WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Rumble got bigger, specifically because of the fact there's pushback

2
00:00:03.919 --> 00:00:06.879
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube because they literally won't even let Nick fuent

3
00:00:07.000 --> 00:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>As on YouTube and he's on Rumble and he's like,

4
00:00:10.759 --> 00:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>they're number one guys, kelen it on Rumble.

5
00:00:12.759 --> 00:00:13.439
<v Speaker 2>See that's the thing.

6
00:00:13.519 --> 00:00:16.199
<v Speaker 1>It's like, if you hold something back, you're just gonna

7
00:00:16.239 --> 00:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>make another version of it that opposes it, and they're

8
00:00:19.920 --> 00:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna have more energy to fight against you because you've.

9
00:00:23.039 --> 00:00:24.359
<v Speaker 2>You've stopped the truth.

10
00:00:24.600 --> 00:00:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you've stopped stopped the truth about like not like

11
00:00:28.120 --> 00:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>about petty things, about really important things.

12
00:00:30.679 --> 00:00:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Liberty Lockdown. This is Clint Russell. As you

13
00:00:32.679 --> 00:00:36.640
<v Speaker 2>guys know, I have I think I've given positive coverage

14
00:00:36.640 --> 00:00:40.240
<v Speaker 2>of Nick fuentt As for quite some time now, almost

15
00:00:40.359 --> 00:00:43.079
<v Speaker 2>universally positive I have. You know, I've been critical of

16
00:00:43.119 --> 00:00:46.039
<v Speaker 2>him at times, but certainly i'd say ninety percent of

17
00:00:46.079 --> 00:00:48.479
<v Speaker 2>the times I bring him up, it's because I agree

18
00:00:48.520 --> 00:00:51.240
<v Speaker 2>with or I appreciate something that he's saying. Over the

19
00:00:51.240 --> 00:00:54.280
<v Speaker 2>past couple months. That has changed. Now I'm not saying

20
00:00:54.280 --> 00:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>that my coverage of him has changed. I'm saying that

21
00:00:56.840 --> 00:01:00.280
<v Speaker 2>his behavior has begun to concern me a bit when

22
00:01:00.320 --> 00:01:03.079
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the candidates that he endorses or the

23
00:01:03.079 --> 00:01:05.200
<v Speaker 2>candidates that he goes against, seeing as he doesn't seem

24
00:01:05.239 --> 00:01:08.000
<v Speaker 2>to really endorse any candidates at this point unless they're Democrats.

25
00:01:08.239 --> 00:01:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Everybody's attacking me today and I see all this stuff

26
00:01:10.719 --> 00:01:15.640
<v Speaker 3>and I'm like, Wow, they really don't want white people

27
00:01:15.719 --> 00:01:19.799
<v Speaker 3>to vote Democrat. Is that what it is? Think about it.

28
00:01:19.840 --> 00:01:22.319
<v Speaker 3>I really didn't even think that was the biggest taboo.

29
00:01:22.400 --> 00:01:25.920
<v Speaker 3>There's some red lines you just can't cross. I guess lately.

30
00:01:26.159 --> 00:01:29.680
<v Speaker 3>You can attack Jews all day long, that's totally in fashion.

31
00:01:29.719 --> 00:01:33.439
<v Speaker 3>You can attack Israel, you can be racist. People don't

32
00:01:33.439 --> 00:01:35.400
<v Speaker 3>even bat and I when I say the N word,

33
00:01:35.519 --> 00:01:38.760
<v Speaker 3>nobody even cares. But you start to say, I'm off

34
00:01:38.799 --> 00:01:43.719
<v Speaker 3>the Republican plantation, I'm voting Democrat, and everybody loses their minds.

35
00:01:43.879 --> 00:01:45.840
<v Speaker 3>We are going to vote Democrat in the mid terms.

36
00:01:46.079 --> 00:01:48.400
<v Speaker 3>We are going to vote for Amy Acton in Ohio.

37
00:01:48.719 --> 00:01:51.560
<v Speaker 2>What makes this interesting is that there was a good

38
00:01:51.640 --> 00:01:54.359
<v Speaker 2>America first candidate that was running for the governor of Ohio.

39
00:01:54.680 --> 00:01:58.000
<v Speaker 2>That was Casey Putsch. Now, he fell short. He ended

40
00:01:58.040 --> 00:02:00.319
<v Speaker 2>up getting I think twenty percent of the vote in

41
00:02:00.359 --> 00:02:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the primary. So Vivic ran away with it, which was

42
00:02:02.840 --> 00:02:06.280
<v Speaker 2>to be expected, particularly given that Casey had only raised

43
00:02:06.319 --> 00:02:08.199
<v Speaker 2>I think one hundred and thirty thousand to go up

44
00:02:08.199 --> 00:02:11.919
<v Speaker 2>against the tens of millions that Vivik had raised. So

45
00:02:12.159 --> 00:02:14.479
<v Speaker 2>Vivic was almost certainly going to win that. But it

46
00:02:14.560 --> 00:02:18.639
<v Speaker 2>was interesting that Nick Fuentes chose not to back casey

47
00:02:18.680 --> 00:02:22.319
<v Speaker 2>push and I was mystified by it. Now that being said,

48
00:02:22.360 --> 00:02:24.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to do something that a lot of Knick's

49
00:02:24.400 --> 00:02:26.719
<v Speaker 2>dissenters won't do. I'm going to give him the benefit

50
00:02:26.719 --> 00:02:28.800
<v Speaker 2>of the doubt. The reason I feel this way is

51
00:02:28.840 --> 00:02:32.919
<v Speaker 2>because I've had opportunities to interview, for instance, James Fishback,

52
00:02:33.000 --> 00:02:35.919
<v Speaker 2>who's running to be the governor of Florida. I also

53
00:02:35.960 --> 00:02:39.000
<v Speaker 2>had the opportunity, in fact, I did interview Mark Lynch,

54
00:02:39.000 --> 00:02:42.280
<v Speaker 2>who's going up against Lindsay Graham to be Senator in

55
00:02:42.319 --> 00:02:45.159
<v Speaker 2>South Carolina. Now I had audio issues with that recording.

56
00:02:45.199 --> 00:02:48.639
<v Speaker 2>My levels were totally screwed up, so I had I

57
00:02:48.719 --> 00:02:50.280
<v Speaker 2>was going to have to redo the interview, and I

58
00:02:50.280 --> 00:02:52.639
<v Speaker 2>opted not to because the nature of the interview it

59
00:02:52.759 --> 00:02:54.840
<v Speaker 2>just made me feel as if this guy, while he

60
00:02:54.960 --> 00:02:57.199
<v Speaker 2>is obviously better than Lindsay Graham, it was just not

61
00:02:57.240 --> 00:02:58.960
<v Speaker 2>a candidate that I was prepared to get behind.

62
00:02:59.120 --> 00:02:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Now.

63
00:02:59.280 --> 00:03:00.840
<v Speaker 2>That's not to say I don't want him to win.

64
00:03:00.919 --> 00:03:03.240
<v Speaker 2>I want Mark Lynch to win. I just didn't want

65
00:03:03.280 --> 00:03:05.680
<v Speaker 2>to be put in a position of having to endorse

66
00:03:05.759 --> 00:03:08.199
<v Speaker 2>him or go against him, because I just want him

67
00:03:08.199 --> 00:03:10.280
<v Speaker 2>to sink or swim on his own merits and I

68
00:03:10.319 --> 00:03:13.560
<v Speaker 2>wish him well. But there was certain aspects of the

69
00:03:13.639 --> 00:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>questions that I asked him about that just felt as

70
00:03:15.680 --> 00:03:18.159
<v Speaker 2>if he didn't have the same worldview I did. So

71
00:03:18.240 --> 00:03:20.360
<v Speaker 2>therefore I just didn't want to put my hand on

72
00:03:20.439 --> 00:03:23.919
<v Speaker 2>the scale whatsoever. I feel similarly about James Fishback. James

73
00:03:23.919 --> 00:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Fishback well. He gives good answers at times, and I

74
00:03:27.280 --> 00:03:31.840
<v Speaker 2>appreciate his courageous willingness to touch third rail political topics.

75
00:03:32.159 --> 00:03:35.240
<v Speaker 2>He also gives me the vibe of being a shape

76
00:03:35.240 --> 00:03:37.800
<v Speaker 2>shifter to a certain extent that I don't actually know

77
00:03:37.840 --> 00:03:42.120
<v Speaker 2>what his principles are. He is obviously using clickbait marketing

78
00:03:42.199 --> 00:03:45.919
<v Speaker 2>and campaign attempts when it comes to, you know, increasing

79
00:03:46.000 --> 00:03:49.439
<v Speaker 2>taxes against OnlyFans girls, and then talking about, oh, well,

80
00:03:49.479 --> 00:03:50.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to just tax them, I'm going to

81
00:03:51.000 --> 00:03:53.439
<v Speaker 2>tax this, and I'm gonna text that, and I'm gonna

82
00:03:53.479 --> 00:03:55.360
<v Speaker 2>use taxes to do this and that, and it's like

83
00:03:55.719 --> 00:03:59.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm a libertarian like I'm not. Just because I don't

84
00:03:59.199 --> 00:04:02.000
<v Speaker 2>like certain idle ills doesn't mean that I want you

85
00:04:02.039 --> 00:04:05.319
<v Speaker 2>to become a right wing Democrat, which is just using

86
00:04:05.479 --> 00:04:09.039
<v Speaker 2>taxation to try and sculpt the culture of the state

87
00:04:09.039 --> 00:04:13.520
<v Speaker 2>of Florida. Moreover, James Fishbeck's rhetoric reminds me a bit

88
00:04:13.560 --> 00:04:18.079
<v Speaker 2>of Obama, where it's very it's very polished, it comes

89
00:04:18.079 --> 00:04:22.920
<v Speaker 2>across very good. If you're not astute political analyst, that

90
00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:25.240
<v Speaker 2>sounds like I'm petting myself on the back too much.

91
00:04:25.839 --> 00:04:28.160
<v Speaker 2>That's not what I mean. What I mean is sometimes

92
00:04:28.160 --> 00:04:30.279
<v Speaker 2>you just get a bad vibe. And maybe that's how

93
00:04:30.360 --> 00:04:34.079
<v Speaker 2>Nick felt about Casey Putsch. Maybe, and I share Nick

94
00:04:34.120 --> 00:04:38.079
<v Speaker 2>Fointe's hesitation when it comes to backing Dan Bilsarian too,

95
00:04:38.480 --> 00:04:41.040
<v Speaker 2>even though I think that Randy Fine is probably the

96
00:04:41.079 --> 00:04:44.560
<v Speaker 2>worst congressional representative we have on the GOP side of

97
00:04:44.600 --> 00:04:46.519
<v Speaker 2>the aisle, and I would love to see him gone,

98
00:04:46.560 --> 00:04:50.000
<v Speaker 2>And ultimately I hope that Dan Bilzarian defeats him, or

99
00:04:50.040 --> 00:04:52.040
<v Speaker 2>for that matter, Aaron Day, the other guy who's running

100
00:04:52.040 --> 00:04:54.759
<v Speaker 2>against Randy Fine. I hope Randy Fine loses, is what

101
00:04:54.800 --> 00:04:57.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying. That being said, I don't actually know what

102
00:04:57.480 --> 00:05:00.199
<v Speaker 2>Dan Bilzarian believes in. I know that Dan Bilzerian is

103
00:05:00.360 --> 00:05:04.600
<v Speaker 2>very aggressively against our relationship to Israel. I can appreciate

104
00:05:04.600 --> 00:05:07.519
<v Speaker 2>and respect that, But beyond that, I don't actually know

105
00:05:07.560 --> 00:05:10.560
<v Speaker 2>that we ideologically align. But this is where things get interesting.

