WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to my podcast. This is an audio

2
00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:06.719
<v Speaker 1>version of my videos available to make listening to my

3
00:00:06.759 --> 00:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the background easier than YouTube makes it. But

4
00:00:10.160 --> 00:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>since my videos are primarily made for YouTube, there may

5
00:00:13.679 --> 00:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>be occasional references to visual materials. If you'd like this

6
00:00:16.960 --> 00:00:19.519
<v Speaker 1>podcast ad free, you can join us on Patreon app,

7
00:00:19.559 --> 00:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Patreon dot com slash Vice Rhino. Please enjoy.

8
00:00:23.800 --> 00:00:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Today's video is brought to you by surf Shark. Hello

9
00:00:26.800 --> 00:00:30.719
<v Speaker 2>and welcome to my channel Vice Rhino. Here today, I'm

10
00:00:30.760 --> 00:00:33.399
<v Speaker 2>looking at a video on Dan Patterson's channel formerly called

11
00:00:33.479 --> 00:00:36.759
<v Speaker 2>Questioning Christianity. The presenter is not Dan Patterson. I forget

12
00:00:36.759 --> 00:00:38.920
<v Speaker 2>his name and didn't write it down. This video seeks

13
00:00:38.960 --> 00:00:40.880
<v Speaker 2>to answer the question of whether or not Jesus really

14
00:00:40.960 --> 00:00:43.520
<v Speaker 2>rose from the dead. Of course, we know their answer

15
00:00:43.560 --> 00:00:45.359
<v Speaker 2>is going to be yes, but it's always fun to

16
00:00:45.359 --> 00:00:47.520
<v Speaker 2>see how they get there. So let's take a look.

17
00:00:47.679 --> 00:00:51.039
<v Speaker 2>But first, a word from our sponsor, surf Shark. I

18
00:00:51.079 --> 00:00:53.439
<v Speaker 2>have five children. Do you know what that means? I

19
00:00:53.479 --> 00:00:57.640
<v Speaker 2>don't have privacy, but at least thanks to surf SHARKVPN,

20
00:00:57.759 --> 00:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I have some online privacy, especially while on public Wi Fi.

21
00:01:01.399 --> 00:01:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Serf Shark is a virtual private network. They provide you

22
00:01:03.920 --> 00:01:05.959
<v Speaker 2>with an extra layer of encryption when connected, so not

23
00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>even your ISP can see what you're up to. But

24
00:01:08.400 --> 00:01:10.879
<v Speaker 2>it also lets you change your virtual location. If you

25
00:01:10.920 --> 00:01:13.480
<v Speaker 2>open up a streaming service and get this content isn't

26
00:01:13.480 --> 00:01:16.519
<v Speaker 2>available in your region message, serf Shark lets you respond

27
00:01:16.599 --> 00:01:19.680
<v Speaker 2>with that sounds like a you problem. And with their

28
00:01:19.719 --> 00:01:21.439
<v Speaker 2>clean Web two point oh features, you can browse the

29
00:01:21.439 --> 00:01:24.519
<v Speaker 2>web without seeing ads, automatically reject the unwanted cookies, be

30
00:01:24.599 --> 00:01:26.560
<v Speaker 2>alerted when a site was the target of a data breach,

31
00:01:26.640 --> 00:01:29.400
<v Speaker 2>and block malware. All you need is one account for

32
00:01:29.439 --> 00:01:33.040
<v Speaker 2>all of your devices, phone, laptop, tablet, whatever, no extra

33
00:01:33.120 --> 00:01:35.719
<v Speaker 2>per device fees. It is easy to use and simple

34
00:01:35.719 --> 00:01:37.680
<v Speaker 2>to install, and they offer a thirty day money back

35
00:01:37.680 --> 00:01:40.439
<v Speaker 2>guarantee so you can try it out completely risk free.

36
00:01:40.560 --> 00:01:42.239
<v Speaker 2>My viewers get a special promo where you can get

37
00:01:42.239 --> 00:01:44.359
<v Speaker 2>an extra four months out of your subscription for free.

38
00:01:44.519 --> 00:01:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Go to surf shark dot com slash rhino or use

39
00:01:46.719 --> 00:01:48.680
<v Speaker 2>cod rhino at checkout and get four extra months of

40
00:01:48.719 --> 00:01:51.959
<v Speaker 2>search SHARKVPN. Again, that's surf shark dot com, slash Rihi

41
00:01:52.000 --> 00:01:54.159
<v Speaker 2>and O for an extra four months for free. This

42
00:01:54.239 --> 00:01:56.879
<v Speaker 2>is a limited time offer, so sign up today, and

43
00:01:56.959 --> 00:01:59.560
<v Speaker 2>remember by signing up for surf SHARKVPN, you are helping

44
00:01:59.560 --> 00:02:03.840
<v Speaker 2>to support channel, So thank you.

45
00:02:07.319 --> 00:02:10.919
<v Speaker 3>The resurrection of Jesus Christ is not just another religious claim.

46
00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:15.000
<v Speaker 3>It is the claim of the world's largest religion, Christianity.

47
00:02:15.439 --> 00:02:18.599
<v Speaker 2>So it's just another religious claim. I know that as

48
00:02:18.639 --> 00:02:21.159
<v Speaker 2>a Christian it seems like the central claim of your

49
00:02:21.199 --> 00:02:24.319
<v Speaker 2>religion deserves extra consideration over the claims of other religions.

50
00:02:24.560 --> 00:02:28.240
<v Speaker 2>But something being important to you does not automatically make

51
00:02:28.280 --> 00:02:30.199
<v Speaker 2>that thing important to everyone else.

52
00:02:30.960 --> 00:02:34.319
<v Speaker 3>Christianity rises and falls with this, As the Apostle Paul says,

53
00:02:34.560 --> 00:02:37.479
<v Speaker 3>if Jesus was not raised, your faith is futile. You

54
00:02:37.520 --> 00:02:41.680
<v Speaker 3>are still in your sins. Everything hangs on this. Did

55
00:02:42.039 --> 00:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Jesus really rise from the dead.

56
00:02:45.240 --> 00:02:48.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's nothing really special about any of that. If

57
00:02:48.199 --> 00:02:50.719
<v Speaker 2>the core claim of a religion fails, then that religion

58
00:02:50.759 --> 00:02:53.599
<v Speaker 2>isn't true. This is true of any religion.

59
00:02:54.120 --> 00:02:56.280
<v Speaker 3>But how do we even go about answering a question

60
00:02:56.639 --> 00:02:57.039
<v Speaker 3>like that?

61
00:02:57.319 --> 00:02:59.520
<v Speaker 2>The way I see it, you shouldn't have to. If

62
00:02:59.560 --> 00:03:02.199
<v Speaker 2>God really is all powerful and really does want a

63
00:03:02.240 --> 00:03:05.879
<v Speaker 2>personal relationship with everyone, then it's on him to answer

64
00:03:05.919 --> 00:03:07.120
<v Speaker 2>that question, not you.

65
00:03:07.960 --> 00:03:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, first, let's take a breath and ask, how do

66
00:03:10.439 --> 00:03:13.240
<v Speaker 3>we answer any question about a past event When it

67
00:03:13.280 --> 00:03:16.879
<v Speaker 3>comes to eyewitnesses to those events, we generally have three

68
00:03:17.000 --> 00:03:19.680
<v Speaker 3>different options on the table for WIGNE testimony.

69
00:03:20.039 --> 00:03:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, before you get into it, let me guess the

70
00:03:22.000 --> 00:03:24.919
<v Speaker 2>reliability of the witnesses, any potential biases they might have,

71
00:03:25.159 --> 00:03:27.599
<v Speaker 2>and their proximity to the events that they are reporting.

72
00:03:27.960 --> 00:03:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Am I close.

73
00:03:29.280 --> 00:03:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Number one is deception the eyewitnesses were intentionally lying, fabricating

74
00:03:33.560 --> 00:03:36.120
<v Speaker 3>the story, making it all up. Number two is delusion,

75
00:03:36.400 --> 00:03:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the witnesses were confused, as in they were just misinformed

76
00:03:39.719 --> 00:03:42.680
<v Speaker 3>or mistaken somehow. And the third option is devotion. The

77
00:03:42.680 --> 00:03:46.039
<v Speaker 3>witnesses weren't deceiving or deluded. They were simply devoted to

78
00:03:46.120 --> 00:03:48.319
<v Speaker 3>the truth of what really happened. And it's up to

79
00:03:48.439 --> 00:03:50.759
<v Speaker 3>us now to try and piece together all of the

80
00:03:50.800 --> 00:03:52.719
<v Speaker 3>information into a coherent whole.

81
00:03:53.159 --> 00:03:55.599
<v Speaker 2>Huh. I see, you're just going for your own version

82
00:03:55.599 --> 00:03:58.800
<v Speaker 2>of the cs lewis liar, lunatic lord trilemma. And as

83
00:03:58.879 --> 00:04:01.400
<v Speaker 2>much as I love a good alliteration, I don't think

84
00:04:01.439 --> 00:04:04.159
<v Speaker 2>it really works here. The way I see these categories

85
00:04:04.199 --> 00:04:06.840
<v Speaker 2>is that either the witness is lying, they are correct,

86
00:04:07.000 --> 00:04:09.120
<v Speaker 2>or they are mistaken. If you ask me the color

87
00:04:09.159 --> 00:04:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of the car that just drove by, and I responded

88
00:04:10.960 --> 00:04:13.639
<v Speaker 2>by saying that it's red. Then either I am lying.

