,840
we get away from only a subjective committee and ad

336
00:14:54,320 --> 00:14:58,440
an algorithm to balance out the human corruptible eye test

337
00:14:58,679 --> 00:15:00,679
nature of the current committee.

338
00:15:01,759 --> 00:15:03,320
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, first of all, like I've never had

339
00:15:03,320 --> 00:15:05,480
a problem with sixteen, I've assumed we'd be at sixteen

340
00:15:05,480 --> 00:15:08,200
by now. But also I've come to really like twelve.

341
00:15:08,200 --> 00:15:11,440
That's a really high bar still, and lots of games

342
00:15:12,159 --> 00:15:13,639
you know, ended up making a huge difference.

343
00:15:13,639 --> 00:15:14,679
Speaker 5: Obviously for how to Dame.

344
00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:17,879
Speaker 4: The first two games made all the difference, but I

345
00:15:17,919 --> 00:15:20,159
think that kept the bar really high, and obviously Miami

346
00:15:20,399 --> 00:15:22,320
barely squeaking in and it almost went in. The whole

347
00:15:22,320 --> 00:15:24,559
thing I think was good for the system as a whole.

348
00:15:24,559 --> 00:15:26,440
So if we stay at twelve for a long time,

349
00:15:26,480 --> 00:15:29,080
I'm I'm totally good with it. But I've you know,

350
00:15:29,320 --> 00:15:31,240
first time I haven't wrote about the playoff. I think

351
00:15:31,240 --> 00:15:33,240
it was for Football outsiders in like two thousand and eight,

352
00:15:33,279 --> 00:15:35,679
and I said, I was advocated for sixteen, So I'm

353
00:15:35,679 --> 00:15:37,360
not going to complain if we get that too. I

354
00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:39,919
the twenty four and the multiple auto beds and all that,

355
00:15:39,919 --> 00:15:41,480
you can you can miss me with all that, we

356
00:15:41,519 --> 00:15:44,120
haven't even, man, we haven't. We have a twenty fourteen playoff.

357
00:15:44,159 --> 00:15:46,159
That's the way things are are shaped up right now.

358
00:15:46,200 --> 00:15:47,120
Speaker 5: It'll end in March.

359
00:15:47,360 --> 00:15:49,360
Speaker 4: We haven't even mastered twelve yet, so we don't need

360
00:15:49,360 --> 00:15:52,279
to think anything past four rounds just yet. But I'm

361
00:15:52,279 --> 00:15:55,000
fine with twelve or sixteen. And like I said, I

362
00:15:55,039 --> 00:15:58,279
mean my joke, and late in the season it was

363
00:15:58,320 --> 00:16:00,840
a pretty bitter joke. But this is the committee was

364
00:16:00,919 --> 00:16:03,440
no longer. This was the year it became official that

365
00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:06,759
the Committee does not rank twenty five teams. Crafts an

366
00:16:07,039 --> 00:16:11,080
archiesonally hand crafted list of teams for the playoffs, and

367
00:16:11,120 --> 00:16:12,759
they don't just rank one to twenty five.

368
00:16:12,799 --> 00:16:14,679
Speaker 5: And if the humans can't do it, I just want

369
00:16:14,720 --> 00:16:15,320
computers to do.

370
00:16:15,679 --> 00:16:17,639
Speaker 4: I just want to one through twenty five and then

371
00:16:17,679 --> 00:16:20,360
we'll figure out who made the playoff after those teams

372
00:16:20,360 --> 00:16:23,639
are ranked, and instead they were just twisting themselves in

373
00:16:23,759 --> 00:16:24,679
nots and I hated it.

374
00:16:25,320 --> 00:16:28,519
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm good with a Sweet sixteen, if you will.

375
00:16:28,799 --> 00:16:34,919
And if that Sweet sixteen would have been effectuated this year,

376
00:16:35,240 --> 00:16:37,399
who would have been in that thirteen fourteen to fifteen

377
00:16:37,480 --> 00:16:40,720
kind of sixteen slots? And do you think any of

378
00:16:40,720 --> 00:16:43,559
those teams could have maybe made a run in the

379
00:16:43,639 --> 00:16:47,600
CFP if you looked at kind of the potential seedings.

380
00:16:48,240 --> 00:16:50,960
Speaker 5: Yeah, I think if they were sixteen with my computer.

381
00:16:50,720 --> 00:16:53,360
Speaker 4: Thing that I was doing, BAU and Alabama are definitely in.

382
00:16:53,399 --> 00:16:56,559
I think Vanderbilt was in, and then I can't remember

383
00:16:56,600 --> 00:16:59,519
for sure the last pot was It might have been

384
00:17:00,000 --> 00:17:02,000
I had been, Oklahoma might have been.

