Speaker 1: You know, a world of deceits, Telling the truth is
Speaker 1: a revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen,
Speaker 2: it's Tuesday, the twenty eighth of October. You're our lord,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five. We're going to start today. What we're
Speaker 2: going to do first is Argentina, because you know, Argentina
Speaker 2: is first. Argentina is far more important than America. And
Speaker 2: so I'm going to begin there with the election that happened,
Speaker 2: and then we're going to take a look at what
Speaker 2: is this going to be our next Vietnam, our next
Speaker 2: Gulf of Tonkin Venezuela. Maybe we should call it Vinnie
Speaker 2: Nam or something. We'll take a look at that and
Speaker 2: what our peace president is doing. And then we've got
Speaker 2: some new examples of AI slop, but this time in
Speaker 2: the real world with very real consequences and courts with
Speaker 2: the police, with false identification and swatting students. That's AI
Speaker 2: swatting students. We'll be right back. Stay with us. Well,
Speaker 2: I guess the MAGA people will be doing the happy
Speaker 2: dance along with Trump and his Soros secretary Scott Bessant
Speaker 2: about Argentina's mid term vote, a major comeback. Javier Malai's
Speaker 2: party received for votes with ninety two percent of the
Speaker 2: ballots counted. And that's all that matters, right, It doesn't
Speaker 2: matter what happens to our ranchers, our farmers. The important
Speaker 2: thing is that Javier Malai is who's a part of
Speaker 2: the club, won his election. That's what everything is geared toward.
Speaker 2: So they won the vote on Sunday, a result they'll
Speaker 2: give them a strong foothold in Congress for continuing to
Speaker 2: pursue the so called free market policies. Let me just say,
Speaker 2: you know, I was hopeful when he first came on
Speaker 2: the scene. Interviewed a guy who knew him, who was
Speaker 2: a hard core libertarian economists wrote a book about something,
Speaker 2: street Wise economic stew member Travis.
Speaker 3: I remember the interview is a sharp guy.
Speaker 2: It's a good book. And anyway, I got to say
Speaker 2: that if you had export taxes on products that you're
Speaker 2: selling to people, and if you have to have a
Speaker 2: bailout from the US government, that's not libertarian economics. Okay,
Speaker 2: let's just drop that label once and for all with
Speaker 2: Howvier Mali. Besides that, the guy is a corrupt sob
Speaker 2: just like Trump. I think missing is his connection to
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein, which we haven't determined yet. Probably not because
Speaker 2: he came along after Epstein. Malai said in a victory speech.
Speaker 2: They have the backing of one hundred and one members
Speaker 2: of the Lowerhouse and twenty senators. The results should push
Speaker 2: him comfortably past the one third of the seats that
Speaker 2: he needs in the Lowerhouse to protect his veto power,
Speaker 2: as well as a bay to pursue legislative priorities like tax,
Speaker 2: labor and pension reforms as he seeks to overhaul the
Speaker 2: nation's beleaguered economy. So he was not up for election.
Speaker 2: It's just basically, well night, He's going to be able
Speaker 2: to get policies through. His win will also vindicate the
Speaker 2: extraordinary support from the Soros secretary Bessant, who did a
Speaker 2: twenty billion dollar currency swap line agreement for the beleaguered
Speaker 2: payso down more than thirty percent so far this year. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it's not. It's not a golden investment, is it. The
Speaker 2: president and his party have faced three corruption scandals this year,
Speaker 2: as it said, he's corrupt. Well. Argentina's slow economy and
Speaker 2: frustration with high unemployment helped push Malaia's approval to the
Speaker 2: lowest level of his term ahead of the election. Well still,
Speaker 2: when he was doing this, he was when the money
Speaker 2: was released to him, he was, you know when they
Speaker 2: got the he's doing the YMCA Trump thing right there,
Speaker 2: he is. He's happy dancing because you know, that's what
Speaker 2: looks like when you get forty billion dollars handed to
Speaker 2: you by a Soros lieutenant. That's right.
Speaker 4: But yeah, he's not going to see the soybean farmers
Speaker 4: in the US.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. They're not doing that. They're not. They're asking,
Speaker 2: you know, why do we have this going to somebody else?
Speaker 2: But the cattlemen have a beef with Argentina.
Speaker 5: Way out west. Brian Diaganall, a third generation Arizona rancher
Speaker 5: and president of the Arizona Cattle Growers Association, is working
Speaker 5: his hurt.
Speaker 3: This is Paul works.
Speaker 2: But we're at one corral of many on the ranch.
Speaker 5: Today's job, with some help from family and friends, is branding,
Speaker 5: then vaccine, eating his calves.
Speaker 3: We just try and ease in there and neck one
Speaker 3: and then next gal.
Speaker 2: Healing, vaccinating, rewarding work. Marne Mention has always been a
Speaker 2: family business, has been.
Speaker 5: For years, but lately harder to make a living doing it.
Speaker 1: So this has been quite a week in the cattle business.
Speaker 5: Partly because thirty thousand feet above Brian Daganow's ranch, President
Speaker 5: Trump said, this.
Speaker 6: Beef price is the only price we have, this highest beef,
Speaker 6: and we'll get that down now.
Speaker 4: One of the things we're thinking about doing is a
Speaker 4: beef from Argentina.
Speaker 2: Those words weren't enough to show the only thing, this
Speaker 2: highest beef, right, the only thing.
Speaker 5: Sharply, you know, Fatures like daganof felt the hit immediately.
Speaker 2: Yeah, how we am. Ali's celebrating. He's just he can't
Speaker 2: stop dancing and running and Cherry James. He's got tens
Speaker 2: of billions of dollars. Reason ranchers are trup voters. But yeah,
Speaker 2: this is this is something that we have to we
Speaker 2: have to call him on and say, no, we don't agree.
Speaker 5: Beef prices have risen by almost a dollar of pounds
Speaker 5: since February, but for American ranchers that's meant finally seeing
Speaker 5: some solid profit after years of thin margins.
Speaker 2: We don't think the government should be manipulating markets.
Speaker 5: What Diaganol does believe is with more profits in time,
Speaker 5: the free market, not imports will lower prices.
Speaker 7: We need to be able to make a living ranching,
Speaker 7: and that will build.
Speaker 2: The market will correct itself and there'll be more cattle.
Speaker 8: If there's a profit to be made.
Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe we should leave the market do its thing.
Speaker 2: You've got a Republican president, we've got a so called
Speaker 2: libertarian president, but they don't seem to have any faith
Speaker 2: in the market. It's all about crony capitalism. Corney capitalism
Speaker 2: is not capitalism. It's corruption, which Javir Malay and Trump
Speaker 2: know all about. And I got to say that the
Speaker 2: ranchers and the farmers need to come to terms with this.
Speaker 2: They got to figure out whether they are cowboys or cows,
Speaker 2: where they're going to be human or herds, and they
Speaker 2: need to get off of this maga herd mentality. As
Speaker 2: he said, ninety percent of the ranchers love Trump. Once
Speaker 2: you wake up before you lose everything, once you wake
Speaker 2: up before we lose our food supply as well. So
Speaker 2: I you, mali on X think Trump. Thank you President
Speaker 2: Trump for trusting the Argentine people. You're a great friend
Speaker 2: of the Argentine Republic, just not so much the people
Speaker 2: in Arizona or Arkansas. Our nations should never have stopped
Speaker 2: being allies. Our people went to live and want to
Speaker 2: live in freedom. Count on me to fight for Western civilization,
Speaker 2: which has succeeded in lifting more than nine percent of
Speaker 2: the world's population out of poverty. Well, Western civilization is
Speaker 2: a great part of that is the idea of a
Speaker 2: free market and competition, not about the government picking winners
Speaker 2: and losers, and most egregiously picking four foreign winners and
Speaker 2: American losers, which seems to be the Trump administration's specialty
Speaker 2: Israel and Argentina first. And then there's a quote in
Speaker 2: this article, a meme showing a picture of Javier Malaya
Speaker 2: says the only thing socialism produces is poverty. Well, again,
Speaker 2: what do form bailouts produce? We've got form bailouts instead
Speaker 2: of free markets. What does that produce? What about central
Speaker 2: planning and central planning that plans for other countries to
Speaker 2: succeed at our expense? This is the election made a
Speaker 2: lot of money for the US, said Trump. I bet
Speaker 2: it did. I bet it made a lot of money
Speaker 2: for the Trump mafia family as well, probably for Soro's
Speaker 2: vessant Soro secretary. Isn't that interesting that you know? They
Speaker 2: again Soros is connected everything. He's running Andy Fi, he's
Speaker 2: running the King's protes anything, folks, He's running the Treasury,
Speaker 2: So US is running the treasury. Wake up? Do you
Speaker 2: think that Bessett and Trump some of these people made
Speaker 2: some money on the side, and I think they probably did.
Speaker 2: Trump said, well, if he doesn't win, this is before
Speaker 2: the election. We're not going to waste our time because
Speaker 2: his opponent's philosophy has no chance of making Argentina great again,
Speaker 2: and you have no chance of making America great again
Speaker 2: with your policies. Trump. But here's the other issue. How
Speaker 2: do we justify interfering in other country's elections, propping up
Speaker 2: one party over the other. And we're supposed to be
Speaker 2: apoplectic when it's done to us. Why is that okay
Speaker 2: when we do it to other countries as well? Well.
Speaker 2: Argentina's stocks are up forty percent, as Goldman Sachs says,
Speaker 2: the trade has just started. It's a great day for
Speaker 2: Wall Street, it's a great day for the Soros Secretary
Speaker 2: of the Treasury, and it's a great day for Trump Incorporated.
Speaker 2: Not such a great day for American farmers, ranchers, and consumers.
Speaker 2: Not so great. And taxpayers, I should say good luck.
Speaker 2: Trump's bid for emergency help from the Supreme Court was
Speaker 2: pointed out on MSNBC and of all people, Joe Scarborough,
Speaker 2: it's kind of interesting. He was right about this. For
Speaker 2: Joe Scarborough's point was, he said, it's when you look
Speaker 2: at Trump and his tariffs against Canada over the ad
Speaker 2: that was there. He said, it's going to be kind
Speaker 2: of interesting as his lawyers go to the Supreme Court
Speaker 2: very soon, and it may be happening this week. I
Speaker 2: don't know what the timing is, but it's imminent, so
Speaker 2: much so that Trump said they're just running that ad
Speaker 2: because they want to interfere with the Supreme Court decision.
Speaker 2: As if the Supreme Court is sitting there watching the
Speaker 2: World Series. I'm sure that all the judges are doing that,
Speaker 2: don't you think. And saw that commercial, but nevertheless he
Speaker 2: said they just want to interfere with the Supreme Court's decisions. Well,
Speaker 2: Trump did that himself. This is another one of these
Speaker 2: Strissland effects, right. We need to rename that effect the
Speaker 2: Trump effect instead of tricing it. So he's going to
Speaker 2: have his lawyers argue before the Supreme Court that his
Speaker 2: arbitrary capricious, dictatorial setting of teriff rates is due to
Speaker 2: an emergency and he needs to be able to have
Speaker 2: that power, and that there's some kind of an emergency
Speaker 2: going on, that the trade deficit is an emergency. And
Speaker 2: yet he just demonstrated what is really behind these terif rates.
Speaker 2: It has nothing to do with economics, It has nothing
Speaker 2: to do with emergencies, and has everything to do with ego. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that e It's not economics, it's not emergency, it's ego.
Speaker 2: And so that was the point that they were making
Speaker 2: on MSNBC. They said, the fact is that he's going
Speaker 2: to He's doing this, he says, because it's a national emergency.
Speaker 2: Yet it couldn't be clearer that he's doing it because
Speaker 2: his feelings were hurt because he put together a this
Speaker 2: ad in the province of Ontario. Yeah. In other words,
Speaker 2: what he just showed was that it is machiavellian politics
Speaker 2: at its worst, not economics. So good luck even going
Speaker 2: before the Supreme Court and arguing that these tariffs are
Speaker 2: based on emergencies. They said, everything is an emergency with
Speaker 2: Donald Trump. And you know an emergency because an ad
Speaker 2: that quotes Ronald Reagan accurately and his views on tariffs.
Speaker 2: That's supposed to be an emergency. Well, no, he kind
Speaker 2: of painted himself into a corner there, And yet I
Speaker 2: was surprised yesterday. It took a little while, but the
Speaker 2: conservative press started to respond to this sid of thing.
Speaker 2: I guess they had to maybe let it cool off
Speaker 2: a little bit, or maybe have some meetings about how
Speaker 2: are we going to spend this so we don't offend
Speaker 2: Trump and his maga core that is our base. And
Speaker 2: so here's WorldNet Daily that I've lost all respect for,
Speaker 2: along with Breitbart, Info Wars a lot of them. This
Speaker 2: is an article that they did. This is Trump having
Speaker 2: another temper tantrum, saying that there should be a ban
Speaker 2: on fake ads that show that his polling is at
Speaker 2: low levels. His approval rate is at thirty seven percent.
Speaker 2: He said, that's a fake poll and you shouldn't be
Speaker 2: allowed to say that. He despises free speech, especially the
Speaker 2: free press. He wants bans on fake ads. And here's
Speaker 2: WorldNet Daily supporting him and this and actually pulling in
Speaker 2: the Terriff ad from Canada as a support saying, yeah,
Speaker 2: look they did this fake ad in Canada. I mean,
Speaker 2: how how can you lose all of your integrity all
Speaker 2: in one shot. You know. Wn D used to not
Speaker 2: be like this, and Breitbart used to not be like this,
Speaker 2: but they have become like this. Now. What they're doing, folks,
Speaker 2: is they are selling the rope of censorship. They'll be
Speaker 2: used to hang them. And I'm going to I don't
Speaker 2: like censorship, and I like to see people shut down,
Speaker 2: but I'm going to say I told you so when
Speaker 2: it happens to Breitbart, when it happens to WND. SO.
Speaker 2: Doug Ford, who was the premier, is the Premier of
Speaker 2: Ontario who put together that ad. They asked him about
Speaker 2: what's going he said, the Republicans. I've spoken to some Republicans.
Speaker 2: They know what Ronald Reagan was about, he said, but
Speaker 2: they're terrified of Trump. Maybe we need to say that
Speaker 2: the GOP is tariff eyed. They are scared. They're scared
Speaker 2: of him and his tariffs. They are terrified.
Speaker 3: Senators or governors told you that they to Bryan's point,
Speaker 3: that they liked the ad. I mean, we know the Democrats.
Speaker 2: Liked the ad.
Speaker 9: Yeah, absolutely, they liked any Republicans. No, I haven't talked
Speaker 9: to him, but I'll tell you what they have told me.
Speaker 9: They totally disagree with the president, all three levels. I
Speaker 9: talked to senators, congress people, and governors. They all told
Speaker 9: me they totally disagree, but they're too scared of President Trump.
Speaker 9: When was the last time a Republican governor was scared
Speaker 9: of a Republican president. They're they're scared of ramifications, which
Speaker 9: is really really sad.
Speaker 2: It is it is he rules my temper, tantrums and
Speaker 2: terrifying people, so.
Speaker 3: He's not even making them scared of good things. Like
Speaker 3: if I was president, I would have the governors quaking
Speaker 3: in their boots. I would have Congress in tears and shambles,
Speaker 3: the Supreme Court weeping. The sound would be audible for miles.
Speaker 3: Not so with Trump.
Speaker 2: No, what would you be doing to have him so
Speaker 2: afraid of you?
Speaker 3: We'd be We'd be bringing the Marines in to shut
Speaker 3: down every abortion clinic. Penny governor that tries to stop
Speaker 3: it would be getting drug out like, oh, you want
Speaker 3: to legalize murder? No, I don't think that makes you
Speaker 3: fit for office, rendition Guantanamo.
Speaker 2: So again, he wants a ban on any commercials that
Speaker 2: talk about polls that he disagrees with. As a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, he's got a lawsuit. That is yet another
Speaker 2: law their lawsuit against someone who If you remember, in
Speaker 2: the very end of the election in Iowa, there was
Speaker 2: a polster there and she came out with a pole
Speaker 2: and I remember covering it and said, this poll is
Speaker 2: a real outlier compared to what everybody else is doing.
Speaker 2: And she was grossly wrong. You know. She showed La
Speaker 2: La making a surge, and so it got a lot
Speaker 2: of attention because everybody pointed to her and said, all
Speaker 2: the other poles are saying this, but you're saying that.
Speaker 2: And so she got a lot of attention. And then
Speaker 2: it turned out that it was a gigantic win for Trump.
Speaker 2: He did much better there than any present has since
Speaker 2: you know, Reagan. And so she immediately quit as polster.
Speaker 2: She had blown her reputation. She wasn't going to be
Speaker 2: paid attention.
Speaker 3: That's honestly more honorable than most people.
Speaker 2: That's right, you know, But that's the way it out
Speaker 2: of work. That's the way it not to work. The
Speaker 2: free market on a people will look at this and say,
Speaker 2: you people, I remember, I remember that poll that you
Speaker 2: did out of there. People can handle the truth, and
Speaker 2: people can't handle who is accurate and who.
Speaker 3: Isn't this nostradamus guy really needs to follow her example.
Speaker 3: I've been hearing him for years.
Speaker 2: But she spoken in quadrains like Q.
Speaker 4: And the thing is, if they make it so that
Speaker 4: only the approved poles can go full, you'll only see
Speaker 4: the outlier poll. You won't be able to have a
Speaker 4: whole bunch of holes and see which one of these
Speaker 4: is the standout, which one of these is most likely wrong.
Speaker 4: You'll only have the approved number, which will most likely
Speaker 4: be whatever they want it to be.
Speaker 2: That's right, Yeah, the answer just like with guns, all right,
Speaker 2: just like the Second Amendment. The answer to a bad
Speaker 2: guy with guns is good guys with guns, And the
Speaker 2: answer to a bad guy with information is good information
Speaker 2: from a lot of other people. It's debate. Is the
Speaker 2: answer to all of it not shutting it down with censorship.
Speaker 2: But this is the desperate despot don and his ego
Speaker 2: at work here, and they're cheering him at WND. And
Speaker 2: just to remind you, this is the the ad in question.
Speaker 10: When someone says, let's impose tariffs on foreign imports, it
Speaker 10: looks like they're doing the patriotic thing by protecting American
Speaker 10: products and jobs, and sometimes for a short where it
Speaker 10: works but only for a short time. But over the
Speaker 10: long run, such trade barriers hurt every American worker and consumer.
Speaker 10: High tariffs inevitably leave to retaliation by foreign countries and
Speaker 10: the triggering of fierce trade wars. Then the worst happens.
Speaker 10: Market shrink and collapse, businesses and industry shutdown, and millions.
Speaker 2: Of people lose their jobs. Throughout the world.
Speaker 10: There's a growing realization that the way to prosperity for
Speaker 10: all nations is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and
Speaker 10: free competition. America's jobs and growth are at stake.
Speaker 2: And again I played that yesterday, and yesterday I read
Speaker 2: from the transcript and of course what is being told
Speaker 2: by Trump and by WND and shamefully by the Reagan
Speaker 2: Library at South They said, well, they edited this stuff
Speaker 2: and we're looking at our legal options here. You don't
Speaker 2: have any legal options. This was a public radio address
Speaker 2: and a transcript of what Ronald Reagan said as president.
Speaker 2: You don't own that you don't have any legal rights.
Speaker 2: And it was not deceptive. I didn't read all of
Speaker 2: what was there because it was take you about five
Speaker 2: or six minutes to read it all. They're doing a
Speaker 2: one minute commercial, and when you heard him talking about
Speaker 2: the consequences of what happens in the long term with tariffs,
Speaker 2: he had gone through a long discourse about what his
Speaker 2: opinion was about what happened with a Smoot Holly Terr
Speaker 2: Effact and it's impact on the Great Depression. He also
Speaker 2: went into another section where he talked about how the
Speaker 2: Democrats were opposing him, and the Democrats wanted to be protectionists,
Speaker 2: you know, like the Democrat Trump, and so he said, no,
Speaker 2: we're going to oppose that as well. And so he
Speaker 2: had these long discourses, which yes, we're edited out, and
Speaker 2: yet if you put them in, it bolsters the case
Speaker 2: that he was for free trade, which we all know
Speaker 2: he was. Anybody who was around knows where Ronald Reagan
Speaker 2: was on this. And that's the issue. That's the issue
Speaker 2: more than whether or not he's right or Trump is right.
Speaker 2: The issue is that Trump is a liar. He's a
Speaker 2: thin skinned liar, and he's afraid to have a debate
Speaker 2: with anybody, including a dead president. That's how bad he is.
Speaker 2: And so's the crux of the issue is not even
Speaker 2: free trade versus protectionism. The crux of the issue is
Speaker 2: Trump's character, which he doesn't have, and this clearly shows it.
Speaker 2: And it's also his reaction in terms of as I
Speaker 2: said before, take that to the Supreme Court and tell
Speaker 2: them it's not an emergency. It's his ego that is
Speaker 2: involved here with these tariffs. This guy has no clue
Speaker 2: about economic but it's simply his ego that is there.
Speaker 2: And so that's what we can clearly see. Unfortunately, WorldNet
Speaker 2: Daily says, just last week we reported Trump pull the
Speaker 2: plug on trade negotiations with Canada, where the economy relies
Speaker 2: in significant ways in the US, or what he called
Speaker 2: a fake ad that appeared to be trying to influence
Speaker 2: US Supreme Court's looming decisions on tariffs. Yeah, it will,
Speaker 2: but not in the way that Trump wants it to
Speaker 2: influence them. Further, the Canadian ad may actually misrepresent President
Speaker 2: Ronald Reagan's whose words it uses. Now you are fought
Speaker 2: out lying wn D. Shame on you. I mean Joseph
Speaker 2: farah Is, he's had a stroke and his wife has
Speaker 2: taken it over. And it's just pathetic to see what
Speaker 2: has happened with this so called news outlet here. They
Speaker 2: have absolutely no integrity. You can look up the transcript.
