WEBVTT

1
00:00:10.519 --> 00:00:12.359
<v Speaker 1>The human guinea pig stuff in Africa.

2
00:00:18.839 --> 00:00:19.800
<v Speaker 2>It's so insane.

3
00:00:38.079 --> 00:01:37.159
<v Speaker 3>It's so insane, so insane.

4
00:01:18.920 --> 00:01:33.640
<v Speaker 2>It is so insane.

5
00:01:36.040 --> 00:01:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Fuck up, fuck of Boo, Fuco, fuck of bo.

6
00:02:00.200 --> 00:02:04.640
<v Speaker 5>I got married. I got married to a funk Oh.

7
00:02:08.400 --> 00:02:14.360
<v Speaker 6>We got wedded, come joint in the subway, he shot, Oh, well.

8
00:02:16.879 --> 00:02:20.120
<v Speaker 5>I am married. I'm married to.

9
00:02:20.199 --> 00:02:20.879
<v Speaker 2>My funk o.

10
00:02:21.280 --> 00:02:28.680
<v Speaker 5>But do we get joined? Go white as soon as

11
00:02:28.800 --> 00:02:29.840
<v Speaker 5>subway he shot?

12
00:02:30.280 --> 00:02:37.000
<v Speaker 7>Four specimens and biscuits and minerals they come to even

13
00:02:37.159 --> 00:02:40.639
<v Speaker 7>to my whole life is spit go.

14
00:02:40.759 --> 00:03:03.120
<v Speaker 5>To m mother, rather offer I'm married to I don't hooper.

15
00:03:06.960 --> 00:03:11.080
<v Speaker 6>We got wedded, but we got joining in the subway,

16
00:03:11.319 --> 00:03:12.879
<v Speaker 6>shut over the road.

17
00:03:14.800 --> 00:03:19.800
<v Speaker 7>Visiting and minerals they come to you visit it and

18
00:03:19.960 --> 00:03:22.759
<v Speaker 7>minerals they come from it too.

19
00:03:28.879 --> 00:03:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Don't talk about for.

20
00:03:34.120 --> 00:03:37.520
<v Speaker 5>Buck.

21
00:03:48.759 --> 00:03:53.240
<v Speaker 6>I got married, I got married to my don't go hooper.

22
00:03:53.879 --> 00:04:01.919
<v Speaker 6>Oh we got wedded. Ah we get joy says shocking.

23
00:04:05.159 --> 00:04:07.960
<v Speaker 8>First sight, first sight? What should I do with the

24
00:04:08.319 --> 00:04:10.479
<v Speaker 8>first sight? Put it in my head, throw it on

25
00:04:10.520 --> 00:04:13.039
<v Speaker 8>the ground, and who knows? Just what will I do?

26
00:04:16.959 --> 00:04:17.360
<v Speaker 9>Sweet?

27
00:04:19.279 --> 00:04:21.319
<v Speaker 5>How you joined me as some way?

28
00:04:21.560 --> 00:04:22.959
<v Speaker 2>Shut love.

29
00:04:34.759 --> 00:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>The human guinea pig stuff in Africa, It's so insane.

30
00:04:53.959 --> 00:05:08.959
<v Speaker 1>The human guinea pig stuff in Africa.

31
00:05:12.160 --> 00:05:18.800
<v Speaker 8>Oh yeah, welcome to a nice cozy evening with me.

32
00:05:20.240 --> 00:05:24.439
<v Speaker 10>You're not gonna get me being weird. You're not gonna

33
00:05:24.439 --> 00:05:29.240
<v Speaker 10>get me being spurgy and energetic. You're gonna get me

34
00:05:29.319 --> 00:05:31.560
<v Speaker 10>being very calm and very loving with you.

35
00:05:33.839 --> 00:05:38.240
<v Speaker 8>I'm not gonna be debating. I'm gonna be calm, and

36
00:05:38.279 --> 00:05:43.000
<v Speaker 8>I'm gonna be soothing. I'm gonna soothe you. So instead

37
00:05:43.000 --> 00:05:45.360
<v Speaker 8>of debating, we're just gonna listen to me say the

38
00:05:45.399 --> 00:05:58.160
<v Speaker 8>word sooth. So is that the kind of asthma that

39
00:05:58.199 --> 00:06:05.319
<v Speaker 8>you like? Do you all like the asthma? Welcome everyone

40
00:06:05.319 --> 00:06:09.959
<v Speaker 8>to evening debate time. That was all not true. Everything

41
00:06:10.000 --> 00:06:14.000
<v Speaker 8>I said was complete lies, disinformation, and deception, straight from

42
00:06:14.040 --> 00:06:17.560
<v Speaker 8>the source. It's an evening debate. Everyone was so used

43
00:06:17.600 --> 00:06:22.600
<v Speaker 8>to my afternoon debates that I thought I'd throw a

44
00:06:22.639 --> 00:06:25.000
<v Speaker 8>curve ball at your face. Now you don't know what

45
00:06:25.040 --> 00:06:30.519
<v Speaker 8>to do. Now you're over there shaking, shaking in your crib,

46
00:06:30.959 --> 00:06:35.399
<v Speaker 8>shaking in your adult diapers because you're a gamer, and

47
00:06:35.439 --> 00:06:36.959
<v Speaker 8>you don't need to get up to go to the

48
00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:43.680
<v Speaker 8>bathroom because you're gaming, pooping yourself like a Matt Delon monkey.

49
00:06:44.120 --> 00:06:51.279
<v Speaker 8>Evolutionary being, achieving ascendency, achieving initiation into the mystery of

50
00:06:51.319 --> 00:06:56.120
<v Speaker 8>the maya maya being the illusion, the illusion that you're

51
00:06:56.160 --> 00:07:03.199
<v Speaker 8>all encapsulated in the matrix. AKA. Today we're going to

52
00:07:03.240 --> 00:07:07.319
<v Speaker 8>break the matrix by breaking your mind, by breaking your psyche,

53
00:07:07.360 --> 00:07:10.839
<v Speaker 8>but breaking your soul, because we're going to open up

54
00:07:10.879 --> 00:07:14.959
<v Speaker 8>to debate. There's nothing more contrary to the ethos of

55
00:07:15.000 --> 00:07:19.920
<v Speaker 8>our era, of our society, of our times than this old, forgotten,

56
00:07:21.079 --> 00:07:25.040
<v Speaker 8>dusty ass art of debate, which nobody believes is an

57
00:07:25.120 --> 00:07:32.319
<v Speaker 8>art anymore. And that's why even though I debate all

58
00:07:32.360 --> 00:07:36.600
<v Speaker 8>these people, nobody really cares that you would debate. The

59
00:07:36.639 --> 00:07:40.240
<v Speaker 8>debate is not seen as anything debates. What is that

60
00:07:41.920 --> 00:07:45.439
<v Speaker 8>People think debate is arguing No, no, no, it's proving your

61
00:07:45.519 --> 00:07:53.040
<v Speaker 8>case through abstract mental chess games. That's what I like

62
00:07:53.120 --> 00:07:58.240
<v Speaker 8>to think of it as it's thought chess. I saw

63
00:07:58.360 --> 00:08:02.199
<v Speaker 8>videos of people playing chess, and I thought, that's what

64
00:08:02.279 --> 00:08:11.920
<v Speaker 8>debates are. Debates are mind chess, mind chess. Now we're

65
00:08:11.959 --> 00:08:14.839
<v Speaker 8>pretty fair, I would say. Over here on my channel,

66
00:08:15.600 --> 00:08:18.680
<v Speaker 8>we've been opening it up to debate for many years now,

67
00:08:19.639 --> 00:08:25.959
<v Speaker 8>almost two three times every week, and it's a lot

68
00:08:25.959 --> 00:08:28.759
<v Speaker 8>of fun. Sometimes I get tired of it gets old

69
00:08:29.000 --> 00:08:31.879
<v Speaker 8>because it's usually the same old stuff, you know. It's

70
00:08:31.879 --> 00:08:37.399
<v Speaker 8>sort of like everybody's just rehashing crap that they just

71
00:08:37.440 --> 00:08:39.679
<v Speaker 8>heard for the first time, and they don't even realize

72
00:08:39.720 --> 00:08:42.720
<v Speaker 8>that what you just heard has already been addressed like

73
00:08:42.840 --> 00:08:46.200
<v Speaker 8>five hundred times and you just didn't know. So but

74
00:08:46.279 --> 00:08:51.200
<v Speaker 8>that's the nature of the game. That's where we're at this.

75
00:08:51.240 --> 00:08:52.519
<v Speaker 11>But video popped up.

76
00:08:52.519 --> 00:08:56.000
<v Speaker 8>And I'm like, what is this? And so this random

77
00:08:56.080 --> 00:08:57.919
<v Speaker 8>I don't know. He looks like a worship leader. He

78
00:08:57.960 --> 00:09:02.840
<v Speaker 8>looks like he would be I don't know the he's

79
00:09:02.879 --> 00:09:08.279
<v Speaker 8>the stuntman for Scott stat Can you treat me higher?

80
00:09:09.600 --> 00:09:10.519
<v Speaker 5>Cool a parish?

81
00:09:10.879 --> 00:09:17.000
<v Speaker 8>We're blind man and shee. But he is a convert.

82
00:09:17.039 --> 00:09:21.879
<v Speaker 8>His name is Keith, not Keith Urban and not Keith Chief,

83
00:09:22.639 --> 00:09:27.600
<v Speaker 8>Keith Nestor. No idea who this person is. He's already

84
00:09:27.639 --> 00:09:33.320
<v Speaker 8>got merch. He's the next level three thousand, six hundred convert.

85
00:09:33.799 --> 00:09:39.799
<v Speaker 8>He's part of the Rosary Crew, the Rosary Crew talk

86
00:09:39.799 --> 00:09:41.440
<v Speaker 8>about cringe. Dude, let's go ahead and give this a

87
00:09:41.440 --> 00:09:45.519
<v Speaker 8>thumbs down right here. And he's gonna tell us what

88
00:09:46.440 --> 00:09:49.879
<v Speaker 8>convinced him Catholicism. How there's all these killer arguments. We're

89
00:09:49.879 --> 00:09:52.000
<v Speaker 8>gonna make this quick as this kind of our introduction.

90
00:09:52.759 --> 00:09:56.320
<v Speaker 8>Of course, it's not restricted to Catholic stuff today. We're

91
00:09:56.320 --> 00:10:00.600
<v Speaker 8>gonna be talking about any topics you want to bring

92
00:10:01.879 --> 00:10:05.879
<v Speaker 8>to the table, Baby, you want to bring into the spotlight.

93
00:10:07.279 --> 00:10:10.840
<v Speaker 8>And of course Apple update made my volume all.

94
00:10:10.679 --> 00:10:11.200
<v Speaker 11>The way low.

95
00:10:11.840 --> 00:10:14.360
<v Speaker 8>I'm sorry for y'all, but you just had to turn

96
00:10:14.440 --> 00:10:17.799
<v Speaker 8>up me singing. So we got Scott Stapp over here,

97
00:10:17.799 --> 00:10:23.960
<v Speaker 8>converted and he's gonna tell us his reasons. And it's

98
00:10:24.039 --> 00:10:27.440
<v Speaker 8>just a little frustrating, honestly, because you know, I look

99
00:10:27.480 --> 00:10:31.759
<v Speaker 8>at this channel and this is a pretty recent video

100
00:10:31.759 --> 00:10:36.360
<v Speaker 8>a few months ago, what two hundred something two quarter

101
00:10:36.360 --> 00:10:40.039
<v Speaker 8>of a million views on this low tier stuff. Come

102
00:10:40.080 --> 00:10:46.759
<v Speaker 8>over here, and we got Bobby's perspective mega grifter from

103
00:10:47.159 --> 00:10:50.679
<v Speaker 8>two three years ago. He's still going strong. Look at

104
00:10:50.679 --> 00:10:53.440
<v Speaker 8>the Look at the kind of garbage Bobby has on

105
00:10:53.480 --> 00:10:58.720
<v Speaker 8>his channel. First of all, we've got this nonsense about

106
00:10:59.639 --> 00:11:02.440
<v Speaker 8>sam Shamun is caught lying because Sam she Mun says

107
00:11:03.320 --> 00:11:08.519
<v Speaker 8>Allah is Satan, but the word can also refer to God,

108
00:11:08.679 --> 00:11:11.080
<v Speaker 8>as in God of the Bible, and Bobby thinks this

109
00:11:11.200 --> 00:11:13.399
<v Speaker 8>is like a massive own. This has one hundred and

110
00:11:13.399 --> 00:11:17.159
<v Speaker 8>sixty six thousand views. We come over here, what is

111
00:11:17.200 --> 00:11:22.240
<v Speaker 8>Bobby uploading Islam and ayahuasca? You can't make this stuff up.

112
00:11:22.320 --> 00:11:27.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean, we are literally dealing with just armies of

113
00:11:27.360 --> 00:11:31.159
<v Speaker 8>dummies that are everywhere. And I don't know what to

114
00:11:31.200 --> 00:11:35.679
<v Speaker 8>do here because people are getting so dumb that, let's say,

115
00:11:35.679 --> 00:11:39.720
<v Speaker 8>for the sake of argument, I refute fifty dummies in

116
00:11:39.759 --> 00:11:43.200
<v Speaker 8>a five hour livestream. People are so dumb they can't

117
00:11:43.240 --> 00:11:49.080
<v Speaker 8>even see and know the dummies got refuted. People are

118
00:11:49.080 --> 00:11:54.399
<v Speaker 8>so dumb they can't recognize bad arguments, are people losing debates?

119
00:11:54.919 --> 00:11:58.440
<v Speaker 8>And also they don't even care. For example, many things

120
00:11:58.480 --> 00:12:00.360
<v Speaker 8>have happened over the years that you would have thought

121
00:12:00.559 --> 00:12:04.200
<v Speaker 8>would end a person's career, like you would think that

122
00:12:05.200 --> 00:12:07.639
<v Speaker 8>Taylor Marshall is saying that Mary appeared to him in

123
00:12:07.639 --> 00:12:11.679
<v Speaker 8>a vision and he saw giant breast milkers and that

124
00:12:11.840 --> 00:12:14.679
<v Speaker 8>was some object less envisioned. No, no, no, His channel

125
00:12:14.799 --> 00:12:18.639
<v Speaker 8>grew tremendously. So it's almost like the dumber you are,

126
00:12:18.720 --> 00:12:21.519
<v Speaker 8>the stupider your stuff is, the more hard headed you are,

127
00:12:22.159 --> 00:12:24.759
<v Speaker 8>the more you're actually exposed and refuted, the better you

128
00:12:24.799 --> 00:12:29.440
<v Speaker 8>are off. I mean, Hawk Tua is now she's probably

129
00:12:29.480 --> 00:12:31.399
<v Speaker 8>gonna do better now that she had a giant rug

130
00:12:31.440 --> 00:12:39.519
<v Speaker 8>poke coin. Everything is in working opposite in this we're

131
00:12:39.559 --> 00:12:45.159
<v Speaker 8>in upside down world. We somehow went through the stranger things,

132
00:12:46.000 --> 00:12:48.799
<v Speaker 8>but whole dimension to the other side, and everything isn't verse,

133
00:12:49.080 --> 00:12:52.159
<v Speaker 8>everything's reverse. So the stupider you are, the more ridiculous

134
00:12:52.200 --> 00:12:55.720
<v Speaker 8>you are, the more you get refuted, the more people

135
00:12:55.759 --> 00:13:01.039
<v Speaker 8>will listen to you. What And also, of course I

136
00:13:01.120 --> 00:13:04.200
<v Speaker 8>suspect I can't prove it, but I think these kinds

137
00:13:04.200 --> 00:13:12.000
<v Speaker 8>of things are given boosts, right, boosting the algo. So

138
00:13:12.240 --> 00:13:17.440
<v Speaker 8>when he was a vegan pseudo Orthodox channel, he had

139
00:13:17.480 --> 00:13:21.360
<v Speaker 8>like fifty thousand subscribers. And then when he started to

140
00:13:22.120 --> 00:13:26.000
<v Speaker 8>tell you not believe in the Trinity anymore, I did

141
00:13:26.039 --> 00:13:28.759
<v Speaker 8>not even know that Orthodox who he was the teaching

142
00:13:28.799 --> 00:13:31.600
<v Speaker 8>of the Trinity. So he's supposedly a cradle Orthodox and

143
00:13:31.639 --> 00:13:35.919
<v Speaker 8>he didn't know that it taught the Trinity. Uh So

144
00:13:36.200 --> 00:13:40.159
<v Speaker 8>then he realized if he grifts with a bunch of

145
00:13:42.320 --> 00:13:46.960
<v Speaker 8>Islam videos, he would appeal to this rising, giant horde

146
00:13:47.000 --> 00:13:51.480
<v Speaker 8>of idiots that believe Islam and believe the low tier

147
00:13:51.559 --> 00:13:56.000
<v Speaker 8>stuff that they push. And you know, unfortunately it's not

148
00:13:56.080 --> 00:13:59.840
<v Speaker 8>much better for the Catholic side of things. I mean,

149
00:13:59.840 --> 00:14:03.480
<v Speaker 8>I would say that the Catholic YouTubers are at least

150
00:14:03.480 --> 00:14:10.279
<v Speaker 8>more intelligent on the average, But the quality of the argumentation,

151
00:14:10.600 --> 00:14:18.720
<v Speaker 8>oh my gosh, like it's just so it's so low tire,

152
00:14:18.759 --> 00:14:20.559
<v Speaker 8>and I'm just at an impasse. I don't know what

153
00:14:20.679 --> 00:14:24.799
<v Speaker 8>to do. How do you combat super dumb arguments that

154
00:14:24.960 --> 00:14:28.159
<v Speaker 8>convince hordes of people to believe dumb stuff? Like what's

155
00:14:28.200 --> 00:14:32.480
<v Speaker 8>the solution here? I'm not sure how to People are saying,

156
00:14:32.519 --> 00:14:35.720
<v Speaker 8>debate me. This is for you, dummy, this is why

157
00:14:36.559 --> 00:14:39.159
<v Speaker 8>you can hop on tonight. You're telling me to debate you.

158
00:14:39.600 --> 00:14:42.200
<v Speaker 8>These streams are for you to come debate me right here,

159
00:14:42.960 --> 00:14:49.279
<v Speaker 8>here's the link, call in right there. What's the solution?

160
00:14:49.919 --> 00:14:52.639
<v Speaker 8>We have a really smart audience? Does a collective audience

161
00:14:52.679 --> 00:14:56.440
<v Speaker 8>have a solution here? How do you combat millions of idiots?

162
00:14:56.440 --> 00:15:02.159
<v Speaker 8>I don't know, because you can't make them smart. And

163
00:15:02.200 --> 00:15:04.000
<v Speaker 8>it's almost like it doesn't matter how many times you've

164
00:15:04.039 --> 00:15:07.960
<v Speaker 8>been correct, how many times people have been demonstrated to

165
00:15:08.000 --> 00:15:12.799
<v Speaker 8>be just complete bozos, complete goobers like that, it just

166
00:15:13.200 --> 00:15:20.679
<v Speaker 8>marches on. So, like, what is the secret to helping

167
00:15:20.840 --> 00:15:27.360
<v Speaker 8>many people understand? Is it simpler? Videos. Are we too cerebral?

168
00:15:27.639 --> 00:15:30.200
<v Speaker 8>I know it's I understand prayer, So thank you all.

169
00:15:30.240 --> 00:15:33.399
<v Speaker 8>You have very pious people. I'm speaking at the level

170
00:15:33.519 --> 00:15:39.759
<v Speaker 8>of compacting and packaging information. Is that what it is?

171
00:15:40.639 --> 00:15:43.799
<v Speaker 8>Because I mean, is this guy winning over here with

172
00:15:44.080 --> 00:15:46.879
<v Speaker 8>his numbers on his video because he did too many rosaries?

173
00:15:46.919 --> 00:15:48.440
<v Speaker 8>Like is that what you're saying? Like he prayed a

174
00:15:48.480 --> 00:15:55.039
<v Speaker 8>lot more than I'm joking, But more people have to

175
00:15:55.080 --> 00:15:58.399
<v Speaker 8>speak up. Well, it's good that we're getting more clergy

176
00:15:58.480 --> 00:16:00.960
<v Speaker 8>and priests doing this kind of stuff then used to

177
00:16:01.039 --> 00:16:02.919
<v Speaker 8>you know, in twenty seventeen eighteen, there was hardly any

178
00:16:02.960 --> 00:16:04.519
<v Speaker 8>and now we got a lot more clergy trying to

179
00:16:04.559 --> 00:16:09.080
<v Speaker 8>do this stuff, which is good. Hey, Jamie, could you

180
00:16:09.080 --> 00:16:17.799
<v Speaker 8>make me an expresso? Thank you? Signs of the times

181
00:16:17.840 --> 00:16:20.919
<v Speaker 8>could be somebody said, just talk from your toilet probably

182
00:16:20.919 --> 00:16:23.559
<v Speaker 8>would get way more subscribers.

183
00:16:22.840 --> 00:16:26.000
<v Speaker 11>Like toilet bowl pologetics.

184
00:16:26.519 --> 00:16:31.159
<v Speaker 8>Right, I'm serious, Like you would probably get like your

185
00:16:31.240 --> 00:16:35.440
<v Speaker 8>channel would blow up doing a poop apologetics on the toilet, right,

186
00:16:35.519 --> 00:16:42.720
<v Speaker 8>like one minute TikTok videos. Anyway, I don't know, maybe

187
00:16:42.720 --> 00:16:46.519
<v Speaker 8>there's not a solution. Maybe it's like we're just doomed

188
00:16:46.600 --> 00:16:54.679
<v Speaker 8>with dummies or something. Like dummy doom, dummy doom. Anyway,

189
00:16:55.759 --> 00:16:57.679
<v Speaker 8>So again, so people in the chat, we're gonna do it.

190
00:16:57.679 --> 00:17:00.919
<v Speaker 8>It's a cozy evening debate stream because I was in

191
00:17:00.960 --> 00:17:03.360
<v Speaker 8>the mood. I just saw so much stupid stuff on

192
00:17:03.399 --> 00:17:06.119
<v Speaker 8>Twitter today and then these these videos popping up in

193
00:17:06.200 --> 00:17:13.400
<v Speaker 8>my feed and I'm like what. And there's a bunch

194
00:17:13.480 --> 00:17:15.400
<v Speaker 8>more too. I noticed a bunch of other dumb videos

195
00:17:15.440 --> 00:17:19.559
<v Speaker 8>popping up. It's just today we want to combat the idiocy,

196
00:17:19.559 --> 00:17:24.519
<v Speaker 8>the idiocracy, combating idiocracy today. We already got five people

197
00:17:24.799 --> 00:17:30.279
<v Speaker 8>in the queue here. Let's hear a couple arguments here

198
00:17:30.279 --> 00:17:33.079
<v Speaker 8>from Scott's Stapp as to why he converted.

199
00:17:34.920 --> 00:17:37.759
<v Speaker 12>Is Catholicism based on circular reasoning?

200
00:17:37.799 --> 00:17:39.319
<v Speaker 13>What is circular reasoning?

201
00:17:39.720 --> 00:17:42.880
<v Speaker 8>Sometimes I get this, well, this is INtime because this

202
00:17:43.000 --> 00:17:45.359
<v Speaker 8>is a thing I said in a video many years

203
00:17:45.400 --> 00:17:49.279
<v Speaker 8>ago one of my early critiques of Rome, I talked

204
00:17:49.279 --> 00:17:52.160
<v Speaker 8>about the papacy being circular. Let's see if that's where

205
00:17:55.079 --> 00:17:59.200
<v Speaker 8>freaking I can't say he is Billy Ray Stap.

206
00:18:00.880 --> 00:18:03.680
<v Speaker 12>Scott cyrus over her injection to some of my videos

207
00:18:03.680 --> 00:18:06.279
<v Speaker 12>where people say things like, well, you're just saying the

208
00:18:06.319 --> 00:18:09.319
<v Speaker 12>Catholic Church is true because the Catholic Church says it's true.

209
00:18:09.519 --> 00:18:10.720
<v Speaker 13>Is that a circular argument.

210
00:18:10.960 --> 00:18:13.839
<v Speaker 12>Yes, Circular reasoning is a logical fallacy in which the

211
00:18:13.880 --> 00:18:16.799
<v Speaker 12>reasoner begins with what they're trying to end with. And

212
00:18:16.920 --> 00:18:20.359
<v Speaker 12>circular reasoning is an argument where the premises are just

213
00:18:20.400 --> 00:18:23.119
<v Speaker 12>as much in need of the proof or evidence as

214
00:18:23.160 --> 00:18:27.400
<v Speaker 12>the conclusion. Is this what Catholicism teaches? Are we exposed here?

215
00:18:27.440 --> 00:18:29.720
<v Speaker 12>I think we need to look at this. A circular

216
00:18:29.799 --> 00:18:33.160
<v Speaker 12>argument when it comes to Catholicism would look something like this.

217
00:18:34.640 --> 00:18:38.839
<v Speaker 8>I'm already starting to WinCE and cringe because I already

218
00:18:38.839 --> 00:18:40.920
<v Speaker 8>feel like this is gonna be way more low tier

219
00:18:41.599 --> 00:18:43.480
<v Speaker 8>than I expected. I was a little impressed that he

220
00:18:43.599 --> 00:18:47.480
<v Speaker 8>started off with dealing with a fallacy, but I'm afraid

221
00:18:47.480 --> 00:18:49.839
<v Speaker 8>it's gonna go downhill. Let's see, catholic.

222
00:18:49.519 --> 00:18:54.160
<v Speaker 12>Church is true because the truth is Catholicism. That would

223
00:18:54.160 --> 00:18:58.039
<v Speaker 12>be a circular argument. The conclusion is dependent on the premise.

224
00:18:58.920 --> 00:19:03.240
<v Speaker 12>Is this what Cathosis does? Are the arguments for Catholicism

225
00:19:03.599 --> 00:19:06.640
<v Speaker 12>just simply based on Catholicism is true because what it

226
00:19:06.680 --> 00:19:09.079
<v Speaker 12>says about itself. I say, no way.

227
00:19:13.119 --> 00:19:15.480
<v Speaker 8>Is he sitting there with like his drum? Is that

228
00:19:15.599 --> 00:19:18.359
<v Speaker 8>a drum set in the background or some kind of

229
00:19:18.400 --> 00:19:24.920
<v Speaker 8>weird drink dispenser. And who is this person? Like, is

230
00:19:25.119 --> 00:19:27.599
<v Speaker 8>he some kind of musician or something like? What is

231
00:19:27.640 --> 00:19:31.240
<v Speaker 8>this a rock star who became a Roman Catholic? Who

232
00:19:31.319 --> 00:19:37.119
<v Speaker 8>is this dude a former pastor? Oh my gosh, So

233
00:19:37.200 --> 00:19:41.799
<v Speaker 8>here we go. So he had to shift his ministry

234
00:19:42.000 --> 00:19:54.480
<v Speaker 8>into papism, So here we go.

235
00:19:55.200 --> 00:19:57.240
<v Speaker 12>Claims for truth are not based solely on what it

236
00:19:57.240 --> 00:20:01.480
<v Speaker 12>says about itself, but rather on the Bible, history, reason,

237
00:20:01.880 --> 00:20:04.319
<v Speaker 12>and ultimately faith. So I'm going to break down the

238
00:20:04.400 --> 00:20:07.160
<v Speaker 12>case for Catholicism one by one here, and I'm going

239
00:20:07.240 --> 00:20:08.200
<v Speaker 12>to begin with the Bible.

240
00:20:08.599 --> 00:20:13.359
<v Speaker 8>But wait a minute, So there is actually an element

241
00:20:13.400 --> 00:20:17.559
<v Speaker 8>of circularity here because, as is often utilized by Roman

242
00:20:17.599 --> 00:20:21.240
<v Speaker 8>Catholic apologists, they will say, well, the Bible is actually

243
00:20:21.480 --> 00:20:23.920
<v Speaker 8>true and we know what it is because of the papacy.

244
00:20:23.960 --> 00:20:26.279
<v Speaker 8>We would not have the Bible without the papacy telling

245
00:20:26.359 --> 00:20:30.160
<v Speaker 8>us what the Bible is. That's a classic Roman Catholic argument. So,

246
00:20:30.599 --> 00:20:33.160
<v Speaker 8>depending upon where he goes with this argument, that actually

247
00:20:33.200 --> 00:20:35.480
<v Speaker 8>would be a circular argument. If he goes the route

248
00:20:35.480 --> 00:20:38.519
<v Speaker 8>of saying that if you're a Protestant, you need the

249
00:20:38.559 --> 00:20:41.599
<v Speaker 8>papacy to know the Bible But wait a minute, the

250
00:20:41.640 --> 00:20:44.799
<v Speaker 8>papacy is proven. You're arguing here, and as many Roman

251
00:20:44.799 --> 00:20:47.640
<v Speaker 8>Catholics city from the Bible, so that would actually be

252
00:20:48.119 --> 00:20:50.519
<v Speaker 8>a circular self referencing argument.

253
00:20:50.640 --> 00:20:53.559
<v Speaker 12>Hey, Keith, the Catholic Church is not in the Bible.

254
00:20:53.880 --> 00:20:56.319
<v Speaker 12>I hear this all the time. Where are the words

255
00:20:56.440 --> 00:20:57.759
<v Speaker 12>Roman Catholic in the Bible.

256
00:20:58.400 --> 00:21:04.559
<v Speaker 8>Well, Keith, you're just assuming that the Bible is when

257
00:21:04.559 --> 00:21:08.400
<v Speaker 8>it refers to the one universal body, that it's the

258
00:21:08.440 --> 00:21:13.079
<v Speaker 8>Franco Latin papal Church. In the first centuries of Christianity,

259
00:21:13.160 --> 00:21:17.119
<v Speaker 8>especially up into the Ecumenical councils, the locus of Christianity

260
00:21:17.200 --> 00:21:22.119
<v Speaker 8>was in the Eastern Byzantine Empire. All the ecumenical councils

261
00:21:22.160 --> 00:21:25.599
<v Speaker 8>were in the East and had pretty much nothing to

262
00:21:25.640 --> 00:21:29.599
<v Speaker 8>do with Rome itself until later in six forty nine,

263
00:21:30.079 --> 00:21:34.119
<v Speaker 8>where the Pope first tried to call his own ecumenical

264
00:21:34.160 --> 00:21:38.640
<v Speaker 8>council without any reference to an emperor. Roman Catholics do

265
00:21:38.759 --> 00:21:42.480
<v Speaker 8>not count later in six forty nine as an ecumenical council,

266
00:21:42.880 --> 00:21:46.960
<v Speaker 8>which they ought to do if the Roman Catholic principles

267
00:21:46.960 --> 00:21:50.359
<v Speaker 8>of Vatican One were the case. In the first thousand years,

268
00:21:50.880 --> 00:21:55.039
<v Speaker 8>whereby the papacy determines the true and false councils, so

269
00:21:55.079 --> 00:21:58.440
<v Speaker 8>already from the outset, Keith has no idea actually about

270
00:21:58.839 --> 00:22:03.359
<v Speaker 8>the progress of the early Catholic Church into the later

271
00:22:03.559 --> 00:22:07.799
<v Speaker 8>medieval East West split in ten fifty four between the

272
00:22:07.839 --> 00:22:12.200
<v Speaker 8>Eastern Church, the Buzinessing Empire, the other the Four Patriarchs,

273
00:22:12.839 --> 00:22:16.559
<v Speaker 8>and the Franco Latin Papal soon to be Church.

274
00:22:17.519 --> 00:22:20.440
<v Speaker 12>Is that objection alone enough to blow up my argument

275
00:22:20.839 --> 00:22:23.359
<v Speaker 12>for some maybe, but I suspect.

276
00:22:23.000 --> 00:22:25.319
<v Speaker 8>By the way, that is not my opinion. That is

277
00:22:25.400 --> 00:22:30.079
<v Speaker 8>two day's top Catholic scholars like Devornik or Kongar to

278
00:22:30.160 --> 00:22:31.519
<v Speaker 8>write about that they.

279
00:22:31.359 --> 00:22:33.640
<v Speaker 12>Would be in trouble if they apply that same standard

280
00:22:33.680 --> 00:22:38.000
<v Speaker 12>to themselves. I mean, where is independent fundamentalist Baptist King

281
00:22:38.119 --> 00:22:41.599
<v Speaker 12>James only or reformed Calvinists found in the Bible. There

282
00:22:41.599 --> 00:22:44.440
<v Speaker 12>are many things not explicitly mentioned in the Bible that

283
00:22:44.519 --> 00:22:47.359
<v Speaker 12>these same objectors will usually accept the Trinity.

284
00:22:47.559 --> 00:22:50.680
<v Speaker 8>Well, that's true, but that does not lead to the

285
00:22:50.680 --> 00:22:55.440
<v Speaker 8>conclusions that Vatican One's teachings, nor that the Franco Latin

286
00:22:55.480 --> 00:22:59.000
<v Speaker 8>Papal dogmas from the first thousand years and the second

287
00:22:59.039 --> 00:23:01.599
<v Speaker 8>millennium are found in them Bible either or that they're

288
00:23:01.599 --> 00:23:05.200
<v Speaker 8>true or that just because, in other words, it doesn't

289
00:23:05.240 --> 00:23:08.960
<v Speaker 8>follow that because something is or isn't mentioned in scripture,

290
00:23:09.039 --> 00:23:13.960
<v Speaker 8>then that you could erect an evolving dogmatic tradition outside

291
00:23:13.960 --> 00:23:17.200
<v Speaker 8>of the scriptures either. So this is a two pronged problem.

292
00:23:17.279 --> 00:23:20.160
<v Speaker 8>If you go the route of saying that, well, not

293
00:23:20.279 --> 00:23:22.920
<v Speaker 8>everything that's dogma is in scripture, which we would believe,

294
00:23:22.920 --> 00:23:27.200
<v Speaker 8>we would agree as Orthodox, but what that means is

295
00:23:27.319 --> 00:23:30.720
<v Speaker 8>very ambiguous until you start to pin down what the

296
00:23:30.799 --> 00:23:34.680
<v Speaker 8>romancalogy means on those topics, on those subjects with specificity.

