Speaker 1: Welcome back and joining us now is Zoe Smith. She
Speaker 1: has set up a website a thrill Kill Medical cult
Speaker 1: dot com. You can also find her on substack. The
Speaker 1: name of the substack is Zoe. That's zwe dot substack
Speaker 1: dot com. And we want to talk to her about
Speaker 1: being a whistleblower and the things that she saw during
Speaker 1: the pandemic lockdown. Zoe worked as a medical coder for
Speaker 1: over a decade. Tell us a little bit about that.
Speaker 1: What was that involved with? Is that for insurance purposes,
Speaker 1: identifying the procedures and putting the right code on it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Hi, thanks for thanks for being here. Yeah, so
Speaker 2: a medical coder, A lot of people don't even know
Speaker 2: that it exists because you don't really see it as
Speaker 2: a patient.
Speaker 3: But everything that happens to you in a.
Speaker 2: Hospital, clinic, X ray lab, whatever has to have a diagnosed,
Speaker 2: some procedure assigned, and that's how your doctor gets paid.
Speaker 2: So the coder is the one who reviews that documentation,
Speaker 2: assigns the right diagnosis code, assigns the right procedure code,
Speaker 2: and that's what gets put on the bill and that
Speaker 2: your insurance or Medicare uses to pay your doctor, ORB
Speaker 2: or the hospital for their services.
Speaker 3: So it's really boring until would happen.
Speaker 1: Then you had a bird's eye view of what was
Speaker 1: going on. I was just telling you off air, I said,
Speaker 1: the AHA moment for me was the aha the American
Speaker 1: Hospital Association, and I believe it was August of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: I've talked about this many times. They got very upset
Speaker 1: because they said to CMS, who was paying them. They said,
Speaker 1: you told us that we didn't have to have a
Speaker 1: PCR documentation for this. He said that you didn't have
Speaker 1: enough of them, and you said they didn't work, and
Speaker 1: you said, we just pointed somebody to a clinical diagnosis,
Speaker 1: and you would give us a twenty percent bonus on
Speaker 1: everything that we did to the people, as well as
Speaker 1: the upfront cash bonus of thirteen thousand dollars. And now
Speaker 1: you want to have this new requirement. You know that's
Speaker 1: not fair. And so they were complaining because they weren't
Speaker 1: getting paid, and it kind of exposed the whole thing,
Speaker 1: except nobody would cover that. It was amazing to me
Speaker 1: how there was dead silence everywhere about that. I mean,
Speaker 1: you incentiviize people to that degree. And I would always
Speaker 1: say to people, look the money is the issue. You know.
Speaker 1: The decoration of the emergency by Trump unleashed the money
Speaker 1: and then they put out these rules through CMS and
Speaker 1: paid these people to kill is really what was happening.
Speaker 1: And that's what you saw as well.
Speaker 3: Right, Yeah, that's they did.
Speaker 2: I don't know if you're familiar with the vaxed bus,
Speaker 2: but Children's Health Defense they sent out a third one.
Speaker 2: So they've done a part one, part two, and now
Speaker 2: part three. The part three is called authorized to kill
Speaker 2: for that reason because the CARES Act really did. It
Speaker 2: incentivized a behavior change in hospitals and with positions and
Speaker 2: how they were able to practice medicine. It set everything
Speaker 2: on its head and it incentivizes everything. What you're talking about,
Speaker 2: what the AGA said about you didn't even need a
Speaker 2: PCR test result to get that COVID diagnosis is absolutely correct.
Speaker 2: And that was one of the things that I noticed
Speaker 2: in the Pandora's box of things that changed right at
Speaker 2: when they declared two weeks to flatten the curve in
Speaker 2: March twenty twenty, they changed all the coding roles as well,
Speaker 2: so they April first, twenty twenty is when the COVID
Speaker 2: nineteen diagnosis went into effect, and we were actually told
Speaker 2: to commit fraud before that time because we didn't have
Speaker 2: a code to reflect COVID nineteen and we needed to
Speaker 2: track that so much, and of course everyone had to
Speaker 2: get the PCR test in order to get the diagnosis.
Speaker 2: But then there was this official coding Guideline, which is
Speaker 2: what we use as coders.
Speaker 3: It's like our bible.
Speaker 2: It tells us what's correct, what's fraud, and it's essentially
Speaker 2: it lays.
Speaker 3: Out the rules.
Speaker 2: And in those rules, there's a part that says, in
Speaker 2: order to be diagnosed with COVID nineteen, all your position
Speaker 2: needs to do is write down in their medical opinion
Speaker 2: that they think that you have COVID nineteen. They didn't
Speaker 2: need to do an exam, they didn't need to have
Speaker 2: a PCR test result, and it says right in that
Speaker 2: official guideline. This is an exception to section two H
Speaker 2: in patient Coding Guidelines, which says for every other diagnosis
Speaker 2: they have to do an exam and they have to
Speaker 2: have some sort of clinical documentation, usually some sort of
Speaker 2: lab work or diagnostics to prove their working diagnosis.
Speaker 3: So COVID was an exception for.
Speaker 2: That, and that was one of the really big red
Speaker 2: flags that came up for me, And of course I
Speaker 2: noticed in my position, not only is everyone getting this
Speaker 2: PCR test when we come in, they're not all sick,
Speaker 2: but then they get this COVID nineteen diagnosis. And the
Speaker 2: part that most people that still a lot of people aren't.
Speaker 3: Familiar with is when they did the two weeks.
Speaker 2: To flatten the curve and they locked down everybody. They
Speaker 2: actually kicked people out of the ICU early, and they
Speaker 2: shut down other wings of the hospital. They went down
Speaker 2: to a skeleton crew, so they consolidated wings within the hospital,
Speaker 2: so the ER and the ICU stayed open, but the
Speaker 2: rest of the hospital was shut down.
Speaker 3: We were getting.
Speaker 2: Furloughed and laid off and hiring freezes and no raises,
Speaker 2: no bonuses.
Speaker 3: During the time when the media was saying.
Speaker 2: These healthcare heroes are showing up to fight the onslaught.
Speaker 3: Of COVID nineteen patients. What was an onslaught of false
Speaker 3: positive tests, But it wasn't an onslaught of a whole
Speaker 3: bunch of patients. We were getting furloughed.
Speaker 2: So the hospital really really needed that money because they
Speaker 2: were bankrupted right before those incentives came out, so they
Speaker 2: really needed those incentives, so they were absolutely excited to
Speaker 2: label someone as COVID nineteen at that twenty percent diagnosis,
Speaker 2: and then he come up to the ventilator, which they
Speaker 2: got another bonus for, and then the ren does appear,
Speaker 2: which they were giving out like candy during this entire time.
Speaker 2: The bonus really didn't go into effect until August of
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, but they were using it from about April
Speaker 2: all the way through.
Speaker 3: And I noticed how the protocols were killing.
Speaker 2: People, and doctors would just say, oh, this is a
Speaker 2: progression of COVID nineteen. And to this day, a lot
Speaker 2: of people will say, oh, I had a family member
Speaker 2: that died of COVID. They went to the hospital because
Speaker 2: they had COVID and they died of COVID. But I
Speaker 2: asked them, did they really die of COVID or did
Speaker 2: they die of the protocol? Were they not that sick
Speaker 2: until they got there? And then they circled the drain
Speaker 2: because in my experience, most of the patients within sometimes
Speaker 2: a few days to sometimes it took up to a month.
Speaker 2: But those protocols were killing people, shutting down their organs
Speaker 2: and then they would die, and that wasn't normal. To
Speaker 2: have that happen to a pneumonia patient.
