Speaker 1: This is Dan Capless and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. She saw something
Speaker 1: really extraordinary, and I'm blessed to be on air about
Speaker 1: thirty years now, been a trialer about forty years. That
Speaker 1: was by far the single best interview I've ever seen conducted.
Speaker 1: Brett Baer was masterful under very difficult circumstances. When you have,
Speaker 1: excuse me, a sitting vice president, so you can only
Speaker 1: be so firm, right, it's a sitting vice president, but
Speaker 1: clearly intending to avoid and evade and not answer direct questions.
Speaker 1: And when Bear appropriately interrupts, she actually and CNN describes
Speaker 1: it as getting heated. She got heated with him, so
Speaker 1: in addition to talking over him, she did so in
Speaker 1: an angry kind of way, which leads to the question
Speaker 1: where did the joy go? But in avoiding these fair
Speaker 1: tough questions, I think she did herself tremendous damage. A
Speaker 1: couple of quick notes before we go to our firing
Speaker 1: lines and text as well on this some of the
Speaker 1: questions she did respond to. I think she really hurt
Speaker 1: herself and a couple in particular. I won't get to
Speaker 1: all of them here. I want to get to callers,
Speaker 1: but the beauty and I hope Trump turns this into
Speaker 1: a spot instantly is Bear came back. When she was filibustering,
Speaker 1: she wouldn't answer direct questions on immigrations, such as, Okay,
Speaker 1: how many ilegals have come in on your watch? Why
Speaker 1: did you reverse so many of Trump's border policies that
Speaker 1: allowed this to happen? And then she filibusters blaming Republicans,
Speaker 1: you know, the drill. But then Bear was ready and
Speaker 1: he came back and he said, well, why did the
Speaker 1: border patrol then endorse Trump? And her response to that
Speaker 1: an instant classic. I get it, I get it. And
Speaker 1: then she went on to say they're frustrated, etc. But
Speaker 1: when you say you get the border patrol endorsing Trump,
Speaker 1: that's an instant spot. And then Bear again it did
Speaker 1: a brilliant job of pinning her down. He played the
Speaker 1: spot that we've been talking about on our air. It
Speaker 1: was the first of all of her wacko statements we
Speaker 1: played on air when she was installed as the nominee
Speaker 1: taxpayer funding for sex change operations for prisoners. He played
Speaker 1: the spot and she wouldn't back off it. She wouldn't
Speaker 1: change her position on that. Fascinating, and we'll talk about
Speaker 1: why why you think she didn't take advantage as this
Speaker 1: the opportunity to say, oh no, that's another one of
Speaker 1: my positions I've changed. She wouldn't do that, and I
Speaker 1: think that does her great harm because you know, she
Speaker 1: was complaining about how much money Trump has spent on
Speaker 1: the spot. Yeah, she knows that amount, and she's complaining
Speaker 1: about it because the spot is devastating. And I think
Speaker 1: that's showing up in the polling, including the Fox polling,
Speaker 1: which had a four point flip. And Fox is a
Speaker 1: left leaning pole, had Trump down to in the last poll,
Speaker 1: now has him up to. Let's go to what You
Speaker 1: Talk Kansas. We'll start with Mack here on the Dan
Speaker 1: Kaplis Show. Welcome Mack, Hey, Dan and Ryan.
Speaker 2: I really enjoy your show. Been listening since twenty ten.
Speaker 1: Nice, thank you.
Speaker 2: I've got just basically one comment. I think Brett Bair
Speaker 2: did a really good job, and I think that he
Speaker 2: was channeling the great Jim Russers because if you recall
Speaker 2: Tim Russell, when he interviewed people from either side of
Speaker 2: the aisle, would take a clip that someone had said before,
Speaker 2: sometimes years before, any would put them right there and
Speaker 2: they have to answer their own words.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, you're right. I have beautiful observation, Matt. That
Speaker 1: is a great observation, my friend. Thank you and appreciate
Speaker 1: the call. I hope you become a frequent caller. So nice, Matt.
Speaker 1: Going back to twenty ten with the show in Denver,
Speaker 1: it's Eric. You're on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 3: Welcome, Hey you great America.
Speaker 4: Eric.
Speaker 1: How you doing, my friend?
Speaker 3: Okay, my brother, you stole.
Speaker 5: My word because you did a masterful job breaking down
Speaker 5: the interview. Thank you with Kamala Harris. But I have
Speaker 5: to I have to stress to you because I heard
Speaker 5: a lot of smacking in this, a lot of slurring.
Speaker 3: I think Kamala Harris.
