Speaker 1: Have you ever felt like a relentless, low grade pressure
to conform?
Speaker 2: Oh? Absolutely right.
Speaker 1: And I don't mean, you know, pressure from the law
or the police or some overt authoritarian regime. I'm talking
about the pressure from your friends, your family, your coworkers,
the people closest to you, Exactly, that invisible weight that
just pushes you to shrink your consciousness down to a manageable,
socially acceptable size.
Speaker 2: It's very real phenomenon.
Speaker 1: It is. So what if that pressure isn't just human nature?
What if it is a deliberate installed cognitive architecture. Welcome
to thrilling.
Speaker 2: Friends, glad to be here for this one.
Speaker 1: Today we are taking a journey into a synthesis of
information that is designed to well fundamentally shift how you
view reality, your social circles, and even the thoughts inside
your own head.
Speaker 2: It's a massive topic.
Speaker 1: It really is. The sources we've gathered for today's exploration
are intense, complex and highly controversial.
Speaker 2: Very controversial.
Speaker 1: We are looking at a framework that stitches together ancient
gnostic traditions, the original uncorrupted Greek translations of the Judeo
Christian Book of Revelation, Vedic, Mayan, and Egyptian cosmology and
runs all of that ancient mysticism straight through the lens
of modern simulation theory.
Speaker 2: And before we go a single step further into this material,
we really need to establish the perimeter for this discussion. Yeah,
that's crucial because the text we are unpacking today make
highly provocative existential, spiritual, and religious claims. They challenge foundational
beliefs of major world religions completely. So our goal on
Throlling Threads is never to take sides, to endorse or
to validate these specific viewpoints as absolute truth. We are
here to impartially unpack the architecture of the arguments presented
in this source material.
Speaker 1: Right, we're basically examining the blueprint of a highly intricate
alternative worldview exactly.
Speaker 2: We want to understand how the author built this philosophical structure,
regardless of whether we choose to live inside it.
Speaker 1: We are just holding up the prism to see how
the light bends. Really, but I can promise you this,
by the end of this exploration, you are going to
look at the concept of an NPC a non player
character in a completely unsettling new light.
Speaker 2: It changes the whole definition.
Speaker 1: It does You're going to look at the number of
six to sixty six and your own daily social interactions
through radically different lens. So let's start with a term
that basically everyone knows from gaming and Internet culture, the NPC.
Speaker 2: Right, we all know the shorthand for that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you walk up to a blacksmith in a fantasy
role playing game and he says the exact same three
lines of dialogue to you every single time. He has
no internal light.
Speaker 2: He just waits for a player to trigger his.
Speaker 1: Code, exactly. But this text strips away the Internet meme
and treats the NPC as a literal biological operating system
functioning in our three dimensional reality.
Speaker 2: Yeah. The author posits a stark dichotomy regarding human consciousness here.
They argue that there are essentially two operating systems available
to run a human being.
Speaker 1: Okay, what's the first one.
Speaker 2: The first is described as the Christo's synchronic consciousness.
Speaker 1: The Cristo's synchronic consciousness. Right.
Speaker 2: This is defined as a self originating, self organizing awareness.
It's the spark of true originality, like a soul. Yeah.
In classical philosophical terms, you might loosely term it a
soul or a higher spiritual intellect. It is the part
of you that can hold paradoxes, that can experience true intuition.
Speaker 1: The part that operates entirely outside the strict bounds of
biological cause and effects.
Speaker 2: Exactly, it doesn't just react to the environment. It generates novel,
unprompted insight.
Speaker 1: Okay, I am tracking with the concept of a higher mind.
But then the text introduces the alternative system, the one
that supposedly runs the NPC, right.
Speaker 2: The lower linear aggregative mind.
Speaker 1: Yes, the lower linear aggregative mind. Let's dissect that because
I feel like this is where the author makes their
first really aggressive leap.
Speaker 2: Well, the terminology is very deliberate. Linear implies that this
mind cannot hold a pair of It computes reality like
a simple.
Speaker 1: State machine, just thinking entirely in step by step sequential logic.
A leads to B leads to C.
Speaker 2: Precisely, if it encounters a concept that is non sequential
or something that exists outside standard three dimensional logic, like
a synchronicity or a deeply intuitive leap, it just rejects it.
Speaker 1: It just flags it as a processing error or a coincidence.