106
00:05:11.160 --> 00:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Dan Bilzerian and Nick Flints are in a fed jacketing off. Okay,

107
00:05:16.000 --> 00:05:19.519
<v Speaker 2>that sounds a little bit weird. They're both fed jacketing

108
00:05:19.560 --> 00:05:22.519
<v Speaker 2>one another. In other words, they're both calling each other

109
00:05:22.759 --> 00:05:26.360
<v Speaker 2>federal informants or agents for that matter. And we need

110
00:05:26.399 --> 00:05:29.480
<v Speaker 2>to dig into this because this is a very important topic.

111
00:05:29.720 --> 00:05:36.879
<v Speaker 5>Nickquint is, Oh man, you're really trying to fucking stir

112
00:05:37.040 --> 00:05:42.160
<v Speaker 5>the pot. If I'm going to talk about him, I

113
00:05:42.199 --> 00:05:44.639
<v Speaker 5>think I need to give the whole picture, because they

114
00:05:44.720 --> 00:05:48.079
<v Speaker 5>do think that he was one of the early pioneers

115
00:05:48.360 --> 00:05:50.839
<v Speaker 5>of this stuff, and I do have respect for him.

116
00:05:50.839 --> 00:05:54.560
<v Speaker 5>He's definitely an intelligent guy. My criticism of him would

117
00:05:54.560 --> 00:05:57.800
<v Speaker 5>be that I think it's so obvious what the problem is,

118
00:05:58.759 --> 00:06:00.480
<v Speaker 5>and he went on a bunch of big play platforms

119
00:06:00.519 --> 00:06:03.000
<v Speaker 5>and didn't really use any of them to talk about

120
00:06:03.160 --> 00:06:05.720
<v Speaker 5>the fucking Jewish supremacy problem that we all know about

121
00:06:05.800 --> 00:06:09.480
<v Speaker 5>and maybe that's because he's talked about it so much

122
00:06:09.759 --> 00:06:11.800
<v Speaker 5>that he's kind of bored of it. So I think

123
00:06:11.839 --> 00:06:15.360
<v Speaker 5>a part of doing too much content is that you

124
00:06:15.399 --> 00:06:17.959
<v Speaker 5>get bored talking about the real issues. So now we

125
00:06:18.040 --> 00:06:20.920
<v Speaker 5>got to, like, you know, talk about why Epstein was

126
00:06:20.920 --> 00:06:23.240
<v Speaker 5>a good guy and Stalin was good and like some

127
00:06:23.399 --> 00:06:26.279
<v Speaker 5>crazy shit that I just obviously really disagree with, and

128
00:06:26.319 --> 00:06:28.680
<v Speaker 5>it was just like a kind of like a steady

129
00:06:28.680 --> 00:06:30.800
<v Speaker 5>stream of bad takes that he didn't understand.

130
00:06:30.920 --> 00:06:34.399
<v Speaker 2>In my opinion, that's a very fairly mild critique to

131
00:06:34.439 --> 00:06:37.160
<v Speaker 2>come from Dan Bilzerian towards Nick Funt is basically saying

132
00:06:37.160 --> 00:06:40.399
<v Speaker 2>that he represents himself to be a very radical, fringe

133
00:06:40.439 --> 00:06:43.120
<v Speaker 2>figure when he's on his own program or on smaller programs,

134
00:06:43.120 --> 00:06:44.759
<v Speaker 2>but when he goes on to a larger show like

135
00:06:44.800 --> 00:06:48.519
<v Speaker 2>Piers Morgan or Tucker Carlson, he moderates, and Dan Bilzarian,

136
00:06:49.439 --> 00:06:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess, to his credit in some regards, sometimes is

137
00:06:53.040 --> 00:06:54.959
<v Speaker 2>nothing if not a radical.

138
00:06:55.160 --> 00:06:58.519
<v Speaker 5>I mean, honestly, the only real battle in the world

139
00:06:58.639 --> 00:07:01.519
<v Speaker 5>today that I see worth fighting is fucking, you know,

140
00:07:01.720 --> 00:07:05.000
<v Speaker 5>extreminating Israel. I mean, I would sign up tomorrow and

141
00:07:05.040 --> 00:07:07.000
<v Speaker 5>go fucking put boots on the ground.

142
00:07:07.120 --> 00:07:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm gonna end that clip there, because if I

143
00:07:08.959 --> 00:07:11.519
<v Speaker 2>were to take it another ten seconds further this episode,

144
00:07:11.519 --> 00:07:15.959
<v Speaker 2>we'll get taken down. Dan Bilzarian is very, very aggressively

145
00:07:16.079 --> 00:07:18.759
<v Speaker 2>anti israel I, would say I am more of a

146
00:07:18.800 --> 00:07:20.800
<v Speaker 2>non interventionist. I do not want to go to war

147
00:07:20.839 --> 00:07:23.319
<v Speaker 2>with israel I very much. Do want to cut them off,

148
00:07:23.319 --> 00:07:26.120
<v Speaker 2>though when it comes to a munitions or military support

149
00:07:26.120 --> 00:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>that we've offered them for decades. In fact, my entire

150
00:07:28.480 --> 00:07:31.360
<v Speaker 2>adult life affect my entire life. I would like to

151
00:07:32.279 --> 00:07:35.480
<v Speaker 2>separate the two entities to deal with our own problems

152
00:07:35.519 --> 00:07:38.240
<v Speaker 2>for once. And I agree with Nick Fuint's and Dan

153
00:07:38.279 --> 00:07:40.839
<v Speaker 2>Bilzerian and Sneako and many others when it comes to

154
00:07:40.920 --> 00:07:44.480
<v Speaker 2>that topic. I think, tactically we have our differences of opinion,

155
00:07:44.680 --> 00:07:47.639
<v Speaker 2>and maybe that's all they this is. Maybe Dandlzarian and

156
00:07:47.720 --> 00:07:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Nick Fuint does simply have tactical disagreements. Maybe, but it

157
00:07:52.199 --> 00:07:54.839
<v Speaker 2>escalated to a point where you can't really assume that's

158
00:07:54.839 --> 00:07:55.360
<v Speaker 2>all it is.

159
00:07:55.759 --> 00:07:59.680
<v Speaker 3>They're going to do something much more subtle and much

160
00:07:59.720 --> 00:08:03.879
<v Speaker 3>more subversive and much more calculated and complex, which is

161
00:08:03.920 --> 00:08:08.920
<v Speaker 3>they're going to try to skin suit this movement. This

162
00:08:09.199 --> 00:08:12.279
<v Speaker 3>is always the track that the political class will take.

163
00:08:12.360 --> 00:08:14.680
<v Speaker 3>They did it with the Tea Party movement, they did

164
00:08:14.680 --> 00:08:18.879
<v Speaker 3>it with MAGA, and then they slowly but surely brought

165
00:08:18.959 --> 00:08:23.000
<v Speaker 3>us back to establishment conservatism. And they're doing the same

166
00:08:23.040 --> 00:08:26.160
<v Speaker 3>thing with America first. And if you pay close attention,

167
00:08:26.319 --> 00:08:30.680
<v Speaker 3>this was the hold Tucker Carlson moo. He brought me

168
00:08:30.800 --> 00:08:34.799
<v Speaker 3>on the show, wrapped his arms around me and said, hey, look,

169
00:08:34.840 --> 00:08:38.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna listen to this kid who's got all these problems.

170
00:08:39.399 --> 00:08:42.159
<v Speaker 3>And ever since we did the interview, he goes on

171
00:08:42.240 --> 00:08:46.039
<v Speaker 3>every other show and says I tried to talk him

172
00:08:46.039 --> 00:08:48.039
<v Speaker 3>in off the ledge and get him to stop being

173
00:08:48.080 --> 00:08:51.879
<v Speaker 3>an anti semite. He hates women because he's afraid of women.

174
00:08:52.080 --> 00:08:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Oftentimes, what I see Nick doing is he takes what

175
00:08:55.240 --> 00:08:59.120
<v Speaker 2>could be sincere, genuine differences of opinion, which I think

176
00:08:59.200 --> 00:09:03.200
<v Speaker 2>are really held by Tucker Carlson, Dave Smith, myself, a

177
00:09:03.200 --> 00:09:05.600
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of other people, Ian Carroll for that matter,

178
00:09:06.039 --> 00:09:10.480
<v Speaker 2>and he he extrapolates it into us trying to steal

179
00:09:10.639 --> 00:09:14.039
<v Speaker 2>his movement, trying to take away his I don't know

180
00:09:14.080 --> 00:09:17.679
<v Speaker 2>his platform, whatever he's built, whatever he's created, we're trying

181
00:09:17.679 --> 00:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to use it for our ends and discard him. Now.

182
00:09:20.000 --> 00:09:22.399
<v Speaker 2>I won't speak for anybody else, but I will say

183
00:09:22.559 --> 00:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>that's not what I'm doing. I believe that Nick is

184
00:09:26.200 --> 00:09:29.279
<v Speaker 2>directionally correct that we need to have a nation, a

185
00:09:29.360 --> 00:09:32.440
<v Speaker 2>government that actually represents and concerns itself with the people

186
00:09:32.480 --> 00:09:35.759
<v Speaker 2>that are born here Americans, and I think we can

187
00:09:35.759 --> 00:09:38.440
<v Speaker 2>all agree on that, and then if we have differences

188
00:09:38.480 --> 00:09:41.799
<v Speaker 2>of opinion beyond that, well then okay, that's fair. I

189
00:09:41.799 --> 00:09:44.159
<v Speaker 2>also agree with him that our relationship to Israel is

190
00:09:44.159 --> 00:09:46.519
<v Speaker 2>a massive detriment and it needs to end. I think

191
00:09:46.600 --> 00:09:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Nick's problem has been that he alienates and demonizes basically

192
00:09:51.039 --> 00:09:54.000
<v Speaker 2>anybody who doesn't agree with every single thing he says.

193
00:09:54.200 --> 00:09:56.720
<v Speaker 2>For instance, I think it's absolutely insane to vote for

194
00:09:56.759 --> 00:10:00.519
<v Speaker 2>Amy Acton in Ohio. And if he was prepared to

195
00:10:00.600 --> 00:10:03.360
<v Speaker 2>do that, if he was prepared to use the nuclear

196
00:10:03.840 --> 00:10:07.960
<v Speaker 2>option and vote for a Democrat in Ohio instead of

197
00:10:07.960 --> 00:10:10.320
<v Speaker 2>a Aake Ramaswami, why would you not back up Casey

198
00:10:10.360 --> 00:10:13.759
<v Speaker 2>push right? If you actually had an option that you

199
00:10:13.799 --> 00:10:18.320
<v Speaker 2>thought was viable or at least preferable, wouldn't you back him?

200
00:10:18.600 --> 00:10:21.279
<v Speaker 2>But you didn't do that, So you hate fa Vek.

201
00:10:21.480 --> 00:10:23.679
<v Speaker 2>You're willing to pull the nuclear option and vote for

202
00:10:23.720 --> 00:10:27.159
<v Speaker 2>the Democrat, but you also hate the America first guy,

203
00:10:27.919 --> 00:10:30.799
<v Speaker 2>white dude born in Ohio, and you're like, don't want

204
00:10:30.879 --> 00:10:33.639
<v Speaker 2>him either. I'm going to go with the Jewish Democrat, lady, like,

205
00:10:33.960 --> 00:10:35.559
<v Speaker 2>I think it's fair for all of us to be

206
00:10:35.600 --> 00:10:37.600
<v Speaker 2>a little bit surprised by that, right, And this is

207
00:10:37.600 --> 00:10:40.200
<v Speaker 2>a trend that I've seen played out over and over again.

