1
00:00:02,759 --> 00:00:05,960
Speaker 1: What's up everybody. Welcome into another episode of Profit Picks.

2
00:00:06,320 --> 00:00:08,880
If you are new, we do always start this show

3
00:00:08,919 --> 00:00:13,160
by being transparent. And yesterday I did not have a

4
00:00:13,160 --> 00:00:15,439
good day. I went three and five, three and four

5
00:00:15,439 --> 00:00:18,039
in the NBA, and my best bet was in the

6
00:00:18,120 --> 00:00:21,519
NFL was the coach plus six was a loser. So

7
00:00:23,120 --> 00:00:25,760
got to get back on track here today. You know,

8
00:00:26,760 --> 00:00:28,640
it is always good to be back on the show

9
00:00:28,719 --> 00:00:32,039
doing it with you. Are back doing the show with you.

10
00:00:32,840 --> 00:00:34,679
Hopefully yesterday was a little bit better for you.

11
00:00:36,439 --> 00:00:38,600
Speaker 2: It was ski. We had two and oh yesterday. Both

12
00:00:38,640 --> 00:00:42,359
came from college though college football game played. The Utah

13
00:00:42,359 --> 00:00:44,840
State team total under twenty four and a half got

14
00:00:44,840 --> 00:00:47,240
the twenty one, so that was a winner. And then

15
00:00:47,280 --> 00:00:50,320
at night, you know, it's becoming a little bit of

16
00:00:50,359 --> 00:00:53,079
a favorite of mine, but cal State Northridge, over the

17
00:00:53,240 --> 00:00:56,039
team total of eighty seven and a half, scored one

18
00:00:56,079 --> 00:01:00,000
hundred last night, something they're starting to do pretty regular.

19
00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:02,560
So we had a two and oh. Nice start to

20
00:01:02,600 --> 00:01:05,079
the week. On Monday, we'll see if we can push

21
00:01:05,079 --> 00:01:08,280
it through here to Tuesday. And I'm through the Christmas week.

22
00:01:09,239 --> 00:01:13,560
Speaker 1: All right, let's uh, let's get see what we can

23
00:01:13,560 --> 00:01:16,640
get out of this humongous Tuesday cards. If you watch

24
00:01:16,719 --> 00:01:19,480
the shelves, they will be a little bit different. I'm

25
00:01:19,519 --> 00:01:22,239
not gonna just deep break down all these games because

26
00:01:22,519 --> 00:01:25,079
it's a lot of back to backs. It's the you know,

27
00:01:25,560 --> 00:01:28,319
last day, last day before everybody goes and does their

28
00:01:28,359 --> 00:01:31,959
Christmas thing. You know, it's not everybody doesn't care about

29
00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:35,159
playing today. So it's tough to put in a pick

30
00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:37,799
on all of these games very early. But Brooklyn and

31
00:01:37,840 --> 00:01:41,480
Philly is one that I was interested in. Opened up

32
00:01:41,519 --> 00:01:45,680
ten for Philly still ten total says that open too.

33
00:01:45,719 --> 00:01:48,000
Eighteen and a half looks like to nineteen and a half.

34
00:01:48,920 --> 00:01:51,680
I disagree with that. Going up the point, I mean,

35
00:01:52,359 --> 00:01:55,120
neither team has been really playing up tempo lately. I

36
00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:58,079
have twenty third and nineteenth in pace over the last

37
00:01:58,079 --> 00:02:03,120
five games. And on the defensive end, I mean, I

38
00:02:03,120 --> 00:02:05,319
think I shout this out the other day, but the

39
00:02:05,480 --> 00:02:09,280
nets nets or the what is that the second best

40
00:02:09,280 --> 00:02:14,400
defensive for the team last five games. I mean I

41
00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:16,400
cast it under with them, I think the other day,

42
00:02:16,960 --> 00:02:19,039
or I cast out on the spread with them because

43
00:02:19,039 --> 00:02:21,479
of their defense. It was something like that. But they've

44
00:02:21,479 --> 00:02:24,000
been playing good defense for a little bit. Now you

45
00:02:24,039 --> 00:02:26,879
look at for the last five games for the Nets

46
00:02:26,879 --> 00:02:30,080
have stayed under this number for the last five meetings,

47
00:02:30,360 --> 00:02:34,039
got Edgecomb still questionable like under in this game, Rob,

48
00:02:34,080 --> 00:02:37,439
you know, what do you think about Brooklyn and Philadelphia.

49
00:02:38,400 --> 00:02:43,680
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'll just support your Brooklyn defense. Recent defensive surge lately.

50
00:02:43,759 --> 00:02:46,879
Ski last three opponents against the Nets only averaged eighty

51
00:02:46,960 --> 00:02:51,080
nine point seven points per game. That's crazy good. And

52
00:02:51,280 --> 00:02:53,159
Nick Claxton had a little bit to say about it.

53
00:02:53,199 --> 00:02:55,879
He just said, we're just doing what we do better.

54
00:02:56,479 --> 00:02:59,680
Our defense has been pretty solid this past month. It's

55
00:02:59,719 --> 00:03:02,199
been really good. So we've just got to keep taking

56
00:03:02,240 --> 00:03:04,560
steps in the right direction. But really we've been doing

57
00:03:04,599 --> 00:03:08,159
a good job guarding. We've got a lot of switchable defenders.