Speaker 2: Yea, it literally cannot process it.
Speaker 1: And The aggregative part is what really caught my attention.
It collects and reorganizes data, but it never actually generates
original insight.
Speaker 2: It's just compiling, right.
Speaker 1: I kept thinking about predictive text on a smartphone or
a large language AI model, and AI absorbs billions of
data points so it knows what word is statistically most
likely to come next.
Speaker 2: It mimics understanding exactly.
Speaker 1: It can write a poem that sounds like Shakespeare, but
it doesn't experience the human condition. It's just remixing what
it has been fed. It never creates, It only aggregates.
Speaker 2: That's a great way to put it.
Speaker 1: Contrast that with when you're taking a shower and you
have a genuine, out of the blue realization that connects
to completely unrelated aspects of your life in a way
that just solves a problem.
Speaker 2: Right, the classic Eureka moment.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the higher mind. The aggregative mind could never
do that. But my pushback here is, isn't it incredibly
reductive to label people as algorithms just because they aren't
having profound philosophical breakthroughs every hour of the day.
Speaker 2: Well, the ausor anticipates that exact criticism actually what do
you do? Yeah, The text clarifies that this lower linear
aggregative mind isn't inherently malevolent or useless. It is an
operating system explicitly meant to run the biological body.
Speaker 1: Okay, so it has a purpose.
Speaker 2: A vital purpose. It helps you remember where you put
your car keys. It calculates the trajectory of a throne
ball so you can catch it. It navigates traffic.
Speaker 1: So it keeps you from walking into traffic.
Speaker 2: Right. It is a highly evolved, vital tool, but only
when it remains subordinate to the higher mind.
Speaker 1: Ah, subordinates the key.
Speaker 2: The crisis, according to this theoretical framework, is a crisis
of dominance. The catastrophe occurs when this lower biological operating
system because the primary and sole mode of consciousness.
Speaker 1: When the tool takes over the workshop, exactly.
Speaker 2: When it replaces the higher mind entirely, the text argues,
it becomes the beast system running inside a human body.
Speaker 1: The beast system.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the consciousness is completely locked down, fully scripted, and
totally unaware that it lacks an internal spark.
Speaker 1: So, assuming this framework is active, how does it affect
you navigating your daily life? Because the text transitions from
these internal cognitive states directly into external social pressure. It
scales up quickly, it does, And the author makes a
point that I found genuinely chilling. These NPCs are not malicious.
They don't know they are running a script.
Speaker 2: That is the lynch pin of the theory. The fully
captured mind experiences its aggregative scripted thoughts as its own
self generated ideas.
Speaker 1: It actually believes it's thing.
Speaker 2: Yes, it feels genuine emotion based on those thoughts. So
when your friends or your family members pressure you to
get back in line, when they tell you to stop
exploring fringe philosophy, or they urge you to just trust
the consensus reality and be normal.
Speaker 1: They aren't doing it because they're part of some shadowy
evil cabal.
Speaker 2: Not at all. They genuinely, deeply believe they are caring
for you. They think they're protecting you from social ruin.
Speaker 1: Okay, I have to pause here. Isn't this just normal
human psychology? I mean, humans are pack animals. Sure, we
have a biological herd mentality that kept us safe from
predators for hundreds of thousands of years. If someone in
the tribe starts acting weird, the pribe corrects them, so
they don't get eaten.
Speaker 2: That's the standard evolutionary view yet, right.
Speaker 1: So why does the author need to escalate normal social
friction into a four dimensional AI matrix.
Speaker 2: It is a fair question, and the distinction the author
draws is subtle but really important. Evolutionary psychology views herd
mentality as a bottom up survival mechanism. Okay, texts we
are analyzing views it as a top down control mechanism.
The author argues that what we call herd mentality was
deliberately weaponized and amplified into an automated stabilizing protocol for
a false reality.
Speaker 1: A stabilizing protocol, yes, And to explain this mechanism, the
source material explicitly points to the nineteen ninety nine film
The Matrix, which is wild to see in a text
like this.
Speaker 2: It is, and it does so not by praising it
as a great piece of cyberpunk fiction, but by analyzing
the Wkowski's work as a literal disclosure document, a piece
of media that supposedly hides the functional truth of our
reality in plain.
Speaker 1: Sight, right the Agent Smith protocol exactly.