Speaker 5: As high as heck, and she gets bold and brave,
Speaker 5: and she used you know, our great President Trump that
Speaker 5: I love as an OUTCRD for not answering rich questions. Uh, Dan,
Speaker 5: you think that's going to work for oh my god,
Speaker 5: no no, And then you know what, it's not going
Speaker 5: to work for her? Is that? And you had.
Speaker 3: Told us all along, Kamala Harris, she started, she's starting
Speaker 3: from the from the end, you know, of the race.
Speaker 3: What she's doing now, she should have did at the beginning,
Speaker 3: so to speak.
Speaker 6: And why do you know that she was going to fail?
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's why they put her in the basement, right
Speaker 1: because they knew it would hurt the campaign.
Speaker 3: Yeah, she was just.
Speaker 5: Wondering to how much jan or vodka or whatever that
Speaker 5: she can consume to.
Speaker 3: Be brave enough to go on with Brent Baer.
Speaker 5: And before I let you go, I love Jeff Hunt. Okay,
Speaker 5: I've been I've been.
Speaker 3: To a lot of his state.
Speaker 5: He loves he loves you like a brother too. I mean,
Speaker 5: I am grateful for and he wants you the one
Speaker 5: for governor.
Speaker 1: He keeps saying that that boy coming from Jeff, that
Speaker 1: means a lot to me. Eric, Thank you, man. I
Speaker 1: really appreciate that call every day. Thank you.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 1: I really love hearing from Eric. Uh listen personally, Do
Speaker 1: I think she was under the influence of anything today? No,
Speaker 1: I don't. I understand why a lot of people out
Speaker 1: there have raised the question on other occasions as to
Speaker 1: you know, whether there might be some added exuberance.
Speaker 7: What about Kelly's theory that maybe they gave her his NX, see,
Speaker 7: I that's for anxiety.
Speaker 1: I did not see that in today's interview. I mean
Speaker 1: I've seen him. We've all played a lot of tape
Speaker 1: where there's a fair question as to Okay, did she
Speaker 1: start the weekend earlier not? Or is this you know,
Speaker 1: is this some other issue that she has, right? I mean, personally,
Speaker 1: I don't think we can ever know the answer to that.
Speaker 1: For me, it's just proof that she doesn't have the
Speaker 1: kind of intellect you need in a president. Today, I
Speaker 1: think their mo was clear. They were going to stall,
Speaker 1: they were going to run out the clock, and the
Speaker 1: whole point of her coming on was to do two things.
Speaker 1: One is be able to say she came on Fox,
Speaker 1: but but also to be tough and angry and hope
Speaker 1: that was interpreted as strength. I think that was the
Speaker 1: mo for today, right, because, as I've been talking about
Speaker 1: forever on this show, she is properly perceived, properly perceived
Speaker 1: I think in every quarter, and it's hurting her, particularly
Speaker 1: with men, properly perceived as weak because she is. It
Speaker 1: has nothing to do with gender, has nothing to do
Speaker 1: with anything other than her. She is the epitome of weakness.
Speaker 1: Trump is the epitome of strength. And so I think
Speaker 1: her plan was go on Fox and be angry and
Speaker 1: interrupt and heated and yell and hope that's taken his strength.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's going to work for her with
Speaker 1: the people who get to decide the election. I compare
Speaker 1: it as we go to our text and back to
Speaker 1: the phones, very much to the debate, because the debate,
Speaker 1: everybody said, oh, Kamala Hurst one, you know, stylistically she
Speaker 1: was better than Trump, this or that. I came out
Speaker 1: of the debate and said, wait, she lost. If your
Speaker 1: measure of success is doing what you have to do
Speaker 1: to win the presidency, she did not do in the
Speaker 1: debate what she had to do to win the presidency,
Speaker 1: and that's why she finds herself in a desperate situation. Now.
Speaker 1: So she comes on this Fox News interview and yeah,
Speaker 1: she stalled, and yeah she was angry and you know,
Speaker 1: interrupts Brett Barrett c But she refused to answer fair
Speaker 1: direct question. So if the goal of this interview was
Speaker 1: to win the election by convincing the persuadables, I think
Speaker 1: that backfired on her, because if you don't answer fair
Speaker 1: direct questions, what reaction do you think truly undecided people
Speaker 1: are going to have. It's not going to be a
Speaker 1: good one. It's going to be that's just flat disrespectful.
