Speaker 1: I want to welcome everyone back to the Peak and
Yona Show. Phil Gibson, it's been a while. How are you.
Speaker 2: Listenp Man Happy to be here to talk about our
favorite people.
Speaker 1: Why don't you tell everybody a little bit about yourself?
Speaker 2: Yeah, So my name is Phil Gibson, mister Seu on
Twitter Mr ps eu for those who aren't good at phonetics.
And I've been kind of following Pete's track for a while.
It's funny how my ideology and a few others kind
of change as his have. But I've been doing the
podcast thing off and on, mostly focused my efforts on
my substat Paul qpo L and where I talk about
this stuff. I like to consider myself a lu Wogan
Tom Luongo, who I heard on Pete's show and totally
turned my brain inside up, inside out to upside down.
And so I just kind of looked through that really
new school thought of geopolitics, macro and also how that
all kind of impacts culture, and yeah, I try to
find the white pill and everything, and from what's been
happening at kind of a macro level and kind of
downstream from that, I think we've picked up a few
white pills this year, especially with this Chevron thing, with
a few things I've happened this past week. But yeah,
that's kind of what I'm all about. I'm open minded
to change opinions when the information is provided and just
keep chugging along.
Speaker 1: Well, that's important, being able to change your mind and
not be stuck and stuck in the mud. So I
guess there's a couple of schools a thought. I think
on the Historically, a lot of people have looked at
works like Carol Quigley's Tragedy and Hope and came at
a lot of the problems that exist in in our society.
From England wants to bring us back into the British Empire.
We've been a British empire basically cut out since the beginning. Really,
that's what a lot of people will say, right from
the beginning, we always have been. It's just that this
century they've really amped it up to bring us into
their empire. And then there's another group that says there's
some people who say, well, we can't ignore Jewish power
and influence. It's if they're two percent of the population
and they control so much, then we have to look
at it. The people on the Quagli side, the people
who say this is all being run from London. Well
maybe that's true.
Speaker 2: And I think that's the map, Yes, that's where they are.
Speaker 1: Yes, So I guess that's why we you know, we
decided when we when we read this, that maybe it'd
be a good thing to read this article by I
will share it in a second Larry Romanov. It's on
November twenty second, twenty twenty two on uns uns dot
com where it's just entitled the City of London and
it talks about the City of London. So you have
any comments you want me to just start reading?
Speaker 2: No, I mean I mentioned before we started going that
this really sparked a lot of things that I've been
looking at the past few years, and some parallels I'd
kind of like to draw out of that, especially when
we get to roths Trout poking the finger in Charles's chest.
You still see a lot of that today. But yeah, man,
let's just uh, let's let it roll.
Speaker 1: All right, there we go, all right, stop me anytime?
Speaker 2: Cool?
Speaker 1: All right? This is the City of London by Larry Romanoff.
Speaker 2: And also for the record, I think everyone knows, but
just to for my recollection owns is himself Jewish?
Speaker 1: Right, Yes, yeah, he is interesting. He's definitely an atheist
and definitely definitely done a lot of really good work
in our sphere. And another thing a lot of people
don't know is that he's fine. He's dumped a bunch
of money behind people, behind laws, behind bills in States.
He's a guy who he's in this. He's not just posting.
He just doesn't have a website. He does this in
real life. He's run for office before you know. So, yeah, interesting,
all right. City of London laya romanoff. You may be
surprised to learn that the City of London. That the
City of London and the City of London are two
very different things, related to each other mostly by historical
accident and geographical proximity and coexisting today and a rather
complicated power system in which the City of London appears
gloriously victorious. First, the City of London. I'll keep the
map up here so people and see it. First. The
City of London, a small area of about one square
mile in size, was established as a haven by the
Kazar Jews during their extermination from Kazaria nearly one thousand
years ago, and was named London at the time, and yes,
I know the Romans had been there first. The City
of London, with the bridge and harrods and the fish
and chips and the people driving on the wrong side
of the road, was established much later, adopted the same name,
and gradually expanded with population until it completely surrounded the
Jewish enclave of the City of London. You could see
the positions and relative sizes from the map. When you
read about the Lord Mayor of London, you are not
reading about the chief executive of the city, but about
the chief executive of the city. The City of London Corporation,
with its square mile directly in the center of London,
obviously owns some very expensive real estate. This in addition
to a great deal of other property also in the
city center. But this amounts to only perhaps ten billion
in total, and, as we will see, is trivial. The
City of London is effectively an independent city state existing
inside Greater London. However, its nature is unique and complicated.
It is not so neat and tidy as is the Vatican,
for example, which is clearly a separate sovereign entity nestled
within the City of Rome. Still, the city of London
has its own government and police force, with its own
laws and levies its own taxes. It has its own flag,
crest and ceremonial armed forces. I have seen one reference
stating that the city also has its own port. I
could not find an independent confirmation of this, but it
would fit the pattern, and the city does have some
responsibilities for London ports, so this is plausible. If true,
it would be stunning because that would mean that the
city could bring in products of any kind, including currency,
precious metals, cocaine, and also people without the permission or
even knowledge of UK customs and Immigration or the UK government.
In performing a search the other day, I was first
met with a notice in capital letters telling me the
City of London is not a sovereign state, followed by
a small avalanche of websites all doing fact checking and
misinformation debunking to assure me the City of London was
not an independent anything. There is hardly a sign more
certain that we are onto something than when twenty five
Jewish websites leap up to tell us there's nothing to see.
Speaker 2: Here, including groc.
Speaker 1: Yeah you checked it on groc. Oh, that's what you
sent that green? Yeah, yeah, you sent me the screenshot. Yeah,
we should check it on gabs ai.
Speaker 2: Sure.
Speaker 1: The city is the center and home base of the
world's banking and insurance industries. It is the home of
the Bank of England, which was supposedly privatized but is
still Rockschild own, the home of Lloyd's of London, and
the literal head office of many of the world's major banks,
some of which you know and many of which you
have never heard of. It still contains a home office
of the former British East India Company, which was always
a Kazarre Jewish company and undoubtedly the greatest criminal organization
in the history of the world up to that time,
and whose archives are still closed to the world for
good reason. The city of London is also the home
of the oldest Masonic temple in the world. Our history
books tell us that the origins of the Freemasons are
lost to history, but that's not really true. Freemasonry was
a Jewish cult that was formalized in the city in
the early seventeen hundreds, and there's a sign here from
Corporation of London near this site. The Grand Lodge of
English Freemasons first met seventeen seventeen the legal policic.
Speaker 2: Quick question on that, I think you and myself might
know a couple Masons. How much water do they hold
with that statement that it was always like a Jewish thing.
Do you have any idea are there are there like
different factions of them? Do they dispute this?
Speaker 1: This from from knowing somebody whose father was a Mason.
Apparently ninety seven to ninety eight percent of Masons it's
a social club and they get together and they buy
stretches of highway to clean do things like that. There's
a two to three percent that take it seriously and
actually start getting into the esoteric kind of teachings that
people have that like Manly P. Hall talked about in
his books about what the Freemasons are about. So yeah,
I I honestly they're probably one of the most secretive groups.
But from what I understand most of them are, the
overwhelming majority of them are just this is something my
dad did, and yeah, it's just a social club, basically, right.
The legal political relationship between the City of London and
the UK is a bit murky. On one hand, the
city is at least theoretically subject or can be made
subject to at least some UK regulation legislation, although in
practice this seldom, if ever, has happened, for reasons I
will describe below. On the other hand, the city is
so sovereign that the King of England himself is forbidden
by the UK and City law to even enter the
City of London without first obtaining a special invitation, which
process is too complicated to bother discussing. The invitation ceremony
is not required by law, but the invitation itself is
so do they I don't remember. Do they put the
picture of Jacob Rothschild putting his finger into Charles's chest
in this article?
Speaker 2: They do? It's like the last quarter of the esssay yeah.
Speaker 1: So yeah. Readers may not be aware that democracies can
have flavors, the UK version being one such with a
very distinct flavor in this case. On the floor of
the British Parliament, directly facing the Speaker of the House
is a special chair. Think of it as a kind
of throne. The person occupying the chair is a representative
of the City of London, attended by six lawyers. His
purpose is to monitor all debate in the British Parliament
and to scrutinize an exhaustive detail all proposed and drafted
legislation to determine any possible effect on the interests or
operations of the City of London, and to take appropriate
action if such interests are affected. Appropriate action inevitably results
in the legislation being killed. This is not necessarily done
by force, but by what we might term lobbying, sometimes
by extortion, and often simply by an all pervasive influence
on British politicians. So next heading is lobbying and or extortion.
There are many news articles available on the kind and
extent on the kind of an extent of the lobbying
done by the City to ensure compliance from the UK Parliament.