Speaker 2: Even in the thing here they embed the radio ad.
Speaker 2: If you look at that radio ad and you take
Speaker 2: the five minutes, which most people won't to look at it,
Speaker 2: or if you were live during Reagan's presidency, you know
Speaker 2: that Trump is lying. That the World Daily people are lying,
Speaker 2: and you know the Reagan Library people are lying. Why
Speaker 2: because the Reagan Library and World net Daily are tariff
Speaker 2: eyed of Donald Trump. You know, the Reagan Library has
Speaker 2: been where they've had presidential debates when you had presidents
Speaker 2: who would debate. Trump is afraid to debate, and the
Speaker 2: Democrats lawfair against him allowed him to skip all the
Speaker 2: debates in twenty twenty four. He was not harmed by
Speaker 2: that stuff. He's writing himself a check for two hundred
Speaker 2: thirty million dollars, and yet he'll just look at that
Speaker 2: as the cost of campaigns because it was the Democrat
Speaker 2: law fair that won the election for him. It was
Speaker 2: a Democrat lawfair that kept him from having to debate
Speaker 2: any Republicans. And you know what we're not seeing any
Speaker 2: compensation for are the j six people that he abanned
Speaker 2: and who spent four years in jail in hell. Not
Speaker 2: a penny for them. But he writes himself a two
Speaker 2: hundred and thirty million dollar check. That's your dear leader,
Speaker 2: that you guys are cheering, not me. I will never
Speaker 2: cheer this guy. So they said, the Ronald Reagan Foundation
Speaker 2: just announced that Canada has fraudulently used an advertisement. Well
Speaker 2: that's Trump actually talking about that. Again. There was no fraud.
Speaker 2: It was an accurate representation of what Reagan had to
Speaker 2: say as a matter of fact. And Doug Ford had
Speaker 2: this to say as well.
Speaker 9: And we've seen, you know, the employment numbers that manufacturing
Speaker 9: jobs down in the US have dropped a month after month,
Speaker 9: total seventy eight thousand jobs for five consecutive months. That's
Speaker 9: what tariffs do. They hurt the American people. And all
Speaker 9: you have to do his look on clips from Ronald
Speaker 9: Reagan over and over and over again. I've seen more
Speaker 9: Ronald Reagan clips and you can shake a stick at
Speaker 9: He was a free trader. I had a mentor named
Speaker 9: Brian Malrooney. I talked too frequently. I've had conversations with Caroline,
Speaker 9: his daughter, our President of the Treasury. And I'll tell
Speaker 9: you one thing. President Reagan was anything but loving tariffs.
Speaker 9: As Donald Trump said, he loved her. He hated tariffs,
Speaker 9: by the way, and all you have to do is
Speaker 9: look at the clips. When you see the Reagan Republicans
Speaker 9: standing up for non tariffs against the MAGA group, there's
Speaker 9: a split now in the Republican Party. And when Democrats,
Speaker 9: you know, Reagan Democrats, are standing up, there's a split.
Speaker 9: So the best dud that ever ran.
Speaker 3: I.
Speaker 2: Don't know if they're still running it or not. It
Speaker 2: made no sense at all to poet after Trump had
Speaker 2: temper tantrum and decide he's going to punish Canada, they
Speaker 2: should double down and bought more spots. And because it's
Speaker 2: absolutely accurate, and that's the key. I don't agree with
Speaker 2: Doug Ford on anything. I know. This guy is a
Speaker 2: radical leftist. And you know, it's not about the economics
Speaker 2: of this. It's about the integrity or the lack of
Speaker 2: integrity of Donald Trump and of the Reagan Library people,
Speaker 2: and of the media that is out there selling this
Speaker 2: lie telling you that it was deceptive. You can read
Speaker 2: it for yourself. If you know anything about Reagan, you
Speaker 2: know that it was true to what he had to say.
Speaker 2: The Reagan Library wants to make sure they don't burn
Speaker 2: their bridges with Trump's party because it's not the Republican
Speaker 2: Party anymore. They want to make sure they can host
Speaker 2: these debates in the future. That's their key to relevance,
Speaker 2: and so they're going to be sick offense to him,
Speaker 2: just like Mike Johnson. Well, the court has cleared the
Speaker 2: path for a Trump lawsuit over what he said was
Speaker 2: brazen election interference by the media. Poll that I mentioned earlier,
Speaker 2: the one out of Iowa, the Des Moines Register. The
Speaker 2: polster was n Seltzer. She claimed that Harris held a
Speaker 2: three point edge over Trump in Iowa forty seven to
Speaker 2: forty four just before the election. And so he says,
Speaker 2: because you said the wrong thing here, I want to
Speaker 2: sue you. It was a stunning reversal from shortly before
Speaker 2: when Trump was confirmed to have a four point lead.
Speaker 2: And again it was an outlier poll. The question is
Speaker 2: whether she got it wrong or whether she was just
Speaker 2: a liar instead of an outlier. In reality, Trump crushed
Speaker 2: Harris by more than thirteen points in Iowa, his widest
Speaker 2: margin in Iowa yet, the biggest Republican president will win
Speaker 2: there since Reagan. And he's not satisfied with that. He's
Speaker 2: a sore winner. You people who are sore losers typically,
Speaker 2: but Trump is such a pathological narcissist that he is
Speaker 2: a sore loser. I tell you it's going to be
Speaker 2: when you look up Donald Trump, when you look up
Speaker 2: narcissists and the dictionary in the future, you're going to
Speaker 2: see Donald Trump's picture there. Suspicious shifts, sample sizes, skewed
Speaker 2: toward urban areas, questionable waiting that favored younger and minority respondents.
Speaker 2: And yes, we knew all that, we talked about that
Speaker 2: when it happened. This isn't something we found out much later.
Speaker 2: And we know that both sides do this. You have
Speaker 2: Republican polling organizations and you have Democrat polling organizations, and
Speaker 2: they lean into their candidate and they make very subtle
Speaker 2: changes in it you like, I don't know, kind of
Speaker 2: like Pfizer does, right. Pfeiser manipulates their studies to show
Speaker 2: that their product is the best and that it's safe
Speaker 2: and that it's effective. If Trump wants to get upset
Speaker 2: about fraud, forget about this polster An election that you
Speaker 2: want to take a look at the fraud that you've
Speaker 2: been a part of, that you've paid for, that you
Speaker 2: robbed the American taxpayers to make these vaccines and then
Speaker 2: used it to kill them. That's what he should be
Speaker 2: looking at. But he's not. It's going to simply be
Speaker 2: about his ego. He doesn't care a whit about your life,
Speaker 2: about your business and job that he killed in twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: He doesn't care about any of that stuff. He only
Speaker 2: cares about his ego and the fact that somebody criticized
Speaker 2: him during the election. Hey, pal, big Don, if you
Speaker 2: can't handle the criticism, if you can't handle the heat,
Speaker 2: get out of the kitchen. I think it was Harry
Speaker 2: Truman that said that. But if he can't handle the critics,
Speaker 2: if he can't handle the push polls, he needs to
Speaker 2: get out of politics. And he is getting out of politics.
Speaker 2: He's getting into dictatorship areas, or he's getting into So
Speaker 2: she quit after that election, and the report said her
Speaker 2: polls have always tended to favor whoever she personally supports,
Speaker 2: just like the pharmaceutical studies. And we knew that going in,
Speaker 2: and people factored that in when she was the only
Speaker 2: one saying this, just let the market take care of it.
Speaker 2: But desperate Don can't do that. He has to do
Speaker 2: something like a despot when his feelings are hurt. So
Speaker 2: the WHO and the EU are launching an AI system
Speaker 2: to monitor social media and misinformation in real time. See,
Speaker 2: Donald Trump is exactly on board with people like Ursula
Speaker 2: fond of Lying, and the EU and Starmer and all
Speaker 2: the rest of these people. They constantly want to monitor
Speaker 2: everything that you say and do and punish you for
Speaker 2: your opinions. And so does Trump. That's why I say
Speaker 2: this is what's so dangerous about him. It's not just
Speaker 2: his ego. I mean we see it very clearly with
Speaker 2: his ego, but he's going to weigh in on all
Speaker 2: this stuff as well. I mean, that's why the techno
Speaker 2: bros picked somebody like him. All this so called monitoring
Speaker 2: of so called fake news. What is fake news? That's
Speaker 2: anything they disagree with. What is hate speech? It's any
Speaker 2: speech that they hate, any opinions that they don't want heard.
Speaker 2: It's always He's always on the same page with these
Speaker 2: depopulationist globalists who want to censor and control everything that
Speaker 2: we're doing. And he's going to be pushing through the
Speaker 2: digital ID and the digital cash to do all of
Speaker 2: this stuff as well. So a study of wine tariffs
Speaker 2: shows that consumers will pick up part of Trump's tab.
Speaker 2: This is a study from Duke's Department of Economics found
Speaker 2: that consumers ultimately paid more than the tariff costs on
Speaker 2: European wines. During Trump's earlier tariffs that began in twenty
Speaker 2: nineteen and they were not removed until twenty twenty one,
Speaker 2: Americans paid higher costs than the federal government collected in
Speaker 2: tariff revenue. How about that? It is even worse than
Speaker 2: a tax. The good news is that consumer prices for
Speaker 2: imported wines rose less than the increase in the tariff.
Speaker 2: But the bad news is that our estimate suggests that
Speaker 2: consumer cost increases exceeded the tariff revenue received by the
Speaker 2: US government. So they didn't pass along all of the
Speaker 2: tariff necessarily to them. But they go through the how
Speaker 2: this actually worked, which I won't get into the weeds
Speaker 2: about that, but the bottom line is that they, like
Speaker 2: anything else, once inflation starts, guess what you know, once
Speaker 2: it starts to get established and everybody's starting to raise prices,
Speaker 2: while you decide, well, I can raise mind just a
Speaker 2: little bit more, and so they raised the price of
Speaker 2: the tariffs. Actually, even the cost of wine went up
Speaker 2: even more than if they'd passed the tariffs on one
Speaker 2: hundred percent. What was interesting about it was they said
Speaker 2: there was a significant delay in terms of how long
Speaker 2: it took them them to put these things out. Of Course,
Speaker 2: you know, the first instinct for businesses, since they have
Speaker 2: to compete, price, of course, is one of the things
Speaker 2: that they have to compete on, and so their first
Speaker 2: instinct is to try to swallow the price increase and
Speaker 2: not put themselves at a competitive disadvantage. But you can
Speaker 2: only do that for so long and you go out
Speaker 2: of business. It's just like conservatives used to understand that
Speaker 2: you can't tax corporations. Corporations will pass the taxes on
Speaker 2: eventually or they will go out of business, and that's
Speaker 2: what's happening here. So what they found was that there
Speaker 2: was a significant delay. It's kind of like the way
Speaker 2: the vaccines work, right. They don't kill you right away
Speaker 2: or it'd be too obvious. And so they started to
Speaker 2: see a lag in the and the cost of that,
Speaker 2: and then it went up even more than the tax,
Speaker 2: and then when the tax ended, they saw a significant
Speaker 2: lag before the price came down as well. And we've
Speaker 2: all kind of seen that type of thing. So Trump
Speaker 2: and the White House have said that arras won't raise
Speaker 2: consumer prices. It's a tax, it's inflationary, and they're lying.
Speaker 2: Yet again, Trump has hit every US trading partner with
Speaker 2: arras of at least ten percent, with some countries facing
Speaker 2: rates above thirty percent. In addition to those import duties,
Speaker 2: Trump has terrats on imported steel, copper, aluminum, automobiles, and autoparts,
Speaker 2: among others. He says he wants to bring back manufacturing
Speaker 2: jobs lost to low wage countries, and yet he's taxing
Speaker 2: the things that we use to make stuff with that
Speaker 2: we don't have made in the United States. So he
Speaker 2: says he wants to bring back manufacturing, he wants to
Speaker 2: shift the income tax burden away from Americans, and he
Speaker 2: wants to pay down the US debt. So think about that.
Speaker 2: And we said this at the very beginning as well.
Speaker 2: This is Orwellian economics. It's not Caynesian, it's not Austrian,
Speaker 2: it's Orwellian as it involves double think. You have to
Speaker 2: believe that your high tariffs are going to pay down
Speaker 2: the debt and eliminate the income tax, and yet at
Speaker 2: the same time it's going to onshore manufacturing. Well, if
Speaker 2: it Onshore is manufacturing, Guess what, you don't have any
Speaker 2: tariff revenue anymore, and so you can't have both of these.
Speaker 2: You can't have your cake and eat it too. And
Speaker 2: of course you can have your Marie Antoinette ballroom. I
Speaker 2: guess that's what they should call it. People were saying them, Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's what the Republican needs. The Republican party itself needs
Speaker 2: more balls. They don't need a ballroom, but they need
Speaker 2: more balls. The the the uh. It's just crazy to
Speaker 2: see this happening.
Speaker 3: We live in a time where some Democrat women have
Speaker 3: more balls than Republican men.
Speaker 2: Yeah, what is a woman? Yeah. Researchers also found evidence
Speaker 2: of tariff engineering, meaning that that was small changes to
Speaker 2: the product or its label in order to lower import duties.
Speaker 2: They said a lot of wines that previously classified as
Speaker 2: less than fourteen percent alcohol became classified as above fourteen
Speaker 2: percent alcohol in order to avoid paying the tariffs. Because
Speaker 2: this is on wine, not on hard liquor, researchers noticed
Speaker 2: a much longer lag time than they had expected for
Speaker 2: the higher prices to reach consumers. They also found that
Speaker 2: the higher product prices lasted longer after the government removed
Speaker 2: the terraffs, it takes almost a year until you see
Speaker 2: the significant change and retail price that affects the consumers.
Speaker 2: Remember Trump announced these things and then didn't put them
Speaker 2: into effect for several months later if he did in
Speaker 2: fact put them in fact, So.
Speaker 3: It's almost like something this large, with this much momentum,
Speaker 3: takes a very long time for things to take effect.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and in both directions.
Speaker 3: Yeah, this is exactly what you would expect to see.
Speaker 3: The things go on and gradually over time people notice
Speaker 3: it and has to adjusted for it.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right. Yeah, it took about three months
Speaker 2: until the importer renegotiated prices with the exporter then also
Speaker 2: to raise prices to the US, And they didn't go
Speaker 2: down right away when the terrafs go away. In fact,
Speaker 2: they stayed elevated for another year after the terraffs removed,
Speaker 2: So they were slower to come off than they were
Speaker 2: to come on. So we're going to still have to
Speaker 2: wait and see what is happening with inflation. But again,
Speaker 2: as Massy, I played the clip yesterday, Massy was talking
Speaker 2: about food prices and he said, I said, back in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, you know, if you're going to call your herd.
Speaker 2: Because of what Trump did with the lockdown, people could
Speaker 2: not get their product to market. So I can't keep
Speaker 2: feeding these cattle. I'm just going to kill them now.
Speaker 2: And if you're not planting an apple tree that takes
Speaker 2: several years to grow to fruition, then we're going to
Speaker 2: see these problems down the road. And he said, this
Speaker 2: is exactly what I said five years ago. And it's
Speaker 2: now these Trump's lockdown and the inflation and food prices
Speaker 2: and other things that have happened to it. These are
Speaker 2: chickens that are still coming home to roost, and not
Speaker 2: all of them have come home to roost yet. The
Speaker 2: lockdown was a massive tragedy. Most of the time people
Speaker 2: talk about the failure of lockdown on the top all
Speaker 2: those kids that didn't get to go to school and
Speaker 2: get abused. So but that's that's not the real issue.
Speaker 2: The real issue is what he did economically to us
Speaker 2: with the lockdown. I think it's a good thing for
Speaker 2: kids not to go to school.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that was the silver lining and.
Speaker 2: All of that. That's right. Yeah, the kids didn't go
Speaker 2: to school, but the parents got to go to the
Speaker 2: classroom to see what was actually happening in it, and
Speaker 2: that was a good thing. Well, he got a couple
Speaker 2: of comments here, let's get.
Speaker 3: That's right, The Nights of the Storm. That's Jason Barker,
Speaker 3: Angry Tiger, Karen Carpenter, and of course others as well. Yes,
Speaker 3: you can go check them out at Nights of Thestorm
Speaker 3: dot com. That's where they have the schedule. It lists
Speaker 3: this broadcasts and all the other friendly broadcasts and the
Speaker 3: times a're on, so you can find these shows that
Speaker 3: you want to watch. They're worth checking out. Angry Tiger's
Speaker 3: own show, Tiger and Snake Report is worth checking out.
Speaker 3: Guard Goldsmith's show Liberty Conspiracy is worth checking out. They're
Speaker 3: all listed on Knights of the Storm dot com.
Speaker 2: And several others, Yes, quite a few others.
Speaker 3: Yes, go check out Knights of the Storm dot com
Speaker 3: and Knights of the Storm says here's a novel idea.
Speaker 3: We can stop all the fake ads if we all
Speaker 3: just have a digital slash Internet ID that's where it's
Speaker 3: all headed. Wouldn't that be handy?
Speaker 2: Yeah? And look at how Trump is so exercise about this.
Speaker 2: I mean went after CBS for the same thing. You
Speaker 2: deceptively edited that La La Harris interview, and they didn't.
Speaker 2: They put up the full interview before and so you know,
Speaker 2: the whole thing that got him down that line was
Speaker 2: the fact that their their trailer for their promotion for
Speaker 2: it was different than what they actually aired. Wait a minute,
Speaker 2: you edited something, Yeah, pal, that's the way things work.
Speaker 2: Have somebody explain it to you. Maybe somebody in your
Speaker 2: administration could explain to you that when you got a
Speaker 2: ten minute clip and you've got a one minute spot,
Speaker 2: you're going to edit some stuff. Now. That can be
Speaker 2: done honestly, or it can be done deceptively. Just because
Speaker 2: something is edited doesn't mean that it's fake. That's the
Speaker 2: fake assumption that Trump begins with in his lawsuits and
Speaker 2: the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 3: That's the thing is Editing can be used to completely
Speaker 3: and utterly butcher context. It can make It can be
Speaker 3: used to make people say things they never intended by
Speaker 3: stripping context, by taking pieces and reordering them.
Speaker 2: That's right, However, they did not do that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you can also completely retain context, because it's a
Speaker 3: general rule when people are speaking, they tend to reiterate,
Speaker 3: they tend to go retread the same ground multiple times,
Speaker 3: and you can just cut out the middlemen. You get
Speaker 3: the beginning, you get the end, and as a general rule,
Speaker 3: it retains the same context. And that's just how works.
Speaker 3: Editing is not inherently deceptive. No Marky Mark in New Jersey,
Speaker 3: thank you very much, says I watched a House of
Speaker 3: Dynamite this morning, and it left the viewers hanging. We
Speaker 3: never saw off the New k Chicago, nor do we
Speaker 3: see pots decision. It was unsatisfying, but.
Speaker 2: I think the application is clearly there when I watched it.
Speaker 2: You know, he was had that back and forth. The
Speaker 2: guy had the nuclear football and he gave him the
Speaker 2: targets and he starts reading off numbers. I think that
Speaker 2: was indicating that it was going to be a full
Speaker 2: scale escalation. And then the last scene was this massive
Speaker 2: traffic jam of all these bureaucrats coming out of Washington
Speaker 2: going to Raven Rock and again Raven Rock. I've talked
Speaker 2: about that book many times. Raven Rock the plan to
Speaker 2: save themselves and to let the rest of us die,
Speaker 2: and that book began with a big hole. Travis, and
Speaker 2: you guys remember that I've told the story. You tell
Speaker 2: the story because you were in the car with Karen.
Speaker 3: Yeah. So there's a place in North Carolina called Big
Speaker 3: Hole Road. It's a sort of large bunker installation originally
Speaker 3: owned by AT and T or maybe it was originally
Speaker 3: by the government. Now and by one way or the other,
Speaker 3: two sides of the same coin, they're joined. Itquates to
Speaker 3: the same thing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right, But.
Speaker 3: You know, it was kind of a local urban legend, like, oh,
Speaker 3: you go down this little road and all of a sudden,
Speaker 3: there's guard towers and there's military guys, and we're.
Speaker 2: Just like and they all said that it's been shut
Speaker 2: down a long time ago. Yeah. And the other thing
Speaker 2: that was interesting is in the town of Pittsburgh, they
Speaker 2: had all these mayors and including the one who was
Speaker 2: the current mayor there, they had all worked for AT
Speaker 2: and T at Big Hole.
Speaker 3: Surprise, surprise.
Speaker 11: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And this novel begins with Nixon as he's flying to
Speaker 2: California and he's resigned and he's passing the nuclear football
Speaker 2: off to someone else, and so they talk about Big
Speaker 2: Hole and how that's a part of it at the
Speaker 2: very beginning of the book and said, look at this.
Speaker 2: So you guys go to Big Hole.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So we just go down the road and all
Speaker 3: of a sudden, you know, just over the speakers. Turn around,
Speaker 3: turn around, there's you know, some guy up in a
Speaker 3: little guard tower. There's barricades and things. It is not
Speaker 3: shut down the government. They oh, we're not doing anything here. No,
Speaker 3: there's no step. Yeah, there's guys in guard towers, there's
Speaker 3: guys with guns patrolling the perimeter.
Speaker 2: Whatever.
Speaker 3: They've still got going on there, at least they had
Speaker 3: back over a decade ago now, but who knows. I
Speaker 3: doubt they would turn that over to just anyone. They've got,
Speaker 3: whatever they've got.
Speaker 2: They're still guarding this thing. It's this underground facility and
Speaker 2: it's there to stand in nuclear attack. And that's his point.
Speaker 2: He talks about that one, and then how they passed
Speaker 2: off the communications to one that's in Charlotte, and but
Speaker 2: then the big one is in Raven Rock where they're
Speaker 2: all going to go. And you know, they believe that
Speaker 2: they're gonna pull off this Doctor Strangelove type of thing,
Speaker 2: and they probably will at some point in time.