385
00:17:02,399 --> 00:17:03,840
Speaker 5: I don't.

386
00:17:04,519 --> 00:17:07,839
Speaker 4: I think Utah Maybe I'm trying to remember for sure,

387
00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:09,559
but yeah, I mean, and again at that point, we

388
00:17:09,599 --> 00:17:12,200
are kind of we are lower in the bar when

389
00:17:12,359 --> 00:17:15,359
you get to the you know, Utah having lost to

390
00:17:15,440 --> 00:17:17,880
buy U n Tech and all that, but the Utah

391
00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:19,680
was a really good football team. I think any of

392
00:17:19,720 --> 00:17:21,839
those b y U and Utah both had the line

393
00:17:21,880 --> 00:17:24,559
play that could have been necessary to win at least

394
00:17:24,599 --> 00:17:27,000
a game or two. You know, they didn't have a

395
00:17:27,000 --> 00:17:30,559
Malachai Tony necessarily like Miami did. But the line play

396
00:17:30,599 --> 00:17:33,759
is what got Miami pretty far down that road.

397
00:17:33,799 --> 00:17:36,480
Speaker 6: And I think by U and Utah were both extremely physical.

398
00:17:36,519 --> 00:17:38,400
Speaker 4: That's why those three teams stood out in the Big

399
00:17:38,440 --> 00:17:40,200
twelve as a whole this year. Those are the three

400
00:17:40,240 --> 00:17:43,319
teams that could really really play in the trenches. And

401
00:17:44,440 --> 00:17:46,839
you know, we'll see, we'll see if anybody can change that.

402
00:17:46,880 --> 00:17:49,759
I've been updating rosters. I love, you know, Oklahoma State

403
00:17:49,839 --> 00:17:53,960
basically importing North Texas's offense. That's gonna be great. Kansas State.

404
00:17:54,000 --> 00:17:56,599
I think I love the moves Kansas State made on defense.

405
00:17:56,759 --> 00:17:59,400
But the top three were the top three, and obviously

406
00:17:59,480 --> 00:18:01,160
Morgan scot he's got a high bar to clear, but

407
00:18:01,200 --> 00:18:02,000
they might clear it.

408
00:18:03,079 --> 00:18:07,200
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's definitely intriguing this next year. Do you have

409
00:18:07,640 --> 00:18:11,079
a way too early win loss prediction for BYU football

410
00:18:11,119 --> 00:18:15,279
as you've been aggregating the roster talent and what they

411
00:18:15,319 --> 00:18:16,400
bring in and what they return.

412
00:18:17,359 --> 00:18:20,079
Speaker 4: I don't have updated rankings yet, but I can tell

413
00:18:20,079 --> 00:18:23,279
you that based on I have this year's schedule, based

414
00:18:23,319 --> 00:18:24,440
on last year's rating, that.

415
00:18:24,359 --> 00:18:26,200
Speaker 6: Would be right around nine wins for BYU.

416
00:18:26,319 --> 00:18:27,079
Speaker 5: So we'll see. I don't.

417
00:18:27,519 --> 00:18:29,440
Speaker 4: I'm pretty sure they're going to rank relatively high in

418
00:18:29,480 --> 00:18:30,839
returning production if I had to bet.

419
00:18:30,920 --> 00:18:32,519
Speaker 5: I'm not seeing really any.

420
00:18:32,720 --> 00:18:35,880
Speaker 4: Major major holes that suddenly have to be filled, so

421
00:18:35,920 --> 00:18:37,240
maybe it ends up being higher than that.

422
00:18:37,279 --> 00:18:38,359
Speaker 5: But yeah, I think I'm thinking.

423
00:18:38,839 --> 00:18:40,880
Speaker 4: My guess is that they'll probably start the year second

424
00:18:40,920 --> 00:18:42,839
in the conference, just like the finished the year.

425
00:18:42,880 --> 00:18:46,039
Speaker 3: I guess, Well, that's interesting because I think that would

426
00:18:46,200 --> 00:18:50,519
that would be maybe the most optimistic win loss or

427
00:18:50,559 --> 00:18:52,759
win projection from SP plus.

428
00:18:53,400 --> 00:18:56,079
Speaker 1: I want to say in the last five years, right that.

429
00:18:56,160 --> 00:18:58,400
Speaker 5: Yeah, I'm trying to I'm trying to. Yeah, I'm trying

430
00:18:58,400 --> 00:18:58,720
to remember.