The City's Financial Services Group spends well over one hundred
million per year on whining, dining, bribing, and sexually satisfying
UK politicians and regulators. One place for dining is the
opulent Guildhall, which even high level guests describe as intoxicating
because of the sheer power sitting in that room. Definitely
as some eyes wide shut vibes does in it. Let
you look at it.
Speaker 2: I'll be honest, I haven't seen that movie, but I've
seen that.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I get to watch it and take a
shower afterwards. There are well over one hundred different city
organizations and more than eight hundred people involved in securing stability, secrecy,
and tax free status for the city's operations. These groups
are repeatedly successful in reducing banking and insurance taxes to
save them billions. They are also notably successful in killing
proposed legislation for any kind of oversight or watchdog effort
to police not only banking activities but also quoted companies
on the London Stock Exchange. They have even successfully killed
a pension plan intended for low paid and temporary workers.
I have no idea or how or why this proposed
legislation would have affected the interests of the city, but
they felt it did and the legislation was scrapped.
Speaker 2: I mentioned the Chevron's doctrine earlier, and I know, like
this is UK blah blah blah, but we have these
British plants have infiltrated our government and so with the
Scot's decision to just get rid of Chevron basically tell
me stop sorry, I haven't got my lat this chewing
on the table. Basically, the these agencies that have more
clout and power than the course themselves are able to
have that leverage anymore, and so it's going to go
back to the courts, and those have their own issues
from the past. That's why Chevron came about to begin with.
But I wonder how much of that of that leverage,
you know, those agencies and lobbying firms will lose. I'd
have to do some like history, like you know, compare
contrast and what's happened. But is that something that you've
thought about this past week?
Speaker 1: Well, what I've had two thoughts. I've had the thought
that either, I mean, they're just going to ignore and
just do business as usual, or you know, another thought
in lee Enfield was the one who really you know,
started talking about this before I heard anyone else talk
about it, is if you have Trump, if they think
Trump's going to get elected and Project twenty twenty five
is going to be implemented, then you've kind of just
shot yourself in the foot because Chevron allows the executive
to have more power than it does without. And we
know that conservatives have a tendency to follow the rule
of the law unlike the left, which is why the
conservatives always lose. Republicans always lose, And yeah, if you
did have some hard chargers coming in there who you know,
we're willing to or trying to flip the table, then
leaving Chevron intact would have probably been a better move.
But interesting, Yeah, we'll see. Yeah, I still I mean,
when it comes down to it, if the executive decides
he's going to rule like a king or a CEO,
I mean that really doesn't matter. But the point is
is that is Trump going to do that or are
the people he's surrounding himself going to do that? That's
she has to be seen.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I doubt he will. I think he's just kind
of like the first phase in that happening. And I
think this is all just so like re establish what
the rule law is going to be and trying to
keep the oligarchs of those certain agencies out of it.
And so I'm just wondering how that affects that people
running stuff at the City of London that have infetrated
our government and agencies. If that'll start to it, they'll
start to feel that the squeeze on that. But I
guess we'll have yet to see.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, well, I mean a lot of the
things the court has done. I mean abortion was it
as E. Michael Jones says, over fifty fifty or one
hundred Jewish agencies and organizations came out and said abortion
is a Jewish a Jewish value. So you know, I
mean they're they're either completely in control and they've done this,
or what I think is happening is is I think
there is a civil war happening between right wing and
left wing Jays, and things are certain things are. And
also I think that there's a there's a wasp uprising
in this country. And you can speak to that because
you follow Jerome Powell, and I think Jerome Powell and
Jamie Diamond, or even though Jamie Diamond's not a wasp,
he's part of that coterie that seems to be at
war with the Jays.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Bill Ackerman, of all people's bagging Trump? Now, who
would have thought? All right?
Speaker 1: Many believe the city puts its interest above those of
the nation, and of course they are correct, evidenced by
a long string of such legislative victories over Parliament. I mean,
how can that be denied? You just look at look
at our look at our government. Our government will do anything,
will do anything for Israel. Yet I mean, they can't
close the border. They won't even consider it. They won't
even consider it like a reduction in immigration. I mean this,
and who pushes that? Groups like hyas who are Jewish, groups,
other groups too, But I mean they've admitted, they've I
have a whole collage of headlines from Jewish organizations talking
about how we need open you know, the United States
needs open immigration. Why I think Israel needs open immigration?
But hey, quoting for almost one thousand years, the City
of London Corporation has resisted virtually every attempt by monarchs, governments,
or subjects to reign in this vast financial wealth and influence,
such as the corporation's political and economic influence that today
some suggest a British state, rather than controlling the corporation,
is in fact subservient to it end quote, according to
the Financial Times, quote, because the corporation is entitled to
special tax and legal privileges, this renders it renders it
in offshore island within Britain and a tax haven in
its own right, and gives those who own businesses within
its borders a distinct upper hand over everyone else. End quote.
But it is also true that the Jews in the
city have UK politicians so much in their pockets that
even the UK Prime Minister will lobby against any regulation
that might handicap the city's financial crimes. The UK Labor
Party tried to tried at one time to obtain election
within the city to have the power to repair some
excesses from the inside, but failed. New heading the City
tax Havens and Money Flows, the City of London is
indeed a tax haven. This is not particularly germane to
our main topic, so I won't dwell on it other
than to state that Jewish bankers who run the city
do so in conjunction with almost all the world's tax havens,
with money flowing through those labyrinths in ways to disguise
forever the source and ownership of funds. It is not
a secret, requiring quiet discussion that nearly all the world's
narcotics comes from home to the comes home to the
city to be laundered by the Jewish banks, notably the HSBC,
but others too. Equally, it is widely acknowledged that dictators
all the garch's legal and illegal arms dealers, bank robbers,
jewel thieves, sex slavery kingpins, and criminal criminals generally will
naturally funnel their money to the Jewish banks in the
city for laundering, for anonymity, and for privacy and security.
For hundreds of years, the city has been the safe
depository of Jewish funds obtained from slave trading, tax farming, looting,
opium and narcotics trafficking, and also the temporary even for
funds when Jews were expelled from various countries over the centuries.
I'm glad he included opium. Yeah, because anyone who studied
the opium wars knows where the opium wars were run
out of.
Speaker 2: And it's important to mention that HSBC, like Hong Kong
whatever like. You might think it's an Asian bank, but
it was set up by the City of London from
the get go. And so it's interesting when the whole
epigram real estate thing was going down and neocons are
pointing at China saying, oh, their economy's wrecked, They're screwed,
they have nothing. Well, I personally see it as China
going self destruct on Soros esque and similar ilk soft
power control, because if all that City of London money
is propping up in real estate and China hits the
big red button on it. It's basically saying like pop off,
like we're it's just really interesting. So I don't know
how valid that is, but I can see it very probable,
just the way that Eastern like slow time preference like mine.
Uh but just wait wait way of thinking is just
how strategic they are. So is that something that you
thought about or no?
Speaker 1: No, I haven't really put together the evergrand thing. But yeah,
I mean HSBC is has always been a Jewish bank,
and I can't remember who they were they were funneling
money too, I can't. I can't remember the the scandal
that they had. I know JP Morgan Chase some year
in the two thousands was funneling money to Epstein victims,
but I can't remember the HSBC one specifically. To be sure,
not all the money flowing through the city is from
illegal criminal activity. About half of the daily four trillion
in normal foreign exchange trading flows through the city's Jewish banks,
as do nearly fifty percent of the world's derivative trading
and seventy percent of eurobond trading, and London stock exchange
is still the fourth largest in the world, with much
of this processing being legitimate and thus providing a good
cover for the balance. However, due to the unique relation
between the City of London and the UK, the tens
of trillions of dollars flowing into and out of Jewish
banks in the city each day do not appear in
UK capital flows or transaction records, and there is thus
no way to know how much money enterers passes through
and leaves the city, nor is there any way to
know the source of application of these funds.
Speaker 2: So real quick, this is basically was your own power
was trying to destroy Detroit take control over. Arguably, America
didn't have its independence July seventy six. Funnily enough, this
is the week of the fourth of July, so happy birthday, America.
Speaker 1: But the second and I think actually today is the
day they actually started signing the declaration.
Speaker 2: So yeah, that's happy independence woo. Except not really until
twenty twenty two, because that's when we switched away from
libor to So for what that word salad basically is
means is that City of London has always ran American
monetary policy, meaning even after like World War Two, when
bridge pound was no longer the world reserve currency, we
were now it was king dollar. They still controlled our
price of dollars, and that was through libor. It was
just an indexing rate. Your credit card, your mortgage, your
aud loans, any revolving credit that was all tied to
Libar libar. If you google it, google library scandal, it
was bullshit. It was a central planning commy, we're gonna
make economics as fake and gay as possible sort of scheme.