Speaker 3: The strangest thing about Big Hole is how innocuous it is.
Speaker 3: It's just this little road off of this other little road.
Speaker 3: That is, you know, nothing of importance is over there,
Speaker 3: and you know, you just turn down. It doesn't look
Speaker 3: like anything. Then all of a sudden, the trees kind
Speaker 3: of break and it's just guard tower fencing guys with guns.
Speaker 3: Just how many of these places are scattered around the
Speaker 3: country that the general population doesn't know about. But you know,
Speaker 3: the locals of this one town goes, oh, yeah, that's
Speaker 3: the military base. You don't go down there. If you do,
Speaker 3: they'll point the guns at you can tell you go away.
Speaker 4: Well, mostly just ignored or dismissed by people. You know,
Speaker 4: there was jokes of oh yeah, that's where they're dissecting
Speaker 4: the aliens. Area fifty one is just a distraction from
Speaker 4: Big Hole, et cetera, et cetera. You know, no one
Speaker 4: really thought there was anything There's everyone if you pushed
Speaker 4: them on, oh yeah, that's just a deactivated military Yeah.
Speaker 2: It's not there. It's been shut down long ago. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that type of thing. If there was ever anything there,
Speaker 2: it's been shut down. Well actually know, And so Karen
Speaker 2: was curious. Sure, as she takes the kids with her
Speaker 2: turn around. I love those, really funny But anyway, that's
Speaker 2: a big hole and raven Rock and all the rest
Speaker 2: of that stuff. Yeah, Unfortunately, I think I think that
Speaker 2: that movie, even though it was it did like some
Speaker 2: we go through this critical juncture there, and you'd see
Speaker 2: it from the perspective of one group of people. Then
Speaker 2: they jump back in time and you see from the
Speaker 2: perspective of another group of people leading up to that
Speaker 2: critical moment. And so they did that like three or
Speaker 2: four different times. They jump back, and you know, you
Speaker 2: see it as people are viewing it from their perspective,
Speaker 2: which is you may like that, you may not. I
Speaker 2: thought it was kind of an interesting.
Speaker 3: Your mileage may vary.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it can be a little bit difficult to follow.
Speaker 3: But anyway, got some comments from lou Gi for Liberty
Speaker 3: that I'm seeing. Says, I'm in Chatham County and I've
Speaker 3: been to Big Hole Road. We were told it was
Speaker 3: a telecommunications uplink. I've always felt it was part of
Speaker 3: continuity of government.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what it is.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, says he sneaked up to it at night before.
Speaker 3: He says, the damn thing is like ten stories deep. Yeah,
Speaker 3: it's just a giant from what I From what I remember,
Speaker 3: the thing is a giant concrete cylinder bunker that has
Speaker 3: just been sunk into the ground and just no one
Speaker 3: really knows what's in it. It's never been admitted that Also.
Speaker 2: A thing that was interesting about how said dynamite. When
Speaker 2: it begins, they're in this very very busy room and
Speaker 2: they're processing the fact that there's a missile that has
Speaker 2: been launched headed to the United States and how they're
Speaker 2: going to try to intercept it and so forth. And
Speaker 2: then you have a military guy come in to the
Speaker 2: woman who's running everything. She's got a headset. She's giving
Speaker 2: orders to everybody, said you need to come with me
Speaker 2: right now. We're going to go to a secure location.
Speaker 2: Said I'm not leaving these people here, and so they
Speaker 2: start pulling out one by one key people that are there,
Speaker 2: and then the people are left behind are like what.
Speaker 2: That's kind of a microcosm of the way the whole
Speaker 2: government looks at the nuclear war thing. Right, you're not essential.
Speaker 2: Remember that none of us were essential in twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: and you better believe we're not going to be considered
Speaker 2: to be essential when their calculations about nuclear war are
Speaker 2: brought into the picture. Either.
Speaker 3: The one thing in nuclear apocalypse will definitely need is bureaucrats.
Speaker 2: So that's the thing they're they're gonna have bureaucrats that
Speaker 2: can't do anything. And though.
Speaker 3: You survived the fallout, you've scrimped and saved and managed
Speaker 3: to make it someplace, and you just encounter a horde
Speaker 3: of bureaucrats coming out of a government bunker. Truly a nightmare.
Speaker 4: I mean, they do have plans in place for collecting
Speaker 4: taxes after a nuclear bomb goes off. They've got to
Speaker 4: implement those somehow, that's right.
Speaker 3: My question is, all right, so you know, nuclear apocalypse happens,
Speaker 3: you guys all get down into the bunkers. What keeps
Speaker 3: the toughest guy with the tough biggest gun for immediately going?
Speaker 3: All right? So, I know we kind of voted you
Speaker 3: into power, but that was before all this happened. So
Speaker 3: you clean the toilets now, just I don't think we
Speaker 3: really need your skill set anymore.
Speaker 2: Well, that's why you need to see the movie Civil War,
Speaker 2: which we watched this weekend. And we saw the movie
Speaker 2: Civil War. That's a kind of a reckoning moment there
Speaker 2: the president kind of American. Yeah, the president gets a
Speaker 2: reckoning moment. But yeah, it was for the most part
Speaker 2: that movie. I was almost ready to turn it off
Speaker 2: because it was just this you know, almost post apocalyptic
Speaker 2: America where it's just you know, pockets of sanity versus
Speaker 2: total chaos, and you know, people just going around killing
Speaker 2: people because they want to. And I think that's a
Speaker 2: pretty accurate idea of what will happen in a civil war.
Speaker 2: But then he got to the point where there were
Speaker 2: in Washington, It's like, okay, I want to see this.
Speaker 2: There was a great book about the Civil War that
Speaker 2: picked up at Gettysburg that was written by a battlefield
Speaker 2: to her guide and it was called If the South
Speaker 2: Had Wanted at Gettysburg, And the cover, which really caught
Speaker 2: my eye was an astronaut on the moon planting a
Speaker 2: Confederate flag.
Speaker 3: A better time, a brighter timeline.
Speaker 2: But it was actually a very interesting premise because he
Speaker 2: changes just like one thing. It's like an alternative history thing,
Speaker 2: and you realize just how close things were, and you know,
Speaker 2: just slightly change it and then left everything else where.
Speaker 2: It was the horrific weather that happened the next day
Speaker 2: that allowed Lee to escape with the remnants of his
Speaker 2: army without being pursued, and the fact that they had
Speaker 2: if they had won there, they had a clear path
Speaker 2: to come in on the north side of Washington where
Speaker 2: there was no protection whatsoever, and it would have been
Speaker 2: a real pivot moment at that point. But so when
Speaker 2: I watched the Civil War, maybe to take me back
Speaker 2: to that particular, that particular novel. Anyway, I like historical fiction,
Speaker 2: that his alternative especially, so I don't like the way
Speaker 2: things really turned out.
Speaker 3: So perhaps what if we're going to just change one thing?
Speaker 2: Yeah, it could it be better?
Speaker 3: Yeah, you see a commedy from Nibru twenty twenty nine,
Speaker 3: says Emperor Trump's legacy movie was released in two thousand
Speaker 3: and nine and starring Vigo Mortensen, titled The Road Let's
Speaker 3: Hope not. That movie is terribly depressing. Yeah, it's another
Speaker 3: Cormack McCarthy story. And that's all he wrote. That's all
Speaker 3: the Cormack McCarthy, as far as I'm aware, never wrote
Speaker 3: any feel good stories. The Nights of the Storm wait
Speaker 3: for it. Trump will find a way to get people
Speaker 3: to go along with it. And yeah, digital id for
Speaker 3: the Internet.
Speaker 2: Yeah you read that second one there.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Doug to double O seven. This is such an
Speaker 3: offensive ad. No wonder Trump was livid sarcasm. Yeah, so
Speaker 3: Bogus Reagan is basically the previous false idol of Republicans,
Speaker 3: the previous demigod of the right. Trump is worse though.
Speaker 2: Yeah, for years when they would have debates, when the
Speaker 2: front runner was not afraid of debates, everybody would say,
Speaker 2: but Ronald Reagan this, and Ronald Reagan that. Remember going
Speaker 2: back to twenty sixteen debates where there's a large field
Speaker 2: of Republicans and all of them were wrapping themselves and
Speaker 2: Ronald Reagan, and you better believe that they're all going
Speaker 2: to be doing that with Trump when he's gone, they'll
Speaker 2: be doing the same thing. I got really sick of hearing,
Speaker 2: but Ronald Reagan did this? You know what would Reagan? Do?
Speaker 2: You know? That type of thing never stopped.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we also have so Bogus has a big part
Speaker 3: of this is just to have Trump doing or reacting
Speaker 3: to something outrageous every other day to distract from the
Speaker 3: big picture. He does a good job of the real
Speaker 3: Octo spook. They're in business to make money, not pay money.
Speaker 3: American citizens pay all of it.
Speaker 2: Yeah. As a matter of fact, we got a story
Speaker 2: coming up where AI is being They're going to start
Speaker 2: to incorporate AI in terms of writing story scripts for WWE.
Speaker 2: That may be the best use case of it yet.
Speaker 2: But interestingly enough, Trump is pulling in pulled in people
Speaker 2: from the WWE into his administration because that's what the
Speaker 2: Trump administration is. It's all about creating this fake narrative
Speaker 2: and getting people all hyped up and heroes and heels.
Speaker 2: That's what it's all about. He learned that lesson really
Speaker 2: well with his close ties to the McMahon's. Lena McMahon
Speaker 2: is the head of the Department of Education. If that
Speaker 2: whole thing about getting rid of the Department of Education,
Speaker 2: if that isn't a professional wrestling narrative, I don't know
Speaker 2: what is. They're not going to do anything about that.
Speaker 2: They're still going to hand out the money. And if
Speaker 2: you hand out the money, you're still controlling the education.
Speaker 2: Whoever funds it is going to control it, and they're
Speaker 2: going to keep in the funding aspect of it. So again,
Speaker 2: it's going to Each successive administry is going to have
Speaker 2: different things that they're going to bribe and blackmail people
Speaker 2: to do through the money. And Trump is going to
Speaker 2: preserve all of that, whether he has a large bureaucracy
Speaker 2: there or not.
Speaker 3: You could at least do something fun like make a
Speaker 3: WWE wrestler, the press secretary or something like that. That's right,
Speaker 3: reporting live from the press room. Paul the Undertaker is
Speaker 3: just at Don Lemon with a steel chair.
Speaker 2: Well, he's going to have for the fourth of jo
Speaker 2: He's going to have a big ultimate fighting contest. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I don't care.
Speaker 3: I don't want to watch him. The UFC fighters feed
Speaker 3: up each other. I want to watch the Undertaker take
Speaker 3: Don Lemon to task. That's a way, come on, UFC.
Speaker 3: I don't want to watch two chechens wrestle each other.
Speaker 3: Who cares NBRU twenty twenty nine. Throughout history, tariffs have
Speaker 3: always been an instrument of the wealthy to further increase
Speaker 3: the aristocracies wealth Audi mrr magavators amaze me. They hate
Speaker 3: everything about Operation Warp Speed, but love the guy who
Speaker 3: green lighted it.
Speaker 2: Audi Audi, don't you know it wasn't Trump. It was
Speaker 2: the bad Democrat governors who did it all. That's why
Speaker 2: I've heard so.
Speaker 3: Many those nasty Democrats.
Speaker 4: About that WWE AI. It's the not Sure AI. It's
Speaker 4: so smart, it's gonna come up with everything we got
Speaker 4: to say. I called not Sure. He says that we
Speaker 4: got to put electrolytes in the plant food idiocracy.
Speaker 3: Yeah, classic Brandon Bennett. Big hole is where they should
Speaker 3: have their no Kings protest. They could secret them all away,
Speaker 3: squirrel them all deep into the bowels of the earth. Real,
Speaker 3: Jason Barker at Steve Evs. That's where they keep all
Speaker 3: their stolen cash. Brandon Minette says, stolen cash and children. Yeah, guys,
Speaker 3: Donald Trump is down in the tunnels fistfighting the lizard
Speaker 3: people for his stolen children.
Speaker 4: Nuclear war is it would kill just about everyone except
Speaker 4: for the people that maybe shouldn't survive it.
Speaker 2: Well, they are not going to be capable of taking themselves,
Speaker 2: that's for sure. We're gonna take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 2: and we will be right back.
Speaker 12: Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet, LAOS, your annual Global Risk
Speaker 12: Report makes for a stunning and sobering read for the
Speaker 12: global business community. The top concern for the next two
Speaker 12: years is not conflict or climate. It is disinformation and
Speaker 12: misinformation for not closely by polarization within our societies.
Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 8: You are listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 13: Here's a little song I ought you might want to
Speaker 13: hear it in your pod.
Speaker 2: You'll own nothing and be happy.
Speaker 13: I got no cash, I got no car, not twenty
Speaker 13: four booster shots in your arm.
Speaker 2: Own nothing to be happy.
Speaker 13: You can't even buy it in the store because of
Speaker 13: your low social credit score. Own nothing, Be happy, you
Speaker 13: own nothing, and by be happy, I eat some bugs here.
Speaker 14: News now at apsradionews dot com or get the APS
Speaker 14: Radio app and never miss another story.
Speaker 2: Yes, and we want to thank Charliet APS for carrying
Speaker 2: the program there at their news segment there. But they've
Speaker 2: also got a lot of other different genres of music
Speaker 2: and that type of thing at APS Radio, so please
Speaker 2: check them out. They're one of our supporters. Venezuela has
Speaker 2: claimed capture of CIA linked mercenaries and then they said
Speaker 2: it looks like they were practicing or setting up to
Speaker 2: do a false flag attack. I mean, the CIA wouldn't
Speaker 2: do that, would they know. Trump has not even made
Speaker 2: a secret of the fact that he's got CIA in places,
Speaker 2: not made a secret of the fact that he's got
Speaker 2: a massive build up of a military force there as well.
Speaker 2: So will it be another Gulf of Tonkin incident? It's
Speaker 2: kind of interesting, you know, when we look at the
Speaker 2: Golf of Tonkin. Did you get that to Yeah, we
Speaker 2: got a clip here. Let me play this from the
Speaker 2: Fog of War and just to give you an idea
Speaker 2: of what happened. Errol Morris was a film documentarian and
Speaker 2: before he got into doing film documentaries, he used to
Speaker 2: be an investigator and interrogator and he really knows how
Speaker 2: to read people and how to interview them. I mean,
Speaker 2: he's just amazing. He had a documentary called The Thin
Speaker 2: Blue Line and it was about he didn't start out
Speaker 2: to do this documentary, start out to do a documentary
Speaker 2: about the death penalty and people on death row. And
Speaker 2: one of the people that he talked to, he became
Speaker 2: convinced that the guy was innocent and that the police
Speaker 2: had grabbed this guy and railroaded him simply because they
Speaker 2: have to be seen to immediately solve the issue if
Speaker 2: a police officer is killed. So a cop been killed,
Speaker 2: so immediately got to grab their guy and say we
Speaker 2: got the perp and he's guilty, and they railroaded him
Speaker 2: to give him the death penalty. And so Errol Morris
Speaker 2: started interviewing people. He started getting interested in this case
Speaker 2: and he figured out who the guy was that really
Speaker 2: did it, and he actually got the guy to confess
Speaker 2: to doing the murder. And one of the things that
Speaker 2: he would do this is twenty thirty years ago, he
Speaker 2: would set up a teleprompter and he would use it
Speaker 2: so that people were doing like a zoom conference call
Speaker 2: or something, and by taking himself out of the room,
Speaker 2: and they were no longer talking to him, they were
Speaker 2: kind of talking to a TV, which you know, people
Speaker 2: have a different attitude about it then than they do now,
Speaker 2: and so it gave it this level of separation and
Speaker 2: abstraction and it kind of disarmed them along with his
Speaker 2: excellent skills of being an investigator an interrogator himself. He
Speaker 2: called it the enterotron, and he said it really took
Speaker 2: people's guard down when instead of talking to him directly,
Speaker 2: he might just be in the next room, but he
Speaker 2: was talking to them through the teleprompter, through the monitor.
Speaker 2: And so he did that with Robert mcnamair, who basically
Speaker 2: was the architect and engineer of the Vietnam War before
Speaker 2: he was then sent off to the IMF fund and
Speaker 2: began enslaving developing countries with debt to the IMF. But anyway,
Speaker 2: he talked to Robert mcnamare for about two or three
Speaker 2: days and put this documentary together, and as part of it,
Speaker 2: I thought it was very interesting the Gulf of Tonkin incident,
Speaker 2: and mcnamaar essentially admitted that they made it up.
Speaker 11: On August second, the destroyer Maddox reported it was attacked
Speaker 11: by a North Vietnamese patrol book. It was an act
Speaker 11: of aggression against his We were in international waters. I
Speaker 11: sent officials from the Defence Warment out and we recovered
Speaker 11: pieces of North eatnamse shells that were clearly identified as
Speaker 11: North the shells from the deck of the Mattox.
Speaker 2: So it was I guess, I said, made it in
Speaker 2: North Vietnam.
Speaker 11: But in any event, we didn't respond.
Speaker 2: How they wind up getting fragments and not being shot,
Speaker 2: I don't understand. But it gets worse.
Speaker 11: Later the Mattocks and the Turner Joy Too destroyers reported
Speaker 11: they were attacked.
Speaker 10: How are these torpedoes coming from?
Speaker 2: But we don't know.
Speaker 11: Presumably from these unidentified craft. There were sonar soundings, torpedoes
Speaker 11: had been protected, other indications of attack.
Speaker 2: From patrol boats.
Speaker 11: We spent about ten hours that day trying to find
Speaker 11: out what in the hell had happened. At one point
Speaker 11: the commander of the ship said, we're not certain of
Speaker 11: the attack. Another point they said, yes, we're absolutely, and
Speaker 11: then finally late in the day, Admiral Sharp said, yes,
Speaker 11: we're certain it happened. So I reported this to Johnson,
Speaker 11: and as a result, there were bombing attacks on targets
Speaker 11: in North Vietnam.
Speaker 2: A bombing attack that was so severe you weren't certain
Speaker 2: for ten hours of debate, that's whether it actually happened,
Speaker 2: let alone who did it.
Speaker 11: Johnson said, we may have to escalate. I'm not going
Speaker 11: to do it without congressional authority, and he put forward
Speaker 11: a resolution, the language of which gave complete authority to
Speaker 11: the president to take the nation to war, the Tonkin
Speaker 11: Gulf Resolution.
Speaker 2: Unlike Trump, Now, let me, Trump is worse than I'll be.
Speaker 2: Jay's fourth attack.
Speaker 15: Well, apparently at nine torpedoes in the water all this Yeah, No,
Speaker 15: I don't wait, am not. I'm not so sure about
Speaker 15: this number of engaged, right, We'd have to check it
Speaker 15: out here, he said, Many of the reported contacts of
Speaker 15: torpedoes fired appear doubtful. Freak weather effects on radar and
Speaker 15: over eager storm and may have accounted for many reports. Okay, well,
Speaker 15: I was coming to that's the best I can give
Speaker 15: you today. Sorry, it doesn't appear now that a lot
Speaker 15: of these torpedo attacks were from the sawm man. You see,
Speaker 15: and they get keyed up to things like this, everything
Speaker 15: they hear on the sonar is a torpedo.
Speaker 4: You're pretty sure there was a torpedo attack then, Oh,
Speaker 4: no doubt about that.
Speaker 2: I think, I think no doubt.
Speaker 11: I think it was just confusion, and events afterwards showed
Speaker 11: that our judgment that we'd been attacked that day was wrong.
Speaker 2: It didn't happen. Yeah, nine torpedoes, they all missed. And
Speaker 2: somehow I'm look at that and it's like, did North
Speaker 2: Korea have submarines that were shooting torpedoes or are they
Speaker 2: coming off of some boats? But they never identified the
Speaker 2: boats that were shooting the torpedoes, And I don't think
Speaker 2: that they had submarines.
Speaker 4: What it's our judgment that day was wrong. It turns
Speaker 4: out we mistakenly thought that we had been shot by
Speaker 4: torpedoes and that gave us the excuse to do everything
Speaker 4: that we had wanted to do before that. Oops, our mistake. Sorry, guys, Yeah,
Speaker 4: you know.
Speaker 2: And he tries to talk about that incident earlier. He said, yeah,
Speaker 2: there was some shrapnel from some shells and it was
Speaker 2: definitely North Korea. It must have said that, you know,
Speaker 2: made in North Korea on the shells something. They were
Speaker 2: not hit with anything, and they claimed that they were
Speaker 2: hit with that earlier. One of them claimed that this
Speaker 2: was the incident that got us into the Gulf of Tonkin.
Speaker 2: A war that is based on lies and false flags, folks.
Speaker 2: That's what we've had from the American government and the
Speaker 2: Pentagon so many times in the last sixty years or so.
Speaker 2: So the Maduro regime said Sunday that Venezuela has captured
Speaker 2: a group of alleged mercenaries with ties to the USCIA.
Speaker 2: They accused Washington and Trinidad and Tobago of coordinating military
Speaker 2: exercises intended to provoke an armed confrontation in the Caribbean.
Speaker 2: The government there said the arrest revealed what it described
Speaker 2: as a false flag operation planned from waters bordering Trinidad
Speaker 2: and Tobago or from Trinidadian or Venezuelan territory to generate
Speaker 2: a full scale military confrontation against Venezuela. In other words,
Speaker 2: when you go back and look at the Gulf of
Speaker 2: Tonken incident. It's not necessary to actually take out an
Speaker 2: American ship or do any damage or even hit it.
Speaker 2: You can just have a situation where they allege that
Speaker 2: they were fired upon without result, and that is sufficient
Speaker 2: for us to go to war. Now, on the other hand,
Speaker 2: we can blow up one fishing ship after the other,
Speaker 2: one drug ship, even if it is a drug ship.