Speaker 1: They have questions they want answered. Brett Beaar was asking them,
Speaker 1: and she was refusing answer. Not a formula for success, Dan,
Speaker 1: will the Dems try to sub Biden back in after
Speaker 1: this Kamala disaster? That from Alexa? No, I think that
Speaker 1: ship has sailed. It is an interesting question we'll kicking
Speaker 1: around at some point whether they would be in better
Speaker 1: shape right now with Biden than Harris. Do you think
Speaker 1: Joe watched this today? Oh yeah, Oh yeah, I think
Speaker 1: he absolutely noticed her quote, my presidency will not be
Speaker 1: a continuation of the Biden presidency. Yeah, I think he
Speaker 1: noticed that. Alexa says, I think Kamala was trying to
Speaker 1: be tough and him Trump and vance that did not
Speaker 1: come across. Well, you know, I would certainly agree with that, Dan.
Speaker 1: What is the world record for least questions answered in
Speaker 1: an interview? I think we saw that tied today because
Speaker 1: the world record has to be zero, right, but probably
Speaker 1: lots of people tie for that record, and Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: did today. Dan, I don't think the Brettbear interview moved
Speaker 1: the needle either way. The media and or supporters will
Speaker 1: be saying she was great and the undecided's are only
Speaker 1: going to see favorable soundbites from social media. Interesting perspective.
Speaker 3: I think the.
Speaker 1: Big unanswerable is is how many persuadables. I don't like
Speaker 1: the term undecided right because we're human. It's fluid. For
Speaker 1: people who are persuadable, they may already be in one
Speaker 1: camp or the other, but they're persuadable, so they're not
Speaker 1: truly an undecided. So I use persuadable for truly persuadables
Speaker 1: who were watching. I think it's a big negative for
Speaker 1: her because they're persuadable because they have unanswered questions. And
Speaker 1: I just think it's the way we're wired as humans.
Speaker 1: If somebody won't answer a direct question, we don't trust them,
Speaker 1: right in a situation like this where they're asking for
Speaker 1: something from you, they're asking for your vote, and they
Speaker 1: won't answer a direct question that pertains to to voting
Speaker 1: and why somebody would vote for somebody. Yeah, I think
Speaker 1: that really hurt her with persuadables, And to the Texter's point, yeah,
Speaker 1: people who love her already are going to see what
Speaker 1: they want, and the people who don't like already are
Speaker 1: going to see what they want. But the persuadables, you
Speaker 1: better answer their questions. You're going to lose eight five
Speaker 1: five or zero five eight two five five. Ye're on
Speaker 1: the Dan Capla.
Speaker 8: Show and now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 9: If it's all on the wrong track, that track follows
Speaker 9: three and a half years of you being vice president
Speaker 9: and President Biden being president. That is what they're saying,
Speaker 9: seventy nine percent of them. Why are they saying that
Speaker 9: if you're turning the page, you've been in office for
Speaker 9: three and a.
Speaker 10: Half years and Donald Trump has been running for office.
Speaker 1: The person you know, that's the same as remember Lester
Speaker 1: Holt said, you know, when are you going to go
Speaker 1: to the border, and she said, I've been to the border.
Speaker 1: And he said, no, you haven't been to the border
Speaker 1: in paraphrase, and she said, well, I haven't been to
Speaker 1: Europe either. I mean, that was wrecked up there with that, right,
Speaker 1: And I think it's that sort of thing that, among
Speaker 1: other things, really hurt her today. I think some other
Speaker 1: things hurt her worse than that. Will continue to mix
Speaker 1: in sound from the interview. If you're just joining us,
Speaker 1: thank you. We carried in its entirety the interview between
Speaker 1: Brett Behar and Kamala Harris. Ten second summary, Bear was masterful.
Speaker 1: She came in intending clearly not to answer direct questions,
Speaker 1: and came in intending to be heated, intending to be
Speaker 1: at times angry, and hope that came across as strength.
Speaker 1: I don't think personally it worked for I think certain
Speaker 1: things she said were particularly damaged to her, but abobble,
Speaker 1: I think what hurt her most was the refusal to
Speaker 1: answer the direct questions. Because with persuadables, I think that's death.
Speaker 1: They want answers to direct questions. And when a candidate
Speaker 1: won't do that, why in the world should the persuadable
Speaker 1: vote for that person. We'll get into more detail as
Speaker 1: we take calls and texts. Let me get to some
Speaker 1: texts before I go back to the callers in no
Speaker 1: particular order. Dan, I think you're mistaken if you think
Speaker 1: Trump has been answering all the direct questions asked of him. No,
Speaker 1: I don't think that at all. But here's the point.