As you can imagine, it was basically in later days,
of course, a panel of seventeen member banks would get
like on a zoom call and figure out what this
library right was gonna be. That was our benchmark, and
that's where they would start and charge interest to other
other partners. So basically they could set the price of
their dollars. We would feel that over in America, for example,
when there was a credit snafu, a little sniffle across
a pond, interest rates would give up over there, because
you know, if one party doesn't have the funds to
pay back to the other party, then of course interest
rate's gonna give up. That's going to signal that that
lender is in trustworth, so you know risk, That's what
interest rates really are they're also rewarding you for the
longer that you invest your money in like a treasury bond,
you expect to get paid more at the higher rate
the longer that you put your money in. That aside, though,
live Or was our ball and chain basically like our
central planning community communists ball and chain that we were
tied to because when rates went up across upond, we
would feel that in our debt and our credit cards
and our mortgage whatever. So it's kind of like we
bail them out in a way. You can kind of
think of that now. All that went away when under
the FED ran by Drone pal who I believe is
a Jesuit, Like he went to a Jesuits school at least,
so he's not your Bemberniki Janet Yellen that ilk completely.
Speaker 1: And he's the first gentile head of the Federal Reserve.
And how long I had been very long time.
Speaker 2: I don't even know if Vulgar was a gentile or not.
But regardless, this is what higher for longer palaism monetary
policy is all about. Self was the true declaration of
independence for America because the City of London didn't run
our money anymore, and we'll get to the offshore banking
kind of stuff. But what this basically does is that
it's this common libe or rate we have so for
so for stands for the secure overnight financing rate. What
that means is like primary dealers, large banking institutions that
borrow money from each other in the rebuild markets, basically
overnight markets. They pay. The rate that they set is
based off of like what all of our domestic debt
is based on what those dealers charge each other. So
in a way, is based off of dare I say
a free market rate? And I kind of cringe inside
when I say that, but at it's off of something real,
something tangible, Like that's why it's securitized, because it's based
off of actual market activity. Whereas City London, those seventeen
panel banks decided what the rate was going to be,
only one of which of those banks represent the interest
of America, and that was Shaping Morgan. So it really
makes you think going back to Jamie Diamond, still a gentile,
he's Greek, whatever, But there's really like a factioning of
these banking powers on Wall Street that are saying, hey,
for lack of a better word, we want an America
first bank. Federal Reserve is not going to be the
central bank of the world that's going to bail everyone
out because we're not going to abide by the City
London policies anymore. And I don't know if we covered
the offshore dollars stuff, but we're the offshore banking stuff.
But all the money that was slashing around at the
City of London that was basically euro dollars, euro dollars,
I don't think of the euro euro dollars are basically
mechanism through the Marshall Plan after World War Two, when
we sent money to rebuild Europe and basically buy the DIP.
A lot of family got rich that way, but basically
gave them like dollar reserves and all these banks and
off shore banks, and they could basically leverage that and
print as many dollars print. It's not like real like
printing anymore. And the Fed doesn't print, that's Congress. They're
just forced to monitize that debt. So that's why there's
a battle between Janet Yellen at the Treasury and dru
and Powell, like fiscal battle versus monitary battle. But that aside,
Sorry Tangent basically, with these offshore banks and these reserves
that they could leverage up, they could print more dollars
beyond America's jurisdiction and that was okay as long as
the FED was compliant with that. With all that, in
addition to bember Nak's zero interestry policy, ZERP like QWI
by definition basically what they came up with in those
back toor meetings. QWI doesn't exist unless if we are
going towards the zero bound and in Europe's case negative.
And this is why if you follow Daniel D Martina Booth,
who's a great I've learned so as much from her
as I have Tom that Jerome Powell does not have
to be doing this. They call him private equity paler
for a reason because that's where he came from. But
he was also like a lawyer, and he went up
against like Salomon Brothers when they were trying to corner
the treasury market. So it's kind of like he already
has like this pre destined, like beef with this ilk possibly,
but this is a completely different ballgame. Like this on
the surface is representing that there is a faction of
if you want to call them sovereigntists or not. But
these are people that aren't really They are thinking globalist
in the sense where they want to maintain safe, sound,
rational policy trading and economic activity between nations. But they're
done weaponizing the dollar against China and Russia and raising
rates is basically bankrupting these offshore banks and offsher entities
in the City of London because they don't control the
price of their money anymore. Because by September thirtieth of
this year, we're done with Librar. Well we've been done
since twenty twenty two because we were on sofa, but
everyone else in the world is completely done with Librar
by September thirtieth. So when you like, even on stories
like on Yahoo, de Vojians as Tom likes to call them,
basically these globalist traders in the US, Elizabeth Warren will
send out like like letters saying that Pale needs to
cut rates or else. So like when he's raising rates,
who's that really hurting? Yes, everyone in the economy is
getting wrecked to some extent. Like I lost my job
because the Silicon Valley Bank went down. That's the company,
the company I worked with banks with them, the Silicon
Valley arguably was like taken out as a hit job
by the FED because they were essentially another offshore bank
technically onshore, but San Francisco FED is a as global
as screw as it gets, and all these companies, all
these banks had lobbyists that could charter, that could loby
be for them to get a bank charter to essentially
be like these onshore Euro dollar banks under like loose
monetary policy to bank the reserves of all these bullshit
companies that wouldn't exist if Zrup hadn't been around. So
we're having this complete like demolition on the economic plan
field of basically punishing bad actors, if you want to
put it that way. No one here essentially is your friend.
But it's just aligned interest and it all stems on
how do you nip it in the bud at the
City of London. Well, you get someone in charge of
the most powerful central bank in the world to give
them the finger and say, hey, our montre policy is
going to be America first, go fuck yourself.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I can't stress that enough. Where it's not that
Jerome Powell and friends are on our side. It just
so happens that by them doing this and we will
eventually benefit from it as the rest of the world
is suffering as the rest of the world who was
decided who decided to get in bed with us, now, Russia, China, Bricks,
they're going and doing their own thing. And you know
they because they they see this coming. That's why you
have so many people flocking to bricks. And I mean, like,
like I said, do I think Jerome Powell's our friend?
I don't know, but what he's doing seems to be
helping the country and inevitably will help us. Would you
agree with that? I do.
Speaker 2: And one more point of this and then we can
continue with the article. This whole fear point of dedollarization
that maybe you'll see on zero hedge or you know,
similar kind of outfits. Raising rates itself is de dollarization
if you think about it, because it's deleveraging, destroying all
these offshore dollars, and he's that hurting you know, the
usual suspects. And so it's kind of funny. I heard
Tom talk about this in a recent interview, but I
told him, like, you know, I can't believe this because
I never thought to frame it in that way. But
it's it's just brilliant, because that's why Pal's okay with
the dollar no longer being the reserve currency. Like he's
on record saying this on tape somewhere a couple of
years ago, but he said, basically, there's more than enough
room for one reserve currency in the world because he
understands stands how you're tripping the lembit has basically like
screwed us over the long term, and so dedoarisation basically
means destroying and deflatating that eurodar system that again is
outside of America's control, while we kind of rang it
in put a leash on it with Sofur, so we're
kind of now in control of that system. But again,
monetary policy in general happens on a six month to
twelve month lag. But ever since he started doing like
stealth qt technically in twenty twenty one, we really kind
of see the hens come home to roost for people
that are running certain institutions that aren't favorable to the people.
If people's if you will, all.
Speaker 1: Right, let's go on. Whatever the original intent of the
financial design of the city by its Jewish owners, one
clear result is that the entire design is tailor made
for the benefit of organized crime of every nature. Currencies, gold,
and precious metals, financial certificates are run through an enormous
labyrinth of tax havens and then simply disappear into the
black hole of the Jewish city banks, the secrecy fully
protected by the city's unique relationship with its host country.
There's a block quote here, and I'm going to link
to this article. There's we're already up to twenty two
footnotes on this and there's three footnotes just in this
block quote. I'm not gonna say you can please look
them up on your own.
Speaker 2: That's not even like half of the footnotes too. I
think there's like forty to fifty.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Did you look at any of them?
Speaker 1: Yeah, Yeah, I've clicked around a couple. Yeah. I mean
there are great articles on the legitimate sites. Yeah, And
whatever articles they are are footnoting legitimate things. I mean,
this isn't some conspiracy theory quoting. Behind it all lies
the City of London, anxious to preserve its access to
the world's dirty money. The City of London is a
money laundering filter that lets the city get involved in
dirty business while providing it with enough distance to maintain
plausible deniability, a crypto feudal oligarchy, which of itself is
captured by the international offshore banking industry. It's a gangster
regime cloaked with the respectability of the trappings of the
British establishment, guaranteed protection, no matter just how no matter
just how nakedly lawless their own conduct. New quote. The
city is often now described as the largest tax haven
in the world, and it acts as the largest center
of global tax avoidance system. An estimated fifty percent of
the world's trade passes through tax havens, and the city
acts as a huge funnel for much of that money.