297
00:23:35.359 --> 00:23:39.119
<v Speaker 8>And these pap apologists never go into the actual documents

298
00:23:39.119 --> 00:23:42.880
<v Speaker 8>of Vatican One or Vatican two. They only repeat pop

299
00:23:42.920 --> 00:23:46.559
<v Speaker 8>apologetics because that's all they know. And this poor guy,

300
00:23:46.720 --> 00:23:48.880
<v Speaker 8>which I've been exactly in the same situation he's in.

301
00:23:48.960 --> 00:23:51.720
<v Speaker 8>I was a Protestant who became Roman Catholic in two

302
00:23:51.759 --> 00:23:55.519
<v Speaker 8>thousand and three from these kinds of pop papal arguments,

303
00:23:55.680 --> 00:23:59.079
<v Speaker 8>and I was duped by fake papal quote minds. That

304
00:23:59.160 --> 00:24:00.640
<v Speaker 8>was one of the reasons I went into it. I

305
00:24:00.720 --> 00:24:03.160
<v Speaker 8>thought a lot of those papal quote minds were legit,

306
00:24:03.759 --> 00:24:05.519
<v Speaker 8>and later I found out they weren't, where they were

307
00:24:05.559 --> 00:24:07.720
<v Speaker 8>out of context or They didn't tell the whole story,

308
00:24:07.720 --> 00:24:12.799
<v Speaker 8>the whole picture, and they also didn't prove or demonstrate

309
00:24:12.880 --> 00:24:16.559
<v Speaker 8>what Vatican one claims. Hence why rom Catholicism argues for

310
00:24:16.920 --> 00:24:19.000
<v Speaker 8>doctrinal development, eventually.

311
00:24:18.960 --> 00:24:22.359
<v Speaker 12>The canon of the Bible, the sinner's prayer. Those are

312
00:24:22.400 --> 00:24:24.559
<v Speaker 12>just some examples, but I don't want to play that game.

313
00:24:24.920 --> 00:24:28.519
<v Speaker 12>Using a Lowsi argument to expose another Lowsy argument is

314
00:24:28.519 --> 00:24:32.319
<v Speaker 12>sometimes necessary, but it really doesn't get us anywhere. Whenever

315
00:24:32.359 --> 00:24:35.160
<v Speaker 12>someone fires up the where's that in the Bible argument,

316
00:24:35.640 --> 00:24:40.279
<v Speaker 12>I prepare for not getting anywhere. Usually these arguments evolve into, well,

317
00:24:40.319 --> 00:24:43.359
<v Speaker 12>that's not what that means. For example, when arguing for

318
00:24:43.400 --> 00:24:46.519
<v Speaker 12>apostolic succession based on the Bible, I take people to

319
00:24:46.559 --> 00:24:50.279
<v Speaker 12>Acts chapter one, where the apostles literally chose a successor

320
00:24:50.319 --> 00:24:53.559
<v Speaker 12>to Judas is Scariot because Peter applies the scripture from

321
00:24:53.599 --> 00:24:57.000
<v Speaker 12>Psalm one oh nine, let another his office take as

322
00:24:57.039 --> 00:24:59.799
<v Speaker 12>the reason to elect Matthias to his office.

323
00:25:00.079 --> 00:25:01.359
<v Speaker 13>That's a pretty clear cut.

324
00:25:01.119 --> 00:25:04.160
<v Speaker 12>Example, sure, but I rarely hear someone go, oh, you

325
00:25:04.240 --> 00:25:06.960
<v Speaker 12>got me on that one. They instead argue, well, that's

326
00:25:07.000 --> 00:25:09.440
<v Speaker 12>not what that means. We can do the same thing

327
00:25:09.440 --> 00:25:13.079
<v Speaker 12>about Mary's immaculate conception, which is rooted in Gabriel's greeting

328
00:25:13.119 --> 00:25:15.480
<v Speaker 12>to her in Luke one twenty eight and in what

329
00:25:15.559 --> 00:25:17.880
<v Speaker 12>God said to the serpent in Genesis three point fifteen

330
00:25:18.279 --> 00:25:20.880
<v Speaker 12>about the woman who would have enmity with him.

331
00:25:21.000 --> 00:25:24.799
<v Speaker 8>Who's wait a minute, where's immaculate conception in either of

332
00:25:24.839 --> 00:25:26.000
<v Speaker 8>those passages.

333
00:25:25.559 --> 00:25:26.599
<v Speaker 13>See would crush his head?

334
00:25:27.160 --> 00:25:28.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but that isn't Where do you get that that's

335
00:25:28.960 --> 00:25:32.680
<v Speaker 8>immaculate conception? So he's not even aware of the divergence

336
00:25:32.720 --> 00:25:36.359
<v Speaker 8>between East and West on this issue. Nor is he aware,

337
00:25:36.359 --> 00:25:40.839
<v Speaker 8>apparently that you do not find immaculate conception in the

338
00:25:40.880 --> 00:25:43.559
<v Speaker 8>first several centuries of christian It's a very late idea.

339
00:25:44.559 --> 00:25:48.359
<v Speaker 8>In fact, even the Eastern Catholic churches still retain the

340
00:25:48.519 --> 00:25:51.119
<v Speaker 8>feast of her dor mission meaning her going to sleep,

341
00:25:51.160 --> 00:25:54.079
<v Speaker 8>meaning she died, meaning that she's a daughter of Adam

342
00:25:54.119 --> 00:25:57.599
<v Speaker 8>who experienced the effects of sin like everyone else. As Orthodox,

343
00:25:57.680 --> 00:26:00.160
<v Speaker 8>we also agree that does not mean that Mary he

344
00:26:00.240 --> 00:26:03.400
<v Speaker 8>became a sinner. She is a spotless virgin, but spotless

345
00:26:03.480 --> 00:26:07.319
<v Speaker 8>virgin does not equate to immaculate conception, which would have

346
00:26:07.359 --> 00:26:10.519
<v Speaker 8>exempted her from the effects of original sin, namely death.

347
00:26:10.920 --> 00:26:14.599
<v Speaker 8>But even they celebrate her going to sleep her death,

348
00:26:15.720 --> 00:26:18.960
<v Speaker 8>so she's not exempted from original sin, and the immaculate

349
00:26:19.000 --> 00:26:22.880
<v Speaker 8>conception doctrine is also bound up with the Augustinian doctrine

350
00:26:22.920 --> 00:26:27.519
<v Speaker 8>of inherited guilt. That's the early origins of the idea.

351
00:26:27.559 --> 00:26:30.279
<v Speaker 8>I'm not saying that Augustine taught necessarily immaculate conception.

352
00:26:30.319 --> 00:26:32.920
<v Speaker 12>All that you did this is a clear reference to Mary, who,

353
00:26:33.119 --> 00:26:35.960
<v Speaker 12>if she were born into sin, would have at one

354
00:26:36.000 --> 00:26:39.279
<v Speaker 12>point in time been an enemy of God rather than Satan.

355
00:26:39.720 --> 00:26:42.160
<v Speaker 8>No, this is still based on the assumption that being

356
00:26:42.200 --> 00:26:45.440
<v Speaker 8>born in sin in some way is a bound up

357
00:26:45.480 --> 00:26:49.599
<v Speaker 8>with inherited guilt. Only the Orthodox Church maintains the ancient

358
00:26:49.640 --> 00:26:52.839
<v Speaker 8>Patristic teaching, and you'll notice that no church fathers, probably

359
00:26:52.880 --> 00:26:55.960
<v Speaker 8>to Augustine, taught that infants had guilt. Why is Augustine

360
00:26:55.960 --> 00:26:59.000
<v Speaker 8>the first church father to speak of in an explicit

361
00:26:59.039 --> 00:27:03.200
<v Speaker 8>way in having the guilt of Adam. If you read

362
00:27:03.200 --> 00:27:05.279
<v Speaker 8>The City of God and other writings that we've covered

363
00:27:05.319 --> 00:27:07.759
<v Speaker 8>extensively on my channel over the years, you'll notice that

364
00:27:07.799 --> 00:27:10.039
<v Speaker 8>Augustine makes it very clear that he believes that all

365
00:27:10.079 --> 00:27:13.359
<v Speaker 8>men were in Adam as in an archetype, and he

366
00:27:13.400 --> 00:27:15.720
<v Speaker 8>calls them the mass down nod of the damned Mass.

367
00:27:16.279 --> 00:27:19.519
<v Speaker 8>That's the basis for why he thought everyone was guilty

368
00:27:19.599 --> 00:27:24.599
<v Speaker 8>for Adam's sin, even an infant, even a zygote. But

369
00:27:24.880 --> 00:27:29.319
<v Speaker 8>no other church fathers ever taught this. Were they all Pallagian? No,

370
00:27:29.720 --> 00:27:33.000
<v Speaker 8>But they understood as Ezekiel says, you're not guilty for

371
00:27:33.079 --> 00:27:36.079
<v Speaker 8>the sins of your father's until you commit an actual sin.

372
00:27:36.799 --> 00:27:41.279
<v Speaker 8>The Roman Colloty Church eventually even qualified and rejected the

373
00:27:41.279 --> 00:27:45.799
<v Speaker 8>notion of inherited guilt. Yet the argumentation that they use

374
00:27:45.920 --> 00:27:50.279
<v Speaker 8>to prove immaculate conception, ironically still goes back to these

375
00:27:50.279 --> 00:27:54.599
<v Speaker 8>confusions of inherited guilt and actual sin. You do not

376
00:27:54.680 --> 00:27:59.960
<v Speaker 8>have guilt until you sin. Actually, you're not sin actually

377
00:28:00.200 --> 00:28:03.359
<v Speaker 8>until you are able to sin with will and reasoning.

378
00:28:03.880 --> 00:28:07.279
<v Speaker 8>That does not mean that infants are quote guiltless, or

379
00:28:07.279 --> 00:28:09.680
<v Speaker 8>that they don't have the effects of adam sin. They

380
00:28:09.720 --> 00:28:12.920
<v Speaker 8>have the effects, but not the guilt. That's why so

381
00:28:12.960 --> 00:28:15.559
<v Speaker 8>many church fathers. As you read, if you get really

382
00:28:15.559 --> 00:28:18.119
<v Speaker 8>get into the church fathers, you'll notice that many of

383
00:28:18.119 --> 00:28:23.119
<v Speaker 8>them quite often have no qualms about calling infants innocent children,

384
00:28:23.400 --> 00:28:27.799
<v Speaker 8>innocent babies, innocent infants. In fact, there's a feast the

385
00:28:27.920 --> 00:28:33.240
<v Speaker 8>murder when the murder of the forty innocence. They're called

386
00:28:33.279 --> 00:28:36.519
<v Speaker 8>the feasts of the murder of innocence? Why are they

387
00:28:36.640 --> 00:28:39.839
<v Speaker 8>called the feast of innocence forty or whatever?

388
00:28:39.960 --> 00:28:40.119
<v Speaker 9>Many?

389
00:28:40.119 --> 00:28:44.240
<v Speaker 8>It was murdered infants if they have actual guilt, Well

390
00:28:44.279 --> 00:28:47.559
<v Speaker 8>they don't, and so this is a distinction that's later

391
00:28:47.640 --> 00:28:52.160
<v Speaker 8>confused in later Latin theology, which leads to the Augustinian doctrines,

392
00:28:52.160 --> 00:28:53.720
<v Speaker 8>which the rest of the Church does not teach.

393
00:28:54.160 --> 00:28:55.519
<v Speaker 13>Oh, that's not what that means.

394
00:28:55.799 --> 00:28:58.839
<v Speaker 12>We can also look to Matthew sixteen eighteen, where Jesus

395
00:28:58.880 --> 00:29:03.079
<v Speaker 12>renamed Simon to Peter, which literally means rock, and then

396
00:29:03.119 --> 00:29:05.880
<v Speaker 12>says upon this rock I will build my church, and

397
00:29:05.920 --> 00:29:08.440
<v Speaker 12>the gates of Hell will not stand against it. That's

398
00:29:08.519 --> 00:29:10.839
<v Speaker 12>not what that means. We can do this all day.

399
00:29:11.359 --> 00:29:14.319
<v Speaker 12>When you ask deep questions about Catholic beliefs, you will

400
00:29:14.359 --> 00:29:18.160
<v Speaker 12>discover the scriptural roots of everything. The issue is are

401
00:29:18.200 --> 00:29:21.920
<v Speaker 12>those interpretations accurate? So I want to ask this question

402
00:29:22.039 --> 00:29:25.400
<v Speaker 12>differently because we must avoid using circular reasoning.

403
00:29:29.079 --> 00:29:30.559
<v Speaker 8>So here we go. Now we're going to get an

404
00:29:30.640 --> 00:29:34.160
<v Speaker 8>argument for how do we know the right interpretation of

405
00:29:34.200 --> 00:29:37.160
<v Speaker 8>these passages. I'm gonna bet he actually does engage in

406
00:29:37.200 --> 00:29:40.680
<v Speaker 8>circular reasoning. But you'll notice that he quoted Matthew sixteen eighteen,

407
00:29:40.759 --> 00:29:44.160
<v Speaker 8>which everybody would agree. Okay, yes, Jesus is speaking to

408
00:29:44.160 --> 00:29:46.720
<v Speaker 8>Peter because Peter confessed the deed of Christ. There, you're

409
00:29:46.759 --> 00:29:49.680
<v Speaker 8>the son of God. And Jesus says, you will have

410
00:29:49.720 --> 00:29:52.400
<v Speaker 8>the keys, you will have the ability to bind into loose.

411
00:29:53.000 --> 00:29:56.799
<v Speaker 8>But how often do Roman Catholics ever quote or bring

412
00:29:56.839 --> 00:29:59.720
<v Speaker 8>in two chapters later, where Jesus says the exact same

413
00:29:59.759 --> 00:30:03.640
<v Speaker 8>thing to the other apostles, I mean to the entire college.

414
00:30:03.680 --> 00:30:07.240
<v Speaker 8>He says, whatever you guys bind on earth, it'll be

415
00:30:07.279 --> 00:30:09.799
<v Speaker 8>bound in heaven. Whatever you loose on earth, it'll be

416
00:30:09.799 --> 00:30:12.200
<v Speaker 8>loose in heaven. Again, I say to you, to the

417
00:30:12.240 --> 00:30:17.480
<v Speaker 8>College of the Apostles. That's the audience here, not every

418
00:30:17.480 --> 00:30:21.440
<v Speaker 8>evangelical praying in his basement. To you, College of Apostles.

419
00:30:21.480 --> 00:30:26.319
<v Speaker 8>When you guys agree, my father will agree. Where two

420
00:30:26.400 --> 00:30:29.519
<v Speaker 8>or three of you are there, I am with you

421
00:30:29.599 --> 00:30:34.839
<v Speaker 8>in your midst. Now this does not specify something that

422
00:30:35.000 --> 00:30:38.960
<v Speaker 8>is unique to Peter. Two chapters later, the first statement

423
00:30:39.039 --> 00:30:42.240
<v Speaker 8>is and Peter, I think, is given an award, a

424
00:30:42.319 --> 00:30:45.079
<v Speaker 8>kind of a honor. And the Orthodox Church agrees that

425
00:30:45.119 --> 00:30:49.960
<v Speaker 8>Peter got that honor. He's the mouthpiece the corythais of

426
00:30:50.000 --> 00:30:58.319
<v Speaker 8>the apostles. However, at the same time he says the

427
00:30:58.359 --> 00:31:01.440
<v Speaker 8>same thing to the to the apostles later on, which

428
00:31:01.480 --> 00:31:04.880
<v Speaker 8>is to bind into loose, which is the office of

429
00:31:04.920 --> 00:31:08.960
<v Speaker 8>the keys is not restricted to Peter alone. It's said

430
00:31:09.000 --> 00:31:11.000
<v Speaker 8>to be the entire college of the Apostles. And hence

431
00:31:11.079 --> 00:31:14.200
<v Speaker 8>why the Orthodox Church has always said that it's a

432
00:31:14.319 --> 00:31:19.160
<v Speaker 8>collegial synodal form of church government. Why would Jesus say

433
00:31:19.160 --> 00:31:21.079
<v Speaker 8>that any of you, if you the two or three

434
00:31:21.119 --> 00:31:25.640
<v Speaker 8>of you agree, God will agree with you. Why would

435
00:31:25.640 --> 00:31:28.640
<v Speaker 8>all of them have the ability to open and too loose?

436
00:31:29.319 --> 00:31:33.240
<v Speaker 8>If it's something that is specific only to Peter, But

437
00:31:33.559 --> 00:31:35.680
<v Speaker 8>when we have verses out of context, it can give

438
00:31:35.720 --> 00:31:39.960
<v Speaker 8>the impression that it is, oh something that only Peter has. Likewise,

439
00:31:40.160 --> 00:31:42.440
<v Speaker 8>when Jesus breathed on the apostles and says that you

440
00:31:42.480 --> 00:31:47.079
<v Speaker 8>can forgive sins, does he say this only to Peter?

441
00:31:47.440 --> 00:31:49.519
<v Speaker 8>Does he say does he breathe on Peter and then

442
00:31:49.519 --> 00:31:51.799
<v Speaker 8>tell Peter to breathe on them? When the Holy Spirit

443
00:31:51.839 --> 00:31:54.000
<v Speaker 8>comes a Pentecost? Does it come on Peter and then

444
00:31:54.039 --> 00:31:56.559
<v Speaker 8>Peter hand the Holy Spirit off to everyone else? At

445
00:31:56.559 --> 00:32:01.240
<v Speaker 8>pentecost or does it come down in a elective, collegial way,

446
00:32:01.359 --> 00:32:04.039
<v Speaker 8>in the same way as Jesus breathing on all of them?

447
00:32:04.400 --> 00:32:08.839
<v Speaker 8>So where is there any of the Vatican one ideas?

448
00:32:08.920 --> 00:32:12.400
<v Speaker 8>So notice that this happens, because this duped me when

449
00:32:12.440 --> 00:32:15.599
<v Speaker 8>I was a young twenty one two three year old

450
00:32:15.640 --> 00:32:17.759
<v Speaker 8>reading a lot of these verses, reading a lot of

451
00:32:17.759 --> 00:32:22.519
<v Speaker 8>these apologetics. Where is the Vatican one claim in any

452
00:32:22.559 --> 00:32:26.359
<v Speaker 8>of this? And it's not there. Vatican one is very precise,

453
00:32:26.480 --> 00:32:31.880
<v Speaker 8>very specific, that Peter is being given universal dominion over

454
00:32:31.920 --> 00:32:35.039
<v Speaker 8>the entire Church in a unilateral way to do essentially

455
00:32:35.079 --> 00:32:42.200
<v Speaker 8>whatever he feels is necessary to govern the Church. There

456
00:32:42.279 --> 00:32:47.279
<v Speaker 8>is no collegial situation. It's an autocracy according to Vatican One,

457
00:32:48.279 --> 00:32:50.920
<v Speaker 8>and Peter and his successors have that power, that authority

458
00:32:52.359 --> 00:32:54.799
<v Speaker 8>for all time until the end of the world. And

459
00:32:54.839 --> 00:32:56.960
<v Speaker 8>that it was always this way and it was always

460
00:32:56.960 --> 00:32:59.519
<v Speaker 8>this case in the church. That's the Vatican one dogma.

461
00:33:01.480 --> 00:33:04.599
<v Speaker 8>But that is not anywhere in the New Testament, nor

462
00:33:04.720 --> 00:33:07.720
<v Speaker 8>is it anywhere in the first eight hundred years of Christianity.

463
00:33:08.240 --> 00:33:11.200
<v Speaker 8>You do have a first among equals place for the

464
00:33:11.200 --> 00:33:14.359
<v Speaker 8>patriarch of the West of Rome, but none of that

465
00:33:14.359 --> 00:33:16.720
<v Speaker 8>equates to Vatican One, and in fact, the Vatican nowadays

466
00:33:16.759 --> 00:33:20.880
<v Speaker 8>has admitted most of these Orthodox criticisms, even to the

467
00:33:20.880 --> 00:33:24.799
<v Speaker 8>extent of saying that the pope did not exercise universal

468
00:33:24.880 --> 00:33:29.160
<v Speaker 8>jurisdiction in the first thousand years. Rome has admitted this.

469
00:33:31.519 --> 00:33:35.680
<v Speaker 11>Where did Rome admit in the Chady.

470
00:33:35.319 --> 00:33:44.160
<v Speaker 8>Document at the very end Chad Document right here, chapter nineteen,

471
00:33:44.440 --> 00:33:51.119
<v Speaker 8>section nineteen, Rome did not exercise canonical authority over the

472
00:33:51.200 --> 00:33:54.759
<v Speaker 8>churches of the East. Yet that's exactly what Vatican One

473
00:33:54.960 --> 00:34:02.559
<v Speaker 8>claims Rome always did and had. So Key is new,

474
00:34:02.759 --> 00:34:05.799
<v Speaker 8>obviously to a lot of these arguments. He probably converted

475
00:34:05.799 --> 00:34:08.360
<v Speaker 8>in the last few years, but is not aware of

476
00:34:08.400 --> 00:34:13.360
<v Speaker 8>the more broader context for a lot of these passages

477
00:34:14.119 --> 00:34:16.800
<v Speaker 8>and how much is being read into these passages. Another

478
00:34:16.840 --> 00:34:19.880
<v Speaker 8>point that's brought up in the Edward Denny Papalism book

479
00:34:20.559 --> 00:34:26.000
<v Speaker 8>is that it's entirely possible to read Matthew sixteen as Peter,

480
00:34:26.119 --> 00:34:28.800
<v Speaker 8>even though that's actually the minority interpretation of most of

481
00:34:28.800 --> 00:34:32.639
<v Speaker 8>the Church fathers. The majority interpreted as the Faith or

482
00:34:32.679 --> 00:34:36.280
<v Speaker 8>the Confession. There are about fifteen or sixteen I think,

483
00:34:36.280 --> 00:34:38.880
<v Speaker 8>if I recall what Denny says church fathers that interpreted

484
00:34:38.920 --> 00:34:41.440
<v Speaker 8>as Peter himself because of the naming and the new

485
00:34:41.519 --> 00:34:44.000
<v Speaker 8>naming being the Rock and so forth. But none of

486
00:34:44.000 --> 00:34:47.079
<v Speaker 8>that necessarily translates into Peter being the super bishop above

487
00:34:47.119 --> 00:34:49.639
<v Speaker 8>all the other bishops. In other words, when you have

488
00:34:49.920 --> 00:34:52.480
<v Speaker 8>some church fathers who do think it's Peter, such as

489
00:34:52.519 --> 00:34:56.480
<v Speaker 8>Saint Cyprian, Cyprian says every bishop is a Peter. So

490
00:34:56.599 --> 00:34:59.719
<v Speaker 8>this is a promise not just to Peter as a

491
00:35:00.079 --> 00:35:05.599
<v Speaker 8>civic singular bishop, but that every bishop has Peter functioning

492
00:35:05.639 --> 00:35:09.159
<v Speaker 8>in him in this way. So there's a lot of

493
00:35:09.199 --> 00:35:14.880
<v Speaker 8>assumptions in this very low level pop apologetic that is

494
00:35:14.920 --> 00:35:17.119
<v Speaker 8>not being dealt with or is not taken into account.

495
00:35:17.360 --> 00:35:20.599
<v Speaker 8>It's precisely this kind of stuff that dupes two hundred

496
00:35:20.599 --> 00:35:21.599
<v Speaker 8>and fifty thousand people.

497
00:35:22.000 --> 00:35:22.800
<v Speaker 13>How can we do that?

498
00:35:24.000 --> 00:35:25.880
<v Speaker 12>We will take the questions out of the realm of

499
00:35:25.920 --> 00:35:29.679
<v Speaker 12>personal interpretation and instead ask it this way. Does the

500
00:35:29.719 --> 00:35:34.239
<v Speaker 12>Catholic Church accurately teach the Christian faith? This leads to

501
00:35:34.280 --> 00:35:36.960
<v Speaker 12>the question what is the Christian faith and how can

502
00:35:37.039 --> 00:35:40.079
<v Speaker 12>we know what it teaches? Who gets to define what

503
00:35:40.199 --> 00:35:44.239
<v Speaker 12>Christianity is? The Catholic Church claims that it is the

504
00:35:44.280 --> 00:35:45.719
<v Speaker 12>fullness of the Christian faith.

505
00:39:51.039 --> 00:39:53.719
<v Speaker 8>Right, so every time I try to hit the unmute.

506
00:39:54.239 --> 00:39:59.000
<v Speaker 8>It doesn't always work, does it doesn't always register. So basically,

507
00:39:59.039 --> 00:40:01.719
<v Speaker 8>all I've been outlining for all the people in the

508
00:40:01.760 --> 00:40:04.599
<v Speaker 8>Twitter space, they're hearing it. But basically what I've outlined

509
00:40:04.679 --> 00:40:07.719
<v Speaker 8>is just simply that when of Santem makes it clear

510
00:40:07.760 --> 00:40:10.159
<v Speaker 8>that you have to believe in the universal supremacy of

511
00:40:10.159 --> 00:40:14.280
<v Speaker 8>the Roman Bishop in an earthly sense to be saved,

512
00:40:14.719 --> 00:40:18.199
<v Speaker 8>and it makes us very clear within a few centuries

513
00:40:18.199 --> 00:40:23.360
<v Speaker 8>after Dictatus Pape in ten ninety and so this is

514
00:40:23.400 --> 00:40:25.880
<v Speaker 8>something that's no longer required, right, And I made a

515
00:40:25.960 --> 00:40:27.639
<v Speaker 8>video on this. You can go watch the video I

516
00:40:27.679 --> 00:40:33.239
<v Speaker 8>made the other day called this one dogma really refutes Catholicism.

517
00:40:33.719 --> 00:40:36.320
<v Speaker 8>So if I no longer have to believe in the

518
00:40:36.360 --> 00:40:38.760
<v Speaker 8>temporal supremacy of the Roman Bishop to be saved, then

519
00:40:38.800 --> 00:40:42.199
<v Speaker 8>clearly Roman Catholic dogma does change, and it does contradict.

520
00:40:42.400 --> 00:40:45.880
<v Speaker 8>And this is a very explicit, obvious, easy contradiction. There

521
00:40:45.880 --> 00:40:49.320
<v Speaker 8>are many more. For example, Cantate Domino says that you

522
00:40:49.360 --> 00:40:53.039
<v Speaker 8>can't be a martyr outside of the Roman Communion. Well,

523
00:40:53.079 --> 00:40:57.320
<v Speaker 8>the Roman Catholic Church today recognizes countless quote martyrs outside

524
00:40:57.360 --> 00:41:02.079
<v Speaker 8>of Rome and other religions perhaps who knows. I mean

525
00:41:02.360 --> 00:41:05.719
<v Speaker 8>there's at least Anglican martyrers Coptic martyrs. I mean the

526
00:41:05.800 --> 00:41:08.800
<v Speaker 8>Roman Catholic erst now accepts Orthodox Saints that used to

527
00:41:08.840 --> 00:41:12.920
<v Speaker 8>be for centuries considered excommunicated heretics. So these are all

528
00:41:12.960 --> 00:41:17.880
<v Speaker 8>just clear examples of one hundred percent dogmatic contradiction. And

529
00:41:17.880 --> 00:41:20.079
<v Speaker 8>that's why so many a Roman Catholics. You noticed they

530
00:41:20.079 --> 00:41:22.400
<v Speaker 8>do not deal with this argument. When I had an

531
00:41:22.440 --> 00:41:26.079
<v Speaker 8>hour plus debate with that Crisp Plants guy, it took

532
00:41:26.119 --> 00:41:28.360
<v Speaker 8>him an hour to even understand what the argument was.

533
00:41:28.400 --> 00:41:31.199
<v Speaker 8>He thought I was saying that the pope doesn't have

534
00:41:31.320 --> 00:41:35.320
<v Speaker 8>authority over the body. I'm like, no, no, no, it's authority

535
00:41:35.400 --> 00:41:40.199
<v Speaker 8>in a sense of like temporal power, like a king. Now,

536
00:41:40.239 --> 00:41:46.239
<v Speaker 8>does anyone believe that Jesus was handing to Peter a giant, global,

537
00:41:46.840 --> 00:41:52.159
<v Speaker 8>worldly empire with standing armies and a bank utilizing usury,

538
00:41:52.840 --> 00:41:56.679
<v Speaker 8>utilizing the raw childs who have been the classic people

539
00:41:56.800 --> 00:41:59.760
<v Speaker 8>bankers since the seventeen hundreds? Does anyone believe that's what

540
00:41:59.800 --> 00:42:02.719
<v Speaker 8>g This had in mind? But you understand that if

541
00:42:02.719 --> 00:42:06.679
<v Speaker 8>you become Roman Catholic, this is what you're adopting. And

542
00:42:06.719 --> 00:42:09.440
<v Speaker 8>it's very similar to this this pattern that you're that

543
00:42:09.519 --> 00:42:12.159
<v Speaker 8>I'm pointing out here, this is very similar to what

544
00:42:12.280 --> 00:42:16.199
<v Speaker 8>happens when Muslims or people who are interested in Islam

545
00:42:17.199 --> 00:42:19.519
<v Speaker 8>think that it's about this simple thing and they don't

546
00:42:19.559 --> 00:42:22.440
<v Speaker 8>realize you go, you gotta believe all these Hadiaths too, Bro,

547
00:42:22.960 --> 00:42:25.760
<v Speaker 8>you got to believe the fart had deaths. You gotta

548
00:42:25.760 --> 00:42:29.000
<v Speaker 8>believe the Semen had deaths. You gotta believe all these

549
00:42:29.119 --> 00:42:32.360
<v Speaker 8>crazy hadeaths. And you don't get to say, oh, I

550
00:42:32.360 --> 00:42:34.320
<v Speaker 8>don't believe any I just believe the Koran because it's

551
00:42:34.320 --> 00:42:38.199
<v Speaker 8>a simple message. That's all bologney. But a lot of

552
00:42:38.199 --> 00:42:42.679
<v Speaker 8>these religions world religions, particularly Roman Catholicism as well, do

553
00:42:42.760 --> 00:42:46.239
<v Speaker 8>the exact same thing, where there's this claim of simplicity

554
00:42:46.320 --> 00:42:48.880
<v Speaker 8>and it's very clear and it's just this these basics

555
00:42:48.880 --> 00:42:51.280
<v Speaker 8>and oh, you only have to believe the extra Cathedra statements.

556
00:42:51.360 --> 00:42:55.039
<v Speaker 8>None of that's true. And that's why when the honeymoon

557
00:42:55.039 --> 00:42:57.639
<v Speaker 8>wears off and you realize what the rest of Roman

558
00:42:57.679 --> 00:42:59.719
<v Speaker 8>Catholicism teaches and all the stuff that you have to

559
00:42:59.760 --> 00:43:04.119
<v Speaker 8>exc that's when you start to notice this vast matricey

560
00:43:04.679 --> 00:43:07.320
<v Speaker 8>of history of all of these contradictions and problems.

561
00:43:09.960 --> 00:43:13.599
<v Speaker 12>So therefore that's the claim we must test. How do

562
00:43:13.679 --> 00:43:16.360
<v Speaker 12>we know what the Christian faith is? And how is

563
00:43:16.400 --> 00:43:19.639
<v Speaker 12>Catholicism the fullness of it? This is where the argument

564
00:43:19.679 --> 00:43:23.159
<v Speaker 12>from history comes into play. We know what Christianity is

565
00:43:23.239 --> 00:43:26.880
<v Speaker 12>because we can see what the earliest Christians believed and taught.

566
00:43:27.440 --> 00:43:30.320
<v Speaker 12>We find this information by studying their writings and the

567
00:43:30.360 --> 00:43:34.920
<v Speaker 12>writings of others about them. These writings show us their beliefs, practices,

568
00:43:34.960 --> 00:43:37.920
<v Speaker 12>and their history. Some of these writings are found in

569
00:43:37.960 --> 00:43:40.639
<v Speaker 12>what became the New Testament, which was added to the

570
00:43:40.679 --> 00:43:42.320
<v Speaker 12>Hebrew scriptures the Old Testament.

571
00:43:42.679 --> 00:43:45.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but it isn't interesting When Roman Catholics talk about this,

572
00:43:46.239 --> 00:43:52.039
<v Speaker 8>they conveniently ignore all of the patristic evidence for collegiality, cynidality,

573
00:43:52.840 --> 00:43:57.599
<v Speaker 8>and anything that would be against the Vatican one papal

574
00:43:57.679 --> 00:44:01.639
<v Speaker 8>idea because it doesn't really exist first several centuries.

575
00:44:02.119 --> 00:44:02.320
<v Speaker 11>Now.

576
00:44:02.519 --> 00:44:05.239
<v Speaker 8>One example that we might think could be an indicator

577
00:44:05.239 --> 00:44:08.760
<v Speaker 8>of that would be perhaps when Pope Victor in about

578
00:44:08.760 --> 00:44:11.519
<v Speaker 8>one point eighty thinks I'm going to excommunicate everyone in

579
00:44:11.599 --> 00:44:16.559
<v Speaker 8>the East over the dating of Easter. And you can say, okay,

580
00:44:16.599 --> 00:44:20.320
<v Speaker 8>maybe this is a early unilateral papal move but when

581
00:44:20.320 --> 00:44:23.559
<v Speaker 8>he did this, how did it work out? Did the

582
00:44:23.599 --> 00:44:27.400
<v Speaker 8>rest of the church accept it? In fact, no Irenaeus,

583
00:44:27.519 --> 00:44:30.320
<v Speaker 8>Saint Ernaeus, whom Roman Catholics try to utilize as a

584
00:44:30.360 --> 00:44:36.159
<v Speaker 8>papal proof, famously rebuked Victor and this was not worried with.

585
00:44:36.880 --> 00:44:43.119
<v Speaker 8>Right the people didn't accept Victor's outlandish, extensive excommunication. But

586
00:44:43.239 --> 00:44:46.960
<v Speaker 8>beyond that, it doesn't even matter that one bishop says

587
00:44:47.000 --> 00:44:50.239
<v Speaker 8>someone else far away is excommunicated, because later on many

588
00:44:50.280 --> 00:44:53.480
<v Speaker 8>patriarchs and bishops do this very thing. It's very common

589
00:44:53.559 --> 00:44:55.920
<v Speaker 8>later on, And this came up in the ubi Ebara

590
00:44:55.960 --> 00:45:00.599
<v Speaker 8>debate that just because somebody says we reject heretic from

591
00:45:01.119 --> 00:45:04.079
<v Speaker 8>five hundred miles away, it doesn't follow from that that, oh,

592
00:45:04.119 --> 00:45:08.480
<v Speaker 8>therefore you have petrine, you know, super universal jurisdiction. That's

593
00:45:08.519 --> 00:45:12.920
<v Speaker 8>another leap that doesn't follow. So what often is the

594
00:45:12.960 --> 00:45:16.719
<v Speaker 8>case is that you get these out of context things

595
00:45:16.880 --> 00:45:21.320
<v Speaker 8>like Peter has spoken through Leo, Rome has spoken cases closed,

596
00:45:21.360 --> 00:45:23.960
<v Speaker 8>and in those instances when you go actually read the context,

597
00:45:24.000 --> 00:45:26.079
<v Speaker 8>they don't back up the Vatican One idea at all.