Speaker 3: Normally, they'd be there three days, we pump them full
Speaker 3: of antibiotics, which we weren't using for COVID nineteen, and
Speaker 3: then they would go home. So this was totally backwards.
Speaker 2: And then I started to notice all the incentives because
Speaker 2: even as a coder, they have all these checks and
Speaker 2: balances in the electronic medical record system and it counts
Speaker 2: against you if you miss something, So like if I
Speaker 2: missed someone for COVID nineteen, I would get a notice
Speaker 2: about it, like, oh, this is going to count against
Speaker 2: your score and might not get a raised this year
Speaker 2: because you weren't a good coder. And they were watching
Speaker 2: that for Randesevir because the bonuses were so much on
Speaker 2: the bill. Every single Randezevier infusion was four thousand dollars,
Speaker 2: give or take a little bit throughout the country because
Speaker 2: it's weighted based on where you live, so be more
Speaker 2: expensive in New.
Speaker 3: York or California. But around four thousand dollars per dose
Speaker 3: is how much they were getting.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the middle. I interviewed a woman who was a nurse.
Speaker 1: She wrote a book called Pandemic Nurse, and she was
Speaker 1: in Florida, and she said, I wasn't seeing, you know,
Speaker 1: the kind of narrative that they were talking about with
Speaker 1: the pandemic, and everybody was saying it was all happening
Speaker 1: up in New York. So she left and went to
Speaker 1: New York to help and set around for a couple
Speaker 1: of days before after she told them she was there
Speaker 1: before they brought her in. When they finally did bring
Speaker 1: her in, she's like, you know, what's going on. They're
Speaker 1: not busy either. When they brought her in, physician walked around,
Speaker 1: showed the people on the ventilators and said, you know,
Speaker 1: about ninety percent of these people are going to die,
Speaker 1: and she said it was horrible. They were just killing people.
Speaker 1: And of course, when you look at it, if you
Speaker 1: get a thirteen percent, if you get a thirteen thousand
Speaker 1: dollars bonus for pointing at somebody and saying they got COVID,
Speaker 1: they may not even be sick, as you pointed out,
Speaker 1: then if you put them on a ventilator, you get
Speaker 1: thirty nine thousand dollars already right there, You got fifty
Speaker 1: two thousand dollars for a machine that costs you fifty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. And then they will pay you twenty percent
Speaker 1: on the charges that you've got for them to use
Speaker 1: it until you kill them with that ventilator. And again
Speaker 1: pullmonologists were looking at this and back and said, this
Speaker 1: never made any sense. We never did it, like, as
Speaker 1: you're pointing out, they'd get people antibiotics and things like that,
Speaker 1: so we would never put people on a ventilator, you know,
Speaker 1: for pneumonia or things like that.
Speaker 3: Exactly.
Speaker 1: All of it was so incredibly corrupt and counterintuitive, and
Speaker 1: they turned the hospitals into killing machines for money, and
Speaker 1: everybody who's willing to do that. I mean, if you
Speaker 1: got somebody this there, and even if it wasn't an
Speaker 1: economic emergency that had been created partially by the government,
Speaker 1: you know, if you were to tell somebody, you point
Speaker 1: to that person and say they've got this condition, I'll
Speaker 1: give you thirteen thousand dollars. We know how human nature works,
Speaker 1: and we know how the corporate hospitals work. I mean,
Speaker 1: the incentives to do that are going to be huge,
Speaker 1: just like the disincentives to report somebody when they've had
Speaker 1: a reaction to the vaccines are going to be huge
Speaker 1: as well. Were you still there when they started the
Speaker 1: vaccination program or had you left because you say that
Speaker 1: you left when they made the vaccine mandatory, it happened
Speaker 1: before that.
Speaker 2: I started to wake up during really when they started
Speaker 2: declaring two weeks to flatten the curb and I started
Speaker 2: seeing people wearing.
Speaker 3: Masks in public.
Speaker 2: I knew this was not this was not a pandemic
Speaker 2: and there was something some kind of psychological operation going
Speaker 2: on because I had worked in the hospital for the
Speaker 2: swine flu scare and it wasn't a thing in the hospital,
Speaker 2: like it was just regular flu. I don't even talked
Speaker 2: to people that were on the front lines, like er
Speaker 2: doctors and nurses, and they said some of them even
Speaker 2: said that they got it and it wasn't.
Speaker 3: That big of a deal.
Speaker 2: So when they declared COVID, I was really suspicious, this
Speaker 2: is just going to be another vaccination campaign, because they
Speaker 2: already had mandates for the flu shot for healthcare workers
Speaker 2: for like a decade before that, and I had been
Speaker 2: doing the exemption every year. And the reason I did
Speaker 2: that is because the first year that they made healthcare
Speaker 2: workers get the flu shot, everybody was getting the flu. Yeah,
Speaker 2: And so that was the year that we came up
Speaker 2: with the it was just a rumor within the universe
Speaker 2: to do lab where I worked, but everybody was saying
Speaker 2: it that you get the flu from the flu shot,
Speaker 2: so ever since then, I just didn't want to do it.
Speaker 3: So during that whole year of operation work.
Speaker 2: Speed, the only thing that's going to get us back
Speaker 2: to normal is this vaccine. I thought this, If the
Speaker 2: flu shot never worked, the chances that the covid shot
Speaker 2: is going to work is slim to nil. And the
Speaker 2: amount of pressure for this one compared to the flu
Speaker 2: shot is astronomical, so there's something to it. So that
Speaker 2: made me actually not just look at the.
Speaker 3: Covid shot, but look at all the other vaccines.
Speaker 2: And what I learned was they don't teach coders or
Speaker 2: doctors or nurses anything about vaccine side effects or adverse effects,
Speaker 2: despite the fact that they have codes to assign for
Speaker 2: vaccine effects. But I would see patients come in with
Speaker 2: like eon beret before this, and the doctors would try
Speaker 2: very hard not to relate it to a vaccine, and
Speaker 2: there would be codes in there like adverse effect of
Speaker 2: flu shot or adverse effect whatever, and those are supposed
Speaker 2: to be like a safety signal code, like one of
Speaker 2: the reasons why. The ICD ten system, which is owned
Speaker 2: by the WHO, by the way, so every member state
Speaker 2: that is part of the WHO has to report these codes,
Speaker 2: and it's for statistical monitoring purposes. So this is how
Speaker 2: they monitor pandemics. This is how they monitor cancer, like
Speaker 2: how many cases of cancer there are throughout the world,
Speaker 2: or heart problems or pneumonia cases. This is the system
Speaker 2: that they use, and it's also supposed to be us
Speaker 2: starting in clinical trials for devices and drugs to look
Speaker 2: for a safety signal. So I thought, with this COVID
Speaker 2: nineteen vaccine, there should be a code for adverse effect
Speaker 2: of this shot, and it should be my job to
Speaker 2: assign it. So I didn't my due diligence, and I
Speaker 2: looked into all the warnings and what could happen if
Speaker 2: people got the shot, And then I looked at.
Speaker 3: What could happen if people got the.
Speaker 2: Other vaccines, and I started to realize that they have
Speaker 2: been varying all of the effects that people would get
Speaker 2: from vaccines and not assigning these adverse effect codes up
Speaker 2: until twenty twenty. And then when the COVID nineteen vaccine
Speaker 2: came out, there was no code to report it. So
Speaker 2: it should have been my job to collect that danger signal.
Speaker 2: And I even went on a podcast called Deborah Gets
Speaker 2: Red Pill. It was just a radio show in early
Speaker 2: twenty twenty one, right after I quit my job.
Speaker 3: And I said, the COVID nineteen vaccine is.