58
00:03:08,639 --> 00:03:10,360
We still got areas we can get better, but we

59
00:03:10,479 --> 00:03:13,599
got to keep going. So vote of confidence for the

60
00:03:13,680 --> 00:03:16,560
Nets defense here Philadelphia for what it's worth. Team total

61
00:03:17,240 --> 00:03:20,000
for the Sixers five and one to the over in

62
00:03:20,080 --> 00:03:22,360
their last six Again, I mentioned a lot of times

63
00:03:22,400 --> 00:03:25,759
they're really a pace team, especially if Embid is not

64
00:03:25,919 --> 00:03:29,360
on the floor. MAXI Edgecomb, like you say, maybe a

65
00:03:29,439 --> 00:03:31,520
question mark next to him. I think he's gonna go

66
00:03:31,680 --> 00:03:33,800
just being here in the area. It seems like he's

67
00:03:34,560 --> 00:03:37,159
he may go for this one. So a little bit

68
00:03:37,159 --> 00:03:40,400
of contradiction there between those two. I would probably lean under, though,

69
00:03:40,439 --> 00:03:44,560
because Brooklyn seems to be leaning into the slower pace

70
00:03:44,639 --> 00:03:47,840
and better defense as their new identity, which there was

71
00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:50,479
nothing like that earlier this season, but they seem to

72
00:03:50,479 --> 00:03:53,319
have become a pretty cohesive defensive unit.

73
00:03:54,680 --> 00:03:58,000
Speaker 1: All right now. Washington and Charlotte. Washington has been I mean,

74
00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:00,280
I'm sorry, Charlotte has been good on back to act,

75
00:04:01,120 --> 00:04:05,759
but not necessarily favorites in these games. They open five

76
00:04:05,800 --> 00:04:08,199
and a half, they're looking like seven. Now. I mean,

77
00:04:08,439 --> 00:04:10,680
I can't push the button on the Charlotte minus seven

78
00:04:11,439 --> 00:04:15,960
as bad as Washington is, So maybe I'll just go

79
00:04:16,040 --> 00:04:17,720
with the total. I don't really trust either team to

80
00:04:17,720 --> 00:04:20,439
play defense. I guess I'll lean towards over anything for you,

81
00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:21,639
Charlotte and Washington.

82
00:04:22,600 --> 00:04:25,199
Speaker 2: Yeah, Charlotte got us home with the show best bet.

83
00:04:25,279 --> 00:04:29,519
Yesterday Charlotte team total over against Cleveland, both teams in

84
00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:31,920
the one thirties. For Charlotte, it was kind of a

85
00:04:31,959 --> 00:04:35,720
bounce back, a real good performance against Atlanta offensively, then

86
00:04:35,759 --> 00:04:38,439
a bad one, then a real good one last night.

87
00:04:39,560 --> 00:04:41,000
I don't know you should be able to follow it

88
00:04:41,079 --> 00:04:44,120
up against Washington. But I think Washington will score on

89
00:04:45,040 --> 00:04:48,199
the Charlotte Hornets here. They just don't play very much defense.

90
00:04:49,079 --> 00:04:52,120
I could take a slight look towards the Wizards team

91
00:04:52,160 --> 00:04:55,839
total over one sixteen, but I don't know that I

92
00:04:55,879 --> 00:04:58,399
would want to exclude Charlotte in this case. Probably a

93
00:04:58,439 --> 00:05:01,720
pass for me, but some form of total. If you're

94
00:05:01,759 --> 00:05:03,240
looking that way, I could endorse that.

95
00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:10,240
Speaker 1: All right. Next game, it looks like Milwaukee and Indiana.

96
00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:13,360
I don't really have any opinion on that game, so

97
00:05:13,959 --> 00:05:15,680
I'm willing to skip if you're willing to skip.

98
00:05:16,879 --> 00:05:19,040
Speaker 2: Yeah, I would just say that I can't get anywhere

99
00:05:19,079 --> 00:05:22,120
near Milwaukee right now. Ski. Not that I want to

100
00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:24,160
be on Indiana, but it just can't get anywhere near

101
00:05:24,160 --> 00:05:25,199
Milwaukee at this point.

102
00:05:26,199 --> 00:05:27,759
Speaker 1: They shout out to the chat as well. We have

103
00:05:27,879 --> 00:05:31,319
be men in here, Mark and Merry Christmas and happy holidays.

104
00:05:31,319 --> 00:05:35,680
Appreciate it. Happy holidays to you as well. Daniel, appreciate

105
00:05:35,720 --> 00:05:39,079
you said. Shout out to Ski and Rob Legends and

106
00:05:39,199 --> 00:05:42,079
Brian sharing on that last game. We just talked about

107
00:05:42,199 --> 00:05:44,800
the Charlotte and Washington. He likes the first quarter over sixty,

108
00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:49,399
so appreciate you guys in the chat. You know I'm

109
00:05:49,399 --> 00:05:52,519
gonna go to the next game that is Raptors and Heat,

110
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:55,160
And I do have a slight opinion here. I mean,

111
00:05:55,759 --> 00:05:58,480
for one, I don't want anything to do with the

112
00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:02,040
Raptors until our Beard is back. And not only is

113
00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:07,800
r J bard out yaka perdos out. So that makes

114
00:06:07,839 --> 00:06:10,839
me automatically want to fade the Raptors. Makes me look

115
00:06:10,879 --> 00:06:15,480
towards the Miami Heat. And when I think about the Heat,

116
00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:19,319
I mean Bam said it. Yeah, you know, they should

117
00:06:19,319 --> 00:06:21,759
be able to lean on their defense even if they're

118
00:06:21,759 --> 00:06:24,079
not making shots. I think that the Raptors are going

119
00:06:24,160 --> 00:06:26,079
to struggle to score here. I do think this is

120
00:06:26,079 --> 00:06:30,079
a lower scoring game. Looking at the pace last five

121
00:06:30,079 --> 00:06:32,639
games for both of these teams, Raptors are dead last

122
00:06:33,199 --> 00:06:36,439
Heat kind of middle of the pack. Both defenses better

123
00:06:36,480 --> 00:06:39,639
in the offense. Yeah, Raptors are the slowest pace and

124
00:06:39,720 --> 00:06:43,279
the worst offensive rated team last five games. I mean,

125
00:06:43,959 --> 00:06:45,639
that's not the recipe for hundreds. I don't know what

126
00:06:45,639 --> 00:06:48,279
it is. They've gone under those five straight team total hunders,

127
00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:52,160
and all five straight they're averaging ninety nine points per game.

