Speaker 1: You're listening to Jay's Analysis integrating film, philosophy, geopolitics, literature, history, economics,
intrigue and Espionage only at Jaysanalysis dot Com and now
Jay's Analysis Podcast with your host Jadier.
Speaker 2: You're listening to Jay's Analysis. This time we come to
the subject of tragedy and Hope, something that I've been
intending to get to for a long time, and I
hope that we can really cover a lot of ground
and metalware of anyone else doing a full talk series
on the entire book. So I think that it's going
to be beneficial. It's going to be a lot of
talks that we've got here, and I think that you're
going to want to take notes and enjoy it because
it's one of the most seminal books, i'd say, of
the twentieth century in terms of revealing really how geopolitics
works and the strategy of what we're going to call
the Atlanticist Anglo American establishment, which is of course Quigley's
term that he uses in another text that's of that
same title, The Anglo American Establishment, another book that he's written,
and of course he also wrote on military history. But
the reason that tragedy and hope is so significant is
that it was intended to be a history of the
twentieth century from the perspective of the Western establishment and
from the perspective of the CFR archives.
Speaker 3: So that's why.
Speaker 2: Book stands out. It's not your typical history of Western civilization.
It's not your typical I don't know, Fernand Bradel book
on the History of Civilizations or something like that, sort
of a mainline historian. It's really a policy book for
those in the establishment. And of course quickly was a
Harvard University graduate historian, then later at Georgetown University, where he.
Speaker 3: Spent the most of his career.
Speaker 2: And so what he's going to do is essentially put
forth the real history from the archives of the Roundtable Group,
the Milner Group, and so forth, who will later in
the book be called the Clivenden set, especially during the
time of World War Two, who we might just simply
refer to as kind of the English European banking dynasty,
and eventually this will include the American banking dynasties Rockefellers, Shifts, Warburgs,
and others, who, while they may have at times differences
amongst themselves various policies, family rivalries in the big picture
are actually not in opposition, but rather interested in consolidating
power for the purpose of restructuring the globe and moving
us into the age of transitions in global government. And
in fact, quickly we'll have an entire chapter where he
talks about just that very thing, but the move into
the third wave convergence period, which is what the globalists
have planned for our era roughly the past few decades
and into the next few decades of the future. And
what I think is the most telling about Quigley's book
is that it's not a conspiracy book. It's an apologetic
of sorts, because really Quigley's interested in saying I have
no aversions to the Western establishments, aims and goals.
Speaker 3: In fact, I think that it's the best.
Speaker 2: Hope for mankind, hence the title tragedy that would be
of course the world wars of the last century, and
then hope, which would be ultimately speaking, the extension of
Western Atlanticist libertarian even though he's not strictly a libertarian,
but basic ideas of liberal.
Speaker 3: Democracy which need to be.
Speaker 2: Seeded in the rest of the globe.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 2: Of course, Quigley was Bill Clinton's mentor and if you
find the clips on YouTube, you can find Bill Clinton
thanking his mentor, Carol Quigley for sort of tutoring him,
handling him so to speak at Georgetown. But I've also
there's also kind of a bit of mythology that's grown
up around the book, which is difficult to ferret out.
And so you'll hear all kinds of myths and stories
and legends, and I don't claim to know which ones
are true or not true. I don't know how you
could really verify these things that people say, Oh, there
was once a plate secret Plates that were suppressed and
the book wasn't supposed to be published because it showed
too much, and oh oops, they accidentally printed it. And
I don't know that I believe all of that, because
it's not like there aren't other books that tell you
essentially the same game plan or strategy, you know, Brave
New World, right.
Speaker 3: I mean, if the bankers.
Speaker 2: And the technocotic establishment was really worried about it, they
would not have been published, right. But it's not like
the establishment was worried about the publication of New World.
It was published on purpose by one of its top brains,
Elvis Huxley. And it's the same I would say with
Tragy and Hope. I don't they're not worried about this
getting out, or else it wouldn't be out right. I mean,
it's kind of a It's important to understand too, which
people don't usually talk about, is that there's also propaganda
in Quigley's book. It's a defense of the Western establishment. Now,
some people will make these arguments O Quigley was secretly
trying to get out what he couldn't say. And no,
he numerous times in the book defends the Western position
in its various expansionist tendencies, colonialism, and so forth. He's
at times critical of monetary policy and the hardcore libertarian
I guess you could perspectives, I guess you could say,
and so we might class him in this kind of
democratic convergence perspective, as we said, third wave, which was
more popular I think in the you know, back in
the sixties and seventies when he was writing, than it
is nowadays. Even though really the Fabian third wave sort
of blending of Eastern socialism and communism and Western capitalism
is pretty much what's happening. Those terminologies are somewhat dated, right,
so you know, figures like Alvin Toffler and so forth
all have written and spoken of this phenomenon in this
this perspective.
Speaker 3: But as we said, the book is important because it's
going to.
Speaker 2: Lay out the way that the Western establishment, which has
the upper hand obviously geopolitically, the way that it views geopolitics,
and why.
Speaker 3: It views geopolitics the way it does, and why it
does what it does.
Speaker 2: Now, whether you think that's good or bad will of
course be determined based on what you think of what
your worldview right tells you on how things are, and
whether we live in a situation where the world has
progressed to be something essentially much greater and more positive
than it was decades or centuries ago, or whether you
think that it maybe is digressed.