Speaker 1: People know Trump, whether they like him or not, they
Speaker 1: know him. He was president. That's why I just sit
Speaker 1: back and laugh at I'd send the limo for all
Speaker 1: these attacks. Oh he's deranged, he's a fascist, he's this,
Speaker 1: he's that. Give me. Americans saw him as president. They
Speaker 1: know what he did, and then they can decide whether
Speaker 1: they want him or not. People have a lot of
Speaker 1: questions about Kamala Harris, and so when she refuses to
Speaker 1: answer the those questions, I think it hurts her a lot. Plus,
Speaker 1: everybody knows Trump has been doing interviews with all sorts
Speaker 1: of hostile interviewers for years, and everybody knows that Harris
Speaker 1: has been largely hiding in the basement and then eventually
Speaker 1: forced out to go on with for the most part,
Speaker 1: the Howard Stearns of the world. And then when she
Speaker 1: did go on with CBS and the interviewer did a
Speaker 1: good job, CBS had to falsify the interview. They had
Speaker 1: to doctor the interview to try to make her sound coherent.
Speaker 1: Dan going over Twitter right now, the left is saying
Speaker 1: that she nailed the interview despite all of his interruptions.
Speaker 1: There's no winning. Wait a second, winning doesn't mean getting
Speaker 1: the left to be honest. The left is never going
Speaker 1: to be honest. What winning means is getting enough people
Speaker 1: in the middle to see the truth. And I have
Speaker 1: no doubt that's happening. Just look at the polls. And
Speaker 1: winning means getting those inclined to vote for Trump so
Speaker 1: revved up that they would crawl over glass to vote
Speaker 1: for him. And I think this interview today helped him
Speaker 1: accomplish that. Also, let's go to beautiful for Collins. Great
Speaker 1: win for the Rams last weekend. Tim, you're on the
Speaker 1: Dan Kapalas show.
Speaker 4: Welcome then, Yeah, I think Bredair did a good job.
Speaker 4: And uh, every time I hear Kamala Harris say, let
Speaker 4: me be clear, a bit red flag goes up because
Speaker 4: that's the last thing you do. And also you may
Speaker 4: it laugh. It's uh if you're change the movie the
Speaker 4: Ghost get mister Chickens with don knots. You have to
Speaker 4: get this speech in the first Yeah, I had to, well,
Speaker 4: let me clarify this, and it's just resonated with me.
Speaker 3: This is just such a joke.
Speaker 4: She's afraid to answer the questions. Yeah, that's okay. She's
Speaker 4: gonna follow the law when it comes to uh sex
Speaker 4: change in prison? What law was there enforced that allowed
Speaker 4: her to do it on the guy who killed the
Speaker 4: two the man and woman in Florida.
Speaker 1: Beautiful point, Tim, Thank you for that, because this may
Speaker 1: be where she hurt herself worse today. And the reason
Speaker 1: I say that is because Trump has been wisely and
Speaker 1: is pack supporters saturating the airwaves with the spot I'm
Speaker 1: sure you've seen by now, which is Kamala Harris in
Speaker 1: her own words on video bragging about leading the way
Speaker 1: to use taxpayer dollars to guarantee sex change operations for prisoners.
Speaker 1: That has been the most devastating ad of our political lifetime,
Speaker 1: the most devastating ad since the Daisy ad that was
Speaker 1: run against Goldwater in sixty four.
Speaker 10: And so.
Speaker 1: I think she really hurt herself today when Bear handed
Speaker 1: her the chance to back off it and she wouldn't
Speaker 1: take it instead of saying no, I don't believe that anymore,
Speaker 1: because she's saying that about all the stuff she really believes, right,
Speaker 1: why wouldn't she say that about this? I'd love your
Speaker 1: take on that. It would have been so easy for
Speaker 1: her to say no. Listen, this is another one of
Speaker 1: my positions you know that, Hey, I've gathered more information
Speaker 1: seeking consensus. No, I wouldn't do that. But by refusing
Speaker 1: to say that, refusing to say this is one of
Speaker 1: those areas where she's changed, she has dumbled down on it,
Speaker 1: and that I think just confirms my point that she knows.
Speaker 1: I believe she knows she has likely lost this race.
Speaker 1: Nothing is certain right until election day in the days after,
Speaker 1: but I think she believes she has likely lost this race,
Speaker 1: and what she's looking ahead to now is the next
Speaker 1: part of her life and whether she's envisioning having a
Speaker 1: talk show, you know, writing a book. She gets a
Speaker 1: lot of money for whatever. I think that's why she
Speaker 1: wouldn't back off this position today. She knows its political death,
Speaker 1: but she's looking beyond this race. Eight five five for
Speaker 1: zero five eight two five five the number some more
Speaker 1: texts Dan she did interrupt him or did he interrupt her?