128
00:06:52,240 --> 00:06:54,560
They're allowing one on five point two, but they just

129
00:06:54,600 --> 00:06:58,480
can't score, so I know the defense does get a

130
00:06:58,480 --> 00:07:01,560
little bit worse with out Yako perdo for the Raptors.

131
00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:06,240
That makes me think that we just Raptors team total

132
00:07:06,319 --> 00:07:08,879
under here, just trust the Heat to play defense? Do

133
00:07:09,040 --> 00:07:11,399
we just back the Heat on the spread? What do

134
00:07:11,439 --> 00:07:12,800
you think about this game, Rabo?

135
00:07:14,480 --> 00:07:20,879
Speaker 2: Yeah, a little contradictory inside my thinking here, Ski, but

136
00:07:20,920 --> 00:07:23,160
my initial thought was to play Miami. I like them

137
00:07:23,160 --> 00:07:26,360
off the back to back losses, and they got me home.

138
00:07:26,439 --> 00:07:28,600
The other night by the hook, I took seven and

139
00:07:28,680 --> 00:07:32,439
a half against the Knicks and Miami lost by seven.

140
00:07:32,480 --> 00:07:35,600
They hung in that game the entire way. So now

141
00:07:35,839 --> 00:07:37,399
the only problem I have with it is it was

142
00:07:37,399 --> 00:07:40,639
three straight road games and now they're home. But the

143
00:07:40,680 --> 00:07:43,800
back to back losses to Boston and New York, I

144
00:07:43,839 --> 00:07:46,480
think is reason enough to look to the Miami side.

145
00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:51,279
There's been a little bit of improvement in their play

146
00:07:51,879 --> 00:07:55,600
since I think we talked about them, maybe, or at

147
00:07:55,680 --> 00:07:57,720
least I had read the quote about them maybe running

148
00:07:57,720 --> 00:07:59,600
out of gas a little bit because they played so fast.

149
00:07:59,639 --> 00:08:02,360
You just mention that their tempo has kind of slid

150
00:08:02,399 --> 00:08:05,160
down recently to the middle of the pack. They're no

151
00:08:05,240 --> 00:08:08,240
longer you know, flying up and down. So maybe a

152
00:08:08,279 --> 00:08:11,079
little different approach here for Miami. Get a couple of

153
00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:13,040
days off after this, but I think they're the right

154
00:08:13,120 --> 00:08:16,240
side at home short price against the Toronto team that,

155
00:08:16,360 --> 00:08:18,439
like you say, all we have to say really about

156
00:08:18,439 --> 00:08:21,639
Toronto is eighty one points against the Nets. I mean,

157
00:08:22,199 --> 00:08:23,879
you got to be better than that, and it's the

158
00:08:23,959 --> 00:08:25,959
third time in their last five that they haven't reached

159
00:08:25,959 --> 00:08:28,959
one hundred. So I'd probably be on Miami here.

160
00:08:30,439 --> 00:08:33,279
Speaker 1: Yeah, it has to be has to be Miami or nothing.

161
00:08:33,320 --> 00:08:39,679
In that game, Oh, alvs and Pelicans, I mean, do

162
00:08:39,759 --> 00:08:41,519
we still have to break this game down? Raven know

163
00:08:42,480 --> 00:08:45,840
Cavaliers still laying nine points out there. I mean, I

164
00:08:45,879 --> 00:08:48,200
know the Pelicans have to travel on the back to back.

165
00:08:48,960 --> 00:08:52,519
I don't think any situation the Cavaliers should be laying

166
00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:56,120
and expecting to win by double digits. So I means

167
00:08:56,159 --> 00:08:59,600
Pelicans are past. What do you see there from that game?

168
00:09:00,480 --> 00:09:05,759
Speaker 2: Well, certainly, I mean current ats form, it's it's all Pelicans, right,

169
00:09:05,799 --> 00:09:10,240
It's now six straight covers for New Orleans. They just

170
00:09:10,919 --> 00:09:14,799
they lose games, but they cover spreads. They beat Dallas

171
00:09:14,879 --> 00:09:17,559
last night out right, they're playing I mean you said

172
00:09:17,559 --> 00:09:21,600
it all. Yes, say they're playing better obviously, doesn't really

173
00:09:21,639 --> 00:09:24,399
matter who's on the floor. They found a way to

174
00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:28,279
play well. And Cleveland again, like you say, we shouldn't

175
00:09:28,320 --> 00:09:29,879
have to talk about it over and over again, but

176
00:09:29,919 --> 00:09:32,440
they keep doing the same thing and they just I

177
00:09:32,480 --> 00:09:34,679
bet against it last night. I bet against their defense,

178
00:09:34,720 --> 00:09:36,879
just straight fade of their defense. This total's going from

179
00:09:36,879 --> 00:09:38,480
two thirty seven and a half all the way to

180
00:09:38,679 --> 00:09:41,519
forty four and a half. For good reason. Cleveland won't

181
00:09:41,519 --> 00:09:44,720
play any defense. They'll try and score. New Orleans will score.

182
00:09:45,399 --> 00:09:48,240
So maybe if you want to look over you could

183
00:09:48,240 --> 00:09:51,240
look that way too. But I'll tell you what point

184
00:09:51,279 --> 00:09:54,679
spread form recently, and for Cleveland, you could bring it

185
00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:57,720
back even more than recently. One team's really good at

186
00:09:57,720 --> 00:10:00,240
making your money with points, and the other team he's

187
00:10:00,279 --> 00:10:03,039
really good at burning your money laying points. So I

188
00:10:03,039 --> 00:10:04,960
think New Orleans decide you want to be hunt.