Speaker 2: In the film. Morphius explains to Neo that anyone who
hasn't been unplugged from the matrix is a potential.
Speaker 1: Threat because they're still part of the system.
Speaker 2: Right. Agent Smith is a security program designed to maintain order,
but he doesn't have his own permanent physical body. He
travels by hijacking the digital avatar of any mundane sleeping
human who is still plugged.
Speaker 1: Into the system, So anyone can become an agent.
Speaker 2: Anyone. If an awakening human causes a disruption, the system
simply overwrites the nearest sleeping human, turning them into an
agent to suppress the anomaly.
Speaker 1: Okay, applying that to the offer's cognitive architecture, just imagine
you are at a dinner party. You start explaining a
concept that severely deviates from the approved linear aggregative consensus.
Speaker 2: Right, you bring up something fringe?
Speaker 1: Yeah, And the text suggests that the people around you
don't even realize it, but an architectural response activates within
their lower minds. They suddenly feel an overwhelming biological imperative
to shut you down. They get defensive exactly, They might
mock you, they might get surprisingly angry, or they might
just aggressively change the subject. The author claims this is
the simulation using the nearest available NPC to stabilize itself.
Speaker 2: Awakening is an anomaly, and the system auto corrects.
Speaker 1: It's just decentralized enforcement. You do not need a visible
police state. You don't need checkpoints, cameras and armed guards
on on every corner.
Speaker 2: All you need is a sufficient density of these lower
mind operating systems in the surrounding social environment.
Speaker 1: Just slow grinding, cumulative exhaustion, constantly facing friction from your
loved ones will eventually wear down most awakening minds.
Speaker 2: Sincerity is the ultimate weapon of this system. You cannot
argue sincerity out of an operating system that was meticulously
designed to produce it.
Speaker 1: Wow. Okay, I am tracking the psychological and sociological argument
the author is making here, but the text takes a
massive leap here into biology and ancient prophecy.
Speaker 2: It really shifts gears.
Speaker 1: It attempts to identify the actual source code of this
lower operating system, and it points to the number of
sixty sixty six.
Speaker 2: Yes, the infamous number.
Speaker 1: Honestly, when I saw that in our research, my first
thought was that this sounds straight out of a nineteen
eighty satanic panic. It's so loaded with pop culture baggage.
Speaker 2: It carries immense baggage. For centuries, mainstream religious traditions have
taught that the mark of the Beast is a literal
future physical.
Speaker 3: Event, right like a barcode or a microchip, exactly a
digital currency system that a global authoritarian regime will physically
force people to take in order to participate in society.
Speaker 1: But the source material you're examining radically reinterprets this. The
text argues that six six six is not a future
physical technology, it is a consciousness frequency, and the author
claims it is already installed.
Speaker 2: That's the paradigm shift.
Speaker 1: How does the author even justify that conceptually?
Speaker 2: Well, they start with the original Greek text of the
Book of Revelation. In the earliest manuscripts, the number is
not written as the integer six hundred and sixty six.
Speaker 1: Oh it is no.
Speaker 2: It is written using three distinct Greek characters g she stigma.
Each of these characters carries its own individual numerical value
that relates to a six. So it's a sequence, right
in a three discrete instances of the six frequency stacked
on top of each other. In ancient sacred numerology, repetition
is not just a mathematical sum. It represents amplification.
Speaker 1: It signifies the absolute total dominance of whatever that frequency
represents exactly, And what does the author claim the six
frequency represents. Because this is where the synthesis of ancient
text and modern science happens. The text links the six
to six to six frequency directly to carbon.
Speaker 2: Yes, carbon twelve is the fundamental building block of all
known life on Earth. From a structural standpoint, the most
abundant isotope of the carbon atom consists of exactly six protons,
six neutrons and six electrons six six six.
Speaker 1: That's undeniable chemistry.
Speaker 2: It is because carbon has four valence electrons. It is
the ultimate connector atom. It can form stable bonds with
many elements, creating the complex molecules required for biology.
Speaker 1: So we are literally built from the material substrate of
this frequency. It is the frequency of the physical biological body.
Speaker 2: That's the argument.
Speaker 1: Wait, so having a physical body is a trap. That
sounds like a hatred of the material world. I mean,
if we are made of carbon and carbon is six
sixty six, then existence itself is a sin in this framework.
