WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.280 --> 00:00:03.839
<v Speaker 1>And you can come and smash me. Calvinists making a

2
00:00:03.839 --> 00:00:07.919
<v Speaker 1>big fuss. James White can't stop talking about me, and

3
00:00:08.320 --> 00:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I did. I posted my thirty minute roast. Forty minute roast,

4
00:00:11.759 --> 00:00:15.439
<v Speaker 1>so you can go watch the roast. Indiana, what's up, man? Come,

5
00:00:15.640 --> 00:00:28.879
<v Speaker 1>let's chat about our exchange. You got an a mute.

6
00:00:32.039 --> 00:00:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Yo?

7
00:00:33.520 --> 00:00:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Hey are you there? Can you hear me?

8
00:00:39.320 --> 00:00:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I can hear you. Yeah.

9
00:00:41.240 --> 00:00:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was perfectly cordial to you. When I

10
00:00:43.399 --> 00:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>asked you if you wanted to debate. You said, I'm

11
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:49.039
<v Speaker 1>not interested in representing a position in a debate for him,

12
00:00:49.159 --> 00:00:52.039
<v Speaker 1>but you're open to a conversation. And I asked you

13
00:00:52.119 --> 00:00:54.159
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times if you'd like to chat. So

14
00:00:54.399 --> 00:00:57.119
<v Speaker 1>where did I do anything like what you accuse me of.

15
00:01:00.560 --> 00:01:00.640
<v Speaker 2>No?

16
00:01:00.799 --> 00:01:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I came on here to publicly apologize, humbly admitting

17
00:01:06.359 --> 00:01:10.719
<v Speaker 3>that I was wrong. I misrepresented our conversation. I deleted

18
00:01:10.719 --> 00:01:13.359
<v Speaker 3>the tweet, not as a I'm trying to hide what

19
00:01:13.400 --> 00:01:14.000
<v Speaker 3>I did.

20
00:01:14.359 --> 00:01:15.159
<v Speaker 2>But I did.

21
00:01:15.239 --> 00:01:17.879
<v Speaker 3>I misrepresented and I exaggerated our conversation.

22
00:01:18.079 --> 00:01:18.879
<v Speaker 2>Shouldn't have done.

23
00:01:18.760 --> 00:01:21.719
<v Speaker 1>That fair enough. I will take it down because you

24
00:01:21.760 --> 00:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>were well.

25
00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:23.599
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you have to do that.

26
00:01:23.680 --> 00:01:25.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I mean I didn't come here to be

27
00:01:25.719 --> 00:01:27.319
<v Speaker 3>like to try to cover my ass or anything. But

28
00:01:28.200 --> 00:01:30.920
<v Speaker 3>I you know, there comes a point where you do

29
00:01:31.000 --> 00:01:33.640
<v Speaker 3>make a mistake online and you gotta come up and

30
00:01:33.680 --> 00:01:36.560
<v Speaker 3>you gotta admit that you that you overstepped your bounds.

31
00:01:37.560 --> 00:01:43.920
<v Speaker 3>I was a little agitated because and you know, secondarily,

32
00:01:44.120 --> 00:01:47.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, uh, I don't know. I get a lot

33
00:01:47.239 --> 00:01:49.359
<v Speaker 3>of d ms from people who I don't know if

34
00:01:49.359 --> 00:01:50.920
<v Speaker 3>they're affiliated with you at all, and I'm not going

35
00:01:51.000 --> 00:01:53.799
<v Speaker 3>to assume that they are, but a lot of just

36
00:01:54.480 --> 00:01:56.280
<v Speaker 3>horrible dms, and they're.

37
00:01:56.079 --> 00:01:57.319
<v Speaker 2>All telling me to debate you.

38
00:01:58.200 --> 00:01:58.560
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

39
00:01:58.599 --> 00:02:00.480
<v Speaker 3>And that just the horrible thing as I hear it

40
00:02:00.560 --> 00:02:04.879
<v Speaker 3>come coming in my dms. So uh, And I apologize

41
00:02:05.200 --> 00:02:09.360
<v Speaker 3>for allowing that to bleed over into you know, me

42
00:02:09.520 --> 00:02:11.800
<v Speaker 3>talking about you on a public forum.

43
00:02:12.000 --> 00:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>That's all good. It's forgiven and forgotten. You can if

44
00:02:15.639 --> 00:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>you anytime you'd like to have a conversation about the

45
00:02:18.000 --> 00:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>topics the issues. It's an open forum. It's there's an

46
00:02:21.960 --> 00:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>open door there. I would also say that if you post,

47
00:02:26.000 --> 00:02:28.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Instagram stuff calling out Orthodoxy, you have

48
00:02:28.919 --> 00:02:31.759
<v Speaker 1>to expect pushback. I can't speak for all the people

49
00:02:31.840 --> 00:02:34.719
<v Speaker 1>that DM you or what the comments are My comment

50
00:02:34.840 --> 00:02:37.439
<v Speaker 1>on your post, you know, going after Relics was just

51
00:02:37.520 --> 00:02:39.199
<v Speaker 1>would you like to have a debate about this? And

52
00:02:39.240 --> 00:02:42.159
<v Speaker 1>that's just my default modus offerande for everybody.

53
00:02:43.280 --> 00:02:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha? Gotcha? No? Yeah, And I.

54
00:02:47.360 --> 00:02:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Respect that I don't know, I'm not super familiar with

55
00:02:50.840 --> 00:02:55.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot of your content. So again, another apology, you know,

56
00:02:55.280 --> 00:03:01.479
<v Speaker 3>just like making a blatant, you know statement about you know,

57
00:03:01.560 --> 00:03:04.000
<v Speaker 3>questioning your Christianity because I really don't. I haven't taken

58
00:03:04.039 --> 00:03:09.479
<v Speaker 3>the time to go over everything that you post. So yeah,

59
00:03:09.520 --> 00:03:11.639
<v Speaker 3>I'll take some time to look over you know, your

60
00:03:11.680 --> 00:03:14.360
<v Speaker 3>position and more in depth. And yeah, i'd definitely be

61
00:03:14.400 --> 00:03:15.360
<v Speaker 3>down to have a conversation.

62
00:03:15.520 --> 00:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah we can, we can. It can be friendly. We

63
00:03:17.240 --> 00:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be adversarial. It can be exchanged back

64
00:03:20.120 --> 00:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and forth. It's fine. We do that often. So it's

65
00:03:23.080 --> 00:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>entirely up to the guest or the people that come on.

66
00:03:26.479 --> 00:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>If they want to have a heated exchange, I'll do that.

67
00:03:28.680 --> 00:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>If they just want to have a conversational exchange, we

68
00:03:31.000 --> 00:03:31.759
<v Speaker 1>can do that as well.

69
00:03:32.599 --> 00:03:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

70
00:03:33.800 --> 00:03:36.199
<v Speaker 3>Again, I know I already apologize, you already forget me,

71
00:03:36.240 --> 00:03:38.520
<v Speaker 3>but I just want to say so sorry, Like I

72
00:03:38.599 --> 00:03:44.039
<v Speaker 3>really like embarrassed because honest, and I'm not gonna lie.

73
00:03:44.159 --> 00:03:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Like when I was typing that, I actually was thinking.

74
00:03:48.800 --> 00:03:50.639
<v Speaker 3>I was like, I think I might be exaggerating a

75
00:03:50.680 --> 00:03:53.960
<v Speaker 3>little bit, and I still posted it anyway, So that should.

76
00:03:53.719 --> 00:03:56.639
<v Speaker 2>Just you know that I feel I definitely feel shame

77
00:03:56.719 --> 00:03:56.919
<v Speaker 2>in that.

78
00:03:56.960 --> 00:04:02.719
<v Speaker 3>So but yeah, all right, everybody, I'm not going to

79
00:04:02.759 --> 00:04:03.520
<v Speaker 3>take up much of this.

80
00:04:03.960 --> 00:04:05.599
<v Speaker 2>You know, space or anytime if you want me to

81
00:04:05.599 --> 00:04:06.120
<v Speaker 2>stay up here.

82
00:04:06.120 --> 00:04:07.840
<v Speaker 3>And you want to hear my opinion on whatever we're

83
00:04:07.840 --> 00:04:09.680
<v Speaker 3>going to talk about, but if not.

84
00:04:09.879 --> 00:04:11.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll just it's up to you. Like, so we can

85
00:04:11.800 --> 00:04:14.759
<v Speaker 1>talk about the principle behind relics, we can talk about

86
00:04:14.800 --> 00:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>what your issues are with Orthodoxy, or we can say

87
00:04:16.920 --> 00:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for another time, it's balls in your court.

88
00:04:22.000 --> 00:04:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Well again, you know, I'm not super familiar with the

89
00:04:26.639 --> 00:04:30.240
<v Speaker 3>major distinctions between Orthodoxy and Catholicism. I mainly I don't

90
00:04:30.240 --> 00:04:33.000
<v Speaker 3>know if y'all people focus see what I post, I

91
00:04:33.120 --> 00:04:36.160
<v Speaker 3>mainly focus on Catholicism because that's where I'm what I'm

92
00:04:36.160 --> 00:04:38.480
<v Speaker 3>more familiar with. I have you know, half my family's

93
00:04:38.480 --> 00:04:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Catholic grew up in Louisiana.

94
00:04:41.240 --> 00:04:43.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, Catholicism is all over the place.

95
00:04:44.839 --> 00:04:47.959
<v Speaker 3>Orthodoxy, I've just it's like that's just within the past

96
00:04:48.560 --> 00:04:51.360
<v Speaker 3>year and a half, I've really even understood that there

97
00:04:51.399 --> 00:04:57.000
<v Speaker 3>was a distinction between the two. So and as far

98
00:04:57.040 --> 00:05:00.439
<v Speaker 3>as I'm concerned, is there a distinction between you know,

99
00:05:00.759 --> 00:05:04.560
<v Speaker 3>what Catholics believe about relics versus what Orthodox believe about relics.

100
00:05:06.120 --> 00:05:09.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, is there something different there?

101
00:05:09.639 --> 00:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, we would believe, I mean, there would be some

102
00:05:12.000 --> 00:05:14.319
<v Speaker 1>level of distinction between what we would say about relics

103
00:05:14.319 --> 00:05:15.959
<v Speaker 1>and what a Roman Catholic would say. We do not

104
00:05:16.079 --> 00:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>disagree about the reverencing. Yeah, somebody was calling you. We

105
00:05:22.639 --> 00:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>don't disagree about the reverencing of the relic, but we

106
00:05:26.879 --> 00:05:29.759
<v Speaker 1>do disagree about what's going on there and how that happens.

107
00:05:29.800 --> 00:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>We believe in the doctrine of the energies, which is

108
00:05:31.879 --> 00:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that God's uncreated energies permeate his creation, and in particular

109
00:05:36.199 --> 00:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in a special way. The uncreated energies and power of

110
00:05:39.120 --> 00:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>God are present in his physical spatial dimensions and locations

111
00:05:45.279 --> 00:05:47.879
<v Speaker 1>that are sanctified, so churches are still holy. In the

112
00:05:47.879 --> 00:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>New Testament, Peter talks about the Holy Mountain where the

113
00:05:51.240 --> 00:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Lord was transfigured. That lets us know that places can

114
00:05:54.040 --> 00:05:57.519
<v Speaker 1>still be sanctified. There was the pool where people would

115
00:05:57.560 --> 00:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>go in in the Gospel John to be healed, where

116
00:05:59.600 --> 00:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>an angel stir the waters. There can be you know,

117
00:06:02.920 --> 00:06:06.519
<v Speaker 1>holy pools even and in the Book of Actual, notice

118
00:06:06.560 --> 00:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that when Paul, they take clothes from Paul's body and

119
00:06:11.920 --> 00:06:14.399
<v Speaker 1>they heal people and it drives out demons. And this

120
00:06:14.519 --> 00:06:18.639
<v Speaker 1>is on the principle of Elijah's bones that resurrect the

121
00:06:18.680 --> 00:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>person who falls into the tomb and the body touches

122
00:06:22.560 --> 00:06:26.519
<v Speaker 1>his relics and he's resurrected. So we believe that the

123
00:06:26.519 --> 00:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>bodies of the saints are endued with the power of

124
00:06:28.720 --> 00:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>God because we become little arcs of God, and they

125
00:06:32.480 --> 00:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>do have that power. Roman Catholics do believe in these things,

126
00:06:35.959 --> 00:06:38.519
<v Speaker 1>but they believe in a created grace, which is very

127
00:06:38.560 --> 00:06:42.399
<v Speaker 1>different from uncreated grace in the Orthodox Church. But yeah,

128
00:06:42.439 --> 00:06:44.519
<v Speaker 1>we do believe that the relics have power to do

129
00:06:44.560 --> 00:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>these things.

130
00:06:46.279 --> 00:06:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Interesting, no, yeah, and that's something that is undeniable. You know,

131
00:06:50.120 --> 00:06:53.000
<v Speaker 3>when you read the scriptures, reading acts, it's like, oh,

132
00:06:53.120 --> 00:06:56.759
<v Speaker 3>handkerchief is taken away to heal people. Where my concern

133
00:06:57.040 --> 00:07:00.800
<v Speaker 3>is is when you are presented with these you know,

134
00:07:01.959 --> 00:07:07.800
<v Speaker 3>vague stories. You know that there's not like a distinctive teaching.

135
00:07:08.199 --> 00:07:11.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, there isn't a formula that's presented to us

136
00:07:11.759 --> 00:07:13.199
<v Speaker 3>from apostolic.

137
00:07:12.639 --> 00:07:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Witness on uh the on the activity of the spirit

138
00:07:17.439 --> 00:07:18.759
<v Speaker 2>through physical objects.

139
00:07:18.800 --> 00:07:21.759
<v Speaker 3>We just hear that, you know, like for example, the

140
00:07:21.800 --> 00:07:23.079
<v Speaker 3>woman who who.

141
00:07:23.079 --> 00:07:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Just touched Jesus's uh clothes, right, Like, what would I like?

142
00:07:27.839 --> 00:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Is that like.

143
00:07:30.160 --> 00:07:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Is that something I would formulate doctrine off of? Or

144
00:07:33.000 --> 00:07:35.879
<v Speaker 3>is that like like was it because she actually.

145
00:07:35.480 --> 00:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Touched is well, it's a great example. That's actually a

146
00:07:40.079 --> 00:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>great example because or was it faith?

147
00:07:42.279 --> 00:07:42.519
<v Speaker 2>You know?

148
00:07:42.920 --> 00:07:45.399
<v Speaker 3>So is it like like for example, when Jesus talks

149
00:07:45.439 --> 00:07:48.120
<v Speaker 3>to Nicodemus says, the activity of the spirit is like

150
00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:48.560
<v Speaker 3>the wind.

151
00:07:48.920 --> 00:07:51.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, it goes just like the wind.

152
00:07:51.360 --> 00:07:53.199
<v Speaker 3>You can't see it, but it you know, it's powerful

153
00:07:53.199 --> 00:07:56.240
<v Speaker 3>and you can effects in the same way. It's like,

154
00:07:57.759 --> 00:08:04.000
<v Speaker 3>how can we formulate like solid, concrete doctrine on these vague,

155
00:08:04.639 --> 00:08:09.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, spiritual experiences that we're seeing, you know, in

156
00:08:09.360 --> 00:08:11.720
<v Speaker 3>the first century church and acts. You know, the spirit

157
00:08:11.879 --> 00:08:15.759
<v Speaker 3>is extremely active. People are being filled with the spirit.

158
00:08:16.600 --> 00:08:19.199
<v Speaker 3>So I guess my concern is, like, are we making

159
00:08:19.199 --> 00:08:20.720
<v Speaker 3>like false correlations?

160
00:08:20.759 --> 00:08:23.680
<v Speaker 2>There was it the faith of the people bringing the.

161
00:08:23.639 --> 00:08:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Handkerchief that was where the power was or was it

162
00:08:26.199 --> 00:08:28.759
<v Speaker 3>the actual handkerchief because it was you know, touched by

163
00:08:29.279 --> 00:08:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Peter or Paul or whoever.