End quote. Here is an important website that contains many
links related to the City of London and its use
of tax havens to launder money. And then he links
to a links to let me let me look at
I'll just say what that one is? What website? That
is UK and City of London center of world tax havens.
It's www dot BetterWorld dot info. All right, new heading.
The hydra. The hydra was one of the most fearsome
monsters in Greek mythology. A multi headed snake descended from
a long line of terrible beasts possessing deadly poisons and
with the power of regeneration, a rather accurate description of
the City of London today, and as Jewish causar denizens,
at least by some measures. The City of London is
also the mother of all tax havens and is unquestionably
the home of all the world's dirty money today. Here
are several references that describe the City of London as
a global spider spider's web of deceit, one by the
UK Guardian claiming that shrinking the city is the only
way to stop the world's criminals flourishing in the UK,
and two of other interests. So yeah, we have a
Guardian this one called Banking City of London tax havens,
Global webspider deceit Chapter ten. Yeah, a bunch of links.
Check all these out, all right. George Monbiat wrote an
excellent article for the UK Guardian where he quoted Nicolas
Shucksen's Treasurer's Island, stating that quote the corporation exists outside
many of the laws and democratic controls which govern the
rest of the United Kingdom. The City of London is
the only part of Britain over which Parliament has no
authority end quote. His last comment may not entirely be true,
although it does work that way in practice. Mombiat says
further that the corporation acts as the superior body, superior
to the UK Parliament, and that part is definitely true.
Mombiart begins by writing, quote, the city is the heart,
the dark heart of Britain, the place where democracy goes
to die. Immensely powerful, equally unaccountable. Mombiat's cites Clement at
Lee's lament that quote over and over again. We have
there there is in this country another power, that which
has taken its seat at westn He continues that quote,
The city has exploited this remarkable physician to establish itself
as a kind of offshore state, a secrecy jurisdiction which
controls the networks of tax havens housed in the UK,
the UK's crown dependencies and overseas territories. This autonomous state
within our borders is in positions of global the ill
gotten cash of all the garks, kleptocrats, gangsters and drug barons.
End quote. All of that is very true. In the
power of the Jews within the city have made impossible
any effective regulation of global finance. American firms like AIG
and Lehman Brothers simply moving to the city of London
to carry out their balance sheet criminal machinations that bankrupted
so many people. American and other firms have often utilized
the services of the city to evade the financial laws
of their own governments. The city is, in real terms,
a vast criminal enterprise run by gangsters. That's what they're
saying over there. This isn't a bunch of American conspiracy theorists.
These would be European conspiracy theorists who bring receipts. So
it doesn't seem widely known that immediately prior to its
financial collapse, Lehman was selling their corporate bonds quote backed
by the full faith and credit of Lehman Brothers unquote,
so unsuspecting investors who had no idea that bankruptcy was
already virtually in motion. I don't know where all these
bonds were sold, but I know that billions of dollars
of them were disposed of in Hong Kong, the money
from these sales apparently disappearing into the bowels of the
city of London. Joseph Stieglitz also railed against the Jews
in the city, telling UK legislature laters, quote, these people
are just using your rule of law to protect money
they have stolen in other countries. From a global point
of view, you are aiding and abetting theft end quote.
A British MP said the city of London and is
a magnet for dirty money, quoting At the same time,
the government's anti fraud minister resigned because the Jews in
the city had once again killed legislations a combat economic
crime by the city, saying that nobody in the UK
government compared about stopping kleptocrats, all the arks and organized
crime lords stashing their elite loot in the UK, and
another article telling us how the city remains a safe
haven for all the world's dirty cash. Here is another
interesting article from the UK with the five step guide
telling how the Jews in the city can help you
get away with stealing millions that is thirty one says, Yeah,
it's just it's from the Guardian, Yeah all right, ironic,
Yeah yeah, I mean.
Speaker 2: Like we'll get into it how they basically off you
if you go against them. But I'm just curious, like
the livelihoods of all the people that are coming out
and saying this all these sources that he cited, like
did they change their names? Like? What what happened?
Speaker 1: One indication of this is the UK's official UK Company's
Register that is littered with fake names because no identity
checks are required. One corporation is registered, for example, in
the name of Holy Jesus Christ, with his stated occupation
as creator, his nationality as an angelic, and his country
of residences Heaven. Another is in the name of Adolph
Tooth Fairy Hitler, with the City sales firm in the
name of Donald dunk Duck, and so on. The UK
government claims it hasn't the resources to police to corporate registry,
but the truth is they permitted to continue because it
serves nicely the purposes of the gangsters in the city.
Another footnote there controlling legislation was proposed, but the Jews
in the city had it killed. Read another block quote here.
An article in the Eurasia Review called the city of
London a parasite's paradise criminals. That would be really cool,
A parasite's paradise or the best criminal sanctuary money can buy.
London has become the center of global financial capital by
engaging in long term large scale active collaboration with multi
billion pound drug arms, people smuggling, and sex slave cartels.
The Jews in the city specialize in laundering funds from
the Mexican, Colombian, Peruvian, Russian, Polish, Czech, Nigerian Narco kings,
white slavers have their private bankers at prestigious city banks, kleptocrats,
lifelong billion dollar in tax evators fleeing from their pillaged homeland.
It continues that the City Boys welcome every gangster oligarch.
It continued by stating the London sanctuary for the world's
richest plunderers and parasites, often unprecedented services, especially protection from
extradition and criminal prosecution at the site of their crimes. Nowadays,
the City of London is an anachronism of the worst kind.
The corporation, which runs a city like a one party
mini state, is an unreconstructed old boys network whose medievalist
pageantry camouflages to very real power and wealth which it holds.
The City of London Corporation ranks as a political power
without rival in Britain, possibly in the world. It has
used its power to exert gnormous political influence to resist
regulation and extract tax exemption. It is fostered criminality by
ensuring that the city ranks amongst the least accountable of
financial centers on the face of the earth. The Tax
Justice website calls the City of London, a state within
a state, the most powerful, self interested political lobby in
the world. There is much more, including the child rothschild banks,
financing of Zionism, and the atrocities continuing in Palestine since
prior to the founding of Israel, all through and under
the auspices of the Jews in the city of London. Also,
Sinhalanet had an article you might find interesting in which
it is claimed that three corporations run the world city
of London, Washington, d C. And Vatican City, and that
together they control politicians' economies in eighty percent of the
world's wealth. New heading the King of England meets his
Master North Americans seldom pay attention to news details in
the UK and might not be aware of the recurrent
brief media campaigns about should the monarchy be abolished. These
normally emerge abruptly without warning or with or apparent cause,
listing all the usual issues of monarchy. Being an anachronism,
the British royal family being a useless appendage to government,
a needless expense, and so fourth they disappear equally suddenly,
all the UK media silencing their peeps at the same time.
These little campaigns are not accidents. They are reminders or
in some cases a warning by the gnomes controlling the
City of London that they have the power to work
the UK public into a frenzy on command, and also
the influence to introduce and push through Parliament a vote
that would indeed disband the monarchy. This would be the
King and all his princelings not destitute or homeless, but alone,
shunned and unemployed. Look at this photo of then Prince
Charles and Evelyn de Rothschild. I said it was Jacob
Rothschild my mistake. And Evelyn de Rothschild. I think when
Evelyn de Rothschild got married thenk He got married in
nineteen ninety nine, and I think he spent his honeymoon
at the White House. Look that up.
Speaker 2: Huh.
Speaker 1: Look at the photo of then Prince Charles and Evelyn
de Rothschild with smug roths Child poking Charles in the chest.
That is a very aggressive gesture and not something one
would do to a superior. Can you picture yourself walking
up to your boss or the chairman of the board,
poking him in the chest and saying, I have something
to tell you. Definitely not, we would do this only
to a distinct inferior and someone we were bullying, also
treating with contempt. The gesture is not only to accent
accentuate a point, but is a kind of threat one
we might imagine a policeman making when issuing an order.
From the photo, the relation between the two men is
quite clear. We can't know the topic of conversation, but
Rothschild is essentially telling Charles this is how it is,
and you don't have to like it all right.
Speaker 2: Quick parallel to this, so if anyone remembers in fall
of twenty twenty two there was the guilt crisis that happened,
basically I I guess you could say there was like
no bid on the guilts. So those are just basically
like Great Brains version of treasury bonds ten years. And
that is because the main buyer of those guilts and
long duration debt is usually pretty reliable, stable sound investment,
and so the main buyers of those are people that
manage pensions. The main manager of pensions is black Rock.
This is a round also the time. I can't remember
if it was before after King Charles died. I think
it was definitely out King Charles. Yeah, King Charles died, Sorry,
that was it.