208
00:10:40.279 --> 00:10:43.279
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately with many of my friends like Dave Smith or

209
00:10:43.320 --> 00:10:45.039
<v Speaker 2>Ian Carroll. I've also saw it, even though I'm not

210
00:10:45.080 --> 00:10:47.440
<v Speaker 2>friends with him, but with Tucker Carlson. Tucker Carlson had

211
00:10:47.480 --> 00:10:50.559
<v Speaker 2>him on his show, and then it seemed almost immediately

212
00:10:50.600 --> 00:10:54.879
<v Speaker 2>afterwards that Nick started to smear Tucker. He started to say,

213
00:10:54.919 --> 00:10:58.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't trust him. I think he's he's duplicitous, he's

214
00:10:58.440 --> 00:11:01.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's a fed or whatever. And then Tucker,

215
00:11:02.159 --> 00:11:05.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, naturally, in my opinion, naturally started to pivot

216
00:11:05.440 --> 00:11:07.960
<v Speaker 2>against Nick two when he was questioned about him in public,

217
00:11:07.960 --> 00:11:10.879
<v Speaker 2>and he's like, well, screw this kid, he's gonna smere me.

218
00:11:11.000 --> 00:11:13.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna try and defend him either. So they

219
00:11:13.480 --> 00:11:15.840
<v Speaker 2>both started to throw each other under the bus. But

220
00:11:16.080 --> 00:11:18.879
<v Speaker 2>I felt as if the first shots, as is often

221
00:11:18.919 --> 00:11:21.840
<v Speaker 2>the case in these instances were fired by Nick himself,

222
00:11:22.279 --> 00:11:25.240
<v Speaker 2>only to then in hindsight be looked back on as

223
00:11:25.279 --> 00:11:29.279
<v Speaker 2>if you know, this was all his opponent's fault, Dave

224
00:11:29.320 --> 00:11:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Smith's fault, and Ian Carroll's fault, and Tucker Carls. It's

225
00:11:32.039 --> 00:11:34.519
<v Speaker 2>never it's never Nick, It's never something he did. I

226
00:11:34.600 --> 00:11:37.039
<v Speaker 2>just wanted to make the point that Nick is right.

227
00:11:37.559 --> 00:11:40.559
<v Speaker 2>He is right about this. If if no matter how

228
00:11:40.600 --> 00:11:44.639
<v Speaker 2>bad the GOP candidate is, you are assured that you

229
00:11:44.720 --> 00:11:47.360
<v Speaker 2>are going to vote GOP, You're gonna vote red until

230
00:11:47.360 --> 00:11:50.159
<v Speaker 2>you're dead. As people say, it's the same thing as blue,

231
00:11:50.240 --> 00:11:52.679
<v Speaker 2>no matter who I mean. It's if you are a

232
00:11:52.720 --> 00:11:55.600
<v Speaker 2>partisan hack who is just going to vote for your

233
00:11:55.720 --> 00:11:59.240
<v Speaker 2>preferred party no matter how bad they are, well, then

234
00:11:59.440 --> 00:12:03.120
<v Speaker 2>you are not a viable consideration when it comes to

235
00:12:03.159 --> 00:12:06.720
<v Speaker 2>electoral politics. You are a given. You are already a

236
00:12:06.759 --> 00:12:09.240
<v Speaker 2>box that has been checked. The only way you can

237
00:12:09.279 --> 00:12:12.799
<v Speaker 2>actually have demands that might get met is to not

238
00:12:12.960 --> 00:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>be a guaranteed vote. So now I'm not prepared to

239
00:12:16.200 --> 00:12:18.960
<v Speaker 2>vote for Amy Acton in Ohio, but I do understand

240
00:12:19.120 --> 00:12:22.039
<v Speaker 2>the tactical argument that you cannot always vote for the

241
00:12:22.039 --> 00:12:24.639
<v Speaker 2>GOP no matter who they force feed you. You do

242
00:12:24.759 --> 00:12:26.919
<v Speaker 2>have to have a red line where you say, I'm

243
00:12:27.000 --> 00:12:29.840
<v Speaker 2>not going to back this guy or gal because I

244
00:12:29.879 --> 00:12:33.159
<v Speaker 2>think that they are ultimately a plant or whatever. And

245
00:12:33.200 --> 00:12:35.679
<v Speaker 2>I would take Nick a lot more seriously on taking

246
00:12:35.720 --> 00:12:38.919
<v Speaker 2>that stand if it weren't for the fact that every

247
00:12:39.000 --> 00:12:42.320
<v Speaker 2>time basically that I've seen, at least every time there is,

248
00:12:42.480 --> 00:12:46.240
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, a good America First option, he seems

249
00:12:46.279 --> 00:12:49.720
<v Speaker 2>to either go against them, or have nothing to say

250
00:12:49.759 --> 00:12:52.759
<v Speaker 2>about them, or certainly is not a loud proponent or backer.

251
00:12:53.120 --> 00:12:55.600
<v Speaker 2>My example, obviously, as you guys would expect, would be

252
00:12:55.679 --> 00:12:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Massey. I think Thomas Massey is in a fight

253
00:12:58.559 --> 00:13:01.320
<v Speaker 2>for his life in the great State of Kentucky, up

254
00:13:01.360 --> 00:13:04.840
<v Speaker 2>against a total empty suit, and the Adelsins, along with

255
00:13:04.879 --> 00:13:08.600
<v Speaker 2>a few of the other Epstein clients, are throwing twenty

256
00:13:08.639 --> 00:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>five million dollars to try and oust him in the

257
00:13:11.320 --> 00:13:14.600
<v Speaker 2>GOP primary, and yet Nick doesn't deign it necessary to

258
00:13:14.639 --> 00:13:17.960
<v Speaker 2>lift a finger to assist Thomas Massey. Thomas Massey, who

259
00:13:18.039 --> 00:13:21.399
<v Speaker 2>in my estimation, is as America First as you have

260
00:13:21.639 --> 00:13:25.000
<v Speaker 2>in Congress currently, and yet he's still not good enough

261
00:13:25.039 --> 00:13:28.399
<v Speaker 2>for Nick. So my question to you, Nick, who, by

262
00:13:28.399 --> 00:13:30.759
<v Speaker 2>the way, I have invited to be on the show before.

263
00:13:30.840 --> 00:13:33.440
<v Speaker 2>He has never accepted, and that's fine, that's his prerogative.

264
00:13:33.480 --> 00:13:35.039
<v Speaker 2>But I just wanted to be on the record that

265
00:13:35.080 --> 00:13:37.000
<v Speaker 2>I have tried to have this conversation with him. He

266
00:13:37.000 --> 00:13:38.440
<v Speaker 2>didn't want to have it or he didn't have the time,

267
00:13:38.480 --> 00:13:41.879
<v Speaker 2>and that's totally his prerogative. But I think it's fair

268
00:13:41.919 --> 00:13:45.559
<v Speaker 2>for us to ask at some point, who is good enough?

269
00:13:46.039 --> 00:13:50.279
<v Speaker 2>Who are you actually looking for? You hate Vivek Okay, fine,

270
00:13:50.720 --> 00:13:53.679
<v Speaker 2>why not Casey make it explicit. I know you don't

271
00:13:53.759 --> 00:13:57.399
<v Speaker 2>like the Adelsins, so why would you not get behind

272
00:13:57.480 --> 00:13:59.879
<v Speaker 2>the guy who they're trying to oust in Thomas Massey.

273
00:14:00.519 --> 00:14:03.320
<v Speaker 2>I know you don't like Randy Fine, so not down

274
00:14:03.399 --> 00:14:06.519
<v Speaker 2>bils Arian either. Okay, how about Aaron Day. I haven't

275
00:14:06.559 --> 00:14:09.919
<v Speaker 2>heard you mention him. Joe Kent came out earlier this

276
00:14:10.039 --> 00:14:13.279
<v Speaker 2>year and blew the whistle on our relationship to Israel,

277
00:14:13.360 --> 00:14:15.399
<v Speaker 2>and it came to the lead up and the actual

278
00:14:15.440 --> 00:14:17.840
<v Speaker 2>starting of the war in Iran. He resigned over it.

279
00:14:18.240 --> 00:14:22.039
<v Speaker 2>You have already decided, because I guess he disavowed you

280
00:14:22.120 --> 00:14:25.000
<v Speaker 2>when he was running for Congress that he is an

281
00:14:25.080 --> 00:14:28.240
<v Speaker 2>enemy combatant too, So you don't like him. I'm just saying,

282
00:14:28.320 --> 00:14:31.360
<v Speaker 2>like everybody that's got a shot at winning a position

283
00:14:31.399 --> 00:14:33.960
<v Speaker 2>of power within the federal government that seems to at

284
00:14:34.039 --> 00:14:37.440
<v Speaker 2>least be seventy to eighty percent aligned with you, it's

285
00:14:37.440 --> 00:14:39.720
<v Speaker 2>still not good enough. And I'm like, I'm just waiting

286
00:14:39.799 --> 00:14:45.240
<v Speaker 2>to hear, Okay, whom will you actually back, because it

287
00:14:45.279 --> 00:14:48.399
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem as if it's anybody other than yourself. So

288
00:14:48.440 --> 00:14:50.960
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend this boils completely out of control, and

289
00:14:51.000 --> 00:14:53.600
<v Speaker 2>you have Nick funt as well. I should say this

290
00:14:53.679 --> 00:14:56.399
<v Speaker 2>did begin with Dan Bilzarian saying that he thinks that

291
00:14:56.480 --> 00:14:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Nick funt Is is a fed. Basically, the reason he's coming

292
00:14:59.279 --> 00:15:01.919
<v Speaker 2>to that conclusion is the same line of logic that

293
00:15:01.960 --> 00:15:04.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm using. That it doesn't seem as if there's ever

294
00:15:04.559 --> 00:15:07.799
<v Speaker 2>candidate that Nick really gets behind, especially in the America

295
00:15:07.799 --> 00:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>first one, and oftentimes he goes against them loudly, proudly.

296
00:15:11.320 --> 00:15:13.720
<v Speaker 2>And Nick didn't take that kindly, nor should he. For

297
00:15:13.799 --> 00:15:16.519
<v Speaker 2>the record, if Nick is not a federal agent or informant,

298
00:15:16.559 --> 00:15:18.919
<v Speaker 2>then I would expect him to be very very angry

299
00:15:18.960 --> 00:15:22.039
<v Speaker 2>about the accusation coming from Dan Bilzerian, which, by the way,

300
00:15:22.080 --> 00:15:23.919
<v Speaker 2>you'll note I have not made that accusation, nor do

301
00:15:23.960 --> 00:15:27.159
<v Speaker 2>I intend to. In this episode, but Nick Fuente's responds

302
00:15:27.200 --> 00:15:30.320
<v Speaker 2>on May eighth, saying, the first time I met Dandilzerian

303
00:15:30.360 --> 00:15:32.240
<v Speaker 2>at his house, he had us put our phones in

304
00:15:32.279 --> 00:15:35.120
<v Speaker 2>another room, then asked me how difficult it would be

305
00:15:35.200 --> 00:15:38.879
<v Speaker 2>to assassinate Israeli government ministers. Then he invited me to

306
00:15:38.960 --> 00:15:41.559
<v Speaker 2>Dubai and Qatar, which I declined. On his way there,

307
00:15:41.600 --> 00:15:44.559
<v Speaker 2>he was ambushed by the FBI. So let's pause there

308
00:15:44.639 --> 00:15:48.759
<v Speaker 2>and see if this claim is valid. Does Dandlsarian actually

309
00:15:48.799 --> 00:15:53.080
<v Speaker 2>take cell phones from house guests? That phone thing, Dan happened.

310
00:15:53.120 --> 00:15:54.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why you did it.

311
00:15:54.279 --> 00:15:55.559
<v Speaker 6>Do you deny that happened?

