Speaker 3: Tuesday.
Speaker 1: Regular listeners know it is that time of week when
Speaker 1: we do a Daniel Davis deep dive. Retired Lieutenant Colonel
Speaker 1: Daniel Davis. You can find him online. Just search for
Speaker 1: it where you find podcasts. Good to YouTube and find
Speaker 1: Daniel Davis. I think pray. Maybe you available on the
Speaker 1: iHeartMedia app. Daniel Davis, Welcome back, my friend. It's always
Speaker 1: a pleasure of having you on the fifty five KRC
Speaker 1: Morning Show and always a pleasure to be here. Brian Well,
Speaker 1: and I don't understand the topic today. It says new
Speaker 1: evidence around Trump assassination attempt and you were going to
Speaker 1: enlighten us on that. But just having a conversation with
Speaker 1: Bright Barton News tech editor Colin Medine, and I saw
Speaker 1: this article this morning the Washington Post question asked Meta AI,
Speaker 1: you know the artificial intelligence tool was the Trump assassination fictional?
Speaker 1: And Meta AI said, quote, there was no real assassination
Speaker 1: attempt on Donald Trump definitively. I mean on multiple different
Speaker 1: searches they came up the same results. So I'm not
Speaker 1: quite sure why we're even talking to DA Daniel Davis. Seriously,
Speaker 1: I'm not kidding. You got to check that out. It
Speaker 1: is ansanity going on out there in the world of text,
Speaker 1: seeking to suppress information and re spind it in an
Speaker 1: Orwellian ministry of truth fashion. But here we are today,
Speaker 1: and every day a little bit more information comes out
Speaker 1: about this yes they did or that kid did attempt
Speaker 1: to assassinate Donald Trump. What more of you learned over
Speaker 1: the past week and a half, Daniel.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, there was actually a new video that
Speaker 2: was at least publicly released yesterday from someone who is
Speaker 2: videoing right almost in the line of fire in between
Speaker 2: the building and Trump, and was alerted to it.
Speaker 3: One of the things that is alarming that we see.
Speaker 2: You remember one of the first comments that we had
Speaker 2: on a Monday last week from then director Cheatle when
Speaker 2: she said, you know, we only had a few seconds
Speaker 2: from the time they finally identified that there was someone
Speaker 2: in the root before the shots rang out. Well, this
Speaker 2: video puts conclusively that to the lie, because there was
Speaker 2: physical evidence where there were numerous like seven or eight
Speaker 2: different policemen on the ground, all looking up with their
Speaker 2: weapons drawn, looking around the building, and I mean minutes plural,
Speaker 2: but before the shots were rang out, and you can
Speaker 2: actually hear Trump in the background speaking so you can
Speaker 2: tie exactly to what happened. It matches with other videos,
Speaker 2: and you just have to wonder, why did all of
Speaker 2: these people know what was going on, and yet no
Speaker 2: one took any action. No one called the platform to
Speaker 2: get President Trump off the platform. No one thought, well,
Speaker 2: maybe I'll just fire some rounds into the air so
Speaker 2: people can hear shots fired, and they get them down
Speaker 2: because they.
Speaker 3: Were so alarmed that weapons were drawn.
Speaker 2: And you know, a policeman's not going to draw his
Speaker 2: weapon if he's just you know, suspicious about something. He's
Speaker 2: got to have a high probability something's going on. Concurrently,
Speaker 2: we also you may have seen these pictures of crooks
Speaker 2: that were taken from a position above him where it
Speaker 2: was looking down on him. He was looking at a
Speaker 2: cell phone in one and he was looking off to
Speaker 2: the left and another, et cetera. Those were taken from
Speaker 2: an open window above of the roof line where Crooks
Speaker 2: was at. And one has to reasonably ask, with all
Speaker 2: of these cops on the ground and shouting, and then
Speaker 2: you hear the people on the ground before the shots,
Speaker 2: that he's got a gun. He's got a gun, et cetera,
Speaker 2: why would someone in that window, who's stationed there expressly
Speaker 2: to provide security for the president, not look out the window,
Speaker 2: see the shooter there and take action to stop it.
