1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:01,679
Speaker 1: Have you ever looked at the Mona Lisa, you know,

2
00:00:01,720 --> 00:00:06,519
that iconic, really enigmatic smile, and just felt this subtle pull,

3
00:00:07,639 --> 00:00:09,720
like a whisper, that there might be a layer of

4
00:00:09,839 --> 00:00:14,119
meaning hidden right there in plain sight. Hmm, just waiting

5
00:00:14,160 --> 00:00:17,800
for the right key, somehow to unlocket. What if and

6
00:00:17,839 --> 00:00:19,800
this is a big what if one of the most

7
00:00:19,839 --> 00:00:23,679
famous paintings in the world held a secret so profound

8
00:00:24,000 --> 00:00:27,640
it could actually challenge our whole understanding of history, maybe

9
00:00:27,719 --> 00:00:28,920
even reality itself.

10
00:00:29,280 --> 00:00:32,399
Speaker 2: Or maybe you've been looking at an ancient carving, something

11
00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:36,240
thousands of years old, right, Yeah, and wondered is this

12
00:00:36,399 --> 00:00:40,479
just symbolic art or is it maybe a literal picture

13
00:00:40,520 --> 00:00:43,200
of something extraordinary, something you know we're only now starting

14
00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:44,280
to maybe get our heads around.

15
00:00:44,359 --> 00:00:47,280
Speaker 1: It's such a deeply human thing, isn't it, That curiosity

16
00:00:47,320 --> 00:00:50,320
about the untold stories, the hidden truths that might just

17
00:00:50,359 --> 00:00:52,240
be woven into the fabric of our past.

18
00:00:52,439 --> 00:00:56,719
Speaker 2: Absolutely, we see these artifacts, these masterpieces, these ancient records,

19
00:00:56,759 --> 00:00:59,799
and we well, we often assume we understand them within

20
00:00:59,799 --> 00:01:03,280
our current historical frameworks. But what if those frameworks are

21
00:01:03,759 --> 00:01:07,439
like incomplete? What if the stories we've accepted are only

22
00:01:07,480 --> 00:01:10,319
just scratching the surface of something much bigger, much more.

23
00:01:10,280 --> 00:01:13,560
Speaker 1: Complex, exactly. And that's really our mission today on the

24
00:01:13,560 --> 00:01:16,319
deep dive. For this deep dive, we're going to journey

25
00:01:16,359 --> 00:01:21,480
across centuries, across continents, exploring a whole stack of fascinating

26
00:01:21,519 --> 00:01:25,719
insights from articles and research that ask precisely these kinds

27
00:01:25,760 --> 00:01:30,000
of questions. Our dive today will unpack some truly intriguing theories.

28
00:01:30,400 --> 00:01:35,799
We're talking hidden messages in Leonardo da Vinci's masterpieces, ancient

29
00:01:35,879 --> 00:01:40,599
rock carvings depicting mysterious figures way up in Italy, and

30
00:01:40,640 --> 00:01:44,480
even enigmatic hieroglyphs found in well the most unexpected places

31
00:01:44,519 --> 00:01:47,879
like Australia. We're looking for those common threads that link

32
00:01:47,920 --> 00:01:51,280
these seemingly separate historical anomalies and really challenge us to

33
00:01:51,319 --> 00:01:52,920
rethink what we believe about our past.

34
00:01:53,280 --> 00:01:55,640
Speaker 2: And this isn't just about you know, ancient myths or

35
00:01:55,640 --> 00:01:58,640
digging through dusty art history books, you see. It's about

36
00:01:58,680 --> 00:02:01,920
potentially decoding what some people think is a meticulously laid

37
00:02:01,920 --> 00:02:04,959
out historical scavenger hunt, like a series of clues left

38
00:02:04,959 --> 00:02:08,439
by those who came before us. It's about recognizing that maybe,

39
00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:12,560
just maybe the stories our textbooks tell are missing entire chapters,

40
00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:14,360
huge chunks potentially.

41
00:02:14,759 --> 00:02:19,039
Speaker 1: And what's genuinely exciting now is how modern technology and

42
00:02:19,719 --> 00:02:23,199
first perspectives are letting us see these familiar artifacts in

43
00:02:23,240 --> 00:02:24,159
completely new ways.

44
00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:25,000
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's key.

45
00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:28,159
Speaker 1: It's like we're finally getting the right magnifying glass or

46
00:02:28,639 --> 00:02:32,599
maybe even a kind of digital scanner, revealing surprising facts

47
00:02:32,639 --> 00:02:36,039
and well thought provoking connections that were simply invisible before.

48
00:02:36,199 --> 00:02:39,520
Speaker 2: We're moving beyond just assumption, I think, into the realm

49
00:02:39,639 --> 00:02:43,000
of really precise investigation.

50
00:02:42,439 --> 00:02:45,360
Speaker 1: Which I find absolutely thrilling. It feels like we're on

51
00:02:45,400 --> 00:02:48,439
the cusp of some major reinterpretations me too.

52
00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:50,840
Speaker 3: It's a fascinating time to be looking at this stuff.

53
00:02:50,879 --> 00:02:54,039
Speaker 1: Okay, so let's unpack this with one of history's greatest enigmas,

54
00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:56,840
Leonardo da Vinci. I mean, the name itself is basically

55
00:02:56,879 --> 00:02:59,479
synonymous with genius. We all know the Mona Lisa that

56
00:02:59,520 --> 00:03:04,000
captivated portrait y. What's truly fascinating, I think is Leonardo's profound,

57
00:03:04,479 --> 00:03:07,439
almost obsessive relationship with this specific painting.

58
00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:11,159
Speaker 2: It really was an obsession. Think about it began in Florence,

59
00:03:11,199 --> 00:03:15,479
Italy fifteen oh three, just a simple portrait commissions supposedly

60
00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:19,719
from a wealthy silk merchant, Francesco del Jacondo for his

61
00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:21,680
wife Lisa Jardini.

62
00:03:21,879 --> 00:03:23,520
Speaker 1: Okay, standard enough beginning.

63
00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:27,000
Speaker 2: But here's the kicker. As you said, Leonardo never actually

64
00:03:27,080 --> 00:03:27,479
delivered it.

65
00:03:27,520 --> 00:03:29,240
Speaker 1: He kept it, never gave it to the guy who

66
00:03:29,240 --> 00:03:29,759
paid for it.

67
00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:30,280
Speaker 3: Nope.

68
00:03:30,520 --> 00:03:32,719
Speaker 2: He started it in fifteen oh three and he never

69
00:03:32,759 --> 00:03:34,919
parted with it, carried it with him for the rest

70
00:03:34,919 --> 00:03:36,560
of his life, even took it to France when he

71
00:03:36,560 --> 00:03:38,719
moved there as an old man under the patronage of

72
00:03:38,759 --> 00:03:40,080
King Francis thes Sirsto.

73
00:03:40,599 --> 00:03:43,280
Speaker 3: And get this, he dedicated.

74
00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:47,719
Speaker 2: His final sixteen years of his life to this single, smallish,

75
00:03:48,319 --> 00:03:50,080
twenty by thirty inch portrait.

76
00:03:50,400 --> 00:03:52,120
Speaker 1: Sixteen years on one painting.

77
00:03:52,280 --> 00:03:55,719
Speaker 2: Sixteen years for a man who was constantly inventing, sketching,

78
00:03:55,840 --> 00:04:00,280
studying anatomy, designing war machines, dissecting bodies, painting other major works.

79
00:04:00,879 --> 00:04:03,120
Speaker 3: This singular, continuous.

80
00:04:02,520 --> 00:04:06,199
Speaker 2: Focus on one portrait is just well, it's unprecedented.

81
00:04:06,280 --> 00:04:07,759
Speaker 1: It's scream significance, doesn't it.

82
00:04:07,759 --> 00:04:11,199
Speaker 2: It absolutely signals an unparalleled personal significance. It wasn't just

83
00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:11,919
another job.

84
00:04:12,400 --> 00:04:15,479
Speaker 1: Sixteen years. I mean, when you think about how long

85
00:04:15,599 --> 00:04:18,480
artists usually spend on a portrait, even a detailed one.

86
00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:22,279
That kind of commitment is simply mind boggling. It really

87
00:04:22,319 --> 00:04:25,399
makes you wonder what was it about this painting that

88
00:04:25,519 --> 00:04:28,120
consumed him so completely exactly.

89
00:04:28,160 --> 00:04:30,680
Speaker 2: It clearly wasn't just a commission anymore, or even just

90
00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:34,600
a beautiful painting of a woman, As many scholars have noted,

91
00:04:34,639 --> 00:04:38,360
it seemed to evolve into this philosophical meditation on all

92
00:04:38,399 --> 00:04:40,160
his intellectual concerns.