312
00:15:55.919 --> 00:15:57.679
<v Speaker 7>That you and I sat down with Jake in that

313
00:15:57.759 --> 00:16:00.240
<v Speaker 7>room and our phones are on the couch. There are

314
00:16:00.240 --> 00:16:03.360
<v Speaker 7>such a fucking attention horror bro. I take people's phones

315
00:16:03.360 --> 00:16:05.360
<v Speaker 7>in my house all the time. You also sign an

316
00:16:05.480 --> 00:16:09.120
<v Speaker 7>nea by the way, dipshit. Uh So I just want

317
00:16:09.200 --> 00:16:11.240
<v Speaker 7>to say that, Yeah, and Jake was there, and you're

318
00:16:11.240 --> 00:16:12.759
<v Speaker 7>a fuck You're just like, I don't know if you're

319
00:16:12.799 --> 00:16:15.399
<v Speaker 7>a fucking fed or you're trying to fucking like incriminate

320
00:16:15.480 --> 00:16:16.759
<v Speaker 7>me for some shit that I didn't do.

321
00:16:17.000 --> 00:16:20.399
<v Speaker 2>So Nick didn't lie about that. It's true, Dan, Bilzarian

322
00:16:20.519 --> 00:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>takes the phones of his house guests. Now you might

323
00:16:23.639 --> 00:16:27.799
<v Speaker 2>find that odd, and certainly I think for normal people

324
00:16:27.879 --> 00:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>standards that would be odd. But if you're a very wealthy,

325
00:16:31.120 --> 00:16:36.320
<v Speaker 2>powerful influential person who's also talking about third rail topics

326
00:16:36.399 --> 00:16:39.320
<v Speaker 2>and doing so in a very aggressive fashion, I can

327
00:16:39.440 --> 00:16:43.000
<v Speaker 2>understand wanting to have some precautionary measures in place. So

328
00:16:43.200 --> 00:16:46.519
<v Speaker 2>Dan Bilzarian, in my opinion, was actually being smart about this.

329
00:16:46.639 --> 00:16:48.360
<v Speaker 2>That if you're going to have people over your house,

330
00:16:48.440 --> 00:16:50.320
<v Speaker 2>especially to meet them for the first time, and you

331
00:16:50.360 --> 00:16:53.039
<v Speaker 2>only know them because of their Internet persona, it would

332
00:16:53.080 --> 00:16:56.120
<v Speaker 2>be wise to make sure that they can't record what

333
00:16:56.200 --> 00:16:58.279
<v Speaker 2>you have to say. That maybe they signed an NBA

334
00:16:58.399 --> 00:17:00.440
<v Speaker 2>so that they can't, you know, rat you out to

335
00:17:00.480 --> 00:17:02.559
<v Speaker 2>the New York Times or something crazy like that. So,

336
00:17:02.600 --> 00:17:04.559
<v Speaker 2>while I agree it's not the most normal thing in

337
00:17:04.599 --> 00:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>the world to do, it's also understandable for someone in

338
00:17:07.759 --> 00:17:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Bilsarian's position this kind of I don't know if he's

339
00:17:10.319 --> 00:17:15.240
<v Speaker 2>a billionaire, but one hundred millionaire playboy who's undoubtedly kind

340
00:17:15.240 --> 00:17:18.000
<v Speaker 2>of under the watchful eye of the intelligence agencies, I

341
00:17:18.000 --> 00:17:20.920
<v Speaker 2>think would be fair to say. Lucas Gage responds to

342
00:17:20.960 --> 00:17:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Nick Foint to his post, and he says, Holy fuck, Nick,

343
00:17:23.519 --> 00:17:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I swear to god he did the same thing to me.

344
00:17:25.240 --> 00:17:27.359
<v Speaker 2>He walked me and Jake up to that room with

345
00:17:27.400 --> 00:17:29.279
<v Speaker 2>the batting cage. We put our phones on the couch

346
00:17:29.319 --> 00:17:31.319
<v Speaker 2>and went up to that seclude room with the big TVs.

347
00:17:31.319 --> 00:17:34.440
<v Speaker 2>He asked me about where Ben Shapiro lived and how

348
00:17:34.839 --> 00:17:38.160
<v Speaker 2>he could be taken out. Nick responds, this is getting

349
00:17:38.200 --> 00:17:40.440
<v Speaker 2>really weird, man. I wonder if anyone else has had

350
00:17:40.440 --> 00:17:43.720
<v Speaker 2>similar experience. Seems like his move was to invite all

351
00:17:43.759 --> 00:17:46.079
<v Speaker 2>of the prominent JQ influencers to his place in twenty

352
00:17:46.119 --> 00:17:48.079
<v Speaker 2>four to twenty five. Maybe the whole thing was like

353
00:17:48.119 --> 00:17:51.200
<v Speaker 2>an Epstein style honeypot. I just thought he was really dumb.

354
00:17:51.519 --> 00:17:53.839
<v Speaker 2>Lucasen response, I've only told one person about this and

355
00:17:53.880 --> 00:17:56.240
<v Speaker 2>they can confirm. Now it's important to understand the Lucas

356
00:17:56.279 --> 00:17:58.759
<v Speaker 2>Gage role in this. Lucas Gage was kind of a

357
00:17:58.960 --> 00:18:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Nick point Dizzy and Dan Bilzarian level figure in the

358
00:18:03.680 --> 00:18:06.359
<v Speaker 2>JQ alt right, whatever you want to call it. And

359
00:18:06.720 --> 00:18:09.880
<v Speaker 2>he has come out over the past week basically disavowing

360
00:18:09.920 --> 00:18:11.920
<v Speaker 2>all of his opinions when it comes to Jewish people

361
00:18:11.960 --> 00:18:14.599
<v Speaker 2>and Jewish influence and all that. So he has made

362
00:18:14.599 --> 00:18:18.279
<v Speaker 2>the big pivot. But Nick is essentially teaming up with

363
00:18:18.400 --> 00:18:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Lucas Gage to smear Dan Bilzarian, who's going up against

364
00:18:22.319 --> 00:18:26.039
<v Speaker 2>one of the most ardent Zionist congressional members in Randy Fine.

365
00:18:26.359 --> 00:18:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Just it's interesting, Bedfellows, is it not? And it gets

366
00:18:29.640 --> 00:18:32.279
<v Speaker 2>more interesting in that Tim Poole seems to be backing

367
00:18:32.359 --> 00:18:35.440
<v Speaker 2>up Nick Fuentes over Bilzarian as well, largely on.

368
00:18:35.400 --> 00:18:40.960
<v Speaker 8>Issues of race and but he made a few important points.

369
00:18:40.960 --> 00:18:45.160
<v Speaker 8>One he called out Candice Owens for lying. That's good,

370
00:18:45.240 --> 00:18:48.359
<v Speaker 8>but he also pointed something else out recently, Tucker Carlson

371
00:18:48.519 --> 00:18:52.599
<v Speaker 8>meets with heads of state in Middle Eastern countries. This

372
00:18:52.680 --> 00:18:56.319
<v Speaker 8>is not something a podcaster does. This is something a

373
00:18:56.480 --> 00:19:01.400
<v Speaker 8>government actor does. Tucker Carlson is not just journalist or podcaster.

374
00:19:01.799 --> 00:19:05.000
<v Speaker 8>He is of worldly affairs, negotiating and cutting back round

375
00:19:05.000 --> 00:19:05.839
<v Speaker 8>deals and advising.

376
00:19:05.920 --> 00:19:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Found this admission by Tim absolutely fascinating, especially since he

377
00:19:09.480 --> 00:19:11.599
<v Speaker 2>and I have been I don't want to say beefing,

378
00:19:11.640 --> 00:19:14.720
<v Speaker 2>but we've been, we've been throwing internet blows at one another,

379
00:19:15.319 --> 00:19:18.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of like stop. But Nick has fed jacketed Tucker

380
00:19:18.960 --> 00:19:21.400
<v Speaker 2>many times. He has said that, you know, his dad

381
00:19:21.519 --> 00:19:24.440
<v Speaker 2>was Air America, and he's a CIA agent, and it's

382
00:19:24.599 --> 00:19:27.319
<v Speaker 2>highly likely that Tucker is either an agent or an

383
00:19:27.359 --> 00:19:32.160
<v Speaker 2>asset himself. And I just think it's absolutely unbelievable that

384
00:19:32.279 --> 00:19:35.359
<v Speaker 2>Tim is backing up Nick Flines on those accusations against

385
00:19:35.400 --> 00:19:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Tucker Carlson and his evidence being that Tucker Carlson meets

386
00:19:40.160 --> 00:19:44.359
<v Speaker 2>in private with foreign heads of state when Tim Poole

387
00:19:44.480 --> 00:19:47.240
<v Speaker 2>very famously met with bb Net and Yahoo I think

388
00:19:47.240 --> 00:19:51.759
<v Speaker 2>about a year ago now in private with Chathamhouse rules

389
00:19:51.799 --> 00:19:54.119
<v Speaker 2>where you're not allowed to report on the actual things

390
00:19:54.160 --> 00:19:58.559
<v Speaker 2>that were discussed at that meeting. And I'm like, Tim, really, like,

391
00:19:59.119 --> 00:20:02.119
<v Speaker 2>are you saying I mean, what he's saying there is

392
00:20:02.119 --> 00:20:04.559
<v Speaker 2>that his own actions put him in the category of

393
00:20:04.599 --> 00:20:07.880
<v Speaker 2>being a government asset of some variety. So if he

394
00:20:07.960 --> 00:20:11.119
<v Speaker 2>actually believes that about Tucker, why is it applicable to

395
00:20:11.160 --> 00:20:13.799
<v Speaker 2>Tucker but not to him? I don't understand. And what's

396
00:20:13.839 --> 00:20:16.960
<v Speaker 2>even weirder about the accusations from Tim is that obviously

397
00:20:16.960 --> 00:20:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Tucker Crawlson is not just a podcaster. He was the

398
00:20:19.799 --> 00:20:22.279
<v Speaker 2>number one nightly news guy on Cable TV for like

399
00:20:22.319 --> 00:20:25.480
<v Speaker 2>a decade, so he is big time. He's much bigger

400
00:20:25.519 --> 00:20:28.240
<v Speaker 2>than podcasting. Even if he is a podcaster at this point,

401
00:20:28.559 --> 00:20:31.160
<v Speaker 2>but he is also the most successful right wing political

402
00:20:31.480 --> 00:20:34.799
<v Speaker 2>commentator and podcaster that exists today. So the fact that

403
00:20:34.839 --> 00:20:37.359
<v Speaker 2>he is going around and doing things that maybe Barbara

404
00:20:37.440 --> 00:20:41.119
<v Speaker 2>Walters would have done on twenty twenty when I was

405
00:20:41.160 --> 00:20:43.599
<v Speaker 2>growing up, Yeah, that makes sense. It makes sense that

406
00:20:43.599 --> 00:20:45.319
<v Speaker 2>you're going to have a guy like Tucker Cralson that

407
00:20:45.400 --> 00:20:49.440
<v Speaker 2>has the clout, the gravitas to actually get a meeting

408
00:20:49.519 --> 00:20:51.119
<v Speaker 2>with a foreign head of state as he did with

409
00:20:51.200 --> 00:20:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Putin and other foreign dignitaries like that is valuable journalism.

410
00:20:55.799 --> 00:20:59.039
<v Speaker 2>So I don't view that as evidence that Nick Foint

411
00:20:59.119 --> 00:21:01.160
<v Speaker 2>is this correct and that Tucker Carlson is some sort

412
00:21:01.160 --> 00:21:04.119
<v Speaker 2>of government asset. That doesn't mean that he's wrong, just

413
00:21:04.160 --> 00:21:06.119
<v Speaker 2>means that that's not proof of that. So I found

414
00:21:06.160 --> 00:21:10.480
<v Speaker 2>it absolutely jaw dropping that Tim would say that, yeah,

415
00:21:10.480 --> 00:21:12.519
<v Speaker 2>he's not just a journalist, that makes him a government

416
00:21:12.559 --> 00:21:15.079
<v Speaker 2>agent of some variety. And to be honest, what got

417
00:21:15.119 --> 00:21:17.880
<v Speaker 2>my hackles up was a few days prior to that,

418
00:21:18.119 --> 00:21:19.519
<v Speaker 2>when Stephen Crowder weighed in.