Speaker 3: Or maybe neither one.
Speaker 2: Maybe the world's just continuing on as it always has
with different power structure, is vying for power, or maybe
power doesn't change hands, maybe power is always concentrated in
central institutions.
Speaker 3: The irony, of course, will.
Speaker 4: Be that the this new speak about democracy that will
play such an important role in Quigley's books in Western
propaganda and parlance is quite admittedly a fiction, and I
think That's one of the first things that will stand
out in Quigley's book is that the lauding.
Speaker 2: Praise, adulation and so forth in terms of what democracy
is and freedom is that this supposedly is represented by
the West, and all other powers and forces in the
world are of course by this sort of via negative,
of this negation perspective, conceived of as or demonized, right,
conceived of as anti liberty.
Speaker 3: And we'll see this.
Speaker 2: Of course in World War One, World War II, Vietnam, Korea,
Cold War especially, and then nowadays in the War on Terror. Right,
the same refrain of propaganda and psychological warfare has been
chanted for over a century now and ultimately going back,
you know, certainly to the French Revolution, the chant of liberty, freedom,
democracy and equality, liberty, egalite fraternity. Yes, we've seen all
of this Western civilization overturned, upturned, churned over, reorganized under
this banner since the time of the French Revolution. And
obviously it had precedents as well, part of that scientific revolution,
empiricism and so forth under the banner of liberty. And
what's so startling about this is really the fact that
it's been so successful precisely because it has no real
context or fuller sense to give it meaning. It's just
bear phraseology, it's slogan airing. At the time of the
French Revolution, it was nationalism that was the libertarian movement, right,
and over time, through large scale banker geostrategic planning, nationalism
has now become the far right ideology. Interesting, So what
was libertarian, liberal leftist at the time of the French Revolution,
French nationalism and so forth has morphed, transmuted and turned
into now liberal global hegemony of the West, and that
is the only representation of democracy and humanitarianism and so forth.
For a good treatise on this, I would suggest, if
you haven't heard it, listen to my interview with Alexander Dugan,
Putin's former advisor on this very topic. Right, the liberal
American world order, and that's what quickly is going to
treat at length and defend at length, the liberal American
world order.
Speaker 3: Now American here.
Speaker 2: Of course, even strictly speaking, be honest, is not the
American people, right, It's not you and me and our
buddies and so forth, and even our friends who went
off to fight in foreign wars.
Speaker 3: That's not what makes up America.
Speaker 2: Although to some degree it does, and especially if you
are a soldier, you're fighting under the banner of America.
Americanism is an ideology, and it's the ideology of classical
Western liberalism that derives from the Enlightenment, comes to kind
of a fruition in the French Revolution, and is based
upon a whole host of philosophical and religious or anti
religious presuppositions that ultimately serve to.
Speaker 3: Remove, just like.
Speaker 2: With Darwinism and scientism and so forth coming out of
the same period, remove any kind of metaphysical relations in
the seventeen hundreds, it would become replaced with materialism, and
naturalism would become the new metaphysical god by which persons
might find themselves united. And over several generations and centuries
we now see the flowering of Western quote liberty in
the erasing of gender right explicitly and perfectly, as Professor
Dugan in that talk discusses right as the logical consequence
of these positions, Well, how do we get here? Well quickly,
it's going to tell us that. And so in the
beginning of the book he kind of lays out the
strategy and the framework and briefly what gave rise to
the success of Western civilization and its population increase, and
he discusses things like revolutions in agriculture, revolutions and transportation
industrial revolution.
Speaker 3: Right. All of these.
Speaker 2: Things, of course lead up to and of course the
philosophy right there are one of the reasons for the
success of Western philosophy historically in maintaining a general kind of.
Speaker 3: Tradition.
Speaker 2: I guess you could say, is the philosophy that undergirded it,
and then quickly begins, for example, on page twenty four,
are discussing what I just laid out, the various shifts
right that will give birth to the twentieth century, and
quickly lists as those shifts as I said, many of
the ones that I mentioned number one, the belief in
the innate goodness of man number two, secularism exactly, number three,
belief in progress number four, liberalism number five, capitalism number six,
faith in science number seven, democracy, number eight, nationalism exactly.
So all of the things that I've been telling you,
and all the things you've heard me say and write
about for many years, now here's quickly telling you all
of that. So I know what I'm talking about, right,
I didn't invent my ideas. They're not, you know, speculations.
Here's the establishment telling you right. And so quickly then
goes on to list a lot of the figures who,
of course would play prominently in the birth of these
new ideas that Maestra, Maider, Nick Jefferson, John Stuart Miller,
John Locke, you know, on and on and on. We
could list many of Newton, many of these figures.
Speaker 3: That would.
Speaker 2: Be prominent luminaries and lights in the secular sense that
would lead to the alteration of the way that Western
civilization prior to this, which functioned on depending on how
rough or generically you want to define the term West
was monarchical. You had monarchy, and you had the church
right thrown an altar. And so the eight points that
he lists at that time, you know, seventeen hundreds so forth,
constituted liberalism. And this is of course where we get
the term the classical liberal tradition right, Thomas Reid, right,
John Locke, John Stuart Mill, Jefferson, Franklin right, the fathers
of America, Rousseau and so on, and many of its predecessors,
Saint Simon, Auguste Compte and the luminists bishopped these all
would play into Mazzini many of the even the Masonic
orders and so forth, would play into the European shift
as Quigley describes it. In that European shift, of course,
is grounded in the notion of away with thrown, away
with altar, and this is explicitly mentioned in I forget
one of the Scottish rite.