89
00:04:13.800 --> 00:04:15.319
<v Speaker 2>I know it's really blue, but I told you it

90
00:04:15.360 --> 00:04:18.079
<v Speaker 2>was red. I'm correct, it really was red, or I

91
00:04:18.199 --> 00:04:20.240
<v Speaker 2>was mistaken. I thought it was red, but it was

92
00:04:20.279 --> 00:04:23.319
<v Speaker 2>really blue or something. And as fun as your alliteration is,

93
00:04:23.720 --> 00:04:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I do not have to be devoted to the idea

94
00:04:26.040 --> 00:04:27.959
<v Speaker 2>of the car being read for my telling you that

95
00:04:28.040 --> 00:04:30.319
<v Speaker 2>it is read to be a true statement. Nor do

96
00:04:30.399 --> 00:04:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I have to be delusional or deceptive to have done

97
00:04:32.600 --> 00:04:34.319
<v Speaker 2>something like misremember a detail.

98
00:04:34.800 --> 00:04:37.279
<v Speaker 3>That's more or less the trilemma we're left with when

99
00:04:37.279 --> 00:04:40.000
<v Speaker 3>we consider the resurrection account of Jesus in the New

100
00:04:40.040 --> 00:04:43.199
<v Speaker 3>Testament Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. The claim

101
00:04:43.240 --> 00:04:46.399
<v Speaker 3>is that Jesus lived, that he died, that his tomb

102
00:04:46.480 --> 00:04:48.839
<v Speaker 3>was found empty on the third day after his death,

103
00:04:49.120 --> 00:04:50.879
<v Speaker 3>and his followers saw him alive.

104
00:04:51.399 --> 00:04:54.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's actually several claims that can be examined relatively independently.

105
00:04:55.040 --> 00:04:58.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm okay granting thee he lived and died, ones specific

106
00:04:58.040 --> 00:05:00.160
<v Speaker 2>evidence for them can be rather scant, But at the

107
00:05:00.199 --> 00:05:02.040
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, a guy with a common name

108
00:05:02.120 --> 00:05:03.879
<v Speaker 2>was preaching a message that was fairly common in that

109
00:05:03.920 --> 00:05:06.720
<v Speaker 2>time and location, and was executed by a fairly common

110
00:05:06.720 --> 00:05:09.680
<v Speaker 2>method of execution. Is such a mundane claim that I

111
00:05:09.720 --> 00:05:12.360
<v Speaker 2>don't really see the need to argue against it. The tomb, though,

112
00:05:12.519 --> 00:05:14.680
<v Speaker 2>that is where we start to have issues. There is

113
00:05:14.800 --> 00:05:17.160
<v Speaker 2>no evidence that Jesus was buried in a tomb that

114
00:05:17.240 --> 00:05:20.199
<v Speaker 2>comes from earlier than seventy CE, and the evidence we

115
00:05:20.319 --> 00:05:22.879
<v Speaker 2>do have, inasmuch as you can call it, that, is

116
00:05:22.920 --> 00:05:26.079
<v Speaker 2>not from eyewitness accounts. It's the written accounts of stories

117
00:05:26.079 --> 00:05:28.319
<v Speaker 2>that have been passed around for decades. By that point.

118
00:05:28.480 --> 00:05:31.680
<v Speaker 2>The evidence for the resurrection is somewhat amusingly a bit

119
00:05:31.720 --> 00:05:34.040
<v Speaker 2>stronger than the evidence for the tomb, though that's still

120
00:05:34.040 --> 00:05:36.040
<v Speaker 2>not saying much. But at least we do have the

121
00:05:36.079 --> 00:05:38.319
<v Speaker 2>writings of a guy who actually was witnessed to a

122
00:05:38.319 --> 00:05:41.560
<v Speaker 2>post resurrection appearance. I mean, the actual description of his

123
00:05:41.639 --> 00:05:44.639
<v Speaker 2>experience wasn't written down for at least twenty years, and

124
00:05:44.680 --> 00:05:46.639
<v Speaker 2>then by the author of Luken Acts, rather than by

125
00:05:46.680 --> 00:05:48.759
<v Speaker 2>Paul himself, who had been dead for quite a while

126
00:05:48.800 --> 00:05:50.800
<v Speaker 2>by the time those books were written. What little there

127
00:05:50.879 --> 00:05:53.040
<v Speaker 2>is of Paul's first hand writing of his own conversion

128
00:05:53.279 --> 00:05:55.720
<v Speaker 2>makes it seem like a vision rather than a bodily apparition,

129
00:05:55.920 --> 00:05:57.879
<v Speaker 2>going so far as to tell Usingalatians one that he

130
00:05:57.959 --> 00:06:00.360
<v Speaker 2>did not receive his gospel message from any man, but

131
00:06:00.399 --> 00:06:03.480
<v Speaker 2>through a revelation from Christ. Quote for I would have

132
00:06:03.519 --> 00:06:05.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, brothers, that the gospel that was preached by

133
00:06:05.560 --> 00:06:08.120
<v Speaker 2>me is not man's gospel. For I did not receive

134
00:06:08.160 --> 00:06:10.199
<v Speaker 2>it from any man, nor was I taught it, but

135
00:06:10.240 --> 00:06:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ. So

136
00:06:13.560 --> 00:06:16.199
<v Speaker 2>there's no reliable evidence for a tomb burial, and the

137
00:06:16.240 --> 00:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>best evidence for a resurrection is one guy who gave

138
00:06:19.160 --> 00:06:22.439
<v Speaker 2>us a rather vague he was revealed to me statement. Yeah.

139
00:06:22.480 --> 00:06:24.040
<v Speaker 2>He also added his name to the list of people

140
00:06:24.040 --> 00:06:27.160
<v Speaker 2>who had seen arisen Jesus in First Corinthians fifteen. But again,

141
00:06:27.439 --> 00:06:29.480
<v Speaker 2>that is worded in a way that makes it unclear

142
00:06:29.519 --> 00:06:32.600
<v Speaker 2>whether this was a bodily resurrection or just an appearance,

143
00:06:32.759 --> 00:06:35.199
<v Speaker 2>which might seem like splitting hairs. But I feel like

144
00:06:35.240 --> 00:06:37.319
<v Speaker 2>it's a lot easier to wind up with mistaken witnesses

145
00:06:37.319 --> 00:06:39.959
<v Speaker 2>if the event they supposedly witnessed was inside their head

146
00:06:39.959 --> 00:06:40.560
<v Speaker 2>to begin with.

147
00:06:41.120 --> 00:06:45.079
<v Speaker 3>First deception, this idea that Jesus' disciples concocted the whole

148
00:06:45.120 --> 00:06:47.839
<v Speaker 3>resurrection story. There are number of different ways that people

149
00:06:47.920 --> 00:06:48.720
<v Speaker 3>make this case.

150
00:06:49.279 --> 00:06:51.560
<v Speaker 2>There are, indeed, and well, it is not the option

151
00:06:51.639 --> 00:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>that I personally hold to. It is entirely reasonable to

152
00:06:54.600 --> 00:06:56.879
<v Speaker 2>think that a handful of people made up a religion

153
00:06:56.959 --> 00:07:00.079
<v Speaker 2>for power and profit. A common response to this is

154
00:07:00.079 --> 00:07:02.079
<v Speaker 2>to point out how humble the early church leaders like

155
00:07:02.079 --> 00:07:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Paul were. And yeah, in the letters that Paul wrote

156
00:07:05.160 --> 00:07:07.079
<v Speaker 2>to convince his followers that he was but a humble

157
00:07:07.120 --> 00:07:09.959
<v Speaker 2>servant of God, he definitely came across as a humble

158
00:07:10.000 --> 00:07:12.680
<v Speaker 2>servant of God. But if we put our skeptical hats

159
00:07:12.680 --> 00:07:15.399
<v Speaker 2>on for a moment, let's hypothetically start with the assumption

160
00:07:15.439 --> 00:07:17.720
<v Speaker 2>that Paul was making it up for power and profit.

161
00:07:18.120 --> 00:07:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Would we expect him to just come out and say

162
00:07:20.399 --> 00:07:22.839
<v Speaker 2>that in his letters or would we expect him to

163
00:07:22.879 --> 00:07:25.240
<v Speaker 2>pump up his image as a humble servant of God?

164
00:07:25.600 --> 00:07:28.759
<v Speaker 2>And humans kind of suck. There are plenty of people

165
00:07:28.800 --> 00:07:31.439
<v Speaker 2>who go on power trips over tiny things that don't

166
00:07:31.480 --> 00:07:34.040
<v Speaker 2>matter in the slightest. My partner is on the PTA,

167
00:07:34.399 --> 00:07:36.439
<v Speaker 2>and the treasurer of the PTA is a person who

168
00:07:36.600 --> 00:07:39.839
<v Speaker 2>uses her position as treasurer to exert her authority over

169
00:07:39.879 --> 00:07:42.759
<v Speaker 2>everyone else. She has had to be reminded several times

170
00:07:42.800 --> 00:07:45.680
<v Speaker 2>that once the PTA has voted on something, her sole

171
00:07:45.839 --> 00:07:48.839
<v Speaker 2>job is to sign the check. She doesn't have veto power,

172
00:07:48.920 --> 00:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>even though she seems to think that she does, and

173
00:07:51.279 --> 00:07:54.360
<v Speaker 2>we're not talking about massive expenditures here. She's caused problems

174
00:07:54.360 --> 00:07:57.000
<v Speaker 2>over things like buying a caraft to put hot chocolate

175
00:07:57.000 --> 00:08:00.240
<v Speaker 2>in during certain school events. Point is, some people go

176
00:08:00.279 --> 00:08:03.519
<v Speaker 2>to weird lengths to assert even the smallest bit of authority.