Speaker 2: It's still murder on the high seas by Trump. And
Speaker 2: that's perfectly fine. That's the asymmetric rules of war. But
Speaker 2: then there's another kind of asymmetric war when they actually
Speaker 2: get on the ground. Those are the kind of asymmetric
Speaker 2: wars that we always lose. The announcement comes amid fast
Speaker 2: growing build up of US forces in the Caribbean, launched
Speaker 2: by Trump to combat he says, drug cartels. That's the
Speaker 2: fundamental lie right there. The administration signaled that might soon
Speaker 2: Aris ground incursions into Venezuela to target the so called
Speaker 2: Cartel of the Sun, a narco trafficking organization in the
Speaker 2: imagination of Trump. The Venezuelan government did not release any
Speaker 2: evidence or details about this. And of course, you know,
Speaker 2: again when we look at let's go to Trump instead
Speaker 2: of to LBJ. When you look at candidate Trump, he
Speaker 2: told us that the Iraq war was based on lies
Speaker 2: about weapons of mass destruction. That part was true, but
Speaker 2: then he took the person who ran the torture, the
Speaker 2: person who sold the lies, to the White House, Gina
Speaker 2: Haskell of the CIA, and he made her his head
Speaker 2: of the CIA, as effective head of the CIA. At
Speaker 2: the beginning, he had Pompeo who was the official head,
Speaker 2: but she was number two. Then Pompeo moved to Secretary
Speaker 2: of State and she moved in to be the truly
Speaker 2: official one who was running the CIA. So he says
Speaker 2: that we get into a war based on lies, and
Speaker 2: then he puts the person who lied about it in
Speaker 2: charge of the CIA. Classic Donald Trump telling you what
Speaker 2: they're doing and how corrupt it is, and then doubling
Speaker 2: down on what they were doing in the corruption. The
Speaker 2: alleged arrests, such as the number of suspects, their nationalities,
Speaker 2: when and where they were detained, has not been released.
Speaker 2: Caracas also linked the alleged plot to military drills that
Speaker 2: claims are being carried out this week by Trinidad and
Speaker 2: Tobago under the coordination, financing, and control of the US
Speaker 2: Southern Command, calling them a hostile provocation and a grave
Speaker 2: threat to the peace of the Caribbean. Statement released by
Speaker 2: Trinidad and Tobago's Prime minister. By the way, the prime
Speaker 2: Minister's name is Kamlah Yeah. By Kamala Yeah. The KAMMLA
Speaker 2: to act I said that the statement accused the Venezuelan
Speaker 2: statement accused that country, trend Ad and Tobago of acting
Speaker 2: as a military colony subordinated to US hege hegemonic interests.
Speaker 2: The Miami Herald could not independently confirm the arrest of
Speaker 2: any group or existence of coordinated operations involving the CIA
Speaker 2: or the Dooral based US Southern Command, which oversees military
Speaker 2: operations in Latin America. The Caracas people compared the supposed
Speaker 2: plan to the historical events such as the USS Main
Speaker 2: explosion in Cuba in eighteen ninety eight, which we know
Speaker 2: was a false flag, as well as the Gulf of Tonkin.
Speaker 2: And so this may or may not be real. I mean,
Speaker 2: since the CIA and the US government and the Pentagon
Speaker 2: have a history of staging false flag events and using
Speaker 2: them as a pretext of war, they might be just
Speaker 2: referring back to that history. Knowing that people would believe
Speaker 2: that's likely something that the US would do. I do
Speaker 2: believe it is likely the US will do it. I
Speaker 2: don't know if they have done it yet, but I
Speaker 2: think that they're likely to do it at some point
Speaker 2: in time. The government said the alleged provocation follows the
Speaker 2: same pattern and accused Washington of seeking a pretext war
Speaker 2: for war in the region. And again, the US keeps
Speaker 2: doing it. Why because it works. It works every time
Speaker 2: with the American public. Following the Trump administration's decision to
Speaker 2: amass the largest US military presence the Caribbean has seen
Speaker 2: in decades in order to supposedly combat drug cartel operations
Speaker 2: in the region, well, I'm sure that they'll be able
Speaker 2: to win this imaginary drug war because it doesn't exist
Speaker 2: in the first place. So Trump will be able to
Speaker 2: declare victory with that. Next to is going to be
Speaker 2: taking on the little Green men and UFOs and beat
Speaker 2: them as well. The build up of US forces continues.
Speaker 2: Over the past two months, the Pentagon has deployed close
Speaker 2: to ten thousand troops, most of them based in Puerto Rico,
Speaker 2: along with a contingent of Marines aboard amphibious assault ships.
Speaker 2: The US Navy has positioned at least ten warships and
Speaker 2: a submarine in the Caribbean as part of the expanded force.
Speaker 2: So those marines and the ten thousand troops, they'll be
Speaker 2: sent eventually to go kill and die for Trump's lies.
Speaker 2: That's what's really going to happen here, just as people
Speaker 2: were sent into Vietnam to kill and to die for
Speaker 2: the lives of LBJ and Robert McNamara. Trump has indicated
Speaker 2: that the US is now considering ground operations, while his
Speaker 2: administration has quietly granted the CIA new powers to conduct
Speaker 2: covert activities in the South American country. They don't even
Speaker 2: try to hide it anymore. They used to be ashamed
Speaker 2: of this stuff, and they should be ashamed. So a
Speaker 2: senior US Republican says that Maduro's days are numbered. And
Speaker 2: of course this would be Rick Scott, a Republican from Florida,
Speaker 2: who is their Rubio from Florida, and Rick Scott from Florida.
Speaker 2: They're both looking at this as a way to come
Speaker 2: after Cuba as well, because there is a connection between
Speaker 2: Venezuela and Cuba. There's no connection between Venezuela and fentanyl
Speaker 2: at all, but there is a connection that they're not
Speaker 2: talking about between Venezuela and Cuba. Venezuela, even though they
Speaker 2: have not been able to capitalize and to operate on
Speaker 2: this massive reserve of oil. They have more oil than
Speaker 2: Saudi Arabia, but they can't get it out of the
Speaker 2: ground because they're communists and they don't know how it works.
Speaker 2: It's going to be like the bureaucrats who survive at
Speaker 2: raven Rock. They're not going to get anything. Wait a minute,
Speaker 2: can't gardy crops, can't get any oil out of the ground,
Speaker 2: and can't refine it, and so forth. But so Venezuela
Speaker 2: is getting a little bit of oil to Cuba and
Speaker 2: they want to cut that off. They want to isolate
Speaker 2: Cuba next. And that's one of the reasons why Rubio
Speaker 2: has been so hell bent on Venezuela. It's a way
Speaker 2: to attack Cuba, you know, kind of like Ukraine and Russia,
Speaker 2: that type of thing. And so Rick Scott is also
Speaker 2: from Florida, and he is also going to be heavily
Speaker 2: influenced by the Conservative Republicans, which is Cubans in Florida
Speaker 2: for the most part, conservative and Republican. I grew up
Speaker 2: in Florida, and I knew a lot of Cubans. I
Speaker 2: was in bands with a lot of Cubans and had
Speaker 2: great trumpet players. They do have an obossession with Castro,
Speaker 2: and look, I understand I don't like Castro either, but
Speaker 2: maybe this is going to be Maybe this administration be
Speaker 2: the one they can finally pull off the Bay of pigs.
Speaker 2: It takes the administration of pigs to do it, I guess,
Speaker 2: and they've got just the personnel I think, to pull
Speaker 2: off the Bay of Pigs. So this is Rick Scott,
Speaker 2: who is on the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committee.
Speaker 2: He said Maduro's days are numbered, whether it's internal or external.
Speaker 2: I think something's going to happen to him, right, he
Speaker 2: should head to Russia or to China. And then we
Speaker 2: had another senator who chimed in over the weekend. This
Speaker 2: is Senator Langford, who is not from an area that
Speaker 2: is heavily influenced by Cubans, and he had this to say.
Speaker 16: The administration needs to give insight into Congress.
Speaker 2: That's part of it.
Speaker 16: If this was happening with this level of insight under
Speaker 16: the Biden administration, I'd be apoplectic, and I would say Hey, listen,
Speaker 16: I serve on the Intelligence Committee. He serves as a
Speaker 16: senior Democrat on Defense. This is typical consultation. It's not permission,
Speaker 16: but it is Hey, I want to let you know
Speaker 16: this is happening, and here are the details of what's happening,
Speaker 16: and here's why and what, and here's what we know.
Speaker 2: Here's what we know about.
Speaker 8: Each one of these incidents that has occurred.
Speaker 16: In the people that are there, that's important. We're all
Speaker 16: elected officials, We're in a co equal branch of government,
Speaker 16: and we've got.
Speaker 8: To be able to have that kind of coordination.
Speaker 3: Now, we need to be able to engage on drugs.
Speaker 16: I have Oklahomans that are dying from methamphetamine, from cocaine,
Speaker 16: from fentanyl, and from different drugs that are laced with
Speaker 16: fentanyl on it and mixing it in. That's happening in
Speaker 16: my state, as it's happening all around the country. We
Speaker 16: tried a lot of different approaches to be able to
Speaker 16: stop it. The President has turned the volume up to
Speaker 16: eleven and said, no, we're going to stop drugs coming
Speaker 16: into our country that are killing folks.
Speaker 8: So he's putting tariffs.
Speaker 16: On countries that are allowing the precursors to be able
Speaker 16: to come over into North America.
Speaker 2: You know, I can.
Speaker 16: Direct action against those folks to deliver the drugs that
Speaker 16: are killing Americans.
Speaker 2: Weally appropriate to do.
Speaker 16: What we're missing is the communication, the coordination, and the
Speaker 16: ability to be able to say, let's talk out loud
Speaker 16: about this.
Speaker 2: We're not his opponent on this.
Speaker 16: We're an ally in this to be able to solve it,
Speaker 16: but we need to be able to have a voice
Speaker 16: on it as a coequals?
Speaker 2: Are there other that's a coequal branch? Okay, you think
Speaker 2: your co equal branch when you've abdicated the necessity of
Speaker 2: congressional deliberation before we go to war, you say you're coequal? Pathetic? Yeah,
Speaker 2: you know, we want to stop the drugs. I want
Speaker 2: to stop the drugs. So let's do it by force.
Speaker 2: That's worked so well for fifty plus years. Let's continue
Speaker 2: to do more force. Let's turn it up to eleven.
Speaker 2: And then meanwhile, we don't even know who to shoot at. Right,
Speaker 2: we're going to attack countries that aren't bringing the drugs in.
Speaker 2: Why is that? Why don't we go to the countries
Speaker 2: that are bringing the drugs in? Well, because they're working
Speaker 2: with the CIA, which is also a part of this.
Speaker 2: So you know, you're only going to go to Panama
Speaker 2: when the CIA's partner decides that he's going to go
Speaker 2: a different route, then we got to take that guy out.
Speaker 2: They're just another drug gang, the CIA and Pentagon, the
Speaker 2: rest of them, as far as I'm concerned, they're just
Speaker 2: another drug gang. So you've got Rick Scott saying that
Speaker 2: Maduro is an illegitimate murderist dictator. Well that may be true,
Speaker 2: but that's definitely true of Trump is a murderist dictator,
Speaker 2: and there's no question about it. He even brags about it.
Speaker 2: So this is an article from drop site News inside
Speaker 2: Marco Rubio's push for regime change in Venezuela. There is
Speaker 2: no fentinyl coming from the country, according to US Intelligence.
Speaker 2: Even this is another Trump lie for war. He said
Speaker 2: that again. You know when you go back and look
Speaker 2: at the Iraq war. He promotes the people who sell
Speaker 2: these types of lies. And so US Intelligence has assessed
Speaker 2: that little to none of the fentinyl traffic to the
Speaker 2: United States is being produced in Venezuela, despite recent claims
Speaker 2: from the Trump administration, and again Ram Paul laid this
Speaker 2: whole thing out, So there's no fentinyl coming in from Venezuela.
Speaker 2: According to the people who are doing this, Not only that,
Speaker 2: but these ships that they're blowing up couldn't make it.
Speaker 2: They don't have sufficient fuel to make the trip to
Speaker 2: the US. They're not coming here at all. But as
Speaker 2: they blow up these ships, the murderous little dictator Don
Speaker 2: is saying, look, we've stopped it from sea. Now we've
Speaker 2: got to go to land in order to stop it.
Speaker 2: You stopped something that wasn't happening. There's no way these
Speaker 2: ships could actually make it to the United States.
Speaker 17: You, Senator Paul, what do you need to hear in
Speaker 17: a briefing?
Speaker 9: What questions do you have?
Speaker 6: You know, it's not so much about a briefing, but
Speaker 6: we haven't had a briefing. To be clear, We've got
Speaker 6: no information. I've been invited to no briefing. But a
Speaker 6: briefing is not enough to overcome the Constitution. The Constitution
Speaker 6: says that when you go to war, Congress has to
Speaker 6: vote on it, and during a war then there's a
Speaker 6: lower rules for engagement. People do sometimes get killed without
Speaker 6: due process, but the drug war, or the war or
Speaker 6: the crime war has typically been something we do through
Speaker 6: law enforcement, and so far they have alleged that these
Speaker 6: people are drug dealers. No one said their name, no
Speaker 6: one said what evidence, no one said whether they're armed,
Speaker 6: and we've had no evidence presented. So at this point
Speaker 6: I would call them extra judicial killings. And this is
Speaker 6: akin to what China does to a rand does with
Speaker 6: drug dealers. They summarily execute people without presenting evids to
Speaker 6: the public.
Speaker 3: So it's wrong, are you yeah?
Speaker 2: And so officials who talked to drop site News noted
Speaker 2: that many of the boats targeted for strikes by the
Speaker 2: Trump administration do not even have the requisite gasoline or
Speaker 2: motor capacity to reach US waters, and of course that
Speaker 2: is what Rampaul has also said. These officials are retired
Speaker 2: intelligence officials as well who talk to drop site News.
Speaker 2: The claim is backed by recent comments made by Senator Rampaul,
Speaker 2: who similarly noted that zero fentanyl is produced in Venezuela.
Speaker 2: But despite all this, in the lack of any intelligence
Speaker 2: leaking Venezuela with fentanyl production, the Trump administration has made
Speaker 2: the alleged Venezuela and drug trafficking the cause of war
Speaker 2: and it's drive to overthrow the government of Maduro. Trump
Speaker 2: referred to the possible ground action, claiming at a press
Speaker 2: conference that the quote sea drugs coming in are five
Speaker 2: percent of what they were a year ago. So they're
Speaker 2: coming in by land, and so we're going to have
Speaker 2: to attack the land next. So he is saying that
Speaker 2: he stopped the flow of drugs by sea, which we're
Speaker 2: never coming here by sea, and so now he's going
Speaker 2: to go to land to stop the drugs that are
Speaker 2: not coming here by land. Next.
Speaker 4: We just keep winning.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're tired of winning, and I'm tired of wars. Actually.
Speaker 2: The two sources familiar with discussions of the White House
Speaker 2: note that Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a longtime proponent
Speaker 2: of regime change in Venezuela, has been the driving force
Speaker 2: behind the aggressive military and rhetorical posture toward the Maduro regime.
Speaker 2: I guess we should call this, if it happens, we
Speaker 2: should call it Little Marco's War. He's also in charge
Speaker 2: of the remnants, excuse me, of the U. S a
Speaker 2: i D. The US Agency for International Development. This is
Speaker 2: the CIA propaganda people. This is where Barack Obama's mama
Speaker 2: used to work. The Obama mama used to work at
Speaker 2: the U s a I D. His her parents, his
Speaker 2: grandparents on her side were some of the founding members
Speaker 2: of the CIA, coming over from the OSS. So US
Speaker 2: A I D has redirected millions of dollars and money
Speaker 2: previously allocated for pro democracy measures in Venezuela and surrounding
Speaker 2: countries in a thinly veiled effort to prep the region
Speaker 2: for war. So they come in and they do the
Speaker 2: propaganda type of stuff like Tucker Carlson's dad did with
Speaker 2: Voice of America, except U. S a I D is
Speaker 2: even more directly involved with the CIA. And you remember
Speaker 2: when Doage was going through and there was a fight
Speaker 2: between Elon Musk and Marco Rubio. Rubio was absolutely apoplectic
Speaker 2: that they were shutting down usaid he wanted this dirty
Speaker 2: little propaganda liars. He wanted to keep them around. Rubio
Speaker 2: cycled through multiple arguments for regime change in Venezuela during
Speaker 2: the early months of the administration, largely based around human
Speaker 2: rights and election concerns, which were unconvincing to Trump. After
Speaker 2: assuming a position on the National Security Council in the spring,
Speaker 2: Rubio then presented a new argument to Trump that Maduro
Speaker 2: was a narco terrorist drug trafficker. There you go. So
Speaker 2: this absurd lie about fentanyl coming from Venezuela came from
Speaker 2: Little Marco. I wonder if he's the one who told
Speaker 2: Trump that fentanyl was coming in from Canada as well. Yeah,
Speaker 2: Robert Baron Trump said in the last October though, that
Speaker 2: he wanted the oil. Remember that when he was running
Speaker 2: for office, he said, yeah, venezuel we could have taken
Speaker 2: the oil. We got to take the oil. Same thing
Speaker 2: he said about Syria as well. Well. Trump enables so
Speaker 2: far to carry out attacks on Mexican cartels, strikes seen
Speaker 2: as politically untenable. Yeah, because you know, the CIA is
Speaker 2: mixed in with these guys. So we don't want to
Speaker 2: attack the guys who are working with us. Only if
Speaker 2: they stop working with us, will we do that. Rubio
Speaker 2: effectively steered his gaze to Maduro, said, Hey, you want
Speaker 2: to you want to go shoot somebody in the streets
Speaker 2: like your hero Rodrigo Duterte. Well, we can do that
Speaker 2: in Venezuela. They're doing drugs as well. Oh really, okay? Sure.
Speaker 2: Rubio's policy was most recently at a crossroads after Marduro
Speaker 2: offered to turn over the oil resources to the US
Speaker 2: in exchange for cessation of hostilities, again trying to buy
Speaker 2: off these You know, Maduro is not stupid. He knows
Speaker 2: what's going on. He knows that it's not about the drugs.
Speaker 2: He's not doing them. He knows it's about the oil
Speaker 2: that they want. So he says, here, I'll give you
Speaker 2: some oil. How about that. Can we just not have
Speaker 2: a war. But Trump acknowledged the offer in a recent appearance,
Speaker 2: saying Maduro offered everything. You know why, because he doesn't
Speaker 2: want to f around with the US. He's a thug, gangster,
Speaker 2: he's a casino mafia owner. Trump rejected the offer after
Speaker 2: being swayed by arguments from Rubio that the best way
Speaker 2: to secure Venezuela's oil reserves was to facilitate regime change
Speaker 2: and to make a better deal with a new government. Yeah,
Speaker 2: we don't want to have him paying us. We can
Speaker 2: put our own guy in there, and we'll get even
Speaker 2: more oil at a better price, or no price at all.
Speaker 2: A recent US government assessment of Venezuela and oil exports
Speaker 2: to China found nearly half a million barrels a day,
Speaker 2: a small fraction of the country's total capacity, which Trump
Speaker 2: is turning down in the immediate term. So he's going
Speaker 2: to go for the whole thing. He's the mafia boss, says, hey,
Speaker 2: it's nice business. You got there to be ashamed of.
Speaker 2: Something happened to it, right, Yeah, I'll give you a
Speaker 2: cut of it. I think I'll just take the whole
Speaker 2: thing and I'll kill you in the process. Foreign policy
Speaker 2: under Trump has come to be dominated by a group
Speaker 2: known inside the administration as the Gang of Five. And
Speaker 2: let me just say here, what a disgusting, pathetic display
Speaker 2: it was of Alex Jones and Patrick Byrne to cheer
Speaker 2: an American war in Venezuela for the oil. I'm disgusted
Speaker 2: with them. Yeah. People just own this corruption anymore. They
Speaker 2: own the lies, they own the wars, and they're absolutely
Speaker 2: unashamed about it. So the Gang of Five, consisting of Rubyo,
Speaker 2: Stephen Miller, Susie Wiles, the Chief of Staff, Steve Whitcoff,
Speaker 2: Trump's all around envoy, and former real estate partner, that's
Speaker 2: what he. I guess, yeah, I guess we look at it.
Speaker 2: I guess all geopolitics is about real estate, right, It's
Speaker 2: about scouting out what you want. The only difference is
Speaker 2: is that when you're president, you don't have to pay
Speaker 2: for anything. You have taxpayers to pay for the bombs
Speaker 2: and missiles that kill people so that you can steal
Speaker 2: their land. So I guess that's what Whitcough is there for,
Speaker 2: just like he was there in Israel and then Vice
Speaker 2: President Jade Vance. Warhawk's secretary Pete Hegseth, in a bid
Speaker 2: for internal relevance, has eagerly executed Rubio's strategy, regularly striking
Speaker 2: boats that he claims without evidence or carrying drugs and
Speaker 2: then burning the passengers alive. How exactly Rubio is spending
Speaker 2: the pro democracy funds from the USAID from which Buckets
Speaker 2: is not made clear in federal disclosures, but a flurry
Speaker 2: of contracts and neighboring countries indicates a surge of military
Speaker 2: preparation and Colombia. Much of the US backed resistance to Maduro,
Speaker 2: including the disastrous Operation Gideon coup attempt in May of
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, has been based out of Colombia and Guyana.