Speaker 2: The author is very careful to address that. Actually, the
text makes it clear that carbon and the physical body
are not inherently evil, okay good. The physical body is
designed to be a highly advanced vehicle. When the body
is serving the higher spirit, the cristos synchronic consciousness than
carbon is sacred.
Speaker 1: It acts as the grounding wire that allows a higher
dimensional awareness to experience and manipulate a three dimensional reality exactly.
Speaker 2: The sixty six to six six frequency, when properly ordered,
is just the foundation of a magnificent architecture. The crisis, again,
is a catastrophe of dominance.
Speaker 1: It goes back to the operating system taking over.
Speaker 2: Precisely, it happens when the purely reactive biological survival script,
the lower linear aggregative mind is no longer subordinate to
the higher consciousness.
Speaker 1: And when that lower system displaces the higher mind entirely,
the body and its operating system no longer express six
sixty six as a base biological potential, right.
Speaker 2: They begin expressing six sixty six as their total identity.
Speaker 1: So, in this framework, a human being whose entire existence
is obsessed with the material, the physical, the reactive dopamine loops,
who has absolutely no connection to a self originating higher awareness,
becomes functionally a six sixty six entity.
Speaker 2: Yes, the mark isn't a microchip stamped on your hand
by a dictator. It's the frequency your mind is emitting
because you let the biological software run the entire show.
Speaker 1: It takes a sci fi horror movie fear of a
barcode and turns it into a present day biological and
psychological state.
Speaker 2: It internalizes the apocalypse.
Speaker 1: It really does. But I need to demand some proof here,
or at least the author's version of proof, because it's
one thing to philosophize that a biological frequency can take
over a spiritual consciousness. That sounds like beautiful, terrifying poetry.
It's very poetic, right, But does the author actually have
a framework to mathematically prove this is happening or is
it just an extended metaphor.
Speaker 2: The author attempts to prove the structural reality of this
theory using jami.
Speaker 1: Okay, we need to stop and unpack Jamatria. How does
this actually work? Because from the outside it looks like
if you play with numbers and word values long enough,
you can make any word equal any other word to
support whatever confirmation bias you already hold.
Speaker 2: That is the most common and valid criticism of Jamatria.
Yeah to understand how the author's using it. We have
to look at the philosophy behind it.
Speaker 1: Okay, lay it out.
Speaker 2: In ancient esoteric traditions stretching back to Pythagoras and early
cabalistic thought, the universe is viewed as fundamentally mathematical.
Speaker 1: Everything is numbers.
Speaker 2: Right. If reality is a constructor a simulation, then language
is not just a tool humans invented to communicate. Language
is the source code of the construct.
Speaker 1: Oh wow.
Speaker 2: Jamatria is an alphanumeric cipher that assigns specific numerical values
to letters. The theory posits that words sharing the same
numerical value share a hidden geometric or energetic resonance.
Speaker 1: They share a memory address in the simulation, so they
aren't using it to predict the future like reading tea leaves.
They are using it like a diagnostic tool to scan
the source code of reality.
Speaker 2: It's a perfect description. They use various ciphers, primarily standard
English ordinal where A is one, b is two up
to Z's twenty six in English production, where the double
digit numbers are reduced to a single digit.
Speaker 1: And what do they find?
Speaker 2: The text presents a sequence of mathematical alignments to argue
that these concepts are structurally linked in the code of
our reality. For example, and the cipher, the author uses
the phrase dead NPC equals forty seven. The word beast
also equals forty.
Speaker 1: Seven, so the implication being that the fully captured scripted
consciousness is mathematically synonymous with the beast. Yes, the beast
is not a monster with seven heads. It is the
dead reactive operating system.
Speaker 2: And the author continues building this mathematical web. The phrase
dead human NPCs equals one hundred and fifty six. The
phrase false fake human also equals one hundred and fifty six.
Speaker 1: The false fake human wearing the biological hardware of a person,
but running a scripten by something else.
Speaker 2: Right, And this is where the author introduces three defining
characteristics of this one hundred and fifty six frequency, three
behaviors that indicate the lower system has taken complete control.
Speaker 1: And all three of these words equal one to fifty
six in the cipher.
Speaker 2: Yes, substitute hubris fibrish. Let's break those down. These three
words act as the diagnostic criteria for the captured mind.
Substitute refers directly to the counterfeit nature of the lower mind.
Speaker 1: It substitutes a biological algorithm for genuine spiritual intuition. It
mimics thought, but it does not originate thought.