598
00:45:26.119 --> 00:45:32.079
<v Speaker 8>In fact, in the context, Peter is speaking through Cyril,

599
00:45:32.280 --> 00:45:36.039
<v Speaker 8>which is why he's speaking through Leo, because Cyril's tome

600
00:45:36.239 --> 00:45:40.599
<v Speaker 8>is judged against Leo at Calcedon, but Romancaloq pop apologists

601
00:45:40.639 --> 00:45:42.760
<v Speaker 8>always flip it, twist it and make it the other

602
00:45:42.800 --> 00:45:45.760
<v Speaker 8>way around. Everyone just saw Leo's tome and they all

603
00:45:45.760 --> 00:45:48.840
<v Speaker 8>just submitted when Leo wrote the letter, Well, then why

604
00:45:48.840 --> 00:45:52.119
<v Speaker 8>do they judge it and spend days investigating to see

605
00:45:52.159 --> 00:45:55.320
<v Speaker 8>if it was consistent with Cyril? You don't judge the

606
00:45:55.360 --> 00:45:58.519
<v Speaker 8>first see if the Roman Catholic position is true, you

607
00:45:58.639 --> 00:46:02.760
<v Speaker 8>accept it. That's what Batican one says, you accept with docility.

608
00:46:03.519 --> 00:46:08.480
<v Speaker 8>So again, over and over and over. It's always out

609
00:46:08.480 --> 00:46:13.159
<v Speaker 8>of context proof texting without the broader sense and ethos

610
00:46:13.159 --> 00:46:18.000
<v Speaker 8>of what's going on. Wait a minute, isn't that what

611
00:46:18.360 --> 00:46:20.280
<v Speaker 8>Protestants do? Wow?

612
00:46:20.480 --> 00:46:20.760
<v Speaker 11>What?

613
00:46:21.159 --> 00:46:26.000
<v Speaker 8>Yes, the Roman Catholics do the exact same thing as Protestants.

614
00:46:26.159 --> 00:46:29.880
<v Speaker 8>Protestants with scripture, Roman Catholics with the Church fathers, and

615
00:46:29.880 --> 00:46:33.440
<v Speaker 8>in many Roman Cals' mind, it doesn't matter what the

616
00:46:33.519 --> 00:46:35.800
<v Speaker 8>context was or where the Church fathers were teaching. It's

617
00:46:36.079 --> 00:46:38.519
<v Speaker 8>actually okay to pull it out of context and make

618
00:46:38.559 --> 00:46:43.320
<v Speaker 8>it mean some super papal thing. Yet they turn around

619
00:46:43.320 --> 00:46:47.039
<v Speaker 8>and tell every Protestant that it's ridiculous and wrong for

620
00:46:47.079 --> 00:46:52.039
<v Speaker 8>them to do this with the scriptures, but Roman Catholics

621
00:46:52.079 --> 00:46:57.519
<v Speaker 8>are Protestants when it comes to the Church fathers and

622
00:46:58.679 --> 00:47:01.920
<v Speaker 8>with the papal teaching. And what I mean by that, Well,

623
00:47:02.000 --> 00:47:04.559
<v Speaker 8>when Francis says that all paths lead to God, as

624
00:47:04.559 --> 00:47:07.239
<v Speaker 8>he said a few months ago, every Roman Catholic says,

625
00:47:07.280 --> 00:47:09.039
<v Speaker 8>I don't have to accept it. I don't have to

626
00:47:09.039 --> 00:47:13.599
<v Speaker 8>accept it. So there's this total picking and choosing of

627
00:47:13.760 --> 00:47:17.960
<v Speaker 8>what documents they accept as faithful from the pope himself.

628
00:47:18.440 --> 00:47:20.960
<v Speaker 8>When the Pope is supposed to be the epistemic principle

629
00:47:21.199 --> 00:47:23.679
<v Speaker 8>to give us the certitude and the knowledge of which

630
00:47:23.679 --> 00:47:26.119
<v Speaker 8>one's true, which faith is true, which interpretation's true?

631
00:47:26.719 --> 00:47:28.079
<v Speaker 13>Became the Christian Bible.

632
00:47:28.599 --> 00:47:30.800
<v Speaker 12>The books of the Bible are believed to be more

633
00:47:30.840 --> 00:47:33.559
<v Speaker 12>than the writings of humans, though they are considered to

634
00:47:33.599 --> 00:47:37.199
<v Speaker 12>be the inspired, infallible word of God, thus carrying the

635
00:47:37.320 --> 00:47:40.480
<v Speaker 12>highest level of authority, along with two other sources of

636
00:47:40.480 --> 00:47:44.159
<v Speaker 12>authority sacred tradition, which means the way the apostles and

637
00:47:44.199 --> 00:47:48.880
<v Speaker 12>their followers have understood Christianity and the magisterium of the Church.

638
00:47:50.199 --> 00:47:52.880
<v Speaker 8>Is Keith perhaps not aware that almost all of the

639
00:47:52.960 --> 00:47:57.519
<v Speaker 8>modern Roman Catholic magisterium no longer believes in the inerrancy

640
00:47:57.679 --> 00:48:00.920
<v Speaker 8>and infallibility of the Bible. I mean, they believe that

641
00:48:01.000 --> 00:48:03.360
<v Speaker 8>it is a word of God, so to speak. But

642
00:48:03.519 --> 00:48:09.400
<v Speaker 8>pretty much every Roman Catholic seminarian, theologian, you name it

643
00:48:09.440 --> 00:48:13.519
<v Speaker 8>has been infected with modern, higher critical liberal scholarship. And

644
00:48:13.599 --> 00:48:15.440
<v Speaker 8>I know that because I was in the Roman Catholic

645
00:48:15.559 --> 00:48:18.840
<v Speaker 8>ethos and world for many, many years. And I mean

646
00:48:18.920 --> 00:48:22.719
<v Speaker 8>I found some tradcats who believed in the older documents

647
00:48:22.840 --> 00:48:27.840
<v Speaker 8>like Lamentabili and you know Pachindia Pius the tenth, which

648
00:48:27.880 --> 00:48:33.159
<v Speaker 8>condemn modernism in the scripture studies, textual departments. But that's

649
00:48:33.159 --> 00:48:35.519
<v Speaker 8>all been discarded. Rome doesn't care about that, and Rome

650
00:48:35.599 --> 00:48:37.599
<v Speaker 8>does not uphold those teachings at all.

651
00:48:37.800 --> 00:48:40.840
<v Speaker 12>Which means the teaching authority, the Pope and the councils

652
00:48:41.480 --> 00:48:44.440
<v Speaker 12>think of this as how the Church interprets and applies

653
00:48:44.519 --> 00:48:47.960
<v Speaker 12>God's word. All three sources of authority revealed to the

654
00:48:47.960 --> 00:48:49.800
<v Speaker 12>world what the Christian faith is.

655
00:48:50.719 --> 00:48:50.920
<v Speaker 8>Well.

656
00:48:50.960 --> 00:48:54.039
<v Speaker 12>Individual writings of the church fathers are not infallible. They

657
00:48:54.079 --> 00:48:56.800
<v Speaker 12>show us how the beliefs and practices of the Christian

658
00:48:56.800 --> 00:49:01.519
<v Speaker 12>faith were understood and even developed over time. The Magisterium

659
00:49:01.559 --> 00:49:03.800
<v Speaker 12>of the Church, led by the Pope, the successor to

660
00:49:03.840 --> 00:49:06.800
<v Speaker 12>Saint Peter, the leader of the Apostles, leads the church

661
00:49:06.880 --> 00:49:09.800
<v Speaker 12>in teaching and in worship. So the question is is

662
00:49:09.840 --> 00:49:13.280
<v Speaker 12>the Catholic Church the fullness of Christianity? The answer is

663
00:49:13.360 --> 00:49:17.360
<v Speaker 12>much bigger than yes, because it says so, Catholicism is

664
00:49:17.400 --> 00:49:20.719
<v Speaker 12>an unbroken line of succession that traces back to Jesus

665
00:49:20.800 --> 00:49:23.159
<v Speaker 12>and the Apostles, and if you look at the earliest

666
00:49:23.159 --> 00:49:25.960
<v Speaker 12>writings of the Christians, you will find the beginnings of

667
00:49:26.000 --> 00:49:26.760
<v Speaker 12>the Catholic Church.

668
00:49:27.760 --> 00:49:30.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but there are many groups that claim to have

669
00:49:30.920 --> 00:49:38.280
<v Speaker 8>Apostolic succession, from the Orthodox, to the Coptics to even

670
00:49:38.679 --> 00:49:41.800
<v Speaker 8>some Anglicans and Lutherans. And I'm not saying that they

671
00:49:41.840 --> 00:49:44.639
<v Speaker 8>actually possess it, but they all claim to have it.

672
00:49:45.000 --> 00:49:48.800
<v Speaker 8>So even this argument is not that good because just

673
00:49:48.920 --> 00:49:52.119
<v Speaker 8>because these groups claim to have Apostolic succession, that doesn't

674
00:49:52.159 --> 00:49:54.159
<v Speaker 8>mean that it's the one true Catholic Church church or

675
00:49:54.159 --> 00:49:57.920
<v Speaker 8>that it possesses it necessarily, because that's something that all

676
00:49:58.000 --> 00:50:02.079
<v Speaker 8>those groups possess. So so just Apostolic succession by his

677
00:50:02.119 --> 00:50:04.559
<v Speaker 8>own testament, by his own line of argument, isn't really

678
00:50:04.559 --> 00:50:08.239
<v Speaker 8>good enough to prove anything about Rome being the true Church.

679
00:50:08.480 --> 00:50:09.760
<v Speaker 13>People get worked up about that.

680
00:50:10.199 --> 00:50:12.559
<v Speaker 12>They think, if this were true, the church should look

681
00:50:12.599 --> 00:50:15.880
<v Speaker 12>today precisely as it looked two thousand years ago. But

682
00:50:16.000 --> 00:50:18.960
<v Speaker 12>is that realistic? Is that God's plan for the church?

683
00:50:19.599 --> 00:50:21.679
<v Speaker 12>At what point in history do you say it should

684
00:50:21.679 --> 00:50:22.360
<v Speaker 12>stop growing?

685
00:50:23.239 --> 00:50:27.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, here we get the ambiguity in moving the goalposts,

686
00:50:28.000 --> 00:50:32.639
<v Speaker 8>because yeah, I mean, we would expect commonality, and we

687
00:50:32.679 --> 00:50:37.480
<v Speaker 8>would expect you know, synthesis and harmony with the Church

688
00:50:37.559 --> 00:50:40.519
<v Speaker 8>of the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh century. Sure,

689
00:50:41.199 --> 00:50:45.599
<v Speaker 8>but we also would expect some differences in some expressions

690
00:50:45.639 --> 00:50:49.199
<v Speaker 8>in terms of cultural whatever that are different. We would

691
00:50:49.280 --> 00:50:57.280
<v Speaker 8>not expect vast radical changes in dogma or in liturgical expression.

692
00:50:58.079 --> 00:51:02.639
<v Speaker 8>And guess what we have seen vast radical changes in

693
00:51:02.800 --> 00:51:07.239
<v Speaker 8>liturgical expression and worship in the Roman See. We have

694
00:51:07.320 --> 00:51:11.360
<v Speaker 8>not seen that in any Orthodox church or any Orthodox bishopric,

695
00:51:11.679 --> 00:51:14.079
<v Speaker 8>except that I'm aware of. There may be one outlier,

696
00:51:14.360 --> 00:51:17.159
<v Speaker 8>But that's different than comparing it to what the Roman

697
00:51:17.239 --> 00:51:21.159
<v Speaker 8>See itself pushes and presents. Why do I say that,

698
00:51:21.559 --> 00:51:26.480
<v Speaker 8>Because this is way beyond this guy's level of grasping

699
00:51:26.519 --> 00:51:29.880
<v Speaker 8>this stuff. There's a famous document you can look up

700
00:51:29.920 --> 00:51:33.880
<v Speaker 8>in a Roman Catholic dogmatic history is called actorum fide,

701
00:51:34.360 --> 00:51:39.519
<v Speaker 8>and it's a dogmatic condemnation of the Jansenists. And one

702
00:51:39.559 --> 00:51:42.280
<v Speaker 8>of the propositions that's condemned is that the Jansonists were

703
00:51:42.360 --> 00:51:49.199
<v Speaker 8>arguing that Rome could promulgate defective rights, liturgies and sacraments.

704
00:51:49.719 --> 00:51:55.800
<v Speaker 8>This is one reason why, for example, the later Reformers

705
00:51:55.960 --> 00:51:58.719
<v Speaker 8>utilize these same types of arguments which were already condemned

706
00:51:58.719 --> 00:52:02.599
<v Speaker 8>in the Jansenists condemnation. But the pro the response to

707
00:52:02.599 --> 00:52:07.400
<v Speaker 8>the Vatican in doctorum fide is that given the Keroism

708
00:52:07.519 --> 00:52:11.000
<v Speaker 8>of Peter, to the Roman See, it would be completely

709
00:52:11.039 --> 00:52:15.239
<v Speaker 8>destructive and impossible to the entirety of papal supremacy and

710
00:52:15.280 --> 00:52:21.440
<v Speaker 8>authority for Rome to promulgate defective rights and sacraments. And

711
00:52:21.519 --> 00:52:25.280
<v Speaker 8>so that's a Protestant position that is condemned. And I

712
00:52:25.360 --> 00:52:28.119
<v Speaker 8>say that because that means you have to accept the Novasorto.

713
00:52:28.320 --> 00:52:32.119
<v Speaker 8>Because Rome has promulgated and pushed and accepted the Novasorto

714
00:52:32.199 --> 00:52:37.159
<v Speaker 8>mass since Vatican two. Well, what does that mean? That

715
00:52:37.199 --> 00:52:41.400
<v Speaker 8>means there is a drastic change in the style an

716
00:52:41.400 --> 00:52:46.559
<v Speaker 8>expression of worship such that it constitutes a revolution in

717
00:52:46.599 --> 00:52:52.199
<v Speaker 8>worship akin to the Protestant revolution in worship. And that's

718
00:52:52.199 --> 00:52:56.079
<v Speaker 8>why Vatican two was an absolutely one percent protestantizing of

719
00:52:56.079 --> 00:53:00.719
<v Speaker 8>the Roman Catholic Church from the top down, not in

720
00:53:00.800 --> 00:53:06.960
<v Speaker 8>a few liberal bishoprics from the Roman seat dogmatically for

721
00:53:07.000 --> 00:53:10.800
<v Speaker 8>the last seventy plus years. So it is not the

722
00:53:10.800 --> 00:53:15.400
<v Speaker 8>case that the Romancality Church has not fundamentally changed in

723
00:53:15.519 --> 00:53:19.480
<v Speaker 8>fundamental expressions of the faith, one of which the most important,

724
00:53:19.519 --> 00:53:22.159
<v Speaker 8>which perhaps is the worship of God.

725
00:53:22.280 --> 00:53:24.920
<v Speaker 12>You could make this argument when Jesus called others to

726
00:53:24.960 --> 00:53:27.840
<v Speaker 12>follow him after the twelve Apostles, Hey, this doesn't look

727
00:53:27.840 --> 00:53:30.679
<v Speaker 12>the way it used to look. Or what about a

728
00:53:30.760 --> 00:53:33.880
<v Speaker 12>Pentecost when the church grew by three thousand people, or

729
00:53:33.920 --> 00:53:35.639
<v Speaker 12>when the Apostles created deacons.

730
00:53:35.840 --> 00:53:38.719
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but that's also not in any way analogous to

731
00:53:39.159 --> 00:53:43.519
<v Speaker 8>a giant global Vatican bank that utilized his organized crime

732
00:53:43.599 --> 00:53:47.639
<v Speaker 8>and usury literally for the last three centuries with the

733
00:53:47.679 --> 00:53:52.840
<v Speaker 8>approval of the Vatican run by the Rothschilds explicitly publicly.

734
00:53:53.000 --> 00:53:56.199
<v Speaker 8>History is that what Jesus had in mind standing armies,

735
00:53:56.599 --> 00:54:00.199
<v Speaker 8>The Pope says, kiss my feet and my ring as

736
00:54:00.199 --> 00:54:03.960
<v Speaker 8>a worldly emperor. I thought Jesus told the apostles that

737
00:54:04.719 --> 00:54:07.960
<v Speaker 8>do not try to be like the global emperors and

738
00:54:08.000 --> 00:54:11.840
<v Speaker 8>the world powers. With their vanity and their glory. He said,

739
00:54:12.280 --> 00:54:17.000
<v Speaker 8>you are subject to one another through humility. And yet

740
00:54:17.039 --> 00:54:19.400
<v Speaker 8>what is the papas the historically what is when I'm

741
00:54:19.400 --> 00:54:24.679
<v Speaker 8>sanctum infinitely light year? Is the opposite of that seeking

742
00:54:24.719 --> 00:54:28.519
<v Speaker 8>to be explicitly a geopolitical world power?

743
00:54:30.199 --> 00:54:32.679
<v Speaker 12>When are we supposed to have a snapshot and never

744
00:54:32.760 --> 00:54:33.440
<v Speaker 12>grow from there?

745
00:54:33.679 --> 00:54:36.840
<v Speaker 13>Do you see my point? The church is on a trajectory.

746
00:54:37.199 --> 00:54:41.000
<v Speaker 8>Notice the ambiguity that all of these guys utilize. The

747
00:54:41.000 --> 00:54:44.039
<v Speaker 8>idea that the church grew in numbers and expansion and

748
00:54:44.199 --> 00:54:47.920
<v Speaker 8>expression of faith through the liturgy and through when I

749
00:54:47.920 --> 00:54:51.119
<v Speaker 8>say the liturgy, I mean through the linguistic expressions of

750
00:54:51.159 --> 00:54:53.880
<v Speaker 8>the various groups in the church. Roman Catholics called them

751
00:54:53.920 --> 00:54:57.559
<v Speaker 8>the sixteen rites of the of the Church. Are ite,

752
00:54:58.119 --> 00:55:00.360
<v Speaker 8>They'll say, well, look you've got all these sixteen rights,

753
00:55:00.400 --> 00:55:03.679
<v Speaker 8>they all express the one papal faith. No, no, no, that's

754
00:55:03.760 --> 00:55:05.920
<v Speaker 8>not what I'm talking about in terms of growth. So

755
00:55:05.960 --> 00:55:10.239
<v Speaker 8>he's training on ambiguity with growth. And this is precisely

756
00:55:10.280 --> 00:55:13.239
<v Speaker 8>what they do with development of doctrine, because development of

757
00:55:13.280 --> 00:55:18.079
<v Speaker 8>doctrine then becomes a catch all for the papacy tacking

758
00:55:18.119 --> 00:55:21.320
<v Speaker 8>on new things. So when I talk about these medieval

759
00:55:21.360 --> 00:55:26.719
<v Speaker 8>things with unam sanctam and temporol supremacy. Oh well, you see,

760
00:55:26.719 --> 00:55:30.880
<v Speaker 8>that's the natural, organic growth and development that we're talking about.

761
00:55:30.880 --> 00:55:38.679
<v Speaker 8>So now growth becomes a cover for dogmatic contradiction and change. No,

762
00:55:38.679 --> 00:55:43.599
<v Speaker 8>no having standing armies, which the Canons of Chalcedon say,

763
00:55:43.840 --> 00:55:47.400
<v Speaker 8>no cleric can be a part of civil service is

764
00:55:47.440 --> 00:55:50.960
<v Speaker 8>a contradiction. And there's nothing in the Canons of Chalcaton

765
00:55:51.000 --> 00:55:53.519
<v Speaker 8>to say except for the Bishop of Rome, he can,

766
00:55:53.599 --> 00:55:57.239
<v Speaker 8>of course be a world emperor. When Chalcidon wrote it's canons,

767
00:55:57.440 --> 00:56:00.559
<v Speaker 8>they didn't make any exceptions for any cleric, much less

768
00:56:00.599 --> 00:56:03.599
<v Speaker 8>the Bishop of Rome. So if a few centuries later

769
00:56:03.639 --> 00:56:05.559
<v Speaker 8>the Bishop of Rome says, oh, by the way, I'm

770
00:56:05.599 --> 00:56:09.079
<v Speaker 8>also a world emperor. And if you don't accept that,

771
00:56:09.400 --> 00:56:16.000
<v Speaker 8>you're not saved. That is absolutely a contradiction. And yes,

772
00:56:16.039 --> 00:56:16.840
<v Speaker 8>it's dogmatic.

773
00:56:19.159 --> 00:56:22.880
<v Speaker 12>Grows and develops because it is alive, and as it does,

774
00:56:23.039 --> 00:56:25.920
<v Speaker 12>things will look different, and when you ask why, you

775
00:56:25.960 --> 00:56:28.920
<v Speaker 12>can find an answer. For example, the church became headquartered

776
00:56:28.920 --> 00:56:31.320
<v Speaker 12>in Rome because that's where Peter was bishop when he died.

777
00:56:31.639 --> 00:56:38.159
<v Speaker 8>However, I love this argument, So where they die is

778
00:56:38.199 --> 00:56:44.440
<v Speaker 8>what confers these special superpowers. Now, keep in mind, Peter

779
00:56:45.320 --> 00:56:49.599
<v Speaker 8>ordained the line of bishops in Alexandra and Antioch. Those

780
00:56:49.599 --> 00:56:52.119
<v Speaker 8>are all patrin seas, all the way up into the

781
00:56:52.199 --> 00:56:54.679
<v Speaker 8>days of Pope Saint Gregory the Great, who writes letters

782
00:56:54.679 --> 00:56:58.199
<v Speaker 8>saying there are three patrin sees, Rome, Alexander, and Antioch.

783
00:56:59.400 --> 00:57:01.519
<v Speaker 8>So how is that Rome that had to come up

784
00:57:01.519 --> 00:57:06.360
<v Speaker 8>with a reason why Rome was so special? Which actually

785
00:57:06.400 --> 00:57:09.159
<v Speaker 8>in the Church Fathers this is mentioned many times. For example,

786
00:57:09.239 --> 00:57:12.800
<v Speaker 8>Ieron Aa says Rome is special because it's doubly Apostolic.

787
00:57:14.320 --> 00:57:19.519
<v Speaker 8>He explicitly says Peter and Paul in every Orthodox icon,

788
00:57:20.280 --> 00:57:22.559
<v Speaker 8>you'll notice that of the church, you see Peter and

789
00:57:22.639 --> 00:57:26.960
<v Speaker 8>Paul holding the church, so they're equal. So it makes

790
00:57:26.960 --> 00:57:30.280
<v Speaker 8>sense why Rome would be called special in that sense,

791
00:57:30.360 --> 00:57:35.440
<v Speaker 8>being doubly Apostolic. Hence, Paul writes the famous Letter to

792
00:57:35.480 --> 00:57:40.519
<v Speaker 8>the Roman Church to the Romans, but Paul warns the

793
00:57:40.599 --> 00:57:43.599
<v Speaker 8>Romans in chapter eleven that if they are haughty and arrogant,

794
00:57:43.679 --> 00:57:46.199
<v Speaker 8>they can be grafted out of the Covenant. Now, why

795
00:57:46.199 --> 00:57:48.480
<v Speaker 8>would Paul write that to a church that could never

796
00:57:48.840 --> 00:57:53.519
<v Speaker 8>fail and could never be grafted out of the Covenant. Ironically, providentially, prophetically,

797
00:57:54.039 --> 00:57:58.239
<v Speaker 8>Paul actually predicts the downfall of the Roman Church, because

798
00:57:58.280 --> 00:58:03.039
<v Speaker 8>he warns that church, you guys could fall into pride

799
00:58:03.079 --> 00:58:06.400
<v Speaker 8>and arrogance and fall from that pride. Do not be haughty,

800
00:58:07.039 --> 00:58:09.960
<v Speaker 8>because if God grafted out Jews, he can graft out

801
00:58:10.000 --> 00:58:12.760
<v Speaker 8>the Roman Church. And he did. And that's the key

802
00:58:12.800 --> 00:58:16.440
<v Speaker 8>point here. This is why the Roman Church manifests all

803
00:58:16.480 --> 00:58:20.199
<v Speaker 8>the blasphemies and the ridiculousness that they've manifested for so

804
00:58:20.360 --> 00:58:24.480
<v Speaker 8>many decades. And Roman Catholics and Tradcats are liars when

805
00:58:24.480 --> 00:58:26.960
<v Speaker 8>they lie to themselves that that's not true. And I

806
00:58:26.960 --> 00:58:29.039
<v Speaker 8>don't have to accept it, and it's not the case.

807
00:58:29.360 --> 00:58:32.440
<v Speaker 8>And I don't have to accept Benedict praying towards Mecca,

808
00:58:32.599 --> 00:58:34.360
<v Speaker 8>and I don't have to accept John Pall the Second

809
00:58:34.400 --> 00:58:36.760
<v Speaker 8>praying in the synagogues, even though that's condemned in the

810
00:58:36.760 --> 00:58:39.840
<v Speaker 8>ancient canons. No, you do have to condemn those things.

811
00:58:40.159 --> 00:58:42.920
<v Speaker 8>You do have to accept those things if you're a Catholic.

812
00:58:43.719 --> 00:58:45.800
<v Speaker 8>And this is what creates the double mind and the

813
00:58:45.800 --> 00:58:48.440
<v Speaker 8>insanity and the craziness in the way that they act.

814
00:58:49.800 --> 00:58:52.840
<v Speaker 12>Constantine did not start the Catholic Church in the fourth century.

815
00:58:53.360 --> 00:58:56.119
<v Speaker 12>You can't just accept these myths created by anti Catholics

816
00:58:56.119 --> 00:58:56.559
<v Speaker 12>as fact.

817
00:58:56.679 --> 00:58:58.079
<v Speaker 13>You need to look at history.

818
00:58:58.320 --> 00:59:01.880
<v Speaker 12>Unfortunately, we have writings before the time of Constantine that

819
00:59:01.960 --> 00:59:04.199
<v Speaker 12>show us what was going on in the early Church.

820
00:59:05.119 --> 00:59:07.840
<v Speaker 12>Over the centuries, the Church has continued to grow and

821
00:59:07.880 --> 00:59:11.840
<v Speaker 12>develop in its practices and theological understanding. That's why we

822
00:59:11.880 --> 00:59:15.960
<v Speaker 12>need an authoritative magisterium to protect and defend the depositive

823
00:59:16.000 --> 00:59:19.880
<v Speaker 12>faith given by Jesus to his apostles. As the Church

824
00:59:19.960 --> 00:59:23.079
<v Speaker 12>grows and its mission and new issues are raised, the

825
00:59:23.199 --> 00:59:27.000
<v Speaker 12>Church clarifies its beliefs and settles disputes. That's what we

826
00:59:27.039 --> 00:59:30.519
<v Speaker 12>see in history and this is important as we look

827
00:59:30.559 --> 00:59:31.719
<v Speaker 12>at Catholicism today.

828
00:59:31.840 --> 00:59:35.199
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but we see it through ecumenical councils. We don't

829
00:59:35.199 --> 00:59:37.480
<v Speaker 8>see it through just writing to the Bishop of Rome

830
00:59:37.519 --> 00:59:40.000
<v Speaker 8>to solve the disputes and make it clear, which, by

831
00:59:40.039 --> 00:59:42.440
<v Speaker 8>the way, wouldn't that have been the way to do

832
00:59:42.519 --> 00:59:45.679
<v Speaker 8>it if the Vatican One view is true. And you

833
00:59:45.719 --> 00:59:47.599
<v Speaker 8>know this has been brought up many many times to

834
00:59:47.599 --> 00:59:50.639
<v Speaker 8>the Roman Catholic paup apologists, and they do address this,

835
00:59:50.800 --> 00:59:53.119
<v Speaker 8>but do you know how they address this objection? You

836
00:59:53.119 --> 00:59:54.519
<v Speaker 8>remember what Abara said.

837
00:59:54.960 --> 00:59:57.440
<v Speaker 11>Well, the pope couldn't answer all those letters, he'd be

838
00:59:57.519 --> 01:00:02.000
<v Speaker 11>walking around in a sea of papers into Vedic. That's

839
01:00:02.079 --> 01:00:06.679
<v Speaker 11>literally that was his argument. So I mean, well, but

840
01:00:06.800 --> 01:00:09.559
<v Speaker 11>the pope wants to do things in collusion with the bishops.

841
01:00:09.840 --> 01:00:14.440
<v Speaker 8>Why involve everybody else in the world, in the ancient world,

842
01:00:14.519 --> 01:00:16.840
<v Speaker 8>bringing a bunch of people from all over to a

843
01:00:16.920 --> 01:00:20.800
<v Speaker 8>central location which would take months, perhaps even years to

844
01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:24.280
<v Speaker 8>send the letters and to get everybody there. And by

845
01:00:24.320 --> 01:00:27.119
<v Speaker 8>the way, no popes call ecumenical councils. It's all emperors.

846
01:00:29.519 --> 01:00:32.320
<v Speaker 8>So none of that makes any sense with the Vatican

847
01:00:32.360 --> 01:00:35.440
<v Speaker 8>One model of how the church is supposed to be

848
01:00:35.519 --> 01:00:38.159
<v Speaker 8>run and directed. Oh well, but that was a different time,

849
01:00:38.199 --> 01:00:40.039
<v Speaker 8>and you see it change. Yeah, exactly what I thought

850
01:00:40.199 --> 01:00:43.039
<v Speaker 8>rom Kellock Gooma doesn't change. Well, it developed. Oh okay,

851
01:00:43.079 --> 01:00:45.079
<v Speaker 8>so what does that mean. Well, so whatever the pope

852
01:00:45.119 --> 01:00:47.800
<v Speaker 8>says today, that's the true thing you said, that's that's

853
01:00:47.800 --> 01:00:51.320
<v Speaker 8>actually how it operates. So if the pope today says

854
01:00:52.440 --> 01:00:55.159
<v Speaker 8>there was never a time when we condemned the Muslims,

855
01:00:55.239 --> 01:00:58.239
<v Speaker 8>then then it's like quantum papacy. It was never true.

856
01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:06.239
<v Speaker 8>Literally retroactive retro causation. You thought that the or urban

857
01:01:06.280 --> 01:01:09.239
<v Speaker 8>the second called crusades against Islam. No, no, no, you see

858
01:01:09.280 --> 01:01:13.599
<v Speaker 8>that never happened. Retroactive causation. The pope has now preyed

859
01:01:13.599 --> 01:01:16.280
<v Speaker 8>in the Moss towards Mecca with the Muslims, so there

860
01:01:16.400 --> 01:01:20.079
<v Speaker 8>was there were no crusades that didn't happen, So just

861
01:01:20.360 --> 01:01:24.119
<v Speaker 8>papal gas lighting and quantum papacy rewriting history.

862
01:01:24.760 --> 01:01:27.280
<v Speaker 12>We can see its connection to the past. We can

863
01:01:27.320 --> 01:01:30.480
<v Speaker 12>see how the Church fathers processed and worked out certain

864
01:01:30.519 --> 01:01:35.760
<v Speaker 12>theological concepts like the canon of the Bible, the Trinity, baptism, salvation,

865
01:01:36.360 --> 01:01:37.840
<v Speaker 12>but also practical things like.

866
01:01:38.320 --> 01:01:41.360
<v Speaker 8>What about communion. Did the Church have a worked out

867
01:01:41.400 --> 01:01:45.079
<v Speaker 8>practice of communion in the first seven eighth centuries? Actually

868
01:01:45.119 --> 01:01:49.159
<v Speaker 8>it did, and pretty much universally it included infants. And

869
01:01:49.280 --> 01:01:52.119
<v Speaker 8>yet when we get the rise of the papacy, at

870
01:01:52.239 --> 01:01:55.159
<v Speaker 8>least in terms of temporal power in the eighth ninth

871
01:01:55.199 --> 01:01:59.039
<v Speaker 8>tenth century, particularly when it comes into collusion with the

872
01:01:59.079 --> 01:02:03.639
<v Speaker 8>Frankish power. Isn't it interesting that that's exactly when there's

873
01:02:03.679 --> 01:02:08.320
<v Speaker 8>no longer infant communion in the West, another liturgical revolution

874
01:02:09.360 --> 01:02:11.719
<v Speaker 8>which is not mentioned or not dealt with, or just

875
01:02:11.800 --> 01:02:14.079
<v Speaker 8>swept under the rug. And when you bring this up

876
01:02:14.119 --> 01:02:16.719
<v Speaker 8>to Roman Catholics, they either deny it, they don't care,

877
01:02:17.280 --> 01:02:19.760
<v Speaker 8>or they act like It's just not the case. No,

878
01:02:19.880 --> 01:02:24.440
<v Speaker 8>Rome never commune infants. Yes they did, Western Latin church

879
01:02:24.440 --> 01:02:28.239
<v Speaker 8>fathers talk about infant communion. Oh well, the pote made

880
01:02:28.280 --> 01:02:31.000
<v Speaker 8>a change because it was necessary. Why how is there

881
01:02:31.039 --> 01:02:35.480
<v Speaker 8>this unilateral change in liturgical practice when the purpose is

882
01:02:35.519 --> 01:02:39.440
<v Speaker 8>supposed to be preservation of the tradition and the practices.

883
01:02:42.360 --> 01:02:45.280
<v Speaker 8>There were Latin priests that were married. Did you know that?

884
01:02:46.079 --> 01:02:49.039
<v Speaker 8>Did you know that Initially Rome didn't have a problem

885
01:02:49.079 --> 01:02:53.239
<v Speaker 8>with Trollo and then later they did. Why is that?

886
01:02:53.320 --> 01:02:56.440
<v Speaker 8>I thought it was maintaining the traditions and preserving the

887
01:02:56.480 --> 01:02:57.280
<v Speaker 8>truth for all time.