Speaker 3: I think with the royal arch maybe where.
Speaker 2: You vow or to stab the bishop's miter or something
that you spit on it or something to that, whatever
it is, but it's a it's a vow to destroy
throne and altar for what well, for the erecting of
the liberal, republican, democratic world order. And it's important to
understand that though Quiggli doesn't engage in anything really dealing
with Masonry, just replace all of his comments in the
first few chapters about liberalism with masonry and you've got
the same thing, right.
Speaker 3: So it's a plan which quickly does.
Speaker 2: Talk about the negative idea of nature, of the nature
of evil flow from the belief that human nature was good,
and this comes out of the notion of liberalism from
the Enlightenment and the belief that society, collective social orders
were somehow inherently lesser or bad. And this is how
we get the notion of classical liberalism. The state is
evil because it is in some way a collective grouping
or a metaphysical category that is arbitrary and created, and therefore,
as a result, the solution, the source of freedom for
man is individual liberty.
Speaker 3: Now, this is why I don't class myself as.
Speaker 2: A libertarian or a free marketer, or a anarchist or
any of these Enlightenment invented ideologies, is for number one,
because they're not good philosophy. And that would be because
they are grounded in the notion of the idea that
you can have a dialectical tension that is the source
of freedom, right, so.
Speaker 3: That somehow that atomistic individualism.
Speaker 2: Is the way or the means out of the box
of this life, the prison and the struggle and so forth.
So whereas Thomas Hobbes would have said in Leviathan that
life is nasty, British and short, and the state is
the Leviathan and that's the only way to go. We're
all part of this big collective entity of the state.
The revolutionary dialectical opposite, which is controlled opposition, is the
notion of individual libertarian freedom. Oh, if the state and
collectivism is bad, then I must rush to the opposite,
as humans often do creatures of extremes. Then the opposite
is the truth. And this is why we're all constantly
manipulated and conton dialectics, is because we think that if
that equals bad, and the people that we listen to
who propagandizes tell us that collectivism socialism are bad, then
we must rush to the other end, to the freedom
loving libertarian forefathers and Jefferson and so forth. But the
fathers of collectivism and the fathers of atomistic individual libertarianism
are all members of the same lodges, aren't they. Now
they may have disputes and spats amongst them, but both
the Eastern communism and the Western libertarian free marketers are
all sons.
Speaker 3: Of the lodge.
Speaker 2: They're all sons of the widow or whatever the sonic
terminology is, and they are all united in the rejection
of metaphysical categories for nation, tribe, and embodied in the
monarch and the church in a sort of leveling attempt
right where it becomes the goddess reason right not actually
believed to be a real goddess, but the symbolic embodiment
of human rationality and reason. And we see this today
in its full flowering with transgenderism. Right, because if all
external metaphysical categories, such as becoming belonging to the human race, right,
that's a collective belonging, belonging to a family, belonging to
the gender of male, right, these all become tyrannies in modern,
full fledged, coming to its full conclusion liberalism.
Speaker 3: So we live in the liberal era, whether we even
know it or not. We swim in its sea.
Speaker 2: We are sons and daughters of its milieus, zeitgeisten ethos,
whether we know it, acknowledge it, or even care. And
so we can truly speak of the spirit of our
times as quote liberal. But the iron, of course is
even we'll see what quickly is that this liberal belief
is fiction.
Speaker 3: It's not true liberty.
Speaker 2: It is rather a reorganization in new business phase by
which to reorganize the globe under the banner of liberty. Meanwhile,
everyone is kept in abject slavery embodied as I said
in the Final Revolution of Bertrand Russell and Eldos Hugsley.
The total technocratics say and quickly will deal with that
in a chapter. He will actually discuss that we are
now moving into the age of total technocratic expert control.
Speaker 3: The experts. Right. It makes me think of Alan Watt
always talk to.
Speaker 5: Me, well, you see the experts quickly, Oh you see,
Carl quickly told you you'd be under the rule of
the experts.
Speaker 2: You see, right, the experts, and that quickly has a
chapter on So Alan and Watt is correct in that statement.
Speaker 3: But most of the.
Speaker 2: Persons who in the alternative sphere soda which I don't
hate all of that, I don't like being classed with it,
they're going to tell you that the answer in the
way out of all of this mess is more of
seventeen seventy six, right, we need more of what was
the venom that started this whole problem of the modern world.
And if you doubt me, right, all you libertarians and
anarchists out there, just read page twenty four of the
Quigley's book What is the modern Liberal Era? Grounded in
belief in the anate goodness of men? Secularism, belief in progress, liberalism, capitalism,
faith and science, scientism, democracy, and nationalism. These aren't liberal
movements of yesteryear. Now Western Civilization to nineteen fourteen will
begin the first section of the book. And here what
stands out is the fact that we're not going to
get really deep into kind of the boring things of
all the economic facts and figures. We're going to focus
on sections such as page forty seven where Quigley says,
considering the bankers, okay, banker power, and this is what's
going to characterize.