419
00:21:19.720 --> 00:21:21.880
<v Speaker 9>I interviewed Nick quents I would do it again. I

420
00:21:21.880 --> 00:21:23.599
<v Speaker 9>thought it was I thought it was productive. I thought

421
00:21:23.599 --> 00:21:25.559
<v Speaker 9>we got some important questions. I think you're allowed to

422
00:21:25.559 --> 00:21:30.480
<v Speaker 9>interview whoever you want. Tucker walks it back, but he lies,

423
00:21:30.640 --> 00:21:32.599
<v Speaker 9>or at least no, he lies.

424
00:21:32.400 --> 00:21:33.799
<v Speaker 10>While walking it back.

425
00:21:33.839 --> 00:21:34.079
<v Speaker 2>Here.

426
00:21:34.440 --> 00:21:39.599
<v Speaker 11>I wish I hadn't a flint his interview because really, yeah,

427
00:21:39.640 --> 00:21:41.200
<v Speaker 11>it was totally not worth it. I mean, it was

428
00:21:41.240 --> 00:21:44.519
<v Speaker 11>a kind of interesting, I guess, but it was used

429
00:21:44.720 --> 00:21:49.400
<v Speaker 11>as I added to the distraction. What I really wanted

430
00:21:49.440 --> 00:21:55.240
<v Speaker 11>to talk about was where we were going in this

431
00:21:55.519 --> 00:21:56.240
<v Speaker 11>war with Iran.

432
00:21:57.200 --> 00:21:59.279
<v Speaker 9>But Ron and I searched the transcripts, you guys, can

433
00:21:59.359 --> 00:22:02.359
<v Speaker 9>it only came up once once. In other words, there'd

434
00:22:02.359 --> 00:22:04.720
<v Speaker 9>be nothing precluding him. He also sat down Nick told

435
00:22:04.799 --> 00:22:07.200
<v Speaker 9>us about this with Nick Fuentes for dinner for I

436
00:22:07.200 --> 00:22:09.839
<v Speaker 9>think two or three hours beforehand. Throughout the entire interview,

437
00:22:09.839 --> 00:22:13.279
<v Speaker 9>the only reference to Iran I could find was Iran

438
00:22:13.400 --> 00:22:15.920
<v Speaker 9>is not as big of a threat to us as OnlyFans.

439
00:22:17.200 --> 00:22:18.480
<v Speaker 9>I think he did Nick dirty.

440
00:22:18.640 --> 00:22:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm gonna lose some of you on this part,

441
00:22:20.519 --> 00:22:22.400
<v Speaker 2>and that's fine. You don't have to agree with me.

442
00:22:22.839 --> 00:22:25.319
<v Speaker 2>But I don't trust Steven Crowder. I don't think that

443
00:22:25.359 --> 00:22:28.200
<v Speaker 2>his analysis is sound, and I think that he behaves

444
00:22:28.200 --> 00:22:30.440
<v Speaker 2>in a way that makes me feel as if he's

445
00:22:30.480 --> 00:22:34.400
<v Speaker 2>got inside track information periodically, especially when it comes to

446
00:22:34.839 --> 00:22:37.960
<v Speaker 2>mass shootings or the Charlie Kirk assassination. There are many

447
00:22:38.000 --> 00:22:42.599
<v Speaker 2>instances where he is fed information in the twenty four

448
00:22:42.640 --> 00:22:45.319
<v Speaker 2>hours after a major event that makes me know that

449
00:22:45.440 --> 00:22:49.640
<v Speaker 2>he's got inside sources that it makes me doubt his

450
00:22:50.039 --> 00:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>full independence. I'll put it like that. So I find

451
00:22:52.440 --> 00:22:56.680
<v Speaker 2>it interesting that Crowder would use Nick Fuentes as kind

452
00:22:56.720 --> 00:23:00.640
<v Speaker 2>of a wedge issue to try and attack to Carlson,

453
00:23:00.720 --> 00:23:05.160
<v Speaker 2>while simultaneously Nick is actively attacking Dan Bilzarian. It just

454
00:23:05.160 --> 00:23:07.359
<v Speaker 2>seems as if there's a lot of and maybe it's

455
00:23:07.400 --> 00:23:10.119
<v Speaker 2>all just organic power struggles, as people want to be

456
00:23:10.160 --> 00:23:11.920
<v Speaker 2>the biggest right wing voice and this is how they

457
00:23:11.920 --> 00:23:16.319
<v Speaker 2>get notoriety and clicks and listeners and viewers. Maybe that's

458
00:23:16.359 --> 00:23:20.160
<v Speaker 2>all it is. Maybe, but I think it's fair to

459
00:23:20.240 --> 00:23:22.839
<v Speaker 2>wonder aloud if it might be something bigger than that.

460
00:23:23.119 --> 00:23:25.960
<v Speaker 2>And just to give you an example, here's Alex Jones

461
00:23:26.079 --> 00:23:29.079
<v Speaker 2>talking to Nick Wantz as well as Owen Sroyer, who

462
00:23:29.079 --> 00:23:31.279
<v Speaker 2>I just did a four on four debate with him,

463
00:23:31.319 --> 00:23:33.559
<v Speaker 2>and Kevin Mcinness and Josie and a bunch of other people,

464
00:23:33.720 --> 00:23:35.480
<v Speaker 2>and it's an absolute barn burner. Will be out in

465
00:23:35.480 --> 00:23:36.799
<v Speaker 2>a couple weeks I can't wait for you guys to

466
00:23:36.839 --> 00:23:40.039
<v Speaker 2>see it. But anyways, I got to meet Owen, great dude. Anyways,

467
00:23:40.119 --> 00:23:41.559
<v Speaker 2>let's hear what Alex had to say.

468
00:23:41.759 --> 00:23:47.839
<v Speaker 4>Charlottesville was mainly a bunch of homosexual leftist addressing up

469
00:23:47.880 --> 00:23:50.720
<v Speaker 4>like Nazis who'd all formerly worked for Obama or Hillary

470
00:23:51.000 --> 00:23:53.160
<v Speaker 4>part of their art club, and then they learned a

471
00:23:53.160 --> 00:23:56.519
<v Speaker 4>bunch of reporters there and some real white supremacist so

472
00:23:56.559 --> 00:23:59.680
<v Speaker 4>the police could stand down and collide them into the folks.

473
00:23:59.720 --> 00:24:02.720
<v Speaker 4>I pointed out that some of the same leftist foundations

474
00:24:02.759 --> 00:24:05.119
<v Speaker 4>are funding the white supremacist that are funding real white

475
00:24:05.119 --> 00:24:06.279
<v Speaker 4>supremacis in Ukraine.

476
00:24:06.720 --> 00:24:08.279
<v Speaker 2>I got sued for that, even.

477
00:24:08.119 --> 00:24:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Though it's you know that they tried to say that

478
00:24:09.680 --> 00:24:12.319
<v Speaker 4>I said some cameraman killed the girl. I did to

479
00:24:12.400 --> 00:24:14.039
<v Speaker 4>say that the cameraman killed them. I said it was

480
00:24:14.039 --> 00:24:16.200
<v Speaker 4>all part of leftists coming out to come to this

481
00:24:16.240 --> 00:24:18.400
<v Speaker 4>big event. Hope there was some big crisis out of

482
00:24:18.400 --> 00:24:20.920
<v Speaker 4>it to demonize the right in general and tie us

483
00:24:20.960 --> 00:24:21.599
<v Speaker 4>the Nazis.

484
00:24:22.039 --> 00:24:25.359
<v Speaker 2>So Alex, as is often the case, Alex Jones was right.

485
00:24:25.799 --> 00:24:27.680
<v Speaker 2>He got it right, and that was seven eight years ago,

486
00:24:27.839 --> 00:24:29.839
<v Speaker 2>and he's talking about what we now know to be

487
00:24:29.880 --> 00:24:33.559
<v Speaker 2>true that there was SPOC, there was funding that was

488
00:24:33.680 --> 00:24:36.640
<v Speaker 2>being pushed to the more radical elements when it came

489
00:24:36.640 --> 00:24:38.799
<v Speaker 2>to Charlottesville to try and get it to boil over,

490
00:24:39.119 --> 00:24:42.200
<v Speaker 2>to try and get it to be a big story

491
00:24:42.240 --> 00:24:46.480
<v Speaker 2>that could be used to attack the nationalist right wing movement,

492
00:24:46.599 --> 00:24:50.200
<v Speaker 2>the fledgling young movement at the time. I've already covered

493
00:24:50.200 --> 00:24:52.680
<v Speaker 2>this extensively on my show, but I think a similar

494
00:24:52.839 --> 00:24:55.759
<v Speaker 2>dynamic happen at J six. You had hundreds of plain

495
00:24:56.240 --> 00:25:00.400
<v Speaker 2>clothes Capitol police that were at that event, iron you

496
00:25:00.480 --> 00:25:03.519
<v Speaker 2>had Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes and Owen Troyer, I

497
00:25:03.960 --> 00:25:07.200
<v Speaker 2>think owing to we're all present on J six, and

498
00:25:07.240 --> 00:25:10.119
<v Speaker 2>in fact, Nick very famously grabs the bullhorn and he says,

499
00:25:10.519 --> 00:25:12.559
<v Speaker 2>you go into the Capitol, we're taking it, taking it

500
00:25:12.599 --> 00:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>over for the people or whatever.

501
00:25:18.000 --> 00:25:19.640
<v Speaker 5>Is disregard of the LAE.

502
00:25:28.920 --> 00:25:30.559
<v Speaker 2>And he didn't get any jail time over that, which

503
00:25:30.640 --> 00:25:34.079
<v Speaker 2>already had raised concern amongst people that maybe he was

504
00:25:34.480 --> 00:25:37.319
<v Speaker 2>an asset or informant. I don't know, I'm not making

505
00:25:37.319 --> 00:25:40.079
<v Speaker 2>that accusation. I'm just saying the reason that this is

506
00:25:40.119 --> 00:25:43.839
<v Speaker 2>a persistent concern is that we do know that this

507
00:25:44.200 --> 00:25:48.240
<v Speaker 2>is a thing that happens, and it's inevitable that some

508
00:25:48.319 --> 00:25:52.880
<v Speaker 2>of the high profile people, and that could include could myself,

509
00:25:53.160 --> 00:25:55.519
<v Speaker 2>Ian Carroll, I'll use my people so that I don't

510
00:25:55.680 --> 00:25:59.160
<v Speaker 2>look as if I'm just throwing shade at my competitors

511
00:25:59.240 --> 00:26:03.759
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. That you could suspect that someone in our world,

512
00:26:03.880 --> 00:26:09.880
<v Speaker 2>and probably someone's plural, are assets, they're agents, their informants, whatever.

513
00:26:10.079 --> 00:26:13.079
<v Speaker 2>So when you have Dan Bilzarian making that accusation against

514
00:26:13.160 --> 00:26:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Nick Wentes, and Nick Fuentt is returning fire with that

515
00:26:15.799 --> 00:26:18.599
<v Speaker 2>same accusation, particularly given that Nick has also made that

516
00:26:18.640 --> 00:26:22.519
<v Speaker 2>acquisition against Tucker Carlson and others, you start to wonder, well,

517
00:26:23.480 --> 00:26:28.279
<v Speaker 2>who whom of you? Which it's not none of you

518
00:26:28.759 --> 00:26:31.480
<v Speaker 2>that I'm pretty confident of. I just don't know who.

519
00:26:31.680 --> 00:26:35.440
<v Speaker 12>I think that Dan Bossarian saw that his popularity being

520
00:26:35.519 --> 00:26:38.799
<v Speaker 12>this you know, well known, you know, playboy, cool guy,

521
00:26:38.920 --> 00:26:42.559
<v Speaker 12>et cetera, this kind of is waning. People are not

522
00:26:42.759 --> 00:26:46.279
<v Speaker 12>paying attention to this anymore, nobody cares anymore. So what

523
00:26:46.400 --> 00:26:49.400
<v Speaker 12>he did instead of that is he invented this new

524
00:26:49.440 --> 00:26:53.759
<v Speaker 12>persona where he's this super America first, you know, like

525
00:26:53.880 --> 00:26:57.119
<v Speaker 12>big person He's he's drifting into the Palestinian thing. I

526
00:26:57.160 --> 00:27:00.559
<v Speaker 12>think massively, and I don't think that it's authentic.