93
00:04:39,759 --> 00:04:41,680
Speaker 1: So like a personal notebook, but in paint.

94
00:04:42,199 --> 00:04:44,360
Speaker 2: In a way, yeah, it became a canvas for his

95
00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:48,199
entire worldview, a place to put his thoughts on science, art,

96
00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:52,519
the human body, optics, maybe even the nature of reality itself.

97
00:04:52,639 --> 00:04:55,519
Speaker 1: And that's maybe what gives her smile, that enduring mystery,

98
00:04:55,720 --> 00:04:58,120
that famous fumato effect where the corners of her mouth

99
00:04:58,199 --> 00:05:01,040
or blurred, making her smile seem to shift and change.

100
00:05:01,160 --> 00:05:03,600
Speaker 2: Right, she seems to know something that we don't, as

101
00:05:03,639 --> 00:05:06,759
the saying goes, And perhaps that reflects Leonardo himself imbuing

102
00:05:06,839 --> 00:05:09,519
it with some kind of knowledge, something deeper that goes

103
00:05:09,519 --> 00:05:11,199
beyond just the visual representation.

104
00:05:11,480 --> 00:05:13,839
Speaker 1: It's almost like he was encoding his thoughts into the

105
00:05:13,879 --> 00:05:14,639
paint itself.

106
00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:19,360
Speaker 2: It definitely raises that question, what profound secrets or personal beliefs.

107
00:05:19,360 --> 00:05:21,639
Would you embed in your life's greatest work if you

108
00:05:21,720 --> 00:05:25,519
knew it would last for centuries be scrutinized by millions.

109
00:05:26,079 --> 00:05:29,879
Leonardo's unique approach seems perfect for hiding things in plain sight,

110
00:05:30,959 --> 00:05:35,199
and this intense personal obsession has definitely fueled these pervasive

111
00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:38,839
theories that Leonardo deliberately puts secret symbols and messages into

112
00:05:38,879 --> 00:05:40,319
his works, not just.

113
00:05:40,279 --> 00:05:42,439
Speaker 1: The Mona Lisa, So it wasn't just a one off.

114
00:05:43,000 --> 00:05:43,759
Speaker 3: Arguably not.

115
00:05:44,160 --> 00:05:47,240
Speaker 2: Some believe he was rethinking traditional subjects in new and

116
00:05:47,319 --> 00:05:49,920
creative ways from the very start of his career, always

117
00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:53,639
pushing boundaries, always trying to encode deeper meaning. It really

118
00:05:53,680 --> 00:05:56,399
makes you think about how an artist's personal intensity, their

119
00:05:56,439 --> 00:06:00,000
inner world can transform a simple commission into a life's world,

120
00:06:00,639 --> 00:06:03,839
layering it with unspoken meaning that still intrigues us hundreds

121
00:06:03,879 --> 00:06:04,480
of years later.

122
00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:06,759
Speaker 1: It's not just pain on wood, it's yeah, yeah, a

123
00:06:06,800 --> 00:06:09,600
piece of his soul, maybe even a coded message left

124
00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:09,959
for us.

125
00:06:10,120 --> 00:06:12,759
Speaker 2: And speaking of hidden messages, we absolutely have to talk

126
00:06:12,800 --> 00:06:17,439
about one of Leonardo's most defining, most idiosyncratic characteristics, his

127
00:06:17,560 --> 00:06:19,600
consistent use of mirror writing.

128
00:06:19,839 --> 00:06:22,399
Speaker 1: Ah Yes, the backward script exactly.

129
00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:26,480
Speaker 2: Almost all his personal notes, from scientific observations down to

130
00:06:26,759 --> 00:06:29,959
like shopping lists were penned from right to left, a

131
00:06:30,040 --> 00:06:33,480
reverse script that you actually need a mirror to read easily.

132
00:06:33,800 --> 00:06:37,040
It's a technique that truly defines him as an individual,

133
00:06:37,399 --> 00:06:40,759
a private code really for a profoundly private man.

134
00:06:41,439 --> 00:06:44,120
Speaker 1: So strange, but so typically Leonardo.

135
00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:45,639
Speaker 3: It's a crucial piece of the puzzle.

136
00:06:45,639 --> 00:06:48,800
Speaker 2: Though. If mirror writing was so central to how he wrote,

137
00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:51,920
the possibility that he also used this mirror technique within his.

138
00:06:51,920 --> 00:06:54,360
Speaker 1: Artwork to create hidden images.

139
00:06:54,040 --> 00:06:56,959
Speaker 3: Exactly, creating unknown dimensions.

140
00:06:56,360 --> 00:07:00,560
Speaker 2: That only a reflection or perhaps digital manipulation now could reveal.

141
00:07:00,959 --> 00:07:04,360
It's certainly worth exploring. Remember, Leonardo wasn't just an artist.

142
00:07:04,360 --> 00:07:05,800
Speaker 3: He was a meticulous.

143
00:07:05,279 --> 00:07:09,639
Speaker 2: Scientist obsessed with optics, totally obsessed. He was insatiably curious

144
00:07:09,639 --> 00:07:12,839
about reflections and refractions and optics and the human anatomy

145
00:07:12,839 --> 00:07:16,120
of the eye, even things like mirrored reflections of conical

146
00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:19,600
shaped mirrors. This wasn't just some stylistic quirk. It was

147
00:07:19,680 --> 00:07:24,000
deeply tied into his scientific and artistic curiosity. He understood

148
00:07:24,079 --> 00:07:26,600
light shadow perspective like almost no one else.

149
00:07:26,920 --> 00:07:31,399
Speaker 1: Okay, so inter graphic designer Terrence Masson at Northeastern University.

150
00:07:31,439 --> 00:07:34,519
He's been using a cutting edge computer tech to explore

151
00:07:34,519 --> 00:07:38,199
this very hypothesis, driven, like you said, by Leonardo's known

152
00:07:38,199 --> 00:07:41,040
fascination with optics and reflections.

153
00:07:40,519 --> 00:07:45,399
Speaker 2: Right and Masson parstially, is something really interesting that Leonardo's deliberate,

154
00:07:45,519 --> 00:07:49,199
often anatomically unusual hand placements in his portraits.

155
00:07:49,639 --> 00:07:51,079
Speaker 1: The way hands are posed.

156
00:07:51,160 --> 00:07:55,240
Speaker 2: Yeah, those sometimes slightly odd looking poses might actually be

157
00:07:55,360 --> 00:07:58,160
a clue to the axis points of rotation of these

158
00:07:58,199 --> 00:08:02,279
mirrored angles, like wi cues almost markers telling you where

159
00:08:02,319 --> 00:08:05,480
to place the reflective plane or where to digitally fold.

160
00:08:05,199 --> 00:08:08,120
Speaker 1: The image, like he left instructions embedded in the art

161
00:08:08,160 --> 00:08:11,600
itself for a future generation with the right tools.

162
00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:12,480
Speaker 3: That's the idea.

163
00:08:12,600 --> 00:08:15,279
Speaker 2: And what's fascinating here is how modern tech lets us

164
00:08:15,319 --> 00:08:18,079
test these suspicions things that would have been impossible just

165
00:08:18,120 --> 00:08:19,120
a few decades ago.

166
00:08:19,680 --> 00:08:21,399
Speaker 1: So what did Mason do well?

167
00:08:21,439 --> 00:08:25,560
Speaker 2: His work involved digitally replicating and manipulating the classic Mona Lisa,

168
00:08:26,120 --> 00:08:29,439
taking the image, duplicating it, and then mirroring one half

169
00:08:29,480 --> 00:08:32,759
along a specific axis, often suggested by those hand positions

170
00:08:32,799 --> 00:08:36,559
you mentioned. And when the two mirrored halves were brought together,

171
00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:37,679
what did it.

172
00:08:37,639 --> 00:08:40,200
Speaker 1: Reveal don't keep me in suspense, A.

173
00:08:40,200 --> 00:08:44,720
Speaker 2: Helmet shaped creature, clearly identifiable with quite distinct features, not

174
00:08:44,840 --> 00:08:46,039
just a random pattern.

175
00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:49,480
Speaker 1: A helmet shaped creature. Wow? Okay, but is that just

176
00:08:50,360 --> 00:08:54,559
a coincidence? Perry Dolia? Maybe seeing faces in clouds?

177
00:08:54,600 --> 00:08:57,480
Speaker 3: That's always the question, right. But here's where it gets

178
00:08:57,679 --> 00:08:58,759
truly remarkable.

179
00:08:59,279 --> 00:09:03,000
Speaker 2: This apparently isn't an isolated incident, a very similar creature,

180
00:09:03,080 --> 00:09:07,240
an almost identical visual anomaly is seen when this exact

181
00:09:07,279 --> 00:09:11,080
technique is applied to another famous Da Vinci painting, Virgin

182
00:09:11,159 --> 00:09:12,559
and Child with Saint Anne.