177
00:08:03.680 --> 00:08:06.560
<v Speaker 2>So even though I don't personally think this is what happened,

178
00:08:06.720 --> 00:08:09.120
<v Speaker 2>it's not implausible to suggest that this is what Paul

179
00:08:09.279 --> 00:08:11.480
<v Speaker 2>was doing when he decided to join the newly formed

180
00:08:11.560 --> 00:08:12.319
<v Speaker 2>Christian community.

181
00:08:13.040 --> 00:08:16.199
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps the oldest one is to stolen body theory, mentioned

182
00:08:16.240 --> 00:08:19.120
<v Speaker 3>in the Bible itself Matthew twenty eight eleven through fifteen.

183
00:08:19.720 --> 00:08:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Here the claim is that the Jewish leaders started the

184
00:08:22.279 --> 00:08:25.079
<v Speaker 3>rumor that Jesus' friends snuck into the tomb when the

185
00:08:25.120 --> 00:08:28.040
<v Speaker 3>gods were asleep or something like that, stole his corpse,

186
00:08:28.079 --> 00:08:31.199
<v Speaker 3>and fabricated the whole resurrection story for some sort of

187
00:08:31.240 --> 00:08:33.320
<v Speaker 3>social or political gain or influence.

188
00:08:33.600 --> 00:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Ah. So for this one, I don't think we even

189
00:08:35.879 --> 00:08:38.080
<v Speaker 2>have to go as far as suggesting that anyone was lying,

190
00:08:38.240 --> 00:08:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Given that the most likely scenario for what happened to

191
00:08:40.240 --> 00:08:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Jesus' body is that it was left on the cross

192
00:08:42.000 --> 00:08:44.720
<v Speaker 2>for several days before being thrown into an unmarked mass grave.

193
00:08:45.080 --> 00:08:47.919
<v Speaker 2>The story of the disciples stealing the body probably developed

194
00:08:47.960 --> 00:08:50.159
<v Speaker 2>in tandem with the story of the empty tomb. To

195
00:08:50.200 --> 00:08:52.720
<v Speaker 2>be clear, this is just a hypothetical here, but it

196
00:08:52.759 --> 00:08:55.639
<v Speaker 2>seems entirely plausible to me that at first nobody knew

197
00:08:55.639 --> 00:08:58.279
<v Speaker 2>where Jesus' body was, and all of his appearances were

198
00:08:58.320 --> 00:09:00.919
<v Speaker 2>spiritual anyway, so what is it even matter. But as

199
00:09:00.919 --> 00:09:03.399
<v Speaker 2>the story was told and retold, eventually someone thought to

200
00:09:03.440 --> 00:09:05.960
<v Speaker 2>ask where his body was, because it seems weird that

201
00:09:06.000 --> 00:09:08.519
<v Speaker 2>such an important person wouldn't have a proper burial. So

202
00:09:08.639 --> 00:09:11.440
<v Speaker 2>the tomb story began. But the resurrection was still spiritual,

203
00:09:11.519 --> 00:09:13.240
<v Speaker 2>so it's weird that you can't tell me where the

204
00:09:13.240 --> 00:09:15.879
<v Speaker 2>tomb is, and so on and so on. At no

205
00:09:16.039 --> 00:09:18.320
<v Speaker 2>point in the development of the story did anyone have

206
00:09:18.440 --> 00:09:20.559
<v Speaker 2>to be lying. It could easily have grown in this

207
00:09:20.600 --> 00:09:22.840
<v Speaker 2>manner through the same kind of apologetic reasoning that we

208
00:09:22.879 --> 00:09:25.480
<v Speaker 2>see happening today with stories like the death of Judas

209
00:09:25.559 --> 00:09:28.519
<v Speaker 2>the Bible covers three aspects of judas death. First, what

210
00:09:28.600 --> 00:09:31.240
<v Speaker 2>happened to the thirty pieces of silver? Second the manner

211
00:09:31.279 --> 00:09:33.679
<v Speaker 2>of judas death, and third why the field is called

212
00:09:33.720 --> 00:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>the field of blood. In Matthew, Judas throws the silver

213
00:09:36.399 --> 00:09:38.639
<v Speaker 2>into the temple, which the chief priests collect and then

214
00:09:38.720 --> 00:09:41.000
<v Speaker 2>used to buy the potter's field. Judas then dies by

215
00:09:41.000 --> 00:09:43.840
<v Speaker 2>hanging himself in an unspecified location. And the reason the

216
00:09:43.840 --> 00:09:45.799
<v Speaker 2>potter's field is called the field of blood is because

217
00:09:45.840 --> 00:09:48.639
<v Speaker 2>the chief priest used blood money to buy it. In Acts,

218
00:09:48.720 --> 00:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Judas himself uses the thirty pieces of silver to buy

219
00:09:51.120 --> 00:09:53.600
<v Speaker 2>a field. He dies by falling headlong and bursting open

220
00:09:53.639 --> 00:09:55.440
<v Speaker 2>in the middle, and it is the field of blood

221
00:09:55.480 --> 00:09:58.360
<v Speaker 2>because of the gruesome death that he experienced there. These

222
00:09:58.519 --> 00:10:01.879
<v Speaker 2>are too fairly simple and obvious contradictory accounts, But when

223
00:10:01.919 --> 00:10:03.879
<v Speaker 2>you look up what happened to Judas, you'll find a

224
00:10:03.879 --> 00:10:07.039
<v Speaker 2>fairly common story on pretty much all of the apologetics websites.

225
00:10:07.440 --> 00:10:10.120
<v Speaker 2>In most cases, it goes something like this. Judas threw

226
00:10:10.159 --> 00:10:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the money into the temple, then he went and hanged himself.

227
00:10:12.440 --> 00:10:14.919
<v Speaker 2>His body went undiscovered for long enough that it became bloated,

228
00:10:15.080 --> 00:10:17.559
<v Speaker 2>and eventually either the tree branch or the rope snapped,

229
00:10:17.639 --> 00:10:20.279
<v Speaker 2>dropping his body, which, because of the bloating, burst open

230
00:10:20.320 --> 00:10:22.399
<v Speaker 2>on impact. The chief priest then used the money to

231
00:10:22.399 --> 00:10:24.399
<v Speaker 2>buy the field that Judas died in and named it

232
00:10:24.399 --> 00:10:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the field of Blood. Also, the priest buying the field

233
00:10:26.840 --> 00:10:29.639
<v Speaker 2>with Judas money counted as Judas buying the field, because

234
00:10:29.759 --> 00:10:31.480
<v Speaker 2>how else are you supposed to make that one makes sense?

235
00:10:31.639 --> 00:10:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Setting aside that this isn't really a satisfying harmonization, you'll

236
00:10:35.000 --> 00:10:37.480
<v Speaker 2>notice that the Bible makes no mention of his body

237
00:10:37.519 --> 00:10:39.759
<v Speaker 2>being undiscovered for any amount of time, the bloating of

238
00:10:39.759 --> 00:10:42.120
<v Speaker 2>his body, the rope or branch snapping, or his fall

239
00:10:42.159 --> 00:10:45.200
<v Speaker 2>being a post mortem event. But these details being absent

240
00:10:45.240 --> 00:10:48.279
<v Speaker 2>from the Bible do nothing to dissuade the Christian organizations

241
00:10:48.279 --> 00:10:51.519
<v Speaker 2>from treating them as almost canonical facts. So with the

242
00:10:51.559 --> 00:10:53.840
<v Speaker 2>example of the Judas story in hand, we can see

243
00:10:53.840 --> 00:10:56.759
<v Speaker 2>how people who sincerely believe positing what they think are

244
00:10:56.799 --> 00:11:00.080
<v Speaker 2>plausible responses to criticism can result in the story growing

245
00:11:00.120 --> 00:11:02.480
<v Speaker 2>over time, with more and more details being added to

246
00:11:02.480 --> 00:11:05.840
<v Speaker 2>fill in skeptical questions later, and as a bonus, this

247
00:11:05.879 --> 00:11:08.240
<v Speaker 2>explains a lot of the contradictions in the Gospels. They

248
00:11:08.240 --> 00:11:10.519
<v Speaker 2>didn't have the Internet, so apologist couldn't just reference each

249
00:11:10.559 --> 00:11:12.519
<v Speaker 2>other and come to a singular conclusion like they seem

250
00:11:12.559 --> 00:11:14.960
<v Speaker 2>to have with the Judah story. So each community's version

251
00:11:15.000 --> 00:11:16.960
<v Speaker 2>of the story developed in slightly different ways.

252
00:11:17.399 --> 00:11:20.720
<v Speaker 3>But the problems here abound. But one, Roman guards don't

253
00:11:20.759 --> 00:11:24.679
<v Speaker 3>just sleep through a grave robbery, and Jesus followers, frightened,

254
00:11:24.840 --> 00:11:28.480
<v Speaker 3>scattered teenage women amongst them weren't exactly a covid ops

255
00:11:28.519 --> 00:11:30.240
<v Speaker 3>team capable for the task.

256
00:11:30.519 --> 00:11:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, so you're going with the apologetic tactic of assuming

257
00:11:33.120 --> 00:11:35.679
<v Speaker 2>that the Bible is accurately recording events and then using

258
00:11:35.679 --> 00:11:38.840
<v Speaker 2>that assumption to conclude that the Bible accurately recorded events.