189
00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:10,840
Speaker 1: All right. Chicago and Atlanta. Speaking of another team that's

190
00:10:10,840 --> 00:10:14,360
been burning money, Chicago one nothing to do with them,

191
00:10:14,679 --> 00:10:17,039
I mean know, absolutely nothing to do with them. It

192
00:10:17,000 --> 00:10:20,200
will be Hawks or a pass here. Chicago doesn't have

193
00:10:20,240 --> 00:10:22,679
anybody on the injury report. That's a good thing for him.

194
00:10:22,759 --> 00:10:26,960
Atlanta will be without Dyson Daniels and Porzingis. But I

195
00:10:27,000 --> 00:10:29,600
still just want nothing to do with the Bulls until

196
00:10:29,600 --> 00:10:32,799
they show me they can consistently play good basketball again.

197
00:10:33,240 --> 00:10:35,720
So just the slightest of leans towards Atlanta for me,

198
00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:38,399
any thoughts for you from you?

199
00:10:40,039 --> 00:10:43,360
Speaker 2: They just played two days ago and scored three hundred

200
00:10:43,360 --> 00:10:47,440
and two points. I mean, come to one fifty. Nobody

201
00:10:47,480 --> 00:10:52,720
cares on either team, and Dyson Daniels, who you just mentioned,

202
00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:56,480
is the only defender that Atlanta has that cares. So

203
00:10:57,399 --> 00:10:59,240
I could see another over. I mean, this thing is

204
00:10:59,320 --> 00:11:02,120
up to fifty three and a half, but when you

205
00:11:02,159 --> 00:11:04,639
can get to three hundred and two to fifty three

206
00:11:04,679 --> 00:11:07,279
and a half, isn't that bad? So maybe you look over.

207
00:11:07,360 --> 00:11:09,279
I won't play ski. I mean it's two teams that

208
00:11:09,360 --> 00:11:11,399
really we don't want anything to do with at this point.

209
00:11:14,559 --> 00:11:18,279
Speaker 1: Uh, Denver and Dallas. I don't This is a game

210
00:11:18,320 --> 00:11:21,080
I don't really want anything to do with, honestly, So

211
00:11:21,679 --> 00:11:24,200
I'm willing to skip this one unless you have an opinion.

212
00:11:25,600 --> 00:11:27,799
Speaker 2: The only thing I'll say is Denver did it again.

213
00:11:27,840 --> 00:11:29,840
I mean we sat here on this show and said

214
00:11:29,879 --> 00:11:33,320
how high can they make these Denver numbers total wise

215
00:11:33,919 --> 00:11:36,360
one thirty five last night they got over that one

216
00:11:36,399 --> 00:11:38,879
thirty one and a half. They just keep finding ways

217
00:11:38,919 --> 00:11:42,720
to climb over team totals. If you want to look,

218
00:11:42,759 --> 00:11:46,039
maybe you look there. Underdog's been good too as of late.

219
00:11:46,080 --> 00:11:48,080
It's actually a game where two teams have been playing

220
00:11:48,120 --> 00:11:51,159
pretty well. But yeah, look, somebody just said, let's look

221
00:11:51,159 --> 00:11:52,600
at the Denver team total over.

222
00:11:52,840 --> 00:11:53,919
Speaker 1: Yeah, let's go back to that.

223
00:11:54,039 --> 00:11:58,440
Speaker 2: So much sense we can latch onto that.

224
00:11:58,480 --> 00:12:03,559
Speaker 1: I guess New York and Minnesota when I see this

225
00:12:03,720 --> 00:12:09,360
line it opened too, and it's all the way up

226
00:12:09,360 --> 00:12:11,480
to seven and a half has to be some injury stuff.

227
00:12:11,840 --> 00:12:13,200
I mean, a lot of these games are gonna have

228
00:12:13,240 --> 00:12:19,159
injury stuff. But yeah, Brunson and Anobi McBride shammit yabu

229
00:12:19,240 --> 00:12:24,639
Setti all out for Minnesota. McDaniel's and Ingles are both out.

230
00:12:25,200 --> 00:12:26,759
That's why the spread looks like the seven and a

231
00:12:26,799 --> 00:12:31,759
half that we're looking at there. Clearly the Knicks are

232
00:12:31,879 --> 00:12:37,240
looking ahead, getting ready for their Christmas Day game. So

233
00:12:37,440 --> 00:12:39,399
just for that reason, it makes me want to look

234
00:12:39,399 --> 00:12:43,360
towards the Wolves. But the Wolves have not shown any

235
00:12:43,399 --> 00:12:45,559
reason the latest kind of a number. They have not

236
00:12:45,679 --> 00:12:49,279
been playing good basketball. So for that reason, I don't

237
00:12:49,320 --> 00:12:52,639
want to push the button. It's tough, but I do

238
00:12:52,799 --> 00:12:55,240
think the Wolves are the right side. What do you think?

239
00:12:55,360 --> 00:12:55,519
You know?

240
00:12:56,399 --> 00:12:59,679
Speaker 2: I agree, And the reason you used to start off is,

241
00:13:00,360 --> 00:13:03,200
I mean, it's you can't handicap a game. Sometimes you

242
00:13:03,240 --> 00:13:04,799
can't with just one reason. But the fact that the

243
00:13:04,879 --> 00:13:09,240
Knicks played the noontime game Eastern on Christmas Day, they

244
00:13:09,440 --> 00:13:12,120
just had to leave home to travel to Minnesota, only

245
00:13:12,159 --> 00:13:14,039
to travel back home to get ready for that game.