183
00:09:12,679 --> 00:09:13,919
Speaker 1: The same creature shows up again.

184
00:09:14,159 --> 00:09:14,679
Speaker 3: Very similar.

185
00:09:14,799 --> 00:09:17,279
Speaker 2: Yes, And then you look at Virgin of the Rocks

186
00:09:17,480 --> 00:09:22,519
with its famously dramatic and anatomically complex hand poses, which

187
00:09:22,559 --> 00:09:25,080
again prompts the question is this also hinting at where

188
00:09:25,080 --> 00:09:28,360
to place a reflective plane to reveal yet another hidden image?

189
00:09:28,440 --> 00:09:31,480
The consistency starts to challenge the idea of pure coincidence.

190
00:09:31,559 --> 00:09:34,120
Speaker 1: It really does if it's in multiple major works.

191
00:09:34,440 --> 00:09:37,320
Speaker 2: And when these manipulated images are brought into a three

192
00:09:37,399 --> 00:09:41,559
D environment, duplicated and further analyzed using this mirror technique,

193
00:09:41,720 --> 00:09:45,360
the results are quite striking. The composite images reveal something

194
00:09:45,399 --> 00:09:48,759
described as spooky and bearing an interesting similarity to what

195
00:09:48,799 --> 00:09:52,559
was found in the Mona Lisa, consistently resembling something close

196
00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:54,679
to a modern understanding of alien heads.

197
00:09:55,039 --> 00:09:58,639
Speaker 1: Okay, alien heads is a big leap, but the repetition

198
00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:04,600
across masterpieces it does suggest a deliberate, meticulous intention, doesn't it.

199
00:10:04,600 --> 00:10:05,879
Speaker 3: It strongly suggests it.

200
00:10:05,799 --> 00:10:08,519
Speaker 2: It really makes you wonder why would he so precisely

201
00:10:08,559 --> 00:10:11,679
embed and hide these images? What does it imply about

202
00:10:11,720 --> 00:10:15,720
his worldview or perhaps even his experiences. The precision and

203
00:10:15,879 --> 00:10:19,919
frankly foresight required to embed such complex visual codes within

204
00:10:20,000 --> 00:10:23,200
works meant to be viewed normally for centuries, It's truly

205
00:10:23,279 --> 00:10:25,799
mind boggling. It speaks to a genius far beyond just

206
00:10:25,919 --> 00:10:26,799
artistic skills.

207
00:10:26,840 --> 00:10:30,639
Speaker 1: Seriously, imagine the sheer brain power required to not just

208
00:10:30,720 --> 00:10:34,919
pain a masterpiece, but to embed a whole second, hidden

209
00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:38,720
layer of meaning that only technological advances centuries later could

210
00:10:38,720 --> 00:10:42,480
fully reveal. It's like he was leaving digital breadcrumbs almost

211
00:10:42,639 --> 00:10:45,399
for a future generation, knowing they would eventually have the

212
00:10:45,440 --> 00:10:47,919
tools to follow them. It just makes you pause and

213
00:10:48,000 --> 00:10:53,120
consider the vast intellectual leap needed to even conceive such

214
00:10:53,159 --> 00:10:55,279
a complex time delayed message system.

215
00:10:55,399 --> 00:10:58,360
Speaker 2: It really does, and it raises that crucial question. Was

216
00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:03,120
he documenting something witnessed, perhaps something controversial or dangerous to

217
00:11:03,159 --> 00:11:04,480
reveal openly.

218
00:11:04,039 --> 00:11:05,519
Speaker 1: Back then, or was it something else?

219
00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:09,759
Speaker 2: Or was he expressing a deeply held, maybe esoteric, belief

220
00:11:10,039 --> 00:11:13,159
about humanity's place in the cosmos, a vision of non

221
00:11:13,240 --> 00:11:16,320
human entities that he felt compelled to capture, even if.

222
00:11:16,279 --> 00:11:17,000
Speaker 3: He had to hide it.

223
00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:21,120
Speaker 1: Now, let's pivot slightly from his masterpieces to something even

224
00:11:21,159 --> 00:11:25,320
more personal and incredibly rare. The British Library holds Leonardo

225
00:11:25,399 --> 00:11:29,600
da Vinci's Codex Arundel. This is essentially Leonardo's personal collection

226
00:11:29,720 --> 00:11:34,639
of scientific observations, engineering designs, philosophical thoughts, all penned in

227
00:11:34,679 --> 00:11:36,080
that distinctive mirrorscript.

228
00:11:36,240 --> 00:11:38,840
Speaker 2: A real treasure trove, two hundred and eighty three papers,

229
00:11:38,840 --> 00:11:41,039
and we have thousands of pages of his writing. Overall,

230
00:11:41,279 --> 00:11:42,799
they tell us a lot about what he was thinking,

231
00:11:42,799 --> 00:11:43,559
what he was creating.

232
00:11:43,759 --> 00:11:46,559
Speaker 1: But what's striking, as you mentioned earlier, is the almost

233
00:11:46,600 --> 00:11:52,200
complete absence of personal details. Leonardo was famously private, fiercely.

234
00:11:51,759 --> 00:11:56,120
Speaker 2: Guarded, extremely which makes any autobiographical notes we do find

235
00:11:56,159 --> 00:11:59,840
incredibly significant, like finding a single personal diary entry in

236
00:12:00,200 --> 00:12:02,000
massive technical library.

237
00:12:01,600 --> 00:12:03,120
Speaker 1: A needle, and a genius haystack.

238
00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:06,600
Speaker 2: Exactly so, when a figure so famously private chooses to

239
00:12:06,639 --> 00:12:10,919
record something personal, it immediately flags it as profound, maybe

240
00:12:10,919 --> 00:12:12,320
even traumatic.

241
00:12:11,840 --> 00:12:13,600
Speaker 1: And there is something like that in the Codex Artle.

242
00:12:13,720 --> 00:12:17,559
Speaker 2: There is among these papers a few rare personal anecdotes

243
00:12:17,600 --> 00:12:21,559
were found written just after his mysterious two year disappearance

244
00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:24,440
between fourteen seventy six and fourteen seventy eight.

245
00:12:24,559 --> 00:12:26,159
Speaker 1: He disappeared for two years, yes.

246
00:12:26,200 --> 00:12:29,679
Speaker 2: A period where his whereabouts are largely unaccounted for, and

247
00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:33,440
one particular account details a youthful adventure where he encountered.

248
00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:34,559
Speaker 3: A vast, mysterious cave.

249
00:12:34,759 --> 00:12:37,919
Speaker 2: Okay, he describes standing on its edge, feeling both terrified

250
00:12:37,919 --> 00:12:41,080
by the darkness and simultaneously having a certain desire to

251
00:12:41,120 --> 00:12:43,519
try to understand what was in there, drawn in by

252
00:12:43,559 --> 00:12:45,240
curiosity despite his fear.

253
00:12:45,399 --> 00:12:50,120
Speaker 1: Terrified by the darkness, but a desire to understand. Wow,

254
00:12:50,159 --> 00:12:53,480
that's a powerful and very human mix of emotions, isn't it.

255
00:12:53,559 --> 00:12:56,480
Speaker 2: Absolutely And remember this was one of the very few

256
00:12:56,559 --> 00:13:00,919
personal anecdotes he ever recorded that alone suggest it's profound,

257
00:13:01,000 --> 00:13:02,320
indelible impact on him.

258
00:13:02,440 --> 00:13:03,559
Speaker 1: Something must have happened.

259
00:13:03,639 --> 00:13:06,480
Speaker 2: Some have even speculated this incident occurred round the same

260
00:13:06,519 --> 00:13:09,840
time in his childhood when he supposedly fashioned his famous

261
00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:13,960
rather terrifying shield with the head of the monstrous medusa

262
00:13:14,039 --> 00:13:14,519
on it.

263
00:13:14,480 --> 00:13:17,639
Speaker 1: A creature of terrifying power. Interesting connection.

264
00:13:17,840 --> 00:13:21,399
Speaker 2: It raises the question what exactly did Leonardo find or

265
00:13:21,440 --> 00:13:23,480
think he found in that cave that left such a

266
00:13:23,559 --> 00:13:27,399
lasting impression. Was it just a weird geological formation or

267
00:13:27,399 --> 00:13:30,200
did he genuinely believe he glimpsed something other.

268
00:13:30,440 --> 00:13:32,480
Speaker 1: The fact that he wrote it down when he wrote

269
00:13:32,519 --> 00:13:36,200
almost nothing else personal is just so significant. It points

270
00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:38,440
to maybe a singular transformative experience.

271
00:13:38,679 --> 00:13:39,159
Speaker 3: It could.