Speaker 3: The modern era.
Speaker 2: The modern liberal era is homo economicus.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 2: Another very wise man, Osbald Spengler, who wrote The Decline
of the West, another great civilization treatment, wrote that we
have passed out of Western Faustian man, as he called it,
This is Western man seeking, you know, always to explore,
to expand, to create civilization and so forth. And we
passed out of that into the modern era of decay
that Schwengler titled the dominance of the money power Homo economicus.
So out of Faustian man into homo economicus monetary quantitative man.
And again this is a natural corollary to the liberalism, capitalism, democracy, nationalism, scientism, secularism,
and monetarism materialism of the European shift that quickly talks
about so naturally, that shift away from the belief in
metaphysical truths and principles is what gives rise to going
to Dallas or New York and seeing the tallest buildings
being banks. Okay, banks are the new cathedral. The banking
cathedral is what defines the modern era. Talks about that. Okay,
So it is a banker conspiracy. Don't ever doubt that.
And so when discussing the bankers on page forty seven,
quickly says moreover, their relationships with governments were always in
monetary terms, not real terms. So the banker's angle was
always about money with governments. Why is that, Well, because
they were obsessed, he says, with the stability of monetary
exchanges between one country's money system another. And they used
this power of influence to do two things. Number One,
to make all money and debt expressed explicitly and strictly
in terms of a single limited commodity which they controlled.
Speaker 3: Of course, gold.
Speaker 2: So prior to nineteen fourteen, Western civilization was about a
banker determined gold standard, okay. And what was number two here? Quickly,
two to get all monetary systems and matters out of
control of the government into private banking hands.
Speaker 3: That is crucial because.
Speaker 2: Number one, you are going to see endlessly regurgitated and
repeated in the libertarian patriot Patriot haard Alt media Tea
Party circus, the ridiculous Moniker that if we could only
go back to the gold standard in seventeen seventy six,
and blah blah blah blah blah. Well that's an older
bankster model.
Speaker 3: Duh.
Speaker 2: It's right here in Quickly's book on page forty seven,
and Quickly says right after that the whole point of
this was to shift commercial capitalism into mercantilism and the
whole pattern of social organization around dynastic monarchy to restructure it.
So the whole point of all that was restructuring society
out of monarchies and an older form of commercial capitalism
that would be East India Company, Hudson Bay Company, Dutch Company,
Virginia Company, and so forth, these great predecessors to the
modern corporation, which were at that time licensed state corporations,
and shift away into private banking control of monetary systems.
That was the banker's entire strategy prior to nineteen fourteen.
Speaker 3: Now this does not just include Jewish bankers.
Speaker 2: It includes all the big banking houses and dynasties in
all the countries, including Japan.
Speaker 3: All right, So, persons.
Speaker 2: Who obsess over Jews all day, you will find Quigley's
chapter on Japan very relevant because Japan will eventually fall
into the hands of a handful of Japanese bankers. Now
from here, quickly says the period of commercial capitalism okay,
which he calls the period of fourteen forty to eighteen fifty. Okay,
this is the monarchy stamped companies. Okay, And again East
India Company, right, Hudson Bay Company, Virginia Company, Those monarchy
stamped companies are done away with. That's what the bankers want.
And how and why do.
Speaker 3: They do this?
Speaker 2: Well, they want control, why and the means by which
they do this is the libertarian philosophy. It's seventeen seventy
six and seventeen eighty nine. That's not me, Okay, if
you're mad out there, it's page forty seven, and quickly, okay,
it's the first chapter, and it's the second chapter. Now
you can think of that what you want. But that's
what he says. Now, how else did they do this scam? Well, Britain,
of course, will figure into this in a key role,
particularly from seventeen seventy to eighteen fifty in the industrial
capitalism period, where Britain achieved victories over Louis the fourteenth
Right in the sixteen sixties, and then the French Revolutionary
government with Napoleon also britain victory there as well seventeen
ninety two to eighteen fifteen leads of course to the
predominance of the British Empire, the Anglo American establishment, now British,
the Anglo American establishment.
Speaker 3: The earlier form, right, the British Empire.
Speaker 2: This is not an empire, as we said of the people, okay,
it's a shadow banking empire. And more or less quickly
we'll say that, right, because he's just talked about how
the bankers wanted to get the monarchs in their pocket,
and that's what they did.
Speaker 3: He get them in debt.
Speaker 2: Run the countries up debt, debt. Wise, get those monarchs
into your pocket, and then the monarchs become your puppets.
You can get them to do what you want because
they owe you billions of dollars. Okay, and wars help that, right,
So we all know about these stories of the Rothchilds
and Napoleon and Waterloo and so forth. Right, Now again
the whole point, run up everybody's credit, get them in debt.
And this is the old banker trick. And how they
do this, Well, here we go. For generations. Men had
sought to avoid the one drawback of gold, it's heaviness,
by using pieces of paper gold notes, right, to represent
the specific pieces of gold. Right, gold's heavy. We're gonna
use gold as the currency. Well, we might as well
have pieces of paper to represent the gold, because then
it's not you know, you're not lugging around six hundred
pounds worth of gold to buy your groceries.
Speaker 3: Now today we.