888
01:02:57.559 --> 01:03:01.159
<v Speaker 12>Do with those who denied the faith and wanted to return,

889
01:03:01.760 --> 01:03:05.000
<v Speaker 12>or how the church should be administered, the interplay between

890
01:03:05.039 --> 01:03:08.880
<v Speaker 12>the church and the various political states. These are real issues,

891
01:03:08.880 --> 01:03:11.400
<v Speaker 12>and they weren't all explicitly fully defined at the time

892
01:03:11.440 --> 01:03:12.000
<v Speaker 12>of Jesus.

893
01:03:12.480 --> 01:03:14.440
<v Speaker 13>We see a great example of this in action.

894
01:03:14.599 --> 01:03:17.760
<v Speaker 8>So would that include uhen I'm sanctam and the pope

895
01:03:17.760 --> 01:03:20.039
<v Speaker 8>being the quisas hoder Rock? I mean? Is that where

896
01:03:20.039 --> 01:03:22.840
<v Speaker 8>you're going with this? Is that part of the evolving tradition.

897
01:03:22.800 --> 01:03:26.280
<v Speaker 12>Chapter fifteen, where the Magisterium of the Church had to

898
01:03:26.360 --> 01:03:29.480
<v Speaker 12>work out what to do with Gentile conference to Christian.

899
01:03:29.599 --> 01:03:31.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know some Magisterian by the way, isn't it Peter.

900
01:03:32.519 --> 01:03:34.679
<v Speaker 8>It's a council presided over by James.

901
01:03:34.719 --> 01:03:38.559
<v Speaker 12>Interesting, Andy, would these people need to obey the entire

902
01:03:38.639 --> 01:03:42.719
<v Speaker 12>Jewish law before becoming Christians? There was a discussion and prayer,

903
01:03:42.920 --> 01:03:45.679
<v Speaker 12>and ultimately, based on experience and the leading of the

904
01:03:45.679 --> 01:03:48.519
<v Speaker 12>Holy Spirit, a decision was made to settle this.

905
01:03:48.639 --> 01:03:51.800
<v Speaker 8>New How was that decision made? Was it made unilaterally

906
01:03:51.920 --> 01:03:55.559
<v Speaker 8>by asking Peter what the answer is? Or do they

907
01:03:55.559 --> 01:04:00.039
<v Speaker 8>have a synod synodol church government, which is what the

908
01:04:00.519 --> 01:04:03.960
<v Speaker 8>Orthodox Church still does, which is what the Roman Catholic

909
01:04:04.039 --> 01:04:15.440
<v Speaker 8>Church has conceded in their recent synods on sinidality. So

910
01:04:15.599 --> 01:04:20.840
<v Speaker 8>in twenty sixteen they started this dialogue about cynidality and

911
01:04:20.920 --> 01:04:25.159
<v Speaker 8>primacy and this was the first admission in this series

912
01:04:25.199 --> 01:04:30.280
<v Speaker 8>of admissions where Rome was not what Vatican one says.

913
01:04:30.760 --> 01:04:34.559
<v Speaker 8>And then they came out with another document in twenty

914
01:04:34.639 --> 01:04:37.760
<v Speaker 8>twenty three called the Alexandria Document. And what's it on

915
01:04:38.440 --> 01:04:45.679
<v Speaker 8>sinnodality and what councils are they having in Rome right now?

916
01:04:45.760 --> 01:04:47.599
<v Speaker 8>I don't know if it's still ongoing or if it's ended.

917
01:04:47.639 --> 01:04:50.639
<v Speaker 8>But Tim Gordon has been yelling about it for the

918
01:04:50.719 --> 01:04:58.800
<v Speaker 8>last year the synods on sinidality. So if this is

919
01:04:59.119 --> 01:05:01.960
<v Speaker 8>the case, why having to make all these concessions in

920
01:05:02.039 --> 01:05:13.400
<v Speaker 8>their own synods to sinidality issue.

921
01:05:13.599 --> 01:05:15.880
<v Speaker 12>They didn't just quote a verse from the Old Testament.

922
01:05:16.639 --> 01:05:20.559
<v Speaker 12>This is the pattern that continued throughout the history of Christianity.

923
01:05:20.599 --> 01:05:22.039
<v Speaker 13>This is Catholicism.

924
01:05:22.639 --> 01:05:25.079
<v Speaker 12>By the way, for Protestants who get wigged out by

925
01:05:25.079 --> 01:05:28.400
<v Speaker 12>practical or doctrinal development, why do they never apply this time?

926
01:05:28.519 --> 01:05:33.079
<v Speaker 8>Ah, you notice that that he slipped in, So he

927
01:05:33.199 --> 01:05:38.119
<v Speaker 8>slipped in doctrinal development. Does Vatican want anywhere appeal to

928
01:05:38.719 --> 01:05:42.480
<v Speaker 8>doctrinal development? No, it does not. In fact, it actually claims,

929
01:05:42.559 --> 01:05:46.079
<v Speaker 8>as does satist Cognium of Leo the thirteenth, that the

930
01:05:46.119 --> 01:05:50.079
<v Speaker 8>papal position, the vatican one position, was always the case,

931
01:05:50.519 --> 01:05:54.639
<v Speaker 8>universally known from the earliest days of the Church. But now,

932
01:05:54.679 --> 01:05:59.440
<v Speaker 8>in order to solve the apparent problem of medieval pope

933
01:05:59.440 --> 01:06:03.519
<v Speaker 8>says kings and emperors, Well, it's develops, you see. So

934
01:06:03.559 --> 01:06:07.880
<v Speaker 8>there's a lot of ambiguity and elastic terminology such as

935
01:06:08.079 --> 01:06:13.639
<v Speaker 8>develops and the church grows. Well, at first, it sounded

936
01:06:13.679 --> 01:06:15.679
<v Speaker 8>like you were talking about grows in terms of numbers,

937
01:06:15.800 --> 01:06:18.880
<v Speaker 8>which everybody agrees with. But then that somehow flipped over

938
01:06:18.920 --> 01:06:21.840
<v Speaker 8>into bait and switch to be grows in terms of

939
01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:27.159
<v Speaker 8>doctrinal understanding to where no, there wasn't in Jesus's mind

940
01:06:27.239 --> 01:06:29.639
<v Speaker 8>necessarily at the time of the founding of the Church,

941
01:06:30.079 --> 01:06:33.840
<v Speaker 8>a Vatican bank and an imperial insignia that you had

942
01:06:33.880 --> 01:06:36.239
<v Speaker 8>to believe in to be saved by the Pope whatever,

943
01:06:36.360 --> 01:06:40.079
<v Speaker 8>none of the no, that grew and developed. But again,

944
01:06:40.800 --> 01:06:45.599
<v Speaker 8>which one is it? Was it always the case or

945
01:06:45.599 --> 01:06:49.880
<v Speaker 8>did it have a seed form that developed? I hammer

946
01:06:49.960 --> 01:06:53.679
<v Speaker 8>this home all the time for the last several years,

947
01:06:54.280 --> 01:06:58.719
<v Speaker 8>because they do the exact same double standard. The Romancolic

948
01:06:58.760 --> 01:07:00.960
<v Speaker 8>pop apologies will in one voice sit there and tell

949
01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:03.840
<v Speaker 8>you that it was always the case from the earliest days,

950
01:07:04.320 --> 01:07:09.280
<v Speaker 8>and then contradict himself with a mutually exclusive claim that no,

951
01:07:09.360 --> 01:07:11.280
<v Speaker 8>it wasn't really clear. It was a seed form and

952
01:07:11.320 --> 01:07:15.360
<v Speaker 8>it had to grow. It can't be both, And Vatican

953
01:07:15.400 --> 01:07:17.400
<v Speaker 8>won inside these communitims said that it was not a

954
01:07:17.440 --> 01:07:21.159
<v Speaker 8>seed form that grew. That's Cardinal Newman's theory to explain

955
01:07:21.199 --> 01:07:24.920
<v Speaker 8>the problems. Cardinal Newman's theory does not line up with

956
01:07:25.559 --> 01:07:29.599
<v Speaker 8>what Vatican won inside East Communum actually claim, but Ron mccallack.

957
01:07:29.639 --> 01:07:35.760
<v Speaker 8>Apologies with a double standard movable goalpost constantly utilize both

958
01:07:35.840 --> 01:07:39.559
<v Speaker 8>principles in their apologetic and nobody calls them out or

959
01:07:39.599 --> 01:07:42.760
<v Speaker 8>points this out. When it's a mutually exclusive claim, it

960
01:07:42.880 --> 01:07:46.800
<v Speaker 8>literally cannot be both. Imagine if I said the Orthodox

961
01:07:46.880 --> 01:07:50.440
<v Speaker 8>Church was not clear in the first few centuries, but

962
01:07:50.519 --> 01:07:52.960
<v Speaker 8>it was always the Orthodox Church that was clearly there.

963
01:07:53.719 --> 01:07:55.840
<v Speaker 8>The Orthodox Church was a seed that grew to what

964
01:07:55.920 --> 01:07:59.719
<v Speaker 8>it is, but it was also clearly universally there from

965
01:07:59.719 --> 01:08:02.960
<v Speaker 8>the very beginning, at all times, in all places, recognized

966
01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:08.079
<v Speaker 8>by everyone. That makes no sense. But everybody just believes

967
01:08:08.159 --> 01:08:10.639
<v Speaker 8>these dumb pop arguments and just lets these people just

968
01:08:10.679 --> 01:08:13.119
<v Speaker 8>say all this stuff. Nobody ever calls them out on it.

969
01:08:13.320 --> 01:08:16.439
<v Speaker 8>Nobody confronts the paup apologist with this crap, and none

970
01:08:16.479 --> 01:08:18.439
<v Speaker 8>of the paup apologists will ever debate me because I

971
01:08:18.479 --> 01:08:21.119
<v Speaker 8>don't let this nonsense lie. I called him out immediately

972
01:08:21.159 --> 01:08:24.119
<v Speaker 8>on it, and then they bitch and wine moan for

973
01:08:24.159 --> 01:08:29.960
<v Speaker 8>seven years. Now, me give me a break, us.

974
01:08:29.920 --> 01:08:33.199
<v Speaker 12>That the Catholic Church has structure and developments. Do they

975
01:08:33.199 --> 01:08:37.239
<v Speaker 12>not see that in themselves? It's so hypocritical, The only.

976
01:08:37.039 --> 01:08:37.520
<v Speaker 11>People all.

977
01:08:38.960 --> 01:08:41.359
<v Speaker 8>So wait a minute, so you're saying that the Roman

978
01:08:41.399 --> 01:08:46.640
<v Speaker 8>Catholic Church's development is like the development in the Protestant world.

979
01:08:46.840 --> 01:08:51.239
<v Speaker 8>That's a a one admission that Roman Catholicism is a

980
01:08:51.279 --> 01:08:55.119
<v Speaker 8>Protestant type position that develops and changes. It's exactly my point,

981
01:08:55.880 --> 01:08:59.000
<v Speaker 8>and he just admitted it. When you're a hypocritical, if

982
01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:02.159
<v Speaker 8>you're a Protestant, you believe, and you say that doctrines

983
01:09:02.159 --> 01:09:06.560
<v Speaker 8>shouldn't develop, you believe the doctrine develops. Again, notice all

984
01:09:06.560 --> 01:09:10.159
<v Speaker 8>this ambiguity, What exactly do you mean by doctrinal development?

985
01:09:10.239 --> 01:09:12.960
<v Speaker 8>Do you mean that the doctrines change? Or do you

986
01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:15.479
<v Speaker 8>mean that we have a greater understanding of the doctrines

987
01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:17.760
<v Speaker 8>as an order the docts person. I could agree to that,

988
01:09:18.800 --> 01:09:21.279
<v Speaker 8>But saying that I have a greater understanding of the

989
01:09:21.279 --> 01:09:25.479
<v Speaker 8>theological doctrines and pronunciations by the sixth or seventh century

990
01:09:25.680 --> 01:09:30.720
<v Speaker 8>does not equate to a totally new idea that Peter

991
01:09:30.920 --> 01:09:34.279
<v Speaker 8>is also a world emperor, which is nowhere in the

992
01:09:34.319 --> 01:09:38.159
<v Speaker 8>first seven centuries of Christianity. In fact, it's famously based

993
01:09:38.199 --> 01:09:41.760
<v Speaker 8>on a forgery, the Donation of Constantine, which the Vatican

994
01:09:41.800 --> 01:09:47.960
<v Speaker 8>evinces a forgery. So no, there is no equating better

995
01:09:48.079 --> 01:09:54.000
<v Speaker 8>understanding with doctrinal development. When he's using doctrinal development to

996
01:09:54.039 --> 01:09:58.720
<v Speaker 8>explain new dogmas that evolved that contradict previous ideas.

997
01:09:59.199 --> 01:10:03.199
<v Speaker 12>This is are the Eastern Orthodox because they too trace

998
01:10:03.279 --> 01:10:06.279
<v Speaker 12>their history back to the beginning. But that's for another video.

999
01:10:07.119 --> 01:10:10.760
<v Speaker 12>Catholicism traces itself in an unbroken line of succession back

1000
01:10:10.840 --> 01:10:12.920
<v Speaker 12>to Jesus, and you can say.

1001
01:10:13.039 --> 01:10:16.319
<v Speaker 8>So to the Coptics, so to the Assyrians. So do

1002
01:10:16.439 --> 01:10:20.119
<v Speaker 8>the Orthodox like, what does that prove? I'd like to

1003
01:10:20.119 --> 01:10:23.239
<v Speaker 8>see his Orthodox video? I bet what do you want

1004
01:10:23.279 --> 01:10:24.920
<v Speaker 8>to bet? It's not very high tier.

1005
01:10:25.399 --> 01:10:28.600
<v Speaker 12>As an objective fact. People may not like that, but

1006
01:10:28.640 --> 01:10:31.840
<v Speaker 12>it's true. This is why it's so ridiculous when people

1007
01:10:31.880 --> 01:10:33.880
<v Speaker 12>say things like, well, Catholics aren't Christians.

1008
01:10:34.680 --> 01:10:35.600
<v Speaker 13>I've even heard.

1009
01:10:35.359 --> 01:10:38.319
<v Speaker 12>People say this about our Eastern Orthodox brothers and sisters.

1010
01:10:38.880 --> 01:10:42.600
<v Speaker 12>But my friends, Catholics and Eastern Orthodox are the original Christians.

1011
01:10:43.199 --> 01:10:45.600
<v Speaker 8>Yes, well wait a minute, So if I'm an original

1012
01:10:45.680 --> 01:10:48.600
<v Speaker 8>Christian as an Orthodox, then I don't need the papacy.

1013
01:10:49.319 --> 01:10:52.439
<v Speaker 8>And if the papacy has admitted, as Benice the sixteenth

1014
01:10:52.439 --> 01:10:56.119
<v Speaker 8>did that the Orthodox have maintained the Catholic Christian faith

1015
01:10:56.119 --> 01:10:58.199
<v Speaker 8>in the last thousand years and a Roman Catholic submit

1016
01:10:58.279 --> 01:11:01.159
<v Speaker 8>that we have gracious sacraments, which they admit, then why

1017
01:11:01.159 --> 01:11:03.600
<v Speaker 8>do we need the papacy? Exactly what exactly is it

1018
01:11:03.680 --> 01:11:06.760
<v Speaker 8>doing that we missed out on in the last thousand years?

1019
01:11:07.840 --> 01:11:11.960
<v Speaker 8>You see, he's expressing the Vatican two attitude that you

1020
01:11:11.960 --> 01:11:17.319
<v Speaker 8>can reject multiple ecumenical councils and still remain a quote

1021
01:11:17.359 --> 01:11:21.560
<v Speaker 8>true Catholic or Christian. Was that the teaching of Vatican

1022
01:11:21.600 --> 01:11:27.079
<v Speaker 8>one only what a century plus ago? Well, Vatican one

1023
01:11:27.159 --> 01:11:32.039
<v Speaker 8>attaches excommunication to anyone who rejects Vatican One. So if

1024
01:11:32.039 --> 01:11:36.279
<v Speaker 8>you were consistent, Orthodox who are explicit about the rejection

1025
01:11:36.359 --> 01:11:40.640
<v Speaker 8>of Vatican One are not Christian. They are excommunicated heretics

1026
01:11:40.640 --> 01:11:46.119
<v Speaker 8>and schismatics. But he's expressing the lovey dove Vatican two

1027
01:11:46.119 --> 01:11:49.399
<v Speaker 8>Acumenius attitude that oh, well, we're all Christians, bro or

1028
01:11:49.439 --> 01:11:54.439
<v Speaker 8>at least here it seems to be Apostolic Christians, which

1029
01:11:54.479 --> 01:11:56.600
<v Speaker 8>whatever that is, I don't know what that that's supposed

1030
01:11:56.600 --> 01:11:58.960
<v Speaker 8>to be. Oh, anybody who's quote apposolic succession, Well, who

1031
01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:02.039
<v Speaker 8>decides who has episodes excession? Oh Rome does. Oh so

1032
01:12:02.079 --> 01:12:07.479
<v Speaker 8>if Rome accepts the Coptics and the Orthodox and whoever

1033
01:12:08.039 --> 01:12:11.960
<v Speaker 8>Assyrians may be, so suddenly they're now Christians. That's not

1034
01:12:12.079 --> 01:12:14.399
<v Speaker 8>the reasoning or the or the mindset of the ideology

1035
01:12:14.399 --> 01:12:19.279
<v Speaker 8>of ecclesiology from Cantate Domino to Vatican One. That's the

1036
01:12:19.359 --> 01:12:22.439
<v Speaker 8>idea post Vatican One up into Vatican two and Ecumenism,

1037
01:12:22.479 --> 01:12:27.479
<v Speaker 8>when the Roman Catholic Church no longer rejects interfaith gatherings.

1038
01:12:27.560 --> 01:12:31.279
<v Speaker 8>As late as nineteen twenty eight, interfaith gatherings were explicitly

1039
01:12:31.359 --> 01:12:35.479
<v Speaker 8>called apostasy and heresy and surrendering of the faith. Just

1040
01:12:35.560 --> 01:12:41.079
<v Speaker 8>look up Mortalium Anamos a Pious the eleventh. But he's

1041
01:12:41.159 --> 01:12:46.439
<v Speaker 8>already contradicted by now expressing a Vatican two specific Roman Catholicism,

1042
01:12:46.479 --> 01:12:51.479
<v Speaker 8>which literally says schismatics and people who reject a thousand

1043
01:12:51.560 --> 01:12:54.800
<v Speaker 8>years of the papacy are still somehow Catholic Christians in

1044
01:12:54.840 --> 01:12:57.399
<v Speaker 8>good standing. That makes no sense oracle fact.

1045
01:12:58.479 --> 01:13:01.039
<v Speaker 12>Now for some people who still find this is completely crazy,

1046
01:13:01.319 --> 01:13:03.560
<v Speaker 12>I would challenge you to look at the writings of

1047
01:13:03.600 --> 01:13:06.880
<v Speaker 12>the Church fathers. You will see Catholic beliefs on the

1048
01:13:06.920 --> 01:13:09.840
<v Speaker 12>primacy of the Bishop of Rome, the real presence of

1049
01:13:09.920 --> 01:13:13.159
<v Speaker 12>Jesus and the Eucharist, the Mass as a sacrifice to God,

1050
01:13:13.520 --> 01:13:17.359
<v Speaker 12>the baptism of infants and baptismal regeneration, the authority of

1051
01:13:17.359 --> 01:13:20.520
<v Speaker 12>the Catholic Church, the Canon of Scripture as the Catholic

1052
01:13:20.600 --> 01:13:24.239
<v Speaker 12>Church has it today, the veneration of icons, and prayer

1053
01:13:24.279 --> 01:13:26.640
<v Speaker 12>to the saints, and even the veneration of the Blessed

1054
01:13:26.720 --> 01:13:27.359
<v Speaker 12>Virgin Mary.

1055
01:13:27.560 --> 01:13:28.760
<v Speaker 13>Now I know the objections.

1056
01:13:29.079 --> 01:13:31.439
<v Speaker 12>Some say I don't care what the church fathers say,

1057
01:13:31.520 --> 01:13:34.720
<v Speaker 12>I only care about the Bible. But that statement blows

1058
01:13:34.760 --> 01:13:37.319
<v Speaker 12>up when you realize that God used the Church to

1059
01:13:37.399 --> 01:13:41.199
<v Speaker 12>tell you which books are in the Bible are other things.

1060
01:13:41.600 --> 01:13:45.720
<v Speaker 8>So he actually did present a circular argument. The papacy

1061
01:13:45.880 --> 01:13:47.840
<v Speaker 8>is where you get the Bible. You couldn't know the paper.

1062
01:13:47.920 --> 01:13:50.119
<v Speaker 8>And when he says the church, he means the papacy,

1063
01:13:50.520 --> 01:13:52.720
<v Speaker 8>because every Roman Catholic apologist is going to date it

1064
01:13:52.760 --> 01:13:56.359
<v Speaker 8>to the Roman councils and to Damasists to say how

1065
01:13:56.399 --> 01:13:59.239
<v Speaker 8>they know what the canon scripture is. So he decided

1066
01:13:59.399 --> 01:14:07.000
<v Speaker 8>the the papacy as the source of the canon. But

1067
01:14:07.039 --> 01:14:09.159
<v Speaker 8>I wanted to remind you because many of you are

1068
01:14:09.159 --> 01:14:12.439
<v Speaker 8>not familiar with this. Many people have not read Denzinger.

1069
01:14:12.479 --> 01:14:15.039
<v Speaker 8>They don't know what's in contate Domino, which is the

1070
01:14:15.079 --> 01:14:17.680
<v Speaker 8>pronunciation of the Council of Florence. So it's a dogmatic

1071
01:14:17.760 --> 01:14:20.880
<v Speaker 8>statement from the Council Florence. You can look it up,

1072
01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:24.239
<v Speaker 8>Contate Domino, not the liturgical music that pops up, but

1073
01:14:24.279 --> 01:14:29.479
<v Speaker 8>the actual pronunciation of Pute Eugene fourth from the Council Florence.

1074
01:14:29.520 --> 01:14:33.319
<v Speaker 8>This is the bull that he wrote. And I want

1075
01:14:33.319 --> 01:14:35.920
<v Speaker 8>you to tell me if you think this famous Papa

1076
01:14:36.000 --> 01:14:38.640
<v Speaker 8>Bull at all reads like Vatican two and what this

1077
01:14:38.720 --> 01:14:41.920
<v Speaker 8>guy says. The Roman Church firmly believes and professes that

1078
01:14:42.439 --> 01:14:46.000
<v Speaker 8>those not living within the Catholic Church, not only Pagans,

1079
01:14:46.399 --> 01:14:51.079
<v Speaker 8>but Jews, heretics and schismatics, cannot become participants in eternal life,

1080
01:14:51.479 --> 01:14:54.439
<v Speaker 8>but will depart into everlasting fire prepared for the devil

1081
01:14:54.479 --> 01:14:57.840
<v Speaker 8>and his angels, unless before the end of life the

1082
01:14:57.880 --> 01:15:00.960
<v Speaker 8>same have been added to the flock, the paper flock.

1083
01:15:01.520 --> 01:15:04.119
<v Speaker 8>And the said unity of the ecclesiastical body is so

1084
01:15:04.159 --> 01:15:08.199
<v Speaker 8>strong that only those remaining in it, that to those

1085
01:15:08.239 --> 01:15:11.159
<v Speaker 8>remaining and are the sacraments of benefit to salvation and

1086
01:15:11.199 --> 01:15:13.079
<v Speaker 8>do fasting, alms giving, an other functions of piety and

1087
01:15:13.079 --> 01:15:16.640
<v Speaker 8>exercise of the Christian service to produce the eternal reward.

1088
01:15:16.840 --> 01:15:21.319
<v Speaker 8>And that no one who whatever almsgiving he's practiced even

1089
01:15:21.359 --> 01:15:23.359
<v Speaker 8>if he shed blood for the name of Christ, even

1090
01:15:23.359 --> 01:15:27.359
<v Speaker 8>if he's a martyr, a Christian martyr outside of Rome

1091
01:15:28.319 --> 01:15:31.000
<v Speaker 8>is not saved unless he remains in the bosom and

1092
01:15:31.079 --> 01:15:35.880
<v Speaker 8>unity of the Roman Catholic Church. So notice contat Domino

1093
01:15:36.199 --> 01:15:40.520
<v Speaker 8>does not accept martyrs and saints outside of communion with

1094
01:15:40.720 --> 01:15:45.319
<v Speaker 8>the Bishop of Rome. And this is not some obscure document.

1095
01:15:45.439 --> 01:15:48.039
<v Speaker 8>This is one of the most famous documents in the

1096
01:15:48.079 --> 01:15:51.760
<v Speaker 8>history of the Catholic Church. Pope Eugene the fourt's Cantate Domino.

1097
01:15:55.479 --> 01:15:56.359
<v Speaker 11>So go look it up.

1098
01:15:56.439 --> 01:15:59.640
<v Speaker 8>You'll find it very easily if you search it, Cantata

1099
01:15:59.640 --> 01:16:04.840
<v Speaker 8>Domo Eugene, and it tells you that doesn't even matter

1100
01:16:04.880 --> 01:16:09.000
<v Speaker 8>if you're a martyr in some other communion, you're not saved.

1101
01:16:10.159 --> 01:16:13.760
<v Speaker 8>Another contradiction because Madicandu says the very opposite. Not only

1102
01:16:13.800 --> 01:16:17.000
<v Speaker 8>are there martyrs and Christians that people saved in all

1103
01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:20.520
<v Speaker 8>the other schismatic bodies and groups. There's in fact people

1104
01:16:20.600 --> 01:16:25.439
<v Speaker 8>saved in Hinduism, as no tretate says Hindus love God

1105
01:16:25.760 --> 01:16:26.720
<v Speaker 8>like Catholics do.

1106
01:16:27.600 --> 01:16:30.800
<v Speaker 12>Others will say, well, the church fathers aren't unanimous, so

1107
01:16:30.960 --> 01:16:32.239
<v Speaker 12>you guys are picking and choosing.

1108
01:16:32.439 --> 01:16:35.760
<v Speaker 13>I agree, that's precisely why the authority.

1109
01:16:35.359 --> 01:16:37.960
<v Speaker 12>Of the Church is not based only on the Church fathers,

1110
01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:41.840
<v Speaker 12>but also on the scriptures and the magisterium. It is

1111
01:16:41.880 --> 01:16:44.800
<v Speaker 12>the God given role of the Church to preserve, unpack

1112
01:16:44.920 --> 01:16:48.000
<v Speaker 12>and teach the depositive faith pass down from Jesus to

1113
01:16:48.039 --> 01:16:51.239
<v Speaker 12>the apostles and their successors. The Bible says in Second

1114
01:16:51.319 --> 01:16:55.800
<v Speaker 12>Thessalonians two fifteen, So then, brethren, stand firm and hold

1115
01:16:55.840 --> 01:16:58.720
<v Speaker 12>to the traditions which you were taught by us, either

1116
01:16:58.760 --> 01:17:02.279
<v Speaker 12>by word of mouth or by letter. And also in

1117
01:17:02.279 --> 01:17:06.000
<v Speaker 12>one Timothy three fifteen, if I am delayed, you may

1118
01:17:06.079 --> 01:17:07.560
<v Speaker 12>know how one ought to behave.

1119
01:17:08.000 --> 01:17:11.079
<v Speaker 8>Of course, everybody's heard these verses a million times, and

1120
01:17:11.119 --> 01:17:14.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean these are good verses to refute, you know,

1121
01:17:14.079 --> 01:17:17.920
<v Speaker 8>sol Scripture at presuppositions. But none of these things demonstrate

1122
01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:21.840
<v Speaker 8>that the Roman Church is the one true church, or

1123
01:17:21.880 --> 01:17:24.760
<v Speaker 8>that the papacy is the case. And in fact, I

1124
01:17:24.800 --> 01:17:27.039
<v Speaker 8>can keep going on and on and on, for example,

1125
01:17:27.079 --> 01:17:32.520
<v Speaker 8>that it can choose Lumingentium. Paragraph sixteen says that Muslims

1126
01:17:32.560 --> 01:17:35.560
<v Speaker 8>have the faith of Abraham, and that God accepts their

1127
01:17:35.560 --> 01:17:37.960
<v Speaker 8>prayers and their alms giving and so forth, as does

1128
01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:41.439
<v Speaker 8>nos Ratt says the exact same thing. And the reason

1129
01:17:41.479 --> 01:17:43.640
<v Speaker 8>I like to bring both of these quotes up is

1130
01:17:43.680 --> 01:17:48.399
<v Speaker 8>because they will engage in deflection and dissimulation. If you

1131
01:17:48.479 --> 01:17:51.880
<v Speaker 8>mention the fact that the Muslims over here in nostra

1132
01:17:51.880 --> 01:17:55.119
<v Speaker 8>Atate say that they have the faith of Abraham, they'll say, oh,

1133
01:17:55.159 --> 01:17:58.800
<v Speaker 8>but doesn't actually say that says they believe they have it. No, Actually,

1134
01:17:58.960 --> 01:18:03.079
<v Speaker 8>when you compare both documents, it explicitly says they actually

1135
01:18:03.119 --> 01:18:07.079
<v Speaker 8>do have it. So notice the they'll say it's weaponized ambiguity.

1136
01:18:07.399 --> 01:18:11.359
<v Speaker 8>Well wait a minute. Notice the new guy, our new

1137
01:18:11.399 --> 01:18:14.520
<v Speaker 8>guy here, who doesn't really know this stuff and is

1138
01:18:14.560 --> 01:18:16.279
<v Speaker 8>new to all this. He thinks.

1139
01:18:17.720 --> 01:18:20.000
<v Speaker 11>That this is all solved. Bro, it makes it all clear.

1140
01:18:20.079 --> 01:18:23.279
<v Speaker 8>Dude, he's not even on he's not even at the

1141
01:18:23.319 --> 01:18:25.279
<v Speaker 8>stage where he's gonna have to deal with the tradcat

1142
01:18:25.319 --> 01:18:28.239
<v Speaker 8>stuff yet. But give this guy two or three years

1143
01:18:28.520 --> 01:18:32.359
<v Speaker 8>and he'll I like Taylor Marshall now, and then give

1144
01:18:32.439 --> 01:18:34.840
<v Speaker 8>him about five years. I'm starting to think France is

1145
01:18:34.920 --> 01:18:36.600
<v Speaker 8>into pope, all right. So this is the track that

1146
01:18:36.600 --> 01:18:39.319
<v Speaker 8>everybody goes on in this domain. So he's not there yet,

1147
01:18:39.920 --> 01:18:44.159
<v Speaker 8>but he will be. He'll be forced to be, because

1148
01:18:45.520 --> 01:18:47.399
<v Speaker 8>then I'm not trying to be mean or arrogant, like

1149
01:18:47.439 --> 01:18:50.119
<v Speaker 8>where this guy's at I was at this stage in

1150
01:18:50.159 --> 01:18:53.199
<v Speaker 8>two thousand and two. It's exactly where I was twenty

1151
01:18:53.199 --> 01:18:56.359
<v Speaker 8>two years ago. And then you're gonna have to start

1152
01:18:56.399 --> 01:18:59.000
<v Speaker 8>digging into these documents. You're gonna realize, Hey, wait a minute,

1153
01:18:59.079 --> 01:19:01.960
<v Speaker 8>how do we call crusades against people that we now

1154
01:19:02.000 --> 01:19:04.840
<v Speaker 8>say can be saved because they have the faith of Abraham. Hello,

1155
01:19:05.359 --> 01:19:07.159
<v Speaker 8>you don't have the faith of Abraham if you don't

1156
01:19:07.159 --> 01:19:11.479
<v Speaker 8>believe in Christ, and if you don't believe in the Trinity,

1157
01:19:12.199 --> 01:19:15.720
<v Speaker 8>And how are people not recognizing this? In Trent Horn,

1158
01:19:16.479 --> 01:19:20.359
<v Speaker 8>the last surviving sole apologist star of the Roman system,

1159
01:19:21.000 --> 01:19:25.119
<v Speaker 8>who literally thinks that the word triad is an Aryan term,

1160
01:19:26.640 --> 01:19:29.840
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the very term used in Greek Catholic churches

1161
01:19:29.880 --> 01:19:33.399
<v Speaker 8>for the Trinity. This goober still thinks he doubled down,

1162
01:19:33.720 --> 01:19:39.159
<v Speaker 8>still thinks is an anti Trinitarian term. The one who

1163
01:19:39.239 --> 01:19:43.000
<v Speaker 8>says that, yeah, Francis does appear to contradict when he

1164
01:19:43.039 --> 01:19:45.359
<v Speaker 8>says that the death pimple is against the Gospel, but

1165
01:19:45.960 --> 01:19:48.439
<v Speaker 8>come up with about five different ways to make sense

1166
01:19:48.479 --> 01:19:51.239
<v Speaker 8>of it. He says, so these people are sophists. They

1167
01:19:51.319 --> 01:19:59.079
<v Speaker 8>use sophistry but how is Muslims have the faith of

1168
01:19:59.119 --> 01:20:02.319
<v Speaker 8>Abraham and love and worship God like we do. How

1169
01:20:02.399 --> 01:20:03.279
<v Speaker 8>is that at all.

1170
01:20:05.239 --> 01:20:05.760
<v Speaker 11>Meshable?

1171
01:20:06.760 --> 01:20:11.600
<v Speaker 8>Mashable smashable with Cantaze Domino that we just read that

1172
01:20:11.720 --> 01:20:14.439
<v Speaker 8>says that even if you shed blood in a heretical

1173
01:20:14.479 --> 01:20:16.600
<v Speaker 8>sect for the name of Christ, if you're not in

1174
01:20:16.640 --> 01:20:20.199
<v Speaker 8>community with the papacy, you're damned. Well, guess what. They're

1175
01:20:20.239 --> 01:20:24.840
<v Speaker 8>not meshable, they're obvious contradictions. And that's why everybody who's

1176
01:20:24.880 --> 01:20:28.800
<v Speaker 8>honest with himself just says, this is a contradiction, Like

1177
01:20:28.880 --> 01:20:32.840
<v Speaker 8>I can't praying a moss towards Mecca and then turn

1178
01:20:32.880 --> 01:20:37.520
<v Speaker 8>around and deny that this is who we called crusades

1179
01:20:37.520 --> 01:20:42.279
<v Speaker 8>against Hello, it's in your face. And a lot of

1180
01:20:42.279 --> 01:20:43.239
<v Speaker 8>times Rome Kelly.