Speaker 2: More dangerous than all of the other vaccines combined. And
Speaker 2: that was with my That was just an observation, but
Speaker 2: it was ten years of medical coding experience and then
Speaker 2: learning what I learned about vaccine side effects and all
Speaker 2: the cases that I saw of children in the er
Speaker 2: constantly having XMR rashes or even anaphylactic responses, and then
Speaker 2: I look at the record. They just got a vaccine,
Speaker 2: but the doctor's not connecting the two. So when COVID
Speaker 2: nineteen came out, people were having strokes and sephalitis and
Speaker 2: blood class like I've never seen before my own card
Speaker 2: eyed just they were getting COVID nineteen immediately after getting
Speaker 2: the shot, like the same day or the next day,
Speaker 2: and then being hospitalized.
Speaker 3: There were people with paralytic.
Speaker 2: Problems, seizure disorders, blood disorders where they couldn't even figure
Speaker 2: out what was going on because the patient was plotting
Speaker 2: and bleeding at the same time.
Speaker 3: And they didn't even know how to treat it.
Speaker 2: Crazy stuff started happening just in the first four months
Speaker 2: of the vaccine rolled out, so it wasn't even available.
Speaker 3: To the rest of the public yet.
Speaker 2: But by summer in twenty twenty one is when they
Speaker 2: started saying you at home, like this is the hospital leadership.
Speaker 2: They would have videos that they would send to all
Speaker 2: staff all the time monitoring COVID and they were really
Speaker 2: really pushing us to get that shot. They were saying,
Speaker 2: we're not doing as good as the other hospitals who
Speaker 2: are getting incentivized for meeting their vaccination quota, and we weren't.
Speaker 2: So they were pointing to us, people who worked from home,
Speaker 2: who never saw patients, who never walked into a hospital, Well,
Speaker 2: you guys are spreading it around society, and we're going
Speaker 2: to have to fire you if you don't get your shots.
Speaker 3: So at that point I couldn't take it anymore.
Speaker 2: I knew that my job had been to get them
Speaker 2: money for murdering patients, and I was having a crisis
Speaker 2: of conscience over that. And then before the vaccine went out,
Speaker 2: I decided I was going to be a spy at
Speaker 2: that point and just see if the vaccine really was
Speaker 2: as bad as old warnings said, and then it turned
Speaker 2: out to be far worse than I anticipated. And I
Speaker 2: didn't think that the chances would be very good that
Speaker 2: I would get an exemption.
Speaker 3: Because they changed the rules for getting an exemption.
Speaker 2: A lot of people got fired, and I didn't want
Speaker 2: to work for them anymore. I didn't want to continue
Speaker 2: helping them get money to murder people.
Speaker 1: Good for you, Good for you. Yeah, you really do
Speaker 1: have You really did have a bird's eye view of
Speaker 1: this whole thing, because you're seeing the diagnostic codes as
Speaker 1: well as the treatments that are there, and so you
Speaker 1: could get a good picture of what was actually coming
Speaker 1: on and seeing the trends that were there. That's very
Speaker 1: interesting your perspective. You know, I've got something, and I
Speaker 1: apologize it because we can't feed this to you, so
Speaker 1: you can't hear this. I'll kind of talk about it
Speaker 1: and describe it, but I want the audience to hear
Speaker 1: what Lutnick. I call him lucky Lucky Lutnick. What he
Speaker 1: said in terms about the money that can be made
Speaker 1: off of this kind of stuff, and he uses an
Speaker 1: example of the vaccines.
Speaker 4: The United States government the most powerful, the greatest customer
Speaker 4: buy stuff. We walk in, we're going to buy is
Speaker 4: the example I like to use. We're going to buy
Speaker 4: two billion COVID vaccines. When we buy it, Faiza and
Speaker 4: Maderna stocks are going to triple, going to triple. So
Speaker 4: then we say everyone's going to have this vaccine. If
Speaker 4: I were after Jared Start negotiated the best daily could
Speaker 4: Howard lettnik walked in the room, Howard Letnig would say.
Speaker 1: What do you think twenty percent warrants? Twenty percent warrants right?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 3: What?
Speaker 4: So we'd make fifty billion dollars off of who nobody.
Speaker 1: We didn't take from anybody to do it.
Speaker 4: Okay, the shareholders and Pfizer, who we've just trimpled them
Speaker 4: with our order.
Speaker 1: Now, how many of my customers? Yeah, Zoe what he's saying.
Speaker 1: Zoe says, yeah, you get the US government's most powerful customers.
Speaker 1: So we're going to go in and we're going to
Speaker 1: buy two billion dollars worth of these vaccines from Pizer. Moodnna.
Speaker 1: We're going to force people to take them. He goes,
Speaker 1: So I'm looking at this, I'm saying, well, I'm going
Speaker 1: to get some twenty percent warrants. I want some action
Speaker 1: of that. I know what's going to happen with all this,
Speaker 1: and he says, and you know, and who have we
Speaker 1: harmed with all this stuff? It's like the people who
Speaker 1: got the shot, obviously, but he doesn't even see that.
Speaker 1: He sees nothing but dollar signs. This is the guy,
Speaker 1: of course, that is now the Commerce secretary for Trump,
Speaker 1: and he's the guy who's pushing through the stable coins
Speaker 1: and all the rest of this stuff. Makes you wonder
Speaker 1: what he is going to be doing to this with
Speaker 1: the stable coins and the resetting of the financial system.
Speaker 1: This is These are people who see nothing other than money,
Speaker 1: and they don't care what they have to do to
Speaker 1: other people in order to make money. It truly is amazing,
Speaker 1: the greed and the system and the corruption.
Speaker 2: Right it is so hard for me to wrap my
Speaker 2: brain around how many people they killed. It was a
Speaker 2: science silent genocide that is still invisible. But there's no
Speaker 2: family that I've talked to in the last five years
Speaker 2: that hasn't been touched by it in some way. Either
Speaker 2: someone they know is suffering from cancer or some horrible
Speaker 2: chronic condition after getting the shop, or they've lost somebody
Speaker 2: like I lost my cousin who was seventeen, who suddenly.
Speaker 3: Just drove into a tree, and they didn't do.
Speaker 2: An autopsy or look into it. And there's countless other
Speaker 2: people out there like that. I mean, this was our family,
Speaker 2: and people are still just kind of baring their heads
Speaker 2: in the sand and wanting to go on like.
Speaker 3: It didn't happen.
Speaker 1: The amazing system is.
Speaker 3: Still set up to where it could still happen again,
Speaker 3: Like we haven't even held those people accountable.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, we put them back in
Speaker 1: office again. And so you know, that's why to me,
Speaker 1: I look at it, and what astounds me the most
Speaker 1: is just how effective the control of information has been.
Speaker 1: That's why what you're doing is so important. You've got
Speaker 1: to get out there and tell people what happened, because,
Speaker 1: as you point out, allmost everybody I know as well,
Speaker 1: there's been somebody in their family, immediate or extended family
Speaker 1: that's been harmed by this. But everybody thinks that this
Speaker 1: is a one off, it didn't happen to everybody else.
Speaker 1: They don't realize that it happened, how broad this is
Speaker 1: and how extensive it is, And I think that they're alone,
Speaker 1: just like they wanted us to think that we were
Speaker 1: loone if we saw what was happening and we weren't
Speaker 1: going to participate in it. Well, you're the one who
Speaker 1: thinks like that, and we're not. You know, there's a
Speaker 1: lot of people out there who saw what was happening,
Speaker 1: and we're onto this scam from the very beginning. And
Speaker 1: I had the help of a person who gave me
Speaker 1: a heads up about a year before this happened. He said,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of chatter about Dark Winter two and
Speaker 1: he goes, you know what Dark Winter one was, and
Speaker 1: he's like, yeah, I know about that. And so when
Speaker 1: I saw this, it was falling right in the pattern
Speaker 1: of all these germ games. The very first one was
Speaker 1: two months before nine to eleven, So I knew exactly
Speaker 1: what was happening with this, and also knew about the
Speaker 1: PCR test and what Krrie Mollison said, talk a little
Speaker 1: bit about what you saw with the PCR right.