Speaker 2: Call these gold certificates, he says. But such aficate certificate
entitles the bearer to exchange it for a piece of
gold on demand. But in view of the convenience of paper,
only a small fraction of certificate holders ever did make
such demands. Right, so very few people actually went and
claimed their gold with a gold certificate.
Speaker 3: They left it in the bank and they used the notes.
Speaker 2: Now what did this do Well, this allowed the gold
holders to print gold certificates.
Speaker 3: Right. Accordingly, the rest of the gold could be used
for business purposes.
Speaker 2: Right, And so here we have at the beginning of
fractional reserve banking, with gold notes, gold reserve for payments
and demands against them, and so forth. Right, such an
excess volume of paper claims against reserves that we now
call banknotes.
Speaker 3: In fact, the.
Speaker 2: Creation of paper claims greater than the reserves of all
available means that the bankers were creating money out of
nothing fiat beginning of the idea of fiat currency in
the modern era. The same could be said in another
way that by issuing banknotes, the same could be done
in another way, he says, not by bank notes, but
by deposit banks. Deposit banks discovered that orders and checks
drawn against deposits and given to third persons were often
not cashed. So if they weren't cash, it's just sitting
there and you can kind of do what you want
with this gold, right, well, then print up gold certificates.
Speaker 3: Accordingly, it was necessary for the.
Speaker 2: Banker to keep on hand in actual money no more
than the fraction of the deposits that were likely to
be drawn upon and cashed in. So if you have
a billion dollars in gold, and so I say again,
a million dollars in gold, and every year only one
thousand dollars worth of that is actually cashed.
Speaker 3: You can do what you want with all of.
Speaker 2: This extra gold and make up gold certificates. So this
created deposits and give the gave the appearance of value
when there was nothing, nothing actually backing up the value
except for the original amount of gold. Right you could say, well,
I've got a billion dollars worth of bank gold notes,
right when you only had a million dollars with the
gold in the bank. And you could get away with
this because only a fraction of that people are actually
going to claim their gold. In England, in sixteen ninety
four the Bank of England, William Patterson said about the
charter of the Bank of England, the bank hath benefit
of interest on all money is which it creates out
of thin air.
Speaker 3: So there you go. Even in sixteen ninety four this
trick was being used through the.
Speaker 2: Bank of England.
Speaker 3: And of course the Bank of England was.
Speaker 2: Prominent, centrally prominent in this era. And again this is
not the bank of the Government of England. This is
the bank of private families that own the shares and
the stocks in the Bank of England, which the people
of England think.
Speaker 3: Is the bank of the people England.
Speaker 2: Now, in the nature of business and globalism and empire
and so forth, as such that these bankers and by
extension their corporate buddies, want to be international. You don't
want to just be a local business man.
Speaker 3: You want to be global corp. You want to be
global bank.
Speaker 2: And so this impetus for globalism is what would propel
the great banking dynasties that Quigly lists right behind the
Bank of England and others as the rothschild. Right now,
this is page fifty one.
Speaker 3: So there you go.
Speaker 2: Now, so we've seen then this banker scam is very real.
It's this trick that we've heard talked about in alternative media,
you know, for so long. And we might think of,
say Ron Paul talking about the Federal Reserve and all
this private establishment banking in the hands of the money
printers and them running up debts and so forth through
if you have currency. Now, all that's true. The only
problem is that Ron Paul's answer in philosophy, for example,
is a banker philosophy. It's the older banker philosophy, which
quickly says in chapter one and two. So if you
take issue with that, that's fine, that's your issue. I'm
telling you what the establishment itself knows and says about
its own philosophies and plans and strategies in which ones
worked and didn't work.
Speaker 3: So when you're trying to.
Speaker 2: Say we need more seventeen seventy six to solve nineteen
eighty four, seventeen seventy six was beta nineteen eighty four, okay,
nineteen eighty four is two point zero, and now we're
moving beyond.
Speaker 3: Nineteen eighty four.
Speaker 2: So you're not going to solve modern problems with the
thing that started the modern era.
Speaker 3: And again, this is all in quickly, so stop being
so stupid. Please.
Speaker 2: Who are these big banking families of this period, right
the late eighteen hundreds and into the early nineteen hundreds,
they are bearing Lazard, Erlinger, Warburg, Schroeder, Seligmann, Speyer, Mirobad, Malay, Bold,
raw Child, Morgan. All of those are Anglo and Jewish, okay,
And that's the power structure behind. That's the shot real
shadow government of the Atlantis Anglo American establishment. So it's
not all Jewish, it's not all Datzi.
Speaker 3: It's not all one thing.
Speaker 2: It's all of these banking houses that are mega rich,
and they're not all Jewish, but they're also not all
Calvinist or Protestant or halfway right. It's a combo of
them all and you do it that what you want.
Speaker 3: But that's the truth. Okay.
Speaker 2: Now he says they were these banking houses were cosmopolitan
and international.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 2: Now, this is why we get all the internationalist movements
in the modern era. Okay, international communism, international capitalism. It's
because the bankers behind it are internationalists, right for their interests.
And that begins to key you into the fraud nature
of Marxism. Because Marxism is international, it shares all of
its same plans, goals, and strategies of the capitalists.
Speaker 3: It just differs on the.