246
00:13:14,080 --> 00:13:16,320
I just don't know that they care. We talk about

247
00:13:16,360 --> 00:13:18,600
scheduled losses all the time, and it just has the

248
00:13:18,759 --> 00:13:21,840
feel of a scheduled loss for the New York Knicks.

249
00:13:21,919 --> 00:13:25,360
If I was gonna play, it would be Minnesota or nothing.

250
00:13:25,480 --> 00:13:28,480
I think the last game I'm forgetting who Minnesota played

251
00:13:28,480 --> 00:13:33,039
the other night, but they played a pretty solid game. Yeah,

252
00:13:33,080 --> 00:13:35,480
and then Milwaukee came back late, right. They beat Milwaukee

253
00:13:35,600 --> 00:13:37,720
only by three late eleven and a half. So it

254
00:13:37,840 --> 00:13:40,799
was good early, it wasn't good late. Four straight unders

255
00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:46,200
for the Timberwolves, four straight team total unders. They haven't

256
00:13:46,200 --> 00:13:47,960
been really dependable. But I don't want to play the

257
00:13:48,039 --> 00:13:49,840
Knicks here. I just don't think they care too much

258
00:13:49,840 --> 00:13:50,399
about this one.

259
00:13:51,919 --> 00:13:54,799
Speaker 1: Yeah, I like the callouts in the chat for Colic.

260
00:13:55,000 --> 00:13:58,279
I do like Colic in general. You know, I've liked

261
00:13:58,320 --> 00:14:01,039
them since he was at Marquette. He will have a

262
00:14:01,360 --> 00:14:05,039
much bigger opportunity without Jason Brunson on the court, so

263
00:14:05,600 --> 00:14:09,559
he should be starting tonight. We've not seen him any

264
00:14:09,879 --> 00:14:12,919
you know, seen him yet without Brunson. But that's just

265
00:14:13,159 --> 00:14:19,159
what's he been doing lately. In general. He's had he averages,

266
00:14:21,519 --> 00:14:26,240
let's see. I don't think that's yeah, twenty five games.

267
00:14:27,240 --> 00:14:29,480
I mean, he's not been getting closed. But he's gonna

268
00:14:29,480 --> 00:14:32,440
have the opportunity clearly one thousand percent, and I think

269
00:14:32,519 --> 00:14:34,559
he's good enough. So I like the looks in the

270
00:14:34,639 --> 00:14:38,200
chat from from Colic. Whether it's siss has double doubled

271
00:14:38,279 --> 00:14:41,559
or same plus seven hundred, a lot of different ways

272
00:14:41,600 --> 00:14:44,000
to look at it. I think that he can. I

273
00:14:44,039 --> 00:14:46,600
think the sists is a safe bet, but I think

274
00:14:46,679 --> 00:14:51,879
he can hit this too. Good stuff from the chat

275
00:14:52,759 --> 00:14:55,120
spurs and okay, see, I guess that's the big game

276
00:14:55,159 --> 00:14:58,679
of the night. Robino opened up six and a half

277
00:14:58,720 --> 00:15:02,559
for okay, see down to five and have mm hmm.

278
00:15:03,399 --> 00:15:07,639
You know, I can't help but think. I mean There

279
00:15:07,720 --> 00:15:10,080
is a lot, a big list of questionables for Okay

280
00:15:10,120 --> 00:15:13,480
seeing this game, but I do think majority of them

281
00:15:13,480 --> 00:15:19,440
are gonna play, especially Chad Hardenstein also missed yesterday, but

282
00:15:20,320 --> 00:15:24,000
I definitely think they were. They're looking forward and ahead

283
00:15:24,039 --> 00:15:26,399
to this game team that knock them out the Cup

284
00:15:26,960 --> 00:15:30,240
chat always, you know, has that matchup versus Wey Wemby's

285
00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:33,840
questionable here too, But I don't know. I can't help

286
00:15:33,840 --> 00:15:36,320
but think this is the get back game for the Thunder.

287
00:15:38,000 --> 00:15:40,559
How are you viewing it? Well?

288
00:15:40,600 --> 00:15:43,360
Speaker 2: I agree, and I do think that the two bigs

289
00:15:43,399 --> 00:15:47,240
were rested last night intentionally for this game, you know,

290
00:15:47,720 --> 00:15:52,000
Oklahoma City. I talked about it a little bit before

291
00:15:52,080 --> 00:15:55,720
that Cup game against seeing Antonio that all the quotes

292
00:15:55,759 --> 00:15:58,279
coming out of there, as much as they're winning, they

293
00:15:58,360 --> 00:16:00,840
wanted to win that as well, and they didn't get it.

294
00:16:00,919 --> 00:16:02,960
Again for the second straight year they've been to the

295
00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:07,200
Final four, they haven't gotten it either time. Definitely disappointment

296
00:16:07,240 --> 00:16:11,600
in the quotes afterwards. I just think very seldom can

297
00:16:11,679 --> 00:16:15,960
we attach revenge to games in the NBA. It doesn't

298
00:16:16,039 --> 00:16:18,600
work as an angle for the most part. There's isolated

299
00:16:18,639 --> 00:16:21,200
incidents where it does. I think this is one of

300
00:16:21,240 --> 00:16:24,240
those isolated incidents where it will. I think Oklahoma City's

301
00:16:24,240 --> 00:16:27,240
got a little bit to prove. San Anton kind of

302
00:16:27,279 --> 00:16:29,840
acted like they had won the whole thing after they

303
00:16:29,919 --> 00:16:32,399
beat Okay See that night, so I could see Oklahoma

304
00:16:32,440 --> 00:16:34,840
City winning this game by more than five and a half.

305
00:16:37,440 --> 00:16:42,879
Speaker 1: All Right, we're an agreement on that. Memphis and Utah.