Speaker 2: So that was another part of the Pandora's box that
Speaker 2: changed right at the beginning of March twenty twenty when
Speaker 2: they declared two weeks to flatten the curve and changed
Speaker 2: our whole lives upside down.
Speaker 3: I noticed that before COVID.
Speaker 2: I worked in the University Love when I was in college,
Speaker 2: and we had what's called a rapid flu test, and
Speaker 2: it was something that it was a nose swap too,
Speaker 2: or it could be a saliva swab, but it wasn't
Speaker 2: something that went all the way up to your brain
Speaker 2: like the COVID PCR swap did, and even the instructions
Speaker 2: like us in the lab as lab assistants, the one
Speaker 2: of the number one things we did was coach people
Speaker 2: on how to collect specimens properly, because it was our
Speaker 2: job to screen them make sure they were going to
Speaker 2: work for the test, and if they weren't in a
Speaker 2: correct format to accept for the test, then we'd have
Speaker 2: to tell the nurser doctor we needed to go recollect
Speaker 2: that specimen. So these rapid flu tests, they had to
Speaker 2: be done within fifteen minutes, and it was basically a
Speaker 2: PCR test. It didn't have the same cycle threshold part,
Speaker 2: so it was kind of a predecessor to the COVID
Speaker 2: nineteen PCR test. But it wasn't done on every patient
Speaker 2: that had a cold or flu symptom or a pneumonia
Speaker 2: at all.
Speaker 3: It was only done on patients that came in, like
Speaker 3: with a recurrent pneumonia that they couldn't cure, or a
Speaker 3: recurrent cold, and it would be done to try and
Speaker 3: figure out which types of medications this particular disease would
Speaker 3: respond to. So it was like a case by case basis.
Speaker 3: It wasn't just everybody that walked into the hospital.
Speaker 2: And so when COVID nineteen came around and they said,
Speaker 2: you need to stick this all the way up into
Speaker 2: people's brains, no.
Speaker 3: Saliva, and it has to be on every single person,
Speaker 3: because I mean, it really flipped it. At one point.
Speaker 3: It went from you can't get the PCR tests, like because.
Speaker 2: They had a drive through where you could go out
Speaker 2: into society at first and you have to go to
Speaker 2: one of these PCR testing centers and they'd say you
Speaker 2: have to have symptoms.
Speaker 3: You can't get it unless you have symptoms.
Speaker 2: And then people were mad that they couldn't get the
Speaker 2: PCR tests. And then like overnight, it flipped to now
Speaker 2: everybody has to get it for everything. You have to
Speaker 2: get it if you walk in the er, even if
Speaker 2: you don't have COVID symptoms, And I thought that was weird.
Speaker 2: We never did that before. That is not supposed to
Speaker 2: be a screening test. It's supposed to be a diagnostic
Speaker 2: test because the screen is done when you don't have symptoms.
Speaker 2: It's trying to rule out if you're developing something. And
Speaker 2: they were telling us asymptomatic spread. Well, I could see
Speaker 2: in the hospital there is no such thing as asymptomatic spread.
Speaker 2: This six feet thing is made up. Masks don't work.
Speaker 3: I knew that from the very beginning because.
Speaker 2: Masks in the hospital had only been used for like
Speaker 2: collecting spittle over like a surgery case. It wasn't meant
Speaker 2: to prevent germ spread. That was never part of our
Speaker 2: infection control. So I knew there was something up with
Speaker 2: these PCR tests, and I kept looking at the results,
Speaker 2: and finally I find that it's done by PCR.
Speaker 3: And I recall my time at a.
Speaker 2: University lab when we were just starting PCR testing, because
Speaker 2: this was early two thousands and Mulla's invented it, like
Speaker 2: late eighty six is when the NIH took it up
Speaker 2: and started using PCR, so it.
Speaker 3: Got into healthcare early two thousands, and all the.
Speaker 2: Texts like my mom was a medical technologist, it was
Speaker 2: her job which she actually ran one of these labs.
Speaker 2: It was her job to run those tests, and they
Speaker 2: were all talking like this was like their new tech,
Speaker 2: like they were a kid in a candy store, excited
Speaker 2: about it, this PCR thing.
Speaker 3: But it was all genetic testing. It was genetic.
Speaker 2: It was done for cancer screening, which they thought was genetic,
Speaker 2: and it was done for like.
Speaker 3: Women that would like they would call it genetic counseling.
Speaker 3: If you were a couple.
Speaker 2: And you're a female, and you go and you want
Speaker 2: to have genetic counseling, you can see if you have
Speaker 2: like a hereditary disease like Huntington's and then maybe decide
Speaker 2: if you want to continue with appropriation or not. So
Speaker 2: it was genetic. So I thought, why all of a
Speaker 2: sudden are we testing for viruses with PCR. Well, while
Speaker 2: I wasn't looking because for ten years I was a
Speaker 2: medical coder, so I wasn't really looking at what was
Speaker 2: going on in the lab until COVID happened. So then
Speaker 2: I find it's by PCR, and I start looking at well,
Speaker 2: there's obviously this problem with false positives.
Speaker 3: Even Elon Musk was saying, I got two tests in
Speaker 3: one day. One of them was negative, one of them
Speaker 3: was positive.
Speaker 2: And I could see the hospital was running over and
Speaker 2: over and over these PCR tests, waiting to get a
Speaker 2: positive result if they didn't get the right result, and
Speaker 2: I'm like, this doesn't make any sense. What is going
Speaker 2: on here? And fast forward to like after the PCR
Speaker 2: test evolved a little bit towards the end of twenty
Speaker 2: twenty into twenty twenty one, they had it what's called
Speaker 2: a PCR multiplex assay, so it was four different viruses.
Speaker 3: They were actually monitoring flu.
Speaker 2: A, flu B, RSV, and COVID nineteen and the only
Speaker 2: one that ever came up positive out of a whole
Speaker 2: year of running all four of these viruses was covid,
Speaker 2: not one flu, not one RSB.
Speaker 3: And they say, we have an RSB pandemic.
Speaker 1: Now that's such an amazing thing. And you know, we
Speaker 1: go back and we used to play the clips all
Speaker 1: the time of Malis calling out FAUCI because you know,
Speaker 1: FACI used the PCR test claim that AIDS was caused
Speaker 1: by a virus, and that created a big back and
Speaker 1: forth between them, and Mala said, well, I'm not going
Speaker 1: to get involved in that fight, but I'll tell you
Speaker 1: this that you can't prove it using the PCR test.