259
00:11:39.200 --> 00:11:41.600
<v Speaker 2>If I doubt the resurrection as recorded by the Bible,

260
00:11:41.759 --> 00:11:44.080
<v Speaker 2>why would I accept the guard at the tomb, especially

261
00:11:44.080 --> 00:11:46.279
<v Speaker 2>given that it only appears in one gospel, and in

262
00:11:46.320 --> 00:11:48.480
<v Speaker 2>that gospel it is specifically there to set up a

263
00:11:48.519 --> 00:11:50.960
<v Speaker 2>counter to the accusation of body theft. I don't think

264
00:11:50.960 --> 00:11:53.320
<v Speaker 2>that Jesus was ever in a tomb, so why would

265
00:11:53.320 --> 00:11:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I believe that there was a Roman guard guarding the

266
00:11:55.639 --> 00:11:57.159
<v Speaker 2>tomb that I don't think existed.

267
00:11:57.639 --> 00:12:00.080
<v Speaker 3>Also, if the body was stolen, why didn't the au

268
00:12:00.080 --> 00:12:02.919
<v Speaker 3>already simply produce it to end the momentum of this

269
00:12:03.039 --> 00:12:03.799
<v Speaker 3>movement before it.

270
00:12:03.759 --> 00:12:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Began, assuming that the authorities actually cared to stop the

271
00:12:06.600 --> 00:12:09.879
<v Speaker 2>movement before it began. If his body were unceremoniously tossed

272
00:12:09.919 --> 00:12:12.559
<v Speaker 2>into a mass grave, then it is incredibly unlikely that

273
00:12:12.559 --> 00:12:14.600
<v Speaker 2>they would be capable of identifying it, even if they

274
00:12:14.639 --> 00:12:15.120
<v Speaker 2>wanted to.

275
00:12:15.720 --> 00:12:17.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's not like Jesus' friends ran away to

276
00:12:17.759 --> 00:12:20.679
<v Speaker 3>some far off country to begin telling this tale. They

277
00:12:20.720 --> 00:12:24.480
<v Speaker 3>started talking about it days after jesus public execution in

278
00:12:24.519 --> 00:12:26.360
<v Speaker 3>the very same city that it all went down.

279
00:12:26.720 --> 00:12:28.639
<v Speaker 2>If I grant that, keep in mind that this is

280
00:12:28.759 --> 00:12:31.840
<v Speaker 2>a major city. Its population during the first centuries estimated

281
00:12:31.840 --> 00:12:34.440
<v Speaker 2>to be somewhere between twenty and one hundred thousand. Not

282
00:12:34.519 --> 00:12:38.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot by today's standards, but it's not insignificant. For comparison,

283
00:12:38.440 --> 00:12:40.519
<v Speaker 2>I live in a town of about thirty thousand people.

284
00:12:40.919 --> 00:12:43.559
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty two, there was a brutal murder in

285
00:12:43.600 --> 00:12:46.200
<v Speaker 2>an apartment building that is within walking distance of where

286
00:12:46.240 --> 00:12:48.519
<v Speaker 2>I lived at the time. The victim's body was found

287
00:12:48.519 --> 00:12:50.559
<v Speaker 2>in a storage shed belonging to a church that I

288
00:12:50.559 --> 00:12:53.799
<v Speaker 2>had attended VBS at as a child. That's Vacation Bible

289
00:12:53.840 --> 00:12:56.279
<v Speaker 2>School for those of you not blessed with a Christian upbringing,

290
00:12:56.519 --> 00:12:59.159
<v Speaker 2>A shocking crime happened quite near me and what is,

291
00:12:59.200 --> 00:13:01.960
<v Speaker 2>by today's standards a fairly small town and involved a

292
00:13:02.039 --> 00:13:05.039
<v Speaker 2>church that I have relatively close ties to. Do you

293
00:13:05.080 --> 00:13:07.879
<v Speaker 2>know when I found out about this attack today? When

294
00:13:07.919 --> 00:13:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I was looking for information on a different murder that

295
00:13:10.120 --> 00:13:12.240
<v Speaker 2>happened on the street that I lived on at the time,

296
00:13:12.480 --> 00:13:14.679
<v Speaker 2>within a block of where I was living, and which

297
00:13:14.679 --> 00:13:17.519
<v Speaker 2>I didn't find out about for several years. So in

298
00:13:17.600 --> 00:13:20.279
<v Speaker 2>my lifetime in this small town, there have been two

299
00:13:20.399 --> 00:13:23.879
<v Speaker 2>murders within walking distance of my home, and even in

300
00:13:23.919 --> 00:13:26.039
<v Speaker 2>this age of the Internet, it took me years to

301
00:13:26.080 --> 00:13:28.759
<v Speaker 2>find out about them. My point is a lot can

302
00:13:28.799 --> 00:13:31.440
<v Speaker 2>happen in a town of this size without everybody knowing

303
00:13:31.519 --> 00:13:33.960
<v Speaker 2>about it. So there is no reason to think that

304
00:13:34.120 --> 00:13:36.799
<v Speaker 2>even if the Disciples began preaching about it days after

305
00:13:36.799 --> 00:13:40.360
<v Speaker 2>the crucifixion, they wouldn't have just flown completely under the radar.

306
00:13:40.759 --> 00:13:42.519
<v Speaker 2>But there's also really no reason to think that the

307
00:13:42.519 --> 00:13:45.639
<v Speaker 2>Disciples began preaching that early or in that region, or

308
00:13:45.679 --> 00:13:48.159
<v Speaker 2>that all of them even joined in. There's actually another

309
00:13:48.200 --> 00:13:51.600
<v Speaker 2>potential apologetic in Matthew that would explain the noted absence

310
00:13:51.600 --> 00:13:54.200
<v Speaker 2>of several of the disciples. Matthew twenty eight sixteen through

311
00:13:54.200 --> 00:13:57.519
<v Speaker 2>seventeen says, quote, now, the eleven disciples went to Galilee,

312
00:13:57.559 --> 00:13:59.759
<v Speaker 2>to the mountain to which Jesus had directed them, and

313
00:14:00.120 --> 00:14:03.000
<v Speaker 2>they saw him. They worshiped him, but some doubted, which

314
00:14:03.159 --> 00:14:05.799
<v Speaker 2>to a first century Christian would explain why they aren't

315
00:14:05.840 --> 00:14:07.840
<v Speaker 2>here preaching today, despite the fact that they're such a

316
00:14:07.840 --> 00:14:12.200
<v Speaker 2>prominent figure in the story. Also, notably, Galilee is not Jerusalem,

317
00:14:12.240 --> 00:14:14.720
<v Speaker 2>and this is the first appearance of Jesus to the disciples,

318
00:14:14.960 --> 00:14:17.320
<v Speaker 2>So no, at least according to the Book of Matthew,

319
00:14:17.480 --> 00:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>the disciples did not start talking about it in Jerusalem

320
00:14:20.240 --> 00:14:21.320
<v Speaker 2>days after the execution.

321
00:14:21.919 --> 00:14:24.639
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps the reason the authorities didn't produce the corpse is

322
00:14:24.679 --> 00:14:27.639
<v Speaker 3>simply because they had no corpse to produce.

323
00:14:27.679 --> 00:14:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Which would be the case if his body were thrown

324
00:14:29.840 --> 00:14:32.279
<v Speaker 2>into a mass grave. Thanks for coming to my ted talk.

325
00:14:33.200 --> 00:14:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Even more compelling, though, is why would Jesus followers willingly

326
00:14:36.279 --> 00:14:38.519
<v Speaker 3>suffer for a claim that they knew was a lie?

327
00:14:38.600 --> 00:14:40.799
<v Speaker 2>Who says they did. The sources for the martyrdom of

328
00:14:40.840 --> 00:14:44.279
<v Speaker 2>the disciples are extremely dubious, and none of them actually

329
00:14:44.320 --> 00:14:45.879
<v Speaker 2>say that they were ever given a chance to save

330
00:14:45.919 --> 00:14:48.279
<v Speaker 2>their skin if they were canted, Can we really say

331
00:14:48.279 --> 00:14:50.639
<v Speaker 2>that they died for the lie? If they were never

332
00:14:50.679 --> 00:14:52.559
<v Speaker 2>given a chance to live. If they admitted it was

333
00:14:52.600 --> 00:14:54.559
<v Speaker 2>a lie.

334
00:14:53.720 --> 00:14:56.799
<v Speaker 3>They had nothing to gain and everything to lose. It's

335
00:14:56.840 --> 00:14:59.120
<v Speaker 3>a well documented fact that for the first two to

336
00:14:59.159 --> 00:15:02.159
<v Speaker 3>three hundred years of the early Christian Church, Christians would

337
00:15:02.240 --> 00:15:05.000
<v Speaker 3>brually tortured and killed for their beliefs in the Resurrection

338
00:15:05.120 --> 00:15:05.840
<v Speaker 3>of Jesus.