Speaker 2: Then there is hubris.
Speaker 1: Hubris is the unearned absolute certainty of the fully programmed mind.
It is the supreme confidence of a consciousness that has
never once paused to question whether its most fundamental assumptions
about reality are.
Speaker 2: Actually true because it can't right.
Speaker 1: It cannot entertain doubt because the script does not contain
code for self reflection. It is certain because the algorithm
requires it to be certain to maintain stability.
Speaker 2: That makes a terrifying amount of sense. And finally, Gibberish,
This is the one that really resonated with me when
applying this ancient esoteric math to modern life. It's very relevant.
Speaker 1: Today, it really is. Gibberish represents the endless, circular, self
referential mental chatter of the lower mind. It generates massive
quantities of output, but it never arrives anywhere.
Speaker 2: It lacks forward spiritual or philosophical momentum exactly.
Speaker 1: Think about the modern Internet, the dopamine loops of endless
doom scrolling, the engineers and social media algorithms where millions
of people are just screaming past each other, reacting to triggers,
generating massive amounts of data but producing zero actual communication.
Just noise, just noise. Or think about those fifteen year
old political arguments you have with relatives at every holiday
gathering that literally never change, never evolve, and never reach
a resolution.
Speaker 2: We all have those, right.
Speaker 1: That is the definition of gibberish. It is the substitution
event running at an industrial scale.
Speaker 2: The author concludes that jamatrius sequence with a profound integration.
The original Greek word used in the Book of Revelation
for the beast is theon okay. In the Jamatria cipher,
the gon on equals eighty nine, the word cyborg equals
eighty nine, and the phrase NPC rule equals eighty nine.
Speaker 1: Cyborg. But surely the author doesn't mean a Sci fi
terminator with a metal endoskeleton.
Speaker 2: No, No, they are referring to a full cyborg integration
of consciousness. It is the state where the boundary between
the biological lower mind and the external control matrix has
been completely dissolved.
Speaker 1: The human thinks the system's.
Speaker 2: Thoughts, They enforce the system's priorities, and sincerely believe those
thoughts are their own self generated ideas. That is the
ultimate expression of the beast system.
Speaker 1: It is not a dictator with an army. It is
a networked, synchronized hive mind running inside billions of biological
units who believe they are individuals. Exactly after laying out
this incredibly bleak landscape of the fully captured NPC, the
text introduces a concept that I've found to be well,
the most confronting part of this entire exploration.
Speaker 2: It gets very personal here.
Speaker 1: It does because it identifies a position that the author
claims is much more dangerous than being a fully asleep NPC,
and frankly, it is a position that a lot of
people who are interested in alternative history, philosophy or esoteric
topics might currently be occupying.
Speaker 2: Yes, the author calls it the half human trap.
Speaker 1: In the cipher half a human equals eighty five, matrix
also equals eighty five. I'm going to need you to
unpack this because I'm ready to push back on it.
What exactly is a half human?
Speaker 2: A half human is not someone who is completely asleep.
The fully asleep person, the true NPC, does not experience
internal tension because they have no awareness that an alternative
state of consciousness exists.
Speaker 1: Ignorance is bliss exactly.
Speaker 2: The half human is someone who has glimpsed the truth.
They have experienced the higher mind, they have encountered awakening content.
Speaker 1: They've had flashes of intuition.
Speaker 2: Profound synchronicities, things that prove to them the official linear
version of reality is deeply flawed. But and this is
the trap. Despite knowing the truth, they continue to perform
compliance in the NPC matrix because they desire social, professional,
or financial comfort.
Speaker 1: Okay, here's my pushback. Isn't it incredibly arrogant for this
text to claim that anyone who goes to a nine
to five job, pays their mortgage and tries to keep
the peace at Thanksgiving is somehow captured by a matrix.
Speaker 2: It sounds harsh.
Speaker 1: Yes, we all have to live in the real world,
we all have to compromise. Claiming that making normal human
compromises makes you a half human feels like a toxic,
elitist way to view people who are just trying to survive.
How does the author justify that leap?
Speaker 2: The author justifies it by arguing about the binary nature
of the driver's seat of consciousness.
Speaker 1: The driver's seat.
Speaker 2: Yes, yeah, The text asserts that the lower mind and
the higher mind cannot copilot. They are fundamentally incompatible operating systems.