164
00:08:31.480 --> 00:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let me address that. So it's not in our

165
00:08:35.559 --> 00:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>view it wouldn't be an either or there's a relationship

166
00:08:38.240 --> 00:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of synergy that goes on there, because for example, in

167
00:08:40.600 --> 00:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the Gospels, you know, there's a place where it says

168
00:08:42.480 --> 00:08:45.799
<v Speaker 1>and he Christ could not work many miracles there because

169
00:08:45.840 --> 00:08:48.399
<v Speaker 1>of their lack of faith. It's not that Christ didn't

170
00:08:48.440 --> 00:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>have the power. It's that God has determined and decided

171
00:08:52.639 --> 00:08:55.799
<v Speaker 1>to have a reciprocal relationship with human beings and creatures

172
00:08:55.840 --> 00:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>such that he won't if they don't have faith. So

173
00:08:58.639 --> 00:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the power would not have gone out of him had

174
00:09:01.240 --> 00:09:04.039
<v Speaker 1>the woman not had faith. You're right about that. But

175
00:09:04.600 --> 00:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we can know some of the doctrines because if I

176
00:09:07.440 --> 00:09:09.879
<v Speaker 1>recall and I'm going for a memory, but I think

177
00:09:09.919 --> 00:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the word there is dunamis, which is the Greek word

178
00:09:13.120 --> 00:09:15.639
<v Speaker 1>that Paul uses when he talks about the energy and

179
00:09:15.799 --> 00:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>power dunamis innergaia that's at work in him, and he

180
00:09:20.159 --> 00:09:22.399
<v Speaker 1>says it is the power of God at work in

181
00:09:22.480 --> 00:09:25.759
<v Speaker 1>him to do according to God's purpose. So what is

182
00:09:25.799 --> 00:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that power of God. I mean, is it an actual

183
00:09:29.559 --> 00:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>essence of God? Is it the divine persons? Or is

184
00:09:33.039 --> 00:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it a divine energy. Well, thankfully we know because in

185
00:09:35.960 --> 00:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Corinthians Paul says in the in the chapter thirteen where

186
00:09:40.600 --> 00:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about the spiritual gifts, he says that the

187
00:09:43.480 --> 00:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve and thirteen he says that the spirit apportions the

188
00:09:47.200 --> 00:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>gifts as he wills, according to his inner gaia. So

189
00:09:51.200 --> 00:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>these are energetic gifts. So this is a New Testament

190
00:09:54.480 --> 00:09:58.279
<v Speaker 1>doctrine of the uncreated energies, and no church teaches us

191
00:09:58.320 --> 00:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>except the Orthodox Church. There are no churches that teach

192
00:10:00.720 --> 00:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the uncredited energy doctrine. So Relics themselves points to this

193
00:10:05.279 --> 00:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>principle of divine dunamus and inner gaia. And it's not

194
00:10:09.080 --> 00:10:12.919
<v Speaker 1>just scant examples we have. For example, in Hebrews thirteen,

195
00:10:13.000 --> 00:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Paul says that the New Testament Church has an altar

196
00:10:16.240 --> 00:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>from which we eat, that those who serve in the

197
00:10:19.039 --> 00:10:21.879
<v Speaker 1>tabernacle have no right to eat from. So Paul calls

198
00:10:21.919 --> 00:10:25.799
<v Speaker 1>the New Testament alter a altar that we eat from.

199
00:10:26.360 --> 00:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And in the earliest records of the Christian Church, after

200
00:10:29.279 --> 00:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the Death of the Apostles, you can read something like

201
00:10:31.039 --> 00:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the Martyrdom of Polycarp where they are collecting his relics,

202
00:10:34.360 --> 00:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>where they are reverencing the cross, even from that early

203
00:10:36.960 --> 00:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of the day. If you go to Rome, you can

204
00:10:39.000 --> 00:10:42.159
<v Speaker 1>go into the catacombs and you can see images of

205
00:10:42.600 --> 00:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Christian iconography. You can see altars underneath the city of

206
00:10:47.360 --> 00:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Rome in the catacombs. So the early Church had all

207
00:10:50.120 --> 00:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of these things on this sacramental principle, which is why,

208
00:10:53.759 --> 00:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, Jesus spits in the dirt and he makes

209
00:10:56.519 --> 00:10:58.879
<v Speaker 1>clay to heal a guy's eyes. I mean, Jesus could

210
00:10:58.879 --> 00:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>have just thought and willed the guy's eyes to be healed,

211
00:11:02.320 --> 00:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>but he chose to use stuff physical matter. That's what

212
00:11:05.360 --> 00:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Paul says. The cross is the instrument of our salvation.

213
00:11:10.080 --> 00:11:12.799
<v Speaker 1>That's why in the Orthodox Church we honor and revere

214
00:11:12.879 --> 00:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the cross.

215
00:11:15.039 --> 00:11:15.399
<v Speaker 2>All right.

216
00:11:15.759 --> 00:11:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Now, again, where my concern lies is how do you

217
00:11:19.960 --> 00:11:26.120
<v Speaker 3>set up an objective formula for use for putting this

218
00:11:26.159 --> 00:11:31.960
<v Speaker 3>into practice, like because like we've already established like there

219
00:11:32.000 --> 00:11:39.559
<v Speaker 3>isn't necessarily an exact consistency with you know, divine objects,

220
00:11:39.759 --> 00:11:42.720
<v Speaker 3>right like Jesus heals without dirt, Jesus heels with dirt.

221
00:11:43.480 --> 00:11:48.039
<v Speaker 3>Jesus heals the nobleman's son without even being there, but

222
00:11:48.080 --> 00:11:51.559
<v Speaker 3>then he could physically to Lazars. So there's you know,

223
00:11:51.639 --> 00:11:56.320
<v Speaker 3>there's obviously not a lot of consistency there. But I

224
00:11:56.360 --> 00:12:00.279
<v Speaker 3>would argue that this is like Jesus using content text

225
00:12:00.440 --> 00:12:04.600
<v Speaker 3>or like there's context is key in these in these scenarios,

226
00:12:04.759 --> 00:12:09.039
<v Speaker 3>and it's not so much the actual physical objects.

227
00:12:08.600 --> 00:12:13.279
<v Speaker 2>It's you knows words.

228
00:12:13.320 --> 00:12:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's let's think about in John three, right, Jesus

229
00:12:16.480 --> 00:12:20.919
<v Speaker 1>says that the bronze serpent was put up on a

230
00:12:20.960 --> 00:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>pole in the Book of Numbers to heal the Israelites

231
00:12:23.519 --> 00:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>when they were being bitten by the snakes, and he

232
00:12:26.440 --> 00:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>likens the cross to that very thing. So there's a

233
00:12:29.440 --> 00:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>continuity here of objects having the ability to be endued

234
00:12:34.759 --> 00:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>with sacramental grace, energetic, dunamous power. And that's not a

235
00:12:39.639 --> 00:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>principle that goes away in the New Testament. And I've

236
00:12:42.320 --> 00:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>already listed several examples, but there's many more. There's oil

237
00:12:46.240 --> 00:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is used in the New Testament, bread and wine are

238
00:12:48.679 --> 00:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>used in the New Testament. These are physical means of

239
00:12:51.200 --> 00:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>grace that are premised on the incarnation itself. Jesus took

240
00:12:56.120 --> 00:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>on a human body, which is the image of God

241
00:13:00.080 --> 00:13:04.159
<v Speaker 1>and in a in a created sense, so God doesn't

242
00:13:04.200 --> 00:13:06.919
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with created things, but Protestants tend to.

243
00:13:08.480 --> 00:13:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Hey, can I add real quick this was brought up.

244
00:13:11.440 --> 00:13:13.279
<v Speaker 5>I thought that russelled me the point I never thought

245
00:13:13.320 --> 00:13:20.639
<v Speaker 5>about this that if you notice Christ's miracles in the

246
00:13:20.759 --> 00:13:24.200
<v Speaker 5>order of time, they become more and more incarnational.

247
00:13:26.480 --> 00:13:29.399
<v Speaker 2>That it starts like just you know.

248
00:13:29.679 --> 00:13:35.000
<v Speaker 5>Uh, proclaiming that you know, you're you're, you are healed,

249
00:13:35.720 --> 00:13:39.679
<v Speaker 5>and then it each miracle that happens gets more and

250
00:13:39.679 --> 00:13:40.639
<v Speaker 5>more incarnational.

251
00:13:40.679 --> 00:13:42.000
<v Speaker 2>It's the touching, it's.

252
00:13:41.879 --> 00:13:46.320
<v Speaker 5>Going, it's putting the there's a chronological order of thens,

253
00:13:46.399 --> 00:13:49.600
<v Speaker 5>spitting into the mud and putting into the deaf man's ear,

254
00:13:49.720 --> 00:13:53.360
<v Speaker 5>which itself is a pedagogical lesson. So he's taking people,

255
00:13:56.000 --> 00:13:59.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, from the power of God's commands to then

256
00:13:59.639 --> 00:14:04.879
<v Speaker 5>teach that it's by touching and becoming one physically with

257
00:14:05.240 --> 00:14:07.200
<v Speaker 5>my body that actually heals.

258
00:14:08.080 --> 00:14:11.559
<v Speaker 2>And of course it's a both.

259
00:14:11.679 --> 00:14:18.039
<v Speaker 5>And it's not simply your faith that saves you, for example,

260
00:14:19.240 --> 00:14:26.360
<v Speaker 5>or vice versa, simply the power of Christ that saves you. It's,

261
00:14:26.519 --> 00:14:30.559
<v Speaker 5>for example, in the confession, if you don't have faith

262
00:14:30.759 --> 00:14:35.600
<v Speaker 5>and you're receiving the divine energy of Christ forgiveness. He's

263
00:14:35.600 --> 00:14:38.399
<v Speaker 5>not going to force it on you that your lack

264
00:14:38.480 --> 00:14:42.799
<v Speaker 5>of faith can prevent you from receiving the healing graces

265
00:14:43.240 --> 00:14:45.759
<v Speaker 5>of Christ. So I would say it's a both, and

266
00:14:46.000 --> 00:14:49.159
<v Speaker 5>it's not simply well, the person just had faith or

267
00:14:49.240 --> 00:14:55.919
<v Speaker 5>Christ just said something. It's incarnational, it's tangible, it's sacramental,

268
00:14:57.000 --> 00:14:59.279
<v Speaker 5>and it requires one's faith to receive that.

269
00:15:01.519 --> 00:15:01.840
<v Speaker 2>M hm.

270
00:15:08.840 --> 00:15:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Another brief point while you're thinking, is that you mentioned,

271
00:15:13.759 --> 00:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the guidance the Holy Spirit kind of leading

272
00:15:16.440 --> 00:15:18.799
<v Speaker 1>us and letting us know the parameters of where this

273
00:15:18.919 --> 00:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is and is inappropriate. You know, Jesus says that he

274
00:15:23.159 --> 00:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>promised the Holy Spirit to the church, right, So he

275
00:15:25.360 --> 00:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>says that in John when he sends the Spirit and

276
00:15:28.039 --> 00:15:31.039
<v Speaker 1>acts to a Pentecost, there's the assumption, I believe that

277
00:15:31.720 --> 00:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the Spirit really will lead and guide the church into

278
00:15:34.320 --> 00:15:36.759
<v Speaker 1>all truth. I will not leave you as orphans, I

279
00:15:36.759 --> 00:15:38.519
<v Speaker 1>will not forsake you. I will be with you until

280
00:15:38.519 --> 00:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of the age. That promise didn't go away.

281
00:15:42.000 --> 00:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Right with the first and second century Church fathers like Clement,

282
00:15:46.440 --> 00:15:51.919
<v Speaker 1>polycarp Ignacious, et cetera. They express the same faith as

283
00:15:52.000 --> 00:15:56.519
<v Speaker 1>what was handed down from those apostles, and in those

284
00:15:56.519 --> 00:16:01.559
<v Speaker 1>writings we already see the acceptance of and the veneration

285
00:16:01.840 --> 00:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of the bodies of holy men.

286
00:16:04.679 --> 00:16:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Wait, waitch writings, what are you talking about?

287
00:16:06.399 --> 00:16:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Martyred him a polycarp Okay?

288
00:16:13.399 --> 00:16:16.919
<v Speaker 2>And then also did you mention is martyred?

289
00:16:21.840 --> 00:16:24.399
<v Speaker 1>So these are people that were taught by John the apostle,

290
00:16:24.440 --> 00:16:27.279
<v Speaker 1>for example polycarp.

291
00:16:34.000 --> 00:16:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Ei.

292
00:16:34.159 --> 00:16:37.759
<v Speaker 1>There anything else you want to discuss, I'm thinking, Okay,

293
00:16:37.799 --> 00:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. I mean, there's a mean here's another classic.

294
00:16:41.559 --> 00:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>If you look at Joshua seven in the Masoretic Text,

295
00:16:46.840 --> 00:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it points out that when Joshua in verse six, it says,

296
00:16:51.039 --> 00:16:54.519
<v Speaker 1>Joshua tore his clothes and he fell to the earth

297
00:16:54.600 --> 00:16:57.039
<v Speaker 1>on his fake face before the ark of the Lord

298
00:16:57.440 --> 00:16:59.799
<v Speaker 1>until evening he and all the elders of Israel, and

299
00:16:59.840 --> 00:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>they put dust on their heads. And most Protestants who

300
00:17:03.440 --> 00:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>are sort of iconoclastic would have tremendous problem with Orthodox

301
00:17:08.680 --> 00:17:12.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, prostrating before the cross or bowing and venerating

302
00:17:12.279 --> 00:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>icons and this kind of stuff. And yet it's a

303
00:17:14.519 --> 00:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>very principle from the Old Testament itself, as Joshua prostrates

304
00:17:18.200 --> 00:17:18.759
<v Speaker 1>before the arc.

305
00:17:19.400 --> 00:17:24.039
<v Speaker 3>Well, so, so, yeah, I've heard that argument plenty of times,

306
00:17:24.240 --> 00:17:26.440
<v Speaker 3>and the context of that is not.

307
00:17:26.960 --> 00:17:29.839
<v Speaker 2>Venerating the arc, it is it is he's lamenting.

308
00:17:31.319 --> 00:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, then why is he falling down towards the arc?

309
00:17:34.680 --> 00:17:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Because the arc was.

310
00:17:37.160 --> 00:17:40.359
<v Speaker 3>The where the presence of God was made manifest.

311
00:17:40.559 --> 00:17:44.039
<v Speaker 1>But isn't in the physical objects with images on it?

312
00:17:44.599 --> 00:17:46.279
<v Speaker 2>Exactly? And who? And who?

313
00:17:46.359 --> 00:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So they were bowing down to images and.

314
00:17:48.640 --> 00:17:51.079
<v Speaker 2>In the New Covenant. What is the image of the

315
00:17:51.119 --> 00:17:51.680
<v Speaker 2>living God.

316
00:17:52.079 --> 00:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>It's the person of the logos.

317
00:17:54.160 --> 00:17:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Jesus, Jesus Christ.

318
00:17:56.519 --> 00:17:59.759
<v Speaker 1>And so would you vow before his physical body?

319
00:18:00.079 --> 00:18:02.559
<v Speaker 2>I would? I would bow before Jesus in the.

320
00:18:02.519 --> 00:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Flesh, yes, okay, which you.

321
00:18:04.599 --> 00:18:07.279
<v Speaker 2>Know, got a picture of him.

322
00:18:07.640 --> 00:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, wait a minute, is his body created.

323
00:18:11.759 --> 00:18:15.160
<v Speaker 3>His Yes, his body was formed in the wound marries wound.

324
00:18:15.240 --> 00:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So you're bowing before a created thing.

325
00:18:18.759 --> 00:18:21.400
<v Speaker 3>So okay, So are we saying that Jesus is a

326
00:18:21.480 --> 00:18:22.640
<v Speaker 3>created being?

327
00:18:23.160 --> 00:18:27.799
<v Speaker 2>The body of created is absolutely okay? Well yeah, so

328
00:18:27.799 --> 00:18:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm bowing before Jesus.

329
00:18:29.799 --> 00:18:33.480
<v Speaker 3>So okay, wait, are we separating Jesus flesh from his deities?

330
00:18:33.519 --> 00:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>That we're doing is not at all. In fact, if

331
00:18:35.640 --> 00:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you read the Council of Ephesus, this is the very

332
00:18:37.759 --> 00:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>argument that Cyril uses against Nestorius to prove the deity

333
00:18:42.400 --> 00:18:45.079
<v Speaker 1>of Christ and the real presence in the Eucharist, that

334
00:18:45.119 --> 00:18:48.279
<v Speaker 1>there's only one divine subject, because he says in the

335
00:18:48.359 --> 00:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Canons of Ephesus, you, if Jesus was a

336
00:18:51.440 --> 00:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>mere man, you would be eating the flesh of a

337
00:18:53.920 --> 00:18:56.599
<v Speaker 1>mere man, and that would be cannibalism. But he argues

338
00:18:56.640 --> 00:18:59.759
<v Speaker 1>that you're eating the flesh of the god man and

339
00:18:59.799 --> 00:19:02.839
<v Speaker 1>that that's what deifies you. So it's the Protestants that

340
00:19:02.839 --> 00:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>would reject Ephicus on this point.

341
00:19:05.119 --> 00:19:10.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, No, I do reject real physical presence. I

342
00:19:10.359 --> 00:19:14.599
<v Speaker 3>do believe in real presence. The spirit is real, and

343
00:19:14.640 --> 00:19:16.720
<v Speaker 3>that's a that's a whole other topic in and of itself,

344
00:19:16.759 --> 00:19:19.839
<v Speaker 3>but which I don't know if you guys.