1181
01:20:43.079 --> 01:20:46.119
<v Speaker 11>Said, well, if God was really allowing and permitting a

1182
01:20:46.159 --> 01:20:48.640
<v Speaker 11>deception with Rome, wouldn't he make it obvious?

1183
01:20:48.720 --> 01:20:54.920
<v Speaker 8>He has. It is obvious. It has been displayed before

1184
01:20:54.920 --> 01:20:58.840
<v Speaker 8>the entire world for seventy plus years, and every day

1185
01:20:58.880 --> 01:21:02.560
<v Speaker 8>almost Francis grants us a new scandal that helps us

1186
01:21:02.560 --> 01:21:07.039
<v Speaker 8>to see. Yeah, absolutely, he doesn't believe the Catholic faith.

1187
01:21:07.159 --> 01:21:10.560
<v Speaker 8>He doesn't believe the Christian faith. In fact, Francis hates

1188
01:21:10.640 --> 01:21:14.760
<v Speaker 8>you and he makes fun of you. All you tradcats

1189
01:21:15.119 --> 01:21:17.199
<v Speaker 8>are arguing for the guy who hates you and makes

1190
01:21:17.199 --> 01:21:19.399
<v Speaker 8>fun of you. He thinks you're ridiculous. He one hundred

1191
01:21:19.399 --> 01:21:24.439
<v Speaker 8>percent absolutely serves the globalist agenda. Remember the globalist agenda

1192
01:21:24.479 --> 01:21:26.760
<v Speaker 8>that Trent says doesn't exist. There is no such thing

1193
01:21:26.800 --> 01:21:30.279
<v Speaker 8>as that. Here's your genius Roman Catholic apologist who's so

1194
01:21:30.520 --> 01:21:34.439
<v Speaker 8>normy turbo noormy that he doesn't even know what the

1195
01:21:34.600 --> 01:21:38.439
<v Speaker 8>nWo is. He doesn't even know what Davos is, doesn't

1196
01:21:38.439 --> 01:21:42.239
<v Speaker 8>know what Klaus talks about. He says that my positions

1197
01:21:42.239 --> 01:21:45.760
<v Speaker 8>are the equivalent to chick tracks. You are listening to

1198
01:21:45.960 --> 01:21:50.039
<v Speaker 8>a normy on your religious soul decision who doesn't know

1199
01:21:50.119 --> 01:21:52.720
<v Speaker 8>that there's Davos in a World Economic Forum and all

1200
01:21:52.720 --> 01:21:56.119
<v Speaker 8>that stuff. Why would you listen to somebody so naive

1201
01:21:56.600 --> 01:22:03.039
<v Speaker 8>and silly about how the world works, but you think

1202
01:22:03.079 --> 01:22:07.039
<v Speaker 8>he knows where to go spiritually in terms of your destiny.

1203
01:22:07.560 --> 01:22:13.840
<v Speaker 8>You're foolish, you're ignorant, You're being used. And I don't

1204
01:22:13.840 --> 01:22:16.800
<v Speaker 8>think that he's malicious. I think that he just doesn't know.

1205
01:22:17.880 --> 01:22:20.119
<v Speaker 8>In fact, in the debate that I had with Trent,

1206
01:22:21.119 --> 01:22:24.600
<v Speaker 8>there were like five philosophy basics that he had no

1207
01:22:24.680 --> 01:22:27.399
<v Speaker 8>idea what they meant, he didn't even know what I

1208
01:22:27.439 --> 01:22:32.800
<v Speaker 8>was talking about. So no, I don't think Trent is malicious.

1209
01:22:32.960 --> 01:22:36.439
<v Speaker 8>I just think he has no idea. And that's why

1210
01:22:36.520 --> 01:22:38.760
<v Speaker 8>I've asked three times over the years for him to

1211
01:22:38.880 --> 01:22:42.840
<v Speaker 8>debate me on the geopolitical entanglements of the papacy, and

1212
01:22:42.880 --> 01:22:47.560
<v Speaker 8>he declines every time. And They've suggested multiple other professors

1213
01:22:47.600 --> 01:22:50.560
<v Speaker 8>that I've reached out to who also decline. Why will

1214
01:22:50.600 --> 01:22:53.399
<v Speaker 8>none of them debate me on the geopolitical history of

1215
01:22:53.399 --> 01:22:57.079
<v Speaker 8>the papacy? Why do none of them talk about Gladiol?

1216
01:22:57.399 --> 01:23:01.960
<v Speaker 8>Why why do none of them take on the unam

1217
01:23:02.079 --> 01:23:07.600
<v Speaker 8>sanctum quisa's Hoderock argument? If this is also clear and

1218
01:23:07.640 --> 01:23:09.920
<v Speaker 8>so true, all you gotta do is de book my

1219
01:23:10.079 --> 01:23:14.000
<v Speaker 8>arguments prove it right. Why don't they ignore it? Because

1220
01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:16.880
<v Speaker 8>they can't deal with it because they don't know and

1221
01:23:16.960 --> 01:23:20.680
<v Speaker 8>they don't have answers. How can you guys not see this?

1222
01:23:22.439 --> 01:23:26.079
<v Speaker 8>Why are you all still following these people? Taylor Marshall

1223
01:23:26.079 --> 01:23:30.520
<v Speaker 8>has over a million subscribers. He says Mary came to

1224
01:23:30.600 --> 01:23:33.960
<v Speaker 8>him and he saw her boobs. Are you insane? What

1225
01:23:34.039 --> 01:23:36.479
<v Speaker 8>is wrong with you people? Why would you fall for that?

1226
01:23:36.800 --> 01:23:42.920
<v Speaker 8>You don't have any discernment to recognize delusion. Mary did

1227
01:23:42.960 --> 01:23:45.560
<v Speaker 8>not come to Taylor Marshall. I might as well call

1228
01:23:45.640 --> 01:23:52.800
<v Speaker 8>Taylor Swift Taylor Marshall Swift. That wasn't Mary talking about milkers.

1229
01:23:53.279 --> 01:23:58.720
<v Speaker 8>That was Taylor Marshall milking you idiots who follow him.

1230
01:23:59.119 --> 01:24:01.479
<v Speaker 8>Why do you think Taylor Marshall won't debate me. I've

1231
01:24:01.520 --> 01:24:03.680
<v Speaker 8>asked him for over ten years to do a debate

1232
01:24:04.479 --> 01:24:06.720
<v Speaker 8>and he just blocks me and ignores me. Why because

1233
01:24:06.760 --> 01:24:09.880
<v Speaker 8>it's a grift, dummies? Why do you Roman Celics have

1234
01:24:09.920 --> 01:24:11.760
<v Speaker 8>to be so stupid? Why do you have to fall

1235
01:24:11.840 --> 01:24:12.680
<v Speaker 8>for the grift.

1236
01:24:17.640 --> 01:24:20.079
<v Speaker 12>In the household of God, which is the Church of

1237
01:24:20.119 --> 01:24:22.960
<v Speaker 12>the Living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth.

1238
01:24:23.640 --> 01:24:26.600
<v Speaker 12>And of course Jesus himself, when founding his church, says

1239
01:24:26.640 --> 01:24:30.159
<v Speaker 12>to Peter in Matthew sixteen eighteen, and I tell you

1240
01:24:30.159 --> 01:24:32.920
<v Speaker 12>you are Peter, and on this rock I will build

1241
01:24:33.039 --> 01:24:36.199
<v Speaker 12>my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail

1242
01:24:36.279 --> 01:24:36.920
<v Speaker 12>against it.

1243
01:24:37.600 --> 01:24:39.239
<v Speaker 13>I will give you the keys of the.

1244
01:24:39.239 --> 01:24:42.239
<v Speaker 12>Kingdom of Heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall

1245
01:24:42.279 --> 01:24:45.119
<v Speaker 12>be bound in Heaven. And whatever you loose on earth

1246
01:24:45.520 --> 01:24:49.319
<v Speaker 12>shall be loosed in heaven, Christ came to save the

1247
01:24:49.359 --> 01:24:53.319
<v Speaker 12>world from sin and created a church to accomplish his mission.

1248
01:24:54.000 --> 01:24:57.880
<v Speaker 12>And to that church he has given authority, protection and

1249
01:24:58.000 --> 01:25:01.000
<v Speaker 12>power to do that which he he has predestined it

1250
01:25:01.039 --> 01:25:01.319
<v Speaker 12>to do.

1251
01:25:02.319 --> 01:25:06.399
<v Speaker 8>And well, you can't type in uh, don't type in

1252
01:25:06.479 --> 01:25:09.520
<v Speaker 8>milkers because that you don't get the video that I

1253
01:25:09.560 --> 01:25:13.520
<v Speaker 8>thought you're gonna get. So let me find this over here,

1254
01:25:13.560 --> 01:25:15.319
<v Speaker 8>because I have to play for you the Taylor Marshall

1255
01:25:15.359 --> 01:25:18.319
<v Speaker 8>Milkers video. But if you type milkers into Twitter, you

1256
01:25:18.359 --> 01:25:21.760
<v Speaker 8>get something else. Uh, let me find it this way.

1257
01:25:22.159 --> 01:25:25.800
<v Speaker 8>I have to play this for you because it's ridiculous.

1258
01:25:26.079 --> 01:25:32.520
<v Speaker 8>I have it saved in my bookmarks over here. Let

1259
01:25:32.520 --> 01:25:33.000
<v Speaker 8>me find this.

1260
01:25:35.840 --> 01:25:38.119
<v Speaker 11>No, I'll be like, oh, look, look what happens if

1261
01:25:38.119 --> 01:25:39.079
<v Speaker 11>you tube in milkers.

1262
01:25:39.479 --> 01:25:42.479
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, don't type that in. But at least they were

1263
01:25:42.520 --> 01:25:46.119
<v Speaker 8>all chunky. So we'll have to make this a half

1264
01:25:46.119 --> 01:25:58.720
<v Speaker 8>and half stream. You can search your bookmarks now, okay, yeah,

1265
01:25:58.840 --> 01:26:12.760
<v Speaker 8>have like a million bookmarks, so let's search Taylor. Here

1266
01:26:12.800 --> 01:26:21.399
<v Speaker 8>we go, just a bit of a reminder for you.

1267
01:26:25.720 --> 01:26:27.880
<v Speaker 8>Is it true what I'm saying? Where did I get this?

1268
01:26:28.920 --> 01:26:29.840
<v Speaker 8>Let's see.

1269
01:26:31.199 --> 01:26:32.760
<v Speaker 13>See.

1270
01:26:33.680 --> 01:26:36.520
<v Speaker 14>Well, I'm not a visionary and turning not a profit,

1271
01:26:36.680 --> 01:26:41.079
<v Speaker 14>but I have seen supernatural things in my life as

1272
01:26:41.079 --> 01:26:44.119
<v Speaker 14>a Christian of a Catholic and one of those things

1273
01:26:44.159 --> 01:26:48.720
<v Speaker 14>happened last night, and I'm reluctant to share it.

1274
01:26:49.600 --> 01:26:52.479
<v Speaker 8>But I think it'll be a comfort to other people.

1275
01:26:52.640 --> 01:26:55.319
<v Speaker 8>So yes to a confession.

1276
01:26:56.079 --> 01:26:58.840
<v Speaker 14>And one of the things I confessed was being prideful

1277
01:26:59.199 --> 01:27:02.880
<v Speaker 14>and judgmental and worried and concerned about the state of

1278
01:27:02.960 --> 01:27:09.560
<v Speaker 14>the church and corruption in the church and scandals, and it's.

1279
01:27:09.479 --> 01:27:11.199
<v Speaker 8>Been a kind of a struggle for me lately.

1280
01:27:11.279 --> 01:27:13.079
<v Speaker 14>So anyway, I confess that, and the priest had some

1281
01:27:13.199 --> 01:27:16.319
<v Speaker 14>very good things to counsel me on that. And later

1282
01:27:16.399 --> 01:27:19.640
<v Speaker 14>that night, which was last night, I was doing examination

1283
01:27:19.680 --> 01:27:23.880
<v Speaker 14>of conscience before bed, and I was thinking on that

1284
01:27:24.000 --> 01:27:27.359
<v Speaker 14>point of being worried and concerned and judgmental and all

1285
01:27:27.399 --> 01:27:31.439
<v Speaker 14>these negative thoughts and emotions about the Holy Catholic Church,

1286
01:27:31.479 --> 01:27:35.239
<v Speaker 14>Mother Church. And as I was suddenly like I saw

1287
01:27:35.279 --> 01:27:38.399
<v Speaker 14>this beautiful woman. She had blonde hair, she was perfect,

1288
01:27:38.399 --> 01:27:41.840
<v Speaker 14>no wrinkles, no spots, and I immediately discerned that this

1289
01:27:41.960 --> 01:27:43.159
<v Speaker 14>was Holy Mother of the Church.

1290
01:27:44.640 --> 01:27:46.920
<v Speaker 8>And she was writhing in pain.

1291
01:27:47.039 --> 01:27:49.159
<v Speaker 14>She was in a bed and there's sheets on her,

1292
01:27:49.199 --> 01:27:52.640
<v Speaker 14>and she was very sick. And I noticed that her

1293
01:27:52.680 --> 01:27:58.560
<v Speaker 14>breasts were engorged with milk, tons of milk, and there

1294
01:27:58.600 --> 01:28:01.640
<v Speaker 14>were babies and children crying out to her that were hungry,

1295
01:28:01.680 --> 01:28:04.239
<v Speaker 14>and she wanted to feed them, and she was upset,

1296
01:28:04.800 --> 01:28:06.880
<v Speaker 14>but she was so sick she could hardly sit up

1297
01:28:06.920 --> 01:28:10.079
<v Speaker 14>from her bed. And then I thought to myself, Oh,

1298
01:28:10.119 --> 01:28:13.159
<v Speaker 14>she doesn't want she's poisoned. She doesn't want to nurse

1299
01:28:13.199 --> 01:28:16.199
<v Speaker 14>the children because then she'll give them the poison.

1300
01:28:16.279 --> 01:28:17.720
<v Speaker 8>And then there was this voice.

1301
01:28:17.720 --> 01:28:19.520
<v Speaker 14>It was like God or an angel, I don't know,

1302
01:28:19.560 --> 01:28:24.760
<v Speaker 14>and it said, no, the milk is still pure. And

1303
01:28:24.800 --> 01:28:26.720
<v Speaker 14>so I saw her there and all her beauty but

1304
01:28:26.800 --> 01:28:32.119
<v Speaker 14>so sick and struggling and loving those children, and seeing

1305
01:28:32.159 --> 01:28:37.439
<v Speaker 14>her all that milk stored up there, and I realized

1306
01:28:37.479 --> 01:28:43.479
<v Speaker 14>that the sacramental graces, the dogma, the doctrine, the the.

1307
01:28:42.880 --> 01:28:46.359
<v Speaker 8>Scuba had a damn dirty dream. That he's turning into

1308
01:28:46.640 --> 01:28:51.319
<v Speaker 8>a spiritual vision to milk all you idiots to follow him.

1309
01:28:51.560 --> 01:28:54.319
<v Speaker 8>It's kind of unreal, really, but I mean, I guess

1310
01:28:54.319 --> 01:28:56.600
<v Speaker 8>this shows us the quality of the audience that we

1311
01:28:56.640 --> 01:28:59.399
<v Speaker 8>would get in the Taylor Marshalls sphere. I mean, imagine

1312
01:28:59.399 --> 01:29:03.239
<v Speaker 8>believing that this dude is like your your ideological leader, right,

1313
01:29:03.640 --> 01:29:06.439
<v Speaker 8>a dude who literally takes dirty dreams about boobs and

1314
01:29:06.520 --> 01:29:10.840
<v Speaker 8>turns it into like spiritual, mystical, like prophetic words for

1315
01:29:10.920 --> 01:29:14.560
<v Speaker 8>the church. I mean, you can't make this up. And

1316
01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:17.079
<v Speaker 8>ra mccalics love that. They eat this stuff up, dude,

1317
01:29:17.159 --> 01:29:20.880
<v Speaker 8>especially this Mariyan mystical nonsense. They eat it up, dude.

1318
01:29:20.920 --> 01:29:24.680
<v Speaker 8>In fact, they actually follow that more than anything else

1319
01:29:24.960 --> 01:29:28.720
<v Speaker 8>in fact. And so and ultimately what happens is when

1320
01:29:29.039 --> 01:29:31.640
<v Speaker 8>Roman Catholics are presented with a lot of the theological

1321
01:29:31.640 --> 01:29:34.800
<v Speaker 8>dogmatic problems, what do they end up resorting to? They

1322
01:29:34.840 --> 01:29:37.439
<v Speaker 8>end up resorting to just marrying stuff. Well, Mary appeared,

1323
01:29:37.479 --> 01:29:39.079
<v Speaker 8>and you know, I don't care. I don't care about

1324
01:29:39.079 --> 01:29:43.680
<v Speaker 8>the theology because Fatima Rosary that's all. That's it, That's

1325
01:29:43.720 --> 01:29:47.479
<v Speaker 8>what I got, and that's their kind of fallback. But

1326
01:29:47.600 --> 01:29:50.520
<v Speaker 8>eventually they realized this and this is most people who

1327
01:29:50.720 --> 01:29:53.000
<v Speaker 8>you know, have the Rmancaloic phase and then come out

1328
01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:55.760
<v Speaker 8>of it. I never really, I guess I did kind

1329
01:29:55.800 --> 01:29:58.279
<v Speaker 8>of retreat into the Maryan stuff maybe at one point

1330
01:29:58.640 --> 01:30:00.319
<v Speaker 8>when I was really struggling with a lot of these

1331
01:30:00.439 --> 01:30:05.960
<v Speaker 8>theological issues. But eventually you just kind of realized, like, well,

1332
01:30:06.039 --> 01:30:08.439
<v Speaker 8>just praying the Rosary over and over and over is

1333
01:30:08.520 --> 01:30:13.760
<v Speaker 8>not actually solving my intellectual problems because I'm noticing big,

1334
01:30:13.840 --> 01:30:18.840
<v Speaker 8>huge contradictions and just suppressing it and acting like it's

1335
01:30:18.880 --> 01:30:22.119
<v Speaker 8>not there doesn't make it go away. Keeps popping up.

1336
01:30:22.439 --> 01:30:25.560
<v Speaker 8>He keeps popping up like Taylor Marshall's Privy member when

1337
01:30:25.600 --> 01:30:30.520
<v Speaker 8>he's having his dirty dreams. Right, So keep in mind,

1338
01:30:31.199 --> 01:30:36.199
<v Speaker 8>I didn't make this up. It's a classic here it is.

1339
01:30:36.600 --> 01:30:41.039
<v Speaker 8>Be sure and following me right there, and we'll open

1340
01:30:41.039 --> 01:30:42.439
<v Speaker 8>it up in a second. We're almost done with this

1341
01:30:42.479 --> 01:30:46.159
<v Speaker 8>guy's video, just a few more minutes. It was pretty bad.

1342
01:30:46.199 --> 01:30:48.520
<v Speaker 8>It's about what I expected, just super low tier stuff.

1343
01:30:48.560 --> 01:30:50.239
<v Speaker 8>He kind of surprised me for I thought he was

1344
01:30:50.239 --> 01:30:51.880
<v Speaker 8>gonna get kind of kind of deep. When he starts

1345
01:30:51.880 --> 01:30:54.399
<v Speaker 8>talking about circular argument, it's like, Wow, maybe this is

1346
01:30:54.439 --> 01:30:58.560
<v Speaker 8>gonna have some some meat and bones to it. No,

1347
01:30:58.840 --> 01:31:03.319
<v Speaker 8>it was as barren as his Novusorto backdrop that he had.

1348
01:31:03.399 --> 01:31:07.760
<v Speaker 8>Looks his backdrop looks like every novusort of church behind

1349
01:31:07.800 --> 01:31:08.960
<v Speaker 8>their Masonic altar.

1350
01:31:09.079 --> 01:31:12.359
<v Speaker 12>Right household of God, according to Ephesians two twenty, is

1351
01:31:12.520 --> 01:31:15.479
<v Speaker 12>the one that stands today, built on the foundation of

1352
01:31:15.520 --> 01:31:18.760
<v Speaker 12>the apostles, with Jesus Christ as the cornerstone, and as

1353
01:31:18.760 --> 01:31:22.279
<v Speaker 12>Matthew sixteen says, with Peter as the rock, that church

1354
01:31:22.640 --> 01:31:27.479
<v Speaker 12>is the Catholic Church. Now let's talk about reason. Is

1355
01:31:27.520 --> 01:31:31.880
<v Speaker 12>Catholicism reasonable? I know this is the most subjective aspect,

1356
01:31:32.399 --> 01:31:34.880
<v Speaker 12>but sometimes we just have to ask ourselves does this

1357
01:31:34.960 --> 01:31:38.399
<v Speaker 12>make any sense? When I think about Christianity, there are

1358
01:31:38.399 --> 01:31:42.399
<v Speaker 12>two main narratives that explain its nature and origin. Jesus

1359
01:31:42.439 --> 01:31:45.880
<v Speaker 12>came to the world, lived and died, rose again, ascended

1360
01:31:46.039 --> 01:31:50.279
<v Speaker 12>into heaven, and promised to return. Both narratives agree on this,

1361
01:31:50.600 --> 01:31:53.680
<v Speaker 12>but the question is how his mission and message were

1362
01:31:53.720 --> 01:31:58.079
<v Speaker 12>meant to be spread worldwide. One narrative says that God's

1363
01:31:58.399 --> 01:32:01.159
<v Speaker 12>word in the Bible is the only infallible source of

1364
01:32:01.159 --> 01:32:04.520
<v Speaker 12>authentic Christianity, and that the way we discover the faith

1365
01:32:04.600 --> 01:32:07.199
<v Speaker 12>is by reading and understanding the Bible. There can be

1366
01:32:07.239 --> 01:32:11.159
<v Speaker 12>other sources of information, but the Bible alone gives us

1367
01:32:11.199 --> 01:32:13.520
<v Speaker 12>what we need to know about Christianity and how to

1368
01:32:13.560 --> 01:32:16.439
<v Speaker 12>live it. This is the narrative in which I was raised.

1369
01:32:17.159 --> 01:32:20.600
<v Speaker 12>I know this narrative well. The problem with this narrative

1370
01:32:20.920 --> 01:32:23.920
<v Speaker 12>is that it doesn't answer some fundamental questions. By what

1371
01:32:23.960 --> 01:32:27.399
<v Speaker 12>authority do we know that the Bible is God's word,

1372
01:32:27.520 --> 01:32:30.399
<v Speaker 12>and even what it is, how do we account for

1373
01:32:30.439 --> 01:32:31.119
<v Speaker 12>the fast difference?

1374
01:32:31.279 --> 01:32:34.840
<v Speaker 8>Uh oh, now we're back to epistemic circles that he

1375
01:32:34.920 --> 01:32:39.239
<v Speaker 8>has not figured out. So remember this video was intended

1376
01:32:39.279 --> 01:32:46.119
<v Speaker 8>to dispel the circular augmentation that supposedly Roman Catholics engage in.

1377
01:32:46.680 --> 01:32:48.880
<v Speaker 8>But now, in order to know that the Bible is

1378
01:32:48.920 --> 01:32:53.359
<v Speaker 8>the word of God, it requires another authority, namely the papacy.

1379
01:32:54.000 --> 01:32:56.119
<v Speaker 8>But remember he said at the beginning, the papacy is

1380
01:32:56.159 --> 01:32:58.840
<v Speaker 8>not a circule circle. That's the Romancalllics says, is not

1381
01:32:58.880 --> 01:33:02.000
<v Speaker 8>a circle based on the Bible, but it is.

1382
01:33:03.239 --> 01:33:05.840
<v Speaker 13>This is an interpretation of the Bible by those who

1383
01:33:05.880 --> 01:33:06.920
<v Speaker 13>hold to this narrative.

1384
01:33:07.439 --> 01:33:09.239
<v Speaker 12>Who gets to make the call when it comes to

1385
01:33:09.239 --> 01:33:10.239
<v Speaker 12>differences of opinion.

1386
01:33:10.800 --> 01:33:16.239
<v Speaker 8>But this is the common conflation once again, between existential

1387
01:33:16.399 --> 01:33:22.119
<v Speaker 8>individual certitude and normative authority. Every Roman pop apologist falls

1388
01:33:22.159 --> 01:33:26.159
<v Speaker 8>for this category error. It's a category error. It's not

1389
01:33:26.159 --> 01:33:30.159
<v Speaker 8>a fallacy. It's more of a category error because at

1390
01:33:30.159 --> 01:33:32.159
<v Speaker 8>the end of the day, everybody's in the same boat

1391
01:33:32.199 --> 01:33:36.039
<v Speaker 8>when it comes to knowing or finding certitude on the

1392
01:33:36.039 --> 01:33:39.039
<v Speaker 8>interpretation of this or that passage or whatever. In church

1393
01:33:39.079 --> 01:33:42.520
<v Speaker 8>theology or whatever. We're all individually going to have to

1394
01:33:42.560 --> 01:33:45.359
<v Speaker 8>rely on in some way our own reasoning and reading

1395
01:33:45.439 --> 01:33:50.079
<v Speaker 8>of those documents that is not bypassed by positing the pope.

1396
01:33:50.800 --> 01:33:54.640
<v Speaker 8>All that does is move that problem, the individual epistemic

1397
01:33:54.760 --> 01:33:58.760
<v Speaker 8>certitude problem, back a step, because now an individual Catholic

1398
01:33:58.880 --> 01:34:02.039
<v Speaker 8>has to sift through all the papal documents and all

1399
01:34:02.079 --> 01:34:05.760
<v Speaker 8>the councils and the encyclicals and on on and the

1400
01:34:05.800 --> 01:34:10.840
<v Speaker 8>Bible to interpret them properly. So you haven't solved the

1401
01:34:10.880 --> 01:34:14.359
<v Speaker 8>epistemic dilemma. You've moved the problem back a step and

1402
01:34:14.399 --> 01:34:17.800
<v Speaker 8>said that the papacy solves it. But it begs the question, Well,

1403
01:34:17.960 --> 01:34:21.319
<v Speaker 8>that assumes I'm interpreting the papal claim statements and documents

1404
01:34:21.319 --> 01:34:26.479
<v Speaker 8>and dogmas correctly. So you don't solve an epistemic problem

1405
01:34:26.520 --> 01:34:31.000
<v Speaker 8>with interpreting the texts by adding another external textual thing,

1406
01:34:31.199 --> 01:34:34.920
<v Speaker 8>a bunch of papal documents. You see, it just adds

1407
01:34:34.960 --> 01:34:38.399
<v Speaker 8>to the problem. What he's talking about is what we

1408
01:34:38.439 --> 01:34:42.279
<v Speaker 8>call normative authority. That is, there some group within history

1409
01:34:42.560 --> 01:34:46.560
<v Speaker 8>that has the authority to bind people's consciences to an interpretation.

1410
01:34:47.239 --> 01:34:51.640
<v Speaker 8>But that's a different category. Normative authority. That's an ethical thing.

1411
01:34:51.720 --> 01:34:54.319
<v Speaker 8>I mean, it relates to epistemology, but it's an ethical

1412
01:34:54.359 --> 01:34:59.840
<v Speaker 8>domain versus the individual certitude about this or that passages interpretation.

1413
01:35:00.760 --> 01:35:05.479
<v Speaker 8>That's an epistemic issue. So every Roman Calariy pop apologist

1414
01:35:05.960 --> 01:35:09.119
<v Speaker 8>is only hurting their own case ultimately, even though they

1415
01:35:09.119 --> 01:35:12.479
<v Speaker 8>don't see it right away by making this conflation between

1416
01:35:12.560 --> 01:35:15.800
<v Speaker 8>a category error two different categories. Does that make sense?

1417
01:35:17.399 --> 01:35:20.560
<v Speaker 12>Does it make sense that Jesus would expect his followers

1418
01:35:20.720 --> 01:35:23.520
<v Speaker 12>to know his mission in teaching through a book alone,

1419
01:35:23.680 --> 01:35:27.600
<v Speaker 12>especially one he never commanded anyone to write that wouldn't

1420
01:35:27.600 --> 01:35:30.279
<v Speaker 12>exist in its final form for hundreds of years?

1421
01:35:31.159 --> 01:35:32.159
<v Speaker 13>Now, what about the people who?

1422
01:35:32.239 --> 01:35:34.880
<v Speaker 8>But that same question can be asked, does Jesus expect

1423
01:35:34.880 --> 01:35:37.840
<v Speaker 8>his followers to sift through tens of thousands of pages

1424
01:35:38.119 --> 01:35:41.479
<v Speaker 8>of papal documents to know the faith? You just argue

1425
01:35:41.520 --> 01:35:44.119
<v Speaker 8>that the papacy and its documents are the thing that

1426
01:35:44.279 --> 01:35:46.960
<v Speaker 8>is the key to know the faith. But you didn't

1427
01:35:47.039 --> 01:35:50.840
<v Speaker 8>do anything except make the problem even bigger by tacking

1428
01:35:50.880 --> 01:35:53.520
<v Speaker 8>on tens of thousands of pages of more documents that

1429
01:35:53.600 --> 01:35:54.479
<v Speaker 8>you have to learn.

1430
01:35:54.520 --> 01:35:57.479
<v Speaker 12>Who lived before it was written and compiled? How did

1431
01:35:57.479 --> 01:36:57.640
<v Speaker 12>they know what Christianity was how would future disputes about

1432
01:36:57.640 --> 01:37:01.000
<v Speaker 12>the Bible be settled? Does it make sense that Jesus

1433
01:37:01.039 --> 01:37:03.960
<v Speaker 12>would do it this way, especially when the Bible is.

1434
01:37:03.840 --> 01:37:06.640
<v Speaker 8>So Once again that didn't register. All I was saying

1435
01:37:06.720 --> 01:37:09.920
<v Speaker 8>is that I can easily refute this argument by saying,

1436
01:37:10.439 --> 01:37:14.119
<v Speaker 8>if the papacy is necessary in the magisterium, as you're saying,

1437
01:37:14.119 --> 01:37:17.720
<v Speaker 8>which is the papacy to know the faith epistemically? I

1438
01:37:17.720 --> 01:37:19.800
<v Speaker 8>can easily refute this and show this to be a

1439
01:37:19.840 --> 01:37:22.920
<v Speaker 8>really stupid, low tier argument by pointing out that how

1440
01:37:22.920 --> 01:37:24.960
<v Speaker 8>did a Christian in the year three hundred know what

1441
01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:27.680
<v Speaker 8>the faith was who didn't have access to Rome and

1442
01:37:27.720 --> 01:37:32.279
<v Speaker 8>there's no ecumenical council yet there's not been a magisterial pronouncement.

1443
01:37:32.840 --> 01:37:34.760
<v Speaker 8>So did all the Christians in the first, second, and

1444
01:37:34.840 --> 01:37:37.279
<v Speaker 8>third century who didn't have access to Rome and had

1445
01:37:37.279 --> 01:37:40.159
<v Speaker 8>not been in an ecumenical council, yet they didn't know

1446
01:37:40.239 --> 01:37:43.000
<v Speaker 8>the faith? By this dumb argument, that's what he would

1447
01:37:43.039 --> 01:37:47.279
<v Speaker 8>have to say, because you can't know without the magisterium. Yet,

1448
01:37:47.319 --> 01:37:49.119
<v Speaker 8>if I'm a Christian in the year three hundred in

1449
01:37:49.159 --> 01:37:51.479
<v Speaker 8>Corinth I have no access to Rome, I don't know

1450
01:37:51.479 --> 01:37:53.880
<v Speaker 8>what they're up to. There's not been an ecumenical council yet,

1451
01:37:53.920 --> 01:37:55.159
<v Speaker 8>and I see as a few years away.

1452
01:37:56.279 --> 01:37:58.279
<v Speaker 11>How do I know the faith? I don't know. I

1453
01:37:58.319 --> 01:37:59.880
<v Speaker 11>don't know until Rome pills us.

1454
01:38:00.319 --> 01:38:02.840
<v Speaker 8>This is so silly, it's such a bad argument. But

1455
01:38:03.279 --> 01:38:06.960
<v Speaker 8>it's a bad argument that dupes millions of people. Millions

1456
01:38:06.960 --> 01:38:09.600
<v Speaker 8>of people fall for this super low tiered don Roman

1457
01:38:09.640 --> 01:38:10.560
<v Speaker 8>Catholic argument.

1458
01:38:13.199 --> 01:38:13.960
<v Speaker 13>Says otherwise.

1459
01:38:14.880 --> 01:38:18.600
<v Speaker 12>For example, in Matthew chapter eighteen, Jesus tells his followers

1460
01:38:18.640 --> 01:38:21.399
<v Speaker 12>to take their disputes that they can't settle to the church.

1461
01:38:22.079 --> 01:38:24.479
<v Speaker 12>But how can this command be applied in the narrative

1462
01:38:24.520 --> 01:38:28.039
<v Speaker 12>that denies the existence of a visible church with authority

1463
01:38:28.359 --> 01:38:30.920
<v Speaker 12>not to mention when looking at the history of the church,

1464
01:38:31.159 --> 01:38:32.960
<v Speaker 12>it didn't function according.

1465
01:38:33.359 --> 01:38:37.640
<v Speaker 8>You notice that demonstrates the very thing I said. He

1466
01:38:37.760 --> 01:38:44.039
<v Speaker 8>conflated epistemic certitude with normative authority. So the passage he's

1467
01:38:44.079 --> 01:38:45.960
<v Speaker 8>using in Matthew eighteen, which by the way, does not

1468
01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:47.800
<v Speaker 8>make it about Peter, It actually makes it about the

1469
01:38:47.800 --> 01:38:51.039
<v Speaker 8>whole college of the Apostles, is a passage dealing with

1470
01:38:51.239 --> 01:38:54.479
<v Speaker 8>solving disputes in the church by the authority of the bishops,

1471
01:38:54.600 --> 01:38:58.760
<v Speaker 8>who can bind consciences. That's the Orthodox position. But remember

1472
01:38:58.800 --> 01:39:01.119
<v Speaker 8>he started this section of his video by saying that

1473
01:39:01.359 --> 01:39:05.479
<v Speaker 8>the only way to have certainty about theological doctrines was

1474
01:39:05.520 --> 01:39:10.239
<v Speaker 8>with the magisterium. Well, then, how did a Christian in

1475
01:39:10.279 --> 01:39:14.239
<v Speaker 8>the first, second, and third century, admittedly without any magisterium

1476
01:39:14.279 --> 01:39:15.880
<v Speaker 8>or knowledge of what Rome was up to in the

1477
01:39:15.880 --> 01:39:19.520
<v Speaker 8>ancient world, there's no Council of Nicea. Yet, how did

1478
01:39:19.520 --> 01:39:22.920
<v Speaker 8>they know the doctrines? How did they know the truth?