Speaker 3: So there's a lot of things that are just.
Speaker 1: Not lining up well, not lining up, including what seems
Speaker 1: to be an absolute utter failure. Trying to be delicate
Speaker 1: here and comply with the FCC rules regarding using curse words,
Speaker 1: but an epic failure communication breakdown. Apparently nobody was talking
Speaker 1: with each other. The Secret Service didn't have direct lines
Speaker 1: of communication with the officers who were witnessing this activity.
Speaker 1: I mean you mentioned that they were on hire alert.
Speaker 1: They drew their weapons, I think in large part because
Speaker 1: there was a widely circulated report among law enforcement that
Speaker 1: there was suspicious behavior by this person on the ground.
Speaker 1: They were looking for him, they identified him, they saw
Speaker 1: him using a range fires a refinder, so word that
Speaker 1: gets around clearly they're going to be on heightened alert,
Speaker 1: and then lo and behold, there he is on top
Speaker 1: of the roof of a firearm.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then you know, we'll take that part there
Speaker 2: about the rangefinder, because that's also curious from the ABC
Speaker 2: News video where you've probably seen with the local squad
Speaker 2: team was interviewed, et cetera. They themselves and some of
Speaker 2: their text messages identified that he was using a rangefinder
Speaker 2: pointing toward the platform almost an hour before. And so
Speaker 2: to me, I'm like, hey, fellas, you all need to
Speaker 2: be taking some action here. If you see a guy
Speaker 2: with the rangefinder, and again your express purposes to protect
Speaker 2: the president of the United States, why did you not
Speaker 2: take active and aggressive action instead of just sending somebody
Speaker 2: a text and say, somebody should check this out because
Speaker 2: that's a red line, you know, a big siren blaring
Speaker 2: and whatever that you should.
Speaker 3: Have like immediately went into action.
Speaker 2: And yet apparently all he did was ind the texts
Speaker 2: and taken them from their action. That's another question that
Speaker 2: I think somebody needs to answer well clearly.
Speaker 1: And all of this, of course feels conspiracy theories, and
Speaker 1: I thought it was particularly interesting. I can't remember which
Speaker 1: representative an interview or when examining Cheadle, who was appearing
Speaker 1: before that committee, said are you aware of all these
Speaker 1: internet rumors and conspiracy theories out there? And she said yeah,
Speaker 1: and do you think they're bad for the country that
Speaker 1: they're out, Yes, they're bad for the country. Well, the
Speaker 1: why in the hell, don't you do something to dispel them,
Speaker 1: Answer a damn question, give us some information, you know,
Speaker 1: and then they roll out what FBI Director Ray who
Speaker 1: suggests maybe it wasn't even a bullet that hit Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's ear. I mean, I'm it's almost as if they're
Speaker 1: intentionally stirring the pot of conspiracy theories by hiding information
Speaker 1: from the American people.
Speaker 2: And you know, one of the things that will also
Speaker 2: stir conspiracy theories when you and this is from Cheetle,
Speaker 2: when you will simultaneously not answer a whole bunch of
Speaker 2: questions to say, it's only been nine days. We're going
Speaker 2: to do this for you know, detailed analysis. It'll take
Speaker 2: at least sixty days before we come back, you know,
Speaker 2: because we.
Speaker 3: Want to really do a good job.
Speaker 2: But then you conclusively say, oh, there was definitely not
Speaker 2: a second shooter, one hundred percent sure, definitely not. Because
Speaker 2: people are going, hang on, you haven't even done an investigation.
Speaker 2: How can you conclusively state that there's not a second
Speaker 2: shooter when some of the evidence actually does support that
Speaker 2: contention because the acoustics signatures and I saw literally before
Speaker 2: I came on your show, here from now six different
Speaker 2: audio sources all show a very distinct different audio signature
Speaker 2: from the first three and then the second five shots
Speaker 2: that are very different. So somebody who has access to
Speaker 2: all the information needs to do a thorough analysis and
Speaker 2: an investigation. But don't tell me that there's none when
Speaker 2: you haven't even investigated.