345
00:19:20.160 --> 00:19:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Did Jesus deify the human body that he took.

346
00:19:22.440 --> 00:19:28.279
<v Speaker 3>On, Yeah, his resurrection body was his glorified.

347
00:19:29.200 --> 00:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Body, right, So so God can make matter dea form

348
00:19:34.200 --> 00:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and transfigured.

349
00:19:38.319 --> 00:19:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean at the transfiguration he was appearing in

350
00:19:41.480 --> 00:19:46.599
<v Speaker 3>his glorified state, you know, after the resurrection, he was

351
00:19:46.640 --> 00:19:47.960
<v Speaker 3>in his resurrected So.

352
00:19:47.920 --> 00:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>He only does that too Jesus's actual body, or does

353
00:19:50.680 --> 00:19:51.759
<v Speaker 1>he do it to our bodies too?

354
00:19:54.279 --> 00:19:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

355
00:19:54.519 --> 00:19:57.599
<v Speaker 3>I believe our resurrection body is going to be you know,

356
00:19:58.079 --> 00:19:59.039
<v Speaker 3>renewed in.

357
00:19:59.039 --> 00:20:01.799
<v Speaker 2>A you know, something that is distinct from what it

358
00:20:01.839 --> 00:20:02.160
<v Speaker 2>is now.

359
00:20:02.200 --> 00:20:06.039
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, So when John six talks about you must eat

360
00:20:06.079 --> 00:20:08.559
<v Speaker 1>my flesh and drink my blood to have life in you,

361
00:20:09.559 --> 00:20:12.039
<v Speaker 1>is that not talking about the Lord's Supper or the Eucharist.

362
00:20:13.319 --> 00:20:17.039
<v Speaker 3>So I believe John six does not point us to

363
00:20:17.440 --> 00:20:18.200
<v Speaker 3>the Lord's table.

364
00:20:18.240 --> 00:20:19.119
<v Speaker 2>It points us.

365
00:20:19.039 --> 00:20:23.359
<v Speaker 3>To the cross, and the Lord's table subsequently points us

366
00:20:23.480 --> 00:20:27.599
<v Speaker 3>to the cross. So I'm actually I just finished a script.

367
00:20:28.599 --> 00:20:31.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna post a video soon. A lot of people

368
00:20:31.319 --> 00:20:33.519
<v Speaker 3>have been like in my DMS. I don't know if

369
00:20:33.599 --> 00:20:35.880
<v Speaker 3>y'all know the YouTuber. His name's how to Be Christian.

370
00:20:37.200 --> 00:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>He posted a video.

371
00:20:38.079 --> 00:20:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Like a long time ago, and I.

372
00:20:40.519 --> 00:20:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Made the mistake of arrogantly, you know, you know, saying like, oh,

373
00:20:44.920 --> 00:20:49.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna make this reply whatever whatever. And you know,

374
00:20:49.559 --> 00:20:52.400
<v Speaker 3>he quote tweeted me for months and months and months,

375
00:20:52.400 --> 00:20:57.200
<v Speaker 3>and me being a procrastinator and you know whatever, Long

376
00:20:57.240 --> 00:21:00.400
<v Speaker 3>story short, I put it off. But I finally finished

377
00:21:00.400 --> 00:21:01.839
<v Speaker 3>the script. I'm gonna make a video on this. So

378
00:21:01.839 --> 00:21:06.160
<v Speaker 3>I've been studying through John. And if you take the

379
00:21:06.200 --> 00:21:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Gospel of John and you read it as from the

380
00:21:09.039 --> 00:21:13.920
<v Speaker 3>perspective of John. Jesus preaches the gospel with a specific formula. Right,

381
00:21:14.200 --> 00:21:18.319
<v Speaker 3>John six is not this separate chapter that's unrelated to

382
00:21:18.440 --> 00:21:21.119
<v Speaker 3>John two or John three, or John four or five.

383
00:21:21.720 --> 00:21:24.799
<v Speaker 3>You know, Jesus is very consistent in his in his preaching.

384
00:21:26.680 --> 00:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>What does any of that have to do with the

385
00:21:28.519 --> 00:21:29.759
<v Speaker 1>presence in the Eucharist.

386
00:21:30.599 --> 00:21:33.559
<v Speaker 3>It has to except we're talking about John six, are we.

387
00:21:33.559 --> 00:21:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Well you're talking about the logical sequence of the Gospel

388
00:21:38.279 --> 00:21:40.839
<v Speaker 1>of John in this formula, But what does that have

389
00:21:40.880 --> 00:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to do with the real presence in chapter six?

390
00:21:43.000 --> 00:21:46.039
<v Speaker 2>So well, you're saying that John six is like proof.

391
00:21:45.720 --> 00:21:48.559
<v Speaker 1>That I'm saying is one example, because when he talks

392
00:21:48.599 --> 00:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>about it, it offends a lot of people who walk away,

393
00:21:51.000 --> 00:21:54.079
<v Speaker 1>and he says, is this a hard teaching? Now, if

394
00:21:54.079 --> 00:21:57.279
<v Speaker 1>he's just teaching a spiritual presence that's identical to the

395
00:21:57.319 --> 00:21:59.599
<v Speaker 1>Old Testament conception of the sacrament, so there would be

396
00:21:59.599 --> 00:22:02.799
<v Speaker 1>nothing offensive or weird about that. Why didn't he stop

397
00:22:02.839 --> 00:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>them from walking away?

398
00:22:04.559 --> 00:22:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

399
00:22:04.960 --> 00:22:11.200
<v Speaker 3>So, so never in scripture do we see people understanding

400
00:22:11.319 --> 00:22:13.759
<v Speaker 3>correctly and then walking away from Jesus.

401
00:22:13.759 --> 00:22:16.039
<v Speaker 1>It's always, but it wouldn't be a hard teaching is

402
00:22:16.039 --> 00:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying.

403
00:22:17.519 --> 00:22:21.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. They they did not understand the spiritual truth.

404
00:22:21.519 --> 00:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>But he says, this is a hard teaching. If it's

405
00:22:24.400 --> 00:22:27.799
<v Speaker 1>a it's the if it's the Old Testament understanding of

406
00:22:28.119 --> 00:22:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the sacramental presence, which is largely symbolic in John heart,

407
00:22:32.599 --> 00:22:33.519
<v Speaker 1>it's not a hard saying.

408
00:22:33.880 --> 00:22:36.920
<v Speaker 3>In John six, what was the first statement that made

409
00:22:36.920 --> 00:22:37.839
<v Speaker 3>them quote.

410
00:22:37.559 --> 00:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Grumble, I don't have it pulled up?

411
00:22:41.119 --> 00:22:45.799
<v Speaker 2>What when he told them this offers his flesh?

412
00:22:45.960 --> 00:22:49.400
<v Speaker 3>No, when he said that he came down from heaven,

413
00:22:49.680 --> 00:22:52.759
<v Speaker 3>that was the first thing that made them grumble.

414
00:22:52.920 --> 00:22:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

415
00:22:54.519 --> 00:22:58.240
<v Speaker 3>So when he's saying this is a hard saying, they

416
00:22:58.279 --> 00:23:02.119
<v Speaker 3>were confused about the entire him coming down from heaven.

417
00:23:02.200 --> 00:23:03.599
<v Speaker 2>How are you the bread? How are we going to

418
00:23:03.640 --> 00:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>eat your flesh? Like?

419
00:23:04.599 --> 00:23:07.200
<v Speaker 3>None of this makes sense because they were thinking, and

420
00:23:07.640 --> 00:23:10.400
<v Speaker 3>let's look at the words of Augustine, for example, they

421
00:23:10.440 --> 00:23:11.839
<v Speaker 3>were thinking carnally.

422
00:23:12.440 --> 00:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Augustine taught the real presence. When he talks about carnally,

423
00:23:16.720 --> 00:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>let me think I've read thousands of pages of Augustine,

424
00:23:19.359 --> 00:23:21.519
<v Speaker 1>so let me explain what he's talking about. He's saying

425
00:23:21.559 --> 00:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that by eating carnally, it's not that there's no physical eating.

426
00:23:25.640 --> 00:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>They thought they were going to get a free meal.

427
00:23:27.839 --> 00:23:31.279
<v Speaker 1>John six. The grumblers are thinking, you've been feeding people

428
00:23:31.319 --> 00:23:34.599
<v Speaker 1>with bread and with loaves and fish. Where's our free meal,

429
00:23:34.759 --> 00:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Jesus saying, I'm not talking about a free meal of

430
00:23:37.319 --> 00:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>loaves and fishes. I'm talking about eating the true bread

431
00:23:39.920 --> 00:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that comes down from Heaven. Guess what. That's the passover

432
00:23:43.119 --> 00:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the Pasca. And if you look at Hebrews thirteen, the

433
00:23:46.200 --> 00:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>passives that I mentioned earlier, when Paul we believe Paul

434
00:23:49.279 --> 00:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>wrote this. When Paul talks about the animals that are

435
00:23:52.440 --> 00:23:55.799
<v Speaker 1>sacrificed by Israel at the tabernac on the temple, he

436
00:23:55.880 --> 00:24:00.319
<v Speaker 1>says that those animals do not have the grace to

437
00:24:00.519 --> 00:24:04.319
<v Speaker 1>profit those that eat of it. But we have an

438
00:24:04.400 --> 00:24:09.759
<v Speaker 1>altar that we eat from, and our high priest offering

439
00:24:10.480 --> 00:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is what does sanctify us? And verse twelve says that

440
00:24:13.480 --> 00:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it is his blood that you're partaking of. So Paul

441
00:24:17.359 --> 00:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>calls it an altar with a sacrifice, and it's the

442
00:24:20.039 --> 00:24:23.799
<v Speaker 1>blood of the high priest contrasted to the symbolic sacrifices

443
00:24:24.200 --> 00:24:26.279
<v Speaker 1>of the animals. And you're telling me that, no, Jesus

444
00:24:26.319 --> 00:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>is just teaching the symbolic view of the Old Testament,

445
00:24:28.759 --> 00:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>which is a contradiction from what Paul's saying in Hebrews thirteen.

446
00:24:32.160 --> 00:24:34.240
<v Speaker 3>No, I believe in a real body and real blood,

447
00:24:34.279 --> 00:24:37.160
<v Speaker 3>that really blood, really died on a real cross at

448
00:24:37.160 --> 00:24:38.000
<v Speaker 3>a real point in time.

449
00:24:38.079 --> 00:24:40.519
<v Speaker 1>What is Paul talking about what happened on the cross?

450
00:24:40.559 --> 00:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Or is he talking about the altar that we.

451
00:24:41.880 --> 00:24:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Eat from When he's talking about the blood of Christ,

452
00:24:44.920 --> 00:24:47.640
<v Speaker 3>He's talking about what happened on the cross, because that's

453
00:24:47.680 --> 00:24:48.319
<v Speaker 3>where Jesus is.

454
00:24:48.480 --> 00:24:51.039
<v Speaker 1>I just read to you the passage where he's contrasting

455
00:24:51.079 --> 00:24:53.839
<v Speaker 1>what we eat from what the Jews eat.

456
00:24:54.759 --> 00:24:55.839
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, let's read it then.

457
00:24:56.240 --> 00:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I just read it to you Hebrews thirteen. Do you

458
00:24:58.480 --> 00:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>want me to read it again?

459
00:25:00.079 --> 00:25:02.119
<v Speaker 2>Let me pull it up. Let me pull it up.

460
00:25:02.440 --> 00:25:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Hebre's thirteen. Where are we at?

461
00:25:05.519 --> 00:25:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Verse nine?

462
00:25:07.200 --> 00:25:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Alrighty, all right, hold on yesterday today?

463
00:25:20.599 --> 00:25:25.839
<v Speaker 3>Do not so verse nine? He said, yeah, do not then.

464
00:25:26.559 --> 00:25:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Do not be led away by diverse and strange teachings.

465
00:25:29.880 --> 00:25:32.039
<v Speaker 3>But it is good for the heart to be strengthened

466
00:25:32.039 --> 00:25:36.920
<v Speaker 3>by grace, not by foods which have not benefited those

467
00:25:37.240 --> 00:25:40.880
<v Speaker 3>devoted to them. We have an altar from which those

468
00:25:40.880 --> 00:25:43.119
<v Speaker 3>who serve the tent have no right to eat.

469
00:25:44.119 --> 00:25:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, down to verse thirteen.

470
00:25:47.640 --> 00:25:51.599
<v Speaker 3>All right, therefore, let us go to him outside the

471
00:25:51.640 --> 00:25:55.359
<v Speaker 3>camp and bear the reproach he endured.

472
00:25:58.200 --> 00:26:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Thirteen. Now two thirteen. You're skipping the verses that are

473
00:26:02.319 --> 00:26:03.079
<v Speaker 1>the most important.

474
00:26:03.599 --> 00:26:04.079
<v Speaker 2>Oh, okay.

475
00:26:04.400 --> 00:26:06.839
<v Speaker 3>For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought

476
00:26:07.640 --> 00:26:09.599
<v Speaker 3>into the holy places by the high priest as a

477
00:26:09.640 --> 00:26:11.720
<v Speaker 3>sacrifice for sin are burned outside of the camp. So

478
00:26:11.799 --> 00:26:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Jesus also suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify

479
00:26:14.960 --> 00:26:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the people through his own blood. Therefore, let us go

480
00:26:18.359 --> 00:26:22.200
<v Speaker 3>to him outside the camp and bear reproach, Bear the

481
00:26:22.240 --> 00:26:23.039
<v Speaker 3>approach he endured.

482
00:26:23.400 --> 00:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay. And then the next verse.

483
00:26:25.920 --> 00:26:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, For here we have no lasting city, but we

484
00:26:30.640 --> 00:26:34.920
<v Speaker 3>seek the city that is to come through him. Then

485
00:26:35.000 --> 00:26:39.000
<v Speaker 3>let us continually offer up a sacrifice of praise to God.

486
00:26:39.240 --> 00:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>That is do you know what that word is there?

487
00:26:44.799 --> 00:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>What is the word eu charistia? Do you know what

488
00:26:47.559 --> 00:26:50.319
<v Speaker 1>most Protestant scholars admit about this passage that.

489
00:26:51.799 --> 00:26:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Means thanksgiving.

490
00:26:53.319 --> 00:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It means offering, which could be thanksgiving, or it could

491
00:26:56.440 --> 00:27:00.319
<v Speaker 1>be a ritual service or ceremony. The entire past is

492
00:27:00.359 --> 00:27:05.599
<v Speaker 1>about the superiority of our eucharistic offering and meal that

493
00:27:05.680 --> 00:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>we eat versus what the Jews eat at the tabernacle

494
00:27:09.400 --> 00:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the animals. Okay, so you're removing the contrast and you're

495
00:27:13.920 --> 00:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>literally you're literally saying that it's equivalent to the Old

496
00:27:17.519 --> 00:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Testament symbolism.

497
00:27:19.279 --> 00:27:20.279
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not.

498
00:27:20.799 --> 00:27:26.480
<v Speaker 3>So how does this when you take Jesus's words into

499
00:27:26.519 --> 00:27:29.920
<v Speaker 3>consideration when he says God is seeking such people to

500
00:27:30.000 --> 00:27:32.480
<v Speaker 3>worship Him in spirit and in truth, and then the

501
00:27:32.519 --> 00:27:34.359
<v Speaker 3>New Covenant, the law is going to.

502
00:27:34.279 --> 00:27:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Be written on our hearts. We're transitioning to the truths

503
00:27:38.240 --> 00:27:39.119
<v Speaker 2>of the spirit here.

504
00:27:39.559 --> 00:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know what you think that means. Because

505
00:27:42.839 --> 00:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>God gave the church a liturgical worship service that's not

506
00:27:46.519 --> 00:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>recorded in the New Testament, and all the Apostolic churches

507
00:27:49.680 --> 00:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>have it. So I don't know what you mean by

508
00:27:51.119 --> 00:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>worshiping in spirit and truth because we think that means liturgy,

509
00:27:54.119 --> 00:27:57.079
<v Speaker 1>because that's how God always was worshiped throughout the Old Testament.

510
00:27:58.039 --> 00:28:00.319
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So I mean right here he said, you know,

511
00:28:00.400 --> 00:28:03.319
<v Speaker 3>sacrifice of praise to God. That is so he defines

512
00:28:03.359 --> 00:28:06.400
<v Speaker 3>it the fruit of lips that acknowledge his name.

513
00:28:06.720 --> 00:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>It's in the context now, it's in the context you're

514
00:28:11.000 --> 00:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>doing a false either orger it means hold on, no,

515
00:28:13.480 --> 00:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't it's a false either or the whole context

516
00:28:15.960 --> 00:28:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is eating and you're saying, no, it's really just about

517
00:28:18.680 --> 00:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>spiritual praising. Is this that the megachurch in the first century?