Speaker 1: I think it was a little of both. It was
Speaker 1: but as people watching it all the way through could see,
Speaker 1: he only interrupted her when she was refusing to answer
Speaker 1: a question, and so she interrupted him in order to
Speaker 1: throw off the questioning. So her interruptions of him were
Speaker 1: all part of this evasion and I think she also
Speaker 1: really hurt herself when she got angry interrupting him. Now,
Speaker 1: maybe she thought that would convey strength, but I think
Speaker 1: that really undermines kind of this persona she's been trying
Speaker 1: to project. So I think any fair minded person watching
Speaker 1: could see her point was to evade. Her point was
Speaker 1: to evade fair direct questions, and that including interrupting Bear
Speaker 1: to run out the clock and avoid those questions. A
Speaker 1: Texter says, Dan, what candidate says, I'm going to come
Speaker 1: in and do the exact same thing as my predecessor.
Speaker 1: I think she answered that question, Well, here's the problem
Speaker 1: she asked just a few days ago. She said she
Speaker 1: couldn't think of a single thing she would do differently,
Speaker 1: and and that's what's out in America's consciousness. So when
Speaker 1: she comes in today and says something different than that,
Speaker 1: I don't think that helps her. You're on the Dan
Speaker 1: Capla Show.
Speaker 8: You're listening to the Dan Caplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1: You called Donald.
Speaker 9: Trump, called Donald Trump he's misguided. You say, now he's
Speaker 9: he's not well, you say he's mentally not stable.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you this, And to interviewers that.
Speaker 9: Joe Biden was on his game that ran around circles
Speaker 9: on his staff. When did you first notice that President
Speaker 9: Biden's mental faculties appeared diminished?
Speaker 1: Joe Biden.
Speaker 10: I have watched from the Oval office to the situation room,
Speaker 10: and he has the judgment and the experiment and experience
Speaker 10: to do exactly what he has done and making very
Speaker 10: important decisions on behalf of the American people. Joe Bibra
Speaker 10: will concerns Ruth Joe Biden is not on ballot.
Speaker 1: I understand. Yeah, she really hurt herself with that, because
Speaker 1: if she's seen that Joe Biden was not incognitive decline,
Speaker 1: well then she's proven to either be a liar or
Speaker 1: fatally clueless. So in deciding to go with that answer,
Speaker 1: I think she really really hurt herself eight five five
Speaker 1: for zero five A two five five text, d A
Speaker 1: N five seven seven three nine tremendous text and calls
Speaker 1: coming in and want to get to all of those Dan.
Speaker 1: If Winnie means not answering questions and speaking over the host,
Speaker 1: yes she won. She can't shut her mouth long enough
Speaker 1: for him to even get a word in edgewise, which
Speaker 1: was her plan, because that way she doesn't have to
Speaker 1: answer the question, which makes you wonder why she went on,
Speaker 1: because she hurt herself. I believe, in the individual ways
Speaker 1: we've discussed, and most dramatically by refusing to answer fair,
Speaker 1: direct questions persuadable, that's going to offend them, not going
Speaker 1: to gain her support, it's going to lose her support.
Speaker 1: But then you step back and you look at the
Speaker 1: way she did this, You look at the tone, You
Speaker 1: look at the anger. The CNN disguised describes it as
Speaker 1: heatedness of her interruptions of bear. That's inconsistent with this
Speaker 1: image that she's been trying to project, I believe, a
Speaker 1: false image, but inconsistent with the image that her campaign
Speaker 1: has really been based on. So I don't know how
Speaker 1: that's likely to help her. I believe that this was
Speaker 1: calculated to address what they must be seen in their
Speaker 1: polling is the single most obvious, glaring, fatal weakness, which
Speaker 1: is weakness. And She's correctly perceived as being weak, and
Speaker 1: Trump's correctly persued as being strong. That doesn't mean that's
Speaker 1: the end of the analysis for each and every voter,
Speaker 1: but it's a powerful shaping factor for many. So maybe
Speaker 1: this new tone and this this anger and this hot
Speaker 1: you know, kind of angry approach they believe is going
Speaker 1: to convey strength. I don't think it's going to do that.
Speaker 1: A five five vers five eight two five five the number,
Speaker 1: Rosiel in Denver, You're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 6: Welcome, Hello Dan. That was an utter waste of arid time,
Speaker 6: completely because we already knew she was not going to
Speaker 6: answer any of bers questions. He's a fair journalist, and
Speaker 6: realistically it just only returned to all Americans that she
Speaker 6: is not suitable to be president. So I want people
Speaker 6: to know just because they think, well, Trump has this
Speaker 6: in the basket right now. No go out and vote anyway.