1479
01:39:25.159 --> 01:39:28.399
<v Speaker 8>Did they all just make a hodge pilgrimage to Rome?

1480
01:39:28.920 --> 01:39:31.640
<v Speaker 8>Was Rome the mecca that they all we have? We're

1481
01:39:31.680 --> 01:39:33.039
<v Speaker 8>going to allosk the pope with the faith?

1482
01:39:33.239 --> 01:39:33.279
<v Speaker 15>Was?

1483
01:39:33.600 --> 01:39:37.239
<v Speaker 8>This is so ahistorical and stupid. Yet if his argument

1484
01:39:37.359 --> 01:39:40.600
<v Speaker 8>is the case, he would have to say that the first, second,

1485
01:39:40.600 --> 01:39:43.479
<v Speaker 8>and third century Christians did not know the faith until

1486
01:39:43.560 --> 01:39:46.119
<v Speaker 8>Rome told them what the faith was. And I didn't

1487
01:39:46.119 --> 01:39:48.239
<v Speaker 8>even know was an ecumenical council until Rome said, it's

1488
01:39:48.239 --> 01:39:51.279
<v Speaker 8>an ecumenical council. Yet this guy is not at the

1489
01:39:51.279 --> 01:39:53.960
<v Speaker 8>point yet where he's going to learn that Constantinople one

1490
01:39:54.439 --> 01:39:58.159
<v Speaker 8>was called without Rome was still an ecumenical council accepted

1491
01:39:58.199 --> 01:40:02.239
<v Speaker 8>as such, and retroact accepted by Rome a few centuries later,

1492
01:40:02.560 --> 01:40:05.399
<v Speaker 8>which disproves the whole Romancolic position and proves that they

1493
01:40:05.439 --> 01:40:08.800
<v Speaker 8>didn't think that they needed Rome to know the dogmas.

1494
01:40:08.720 --> 01:40:11.239
<v Speaker 12>That narrative for over fifteen hundred years, and for the

1495
01:40:11.319 --> 01:40:14.279
<v Speaker 12>vast majority of Christians in the world, it still doesn't.

1496
01:40:14.680 --> 01:40:18.640
<v Speaker 12>Does that seem reasonable? I don't think so. What does

1497
01:40:18.640 --> 01:40:22.119
<v Speaker 12>seem reasonable is that Jesus gave his authority to his

1498
01:40:22.199 --> 01:40:26.039
<v Speaker 12>apostles and founded a church that would, by his authority,

1499
01:40:26.439 --> 01:40:30.319
<v Speaker 12>protection and power fulfill his mission to bring the Gospel

1500
01:40:30.359 --> 01:40:33.760
<v Speaker 12>to the world. Through his church, the Bible was written

1501
01:40:33.800 --> 01:40:36.680
<v Speaker 12>and compiled, and through his church it is rightly taught

1502
01:40:36.680 --> 01:40:40.960
<v Speaker 12>and interpreted. Through his church, the world is evangelized. Through

1503
01:40:41.039 --> 01:40:44.479
<v Speaker 12>his church, the fullness of truth is revealed. Even though

1504
01:40:44.479 --> 01:40:48.039
<v Speaker 12>its members are sinners. Jesus works in and through them

1505
01:40:48.079 --> 01:40:51.319
<v Speaker 12>to accomplish his mission. This is the way things worked

1506
01:40:51.359 --> 01:40:53.840
<v Speaker 12>when Jesus was on earth, and that was the way

1507
01:40:53.880 --> 01:40:56.880
<v Speaker 12>things were right at the beginning after he left, and

1508
01:40:56.960 --> 01:40:58.039
<v Speaker 12>this is how right.

1509
01:40:58.359 --> 01:41:00.640
<v Speaker 8>But none of that was Vatican won. And now he's

1510
01:41:00.640 --> 01:41:04.119
<v Speaker 8>trying to argue like it's identically the same communion and.

1511
01:41:04.119 --> 01:41:07.119
<v Speaker 12>Structure things have continued to this day.

1512
01:41:07.520 --> 01:41:09.000
<v Speaker 8>Now wait a minute, in the middle of this video,

1513
01:41:09.039 --> 01:41:11.039
<v Speaker 8>he said that there's a lot of things that are

1514
01:41:11.199 --> 01:41:15.399
<v Speaker 8>vastly different, which constitute doctrinal development. But now by the

1515
01:41:15.479 --> 01:41:17.279
<v Speaker 8>end of the video, oh no, it's actually all the same.

1516
01:41:17.479 --> 01:41:22.680
<v Speaker 8>It's basically like papacy functioning in the year one ten

1517
01:41:23.439 --> 01:41:26.479
<v Speaker 8>pretty much identically the same as papacy functioning in twenty

1518
01:41:26.479 --> 01:41:31.920
<v Speaker 8>twenty four. Uh No, anybody who has a level two

1519
01:41:33.520 --> 01:41:38.279
<v Speaker 8>inductory induction to church history knows that by the Middle Ages,

1520
01:41:38.359 --> 01:41:42.640
<v Speaker 8>when we've got Quisat's hotarock emperor Pope, that is not

1521
01:41:42.800 --> 01:41:46.880
<v Speaker 8>at all in continuity with the papacy in the time

1522
01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:51.119
<v Speaker 8>of you know, the persecutions of Diocletian or whatever, night

1523
01:41:51.199 --> 01:41:53.600
<v Speaker 8>and day. And he already admitted this, because he admitted that,

1524
01:41:53.640 --> 01:41:55.600
<v Speaker 8>Oh yeah, by the Middle Ages, it's like a vastly

1525
01:41:55.600 --> 01:41:58.560
<v Speaker 8>different structure. But that's just doctoral development, dude. But now

1526
01:41:58.640 --> 01:42:01.439
<v Speaker 8>it's not doctoral development, he said, it's all basically the same.

1527
01:42:01.760 --> 01:42:09.560
<v Speaker 8>So all a bunch of assertions, propaganda moving the goalpost, elasticity, ambiguity,

1528
01:42:11.039 --> 01:42:14.359
<v Speaker 8>very little argumentation, maybe only a couple arguments here or

1529
01:42:14.399 --> 01:42:17.479
<v Speaker 8>there throughout this video, with a couple of proof texts,

1530
01:42:18.079 --> 01:42:24.199
<v Speaker 8>and yeah, just just super low tier assertions. That's that's

1531
01:42:24.199 --> 01:42:26.800
<v Speaker 8>about what I expected. But this is the stuff that

1532
01:42:27.840 --> 01:42:32.239
<v Speaker 8>captures you know, a quarter million people, right, So this

1533
01:42:32.319 --> 01:42:35.000
<v Speaker 8>is not that old of a video already been seen

1534
01:42:35.039 --> 01:42:38.119
<v Speaker 8>by a quarter million people. And this is why, this

1535
01:42:38.159 --> 01:42:41.920
<v Speaker 8>is why there's so much just repeating of bad arguments

1536
01:42:41.960 --> 01:42:44.800
<v Speaker 8>all the time. And the whole the second half of

1537
01:42:44.840 --> 01:42:48.319
<v Speaker 8>his video was that freaking stupid argument about the papac

1538
01:42:48.359 --> 01:42:51.680
<v Speaker 8>He's going to give you certitude, which is a basic

1539
01:42:51.880 --> 01:42:55.479
<v Speaker 8>epistemic mistake. How is it going to give you certitude

1540
01:42:55.479 --> 01:42:59.720
<v Speaker 8>when it's more documents to come through? Think about it.

1541
01:42:59.760 --> 01:43:03.960
<v Speaker 8>This is the Protestant Magisterium, so you only have to

1542
01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:07.520
<v Speaker 8>comb through what, however many pages? This is two thousand pages.

1543
01:43:08.439 --> 01:43:10.279
<v Speaker 8>So I got to come through two thousand pages of

1544
01:43:10.279 --> 01:43:12.560
<v Speaker 8>this to make sense of the faith if I'm a Protestant.

1545
01:43:13.279 --> 01:43:15.159
<v Speaker 8>But if I'm a Roman Catholic, you see, oh, the

1546
01:43:15.199 --> 01:43:18.560
<v Speaker 8>papacy solves these things. Oh so now I got to read, however,

1547
01:43:18.640 --> 01:43:21.920
<v Speaker 8>many thousands of pages of papal documents to know the faith.

1548
01:43:24.479 --> 01:43:28.159
<v Speaker 8>So it just taxed on more papers to read. How

1549
01:43:28.199 --> 01:43:30.520
<v Speaker 8>does that put me in a better episemic position to

1550
01:43:30.720 --> 01:43:35.199
<v Speaker 8>know the faith? Because he literally said to have certitude,

1551
01:43:35.279 --> 01:43:37.439
<v Speaker 8>you go to the pope and the magistian which has

1552
01:43:37.479 --> 01:43:42.880
<v Speaker 8>a giant, massive doctrines and documents and it is not true. Right,

1553
01:43:42.960 --> 01:43:46.039
<v Speaker 8>this is the parallel to Islam. Right when you get

1554
01:43:46.039 --> 01:43:49.159
<v Speaker 8>into Islam, all the idiots on the internet falling for Islam.

1555
01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:50.960
<v Speaker 11>It's simple, you just got to believe a few things

1556
01:43:50.960 --> 01:43:53.239
<v Speaker 11>about God's one and then they realize, no, you got

1557
01:43:53.239 --> 01:43:57.600
<v Speaker 11>to believe like giant sections, pages, thousands of pages of hadiths.

1558
01:43:58.199 --> 01:44:01.039
<v Speaker 8>That's also what you gotta believe. It's not just the Qur'an,

1559
01:44:02.439 --> 01:44:05.199
<v Speaker 8>it's all this other junk, and it's full of stupid stuff.

1560
01:44:05.239 --> 01:44:07.840
<v Speaker 8>Guess what, no different in Rome. It's not just a

1561
01:44:07.880 --> 01:44:10.600
<v Speaker 8>handful of ex cathed doctrines that you have to believe.

1562
01:44:10.880 --> 01:44:17.479
<v Speaker 8>Totally not true, pop basic bitch Catholic myth that you

1563
01:44:17.560 --> 01:44:20.399
<v Speaker 8>only have to believe a few ex cathed doctors. I

1564
01:44:20.439 --> 01:44:22.199
<v Speaker 8>don't even know where they come up with this, Like

1565
01:44:22.239 --> 01:44:25.640
<v Speaker 8>who in the Roman Catholic world is telling them you

1566
01:44:25.720 --> 01:44:28.039
<v Speaker 8>only have to believe the exca theater statements. That is

1567
01:44:28.119 --> 01:44:32.399
<v Speaker 8>just not even close to anything true in any Catholic theology.

1568
01:44:33.199 --> 01:44:37.159
<v Speaker 8>Like even the Catholic Catechism is proposed as a totality

1569
01:44:37.199 --> 01:44:40.560
<v Speaker 8>catechism for you to believe that you're supposed to believe

1570
01:44:40.600 --> 01:44:44.640
<v Speaker 8>in with docility in Catholic moral theology. It's just a

1571
01:44:44.680 --> 01:44:48.600
<v Speaker 8>total myth, akin to the myth of the idiot new

1572
01:44:48.640 --> 01:44:51.399
<v Speaker 8>converts to Islam who think I only have to believe

1573
01:44:51.439 --> 01:44:57.079
<v Speaker 8>a few things. Now totally not true. All right, we're

1574
01:44:57.079 --> 01:45:01.520
<v Speaker 8>gonna open it up. We've seen enough of Catholic Scott

1575
01:45:01.600 --> 01:45:04.880
<v Speaker 8>Stap over here with his achy breaky heart video argument

1576
01:45:05.560 --> 01:45:08.680
<v Speaker 8>don't tell my hort my achy breaking prost and hort

1577
01:45:08.800 --> 01:45:11.560
<v Speaker 8>a news don't thank you don By the way, he

1578
01:45:11.640 --> 01:45:14.560
<v Speaker 8>literally looks like he looks like a cross between Billy

1579
01:45:14.640 --> 01:45:17.960
<v Speaker 8>Ray and Scott Stap We're gonna open it up. I

1580
01:45:18.000 --> 01:45:20.039
<v Speaker 8>want to hear your best arguments. It is not restricted

1581
01:45:20.039 --> 01:45:20.880
<v Speaker 8>to Catholicism.

1582
01:45:21.279 --> 01:45:21.439
<v Speaker 11>Uh.

1583
01:45:21.479 --> 01:45:24.439
<v Speaker 8>That video just popped up, and it triggered me. I'm triggered,

1584
01:45:24.439 --> 01:45:27.520
<v Speaker 8>like triggering pop ever. Hear it triggered me. I started shaking.

1585
01:45:27.680 --> 01:45:32.439
<v Speaker 8>I could have I couldn't handle it. I had to reply.

1586
01:45:33.880 --> 01:45:36.760
<v Speaker 8>And by the way, after my fourth espresso, I'm lit, boy,

1587
01:45:36.880 --> 01:45:43.039
<v Speaker 8>I'm hyped up. We started off straight up evening MPR radio.

1588
01:45:43.159 --> 01:45:46.199
<v Speaker 8>I was cool, calm and collected, buddy. But now I'm

1589
01:45:46.199 --> 01:45:49.840
<v Speaker 8>going I'm gone insane. I'm like off the hook. I'm sweating.

1590
01:45:49.920 --> 01:45:53.000
<v Speaker 8>It's hot in here. I'm ready to get down and

1591
01:45:53.159 --> 01:45:57.359
<v Speaker 8>dirty baby with debate. Not what you pers are thinking.

1592
01:45:57.640 --> 01:46:00.760
<v Speaker 8>We're gonna open it up open for him. I apologize

1593
01:46:00.760 --> 01:46:04.960
<v Speaker 8>for subjecting you to that nonsense from Taylor Marshall, but

1594
01:46:05.039 --> 01:46:08.239
<v Speaker 8>we always have to revisit this because, I mean, a

1595
01:46:08.319 --> 01:46:12.439
<v Speaker 8>million people plus follow this goofball and he's literally like

1596
01:46:12.439 --> 01:46:16.800
<v Speaker 8>a four foot goofball. I'm just kind of amazed, like

1597
01:46:16.920 --> 01:46:22.760
<v Speaker 8>people can't. These people don't have discernment, Vain, what's up?

1598
01:46:25.840 --> 01:46:28.399
<v Speaker 8>It's not restricted to Catholson. By the way, if you

1599
01:46:28.439 --> 01:46:30.399
<v Speaker 8>want to come with your atheist arguments, you want to

1600
01:46:30.439 --> 01:46:41.680
<v Speaker 8>come with your Protestant, Calvinist, Muslim, Hebrew Roots, Judaism, whatever else, Mormons, Black, Heeber, Israelites.

1601
01:46:42.279 --> 01:46:45.399
<v Speaker 8>It's all on the table. Bring it, bring it, come,

1602
01:46:45.479 --> 01:46:48.279
<v Speaker 8>smash me, refute me. I'm so eager, I'm so ready

1603
01:46:49.439 --> 01:46:53.000
<v Speaker 8>to be defeated. Please put me in my place, Vain,

1604
01:46:53.039 --> 01:46:53.319
<v Speaker 8>I'm you.

1605
01:46:55.800 --> 01:46:55.960
<v Speaker 16>Deal.

1606
01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:56.560
<v Speaker 8>What's up? Man?

1607
01:46:56.600 --> 01:46:56.680
<v Speaker 14>So?

1608
01:46:57.880 --> 01:47:04.680
<v Speaker 17>When arguing tag right, if saying denying God makes knowledge

1609
01:47:04.680 --> 01:47:05.640
<v Speaker 17>claims impossible?

1610
01:47:05.720 --> 01:47:05.840
<v Speaker 8>Right?

1611
01:47:05.880 --> 01:47:07.239
<v Speaker 18>So when atheist asked.

1612
01:47:06.960 --> 01:47:10.319
<v Speaker 17>Me, well, well then what is it about a different

1613
01:47:10.399 --> 01:47:13.520
<v Speaker 17>theistic belief such as Calvinism, for example, that would make

1614
01:47:13.560 --> 01:47:16.560
<v Speaker 17>knowledge impossible. Like would that be related at all to

1615
01:47:16.680 --> 01:47:19.359
<v Speaker 17>like problems with the Trinity theology?

1616
01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:23.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So, like if you did want to apply Calvinism

1617
01:47:23.520 --> 01:47:26.199
<v Speaker 8>tagged to Calvinism, it's a little more challenging because you

1618
01:47:26.359 --> 01:47:29.479
<v Speaker 8>have to know a lot more about Orthodox metaphysics and

1619
01:47:29.520 --> 01:47:33.319
<v Speaker 8>Trinitarian structures of the world. But it's not impossible. But

1620
01:47:33.359 --> 01:47:35.039
<v Speaker 8>I would just say something like, you know, if the

1621
01:47:35.079 --> 01:47:38.239
<v Speaker 8>Calvinists model of absolute divine simplicity is true, then Calvinists

1622
01:47:38.279 --> 01:47:42.960
<v Speaker 8>are subjected to modal collapse, which makes God unknowable. So

1623
01:47:43.239 --> 01:47:45.479
<v Speaker 8>right there, there's no God that you could know in

1624
01:47:45.520 --> 01:47:49.560
<v Speaker 8>that system if you're consistent with their version of absolute

1625
01:47:49.560 --> 01:47:52.119
<v Speaker 8>divine simplicity, which they do hold. Calvin is very explicit

1626
01:47:52.119 --> 01:47:55.560
<v Speaker 8>about that. It's identical to Augustine's view that would undo

1627
01:47:55.640 --> 01:48:03.079
<v Speaker 8>the possibility of knowledge. All right, thanks, and was it?

1628
01:48:03.119 --> 01:48:04.680
<v Speaker 17>I don't know if if I got this quote correct,

1629
01:48:04.720 --> 01:48:07.239
<v Speaker 17>but but I think father Deacon and I said in

1630
01:48:07.399 --> 01:48:10.199
<v Speaker 17>a or a video will listen to youill before he

1631
01:48:10.199 --> 01:48:14.439
<v Speaker 17>said that Orthodoxy is in a privileged position in terms

1632
01:48:14.520 --> 01:48:16.840
<v Speaker 17>of being able to justify knowledge claims.

1633
01:48:16.880 --> 01:48:19.439
<v Speaker 18>Is that the correct way to say.

1634
01:48:19.239 --> 01:48:22.279
<v Speaker 8>That, right, And the reason he's saying quote, privileged position

1635
01:48:22.399 --> 01:48:25.920
<v Speaker 8>is because in our argument, in our view, we have

1636
01:48:26.039 --> 01:48:29.439
<v Speaker 8>a Gods eye perspective, so in others, we're not subject

1637
01:48:29.560 --> 01:48:34.800
<v Speaker 8>to the problems of secular epistemology, where in their perspectives

1638
01:48:34.880 --> 01:48:37.199
<v Speaker 8>or an atheist epistemology, they're always going to be restricted

1639
01:48:37.239 --> 01:48:42.079
<v Speaker 8>to the individual, finite empiricist perspective, so they don't have

1640
01:48:42.119 --> 01:48:44.880
<v Speaker 8>any access to anything outside of their mind ultimately, right,

1641
01:48:44.880 --> 01:48:47.439
<v Speaker 8>because they're not theists. There's no transcendent realm, et cetera.

1642
01:48:47.720 --> 01:48:51.319
<v Speaker 8>So they're restricted to their own individual sense data experience, right,

1643
01:48:51.960 --> 01:48:56.640
<v Speaker 8>and that immediately boxes them into a lot of problems

1644
01:48:56.680 --> 01:49:01.319
<v Speaker 8>for explaining anything at all in terms of knowledge claims, metaphysics,

1645
01:49:01.359 --> 01:49:04.079
<v Speaker 8>external world identity, over time, et cetera, et cetera. So

1646
01:49:05.079 --> 01:49:06.960
<v Speaker 8>that's what he means is that we're in a privileged

1647
01:49:06.960 --> 01:49:11.680
<v Speaker 8>position because our position is not grounded or starting with

1648
01:49:11.880 --> 01:49:17.600
<v Speaker 8>individual sense data. The position comes from divine revelation, so

1649
01:49:17.640 --> 01:49:20.399
<v Speaker 8>we have a God's eye perspective. And if you want

1650
01:49:20.399 --> 01:49:25.039
<v Speaker 8>the specifics, that would mean that orthodox metaphysics, for example,

1651
01:49:25.079 --> 01:49:30.600
<v Speaker 8>would not be subjected to the bootstrapping problem, but pretty

1652
01:49:30.640 --> 01:49:33.760
<v Speaker 8>much every atheist would have to have some kind of

1653
01:49:34.800 --> 01:49:38.560
<v Speaker 8>way to try to tackle the bootstrapping dilemma.

1654
01:49:40.960 --> 01:49:41.640
<v Speaker 18>Merry Christmas.

1655
01:49:41.680 --> 01:49:44.039
<v Speaker 8>I appreciate Hey, Merry Christmas. Do you thank you so much?

1656
01:49:45.840 --> 01:49:48.920
<v Speaker 11>I don't want to wait in vain for your love.

1657
01:49:49.560 --> 01:49:52.920
<v Speaker 8>It's a little bit of Bob Marley and any lenox

1658
01:49:53.000 --> 01:50:03.800
<v Speaker 8>for you there, vain California Prepper. What's up? Thank you

1659
01:50:03.840 --> 01:50:05.880
<v Speaker 8>guys for being so generous tonight, Merry Christmas? Do you

1660
01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:07.800
<v Speaker 8>all happy? Debate?

1661
01:50:08.279 --> 01:50:08.600
<v Speaker 9>Married?

1662
01:50:08.720 --> 01:50:09.399
<v Speaker 11>Debate? Miss?

1663
01:50:10.760 --> 01:50:10.920
<v Speaker 9>Oh?

1664
01:50:11.880 --> 01:50:12.760
<v Speaker 11>Married debate?

1665
01:50:12.840 --> 01:50:17.079
<v Speaker 8>Miss and may you have a logical Christmas? Go ahead?

1666
01:50:17.279 --> 01:50:17.600
<v Speaker 8>I'm you.

1667
01:50:19.159 --> 01:50:19.359
<v Speaker 11>Hey.

1668
01:50:19.399 --> 01:50:23.039
<v Speaker 19>I had a question, uh for relating to like circular reasons.

1669
01:50:23.279 --> 01:50:24.800
<v Speaker 8>So one of my family.

1670
01:50:24.560 --> 01:50:28.479
<v Speaker 19>Members said something along the lines of, like the Orthodox

1671
01:50:28.520 --> 01:50:31.199
<v Speaker 19>and Catholic Church, they just introduced like the Book of

1672
01:50:31.239 --> 01:50:34.359
<v Speaker 19>Matthew into the cannon just because it said so along

1673
01:50:34.399 --> 01:50:36.479
<v Speaker 19>the lines of like gase of Helena are favail against

1674
01:50:36.479 --> 01:50:38.039
<v Speaker 19>the church, so they put that in there so that

1675
01:50:38.600 --> 01:50:39.439
<v Speaker 19>they could.

1676
01:50:39.800 --> 01:50:42.600
<v Speaker 18>Self certify themselves. How would I respond to.

1677
01:50:42.600 --> 01:50:47.359
<v Speaker 8>This that type of argument, Well, the basis for accepting

1678
01:50:47.439 --> 01:50:55.079
<v Speaker 8>Matthew is a long like episcopacy or see relative exercise.

1679
01:50:55.119 --> 01:50:58.159
<v Speaker 8>In other words, it wasn't like a bunch of bishops

1680
01:50:58.159 --> 01:51:01.840
<v Speaker 8>came together and said, let's put in the Gospel of

1681
01:51:01.920 --> 01:51:04.239
<v Speaker 8>Matthew that the gates of Hell can prevail against the Church.

1682
01:51:04.800 --> 01:51:07.359
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the Gospel of Matthew, like the other Gospels,

1683
01:51:07.479 --> 01:51:13.119
<v Speaker 8>is part of a long historical textual tradition that had

1684
01:51:13.159 --> 01:51:17.520
<v Speaker 8>to be analyzed from all the different bishoprics that had

1685
01:51:17.920 --> 01:51:21.399
<v Speaker 8>Gospels of Matthew to compare them and to see, okay,

1686
01:51:21.439 --> 01:51:25.279
<v Speaker 8>there is unanimity. There is a lot of commonality. It's

1687
01:51:25.399 --> 01:51:28.800
<v Speaker 8>usually like ninety five to ninety eight percent commonality amongst

1688
01:51:28.880 --> 01:51:32.600
<v Speaker 8>various textual traditions. They're very minor differences that relate to

1689
01:51:33.279 --> 01:51:38.720
<v Speaker 8>translations of like grammatical errors or number mistakes here and there.

1690
01:51:38.960 --> 01:51:42.520
<v Speaker 8>They're called scribal errors. But I'm not aware of any

1691
01:51:43.119 --> 01:51:47.439
<v Speaker 8>like reputable historical textual scholar who thinks that there was

1692
01:51:47.479 --> 01:51:50.439
<v Speaker 8>some conspiracy to insert, you know, the gates of Hell

1693
01:51:50.479 --> 01:51:53.960
<v Speaker 8>won't prevail. I think that one way to see that,

1694
01:51:54.079 --> 01:51:59.479
<v Speaker 8>if you wanted like an easy disprover of that, or

1695
01:51:59.520 --> 01:52:02.079
<v Speaker 8>way to disc prove that, would be to look up

1696
01:52:03.119 --> 01:52:07.520
<v Speaker 8>all the patriistic citations of Matthew sixteen eighteen across like

1697
01:52:07.720 --> 01:52:13.439
<v Speaker 8>various traditions or various centuries. So for example, if you

1698
01:52:13.600 --> 01:52:18.079
<v Speaker 8>have you'urinas citing it early, if you've got Cyprian citing

1699
01:52:18.079 --> 01:52:22.439
<v Speaker 8>it early. If you've got Jerome Tratullian, if you've got

1700
01:52:22.479 --> 01:52:26.920
<v Speaker 8>origin all of whom I assume, cite Matthew sixteen eighteen.

1701
01:52:26.960 --> 01:52:28.720
<v Speaker 8>And if you get the Denny book, he'll he'll list

1702
01:52:28.760 --> 01:52:33.720
<v Speaker 8>a bunch of these. You'll notice that there's commonality in

1703
01:52:33.800 --> 01:52:39.079
<v Speaker 8>other cities across the Empire, which suggests that there was

1704
01:52:39.159 --> 01:52:42.760
<v Speaker 8>not some late conspiracy to add the text. Does that

1705
01:52:42.800 --> 01:52:48.960
<v Speaker 8>make sense, yep, it does. Thanks also the decision about

1706
01:52:49.119 --> 01:52:52.520
<v Speaker 8>canonicity for even things like Matthew and all that. I mean,

1707
01:52:52.520 --> 01:52:55.159
<v Speaker 8>it's pretty I would say by the fourth and fifth

1708
01:52:55.199 --> 01:52:57.199
<v Speaker 8>century there's not a whole letter dispute that I'm aware

1709
01:52:57.199 --> 01:53:00.920
<v Speaker 8>of about the Gospels themselves. The Gospel of John actually

1710
01:53:00.960 --> 01:53:08.800
<v Speaker 8>was somewhat doubted and disputed beyond the synoptics. And but

1711
01:53:08.960 --> 01:53:12.560
<v Speaker 8>I don't think by like the time of Athenacious or

1712
01:53:12.600 --> 01:53:15.119
<v Speaker 8>after Athenacious, like there's not a whole lot of debate

1713
01:53:15.199 --> 01:53:19.680
<v Speaker 8>on the Gospels. It's more so the dispute is the

1714
01:53:19.760 --> 01:53:23.960
<v Speaker 8>Catholic epistles, and you know, due to canonical texts. So

1715
01:53:24.199 --> 01:53:28.199
<v Speaker 8>most of the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh century debates and

1716
01:53:28.279 --> 01:53:33.239
<v Speaker 8>questions about canonicity are like the Catholic Epistles and the

1717
01:53:33.239 --> 01:53:36.479
<v Speaker 8>Book of Revelation, perhaps even though Athenasio is pretty much

1718
01:53:36.520 --> 01:53:48.680
<v Speaker 8>convinced Rome to include it. Heath, what's up, Heath, Bar,

1719
01:53:48.800 --> 01:53:57.760
<v Speaker 8>what's up? I'm you dude, Hey, Jay, Hey, going, what's up?

1720
01:53:58.840 --> 01:54:02.640
<v Speaker 18>I'm just going to question about Peter and the Catholic Church.

1721
01:54:03.880 --> 01:54:05.720
<v Speaker 15>Is there any proof that is there any proof at

1722
01:54:05.760 --> 01:54:08.439
<v Speaker 15>all that Peter was actually in Rome, like the Catholic

1723
01:54:08.479 --> 01:54:10.159
<v Speaker 15>Church claim, unlike Paul.

1724
01:54:11.840 --> 01:54:14.800
<v Speaker 8>I think it is a valid tradition. Yeah, I think that,

1725
01:54:15.439 --> 01:54:18.199
<v Speaker 8>you know, the Orthodox Church does accept the tradition that

1726
01:54:18.800 --> 01:54:22.079
<v Speaker 8>Rome is a doubly Apostolic see the see of Peter

1727
01:54:22.159 --> 01:54:24.880
<v Speaker 8>and Paul. So yes, I would say it is a

1728
01:54:24.960 --> 01:54:27.880
<v Speaker 8>valid tradition. But I don't think that Peter being in Rome,

1729
01:54:28.039 --> 01:54:31.079
<v Speaker 8>or dying in Rome in any way somehow contributes to

1730
01:54:32.039 --> 01:54:35.840
<v Speaker 8>the special terrorism and claims a Vatican one. I mean,

1731
01:54:36.479 --> 01:54:38.720
<v Speaker 8>when you when you really ask them, why does Rome

1732
01:54:38.760 --> 01:54:41.199
<v Speaker 8>get it? But not Alexander Antioch, It's like, well, he

1733
01:54:41.279 --> 01:54:44.720
<v Speaker 8>died there, Okay, Well why does him dying there contribute

1734
01:54:45.520 --> 01:54:49.399
<v Speaker 8>this vast you know, power and authority that we don't

1735
01:54:49.439 --> 01:54:51.359
<v Speaker 8>really see elucidated until very late.

1736
01:54:54.039 --> 01:54:56.159
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, because I just seem to use that scripture with

1737
01:54:56.279 --> 01:54:59.560
<v Speaker 15>the Keys to the Kingdom with Peter and relate everything around,

1738
01:55:00.399 --> 01:55:04.159
<v Speaker 15>just to centralize everything. But really it was Paul who

1739
01:55:04.199 --> 01:55:06.479
<v Speaker 15>had more authority in Roman was preaching to the James

1740
01:55:06.520 --> 01:55:10.199
<v Speaker 15>Tarlsien rhyme. So if anything, he should have more authority

1741
01:55:10.239 --> 01:55:11.920
<v Speaker 15>in relation to being at the say.

1742
01:55:11.800 --> 01:55:14.880
<v Speaker 8>Of Yeah, I actually I actually agree with that. I

1743
01:55:14.880 --> 01:55:20.560
<v Speaker 8>mean yeah, I mean I think theologically speaking, I mean

1744
01:55:20.600 --> 01:55:23.680
<v Speaker 8>it's Paul, that's the quote star of the New Testament, right,

1745
01:55:23.760 --> 01:55:27.960
<v Speaker 8>I mean he rebukes Peter and Peter's wrong. So it's like,

1746
01:55:28.640 --> 01:55:32.920
<v Speaker 8>you know, just just basic stuff still kind of I

1747
01:55:32.920 --> 01:55:37.800
<v Speaker 8>think undermines what the Roman position develops into. And this

1748
01:55:37.840 --> 01:55:41.840
<v Speaker 8>is a key thing to understand, Like the Roman Catholic

1749
01:55:42.359 --> 01:55:47.359
<v Speaker 8>Advanced Medieval, late Medieval position, it takes a long time

1750
01:55:47.399 --> 01:55:51.720
<v Speaker 8>for that to develop. It's an evolution and it doesn't

1751
01:55:52.399 --> 01:55:58.279
<v Speaker 8>start with Peter or Victor or Damasis. You know. It's

1752
01:55:58.279 --> 01:56:01.760
<v Speaker 8>like it's a thing that builds on a legitimate tradition

1753
01:56:02.399 --> 01:56:06.800
<v Speaker 8>that becomes insane. Lo fi, what's up?

1754
01:56:06.800 --> 01:56:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Man?

1755
01:56:11.479 --> 01:56:11.640
<v Speaker 9>Kai?

1756
01:56:11.800 --> 01:56:12.319
<v Speaker 8>Do you hear me?

1757
01:56:12.800 --> 01:56:15.039
<v Speaker 18>Yeah?

1758
01:56:15.199 --> 01:56:17.520
<v Speaker 20>I want to ask you a bit of a stupid question,

1759
01:56:17.760 --> 01:56:22.119
<v Speaker 20>but do you think that most of the Catholic apologetics

1760
01:56:22.159 --> 01:56:26.479
<v Speaker 20>are dishonest, because from my point of view, it's like

1761
01:56:26.640 --> 01:56:30.359
<v Speaker 20>impossible to prove their points because the new documents like

1762
01:56:30.479 --> 01:56:34.640
<v Speaker 20>Alexandria or Kiti literally say that the Orthodox are rights

1763
01:56:35.199 --> 01:56:37.199
<v Speaker 20>and all the other points.

1764
01:56:37.239 --> 01:56:38.840
<v Speaker 8>Like when I saw.

1765
01:56:38.840 --> 01:56:42.479
<v Speaker 20>You, would you petrust debate, it seemed pretty obvious for me,

1766
01:56:43.760 --> 01:56:44.840
<v Speaker 20>What do you say about that?