518
00:28:22.759 --> 00:28:24.519
<v Speaker 1>Did Paul go to the megachurch where they were praising

519
00:28:24.559 --> 00:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>with their lips and I didn't have the Eucharist?

520
00:28:26.559 --> 00:28:30.000
<v Speaker 5>And by the way, spiriting truth doesn't mean not a

521
00:28:30.200 --> 00:28:37.079
<v Speaker 5>visible there church. It means the Holy Spirit, okay, the

522
00:28:37.079 --> 00:28:37.960
<v Speaker 5>spirit of truth.

523
00:28:38.880 --> 00:28:40.559
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, so it is.

524
00:28:40.599 --> 00:28:45.359
<v Speaker 5>In a visible manifest visibly in a visible body.

525
00:28:46.920 --> 00:28:47.279
<v Speaker 2>And like.

526
00:28:49.359 --> 00:28:52.119
<v Speaker 3>When Jesus says God is seeking such people to worship him,

527
00:28:52.160 --> 00:28:53.200
<v Speaker 3>what's the context?

528
00:28:53.359 --> 00:28:57.759
<v Speaker 1>You just keep assuming the evangelical spiritual low low, low

529
00:28:57.839 --> 00:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>church interpretation of all these passages, which you not demonstrated.

530
00:29:00.920 --> 00:29:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving you counter evidence to that low church symbolic interpretation,

531
00:29:05.400 --> 00:29:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and you're just restating the symbolism. All right, but you're

532
00:29:08.839 --> 00:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>not let me talk so because you just keep restating

533
00:29:12.240 --> 00:29:13.279
<v Speaker 1>that it's a symbolic thing.

534
00:29:15.039 --> 00:29:16.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I've used the word symbol once.

535
00:29:18.160 --> 00:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you call it quote spiritual, which in your mind

536
00:29:20.519 --> 00:29:23.759
<v Speaker 1>as an evangelical is contrasted to the physical or the flesh.

537
00:29:23.799 --> 00:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's why I keep making the point that that's

538
00:29:26.039 --> 00:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>what well, that's what Paul is contrasting to the Jews

539
00:29:28.920 --> 00:29:32.359
<v Speaker 1>who eat at the temple the Tabernacle in a carnal way.

540
00:29:32.640 --> 00:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>He's not saying that the way to eat non carnally

541
00:29:35.920 --> 00:29:39.839
<v Speaker 1>is not with your mouth, because he says we eat

542
00:29:40.279 --> 00:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>at an altar. You don't have an alter.

543
00:29:44.440 --> 00:29:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So.

544
00:29:47.079 --> 00:29:50.440
<v Speaker 3>When Jesus says in John six, he says, come to me,

545
00:29:50.799 --> 00:29:51.799
<v Speaker 3>and you will never hunger.

546
00:29:52.200 --> 00:29:54.079
<v Speaker 2>Believe in me, and you will never thirst.

547
00:29:54.599 --> 00:29:57.200
<v Speaker 3>So when Jesus says that, he says, you will never

548
00:29:57.319 --> 00:29:59.759
<v Speaker 3>hunger and you will never thirst when you come to

549
00:29:59.839 --> 00:30:03.279
<v Speaker 3>him and believe, believe in him. Why then, so I

550
00:30:03.359 --> 00:30:08.920
<v Speaker 3>know why I continually partake of the elements of the

551
00:30:08.920 --> 00:30:12.680
<v Speaker 3>bread and the wine. I know why I continually do that.

552
00:30:13.200 --> 00:30:18.960
<v Speaker 3>But why do you continually partake If Jesus says you

553
00:30:19.000 --> 00:30:21.599
<v Speaker 3>will never hunger and you will never thirst, why then

554
00:30:21.839 --> 00:30:26.960
<v Speaker 3>in your tradition do you have to continually because bro

555
00:30:27.119 --> 00:30:34.240
<v Speaker 3>hold on because in your theology that sacrifice does not

556
00:30:34.440 --> 00:30:38.640
<v Speaker 3>perfect you, because sin can still make you fall away

557
00:30:38.640 --> 00:30:41.519
<v Speaker 3>from grace, and therefore you need to come back to

558
00:30:41.599 --> 00:30:44.279
<v Speaker 3>the throne of grace and reobtain.

559
00:30:43.799 --> 00:30:48.039
<v Speaker 2>What has been lost. And so when Jesus says, come to.

560
00:30:48.039 --> 00:30:51.079
<v Speaker 3>Me, and you will never hunger, and believe in me,

561
00:30:51.119 --> 00:30:54.759
<v Speaker 3>and you will never thirst, right, you're negating those.

562
00:30:54.559 --> 00:30:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Wordstation hold on then jumping down.

563
00:30:58.599 --> 00:31:01.799
<v Speaker 2>Look, he says, gnaw my flesh. That must mean.

564
00:31:02.000 --> 00:31:05.079
<v Speaker 3>That he's going to start this whole liturgical process of

565
00:31:05.480 --> 00:31:08.599
<v Speaker 3>calling him down from heaven into a wafer and his

566
00:31:08.759 --> 00:31:09.960
<v Speaker 3>blood is made present.

567
00:31:10.759 --> 00:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Catholics, we don't have wafers.

568
00:31:13.000 --> 00:31:14.839
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, whatever need I mean?

569
00:31:14.880 --> 00:31:19.359
<v Speaker 1>You say whatever I mean? Roman Catholics use a judaized bread,

570
00:31:19.440 --> 00:31:23.319
<v Speaker 1>So it's that matters, all right.

571
00:31:25.880 --> 00:31:31.519
<v Speaker 3>Point being, I don't know. I mean, we're jumping all

572
00:31:31.559 --> 00:31:32.160
<v Speaker 3>over the place here.

573
00:31:32.160 --> 00:31:37.039
<v Speaker 2>Well this was great because I remember this was brought

574
00:31:37.160 --> 00:31:41.720
<v Speaker 2>up once. I think it hormly. Why went to church

575
00:31:42.279 --> 00:31:46.480
<v Speaker 2>once I read some of the Bible. Isn't it enough?

576
00:31:46.960 --> 00:31:50.920
<v Speaker 2>You go get him Jesus, You go get him Jesus.

577
00:31:51.039 --> 00:31:52.839
<v Speaker 2>Why do I need to go to church again? Why

578
00:31:52.839 --> 00:31:53.880
<v Speaker 2>do I need to know?

579
00:31:54.039 --> 00:31:56.319
<v Speaker 1>This is just like an overly simple reading of.

580
00:31:56.319 --> 00:31:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Catholics a life source.

581
00:31:59.039 --> 00:32:01.759
<v Speaker 5>And if you said from him in a different way,

582
00:32:01.960 --> 00:32:04.839
<v Speaker 5>like so, yes, of course you will never first, when

583
00:32:04.839 --> 00:32:08.480
<v Speaker 5>you're with me, do all kinds of things that separate

584
00:32:08.599 --> 00:32:11.599
<v Speaker 5>us from God's powers?

585
00:32:11.720 --> 00:32:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So when Paul says that nothing will separate him

586
00:32:14.680 --> 00:32:17.920
<v Speaker 3>from the love of Christ, I mean, is that nothing?

587
00:32:18.599 --> 00:32:18.880
<v Speaker 2>You know?

588
00:32:19.200 --> 00:32:22.759
<v Speaker 1>You have to balance passages with other passages. You can't

589
00:32:22.880 --> 00:32:26.079
<v Speaker 1>take one verse and squeeze every verse into that verse.

590
00:32:25.880 --> 00:32:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Because exactly I agree.

591
00:32:29.039 --> 00:32:31.759
<v Speaker 1>But let me let me I agree.

592
00:32:32.119 --> 00:32:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Listen, six in a vacuum, you can't read John.

593
00:32:35.680 --> 00:32:38.599
<v Speaker 1>I didn't take it. I went immediately to a eucharistic passage,

594
00:32:38.599 --> 00:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and he was thirteen to help explain it. I didn't

595
00:32:40.480 --> 00:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>take it in a vacuum, and I argue that it

596
00:32:42.480 --> 00:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>was only John six.

597
00:32:43.240 --> 00:32:45.279
<v Speaker 2>The person read from John's perspective.

598
00:32:46.759 --> 00:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that you have John's perspective.

599
00:32:48.839 --> 00:32:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Consistently in John's gospel.

600
00:32:51.680 --> 00:32:53.319
<v Speaker 2>Jesus is very consistent.

601
00:32:53.440 --> 00:32:56.240
<v Speaker 3>In John chapter two, he uses the earthly metaphor of

602
00:32:56.319 --> 00:32:59.079
<v Speaker 3>a temple being destroyed to represent the spiritual truth of

603
00:32:59.160 --> 00:33:02.759
<v Speaker 3>the resurrection of his The people who were there were

604
00:33:02.799 --> 00:33:03.920
<v Speaker 3>confused because.

605
00:33:03.680 --> 00:33:06.519
<v Speaker 2>They were thinking physically. But the disciples, yeah, you just

606
00:33:06.599 --> 00:33:06.960
<v Speaker 2>keep it.

607
00:33:07.000 --> 00:33:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Listen, you're making an assumption. Listen, I know what you're doing.

608
00:33:12.440 --> 00:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You're contrasting spirit. Listen, it's a false dilemma. You're contrasting

609
00:33:16.720 --> 00:33:17.599
<v Speaker 1>spirits of flesh.

610
00:33:17.680 --> 00:33:18.839
<v Speaker 2>Number let me talk.

611
00:33:19.960 --> 00:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I already know what you're doing. It's not a good

612
00:33:22.039 --> 00:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>argument you're contrasting. No, it's not. It's a gnostic view.

613
00:33:27.000 --> 00:33:28.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to tell you. That's why you're out of

614
00:33:28.519 --> 00:33:30.759
<v Speaker 1>a chord with what the Church always thought about this.

615
00:33:31.039 --> 00:33:34.240
<v Speaker 3>What is gnostic about my view? Mike, I see you

616
00:33:34.319 --> 00:33:36.079
<v Speaker 3>laughing out there, bro, I'll block.

617
00:33:35.920 --> 00:33:37.519
<v Speaker 2>You, bruh.

618
00:33:38.079 --> 00:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>What's gnostic is that the passages about spirit are not

619
00:33:42.119 --> 00:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>contrasted to body or physicality. It's Holy Spirit. And every

620
00:33:48.000 --> 00:33:52.039
<v Speaker 1>Protestant does this gnostic anti matter reading into these texts.

621
00:33:52.039 --> 00:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I know. I used to be a Protestant. When I

622
00:33:53.680 --> 00:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>read Romans, Paul talks about the body of the flesh

623
00:33:56.640 --> 00:34:00.279
<v Speaker 1>fighting the Spirit. I assumed that that was physical body

624
00:34:00.400 --> 00:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>fighting the Holy Spirit because somehow quote immaterial things are

625
00:34:04.559 --> 00:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>better than physical things. And that's a gnostic heresy.

626
00:34:08.599 --> 00:34:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, No one is saying that immaterial things are better.

627
00:34:13.400 --> 00:34:17.679
<v Speaker 3>What we're saying is that is fallen and needs renewal.

628
00:34:17.760 --> 00:34:20.239
<v Speaker 3>The first coming of Christ, Why is there a second

629
00:34:20.280 --> 00:34:22.280
<v Speaker 3>coming of Christ? The first coming of Christ is to

630
00:34:22.280 --> 00:34:24.599
<v Speaker 3>deal with our sin, and what did sin do? According

631
00:34:24.599 --> 00:34:27.559
<v Speaker 3>to Ezekiel, the soul dies from sin.

632
00:34:27.639 --> 00:34:29.559
<v Speaker 1>So the first body and the soul dies. So I

633
00:34:29.559 --> 00:34:30.519
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you're talking about.

634
00:34:30.800 --> 00:34:34.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, through Adam, all flesh dies because because all sin.

635
00:34:34.360 --> 00:34:36.880
<v Speaker 3>So yes, the flesh and the soul die. But jesus

636
00:34:37.079 --> 00:34:41.320
<v Speaker 3>first coming was to make us born again in the spirit,

637
00:34:41.400 --> 00:34:41.679
<v Speaker 3>and this.

638
00:34:41.639 --> 00:34:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Is and that happens through baptism, water.

639
00:34:43.920 --> 00:34:47.639
<v Speaker 2>Baptism physical. Okay, sure.

640
00:34:48.559 --> 00:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Now wait a minute, so you're saying sure, now there's

641
00:34:50.960 --> 00:34:54.719
<v Speaker 1>water that's used as a medium of regeneration. You're saying

642
00:34:54.719 --> 00:34:55.800
<v Speaker 1>sure to that you agree with that.

643
00:34:56.519 --> 00:34:58.760
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't. But you're I mean, you're just shifting.

644
00:34:59.400 --> 00:35:01.320
<v Speaker 2>What argument do you want to focus on? You want

645
00:35:01.360 --> 00:35:01.760
<v Speaker 2>to jump in?

646
00:35:01.840 --> 00:35:04.800
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm making another point that physical things like water

647
00:35:04.880 --> 00:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>are mediums of grace. That's why an Acts two, it says,

648
00:35:07.519 --> 00:35:10.239
<v Speaker 1>repent and be baptized for the remission of your sins,

649
00:35:10.480 --> 00:35:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and then it says that thousands of them were actually

650
00:35:12.800 --> 00:35:14.199
<v Speaker 1>physically water baptized.

651
00:35:14.800 --> 00:35:17.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so Cornelius receive the spirit without water.

652
00:35:17.719 --> 00:35:20.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that God can't send his Holy Spirit

653
00:35:20.480 --> 00:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and do it in that way. But in Acts two

654
00:35:22.960 --> 00:35:25.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight, as well as Titus three. It specifies that

655
00:35:26.360 --> 00:35:29.559
<v Speaker 1>the labor of baptism is the labor of regeneration? Does

656
00:35:29.599 --> 00:35:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Titus three not say that?

657
00:35:32.960 --> 00:35:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Repeat yourself?

658
00:35:34.079 --> 00:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Does Titus three not call the labor of baptism the

659
00:35:38.159 --> 00:35:39.360
<v Speaker 1>lavor of regeneration?

660
00:35:42.039 --> 00:35:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll have to go study that I'm not gonna do.

661
00:35:44.599 --> 00:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's the same thing Peter's talking about in Act two.

662
00:35:47.280 --> 00:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that the Holy Spirit can't move outside

663
00:35:50.039 --> 00:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of the presence of water, but the normative means by

664
00:35:54.440 --> 00:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>which regeneration occurs is through physical water. So throughout all

665
00:35:59.039 --> 00:36:03.079
<v Speaker 1>of this, your war is against physical objects, and all

666
00:36:03.079 --> 00:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>of your interpretations are that somehow quote spirit is anti matter.

667
00:36:07.480 --> 00:36:10.599
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, got it.

668
00:36:10.800 --> 00:36:14.280
<v Speaker 3>That's your interpretation of what my position is.

669
00:36:14.280 --> 00:36:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that not your position?

670
00:36:15.559 --> 00:36:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Back to what I was saying, John three, So you're.

671
00:36:18.880 --> 00:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Not gonna address any verses. You're just gonna do a

672
00:36:21.280 --> 00:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>walk through of what I already addressed.

673
00:36:23.719 --> 00:36:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, yes, because you're you're shifting the you're shifting

674
00:36:27.400 --> 00:36:28.159
<v Speaker 3>the goal posts.

675
00:36:28.360 --> 00:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>No, bringing up further examples is not moving the goal post.

676
00:36:31.559 --> 00:36:32.599
<v Speaker 1>That's a different fallacy.

677
00:36:33.000 --> 00:36:35.400
<v Speaker 2>You gotta let me were I told.

678
00:36:35.159 --> 00:36:38.320
<v Speaker 1>You, you're a you're walking through. So when you say, okay,

679
00:36:38.400 --> 00:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Jesus's body is the true temple and you destroy the

680
00:36:42.320 --> 00:36:47.159
<v Speaker 1>other temple, that doesn't help your case. Jesus' body is physical, No.

681
00:36:47.239 --> 00:36:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I yes, I agree.

682
00:36:48.519 --> 00:36:54.800
<v Speaker 3>The physical body of Christ was necessary, was absolutely necessary,

683
00:36:54.920 --> 00:36:59.280
<v Speaker 3>because just as sin came into the world through the flesh,

684
00:36:59.400 --> 00:37:01.960
<v Speaker 3>it had to be destroyed in the flesh.

685
00:37:02.199 --> 00:37:07.320
<v Speaker 1>How does this prove your low view of sacraments.

686
00:37:08.000 --> 00:37:10.039
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a low view of SACRAMENTO.

687
00:37:09.679 --> 00:37:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you do. By definition, you literally do.

688
00:37:12.159 --> 00:37:14.679
<v Speaker 2>I believe that communion is worship.

689
00:37:14.480 --> 00:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Is water, baptism regeneration.

690
00:37:17.800 --> 00:37:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I believe that I.