Speaker 1: We're talking about Queen Elizabeth. Yes, and then King Charles
took he became Queen King Charles.
Speaker 2: Okay, cool, thank you. So this was after it was
the had passed and they got was trust in. This
is also later in twenty twenty two. And if you
remember when I said earlier January first in twenty twenty
twenty two is when one we reindexed all of our
debt to Sofa and that's really when Palace started up
in the antitm raising rates and there was talk about
the Bank of England following suit. So I just thought
it was very interesting how you can think of black
Rock managing Great Britain's pensions, deciding Novah's trust. You're going
to saddle up and go along with what we're going
to do, what we would like to see happen, and
not to preserve any credibility in the UK and follow
Jerome Palell's monetary policy of tightening and making our roshur
dollars more expensive. So if you're going to do that
and you're not gonna play ball with us, then we're
just gonna not buy your your guilts anymore, and we're
gonna scare the pensions, and you're gonna either put up
her shut up, So you would have once that's uh,
I mean they got rid of her. They replaced her
with Richie Sunack eventually, So that was just kind of
like one warning sign. But I just thought it was
interesting parallel that people that are running great Britain that
you think are aren't actually doing it. It's people at
the City of London, Larry Fink of Black Rock and
just most of black Rock, I mean, their majority, as
you can guess, and they're very much Tom likes to
talk about how there is a faction between like I
would just say it, there's as you said, there's a
split between left wing US and right wing Juice, but
more granular then that maybe that's more like Macro, but
there's more of like a European faction, and there's more
of like a British uk Neocon British Empire faction. And
it's interesting how Richie Sunac is more of what we
can call the European faction like Davos, as Tom does
and whatever is remanding of the British Empire, those old
heads are kind of being replaced by the European aligur
globalist devotions and so sacking Liz and replacing her with
Richie Sunac, I think is is just a is exemplifying
how Great Britain doesn't really have a control over the
crown anymore. It's Davos, it's City of London, but at
the end of the day we all kind of know
who it is. But it's just it just kind of
reveals like that that fight that is happening there, and
it's all using the thinking gay tools of economics. Who's
managing people's pensions and money people that depend on well,
it's black Rock. They're the one that are buying up
all this sovereign crown debt and giving it a value
to begin with. So if you want stability, and you,
as you know, was trust, want to look good as
a monarch like figure or whatever, then you're going to
put up with what signalant London? What's to do? If
you're not you're going to get embarrassed and we're going
to replace you.
Speaker 1: Cool. Thank you. That's why I invited you for this,
because you have background on this that even I don't.
So thanks.
Speaker 2: Happy to be what I was happy to be here?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, all right, moving on? But why wouldn't Rothschild
poke that little swarp in the chests? Charles says nothing
to him, a convenient nuisance, a bit of a public shield,
but no more. Rothschild has wealth that Charles can barely fathom,
and power exceeding that of Charles by orders of magnitude,
including over the UK Parliament and UK public opinion. Both now,
both men know Rothschild could dethrone the king at any time.
That Charles as a royal exists only at the Jews pleasure. Charles,
the supposed King of England, can't even enter Rothschild's home
or place of business without a specific invitation. How subservient
can you be? It is several roth Childs, sebag Montefiores
and other similar who are considered the real royalty of England,
Charles Andrew Edward being puppet caricatures.
Speaker 2: Yeah, basically new head. Wait out what I said? Who
runs the city?
Speaker 1: So new heading? Who owns the city, while the entity
is described as the corporation of the City of London.
But since this is a privately owned company, we have
no shareholder list. I am told that there are thirteen
Jewish families who are central to the enterprise, the Rothschilds
being the first among them. The city may well operate
as a corporation in some senses, but a little bit
more accurate.
Speaker 2: Did you think of tribes when you first read that?
Because I did.
Speaker 1: Of course I did. Yeah, of course I don't miss numbers.
I don't miss numbers at all. It's all the Bible
study and then the It's amazing how often the number
thirty three comes up. It came up again today in
a conversation we were looking at I was reading something.
I was just like, oh, come on. The city may
well operate as a corporation in some senses, but could
be more accurately described as a typical organized crime family
who are lords of their own mini state and effectively
operate with virtually absolute impunity throughout the world. This impunity
resolves primarily from their financial power, but secondarily from the
political power and influence obtained by that financial power. It
is hardly a secret that national governments like the US,
the UK, France, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Canada and other
are fundamentally and essentially Jewish controlled states, with that control
emanating from the City of London. There it is when
the when, the when the followers of tragedy and hope
with the Carol Quigley, when the Quigglians say, oh, it
all comes out of the City of London, it does
capital c City of London. If we think of Jeffrey what, oh.
Speaker 2: I just gotta admit I haven't read that or listened
so all to cross off my list when I when
I get to it.
Speaker 1: Long book, bro, long book.
Speaker 2: All right, Well that that's your next read. Then, yeah,
screw after three thousand years together or whatever it is.
Speaker 1: Together. Yeah, that one's all the way down the line,
all right. If we think of Jeffrey Epsteine and his
sex entrapment enterprise that flourished for decades, it makes sense
that the city of London would have been the source
of the planning and financing scene's operation was definitely Jewish
and worldwide, there is no other candidate body in the
world with an interest in controlling the politicians of all
nations at least not by that dirty means. If we
think of the world's mass media, which is largely increasingly
Jewish owned, and which is vitally necessary for the propagandas
to control the standard narrative, it makes sense that increasing
media control would arise primarily from the same source. This
would clearly account for the development of the social and
internet media, almost dictating the necessity for the creation of
a Google, a Facebook, or Wikipedia and Instagram, a Telegraph,
and the takeover of Twitter. There is something else here,
dealing with the intelligence agencies, primarily the CIA and MASAD,
although MI five would also almost surely fit into this.
I have a copy of a document that was released
by the CIA under a Foyer request. It is not
a CIA document and it is not clear why it
would have been in the possession of the CIA. The
document is not redacted, but the original author is not identified.
The salient point of this document indicates the existence of
a group somewhere within the CIA that operates independently, acting
under the auspices and authority of the CIA, but with
its own purpose and agenda unrelated to the remainder of
the organization. The document maddeningly lacks precise details, but the
implication is that the group does not report to any
part of the CIA, and its activities may not even
be may not even be known by the CIA executive.
I had read of or heard rumors about such a
group before, but this was the first bit of documented
evidence of its Edward Snowden, in an article titled The
CIA Is Not Your Friend, made reference to this as well.
He wrote that after the creation of the CIA, within
a year, the young agency had already slipped the leash
of its intended role of intelligence collection and analysis to
establish a covert operations division. Within a decade, the CIA
was directly was directing the coverage of American news organizations,
overthrowing to democratically elected governments, at times merely to benefit
a favorite corporation, establishing propaganda outfits to manipulate public sentiment,
launching a long running series of mind control experiments on
unwitting human subjects, and interfering with foreign elections. I don't
think anyone is going to argue with that. Nope. This
is a very large topic, with so many interwoven threads
that even a very long article could scarcely do a justice.
But I wanted to raise one point about the secrecy
the agenda and the lack of a CIA reporting chain.
As one example, it has been reported in several places
that neither the US Congress nor the White House had
any knowledge of the CIA's mk ULTRA program. I covered
this in much detail in a previous article on mk Ultra.
During congressional hearings on an unrelated matter, one witness brought
a colleague who began testifying on a bizarre mind control
program that was unknown to that date, which led to
the exposure of Mkultra and the rapid destruction. So they said,
of all related documents, the important point is that this
enormous and horrific program, spanning decades, escaped external attention. Mk
Ultra was entirely a Jewish program. I have a list
of the top thirty lieutenants of Kultra from got leaved down,
and all are Jews. This is not in dispute, and
in fact I believe that the top fifty or sixty people,
only two or three at the most are not Jews.
The question is, how would it happen that an internal
group of the American CIA would have such a determined
interest in such a horrific program and would have staffed
it entirely with Jews.
Speaker 2: That's a good question.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean I happened and after World War Two.
A similar concern arises from the congressional hearings conducted on
the exposure of the CIA's program, again spanning decades of
assassinating some one hundred and fifty world leaders and senior politicians.
Upon examination of the evidence of all those assassinations, as
is by no means clear that many or even most
of them would have been to any benefit of the
US government. In fact, like the worldwide gold thefts conducted
by the US Treasury Department in the nineteen thirties or
the hijacking of Iraqs Oil today, it is easier to
believe they were carried out on behalf of the secret government,
to the benefit of and masterminded by the City of London.
Looking back on so many world events, it is by
no means certain that any part of the US government
would have had any interest in or seen any benefit
in those activities. I can only speculate here, But if
we assume all those activities, programs, and events were carried
out at the instruction of the Gnomes in the City
of London, everything seems to make sense, like a jigsaw puzzle,
where all the pieces fit perfectly together to make an
overall picture. It's interesting that he mentions that, like missing
pieces in a puzzle. I've started saying recently that you
can't understand the last two thousand years of history until
you can say that, until you can say the word jew.