339
00:15:06.279 --> 00:15:09.279
<v Speaker 2>Ooh, buddy's being really slippery here. What does this say

340
00:15:09.320 --> 00:15:11.360
<v Speaker 2>about your case if you have to be so deceptive

341
00:15:11.360 --> 00:15:14.039
<v Speaker 2>in order to make it notice? How he neatly transitioned

342
00:15:14.039 --> 00:15:16.639
<v Speaker 2>from the question of whether the disciples would be willing

343
00:15:16.679 --> 00:15:18.799
<v Speaker 2>to be tortured for a lie to it being a

344
00:15:18.840 --> 00:15:21.960
<v Speaker 2>well documented fact that Christians were persecuted for the first

345
00:15:22.000 --> 00:15:24.720
<v Speaker 2>four centuries. In the time when the original Eleven Disciples

346
00:15:24.720 --> 00:15:27.519
<v Speaker 2>would have been doing their preaching, there was zero precedent

347
00:15:27.559 --> 00:15:30.279
<v Speaker 2>for Christian persecution. Religion in the Roman Empire was a

348
00:15:30.360 --> 00:15:33.480
<v Speaker 2>largely local affair, and they were generally quite tolerant. The

349
00:15:33.519 --> 00:15:36.799
<v Speaker 2>first century Jews even had several exemptions specifically to accommodate

350
00:15:36.879 --> 00:15:39.679
<v Speaker 2>their religion, and for quite a while after Christianity's origin,

351
00:15:39.879 --> 00:15:42.639
<v Speaker 2>it was essentially a sect of Judaism, so the first

352
00:15:42.720 --> 00:15:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Christians had no reason to think that they'd be any

353
00:15:45.480 --> 00:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>more or less persecuted than the Jews. It wasn't until

354
00:15:48.559 --> 00:15:50.559
<v Speaker 2>Nero needed an escapegoat for the fire in Rome in

355
00:15:50.600 --> 00:15:54.600
<v Speaker 2>sixty four CE that persecution actually began to specifically target Christians,

356
00:15:54.919 --> 00:15:57.840
<v Speaker 2>more than thirty years after Jesus would have been crucified,

357
00:15:58.080 --> 00:16:01.960
<v Speaker 2>and even then the persecution were local, not empire wide,

358
00:16:02.080 --> 00:16:05.080
<v Speaker 2>at least not until Diocletian began issuing edicts regarding Christians

359
00:16:05.120 --> 00:16:08.720
<v Speaker 2>than three zero three CE, meaning that, yes, Christians were

360
00:16:08.840 --> 00:16:12.159
<v Speaker 2>persecuted in the Roman Empire, but that persecution was sporadic

361
00:16:12.240 --> 00:16:15.159
<v Speaker 2>and local, meaning that most Christians could expect to live

362
00:16:15.200 --> 00:16:18.600
<v Speaker 2>relatively normal lives. So there is little to no evidence

363
00:16:18.600 --> 00:16:20.879
<v Speaker 2>that the disciples were martyred, and the average Christian of

364
00:16:20.919 --> 00:16:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the time could reasonably expect to be left alone by

365
00:16:23.240 --> 00:16:26.799
<v Speaker 2>the authorities. So yeah, there's really not much here, is there.

366
00:16:27.480 --> 00:16:29.879
<v Speaker 3>How do we explain they resolve in the face of

367
00:16:29.960 --> 00:16:33.600
<v Speaker 3>such persecution or the subsequent sweep of Christianity across the

368
00:16:33.679 --> 00:16:36.159
<v Speaker 3>Roman Empire that went on to reshape the world as

369
00:16:36.159 --> 00:16:36.879
<v Speaker 3>we know today.

370
00:16:37.039 --> 00:16:39.600
<v Speaker 2>The resolve of the average Christian is explained in the

371
00:16:39.639 --> 00:16:41.960
<v Speaker 2>same way as the resolve of modern examples of religious

372
00:16:41.960 --> 00:16:44.559
<v Speaker 2>people dying for their beliefs. The nine to eleven hijackers

373
00:16:44.559 --> 00:16:46.799
<v Speaker 2>died for their beliefs. Does that mean Islam is true?

374
00:16:47.320 --> 00:16:49.039
<v Speaker 2>But the result of people who would have been in

375
00:16:49.080 --> 00:16:50.639
<v Speaker 2>a position to know if the whole thing was a

376
00:16:50.679 --> 00:16:53.799
<v Speaker 2>lie is pure speculation. As to it sweeping through the

377
00:16:53.879 --> 00:16:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Roman Empire, that's not really much of a mystery. Once

378
00:16:56.240 --> 00:16:59.399
<v Speaker 2>the Roman Emperor converted to Christianity, How on earth could

379
00:16:59.440 --> 00:17:01.759
<v Speaker 2>Christianity we have spread so fast. It's not like it

380
00:17:01.799 --> 00:17:03.960
<v Speaker 2>was being propped up by the most powerful military force

381
00:17:03.960 --> 00:17:04.960
<v Speaker 2>in the world or anything.

382
00:17:05.640 --> 00:17:08.279
<v Speaker 3>However, you explain that, I'd submit to you that deception

383
00:17:08.519 --> 00:17:10.440
<v Speaker 3>at the heart of it all by Jesus' friends and

384
00:17:10.480 --> 00:17:12.279
<v Speaker 3>followers is an unlikely reason.

385
00:17:12.759 --> 00:17:14.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's unlikely. I just think that a

386
00:17:14.839 --> 00:17:17.200
<v Speaker 2>handful of his followers being honestly convinced by some sort

387
00:17:17.240 --> 00:17:20.200
<v Speaker 2>of experience like a bereavement hallucination is more likely than

388
00:17:20.240 --> 00:17:23.119
<v Speaker 2>them being dishonest s grifters. But hey, it's not like

389
00:17:23.200 --> 00:17:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Christianity suffers from a lack of dishonest s grifters, So

390
00:17:25.720 --> 00:17:28.119
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't actually be all that surprising to me if

391
00:17:28.160 --> 00:17:29.680
<v Speaker 2>that were indeed how it started.

392
00:17:30.039 --> 00:17:32.599
<v Speaker 3>So that leaves us now with a second possibility. If

393
00:17:32.680 --> 00:17:35.799
<v Speaker 3>Jesus followers weren't deceivers, maybe they were simply deluded.

394
00:17:36.160 --> 00:17:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Again, I'd prefer mistaken to dilute. It covers more bases

395
00:17:39.720 --> 00:17:41.759
<v Speaker 2>that way, But yeah, I am a fan of pology

396
00:17:41.759 --> 00:17:44.680
<v Speaker 2>as minimal witnesses hypothesis the idea that potentially as few

397
00:17:44.720 --> 00:17:46.759
<v Speaker 2>as one of the disciples had an experience of some

398
00:17:46.839 --> 00:17:49.279
<v Speaker 2>kind that they interpreted as being arisen Jesus, and this

399
00:17:49.359 --> 00:17:52.039
<v Speaker 2>experience was the spark that started the fire of Christianity.

400
00:17:52.519 --> 00:17:55.079
<v Speaker 3>On this score, a number of popular theories have been

401
00:17:55.119 --> 00:17:57.759
<v Speaker 3>put forward. One is the so called swoon theory, which

402
00:17:57.799 --> 00:18:01.839
<v Speaker 3>suggests that Jesus didn't actually die, but fell into a swoon,

403
00:18:01.920 --> 00:18:05.160
<v Speaker 3>a deep coma like state, and later revived in the

404
00:18:05.200 --> 00:18:07.680
<v Speaker 3>cool of the rock cut tomb or something like that.

405
00:18:08.079 --> 00:18:10.519
<v Speaker 2>I'm no expert, but wouldn't him not dying and then

406
00:18:10.559 --> 00:18:13.000
<v Speaker 2>everyone lying about his having died be a betterfit with

407
00:18:13.039 --> 00:18:16.039
<v Speaker 2>the deception category? Or are you saying that him swooning

408
00:18:16.119 --> 00:18:18.319
<v Speaker 2>was thought to be his death by everyone him included,

409
00:18:18.359 --> 00:18:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and so they were all mistaken about it. Either way,

410
00:18:21.160 --> 00:18:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm not really a fan of the swoon idea. It

411
00:18:22.920 --> 00:18:25.359
<v Speaker 2>seems like it overcomplicates the matter. I'm gonna go ahead

412
00:18:25.400 --> 00:18:27.519
<v Speaker 2>and skip all the swoon theory stuff. It just doesn't

413
00:18:27.559 --> 00:18:28.559
<v Speaker 2>interest me in the latest.

414
00:18:29.200 --> 00:18:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they were deluded in thinking he came back alive.

415
00:18:32.200 --> 00:18:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Enter the hallucination theory. The basic idea here is that

416
00:18:35.119 --> 00:18:38.119
<v Speaker 3>Jesus friends were so grief stricken that they began to

417
00:18:38.200 --> 00:18:39.640
<v Speaker 3>imagine him alive.

418
00:18:39.759 --> 00:18:44.319
<v Speaker 2>Not imagine hallucinate. Bereven hallucinations are a thing. Thirty to

419
00:18:44.359 --> 00:18:46.400
<v Speaker 2>sixty percent of people who lose a loved one will

420
00:18:46.440 --> 00:18:49.599
<v Speaker 2>experience some kind of bereaven hallucination, which could be anything

421
00:18:49.599 --> 00:18:52.960
<v Speaker 2>from just sensing a presence to having a multisensory experience

422
00:18:53.000 --> 00:18:55.599
<v Speaker 2>of the deceased. And before he dismisses this idea as

423
00:18:55.640 --> 00:18:57.480
<v Speaker 2>not being enough to convince someone that their dad loved

424
00:18:57.480 --> 00:19:00.359
<v Speaker 2>one is alive, let me share my own personal experience here.