691
00:37:18.920 --> 00:37:22.599
<v Speaker 3>Am regenerated by the Holy Spirit prior.

692
00:37:22.400 --> 00:37:24.519
<v Speaker 1>To water baptists. Then you have a low view of

693
00:37:24.559 --> 00:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the sacraments. By definition, baptism is worship. And is it

694
00:37:30.000 --> 00:37:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the labor of regeneration according to Titus three five, not

695
00:37:32.880 --> 00:37:35.199
<v Speaker 1>by works of righteousness, which we have done, but according

696
00:37:35.199 --> 00:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to his mercy. He saved us through the washing of

697
00:37:38.039 --> 00:37:39.079
<v Speaker 1>the labor regeneration.

698
00:37:39.920 --> 00:37:40.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

699
00:37:40.199 --> 00:37:44.480
<v Speaker 3>And the and he Peter describes the waters as what's

700
00:37:44.559 --> 00:37:45.880
<v Speaker 3>not doing the washing there?

701
00:37:46.920 --> 00:37:47.559
<v Speaker 2>It's the spirit.

702
00:37:47.639 --> 00:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Now he says that it's not washing your body. He

703
00:37:49.760 --> 00:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't say it's not water.

704
00:37:52.679 --> 00:37:54.880
<v Speaker 3>He says, yet not by a washing of dirt off

705
00:37:54.880 --> 00:37:55.599
<v Speaker 3>your body.

706
00:37:55.360 --> 00:37:59.119
<v Speaker 1>So not taking a bath. Water baptism is not a bath.

707
00:37:59.480 --> 00:38:02.039
<v Speaker 2>So he's made a distinction that, No, he's not.

708
00:38:02.440 --> 00:38:06.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not a bath, it's water baptism. Do you think

709
00:38:06.320 --> 00:38:08.199
<v Speaker 1>when you're taking a bath at night that that's the

710
00:38:08.239 --> 00:38:13.079
<v Speaker 1>same thing as a baptism. So that's what Peter's talking about.

711
00:38:13.119 --> 00:38:15.039
<v Speaker 1>He's not saying that there's not a presence of the

712
00:38:15.079 --> 00:38:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Holy Spirit to regenerate you at water baptism.

713
00:38:17.800 --> 00:38:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I didn't say that the Holy Spirit was not present

714
00:38:19.920 --> 00:38:20.639
<v Speaker 3>in baptism.

715
00:38:21.119 --> 00:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>You said that it's not regeneration. You just said that.

716
00:38:24.079 --> 00:38:24.719
<v Speaker 2>I believe that.

717
00:38:24.800 --> 00:38:27.519
<v Speaker 3>I believe that the Christian is regenerated by the Holy

718
00:38:27.599 --> 00:38:30.239
<v Speaker 3>Spirit through faith prior to baptism.

719
00:38:30.320 --> 00:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>You're saying that, But the Bible doesn't say that. It

720
00:38:33.079 --> 00:38:36.280
<v Speaker 1>continually links it to the celebration of the sacrament.

721
00:38:37.480 --> 00:38:38.880
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't use that exact wording.

722
00:38:38.880 --> 00:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But should No, it doesn't. My examples that you won't

723
00:38:41.519 --> 00:38:44.119
<v Speaker 1>talk about literally link it to baptism.

724
00:38:44.320 --> 00:38:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Cornelius, I mean, dude, I mean you're saying, oh, but

725
00:38:46.360 --> 00:38:47.559
<v Speaker 3>that's just an exception like that.

726
00:38:47.719 --> 00:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not. The Holy Spirit can move, the Holy

727
00:38:51.280 --> 00:38:52.599
<v Speaker 1>Spirit can remove.

728
00:38:53.480 --> 00:38:55.320
<v Speaker 2>You're taking the work of God and saying, no, that's

729
00:38:55.360 --> 00:38:57.320
<v Speaker 2>an exception. No, I'm not.

730
00:38:57.519 --> 00:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm dealing with all of the passages, and that's that's prior.

731
00:39:01.679 --> 00:39:04.599
<v Speaker 1>The thief on the cross is prior to the institution

732
00:39:04.760 --> 00:39:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of water baptism and Acts two as the normative means.

733
00:39:07.360 --> 00:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I already said normative. I didn't deny the possibility the

734
00:39:10.519 --> 00:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Holy Spirit doing and moving.

735
00:39:12.039 --> 00:39:12.400
<v Speaker 6>People.

736
00:39:12.440 --> 00:39:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Stop interrupting me. You're new to all this, man, make.

737
00:39:16.679 --> 00:39:19.119
<v Speaker 2>The distinction of normative means of grace.

738
00:39:19.880 --> 00:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we're done.

739
00:39:22.119 --> 00:39:23.760
<v Speaker 2>When does that? When does it make that distinction?

740
00:39:24.119 --> 00:39:27.559
<v Speaker 1>So you okay, you literally think that using terminology that

741
00:39:27.679 --> 00:39:30.320
<v Speaker 1>helps to clarify is not in the Bible itself. Is

742
00:39:30.320 --> 00:39:34.119
<v Speaker 1>the word trinity in the Bible. No, but so that's

743
00:39:34.159 --> 00:39:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a double standard. You're using the double standard.

744
00:39:37.480 --> 00:39:39.559
<v Speaker 2>It's perfectly laid out. No, I'm just saying, like, where

745
00:39:39.639 --> 00:39:41.119
<v Speaker 2>are you establishing that?

746
00:39:41.920 --> 00:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You said that there's no example. All the examples I'm

747
00:39:45.360 --> 00:39:47.599
<v Speaker 1>giving you acts too, where it says repent and be

748
00:39:47.639 --> 00:39:51.360
<v Speaker 1>baptized for their mission of sins, and then they're water

749
00:39:51.400 --> 00:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>baptized in next two right, and then but.

750
00:39:53.800 --> 00:39:56.719
<v Speaker 2>And then it says John baptized with water.

751
00:39:56.920 --> 00:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>But that's the Old Testament they did it. Or what

752
00:40:00.440 --> 00:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>do you know? When is when is Jesus' baptism instituted?

753
00:40:08.280 --> 00:40:09.760
<v Speaker 2>When he sends the Holy Spirit?

754
00:40:10.079 --> 00:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>No, at the end of the Gospel, when he says,

755
00:40:13.000 --> 00:40:16.039
<v Speaker 1>go forth and baptize all the nations, that's when he

756
00:40:16.119 --> 00:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>institutes it. Before he stopped interrupting me, he shut up.

757
00:40:20.519 --> 00:40:25.119
<v Speaker 1>He says it is a trinitarian ritual action, and that's

758
00:40:25.159 --> 00:40:27.559
<v Speaker 1>what they do in Acts. Matthew twenty eight is talking

759
00:40:27.599 --> 00:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>about water baptism. You didn't even know that.

760
00:40:38.559 --> 00:40:39.440
<v Speaker 2>No, I know what, Matthew.

761
00:40:40.320 --> 00:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>You know you said baptism was instituted at Pentecost. You

762
00:40:43.719 --> 00:40:46.639
<v Speaker 1>said Acts two. It's Matthew twenty eight, not Acts too.

763
00:40:47.320 --> 00:40:50.519
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, yeah, all right. I was confused by.

764
00:40:49.960 --> 00:40:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Your question, the obvious question that everyone should know when

765
00:40:53.880 --> 00:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>was baptism instituted? You were confused by that? How would

766
00:40:56.960 --> 00:40:58.519
<v Speaker 1>you be confused by a basic question?

767
00:41:00.800 --> 00:41:07.000
<v Speaker 5>All right, I'm sorry to ask a question about normative means.

768
00:41:07.000 --> 00:41:11.480
<v Speaker 2>It's established that so you can't appeal to cases.

769
00:41:12.639 --> 00:41:18.639
<v Speaker 5>Prior to the institution of baptism is possibly Norman means. Now,

770
00:41:18.719 --> 00:41:23.480
<v Speaker 5>as jab pointed out, that can God send the Holy

771
00:41:23.599 --> 00:41:27.800
<v Speaker 5>Spirit and save somebody apart from the normative means, sure,

772
00:41:27.920 --> 00:41:30.679
<v Speaker 5>but Protestants always take an.

773
00:41:30.480 --> 00:41:33.039
<v Speaker 1>Exception of the rule to be the example.

774
00:41:33.239 --> 00:41:35.360
<v Speaker 2>To be the example, then I can do that.

775
00:41:35.360 --> 00:41:39.000
<v Speaker 5>It's exactly the same analogy of saying, well, could I

776
00:41:39.199 --> 00:41:42.400
<v Speaker 5>say there a terminal cancer without going to a specialist

777
00:41:42.440 --> 00:41:45.320
<v Speaker 5>in the hospital. It's like, yeah, but okay, maybe there

778
00:41:45.360 --> 00:41:47.440
<v Speaker 5>was a case or two where that happened. Like why

779
00:41:47.480 --> 00:41:51.280
<v Speaker 5>in the world would you build a whole therapy on

780
00:41:51.599 --> 00:41:53.719
<v Speaker 5>not going to.

781
00:41:53.079 --> 00:41:55.519
<v Speaker 2>Get healed because you could be healed apart from the

782
00:41:55.559 --> 00:41:59.079
<v Speaker 2>normative means? That's Protestantism for you. It's crazy. It's like, well,

783
00:41:59.159 --> 00:41:59.960
<v Speaker 2>even if you found the.

784
00:42:00.199 --> 00:42:05.000
<v Speaker 7>Cases, do we're exception to the rules after the institution

785
00:42:05.159 --> 00:42:09.079
<v Speaker 7>of baptism, you're going to base a rule on the

786
00:42:09.119 --> 00:42:11.679
<v Speaker 7>exception to the rule and put yourself in that sort

787
00:42:11.719 --> 00:42:13.920
<v Speaker 7>of danger. That's just seems crazy to me.

788
00:42:16.920 --> 00:42:19.199
<v Speaker 2>Call me crazy, Okay, we will.

789
00:42:20.880 --> 00:42:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, and I and I I understand that, like

790
00:42:23.360 --> 00:42:26.320
<v Speaker 3>we're in agreement that we disagree with each other, and

791
00:42:26.440 --> 00:42:28.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm just trying to, you know.

792
00:42:28.039 --> 00:42:30.599
<v Speaker 1>Have a well, no, it's been a great conversation.

793
00:42:30.719 --> 00:42:33.480
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, and I have apologize that we're getting a

794
00:42:33.480 --> 00:42:33.880
<v Speaker 2>little right.

795
00:42:34.920 --> 00:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we can shift a little bit because we're going

796
00:42:36.920 --> 00:42:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to disagree there. Maybe a more fundamental question would be,

797
00:42:41.079 --> 00:42:43.719
<v Speaker 1>how do you know what the word of God is

798
00:42:44.360 --> 00:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the canon of scripture, and what is

799
00:42:46.320 --> 00:42:47.519
<v Speaker 1>your basis for it?

800
00:42:48.400 --> 00:42:55.119
<v Speaker 2>The Cannon conundrum Protestant nightmare. Yeah, so, I mean.

801
00:42:58.760 --> 00:43:02.639
<v Speaker 3>I would say that the recognition of infallibility does not

802
00:43:02.760 --> 00:43:08.719
<v Speaker 3>require the possession of infallibility. The simple historical fact, and

803
00:43:08.760 --> 00:43:11.760
<v Speaker 3>this is a historical fact that I think we should

804
00:43:11.800 --> 00:43:16.079
<v Speaker 3>all agree on, is that neither Jewish reception of the

805
00:43:16.119 --> 00:43:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Old Testament nor early Christian reception of the Scriptures.

806
00:43:20.280 --> 00:43:24.199
<v Speaker 2>Happened through means of infallibility. Period.

807
00:43:24.280 --> 00:43:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you just contradict yourself within like three sentences.

808
00:43:27.480 --> 00:43:28.519
<v Speaker 1>You just said that.

809
00:43:28.800 --> 00:43:30.599
<v Speaker 2>Just take apart my statement.

810
00:43:30.679 --> 00:43:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Please, it's the first thing you said, which was confused.

811
00:43:33.760 --> 00:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you mean by infallibility can happen

812
00:43:36.480 --> 00:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>through What did you say? How did you phrase it?

813
00:43:39.039 --> 00:43:45.639
<v Speaker 3>Recognition of infallibility meaning recognizing God's word does not require

814
00:43:46.119 --> 00:43:48.960
<v Speaker 3>possession of infallibility, meaning that.

815
00:43:48.840 --> 00:43:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I have so Mouthew, so mouthe, you might not have

816
00:43:52.800 --> 00:43:53.920
<v Speaker 1>written Matthew's Gospel.

817
00:43:57.159 --> 00:43:58.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not answering that's a that's.

818
00:43:58.559 --> 00:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>A you're not going to answer it.

819
00:44:02.000 --> 00:44:04.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like, like, I don't understand.

820
00:44:04.000 --> 00:44:05.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand how to answer that question.

821
00:44:06.800 --> 00:44:10.599
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's an important question because it underdoes the assumptions

822
00:44:10.599 --> 00:44:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of your argument. So why would you I don't understand.

823
00:44:12.440 --> 00:44:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Why wouldn't at least attempt to answer it.

824
00:44:16.000 --> 00:44:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a topic that I'm not well studied on.

825
00:44:18.880 --> 00:44:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, Apostolic authorship is very important for inclusion into

826
00:44:23.800 --> 00:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the canon, and Matthew's Gospel doesn't tell you that Matthew

827
00:44:26.960 --> 00:44:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the Disciple wrote it. So guess where you get that

828
00:44:29.239 --> 00:44:37.880
<v Speaker 1>knowledge from. Tell me tradition, got it? So you're relying

829
00:44:37.960 --> 00:44:41.440
<v Speaker 1>on tradition? Is that also perhaps wrong?

830
00:44:43.079 --> 00:44:45.880
<v Speaker 2>All right? Well Acts seventeen eleven.

831
00:44:45.920 --> 00:44:51.719
<v Speaker 1>You're not so you two quote fallacy. You're asking me

832
00:44:51.760 --> 00:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a question when I asked you a question. Yeah, that's

833
00:44:55.519 --> 00:44:59.559
<v Speaker 1>two quote way fallacy. All right, whatever, all right, whatever,

834
00:45:01.000 --> 00:45:03.079
<v Speaker 1>So you don't think fallausy is matter. I don't understand

835
00:45:03.079 --> 00:45:06.679
<v Speaker 1>why you just blow past this. I asked you a

836
00:45:06.760 --> 00:45:08.880
<v Speaker 1>question and you say I'm not going to answer it,

837
00:45:08.960 --> 00:45:10.519
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm gonna You're gonna ask me a question

838
00:45:10.599 --> 00:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that's called a two quote quay fallacy, and then you

839
00:45:12.519 --> 00:45:13.519
<v Speaker 1>say whatever.

840
00:45:14.119 --> 00:45:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, uh, well, ask the question again, what are we

841
00:45:18.000 --> 00:45:20.800
<v Speaker 3>saying here? I told you I'm not an expert on

842
00:45:21.119 --> 00:45:24.559
<v Speaker 3>how we have determined how math that Matthew wrote the

843
00:45:24.559 --> 00:45:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Gospel of Matthew.

844
00:45:25.480 --> 00:45:26.639
<v Speaker 1>The only way is through tradition.

845
00:45:26.760 --> 00:45:28.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to speak on something i'm not an

846
00:45:28.679 --> 00:45:30.800
<v Speaker 3>expert in because I will make myself out to be

847
00:45:30.840 --> 00:45:33.119
<v Speaker 3>a fool. And I don't intend on I don't intend

848
00:45:33.199 --> 00:45:35.719
<v Speaker 3>on doing that. And I see all you guys laughing

849
00:45:35.719 --> 00:45:38.559
<v Speaker 3>in the and you know out there, why don't you

850
00:45:38.559 --> 00:45:40.599
<v Speaker 3>come up here and you know, tell me why we

851
00:45:40.679 --> 00:45:42.239
<v Speaker 3>have every single book of the Bible, you know.

852
00:45:42.280 --> 00:45:44.599
<v Speaker 1>All right, So look, let's just stop there, because I

853
00:45:44.639 --> 00:45:46.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want us to go in a bad direction. We

854
00:45:46.440 --> 00:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>can go and study and read and you can look

855
00:45:49.039 --> 00:45:51.320
<v Speaker 1>into the question if you want, and maybe we can

856
00:45:51.360 --> 00:45:52.960
<v Speaker 1>come back, and we don't. I don't want this to

857
00:45:53.000 --> 00:45:56.199
<v Speaker 1>go in like a sour direction because well, you apologize,

858
00:45:56.199 --> 00:45:57.159
<v Speaker 1>you're you're a good dude.

859
00:45:57.199 --> 00:45:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, I want to say. I want to say

860
00:45:58.880 --> 00:46:03.440
<v Speaker 2>one thing. Sure, all right, guys, come on like y'all hear.