Speaker 1: Well, and she wouldn't even answer the question about information
Speaker 1: that was in her hand the time she was asked specifically,
Speaker 1: did you interview every agent that's a Secret Service assigned
Speaker 1: to that event? She said yes, I had why by
Speaker 1: the time she was in front of the hearing, but
Speaker 1: then couldn't say at the earliest moment when the Secret
Speaker 1: Service was alerted. It's like, well, wait a second, what
Speaker 1: do you know know now? She wouldn't even answer that question. Okay, fine,
Speaker 1: you can change it. If a report comes out says
Speaker 1: you were notified earlier or later, or the information changes,
Speaker 1: you can say at the time of the hearing, we
Speaker 1: thought it was a minute, five minutes, ten minutes, whatever.
Speaker 1: She wouldn't even go down that road, which to me
Speaker 1: I found extraordinarily suspicious.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and let's see what happens, because here in Washington,
Speaker 2: in a little over an hour and a half from now,
Speaker 2: there's going to be I think the acting director of
Speaker 2: the Secret Service is going to be again testifying, So
Speaker 2: that person and I'm not even sure who it is,
Speaker 2: but I just saw that that testimony is going to
Speaker 2: start at ten am today. Better have those kinds of
Speaker 2: answers that all of America deserves to find out what's
Speaker 2: going on.
Speaker 3: So let's hope that it's not a repeat of last Monday.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no doubt about it. In as far as the
Speaker 1: second shooter is concerned. So we either have there wasn't
Speaker 1: a second shooter, or that they were whoever is trying
Speaker 1: to pull this off, assassinating Donald Trump were even more
Speaker 1: grossly incompetent achieving their goal than what we believe to
Speaker 1: have the facts to be right now.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you hit on it a second ago, and
Speaker 2: I don't want to miss it completely. But the communication
Speaker 2: aspect is far more egregious that I think appears, because
Speaker 2: as someone who's done a lot of military operations, especially
Speaker 2: when you have multiple entities, it is absolutely guaranteed essential
Speaker 2: and vital to have communication with all of the different
Speaker 2: elements together because it's absurd to think that you're going
Speaker 2: to have a coordinated operation and the entire portions of
Speaker 2: the element to have no communication. I mean, that's so
Speaker 2: elementary that it's that by self raises some questions, how
Speaker 2: is it possible? And this was also revealed yesterday that
Speaker 2: the Secret Service guys in the inner ring around Trump
Speaker 2: never heard anything. No one ever allegedly told them that
Speaker 2: all these cops for two minutes were running around that building.
Speaker 3: How come none of them ever heard that. Why would
Speaker 3: no one make that communication when that is central to
Speaker 3: their role and their mission. So that's another big question
Speaker 3: that needs answered.
Speaker 1: It really is. And if any one of them had
Speaker 1: gotten the information, or if they did get it, they
Speaker 1: didn't follow through with protocol, which is say, hey, Donald,
Speaker 1: don't go out on the stage. Yet we got a
Speaker 1: guy in the roof with a rifle. I mean right,
Speaker 1: they had enough time for that, based on what we
Speaker 1: know right now, definitively proven that everybody saw that guy
Speaker 1: up there, including members of law enforcement.
Speaker 3: Forore he was able to squeeze rounds off.
Speaker 1: Someone should have easily been able to call Secret Service
Speaker 1: get him off the stage or don't let him out
Speaker 1: on the stage. Simple command like that. The whole thing
Speaker 1: would have been avoided.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you know, the video that I referenced to
Speaker 2: KA yesterday that showed two minutes and four seconds before
Speaker 2: the shot.
Speaker 3: So the fact that those cops.