306
00:16:43,240 --> 00:16:45,759
Only way I'm looking is over in these Utah games.

307
00:16:45,759 --> 00:16:49,320
I know it didn't get there last night, but yeah,

308
00:16:49,440 --> 00:16:52,200
the only way to look is over anything from you here.

309
00:16:54,480 --> 00:16:56,720
Speaker 2: I'm just checking to see real quick if Jah is

310
00:16:56,799 --> 00:17:00,279
going to be involved tonight. It looks like you.

311
00:17:02,159 --> 00:17:02,639
Speaker 1: Questionable?

312
00:17:03,000 --> 00:17:07,000
Speaker 2: Is Utah is pretty good at Memphis list hits questionable?

313
00:17:07,119 --> 00:17:08,920
I don't think it matters though, Ski. We talk about

314
00:17:08,960 --> 00:17:11,920
Jazz home games all the time, and they have been

315
00:17:12,160 --> 00:17:15,440
absolutely if you start going through their ledger, their score

316
00:17:15,519 --> 00:17:19,440
totals have been absolutely on fire lately. So over and nothing.

317
00:17:21,160 --> 00:17:24,079
Speaker 1: Lakers in Phoenix has to be some injury stuff here

318
00:17:24,319 --> 00:17:32,640
as well. Reeves is questionable, Luca's out, Rui's out, Gabe

319
00:17:32,759 --> 00:17:36,559
is out, and then Grayson Allen is doubtful, Jenlely Green

320
00:17:36,599 --> 00:17:41,720
out for Phoenix. Yeah, I mean they get Reeves in there,

321
00:17:41,960 --> 00:17:48,440
Lakers can still win. But yeah, I'm not really wanting

322
00:17:48,519 --> 00:17:51,000
to lay the points with the Signs. I guess that's

323
00:17:51,319 --> 00:17:53,720
just what I'm thinking. As long as they have Reeves,

324
00:17:54,240 --> 00:17:58,599
they'll have enough scoring and playmaking. We've seen them win

325
00:17:58,720 --> 00:18:04,920
games without Luca already this season, so lean Lakers. I'm

326
00:18:04,960 --> 00:18:08,680
probably not gonna bet anything here from you, Robbie now, So.

327
00:18:08,720 --> 00:18:11,319
Speaker 2: I'm gonna make a quick overall point ski because every

328
00:18:11,400 --> 00:18:13,799
year when we come to the All Star Break and

329
00:18:13,920 --> 00:18:16,440
I handicapped this way, I've been doing it for years,

330
00:18:16,480 --> 00:18:19,160
but I always feel like the games leading up to

331
00:18:19,240 --> 00:18:22,599
All Star Break, defense goes out the window. And this

332
00:18:22,799 --> 00:18:25,920
Christmas Break, I think defense probably goes out the window tonight.

333
00:18:25,960 --> 00:18:27,680
If you're looking at any of these games, you just

334
00:18:27,759 --> 00:18:30,319
have the urge I gotta play. I gotta play. My

335
00:18:30,480 --> 00:18:33,119
first inclination always in these types of games is play over.

336
00:18:33,559 --> 00:18:35,440
I happen to like the over in this one, it's

337
00:18:35,480 --> 00:18:38,599
already been pushed up four points, three and a half points.

338
00:18:38,599 --> 00:18:40,519
I guess you could still get two twenty seven, but

339
00:18:40,960 --> 00:18:44,960
I could see a full out offensive onslaught here by

340
00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:47,680
both teams gets the two forty or something. So for me,

341
00:18:47,759 --> 00:18:49,720
it's one of the ones I like quite a bit.

342
00:18:49,799 --> 00:18:51,640
Today's Lakers Phoenix over the total.

343
00:18:53,960 --> 00:19:00,119
Speaker 1: All right, we'll go to Orlando and Portland. And I

344
00:19:00,119 --> 00:19:02,880
don't think Orlando's on the back to back. Oh wait, wait,

345
00:19:04,240 --> 00:19:06,319
you know so many teams it's just hard to keep

346
00:19:06,400 --> 00:19:08,160
up with it. I know Portland is on the back

347
00:19:08,200 --> 00:19:11,279
to back. Yeah, Orlando did play.

348
00:19:11,200 --> 00:19:14,440
Speaker 2: Yesterday, got smacked by Golden State.

349
00:19:15,000 --> 00:19:18,920
Speaker 1: Yep, so another one of those back to back games.

350
00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:20,680
You never know. It's gonna be interro out right now.

351
00:19:20,799 --> 00:19:25,400
The Silva and Subs are questionable for Portland, Grant is

352
00:19:25,480 --> 00:19:31,000
questionable once again. I mean, I think I would trust

353
00:19:31,119 --> 00:19:34,799
Orlando more than I trust Portland right now, especially if

354
00:19:34,799 --> 00:19:40,079
Grant's not going to play again. Portland has been solid

355
00:19:40,119 --> 00:19:43,440
as a home dog. I think they're seven and one

356
00:19:43,519 --> 00:19:47,359
after yesterday, but and they didn't have to travel. I mean,

357
00:19:47,440 --> 00:19:49,680
I guess you can go with that, but you gotta

358
00:19:49,680 --> 00:19:52,079
expect them to win with this two point spread, and

359
00:19:52,200 --> 00:19:55,680
I just don't want to do that. So lean Orlando

360
00:19:57,160 --> 00:19:58,039
anything from you here.

361
00:19:58,279 --> 00:20:01,839
Speaker 2: You know that's the ski. I mean, the Portland home

362
00:20:01,960 --> 00:20:04,319
dog angle is great, but when it's only one and

363
00:20:04,359 --> 00:20:07,720
a half points, it's hard to consider that a true dog.