861
00:46:03.960 --> 00:46:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry about the chick.

862
00:46:05.119 --> 00:46:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Look, you can't look at a chance, just don't. Yeah,

863
00:46:10.360 --> 00:46:15.000
<v Speaker 2>all right, Well, so how do we determine what scripture is?

864
00:46:15.079 --> 00:46:17.519
<v Speaker 3>And my simple answer, and I know this isn't going

865
00:46:17.559 --> 00:46:22.480
<v Speaker 3>to satisfy uh, the people who are listening, but proposed say, okay,

866
00:46:22.679 --> 00:46:25.639
<v Speaker 3>say you have something, you're proposing something to be the

867
00:46:25.679 --> 00:46:28.840
<v Speaker 3>word of God. Say, look, I have this is I'm

868
00:46:28.840 --> 00:46:32.320
<v Speaker 3>calling this the Gospel of Matthew. Matthew wrote it. It's

869
00:46:32.360 --> 00:46:35.199
<v Speaker 3>the Word of God. And i've you know, I've never

870
00:46:35.239 --> 00:46:39.159
<v Speaker 3>seen it before. I haven't studied or anything. What's my first,

871
00:46:39.519 --> 00:46:40.360
<v Speaker 3>you know line of action?

872
00:46:42.000 --> 00:46:44.280
<v Speaker 2>That That's why I was pointing to Acts seventeen eleven.

873
00:46:44.480 --> 00:46:44.920
<v Speaker 2>So you have.

874
00:46:45.039 --> 00:46:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Proposed, so you're begging the question because we don't know

875
00:46:47.400 --> 00:46:49.800
<v Speaker 1>yet that Acts is actually part of the scriptures.

876
00:46:49.920 --> 00:46:53.679
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm just using what happened in Acts as an

877
00:46:53.679 --> 00:46:56.519
<v Speaker 3>example of what could be done to determine what is

878
00:46:56.519 --> 00:46:57.159
<v Speaker 3>the Word of God.

879
00:46:57.840 --> 00:47:02.280
<v Speaker 1>But that example is assuming the thing in question, because

880
00:47:02.320 --> 00:47:05.199
<v Speaker 1>we don't know yet that that's even allowed in the canon.

881
00:47:05.280 --> 00:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Acts, maybe, Luke. You know about like the pseudonymous

882
00:47:08.920 --> 00:47:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Gospels and the you know, Gnostic Gospels, the false Gospels, right.

883
00:47:13.800 --> 00:47:17.000
<v Speaker 3>There are objective ways in which we have found them

884
00:47:17.039 --> 00:47:18.000
<v Speaker 3>to be unreliable.

885
00:47:18.000 --> 00:47:21.199
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not I understand that. But I'm just pointing

886
00:47:21.199 --> 00:47:23.880
<v Speaker 1>out that just because there's a name mentioned like Luke,

887
00:47:24.119 --> 00:47:27.400
<v Speaker 1>or even if it said Matthew, like, it doesn't tell

888
00:47:27.440 --> 00:47:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you that that's authentically the disciple of Jesus. It might be.

889
00:47:32.159 --> 00:47:34.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're getting off topic.

890
00:47:35.280 --> 00:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So no, it's not on topic. It's perfectly on topic.

891
00:47:37.679 --> 00:47:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we have proposed, we have proposed word of God.

892
00:47:40.760 --> 00:47:42.480
<v Speaker 2>This is proposed to be the speech of God.

893
00:47:42.800 --> 00:47:45.559
<v Speaker 3>You take what you know to be the speech of

894
00:47:45.559 --> 00:47:49.039
<v Speaker 3>God and measure it against what is proposed.

895
00:47:48.519 --> 00:47:49.599
<v Speaker 2>To be the speech of God.

896
00:47:49.880 --> 00:47:54.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you have the apostles coming to the church in

897
00:47:54.239 --> 00:47:58.079
<v Speaker 3>Berea and its preaching the Gospel to them.

898
00:47:58.280 --> 00:48:01.679
<v Speaker 1>And then this doesn't work as an example because acts.

899
00:48:01.719 --> 00:48:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't know that Acts is the word of God.

900
00:48:03.559 --> 00:48:05.599
<v Speaker 1>So you're using a thing in question. So it's begging

901
00:48:05.639 --> 00:48:08.559
<v Speaker 1>the question. Can I give you an example of what

902
00:48:08.599 --> 00:48:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about? If you scroll down on my wall,

903
00:48:12.480 --> 00:48:15.079
<v Speaker 1>you'll see an old tweet that I retweeted called Protestantism

904
00:48:15.079 --> 00:48:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and solicripture refuted. And what I do there is I

905
00:48:17.960 --> 00:48:21.960
<v Speaker 1>use the Baptist textual scholar Lee McDonald's list of the

906
00:48:22.000 --> 00:48:26.079
<v Speaker 1>debates about the canon and the different church father lists

907
00:48:26.079 --> 00:48:29.320
<v Speaker 1>into fourth, fifth, sixth century, and you'll notice that whether

908
00:48:29.360 --> 00:48:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the New Testament or the Old Testament, there's variation

909
00:48:33.159 --> 00:48:36.320
<v Speaker 1>amongst all of these different lists. So what I want

910
00:48:36.320 --> 00:48:40.599
<v Speaker 1>to know is whether it's Origin or whether it's Chrysostom,

911
00:48:40.760 --> 00:48:44.239
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's Athanasius's list or Serial of Jerusalem's lists.

912
00:48:44.679 --> 00:48:47.440
<v Speaker 1>How do you, as a Protestant know or what do

913
00:48:47.519 --> 00:48:50.119
<v Speaker 1>we do to determine amongst these church fathers who are

914
00:48:50.119 --> 00:48:52.360
<v Speaker 1>not Protestant, which one is the right list?

915
00:48:55.119 --> 00:48:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Exactly what I was saying, you know, take the what

916
00:48:57.960 --> 00:49:00.039
<v Speaker 3>we know to be the speech of God, which.

917
00:49:00.199 --> 00:49:02.320
<v Speaker 1>We're using the Book of Acts, and the Book of

918
00:49:02.360 --> 00:49:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Acts is not known yet to be the word of God.

919
00:49:04.840 --> 00:49:05.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing in question.

920
00:49:07.039 --> 00:49:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, okay, so how how do we know,

921
00:49:14.559 --> 00:49:15.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean what.

922
00:49:15.079 --> 00:49:16.360
<v Speaker 2>The earliest.

923
00:49:18.960 --> 00:49:22.519
<v Speaker 3>Testimony of the church, I mean the apostles themselves handed

924
00:49:22.559 --> 00:49:28.159
<v Speaker 3>these letters letters off to someone, right, yes, yeah.

925
00:49:28.119 --> 00:49:31.239
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, but you know we don't have onograthha.

926
00:49:30.719 --> 00:49:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, no, yes, yes, I know, I know.

927
00:49:34.599 --> 00:49:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so how do we know the authentic from the

928
00:49:37.280 --> 00:49:43.280
<v Speaker 1>non authentic ones? Do you know what the earliest list

929
00:49:43.320 --> 00:49:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of canon of the canon.

930
00:49:44.559 --> 00:49:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Is the earliest not necessarily, But I do know that

931
00:49:50.320 --> 00:49:54.000
<v Speaker 3>there are lists prior to you know, the Council that

932
00:49:54.039 --> 00:49:58.920
<v Speaker 3>everybody loves to reference in like what three eighty three

933
00:49:59.000 --> 00:50:00.079
<v Speaker 3>eighty three or something like that.

934
00:50:00.199 --> 00:50:02.400
<v Speaker 2>There were plenty of lists prior to that.

935
00:50:03.400 --> 00:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about plenty of it, but they're from.

936
00:50:06.079 --> 00:50:09.599
<v Speaker 3>A handful a handful, and funny enough, most of them

937
00:50:09.679 --> 00:50:11.360
<v Speaker 3>were closer to the Proian canon.

938
00:50:11.840 --> 00:50:15.440
<v Speaker 1>No, that is completely false. You're totally wrong. I mean,

939
00:50:15.440 --> 00:50:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I've got them pulled up. Do you want to look,

940
00:50:16.800 --> 00:50:18.599
<v Speaker 1>you want to walk through them and see that that's false.

941
00:50:20.239 --> 00:50:23.119
<v Speaker 2>No, I didn't say they were exactly.

942
00:50:22.679 --> 00:50:26.440
<v Speaker 1>But no, they're not even close to the Protestant canon. Okay,

943
00:50:27.159 --> 00:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>let's just simply not you. I've got Canon eighty five

944
00:50:29.639 --> 00:50:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Apostolic cannons pulled up right here. This is

945
00:50:31.920 --> 00:50:34.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the earliest. The other earliest is the Canons

946
00:50:34.239 --> 00:50:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of Laodicea and the canon that's listed in the Apostolic

947
00:50:37.840 --> 00:50:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Canons from the three hundreds. It includes oh oh, the

948
00:50:41.360 --> 00:50:43.519
<v Speaker 1>Deutero canon that is not the Protestant canon.

949
00:50:44.039 --> 00:50:45.519
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you got one.

950
00:50:46.079 --> 00:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>No, this is not one. This is canon law, church

951
00:50:49.079 --> 00:50:54.159
<v Speaker 1>law for the church in general, having a normative canon.

952
00:50:55.320 --> 00:50:58.159
<v Speaker 2>Where is this originating from? This is just church? Everyone

953
00:50:58.199 --> 00:50:59.599
<v Speaker 2>in general is agreeing on it.

954
00:51:00.199 --> 00:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Of the church that follows the Apostolic canons. Correct, it's

955
00:51:03.400 --> 00:51:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the earliest, it's the Let me finish, it's the earliest.

956
00:51:06.719 --> 00:51:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Let me finish. It's the earliest collection of canon law

957
00:51:10.320 --> 00:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in the churches in the three hundreds.

958
00:51:12.280 --> 00:51:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, and then you have plenty of testimony after that

959
00:51:17.280 --> 00:51:21.440
<v Speaker 3>saying that the canon is second tier canon, a distinct

960
00:51:22.519 --> 00:51:25.239
<v Speaker 3>good for edification but not for faith.

961
00:51:25.320 --> 00:51:28.199
<v Speaker 1>And no, that's not true. What does Athenians say that

962
00:51:28.239 --> 00:51:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the deal canon is for?

963
00:51:30.360 --> 00:51:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

964
00:51:31.000 --> 00:51:32.559
<v Speaker 1>He says it's for the Catecumans.

965
00:51:34.039 --> 00:51:35.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well I haven't I have said that. So I

966
00:51:35.760 --> 00:51:36.280
<v Speaker 2>can't speak on.

967
00:51:36.280 --> 00:51:41.360
<v Speaker 1>That because, well that refutes what you just said. Athenasian

968
00:51:41.440 --> 00:51:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is not just one guy. What is is what is St? Augustine?

969
00:51:44.760 --> 00:51:46.480
<v Speaker 1>What does Augustine say about the drill can.

970
00:51:48.000 --> 00:51:49.840
<v Speaker 2>He affirmed the exactly right.

971
00:51:49.880 --> 00:51:51.119
<v Speaker 1>So is that now, two guys?

972
00:51:51.400 --> 00:51:52.199
<v Speaker 2>What about Jerome?

973
00:51:52.840 --> 00:51:56.719
<v Speaker 1>What about Wait a minute, no, serial Jeralism, Serial Jeruism

974
00:51:56.760 --> 00:51:58.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the Protestant canon. He doesn't help your case.

975
00:51:59.320 --> 00:52:03.199
<v Speaker 1>You have one, No, he doesn't. You have one? Church Father, Jerome,

976
00:52:03.360 --> 00:52:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Why are we supposed to follow Jerome Jerusalem. No, he doesn't.

977
00:52:07.039 --> 00:52:09.559
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have your canon. He does not have the

978
00:52:09.599 --> 00:52:10.519
<v Speaker 1>Protestant canon.

979
00:52:11.639 --> 00:52:13.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, he included Baruk.

980
00:52:13.280 --> 00:52:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's not the Protestant canon. And I don't think

981
00:52:16.159 --> 00:52:20.639
<v Speaker 1>he has revelation if I recall. So, how does how

982
00:52:20.679 --> 00:52:22.079
<v Speaker 1>does Cyril Jerusalem help your case?

983
00:52:22.519 --> 00:52:24.199
<v Speaker 2>Old Testament that's no, no, no, it's not.

984
00:52:24.159 --> 00:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Just the Old Testament. It's both the New Testament and

985
00:52:25.920 --> 00:52:27.519
<v Speaker 1>the Old Testament. It's the canon.

986
00:52:29.000 --> 00:52:33.920
<v Speaker 2>That's what. That's what where we differ here that you're wrong. No,

987
00:52:34.079 --> 00:52:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the Old Testament that's I'm talking about.

988
00:52:35.920 --> 00:52:38.000
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm talking about the canon. That's not just the

989
00:52:38.000 --> 00:52:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Old Testament. There's differing New Testament lists. Athanatius goes to

990
00:52:45.039 --> 00:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Rome to convince Rome of Hebrews and Revelation because they

991
00:52:48.840 --> 00:52:51.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't think it was canonical. Cyril of Jerusalem does not

992
00:52:51.840 --> 00:52:56.039
<v Speaker 1>have Revelation in his canon. Okay, so that doesn't help

993
00:52:56.079 --> 00:52:56.440
<v Speaker 1>your case.

994
00:52:56.800 --> 00:52:58.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm aware that there was debate on.

995
00:52:58.719 --> 00:53:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so how do we know which one's right we follow?

996
00:53:00.519 --> 00:53:01.400
<v Speaker 1>That's my question.

997
00:53:02.920 --> 00:53:04.519
<v Speaker 2>Again, back to what I said earlier.

998
00:53:04.559 --> 00:53:06.199
<v Speaker 3>You test what is proposed to be the speech of

999
00:53:06.199 --> 00:53:07.760
<v Speaker 3>God with what is known to be the speech.

1000
00:53:07.559 --> 00:53:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Of God, and you're referring to the Book of Acts,

1001
00:53:09.639 --> 00:53:10.360
<v Speaker 1>which is in question.

1002
00:53:12.039 --> 00:53:15.519
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, well, I feel like I'm not really

1003
00:53:15.559 --> 00:53:18.920
<v Speaker 3>getting myself anywhere. But let me ask you, how do

1004
00:53:19.039 --> 00:53:22.159
<v Speaker 3>you determine what is the Canada Scripture?

1005
00:53:22.480 --> 00:53:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, for the Orthodox Church, the highest authority is an

1006
00:53:25.400 --> 00:53:26.559
<v Speaker 1>ecumenical council.

1007
00:53:26.920 --> 00:53:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so a bunch of dudes that just decide.

1008
00:53:31.280 --> 00:53:34.840
<v Speaker 1>No, not a bunch of dudes. It's the church fathers

1009
00:53:34.880 --> 00:53:37.320
<v Speaker 1>with Apostolic succession, who have the gift to the Holy

1010
00:53:37.360 --> 00:53:39.159
<v Speaker 1>Spirit given to them. Does Paul say that the Holy

1011
00:53:39.199 --> 00:53:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Spirit's transferred the Lanyon of Hands to Timothy?

1012
00:53:42.719 --> 00:53:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Uh? Yeah, absolutely?

1013
00:53:43.880 --> 00:53:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Oh but you think that that's not true because you

1014
00:53:45.639 --> 00:53:46.840
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in Apsoltic.

1015
00:53:46.519 --> 00:53:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Succession, not in the way you defind it.

1016
00:53:49.000 --> 00:53:52.519
<v Speaker 1>Now, I just said what happens in the in the

1017
00:53:52.760 --> 00:53:54.679
<v Speaker 1>in Timothy, So what do you mean?

1018
00:53:54.800 --> 00:53:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Paul also says that after he leaves.

1019
00:53:57.400 --> 00:54:02.360
<v Speaker 3>The church, false Christians will infiltrate the church successfully.

1020
00:54:02.519 --> 00:54:05.960
<v Speaker 1>No he doesn't say successfully the church. No, No, he

1021
00:54:06.000 --> 00:54:07.440
<v Speaker 1>does not. He says that they will enter.

1022
00:54:07.400 --> 00:54:09.800
<v Speaker 2>The church away, the disciples draw away.

1023
00:54:09.840 --> 00:54:11.679
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean the destroy the church. The gates of

1024
00:54:11.679 --> 00:54:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Hell cannot prevail against the church.

1025
00:54:13.159 --> 00:54:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Never said that, never said the gates of hell prevailed.

1026
00:54:16.800 --> 00:54:19.480
<v Speaker 1>But if they infiltrate and subvert the Church, then the

1027
00:54:19.480 --> 00:54:20.559
<v Speaker 1>gates of hell prevailed.

1028
00:54:20.719 --> 00:54:21.719
<v Speaker 2>You have this line.