425
00:19:00.519 --> 00:19:03.880
<v Speaker 2>My first wife died in twenty twenty one. Shortly thereafter,

426
00:19:03.920 --> 00:19:07.440
<v Speaker 2>and on several occasions, I had experiences that I'd actually

427
00:19:07.480 --> 00:19:10.119
<v Speaker 2>be hard pressed to describe, but left me feeling like

428
00:19:10.160 --> 00:19:12.599
<v Speaker 2>her death was a mistake of some kind. Now, keep

429
00:19:12.599 --> 00:19:14.839
<v Speaker 2>in mind. I was fully aware of the phenomenon of

430
00:19:14.839 --> 00:19:17.599
<v Speaker 2>bereaban hallucinations, so I knew that this was something that

431
00:19:17.680 --> 00:19:20.759
<v Speaker 2>could happen. But I still found myself rummaging through paperwork

432
00:19:20.799 --> 00:19:23.039
<v Speaker 2>related to her death and wondering how I could possibly

433
00:19:23.039 --> 00:19:25.680
<v Speaker 2>explain having reported her death to multiple banks as well

434
00:19:25.680 --> 00:19:28.640
<v Speaker 2>as the government when she wasn't actually dead. As an

435
00:19:28.680 --> 00:19:31.000
<v Speaker 2>atheist who doesn't believe in ghosts or any kind of

436
00:19:31.039 --> 00:19:34.759
<v Speaker 2>afterlife and is fully aware of bereavement hallucinations, I was

437
00:19:34.880 --> 00:19:38.680
<v Speaker 2>fully convinced multiple times that a dead person whose death

438
00:19:38.759 --> 00:19:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I had witnessed for myself was alive. Because of my

439
00:19:42.279 --> 00:19:45.319
<v Speaker 2>own experience with this phenomenon, I find it incredibly hard

440
00:19:45.400 --> 00:19:48.279
<v Speaker 2>to believe in the impossibility of someone who wasn't familiar

441
00:19:48.279 --> 00:19:51.559
<v Speaker 2>with bereavean hallucinations coming to believe in someone being brought

442
00:19:51.599 --> 00:19:53.000
<v Speaker 2>back from the dead because of one.

443
00:19:53.519 --> 00:19:56.720
<v Speaker 3>But again, there are problems here. Hallucinations, as we know,

444
00:19:57.000 --> 00:20:00.759
<v Speaker 3>are typically private, individual events. Yet the reser direction accounts

445
00:20:00.920 --> 00:20:04.559
<v Speaker 3>speak of group appearances on roads in homes over meals

446
00:20:04.559 --> 00:20:07.640
<v Speaker 3>individuals to crowds. But not only that, this theory doesn't

447
00:20:07.640 --> 00:20:10.000
<v Speaker 3>go on to explain why the tomb was empty to

448
00:20:10.039 --> 00:20:10.400
<v Speaker 3>begin with.

449
00:20:10.680 --> 00:20:13.279
<v Speaker 2>Again, these are only problems if we are taking the

450
00:20:13.279 --> 00:20:16.079
<v Speaker 2>Bible stories at face value. And if we start from

451
00:20:16.119 --> 00:20:18.119
<v Speaker 2>a point of taking the Bible stories of face value,

452
00:20:18.240 --> 00:20:20.599
<v Speaker 2>then why would we even be questioning the resurrection in

453
00:20:20.640 --> 00:20:21.359
<v Speaker 2>the first place.

454
00:20:21.960 --> 00:20:23.839
<v Speaker 3>And beyond all of this, I think the nail and

455
00:20:23.839 --> 00:20:26.680
<v Speaker 3>the coffin of the hallucination theory is that the resurrection

456
00:20:26.759 --> 00:20:29.359
<v Speaker 3>simply wasn't on the mental radar of any first century

457
00:20:29.440 --> 00:20:31.359
<v Speaker 3>Jew for them to even hallucinate about.

458
00:20:31.640 --> 00:20:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Weird how he jumps back and forth between taking Bible

459
00:20:34.160 --> 00:20:37.279
<v Speaker 2>stories at face value and ignoring them. Jesus flat out

460
00:20:37.359 --> 00:20:41.400
<v Speaker 2>told his disciples that he would be resurrected several times. Sure,

461
00:20:41.480 --> 00:20:43.599
<v Speaker 2>it also said that they were complete morons who didn't

462
00:20:43.640 --> 00:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>understand what he was talking about. But you can't say

463
00:20:46.000 --> 00:20:48.519
<v Speaker 2>a thing that Jesus explicitly said was going to happen

464
00:20:48.759 --> 00:20:50.799
<v Speaker 2>wasn't even on anyone's radar at the time.

465
00:20:51.279 --> 00:20:54.200
<v Speaker 3>For many Jews at that time, they believed in something

466
00:20:54.279 --> 00:20:56.640
<v Speaker 3>like a general resurrection at the end of the world,

467
00:20:56.640 --> 00:21:00.359
<v Speaker 3>when God would raise all the righteous dead to life. Certainly,

468
00:21:00.359 --> 00:21:02.799
<v Speaker 3>not a single man in the middle of history.

469
00:21:03.000 --> 00:21:04.519
<v Speaker 2>If we give him the benefit of the doubt and

470
00:21:04.559 --> 00:21:07.279
<v Speaker 2>assume that he is correct, here. All that means is

471
00:21:07.279 --> 00:21:09.599
<v Speaker 2>that Christianity was the origin of the idea of a

472
00:21:09.640 --> 00:21:13.400
<v Speaker 2>singular resurrection. That doesn't mean that it actually happened. Nobody

473
00:21:13.400 --> 00:21:15.319
<v Speaker 2>made a video game about a bug made of void

474
00:21:15.319 --> 00:21:18.160
<v Speaker 2>who would destroy their possessed sibling to purge the infection

475
00:21:18.240 --> 00:21:20.759
<v Speaker 2>of the radiance from hallow Nest until Team Cherry did

476
00:21:20.799 --> 00:21:23.279
<v Speaker 2>it in twenty seventeen. But that doesn't mean that those

477
00:21:23.319 --> 00:21:26.519
<v Speaker 2>events actually happened. But as it turns out, we don't

478
00:21:26.519 --> 00:21:28.279
<v Speaker 2>need to give him the benefit of the doubt. He's

479
00:21:28.319 --> 00:21:31.720
<v Speaker 2>ignoring the prophets Elijah and Elisha. Each of them raised

480
00:21:31.759 --> 00:21:34.039
<v Speaker 2>a deceased child, and Elisha's bones had the power of

481
00:21:34.079 --> 00:21:36.839
<v Speaker 2>resurrection even after he died. When a corpse was thrown

482
00:21:36.839 --> 00:21:39.359
<v Speaker 2>into Alisia's home, it touched his bones and came back

483
00:21:39.400 --> 00:21:42.640
<v Speaker 2>to life. So there are at least three instances in

484
00:21:42.720 --> 00:21:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the Old Testament of individual resurrections in the middle of history,

485
00:21:46.519 --> 00:21:49.240
<v Speaker 2>thus completely dispelling the notion that nobody would have ever

486
00:21:49.319 --> 00:21:51.839
<v Speaker 2>considered the possibility of a single man being resurrected in

487
00:21:51.839 --> 00:21:53.839
<v Speaker 2>the middle of history. Also, to take it back to

488
00:21:53.839 --> 00:21:57.039
<v Speaker 2>my personal experience, I don't believe in any resurrections, but

489
00:21:57.079 --> 00:21:59.440
<v Speaker 2>I was still temporarily convinced of what would amount to

490
00:21:59.480 --> 00:22:01.759
<v Speaker 2>a resurrection had it been true. So I just don't

491
00:22:01.799 --> 00:22:04.039
<v Speaker 2>buy the idea that you can only become convinced of

492
00:22:04.039 --> 00:22:07.319
<v Speaker 2>a resurrection through hallucination if you are first predisposed to

493
00:22:07.319 --> 00:22:08.400
<v Speaker 2>believe in such things.

494
00:22:09.279 --> 00:22:12.680
<v Speaker 3>So while we might struggle with the idea of resurrection today,

495
00:22:12.799 --> 00:22:15.160
<v Speaker 3>like typically dead people don't come back from the dead,

496
00:22:15.240 --> 00:22:18.279
<v Speaker 3>but for first century jew they had that suspicion as well.

497
00:22:18.319 --> 00:22:20.240
<v Speaker 3>But for them the problem was even greater because they

498
00:22:20.240 --> 00:22:22.960
<v Speaker 3>didn't just have cause to doubt dead people not coming

499
00:22:23.000 --> 00:22:26.279
<v Speaker 3>back from the dead, they had religious reasons to resist it.

500
00:22:26.720 --> 00:22:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Christians do know that the Old Testament is the Jewish

501
00:22:29.279 --> 00:22:32.039
<v Speaker 2>Holy Book, right like there are some differences between the

502
00:22:32.039 --> 00:22:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Hebrew Bible and the Old Testament, but the stories of

503
00:22:33.920 --> 00:22:36.799
<v Speaker 2>Elijah and Elisha are in First and Second Kings, which

504
00:22:36.839 --> 00:22:39.279
<v Speaker 2>are both included as one single book in the Hebrew Bible.

505
00:22:39.440 --> 00:22:42.599
<v Speaker 2>Christianity began as a sect of Judaism. Most of the

506
00:22:42.680 --> 00:22:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Christian Bible is actually Jewish scripture. The Christian stuff is

507
00:22:46.839 --> 00:22:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the twenty five percent that's just tacked on at the end.

508
00:22:49.119 --> 00:22:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Help We could even go back into the taking Bible

509
00:22:51.039 --> 00:22:53.799
<v Speaker 2>stories seriously mode and run with the criticism that ancient

510
00:22:53.799 --> 00:22:56.720
<v Speaker 2>pagans like Celsus levied against Jesus. He was not the

511
00:22:56.720 --> 00:22:59.279
<v Speaker 2>son of God, he was just a magician. As such,

512
00:22:59.359 --> 00:23:01.680
<v Speaker 2>we can then accept that he raised Lazarus from the dead.