Speaker 2: Yeah. No, it's like I think you brought this up.
But like that roth Bar quote, like the history of
the United States is the history of banking. Okay, Well,
don't stop there.
Speaker 1: Yeah, keep going, keep going. We can recall that Jeffrey
Epstein was spared from his first arrest because he is
intelligence and above your pay grade. But as I pointed
out above, there is no way the USCIA would have
created a worldwide sex entrapment scheme with or without the
knowledge of any part of the US government. There would
simply be too great a lack of both interest and
benefit to any part of the US. And the only
conclusion I can see is that it must have originated
in the city of London, what would fit perfectly into
the overall picture. In a similar context, the Boer Wars
make no sense if we attribute them to Britain. Yet
England did send in her army to commit astonishing crimes
and atrocities with no benefit whatever to England. But what
we understand that this was done on the order from
the Jews in the City of London to take over
all South Africa's gold and diamond mines for a rothschild.
That all the pieces fit and everything makes sense. Again.
There are perhaps hundreds of articles in many books about
the CIA importing heroin and cocaine and generally trafficking in drugs. Now,
I have no illusions about the chastity of the CIA,
and I'm sure many of their staff are sufficiently evil
to do just this, But it doesn't compute. It's certainly
as possible. But it doesn't make sense that the American
CIA would entirely on its own account, becomes so deeply
involved in international drug running. But the Jews in the
City of London cut their teeth on narcotics trafficking. In fact,
this was the source of much of their initial fortunes.
The cause are Jews have always been among the world's
biggest drug dealers. Thus, if we attribute the drug trafficking
to this central private core in the CIA that reports
to the City of London, all the pieces fit together
and everything makes sense. This would even explain why the
HSBC is reportedly find so heavy in the US for
laundering drug money. That is what the HSBC was created
to do one hundred and fifty years ago, and its
headquarters are in the city. Even the small pieces fit perfectly.
Speaker 2: So in that case, they're fine. They're essentially paying themselves.
Speaker 1: Right, yeah, pretty much. Well, I mean they're yeah, if
they're paying fines to the US government, if they're paying
fines to any government, yep. And people will listen to this,
listen to the language and everything, and they'll go, well,
I mean this is just speculation, are.
Speaker 2: You well, he says to himself, But you know, look
at the footnotes.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but look at the footnotes and look at what
you've look at what we've all learned since October seventh
that this government is is Jewish controlled.
Speaker 2: I mean, like COVID twenty twenty and nine to eleven
before that, Like, this stuff is just someone with the internet.
This stuff is blatantly in front of us now and
now somehow it's kosher to like talk about it. It's weird.
Speaker 1: That's the weird part.
Speaker 2: That's completely another hour conversation.
Speaker 1: Yeah, think again to the CIA assassination program. There is
no way that the CIA, by itself, road group or
otherwise would decide to kill one hundred and fifty presidents,
prime ministers and other high government officials, which in the
most part would have no benefit whatever to the u A,
and no CIA group, rogue or not, would take it
upon themselves to kill the Secretary General of the UN,
again with no apparent benefits of the US. But if
we insert into the equation the political hedgemony ambitions of
the Jews in the city of London, the pieces again
fits snugly together. It is true. This is speculation on
my part. I cannot supply proof for these assertions. I
have simply cobbled cobbled them together from logic and circumstantial evidence.
Once you understand this, once you understand exactly how much
power the city of London has capital c City of London,
and who runs it, then you realize that Israel is
Israel is not the country of Israel, the Kanesset, everything
in Israel is not operating on its own, and it's
not a puppet of the United States like so many
fools have been saying lately. It's controlled by the City
of London and just I mean where did where did
the Balfour Declaration come from? Yeah, I mean yeah, it's.
Speaker 2: Like they exported their military muscle to the US and
it was just the City of London, New Kon transplants
in our government that were heading it. It's always like
been the same source. They just they're nomadic, they have
no home.
Speaker 1: Why can they blend in? Why can they appear? Why
are they called European because they take on that aura
they sound you know, the Rothschilds sound British, but they're not.
They're not any more British than the people who came
on the wind Rush or you know, the people who
flowed out of Middle Eastern prisons and the twenty years
to infect him to destroy Britain. Yeah, it'd be really
interesting to see what the crime rate is in the
City of London Capital c City of London. Do they
do they have an immigrant problem there? I would assume not.
Speaker 2: Probably the same as uh DC incorporated, DC incorporated, Yeah,
or back whatever new heading caution is advised. Certainly these
people are ruthless. There is no shortage of evidence that
they will kill.
Speaker 1: Just they will kill, they will destroy anyone who challenges them,
and will kill anyone who threatens to expose or frustrate
their plans. And this doesn't apply only to Gentiles. They're
equally ruthless to their own. To their own. You have
read what they did to Dominie Dominique strauss Khan. It
is important to note, and there's a footnote there you
can check out. It is important to note that this
man was the managing director of the IMF and almost
surely the next president of France, and yet he was
very much an outsider, far from the center of power.
As I mentioned in my article, he confided to his
wife and others that they are out to get me.
To use such terminology, we can understand these were not
people who were close to him, but who were at
the same time far above him, and he was clearly
hoping he might be sufficiently insignificant they might just ignore him.
He was wrong. Jeremy Corbyn was similar. Former leader of
the UK Labor Party. Corbyn earned the enmity of the
Jews in the city and they destroyed him. He was
permanently tainted as an anti Semite and absolutely trash for
his disobedience to the Jews and his good intentions towards
the British people. The Labor Party state firmly. The Labor
Party state firmly that Corbin will never again cross their
doorstep because he is now too toxic. There was another
matter with newspaper headlines some years back of Amshull Rothschild
commits suicide. This man, a sixth generation banking Rothschild, was
slated to take the reins from his cousin, Sir Evelyn
Rothschild as chairman of n M Rothschilds and Sons. His
body was found by a chambermaid in a parasitesel room.
But there was nothing about this that made any sense.
The first policeman on the scene told reporters that Rothschild
was found with a rope around his neck, attached to
a bathroom fixture upon which he supposedly hung himself. But
the policeman said he'd hugged on the rope and the
entire fixture detached from the wall. He said there was
no way the man could have hung himself because the
fixture could support no weight, that the rope had been
tied there. Afterward, the policeman quickly disappeared and the story
was totally screwed from the Internet. I saw an email
copy from Rupert Murdoch instructing all his newspapers to state
this as a suicide if you mention it at all.
Speaker 2: So I guess now we know who culled Epstein. Big surprise.
Speaker 1: There was no question about that. The official stories that
followed were all nonsense, too pathetic to even be termed
the laws. The UK Mirror was typical, saying it seemed
the real news around Amshell's neck was his fortune of
eighteen million pounds, that huge riches and influences have not
always brought great happiness, and that of his great fortune
you could describe it as a gilded millstone, his great
fortune of eighteen million pounds that would buy two ferraris
one Bugatti and leave enough loose change for a bucket
of Hagendau's ice cream. But this gilded millstone led to
such depression the man hung himself. Another story was that
the man was depressed at the death of his mother,
and so he hung himself. Others, and there were many,
were equally stupid. Of all people, the Rothschilds would have
had the influence to put nearly the entire Paris police
force on the case and hunt every clue to the
ends of the earth. But they didn't. They simply told
many foolish lies and buried it. Know what really happened,
but I have to say, when reading the initial police
report and then theretic the frenetic cover up stories, my
instinctive reaction was that this had to have been a
family hit. We will never know, and it might not
have been the first. Can you imagine committing suicide by
slitting your own throat? Why not the Rothschilds do it?
According to the Jewish Telegraph Agency, Nathaniel Rothschild, second son
of the first Lord Rothschild, committed suicide by cutting his throat.
The specific reasons for the theater are not revealed, nor
are the reasons revealed for the stupidity of the method.
Of all the options available for killing myself, cutting my
own throat would not be my first choice. Here are
some media reports. Decide for yourself and he wants to
five different sources. New heading, last heading? Where do we
go from here? Nowhere? So far as I can see,
many readers like to see us offered. There is one
If King drawska collect sufficient courage and a single minded resolve,
he could deal with it. He could commandeer the UK
media and explain the situation to the people in a
way that they could understand. If he were to do that,
he would surely have the support of the entire country
and also the military. Now the UK army is admittedly
nothing much, but even they have the military might to
launch and all out assaults on an unprotected one square
mile of urban landscape. I guess that's when Arvin talks
about tanks on Harvard Yard. The UK version would be
tanks on the city of London. Gather all the missiles
and artillery. Gather all the missiles and artillery and completely
demolish the city of London, leave no stone resting upon
one another, and kill anything that moves. If the head
and brain of the hydra are thus killed, the body
was slowly dyed too. But this is a dream. Let's
just say we do not endorse his message at all.