1029
00:54:21.760 --> 00:54:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Now you're changing, so you don't want to address you

1030
00:54:23.320 --> 00:54:23.880
<v Speaker 1>throw stuff out.

1031
00:54:24.159 --> 00:54:26.159
<v Speaker 3>Is this line of succession that you have? Is this

1032
00:54:26.239 --> 00:54:28.119
<v Speaker 3>list of men? Is that an infallible list?

1033
00:54:30.000 --> 00:54:34.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not a question of infallibility list. It's not

1034
00:54:34.079 --> 00:54:37.119
<v Speaker 1>a question of infallibility. If I know that the Testament

1035
00:54:37.719 --> 00:54:43.119
<v Speaker 1>stop interrupting me. Athanasius says, for example, that at the

1036
00:54:43.159 --> 00:54:46.519
<v Speaker 1>council and I see the Holy Spirit spoke through those fathers, right,

1037
00:54:47.119 --> 00:54:51.519
<v Speaker 1>So I don't have to accord to the councils when

1038
00:54:51.559 --> 00:54:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they state something about the scriptures the same status of

1039
00:54:54.960 --> 00:54:58.800
<v Speaker 1>divine revelation. I would say, divine revelation is infallible. But

1040
00:54:58.840 --> 00:55:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that divine revelation is restricted to written texts.

1041
00:55:01.880 --> 00:55:04.880
<v Speaker 1>And you do. But when when Peter and Paul preach,

1042
00:55:04.960 --> 00:55:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they call it the Word of God, do you believe

1043
00:55:06.440 --> 00:55:08.639
<v Speaker 1>that it's only written or believe that the preaching is.

1044
00:55:08.599 --> 00:55:12.559
<v Speaker 3>Also I believe, Yeah, the apostolic testimony oral written.

1045
00:55:12.880 --> 00:55:16.440
<v Speaker 1>The okay, So is there an oral thing that's passed on.

1046
00:55:17.880 --> 00:55:20.840
<v Speaker 3>No, we're not told that oral tradition would be passed

1047
00:55:20.840 --> 00:55:21.639
<v Speaker 3>on infallibly.

1048
00:55:21.679 --> 00:55:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Now, no, is it whether you think it's infallible or not,

1049
00:55:24.719 --> 00:55:25.719
<v Speaker 1>is that it passed on at all?

1050
00:55:26.880 --> 00:55:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Absolutely, the oral tradition has always passed on.

1051
00:55:31.159 --> 00:55:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Okay, And was what about one of those things being

1052
00:55:33.719 --> 00:55:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the authorship of.

1053
00:55:34.440 --> 00:55:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Like I said, that's not something I'm.

1054
00:55:40.079 --> 00:55:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Because it refused you, because it refused the point you

1055
00:55:42.239 --> 00:55:42.559
<v Speaker 1>just made?

1056
00:55:43.400 --> 00:55:45.719
<v Speaker 2>What point? And how does it refeet the point?

1057
00:55:45.880 --> 00:55:50.039
<v Speaker 1>It's apostolic tradition that Matthew the disciple wrote the Gospel

1058
00:55:50.039 --> 00:55:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of Matthew. Okay, that refutes the point you just made?

1059
00:55:56.000 --> 00:56:00.239
<v Speaker 2>What and what point? What did I say? That being

1060
00:56:00.280 --> 00:56:00.920
<v Speaker 2>refuted here?

1061
00:56:02.280 --> 00:56:05.440
<v Speaker 1>If you can deny the oral tradition and that we don't,

1062
00:56:05.440 --> 00:56:07.559
<v Speaker 1>we're not bound by that, then I'm not bound by

1063
00:56:07.599 --> 00:56:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the claim of the church that Matthew disciple wrote Matthew's Gospel,

1064
00:56:10.679 --> 00:56:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and I can throw out Matthew on your position that

1065
00:56:16.920 --> 00:56:19.519
<v Speaker 1>all right? That yeah, okay, well there we go. Good job.

1066
00:56:20.400 --> 00:56:23.199
<v Speaker 1>That's where Protestant leads to chopping up the protests and

1067
00:56:23.239 --> 00:56:25.480
<v Speaker 1>leads that's what Luther did. By the way, when Luther and.

1068
00:56:25.320 --> 00:56:28.719
<v Speaker 8>And notice to the confusion as we always see the

1069
00:56:28.760 --> 00:56:35.920
<v Speaker 8>two categories between normative what's binding, and an epistemic category

1070
00:56:35.920 --> 00:56:37.039
<v Speaker 8>of infallibility.

1071
00:56:37.800 --> 00:56:43.239
<v Speaker 2>So uh St Paul says, you're too old. He's speaking

1072
00:56:43.280 --> 00:56:44.960
<v Speaker 2>about normative, right.

1073
00:56:45.599 --> 00:56:49.599
<v Speaker 5>So it's a separate question, and we can answer that

1074
00:56:50.159 --> 00:56:54.400
<v Speaker 5>whether the oral teachings and the written teachings are infallible

1075
00:56:54.519 --> 00:56:57.719
<v Speaker 5>or not. But that's a separate question. Is it binding

1076
00:56:57.800 --> 00:57:00.800
<v Speaker 5>on you? Do you have to hold it? And Saint

1077
00:57:00.840 --> 00:57:04.239
<v Speaker 5>Paul obviously says you do. I had to be bound

1078
00:57:04.239 --> 00:57:05.800
<v Speaker 5>to a line of succession.

1079
00:57:07.239 --> 00:57:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes you do. Yeah, Paul just said, And I gave

1080
00:57:12.480 --> 00:57:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you one example of this oral teaching, which was that

1081
00:57:14.920 --> 00:57:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Matthew the Disciple wrote the Gospel of Matthew. And you said, no,

1082
00:57:17.519 --> 00:57:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to believe that, and fine, throw it out.

1083
00:57:19.800 --> 00:57:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, see you cut me off.

1084
00:57:21.719 --> 00:57:22.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what you said.

1085
00:57:22.920 --> 00:57:23.679
<v Speaker 2>That's not what I said.

1086
00:57:23.800 --> 00:57:25.719
<v Speaker 1>That's what you said. What are you talking about? People

1087
00:57:25.800 --> 00:57:28.119
<v Speaker 1>just heard you say it. Fine, I don't accept that.

1088
00:57:28.119 --> 00:57:32.039
<v Speaker 2>That's not what What did you say? Okay? You said,

1089
00:57:32.320 --> 00:57:34.000
<v Speaker 2>oh so yeah, you know, so you can just.

1090
00:57:33.960 --> 00:57:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Throw out the idea that that Matthew wrote the gospel.

1091
00:57:36.400 --> 00:57:37.719
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, yeah, that's what you just and

1092
00:57:37.800 --> 00:57:39.719
<v Speaker 3>then you cut me off. You're like Lucy, He said, yeah,

1093
00:57:40.960 --> 00:57:42.760
<v Speaker 3>you cut me off, you put words in my mouth.

1094
00:57:42.840 --> 00:57:44.119
<v Speaker 1>No, no, I'm stating that.

1095
00:57:44.599 --> 00:57:46.599
<v Speaker 3>You say, oh, just like Martin Luther cut books out

1096
00:57:46.599 --> 00:57:48.920
<v Speaker 3>of the Bible. Martin Luther actually never took books out.

1097
00:57:48.800 --> 00:57:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Of No, he actually did. He removed the dual can

1098
00:57:51.559 --> 00:57:55.760
<v Speaker 1>no in the German New Testament. He changed words, and

1099
00:57:55.800 --> 00:57:58.519
<v Speaker 1>then when he translated his Bible it does not have

1100
00:57:58.559 --> 00:58:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the duro canon. I've read six of Luther's books.

1101
00:58:00.639 --> 00:58:02.760
<v Speaker 2>And the first edition of Who.

1102
00:58:02.719 --> 00:58:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Cares about his first edition? If the tradition later on

1103
00:58:06.320 --> 00:58:08.719
<v Speaker 1>is that he says, I want to punch Moses' teeth out,

1104
00:58:08.719 --> 00:58:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and I don't care about the law, and he doesn't believe.

1105
00:58:11.559 --> 00:58:14.519
<v Speaker 1>He says that Maccabee's is not scripture because it doesn't

1106
00:58:14.519 --> 00:58:16.599
<v Speaker 1>preach the word of God and includes prayers for the dead.

1107
00:58:18.400 --> 00:58:24.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree on what basis that?

1108
00:58:24.880 --> 00:58:27.079
<v Speaker 3>Well, first off, that it doesn't it doesn't align with

1109
00:58:28.000 --> 00:58:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the testimony of scripture.

1110
00:58:29.199 --> 00:58:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Again begging the question, the question is how do you

1111
00:58:31.800 --> 00:58:34.639
<v Speaker 1>know what's in scripture? And you're saying that Matcwbees isn't

1112
00:58:34.679 --> 00:58:36.760
<v Speaker 1>scripture because it doesn't align with scripture.

1113
00:58:37.960 --> 00:58:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, scripture isn't one book, So.

1114
00:58:41.199 --> 00:58:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's totally totally dishonest. Get out of here with

1115
00:58:44.360 --> 00:58:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that nonsense, Mike, Mike, I'm mute.

1116
00:59:00.000 --> 00:59:03.880
<v Speaker 6>Hey, Jay, what's up, sir? Oh wait, did did Indiana

1117
00:59:03.920 --> 00:59:04.400
<v Speaker 6>get booted?

1118
00:59:04.639 --> 00:59:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Yep?

1119
00:59:05.960 --> 00:59:06.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

1120
00:59:06.280 --> 00:59:09.239
<v Speaker 6>Man, Okay, Well I was I was just gonna say.

1121
00:59:09.280 --> 00:59:12.239
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I don't know how you came to, you know,

1122
00:59:12.320 --> 00:59:15.440
<v Speaker 4>get him in his face because he agreed to debate

1123
00:59:15.480 --> 00:59:18.280
<v Speaker 4>with myself being moderated by Jake growth Nak about you know,

1124
00:59:18.360 --> 00:59:21.639
<v Speaker 4>solo Scriptura's hatred of Mary. So I was just gonna,

1125
00:59:22.000 --> 00:59:24.079
<v Speaker 4>you know, warn you about the type of guy that

1126
00:59:24.199 --> 00:59:26.679
<v Speaker 4>he is. And I came in a little late, so

1127
00:59:26.719 --> 00:59:28.400
<v Speaker 4>I guess you guys are having a good discussion and

1128
00:59:28.440 --> 00:59:29.519
<v Speaker 4>that it morphed into something.

1129
00:59:29.559 --> 00:59:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Well we've already gone for an hour, so it's I

1130
00:59:31.960 --> 00:59:33.679
<v Speaker 1>gave him one out, I give another out.

1131
00:59:34.559 --> 00:59:36.599
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, he's he's a total dishonest actor.

1132
00:59:36.960 --> 00:59:39.159
<v Speaker 4>If he doesn't have chat, GPT or his notes in

1133
00:59:39.159 --> 00:59:40.239
<v Speaker 4>front of him, he can't talk.

1134
00:59:41.199 --> 00:59:42.960
<v Speaker 6>The dude is a total snake in the grass. But

1135
00:59:43.039 --> 00:59:45.119
<v Speaker 6>you know, kudos to you for.

1136
00:59:45.119 --> 00:59:45.639
<v Speaker 2>Having him on.

1137
00:59:45.800 --> 00:59:49.599
<v Speaker 4>He he literally blocks or you know, runs away from

1138
00:59:49.639 --> 00:59:51.239
<v Speaker 4>any other debate so I'm glad to see that at

1139
00:59:51.320 --> 00:59:52.159
<v Speaker 4>least he spoke to him.

1140
00:59:53.239 --> 00:59:55.039
<v Speaker 1>Well, he also says that I'm not in a position

1141
00:59:55.079 --> 00:59:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to debate, but he's right to debate.

1142
00:59:56.559 --> 00:59:58.559
<v Speaker 6>So no, he's he's in it.

1143
00:59:59.159 --> 01:00:01.000
<v Speaker 9>I don't even understan and how anyone who could hold

1144
01:00:01.239 --> 01:00:03.679
<v Speaker 9>full of scripture can give an interpretation of what he

1145
01:00:03.800 --> 01:00:08.039
<v Speaker 9>believes a passage from a scripture means doesn't make any

1146
01:00:08.039 --> 01:00:11.719
<v Speaker 9>sense to me. But you know, I enjoyed your talk

1147
01:00:12.360 --> 01:00:14.039
<v Speaker 9>with him, as I enjoy pretty much a lot of

1148
01:00:14.039 --> 01:00:14.760
<v Speaker 9>the things that you do.

1149
01:00:15.639 --> 01:00:17.039
<v Speaker 6>So I just wanted to say that, and I wish

1150
01:00:17.119 --> 01:00:18.400
<v Speaker 6>he was on here because I did.

1151
01:00:18.880 --> 01:00:22.760
<v Speaker 4>I did challenge him to a boxing match, and I

1152
01:00:22.800 --> 01:00:24.840
<v Speaker 4>said that if he won, I would leave the Catholic

1153
01:00:24.920 --> 01:00:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Church and go to whatever church he worships at Quip.

1154
01:00:29.320 --> 01:00:33.639
<v Speaker 1>I actually was thinking too, because he initially before he apologized,

1155
01:00:33.639 --> 01:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>had lied about what I said and then he apologized.

1156
01:00:36.000 --> 01:00:38.039
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not gonna go that route, but I wanted

1157
01:00:38.079 --> 01:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>to offer a boxing match as well. I'm not kidding.

1158
01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:41.679
<v Speaker 6>No, the dude.

1159
01:00:41.800 --> 01:00:44.320
<v Speaker 4>The dude says that he finally, Oh, I finally you know,

1160
01:00:44.400 --> 01:00:46.679
<v Speaker 4>have a script to debate how to be Christian.

1161
01:00:47.079 --> 01:00:49.800
<v Speaker 6>That's been easily six months in the works.

1162
01:00:49.840 --> 01:00:52.559
<v Speaker 4>I don't I don't know of anybody who needs six

1163
01:00:52.639 --> 01:00:56.079
<v Speaker 4>months to prepare for a simple debate on either a

1164
01:00:56.119 --> 01:00:59.800
<v Speaker 4>space or YouTube. He's full of He's full of bs.

1165
01:00:59.840 --> 01:01:02.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he posts pictures of you know, the Virgin

1166
01:01:03.039 --> 01:01:06.599
<v Speaker 4>Mary on the shoe, you know, of people with with

1167
01:01:06.760 --> 01:01:08.880
<v Speaker 4>the title saying, oh, look at this ship that I

1168
01:01:08.920 --> 01:01:09.320
<v Speaker 4>stepped in.

1169
01:01:09.400 --> 01:01:11.239
<v Speaker 6>I just I can't stand him, and I wish he

1170
01:01:11.280 --> 01:01:13.440
<v Speaker 6>would have been here so I can confront him in person.

1171
01:01:13.719 --> 01:01:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Lord of Mercy. I can't imagine on Judgment Day what

1172
01:01:19.960 --> 01:01:20.559
<v Speaker 2>Christ is.

1173
01:01:20.519 --> 01:01:23.599
<v Speaker 5>Going to be, what Christ is actually going to say

1174
01:01:23.599 --> 01:01:24.800
<v Speaker 5>to people who I.

1175
01:01:24.760 --> 01:01:27.519
<v Speaker 2>Mean, if you dissed somebody's mother, that's worse than dissing.

1176
01:01:28.840 --> 01:01:29.639
<v Speaker 2>We'll come on in.

1177
01:01:29.719 --> 01:01:35.360
<v Speaker 5>Anyways, I thought that was a way out here.

1178
01:01:35.360 --> 01:01:37.599
<v Speaker 1>But again, thank you for doing what you do, and well,

1179
01:01:37.639 --> 01:01:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. I mean, you're welcome to stay and

1180
01:01:39.719 --> 01:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we can have a conversation about Rome if you want.

1181
01:01:42.840 --> 01:01:46.360
<v Speaker 4>I I defer to someone better than me.

1182
01:01:46.599 --> 01:01:48.119
<v Speaker 6>Obviously I'm not going to get into that.

1183
01:01:48.280 --> 01:01:53.119
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, but always again, appreciate you and I'll see

1184
01:01:53.280 --> 01:01:55.039
<v Speaker 4>you know, I'll keep listening a stay for only about

1185
01:01:55.079 --> 01:01:55.920
<v Speaker 4>five more minutes.