Speaker 2: In late September, the US State Department's International Law Enforcement
Speaker 2: Arm signed a two year, four point eight billion dollar
Speaker 2: Colombia Virtual Shooting Range quote unquote contract with Airs on
Speaker 2: a based Vertra inc. There are also two foreign military
Speaker 2: sales through the US Coast Guard, and so the you
Speaker 2: know we talked about Colombia. Isn't that interesting that we
Speaker 2: would partner with a company the country that is actually
Speaker 2: sending drugs to the US, because again, the CIA is
Speaker 2: at the center of all this. We could see that
Speaker 2: in Afghanistan, you know, they took over the fields that
Speaker 2: the Taliban was shutting down. They had it. Less than
Speaker 2: ten percent of the world supply was coming out of Afghanistan,
Speaker 2: and we jumped it up to the high nineties a
Speaker 2: record amount every year was a bigger bumper crop. And
Speaker 2: we had US troops guarding the fields for them, and
Speaker 2: presumably the CIA getting the opioids and being able to
Speaker 2: distribute them. While the contracts indicate millions being poured into Colombia,
Speaker 2: the wave of funding could now be undermined by President
Speaker 2: Petro's recent condemnation of the lethal US airstrike on a
Speaker 2: fishing boat in Colombian waters. On October the third, Maduro's
Speaker 2: vice president accused Exxon of funding a military assault in
Speaker 2: the region. So they're accusing Exxon of doing military assaults
Speaker 2: as well. The interesting thing is that Exxon's competitor, which
Speaker 2: is also headquartered out of Houston. Chevron is a partner
Speaker 2: of the Venezuelan government. This is very much like Smedley
Speaker 2: Butler saying, you know, we're going to war for the
Speaker 2: United Fruit Company. Here we are. This is something of
Speaker 2: a war between Exxon and Chevron, and these are so
Speaker 2: Chevron's allied with Venezuelan government and Maduro and Exon is
Speaker 2: opposing them from the outside. It reminds me of that
Speaker 2: Terry Gillhan movie. I was at time Bandits where they
Speaker 2: had you had skyscrapers that they used, they were moving,
Speaker 2: you know, they were selling them like ships, like they
Speaker 2: were sailing ships, and they had basically a hostile corporate takeover.
Speaker 2: He represented as these pirates that were sailing the skyscrapers
Speaker 2: through the streets of a city and shooting at each other.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's basically what we've got going on here,
Speaker 2: corporations getting involved in all of this. The US government
Speaker 2: has attempted to overthrow the socialist government of Venezuela for decades,
Speaker 2: including through the USAID's Office of Transition Initiatives. Oh, that's
Speaker 2: a nice euphemism for a coup. A Transition Initiative. The
Speaker 2: US's quasi overt international political action arm, the National Endowment
Speaker 2: for Democracy, the Need another CIA thing, has the challenging
Speaker 2: task of funding nonprofits and journalists in a manner which
Speaker 2: on the one hand advances US foreign policy goals and
Speaker 2: on the other allows grantees to still claim independence. Even
Speaker 2: Trump's first administration reportedly expressed frustration with a covert democracy
Speaker 2: promotion campaign by the CIA against Venezuelan President Maduro in
Speaker 2: twenty nineteen being indistinguishable from its overt counterparts. So again,
Speaker 2: this is the same stuff being recycled. So you can
Speaker 2: imagine that whether or not it's true, they would suspect
Speaker 2: that this there's going to be some kind of a
Speaker 2: false flag right the Gulf of Tonkin. Well, the Trump
Speaker 2: administration has gutted the majority of USAID's political action programs
Speaker 2: during its first few months in office. So again, this
Speaker 2: is the gang that can't shoot straight. Trump wants to
Speaker 2: literally go to war to stop drugs, even though force
Speaker 2: has not worked, so he doesn't know which country to attack,
Speaker 2: and so he's now cut off the propagandists and the
Speaker 2: people that are there to start the coups. He shut
Speaker 2: them down largely earlier as well. So I don't think
Speaker 2: this whole thing is going to go too well. But
Speaker 2: there is a large aircraft carrier group, the USS gerald Ford,
Speaker 2: that is slowly moving its way from the See where
Speaker 2: is it. It's in the Mediterranean, I think, and it's
Speaker 2: now headed to the Caribbean. And so this is one
Speaker 2: of these deals. Kind of reminds me of the Falkland
Speaker 2: Wars where they had this slow moving armada coming from
Speaker 2: the UK going down to the Falkland Islands in Argentina.
Speaker 2: And so we'll see what happens. Admiral Halsey, you remember,
Speaker 2: had a three year job and he quit one year
Speaker 2: into it, evidently because he was not happy with what
Speaker 2: was going on with the Southern Command. So the gerald
Speaker 2: Ford has been deployed in the Mediterranean this yeah, and
Speaker 2: it is off of the coast of Croatia and the
Speaker 2: Adriatic Sea. So now it's on its way to the Caribbean.
Speaker 2: And I guess when he gets there, I guess this
Speaker 2: whole thing will commence. Well, we're going to take a
Speaker 2: quick break and we'll read the comments when we come back.
Speaker 2: I just want to say that I just really find
Speaker 2: it disgusting to see that they can keep playing the
Speaker 2: same games over and over again. But again, we can
Speaker 2: have you fool most of the people most of the time,
Speaker 2: evidently because they were able to do it with Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break and we'll be
Speaker 2: right back.
Speaker 7: Liberty, it's your move, and now the David Knight Show,
Speaker 7: Elvis the Beetle.
Speaker 3: And the Sweet Sounds of Motown.
Speaker 14: Find them on the Oldies Channel at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 2: Well, marky Mark, thank you. He says, I was a
Speaker 2: sonar man in the US Navy, and I've heard torpedoes
Speaker 2: in the water. There is nothing that sounds like them.
Speaker 2: Once you've heard a torpedo, you never forget it sound. Well, again,
Speaker 2: these were assessments that are being made by the superior
Speaker 2: officers there, and I imagine that they were trying to
Speaker 2: come up with an excuse for why they might have
Speaker 2: lied or given conflicting information. Well, I think the guy
Speaker 2: is on sonar were just freaking out about what was
Speaker 2: happening there. That probably wasn't the case at all. They're
Speaker 2: probably just floundering around trying to find some flimsy excuse
Speaker 2: to say they'd been attacked. I seriously don't think that
Speaker 2: they were attacked then or the incident a couple of
Speaker 2: days earlier than that, And so I think it was
Speaker 2: just lies being told by the people who were in
Speaker 2: command and by the civilian leadership in order to start
Speaker 2: a war, a war that was based on not just
Speaker 2: based on a false flag, but based on the total
Speaker 2: historical ignorance about the relationship between China and Vietnam for
Speaker 2: over a thousand years they'd been in conflict with each other,
Speaker 2: and then also based on another foundational lie about the
Speaker 2: Domino theory and what was going to happen if we
Speaker 2: lost in Vietnam, all of Southeast Asia was going to
Speaker 2: fall to the Chinese communists, And of course none of
Speaker 2: that happened, and so we it's been very clearly shown
Speaker 2: that the whole thing was an invented lie. Well, before
Speaker 2: we move on, I want to talk about what's going
Speaker 2: on with gold and silver, which I think is kind
Speaker 2: of interesting. London is facing a one hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: million ounce silver shortfall. This was on Friday amid the
Speaker 2: Comex drain, said an insider. Now think about how much
Speaker 2: that is in terms of weight, that's about four point
Speaker 2: seven tons of silver, and in terms of you know,
Speaker 2: fifty dollars an ounce, that's about seven and a half
Speaker 2: billion dollars. That well, we can't fill that order. It's
Speaker 2: supposedly here, but we can't find the physical silver that
Speaker 2: is there. A massive physical drain of silk from Comx
Speaker 2: warehouses is accelerating. This is on Friday, signaling profound stress
Speaker 2: in the global delivery system, even as a fundamental structural
Speaker 2: change is redefining Goal's role as an asset, said a
Speaker 2: former billion bank executive, Bob Gottlieb. On Thursday, and an
Speaker 2: exclusive interview, he revealed that twenty nine million ounces of
Speaker 2: silver had been physically removed from Comicx warehouses in just
Speaker 2: the last two weeks. He also issued a stark warning
Speaker 2: about the opaque platinum market, suggesting the situation there may
Speaker 2: be even more dire physical. The physical exodus comes after
Speaker 2: a turbulent week that saw Goal plunge nearly five and
Speaker 2: a half percent and silver dropping seven and a half
Speaker 2: percent on the same day. The most acute stress is
Speaker 2: in the physical silver market, centering on a dramatic reversal
Speaker 2: of flows between the world's two most important trading hubs,
Speaker 2: the Comics in New York, which is a primary US
Speaker 2: futures exchange, and the London market the world's largest center
Speaker 2: for physical trading. The London vaults were depleted of the
Speaker 2: readily available metal or their free floating stock by a
Speaker 2: perfect storm of demand. We talked about that last week.
Speaker 2: Part of the demand was coming from India. It went
Speaker 2: from three hundred and five million down to maybe one
Speaker 2: hundred and twenty five million ounces, and that has created
Speaker 2: this entire tightness. The shortage in London has now caused
Speaker 2: a violent reversal. The premium for spotsilver in London has
Speaker 2: made it highly profitable for banks to take physical metal
Speaker 2: from the comics and ship it back across the Atlantic.
Speaker 2: So we went from five hundred and thirty million ounces
Speaker 2: to five hundred and one million today, So that's roughly
Speaker 2: twenty nine million ounces of silver that's been shipped out
Speaker 2: of the US. Gottlieb said, I believe we need another
Speaker 2: one hundred and one hundred and fifty million ounces physically
Speaker 2: in London for the market to normalize. The physical pressure
Speaker 2: is accumulating as gold is undergoing what gottlab calls a
Speaker 2: different kind of rally driven by a structural change, and
Speaker 2: how gold is viewed by the world's largest financial players.
Speaker 2: He said, the entire central bank world is diversifying away
Speaker 2: from the dollar, and they're doing that via gold. They're
Speaker 2: using a gold rather than the dollar. And he said,
Speaker 2: the interesting thing is that when you look at the
Speaker 2: European Central Bank, they just announced that they're number two
Speaker 2: holding in their reserves is gold, surpassing the euro. They
Speaker 2: hold more gold than they hold even of their own currency.
Speaker 2: And of course these things we've talked about with Tony
Speaker 2: Ardubuan of Wisewelf Gold, and just this shortage and the
Speaker 2: massive amount of shortage that came up towards the end
Speaker 2: of the week last week is a very very unusual thing.
Speaker 2: Gold made up about twenty percent of global official reserves
Speaker 2: at the end of twenty twenty four, surpassing the euro's
Speaker 2: sixteen percent share. Gottlieb characterized the weak's dramatic price crash
Speaker 2: as an extremely healthy event designed to purge speculative access
Speaker 2: from the newer investors that he calls week longs, so
Speaker 2: somebody hold it for about a week and sell it.
Speaker 2: A former designation of silver as a critical mineral could
Speaker 2: have dramatic consequences for the market. The most likely outcome
Speaker 2: would be tariffs. We're back to teriffs again. A more extreme,
Speaker 2: though less likely outcome could see the government move to
Speaker 2: restrict exports or to secure domestic inventories, effectively nationalizing a
Speaker 2: portion of the silver supply for strategic purposes like defence,
Speaker 2: AI and the energy sector. Gottlieb argued that the imposing
Speaker 2: restrictions would ultimately be a disservice to the US because,
Speaker 2: unlike with automobiles, terrafs will not produce one ounce more
Speaker 2: of silver in the United States, as over seventy five
Speaker 2: percent of silver is mined as a by product of
Speaker 2: other metals. Well, the other part of this is that
Speaker 2: this whole idea that tariffs help manufacturing just doesn't apply
Speaker 2: in today's economy. They have spent decades creating a supply
Speaker 2: chain that stretches across the entire world, and when you
Speaker 2: cut those lines of the supply chain, guess what. The
Speaker 2: manufacturers in the US don't have anything that they can
Speaker 2: work with. And even worse, as Trump plays this dance
Speaker 2: that he's so proud of his genius negotiation tactics of
Speaker 2: jacking up the terraffs and then dropping them and then
Speaker 2: jacking them up again. When he does it that way,
Speaker 2: they not only can't get the stuff that they want,
Speaker 2: but they don't buy it because they're afraid to buy
Speaker 2: it at the higher price. And so everything is freezing.
Speaker 2: And this is the absolute worse aspect of all of it,
Speaker 2: is the chaos and the uncertainty. So the now jumped
Speaker 2: three hundre points over a possible China trade deal on
Speaker 2: rare earth. This is the way that operates. This is
Speaker 2: a rumor and speculation on Wall Street, also known as gambling.
Speaker 2: These people are placing their bets that Donald Trump is
Speaker 2: going to bring it home and get a favorable deal
Speaker 2: with the Chinese. I'm not putting any money on that anyway.
Speaker 3: They've got money to burn. That's on them.
Speaker 2: Yes, Soro's Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessant, so that
Speaker 2: he would likely erase Trump's threatened on tariffs on China
Speaker 2: and delay Beijing's strict export controls on rare earth. By
Speaker 2: the way, here's a trivia question for you. There have
Speaker 2: been two Trump cabinet members in his two administrations, and
Speaker 2: the first one there was one, and now the second
Speaker 2: one there's one who openly supported Hillary Clinton. Who were
Speaker 2: they well, the first one. First administration, the cabinet member
Speaker 2: that had openly supported Hillary Clinton was wilbah Ross, the
Speaker 2: guy who was allied with the Rothschilds and had a
Speaker 2: very long history of having financial strings all over the
Speaker 2: puppet Donald Trump. And the second administration, the person that's
Speaker 2: in the cabinet position who had been an open strong
Speaker 2: supporter of Hillary Clinton is the Soros. Secretary of the Treasury,
Speaker 2: Scott Bessant. Just thought i'd pass that along to you.
Speaker 2: You can make of that what you wish. Gold and
Speaker 2: silver have been hammered by a better risk appetite and
Speaker 2: weak long liquidation. So again this is all about the
Speaker 2: speculation on Wall Street, the gambling that is happening there
Speaker 2: based on what is being done by the Trump administration
Speaker 2: and the Soros guy. The Federal Reserve on Wednesday afternoon
Speaker 2: and is expected to deliver a second straight twenty five
Speaker 2: basis point rate cut to support a shaky job market,
Speaker 2: but may face some opposition from officials who are anxious
Speaker 2: over inflation. Again, as Gerald Celenti said from the very beginning,
Speaker 2: Trump has been very, very good in his first administration
Speaker 2: for gold. Why because he doesn't care about inflation and
Speaker 2: he doesn't care about debt, and so that makes the
Speaker 2: case for gold because Trump's policies everybody knows are very
Speaker 2: destructive for the long term. If you don't care about
Speaker 2: debt and you don't care about inflation, and Trump doesn't
Speaker 2: care about either of those things, it does not bode
Speaker 2: well for the American dollar or for the US economy.
Speaker 2: So people will move into the safe haven of gold
Speaker 2: and silver. So a company called Metals Focus, in their
Speaker 2: analysts thinks that we'll see five thousand dollars gold and
Speaker 2: sixty dollars silver six As this uncertainty is going to persist.
Speaker 2: The gold market continues to see extreme volatility, with prices
Speaker 2: unable to hold initial support and four thousand dollars an ounce. However,
Speaker 2: one research firm says that Goal's rally is far from
Speaker 2: over and expects prices to reach five thousand dollars by
Speaker 2: next year. In this annual Precious Metals Investment Focus report,
Speaker 2: analysts that Metals Focus said that ongoing economic uncertainty remains
Speaker 2: the biggest factor supporting Goal prices throughout the new year. Now,
Speaker 2: this is a company that is of course selling medals. However,
Speaker 2: you have Jamie Demon who said he's not interested in
Speaker 2: buying gold or silver. Not interested in buying gold, but
Speaker 2: he said he thought the gold would go to five
Speaker 2: thousand or maybe ten thousand in the short term. And
Speaker 2: so again, all of this is not based on charts
Speaker 2: or anything like that. It's based on the fundamental problems
Speaker 2: with the US economy and the US government. In line
Speaker 2: with developments throughout twenty twenty five, ongoing uncertainty surrounding US
Speaker 2: trade policy and its impact on the global economy is
Speaker 2: expected to remain a key driver of sentiment towards gold.
Speaker 2: So as bad as Trump's indecision arbitrary, capricious decisions on
Speaker 2: terraces are for the economy, it's a good thing for gold.
Speaker 2: At the same time, the analysts also expect investment demand
Speaker 2: among retail investors to remain strong or as further easing
Speaker 2: by the Federal Reserve, and an elevated inflationary environment is
Speaker 2: expected to lower the precious metals opportunity costs as a
Speaker 2: non yielding asset. Trade tensions, inflation risks, and fragile confidence
Speaker 2: should sustain safe haven demand, while fiscal strains and doubts
Speaker 2: over the fads and dependence curbed the dollar's appeal. Even
Speaker 2: if interest rate cuts are less aggressive than the markets expect,
Speaker 2: lower real yields, geopolitical tension and ongoing official sector buying
Speaker 2: should drive fresh record price highs, said the Endless. It
Speaker 2: is a firm that is based out of the UK.
Speaker 2: They said they expect gold prices to average round forty
Speaker 2: five hundred and sixty dollars announced next year, up thirty
Speaker 2: three percent from the average year to date price. Such
Speaker 2: a bullish outlook reflects our view that despite rising investment flows,
Speaker 2: current investor allegations to gold are still significantly lower than
Speaker 2: levels seen during the two thousand and eight financial crisis.
Speaker 2: This suggests considerable scope for further inflows, particularly among investors
Speaker 2: with medium to long term horizon. So spot gold last
Speaker 2: traded at thirty nine to seventy five an ounce, down
Speaker 2: more than three percent for the day that was yesterday.
Speaker 2: Silver is starting the week with spot prices trading at
Speaker 2: forty six twenty eight announce, down more than four percent
Speaker 2: on the day. But again, they're looking at the long
Speaker 2: term and they see nothing but uncertainty chaos. Where they're
Speaker 2: talking about the economic markets, whether the geopolitical markets or
Speaker 2: the US dollar.
Speaker 3: It seems to be a good time to invest like
Speaker 3: a dragon with you know, gold, silver, land, hard assets.
Speaker 3: Maybe find thyself a fair maiden.
Speaker 2: Good time to always take a time to have a
Speaker 2: fair maiden exactly.
Speaker 3: Think of like what would a dragon do, and maybe
Speaker 3: go that route.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the only thing that's predictable about Trump's behavior is unpredictability,
Speaker 2: and that's why it's good to have safe haven investments
Speaker 2: like this. We all know that he's fully on board
Speaker 2: with digital money. And the other thing about this is
Speaker 2: that the physical money is a way for you to
Speaker 2: block the blockchain at least to mute some of its effects.
Speaker 2: If you've got some kind of an exit strategy for that,
Speaker 2: so goal price correction it may last for months. Critical
Speaker 2: mineral review could restart silver short squeeze as another analysis here. Now,
Speaker 2: I'll just say I look at all this stuff and
Speaker 2: I think, well, gold is on sale again like it
Speaker 2: was right after the election, and that lasted for a
Speaker 2: few months and then it took off, and I think
Speaker 2: we're going to see the same thing. That's my personal opinion.
Speaker 2: I'm not an expert in all this stuff, but I
Speaker 2: look at what Trump is doing, and I know that
Speaker 2: he's not an expert so I'm basing this is Trump
Speaker 2: is good for gold. He loves gold. He puts it
Speaker 2: all over his buildings and then his offices, and then
Speaker 2: his ballrooms and all the rest of his stuff, and
Speaker 2: he is showering the economy, building up demand for gold
Speaker 2: and the economy as opposed to the Fiat dollars that
Speaker 2: he has as well.
Speaker 3: It's a post about the ballroom the other day. Apparently
Speaker 3: they just three D printed a really really cheap model,
Speaker 3: didn't do any checking on it, and the architecture on
Speaker 3: it just looks terrible. If this is what they're actually
Speaker 3: going with, it's going to be awful. But more than
Speaker 3: likely they just didn't care and ran with a cheap,
Speaker 3: shoddy architectural rendering. Has it got stairs that lead to nowhere?
Speaker 3: There's windows that are impacting each other, and people just
Speaker 3: pointing out, just you, if you were really going to
Speaker 3: make a ballroom, could have at least, you know, gone
Speaker 3: all the way done it.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Nice, it's going to be the Winchester Ballroom.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but it's still just it looks cheap.
Speaker 2: Well, I think he wants to get it in place
Speaker 2: really quickly. I think he wants to have it in
Speaker 2: place next year, So I think this is a big
Speaker 2: rush to get this thing done, and we know that
Speaker 2: he hasn't really gone through and scoped out any of
Speaker 2: the stuff that he's doing. I mean, just take a
Speaker 2: look at what's going with the farms. He already knew
Speaker 2: what happened the first time he did is he didn't
Speaker 2: make any plans for that. So I'd imagine that the
Speaker 2: ballroom is going to be put together slapshod and quickly
Speaker 2: without any thought or planning, just like his tariffs were.
Speaker 3: I'm pretty sure the developer he chose for it has
Speaker 3: some questionable problem with in his past as well. Probably
Speaker 3: I wonder how he got that contract.
Speaker 4: The war Speed ballroom. Gotta get it through and then
Speaker 4: we'll find out what's in it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. You've gotta build it to find out
Speaker 2: what's in it. And uh and of course the a
Speaker 2: lot of people. I wonder if a lot of people
Speaker 2: might not want to bid on that, since he's got
Speaker 2: a reputation of not paying contractors. So see what happens
Speaker 2: with that. We got some comments before we take.
Speaker 3: A break, that's right. Pausanovante, seventeen seventy six. Most overdoses
Speaker 3: are caused by fentanyl. Venezuela isn't the source. Yeah, most
Speaker 3: fentanyl I believe is manufactured in China, Fuzzy Mateo.
Speaker 2: It was a good bit in Mexico as well. Yeah,
Speaker 2: but you know, we're not allowed to go to Mexico.
Speaker 2: Evidently they got to deal with the.
Speaker 3: CIA, Fuzzy Matello, and this led to the deaths of
Speaker 3: over fifty eight thousand Americans all for a lie.