You don't endorse set message? Do you feel?
Speaker 2: Uh? No? But I will say, thanks to pel some
dreams do you come true? Well, we do not promote violence.
For the record, Yeah, we do not promote violence. But
you know law fair and you know people who know
how to use the system against them. Well, I think
we're seeing and that's I guess That's what what I'd
like to end discussing is that you know, when you
read this, he let me stop sharing this. When you
read this, he's It's late twenty twenty two and October
seventh hasn't happened yet. Mm hm, it seems like October seventh.
Since October seventh, the conversation about I mean not specifically
the city of London things like that, but definitely about
Israel and definitely about Jews in general has opened up.
And the way you know that the.
Speaker 1: It's the conversation is making a making a mark, is
how people are reacting to it. And you immediately saw,
you know, people who with Jewish backgrounds, who had never
really invoked their Judaism before, immediately become tribal and completely
lose their shit, basically, Gad said Dave Rubin. I mean,
the list can go on and on. I mean, we
know Ben Shapiro was a lunatic, he just he just
it became so much more magnified after October seventh. So,
I mean, is this area open to talk about this?
I mean, sure, you're when you talk about this, it's
still we still live in a world where you know,
it's Pete blames everything on the Jews. Everything that, you know,
every every problem Pete's ever had in his life, he
blames on the Jews. Something I've never done because they.
Speaker 2: Stole your hair.
Speaker 1: Yeah, something something i've well, I still want my forest
getting back, Okay, but it's something something I've never done.
I've never said because of Jews. Because of this, I
can't do this. I've never been able to never say
that ever. Once find it on record. You can't find
that on record. You know, it's always been these are
the people who roll over us. The society is going
to ship, everything's going to ship. Is this the way
we want to go to keep going? I mean that
seems logical, you know, once you start taking it apart
and you start seeing, okay, you know who who's in
charge of Hollywood? They admit, you know, Dennis Praeger says
every ism besides Nazism was created by Jews and propagated
by Jews. They celebrate the fact that basically and the
Civil Rights acted, all these things that basically destroyed destroyed
America they're responsible for. Okay, well, I mean for I
mean it's that anti Semitics to believe them. I guess
it's it's not anti semitics to believe the majority of
states as long as you're celebrating it what they.
Speaker 2: Wanted to be in the majority of states. Yeah, with
the bill. But no, like you, you raise up a
really great point. I think, Yeah, it's a loser attitude
to just blame all your problems on them, and it's
not entirely true. I mean, it wasn't for the three
hundred years in Spain, as you and I talked about
on my show a few weeks back. But like, it
doesn't have to be that way. If there are methods.
Everything that I kind of laid out about what's happening
at the FED, that is a method, and it's also
dangerous for be able to and look, I'm victim to this.
Everyone is. We're all human. We have our lizer braid
like kneejor reaction to shit that we see online. And
so that's going to warp our opinion and is gonna
tangle at a heart, shrip heartstrings and make us emotional.
And really, I've been saying this for a while. That's
really the only weapon they have left. I think if
the money's going away and not going away, they're still loaded.
But if it's if they're starting to feel that pain,
then the last spigot of power over us I think
they have is wielding propaganda and using that to scare
the markets into Like this is what Martin Armstrong talks about.
He's all about capital flight, the bond market, and the
value of like the dollar index versus the Euro. And
so when something happens in the US, like oh, it's
probably going to raise race or is not, or even
the fucking debate, right, all of these things are manipulating
the average Joe psyche and that's really what they want.
They want to demoralize us. They want to push it
in front of us, because that's all they have left
is just to manipulate our emotions, and so much to
the fact that they probably want a civil war to happen,
like we should have some sort of secession, but have
it be on our watch and not theirs. And so
that's why, as harsh as it sounds, like, I wrote
my last article about this, like don't be a fucking
useful idiot to these people, like mind your emotions, understand,
Like this is what I learned from Tom. What am
I looking at? Who's presenting it to me? Why? But
why now? And so that's everyone in you know, across
the spectrum, both left and right, but primarily in the
dissident corners. I think that we all kind of fall
victim to that, and they benefit on their victim because
they just leverage out against us, and they use that
an excuse to pass another law here or there to
just assert more control over us. And it's just something
that we have to be careful of, Like I fall
victim to this every day, you know. But it's just
something to be mindful because I honestly do think that's
one of the last things that they can leverage over us,
is our motion of how they use the propain machine.
Speaker 1: I think it's one of the reasons why I like
finding and seeing older articles, because no matter what the
purpose of the article was written, then you can read
it in a new light. Now you see it, whatever
the intent was of reading of writing it at that point, Well,
we're in a new age, and as far as I'm concerned,
post October seventh is a very new age, especially when
it comes to this group of people. So you read
an article like this, and you're like, Okay, Israel is
doing all of this, they're demanding money from the United States.
Why would they demand money from the United States. Obviously
the city of London can finance everything they could find.
I mean they could. They could level all of Gaza
and rebuild it fifty one hundred, a thousand times over.
Why are they doing this to us? There's only one
reason is because they're trying to destroy us. They're trying
to destroy the system, They're trying to destroy our dollar.
They're trying to Maybe this is payback for payback for
what Pale's been doing. And it's just you know, it's
like I describe it like the movie, the original movie
Independence Day. So you go to one place, you exhaust
all the exhaust all of it's reason, then you move on.
That may be what it is, too, but really what
it comes down to, what I think it is, is
that if Powell's taking away the power of their money,
he's taking away their power and people like this, especially materialists.
And when I mean materialists, I'm not only talking about money.
I'm talking about people who don't believe in afterlife. Everything
becomes about this life, right, and that's why you know.
I remember I worked for I worked for a Jew
for a long time, and he told me, he is, like,
I would I go to Israel? He goes. If you
think I'm he literally said this to me, if you
think I'm cheap with money and I'm bad, you know
about money, he goes, I go to Israel and there
are these old guys who are like on their deathbed
and they're still talking about their investments or what their
money is. And he go. And when you when you
look at that and you realize that if you believe
that this is life is the only thing we have,
then you're going to do everything you can to do
whatever your ideology is, whatever your personal ideology is. And
if you take away or you limit their power at all,
this this basically absolute power that they're used to wielding,
this causes an existential crisis.
Speaker 2: For them, especially if they don't have the whole tikun
o mom where they if you all begated to fix
all the evils of the world, and if I mean,
I don't know that.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to wonder if that's I'm starting to wonder
if that's a syop too, if that's just something to
throw you off the trail.
Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe it might be, but it kind of plays
in also.
Speaker 1: The left wing right wing the left wing right wing
jew kind of thing, because that tends to be I
think that tends to have more to do with left
wing Jews, and I don't think these I wouldn't consider
the city of London well left wing.
Speaker 2: I would imagine are more liberal and not religious, right,
what's the word secular? So the whole like religious aspect
of like whatever taking along it really is that's more
of like a theological thing.
Speaker 1: I would imagine more focused on culture than banking and
war and things like that, culture marketing and whatever. Right, well, Hollywood,
you know, pornography, things like that.
Speaker 2: So there's someone I want to say on that, but
I completely forgot what it was.
Speaker 1: You should take you, dude. I learned this from Buck Johnson.
I saw him taking notes. I saw him taking notes,
and that's what I like. Got a notebook and a pen,
and I'm like, I just take note. I take notes now.
So because my mind is gone and if I'm recording
at night, I probably have some there's probably something in
the drink that I'm drinking. So yeah, that could even
mess me up too.
Speaker 2: So yeah, So like so to bring it home, like,
what do you they're they're they're they realize like they're
they're main source of power, money is being taken away
from them, and so now what are you just saying, like, Yeah,
they're just going to be as loud as possible to
bend the US tour will because I believe that it is.
It is like a power struggle between city London slash
like ECB versus the major Wall Street banks and the
FED because the superpower that America has that they never
defaulted on their debt, and the way that you force
them to do that is to drag them into World
War three against Russia, to China whatever, Iran. So I
don't really see that happening, especially when you have, for
whatever reason, more cool, calm, collected people of this class
kind of the usual suspects of getting behind Trump again.