431
00:18:58,759 --> 00:19:01,440
Speaker 4: I remember in twenty after they kind of they lost

432
00:19:01,440 --> 00:19:03,039
a bunch of guys but were still really good. In

433
00:19:03,119 --> 00:19:05,920
twenty one they were I think gus P plus was

434
00:19:05,960 --> 00:19:08,079
super high on them heading into twenty two, and they

435
00:19:08,119 --> 00:19:10,000
fell off, so that I should go back and look

436
00:19:10,000 --> 00:19:10,880
at what the projections were.

437
00:19:10,960 --> 00:19:13,000
Speaker 3: Yeah, they were high, you were, Yeah, you're right going

438
00:19:13,000 --> 00:19:16,160
into twenty twenty two with all the returning production and

439
00:19:16,200 --> 00:19:18,559
the talent. There's a lot of NFL talent on that squad,

440
00:19:19,279 --> 00:19:21,079
and with the strength of schedule in front of them,

441
00:19:21,279 --> 00:19:24,599
they did they fell short in twenty twenty twenty two.

442
00:19:24,640 --> 00:19:26,480
Speaker 1: I'd agree with that. I think you had them pretty high.

443
00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:28,359
I think they would probably be pretty close to each other.

444
00:19:29,079 --> 00:19:29,880
Speaker 5: It was kind of chasing.

445
00:19:29,920 --> 00:19:31,880
Speaker 4: It was chasing BYU around for a couple of years.

446
00:19:31,880 --> 00:19:33,279
The I thought they'd fall off in twenty one.

447
00:19:33,319 --> 00:19:33,960
Speaker 6: They really didn't.

448
00:19:34,000 --> 00:19:36,599
Speaker 4: Thought they'd be great in twenty two, and they weren't. So,

449
00:19:36,839 --> 00:19:38,720
but I think we're back on track now these last

450
00:19:38,720 --> 00:19:39,720
couple of years.

451
00:19:40,119 --> 00:19:41,000
Speaker 1: Yeah, they had lost.

452
00:19:41,079 --> 00:19:44,359
Speaker 3: They lost a Notre Dame that year at a neutral

453
00:19:44,400 --> 00:19:47,200
site in Vegas. They lost to Arkansas at home. Probably

454
00:19:47,240 --> 00:19:49,119
shouldn't have lost that game. They lost to Liberty on

455
00:19:49,160 --> 00:19:52,359
the road. They lost to East Carolina as well at home.

456
00:19:52,599 --> 00:19:55,839
They fell short. There's no doubt about it. The only

457
00:19:55,880 --> 00:19:59,039
loss that I felt like they really probably should have

458
00:19:59,039 --> 00:20:01,519
took it on the on the lipswither was that Oregon

459
00:20:01,559 --> 00:20:05,119
team at Oregon. All the other ones were all winnable games.

460
00:20:06,319 --> 00:20:08,079
Speaker 5: Yeah that was then. I mean they're still grated out.

461
00:20:08,119 --> 00:20:12,160
Speaker 4: Okay, they got worse than twenty three, but then, yeah,

462
00:20:12,240 --> 00:20:14,319
like we were saying, they rallied late and then they've

463
00:20:14,319 --> 00:20:15,160
been good ever since.

464
00:20:16,000 --> 00:20:17,039
Speaker 1: Yep, no doubt about it.

465
00:20:17,079 --> 00:20:20,039
Speaker 3: Bill Conley here the creator of sp plus representing ESPN

466
00:20:20,039 --> 00:20:23,240
dot Com, talking from college football here on your Utah

467
00:20:23,559 --> 00:20:29,440
ESPN Radio network. So, Bill, the Big Twelve as a conference,

468
00:20:30,119 --> 00:20:33,000
how do you see it comparative to the SEC, the

469
00:20:33,039 --> 00:20:36,359
Big Ten, and the ACC Right now? Are they on

470
00:20:36,440 --> 00:20:41,119
the on the bottom rung here? Comparatively speaking from a

471
00:20:41,880 --> 00:20:45,960
talent from a productivity standpoint, Well.

472
00:20:45,880 --> 00:20:48,200
Speaker 4: I think, I mean they were called in terms of

473
00:20:48,240 --> 00:20:52,319
average ratings, they were closer to the Big Ten than

474
00:20:52,480 --> 00:20:53,880
or they were just about as close to the Big

475
00:20:53,880 --> 00:20:57,680
ten ats there where the ACCHC stunk. You know, obviously

476
00:20:58,039 --> 00:21:00,599
obviously Miami peaked late and that ended up flecting well

477
00:21:00,640 --> 00:21:03,440
on a lot of teams. Yeah, but the bottom of

478
00:21:03,480 --> 00:21:05,240
the just as I was saying about the Big Ten,

479
00:21:05,279 --> 00:21:07,920
the bottom of the AEC was really really poor, and

480
00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:10,680
so you're just going to get an extra easy game

481
00:21:10,720 --> 00:21:12,440
in that conference compared to everybody else's.