Speaker 2: Road by which you get to the same end goal. Right,
we're all going, we're all on the bus to hell.
But are we going to take the left fork in
the road or the right fork in the road. Oh well,
it doesn't matter, because both forks in the road end
up in the of hell.
Speaker 3: So there you go.
Speaker 2: Now, sometimes the Marxist path down the road is a
quicker and better route to Hell, and banker control sometimes capital.
Speaker 3: It just depends, right.
Speaker 2: I mean, some countries the strategy of introducing Marxism works better.
That's where the bankers foisted Marxism upon Russia. Some places
a top down monarch like Jordan or Saudi Arabia or
United Arab Emirates, but that works better to getting to
the end goal. Sometimes quote democracy works better. Right, It
just depends. And it doesn't matter which one of these
phony blooney systems you institute. They're all at the best
of the same banker strategy. So here's quick that's quickly
tells you all this on page fifty two and fifty three,
and it's all a skim that's practiced principally through the
banking and central banking monetary system, which is not public.
It is private. So the libertarians that tell you that
the problem is that the banking establishment is public and
not private are alying to you, or they're telling you
have the story right now. The Federal Reserve does have
this air of being governmental because it's under the Treasury Department,
but the money and the stock, the stock, the controlling
interests are owned pipe private families, and it's.
Speaker 3: Always been that way, and you're going to.
Speaker 2: See that pattern in Tragy and Hoe. We're quickly going
to show you that through the money supply, controlling the
money supply, through inflation, through printing, through Fiat currency. This
is how they've always been able to wreck economies, regulate steer.
Speaker 3: Boom, create a boom as well through the money system.
And it really is that simple.
Speaker 2: Now, the scams can get very complex, and we can
get buried in the law in mountains of UK banking
regulations and complexities and all this and so forth, but
it's very simple. And that's essentially Quiggley's point is telling
you that it's just the same basic scam that is
varied and multipliers in different places at different times. And
as we're going to see, it's going to in the
modern era, especially after World War Two, fall under the
aegis of the Bank for International Settlements, right the Central
Bank of Central Banks as it's as it's known, as
it's called. So, as we said here kind of in
this intro talk, we're not gonna we're not gonna waste
time speculating about conspiracy theories about Quigley's own life and
Quigley's book and it being suppressed and all this kind
of stuff.
Speaker 3: It's waste of time.
Speaker 2: You're never gonna you're never going to determine any of
that anyway.
Speaker 3: Why don't we just dive into the book and see
what he says.
Speaker 2: Okay, that's a much better use of our time.
Speaker 3: I've been wasting time speculating about it.
Speaker 2: But and this always comes up, right like when if
you talk about Quigli people come on your.
Speaker 3: Blog and they come in, they put these long.
Speaker 2: Long, sprawling tones of you know, them telling you what
really went on with the Quiggli's and the plates that
we're going to use be used to print drug Who cares, dude,
Then you're not going to figure anything out.
Speaker 3: Uh what, I just wanted to see what's in the book? Okay,
so let's I mean, this thing's.
Speaker 2: You know, thirteen hundred, thirteen hundred pages, So let's get
into it, because we're never going to get to the
bottom of which conspiracy theory about Quigley's life is true. Now,
I one of the first things I noticed as I
was reading was that this.
Speaker 3: Uh, chapter three is.
Speaker 2: About Russia, and it is a very bad propaganda chapter
about Russia. This is the first thing that clues you
into the fact that wait a minute, now, Quigley's Quigley's
got an agenda here. Okay, Now he's obvious. He's ultimately
going to be very open about his agenda and so forth.
But when you begin the book and you're reading the
Russian chapter, you're like, whoa dude, Especially if you know
you know Russian history to some degree, or if you
know the history of the Orthodox Church or the East
and Christianity, medieval Christianity, be it Byzantium or the Roman Empire,
you know that.
Speaker 3: Quigley is not honest here. Okay, he's rotten.
Speaker 2: The propaganda chapter and what's it about, Well, to basically
say Russian civilization. What he does talk about Russian Empire
right up to nineteen seventy.
Speaker 3: Oh, they're all.
Speaker 2: Backwards and they're dumb and they just don't get in
their savage and oh, Western civilization is so great. We're
progressive and liberal and secular, and see those Russians are
all so backwards or they believe in the Church and
orthodox theology.
Speaker 3: I'll give me a break, right, I mean, come on, man,
we know that secularism and scientism is where it's at.
Speaker 2: And that's what he does, all right, being on on
chapter three, page eighty one. Oh, Byzantium is just the
worst thing ever. Russians. Oh, it's dark Ages. It's just
you know, they're all just backwoods and they don't know
their butt from a hole in the ground.
Speaker 3: But the West, of course does.
Speaker 2: And ironically, this is right after he's just talked about
how the New Freedom Initiative of Woodrow Wilson in nineteen
twelve was a bunch of banker scams, right for.
Speaker 3: Getting the US into the.
Speaker 2: War right World War One, and how the bankers were
pretty much behind Woodrow Wilson in the passing of the
Federal Reserve Act in nineteen thirteen, and again this is
all that. So, in other words, for quickly, admittedly, being
liberal and progressive is being a slave to a bunch
of banking scams and guys running your central banking system
scamming you.
Speaker 3: That's progressive and liberal above. But a Russian empire that's
dark Ages.