Speaker 1: They can't be used as a diagnostics like that, and
Speaker 1: so it was very interesting because they also did not
Speaker 1: isolate the HIV, you know, the the virus that supposedly
Speaker 1: caused AIDS either, and so this whole thing has been
Speaker 1: kind of a bluff. What it reminds me of, Zoe
Speaker 1: is the polygraph tests. My wife used to be a
Speaker 1: district personnel manager for convenience stores, and what they would
Speaker 1: do if they would have massive shortages somewhere and they
Speaker 1: thought there was theft that was going on with the employees,
Speaker 1: they would call them in and polygraph them. And the
Speaker 1: polygraph did not work. But it only worked if people
Speaker 1: believed that it could tell them tell whether they were lying,
Speaker 1: and then they would tell the truth about it and
Speaker 1: make a confession. Right. Simply a mind game that was
Speaker 1: being played on the people that were there. And that's exactly, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's what the PCR thing is. It really is a
Speaker 1: mind game, except that it's become something of a lie
Speaker 1: detector for the people who are administering it. We realize
Speaker 1: now that they are the liars who are putting this
Speaker 1: stuff out. I just had in a comment lance put
Speaker 1: up my producer. He said, that video of Lutnik where
Speaker 1: he's talking about that reminds him of this scene out
Speaker 1: of the Big Short, which we just went back and
Speaker 1: watched again because of the AI bubble, And at one
Speaker 1: point this guy gets up and he's talking and one
Speaker 1: of the guys who's onto the whole scam says, why
Speaker 1: is he confessing, And the other guy says, he's not confessing,
Speaker 1: he's bragging. Basically what Lutnik was doing. He wasn't confessing
Speaker 1: about all this stuff. He was bragging about it. And
Speaker 1: now how he continues to get away with this kind
Speaker 1: of stuff truly is amazing. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Well, what's even more nefarious about the PCR.
Speaker 2: Test is so the false positive narrative that is only
Speaker 2: it's about the cycle threshold. But you're correct, they didn't
Speaker 2: actually see what. They didn't sequence stars COVID too, so
Speaker 2: they never had a sequence. They have what's called a
Speaker 2: consensus sequence, which is an average that an AI came
Speaker 2: up with, and that's what they've used because they knew
Speaker 2: they would find this in a percentage of people and
Speaker 2: then they could dial it in with the cycle threshold
Speaker 2: up or down. Same thing with the AIDS thing. They
Speaker 2: never isolated AIDS, and they used their antibody tests at first,
Speaker 2: which could be dialed up or down in the same
Speaker 2: way as a cycle threshold. And David Rasnik, PhD, who
Speaker 2: I've interviewed, can vouch for that.
Speaker 3: He's got all the science on his web page to
Speaker 3: prove all of that.
Speaker 2: But what I was looking past the cycle threshold because
Speaker 2: I knew this test is dialed in for some reason,
Speaker 2: like they can predict the results somehow, and I needed
Speaker 2: to know how they were manipulating the test. And so
Speaker 2: I looked a little bit further and I find a
Speaker 2: document from the CDC that says for every COVID test,
Speaker 2: every CLIA five lab, which.
Speaker 3: Is all of them, they all have to be in
Speaker 3: order to build insurance or anything, have to be CLIA certified.
Speaker 2: Then they have to send a genetic sequence to one
Speaker 2: of two gene banks, either NCBI or GISAID gene banks,
Speaker 2: and it listed like eight different sequences. So they're saying,
Speaker 2: you know the variants in the details.
Speaker 3: But if you look at some of these labs that
Speaker 3: were running PCR tests and making all the money off
Speaker 3: running these PCR tests, they.
Speaker 2: Could also take that same sample off that machine, put
Speaker 2: it on another machine run a sequence, and they needed
Speaker 2: to in order to comply with the CDC's directive to
Speaker 2: send genetic sequences to these gene banks. And I interviewed
Speaker 2: David Rasnik, who is a chemistry professor who worked with.
Speaker 3: Kerry Mullis and new Kerrie Mollis.
Speaker 2: I asked them directly, do you think that they were
Speaker 2: just clipping a tiny little section of the genetic code
Speaker 2: and then sending it to these gene banks or do
Speaker 2: you think they were getting the entire sequence?
Speaker 3: And he says, well, they're running a lab.
Speaker 2: They're busy, they're not really thinking about, you know, taking
Speaker 2: the time to clit out a sequence.
Speaker 3: So could they yes, but would they really do that?
Speaker 2: No, It'd be so much easier for them to just
Speaker 2: send the whole thing and then let the gene bank
Speaker 2: decide which part that they want to determine is the
Speaker 2: variant of concern.
Speaker 3: So they were. And you look at the different gene banks.
Speaker 3: There's one called.
Speaker 2: Data vant which is now a public private partnership. You
Speaker 2: look at the Human Genome Project, which is now BGI
Speaker 2: BGI Gene Genetics I think in China, which is their
Speaker 2: biggest biotech company, and there's billions of billions of dollars
Speaker 2: in collecting our DNA, and what they say they're using
Speaker 2: it for is to And now we have Larry Ellison
Speaker 2: actually admitting it day two of the Trump administration that
Speaker 2: they're going to use AI, which is what they use
Speaker 2: to get the consensus sequence that they dial the PCR
Speaker 2: test in with. They're going to use AI to look
Speaker 2: at our blood and then make a drug or a
Speaker 2: therapeutic or a vaccine tailored to our individual genome. And
Speaker 2: now there's a massive industry of all these big tech
Speaker 2: oligarchs that are using AI to develop different vaccines or
Speaker 2: different therapeutics, biotech therapeutics tailored to the individual genome.
Speaker 3: So whether or not they're successful.
Speaker 2: With this technology, there's a whole bunch of money invested
Speaker 2: in it. So I think PCR was actually a data
Speaker 2: mining operation as well as the money laundering operation.
Speaker 1: That's interesting. Yeah, And of course if they want to
Speaker 1: make a bioweapon that is going to target certain groups
Speaker 1: of people, that makes it very easy to do that
Speaker 1: as well. You know, and when you look at the PCR.
Speaker 1: Handy who also has a substack and he's been a
Speaker 1: regular listener comment or on the program, he worked in
Speaker 1: hospital and he said he was suspicious of these things.
Speaker 1: Finally got a nurse to take one of these swabs
Speaker 1: right out of the package and run it through and
Speaker 1: got a positive test without swamping anybody. So some of these, yeah,
Speaker 1: it was. It was such garbage. I mean, either it's
Speaker 1: preloaded with something or the PCR test is just so
Speaker 1: off the charts with its magnification whatever. You can find
Speaker 1: anything anywhere carry mallis So.
Speaker 3: Didn't be the president of Tanzania.
Speaker 2: I think he did some like a papaya and like
Speaker 2: a Coca cola.
Speaker 1: That's right, it's total nonsense in garbage. And I remember
Speaker 1: when they had the con Film Festival. It was in
Speaker 1: the summer of twenty twenty, and he had all these
Speaker 1: elitists who somehow they got there, I guess on their
Speaker 1: private jets and didn't have to get screened too much.
Speaker 1: But anyway, they're there and they were complaining that they
Speaker 1: had to do spit tests. They said, that's disgusting. We
Speaker 1: got to spit in this thing and they got a
Speaker 1: test it and so forth. I said, yeah, so why
Speaker 1: don't they allow us to do a spit test? Right?
Speaker 1: They got ram that thing up your nose but you
Speaker 1: don't get that. But the elites, the jet setters, the
Speaker 1: private jets, they get the spit test or whatever. Oh
Speaker 1: my god, all this stuff.
Speaker 2: In the university lab, there was something called sputum testing,
Speaker 2: which is exactly that you basically at hakalugi into a
Speaker 2: cup and like it was the most disgusting sample I
Speaker 2: ever had to deal with when I worked in the lab,
Speaker 2: and I make a joke in my book, we all
Speaker 2: were spared that they that they didn't make that the
Speaker 2: test that we had to do. But I'm telling me,
Speaker 2: that's what the elites do.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that's preferable to have that thing ram
Speaker 1: rotted up your nose. I guess I didn't have that
Speaker 1: done to me, So I went to the whole thing
Speaker 1: without having a PCR test. Sorry, go ahead me neither.
Speaker 3: That was another reason why I walked out, because if
Speaker 3: I were to stay in the hospital, they are stay
Speaker 3: working for them and get the exemption that I was
Speaker 3: going to have to take a PCR test every week.
Speaker 2: And I didn't want to have to take a PCR test.