272
00:13:39,159 --> 00:13:41,320
Speaker 2: And if we connect this to the broader picture of

273
00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:44,480
his artistic output, particularly around that time, we see another

274
00:13:44,519 --> 00:13:49,200
strange anomaly, his series of grotesque heads eh Tho drawings.

275
00:13:49,559 --> 00:13:51,279
Speaker 1: They're really unsettling, they are.

276
00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:54,720
Speaker 2: These are not typical human depictions at all. They are

277
00:13:55,200 --> 00:14:01,480
misshapen faces, elongated skulls, flattened faces, often described as eerie, troubling,

278
00:14:01,679 --> 00:14:05,120
monstrous images with a really strange presence. They just don't

279
00:14:05,159 --> 00:14:05,679
look human.

280
00:14:05,759 --> 00:14:08,080
Speaker 1: And what stands out to me is the striking contrast.

281
00:14:08,480 --> 00:14:12,720
This is the artist renowned for careful realistic depiction, right,

282
00:14:13,120 --> 00:14:17,480
someone who meticulously studied human anatomy, obsessed over the nuances

283
00:14:17,519 --> 00:14:20,759
of the human form exactly, and yet here are these bizarre,

284
00:14:21,200 --> 00:14:24,480
frankly non human like visages. It's not just a stylistic choice,

285
00:14:24,480 --> 00:14:26,600
like a caricature seems to be. It feels like a

286
00:14:26,679 --> 00:14:29,320
radical departure from his usual dedication to realism.

287
00:14:29,399 --> 00:14:30,080
Speaker 3: It really does.

288
00:14:30,200 --> 00:14:32,879
Speaker 1: It forces us to ask that powerful question, what in

289
00:14:32,879 --> 00:14:34,960
the world was he looking at? Did he actually encounter

290
00:14:35,080 --> 00:14:38,000
creatures that look like this, maybe in that cave or

291
00:14:38,080 --> 00:14:39,919
somewhere else during those missing years.

292
00:14:40,159 --> 00:14:43,320
Speaker 2: It's the million dollar question. It makes you wonder, how

293
00:14:43,320 --> 00:14:47,600
do our own most profound, maybe terrifying, or inspiring personal

294
00:14:47,639 --> 00:14:51,639
experiences shape our creative output, perhaps in ways we don't

295
00:14:51,639 --> 00:14:54,799
even consciously realize, or maybe in ways we deliberately obscure

296
00:14:55,279 --> 00:14:58,279
for reasons of personal safety or just societal acceptance at

297
00:14:58,279 --> 00:14:58,639
the time.

298
00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:02,720
Speaker 1: Could these grotesques heads be a kind of artistic reportage,

299
00:15:03,399 --> 00:15:06,080
an attempt to record a non human form that defied

300
00:15:06,159 --> 00:15:07,159
conventional description.

301
00:15:07,600 --> 00:15:10,559
Speaker 2: They are indeed very very strange, as you say, and

302
00:15:10,720 --> 00:15:13,600
their presence in his body of work really challenges the

303
00:15:13,639 --> 00:15:18,000
comfortable narrative of Leonardo as solely a master of human realism.

304
00:15:18,600 --> 00:15:21,440
It implies a hidden narrative, maybe a secret world that

305
00:15:21,480 --> 00:15:24,159
he felt compelled to capture, even if he had.

306
00:15:23,919 --> 00:15:27,679
Speaker 1: To code it. So if Leonardo, this solitary genius, might

307
00:15:27,720 --> 00:15:30,960
have embedded hidden truths in his art, perhaps influenced by

308
00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:35,200
enigmatic personal encounters, it really begs the question where earlier

309
00:15:35,519 --> 00:15:38,919
entire civilizations also attempting to record extraordinary encounters.

310
00:15:39,080 --> 00:15:41,039
Speaker 2: That's the next logical step, isn't it.

311
00:15:41,120 --> 00:15:43,960
Speaker 1: Let's journey from Renaissance Italy go back centuries and just

312
00:15:44,000 --> 00:15:47,759
a few hundred miles north to val Camonica. Here thousands

313
00:15:47,759 --> 00:15:50,120
of ancient rock carvings might offer an even more direct

314
00:15:50,320 --> 00:15:53,759
pictorial record of well celestial visitors.

315
00:15:54,080 --> 00:15:58,399
Speaker 2: Thal Camonica is incredible. It's a UNESCO World Heritage Site

316
00:15:58,440 --> 00:16:00,879
in northern Italy, about a hunt undred and sixty five

317
00:16:00,919 --> 00:16:04,919
miles from that other enigmatic spot, Mount Misene. It's a

318
00:16:05,080 --> 00:16:08,879
genuine treasure trove of images from the ancient world. We're

319
00:16:08,919 --> 00:16:13,360
talking over three hundred thousand petroglyphs carved by the Communion

320
00:16:13,399 --> 00:16:15,919
people over an eight thousand year period.

321
00:16:16,080 --> 00:16:18,519
Speaker 1: Three hundred thousand carvings. That's immense.

322
00:16:18,799 --> 00:16:19,679
Speaker 3: It is, and.

323
00:16:19,679 --> 00:16:22,840
Speaker 2: While scholars people like William Henry and Luca Girelli have

324
00:16:22,919 --> 00:16:27,159
meticulously documented and studied these carvings for years. The reality

325
00:16:27,279 --> 00:16:29,240
is they don't agree on the meaning of the.

326
00:16:29,200 --> 00:16:32,840
Speaker 1: Images ah the classic archaeological debate exactly.

327
00:16:33,440 --> 00:16:37,399
Speaker 2: But this ambiguity, this lack of consensus, leaves a fascinating opening.

328
00:16:37,639 --> 00:16:40,399
Some scholars are actually very open minded to the ancient

329
00:16:40,440 --> 00:16:43,720
astronaut theory when they try to interpret certain recurring motifs

330
00:16:43,759 --> 00:16:44,240
found there.

331
00:16:44,360 --> 00:16:45,840
Speaker 1: And when you look at some of these carvings, you

332
00:16:45,840 --> 00:16:48,200
can absolutely see why they might think that. There's one

333
00:16:48,320 --> 00:16:52,039
really distinct figure that's been famously dubbed the spaceman.

334
00:16:51,799 --> 00:16:53,600
Speaker 2: Right, the camulean astronaut figure.

335
00:16:53,759 --> 00:16:56,960
Speaker 1: It's not just an abstract human form. It clearly has

336
00:16:57,000 --> 00:17:02,720
this large, rounded helmet that looks markably like modern astronaut headgear,

337
00:17:03,519 --> 00:17:05,480
and his body seems to have lines coming off it,

338
00:17:05,599 --> 00:17:07,519
making it appear like he's glowing.

339
00:17:07,680 --> 00:17:10,599
Speaker 2: It's an incredibly detailed depiction, and it really doesn't fit

340
00:17:10,759 --> 00:17:15,519
neatly into the usual interpretations of say, tribal warriors or

341
00:17:15,599 --> 00:17:17,079
nature spirits or deities.

342
00:17:17,279 --> 00:17:19,799
Speaker 1: No, it looks like something else entirely. Then there's the

343
00:17:19,839 --> 00:17:22,240
communion rose, right, this recurring symbol.

344
00:17:22,440 --> 00:17:26,119
Speaker 2: Yes, the communion rose appears thousands of times across the site.

345
00:17:26,160 --> 00:17:29,880
It has a very distinctive flower like shape, often with symmetrical,

346
00:17:29,960 --> 00:17:34,880
spiraling or concentric patterns radiating outwards. Now, its exact meaning

347
00:17:34,960 --> 00:17:36,960
is lost to history obviously.

348
00:17:36,720 --> 00:17:38,160
Speaker 1: So what are the standard theories.

349
00:17:38,480 --> 00:17:42,680
Speaker 2: Traditional theories suggest it's maybe a religious symbol, perhaps representing

350
00:17:42,720 --> 00:17:45,480
the sun, or maybe it's a complex representation of the

351
00:17:45,519 --> 00:17:49,440
movement of the stars in the night sky logical possibilities.

352
00:17:49,680 --> 00:17:52,440
But from an ancient astronaut perspective it takes on a

353
00:17:52,519 --> 00:17:56,480
very different interpretation. It's seen as possibly representing the vessel

354
00:17:56,559 --> 00:18:00,720
that brought these helmeted figures, a twirling spin ship in

355
00:18:00,759 --> 00:18:05,519
the sky, suggesting beings coming from other worlds. The radial

356
00:18:05,559 --> 00:18:08,480
symmetry and the dynamic appearance, you have to admit, lend

357
00:18:08,519 --> 00:18:10,880
themselves quite compellingly to that interpretation.

358
00:18:11,359 --> 00:18:14,880
Speaker 1: A twirling spinning ship. That's a powerful image. And I

359
00:18:14,880 --> 00:18:16,319
think there's also a star symbol.