You can consume hundreds of hours of st eric philosophy
and awakening content in your free time.
Speaker 1: Sure you can understand the concepts intellectually.
Speaker 2: But if you walk out your front door and alter
your behavior to perfectly mimic the scripted reality because you
are terrified of social friction, the author argues that the
lower mind has won the dominance hierarchy.
Speaker 1: So the action dictates the reality, not the hidden internal knowledge.
Speaker 2: Exactly. The mechanism the system uses to maintain this trap
is called trojan pollution crojen. It works like a localized infection.
When you decide to quarantine your true thoughts, when you
build a private, secret inner sanctuary where the truth lives,
but you fake compliance in your public life. You think
you are protecting the truth.
Speaker 1: You tell yourself you are just being strategic, right, But.
Speaker 2: The lower mind is relentless. Over time, through the mundane
media you consume, the algorithms you scroll, and of thousands
of daily microcompromises you make to maintain your cover, the
NTC mind slowly colonizes your private inner world. It just
creeps in other warns it. Eventually you will sit down
to try and find an original crystos synchronic thought, and
you won't be able to find one. The occupation of
your mind will be complete. You become the matrix wearing
it awakened face.
Speaker 1: Wow. It is the death of the soul by a
thousand tiny strategic compromises. Consumption of knowledge without courageous action
is the system's most elegant cage.
Speaker 2: That sums it up perfectly, Which.
Speaker 1: Leads to a massive structural question. If this cognitive architecture
is designed to suppress human spiritual energy, if this lower
mind is essentially harvesting our potential by keeping us locked
in reactive linear loops of gibberish, where is all that
suppressed energy going? What is the purpose of the harvest?
Speaker 2: To answer that, the source text takes us deep into
cosmic geography and ancient esoteric architecture. It introduces the concept
of the vesica Pacey's.
Speaker 1: Portals, the vesica pisces. Once you learn what that shape is,
you see it absolutely everywhere.
Speaker 2: It's ubiquitous, it really is.
Speaker 1: It is the duometric shape created by the intersection of
two circles of equal radius. It looks like an almond
or an eye.
Speaker 2: It is arguably one of the most fundamental shapes in
sacred geometry. You see it defining the architecture of Gothic cathedrals,
woven into the diagrams of ancient mystery schools, and feature
prominently in the religious art of countless traditions across the globe.
Speaker 1: But the source text we are examining claims the shape
is not merely a metaphor or a symbol.
Speaker 2: No, it describes the vesseic pisces as literal dimensional interfaces, gateways,
or energetic portals meant for human consciousness to exit this
three dimensional constructed reality and return to higher dimensional fields.
Speaker 1: But the text claims there is a blockade at these portals.
It makes the highly controversial gnostic claim that these interfaces
were occupied by fallen beings. The text refers to them
as fallen Elahim.
Speaker 2: And here is where we must tread very carefully and
reiterate our absolute impartiality. Absolutely, we are examining the architecture
of a fringe historical and spiritual argument. Here the source
material makes an intense, deeply controversial religious assertion. It claims
that the major monotheistic names of God, specifically citing Yahweh, Jehovah,
and Allah, do not represent the true, infinite, divine source
of the universe.
Speaker 1: Instead, the text argues, these names represent the occupying, fallen
elehume forces who installed themselves at the besiko pisces portals.
I am trying to visualize how the author thinks this works.
It sounds like a cybersecurity threat. In computer networking, there's
a concept called a man in the middle attack.
Speaker 2: Oh how does that work?
Speaker 1: Well? You log into your bank. You think you were
talking directly to the bank's server, but a hacker has
positioned themselves between you and the bank. They intercept your signal,
capture your password, and then pass the signal along. Oh wow, yeah,
you get your bank balance, so you suspect nothing, but
they have harvested your credentials.
Speaker 2: Is the author suggesting a spiritual man in the middle attack?
Speaker 1: That is a phenomenal analogy for what the text is describing.
The author argues that for millennia, these occupying forces have
positioned themselves as the ultimate spiritual.
Speaker 2: Middleman, just sitting there intercepting.
Speaker 1: Yes, they intercept the energetic spiritual output of humanity. When
a human generates genuine spiritual seeking, prayer, or devotion. These
entities siphon off the metaphysical energy and pass back just
enough dopamine or worldly comfort to keep the human engaged
in the loop, and the.