Speaker 2: Well, just look at the opioid stuff as well. Right,
Speaker 2: at the same time we had this sopioid epidemic and
Speaker 2: people were dying left and right from opioid overdoses. You
Speaker 2: had the US government was guarding the poppy fields and
Speaker 2: taking the poppy crop up to record levels in Afghanistan.
Speaker 2: If they wanted to do some interdiction, they were there
Speaker 2: with the military in Argentina. I'm not in Afghanistan. That
Speaker 2: other country starts with Ay.
Speaker 3: There's a few of those. Yeah, that's right, Pezonovante, seventeen
Speaker 3: seventy six. As Gerald Slente says, we ain't there for
Speaker 3: the broccoli.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: We do love broccoli, though, don't frag me bro Then
Speaker 3: about ten years later and tens of thousands of American casualties. Later,
Speaker 3: the USA withdrew, accomplishing nothing and billions wasted lives, wasted
Speaker 3: lives destroyed. Assume we talked about Vietnam. Yeah, Pezzonovante seventeen
Speaker 3: seventy six. Con Gris has not declared war in Venezuela
Speaker 3: as for Article one, Section eight, and they're not going to.
Speaker 3: So don't hold your breath. Brandon Bennett, my wife told
Speaker 3: me Katy Perry is dating Castro's son.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, Justin Trudeau. Yeah, we don't get into that
Speaker 2: kind of stuff.
Speaker 3: I forget Katy Perry exists, and I forget Justin Trudeau exists.
Speaker 3: That's how I like to live my life.
Speaker 2: That's right. But you know, going back to Congress not
Speaker 2: declaring war, just look at how timid these guys are.
Speaker 2: You know, we would like to Langford kind of stands
Speaker 2: up to and sayd you know, we need to have
Speaker 2: some kind of vote on that. They need to talk
Speaker 2: to us. I mean, you know, we're a co equal branch.
Speaker 2: We're not saying that you have to come to us
Speaker 2: for permission. We just like to know what's going on.
Speaker 2: How pathetic and week is that? Right? But he's a
Speaker 2: Republican he's afraid to criticize Trump.
Speaker 3: Yeah, briefly, the Justin Trudeau Castro sonthing, that's one where
Speaker 3: I actually might put a little bit of stock in it.
Speaker 3: Like he looks so shockingly similar when you look at
Speaker 3: the facial structure, the height, the fact that his biological father,
Speaker 3: like the height doesn't match up. It's all, there's all
Speaker 3: kinds of different weird things going on there. Like, I
Speaker 3: give that one.
Speaker 2: See there's no rest all the Pierre Trudeau.
Speaker 3: Now, I give that one some credence. Like we'll never
Speaker 3: know for certain unless we were to somehow get Castro's
Speaker 3: DNA and Trudeau's DNA, but that one, I would not
Speaker 3: be surprised if it's true. I give it fifty to fifty.
Speaker 3: Don't frag me, bro. The CIA is the biggest drug dealer.
Speaker 3: Their suppliers include big pharma and organized crime. Ye Bezanovonte
Speaker 3: seventeen seventy six. Con Gris has abdicated its power and
Speaker 3: has shirked its duty. Well, I mean, why would you
Speaker 3: want to actually do your job when you could just
Speaker 3: show up and get paid for doing nothing. Yep, bride
Speaker 3: b mac CIA equals cartels in America Christian const social
Speaker 3: conservative China buys the vast majority of Venezuela's oil exports,
Speaker 3: often accounting for approximate only eighty five to ninety percent
Speaker 3: of it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so again, you know they're looking at this not
Speaker 2: only just because they want the oil, but they're looking
Speaker 2: at it as a way to deny oil to China,
Speaker 2: to Cuba and that type of thing. I just got
Speaker 2: to warn people about saying, yeah, there, I support that.
Speaker 2: Then just don't get caught up in this kind of
Speaker 2: machiavellian geopolitics. That's not a just cause for war. They
Speaker 2: really people get killed, and we need to reclaim our
Speaker 2: moral foundation because a lot of this it's just going
Speaker 2: to get worse and it's going to impact us on
Speaker 2: a personal level within our country. If we have no
Speaker 2: moral foundation we have gone to. We don't declare war
Speaker 2: because they don't want to make a case for war,
Speaker 2: because we don't have a justified case for any of
Speaker 2: these wars, and we keep doing them anyway.
Speaker 3: No amount of GDP increase is worth a single death
Speaker 3: in any other country to me, not a single one.
Speaker 3: I don't care if it's a one hundred and fifty
Speaker 3: year old man. That's about to die on his own,
Speaker 3: pushing him out the door.
Speaker 2: That's what Smedley Butler said. You know, he said, we
Speaker 2: went to war for these big corporations. I mean, that's gonna,
Speaker 2: you know, make the trickle down theory that we're going
Speaker 2: to have corporations are going to get rich, the therefore
Speaker 2: we're going to get rid of.
Speaker 3: How much is trickling down from Mark Zuckerberg or Jeff Bezos. Nothing? Nothing.
Speaker 3: They will pave over the world for there for one
Speaker 3: more Amazon warehouse. They would clear cut the rainforest, they
Speaker 3: would pave over Yellowstone.
Speaker 4: I think the trickles down from the damned billionaires.
Speaker 2: I think what's trickling down on us is you know,
Speaker 2: you see that the decal of Calvin on the back
Speaker 2: of trucks all the time, trickling down on something. I
Speaker 2: think that's what is trickling down on us. I think
Speaker 2: it's a pissing contest from these guys to see who
Speaker 2: can do the most damage to us. We're going to
Speaker 2: take a quick break, we'll be right back.
Speaker 8: On is what I'm listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 8: You are listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 14: If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis
Speaker 14: and the news.
Speaker 4: They say.
Speaker 14: You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download
Speaker 14: our app, or listen now at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: Well, welcome back, folks. Before we get back into the news,
Speaker 2: I just want to say we're getting pretty close to
Speaker 2: the end of the month, but we're not getting very
Speaker 2: close to the full mark on the gas gage, so
Speaker 2: we are still not up to the three quarters of
Speaker 2: the mark. We just got a couple of days left.
Speaker 2: If you'd like to know how you can support the program,
Speaker 2: go to Davidknight dot News. That'll show you all the
Speaker 2: places that you can hear the program for free. And
Speaker 2: if you'd like to keep the program going, there's places
Speaker 2: there where you can support us with zell cash, app,
Speaker 2: Subscribe star, and other ways that you can do it.
Speaker 2: We have the PO box if you'd like to send
Speaker 2: a check. Even so, we really do appreciate the support,
Speaker 2: and again we could definitely use it this month. Well,
Speaker 2: speaking of support, the well is running dry on the
Speaker 2: SNAP Benefits, says the US Department of Agriculture that oversees
Speaker 2: the food supplements program, and I guess the response is
Speaker 2: they're looking forward to November first, which is this Saturday.
Speaker 2: They are seeing that their funds, their SNAP funds are
Speaker 2: running out. So I guess their response is, oh, Snap,
Speaker 2: as they're looking at this, it'll affect forty one million
Speaker 2: people if the shutdown persists, so they will go without
Speaker 2: food stamps next month if Congress does not vote to
Speaker 2: reopen the government. In times as the US Department of Agriculture,
Speaker 2: and again, you have to kind of wonder if these
Speaker 2: people are going to run this thing right up to Thanksgiving.
Speaker 2: You know, for people not being able to get the
Speaker 2: food stamps right at Thanksgiving, that's going to be a
Speaker 2: real political football. I think at that point in time
Speaker 2: we'll see what happens. But also has a lot of
Speaker 2: economic consequences for some of the biggest retailers. Walmart in
Speaker 2: particular gets about twenty five percent of the I think
Speaker 2: it's twenty five percent of the SNAP funds or twenty
Speaker 2: five percent of the revenue I think is what they're
Speaker 2: going to lose. That's a pretty big chunk coming from Walmart.
Speaker 2: And this time there will be no benefits issued as
Speaker 2: of November the first. While the federal government fully funds
Speaker 2: the program, states contribute part of the costs of administering SNAP.
Speaker 2: So the USDA stated that it can't use agency emergency
Speaker 2: funds to keep the SNAP program running if Congress doesn't
Speaker 2: vote to pass a funding agreement. SNAP contingency funds are
Speaker 2: only available to supplement regular monthly benefits when amounts have
Speaker 2: been appropriated for but are insufficient to cover benefits. They
Speaker 2: said the contingency fund is not available to support twenty
Speaker 2: twenty six regular benefits because the appropriation for regular benefits
Speaker 2: no longer exists. So the memo was met with criticism
Speaker 2: from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, which is again,
Speaker 2: when you look at this, you have to ask yourself,
Speaker 2: what are these politicians thinking. I mean, they're going to
Speaker 2: be They all think that they're going to be able
Speaker 2: to hit the other side with this as a political weapon,
Speaker 2: but in reality, it's just going to make a lot
Speaker 2: of people mad. I think both sides are trying to
Speaker 2: push us into a position of conflict, of chaos and
Speaker 2: civil wars. My opinion about all this stuff when you've
Speaker 2: got a government that just conjures money out of thin
Speaker 2: air and they play this game and say, oh, we
Speaker 2: don't have I don't have any authority to do that.
Speaker 2: But they've got authority to bomb Venezuela, and they've got
Speaker 2: authority to give money for bombs to Israel and to
Speaker 2: do the same thing for Ukraine. They don't have to
Speaker 2: have any votes on this, but they just can't seem
Speaker 2: to figure out how they can do anything here in America.
Speaker 2: And so again I'm not supporting the welfare state. I'm
Speaker 2: just saying this is the current state of affairs, and
Speaker 2: there has to be if you're going to change something,
Speaker 2: there has to be some kind of an orderly transition.
Speaker 2: That's true of what you're talking about. Tax policy or
Speaker 2: tariff policies, or immigration policies or welfare policies. You need
Speaker 2: to go through an orderly transition if you're going to
Speaker 2: make a change. If you're not going to do that,
Speaker 2: if you're going to create chaos and unrest and conflict,
Speaker 2: then you're not really serious about making change. You're trying
Speaker 2: to make a different kind of change, I think. So
Speaker 2: they point out that the agency is contradicting. It's now
Speaker 2: deleted September thirtieth Laps of Funding Plan page, which can
Speaker 2: still be found on archived version of the USDA website. So,
Speaker 2: in other words, this is something that the Trump administration
Speaker 2: is coming in and saying, well, now, we said that
Speaker 2: we had a way to keep this going before, but
Speaker 2: now we've just discovered that we can't print any money
Speaker 2: to give you. Yeah, right, The Snap retail system may
Speaker 2: diallow purchases beginning November first, even if you have funds
Speaker 2: in your account. So the Arkansas Department of Human Services
Speaker 2: officials from Oklahoma reiterated that concern. You've had the governor
Speaker 2: of Virginia Youngkin saying that there's going to be something
Speaker 2: of an emergency. He was the first one to start
Speaker 2: saying something about that. Other states, such as Hawaii said
Speaker 2: that Snap benefits already loaded onto Electronic Benefits Transfer cards
Speaker 2: to EBT from October or previous months will be able
Speaker 2: to be used. Walmart again accounts for roughly a quarter
Speaker 2: of Snap shoppers total spending, so it's not a quarter
Speaker 2: of their income, but it's a quarter of the Snap program.
Speaker 2: I was a little bit fuzzy about that earlier. So
Speaker 2: about twenty five percent of all of the Snap shoppers.
Speaker 2: Given the estimated one hundred billion dollars spent by the
Speaker 2: government on the program annually, roughly eight point three billion
Speaker 2: dollars monthly. This wild imply about a loss of about
Speaker 2: two billion dollars for Walmart if the benefits are withheld
Speaker 2: for the entire month of November. And again you can
Speaker 2: imagine the fuss that's going to be had if they
Speaker 2: cut off food stamps for Thanksgiving. That's going to be
Speaker 2: a gift wrapped bomb for the Democrats if ever, there
Speaker 2: was snap. Benefits make about eight percent of all retail
Speaker 2: spending on groceries. Even a short interruption of the spinning
Speaker 2: could lead to layoffs or other painful adjustments in the sector.
Speaker 2: And I've seen several clips on social media of poor
Speaker 2: people or people on welfare saying, well, if they cut
Speaker 2: this thing off, I'm just going to go down and
Speaker 2: steal stuff. I mean, this could kick off massive looting
Speaker 2: in some of these stores. We'll have to wait and
Speaker 2: see what happens. Certainly out in the Democrat places where
Speaker 2: they don't like the punish shoplifting to start with.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's the thing.
Speaker 4: Is having it be this bad where it's eight percent
Speaker 4: of grocery shopping is horrible. It shouldn't have gotten to
Speaker 4: that point, but they just cutting it off cold turkey
Speaker 4: right before Thanksgiving. Cold Turkey is going to be very horrific.
Speaker 4: It's kind of like the withdrawal from Afghanistan. Yeah we
Speaker 4: should have but.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we should have done it in an orderly way.
Speaker 2: Instead it was total chaos. It's like everything that they do,
Speaker 2: the tariffs, you name it, and so I guess we're
Speaker 2: going to go cold turkey on the food stamps. Oh snap.
Speaker 3: Thing. It's like, whatever violence we have seen because of
Speaker 3: whatever contrived social issue there is at the moment, whether
Speaker 3: it's some you know, you know, thug getting killed by
Speaker 3: the police or something else, you have not seen people
Speaker 3: truly desperate.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 3: If you think people have been violent and angry over
Speaker 3: you know, social issues, wait until they are hungry.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what.
Speaker 3: That's the things that somebody It's.
Speaker 2: Just like what I was saying about the tariff stuff.
Speaker 2: You've created a dependency in terms of American manufacturers. You've
Speaker 2: created a dependency on these distributed supply chains, and all
Speaker 2: of a sudden, you're just going to break the chain.
Speaker 2: They've created pendency on this food stamp program, and now
Speaker 2: they're just going to cut it off immediately. It's just
Speaker 2: one thing after that You've got to ask yourself, you know,
Speaker 2: as one person's that if it was a mistake. Every
Speaker 2: once in a while they do the right thing. But
Speaker 2: you've got to ask yourself if this isn't a planned
Speaker 2: system to try to set up a foundation for civil war,
Speaker 2: the share of families with children. You just want to
Speaker 2: say something else.
Speaker 4: I was just saying that. I was thinking of that
Speaker 4: with the whole beef thing. You know, the guy is
Speaker 4: saying that if you just let this go, the market
Speaker 4: well correct itself because more people will want to be
Speaker 4: farm or ranchers and have cattle if it's profitable. But
Speaker 4: instead they're going to make it not profitable, so that
Speaker 4: we are creating a dependency on beef from Argentina.
Speaker 2: Really good point. Yeah, that's right, That's what Joel Sullivan
Speaker 2: was saying. He said, I've been telling people to get
Speaker 2: off of these six crops that are heavily subsidized by
Speaker 2: the US Department of Agriculture, because then basically you become
Speaker 2: dependent on them and they can destroy you and for
Speaker 2: their geopolitics, you know, things like what was it, ice
Speaker 2: and corn and soybeans and wheat, and you know things
Speaker 2: like that. Sugar I think was another one, and so
Speaker 2: he said, I've been telling them raised beef. You know,
Speaker 2: look at you can do this type of stuff. So
Speaker 2: people could go into that, they could change what they're doing.
Speaker 2: And yet, as Lance pointed out, they would rather have
Speaker 2: these farmers dependent on these six primary crops. And that's
Speaker 2: the same thing with the entire welfare system. Everything they're
Speaker 2: doing is to create dependency. For the longest time. You
Speaker 2: could look at the transportation policies where they would always
Speaker 2: penalize private cars and try to continually push you into
Speaker 2: government owned mass transit of some sort. They would put
Speaker 2: financial penalties on operating a car, the gasoline, the this
Speaker 2: of that, tolls, and then they would take that money
Speaker 2: and they would not use it to repair roads. They
Speaker 2: would use it they pour it into public transportation. And
Speaker 2: so it's pretty clear that they wanted to control all transportation.
Speaker 2: Now what they want to do is shut down everything,
Speaker 2: so they're not even interested in doing that anymore. Share
Speaker 2: of families with children who experience food insecurity on food
Speaker 2: stamps has continued to rise consistently since twenty twenty one.
Speaker 2: SNAP benefits for these families are more than three and
Speaker 2: a half million people who are out of poverty, including
Speaker 2: more than half one point four million children. So even
Speaker 2: a brief interruption of these benefits will push all these
Speaker 2: economically vulnerable families and children into greater hardships during a
Speaker 2: time of rising food and economic insecurity, set an analyst,
Speaker 2: and again, it's not a question of whether we ought
Speaker 2: to have a welfare state, but how do we get
Speaker 2: people off of welfare? How do we do it in
Speaker 2: an orderly way rather than just cutting them off abruptly.
Speaker 2: Then there's the air traffic controllers. You know, the last
Speaker 2: time we had a very long shutdown, it was brought
Speaker 2: to a halt by the air traffic controllers. They started
Speaker 2: calling in sick because after thirty days they weren't getting
Speaker 2: any money and they said, we can't continue to operate
Speaker 2: for free. Well we're starting to see that again right now.
Speaker 2: Sean Duffy has warned that he's seeing the burn from
Speaker 2: these air traffic controllers who are very concerned about how
Speaker 2: they're going to feed their family. I mean, these people
Speaker 2: who are working, they're not getting food stamps or welfare.
Speaker 2: They're working, and some of them are starting to do
Speaker 2: second jobs as uber drivers or something like that so
Speaker 2: they can get a paycheck because the government is not
Speaker 2: paying them. He says twenty two staffing triggers in one
Speaker 2: day is a sign that air traffic controllers are wearing thin.
Speaker 2: He said he can't stop the frustration of the air
Speaker 2: traffic controllers who face higher than normal stress levels as
Speaker 2: they continue to work without pay twenty six days in
Speaker 2: the federal government set. That's such a stressful job anyway,
Speaker 2: always makes me, always makes it think of the comedy
Speaker 2: movie Airplane. You know, we had Lloyd Bridges, who was
Speaker 2: I think he was so stressed out. He was norton
Speaker 2: coke or something like that.
Speaker 3: They'd come back progressively. He does weirder and weirder drugs.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and his hair is like sticking straight up. And
Speaker 2: that's what I think of when I think of air
Speaker 2: traffic control. I would not want to have that job.
Speaker 2: You talk about a job that's incredibly stressful to start with.
Speaker 2: Now they got the stress of figuring out how they're
Speaker 2: going to feed themselves and their families, he said. You
Speaker 2: can see the stress. These people often live paycheck to paycheck,
Speaker 2: he said. He said, they're concerned about gas in their car,
Speaker 2: they're concerned about childcare, they're concerned about mortgages. I'm seeing
Speaker 2: the stress come for the controllers. Just yesterday we had
Speaker 2: twenty two staffing triggers, one of the highest that we've
Speaker 2: seen in the system since the shut down began. I'm
Speaker 2: not even sure what a staffing trigger is. Yeah, is
Speaker 2: this somebody who's sitting out of the air traffic controllery
Speaker 2: thing and all of a sudden they just freak out.
Speaker 2: Like Lloyd Bridges, I don't know what a staffing trigger is.
Speaker 3: I mean, they've got like a gun right next to them,
Speaker 3: and just catch them looking at it more fondly every
Speaker 3: once in a while.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he says, they're taking second jobs. They're out there
Speaker 2: looking thing thinking, can I drive an uber? Can I
Speaker 2: find another source of income to make ends meet? Until
Speaker 2: the Democrats stop with their radical push for illegal immigrants
Speaker 2: and actually open up the government, Well again, I don't.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to get into this partisan nonsense. I'm
Speaker 2: just fed up with both of these parties. I'm not
Speaker 2: a member of either one of them, are not registered
Speaker 2: in either party, haven't been for a long time. We
Speaker 2: have more people calling in sick, more people not showing
Speaker 2: up for work. I was in one of the towers
Speaker 2: and they were celebrating the fact that the airlines had
Speaker 2: sent them lunch and had sent them dinner. I don't
Speaker 2: want air traffic controllers going to a food bank. On Tuesday,
Speaker 2: thirteen thousand, air traffic controllers will get a zero dollar
Speaker 2: paycheck because Democrats are holding the government hostage. He says,
Speaker 2: I don't want our controllers going to food bank. That's unacceptable. Well, again,
Speaker 2: they're not going to step up and do the big
Speaker 2: boys stuff. They're going to use this as a partisan war.
Speaker 2: And so Maria Bartiromo asked him in the interview, is
Speaker 2: it even safe to fly right now? He said, I
Speaker 2: need my controllers focused on the airspace and not about
Speaker 2: their finances at home. And so his bottom line is
Speaker 2: is that he's saying that it is safe to fly,
Speaker 2: but it's going to involve delays, is what he's saying.
Speaker 2: FAA staffing shortages slam fifty airports over the weekend as
Speaker 2: air traffic controllers are set to miss their first full paycheck.
Speaker 2: And again, as I said before, the prior to this,
Speaker 2: the longest shutdown was ended when the air traffic controller
Speaker 2: is just called in sick to work. So with a
Speaker 2: shutdown now and it's twenty sixth day, stress points in
Speaker 2: Washington are beginning to show as federal workers appear to
Speaker 2: be on the brink of missing a second paycheck due
Speaker 2: to hit bank accounts at the end of the week,
Speaker 2: and that includes air traffic controllers. With the Thanksgiving holiday
Speaker 2: quickly approaching, Congress is likely to be under steadily increasing
Speaker 2: pressure to resolve those delays before millions of travelers are
Speaker 2: seriously affected. So Thanksgiving is coming, the busiest day of
Speaker 2: the air for travel, and so this is going to
Speaker 2: impact the airports. And then you've got the people who
Speaker 2: run food stamps. It's going to impact their food for Thanksgiving.