Speaker 2: So now it doesn't matter whatever you think of Russian
and Russian emperor. Okay, but what I'm saying, do you
see how this is propaganda?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 2: Why do I need an what is this? Eighty hundred
forty pages, fifty why do I need fifty pages telling
me how bad Russia is? All right, Well, it's because
Quickly is writing for the Western establishment, and he's writing
concerning the great Game, which he talks about, and this
is the long battle between the British Empire and Russia
for global strategic dominance, particularly when we think of the
Heartland theory of Halfred mckinder and so forth versus the
Western the Eastern different philosophy of the world. Right from Russia,
it's different, and from Eurasia. And Dugan points this out
in one of his talks very well that you know,
basically what Quickly exemplifies here is just a supremely Eurocentric perspective, right,
and by extension, America is Eurocentric as well.
Speaker 3: Right, just this.
Speaker 2: Idea that because we're in the West, and because we
have quote democracy, that this gives us some sort of
legitimacy and superiority, some moral superiority to voice this everywhere
in the world and to consider everything else dark ages.
Speaker 3: Well, no, I'm sorry that the.
Speaker 2: Enlightenment, scientism, scientific revolution, these are scams from more wicked,
nefarious scamsters.
Speaker 3: Okay, So whatever evils are.
Speaker 2: Going on in Ussia and so forth, the Western establishment
is run by total viper bankers who are ten times worse.
That's the point, and that is the hypocrisy of Quigley,
especially in this Russian Empire chapter right pages ninety to one, ten,
one five, and quickly is going to talk about the
Russian ethos Russian nationalism and by extension, Russian imperialism, the
philosophy of Russia and how it's grounded in orthodoxology.
Speaker 3: It's it's an.
Speaker 2: Extension of Byzantium from Saint Cyril and Methodius.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: He will talk about different Russian philosophers and their impact,
different Russian rulers, and then the Slavic mind itself, right
as well as I guess you could say Eurasia by extension,
China and so forth.
Speaker 3: But really he he's got.
Speaker 2: To hone in and talk about how bad Russia is,
and so pretty much everything everything bad is located from
the east from Russia. Socialism and communism and Marxism, those
are bad because they're in Russia. But by the way, quickly,
aren't you actually going to talk about the fact that
the revolutions are funded.
Speaker 3: By the bankers. Well, he does, Yet.
Speaker 2: The Russians are still bad for the socialism and the communism,
but it was foisted by the bankers, So come on here, right,
stop contradicting yourself and be consistent. So yeah, this is
really a propaganda hit piece on Russia, and I mean
it's just it's bad, right, because he tries to talk
about Jesus and this in this retarded section, that the
idea that Russia is supposed to be Christian but doesn't
follow Jesus, as if the West and bankers followed, Jesus
went into the to the temple and cleansed it of bankers.
So come on quickly, right, and here on page one
O two, one O three, he's trying to talk about
Russian Orthodox theology, which he has absolutely no understanding of.
Speaker 3: He has no clue. He's a you know.
Speaker 2: A bat in a blind bat and flying towards the sun.
I mean, he has no idea where he's going, what's
going on.
Speaker 4: And.
Speaker 2: He's one of the worst things he does is try
to talk about philosophy and theology because he's just has
no clue what.
Speaker 3: He's talking about when he talks about these things.
Speaker 2: So he tries to talk about Christian heresies and neoplatonism
and that these actually constitutes for the worst parts of
the book, so he has no idea what he's talking
about when he trust to explain the Greek, Byzantine Russian civilization,
and he ends it by saying that mystical slav imperialism
is apocalyptic and it's.
Speaker 3: Going to destroy the world.
Speaker 2: And the real danger is that because Russia sees itself
as the third Rome, right, and this is just the
worst thing ever. And so the Third Rome idea, he says,
is what merged with Lenin and Marxism to provide the
ideology of silver Russia after nineteen seventeen. Well, that's kind
of true, except that it's not that Russia is just
not the villain of the world. If anything Russia constitutes,
I would say, a large hope for the world. And
it is the Western atlantisists who are basically telling the
little boys and girls to cut off their genitalium and
become genderless goblins. That's the real villains right now, Quickly,
you are a hypocrite because you should have seen and
should know if would you still be saying this quickly
right if you saw where Western liberalism was today, that
it would be wrecking children. Russia is not wrecking children.
Globally the Western banking establishment and Atlantis.
Speaker 3: Are so quickly you've got.
Speaker 2: You've got to rethink and repent, and you've got to.
Speaker 3: You really need to answer for.
Speaker 2: Your on the one hand description of the bankers as
these scamsters who control governments, and then turn around and
talk about all the countries that the bankers target right
to destroy as the bad guys. What hypocrisy, amazing hypocrisy,
actually phenomenal, especially when on page sixty three you talk
about international financial practices and.
Speaker 3: The ability of the bankers to.
Speaker 2: Even co op the US right and bring the US
into all these foreign conflicts which the Founding fathers. Not
that I'm even interested in the Founding fathers, I don't
care for the Founding fathers, but they at least talked
about not being involved in foreign entanglements and expansionism.
Speaker 3: And so forth.