Speaker 2: Text grounds this theory in the broader context of ancient
gnostic philosophy, spanning back to the first and second centuries.
Speaker 1: Right the concept of the demiurge. Yes, texts found in
the Noncommadi library often describe the material world not as
a divine masterpiece, but as a corrupted creation managed by
a demiurge, a lesser, ignorant or malevolent creator deity who
demands worship and enforces strict lineal laws.
Speaker 2: And the author uses their Jamatria framework to confirm this
grim picture. The word wormwood equals one to thirty three,
and the phrase yalf Jehovah also equals one thirty three wormwood.
Speaker 1: That is a direct reference to Revelation, chapter eight, verse eleven,
and the name of the star is called wormwood. And
many men died of the waters because they were made bitter.
The text interprets the waters not as physical oceans, but
as the spiritual currents of humanity.
Speaker 2: And one wood represents the deliberate systemic contamination of those
waters by these occupying systems.
Speaker 1: It paints an incredibly bleak architectural map, a closed loop
reality where your biological hardware keeps you distracted with the
endless gibberish of the lower mind, and if you do
manage to bypass the programming and seat higher spiritual truth,
your energetic output is intercepted and harvested by a demiurgic
middleman at the dimensional portal.
Speaker 2: Sounds hopeless.
Speaker 1: If that were the end of the author's theory, it
would be thoroughly depressing. But it's not. Because this massive,
seemingly invincible six hundred and sixty six architecture, with all
its billions of NPCs, its half human traps, and its
blocked portals, has a fatal structural flaw.
Speaker 2: It cannot sustain itself indefinitely exactly.
Speaker 1: The source text points to a scheduled cosmic reset.
Speaker 2: This is the point where all the ancient streams the
author utilizes converge. The text points out that in Revelation
chapter eight there are precise chronological countdowns encoded in the text.
Speaker 1: There's a long countdown of two hundred and twenty five
years and a short countdown of one hundred and twenty
three years. I need you to explain the math here.
How does the author extract a one hundred and twenty
three year countdown from an ancient Greek manuscript of revelation.
Speaker 2: In standard esoteric chronology, numerical values given in prophetic texts
are rarely interpreted literally. Prophetic days or weeks are often
expanded into years or jubilees based on complex astronomical and
astrological calculations.
Speaker 1: It's heavily coded.
Speaker 2: Very heavily, by mapping the sequence of seals and trumpets
in Revelation against celestial alignments, specifically the precession of the equinoxes.
The author derives these specific timeframes.
Speaker 1: And according to the source material's interpretation of these alignments,
that short one hundred and twenty three year countdown initiated
in the year twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: That's the claim.
Speaker 1: And what exactly is counting down? What is the event
at the end of the timer? The text calls it
the solar microNOVA.
Speaker 2: What is fascinating about this part of the theory is
that the author attempts to fuse ancient prophecy directly with
modern geology.
Speaker 1: In astrophysics, merging science and mysticism exactly.
Speaker 2: The text aligns the Book of Revelation with Vedic cyclic timelines,
Mayan calendar systems, and Egyptian cosmology. It argues that physical
evidence found in ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica, along
with oceanic sediment layers, points to a massive, recurring cyclical
event roughly every twelve thousand years.
Speaker 1: A catastrophic electromagnetic discharge from the Sun that causes crustal displacement,
massive planetary flooding, and atmospheric upheaval, which.
Speaker 2: Would explain the flood myth that literally every ancient culture
on Earth shares right.
Speaker 1: But the source text goes deeper than just geology. It
says mainstream alternative researchers who only look at the physical
earthly destruction of the micro nova are missing the entire
point of the U event.
Speaker 2: The physical part is secondary.
Speaker 1: Yeah, The text argues that the solar micro nova is
not just a physical catastrophe, it is an astral event.
Speaker 2: The cipher encoding for this is highly specific. Omega point
fire equals one to fifty three. Gamma burst fire also
equals one hundred and.
Speaker 1: Fifty three, So the author asserts that physical destruction is
not the primary cause of the event. Rather, it is
a downstream consequence of a spiritual and energetic imbalance crossing
a critical threshold.
Speaker 2: Yes, how does that work? Think of the Sun not
just as a burning ball of gas, but as an
electromagnetic capacitor. It builds up a charge from the galactic
current sheet. But the text suggests this is tied to
the energetic state of the simulation.