482
00:21:12,440 --> 00:21:14,440
Speaker 5: And the Big Ten was or the Big Twelve? Excuse me?

483
00:21:14,599 --> 00:21:16,880
Speaker 4: Was I mean that there were you know, Colorado wasn't

484
00:21:16,920 --> 00:21:18,519
very good. There were a couple of pretty poor teams.

485
00:21:18,559 --> 00:21:20,799
But you just think about in the last two to

486
00:21:20,880 --> 00:21:25,359
three years, almost everybody's been good to quite good at

487
00:21:25,440 --> 00:21:28,519
least once, and that's a pretty impressive thing. Can't necessarily

488
00:21:28,559 --> 00:21:32,160
say that about the about the ACC. So obviously there's

489
00:21:32,200 --> 00:21:34,599
a gap between the top two, but between the top

490
00:21:34,599 --> 00:21:36,680
two and the next two, I should say. But I mean,

491
00:21:36,759 --> 00:21:39,119
right now, I think in terms of consistent quality, Big

492
00:21:39,160 --> 00:21:41,519
twelve is still comfortably ahead of the a SEC.

493
00:21:42,359 --> 00:21:43,400
Speaker 1: That's it. That's a good thing.

494
00:21:43,480 --> 00:21:45,720
Speaker 3: How far away are they from the SEC right now?

495
00:21:45,759 --> 00:21:50,279
I see it seems like they may be falling from grace.

496
00:21:50,559 --> 00:21:52,200
Speaker 1: All of that equity that was.

497
00:21:52,119 --> 00:21:56,160
Speaker 3: Built through uh you know, paying players under the table

498
00:21:56,720 --> 00:21:59,920
and uh, those those car dealerships in rural areas, you know,

499
00:22:00,079 --> 00:22:00,880
fitting the bill.

500
00:22:01,519 --> 00:22:04,200
Speaker 1: It seems like that's possibly coming to an end.

501
00:22:05,559 --> 00:22:07,279
Speaker 4: Well, like I said, I think, you know, in terms

502
00:22:07,319 --> 00:22:10,000
of average rating, the SEC is still the comfortably Their

503
00:22:10,000 --> 00:22:12,000
average espupulsrating was thirteen point one.

504
00:22:12,039 --> 00:22:13,240
Speaker 5: That was forty points.

505
00:22:13,000 --> 00:22:15,359
Speaker 4: Ahead of the Big Ten because again, you know, they

506
00:22:15,359 --> 00:22:18,640
had won. Their worst team was sixty seven, and the

507
00:22:18,680 --> 00:22:20,680
Big Ten had seven teams worse than that.

508
00:22:20,839 --> 00:22:22,000
Speaker 5: So that's the plus.

509
00:22:22,359 --> 00:22:24,640
Speaker 4: You know, in like fifty percent of this year of

510
00:22:24,680 --> 00:22:27,839
this past season's games were decided by one touchdown in

511
00:22:27,920 --> 00:22:30,759
the SEC, so that's I mean, it's extremely competitive it's

512
00:22:30,799 --> 00:22:34,640
very high quality, but as you're suggesting, not really a

513
00:22:34,680 --> 00:22:37,680
guaranteed top five team right now. And the SEC is

514
00:22:37,720 --> 00:22:40,440
the one who insisted that conferences should be judged by

515
00:22:40,440 --> 00:22:43,240
who won the national titles, so they are falling by

516
00:22:43,240 --> 00:22:45,319
their own standard in that regard, even if the average

517
00:22:45,359 --> 00:22:46,480
quality is still really good.

518
00:22:48,079 --> 00:22:51,200
Speaker 3: My guy, Bill Conley, Ladies and gentlemen love talking ball

519
00:22:51,240 --> 00:22:54,400
with you is always a pleasure of blessing and for

520
00:22:54,440 --> 00:22:56,119
all those that are listen, the best way to support

521
00:22:56,160 --> 00:22:57,640
you what you do, how you do it?

522
00:22:57,640 --> 00:22:57,920
Speaker 1: Bill?

523
00:22:59,039 --> 00:23:00,720
Speaker 5: I mean, I'm still I can't say I've been.