527
00:27:00.559 --> 00:27:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Do you can count asmen gold in the front des

528
00:27:02.559 --> 00:27:06.160
<v Speaker 2>camp I personally, I don't agree with him. I think

529
00:27:06.240 --> 00:27:09.880
<v Speaker 2>then Bilzarian comes across as if he's sincere on these topics.

530
00:27:09.960 --> 00:27:12.839
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't mean that he's not some sort of federal asset.

531
00:27:13.559 --> 00:27:16.160
<v Speaker 2>If you're to listen to Laura Lumer, he is in

532
00:27:16.200 --> 00:27:20.279
<v Speaker 2>fact a cooperating witness for Trump's DOJ But that's also

533
00:27:20.480 --> 00:27:24.079
<v Speaker 2>a Lumer report, which I take with a grain of salt.

534
00:27:24.079 --> 00:27:28.160
<v Speaker 2>There's been no evidence provided. It's just my inside sources

535
00:27:28.279 --> 00:27:30.799
<v Speaker 2>who knows who knows what she's actually saying. But I

536
00:27:30.839 --> 00:27:33.359
<v Speaker 2>do find it fascinating that you have so many of

537
00:27:33.400 --> 00:27:36.359
<v Speaker 2>these figures that all seem to be coming together around

538
00:27:36.359 --> 00:27:41.160
<v Speaker 2>flent Dez and going against Bilsarian. It's just an interesting dynamic.

539
00:27:41.400 --> 00:27:44.599
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, there's real reason to question Bilsarian.

540
00:27:44.960 --> 00:27:47.400
<v Speaker 7>And by CIA op, I just meant a person that

541
00:27:47.519 --> 00:27:49.799
<v Speaker 7>is a fucking asset of them, and there's tons of

542
00:27:49.839 --> 00:27:51.920
<v Speaker 7>them out there. I know a friend that's a fucking

543
00:27:51.960 --> 00:27:54.279
<v Speaker 7>CIA asset and he doesn't need to be, and he's

544
00:27:54.279 --> 00:27:56.240
<v Speaker 7>worth like fucking hundreds of millions of dollars and you

545
00:27:56.240 --> 00:27:57.920
<v Speaker 7>would never think in a million years of the guy

546
00:27:57.960 --> 00:27:59.880
<v Speaker 7>work with a CIA, but he fucking does. I don't

547
00:27:59.920 --> 00:28:01.880
<v Speaker 7>know if he wants to think he's fucking James Bond

548
00:28:02.160 --> 00:28:04.359
<v Speaker 7>or what the reason is, but the CIA can definitely

549
00:28:04.400 --> 00:28:06.519
<v Speaker 7>offer people shit and all they have to do is

550
00:28:06.559 --> 00:28:09.480
<v Speaker 7>do something back in return. So it's not a normal relationship.

551
00:28:09.480 --> 00:28:11.599
<v Speaker 7>It's not like this guy went to the fucking federal agency.

552
00:28:11.599 --> 00:28:14.400
<v Speaker 7>It's not like he's fully employed. But he absolutely could

553
00:28:14.440 --> 00:28:16.200
<v Speaker 7>be a fucking asset, and if he is, he would

554
00:28:16.359 --> 00:28:17.880
<v Speaker 7>be doing exactly what he's doing.

555
00:28:17.920 --> 00:28:18.200
<v Speaker 5>Now.

556
00:28:18.599 --> 00:28:21.240
<v Speaker 7>First of all, fuck America first, dude, there is no America.

557
00:28:21.279 --> 00:28:24.440
<v Speaker 2>First. So Dan says that he knows the CIA asset

558
00:28:24.440 --> 00:28:26.119
<v Speaker 2>who's worth hundreds of millions of dollars, which a lot

559
00:28:26.160 --> 00:28:29.240
<v Speaker 2>of people immediately jumped to Tucker Carlson. But I don't

560
00:28:29.279 --> 00:28:32.039
<v Speaker 2>know that Dan Bilzarian is friends with Tucker Carlson or

561
00:28:32.119 --> 00:28:34.960
<v Speaker 2>is making that claim about Tucker. So I'm gonna leave

562
00:28:34.960 --> 00:28:36.759
<v Speaker 2>that one aside. What I did find fascinating is that

563
00:28:36.839 --> 00:28:41.359
<v Speaker 2>is coming from those are Quintez supporters, grippers that are

564
00:28:41.400 --> 00:28:45.039
<v Speaker 2>clipping that and the end of that, what you noticed

565
00:28:45.319 --> 00:28:48.640
<v Speaker 2>was they misclipped it. They clipped it really hard to

566
00:28:48.680 --> 00:28:51.359
<v Speaker 2>make it sound as bad as possible for Bilsarian, But

567
00:28:52.000 --> 00:28:54.920
<v Speaker 2>my research says that what he was actually saying was

568
00:28:55.000 --> 00:28:57.480
<v Speaker 2>when he said fuck America first, it's America only. So

569
00:28:57.559 --> 00:28:59.359
<v Speaker 2>that was the clarifying point he was trying to make,

570
00:28:59.400 --> 00:29:01.839
<v Speaker 2>not to say that he actually against America first. So

571
00:29:02.319 --> 00:29:06.079
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of this is just internescing battles,

572
00:29:06.119 --> 00:29:09.599
<v Speaker 2>This is just ego stuff. But it is important to

573
00:29:09.640 --> 00:29:12.440
<v Speaker 2>understand that this is going to be a dynamic that

574
00:29:12.480 --> 00:29:15.799
<v Speaker 2>we're going to deal with moving forward forever. And there

575
00:29:15.799 --> 00:29:18.880
<v Speaker 2>are real members of the opposition that are really funneling

576
00:29:19.079 --> 00:29:22.880
<v Speaker 2>major money to create this discord. So everybody needs to

577
00:29:23.119 --> 00:29:26.039
<v Speaker 2>kind of put down the weapons and start to think

578
00:29:26.039 --> 00:29:27.160
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more critically.

579
00:29:27.240 --> 00:29:30.680
<v Speaker 13>I'm also the founder of an organization called bright Mind.

580
00:29:31.359 --> 00:29:35.640
<v Speaker 13>What we do is, let's call it digital assets that

581
00:29:35.759 --> 00:29:41.079
<v Speaker 13>serve the Jewish people in a more strategic manner. We

582
00:29:41.279 --> 00:29:45.200
<v Speaker 13>got to close to three billion views since the beginning

583
00:29:45.240 --> 00:29:49.960
<v Speaker 13>of the war. Completely organic. We work with communities of

584
00:29:50.039 --> 00:29:53.519
<v Speaker 13>over sixty thousand people around the world that make our

585
00:29:53.559 --> 00:29:58.160
<v Speaker 13>content viral, but also help us report anti Semitic rhetoric

586
00:29:58.599 --> 00:30:03.680
<v Speaker 13>and fake news for Take it Down and other actions

587
00:30:03.759 --> 00:30:08.079
<v Speaker 13>that do serve the narrative. We also create content for

588
00:30:08.279 --> 00:30:12.160
<v Speaker 13>non Jewish influencers that collaborate with us.

589
00:30:12.440 --> 00:30:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I've already educated you guys about Project Esther, so you

590
00:30:15.240 --> 00:30:17.119
<v Speaker 2>already know that there are hundreds of millions, if not

591
00:30:17.160 --> 00:30:20.920
<v Speaker 2>billions of dollars that are being funneled into the propaganda campaign,

592
00:30:21.079 --> 00:30:24.759
<v Speaker 2>the propaganda war against you and your mind, to try

593
00:30:24.759 --> 00:30:27.599
<v Speaker 2>and make you put a foreign country before your own.

594
00:30:27.880 --> 00:30:30.480
<v Speaker 2>This is a dynamic that isn't going away. What she's

595
00:30:30.519 --> 00:30:34.759
<v Speaker 2>describing there is digital assets, which I would guess means

596
00:30:34.960 --> 00:30:40.799
<v Speaker 2>bot networks, and she explicitly says that they create content

597
00:30:41.279 --> 00:30:45.720
<v Speaker 2>for non Jewish content creators to put out, which means

598
00:30:45.720 --> 00:30:48.200
<v Speaker 2>that they are feeding talking points to some of the

599
00:30:48.200 --> 00:30:51.319
<v Speaker 2>people that you probably listen to and respect, and you

600
00:30:51.359 --> 00:30:53.640
<v Speaker 2>don't even know that that's happening. So you need to

601
00:30:53.640 --> 00:30:56.839
<v Speaker 2>be aware that this is serious, that this is real,

602
00:30:56.880 --> 00:30:58.759
<v Speaker 2>that this is a real thing. That doesn't mean that

603
00:30:58.839 --> 00:31:02.799
<v Speaker 2>Dandel's Aerian, Ornate Flentes or Stephen Crowder or Tucker Carlson

604
00:31:03.480 --> 00:31:07.759
<v Speaker 2>or anybody else is necessarily a federal informant or agent

605
00:31:07.839 --> 00:31:11.200
<v Speaker 2>or asset or whatever else, but it does mean that

606
00:31:11.240 --> 00:31:15.000
<v Speaker 2>there are efforts to create that dynamic.

607
00:31:14.720 --> 00:31:19.599
<v Speaker 13>I offered Hamas's isis, and I offered why, and I

608
00:31:19.759 --> 00:31:22.799
<v Speaker 13>gave a short one o one on how we can

609
00:31:23.160 --> 00:31:28.960
<v Speaker 13>garner attention and traction around that narrative, and that worked.

610
00:31:29.559 --> 00:31:34.160
<v Speaker 13>So in three to four days it became the most

611
00:31:34.279 --> 00:31:38.319
<v Speaker 13>viewed a narrative online. It became viral for almost three

612
00:31:38.319 --> 00:31:43.000
<v Speaker 13>months around the world, in some places even more, and

613
00:31:43.480 --> 00:31:45.160
<v Speaker 13>it even got to Biden's speech.

614
00:31:45.359 --> 00:31:46.880
<v Speaker 2>What you noticed at the end there is that she

615
00:31:46.960 --> 00:31:50.599
<v Speaker 2>says a narrative that they created, which you have to

616
00:31:50.640 --> 00:31:53.000
<v Speaker 2>imagine is a lie, because why would you have to

617
00:31:53.039 --> 00:31:56.079
<v Speaker 2>create the narrative if it's just the truth. It was

618
00:31:56.160 --> 00:31:59.720
<v Speaker 2>repeated in a speech by President Joe Biden. So this

619
00:31:59.880 --> 00:32:02.920
<v Speaker 2>was in the early days of the war, after October seventh,

620
00:32:02.920 --> 00:32:05.079
<v Speaker 2>because Trump wasn't empower yet. And I've already shown you

621
00:32:05.160 --> 00:32:07.920
<v Speaker 2>the clips in prior episodes of bebing Thattna, who's sitting

622
00:32:07.960 --> 00:32:12.839
<v Speaker 2>down with American influencer brigades, dozens of them, just talking

623
00:32:12.880 --> 00:32:16.200
<v Speaker 2>about how you're the most important weapon in our fifth

624
00:32:16.519 --> 00:32:18.640
<v Speaker 2>front of the war, eighth front of the war, whatever

625
00:32:18.680 --> 00:32:21.519
<v Speaker 2>it was, and he's just saying, like this is where

626
00:32:21.559 --> 00:32:26.359
<v Speaker 2>the next frontiers of propaganda fights that we no longer

627
00:32:26.599 --> 00:32:29.839
<v Speaker 2>are listening to corporate news, so there is now another

628
00:32:30.000 --> 00:32:31.720
<v Speaker 2>battlefield that they have to prevail in.