360
00:18:16,599 --> 00:18:16,880
Speaker 3: Yeah.

361
00:18:17,079 --> 00:18:20,160
Speaker 2: Further reinforcing this idea is the frequent appearance of a

362
00:18:20,200 --> 00:18:23,519
five pointed star, not just as a simple dot, but

363
00:18:23,599 --> 00:18:28,160
sometimes depicted radiating lines like energy, which in this specific

364
00:18:28,160 --> 00:18:31,440
context is often interpreted as representing energy from the stars

365
00:18:31,759 --> 00:18:34,559
or maybe even star beings. Themselves coming to this place.

366
00:18:34,680 --> 00:18:37,519
Speaker 1: Okay, So if you put these elements together, the helmeted spaceman,

367
00:18:37,640 --> 00:18:41,359
the possible spinning ship, the star energy, the ancient astronaut

368
00:18:41,359 --> 00:18:44,519
theory basically proposes that these carvings aren't just art or

369
00:18:44,559 --> 00:18:45,720
symbols exactly.

370
00:18:45,799 --> 00:18:48,279
Speaker 2: They see it as a kind of newspaper documenting a

371
00:18:48,359 --> 00:18:52,359
historical event, a literal pictorial record saying what saying. Essentially,

372
00:18:52,799 --> 00:18:55,079
this object was in the sky above us at some point,

373
00:18:55,160 --> 00:18:57,920
and the spaceman figure came down and maybe met.

374
00:18:57,720 --> 00:18:58,640
Speaker 3: The Communion people.

375
00:18:59,039 --> 00:19:02,240
Speaker 2: This perspective rat shifts our understanding of ancient art. It

376
00:19:02,240 --> 00:19:04,799
moves it from purely symbolic or religious to.

377
00:19:05,119 --> 00:19:08,440
Speaker 1: A potentially historical documentation of something extraordinary.

378
00:19:08,480 --> 00:19:12,200
Speaker 2: Precisely, it makes you ask, what if the art of

379
00:19:12,279 --> 00:19:16,240
ancient peoples was not just symbolic but a literal attempt

380
00:19:16,240 --> 00:19:18,799
to record encounters that defy.

381
00:19:18,559 --> 00:19:21,000
Speaker 3: Our modern understanding? And how do we.

382
00:19:21,039 --> 00:19:25,000
Speaker 2: Differentiate between myth, religion and potential eyewitness accounts in the

383
00:19:25,039 --> 00:19:28,960
distant past, Especially when our modern interpretations can be so

384
00:19:29,039 --> 00:19:33,359
easily influenced by our own scientific knowledge and cultural biases.

385
00:19:33,559 --> 00:19:36,839
Speaker 1: It's a profound challenge, isn't it? To our preconceived notions

386
00:19:36,880 --> 00:19:40,119
of what constitutes ancient history. How do we read these

387
00:19:40,160 --> 00:19:42,359
messages without imposing our own worldview.

388
00:19:42,440 --> 00:19:43,480
Speaker 3: It's a huge challenge.

389
00:19:43,480 --> 00:19:45,240
Speaker 2: And to connect this even further, let's look at the

390
00:19:45,240 --> 00:19:49,240
ancient stories from the nearby Sussau Valley, specifically the legend

391
00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:52,680
that the city of Turin, a major regional capital even today,

392
00:19:53,000 --> 00:19:55,920
h was supposedly founded by faith On, a character we

393
00:19:56,000 --> 00:19:58,759
know from Greek mythology, who, according to local legend, came

394
00:19:58,799 --> 00:19:59,799
to Earth from the stars.

395
00:20:00,079 --> 00:20:02,960
Speaker 1: faithOn, son of the sun god Helios Rite, the one

396
00:20:02,960 --> 00:20:04,240
who drove the sun chariot.

397
00:20:04,440 --> 00:20:05,279
Speaker 3: That's the one.

398
00:20:05,759 --> 00:20:09,200
Speaker 2: The myth is incredibly rich in detail, a tragic but

399
00:20:09,319 --> 00:20:14,240
also transformative tale. In the standard Greek version, faithOn, trying

400
00:20:14,240 --> 00:20:17,960
to prove he's Helios's son, demands to drive his father's

401
00:20:18,039 --> 00:20:23,160
fiery chariot across the sky. He loses control, scorches the earth,

402
00:20:23,480 --> 00:20:25,160
and Zeus strikes.

403
00:20:24,880 --> 00:20:26,720
Speaker 1: Him down right, a cautionary tale.

404
00:20:26,720 --> 00:20:30,359
Speaker 2: But in the Susa Valley legends, there's this unique local twist.

405
00:20:31,079 --> 00:20:34,920
Fathson descended to Earth in a fiery chariot, perhaps crashing

406
00:20:34,960 --> 00:20:40,319
into Mount Muzina, that same enigmatic mountain near Valcmonica.

407
00:20:39,519 --> 00:20:41,680
Speaker 1: Crashing near the carvings interesting.

408
00:20:41,319 --> 00:20:43,799
Speaker 2: And crucially, this isn't just a destructive event in the

409
00:20:43,839 --> 00:20:47,440
local lore. It also led to something fortuitous because faithOn

410
00:20:47,680 --> 00:20:50,960
in this version brought gifts to this place, gifts like

411
00:20:51,000 --> 00:20:54,799
what he possessed, great skills as a metallurgist, and supposedly

412
00:20:54,839 --> 00:20:57,640
taught these advanced techniques like metalworking to the local people,

413
00:20:57,960 --> 00:21:00,079
effectively kickstarting their technological deve.

414
00:21:00,519 --> 00:21:02,119
Speaker 1: So not just a visitor from the sky, but a

415
00:21:02,119 --> 00:21:05,720
benefactor who brought advanced knowledge and technology. Metallurgy would have

416
00:21:05,759 --> 00:21:08,160
been absolutely revolutionary back then.

417
00:21:08,039 --> 00:21:08,720
Speaker 2: Game changing.

418
00:21:09,039 --> 00:21:12,960
Speaker 1: This sounds remarkably like what ancient astronaut theorists propose when

419
00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:14,920
they interpret these kinds of myths, doesn't.

420
00:21:14,680 --> 00:21:18,200
Speaker 2: It really does, As researcher David Childress puts it quite directly,

421
00:21:18,759 --> 00:21:21,160
when we look at myths such as the myth of Fathon,

422
00:21:21,640 --> 00:21:24,599
here is really the story of a UFO landing on

423
00:21:24,640 --> 00:21:26,279
a mountain and interacting.

424
00:21:25,759 --> 00:21:26,440
Speaker 3: With the locals.

425
00:21:26,880 --> 00:21:30,119
Speaker 2: It's drawing a direct line between ancient narrative and a

426
00:21:30,160 --> 00:21:33,039
modern interpretation of non terrestrial contact.

427
00:21:33,079 --> 00:21:34,759
Speaker 1: And William Henry, who studies.

428
00:21:34,440 --> 00:21:38,240
Speaker 2: These connections, Yes, Henry explicitly links this myth directly back

429
00:21:38,279 --> 00:21:42,319
to Valclmonica. He suggests that what the ancient artists etching

430
00:21:42,359 --> 00:21:45,480
those spacemen were trying to portray is something that he

431
00:21:45,599 --> 00:21:48,839
actually saw in the sky, something coming out of the heavens.

432
00:21:48,920 --> 00:21:49,359
Speaker 1: Wow.

433
00:21:49,400 --> 00:21:53,359
Speaker 2: The correlation between these two sites relatively close geographically, and

434
00:21:53,400 --> 00:21:57,720
their shared narrative elements celestial visitors bringing knowledge, it's highly suggestive,

435
00:21:57,759 --> 00:21:58,440
you have to admit.

436
00:21:58,720 --> 00:22:02,480
Speaker 1: It forces us again to reconsider how we interpret ancient myths.

437
00:22:02,519 --> 00:22:07,200
Are they pure fantasy, spiritual allegory, or perhaps distorted memories

438
00:22:07,240 --> 00:22:09,720
of real events, maybe cloaked in the language of gods

439
00:22:09,720 --> 00:22:11,920
and heroes to make them understandable back then.

440
00:22:12,079 --> 00:22:16,480
Speaker 2: Could advanced visitors explain sudden leaps and technological knowledge like

441
00:22:16,599 --> 00:22:22,039
metallurgy in early civilizations? The patterns seem to demand we

442
00:22:22,119 --> 00:22:25,640
at least consider a broader interpretation than just myth.

443
00:22:26,000 --> 00:22:28,400
Speaker 1: It's a compelling argument, especially when you start seeing these

444
00:22:28,480 --> 00:22:32,240
kinds of patterns repeat across different cultures and continents, seemingly

445
00:22:32,319 --> 00:22:34,799
transcending geographical boundaries.