Speaker 1: Oh amen to that, Rosiel, great point, and listen, I
Speaker 1: respectfully disagree on one point, and that is yeah, Brett
Speaker 1: Baron again, I think it's a single best interview performance
Speaker 1: I've ever seen on TV under the circumstances, because remember,
Speaker 1: you have a sitting vice president, so you can only
Speaker 1: be so firm because of the office. And I think
Speaker 1: he was as firm as you could be under those circumstances.
Speaker 1: I think he was so tremendously prepared. It reminded me
Speaker 1: of trial prep right where he was clearly anticipating the evasion,
Speaker 1: the lies, etc. And then he had mapped out how
Speaker 1: he would respond to that, and then how he would
Speaker 1: respond to the next effort to evade, etc. I thought
Speaker 1: he handled it brilliantly. But here's where I would disagree
Speaker 1: with their friend Raziel, and that is, it's not a
Speaker 1: waste of time when you have a Democrat nominee for
Speaker 1: president come onto a show and obviously avoid answering the
Speaker 1: questions because just as in a trial, when I'm cross
Speaker 1: examining a witness, it is better for me and my client.
Speaker 1: It's devastating to the other side when a witness refuses
Speaker 1: to answer direct questions. That hurts the witness more than
Speaker 1: any answer they could have given because it concedes my
Speaker 1: point implicitly and makes the witness look dishonest. And I
Speaker 1: think that's how Kamala Harris looked today, So I think
Speaker 1: it was a double net negative for her. Text Alexis
Speaker 1: says Dan, the joy is long gone for Kamala. I
Speaker 1: think that was certainly on display today. That was not
Speaker 1: the tone they've built this campaign around Dan to present
Speaker 1: the other side. Would you please also run the thirty
Speaker 1: minutes of Trump avoiding even more questions and having music
Speaker 1: played instead. Texture. I wish you would call the show
Speaker 1: because your premise is fatally flawed and I don't know
Speaker 1: if you're the innocent victim of the lying media or
Speaker 1: if you're just deciding to misrepresent, But please call the
Speaker 1: show so we can discuss that. Dan, She's spun in
Speaker 1: circles so fast and so hard. Listening to her made
Speaker 1: me sick. You know this goes to another really critical dynamic, right,
Speaker 1: It's pretty simple maths in winning this race. You know,
Speaker 1: she of course both sides fighting for the persuadables, but
Speaker 1: so much of it is about whether your voters turn out.
Speaker 1: We all know that. But I think an interview like
Speaker 1: this does more to ensure that Trump voters will crawl
Speaker 1: over glass to vote for him than almost anything else
Speaker 1: could now, certainly the way he handled being shot in Butler, Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: I think that already has a level of intensity of
Speaker 1: support and dedication. But a performance like this by her
Speaker 1: today and just many other things she's done but today,
Speaker 1: I think so energizes and intensifies the commitment of those
Speaker 1: inclined toward Trump that that's probably the single best thing
Speaker 1: to come for him out of that interview. Dan says
Speaker 1: a Texter. Oh, my lord, why isn't Brett saying If
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is so fit, why isn't he the one
Speaker 1: running for reelection? Why did they put you in as
Speaker 1: a substitute candidate. You know, I think he didn't go
Speaker 1: there because I think that would have been too easy
Speaker 1: for I mean, at that point, she just said, Oh,
Speaker 1: he's so noble and it was such a personal sacrifice
Speaker 1: because he is able to continue, but he knows that
Speaker 1: two years from now he might start to fade. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So I think that's why he didn't go there. Here's
Speaker 1: some more Brett Bear with Kamala Harris today. By the way,
Speaker 1: fascinating report Brett Bear saying on Fox that Kamala's staff
Speaker 1: was urgently trying to end the Fox interview, and as
Speaker 1: we played it, you could hear him refer to that
Speaker 1: I'm getting a hard rap. I'm getting a hard rep,
Speaker 1: he would say to the VP. But here's what Bear
Speaker 1: just added. Quote, I'm talking like four people waving their
Speaker 1: hands like it's got stop. Reminds you of was it
Speaker 1: Rocky four? Right where the father is throwing the throwing
Speaker 1: the towel into the ring to save his son from
Speaker 1: being literally killed by Rocky. Sorry if you haven't seen
Speaker 1: that one yet, but it's been out maybe ten years
Speaker 1: or so. So yeah, anytime you get the staff of
Speaker 1: of the Democrat nominee and you know Brett Bear is
Speaker 1: not going to exaggerate four people waving their hands like
Speaker 1: it's got to stop. You just know they knew how
Speaker 1: bad it was for her, and they had to be
Speaker 1: most concerned not with the substance of any one response,
Speaker 1: though I think there were a few the rare occasions
Speaker 1: when she did respond to a question directly where it
Speaker 1: hurt her, but to the tone and to her anger
Speaker 1: and her overall approach toward him, because nobody is going
Speaker 1: to mistake Brett Bear for our friend Jesse or somebody
Speaker 1: like that. Brett Bear is as down the middle as
Speaker 1: they come. And so yeah, I don't think that angry
Speaker 1: approach to Brett bhar that the kind of raised voice,
Speaker 1: even yelling at him, I don't think that helped her
Speaker 1: cause it all, I don't think Americans. There are a
Speaker 1: lot of Americans who aren't going to want, you know,
Speaker 1: four years of that kind of approach, particularly when you
Speaker 1: don't get the great things that come with it. I
Speaker 1: mean Donald Trump. He can have a strong personality, right,
Speaker 1: he can color outside the lines sometime on the personal stuff,
Speaker 1: but he's delivered. Americans have seen him in office, They've
Speaker 1: seen all the great things he accomplished. They know their
Speaker 1: lives were better under Trump, so they can put up
Speaker 1: with some of that personality stuff. They don't like, Harris.