364
00:20:07,920 --> 00:20:10,920
So again, if you think they can win out right,

365
00:20:10,960 --> 00:20:13,000
you probably just going to the money line anyway, you're

366
00:20:13,000 --> 00:20:15,799
not taking one and a half. But I won't play

367
00:20:15,880 --> 00:20:19,039
that game too much to consider there. And Orlando just

368
00:20:19,119 --> 00:20:20,319
hasn't been good as of late.

369
00:20:22,119 --> 00:20:26,640
Speaker 1: Detroit and Sacramento I want absolutely nothing to do with here, Rovino,

370
00:20:26,839 --> 00:20:29,079
So I'll leave that up to you. If you want

371
00:20:29,160 --> 00:20:31,799
to tackle that game, you.

372
00:20:31,880 --> 00:20:35,119
Speaker 2: Could definitely cut it in half and throw Sacramento out

373
00:20:35,160 --> 00:20:39,200
the window. First, Detroit won and covered again last night

374
00:20:39,279 --> 00:20:41,480
on the road. I think it was against Portland, right,

375
00:20:41,559 --> 00:20:43,920
that was the game where Portland home dog, Detroit good

376
00:20:44,000 --> 00:20:46,960
on the road got it done. They just come to

377
00:20:47,039 --> 00:20:49,160
play every single night. For me, it would be even

378
00:20:49,200 --> 00:20:51,759
though it's nine points, it's got to be Detroit or nothing.

379
00:20:52,759 --> 00:20:54,799
Total bit down to two twenty seven and a half.

380
00:20:54,920 --> 00:21:00,519
Not absolutely sure why that would be a thing team

381
00:21:00,599 --> 00:21:03,160
total with Detroit. I just want to look real quick here,

382
00:21:03,160 --> 00:21:05,519
because that went eighteen and a half. I mean, the

383
00:21:05,559 --> 00:21:08,079
way Sacramento gives him up, I wouldn't be surprised. I

384
00:21:08,119 --> 00:21:09,799
guess the best way I would look there is to

385
00:21:09,920 --> 00:21:12,599
the Detroit team total over one eighteen and a half.

386
00:21:14,039 --> 00:21:16,519
Speaker 1: All right, Then last game on the slate today Rockets

387
00:21:16,519 --> 00:21:21,519
and Clippers open five and a half. It says up

388
00:21:21,599 --> 00:21:25,119
to eight and total down from two twenty two to

389
00:21:25,279 --> 00:21:32,000
two nineteen. I mean, I think we can all agree

390
00:21:32,359 --> 00:21:34,720
the Clippers are one of the less ends in the league.

391
00:21:34,799 --> 00:21:40,759
Right Seven and twenty one is their record. He may

392
00:21:40,920 --> 00:21:43,079
just got done saying that he needs to do a

393
00:21:43,119 --> 00:21:46,119
better job getting his team ready for the lesser opponents.

394
00:21:46,839 --> 00:21:49,279
I mean, you got to you got a chance to

395
00:21:49,319 --> 00:21:53,720
do it right here tonight, right after just losing in

396
00:21:53,839 --> 00:21:58,359
the last game. So I like that chance for the Rockets.

397
00:21:59,079 --> 00:22:02,880
I might being to, you know, first half hand, a

398
00:22:02,920 --> 00:22:07,240
full game in this one, but no Clippers won a game, hooray.

399
00:22:07,359 --> 00:22:09,279
But they're gonna have to show me a little more

400
00:22:09,319 --> 00:22:12,240
than just that one game. So I think the Rockets

401
00:22:12,279 --> 00:22:13,039
are the right side here.

402
00:22:13,079 --> 00:22:15,079
Speaker 2: What do you think? You know? And I think it

403
00:22:15,160 --> 00:22:17,359
was a little wake up call in that game they

404
00:22:17,480 --> 00:22:21,519
played a couple of weeks ago or maybe a week ago,

405
00:22:21,920 --> 00:22:24,799
and Clippers only lost by two in Houston, which is

406
00:22:24,880 --> 00:22:29,160
kind of surprising because again there's so much of an

407
00:22:29,960 --> 00:22:34,880
athleticism edge for Houston. I think maybe they take that

408
00:22:35,039 --> 00:22:39,039
game that result find a way to kind of step

409
00:22:39,119 --> 00:22:41,839
on LA here and just again. LA is the type

410
00:22:41,880 --> 00:22:44,119
of team that would absolutely show no interest in a

411
00:22:44,200 --> 00:22:49,319
game two days before Christmas. So even at home, I

412
00:22:49,359 --> 00:22:51,720
don't think there's much home advantage. I really would look

413
00:22:51,759 --> 00:22:55,039
Houston in that game for the main reason that I

414
00:22:55,119 --> 00:22:57,400
think they were kind of surprised and they might have

415
00:22:57,480 --> 00:23:00,240
let up on LA in that game. One fifteen team.

416
00:23:00,240 --> 00:23:01,279
I don't think they let up here.

417
00:23:03,000 --> 00:23:07,160
Speaker 1: All right, that's the NBA slate for today, So Veno,

418
00:23:08,200 --> 00:23:09,599
I know we got a lot of stuff going on.

419
00:23:09,960 --> 00:23:13,039
I did not. I did not get the last you know,

420
00:23:13,079 --> 00:23:15,200
I can go check it out, but I know we

421
00:23:15,319 --> 00:23:21,880
do have five dollars Tuesday. We have that every single Tuesday.

422
00:23:22,240 --> 00:23:24,039
You can go get a best bet from Robino or

423
00:23:24,119 --> 00:23:28,559
myself overall wagers talk for just five dollars. I'm pretty

424
00:23:28,599 --> 00:23:32,319
sure it's full court our life sex Pass. It's still

425
00:23:32,359 --> 00:23:34,720
up and available three days of NBA and college basketball

426
00:23:34,759 --> 00:23:39,240
from like forty nine dollars. Pretty sure this one is

427
00:23:39,319 --> 00:23:40,599
by three days, get one free.