446
00:22:34,480 --> 00:22:38,240
Speaker 2: Which brings us to our next and perhaps most extraordinary leap.

447
00:22:38,720 --> 00:22:42,000
Speaker 1: Yeah, let's take that leap now literally across oceans, to

448
00:22:42,119 --> 00:22:46,400
a truly mind bending enigma that challenges everything we thought

449
00:22:46,400 --> 00:22:50,319
we knew about ancient travel the Gosford Glyffs. Okay, we're

450
00:22:50,359 --> 00:22:53,480
transporting everyone listening all the way to the Brisbane Water

451
00:22:53,599 --> 00:22:57,240
National Park in New South Wales, Australia, and hidden there

452
00:22:57,400 --> 00:23:01,119
you'll find two massive eight foot high walls covered with

453
00:23:01,160 --> 00:23:04,759
over three hundred ancient carvings. It's an impressive site, tucked

454
00:23:04,759 --> 00:23:05,920
away in a pretty remote area.

455
00:23:06,000 --> 00:23:08,799
Speaker 2: And what's truly astonishing about these carvings, the absolute core

456
00:23:08,839 --> 00:23:11,880
of the enigma is that they do not resemble indigenous artwork,

457
00:23:11,920 --> 00:23:13,240
but Egyptian hieroglyphs.

458
00:23:13,319 --> 00:23:16,119
Speaker 1: Gyptian hieroglyphs in Australia exactly.

459
00:23:16,640 --> 00:23:22,240
Speaker 2: This immediately presents a profound, almost unbelievable historical anomaly. How

460
00:23:22,279 --> 00:23:26,200
could Egyptian hieroglyphs dating back thousands of years appear on

461
00:23:26,240 --> 00:23:29,599
the Australian continent, thousands upon thousands of miles from the

462
00:23:29,680 --> 00:23:33,960
Nile Valley, long before any recorded European discovery of Australia.

463
00:23:34,200 --> 00:23:37,920
Speaker 1: It just completely defies conventional historical timelines, right and what

464
00:23:37,960 --> 00:23:39,759
we thought were the limits of ancient seafaring.

465
00:23:39,880 --> 00:23:41,759
Speaker 3: Absolutely, it's a massive question mark.

466
00:23:41,839 --> 00:23:44,480
Speaker 1: That's the million dollar question, isn't it. And the mystery

467
00:23:44,519 --> 00:23:48,160
only got deeper when in the twenty first century. An

468
00:23:48,200 --> 00:23:52,720
Egyptologist named Ray Johnson undertook the incredibly painstaking work of

469
00:23:53,119 --> 00:23:54,240
deciphering these.

470
00:23:54,079 --> 00:23:56,960
Speaker 2: Texts, and what he revealed was nothing short of astonishing.

471
00:23:57,160 --> 00:24:00,359
According to his translation, the carvings detailed the burial site

472
00:24:00,359 --> 00:24:03,559
of a figure named Lord Neffertreu, identified as a member

473
00:24:03,599 --> 00:24:06,640
of the Egyptian royal family, who, according to the glyphs themselves,

474
00:24:07,000 --> 00:24:09,839
died in that area sometime between twenty six thirty seven

475
00:24:09,880 --> 00:24:11,240
and twenty six fourteen BC.

476
00:24:11,480 --> 00:24:14,160
Speaker 1: Wait gives a name and dates a specific.

477
00:24:13,680 --> 00:24:16,920
Speaker 2: Person, a name, a title, a time frame, and a

478
00:24:16,960 --> 00:24:19,720
cause of death. This isn't just a few random symbols

479
00:24:19,720 --> 00:24:24,440
scattered around. It's presented as a coherent, detailed narrative, a

480
00:24:24,599 --> 00:24:28,200
historical record, seemingly of an Egyptian prince's journey and tragic

481
00:24:28,240 --> 00:24:32,160
demise in Australia. It's like finding a secret diary written

482
00:24:32,200 --> 00:24:35,119
by someone who, according to our history books, simply couldn't

483
00:24:35,160 --> 00:24:35,640
have been there.

484
00:24:35,880 --> 00:24:38,759
Speaker 1: Unbelievable. Has anyone else looked at this? Yes?

485
00:24:38,799 --> 00:24:42,200
Speaker 2: In twenty sixteen, Georgia Tucalos, who many listeners will know

486
00:24:42,240 --> 00:24:45,920
from ancient astronaut theory discussions, visited the site with another

487
00:24:46,000 --> 00:24:49,039
theorist Evan Strong. They got a first hand look and

488
00:24:49,079 --> 00:24:50,920
discussed the implications.

489
00:24:50,279 --> 00:24:51,680
Speaker 1: And what did the glyphs say happen?

490
00:24:51,960 --> 00:24:55,519
Speaker 2: According to Johnson's translation, that they discussed. One panel specifically

491
00:24:55,519 --> 00:24:59,400
describes two brothers, two princes, coming here from Egypt. They

492
00:24:59,440 --> 00:25:03,000
embarked on the perilous journey, were shipwrecked, and tragically one

493
00:25:03,039 --> 00:25:05,880
died from a snake bite. He was then interred here,

494
00:25:06,000 --> 00:25:07,079
buried in Australia.

495
00:25:07,200 --> 00:25:09,359
Speaker 1: Wow. And the other panels other.

496
00:25:09,240 --> 00:25:13,079
Speaker 2: Walls apparently contain a mixture of symbols, which Johnson described

497
00:25:13,079 --> 00:25:16,440
as having a philosophical astrophysic style, suggesting they weren't just

498
00:25:16,480 --> 00:25:21,680
recording history, but maybe also ancient inquiries into cosmology, existence,

499
00:25:21,839 --> 00:25:25,960
Humanity's placed in the stars. Sort of esoteric stuff.

500
00:25:26,000 --> 00:25:27,799
Speaker 1: Okay, but how reliable is the translation?

501
00:25:27,880 --> 00:25:32,440
Speaker 2: That's key crucially for verification. Johnson's translations were apparently sent

502
00:25:32,519 --> 00:25:37,119
to the Cairo library. There, doctor Abu Diagazi, a respected authority,

503
00:25:37,319 --> 00:25:40,000
reportedly confirmed they were indeed proto.

504
00:25:39,720 --> 00:25:42,359
Speaker 1: Egyptian, proto Egyptian meaning.

505
00:25:42,119 --> 00:25:45,640
Speaker 2: An earlier, more pictorial form of the language, predating the

506
00:25:45,680 --> 00:25:49,279
highly formalized hieroglyphs we usually see from later dynasties. This

507
00:25:49,319 --> 00:25:53,200
actually aligns perfectly with the extremely ancient dating suggested.

508
00:25:52,799 --> 00:25:56,960
Speaker 1: Proto Egyptian and the estimated age of these cliphs based

509
00:25:57,000 --> 00:26:00,200
on that form is about forty six hundred years old.

510
00:26:00,279 --> 00:26:02,240
Speaker 3: Four thousand, six hundred years.

511
00:26:02,319 --> 00:26:04,480
Speaker 1: This just blows my mind. It isn't a modern hoax.

512
00:26:04,519 --> 00:26:06,480
It doesn't seem to be a colonial era prank. It

513
00:26:06,480 --> 00:26:09,799
appears to be ancient, verified history written in stone halfway

514
00:26:09,839 --> 00:26:12,640
around the world from Egypt. It forces you to ask,

515
00:26:12,880 --> 00:26:17,400
how how could ancient Egyptians millennia go have traveled halfway

516
00:26:17,400 --> 00:26:20,839
across the globe to Australia. What does this imply about

517
00:26:20,880 --> 00:26:26,680
ancient maritime capabilities, about the interconnectedness of early human civilizations

518
00:26:26,960 --> 00:26:29,839
that our current history books just haven't accounted for. It

519
00:26:29,920 --> 00:26:34,279
completely upends our understanding of early exploration and cultural exchange.

520
00:26:34,359 --> 00:26:37,799
Speaker 2: It certainly challenges the conventional timeline and the scope of

521
00:26:37,920 --> 00:26:41,759
ancient navigation. I mean, the sheer distance involved over seventy

522
00:26:41,759 --> 00:26:45,279
five hundred miles as the crow flies, probably much more

523
00:26:45,279 --> 00:26:47,640
by sea, and the kind of technology required for such

524
00:26:47,680 --> 00:26:51,559
a voyage are staggering. It leads many to question how

525
00:26:51,599 --> 00:26:55,160
such a feat was even possible without perhaps some form

526
00:26:55,200 --> 00:27:00,160
of advanced knowledge or assistance, maybe even non terrestrial inspiration.