1767
01:56:48.239 --> 01:56:51.439
<v Speaker 8>I think, so when it comes to a lot of

1768
01:56:51.439 --> 01:56:57.800
<v Speaker 8>the Catholic apologists, I mean, unless they openly demonstrate outright dishonesty,

1769
01:56:58.479 --> 01:57:00.720
<v Speaker 8>I don't know if I would say they're now necessarily

1770
01:57:00.800 --> 01:57:03.479
<v Speaker 8>being dishonest. I think some of them are. I think

1771
01:57:03.520 --> 01:57:09.720
<v Speaker 8>Lofton is, but I think typically rather than I mean,

1772
01:57:09.720 --> 01:57:11.560
<v Speaker 8>maybe there are some cases. I don't watch a whole

1773
01:57:11.560 --> 01:57:14.720
<v Speaker 8>lot of their content because you got to understand that

1774
01:57:14.840 --> 01:57:19.119
<v Speaker 8>like today's Roman Catholic online paup apologists, they're really not

1775
01:57:19.199 --> 01:57:23.079
<v Speaker 8>any different than the paup apologists from twenty years ago

1776
01:57:23.119 --> 01:57:27.119
<v Speaker 8>that I was first introduced to Rome through. So like

1777
01:57:27.199 --> 01:57:32.359
<v Speaker 8>the Peter Kreeft and the Scott Hawns and the Stephen

1778
01:57:32.439 --> 01:57:41.640
<v Speaker 8>Ray and the Jerry Mattoitics Jimmy Aiken. I'm trying to

1779
01:57:41.640 --> 01:57:44.239
<v Speaker 8>think of all the apologists of twenty years ago that

1780
01:57:44.279 --> 01:57:47.920
<v Speaker 8>everybody knew in two thousand and three four, like that

1781
01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:52.479
<v Speaker 8>whole class of guys, like they were saying the exact

1782
01:57:52.479 --> 01:57:55.880
<v Speaker 8>same stuff that today's pap apologists say. I mean, the

1783
01:57:56.000 --> 01:58:01.239
<v Speaker 8>Roman sphere of apologetics doesn't get any more sophisticated than

1784
01:58:01.279 --> 01:58:04.279
<v Speaker 8>all the same stuff you hear them saying today. And

1785
01:58:04.920 --> 01:58:08.520
<v Speaker 8>I mean, Ibarra might be a quote mind collector beyond

1786
01:58:08.600 --> 01:58:10.640
<v Speaker 8>what the previous guys have done, because I guess his

1787
01:58:10.720 --> 01:58:13.960
<v Speaker 8>book is like eight hundred pages of quote minds, and

1788
01:58:14.399 --> 01:58:16.560
<v Speaker 8>you know, eight hundred pages of quote minds? How good

1789
01:58:16.560 --> 01:58:19.239
<v Speaker 8>did that? How did he fare when UBI just asked him, well,

1790
01:58:19.279 --> 01:58:20.279
<v Speaker 8>what about Virgilius?

1791
01:58:20.840 --> 01:58:23.760
<v Speaker 11>Well, I ain't got a sufficient inswer to that yet,

1792
01:58:23.840 --> 01:58:26.199
<v Speaker 11>so I'm not going to see so.

1793
01:58:26.640 --> 01:58:30.800
<v Speaker 8>What did it do? And again like I'm not. I mean,

1794
01:58:31.520 --> 01:58:33.640
<v Speaker 8>they literally don't say anything different than they said twenty

1795
01:58:33.720 --> 01:58:38.520
<v Speaker 8>years ago. So are they being dishonest? Probably to a degree,

1796
01:58:38.960 --> 01:58:44.520
<v Speaker 8>because I think after many years, the more you're exposed

1797
01:58:44.560 --> 01:58:49.000
<v Speaker 8>to things and challenges and issues at a certain point,

1798
01:58:49.119 --> 01:58:54.560
<v Speaker 8>Yet it does take dishonesty. But you know, I guess

1799
01:58:54.640 --> 01:58:59.680
<v Speaker 8>that's for them to in their own consciences to sort out,

1800
01:59:00.600 --> 01:59:03.840
<v Speaker 8>because like you, Meg could get away with this on

1801
01:59:03.880 --> 01:59:09.279
<v Speaker 8>the in the public sphere with duping people. But like inside,

1802
01:59:09.359 --> 01:59:12.359
<v Speaker 8>in the inner conscience and in their inner heart their news,

1803
01:59:12.439 --> 01:59:14.840
<v Speaker 8>they know they're not being honest with themselves. They know

1804
01:59:14.960 --> 01:59:18.239
<v Speaker 8>that they're coming up with stuff to might to make

1805
01:59:18.279 --> 01:59:25.239
<v Speaker 8>it work. I mean, just think of when Trent said,

1806
01:59:26.039 --> 01:59:28.479
<v Speaker 8>Think of when Trent admitted that it does look like

1807
01:59:28.800 --> 01:59:31.199
<v Speaker 8>France is saying that the death penalty is against the gospel.

1808
01:59:31.279 --> 01:59:34.039
<v Speaker 8>Is a change in Caltholic morals and theology? Yeah, because

1809
01:59:34.079 --> 01:59:35.760
<v Speaker 8>it is? And what did he say to answer it?

1810
01:59:36.239 --> 01:59:38.760
<v Speaker 8>But there's about three or four different ways that you

1811
01:59:38.800 --> 01:59:41.720
<v Speaker 8>could come up with to explain it. Come up with

1812
01:59:43.319 --> 01:59:46.399
<v Speaker 8>so are we just system building and it's a big

1813
01:59:46.479 --> 01:59:51.359
<v Speaker 8>unfalsifiable thing. So yeah, I mean, I'm gonna say that

1814
01:59:52.359 --> 01:59:56.439
<v Speaker 8>I know that Lofton operates in a dishonest, snaky way.

1815
01:59:59.119 --> 02:00:03.840
<v Speaker 8>I've never seen be openly dishonest. Although I mean to

1816
02:00:04.359 --> 02:00:07.720
<v Speaker 8>double down on the fact that Triad is not a

1817
02:00:07.960 --> 02:00:12.159
<v Speaker 8>the triad, it's a term that means anti trinitarianism. I mean,

1818
02:00:12.159 --> 02:00:14.920
<v Speaker 8>it's just false and it really shows that Trend has

1819
02:00:14.960 --> 02:00:18.079
<v Speaker 8>no idea what the Eastern tradition is on the Trinity,

1820
02:00:18.960 --> 02:00:20.960
<v Speaker 8>not interested in any of that. I mean to go,

1821
02:00:21.359 --> 02:00:24.000
<v Speaker 8>why be involved in any of that when you can

1822
02:00:24.079 --> 02:00:27.199
<v Speaker 8>do a pop Roman Catholic video that gets two hundred

1823
02:00:27.199 --> 02:00:29.920
<v Speaker 8>and fifty thousand views. So why deal with the actual

1824
02:00:30.000 --> 02:00:36.359
<v Speaker 8>challenges from somebody like myself or UBI? When like there's

1825
02:00:36.399 --> 02:00:39.720
<v Speaker 8>a giant market you can become a tailor Marshall and

1826
02:00:39.720 --> 02:00:42.840
<v Speaker 8>get a million followers and talk about your you know,

1827
02:00:43.520 --> 02:00:47.520
<v Speaker 8>your wet dreams or somehow special revelations from Mary. I

1828
02:00:47.520 --> 02:00:50.439
<v Speaker 8>mean there's a million idiots that are ready to fall

1829
02:00:50.479 --> 02:00:54.199
<v Speaker 8>for that. Do those million idiots want to talk about

1830
02:00:54.199 --> 02:00:57.840
<v Speaker 8>the Alexander document? No, So maybe you're right, maybe it

1831
02:00:57.880 --> 02:01:12.600
<v Speaker 8>actually has a lot of dishonesty. That's what's up? You're there?

1832
02:01:12.640 --> 02:01:12.960
<v Speaker 8>What's something?

1833
02:01:12.960 --> 02:01:13.079
<v Speaker 19>Man?

1834
02:01:14.479 --> 02:01:15.199
<v Speaker 21>Hey can you hear me?

1835
02:01:16.800 --> 02:01:17.000
<v Speaker 16>Hey?

1836
02:01:17.239 --> 02:01:19.600
<v Speaker 22>Thank you for taking my call. So I have two

1837
02:01:19.600 --> 02:01:23.479
<v Speaker 22>things I want to ask or get your opinion on. So,

1838
02:01:24.439 --> 02:01:27.640
<v Speaker 22>like if I'm a Protestant, I'm not a Protestant, I'm

1839
02:01:27.640 --> 02:01:28.319
<v Speaker 22>an Orthodox.

1840
02:01:28.359 --> 02:01:33.319
<v Speaker 21>But from a Protestant perspective, when when they're spending time

1841
02:01:33.439 --> 02:01:39.119
<v Speaker 21>trying to refute I guess normative authority the Orthodox Church,

1842
02:01:39.199 --> 02:01:42.279
<v Speaker 21>or even I guess the Roman Catholic Church for that matter,

1843
02:01:42.720 --> 02:01:47.199
<v Speaker 21>when they're when they're doing this, and some of them

1844
02:01:47.199 --> 02:01:50.880
<v Speaker 21>would make the assertion and say, uh, well, no church

1845
02:01:51.359 --> 02:01:56.720
<v Speaker 21>tradition has it all correct, aren't they, essentially, in your opinion,

1846
02:01:56.840 --> 02:01:58.560
<v Speaker 21>refuting Christianity in general.

1847
02:02:00.279 --> 02:02:04.359
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's an ambiguous phrase because what does that mean.

1848
02:02:04.439 --> 02:02:07.720
<v Speaker 8>I mean, does that mean that no church tradition knows

1849
02:02:07.840 --> 02:02:11.720
<v Speaker 8>everything or expresses everything exhaustively perfectly? I mean that could

1850
02:02:11.720 --> 02:02:14.359
<v Speaker 8>mean a lot of different things. But it could also

1851
02:02:14.399 --> 02:02:19.880
<v Speaker 8>be interpreted to mean that church's dogmas contradict. So it's

1852
02:02:19.960 --> 02:02:22.680
<v Speaker 8>just an ambiguous phrase that would require I think, some

1853
02:02:22.760 --> 02:02:27.279
<v Speaker 8>degree of specificity to understand exactly what they mean. But

1854
02:02:27.640 --> 02:02:31.560
<v Speaker 8>if they mean dogmatically, then yeah, that would undermine the

1855
02:02:31.640 --> 02:02:33.479
<v Speaker 8>promise that the church could not fail.

1856
02:02:35.000 --> 02:02:37.359
<v Speaker 21>Awesome, and I appreciate that. And the next thing I

1857
02:02:37.399 --> 02:02:40.279
<v Speaker 21>wanted to ask real quick. You were speaking about the

1858
02:02:40.439 --> 02:02:44.560
<v Speaker 21>G eighty document earlier, and I was looking it up

1859
02:02:44.600 --> 02:02:47.399
<v Speaker 21>and I did just a little bit of reading on it,

1860
02:02:47.439 --> 02:02:51.000
<v Speaker 21>and it seems like, Okay, I don't know how much

1861
02:02:51.760 --> 02:02:54.600
<v Speaker 21>involvement did the Pope have with this document, because couldn't

1862
02:02:54.600 --> 02:02:57.880
<v Speaker 21>the Catholic just say, well, this is just you know,

1863
02:02:58.600 --> 02:02:59.920
<v Speaker 21>this is not really dogmatic.

1864
02:03:00.920 --> 02:03:04.920
<v Speaker 8>Well it doesn't matter. But the dogmatic or non dogmatic

1865
02:03:05.000 --> 02:03:07.800
<v Speaker 8>status of this document doesn't matter, because these are the

1866
02:03:07.880 --> 02:03:11.840
<v Speaker 8>Vatican's own theological commissions. So what that means is that

1867
02:03:11.880 --> 02:03:14.640
<v Speaker 8>these are published with the approval of the Vatican. They're

1868
02:03:14.680 --> 02:03:18.840
<v Speaker 8>on Vatican websites. Christianity dot v a is a Vatican website,

1869
02:03:18.840 --> 02:03:23.399
<v Speaker 8>so it's it is a tacit implicit approval, And so

1870
02:03:23.560 --> 02:03:25.039
<v Speaker 8>the Pope doesn't have to come out and say I

1871
02:03:25.119 --> 02:03:29.680
<v Speaker 8>dogmatically state that ady is, you know, in accord with

1872
02:03:29.720 --> 02:03:32.880
<v Speaker 8>the dogma. It doesn't have to because in Roman Callic theology,

1873
02:03:33.119 --> 02:03:37.000
<v Speaker 8>the pope cannot teach error. So if this is a

1874
02:03:37.119 --> 02:03:43.560
<v Speaker 8>Vatican approved document, this is a Vatican okay position, you see,

1875
02:03:45.000 --> 02:03:48.600
<v Speaker 8>this is a Vatican synom this is a Vatican commission.

1876
02:03:49.199 --> 02:03:51.800
<v Speaker 8>So no point is that it doesn't matter about whether

1877
02:03:51.800 --> 02:03:55.640
<v Speaker 8>it's dogmatic or not. That's a deflection from the issue

1878
02:03:55.680 --> 02:03:59.920
<v Speaker 8>of defectibility and indefectibility, because if this document is an error,

1879
02:04:00.239 --> 02:04:04.119
<v Speaker 8>then why does the pope have on his website massive

1880
02:04:04.199 --> 02:04:05.159
<v Speaker 8>theological error.

1881
02:04:06.960 --> 02:04:07.640
<v Speaker 11>It makes.

1882
02:04:09.479 --> 02:04:09.640
<v Speaker 18>Time.

1883
02:04:09.920 --> 02:04:11.840
<v Speaker 8>But no, that's actually a really important point because a

1884
02:04:11.840 --> 02:04:14.840
<v Speaker 8>lot of rom Meanchaolics will deflect into the status of

1885
02:04:14.880 --> 02:04:17.720
<v Speaker 8>the document, which has absolutely nothing to do with whether

1886
02:04:17.760 --> 02:04:22.279
<v Speaker 8>it's heretical or not. Just like in as Abara admitted,

1887
02:04:22.680 --> 02:04:26.000
<v Speaker 8>do you guys, remember you. Barro admits that Honorius is

1888
02:04:26.399 --> 02:04:31.640
<v Speaker 8>excommunicated for a letter that he wrote to somebody about monothelitism.

1889
02:04:33.279 --> 02:04:36.159
<v Speaker 8>Did he make the letter dogmatic? No, a pope's letter

1890
02:04:36.199 --> 02:04:39.199
<v Speaker 8>to one person is not dogmatic, but the letter preaching

1891
02:04:39.439 --> 02:04:43.640
<v Speaker 8>monothelitism was enough to get him ex communicating, condemned. Ibarra

1892
02:04:43.720 --> 02:04:48.479
<v Speaker 8>admits that they're top guy now on the pope. What

1893
02:04:48.520 --> 02:04:51.800
<v Speaker 8>does that demonstrate? It demonstrates the point of making right

1894
02:04:51.840 --> 02:04:54.439
<v Speaker 8>now that the status of the document has nothing to

1895
02:04:54.479 --> 02:04:58.159
<v Speaker 8>do with whether it's heretical or not. So it doesn't matter,

1896
02:04:58.680 --> 02:05:02.920
<v Speaker 8>because this means that the the Vatican is promoting theological

1897
02:05:03.000 --> 02:05:05.520
<v Speaker 8>error on a mass scale to the entire Orthodox world

1898
02:05:05.520 --> 02:05:07.119
<v Speaker 8>and to the rest of the world. That you can

1899
02:05:07.159 --> 02:05:12.000
<v Speaker 8>believe and accept these theological principles now, and they're no

1900
02:05:12.079 --> 02:05:15.600
<v Speaker 8>different really than what stuff was already in Benedict's books.

1901
02:05:16.439 --> 02:05:18.159
<v Speaker 8>So if they're going to say, oh, it's not it's

1902
02:05:18.199 --> 02:05:20.520
<v Speaker 8>not really, it doesn't matter. Even if it's heresy doesn't count.

1903
02:05:20.600 --> 02:05:20.760
<v Speaker 18>Well.

1904
02:05:20.760 --> 02:05:23.079
<v Speaker 8>Benedict wrote the same types of stuff in his books.

1905
02:05:23.079 --> 02:05:27.720
<v Speaker 8>He says that the Orthodox shouldn't be expected to accept

1906
02:05:27.760 --> 02:05:29.319
<v Speaker 8>any more than what was the case in the first

1907
02:05:29.399 --> 02:05:32.520
<v Speaker 8>thousand years of Christianity and the Orthodox have maintained the

1908
02:05:32.560 --> 02:05:35.079
<v Speaker 8>faith without the papers of the last thus year weld.

1909
02:05:35.119 --> 02:05:36.680
<v Speaker 8>I mean, that's all the same types of stuff in

1910
02:05:36.720 --> 02:05:40.920
<v Speaker 8>this So they love to deflect into a topic that

1911
02:05:40.960 --> 02:05:43.680
<v Speaker 8>has nothing to do with whether the document is heretical

1912
02:05:43.760 --> 02:05:49.960
<v Speaker 8>or not, because again, if it's heretical, the pope's dogmatic

1913
02:05:50.159 --> 02:05:53.119
<v Speaker 8>pronouncement of the document has nothing to do with whether

1914
02:05:53.159 --> 02:05:57.920
<v Speaker 8>it's heretical or not. You can be a heretic without

1915
02:05:58.720 --> 02:06:04.960
<v Speaker 8>making it mandatory. Martin Luther had no dogmatic authority behind

1916
02:06:05.000 --> 02:06:08.399
<v Speaker 8>his documents when the Roman Catholic Church excommunicated him as

1917
02:06:08.399 --> 02:06:12.039
<v Speaker 8>a heretic. But Romancalthers are so stupid and so goofy

1918
02:06:12.199 --> 02:06:14.600
<v Speaker 8>when they try to make the system work that they

1919
02:06:14.640 --> 02:06:18.600
<v Speaker 8>will actually end up literally saying that no, it has

1920
02:06:18.680 --> 02:06:22.760
<v Speaker 8>to be dogmatically pronounced for it to be heretical and rejected.

1921
02:06:23.159 --> 02:06:28.520
<v Speaker 8>What I'm not joking like, they'll actually say that you

1922
02:06:28.640 --> 02:06:31.840
<v Speaker 8>only like, it only counts if the pope binds you,

1923
02:06:31.880 --> 02:06:33.479
<v Speaker 8>and then it would be something that we'd have to

1924
02:06:33.479 --> 02:06:35.720
<v Speaker 8>worry with. But I'm not bound by this document. Well

1925
02:06:35.760 --> 02:06:38.720
<v Speaker 8>that's not even true. This is another tried myth that

1926
02:06:38.760 --> 02:06:41.560
<v Speaker 8>you only have to believe what's ex cathedral. That's not true.

1927
02:06:42.079 --> 02:06:44.520
<v Speaker 8>It's just a total myth that they make up. I

1928
02:06:44.560 --> 02:06:46.600
<v Speaker 8>don't even know where they get it. It's like maybe

1929
02:06:46.640 --> 02:06:49.199
<v Speaker 8>some pop apologists says this and they just repeat it

1930
02:06:49.760 --> 02:06:52.520
<v Speaker 8>like a bunch of you know, twitter yapping birds or

1931
02:06:52.560 --> 02:06:54.920
<v Speaker 8>something like. But that's not to mina birds. That's not true,

1932
02:06:55.359 --> 02:06:57.800
<v Speaker 8>like it's been that's actually been condemned four times by

1933
02:06:57.840 --> 02:06:59.960
<v Speaker 8>the Vatican. That you only have to believe the ex cathedra.

1934
02:07:00.520 --> 02:07:21.760
<v Speaker 8>That's just stupid. It's not true. Noah, sincere hypocrypt five dollars.

1935
02:07:21.960 --> 02:07:23.720
<v Speaker 8>One of the copes that I see from Roman Catholics

1936
02:07:23.760 --> 02:07:27.159
<v Speaker 8>is that we've had many bad popes. Have nothing to

1937
02:07:27.199 --> 02:07:31.520
<v Speaker 8>do with whether or not popes are teaching heresy and error,

1938
02:07:31.880 --> 02:07:35.880
<v Speaker 8>so they're always deflecting into morally bad popes. That has

1939
02:07:35.920 --> 02:07:39.399
<v Speaker 8>nothing to do with whether popes are teaching theological error,

1940
02:07:39.800 --> 02:07:45.159
<v Speaker 8>so they're again throwing up confusion and smoke and mirrors

1941
02:07:45.199 --> 02:07:48.640
<v Speaker 8>because the question is not whether there are bad popes

1942
02:07:49.119 --> 02:07:54.319
<v Speaker 8>or does a morally bad pope invalidate the Roman Catholic system.

1943
02:07:54.479 --> 02:07:59.000
<v Speaker 8>It's about theological error, which would mean that the Roman

1944
02:07:59.199 --> 02:08:03.159
<v Speaker 8>see t taches error and thus contradicts Vatican one's claims.

1945
02:08:03.680 --> 02:08:07.520
<v Speaker 8>So no, it's not about popes having you know, prostitutes.

1946
02:08:07.600 --> 02:08:09.960
<v Speaker 8>We all know that, we know Alexander the six had

1947
02:08:10.000 --> 02:08:13.399
<v Speaker 8>a tunnel to the hoe house next door. Nobody's arguing

1948
02:08:13.439 --> 02:08:17.119
<v Speaker 8>that a bad pope is what invalidates the system, because

1949
02:08:17.119 --> 02:08:20.359
<v Speaker 8>there's countless, i'm sure, evil Orthodox bishops in the history

1950
02:08:20.359 --> 02:08:22.079
<v Speaker 8>of the church. So what that's not the argument, it's

1951
02:08:22.079 --> 02:08:25.399
<v Speaker 8>another deflection. The point is that in the Roman Catholic

1952
02:08:25.479 --> 02:08:32.000
<v Speaker 8>system you cannot have popes theologically teaching error on faith

1953
02:08:32.079 --> 02:08:36.359
<v Speaker 8>and morals. That's the point, because that invalidates the system.

1954
02:08:36.479 --> 02:08:39.479
<v Speaker 8>That's why we're pointing out that the status of this

1955
02:08:39.600 --> 02:08:43.000
<v Speaker 8>document has nothing to do with whether the document is

1956
02:08:43.439 --> 02:08:48.000
<v Speaker 8>teaching error and approved by Rome, because it is in

1957
02:08:48.039 --> 02:09:07.279
<v Speaker 8>the Roman system. Warren, what's up, warreng g I'm mute,

1958
02:09:11.960 --> 02:09:12.359
<v Speaker 8>I'm mute.

1959
02:09:12.399 --> 02:09:17.880
<v Speaker 10>Warren, Okay, I just wanted to ask you about why

1960
02:09:18.000 --> 02:09:19.159
<v Speaker 10>government should exist.

1961
02:09:19.840 --> 02:09:24.880
<v Speaker 18>So, the Paternians believe in no government. So how do

1962
02:09:24.960 --> 02:09:29.439
<v Speaker 18>you prove that the government is necessary?

1963
02:09:31.039 --> 02:09:34.119
<v Speaker 8>Well, if you even if you believe in nap and

1964
02:09:34.199 --> 02:09:38.479
<v Speaker 8>everything being privatized, you're still going to get a government.

1965
02:09:38.119 --> 02:09:48.560
<v Speaker 18>Right, So how we define a government?

1966
02:09:49.720 --> 02:09:52.359
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, if we're living on an island full

1967
02:09:52.359 --> 02:09:58.000
<v Speaker 8>of libertarians and everybody voluntarily agrees to a private security

1968
02:09:58.159 --> 02:10:04.199
<v Speaker 8>firm running the islands h law enforcement procedures. Is that

1969
02:10:04.239 --> 02:10:04.840
<v Speaker 8>a government?

1970
02:10:07.680 --> 02:10:14.239
<v Speaker 15>So like everybody are so everybody are having your private probably?

1971
02:10:14.359 --> 02:10:17.359
<v Speaker 18>So if so, that's not a government? So everybody to

1972
02:10:17.439 --> 02:10:18.680
<v Speaker 18>have your private what do.

1973
02:10:18.640 --> 02:10:20.520
<v Speaker 8>You mean it's not a government, it's it's a it's

1974
02:10:20.560 --> 02:10:22.920
<v Speaker 8>a group of people who have the ability to use

1975
02:10:22.960 --> 02:10:27.159
<v Speaker 8>force that other people don't have. Is that not a government?

1976
02:10:29.960 --> 02:10:35.319
<v Speaker 15>But there's no, But there's nobody who is governing uh

1977
02:10:35.479 --> 02:10:36.199
<v Speaker 15>that island?

1978
02:10:36.439 --> 02:10:39.359
<v Speaker 8>So there's you hear what I said, Like I literally

1979
02:10:39.399 --> 02:10:42.960
<v Speaker 8>just said, if a private security firm is hired by

1980
02:10:43.000 --> 02:10:48.119
<v Speaker 8>the island to govern the island voluntarily, is that a government?

1981
02:10:48.279 --> 02:10:48.960
<v Speaker 8>Or is it not?

1982
02:10:52.279 --> 02:10:53.439
<v Speaker 18>It could be a government?

1983
02:10:53.960 --> 02:10:56.119
<v Speaker 8>Okay, So so now you're gonna have to tell me,

1984
02:10:56.199 --> 02:10:58.159
<v Speaker 8>like what do you mean why should there be government?

1985
02:10:58.159 --> 02:11:00.560
<v Speaker 8>Because now you've said that council's government and a lot

1986
02:11:00.560 --> 02:11:03.520
<v Speaker 8>of libertarians would accept that as government. So you do

1987
02:11:03.680 --> 02:11:04.720
<v Speaker 8>or don't believe in government?

1988
02:11:06.880 --> 02:11:09.000
<v Speaker 18>Okay?

1989
02:11:10.439 --> 02:11:19.680
<v Speaker 8>Okay, I thought we were going to go further places there,

1990
02:11:19.680 --> 02:11:22.720
<v Speaker 8>but I guess not. So again, you'll notice, like a

1991
02:11:22.760 --> 02:11:28.119
<v Speaker 8>lot of times debates Hinge on ambiguity and terminology, not always,

1992
02:11:28.560 --> 02:11:33.279
<v Speaker 8>but a lot of atheists overuse this, like uh, theists

1993
02:11:33.399 --> 02:11:38.279
<v Speaker 8>that have ambiguity and terminalogy. But sometimes it's true because well,

1994
02:11:38.319 --> 02:11:41.319
<v Speaker 8>what do you mean by a bad pope? What do

1995
02:11:41.359 --> 02:11:44.520
<v Speaker 8>you mean by government? So right, I feel like Jordan

1996
02:11:44.560 --> 02:11:47.079
<v Speaker 8>Peter depends on what to mean, but I mean sometimes

1997
02:11:47.079 --> 02:11:49.640
<v Speaker 8>that's true. Well, what do you mean because if a

1998
02:11:49.680 --> 02:11:53.439
<v Speaker 8>baby is born on an island where all the libertarians

1999
02:11:53.520 --> 02:11:57.960
<v Speaker 8>consented to a private security firm being the government being

2000
02:11:58.000 --> 02:12:04.279
<v Speaker 8>the enforcers on libertarian an island, fantasy island, deplain deplay, right,

2001
02:12:04.640 --> 02:12:10.000
<v Speaker 8>we're gonna have Tattoo designated as the judge, dread jury

2002
02:12:10.039 --> 02:12:14.760
<v Speaker 8>and executioner of the island. And if a baby's born,

2003
02:12:15.920 --> 02:12:19.600
<v Speaker 8>uh oh, has he consented to Tattoo being the governor

2004
02:12:19.640 --> 02:12:23.039
<v Speaker 8>of his island? No? Uh oh? Violation of the nap

2005
02:12:23.479 --> 02:12:27.239
<v Speaker 8>Now that sounds silly, but actually it's not silly because

2006
02:12:27.279 --> 02:12:30.800
<v Speaker 8>the premise behind libertarianism is typically that it has to

2007
02:12:30.840 --> 02:12:34.479
<v Speaker 8>be voluntary, has to be you have to respect the

2008
02:12:34.520 --> 02:12:37.279
<v Speaker 8>non aggression principle. So I guess we have to let

2009
02:12:38.079 --> 02:12:41.920
<v Speaker 8>babies born on the island govern themselves in little baby

2010
02:12:41.960 --> 02:12:45.640
<v Speaker 8>cribs until they get old enough to voluntarily contract to

2011
02:12:45.760 --> 02:12:52.560
<v Speaker 8>have tattoo on fantasy Island be able to kill them.

2012
02:12:52.680 --> 02:12:54.880
<v Speaker 8>Tell me that one the good analogy. I'm actually cracking

2013
02:12:54.960 --> 02:13:01.279
<v Speaker 8>up thinking about this, like Libertarian fantasy Island. But I

2014
02:13:01.319 --> 02:13:05.279
<v Speaker 8>mean that seems to follow right, Like and by the way,

2015
02:13:05.319 --> 02:13:09.159
<v Speaker 8>what if I visit libertarian fantasy Island and I don't

2016
02:13:09.159 --> 02:13:17.000
<v Speaker 8>consent to you know, what was that tattoos private security

2017
02:13:17.039 --> 02:13:20.640
<v Speaker 8>firm governing me? Like what do I do now? So? Like,

2018
02:13:21.119 --> 02:13:24.439
<v Speaker 8>am I restricted to some corner of the island that's

2019
02:13:24.479 --> 02:13:28.840
<v Speaker 8>like totally savage with no laws. Like the real libertarian

2020
02:13:28.920 --> 02:13:31.560
<v Speaker 8>section of Libertarian Island. Fantasy Island is that where I

2021
02:13:31.600 --> 02:13:36.680
<v Speaker 8>go until I voluntarily signed the papers that tattoo can

2022
02:13:36.760 --> 02:13:38.640
<v Speaker 8>rule me. I mean, it just gets absurd. But the

2023
02:13:38.680 --> 02:13:41.279
<v Speaker 8>reason it gets absurd is like you're actually following through

2024
02:13:41.319 --> 02:13:44.840
<v Speaker 8>with the logic of the libertarian position that no one

2025
02:13:44.880 --> 02:13:47.720
<v Speaker 8>should be governed without their consent. Well, guess what, You're

2026
02:13:47.720 --> 02:13:51.399
<v Speaker 8>born into a family and your father governs you without consent, dummy,

2027
02:13:52.119 --> 02:13:54.880
<v Speaker 8>And then literally you'll get these like Milton Friedman libertarian

2028
02:13:54.920 --> 02:13:59.039
<v Speaker 8>types who are like, no, actually you don't babies. Babies

2029
02:13:59.079 --> 02:14:01.880
<v Speaker 8>are their own individuals, and like, you know, or babies

2030
02:14:01.920 --> 02:14:04.840
<v Speaker 8>are parasites on the mother, and the mother can brought

2031
02:14:05.159 --> 02:14:07.239
<v Speaker 8>a braation the baby because babies are I mean, this

2032
02:14:07.239 --> 02:14:10.800
<v Speaker 8>is how stupid the libertarian shit gets. Because libertarians don't

2033
02:14:10.840 --> 02:14:13.520
<v Speaker 8>live in reality. They live in a fantasy world, just

2034
02:14:13.640 --> 02:14:16.319
<v Speaker 8>like the communists do. That's why none of these costco

2035
02:14:16.399 --> 02:14:19.880
<v Speaker 8>liberal idiots will actually debate me. By the way, mark,

2036
02:14:20.000 --> 02:14:26.840
<v Speaker 8>what's up? The QR code is for bitcoin. I am

2037
02:14:26.880 --> 02:14:29.920
<v Speaker 8>a huge bitcoin supporter. I believe in bitcoin, but I

2038
02:14:29.920 --> 02:14:34.079
<v Speaker 8>don't believe in bitcoin because libertarians and Austrian economists invented it.

2039
02:14:34.560 --> 02:14:37.640
<v Speaker 8>I can disagree with the philosophy even though I think

2040
02:14:38.039 --> 02:14:41.720
<v Speaker 8>bitcoin is the monetary answering solution. That doesn't mean that

2041
02:14:41.880 --> 02:14:45.840
<v Speaker 8>every aspect of a libertarian classical liberal worldview is true.

2042
02:14:46.079 --> 02:14:49.720
<v Speaker 8>What's up? Man? He dropped off, so I guess he

2043
02:14:50.439 --> 02:14:52.279
<v Speaker 8>said he didn't want any of this. What's up?

2044
02:14:52.399 --> 02:14:52.800
<v Speaker 11>Escape?

2045
02:14:54.079 --> 02:14:56.399
<v Speaker 8>We're going to fantasy island, y'all? What's up? Where's all

2046
02:14:56.439 --> 02:15:01.279
<v Speaker 8>the libertarians that to defend the private security contractor tattoo

2047
02:15:01.359 --> 02:15:10.239
<v Speaker 8>inc tattoo justice, the plane, the plane, the gun, the gun?

2048
02:15:11.600 --> 02:15:11.800
<v Speaker 11>Right?

2049
02:15:14.199 --> 02:15:16.520
<v Speaker 8>We all on libertarian fantasy island? Where you all at?

2050
02:15:18.680 --> 02:15:20.840
<v Speaker 16>I think that's sort of starting to come up and say,

2051
02:15:21.000 --> 02:15:25.119
<v Speaker 16>I feel like the monopoly on violence isn't the governance.

2052
02:15:25.159 --> 02:15:28.319
<v Speaker 16>The governance is the collective people agreeing to the rules.

2053
02:15:29.840 --> 02:15:32.840
<v Speaker 16>It feels like in that what the situation you slaid

2054
02:15:32.880 --> 02:15:36.239
<v Speaker 16>for and you try to assign governance to the security force.

2055
02:15:36.359 --> 02:15:38.760
<v Speaker 9>But it'd be the people that agreed to the rules,

2056
02:15:39.079 --> 02:15:39.479
<v Speaker 9>wouldn't it.

2057
02:15:43.079 --> 02:15:45.199
<v Speaker 8>How are the people who agreed to the rules the

2058
02:15:45.239 --> 02:15:47.680
<v Speaker 8>governing force when they're not the ones worth the use

2059
02:15:47.720 --> 02:15:48.119
<v Speaker 8>of force.