1186
01:01:55.840 --> 01:02:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Okay, welcome everybody. We had a good conversation there for

1187
01:02:01.840 --> 01:02:04.119
<v Speaker 1>over an hour. If you would like to support the stream,

1188
01:02:04.119 --> 01:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you can do so via the superchet function there. Superchets

1189
01:02:06.320 --> 01:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>are also pinned there. You can do it also natively

1190
01:02:09.920 --> 01:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>with YouTube. If you would like to call in, you

1191
01:02:12.719 --> 01:02:17.679
<v Speaker 1>can call in through the x space right here. Here

1192
01:02:17.719 --> 01:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is the xpace link to call in. And let's do

1193
01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a little brief look at this before we go to

1194
01:02:27.519 --> 01:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the next person in line. Looks like we got quite

1195
01:02:29.840 --> 01:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a few people in line. So this is Lee McDonald's

1196
01:02:34.039 --> 01:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>book where he lists the canon from various Old and

1197
01:02:40.840 --> 01:02:44.559
<v Speaker 1>New Testament lists from various church fathers. I recommend every

1198
01:02:44.559 --> 01:02:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Protestant who's interested in this question to read Lee McDonald's

1199
01:02:47.719 --> 01:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>book because it's one of the best, as well as F. F.

1200
01:02:50.400 --> 01:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>Bruce's book Kennel Scripture that admits, from the evangelical perspective,

1201
01:02:54.679 --> 01:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the absolutely indispensable aspect of church tradition in determining not

1202
01:03:01.360 --> 01:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>just the canon, but the authenticity and authorship of the

1203
01:03:05.480 --> 01:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>various manuscript copies. This is so key because so many

1204
01:03:09.880 --> 01:03:13.559
<v Speaker 1>Protestants when they hear this argument, they think, oh, you're

1205
01:03:13.559 --> 01:03:16.119
<v Speaker 1>just saying that I need infammable decisions to know what

1206
01:03:16.159 --> 01:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>the Bible is. No, no, no, it's not just a

1207
01:03:18.119 --> 01:03:21.719
<v Speaker 1>question of normandive authority about a binding canon. It's also

1208
01:03:21.719 --> 01:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a question about the authenticity and authorship of disputed texts

1209
01:03:27.519 --> 01:03:33.519
<v Speaker 1>versus pseudopographa and varying lists amongst the church fathers. So

1210
01:03:33.599 --> 01:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>here we have Leemacdald. This won't take but a second.

1211
01:03:35.440 --> 01:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Here we have Lee McDonald listing the Old Testament books

1212
01:03:39.960 --> 01:03:42.159
<v Speaker 1>in the Eastern Church in the fourth and fifth century,

1213
01:03:42.199 --> 01:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and you'll notice there is some variation with Athanasius, basically

1214
01:03:47.400 --> 01:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>including elements of the Duduro canon. And Athanasius says that

1215
01:03:52.280 --> 01:03:55.639
<v Speaker 1>the Dudo canon is for catech humans to read. So

1216
01:03:55.760 --> 01:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>even if we and we don't have a problem in

1217
01:03:57.800 --> 01:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the Ortho our church with the phrase dujuo canon, you say,

1218
01:04:01.199 --> 01:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's not just a question of the Duro canon,

1219
01:04:02.960 --> 01:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>as we'll see, it's also a question of the authenticity

1220
01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:08.519
<v Speaker 1>of the Book of Revelation, which Athanasius has a key

1221
01:04:08.599 --> 01:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>role in determining as canonical by convincing Rome. So the

1222
01:04:14.880 --> 01:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>East convinces the West of the canonicity of the Catholic

1223
01:04:18.400 --> 01:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>Epistles and Revelation. According to Lee McDonald, you'll notice that

1224
01:04:24.079 --> 01:04:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Barrick is included in most of these lists. And by

1225
01:04:29.119 --> 01:04:33.639
<v Speaker 1>the way, I think it's Melito's list that James White

1226
01:04:34.000 --> 01:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>tried to refer to in the trent Horn debate, and

1227
01:04:37.679 --> 01:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Sam Schimun pointed out that James White was dishonest and

1228
01:04:42.880 --> 01:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>wrong about Melito's list. It's also I'm pretty sure it's Malito.

1229
01:04:47.519 --> 01:04:50.639
<v Speaker 1>It's either the Vincentian or Melito's Melito's kN I'm not sure,

1230
01:04:50.719 --> 01:04:53.119
<v Speaker 1>but there's a video that Shimune has on that. By

1231
01:04:53.119 --> 01:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, Epiphanius, you'll notice that it's pretty much as

1232
01:04:59.400 --> 01:05:07.519
<v Speaker 1>dressed bar as well, you'll notice that Ruth is in

1233
01:05:07.719 --> 01:05:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Judges are sometimes also not included, So for example, some

1234
01:05:13.679 --> 01:05:19.239
<v Speaker 1>of these lists will have Ruth, some of these lists won't,

1235
01:05:19.480 --> 01:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>so you can see they're quite different in their inclusion

1236
01:05:23.800 --> 01:05:27.519
<v Speaker 1>and exclusion. Now, yes, I admit that these aren't the

1237
01:05:27.559 --> 01:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>most essential verses you see, but none of that really

1238
01:05:31.199 --> 01:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>are books. But none of that matters in regard to

1239
01:05:33.559 --> 01:05:38.119
<v Speaker 1>the Protestant idea of the final, completed, fixed Word of

1240
01:05:38.159 --> 01:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>God as the only soul authority or final authority for

1241
01:05:42.880 --> 01:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the church. You see, if we come over here to

1242
01:05:48.360 --> 01:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>other lists, here we have pseudo crystalstom pseudo Crystalism, including

1243
01:05:54.840 --> 01:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>syric you have Tobit over here included, and some of

1244
01:05:59.599 --> 01:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>these are just ancient, varying ancient lists. Okay, we're gonna

1245
01:06:02.480 --> 01:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna do several of these. This is still Old Testament.

1246
01:06:05.880 --> 01:06:08.519
<v Speaker 1>If we come over here to Hillary, this is the

1247
01:06:08.559 --> 01:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>book of the Old Testament in the Western Church in

1248
01:06:10.880 --> 01:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the fourth and fifth century. So Hillary, one of his

1249
01:06:15.559 --> 01:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>uh textual lists, has also Tobit first and second Asdras

1250
01:06:21.119 --> 01:06:26.079
<v Speaker 1>and the Epistle of Jeremiah. If you come over to Jerome.

1251
01:06:26.199 --> 01:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Jerme is the only church father that lists explicitly the

1252
01:06:29.960 --> 01:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Protestant canon and then the next list. There's some other

1253
01:06:39.599 --> 01:06:45.679
<v Speaker 1>This is Augustine's list of the Old Testament canon. It

1254
01:06:45.719 --> 01:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>of course includes the Dual Cannon. And why did Augustine

1255
01:06:48.199 --> 01:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>have this list, Well, Augustine agreed with Pope Damas's list

1256
01:06:53.000 --> 01:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Council of Rome. Council of Rome is a

1257
01:06:56.199 --> 01:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>regional council around mid you know, mid three hundreds, late

1258
01:07:01.079 --> 01:07:04.639
<v Speaker 1>three hundreds, and it's maybe around four hundred. I for

1259
01:07:04.679 --> 01:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>get the exact day, but it's very similar to kind

1260
01:07:08.199 --> 01:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of what you see in the Apostolic Canons, except the

1261
01:07:12.440 --> 01:07:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Apostolic canons also have a differing list, as we'll see

1262
01:07:15.199 --> 01:07:18.679
<v Speaker 1>in a second. Here's Augustine's list, and then next to

1263
01:07:18.719 --> 01:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it is the Council of Rome that we're talking about,

1264
01:07:20.800 --> 01:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>which is very important in the West. There's another Council

1265
01:07:24.000 --> 01:07:27.119
<v Speaker 1>of Hippo that includes the duoconomical books, and then the

1266
01:07:27.159 --> 01:07:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Codex Vouticanus includes the deuconomical texts. Codex Sinidicus has wisdom

1267
01:07:34.320 --> 01:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>cyric as well. Codex Alexandrinas also includes duoconomical texts. So

1268
01:07:43.440 --> 01:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>let's look at New Testament books. Eusebius's list. It's unclear

1269
01:07:51.440 --> 01:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>if the Eusebius included the Book of Revelation, and it

1270
01:07:58.119 --> 01:08:12.679
<v Speaker 1>includes the Diction and the Epistle Barnabas. Clement's list includes

1271
01:08:12.840 --> 01:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>texts that no one else included as canonical, such as

1272
01:08:16.640 --> 01:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Pistol Barnabas, Shepherd of Hermas, Acts of Paul, revelation of

1273
01:08:20.960 --> 01:08:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Peter Cyril of Jerusalem, who I mentioned to that guy

1274
01:08:25.720 --> 01:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>does not include the Book of Revelation. So this is

1275
01:08:28.159 --> 01:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>this does not afford Protestants any evidence or help. And

1276
01:08:31.680 --> 01:08:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you can see it right there. He has the correct

1277
01:08:34.439 --> 01:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>New Testament, but he does not include the Book of Revelation.

1278
01:08:44.760 --> 01:08:48.119
<v Speaker 1>We have Athanasius's New Testament canon and it is the

1279
01:08:48.279 --> 01:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>full accurate New Testament canon that again he helps convince

1280
01:08:54.680 --> 01:08:57.039
<v Speaker 1>Rome to accept. When it comes to the Book of Revelation,

1281
01:08:57.319 --> 01:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think the Book of Hebrews and the Catholic Epistles,

1282
01:09:00.880 --> 01:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>there is the Mumpson list, and it looks.

1283
01:09:07.800 --> 01:09:18.560
<v Speaker 10>Pretty acrobat doesn't have the Book of James Epiphanius. I

1284
01:09:18.600 --> 01:09:23.880
<v Speaker 10>don't know why Epiphanius would include Wisdom of Syric, Wisdom

1285
01:09:23.880 --> 01:09:25.079
<v Speaker 10>and Syric in the New Testament.

1286
01:09:25.119 --> 01:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty odd. But it looks like the Apostolic Canons,

1287
01:09:34.600 --> 01:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>which is what we're looking at right here. They do

1288
01:09:38.680 --> 01:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not have the Book of Hebrews or the Book of Revelation.

1289
01:09:46.319 --> 01:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But the Apostolic Canons, which had a wider acceptance, especially

1290
01:09:49.600 --> 01:09:53.039
<v Speaker 1>in the East, did include the Deutero canonical text. And

1291
01:09:53.079 --> 01:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that's why it even trump's an individual church father's opinion.

1292
01:09:57.680 --> 01:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's not even final because we don't include the

1293
01:10:01.880 --> 01:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Letters of Clement, and we do not include and it

1294
01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:10.239
<v Speaker 1>does not include the Book of Revelation. So do you

1295
01:10:10.279 --> 01:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>understand we're walking through the actual historical process of the

1296
01:10:14.720 --> 01:10:20.039
<v Speaker 1>lists and how much variation of differentiation there is. Now,

1297
01:10:20.039 --> 01:10:22.359
<v Speaker 1>there's not a whole lot of differentiation or variation on

1298
01:10:22.520 --> 01:10:29.479
<v Speaker 1>the Gospels. Okay, it's almost always the Catholic epistles, Pauline

1299
01:10:29.479 --> 01:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>epistles to a degree, And I mean if paul wrote Hebrews,

1300
01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying in the Book of Revelation, and the inclusion

1301
01:10:39.920 --> 01:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of books that no one ends up really accepting, like

1302
01:10:43.479 --> 01:10:49.279
<v Speaker 1>clement and so forth. The Apostolic canons include two Clementine

1303
01:10:49.359 --> 01:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>letters and the Apostolic Constitutions apparently, which is odd. Gregory

1304
01:10:54.560 --> 01:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of Nazian Zeus's list does not include Revelation or Hebrews.

1305
01:10:59.680 --> 01:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And the African canons include the Acts of the Martyrs,

1306
01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:08.119
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think anybody includes. So then you have

1307
01:11:08.359 --> 01:11:14.039
<v Speaker 1>again Canon eighty five over here. Now, when Trollo meets,

1308
01:11:14.319 --> 01:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Trollo says, we affirm the canons of the previous councils,

1309
01:11:20.439 --> 01:11:26.479
<v Speaker 1>and we affirm explicitly the Carthaginian list of the canon.

1310
01:11:27.600 --> 01:11:37.039
<v Speaker 1>The Carthaginian list, going from memory is pretty much the

1311
01:11:37.039 --> 01:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Council of Rome lists. So essentially, by the time of

1312
01:11:43.520 --> 01:11:47.079
<v Speaker 1>Trollo and Trollo is affirmed by the seventh Ecumenical Council,

1313
01:11:48.760 --> 01:11:53.119
<v Speaker 1>you have an affirmation of what is pretty much the

1314
01:11:53.760 --> 01:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>identical canon to the West in terms of the Council

1315
01:11:57.000 --> 01:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of Rome and Augusta and Pope Demasis. So there's not

1316
01:12:02.640 --> 01:12:07.359
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of differentiation. I think some people, even

1317
01:12:07.399 --> 01:12:13.239
<v Speaker 1>John Damascus for example, still includes in his canon list

1318
01:12:14.479 --> 01:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Clement the Letters of Clement. So the Orthodox view, because

1319
01:12:17.920 --> 01:12:21.079
<v Speaker 1>we don't believe in soul scriptura, it's not as rigid

1320
01:12:21.800 --> 01:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>as this Protestant idea of you have to have this

1321
01:12:24.079 --> 01:12:28.479
<v Speaker 1>like completely you know, walled off canon that is not

1322
01:12:28.600 --> 01:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in any way sort of flexible. And the Orthodox shirts

1323
01:12:30.640 --> 01:12:34.279
<v Speaker 1>there's more flexibility here because we're not proponents of soul scriptura,

1324
01:12:35.159 --> 01:12:38.319
<v Speaker 1>so we don't believe that all these they're all heretics.

1325
01:12:38.359 --> 01:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>They didn't get the infallible word.

1326
01:12:39.880 --> 01:12:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Of God right.

1327
01:12:41.359 --> 01:12:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, I've noticed Protestants take Revelation twenty two and they say,

1328
01:12:44.359 --> 01:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>if you take away from the Word of God or

1329
01:12:45.960 --> 01:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>if you add to it, you're a part of the

1330
01:12:47.800 --> 01:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>like of fire. So all the church fathers who were

1331
01:12:50.319 --> 01:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>debating and try to figure out the canon, I guess

1332
01:12:51.600 --> 01:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they're all on the lake of fire unless they got

1333
01:12:53.000 --> 01:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the canon right. It's just silly and it's totally divorced

1334
01:12:55.800 --> 01:12:59.039
<v Speaker 1>from history. Last thing, I'm saying on this is the

1335
01:13:00.600 --> 01:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the key things that surprised me. I don't

1336
01:13:02.640 --> 01:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>remember if it was. I think it was in the FF.

1337
01:13:05.920 --> 01:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Bruce book, but I'm going for memory is the admission

1338
01:13:10.600 --> 01:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that liturgy played a really important role in the formation

1339
01:13:15.039 --> 01:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Biblical canon. And a lot of Protestants have

1340
01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:23.399
<v Speaker 1>never heard that. When I was Protestant and debating and

1341
01:13:23.399 --> 01:13:25.479
<v Speaker 1>studying these issues, I'd never heard this that was new

1342
01:13:25.680 --> 01:13:30.279
<v Speaker 1>what liturgy. Yes. In fact, the daily readings or electionaries

1343
01:13:30.560 --> 01:13:34.479
<v Speaker 1>in the ancient sees and churches had a very important

1344
01:13:34.560 --> 01:13:39.159
<v Speaker 1>role in figuring out the tradition of the Church in

1345
01:13:39.199 --> 01:13:43.239
<v Speaker 1>regard to authenticity and authorship of many of these texts.

1346
01:13:43.720 --> 01:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>For example, if an ancient apostolic see say Rome, say Jerusalem,

1347
01:13:49.119 --> 01:13:52.319
<v Speaker 1>if they had cited a text or had been if

1348
01:13:52.319 --> 01:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a text had been read, and it went back as

1349
01:13:55.920 --> 01:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>far as anyone could remember and as far as other

1350
01:13:58.920 --> 01:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>church fathers had given witness to say you're an as

1351
01:14:03.000 --> 01:14:07.359
<v Speaker 1>say Clement, say Ignatius, say they cited a text. Those

1352
01:14:07.359 --> 01:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>were good pieces of evidence that that's probably authentic. But

1353
01:14:13.079 --> 01:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it's also the liturgical cycle and the liturgical readings that

1354
01:14:17.920 --> 01:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>help the church determine from the third, fourth, fifth, sixth,

1355
01:14:22.800 --> 01:14:28.199
<v Speaker 1>seventh centuries, what the normative canon would be. And if

1356
01:14:28.239 --> 01:14:31.399
<v Speaker 1>you understand that, and that's why I brought the mouth,

1357
01:14:31.439 --> 01:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the example of that guy and the authorship, it's not

1358
01:14:34.039 --> 01:14:37.159
<v Speaker 1>just epistolic authorship. There's other things that go into it,

1359
01:14:37.239 --> 01:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>like liturgy that devastates the Protestant solid criture position snack,

1360
01:14:43.920 --> 01:14:44.399
<v Speaker 1>what's up, man,