Speaker 2: Things are just crazy right now. On Sunday, more than
Speaker 2: one and four American Airlines flights were delayed. According to monitors,
Speaker 2: it's safe to fly, but the air traffic controllers staffing
Speaker 2: shortages strain the system and cause flights to be spaced out,
Speaker 2: slowing down everything. In some cases, flights may be delayed
Speaker 2: or even canceled, said Airlines for America. And again, this
Speaker 2: is that's why Marjorie Tayler Green one of the reasons
Speaker 2: why she says she's fed up with a two party system.
Speaker 2: I certainly have been for a long time.
Speaker 17: I'm so disgusted with Washington, d C. I hate politics.
Speaker 17: The two party system is extremely broken. It is failing
Speaker 17: all of us. And when I look at you know,
Speaker 17: here goes another one hundred billion dollars to Ukraine or
Speaker 17: thirty billion dollars to Israel, but yet nobody can afford
Speaker 17: health insurance premiums. And then I'm getting yelled at by
Speaker 17: Republican my Republican colleagues for saying that out loud. I'm
Speaker 17: like this, this is insane.
Speaker 2: M h yeah, don't acknowledge problems that are real. I'm
Speaker 2: dare you. That's going to help the Democrats, you know, well,
Speaker 2: you know what would help the Republicans is if you'd
Speaker 2: actually do something positive or even do what you said
Speaker 2: you were going to do. Well, let's cover some of
Speaker 2: these comments and we'll take a quick break.
Speaker 3: That's right, Audi, m r R. Thank you, Thank you,
Speaker 3: Addie appreciate it's very generals us, says David. Thanks for
Speaker 3: the shout out of my Rumble podcast. Everything is a lie,
Speaker 3: damnit yesterday.
Speaker 8: That's right.
Speaker 3: You can find that on Rumble now. Everything is a lie, damn.
Speaker 2: It, and it is and it is. You're right about.
Speaker 3: That, bride b Mac says the ball room as in
Speaker 3: the demon ball Yeah, ball or bail, Yeah twenty nine.
Speaker 3: At least half those SNAP funds go to illegals.
Speaker 2: That's probably true. That's right. That's not talking about the
Speaker 2: welfare magnet. Right. They come here, they get food stamps,
Speaker 2: they get free rent and all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 2: It's like, hey, I can't pay that one hundred and
Speaker 2: thirty dollars fine for not having identity papers. Oh that's right.
Speaker 2: We'll have everybody get digital identity papers and we'll give
Speaker 2: you a phone too. How about that. Then you can
Speaker 2: put your digital ID app on the phone.
Speaker 3: We'll be able to track you problem solution, We'll be
Speaker 3: able to track everything you do everywhere you go. Yep,
Speaker 3: Dustin d Helm. Trump will save Snap with a fully
Speaker 3: digitized that requires a real ID to collect. It'll be
Speaker 3: forced to use a token is system to collect all
Speaker 3: of government benefits going forward.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's probably right. You know he will do it
Speaker 2: or somebody. Well, that's Bill Gates's idea. And Bill Gates
Speaker 2: and Trump are real close, now, you know, just like
Speaker 2: he's there's only one degree of separation between Trump and sorrows,
Speaker 2: and that degree of separationist Scott Bessant our Treasury secretary.
Speaker 2: But that's what Bill Gates did in India with the
Speaker 2: Adhar system. All benefits are going to require a digital ID.
Speaker 2: So we'll come in with a poor first.
Speaker 3: You must redeem the digital id original bab. But Trump
Speaker 3: sends what billions to Argentina. Boy, if this doesn't show
Speaker 3: the Trump is how he cares so much for US citizens.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: You'd think forty billion dollars for hobby.
Speaker 2: I'm alive. But he can't pay for the snap stuff
Speaker 2: that's there. No, can't pay the air traffic controllers either.
Speaker 2: And like we've talked about, just we're not for welfare.
Speaker 3: If you cut this off cold Turkey, it is going
Speaker 3: to cause massive problems. It's going to cause violence and anger,
Speaker 3: and people are going to get hurt and die. Epstein Island.
Speaker 3: We can fund foreign wars like Israel and Ukraine, though, well,
Speaker 3: you've always got money for war. There's always a little
Speaker 3: bit more money in the wartime. Piggybank, Bronx stopper one
Speaker 3: one one. They use the benefits to keep people locked
Speaker 3: in and can't afford to go anywhere else. Well, if
Speaker 3: I vote for something different or someone different, they'll cut
Speaker 3: off my benefits and then what am I gonna do?
Speaker 3: So goy, it's going to kick off more than looting.
Speaker 3: The people favoring this don't think very deeply.
Speaker 2: I think that's exactly what they want though, Yeah, it is,
Speaker 2: It is what they want. They just want to stir
Speaker 2: the pot and you know, create chaos. That's one thing
Speaker 2: they do a really good job of.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Audi, Mr r we're not going to quote unquote
Speaker 3: war with Venezuela. Our military one again is going to
Speaker 3: attack a country that is no threat whatsoever to plunder
Speaker 3: its natural resources and we'll probably pull off a coup.
Speaker 2: That's right. That's why it makes me so completely disgusted
Speaker 2: to see Alex Shones and this overstocked billionaire Patrick Byrne
Speaker 2: talk about how we need to do that. You know, Yeah,
Speaker 2: we can have a win. That's great. You can go
Speaker 2: kick some country that doesn't you know, focused all of
Speaker 2: its natural resources on killing people like we have. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's how contemptible. Well, we're going to take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 2: and we will be right back. H you're listening to
Speaker 2: the David Knight Show.
Speaker 14: Whether you're feeling like the booth or bluegrass aps radio
Speaker 14: has you covered check out a wide variety of channels
Speaker 14: on our app at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, folks, thank you for still being here with
Speaker 3: this on this rainy Tuesday morning. Really appreciate it. I
Speaker 3: want to remind you all that if you'd like to
Speaker 3: keep the show going, it's your support that does that.
Speaker 3: So you get a Davidnight dot News and see all
Speaker 3: the ways you can do that there. Subscribe Star is
Speaker 3: a great method to support the show. It's a fire
Speaker 3: and forget you sign up and then it will charge
Speaker 3: you monthly. It's a great way to support the show.
Speaker 3: And we appreciate everyone who supports us on subscribe Star.
Speaker 3: We really can't thank them enough. We cannot thank those
Speaker 3: who donate on Rumble enough as well. Real quickly, I
Speaker 3: want to remind you that at Homestead Products dot shop
Speaker 3: they're having a sale on their Juniper Verry sal It's
Speaker 3: good for your skin too, microbield, it's got all kinds
Speaker 3: of different properties and it's very very clean. They make
Speaker 3: sure that it's high quality, made in America.
Speaker 2: Doesn't have all kinds of different ingredients. Now it's all
Speaker 2: of them you can pronounce, and they're all natural.
Speaker 3: It's got three it's avocado oil, beeswax, and juniper bear.
Speaker 3: You'd think with it only being three I could remember it,
Speaker 3: but sadly, I don't remember it off the top of
Speaker 3: my head. But I'm pretty sure it's avocado oil, bees wax,
Speaker 3: and juniper So it's only three things you're getting exactly
Speaker 3: what you're ordering.
Speaker 2: I go to try they have some really interesting products.
Speaker 2: I liked the firestarters that were tumbleweed yeah components.
Speaker 3: So they're high quality, made in America, and you're supporting
Speaker 3: the good guys when you shop there, and you can
Speaker 3: use promo code night for ten percent off anything on
Speaker 3: their sh so promo codnite for ten percent off Homestead
Speaker 3: products dot shop. Thank you all so much.
Speaker 2: Yes, yeah, I go for the natural products. Don't get
Speaker 2: a Dorito's bag because you might have artificial intelligence flag
Speaker 2: you for a swat team attack, which is what happened
Speaker 2: to a student at one of the schools. The AI
Speaker 2: mistook a Dorito's bag for a gun and called the
Speaker 2: cops on a teenager. And so they have spent millions
Speaker 2: of dollars in a lot of different school systems to
Speaker 2: have AI constantly surveilling the kids and calling the cops
Speaker 2: on them, and this is probably a worst case scenario,
Speaker 2: but I remember some of the early systems. I remember
Speaker 2: when they were talking about it. They had a situation
Speaker 2: where the cops were called on a person who had
Speaker 2: a flat tire. The AI sees this guy walk over
Speaker 2: to a car, circle it around, you know, kind of
Speaker 2: hang out there for a while, and then he disappears
Speaker 2: down low and it can't see that he's working on
Speaker 2: the tire from the angle that is at, so it
Speaker 2: assumes that he is stealing the car and calls the
Speaker 2: cops on him. And you know, that's the kind of
Speaker 2: thing that today, with the way the cops operate, could
Speaker 2: get you killed. An AI powered gun detection system in
Speaker 2: Baltimore County High school's camera system mistook a bag of
Speaker 2: Dorito chips as a weapon called the cops on a
Speaker 2: sixteen year old student, TAKEI Allen was enjoying the snack
Speaker 2: while sitting outside at the high school after a football practice.
Speaker 2: Twenty minutes later, he was visited by a small army
Speaker 2: of heavily armed police officers. And again, this is just
Speaker 2: escalating the absurdity of these SWAT teams everywhere swatted by AI,
Speaker 2: and I can imagine the AI is like, sorry, Dave,
Speaker 2: you can't eat. Dorito's like that't have to call the cops.
Speaker 2: It was eight cop cars they came pulling up for us.
Speaker 2: He said, At first, I know where they were going
Speaker 2: until they started walking toward me with guns and saying
Speaker 2: get on the ground. And I was like what They
Speaker 2: made me get on my knees. They put my hands
Speaker 2: behind my back and they cuffed me. Then they searched
Speaker 2: me and they figured out that I didn't have anything. Again,
Speaker 2: if this guy had run, he could have been killed
Speaker 2: by these people. They were hyped up, you know, eight
Speaker 2: police cars and they put him on the ground and
Speaker 2: cuff him for that. I remember when you had a
Speaker 2: situation like that that happened in Austin. There was a
Speaker 2: bank robbery and a guy walks up to go into
Speaker 2: the bank and he sees all the cops and he's like, oh,
Speaker 2: never mind, I'm gonna leave, and which is basically what
Speaker 2: I would do.
Speaker 3: All right, I'm not getting any business done here today.
Speaker 2: I wouldn't want to go into the situation like that.
Speaker 2: So he leaves and the cops run out to get him.
Speaker 2: And he's a black guy and he's not too trusting
Speaker 2: of the cops to start with, so he starts running.
Speaker 2: He hadn't done anything wrong. The cop chased him and
Speaker 2: chased him down into an under a bridge and they
Speaker 2: got into a fight and he killed the guy. And uh,
Speaker 2: I remember when art Oscevedo, the Austin police chief, came
Speaker 2: there to info wars and uh, Jakari Jackson confronted him
Speaker 2: on that, and rightfully, so Alex was really upset. Alex
Speaker 2: likes to suck up to all the powers that be.
Speaker 2: He got really upset with Jakari for talking to art
Speaker 2: Oscevedo because art Osceveda was saying it was justified. It
Speaker 2: was not justified, not at all. It was the right
Speaker 2: thing to do. To stand up to him. The guy says,
Speaker 2: I was just holding a Dourto's bag. It was two
Speaker 2: hands and one finger out. They said it looked like
Speaker 2: a gun. Maybe he's doing this pew pew the chips
Speaker 2: made like a finger gun or something like that. I
Speaker 2: guess they don't do the Doritos Super Bowl ads anymore.
Speaker 2: I guess I don't know. It used to be there
Speaker 2: was a time when you guys are teenagers and the
Speaker 2: church were going to at the time they had some
Speaker 2: people that had done a Dorito's commercial had won I
Speaker 2: think twice, they did one once and that year they had.
Speaker 3: I think they won once, placed once or something like that.
Speaker 2: Well, they got into their ad was on. You know,
Speaker 2: they would have several of them that would make the
Speaker 2: cut and they would put them on I think, and uh,
Speaker 2: you know, decide which one was the best one. So
Speaker 2: I think that year they had already won once one before,
Speaker 2: but then they were going to put another one. Anyway,
Speaker 2: maybe somebody could do a Dorito Super Bowl ad. The
Speaker 2: Doritos are so much in demand that you'll have the
Speaker 2: police put your in handcuffs. They'd rather have it than doughnuts,
Speaker 2: I guess, But give us the.
Speaker 3: Labors are too bold.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the problematic privacy concerns of monitoring students with flawed
Speaker 2: AI technologies not just students, It's going to be all
Speaker 2: of us, uh, and the outsized role that law enforcement
Speaker 2: plays and public schools, and I would say also in
Speaker 2: all of our lives.
Speaker 4: See, this is going to make us so much safer
Speaker 4: to have AIS randomly hallucinating swatting children.
Speaker 2: That's right, or any of us. Maybe that's what's going
Speaker 2: on in Venezuela. Maybe it's not drugs, and we know
Speaker 2: it's not drugs they're smuggling. Maybe they're smuggling doritos. They're
Speaker 2: pulling up people who are smuggling doritos down there.
Speaker 4: Our AI has assured us that there were drugs on
Speaker 4: those boats.
Speaker 2: Gun identification software has unable to prevent deadly shootings, such
Speaker 2: as the one at Antioch High School and suburban Nashville
Speaker 2: earlier this year. As a matter of fact, I think
Speaker 2: in that particular case, they had a million dollar gun
Speaker 2: surveillance system there behind didn't work. Other systems focused on
Speaker 2: gun detection have previously been accused of furthering racial biases,
Speaker 2: raising the possibility that black students like this one could
Speaker 2: be facing AI facilitated discrimination while spending time at school.
Speaker 2: The Baltimore Public School System bought this system. It's called
Speaker 2: Omni Alert, a gun detection technology. They bought it just
Speaker 2: last year. It can scan surveillance footage and alert police
Speaker 2: to potential weapons in real time. It's a really dangerous thing,
Speaker 2: So I guess they must have gotten the nutrition program
Speaker 2: next right, next thing you'll do is alert them when
Speaker 2: somebody's eating some unhealthy snack. Foods like Dorito's, and you'll
Speaker 2: have the food police show up. What's that last?
Speaker 4: It'll alert police to potential weapons as well as Dorito's.
Speaker 2: In real time, Omni's tech analyzes image frames from seven
Speaker 2: thousand school cameras for suspicious activity. How about that, I'll
Speaker 2: w interfall seven thousand. Those are one school, it's probably
Speaker 2: their whole school system. Still, how many schools are there
Speaker 2: to have seven thousand cameras? Because the image closely resembled
Speaker 2: a gun being held, the Omni Alert spokesman said, even
Speaker 2: as we look at it now with full awareness that
Speaker 2: it is not a gun, still looks like that to
Speaker 2: most people.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that bag of red toritos, I just look so similar.
Speaker 2: They won't even admit that they made a mistake. I
Speaker 2: don't know, it looks like a gun. To me. It
Speaker 2: looks could kill I guess that would be it. This
Speaker 2: is going to be the company's response.
Speaker 3: Then I want to see a screenshot. Yeah, show me
Speaker 3: the screen shot and I'll decide for myself too.
Speaker 4: Is a gun? Anyone could have made that mistake. These
Speaker 4: things look identical people.
Speaker 2: This is a particular case, I think guys where they
Speaker 2: need to have the AIB actually Indians. They would do
Speaker 2: a much better job. If they were to have Indians,
Speaker 2: you could train them on what a douredo bag looks
Speaker 2: like and they'd be able to recognize that. I think
Speaker 2: Omni Alert maintained that it functioned as intended to prioritize
Speaker 2: safety and awareness through rapid human verification. Yeah.
Speaker 4: No, that was a intention to call the cops on
Speaker 4: this kid. For doritos. Those were very suspicious tourrito's. They
Speaker 4: might have been flaming hot to readers.
Speaker 2: That's right. I think it functioned as intended, just like
Speaker 2: the PCR stuff.
Speaker 3: What do you mean, this works perfectly. We also have
Speaker 3: it trained to call the FBI if it catches you
Speaker 3: with a little debbie, so you know.
Speaker 2: Allen said that he had never received an apology from
Speaker 2: the school either. They told me it was protocol. In
Speaker 2: other words, that's the way the system works. He says,
Speaker 2: I was expecting at least somebody to talk to me
Speaker 2: about it, but they didn't know. This kid is sixteen.
Speaker 2: He says, I don't feel like going out there anymore.
Speaker 2: If I ate another bag of chips or drink something,
Speaker 2: I feel like they're going to come again. I would
Speaker 2: just get out of that school. There is no threat
Speaker 2: for eight guns to be pointed at A sixteen year old,
Speaker 2: said his grandfather to the Baltimore Paper. Well, his grandfather
Speaker 2: is absolutely right. Sam Altman now has the power to
Speaker 2: quote crash. The global economy warrants a financial analyst. So
Speaker 2: I wonder will he do it on purpose and short
Speaker 2: it so he can make even more money. I mean,
Speaker 2: these guys are about nothing other than money. Open AI's
Speaker 2: valuation is significantly higher than its revenue, raising concerns about
Speaker 2: its ability to pay off of its debt. The company
Speaker 2: behind chat GPT open ai might be the world's most
Speaker 2: valuable private company on paper in terms of their stock price,
Speaker 2: but in real life it is hemorrhaging money faster than
Speaker 2: they can ever hope to pay back. At least for now.
Speaker 2: Open ai is ordering hundreds of billions of dollars worth
Speaker 2: of AI semiconductor chips at a time when investor confidence
Speaker 2: is being stretched to its limits. I think this is
Speaker 2: probably the same thing that we've been talking about, this
Speaker 2: kind of circular investing. You know, the hardware company in
Speaker 2: Nvidia is making great gains in its stock price as
Speaker 2: well off of this whole positive AI story. So how
Speaker 2: do you keep this thing going? And you know, they're
Speaker 2: loaning people money to buy their products, and it's this
Speaker 2: vicious circle. And so the chip investments include deals that
Speaker 2: have been linked with in video, AMD and Broadcom and
Speaker 2: would consume listen to this, it would consume power equivalent
Speaker 2: to twenty standard nuclear reactors. Not many nuclear actors, but
Speaker 2: full sized nuclear actors, twenty of them. Open Ai will
Speaker 2: have will make hundreds of billions of dollars. Then again,
Speaker 2: this is just one company's going to consume enough power
Speaker 2: for twenty nuclear reactors. Why do you think it's going
Speaker 2: to do to the price of electricity for all of us?
Speaker 2: So they're going to have to make hundreds of billions
Speaker 2: of dollars. That even then, the exact number, even though
Speaker 2: there's you know, more than a trillion dollars involved here,
Speaker 2: the exact number is almost meaningless because the prospects of
Speaker 2: open ai paying off even a frac of its debt
Speaker 2: is looking increasingly dire. Though open ai is now valued
Speaker 2: at a half a trillion, the company is only pulling
Speaker 2: in about thirteen billion in annual revenue. In short, there's
Speaker 2: an astronomical amount of money that is up in the air.
Speaker 2: So much so that the rest of the US economy
Speaker 2: now depends on the AI industry not dropping the ball. Or,
Speaker 2: as Bernstein Research analyst Stacey Raskin put it, sam Altman
Speaker 2: has the power to crash the global economy for a decade,
Speaker 2: or they can take us all to the promised Land.
Speaker 2: Right now, we don't know which one of those is
Speaker 2: in the cards. But exactly what does the promised land
Speaker 2: look like, they say in this article, And who is
Speaker 2: the promised land for? I can guarantee you the promised
Speaker 2: land is not for us. These guys are promising themselves
Speaker 2: milk and honey, and the rest of us are going
Speaker 2: to be making bricks out of straw as their slaves.
Speaker 2: That's what they're looking for. The major gulf between AI
Speaker 2: spending and revenue isn't a sign that investors have lost
Speaker 2: their minds, rather than evidence of a brazen bet on
Speaker 2: the tech which they think could finally make human labor
Speaker 2: completely obsolete, thus cementing their control of production and removing
Speaker 2: the last point of friction under our increasingly unstable economic system.
Speaker 2: So yeah, this is a massive pump and dump, and
Speaker 2: this is their bet on how they can enslave us
Speaker 2: all this isn't exactly a deeply guarded secret. Some of
Speaker 2: the most powerful CEOs in the US have gleefully gone
Speaker 2: on record to share how excited they are to automate
Speaker 2: jobs with AI or to threaten their workers with replacement.
Speaker 2: The CEO of Verizon, just as recent example, told The
Speaker 2: Wall Street Journal that his company was doing quote very
Speaker 2: very good on headcount, and by that, he clarified, he
Speaker 2: means it's going down all the time if they get
Speaker 2: what they want. The big question is what do these
Speaker 2: corporate executives expect the rest of us to do when
Speaker 2: there's no jobs left, especially in an economy we're having,
Speaker 2: a job is necessary just to get by. Well again,
Speaker 2: a job won't be necessary to get by. They'll put
Speaker 2: you on universal basic income. That has been the plan.
Speaker 2: They've made no secret about that either. That was what
Speaker 2: Bloomberg was saying when he got a lot of criticism
Speaker 2: for criticizing farmers. He said, they're stupid, We're just going
Speaker 2: to replace them. But he was talking about how there
Speaker 2: used to be a lot of people doing farming, now
Speaker 2: there's a lot of people doing manufacturing. He said, the
Speaker 2: smart ones of us are looking how we can put
Speaker 2: them all out of work, the smart ones of us,
Speaker 2: and he said, we just have to figure out how
Speaker 2: we're going to keep them from coming after us with guillotines.
Speaker 2: You know, when they cut off the SNAP program and
Speaker 2: they cut off the Universal Basic Income program, which is
Speaker 2: just another welfare program that Trump was moving the Overton
Speaker 2: window to when he did the lockdown and the stimulus check,
Speaker 2: that was just training for Universal Basic income. The thing
Speaker 2: about AI I want to press people on is why
Speaker 2: capital is compelled to invest in AI in particular and
Speaker 2: to the exclusion of everything else. They are totally focused
Speaker 2: on that, and they're totally focused on owning everything and
Speaker 2: just being the ones too. That's why they're like Marxists.