527
00:26:59,759 --> 00:27:03,000
Speaker 1: Or it forces us to reevaluate what we thought was

528
00:27:03,039 --> 00:27:06,880
the absolute peak of ancient seafaring technology. Maybe they were

529
00:27:06,920 --> 00:27:09,359
capable of far more than we give them credit.

530
00:27:09,079 --> 00:27:10,200
Speaker 3: For, or maybe they had help.

531
00:27:10,319 --> 00:27:13,079
Speaker 1: And among these gosp for glyphs, there's this one specific,

532
00:27:13,160 --> 00:27:17,440
really striking carving that's been nicknamed the Ufo glyph. You

533
00:27:17,480 --> 00:27:19,960
look at it, and it's an undeniable visual anomaly.

534
00:27:20,039 --> 00:27:21,079
Speaker 3: Yeah, it really stands out.

535
00:27:21,319 --> 00:27:25,359
Speaker 1: It definitely has the classic Ufo shape, you know, disc shaped,

536
00:27:25,680 --> 00:27:28,519
often with a distinct dome on top, and this one

537
00:27:28,599 --> 00:27:31,440
has rays or whatever you want to call it coming

538
00:27:31,480 --> 00:27:35,400
out from the undersides, suggesting maybe light or energy or propulsion.

539
00:27:35,720 --> 00:27:39,400
It just looks dramatically different from the other more conventional

540
00:27:39,440 --> 00:27:40,920
Egyptian symbols around it.

541
00:27:40,920 --> 00:27:42,640
Speaker 3: It really does jump out at you. Now.

542
00:27:42,640 --> 00:27:45,119
Speaker 2: Some might try to explain it away, suggesting maybe it's

543
00:27:45,160 --> 00:27:47,880
just a stylized piece of jewelry like a pectoral, or

544
00:27:47,920 --> 00:27:50,519
perhaps a variant of the sun disk symbol or some

545
00:27:50,640 --> 00:27:53,079
other known element from Egyptian iconography.

546
00:27:53,200 --> 00:27:55,960
Speaker 1: Right, try to fit it into the existing boxes exactly.

547
00:27:56,200 --> 00:27:58,519
Speaker 2: But the observation made by those who've studied it closely

548
00:27:58,599 --> 00:28:01,200
is that it's a completely different symbol that's upside down,

549
00:28:01,200 --> 00:28:04,000
and it really doesn't quite fit in its specific form.

550
00:28:04,000 --> 00:28:07,319
In its context surrounded by proto Egyptian script make it

551
00:28:07,440 --> 00:28:11,079
unique within the known canon of Egyptian higher glyphs. It

552
00:28:11,119 --> 00:28:12,519
seems truly anomalous.

553
00:28:12,839 --> 00:28:16,400
Speaker 1: That strengthens the argument, doesn't it that it represents something unique,

554
00:28:16,519 --> 00:28:20,160
something perhaps witnessed directly by the people who carved it,

555
00:28:20,559 --> 00:28:23,160
rather than just a standard symbol they brought with them.

556
00:28:23,559 --> 00:28:26,720
The distinct departure from known symbolism is what makes it

557
00:28:26,759 --> 00:28:27,319
so compelling.

558
00:28:27,480 --> 00:28:29,960
Speaker 2: So okay, let's assume for a moment the Egyptians did

559
00:28:30,039 --> 00:28:32,240
somehow manage to make it all the way to Australia,

560
00:28:32,319 --> 00:28:37,359
defying incredible odds. The next big question is why what

561
00:28:37,400 --> 00:28:41,440
would possibly motivate them to undertake such a dangerous, likely

562
00:28:41,559 --> 00:28:42,920
multi year journey.

563
00:28:43,000 --> 00:28:45,119
Speaker 1: Yeah, it wouldn't be for tourism, hardly.

564
00:28:45,599 --> 00:28:48,960
Speaker 2: The prevailing theory among those who accept the glyph's authenticity

565
00:28:49,039 --> 00:28:52,200
is that they weren't just exploring randomly. They were specifically

566
00:28:52,240 --> 00:28:57,680
looking for esoteric wisdom, wisdom from whom, specifically from the Aboriginals,

567
00:28:58,039 --> 00:29:00,599
who are of course recognized as one of the world's

568
00:29:00,599 --> 00:29:05,720
oldest continuous cultures holding incredibly deep spiritual knowledge passed down

569
00:29:05,720 --> 00:29:06,640
through generations.

570
00:29:06,799 --> 00:29:10,200
Speaker 1: So the Egyptians, with all their knowledge, were seeking wisdom

571
00:29:10,240 --> 00:29:13,000
from the Aboriginal Australians. That's fascinating.

572
00:29:13,279 --> 00:29:17,920
Speaker 2: It suggests a rich, potentially reciprocal cultural exchange, and this

573
00:29:17,960 --> 00:29:21,519
is where the story becomes even more compelling. Both cultures,

574
00:29:21,640 --> 00:29:25,799
the ancient Egyptians and the Aboriginal peoples of Australia, apparently

575
00:29:25,839 --> 00:29:30,240
share stories about their arrival and about their visits long

576
00:29:30,279 --> 00:29:31,920
before Europeans had arrived here.

577
00:29:32,240 --> 00:29:34,640
Speaker 1: Aboriginal stories mentioned visitors from the sea.

578
00:29:34,759 --> 00:29:38,359
Speaker 2: Yes, Aboriginal oral traditions describe people who came by the

579
00:29:38,400 --> 00:29:42,599
sea and shared knowledge and wisdom and technology. This points

580
00:29:42,640 --> 00:29:46,119
towards a possible reciprocal exchange, perhaps built on the same

581
00:29:46,240 --> 00:29:50,039
similar beliefs and a profound spiritual connection to the sky

582
00:29:50,160 --> 00:29:52,400
world that both cultures seem to have shared.

583
00:29:52,519 --> 00:29:54,799
Speaker 1: The shared fascination with the heavens exactly.

584
00:29:54,880 --> 00:29:58,799
Speaker 2: That shared cosmology that focus on celestial phenomena and beings

585
00:29:59,119 --> 00:30:02,200
could have provided fertile ground for the exchange of esoteric

586
00:30:02,240 --> 00:30:05,039
wisdom and understanding. It might have been the driving force

587
00:30:05,119 --> 00:30:07,039
behind such an incredible journey.

588
00:30:06,799 --> 00:30:09,559
Speaker 1: And this isn't just about oral traditions or interpreting glyphs, though,

589
00:30:09,599 --> 00:30:13,319
Is that there's actual material evidence suggesting this exchange.

590
00:30:13,440 --> 00:30:16,440
Speaker 2: Yes, and this is perhaps the most compelling part. Actual

591
00:30:16,680 --> 00:30:21,079
boomerangs made from ironberg from here, meaning wood native to

592
00:30:21,160 --> 00:30:25,400
Australia have reportedly been discovered in the last Pyramids in Egypt.

593
00:30:25,799 --> 00:30:28,920
Speaker 1: Wait, actual Australian boomerangs in Egyptian tombs.

594
00:30:29,039 --> 00:30:29,880
Speaker 3: Think about that.

595
00:30:30,240 --> 00:30:34,960
Speaker 2: An iconic Aboriginal tool manufactured in Australia from local wood

596
00:30:35,480 --> 00:30:39,759
found thousands of miles away, preserved in an Egyptian pharaoh's

597
00:30:39,759 --> 00:30:41,160
tomb complex from that era.

598
00:30:41,359 --> 00:30:43,400
Speaker 1: That's incredible physical proof.

599
00:30:43,640 --> 00:30:44,519
Speaker 3: It's hard evidence.

600
00:30:44,640 --> 00:30:48,599
Speaker 2: And perhaps even more remarkably, there are Egyptian higherglyphs from

601
00:30:48,640 --> 00:30:52,200
the period depicting blackfellows throwing the boomerangs to take out

602
00:30:52,200 --> 00:30:53,279
the ducks and the geese.

603
00:30:53,440 --> 00:30:55,599
Speaker 1: They drew pictures of Aboriginal people hunting with.

604
00:30:55,599 --> 00:31:00,240
Speaker 2: Boomerangs apparently, So that's incredibly specific and powerful visual proof

605
00:31:00,279 --> 00:31:03,519
of interaction. It shows not just objects being exchanged, but

606
00:31:03,559 --> 00:31:06,920
cultural practices being observed and recorded by the Egyptians. It's

607
00:31:06,960 --> 00:31:09,400
like a cross cultural snapshot frozen in time.

608
00:31:09,720 --> 00:31:14,559
Speaker 1: Wow, it absolutely is. These aren't abstract concepts or vague

609
00:31:14,599 --> 00:31:19,319
interpretations anymore. These are tangible artifacts and visual records that

610
00:31:19,400 --> 00:31:23,279
seem to provide really strong evidence of ancient contact between

611
00:31:23,319 --> 00:31:25,279
these incredibly distant cultures.