But I think, and I'm in the process of writing
about this, but I think they have just been so
exposed in the limelight for too long and they just
need to bring it back in. This is what Matt
king Phil talks about when he read the America Dynamism
paper what a sixteen z interest in Horowitz kind of
talks about is everyone's fed up with the DEI. People
want to bring jobs back to the United States, while
Staple and Green cards on like smart Indians diplomas because
they just want to get rid of some of the
oligarchical bureocracy, and people like Musk and Teel just want
to make it their oligarchical bureaucracy to their terms. So
because of that, I think that there is a faction
of them that don't want to drag us Inward three
with the goal of South whatever because it's not good
for business. So that's one of the few white poles
I think that have been mentioned in this conversation. But yeah,
I'm not really depressed demon gloom about the future. Trump's
not going to fix everything. He's probably gonna be a
useful idiot boob, and we got to rely on the
fusionism that's behind him. You've had Wendel cozy on and
he kind of splits up the fusions of you got
PayPal mafia, you have a faction of like Christian nationalism whatever,
and then you have or wasn't Charles Johnson that kind
of laid this out, And then you have like the
new generation of Zionists that I think are less radical
and they kind of play in they're so oligarchs, so
they have their fingers in the PayPal mafia stuff and
they're probably not radical like Neil Libs either, And so
they just maybe want to close the borders like a
little bit and are back in Trump just because they
wanted to have like a reset, great reset because one
Wall Street Jamie Diamond, Bill Lackman. They don't want that,
because that great reset that they want in the EU
is that just means the end of commercial banking and
the end of the creation and preservation of private capital.
And you can't have that with a ce DC because
ce DC means commercial bankings bye bye. Believe it or not,
Like that is a decentralized mechanism of the commercial banks
being the shareholders of the better reserve. And so again
this all goes back to like Team fed kind of
financing backing this fujianism that's backing Trump because these people
at the City of London trying to drag us into
World War three to force us to default on our debt.
It's not good for business. They're not the good guys.
They're just rational. They're Machabellion.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's and I think that was something that that
me and Matt talked about the first time he came
out when we were talking about the PayPal mafia. They
want to make money, but they also are really because
of where they come from, They're really into competence, and
I think that they see that there are so many
people right now that are just completely incompetent.
Speaker 2: They also have their own dynasties, like they want they
have families. They they're well off to have as big
as families as possible, and so they sure, like you
might be able to call this altruistic, they want to
have a future that their kids can rule as oligarchs
over as they see it, not with these other people.
How these other people see this, and we just happen
to also kind of benefit from that.
Speaker 1: Sometimes there's a lot of self interest. There's a lot
of self interest there. Yeah, yeah, and you know self
interest self interest. If somebody is self interested and they're
looking to take power and they don't hate you, like
the people in power right now, say they're sort of
like neutral where you're concerned, it's a whole lot better
than where we are right now. Oh yeah, yeah, and
it also allows us if they're all about business and
they can create a system, if they can create an
environment where it's easier for people like you and me
to acquire wealth and to accumulate wealth. Well that's just
things down the line that we want to do, changes
that we might want to see that we can that
will help us. So I just I just want things
to get to get to the point where competent people
are actually doing things. So but the crazy thing is
is when you look at everything that's happening. Is Trump
going to jail, is Biden going to die? Is Biden?
Are they going to replace him? It just keeps us
And I'm not one of these people. I do not
believe it or not. I don't sit around all day
thinking about the things. Really, I don't know. I don't
like like, I don't well, I don't stress over them.
I think about them, but I don't stress over them.
It's like, I mean, what's going to happen? Yeah, me
stressing over it is not going to change it. So
I think about it, think about it for content obviously,
and yeah. So yeah, but I love to know this stuff,
and you know, knowing about the city of London versus
the city of London, and then you hear people going, no, no,
it's not the Jews, it's just it's from the city
of London. And then you're like kind of both kind
of both all right, but yeah, let's we got to
figure out exactly what the city of London is first,
and yeah, so do we though? Do you ever?
Speaker 2: Like no, like that. That's one of the like being
in this sphere from like libertarian is to like whatever
the funk we are now it's just like why do
we care? Like why are we on this autistic like
why are we so? Why when this does consume our
mind out of the what a percentage of the day,
Like why does it? Because like we're we're curious cats
were true seekers. But then like then what do we do?
And then this is like what people like will throw
at you and me, like okay, you brought this up,
so what are you going to do? That's of course
when we're like okay, well, you know, focus on your
local communities, what have you. But it's kind of like
it is kind of aggravating, like what would it be
like if I didn't know any of this and I
was just enormy you.
Speaker 1: Know, Well, I mean, ignorance is bliss right right, But
I mean it's where, it's where we are, it's who
we are, it's it's a part of our nature, and
we just have to run with it. And you know,
I'm one of those people who I don't necessarily I
don't believe that like one hundred million people are going
to change anything, because one hundred million people can't organize,
but one hundred million people being upset about something. I
think what you've seen definitely since October seventh is you
see people who potentially elites or elites people who are
in charge, who are like, Okay, there's a tide changing,
or they look at how bad things have gotten with
the economy, with price everything, with international relations, everything urine,
and they're like, well, change needs to be made. People
are complaining about this, and we need the backing of
the people in order to do even when you go,
you know, I've been studying a lot about a lot
of the fourteen hundreds in Spain, even before fourteen ninety
two and early the kings couldn't get anything done without
the nobles. Yeah, they had to have the nobles on
their side, and the nobles had to be able to
communicate with the you know, with the people who were
under them, with the with the population, and to know
what they're talking about, to know what the buzz is,
to know if the king does this, is he going
to cause a rebellion? Things like that. So I mean,
and that's just the same way it is now. And
you just look at you look at the way the
wind is blowing, and a lot of and a good
elite will look at the way the wind is blowing
and go, Okay, maybe we need to go this way.
And that's the reason why I do what I do
and why I'm like, Okay, you know, I wish that
I had ten or twenty times the audience that I do,
just because there's the potential to talk some more elites.
But there's also a potential to create more of a
buzz that elites recognize and they're like, Okay, then we
need to People are upset about this and we need
to we need to get rid of this. We need
to end this trend stuff. We need to end gay
pride parades with men naked in front of kids, getting
pissed on and giving blowjobs in public. We also Twitter
needs to end X needs to end people being able
to put that stuff on there unedited because I don't
need to scroll my timeline and see that. I don't
need to see it explicitly.
Speaker 2: I'm going to sack with the training operation photos too,
like I'm trying to go about my day like I
don't know, maybe I need to fix my settings.
Speaker 1: There was a time when I would put those up
because I was trying to wake people up, and then
I just realized that I was doing more harm than good.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, lives at TikTok is an awful, awful account. Yeah,
it's an awful It's an awful account. I mean, besides
the fact that you.
Speaker 2: Know well that therein lies the source of propaganda demoralizing
us to make us feel like shit.
Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, tell people where they can find your stuff.
We'll get out of here.
Speaker 2: Yeah. No, this is a great chat. Thanks a lot
for having me Pete again. My name is Phil. You
can find me on Twitter primarily handle m r p
SEU mister Sue, and you can find most of my
work on q paul at this q p o l
dot subsec dot com, where I'm putting out like one
article is like a month because I like to take
that time to really focus on what happened most, what matters,
try to make an arrative out of it. And so yeah,
you can support me for six and nine bucks for
the year if you think I'm worth it. If not,
then that's cool. Money's tight these days.
Speaker 1: I get it.
Speaker 2: Also, if you are around on July twenty seventh in Nashville, Tennessee,
or if you're just bored that Saturday, I will be
part of the first annual Patriot Jam the most free
will and music festival in the country. And Pete was
just on with IgG Enormous Steven on his show, so
him and I and a few others have been working
to put this together kind of like I really want
to say, like a right wing music festival. I just
want to say, like it's not filled with debauchery and
crap like Coachella or something like that. So that's something
that's we're going to put the first one on for
the year. It's it's gonna be smaller, low key. If
you're interested, you can DM directly at the Twitter page
Patriot Jam Fest and then we'll be able to send
any more info gate RSVP'd and if not, then the
stream length will be footing around for YouTube and all
the other stuff. But that's my story and I'm sticking
to it. And Pete, again, thank you so much for
having me on to have this conversation.
Speaker 1: Was great.
Speaker 2: Pete was also on like one of my I think
the most recent podcast where we talked about the Spanish
Civil War if you want to check that out. But
thanks for having me. Man.
Speaker 1: Yeah, one question before we go, is that festival indoors
or outdoors?
Speaker 2: It is indoors?
Speaker 1: Ah, okay, okay.
Speaker 2: Yeah. We basically kind of like.
Speaker 1: People that might get people to Tennessee and at the
end of July.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, No, it's like to be honest, a place
like caps out at like sixty at least for like
the room. So it's gonna be small, it's gonna be chill,
but I think it can hold more. So we're just
gonna be Steven's a.
Speaker 1: Great Steven's a great guy. He's a funny guy. We
got to hang out. He was at og at the
Old Glory Club and uh and we were smoking cigars
and drinking and uh talking talking ship.
Speaker 2: I'm excited to meet him. It's gonna be a good time,
all right, man, take care of yourself. All right, you
see it.