Speaker 1: All they've seen is awfulness out of this Biden administration.
Speaker 1: And on top of that, they're going to get that
Speaker 1: kind of approach to things. No, not an attractive, attractive
Speaker 1: policy slash personality combo. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 8: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 9: Why if he's as bad as you say that half
Speaker 9: of this country is now supporting this person who could
Speaker 9: be the forty seventh president of the United States.
Speaker 1: Why is that happening?
Speaker 10: This is a little election for president of the United States.
Speaker 1: It's not supposed to be.
Speaker 10: Easy, I know, but it's not supposed to be It
Speaker 10: is not supposed to be a king Misgott. I would
Speaker 10: never say that about the images.
Speaker 1: Beautiful beautiful point by Brett bhar And you'd have to
Speaker 1: get the full flow, right, I mean, if you haven't
Speaker 1: heard the full interview yet. And my guess is you've
Speaker 1: been at work have not had the chance to you
Speaker 1: got to see the whole thing, because Bear, I'm just
Speaker 1: telling you, he was masterful, obviously very well prepared. Everybody
Speaker 1: knows her. Am Oh, she's going to come in and
Speaker 1: try to stall and run the clock out and duck
Speaker 1: the tough questions. And he did the best he possibly
Speaker 1: could under the circumstances. And she wouldn't answer these tough
Speaker 1: direct questions, which I think hurt her the most. But
Speaker 1: then her tone and the way she started getting openly angry,
Speaker 1: which is so contrary to this contrived brand they've been
Speaker 1: trying to float as the Vibes campaign. Yeah, that's why.
Speaker 1: According to Brett Bhair and he can be believed, there
Speaker 1: were four of her staff members waving their arms that
Speaker 1: the interview had to stop immediately, and they only got
Speaker 1: thirty minutes to begin with. So I think Brettbaar the
Speaker 1: big winner today, right because I had said, and I
Speaker 1: hope others said said, no, he's going to do a
Speaker 1: real good job for a lot of reasons, including the
Speaker 1: fact that hey, he's a smart guy, he's self interested,
Speaker 1: he knows his careers on the line right now in
Speaker 1: terms of how he's perceived by the Fox News audience
Speaker 1: and others. And I think he did himself a tremendous
Speaker 1: service today. More importantly, he did the country a tremendous
Speaker 1: service because he was firm but fair. He allowed the
Speaker 1: truth to be seen and experienced by all, and the
Speaker 1: truth went far beyond her answer to any particular question.
Speaker 1: That's a public service, makes it less likely she's going
Speaker 1: to be president. Whereas the political operators who posed as
Speaker 1: moderators for both ABC and CBS in the presidential and
Speaker 1: VP debate, they did a great disservice to America because
Speaker 1: they protected one of the candidates from one of the
Speaker 1: parties while trying to attack the other party. That's a
Speaker 1: grave disservice to America that ironically and poetically ended up
Speaker 1: backfiring on them and helping the Republican and hurting the Democrat.
Speaker 1: Eight five for five eight two five to five. The
Speaker 1: number will take some more calls and text, and this
Speaker 1: really remarkable afternoon. I think one thing that one hundred
Speaker 1: percent of honest people should be able to agree on
Speaker 1: is that she only went on Fox because she's desperate.