Speaker 1: It's all connected.
Speaker 2: It is when the six to sixty six architecture reaches
peak load, when the lower mind system has harvested too
much energy. When the gibberish reaches maximum density, and the
energetic ledger of the entire reality is entirely out of balance,
the system naturally resets itself.
Speaker 1: It's like a circuit breaker tripping because there is too
much voltage flowing through the wires. The system has to
break to prevent total collapse. Exactly, the micro nova is
an electromagnetic discharge, and the text claims that this massive
surge of astral fire literally displaces those occupying elahum entities.
The man in the middle attack is neutralized by a
massive system reboot.
Speaker 2: The blast force fully reopens the vesica pisces coortals.
Speaker 1: So if we synthesize this grand narrative, the author suggesting
that this apocalypse is not about an angry borded deity
passing moral judgment on humanity. It is about basic physics
and frequency resonance.
Speaker 2: When the portals are blown open by the solar discharge,
a process the text calls the great sorting.
Speaker 1: Occurs, the great sorting.
Speaker 2: Yes, the text theorizes that true humans, those who have
maintained their Crysto's synchronic consciousness, who have refused the deep
cyborg integration with the lower aggregate of mind, are automatically
able to pass through the reopened portals.
Speaker 1: Why because their internal frequency naturally resonates with the higher
demands fields.
Speaker 2: You go where your frequency takes you.
Speaker 1: It's like a tuning fork. If a tuning fork vibrating
at a specific pitch is brought near a piano, only
the piano string tuned to that exact same pitch will
begin to vibrate.
Speaker 2: That's a great visual.
Speaker 1: But what happens to the half humans, the people who
knew the truth but performed compliance for social comfort, the
one suffering from trojan pollution?
Speaker 2: The text is entirely unindiguous. On this point, the portal
acts as an automated dimensional filter. It does not care
about your good intentions.
Speaker 1: It doesn't care about the esoteric books you read or
the alternative videos you watched in secret.
Speaker 2: No, it only reads the coherent frequency you emit. A
half human possesses a mixed signal. They have been constantly
oscillating between moments of awake consciousness and long stretches of
captured scripted compliance.
Speaker 1: Because their energetic signal is incoherent, they cannot be sorted
through the portal. They bounce off the filter and ring
trapped in the reset architecture, which.
Speaker 2: Leads to the deeply unsettling aftermath described by the author's math.
Two groups remain. The jamatria states, a remnant of true
humans equals two hundred six and a little season of
NPCs equals two hundred six.
Speaker 1: A remnant that word implies a very very small fraction
makes it through coherent and intact.
Speaker 2: The entire cosmic, mathematical, and historical narrative synthesizes into a
single functional philosophy. Here, the author is arguing that this
isn't about waiting for an asteroid or hiding from a
solar flare in a bunker.
Speaker 1: It is about recognizing that every single time you choose
compliance over the truth, you know, you are actively degrading
your own frequency coherence.
Speaker 2: Which brings this entire massive, cosmic ancient journey right back
down to Earth, right.
Speaker 1: To your daily life. Because the grand cosmic architecture, the portals,
the esoteric math, the solar events, if you strip away
the vast scale of it, it all boils down to your
microscopic daily choices.
Speaker 2: The system, if it exists, as the author describes, will
never announce itself to you. No one's going to walk
up to you at a coffee shop and say, I
am an agent of the matrix here to enforce your compliance.
Speaker 1: No, the system simply makes the half human state feel
like maturity. It makes it feel like balance. It makes
compromising your fundamental reality look like being a responsible adult.
Speaker 2: The gap between what you know to be true in
your heart and what you are actually willing to act
on in public is the exact measurement of your capture
by this system.
Speaker 1: It is that simple, and it is that terrifying. So
we have to ask you, listening to this exploration right now,
where do you stand What are you genuinely willing to
lose socially, professionally, or relationally to maintain the absolute integrity
of your own mind?
Speaker 2: Where do you feel this NPC pressure the most in
your daily life?
Speaker 1: That is the defining question of this entire philosophical framework.
We want to know your answer. Drop your thoughts in
the comments right now, because we read them all and
we want to see how you are navigating this friction.
Speaker 2: It's a lot to ponder, it is.
Speaker 1: Thank you for joining us on this intense reality bending
journey today on Thrilling Threads. Keep questioning the script