629
00:32:31.960 --> 00:32:36.079
<v Speaker 14>We have seen the deterioration of it support for Israel

630
00:32:36.200 --> 00:32:41.000
<v Speaker 14>in the United States almost I would say it correlates

631
00:32:41.039 --> 00:32:46.200
<v Speaker 14>almost one hundred percent with the geometric rise of social media.

632
00:32:47.240 --> 00:32:49.599
<v Speaker 15>They have very much shifted away from Israel. Look at

633
00:32:49.599 --> 00:32:52.559
<v Speaker 15>this net favorability of Israel among men under the age

634
00:32:52.559 --> 00:32:55.839
<v Speaker 15>of fifty in twenty twenty two. Not too bad, but

635
00:32:55.880 --> 00:32:58.200
<v Speaker 15>not too hot to trot either, at minus three points.

636
00:32:58.319 --> 00:33:01.519
<v Speaker 15>By twenty twenty five, again down we go minus twenty

637
00:33:01.559 --> 00:33:04.359
<v Speaker 15>two points. That is just that is a nineteen point

638
00:33:04.359 --> 00:33:07.359
<v Speaker 15>shift in just three years time. But it gets even worse.

639
00:33:07.400 --> 00:33:10.359
<v Speaker 15>Look at this for Israel minus forty seven points. That's

640
00:33:10.400 --> 00:33:13.880
<v Speaker 15>a forty four point shift away from Israel on the

641
00:33:13.920 --> 00:33:15.759
<v Speaker 15>net favorability amongst young men.

642
00:33:15.799 --> 00:33:18.440
<v Speaker 2>And that's net Nyahoo on sixty minutes just last night.

643
00:33:18.799 --> 00:33:21.640
<v Speaker 2>And what he's saying there is that Israel is losing

644
00:33:21.680 --> 00:33:24.440
<v Speaker 2>support and they believe that it's a consequence of social media. Now,

645
00:33:24.440 --> 00:33:27.759
<v Speaker 2>I would argue that as a consequence of the corporate

646
00:33:27.839 --> 00:33:31.680
<v Speaker 2>narrative no longer applying that the government propaganda narratives no

647
00:33:31.759 --> 00:33:35.039
<v Speaker 2>longer actually get traction that the American people and the

648
00:33:35.039 --> 00:33:38.200
<v Speaker 2>people of the world are getting too much truth, and

649
00:33:38.240 --> 00:33:42.160
<v Speaker 2>that is the real reason that support for Israel has

650
00:33:42.440 --> 00:33:45.359
<v Speaker 2>declined so precipitously. But I also think it's all the

651
00:33:45.400 --> 00:33:50.079
<v Speaker 2>more reason to believe that there are additional assets or

652
00:33:50.319 --> 00:33:54.480
<v Speaker 2>financial mechanisms that are being deployed to try and control

653
00:33:54.519 --> 00:33:57.079
<v Speaker 2>that narrative, to try and get in there, to push

654
00:33:57.119 --> 00:34:03.039
<v Speaker 2>both censorship but also bought networks, so compromising political commentators,

655
00:34:03.079 --> 00:34:06.279
<v Speaker 2>figures that become very popular in this arena, in this lane,

656
00:34:06.720 --> 00:34:09.440
<v Speaker 2>that then get used to that end because they have

657
00:34:09.519 --> 00:34:13.480
<v Speaker 2>already built up credibility within the dissident network, and then

658
00:34:13.559 --> 00:34:16.280
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden they start to push a different message,

659
00:34:16.280 --> 00:34:18.000
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, well, why is that happening. Is that

660
00:34:18.079 --> 00:34:21.599
<v Speaker 2>just an organic shift or were they compromised in some fashion.

661
00:34:21.719 --> 00:34:26.280
<v Speaker 6>We look at hundreds of posts, accounts, you name it,

662
00:34:26.639 --> 00:34:29.800
<v Speaker 6>like for example, Nick Twentday's, so he's a very well known,

663
00:34:30.159 --> 00:34:34.639
<v Speaker 6>really revolting neo NASI social media influencer, but banned from

664
00:34:34.639 --> 00:34:37.159
<v Speaker 6>the platform, which I don't think you don't get much

665
00:34:37.159 --> 00:34:39.039
<v Speaker 6>credit for me for banning Nick one Day's. I mean,

666
00:34:39.039 --> 00:34:42.159
<v Speaker 6>it's kind of common sense. But whereas they banned him.

667
00:34:42.440 --> 00:34:45.800
<v Speaker 6>We found hundreds of accounts that continue to push out

668
00:34:46.079 --> 00:34:50.920
<v Speaker 6>his videos, So whereas his account isn't there, we found

669
00:34:51.280 --> 00:34:55.320
<v Speaker 6>accounts with well over a million followers pushing out his

670
00:34:55.639 --> 00:35:01.599
<v Speaker 6>groyper videos on a daily basis. So continues to populate

671
00:35:01.679 --> 00:35:07.199
<v Speaker 6>and propagate his poison on Instagram despite this sort of

672
00:35:07.280 --> 00:35:11.119
<v Speaker 6>cosmetic kind of policy that they've taken. They're not even

673
00:35:11.239 --> 00:35:14.360
<v Speaker 6>forcing their own policy. They get overall one hundred accounts

674
00:35:14.760 --> 00:35:19.559
<v Speaker 6>with millions of followers pushing out Nick Flentte's garbage every

675
00:35:19.599 --> 00:35:20.519
<v Speaker 6>single death.

676
00:35:20.559 --> 00:35:22.920
<v Speaker 2>That's green blad over at the Adel talking about funt Is,

677
00:35:22.960 --> 00:35:25.159
<v Speaker 2>and not just funt Is but his supporters, and if

678
00:35:25.199 --> 00:35:27.639
<v Speaker 2>you want to talk about ORWELLI in nineteen eighty four crap,

679
00:35:27.719 --> 00:35:30.440
<v Speaker 2>that's about as high level as you get. That they're

680
00:35:30.480 --> 00:35:35.280
<v Speaker 2>not just concerned about Funtez, They're concerned about deplatforming his supporters,

681
00:35:36.159 --> 00:35:39.159
<v Speaker 2>his viewers, his listeners. He wants to nuke the accounts

682
00:35:39.159 --> 00:35:43.039
<v Speaker 2>of people that just boost funt as organically that also

683
00:35:43.119 --> 00:35:47.079
<v Speaker 2>cannot be permitted. So Tuntes is a serious threat to

684
00:35:47.119 --> 00:35:49.639
<v Speaker 2>the establishment, or at least he had been. I think

685
00:35:49.639 --> 00:35:53.239
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting that he is. He is pushing the support

686
00:35:53.280 --> 00:35:56.679
<v Speaker 2>of Democrats, which I think the establishment will love. Why

687
00:35:56.719 --> 00:35:59.039
<v Speaker 2>would they not? So the real question here with his

688
00:35:59.119 --> 00:36:02.880
<v Speaker 2>backing of amyac And as the governor of Ohio, is

689
00:36:02.880 --> 00:36:05.119
<v Speaker 2>is Nick Fuent is doing that because he is a

690
00:36:05.199 --> 00:36:09.239
<v Speaker 2>brilliant five D level chess tactician and technician when it

691
00:36:09.280 --> 00:36:13.400
<v Speaker 2>comes to politics. It's possible, and I mean that sincerely.

692
00:36:13.639 --> 00:36:16.679
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he thinks that if he demonstrates that he can

693
00:36:16.719 --> 00:36:20.239
<v Speaker 2>get amy Acton to prevail over Vivek Ramaswami, that he

694
00:36:20.320 --> 00:36:24.320
<v Speaker 2>will have additional political clout and capital that he can

695
00:36:24.360 --> 00:36:27.599
<v Speaker 2>wield in the twenty twenty eight presidential election. Maybe that's

696
00:36:27.599 --> 00:36:29.360
<v Speaker 2>the angle that he's playing at. But I'll tell you,

697
00:36:29.920 --> 00:36:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't look so much at what people say as

698
00:36:32.559 --> 00:36:34.920
<v Speaker 2>much as what they do. And to me, I would

699
00:36:34.920 --> 00:36:37.280
<v Speaker 2>take funt As a lot more seriously if he was

700
00:36:37.400 --> 00:36:40.400
<v Speaker 2>using his limited political capital as we all have. He's

701
00:36:40.400 --> 00:36:43.199
<v Speaker 2>got much more than I do, but I respect anyone

702
00:36:43.199 --> 00:36:45.679
<v Speaker 2>who wants to use it intelligently. That's what I'm doing

703
00:36:45.760 --> 00:36:48.800
<v Speaker 2>when I'm not backing up Fishback or Lynch or these others,

704
00:36:48.920 --> 00:36:51.679
<v Speaker 2>is like I'm going to only put my finger on

705
00:36:51.719 --> 00:36:53.880
<v Speaker 2>the scale on things that I think matter tremendously and

706
00:36:53.920 --> 00:36:58.679
<v Speaker 2>to me, the most obvious and existential campaign or race

707
00:36:58.719 --> 00:37:02.159
<v Speaker 2>that we have this year is Thomas Massey in Kentucky,

708
00:37:02.679 --> 00:37:04.800
<v Speaker 2>and if he prevails, then I will I will take

709
00:37:04.840 --> 00:37:07.280
<v Speaker 2>my little victory lap. Ultimately, it doesn't save the country

710
00:37:07.320 --> 00:37:09.079
<v Speaker 2>or anything, but at least is a step in the

711
00:37:09.159 --> 00:37:11.800
<v Speaker 2>right direction. What I find fascinating about Funt is that

712
00:37:11.840 --> 00:37:13.880
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't seem to be He doesn't seem to be

713
00:37:13.960 --> 00:37:17.400
<v Speaker 2>interested in deploying any of that political capital to actually

714
00:37:17.480 --> 00:37:20.559
<v Speaker 2>get a win for his movement. And by that I mean,

715
00:37:20.960 --> 00:37:23.639
<v Speaker 2>is it a win to see Amy Acton become the

716
00:37:23.679 --> 00:37:25.920
<v Speaker 2>governor of Like No, what he's saying is it's a

717
00:37:25.960 --> 00:37:29.599
<v Speaker 2>win to see vivek lose. Okay, sure, sometimes it is

718
00:37:29.639 --> 00:37:32.599
<v Speaker 2>a win to see your opposition lose. If that's your worldview,

719
00:37:32.840 --> 00:37:35.039
<v Speaker 2>I can respect that. But when do you intend to

720
00:37:35.079 --> 00:37:39.000
<v Speaker 2>deploy that political that limited political capital on an actual win,

721
00:37:39.400 --> 00:37:42.840
<v Speaker 2>an actual step in the right direction. I think that

722
00:37:42.880 --> 00:37:46.079
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Massey is clearly that. I think it's It could

723
00:37:46.199 --> 00:37:50.079
<v Speaker 2>easily be argued that Casey Putsch or Dan Bilzerian or

724
00:37:50.079 --> 00:37:52.719
<v Speaker 2>a handful of others Mark Lynch could all be the

725
00:37:52.760 --> 00:37:56.800
<v Speaker 2>same thing. I haven't seen Nick Funt is back any

726
00:37:56.840 --> 00:37:59.480
<v Speaker 2>of those options. So I think it's fair and I

727
00:37:59.480 --> 00:38:03.000
<v Speaker 2>hope that he'll take this in the good spirited, open

728
00:38:03.039 --> 00:38:06.880
<v Speaker 2>minded way that I'm conveying it. Tell me what the

729
00:38:06.920 --> 00:38:09.760
<v Speaker 2>plan is. Lay it out a little bit more explicitly,

730
00:38:10.199 --> 00:38:13.039
<v Speaker 2>because if the plan is to just destroy the GOP

731
00:38:13.119 --> 00:38:16.119
<v Speaker 2>by voting for the Democrats and then you expect to

732
00:38:16.639 --> 00:38:20.360
<v Speaker 2>what in twenty twenty eight, if you win these races

733
00:38:20.360 --> 00:38:23.599
<v Speaker 2>by putting Democrats into the power in twenty twenty six,

734
00:38:23.880 --> 00:38:27.519
<v Speaker 2>do you expect the pendulum to swing more aggressively towards

735
00:38:27.559 --> 00:38:30.199
<v Speaker 2>the America First side in twenty twenty eight? Okay, maybe,

736
00:38:30.800 --> 00:38:34.480
<v Speaker 2>but I don't. I don't see how that A leads

737
00:38:34.480 --> 00:38:37.360
<v Speaker 2>to B to C. Like I don't see it, and

738
00:38:37.400 --> 00:38:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of your supporters are probably feeling similarly.