513
00:23:01.920 --> 00:23:04.799
<v Speaker 2>So now, even if individual resurrection was unheard of in

514
00:23:04.880 --> 00:23:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Judaism before, then there is precedent for his disciples to

515
00:23:07.960 --> 00:23:10.680
<v Speaker 2>think something similar might happen to him. Obviously, this is

516
00:23:10.720 --> 00:23:12.880
<v Speaker 2>not what I believe, but it is at least as

517
00:23:12.920 --> 00:23:14.720
<v Speaker 2>plausible as his actual resurrection.

518
00:23:15.240 --> 00:23:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, there are many other theories out there wrong toomb,

519
00:23:18.279 --> 00:23:21.599
<v Speaker 3>identical twins, misidentified bodies, but I don't think when you

520
00:23:21.680 --> 00:23:24.799
<v Speaker 3>weigh them, any of them sufficiently account for the accepted

521
00:23:24.880 --> 00:23:28.319
<v Speaker 3>historical facts. That Jesus died, the tomb was empty, his

522
00:23:28.400 --> 00:23:31.039
<v Speaker 3>followers claimed to see him alive, and the Christian movement

523
00:23:31.160 --> 00:23:33.880
<v Speaker 3>exploded from the very place that he was crucified.

524
00:23:34.079 --> 00:23:36.759
<v Speaker 2>The historical facts, if we want to go the Havermass route,

525
00:23:36.880 --> 00:23:39.480
<v Speaker 2>are that he died by crucifixion. Some of his followers

526
00:23:39.480 --> 00:23:41.839
<v Speaker 2>had experiences that they thought were real that they were

527
00:23:41.880 --> 00:23:44.240
<v Speaker 2>willing to die for their beliefs. That the resurrection was taught.

528
00:23:44.359 --> 00:23:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Very soon after the crucifixion, and that a couple of

529
00:23:46.720 --> 00:23:49.720
<v Speaker 2>specific individuals converted. I'd argue that not all of these

530
00:23:49.799 --> 00:23:52.200
<v Speaker 2>facts are as factual as Habermas would like. But you'll

531
00:23:52.240 --> 00:23:54.799
<v Speaker 2>notice that not only is the empty tomb not on

532
00:23:54.839 --> 00:23:57.039
<v Speaker 2>the list, that he was put into a tomb at

533
00:23:57.039 --> 00:24:01.799
<v Speaker 2>all is conspicuously absent and honestly wrongtom Identical twins and

534
00:24:01.799 --> 00:24:05.359
<v Speaker 2>misidentified bodies would actually explain all the Habermass facts better

535
00:24:05.359 --> 00:24:08.519
<v Speaker 2>than an actual resurrection would. But as I've already stated,

536
00:24:08.559 --> 00:24:11.559
<v Speaker 2>my money's on something like the minimal witnesses hypothesis, I'm

537
00:24:11.640 --> 00:24:13.359
<v Speaker 2>skipping ahead a bit now. When we come back in

538
00:24:13.440 --> 00:24:16.279
<v Speaker 2>he will have introduced his third d Devoted and said

539
00:24:16.279 --> 00:24:18.400
<v Speaker 2>that he thinks the explanation is that the disciples were

540
00:24:18.400 --> 00:24:20.920
<v Speaker 2>devoted to the truth of the resurrection, and that's what

541
00:24:21.039 --> 00:24:21.599
<v Speaker 2>explains it.

542
00:24:22.119 --> 00:24:26.880
<v Speaker 3>But you might say, Dave, resurrection theory isn't exactly a

543
00:24:26.920 --> 00:24:30.519
<v Speaker 3>simple explanation either, and I'll grant you that. But Christianity

544
00:24:30.559 --> 00:24:32.680
<v Speaker 3>doesn't ask you to check your brain at the door

545
00:24:32.720 --> 00:24:36.240
<v Speaker 3>on this score. Truth invites questions, and there are very

546
00:24:36.279 --> 00:24:38.640
<v Speaker 3>thick books written on this subject, in addition to the

547
00:24:38.680 --> 00:24:40.319
<v Speaker 3>Bible for you to consider and weigh.

548
00:24:40.400 --> 00:24:43.200
<v Speaker 2>For yourself pretty sure. He's once again referring to Habermass

549
00:24:43.200 --> 00:24:44.960
<v Speaker 2>and the very thick books that he wrote on a

550
00:24:45.000 --> 00:24:47.319
<v Speaker 2>subject which I'm not really going to get into here,

551
00:24:47.359 --> 00:24:50.119
<v Speaker 2>aside from once again linking to pologia. He has done

552
00:24:50.119 --> 00:24:52.039
<v Speaker 2>what I'm not willing to do and actually read the

553
00:24:52.119 --> 00:24:54.000
<v Speaker 2>damn things, and he's been a bit of a thorn

554
00:24:54.000 --> 00:24:55.880
<v Speaker 2>and Habermass side through this whole process.

555
00:24:56.240 --> 00:24:58.319
<v Speaker 3>But here's what I can tell you. The resurrection of

556
00:24:58.400 --> 00:25:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Jesus is the most stubborn, an inconvenient, paradigm shattering claim

557
00:25:03.000 --> 00:25:05.559
<v Speaker 3>of history because it forces you and I to make

558
00:25:05.599 --> 00:25:08.319
<v Speaker 3>a decision will we accept it or not?

559
00:25:08.960 --> 00:25:11.319
<v Speaker 2>The claim of gay unicorn Gary imprinting everyone with the

560
00:25:11.359 --> 00:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>desire to participate in a gay orgy does that as well?

561
00:25:14.079 --> 00:25:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you accept it or not? The fact that one

562
00:25:16.680 --> 00:25:18.599
<v Speaker 2>can make a supernatural claim in such a way as

563
00:25:18.599 --> 00:25:21.480
<v Speaker 2>to present you with an actual dichotomy does not inherently

564
00:25:21.519 --> 00:25:23.599
<v Speaker 2>make that claim profound or significant.

565
00:25:24.400 --> 00:25:26.119
<v Speaker 3>Let me just be real with you. I have more

566
00:25:26.240 --> 00:25:29.039
<v Speaker 3>questions now than I ever have before. I work for

567
00:25:29.039 --> 00:25:32.240
<v Speaker 3>an organization called questioning Christianity after all.

568
00:25:32.680 --> 00:25:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Actually, good point that I forgot to bring up when

569
00:25:34.720 --> 00:25:36.400
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned the really thick books you can read about

570
00:25:36.400 --> 00:25:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the resurrection. The existence of such books and organizations like

571
00:25:39.920 --> 00:25:41.759
<v Speaker 2>the one he works for that seek to answer the

572
00:25:41.839 --> 00:25:45.839
<v Speaker 2>questions about Christianity implies that the Bible is insufficient. It's

573
00:25:45.839 --> 00:25:47.839
<v Speaker 2>not enough to read the Bible. If you want to

574
00:25:47.920 --> 00:25:51.039
<v Speaker 2>understand Christianity, you have to watch videos by apologists, read

575
00:25:51.119 --> 00:25:54.319
<v Speaker 2>massive boring tones trying to argue Christianity's case. Engage in

576
00:25:54.400 --> 00:25:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Thorough's study seems like a really inefficient way for God

577
00:25:58.039 --> 00:26:01.079
<v Speaker 2>to actually reach people. Anyway, Go ahead and finish that sentence.

578
00:26:01.720 --> 00:26:04.599
<v Speaker 3>And yet I have never been more sure that Jesus

579
00:26:04.680 --> 00:26:05.640
<v Speaker 3>rose from the dead.

580
00:26:06.039 --> 00:26:08.799
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so he's got more questions now than ever before,

581
00:26:08.920 --> 00:26:11.240
<v Speaker 2>but he's never been more sure that Jesus did, in

582
00:26:11.279 --> 00:26:13.599
<v Speaker 2>fact rise from the dead. Remember this next time you

583
00:26:13.599 --> 00:26:16.480
<v Speaker 2>hear an apologist demand that you explain the intricate details

584
00:26:16.519 --> 00:26:19.000
<v Speaker 2>of cosmology in order to justify not believing in their

585
00:26:19.039 --> 00:26:21.599
<v Speaker 2>imaginary friend. It's okay to have a bunch of unknowns

586
00:26:21.599 --> 00:26:23.799
<v Speaker 2>when you accept their claims, but if you want to

587
00:26:23.880 --> 00:26:26.519
<v Speaker 2>doubt their claims, you have to be prepared to answer

588
00:26:26.559 --> 00:26:29.279
<v Speaker 2>all of the tough questions that experts in multiple scientific

589
00:26:29.279 --> 00:26:32.279
<v Speaker 2>fields struggle with. Seems like a bit of a double standard.

590
00:26:32.720 --> 00:26:35.400
<v Speaker 3>And I could spend all day talking about why I

591
00:26:35.440 --> 00:26:38.839
<v Speaker 3>am so convinced. But if Jesus really did rise from

592
00:26:38.880 --> 00:26:41.119
<v Speaker 3>the dead, if he got up, if he walked out,

593
00:26:41.160 --> 00:26:43.720
<v Speaker 3>if he spoke with friends, eight with them, showed them

594
00:26:43.759 --> 00:26:48.160
<v Speaker 3>his scars, then you know what that tells me Everything's

595
00:26:48.200 --> 00:26:48.960
<v Speaker 3>going to be okay.