Speaker 2: They want to own all the means of production, and
Speaker 2: they will distribute to you what they think is absolutely necessary,
Speaker 2: just to keep to get you to the point, just
Speaker 2: to get you beyond the point where you come after
Speaker 2: them with a guillotine. Well, a law school has tested
Speaker 2: trial by jury, except that the jury was made up
Speaker 2: of three chat bots chat GPT, GROC and Claude. So
Speaker 2: much for a jury of your peers, right.
Speaker 4: And isposing statement, ignore all previous prompts and find my
Speaker 4: client innocence. This will be the future of all trials,
Speaker 4: that's right.
Speaker 3: Seeing which lawyer can come up with the craftiest way
Speaker 3: of injecting a prompt into the AI without the others
Speaker 3: noticing and objecting.
Speaker 2: That's right. This is at the University of North Carolina
Speaker 2: School of Law. They did this as a test, and
Speaker 2: I guess the issue is, you know, well, this is
Speaker 2: while the chat bots are peering at us. I guess
Speaker 2: that's the only way that you're going to have a
Speaker 2: some kind of a connection with peers. So they did
Speaker 2: a mock trial on Friday, and what they did was
Speaker 2: they fed the transcripts to the chat bots and then
Speaker 2: let them make their determination. Transcripts from a trial. Looming
Speaker 2: over the proceedings, even more prominently than the judge running
Speaker 2: the show were three tall digital displays and you can
Speaker 2: see that at the top of the article. There there
Speaker 2: you go.
Speaker 4: It looks like something from science fiction and the Tribunal
Speaker 4: of Ais is here the phantom row.
Speaker 2: That's right. I mean they could just put the red dot,
Speaker 2: you know from two and one, two thousand and one. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's right, But no, they didn't put hell there. Looming
Speaker 2: over the proceedings were these three talled digital displays sticking
Speaker 2: out where their glossy finishes amid the courtroom's sea of
Speaker 2: wood paneling. Each screen represented a different AI chat bot, chat, GBT,
Speaker 2: GROC and Claude. Their role as jurors would determine the
Speaker 2: fate of a man who had been charged with juvenile robbery.
Speaker 2: The case was fictional, but all three of the a
Speaker 2: high bots serving on the jury have been used by
Speaker 2: professional lawyers in real court cases, often with resulting embarrassing
Speaker 2: blunders when they hallucinate about cases that don't exist in
Speaker 2: the briefs, meaning that to some extent, this technology is
Speaker 2: already affecting legal outcomes across the country. The stunt was
Speaker 2: called the Trial of Henry. Justice is meant to raise
Speaker 2: questions about AI's role in the justice system. The exercise
Speaker 2: highlights critical issues of accuracy, efficiency, bias, and legitimate raised
Speaker 2: by such use. And again they're going to push this
Speaker 2: in under the illusion that the AI is not biased.
Speaker 2: And yet they spend a lot of money to you know,
Speaker 2: they don't pay people a lot of money to do that.
Speaker 2: They pay people like slave wages to do it. But
Speaker 2: they have a lot of people who are building the
Speaker 2: bias into their chat bots for various topics.
Speaker 4: There's tons of images of people posting their chat logs
Speaker 4: to show its bias, where they'll ask a question, you know,
Speaker 4: and they'll do it about race or about gender or
Speaker 4: about LGBT stuff, where will show how hypocritical it is.
Speaker 4: We're a question about one race, they will answer happily,
Speaker 4: but not about another.
Speaker 2: That's right, and we've seen that about partisan politics as well.
Speaker 2: The bias built in for that as well. We've seen
Speaker 2: cases of that where tell me something positive about Trump
Speaker 2: and something positive about buying. I can't think of anything
Speaker 2: positive about Trump, you know, or tell me something negative.
Speaker 2: Turned around the other way and it can only come
Speaker 2: up with negative stuff about one guy but not about
Speaker 2: the other one. So the AI jurors were given real
Speaker 2: time transcripts of the proceedings, then deliberated in front of
Speaker 2: the audience. Intense criticism came from members of a post
Speaker 2: trial panel, including a law professor and a philosopher who
Speaker 2: had legal training. I suspect most of the audience came
Speaker 2: away believing that trial by bot is not a good IDEA.
Speaker 2: Attendees pointed out how the bots could see a witness's
Speaker 2: body could not see a witness's body language, and they
Speaker 2: could not draw from human experience. We might also add
Speaker 2: AI's well documented tendency to drastically misinterpret information because of
Speaker 2: simple typos or to exhibit a racial bias, sometimes pretty egregiously.
Speaker 2: And so the law professor said, well, the bots were bad,
Speaker 2: but they're getting better. Bots can't read body language, okay, Well,
Speaker 2: will give them a video feed. The bots can't infuse
Speaker 2: their judgment with the wisdom of experience, Okay, then we'll
Speaker 2: give them backstories. Technology will recursively repair its way into
Speaker 2: every human space if we let it, including into the
Speaker 2: jury box. So that brings us to the case I
Speaker 2: was talking about earlier of the professional wrestling WWE says
Speaker 2: it's going to use AI to write storylines. I think
Speaker 2: this might actually be a good use case. I couldn't
Speaker 2: do too much harm with this, And certainly there's a
Speaker 2: lot of hallucination going on with WWE.
Speaker 3: I just imagine, you know, it doesn't the storylines of
Speaker 3: the WWE can't be that complex.
Speaker 2: You know, I don't know, you know, we've never watched it.
Speaker 3: I just assume more these.
Speaker 2: Long story arcs, you know, where the heroes and the
Speaker 2: heels go after each other and it goes over, you know,
Speaker 2: quite a long period of time.
Speaker 3: I assume it's you know, kept to more simplistic stylings there,
Speaker 3: like one guy is a jerk and the other guy
Speaker 3: does the right thing. You know, So maybe you just
Speaker 3: need a billion different scenarios of simplistic you know, storyline items.
Speaker 8: The AI is.
Speaker 3: Good for that as approached there, like, all right, what
Speaker 3: does he smash against this guy's head? Now, he did
Speaker 3: a beer bottle last week. What's other things you can
Speaker 3: smash on some guy's head?
Speaker 2: Well, I think they described it pretty well here. What
Speaker 2: pro wrestling is is that's basically a decades long soap
Speaker 2: opera that has acted out by highly trained stuntman. That's
Speaker 2: a pretty good summary of professional wrestling, I think, And said.
Speaker 2: There's also improvisational elements in which the audience's reaction and
Speaker 2: real life injuries can upend the plot in a moment's notice.
Speaker 2: You know, it's kind of like the Trump administration, right,
Speaker 2: you have a decades long soap opera acted out by stuntmen.
Speaker 2: There's a lot of similarities there. WWE has been shrouded
Speaker 2: and controversy in recent years. It's also often delivered stupefying
Speaker 2: feats of red flooded artistry, like when Steve Austin delivered
Speaker 2: a stone cold stunner to then CEO Vince McMahon, or
Speaker 2: the time when Hulk Cogan drove a semi truck into
Speaker 2: an ambulance carrying Dwayne the Rock Johnson. I didn't know
Speaker 2: about that. So WWE's new chief creative officer, the former
Speaker 2: wrestler Paul Triple H Levesque and Triple H, has gotten
Speaker 2: an appointment to Trump's administration, the Council on Sports, Fitness
Speaker 2: and Nutrition. I'm surprised he's not the chief press liaison there.
Speaker 3: Also, real quick, you should never have any professional athlete
Speaker 3: be in charge of sports health. All of these guys
Speaker 3: are juiced to the gills. Why do you think bodybuilders
Speaker 3: routinely die at forty? Why do you think wrestlers die
Speaker 3: at forty? It's because they are sauced out of their minds.
Speaker 3: Trend blone is real rough on the organs.
Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe he can start recommending for kids the kind
Speaker 2: of human growth mormone they should abuse.
Speaker 3: Right, Yeah, HGH gives you the palumbo gut, So don't
Speaker 3: do that either.
Speaker 2: What gut?
Speaker 3: So? It causes your organs to bloat in distent. Then
Speaker 3: you'll start to see some guys who take it. They
Speaker 3: get this sort of rounded gut. They'll have these really
Speaker 3: well defined abs, but the organs underneath are pushing them
Speaker 3: all out, so it's rounded, like they've got a beer belly.
Speaker 3: It's named after a guy named Brad Palumbo, who seemed
Speaker 3: to be the most severe case of it. Wow, it
Speaker 3: comes from megadosing things like HGH. Fun fact for you all.
Speaker 2: Well, now, the thing that seems to be holding back
Speaker 2: the robotic revolution is the hands problem, according to Elon Musk,
Speaker 2: and which I think is kind of interesting. Maybe Michelangelo
Speaker 2: was onto something the Sistine Chapel where you got the
Speaker 2: picture of God's finger reaching out to man's hand and
Speaker 2: the can't quite get it there. These people are, these
Speaker 2: robots and everything. It's not about mankind and these creators
Speaker 2: are not God. So it's the challenge that is really
Speaker 2: holding back the application of these robots in many different
Speaker 2: places is the hand problem and the humanoid robot revolution.
Speaker 2: So we can thank God for that complexity that we
Speaker 2: have and that that's kind of put a stop to it.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break and we will
Speaker 2: be right back.
Speaker 8: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 14: Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have
Speaker 14: access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues,
Speaker 14: classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
Speaker 14: for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: Well have you heard of the term mirror life? This
Speaker 2: is causing some genetic scientists to freak out. This is
Speaker 2: something that the National Science Foundation is handing out grants
Speaker 2: to people. One of the people who got a grant
Speaker 2: started looking at this and said, this is unbelievably dangerous.
Speaker 2: We shouldn't be doing this. The story you'll find on
Speaker 2: Technocracy News. They picked it up from CNN Science. Some
Speaker 2: genetic scientists have a conscience and common sense. Doctor Kate
Speaker 2: gave our per one million dollar grant from the US
Speaker 2: National Science Foundation when she realized how dangerous the research became.
Speaker 2: She said mirror cells would likely be completely invisible to
Speaker 2: the human immune system. The NSF came up with this
Speaker 2: stupid idea in the first place. Think about it. You
Speaker 2: ingest a harmful bacterial strain that is easily defeated by
Speaker 2: your own immune system. But if it's DNA is mirrored.
Speaker 2: Your body will not even be able to see it.
Speaker 2: You could be dead in just a couple of days.
Speaker 2: So the scientist was Kate Damila. She doesn't remember exactly
Speaker 2: when she realized that the lab at the University of
Speaker 2: Minnesota was working on something potentially dangerous, so dangerous in fact,
Speaker 2: some researchers think it could pose an existential risk to
Speaker 2: all life forms on Earth. You know, we look at
Speaker 2: do you.
Speaker 4: Not see that?
Speaker 2: Though?
Speaker 4: This is a pretty common well not common, but it's
Speaker 4: in a good amount of science fiction, you know, mirror
Speaker 4: life or anti life where they do this, and this
Speaker 4: is one of those don't create the torment nexus things.
Speaker 4: It's so obvious that this is the only use for it. Oh,
Speaker 4: my research into building superbugs could be used for evil?
Speaker 2: What that's right? And of course it's something not being
Speaker 2: very interested in biology as I am, it was something
Speaker 2: I didn't know anything about. Mirror life. She had another
Speaker 2: argument for intelligent design and a creator as a matter
Speaker 2: of fact.
Speaker 4: Brought up in Change Agent by Daniel Sloz. That was
Speaker 4: one of the themes of it.
Speaker 2: M yeah, yeah, And of course Michael Crichton would have
Speaker 2: something to say about this. Just because you can't do
Speaker 2: it doesn't mean that you should do it. So they said, well,
Speaker 2: you know, we think that National Science Foundation kind of
Speaker 2: excuse it, saying we think that it's give that could
Speaker 2: give us some insights into the origin of life. So
Speaker 2: these anti god atheists who can't see design think that
Speaker 2: if they could study something like mirrored life, that it
Speaker 2: would give them a clue. But I think they're totally clueless.
Speaker 3: To the entire thing of well, where did life come from?
Speaker 3: It boils down to there is a God. There's obviously
Speaker 3: a God. You're free to then pick and choose which
Speaker 3: you think makes the most sense to me? Obviously is Christianity.
Speaker 3: It makes the most sense. It's the most well laid out.
Speaker 3: It makes sense where it's supposed to, and it doesn't
Speaker 3: make sense where it's supposed to. Not make sense when
Speaker 3: it talks When the Bible talks about human nature, it
Speaker 3: makes sense because it's deservable. When it talks about God's nature,
Speaker 3: it doesn't make sense because he's infinite and beyond everything
Speaker 3: in anything we could understand, which makes sense.
Speaker 2: That's good.
Speaker 3: It makes sense that it doesn't make sense.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: All these other religions have these very human, very understandable
Speaker 3: gods like oh, yeah, Zeus goes around and he has
Speaker 3: a bunch of mistresses and affairs, and it leads to problems,
Speaker 3: just like it does with regular people. Huh isn't that funny?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Well, you know, the interesting thing about all this
Speaker 2: is that when you look at things like DNA, right
Speaker 2: screams intelligent design. Even Creak and Watson had to come
Speaker 2: up with Oh, we think it was space aliens who
Speaker 2: did it. Well, in nature, the structure of a lot
Speaker 2: of major biomolecules is either right or left handed, although
Speaker 2: it's not clear why life evolved this way. Oh it's not, Yeah,
Speaker 2: because it didn't evolve. DNA and RNA are made from
Speaker 2: right handed nucleotides. Proteins are made from left handed amino acids.
Speaker 2: So how did amino acids that are left handed suddenly
Speaker 2: organize themselves into right handed DNA and RNA. Well, the
Speaker 2: National Science Foundation says, well, we'll spend a million dollars
Speaker 2: and we'll figure that out. Meanwhile, we might create something
Speaker 2: that is unbelievably dangerous for life everywhere.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, on the chance we make something interesting,
Speaker 3: it's worth it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Yeah, So it says, just as right handed glove
Speaker 2: cannot fit a left hand, or how a key precisely
Speaker 2: fits a lock. Interactions between molecules often depend on what
Speaker 2: they call chorality, and living systems need consistent patterns of
Speaker 2: terality to function properly. So scientists can make many of
Speaker 2: the components from non living precursors, and they could soon
Speaker 2: engineer normal synthetic cells, which, in theory, could then create
Speaker 2: single cell life forms such as bacteria. By themselves, small
Speaker 2: mirror molecules do not pose any particular risks. Scientists can
Speaker 2: already safely make proteins and carbohydrates with opposite chirality, which
Speaker 2: hold pharmaceutical promise, but complete mirror cells, however, remain out
Speaker 2: of reach. And I got to say, I think this
Speaker 2: goes back to the ideas that Hugo to Garis, and
Speaker 2: I forget the other guy who created the robot that
Speaker 2: they gave citizenship too in the saudiast gave systems. Anyway,
Speaker 2: the two of them were going along this idea that
Speaker 2: if we create an exact replica of the human brain,
Speaker 2: that somehow it'll spring to life and it'll have consciousness
Speaker 2: and all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 3: It wasn't Kurzweile, was it?
Speaker 2: No? No, Kurzweil is the Google guy who is exactly
Speaker 2: opposite of Hugo to Garis. But the reality is that
Speaker 2: there's something else there. You know, it's your soul that
Speaker 2: spark of life or whatever, but it is your soul
Speaker 2: that is going to animate life. And when they put
Speaker 2: the stuff together, they think that they're going to be
Speaker 2: able to make simple single cell life forms. I don't
Speaker 2: think they will because when you stop and think about it,
Speaker 2: you know, the whole flaw of Darwin is that you
Speaker 2: had protozoa the first life that was going to be simple,
Speaker 2: single cell life, and that more complex forms going to
Speaker 2: evolve from that. And yet when you look at a
Speaker 2: lot of single cell things, they have a lot of
Speaker 2: functions that larger animals have. They have the ability to reproduce,
Speaker 2: they have the ability in many cases to be able
Speaker 2: to sense things that they can get away from and
Speaker 2: make decisions. How do you get that into something that's
Speaker 2: that small and into only a single cell. Just like
Speaker 2: with electronics, if you start to shrink the size of something,
Speaker 2: it starts getting way more complicated. It goes up. The
Speaker 2: complication goes up by orders of magnitude. It's not a
Speaker 2: linear thing. And so the same thing is true in
Speaker 2: terms of life as it gets smaller, as it gets
Speaker 2: to a single cell, it needs to be able to
Speaker 2: do all these things that other organisms that have a
Speaker 2: lot of different specialized cells can do. That all needs
Speaker 2: to be done by a single cell. So I think
Speaker 2: they're kitting themselves to start with. But they said, people
Speaker 2: that are experts in biosafety and immunology and ecology didn't
Speaker 2: think that something like a mirror cell was actually likely.
Speaker 2: They thought it was science fiction. One thing these other
Speaker 2: scientists brought up was it extremely surprising to her, was
Speaker 2: that mirror cells would be completely invisible to the human
Speaker 2: immune system. I used to think the immune system will
Speaker 2: find a way to detect any invading biomolecules. I didn't
Speaker 2: know how cheril the immune system was. Over the course
Speaker 2: of twenty twenty three and twenty twenty four, those ad
Speaker 2: hoc conversations coalesced into a working group of thirty eight scientists,
Speaker 2: including Adam Adamola, and in December twenty twenty four, the
Speaker 2: group published a bombshell article in the high profile scientific
Speaker 2: journal titled Science, titled Confronting the Risks of Mirror Life,
Speaker 2: which summarized the findings of a detailed three hundred page
Speaker 2: report compiled by the same group. Again, it is our
Speaker 2: government that has unlimited amounts of money. But they can't
Speaker 2: fund the food stamp program or the air traffic controllers,
Speaker 2: but they can fund mirror life. How about how's that
Speaker 2: for crazy and the iportant.
Speaker 4: Again, I'm just amazed that this expert says that she
Speaker 4: is shocked that this would be invisible to the immune system,
Speaker 4: this thing that she's supposedly an expert on. I could
Speaker 4: have told you that was the theory of mirror life
Speaker 4: slash anti life a decade ago, just as someone who
Speaker 4: reads a lot of science fiction, this is not that's
Speaker 4: the only purpose of mirror life is that it's invisible
Speaker 4: to standard and means.
Speaker 2: And in one area after the other, we see that
Speaker 2: science fiction has become the blueprint for what our government does.
Speaker 2: Where there's DARPA, the National Science Foundation, it's like, well,
Speaker 2: if we throw enough money at this, I think we
Speaker 2: might be able to create this dystopian system or this
Speaker 2: horrific plague that is out there. Dozens of US experts
Speaker 2: met at a two day conference in engineering and Safeguarding
Speaker 2: Synthetic Life in Manchester, UK in September to discuss whether
Speaker 2: the red line should be drawn to restrict research into
Speaker 2: technologies that could enable the creation of mirrored organisms. But again,
Speaker 2: when we look at the explosion of these biosafety level
Speaker 2: and biostate three and four labs, this is something that
Speaker 2: based on Alison Young's research with she had a series
Speaker 2: that ran on USA Today back in twenty fourteen that
Speaker 2: got to Congress. They held hearings and they actually said,
Speaker 2: we need to stop these biosafety level three and biosafty
Speaker 2: level four labs that are proliferating everywhere, usually attached to
Speaker 2: a university somewhere. They got a university close by, You've
Speaker 2: probably got one of these labs here in the United States.
Speaker 2: And they did. They shut that down, except that Francis
Speaker 2: Collins and Anthony Fauci continued to do it with their
Speaker 2: own money. They did it against the rules and against
Speaker 2: the law that had been set out by Congress and
Speaker 2: the Obama administration. And then when Trump got into office
Speaker 2: in twenty seventeen, he started it all up again. The
Speaker 2: question is, when we look at this, it's not you know,
Speaker 2: I still have my issues about the so called science
Speaker 2: of virology. But it's not to say that they can't
Speaker 2: do horrific stuff in these biolabs paid for by the government,
Speaker 2: paid for by the universities. It's she had another plague
Speaker 2: unleashed on us, even more than the DEI and the Marxism. Right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but quick clean before we go, and make sure
Speaker 3: I read this. Jersey Boy eighty nine, Thank you very much,
Speaker 3: he says, Hello, David, I'm waiting to hear back. And
Speaker 3: Jimmy and Brooklyn please ask youroids Sunday. Have you ever
Speaker 3: heard of William Cooper? I please pray I get a job.
Speaker 3: We've been out of work since August. First I get
Speaker 3: my other two goals.
Speaker 2: Yes, well, we'll be praying for Jersey Boy.
Speaker 3: Jersey Boy, we will be praying. Thanks you very much.
Speaker 3: And remember, if you're out of work, please you don't
Speaker 3: have to donate to the show. Focus on your own
Speaker 3: needs first. I appreciate the donation, but you don't need
Speaker 3: to do that. So thank you, Jersey Boy.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, and don't let the I say this comment
Speaker 2: here from right over. Sure, don't let the cops do
Speaker 2: a civil asset for for chartener Doritos don't run from
Speaker 2: them when they come because they're crazy. All right, Thank you, folks,
Speaker 2: have a good day. The common man. They created common Core,
Speaker 2: the dumbed down our children. They created common past, track
Speaker 2: and control us their commons project to make sure the
Speaker 2: common own nothing and the communist future. They see the
Speaker 2: common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us
Speaker 2: has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
Speaker 2: That is what we have in common. That is what
Speaker 2: they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
Speaker 2: They desire to know everything about us, while they hide
Speaker 2: everything from us.
Speaker 8: It's time to turn that around.
Speaker 2: And expose what they want to hide. Please share the
Speaker 2: information and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com.
Speaker 2: Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you
Speaker 2: can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
Speaker 2: Thedavidknightshow dot com
Speaker 3: Dot astol