612
00:31:26,160 --> 00:31:28,720
Speaker 2: As one researcher involved in this points out, with pretty

613
00:31:28,799 --> 00:31:32,200
undeniable logic, why would they paint us and carve us

614
00:31:32,200 --> 00:31:34,400
on their walls if they didn't come here, good point,

615
00:31:34,519 --> 00:31:37,240
and if that meeting and relationship was not significant, they

616
00:31:37,279 --> 00:31:40,440
wouldn't have carved it. It must have been profoundly important

617
00:31:40,440 --> 00:31:44,359
to them to warrant such meticulous documentation, both in Australia

618
00:31:44,400 --> 00:31:45,480
and back in Egypt.

619
00:31:45,720 --> 00:31:50,400
Speaker 1: It really makes you consider what invaluable knowledge, with spiritual insights,

620
00:31:50,440 --> 00:31:53,960
maybe even what technological advancements might have been exchanged between

621
00:31:54,000 --> 00:31:57,839
these distant peoples, long long before our official recorded history

622
00:31:57,880 --> 00:31:58,519
even begins.

623
00:31:58,799 --> 00:32:01,599
Speaker 2: Could that shared fast nation with the sky world with

624
00:32:01,720 --> 00:32:04,440
mysteries beyond the earth have been the real catalyst for

625
00:32:04,480 --> 00:32:08,880
these incredible journeys and this unexpected cultural fusion, leaving these

626
00:32:08,920 --> 00:32:12,240
tantalizing clues for us to rediscover thousands of years later.

627
00:32:12,480 --> 00:32:15,480
Speaker 1: It's a powerful thought. It suggests a much richer, far

628
00:32:15,519 --> 00:32:19,359
more interconnected ancient world than we typically imagine a world

629
00:32:19,440 --> 00:32:22,480
where the boundaries of continents and maybe even the boundaries

630
00:32:22,519 --> 00:32:26,200
of known human capabilities were far more fluid than our

631
00:32:26,200 --> 00:32:27,599
current history books described.

632
00:32:27,880 --> 00:32:30,519
Speaker 2: So as we kind of bring this deep dive towards

633
00:32:30,519 --> 00:32:32,960
a close, let's just take a moment to pull together

634
00:32:33,039 --> 00:32:35,200
these incredible threads we've explored today.

635
00:32:35,279 --> 00:32:38,160
Speaker 1: Yeah, let's recap. We started with Leonardo da Vinci, right,

636
00:32:38,799 --> 00:32:43,559
his hidden messages, possibly embedded in Renaissance masterpieces, may be

637
00:32:43,680 --> 00:32:47,279
influenced by his own enigmatic personal encounters with what seemed

638
00:32:47,359 --> 00:32:49,079
like non human entities.

639
00:32:49,160 --> 00:32:52,039
Speaker 2: Then we jump back centuries to the ancient rock carvings

640
00:32:52,039 --> 00:32:56,119
of val Camonica in Italy, depicting those spacemen and potential

641
00:32:56,160 --> 00:32:59,720
celestial vessels, challenging our view of ancient art as purely

642
00:32:59,759 --> 00:33:03,640
somembolic and suggesting maybe a pictorial record of actual encounters.

643
00:33:03,680 --> 00:33:07,119
Speaker 1: And finally we landed on the truly astonishing Egyptian hieroglyphs

644
00:33:07,119 --> 00:33:10,799
found in Australia, the Gosford Glyphs, pointing towards an almost

645
00:33:10,839 --> 00:33:15,279
unbelievable intercontinental exchange of wisdom, technology, and perhaps even more

646
00:33:15,319 --> 00:33:19,759
profound connections that just smash conventional historical timelines.

647
00:33:19,440 --> 00:33:22,519
Speaker 2: And what really links all these seemingly disparate points in

648
00:33:22,559 --> 00:33:26,279
time and geography. I think is that persistent human drive

649
00:33:26,400 --> 00:33:29,720
to record the extraordinary. Yeah, Whether it's through the refined

650
00:33:29,759 --> 00:33:33,519
brushstrokes of a master artist subtly embedding a secret or

651
00:33:33,519 --> 00:33:36,319
the rugged etchings on a mountain wall depicting a visitor

652
00:33:36,359 --> 00:33:39,880
from the sky, or meticulous carvings on a sacred cliff

653
00:33:39,880 --> 00:33:42,720
face chronicling a transcontinental journey.

654
00:33:43,839 --> 00:33:47,559
Speaker 1: Humanity has always sought to capture what it perceived as significant,

655
00:33:47,720 --> 00:33:48,720
as outside the norm.

656
00:33:48,920 --> 00:33:51,759
Speaker 2: And in every single instance we looked at these ancient

657
00:33:52,039 --> 00:33:55,480
artistic anomalies, they invite us, no, they compel us to

658
00:33:55,519 --> 00:34:00,000
look closer, to question our assumptions, to consider possibilities far

659
00:34:00,079 --> 00:34:02,480
beyond the conventional narratives we're usually taught.

660
00:34:02,559 --> 00:34:04,960
Speaker 1: It makes you think about the true scope of human history,

661
00:34:05,000 --> 00:34:07,480
doesn't it, and maybe history beyond just the human It.

662
00:34:07,440 --> 00:34:09,280
Speaker 2: Really does make you think about our own lives too,

663
00:34:09,440 --> 00:34:11,920
the stories we tell, the things we choose to document,

664
00:34:12,280 --> 00:34:15,400
the layers of meaning we might consciously or unconsciously embed

665
00:34:15,400 --> 00:34:19,599
for future generations. These aren't just obscure historical curiosities tucked

666
00:34:19,639 --> 00:34:20,960
away in books or museums.

667
00:34:20,960 --> 00:34:23,400
Speaker 1: Oh, they feel alive. They feel like echoes of a

668
00:34:23,559 --> 00:34:27,320
past that might be far more complex, far more thrilling,

669
00:34:27,760 --> 00:34:30,719
and yes, maybe even more otherworldly than we've ever dared

670
00:34:30,719 --> 00:34:33,800
to imagine. Yeah, it forces us to confront the potential

671
00:34:33,800 --> 00:34:37,519
limitations of our current understanding and just embrace the possibility

672
00:34:37,519 --> 00:34:38,880
of a much grander narrative.

673
00:34:39,000 --> 00:34:41,320
Speaker 2: It's a really compelling reminder that the story of our

674
00:34:41,360 --> 00:34:45,480
past is never truly finished. It's constantly being revised, constantly

675
00:34:45,519 --> 00:34:50,000
being expanded as new tools, new perspectives, new discoveries come

676
00:34:50,000 --> 00:34:52,199
to light. We have to stay open to the idea

677
00:34:52,239 --> 00:34:55,079
that what we currently believe to be solid fact is

678
00:34:55,079 --> 00:34:59,000
simply the current understanding, just a snapshot in time. The

679
00:34:59,119 --> 00:35:02,639
very act of questioning and re examining these ancient mysteries

680
00:35:03,239 --> 00:35:06,800
is in itself a testament to our ongoing evolution as

681
00:35:06,840 --> 00:35:09,159
observers and interpreters of history, and.

682
00:35:09,119 --> 00:35:11,920
Speaker 1: That leads us, i think, to a final provocative thought

683
00:35:12,000 --> 00:35:13,960
for all of you listening tom all over as you

684
00:35:14,000 --> 00:35:16,639
go about your week. As we continue to develop these

685
00:35:16,679 --> 00:35:20,519
incredible new technologies, refine our perspectives, get better at seeing

686
00:35:20,920 --> 00:35:24,280
what other hidden dimensions or completely untold histories are just

687
00:35:24,360 --> 00:35:27,880
waiting to be revealed, lurking in the artifacts and stories

688
00:35:27,920 --> 00:35:29,639
we think we already know so well. What if the

689
00:35:29,679 --> 00:35:32,840
most profound secrets of our past aren't actually lost to

690
00:35:32,880 --> 00:35:35,599
the sands of time at all, but are merely awaiting

691
00:35:35,639 --> 00:35:38,679
our ability to truly see them. Perhaps they've been hiding

692
00:35:38,679 --> 00:35:41,280
in plain sight all along, just waiting for the right

693
00:35:41,320 --> 00:35:44,360
pair of eyes, or maybe the right algorithm, the right scanner,

694
00:35:44,679 --> 00:35:45,800
to finally unlock them.

695
00:35:45,920 --> 00:35:48,599
Speaker 2: It certainly feels like we've only just begun to scratch

696
00:35:48,639 --> 00:35:52,320
the surface of these ancient enigmas. There's likely so much

697
00:35:52,400 --> 00:35:53,440
more waiting to be found.

698
00:35:53,559 --> 00:35:55,880
Speaker 1: Definitely feels that way, Well more to explore