596
00:26:49.680 --> 00:26:51.920
<v Speaker 2>And what I'm getting from this is I believe in

597
00:26:52.000 --> 00:26:54.359
<v Speaker 2>Christianity because I am comforted by the idea of a

598
00:26:54.400 --> 00:26:57.240
<v Speaker 2>higher power being in control of everything. Well, given the

599
00:26:57.279 --> 00:26:59.920
<v Speaker 2>behavior of this higher power in the Bible, I am

600
00:27:00.119 --> 00:27:03.119
<v Speaker 2>not comforted. Help forget the Bible. How many times have

601
00:27:03.200 --> 00:27:05.240
<v Speaker 2>we had to hear that a hurricane or earthquake was

602
00:27:05.279 --> 00:27:07.920
<v Speaker 2>sent by God to punish people for being gay as

603
00:27:07.960 --> 00:27:10.799
<v Speaker 2>a Q in the LGBTQ. Why on earth would I

604
00:27:10.839 --> 00:27:11.720
<v Speaker 2>find that comforting?

605
00:27:12.519 --> 00:27:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Because if easter is true and despair is just on

606
00:27:15.839 --> 00:27:16.799
<v Speaker 3>borrowed time.

607
00:27:17.039 --> 00:27:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, as long as you are one of the extreme

608
00:27:19.079 --> 00:27:21.720
<v Speaker 2>minority of people throughout history who have believed in Jesus.

609
00:27:22.000 --> 00:27:23.920
<v Speaker 2>If you're in the majority, you get sent to Hell

610
00:27:24.039 --> 00:27:26.920
<v Speaker 2>for permanent despair. And I'm gonna leave it here. He

611
00:27:27.000 --> 00:27:29.200
<v Speaker 2>just goes into preaching mode at the end today's comment

612
00:27:29.240 --> 00:27:30.920
<v Speaker 2>to the day comes to us from John Thumbull five

613
00:27:30.960 --> 00:27:33.759
<v Speaker 2>one to five four, who says, oh, so scholars agree

614
00:27:33.759 --> 00:27:36.480
<v Speaker 2>that it's a genocide, scholars agree that Jesus was the

615
00:27:36.519 --> 00:27:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Song of God. Seriously, Rhino, I assume that Song of

616
00:27:39.440 --> 00:27:40.880
<v Speaker 2>God was a typo and it's meant to be Son

617
00:27:40.920 --> 00:27:45.160
<v Speaker 2>of God. But honestly, that's some creationist level argumentation. Do

618
00:27:45.240 --> 00:27:47.039
<v Speaker 2>you know how many times I've heard a creation to

619
00:27:47.039 --> 00:27:50.279
<v Speaker 2>say that you can't trust academia or scientific studies because

620
00:27:50.440 --> 00:27:52.799
<v Speaker 2>they'll lose their job or funding if they call evolution

621
00:27:52.880 --> 00:27:55.400
<v Speaker 2>into question. For context, this was in response to a

622
00:27:55.440 --> 00:27:57.799
<v Speaker 2>different Comment of the Day segment where a previous commenter

623
00:27:57.960 --> 00:28:00.200
<v Speaker 2>had told me to do some fact checking before read

624
00:28:00.240 --> 00:28:03.079
<v Speaker 2>the bullsh at Israel's committing a genocide in Gaza, and

625
00:28:03.119 --> 00:28:06.200
<v Speaker 2>in my response I pointed out that I had fact checked.

626
00:28:06.359 --> 00:28:08.559
<v Speaker 2>I referenced both the UN commission that spent two years

627
00:28:08.559 --> 00:28:11.279
<v Speaker 2>investigating the matter and concluded that it was a genocide

628
00:28:11.359 --> 00:28:14.160
<v Speaker 2>and a report by the International Association of Genocide s callers.

629
00:28:14.480 --> 00:28:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I am now two Comments of the Day deep into

630
00:28:16.680 --> 00:28:19.000
<v Speaker 2>this argument, and so far none of you have brought

631
00:28:19.039 --> 00:28:20.960
<v Speaker 2>anything to the table to back up the idea that

632
00:28:21.000 --> 00:28:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Israel is not engaged in genocide. The reports are there,

633
00:28:24.880 --> 00:28:27.640
<v Speaker 2>you can read them for yourself. The UN report, for instance,

634
00:28:27.680 --> 00:28:30.599
<v Speaker 2>includes details like statements by Israeli officials such as when

635
00:28:30.640 --> 00:28:33.799
<v Speaker 2>President Isaac Kurzog said, it's an entire nation out there

636
00:28:33.799 --> 00:28:36.279
<v Speaker 2>that is responsible. It is not true. This rhetoric about

637
00:28:36.319 --> 00:28:38.640
<v Speaker 2>civilians who were not aware and not involved. It is

638
00:28:38.680 --> 00:28:42.079
<v Speaker 2>absolutely not true, indicating an intention to retaliate against the

639
00:28:42.240 --> 00:28:45.440
<v Speaker 2>entire nation, civilians or not. It includes a letter net

640
00:28:45.559 --> 00:28:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Yaho sent to the Israeli soldiers telling them to remember

641
00:28:48.200 --> 00:28:51.400
<v Speaker 2>what Amelek did to you, which, if you'll recall, is

642
00:28:51.440 --> 00:28:54.559
<v Speaker 2>a reference to quite possibly the most explicit genocide in

643
00:28:54.640 --> 00:28:57.319
<v Speaker 2>the Bible. It goes over the military tactics that Israel

644
00:28:57.319 --> 00:29:00.160
<v Speaker 2>has used, including the destruction of important heritage sites, fucking

645
00:29:00.240 --> 00:29:04.279
<v Speaker 2>humanitarian aid, targeting hospitals and other healthcare infrastructure, the direct

646
00:29:04.319 --> 00:29:07.400
<v Speaker 2>targeting of children, and so on. It is quite thorough

647
00:29:07.440 --> 00:29:09.880
<v Speaker 2>and well sourced. If you don't believe the details, they

648
00:29:09.920 --> 00:29:11.640
<v Speaker 2>tell you where you can go to check up on it.

649
00:29:11.960 --> 00:29:14.200
<v Speaker 2>If you're going to come here and claim that these actions,

650
00:29:14.200 --> 00:29:17.200
<v Speaker 2>along with the explicitly expressed intent of the leadership, do

651
00:29:17.359 --> 00:29:20.160
<v Speaker 2>not amount to genocide, then what that tells me is

652
00:29:20.160 --> 00:29:22.920
<v Speaker 2>that you care more about splitting definitional hairs than you

653
00:29:22.960 --> 00:29:25.400
<v Speaker 2>do about protecting innocent people who have lived their entire

654
00:29:25.480 --> 00:29:28.960
<v Speaker 2>lives under the constant threat of extermination. And no, I

655
00:29:28.960 --> 00:29:32.079
<v Speaker 2>don't want to hear what about Hamas as a response. Yes,

656
00:29:32.240 --> 00:29:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Hamas is bad, they also have genocidal intent, but I'm

657
00:29:36.000 --> 00:29:39.480
<v Speaker 2>not sure how them also being bad is somehow justification

658
00:29:39.559 --> 00:29:43.240
<v Speaker 2>for murdering children in hospitals. So go ahead and miss

659
00:29:43.279 --> 00:29:46.079
<v Speaker 2>me with this creation's level bullet of scholars who disagree

660
00:29:46.079 --> 00:29:48.960
<v Speaker 2>with me can't be trusted. Thanks for watching. Don't forget

661
00:29:49.000 --> 00:29:50.599
<v Speaker 2>to go to serfshark dot COM's Last Rhino for an

662
00:29:50.599 --> 00:29:52.519
<v Speaker 2>extra four months for free. I'll be back next Friday

663
00:29:52.559 --> 00:29:53.640
<v Speaker 2>with more, but if you need to get your right

664
00:29:53.640 --> 00:29:55.319
<v Speaker 2>effiics in before then. I live stream of service every

665
00:29:55.319 --> 00:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Wednesday eight thirt Eastern on my other channel, The Watering Hole,

666
00:29:57.440 --> 00:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and periodically publish shorts on the channel Vice Rhino shortsks

667
00:30:00.119 --> 00:30:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Piper for being my editor and special things is always

668
00:30:02.000 --> 00:30:04.440
<v Speaker 2>do my patrons who are the individual resurrection happening in

669
00:30:04.480 --> 00:30:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the Old Testament? That is my channel. If you'd like

670
00:30:07.039 --> 00:30:09.039
<v Speaker 2>to have an old man smush his mouth onto your

671
00:30:09.039 --> 00:30:11.279
<v Speaker 2>Corpse seriously read the stories. They're kind of fucked up.

672
00:30:11.480 --> 00:30:13.160
<v Speaker 2>You can join us on Patreon for as little as

673
00:30:13.160 --> 00:30:14.920
<v Speaker 2>a dollar per week over at patreon dot com, slash

674
00:30:15.000 --> 00:30:16.680
<v Speaker 2>vice Rhino, or by supporting the channel and one of

675
00:30:16.680 --> 00:30:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the other methods that can be foun at links dot

676
00:30:18.119 --> 00:30:20.240
<v Speaker 2>viceround dot com, which is also where you'll find links

677
00:30:20.279 --> 00:30:22.039
<v Speaker 2>to my other projects. If for whatever reason you want

678
00:30:22.039 --> 00:30:24.039
<v Speaker 2>to send me stuff my pobox addresses in the description

679
00:30:24.359 --> 00:30:59.640
<v Speaker 2>see and next time double O seven bating. I know

680
00:30:59.680 --> 00:31:01.119
<v Speaker 2>I make that joke every time I cut in it

681
00:31:01.160 --> 00:31:04.119
<v Speaker 2>seven seconds, but it's you're just gonna have to live

682
00:31:04.119 --> 00:31:04.279
<v Speaker 2>with that.