524
00:23:00,759 --> 00:23:03,240
Speaker 4: I've been, you know, nosing spreadsheets here lately, so I'm

525
00:23:03,279 --> 00:23:03,960
not posting much.

526
00:23:04,000 --> 00:23:07,440
Speaker 5: But go to go to you know, ESPN underscore Bill

527
00:23:07,440 --> 00:23:09,240
C at Twitter. You'll find out what I'm posting.

528
00:23:09,359 --> 00:23:10,240
Speaker 6: Uh, and we'll have.

529
00:23:10,920 --> 00:23:12,319
Speaker 4: It'll take me a while to get through this, but

530
00:23:12,400 --> 00:23:14,240
once we get through all the roster updates, we'll have

531
00:23:14,279 --> 00:23:16,000
a ton of content March most likely.

532
00:23:16,440 --> 00:23:19,880
Speaker 3: I love it, MANH yeah, yeah, what else? Uh? You know,

533
00:23:20,000 --> 00:23:23,599
because you do you do any mail bag things? Were like, uh,

534
00:23:23,960 --> 00:23:26,440
fans are able to send you messages DMS or anything

535
00:23:26,480 --> 00:23:26,640
like that.

536
00:23:26,680 --> 00:23:29,559
Speaker 1: What have been what have people been asking you? About recently.

537
00:23:30,400 --> 00:23:32,200
Speaker 4: I should do an AMA at some point on on

538
00:23:32,359 --> 00:23:35,359
social No it is, I mean right now, I think

539
00:23:35,400 --> 00:23:38,400
everybody's just waiting, you know, like, do you have any updates?

540
00:23:38,400 --> 00:23:40,240
So when I'm returning, production is going to come out.

541
00:23:40,279 --> 00:23:44,799
That's kind of the most common question. But no, that's

542
00:23:44,839 --> 00:23:47,640
that's pretty much. You know, I have, you know, the

543
00:23:47,960 --> 00:23:50,480
normal kind of train of content here coming up right now.

544
00:23:50,519 --> 00:23:53,480
Everybody everybody was distracted by the NFL. Everybody's distracted by

545
00:23:53,519 --> 00:23:56,200
Olympics now, so you know, socials are pretty quiet.

546
00:23:56,759 --> 00:24:00,000
Speaker 3: Love it man, Well, appreciate you Bill as always loved

547
00:24:00,200 --> 00:24:01,319
and ball with your thanks ropping on.

548
00:24:02,160 --> 00:24:04,279
Speaker 6: Absolutely take care Bill Conley.

549
00:24:04,039 --> 00:24:04,839
Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen.

550
00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:09,200
Speaker 3: A great segment, and I always appreciate Bill Conley's time

551
00:24:09,240 --> 00:24:12,480
here on your Utah ESPN Radio Network. That segment was

552
00:24:12,519 --> 00:24:15,759
brought to you by Dental Pros off Utah Dentalprosofutah dot com.

553
00:24:16,039 --> 00:24:17,839
If you've been told you need a filling, a crown,

554
00:24:17,880 --> 00:24:20,599
a rooking out, get a second opinion at Dental Pros

555
00:24:20,640 --> 00:24:22,960
of Utah and American Fort. They utilize the best Bibo

556
00:24:23,039 --> 00:24:26,559
meta techniques. These are minimally invasive techniques to rebuild your teeth.

557
00:24:26,640 --> 00:24:28,559
Speaker 1: Layer by layers. See, you don't have to settle for

558
00:24:28,599 --> 00:24:29,079
the fake teeth.

559
00:24:29,160 --> 00:24:31,920
Speaker 3: Later on in life, if you've struggled with your current dentist,

560
00:24:31,960 --> 00:24:35,960
you're looking for maybe a new experience, new education, maybe

561
00:24:35,960 --> 00:24:38,599
minimally invasive dental care, saving your teeth.

562
00:24:38,400 --> 00:24:40,519
Speaker 1: And your wallet in the long run.

563
00:24:40,559 --> 00:24:42,680
Speaker 3: Contact Dental Pros of Utah and let them know I

564
00:24:42,759 --> 00:24:47,319
sent you VPI products, VPI service, VIP discounts at Dentalprosofutah

565
00:24:47,440 --> 00:24:49,839
dot com. Let's take a time out, guys. We'll be

566
00:24:49,920 --> 00:24:53,240
back and we'll get into some more news and notes,

567
00:24:53,680 --> 00:24:57,680
more college basketball with Chancellor Johnson. The twelve analyst coming

568
00:24:57,759 --> 00:25:00,519
up next, gets his thought on AJ Debond's UH and

569
00:25:00,640 --> 00:25:01,079
his perform