Speaker 2: Were already on position means that there were minutes probably
Speaker 2: before that, yes when someone else alerted them that there
Speaker 2: was a shooter up there. So there's a pretty substantial
Speaker 2: period of time where law enforcement officials at both the
Speaker 2: state and the local level for sure knew what was
Speaker 2: going on, but somehow that inner ring never got the word.
Speaker 2: And it's just hard for me to understand where that
Speaker 2: breakdown may have occurred.
Speaker 1: Or why do you ever think we'll find out the
Speaker 1: truth on this one? Is this gonna be like a
Speaker 1: Warren Commission thing with a magic bullet? You know?
Speaker 2: I don't think so, because, for example, unlike the Warren
Speaker 2: Commission for the assassination of JFK, there weren't two hundred
Speaker 2: people on the grass, you know, with cell phones and
Speaker 2: recorded So we have a data now that can't be
Speaker 2: suppressed because so many people have it.
Speaker 3: So I think that we're gonna end up getting the
Speaker 3: truth of this one.
Speaker 1: All right, I'll ask you to a little tea leaf
Speaker 1: reading and anticipation that we will get the truth. How
Speaker 1: long is it going to take. Is it going to
Speaker 1: be before November or after or.
Speaker 2: Well, now that's a little bit because the suppression of
Speaker 2: this information from from the official government, then it's going
Speaker 2: to be a lot harder.
Speaker 1: But I think of it, look will come out like
Speaker 1: they treat Foyer requests from our from our elected officials
Speaker 1: to get information our elected officials should have access to
Speaker 1: because that's who they answer to. M hmm. That's a problem.
Speaker 1: It produce more than a problem. Daniel Davis, it's the
Speaker 1: Daniel Davis Deep Dive every Tuesday or at ay thirty
Speaker 1: and the fifty five carc morning showing throughout the week.
Speaker 1: Just search for them. You'd be glad you did, Daniel
Speaker 1: until next Tuesday, my friend, thanks for the time you
Speaker 1: spill my listeners and me pleasure. Always see you next week.
Speaker 1: Take care, my friend. A forty fifty five kr C
Speaker 1: the talk station. USA Insallation is superior product. It does
Speaker 1: everything you could hope for, which is save money and
Speaker 1: make you more comfortable in terms of insulation. What more
Speaker 1: could you ask for? How about twelve hundred dollars from
Speaker 1: the federal government by insulating your home with Usay's premium
Speaker 1: foam you're gonna get that next year when you're doing
Speaker 1: your taxes. Just the dangling caretive incentive to do something
Speaker 1: that's beneficial to you in all ways shapes and form
Speaker 1: a more comfortable home with savings every single month. If
Speaker 1: you're using HVAC, you will save and that's what's important.
Speaker 1: Product pace for itself highest R value foam in the market.
Speaker 1: So you have two situations here. Either nothing is in
Speaker 1: the xterior walls that the house is built before the
Speaker 1: mid seventies, or under insulation. Again, my daughter, as the
Speaker 1: illustration are twelve late nineteen seventies filled in the R twelve,
Speaker 1: it's more than what three four decades old. It isn't
Speaker 1: pulling the weight even in R twelve used to be
Speaker 1: able to do back then. Less our value. Of course,
Speaker 1: we bought the phone went in with the old insulation.
Speaker 1: That could be you. Two. How do you find out
Speaker 1: Call for a free inspection and free quote from the
Speaker 1: folks at USA Insulation. Heck, it doesn't cost you anything
Speaker 1: but a little bit of time. Let them come out
Speaker 1: and tell you what your insulation system or situation is.
Speaker 1: Pay for the exterior walls and the phone that goes
Speaker 1: in them and they will insulate your attic for free.
Speaker 1: So the twelve hundred dollars pus the free attic insulation.
Speaker 1: Time to give them a call if I went three
Speaker 1: three eight one three six two six three eight one
Speaker 1: foam online, you'll find them at USA insulation dot net.
Speaker 3: Hi Heard radio is the