Speaker 2: I was pretty sure they were going to be collecting
Speaker 2: our DNA with it or sensing if we're vaccinated or
Speaker 2: not or somehow tying that in with the vaccine passport.
Speaker 2: It wasn't entirely sure how it was going to work,
Speaker 2: but I knew that it wasn't what they were telling us,
Speaker 2: and I wasn't about to play long.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So that was another reason why I couldn't.
Speaker 1: And of course some of the other things too, where
Speaker 1: some people did some you know, zoomed in a microscope
Speaker 1: looking at the tip of the swab and said, look
Speaker 1: at this. You know, here's one of the cotton swab
Speaker 1: and here's this PCR thing. It's got all these spikes
Speaker 1: on it. And if I run it across, some of
Speaker 1: these things of spikes stick and stay. So are they
Speaker 1: actually implanting something into you? You know?
Speaker 2: There's some research on it, and I found there were
Speaker 2: two chemicals on the tip of the swab. One of
Speaker 2: them was ethylene oxide, and that alone can like they
Speaker 2: were putting it, you know, way up in your nose
Speaker 2: where you're piny old land is your third eye, which
Speaker 2: is right at the top. So putting that chemical right
Speaker 2: there is known to cause cancer. And so the more
Speaker 2: you do it, the more personogenic it's going to be.
Speaker 3: And then it also has a.
Speaker 2: Chemical property where it will basically block and calcify your
Speaker 2: pineal gland, so.
Speaker 3: It like closes your third eye. And it's also a
Speaker 3: way that your brain can sense light. It's how your your.
Speaker 2: Body basically like synchronizes hormones throughout your whole body.
Speaker 3: So it can like turn change your whole.
Speaker 2: Endycurrent system if you set off your if you close
Speaker 2: or calcify your pineal plan so all sorts of things
Speaker 2: could happen just with that one chemical. But I think
Speaker 2: there was also graphene oxide on there. There was different
Speaker 2: schools that said they have been given the special masks,
Speaker 2: even that had graphine in them similar like the exact
Speaker 2: same phenomenon about the fibers that actually move and respond
Speaker 2: to magnetics.
Speaker 3: Graphine oxide has.
Speaker 2: A magnetic property to it, That's why they wanted to
Speaker 2: use it. But it's also supposed to be clean. So
Speaker 2: they were saying, like, we're using this to make it
Speaker 2: anti bacterial because it has anti bacterial properties. But both
Speaker 2: the swabs and some of the masks had graphene fibers
Speaker 2: in them that could maybe do that.
Speaker 1: And so if they can't inject the idea what.
Speaker 3: That would do if you shove it off your nose
Speaker 3: over and over and over.
Speaker 1: So they can't inject the graphene into you. They can
Speaker 1: get it in there another way. And of course I
Speaker 1: mentioned this many times too. There's a couple of different batches,
Speaker 1: each of them over a million of these shots in Japan,
Speaker 1: and they noticed that they were getting black particulates. I
Speaker 1: don't know if it happened because they didn't keep them
Speaker 1: at the super cold temperatures or whatever, but they noticed
Speaker 1: black participants in they particulates, and they said they reacted
Speaker 1: with magnets. Yeah, so what is that? But they would
Speaker 1: end the story, no more talking about that, and the
Speaker 1: Japanese government threw away a couple of million of these
Speaker 1: vaccines because of that type of thing. But yeah, there's
Speaker 1: there's so many issues there, and people have been lied
Speaker 1: to so thoroughly about all the stuff. This is why
Speaker 1: it's not a dead issue. It is still alive, and
Speaker 1: they're going to try to do all this stuff again,
Speaker 1: and since it worked so well, they will use the
Speaker 1: same tactics again. That's why it's very important to talk
Speaker 1: about these different tactics. And that's amazing.
Speaker 2: Yes, right, they're moving forward with the mRNA. I mean
Speaker 2: they're not only putting it in our food. Like we've
Speaker 2: probably heard. I'm sure your audience has heard about the
Speaker 2: bird flu and how they're doing the self amplifying bird
Speaker 2: flue injections for poultry and they're trying to get it
Speaker 2: in cattle, and they've had mRNA shots in pork, so
Speaker 2: almost all all the pork is tainted now since like
Speaker 2: twenty eighteen. Now they're rolling it out for pets. So
Speaker 2: now when you go in, you try it, and you
Speaker 2: have to get your annual RABY shot for your pets.
Speaker 2: Now that's going to be mRNA.
Speaker 3: They're moving over to the m RNA platform for all
Speaker 3: the vaccines. Yes, so norm is that who might be
Speaker 3: a little like.
Speaker 2: Cautious about COVID nineteen because they've heard the rumors by
Speaker 2: now most of them, but.
Speaker 3: They haven't heard that now.
Speaker 2: Your RSV, your flu, and a lot of even like
Speaker 2: the childhood vaccines are moving over to this mRNA platform
Speaker 2: where they get to bypass clinical trials.
Speaker 3: So it still hasn't been This is an experiment that is.
Speaker 2: Now being rolled out to all our vaccines under the
Speaker 2: guise of this is totally fine, this is normal science.
Speaker 2: We've totally tested this, but it's absolutely not.
Speaker 3: I mean they've.
Speaker 1: Had that's right.
Speaker 3: People have understood for like three years. Yeah, for the
Speaker 3: first one, we just barely passed the first part of monitory.
Speaker 1: That's right. And people need to understand that the guy
Speaker 1: who boasted about being the father of the vaccine. First
Speaker 1: things he did is you pointed out Stargate thing with
Speaker 1: Larry Elison where he's talking about, well, we're going to
Speaker 1: use AI to design custom design this for your genetics,
Speaker 1: and then we will deliver it with an mr platform.
Speaker 1: And the person that they put in as they chose
Speaker 1: to put in at the head of the CDC, was
Speaker 1: Susan Monirez and that had been what she was working
Speaker 1: on with BARDA and with ARPA H and these dark
Speaker 1: bioweapon companies that are part of the of the government
Speaker 1: and the the military industrial conflicts and the bioweapon platforms
Speaker 1: and things like that. That's what. So there's all these
Speaker 1: different threads that tie this throughout the Trump administration pushing
Speaker 1: m RNA for all these various things. And of course
Speaker 1: then broke Rawlins, who's the Agricultural Secretary. She decides on
Speaker 1: her own initiative that she's going to end this mass
Speaker 1: culling of chickens by authorizing the mRNA bird flu for chickens,
Speaker 1: and then they authorize it for other livestock as well.
Speaker 1: It is the signals are all there that this is
Speaker 1: all still going on, that Trump is right at the
Speaker 1: epicenter of all this mr and A stuff. And I
Speaker 1: guess what we can call now the m RNAi as
Speaker 1: an AI artificial intelligence. It's all connected together, isn't it.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, It's a giant web and it is going to
Speaker 2: be tied to our behavior scores and if we comply,
Speaker 2: how much we comply with it? Looking at you know,
Speaker 2: who's monitoring the DNA where they have to report the
Speaker 2: PCR results, to who's hiding the adverse effects of the vaccine?
Speaker 2: Putting that all together and looking at where are they
Speaker 2: actually where are we reporting all of these PCR results,
Speaker 2: and where are we reporting the COVID nineteen case numbers.
Speaker 2: And now we actually have a code to report the
Speaker 2: COVID nineteen adverse effects, but it's.
Speaker 3: Still not being used. So looking at that and trying.
Speaker 2: To figure out where the code was and why we're
Speaker 2: not able to report it still, I happen to find
Speaker 2: that every agency involved in monitoring COVID nineteen cases and
Speaker 2: vaccination tracking specifically because there's so many vaccine.