Speaker 1: She only went on Fox because she knows she's losing,
Speaker 1: So we'll just start with that heartwarming thought. And in fact,
Speaker 1: Fox's own poll today kind of bore that out. And
Speaker 1: I think you already know that Fox's poll tends to
Speaker 1: lean left. It tends to be trending a bit left
Speaker 1: of where many of the other polls are a bit
Speaker 1: more in Harris's favor. In this one, she'd lost four
Speaker 1: points in a short period of time. She went from
Speaker 1: up to to down two in the Fox polling, which
Speaker 1: I think is consistent with what we have seen from
Speaker 1: her in terms of performance. As she comes out and
Speaker 1: people start to see more of her in these interviews,
Speaker 1: they don't like it. And then on top of that,
Speaker 1: President Trump has been you know, he's a great closer.
Speaker 1: He hasn't been perfect, but what human ever has been.
Speaker 1: But he's a very good closer. He's been everywhere at once,
Speaker 1: and he's been doing a lot of things well. Dan
Speaker 1: Harris going on Fox News with Bear was a complete
Speaker 1: active desperation. Their internal polling much beeit. It must be
Speaker 1: much worse than we believed previously. You know, you can
Speaker 1: find polls all over the map right now, but the
Speaker 1: trend line, the consensus trend line, yeah, I think is
Speaker 1: that this thing is now moving slowly but steadily toward Trump,
Speaker 1: including in the swing States. And as we go micro
Speaker 1: tomorrow into some more really interesting detail, it's going to
Speaker 1: circle back to one thing I promised you in the beginning,
Speaker 1: which was that Harris would lose the Catholic vote big.
Speaker 1: I mean, she must, right. I mean, first of all,
Speaker 1: she's been blatantly hostile to Catholics. I mean, what else
Speaker 1: can you call it when you've got a judicial nominee
Speaker 1: who's eminently qualified, and she's going after the nominee on
Speaker 1: their membership and the Knights of Columbus, a Catholic service society,
Speaker 1: which is as good as it gets, Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: And so there's every reason to believe she would lose
Speaker 1: the Catholic vote big. And normally, whoever wins the Catholic
Speaker 1: vote is going to win. Now, Joe Biden was able
Speaker 1: to hold onto just enough of the Catholic vote because
Speaker 1: he marketed himself as Catholic. She can't do that, and
Speaker 1: so there's every reason to believe she's going to run
Speaker 1: well behind Biden in the Catholic vote. And if the
Speaker 1: Catholic vote had been a bit different, than twenty Biden
Speaker 1: loses by lot. So the simple fact. And remember the
Speaker 1: Catholic vote is particularly prevalent in the Blue Wall as
Speaker 1: well as some other swing states, and so we'll get
Speaker 1: into some of those numbers tomorrow. And she's in big
Speaker 1: trouble there, and I think it's just getting worse for her.
Speaker 1: Dear Kamala, you keep saying turn the page. You've been
Speaker 1: holding the book for three and a half years. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Brett did make that point today, as you would expect,
Speaker 1: and she did not respond to that. Well, Dan, I
Speaker 1: wish I could see Kamala leaving that interview. I bet
Speaker 1: you was pod and blaming her staff. Yeah, you would
Speaker 1: not want to be your staff tonight. And now that
Speaker 1: Fox is reporting four of her staff members, they are
Speaker 1: waving their arms to stop the interview. I think that's
Speaker 1: as clear as it gets. So Wow, what a moment
Speaker 1: to be alive. What a moment we're living through right now.
Speaker 1: And we'll continue to follow up on all of this
Speaker 1: tomorrow and much more. Ran deep thoughts as we wrap
Speaker 1: this one up.
Speaker 7: I think that one as well as it could for
Speaker 7: Donald Trump, that interview for Kamala Harris, and I don't
Speaker 7: think she'll recover from it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Yeah, it's And I do think there was such
Speaker 1: a telling moment today when Brett Bhar played that spot
Speaker 1: that's been devastating her, which is why it's playing everywhere
Speaker 1: every week. Of her saying that she's leading the way
Speaker 1: to use taxpayer funds for sex change operations for prisoners,
Speaker 1: Brett Behar gave her a chance to step back from
Speaker 1: that to say she's changed her position on that, just
Speaker 1: as she's changed your position on many other things. She
Speaker 1: would not do that. She would not change her position
Speaker 1: on that, And I think that just confirms my belief
Speaker 1: that she knows she's likely to lose, and she's looking
Speaker 1: ahead to a life after this presidential race, and she's
Speaker 1: trying to preserve that constituency. Zach, great job. Thank you,
Speaker 1: my friend Ryan, you as well, Kelly. Thank you. Join
Speaker 1: us tomorrow please,