428
00:23:41,400 --> 00:23:41,599
Speaker 2: Yeah.

429
00:23:42,480 --> 00:23:47,160
Speaker 1: Yeah, so we got that one going and yeah, I

430
00:23:47,480 --> 00:23:49,000
don't want to get too far into it. I look

431
00:23:49,079 --> 00:23:50,880
up the next one while I passed it to Robino,

432
00:23:51,000 --> 00:23:53,000
But you know, you can tell me if there's maybe

433
00:23:53,039 --> 00:23:56,759
anything I missed and or anything else you would like

434
00:23:56,799 --> 00:23:58,720
to promote, and if you have a best bet for

435
00:23:58,799 --> 00:24:00,680
the show, we'd love to hear. If you don't, it's

436
00:24:00,720 --> 00:24:01,119
all good.

437
00:24:02,839 --> 00:24:05,720
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm not sure if the ten day one still

438
00:24:05,839 --> 00:24:09,519
is going on, SKI, so I'm not gonna go ahead.

439
00:24:09,200 --> 00:24:14,160
Speaker 1: And oh yeah, I'm sorry. There's a there's a Christmas

440
00:24:14,200 --> 00:24:17,880
you can get twenty five percent off anything using code

441
00:24:18,440 --> 00:24:22,119
x miss twenty five. Use code x miss twenty five

442
00:24:22,160 --> 00:24:25,359
you'll get twenty five percent off. So that's a good

443
00:24:25,359 --> 00:24:26,200
one we have right now.

444
00:24:26,319 --> 00:24:30,720
Speaker 2: Anything that you like, Yeah, that one I think became

445
00:24:30,799 --> 00:24:33,640
active after midnight, so that's a good one. If you

446
00:24:33,680 --> 00:24:36,119
guys are interested in all sports, go ahead, take your

447
00:24:36,640 --> 00:24:40,160
twenty five percent off with that Christmas code. You know,

448
00:24:40,359 --> 00:24:43,359
best bet SKI. I hate a fourteen game card, and

449
00:24:43,400 --> 00:24:45,240
I'm gonna sit here and have no best bet. But

450
00:24:45,319 --> 00:24:47,119
that's the way I see it here tonight. There's just

451
00:24:47,240 --> 00:24:51,000
nothing that really thrills me to the point of wanting

452
00:24:51,119 --> 00:24:55,119
to make a strong play on anything. I may have

453
00:24:55,160 --> 00:24:57,720
a couple of smaller plays later. I'll just say this

454
00:24:57,960 --> 00:25:00,799
on the way out. Things that I like. Two things

455
00:25:00,839 --> 00:25:02,599
that I like especially more than the rest of the

456
00:25:02,680 --> 00:25:05,599
card is La Phoenix over. I think if you have

457
00:25:05,720 --> 00:25:07,680
to pin me down now, that's probably going to be

458
00:25:07,759 --> 00:25:11,680
the play I lean on tonight and okay, see in

459
00:25:11,759 --> 00:25:15,359
a revenge spot against San Antonio. Those two I have

460
00:25:16,559 --> 00:25:18,319
I have an interest in. We'll see if I get

461
00:25:18,319 --> 00:25:21,039
to the window later, but probably neither one is the

462
00:25:21,079 --> 00:25:22,359
best bet at this point in time.

463
00:25:24,359 --> 00:25:26,799
Speaker 1: All Right, I will have a best bet for today,

464
00:25:26,880 --> 00:25:28,920
And let me just flash this because it is the

465
00:25:29,000 --> 00:25:32,200
last day for this discountant right for NBA through the

466
00:25:32,279 --> 00:25:37,240
finals for myself bourn ninety nine. And yeah, like I said,

467
00:25:37,240 --> 00:25:39,000
it's the last day today. I'm still number one in

468
00:25:39,000 --> 00:25:44,119
the NBA since December of twenty twenty one. So what

469
00:25:44,279 --> 00:25:47,480
am I going to do for best bets here? I

470
00:25:47,559 --> 00:25:50,799
am gonna go with the first game that we talked

471
00:25:50,799 --> 00:25:56,960
about Nets and Sixers. I like that game under you

472
00:25:57,039 --> 00:26:00,519
can still get to nineteen and a half. Like I said,

473
00:26:00,920 --> 00:26:05,359
neither team has been playing with pace. Both defenses have

474
00:26:05,480 --> 00:26:09,359
been surprising good, especially for the Nets side. They're the

475
00:26:09,440 --> 00:26:11,839
number two defensive rated team and they just the Nets

476
00:26:11,920 --> 00:26:14,200
keep going under this number. Every time they play under

477
00:26:14,240 --> 00:26:18,079
this number. I think we'll see another slow pace, more

478
00:26:18,160 --> 00:26:24,039
defensive under in that game. So you know, appreciate you

479
00:26:24,119 --> 00:26:26,359
taking the time to do the show with me. I

480
00:26:26,519 --> 00:26:29,240
hope you. I don't think we'll talk again, so you know,

481
00:26:29,480 --> 00:26:32,920
hopefully you have happy holidays and enjoy your time with

482
00:26:33,039 --> 00:26:37,279
your family. Everybody in the chat, we appreciate you all

483
00:26:37,359 --> 00:26:40,759
tapping into the show and supporting the show. Hopefully you

484
00:26:40,839 --> 00:26:45,799
guys all have happy holidays as well. Yeah, so we'll

485
00:26:45,839 --> 00:26:48,599
be back again afterwards to talk about it. That's the

486
00:26:48,680 --> 00:26:51,079
luck on all your action and we'll get you guys later.