2060
02:15:53.359 --> 02:15:55.159
<v Speaker 9>That's the idea of what you're saying.

2061
02:15:55.159 --> 02:15:59.359
<v Speaker 16>If four libertarians lived on an island that live there

2062
02:15:59.479 --> 02:16:01.760
<v Speaker 16>agreeing to a set of rules, and then the private

2063
02:16:01.800 --> 02:16:06.600
<v Speaker 16>security would obviously enforce if somebody felt hard done by

2064
02:16:06.720 --> 02:16:08.359
<v Speaker 16>or felt like their property had been.

2065
02:16:10.039 --> 02:16:11.000
<v Speaker 9>Taken unfairly.

2066
02:16:11.840 --> 02:16:14.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so there's a governing body of a security private

2067
02:16:14.560 --> 02:16:24.239
<v Speaker 8>security farm enforcing the laws or no, the laws.

2068
02:16:24.000 --> 02:16:27.079
<v Speaker 16>Themselves being constructed. That's the governance, isn't it. It's not

2069
02:16:27.119 --> 02:16:28.720
<v Speaker 16>about the enforcement of the laws that.

2070
02:16:28.680 --> 02:16:30.600
<v Speaker 8>Actually So this is why you guys are like, I'm

2071
02:16:30.600 --> 02:16:32.120
<v Speaker 8>not trying to be mean to you, but you guys

2072
02:16:32.200 --> 02:16:36.319
<v Speaker 8>live in a fantasy world. Laws don't enforce themselves. It's

2073
02:16:36.360 --> 02:16:40.520
<v Speaker 8>the power structure that enforces the laws. The actual humans.

2074
02:16:40.920 --> 02:16:45.399
<v Speaker 8>There's no abstract laws enforcing themselves to punish people who

2075
02:16:45.440 --> 02:16:50.920
<v Speaker 8>are stealing your potatoes from your farm.

2076
02:16:51.000 --> 02:16:53.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that's probably what I'm trying to get to it.

2077
02:16:53.120 --> 02:16:55.319
<v Speaker 16>Just the fact that there's a security force doesn't mean

2078
02:16:55.319 --> 02:16:57.200
<v Speaker 16>that they are the only people that are able to

2079
02:16:57.319 --> 02:17:00.200
<v Speaker 16>enforce the rules. The social collective can come together and

2080
02:17:00.239 --> 02:17:04.479
<v Speaker 16>say that person was wrongly treated, and then they're able

2081
02:17:04.520 --> 02:17:06.319
<v Speaker 16>to then enforce the monopoly of violence.

2082
02:17:06.360 --> 02:17:06.719
<v Speaker 9>Also.

2083
02:17:07.879 --> 02:17:10.399
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but it doesn't matter because the whole point of

2084
02:17:10.440 --> 02:17:13.399
<v Speaker 8>the analogy was about the fact that where I was

2085
02:17:13.440 --> 02:17:16.399
<v Speaker 8>going with it was if visitors or children are born,

2086
02:17:17.040 --> 02:17:21.479
<v Speaker 8>they're not voluntarily accepting the laws, right, So you can't

2087
02:17:21.639 --> 02:17:28.000
<v Speaker 8>literally make authority or duty based around voluntary acceptance. It

2088
02:17:28.079 --> 02:17:31.879
<v Speaker 8>leads to absurdities like Milton Freeman's idea that like babies

2089
02:17:31.879 --> 02:17:33.000
<v Speaker 8>are parasites on women.

2090
02:17:36.360 --> 02:17:37.479
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, think in that sense.

2091
02:17:37.520 --> 02:17:40.319
<v Speaker 16>Obviously, a child comes under the like you said, the

2092
02:17:40.399 --> 02:17:43.719
<v Speaker 16>leadership of your parents' house, But when they come of

2093
02:17:43.760 --> 02:17:45.479
<v Speaker 16>an age where they're able to make a decision, they

2094
02:17:45.479 --> 02:17:47.959
<v Speaker 16>could obviously leave the island if they disagreed with that

2095
02:17:48.040 --> 02:17:48.479
<v Speaker 16>rule set.

2096
02:17:48.680 --> 02:17:52.000
<v Speaker 8>Okay, so authority is not based on consent.

2097
02:17:58.000 --> 02:18:00.000
<v Speaker 16>I'm just going to run that through my head, sorry,

2098
02:18:00.200 --> 02:18:01.399
<v Speaker 16>is not based on concern.

2099
02:18:01.639 --> 02:18:03.879
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so because you just admitted that when they come

2100
02:18:03.920 --> 02:18:05.959
<v Speaker 8>of age they could decide not to be under it.

2101
02:18:07.639 --> 02:18:11.440
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, but it's I think it's also then justice is included,

2102
02:18:11.559 --> 02:18:17.399
<v Speaker 16>like that that authority can enact injustice and break those

2103
02:18:17.520 --> 02:18:19.360
<v Speaker 16>rule sets by the force of its power.

2104
02:18:19.399 --> 02:18:20.920
<v Speaker 9>But that means that it's injus.

2105
02:18:24.600 --> 02:18:27.159
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but like a father can abuse his authority in

2106
02:18:27.159 --> 02:18:31.520
<v Speaker 8>the household and that's unjust. We don't get rid of

2107
02:18:31.559 --> 02:18:35.559
<v Speaker 8>fathers because there are unjust fathers, that's my point. So likewise,

2108
02:18:36.159 --> 02:18:39.040
<v Speaker 8>it's actually impossible to have a scenario where there are

2109
02:18:39.079 --> 02:18:43.280
<v Speaker 8>no governing powers or individuals with authority to enforce laws,

2110
02:18:43.719 --> 02:18:49.079
<v Speaker 8>and so there's always some level of possibility of abuse

2111
02:18:49.120 --> 02:18:52.479
<v Speaker 8>of authority. But I'm just saying that libertarian has been

2112
02:18:52.520 --> 02:18:56.799
<v Speaker 8>so fraught with fallacious assumptions and metaphysics that they can't

2113
02:18:56.840 --> 02:19:00.079
<v Speaker 8>justify that these are basic examples that really disprove the

2114
02:19:00.159 --> 02:19:05.559
<v Speaker 8>fact that you can't make governance literally hinging on consent.

2115
02:19:08.559 --> 02:19:09.399
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I agree with that.

2116
02:19:09.440 --> 02:19:12.600
<v Speaker 16>I think I do think that that's the role of

2117
02:19:12.639 --> 02:19:18.680
<v Speaker 16>government obviously is to to write injustice. So if there is,

2118
02:19:19.000 --> 02:19:22.520
<v Speaker 16>but I think that's just lean more towards the fact

2119
02:19:22.559 --> 02:19:25.040
<v Speaker 16>that we've put the government in a too big of

2120
02:19:25.040 --> 02:19:27.479
<v Speaker 16>a position and we've given them so much power of us.

2121
02:19:28.120 --> 02:19:30.280
<v Speaker 8>And well, I agree with that, yeah, but that doesn't

2122
02:19:30.319 --> 02:19:41.200
<v Speaker 8>require me accepting the classical liberal presuppositions to say that, Yeah, cool.

2123
02:19:41.000 --> 02:19:42.680
<v Speaker 9>That's all. I just wanted to jump up because of that.

2124
02:19:42.719 --> 02:19:46.879
<v Speaker 16>I feel like I feel like you were over representation

2125
02:19:47.920 --> 02:19:51.719
<v Speaker 16>the authority of the force. But I think that is

2126
02:19:51.959 --> 02:19:54.840
<v Speaker 16>most of the libertarians I talk to, we will push

2127
02:19:54.920 --> 02:19:58.040
<v Speaker 16>that it's more rules not rulers, like it's the fact

2128
02:19:58.079 --> 02:20:02.399
<v Speaker 16>that there's society these days will put an individual or

2129
02:20:02.680 --> 02:20:06.040
<v Speaker 16>a government and give them so much control over individuals. Then,

2130
02:20:06.159 --> 02:20:09.799
<v Speaker 16>as a Christian, I think that's because a lot of

2131
02:20:09.840 --> 02:20:13.159
<v Speaker 16>society has devoid faith, so they have no accountability to

2132
02:20:13.200 --> 02:20:17.159
<v Speaker 16>a creator, so they'll need something to fill that spot.

2133
02:20:17.239 --> 02:20:20.280
<v Speaker 16>But I think I think I lean more towards I

2134
02:20:20.319 --> 02:20:20.639
<v Speaker 16>think it.

2135
02:20:23.280 --> 02:20:24.319
<v Speaker 8>Might not be a.

2136
02:20:26.799 --> 02:20:28.959
<v Speaker 9>Smoother world if it was a libertarian, but I think

2137
02:20:29.000 --> 02:20:32.120
<v Speaker 9>it'd be the more.

2138
02:20:33.719 --> 02:20:37.440
<v Speaker 8>I don't know, the world that has less Okay, yeah,

2139
02:20:37.479 --> 02:20:40.040
<v Speaker 8>I mean I would actually agree with that. Solution is

2140
02:20:40.159 --> 02:20:47.040
<v Speaker 8>just we have a libertarian island that has a monarch

2141
02:20:47.239 --> 02:20:59.120
<v Speaker 8>for this for the how's that herk. How do I

2142
02:20:59.159 --> 02:21:02.760
<v Speaker 8>call in through the Twitter link? Bro? If you want

2143
02:21:02.760 --> 02:21:05.319
<v Speaker 8>to call in, you just call in on the Twitter

2144
02:21:05.360 --> 02:21:08.879
<v Speaker 8>space right here. That's up.

2145
02:21:10.319 --> 02:21:14.440
<v Speaker 23>Hey, Jay, I'm a libertarian, but I'm left libertarian, So

2146
02:21:14.639 --> 02:21:16.639
<v Speaker 23>I actually agree with a lot of what you were

2147
02:21:16.680 --> 02:21:19.840
<v Speaker 23>just saying to the last two gentlemen. I was going

2148
02:21:19.920 --> 02:21:22.920
<v Speaker 23>to say to the first gentleman that there's a book

2149
02:21:22.959 --> 02:21:27.159
<v Speaker 23>called The Machinery of Freedmen of Freedom by David Friedman

2150
02:21:27.639 --> 02:21:31.680
<v Speaker 23>that explains the private court systems, and it makes it

2151
02:21:31.760 --> 02:21:33.040
<v Speaker 23>sound somewhat.

2152
02:21:32.600 --> 02:21:35.319
<v Speaker 18>Plausible but highly unlikely.

2153
02:21:35.200 --> 02:21:38.520
<v Speaker 23>Given the state of humanity right now. So we're looking

2154
02:21:38.520 --> 02:21:42.319
<v Speaker 23>at hundreds, if not thousands of years of development before

2155
02:21:42.360 --> 02:21:44.840
<v Speaker 23>we get to this Star Trek fantasy land where we

2156
02:21:44.879 --> 02:21:51.239
<v Speaker 23>don't keep centralized planning and local governments can control everything.

2157
02:21:51.959 --> 02:21:56.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. I just saw a video what is the name

2158
02:21:56.360 --> 02:22:00.840
<v Speaker 8>of that? There's a community that is being it's kind

2159
02:22:00.840 --> 02:22:03.680
<v Speaker 8>of already kind of up and running in Nicaragua. I

2160
02:22:03.680 --> 02:22:05.280
<v Speaker 8>forget where it is. So there's some place where there's

2161
02:22:05.280 --> 02:22:08.440
<v Speaker 8>like a full on bitcoin community and there's not a

2162
02:22:08.479 --> 02:22:10.559
<v Speaker 8>whole lot of people living there that there's like five

2163
02:22:10.600 --> 02:22:12.360
<v Speaker 8>people there ten. I don't know what it is, but

2164
02:22:12.719 --> 02:22:17.920
<v Speaker 8>so somebody's trying to create something like this with a

2165
02:22:18.000 --> 02:22:24.479
<v Speaker 8>community that's libertarian run that is totally on the basis

2166
02:22:24.559 --> 02:22:28.360
<v Speaker 8>of bitcoin, and you have to basically voluntarily assent to everything.

2167
02:22:28.520 --> 02:22:32.280
<v Speaker 8>Let me find that video. It's an interesting idea. But

2168
02:22:32.760 --> 02:22:36.239
<v Speaker 8>the thing is is like, already they are very selective

2169
02:22:36.280 --> 02:22:40.079
<v Speaker 8>about who comes, so it's not I mean, obviously like

2170
02:22:40.120 --> 02:22:41.479
<v Speaker 8>to go there, you gotta have a lot of money.

2171
02:22:41.600 --> 02:22:45.040
<v Speaker 8>So it's and I'm not even saying that that's necessarily wrong.

2172
02:22:45.159 --> 02:22:47.000
<v Speaker 8>I don't think there's anything wrong with being wealthy or

2173
02:22:47.000 --> 02:22:49.479
<v Speaker 8>moving to an island or anything like that. But it's like,

2174
02:22:50.000 --> 02:22:52.840
<v Speaker 8>so libertarian and free and all this kind of stuff

2175
02:22:52.879 --> 02:22:57.440
<v Speaker 8>is in reality restricted to like bitcoin zillionaires and people

2176
02:22:57.479 --> 02:23:05.440
<v Speaker 8>that pass this private company's background check or whatever they do.

2177
02:23:06.959 --> 02:23:09.760
<v Speaker 8>Let me find it so I know, l Salvador. You know,

2178
02:23:09.959 --> 02:23:13.520
<v Speaker 8>you could say it's not Bitcoin City. It might be

2179
02:23:13.600 --> 02:23:17.399
<v Speaker 8>this one. I'm not talking about El Salvador. I understand

2180
02:23:17.399 --> 02:23:19.920
<v Speaker 8>there's potentiality for all of this. I do think there's

2181
02:23:19.920 --> 02:23:26.120
<v Speaker 8>a lot of potential for places to become healthy, functioning societies.

2182
02:23:26.479 --> 02:23:31.399
<v Speaker 8>They will have some elements of libertarian principles. I do

2183
02:23:31.520 --> 02:23:34.159
<v Speaker 8>agree with that. Where is this thing? I just watched

2184
02:23:34.159 --> 02:23:36.159
<v Speaker 8>this the other day.

2185
02:23:36.840 --> 02:23:38.280
<v Speaker 23>I would stressed that it has to be done in

2186
02:23:38.360 --> 02:23:45.479
<v Speaker 23>steps so gradually. Most people in America are reliant on

2187
02:23:45.600 --> 02:23:50.600
<v Speaker 23>government programs and would be totally petrified if there were

2188
02:23:50.600 --> 02:23:53.040
<v Speaker 23>any alterations alone cutting them whole scale.

2189
02:23:55.719 --> 02:23:58.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think those are fair objections and arguments. I

2190
02:23:58.639 --> 02:24:00.680
<v Speaker 8>would agree with that that if there is going to

2191
02:24:00.760 --> 02:24:02.479
<v Speaker 8>be something like this is probably a long time down

2192
02:24:02.520 --> 02:24:05.840
<v Speaker 8>the road, or it's going to be restricted to like,

2193
02:24:06.600 --> 02:24:10.799
<v Speaker 8>you know, zillionaires. I can't find what I'm looking for.

2194
02:24:10.879 --> 02:24:14.040
<v Speaker 8>Maybe it's I don't know, it was just some weird

2195
02:24:14.120 --> 02:24:17.559
<v Speaker 8>video of like, but the point was just that it's

2196
02:24:17.600 --> 02:24:20.360
<v Speaker 8>going to be very selective, I guess initially, And I'm

2197
02:24:20.360 --> 02:24:21.600
<v Speaker 8>not even I don't even have a problem with that,

2198
02:24:21.600 --> 02:24:23.840
<v Speaker 8>Like I don't think there's anything wrong with elitism per se.

2199
02:24:24.000 --> 02:24:27.559
<v Speaker 8>But like he's saying that if this was really going

2200
02:24:27.600 --> 02:24:30.600
<v Speaker 8>to spill out into like the rest of the world, yeah,

2201
02:24:30.600 --> 02:24:34.399
<v Speaker 8>we're talking like centuries centuries for this to affect like

2202
02:24:34.479 --> 02:24:38.120
<v Speaker 8>all societies. I do think in the near future, the

2203
02:24:38.200 --> 02:24:43.399
<v Speaker 8>like the next say, fifty years, as even Jacques Attealie

2204
02:24:43.440 --> 02:24:47.719
<v Speaker 8>admits in his book The Cities That Adopt the in

2205
02:24:47.760 --> 02:24:52.719
<v Speaker 8>the areas that adopt the forward thinking technologies are the

2206
02:24:52.719 --> 02:24:56.399
<v Speaker 8>ones that become the megacity economic centers of the future.

2207
02:24:57.440 --> 02:25:02.120
<v Speaker 8>So the places right now where you have massive bitcoin

2208
02:25:02.159 --> 02:25:07.600
<v Speaker 8>mining and acceptance places, maybe in Texas, I'll Salvador Bitcoin

2209
02:25:07.719 --> 02:25:10.680
<v Speaker 8>City Island. Whatever I'm looking for, Like these things I

2210
02:25:10.719 --> 02:25:16.479
<v Speaker 8>think will probably end up being mega centers in the future. Anyway,

2211
02:25:18.840 --> 02:25:27.200
<v Speaker 8>what's up, Alex? But I mean for now, it's like

2212
02:25:27.280 --> 02:25:30.399
<v Speaker 8>Golf's gulch, like whatever I was looking at. If I

2213
02:25:30.399 --> 02:25:37.799
<v Speaker 8>can find that, oh I know how to find it,

2214
02:25:37.840 --> 02:25:42.760
<v Speaker 8>I know where it is. What's up? Man? Got un mute? Dude, Yo?

2215
02:25:42.879 --> 02:25:43.479
<v Speaker 18>What's up? Due?

2216
02:25:47.399 --> 02:25:48.000
<v Speaker 24>I want to know.

2217
02:25:48.040 --> 02:25:49.680
<v Speaker 18>I'm a Catholic, but I want to know.

2218
02:25:49.719 --> 02:25:52.360
<v Speaker 24>I was talking to this other Orthodox, So I'm curious

2219
02:25:52.440 --> 02:25:58.399
<v Speaker 24>your view on exorcism. Like you guys as Orthodox, think

2220
02:25:58.479 --> 02:26:02.760
<v Speaker 24>that as Catholic believe in like different Jesus than you guys.

2221
02:26:04.520 --> 02:26:07.319
<v Speaker 8>Not necessarily. I mean, I think that you're naming and

2222
02:26:07.360 --> 02:26:11.280
<v Speaker 8>intending the same correct Jesus. But how does that relate

2223
02:26:11.319 --> 02:26:14.920
<v Speaker 8>to exorcism Because I could say that exorcisms can happen

2224
02:26:15.120 --> 02:26:17.319
<v Speaker 8>like in Mark seven outside the church, but that doesn't

2225
02:26:17.319 --> 02:26:19.600
<v Speaker 8>approve anything either way.

2226
02:26:21.000 --> 02:26:22.920
<v Speaker 24>Right, That's what I was curious like if so if

2227
02:26:22.920 --> 02:26:28.159
<v Speaker 24>a Catholic exorcism, like they're actually casting demons. So if

2228
02:26:28.159 --> 02:26:31.680
<v Speaker 24>we were using like a false Jesus name, how would

2229
02:26:31.719 --> 02:26:34.600
<v Speaker 24>that work? Or you're saying it's just based on intent, Well,

2230
02:26:34.639 --> 02:26:35.159
<v Speaker 24>I think there.

2231
02:26:35.120 --> 02:26:38.280
<v Speaker 8>Is objective power in that name, and I do think

2232
02:26:38.280 --> 02:26:43.680
<v Speaker 8>that Catholics intend to reference the correct Jesus. But I

2233
02:26:43.719 --> 02:26:46.719
<v Speaker 8>think that and that's why we don't make like judgments

2234
02:26:46.719 --> 02:26:51.360
<v Speaker 8>of individual Roman Catholics. What we judge, or what we say,

2235
02:26:51.600 --> 02:26:56.239
<v Speaker 8>is that the public structure of the Roman Catholic Church

2236
02:26:56.280 --> 02:27:01.479
<v Speaker 8>as an institution is heterodox. It's false, it doesn't give

2237
02:27:01.520 --> 02:27:04.360
<v Speaker 8>all the stuff it promises. But that doesn't mean that

2238
02:27:04.399 --> 02:27:06.719
<v Speaker 8>I'm judging every single individual Roman Catholic because I don't

2239
02:27:06.760 --> 02:27:08.959
<v Speaker 8>know their heart, owner their situation. And now God can

2240
02:27:09.120 --> 02:27:12.559
<v Speaker 8>do a miracle. Do you do a miracle anywhere anyway wants?

2241
02:27:13.719 --> 02:27:16.079
<v Speaker 8>But that's the thing about like the miracle stuff is

2242
02:27:17.120 --> 02:27:20.639
<v Speaker 8>signs and wonders don't prove necessarily which one is the

2243
02:27:20.680 --> 02:27:23.799
<v Speaker 8>true or the false faith. Because Johnnys and John Brace,

2244
02:27:24.600 --> 02:27:28.000
<v Speaker 8>if you read you, they mimic the first two miracles

2245
02:27:28.000 --> 02:27:33.440
<v Speaker 8>of Moses. So does that prove Egyptian theology? No, The

2246
02:27:33.559 --> 02:27:37.200
<v Speaker 8>Coptics points out that Mary supposedly appeared in z I

2247
02:27:37.280 --> 02:27:42.079
<v Speaker 8>Tune Egypt two thousands of Coptics. Does that prove Coptic Christianity. No,

2248
02:27:42.239 --> 02:27:45.200
<v Speaker 8>So you can't base the faith on the signs of

2249
02:27:45.239 --> 02:27:47.879
<v Speaker 8>wonders even though the true faith has signs of wonders.

2250
02:27:47.920 --> 02:27:48.600
<v Speaker 8>Does that make sense?

2251
02:27:50.000 --> 02:27:52.760
<v Speaker 24>Yeah, that makes sense. Also, if I can ask another one,

2252
02:27:52.799 --> 02:27:56.360
<v Speaker 24>what do you make of Like I hear the term

2253
02:27:56.399 --> 02:27:59.959
<v Speaker 24>pre list a lot, do you what do you make

2254
02:28:00.079 --> 02:28:04.399
<v Speaker 24>of Catholic saints like, for example, Mary Faustina. Is she

2255
02:28:05.680 --> 02:28:08.399
<v Speaker 24>hallucinating or are these legitimate encounters?

2256
02:28:08.520 --> 02:28:08.639
<v Speaker 18>Oh?

2257
02:28:08.719 --> 02:28:09.159
<v Speaker 11>I think that.

2258
02:28:09.360 --> 02:28:11.520
<v Speaker 8>I think those are like the best examples of pre

2259
02:28:11.639 --> 02:28:16.200
<v Speaker 8>list in fact, and even even many Roman Catholics admit

2260
02:28:16.319 --> 02:28:19.879
<v Speaker 8>this is one of the strongest arguments against their position

2261
02:28:20.239 --> 02:28:26.280
<v Speaker 8>is cases like Margaret Mary Ala Coquay, who's clearly engaging

2262
02:28:26.360 --> 02:28:30.920
<v Speaker 8>in self harm and has really kind of wild, outrageous claims.

2263
02:28:32.200 --> 02:28:34.280
<v Speaker 8>I made a video that's only about eight minutes. I'm

2264
02:28:34.280 --> 02:28:37.680
<v Speaker 8>going to pull it up on this topic because I

2265
02:28:37.680 --> 02:28:41.079
<v Speaker 8>think this is actually one of the stronger points that

2266
02:28:41.120 --> 02:28:43.680
<v Speaker 8>refutes Rome. It's right here. It's called Roman Catholic Historyonic

2267
02:28:43.719 --> 02:28:47.239
<v Speaker 8>women's saints refute papalism because if you read that. If

2268
02:28:47.239 --> 02:28:50.479
<v Speaker 8>you watch this video, you'll see that, like, you can't

2269
02:28:50.959 --> 02:28:54.600
<v Speaker 8>question her sanctity in her claims because she's said to

2270
02:28:54.639 --> 02:28:56.479
<v Speaker 8>be a saint. So if she's not a saint, then

2271
02:28:56.520 --> 02:28:59.920
<v Speaker 8>her like first of all, that would deny ordinary magistar,

2272
02:29:00.239 --> 02:29:03.280
<v Speaker 8>because you're denying who the Pope says and confirms as

2273
02:29:03.280 --> 02:29:08.079
<v Speaker 8>a saint. Secondly, she's like cutting Jesus's name into her chest,

2274
02:29:08.760 --> 02:29:11.159
<v Speaker 8>I mean like self harm, like literally like what the

2275
02:29:11.200 --> 02:29:15.000
<v Speaker 8>prophets of a bail are doing that Elijah's like rebuking,

2276
02:29:15.479 --> 02:29:18.600
<v Speaker 8>So how is this like saintly when she's doing it

2277
02:29:19.280 --> 02:29:21.879
<v Speaker 8>and she says, oh, well, but Jesus says that, you know,

2278
02:29:21.959 --> 02:29:25.760
<v Speaker 8>he's my boyfriend, just like Felsina Kowalska does. So I

2279
02:29:25.799 --> 02:29:28.639
<v Speaker 8>actually think these are some of the strongest overlooked arguments

2280
02:29:28.639 --> 02:29:32.120
<v Speaker 8>against Rome because clearly this woman is disturbed and she

2281
02:29:32.159 --> 02:29:36.959
<v Speaker 8>has problems, and it's there's at least two papal encyclicals

2282
02:29:36.959 --> 02:29:39.559
<v Speaker 8>that confirm her saint hoods, so you can't reject it.

2283
02:29:42.479 --> 02:29:44.959
<v Speaker 18>Okay, I'll have to look more into that. One last

2284
02:29:45.000 --> 02:29:46.159
<v Speaker 18>question if I can ask you.

2285
02:29:48.000 --> 02:29:50.280
<v Speaker 15>Okay, and don't again, I'm not trying to be too

2286
02:29:50.319 --> 02:29:50.600
<v Speaker 15>I just.

2287
02:29:50.520 --> 02:29:51.559
<v Speaker 18>Want the real answer here.

2288
02:29:51.799 --> 02:29:54.920
<v Speaker 24>So I'm just like back in the day the undivided Church, right,

2289
02:29:56.600 --> 02:30:00.200
<v Speaker 24>would we consider like because nowadays, if Orthodox is the

2290
02:30:00.239 --> 02:30:03.200
<v Speaker 24>only true church and there's about I think last time

2291
02:30:03.239 --> 02:30:06.280
<v Speaker 24>I looked, take three hundred and fifty million members or something,

2292
02:30:07.319 --> 02:30:11.120
<v Speaker 24>and then the rest majority of Christians in the world

2293
02:30:11.159 --> 02:30:16.000
<v Speaker 24>are heretics. Does this mean the original church failed or

2294
02:30:16.000 --> 02:30:17.159
<v Speaker 24>how do you look at it?

2295
02:30:17.200 --> 02:30:17.280
<v Speaker 23>Like?

2296
02:30:18.479 --> 02:30:22.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, I would just reply that nobody, whether you or

2297
02:30:22.079 --> 02:30:25.799
<v Speaker 8>me or any of us, actually believes that the true

2298
02:30:25.879 --> 02:30:28.440
<v Speaker 8>Church is proven on the basis of the numbers. So,

2299
02:30:30.120 --> 02:30:32.760
<v Speaker 8>for example, in the fourth century the Aryan Crisis, even

2300
02:30:32.879 --> 02:30:37.319
<v Speaker 8>Roman Catholics believe that most of the Church had fallen

2301
02:30:37.360 --> 02:30:40.600
<v Speaker 8>into the semi arian position and only at one point

2302
02:30:40.639 --> 02:30:42.760
<v Speaker 8>it was Athanacious and like a handful of bishops were

2303
02:30:42.760 --> 02:30:45.959
<v Speaker 8>the only ones left. So even you guys, you and

2304
02:30:46.040 --> 02:30:49.360
<v Speaker 8>Roman Catholics have to admit that you can't make it

2305
02:30:49.440 --> 02:30:54.920
<v Speaker 8>dependent on numbers. So say Maximus, for example, when he

2306
02:30:55.000 --> 02:30:57.760
<v Speaker 8>was going through his travails with the Monothelites and the

2307
02:30:57.799 --> 02:31:00.959
<v Speaker 8>mone Energists, he at one point said, as if the

2308
02:31:01.000 --> 02:31:04.040
<v Speaker 8>true number of Catholics was reduced to a small band,

2309
02:31:04.120 --> 02:31:07.719
<v Speaker 8>I would be amongst them, right, So that shows us

2310
02:31:07.760 --> 02:31:12.079
<v Speaker 8>that whatever century, especially in centuries of a lot of

2311
02:31:12.159 --> 02:31:15.680
<v Speaker 8>persecution or heresy, that that creeps in and destroys the

2312
02:31:15.760 --> 02:31:18.479
<v Speaker 8>church in areas can't destroy the whole church, but it

2313
02:31:18.479 --> 02:31:22.239
<v Speaker 8>can destroy nations. You know, Jesus says to the Seven Churches,

2314
02:31:23.239 --> 02:31:26.520
<v Speaker 8>entire churches can have their lampstand ripped away. So you

2315
02:31:26.559 --> 02:31:30.239
<v Speaker 8>can have entire nations even that lose the faith. Apostolizing

2316
02:31:30.239 --> 02:31:32.760
<v Speaker 8>the fact I was just reading about. I didn't know this.

2317
02:31:32.840 --> 02:31:38.559
<v Speaker 8>There were Byzantine cathedrals in Jordan, well what's now called Jordan,

2318
02:31:39.319 --> 02:31:47.440
<v Speaker 8>that the Hashami king had demolished, and this actually pissed

2319
02:31:47.479 --> 02:31:51.200
<v Speaker 8>off some of the British imperial spies, who you know,

2320
02:31:51.360 --> 02:31:54.319
<v Speaker 8>were not they weren't Orthodox, but they weren't they weren't

2321
02:31:54.319 --> 02:31:57.000
<v Speaker 8>anti Christian at least, so they actually got mad when

2322
02:31:57.000 --> 02:32:00.559
<v Speaker 8>the king of Jordan demolished some of the business cathedrals.

2323
02:32:00.559 --> 02:32:03.280
<v Speaker 8>So there was there was like Orthodox cathedrals and business

2324
02:32:03.280 --> 02:32:06.479
<v Speaker 8>to cathedrals even in Jordan in places like you know,

2325
02:32:07.120 --> 02:32:10.760
<v Speaker 8>like close to Saudi areas, that Christianity had gotten that far.

2326
02:32:11.200 --> 02:32:13.879
<v Speaker 8>But there's no Christians in those regions now. So you

2327
02:32:13.879 --> 02:32:18.200
<v Speaker 8>can have entire countries, nations, regions lose the faith, and

2328
02:32:18.239 --> 02:32:21.159
<v Speaker 8>that's why again I would say, you know, Paul warns

2329
02:32:21.200 --> 02:32:25.040
<v Speaker 8>the church at Rome that they can they can be

2330
02:32:25.079 --> 02:32:25.719
<v Speaker 8>grafted out.

2331
02:32:28.600 --> 02:32:31.719
<v Speaker 24>Okay, yeah, I guess I kind of understand that. Just

2332
02:32:32.200 --> 02:32:35.399
<v Speaker 24>to me, I don't know, that seems a little wild

2333
02:32:35.479 --> 02:32:38.799
<v Speaker 24>that we like, I feel like it kind of in

2334
02:32:38.840 --> 02:32:41.120
<v Speaker 24>a way, I know what you're saying, like the numbers

2335
02:32:41.120 --> 02:32:44.399
<v Speaker 24>don't matter, but in a way it did, like kind

2336
02:32:44.399 --> 02:32:44.799
<v Speaker 24>of fail.

2337
02:32:44.879 --> 02:32:46.719
<v Speaker 18>It made more heretics than true.

2338
02:32:46.799 --> 02:32:50.920
<v Speaker 8>Now, well, it's not the church making heretics. Heretics are

2339
02:32:52.040 --> 02:32:54.479
<v Speaker 8>people who choose, by their own will and decision to

2340
02:32:54.520 --> 02:32:58.479
<v Speaker 8>become heretics. So the Church isn't making heretics.

2341
02:33:00.079 --> 02:33:01.760
<v Speaker 18>Okay, I guess I see that.

2342
02:33:02.040 --> 02:33:05.000
<v Speaker 8>But I mean, it's never been a numbers game. I mean,

2343
02:33:05.319 --> 02:33:07.559
<v Speaker 8>in the Old Testament, it was not a numbers game.

2344
02:33:07.600 --> 02:33:10.239
<v Speaker 8>You know, even if it's reduced to a remnant, it's

2345
02:33:10.280 --> 02:33:12.879
<v Speaker 8>not a numbers game. I mean again, you guys, as

2346
02:33:12.879 --> 02:33:14.840
<v Speaker 8>a Roman Catholic, you don't believe it was a numbers

2347
02:33:14.879 --> 02:33:20.159
<v Speaker 8>game in the fourth century.

2348
02:33:20.319 --> 02:33:21.959
<v Speaker 18>Okay, yeah, that makes sense.

2349
02:33:22.760 --> 02:33:25.719
<v Speaker 24>All right, Give me something to look into on the

2350
02:33:25.760 --> 02:33:27.440
<v Speaker 24>spirit proceeding.

2351
02:33:26.920 --> 02:33:27.600
<v Speaker 18>Not from the sun.

2352
02:33:27.680 --> 02:33:29.760
<v Speaker 24>What would you recommend I look into if I want

2353
02:33:29.760 --> 02:33:31.360
<v Speaker 24>to be honest with myself.

2354
02:33:32.280 --> 02:33:36.120
<v Speaker 8>You could read the Edward Skshensky book The History of

2355
02:33:36.120 --> 02:33:39.920
<v Speaker 8>the Philly Oaquay. Book is a good introduction to that topic.

2356
02:33:41.120 --> 02:33:43.120
<v Speaker 8>If you want to get deeper into the specific so

2357
02:33:43.239 --> 02:33:45.680
<v Speaker 8>that theology, I would say from the Orthodoxy, I would

2358
02:33:45.680 --> 02:33:50.239
<v Speaker 8>say you got to read Mistagogy by Saint Photius or

2359
02:33:50.840 --> 02:33:51.799
<v Speaker 8>Apidictic Treatise