Speaker 3: Registries that blows your mind. It's tied to national security.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, so it's a matter of national security if
Speaker 3: you participate in this scheme or.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is all DARPA and it's all the military
Speaker 1: and the intelligence agencies and all of the Dark Winter
Speaker 1: stuff they had, you know, Fauci and the former head
Speaker 1: of the CIA was playing the role of the president
Speaker 1: during the first Germ game of Dark Winter. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's all the usual suspects that are involved in all
Speaker 1: this stuff. It really is a bioweapon that is really
Speaker 1: targeted to the population, and it truly is amazing.
Speaker 2: I think they're even going to try and do more
Speaker 2: data mining that go even further than PCR testing with
Speaker 2: the wearables where rollout that we're getting now because the information,
Speaker 2: like when I learned that our COVID nineteen case numbers
Speaker 2: the PCR test is actually getting reported to foreign countries
Speaker 2: and our DNA is being data mined, and they're able
Speaker 2: to tell if we've had a vaccine or not, what's
Speaker 2: our ethnicity, where we are, how much money we make.
Speaker 2: Like they're layering all of this information and during Operation
Speaker 2: work Speed, they had a program called Tiberius, which was
Speaker 2: used in hospitals. There's different palanteer programs that are used
Speaker 2: in hospitals to monitor and manage the hospital down to
Speaker 2: like staffing. There was even a program that was part
Speaker 2: of Operation work Speed called HHS Protect and the hospitals
Speaker 2: had to report how many ventilators were in use, how
Speaker 2: many patients were there.
Speaker 3: I don't know why my camera just stopped. That was weird.
Speaker 1: Well I still have audio, literally, just I didn't do it.
Speaker 1: You're that's good, You're back.
Speaker 2: So they had this program that hospitals had to report
Speaker 2: how many ventilators, how many patients are in the ICU,
Speaker 2: how much rendzivier.
Speaker 3: We were using what's our census report?
Speaker 2: Like all kinds of information that we that even the
Speaker 2: hospital didn't want to have to report, in addition to
Speaker 2: all the other data mining we were doing.
Speaker 3: And that program was a pallunteer.
Speaker 2: Program called Tiberius, which it's used in Gaza, and that's
Speaker 2: the one that they used to assign risk scores.
Speaker 3: Well, they've used that here already in America during.
Speaker 2: Operation Warp Speed to figure out if you were vaccinated
Speaker 2: or not to target different ethnic groups for vaccines, and
Speaker 2: then to figure out where the counter measures, as in,
Speaker 2: where did the ventilators need to go? Where did the
Speaker 2: rend deesevir need to go. So they've already had these
Speaker 2: programs in place that are tied into our medical records.
Speaker 3: And then to hear Larry Ellison.
Speaker 2: Say we're going to use your medical records and your DNA,
Speaker 2: your personal data to design stuff directly to you. And
Speaker 2: then in addition they say we're going to put wearables
Speaker 2: on you. They're going to monitor your body at all
Speaker 2: times for the purposes of national security. And I don't
Speaker 2: know how that doesn't send shivers down the spine in
Speaker 2: this country.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. I mean, we look at their big data
Speaker 1: thing that they have to have total information awareness. Remember
Speaker 1: how everybody was creeped out about that, and yet that
Speaker 1: is what this really is. The implementation of this. The
Speaker 1: big data is looking at everything that you're doing, not
Speaker 1: just online, but they've got to get it out of
Speaker 1: cyberspace into physical space with all these other aspects of it.
Speaker 1: And companies like Palanteer they have been focused on geospatial
Speaker 1: intelligence and data mining and making all these drawing all
Speaker 1: these conclusions about people's politics or religion so forth, based
Speaker 1: just on even geospatial intelligence. When they get to additional
Speaker 1: factors like this, they know everything about you and we're
Speaker 1: not allowed to know anything about what they do or
Speaker 1: the results. That's why it really is, at its essence
Speaker 1: that is an information war, because you know, it is
Speaker 1: all the information that's flowing in one direction, and they
Speaker 1: have an insatiable appetite to know everything about everybody. It
Speaker 1: is part and parcel of their control, this total knowledge
Speaker 1: about everyone and everything. And now AI and especially companies
Speaker 1: like Palanteer have given them the ability to go through
Speaker 1: and collate this massive amount of data that they've been
Speaker 1: collecting for some time. Now they can make sense of it.
Speaker 1: Because it was so much information they've been collecting on people,
Speaker 1: they couldn't sort through it with humans, and so now
Speaker 1: they've got the AI that can sort through this. That
Speaker 1: is what's so concerning about all of this, And it really.
Speaker 3: Is because when you go on social media and you're
Speaker 3: fed an algorithm of like which which posts do you
Speaker 3: get to see today? That's going to be how are
Speaker 3: our whole lives run?
Speaker 2: And I don't know how many people I've known complain
Speaker 2: about their algorithm.
Speaker 3: Oh it's just it's.
Speaker 2: Triggering me today or I don't know why my algorithm's
Speaker 2: all screwed up and it's showing me blah blah. Well,
Speaker 2: imagine if that same algorithm is now your government gets
Speaker 2: to make decisions about if you're a good person or not,
Speaker 2: and if you get to go out today, or if
Speaker 2: you get to eat today, or if you get to
Speaker 2: use your money today.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right. Yeah, it's all about total control. And
Speaker 1: of course that guy Lucky Loutnik, Howard Lutnik, who is
Speaker 1: bragging about how much money he can make knowing that
Speaker 1: the government was going to just flood cash into these
Speaker 1: pharmaceutical companies. Now I can go in and I can
Speaker 1: make money off of that. Right, So he's got this
Speaker 1: insider information. He's the guy that's going to be doing
Speaker 1: the new public private version of a CBDC. And once
Speaker 1: they know all your financial transactions, all the rest, any
Speaker 1: part of this puzzle would give them pretty much total
Speaker 1: control over your life. But they've got so many different
Speaker 1: facets where they are monitoring and information about you that
Speaker 1: it truly is just overwhelming to even try to think
Speaker 1: about it. But again, it's the ignorance and the darkness
Speaker 1: that they have fooled everybody with. That's why it's so
Speaker 1: important what you're doing. And again the site is thrill
Speaker 1: Kill medicalcult dot com. And you're also on substack and
Speaker 1: people find that at Zowe dot substack dot com. And
Speaker 1: it's very important for people to use this information try
Speaker 1: to wake people up as to what's going on. They've
Speaker 1: not only hidden stuff from people, but they have in
Speaker 1: terms of inoculation. The one thing they've inoculated you against
Speaker 1: is the truth, and they've inoculated you against questioning what
Speaker 1: they tell people. And that's why you need to try
Speaker 1: to wake people up with sites like Zoe's as well.
Speaker 1: So is there anything else that you would like to hit.
Speaker 3: I just if anyone is interested.
Speaker 2: I'm going to be doing arial for the people that
Speaker 2: we've lost to hospital protocols and vaccine injured, including women
Speaker 2: who may have had a stillbirth or a miscarriage.
Speaker 3: Due to the shot. So if you go to my website,
Speaker 3: there's a page called vigil and if.
Speaker 2: You'd like to submit a name of a loved one,
Speaker 2: you don't have to tell us anything more, just the
Speaker 2: name of a loved one. You could even just put
Speaker 2: you know, baby boy, or baby Girl if you like,
Speaker 2: and we're going to be lighting a candle in remembrance
Speaker 2: of your loved ones.
Speaker 3: So if you like, please go and submit a name
Speaker 3: and we will.
Speaker 1: Honor your lost It's important. We cannot forget what they've
Speaker 1: done to us, and we cannot forget those that they
Speaker 1: have killed. That's absolutely vital. Thank you so much for
Speaker 1: what you do. Again, Zoe Smith. Her website is Thrill
Speaker 1: Kill Medical Cult dot com and you can find her
Speaker 1: on substack at Zoe dot substack dot com and she's
Speaker 1: felled Zoe z Owe. Thank you so much for joining us.