739
00:38:41.360 --> 00:38:44.760
<v Speaker 2>So if there is a tactical way that that is

740
00:38:45.199 --> 00:38:47.679
<v Speaker 2>a net benefit that Amy Act and being the governor

741
00:38:47.719 --> 00:38:51.400
<v Speaker 2>of Ohio over a casey push or of a Ramaswami

742
00:38:52.199 --> 00:38:55.199
<v Speaker 2>lay it out, I'm all ears And until you do that,

743
00:38:55.880 --> 00:38:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I would, I would hope, or I would encourage not

744
00:38:58.440 --> 00:39:03.239
<v Speaker 2>just nick literally everybody. I'm imploring everybody to stop calling

745
00:39:03.280 --> 00:39:06.239
<v Speaker 2>everybody a federal agent or asset unless you actually have

746
00:39:06.320 --> 00:39:06.880
<v Speaker 2>proof of that.

747
00:39:06.840 --> 00:39:10.400
<v Speaker 16>Nick went does. Obviously he's a federal informant. It's ridiculous

748
00:39:10.440 --> 00:39:13.360
<v Speaker 16>people that don't understand that. It's ridiculous that people just

749
00:39:13.519 --> 00:39:17.920
<v Speaker 16>keep following him despite the overwhelming evidence. I mean, this

750
00:39:18.039 --> 00:39:21.360
<v Speaker 16>guy took a meeting with Dan Wilks's partner after years

751
00:39:21.400 --> 00:39:25.360
<v Speaker 16>of screaming about Ben Shapiro and talking about Israel, and

752
00:39:25.840 --> 00:39:27.079
<v Speaker 16>he took a meeting.

753
00:39:28.679 --> 00:39:33.320
<v Speaker 2>With Defend Texas Liberty. Because that's exactly what Operation Gladiol was.

754
00:39:33.880 --> 00:39:36.480
<v Speaker 2>For those that aren't familiar, Operation Gladiol was a CIA

755
00:39:36.559 --> 00:39:40.000
<v Speaker 2>project largely in Italy during the Cold War where they

756
00:39:40.039 --> 00:39:43.280
<v Speaker 2>would try and sew discord and the way they did

757
00:39:43.320 --> 00:39:48.480
<v Speaker 2>that oftentimes was to fed jacket sincere members of the opposition.

758
00:39:48.920 --> 00:39:51.199
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not saying that I know for a fact

759
00:39:51.239 --> 00:39:53.920
<v Speaker 2>that quant Does is a real boy, or Dan Bilzerian's

760
00:39:53.960 --> 00:39:56.840
<v Speaker 2>a real boy. I don't know. I hope that they

761
00:39:56.880 --> 00:39:59.119
<v Speaker 2>all are to be honest, and I mean that sincerely.

762
00:39:59.719 --> 00:40:03.719
<v Speaker 2>But this is what fed jacketing is. This is actually

763
00:40:03.760 --> 00:40:08.880
<v Speaker 2>its origin labeling people who are genuine dissidents as federal assets,

764
00:40:08.920 --> 00:40:15.159
<v Speaker 2>agents informants, that is Gladiol, that is CIA. So be

765
00:40:15.480 --> 00:40:18.639
<v Speaker 2>very cautious before you start playing that game, because in truth,

766
00:40:19.079 --> 00:40:21.760
<v Speaker 2>you are doing your enemy's bidding if you are doing

767
00:40:21.800 --> 00:40:24.599
<v Speaker 2>so improperly. And just to be clear, I am not

768
00:40:24.920 --> 00:40:28.199
<v Speaker 2>just levying this against Nick Fuentes. I'm saying this to

769
00:40:28.519 --> 00:40:31.679
<v Speaker 2>Tucker Carlson. I'm saying this to Dan Bilzerian, both of

770
00:40:31.719 --> 00:40:34.519
<v Speaker 2>which have made similar accusations against Nick about him being

771
00:40:34.519 --> 00:40:39.199
<v Speaker 2>a fed. Until you guys know, please stop. Please. If

772
00:40:39.239 --> 00:40:41.320
<v Speaker 2>no one knows who to trust, then no one knows

773
00:40:41.320 --> 00:40:43.440
<v Speaker 2>who to back. If no one knows who to back,

774
00:40:43.800 --> 00:40:46.440
<v Speaker 2>then it makes it almost impossible for us to defeat

775
00:40:46.480 --> 00:40:50.079
<v Speaker 2>the duopoly, and I think that's exactly playing into the

776
00:40:50.199 --> 00:40:54.320
<v Speaker 2>hands of our actual enemies. If you guys enjoyed this episode,

777
00:40:54.360 --> 00:40:57.599
<v Speaker 2>please do it the like button, subscribe, hype it, share around.

778
00:40:58.239 --> 00:41:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Let Nick know that I talk shit about him, even

779
00:41:00.760 --> 00:41:03.400
<v Speaker 2>though I don't think I did. I try to be

780
00:41:03.480 --> 00:41:07.320
<v Speaker 2>as open minded and even handed about all of this coverage,

781
00:41:07.360 --> 00:41:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and I hope I did that to your satisfaction. I

782
00:41:11.159 --> 00:41:13.119
<v Speaker 2>did my best. I do have, you know, my own

783
00:41:13.159 --> 00:41:15.239
<v Speaker 2>biases and things like that. I don't like that he

784
00:41:15.360 --> 00:41:18.440
<v Speaker 2>constantly attack Stape Smith and Ian Carroll, who are two

785
00:41:18.480 --> 00:41:21.840
<v Speaker 2>of my buddies, But you know, I try and set

786
00:41:21.880 --> 00:41:25.280
<v Speaker 2>that aside and just be like, all right, net positive

787
00:41:25.400 --> 00:41:28.280
<v Speaker 2>net negative, Like, let's actually parse this out and let's

788
00:41:28.320 --> 00:41:30.519
<v Speaker 2>see how we can actually win. And if you if

789
00:41:30.519 --> 00:41:32.679
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to back up Thomas Massey, tell me

790
00:41:32.760 --> 00:41:36.639
<v Speaker 2>the fuck why I want to know? Nick is there's

791
00:41:36.639 --> 00:41:39.559
<v Speaker 2>nobody else that's more America first in DC. It's not

792
00:41:39.599 --> 00:41:43.440
<v Speaker 2>even close. Tell me why I'm all leayers. All right,

793
00:41:43.800 --> 00:41:46.039
<v Speaker 2>leave a comment if I got anything wrong down below.

794
00:41:46.280 --> 00:41:48.039
<v Speaker 2>You want to support the show at Liberty lock pot

795
00:41:48.039 --> 00:41:50.039
<v Speaker 2>on X, you could subscribe there. I will follow you back.

796
00:41:50.039 --> 00:41:52.719
<v Speaker 2>It's only five bucks a month. I wanted to say briefly,

797
00:41:52.880 --> 00:41:56.039
<v Speaker 2>I really enjoyed my appearance over on Julian Dorry's show

798
00:41:56.400 --> 00:41:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Good Dude, and I had. I really The feedback has

799
00:41:59.400 --> 00:42:02.159
<v Speaker 2>been incredible. I think I got like over three thousand

800
00:42:02.159 --> 00:42:04.239
<v Speaker 2>new subscribers just by doing that appearance, which is the

801
00:42:04.239 --> 00:42:07.119
<v Speaker 2>most I've ever grown from a single guest spot. So

802
00:42:07.320 --> 00:42:09.960
<v Speaker 2>the Julian Dory bump is real. When I say that

803
00:42:10.000 --> 00:42:14.119
<v Speaker 2>he's the young new iteration of Joe Rogan, I ain't lying.

804
00:42:14.280 --> 00:42:17.599
<v Speaker 2>And last but not least, inspired by Julian, who made

805
00:42:17.679 --> 00:42:20.440
<v Speaker 2>his platform what it is, who started to do YouTube

806
00:42:20.440 --> 00:42:23.000
<v Speaker 2>shorts or shorts more broadly. Back in twenty twenty two,

807
00:42:23.079 --> 00:42:25.079
<v Speaker 2>I talked to him about it. He's like, that's how

808
00:42:25.079 --> 00:42:27.039
<v Speaker 2>you grow, dude. That's like, that's how I was like,

809
00:42:27.119 --> 00:42:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't have any clip channel whatsoever, and he's like,

810
00:42:30.000 --> 00:42:33.559
<v Speaker 2>you gotta get one. So now I do Clint Russell Clips.

811
00:42:33.599 --> 00:42:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna link it in the description below. Just put

812
00:42:35.760 --> 00:42:39.559
<v Speaker 2>out the first few shorts today. If you're watching this

813
00:42:39.639 --> 00:42:41.239
<v Speaker 2>right now, please help me out get it to a

814
00:42:41.280 --> 00:42:43.719
<v Speaker 2>thousand subscribers, just so that it can actually have some traction,

815
00:42:43.760 --> 00:42:46.639
<v Speaker 2>because as of now it's got like one subscriber me.

816
00:42:47.440 --> 00:42:51.559
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, Clint Russell Clips. That's the handle on YouTube,

817
00:42:51.639 --> 00:42:54.639
<v Speaker 2>and Dan Smott's is running it for me with dis

818
00:42:54.960 --> 00:42:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Media and he is the best in the game. So

819
00:42:57.440 --> 00:42:59.679
<v Speaker 2>you will not be disappointed. If you ever miss an

820
00:42:59.679 --> 00:43:02.280
<v Speaker 2>episode or if you just want a short version of

821
00:43:02.320 --> 00:43:04.760
<v Speaker 2>this show that you can share more readily, that'll be

822
00:43:05.119 --> 00:43:07.920
<v Speaker 2>your way to do so Clint Russell Clips. Make sure

823
00:43:07.960 --> 00:43:10.039
<v Speaker 2>you subscribe. Appreciate you guys, See you some peace.

824
00:43:10.119 --> 00:43:13.320
<v Speaker 10>Clint Russell did a show on that the other day

825
00:43:13.559 --> 00:43:15.800
<v Speaker 10>and that was just it was perfect. I just thought

826
00:43:15.800 --> 00:43:17.760
<v Speaker 10>it was great. Clint's the man. If you guys don't

827
00:43:17.760 --> 00:43:19.679
<v Speaker 10>watch his shows. One of the best shows out there.

828
00:43:19.800 --> 00:43:20.079
<v Speaker 6>Still.

829
00:43:20.159 --> 00:43:23.599
<v Speaker 10>I always say Clint's criminally underrated. I've just been saying

830
00:43:23.599 --> 00:43:26.719
<v Speaker 10>that for years, but then he really blew up, so

831
00:43:26.760 --> 00:43:29.639
<v Speaker 10>I don't know if I could keep saying he's still underrated.

832
00:43:29.679 --> 00:43:32.599
<v Speaker 10>He deserves more than he is. Just excellent show, Liberty Lockdown,

833
00:43:32.639 --> 00:43:33.960
<v Speaker 10>one of the best podcasts out there.