Speaker 2: But no, quickly you will talk about it, and in
total hypocrisy, turn around and talk about Russia as the enemy,
when it's the Western bankers who sought to wreck Russia
through Marxism and Leninism and so forth. And of course
this in your very infantile understanding of Byzantium orthodoxy and philosophy,
I think is very telling as well. You're a military historian,
but you're going to talk about theology.
Speaker 3: Give me a break. You don't know, you don't even
know what the apocalypse is.
Speaker 2: So I'm not going to pay much attention to Quiggly
trying to talk about Russian theology and the cathari and
the Gnostics. Right, So this is traversing into fields in which.
Speaker 3: He has no clue.
Speaker 2: Now that's going to be, I think a good place
to kind of conclude the free section of our one
beginning in Carol Quigley's Tragy and Hope, and so we've
kind of seen how he set the stage with the
idea of the banksters seeking libertarian philosophy to free the
monetary policies of countries from the state so that it
can be put into private hands.
Speaker 3: And then through.
Speaker 2: The private banking establishment behind a shadow facade of a
public banking institution, they then control nation states. And that
is all admitted, And that was the logical stage, the
necessary progression from the presuppositions of the European shift, which
quickly caused the Enlightenment period of the secularism, the nationalism,
the capitalism, private banking liberalism and so forth. And then
we saw how this required from him and his propaganda
section Virulence Anti Russian treat Us chapter that grounds this
all in the Great Game and has no understanding of theology,
of course, but what do you expect from this guy?
And what we're going to see in the next section
is how this then will lead to the new power structure.
I don't guess you'd call it new, but the main
players the power structure of this period right twentieth century,
end of the nineteenth and in the twentieth century, and
this will be the Cecil Roads, Milner, Rothschild's and the
Roundtable group and from their Royal Society, Royal Institute for
International Affairs and so forth. And this is this is
the power block of the West. This is the center
of power of the Atlanticist Anglo American banking establishment. And
we're going to see how from there that's going to
propel the rest of the century. Right, the entire twentieth
century will be played out on a chessboard, the grand
chessboard that Brazilski will talk about from.
Speaker 3: The vantage point of.
Speaker 2: This Cliven and Set Milner, Roundtable banking families, basically moving
the chess pieces of Europe and the globe around to
reorganize it. And that's what we're going to see from Quigley.
And again it's ultimately even from this period about global
government because of the fact that these people are internationalists.
This is everything that quickly talks about now would just
quickly say, oh, they're immediately planning a global government.
Speaker 3: In a kind of new World order.
Speaker 2: Since not exactly, but he's essentially saying that because they're
internationalists who run an empire, and that's what it's all about.
And so when you see one of their brains, Huxley,
you know, laying it out in Brave New World or
bertrand Russell laying it out in Impact of Sciences, Society
and so forth, and as other books, the other Royal
Society members laying it out right, the other the bankers
laying it out in their books. And you can view
Tragedy and Hope as a book of the bankers. Okay,
it's about global government. He doesn't have to say new
World order. It doesn't matter. That's what it's about. It's empire,
but it's not empire in the older British colonial sense.
Speaker 3: It's a new.
Speaker 2: Way of doing empire through democracy, which is hypocritical because
that's going He's going to attack Russia for speaking of
the Russian Empire, right, the Czars and so forth, the
double hitded Byzantine Eagle. That's all evil because why because
it's not an empire of democracy, which is all a
complete scam. And we're going to see again, not just
because it's bankers foisting all of this democracy scam upon
the world, but we're going to see a lot more
explicit proof quotes, citations, and references that are going to
show that to be the case that it is the
Milner Oxford round two royal society groups that will form
the locus of power for the entire Anglo Atlantis's American establishment,
and it will be really in this period even extending
prior to nineteen hundred la eighteen nineties with Afghanistan the
Great Game, it's largely about Russia because Russia is really
seen to be the only potential possible major threat to
the Atlantis establishment going back at least that far and
then further right, so the division goes back and we
could place this division even further than that, back to
ten fifty four in the split between the Roman Church
and the Orthodox Church right now. Russia will come into
the picture later as a major power, but the ideology
that will separate East and West will really theologically, at
least church wise, which is a big part of culture civilization.
Go back to that period right with the writings that
we read from say Saint Phocios right on the against
the Western view of Augustinian trinitarianism in the Philioque, and
then of course Saints Curial and Methodius, who will give
the Russian and the Slavs the cyrillic alphabet.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: That is all going to give rise to a different mindset,
a different perspective in the East in Eurasia than the
Eurocentric anglocentric liberalism right of the UK, the liberalism of
its colonies.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 3: So you've been.
Speaker 2: Listening to our one as we've done our first lecture
in Tragy and Hope, and to hear the rest of
the talk, you'll want to go to Jasonnalysis dot com
and subscribe for four ninety five a month or sixty
dollars a year. You can also purchase my book Esoteric
Hollywood Sex, Cults and Symbols in Film, which ties all
of this. A lot of this into movies and the
hidden meanings and patterns and structures in film. And you
can also purchase Jamie Henshall's book Hidden Hollywood Mind Control, right,
so definitely go check thus out. And in hour two
we're going to continue with this initial period of around
nineteen fourteen right up to up to the period of
the decline of the Ottoman Empire.
Speaker 3: In the beginning of World War.
Speaker 2: One, and how World War One was kind of a
banker trick.
Speaker 3: No surprise is there, right,