Speaker 1: We take a quick break, folks, and we will be
Speaker 1: right back. Stay with us.
Speaker 3: M H.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 4: Here News now at apsradionews dot com or get the
Speaker 4: APS Radio app and never miss another story.
Speaker 1: Well, let's take a look at the AI bubble, and
Speaker 1: of course it's kind of interesting. Soft Bank. You know,
Speaker 1: we were just talking about Stargate project Larry Ellison and
Speaker 1: the bank that came in was this Japanese bank called
Speaker 1: soft Bank. They're very much invested in technology issues and
Speaker 1: that was what Trump kicked off his second administration with well.
Speaker 1: Soft Bank dumped every single share of Nvidia, and that
Speaker 1: had an effect on the entire market, not just on
Speaker 1: Nvidia stock. Remember we talked about Michael Burry, the guy
Speaker 1: behind the the who sussed out big short who sussed
Speaker 1: out what was going on the market, real estate market
Speaker 1: fraud and bubble, and he focused on shorting in video
Speaker 1: as well as Palenteer. And so we've had a lot
Speaker 1: of big players and people who are very professional, very savvy,
Speaker 1: who are calling bubble and so in Video went down
Speaker 1: by one and a half percent after soft Bank sold
Speaker 1: all of their shares, and and then of course Pollenteer
Speaker 1: is also going down. And Volenteer was really the biggest
Speaker 1: bet that Michael Burry, of the big short put on.
Speaker 1: It was actually when he did the big short of
Speaker 1: over a billion dollars, which is like eighty percent of
Speaker 1: his company or his fond or whatever. So eighty four
Speaker 1: percent of that short was Palenteer and fourteen percent or
Speaker 1: sixteen percent was the in Vidia And somebody put this
Speaker 1: up in verse Kramer. So look at Kramer as being
Speaker 1: a contra indicator of what they should invest in. The
Speaker 1: said Jim Crater. Jim Kramer. Kramer remains undefeated and so
Speaker 1: what they have there is a suite that he put
Speaker 1: out as recently as the twenty ninth of October, and
Speaker 1: he was saying, I'm taking my price target for Pollenteer
Speaker 1: from two hundred to two hundred and fifty exclamation mark.
Speaker 1: Well it went from two hundred when he said that
Speaker 1: down to now about maybe one hundred and sixty five
Speaker 1: one hundred and seventy. As I said, he remains undefeated
Speaker 1: as always being the counter indicator of where things should go.
Speaker 1: And you know, when I look at all of this
Speaker 1: hype about AI robots, so we got from Elon Musk
Speaker 1: last week and so many others, you know, the AI hype,
Speaker 1: the robotic hype and everything. This is Russia and their
Speaker 1: robot that they wanted to demonstrate. Again, we always hear
Speaker 1: about Russian bots, right, they're talking about AI that is
Speaker 1: putting out narratives on social media, But here's a literal
Speaker 1: Russian bot and people's comments are about this. It looks like
Speaker 1: they used a drunk to teach us robot how to walk.
Speaker 1: So that's walking there, that's what happens. Takes another couple
Speaker 1: of steps and just like a drunk, it falls down
Speaker 1: on the side watches. It's coming staggering that goes down.
Speaker 1: So let's hope that that is a metaphor for robotics
Speaker 1: and for AI. Again, as I said last week, a
Speaker 1: lot of people are looking at this and they said, well,
Speaker 1: you know what, how does this end. Well, there's only
Speaker 1: two or three combinations of this that could go. Either
Speaker 1: the AI hype and the bubble bursts and takes down
Speaker 1: the economy big time or global economy big time, or
Speaker 1: it is successful and it takes everybody's jobs. And I said, well,
Speaker 1: there's a third alternative that it is sustained by the
Speaker 1: governments who use it to control us. And I think
Speaker 1: that is true of both AI and robotics. I think
Speaker 1: that the best use case for all this stuff is
Speaker 1: tyranny and totalitarianism. Well, soft Bank dumped their entire Nvidio stake,
Speaker 1: but they're not getting out of AI completely, so it's
Speaker 1: not a complete pushback against AI. They just decided that
Speaker 1: they would move from Nvidia to some other platforms. They
Speaker 1: are still involved in AI, and they had just under
Speaker 1: six billion dollar steak in Nvidia. And the guy who
Speaker 1: is the head of soft Bank, his name is go To.
Speaker 1: I guess he's the go to guy, if you want
Speaker 1: some tech capital. I can't say if we're in an
Speaker 1: AI bubble or not, said go to adding that the
Speaker 1: sale was for capital and can be utilized for our financing.
Speaker 1: So he's not going to say that we're in an
Speaker 1: AI bubble because he's got some other irons in the
Speaker 1: fire and he doesn't want to tank this thing. I
Speaker 1: can neither confirm nor deny that we are in an
Speaker 1: ALI bubble. Yeah, but a lot of people have been
Speaker 1: confirming that. As a matter of fact, Zero Hedge pointed out, said, well,
Speaker 1: we've had four recent articles that are really must read.
Speaker 1: Here's ahead lines the AI bubble watchout Metric has just snapped.
Speaker 1: AI is now a debt bubble too, quietly surpassing all
Speaker 1: banks to become the largest sector in the market. And
Speaker 1: Sam Altman denying open AI needs a government bailout. He
Speaker 1: just wants massive government subsidies. So yeah, we do the
Speaker 1: subsidies so we don't have to do the bailout. So
Speaker 1: it had in fact the course on Nvidio, but also
Speaker 1: on a lot of different stocks. The futures slid down
Speaker 1: as AI jitter's return, and yet no matter how many
Speaker 1: people come out, no matter how many people who are
Speaker 1: large and connected come out against this, you still have
Speaker 1: the bubble continues to inflate. And another company was involved
Speaker 1: in that as well, core Weave. They rent out access
Speaker 1: to the AI chips and they had some interesting issues
Speaker 1: there and setbacks as well. But this article from Free
Speaker 1: Thought Project is very timely. They said it is time
Speaker 1: to pay attention. Europe has just eviscerated monetary privacy and
Speaker 1: it's going to be coming here to the United States next.
Speaker 1: They're basically starting down the path of banning all cash,
Speaker 1: state run digital money. That's the law that has passed
Speaker 1: and it goes live in only four hundred days, and
Speaker 1: so they're going to make it criminal to pay cash
Speaker 1: for anything over ten thousand euros. But of course that
Speaker 1: level is going to continue to come down. That's why
Speaker 1: you need to get into physical gold and silver. You've
Speaker 1: got to get out of this system, and that's what
Speaker 1: they're talking about. They have a lot of different alternatives
Speaker 1: in this Freethought Project article. One thing they don't mention,
Speaker 1: strangely enough, is physical gold and silver. I think that
Speaker 1: is the simplest, easiest, most direct thing to essentially short
Speaker 1: the tautalitarianism that's what you need to be doing. Don't
Speaker 1: short the market. Short that tatalitarianism. Go to David Knight,
Speaker 1: Dye Gold. I'll take you to Tony Ones Wise Wolf Gold.
Speaker 1: Have a good day. Thank you for joining us the
Speaker 1: common Man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children.
Speaker 1: They created common past track and control us. They're Commons
Speaker 1: project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the
Speaker 1: communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary.
Speaker 1: But each of us has worth and dignity created in
Speaker 1: the image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 1: That is what they want to take away. The most
Speaker 1: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 1: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 1: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 1: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 1: at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 1: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 1: keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com