Speaker 1: The Stone Zone, entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 1: podcast network. Now give him a zone.
Speaker 2: It's the Stone Zone.
Speaker 1: Here's Roger Stone.
Speaker 2: You are now entering the Stone Zone. Well, I see
Speaker 2: that Hunter Biden is back in the news. It was
Speaker 2: only about two years ago that I surprisingly received a
Speaker 2: letter from Hunter Biden's lawyer instructing me to preserve all emails, communications,
Speaker 2: documents or records regarding Hunter Biden's laptop, which was really
Speaker 2: quite simple to do because I had none. See, Hunter
Speaker 2: Biden invented this convoluted conspiracy that involved me, Mayor Rudy Giuliani,
Speaker 2: my personal attorney Tyler Nixon, and Hunter's former psychiatrist Keith
Speaker 2: Albow in a bizarre claim that we had somehow fat
Speaker 2: fabricated his laptop. Let me be as clear as I
Speaker 2: possibly can be. Anything I know about Hunter Biden's laptop
Speaker 2: I read in the pages of The New York Post
Speaker 2: in a series of stories by Miranda Devine. So the
Speaker 2: idea that I either possessed or knew about Hunter Biden's
Speaker 2: laptop part of the publication of those stories is categorically false.
Speaker 2: Now Hunter Biden is tempting yet another reinvention fresh from
Speaker 2: securing a one point seven punitive damages judgment against my friend,
Speaker 2: former Overstocked CEO Patrick Byrne, who lost that case by
Speaker 2: default after failing to appear for trial, a judgment that
Speaker 2: is going to be appealed. As I understand it, the
Speaker 2: former first son has launched a coordinated publicity campaign, podcasts,
Speaker 2: frequent posts on x, a new substack, live appearances, and
Speaker 2: an upcoming documentary financed by his Hollywood sugar daddy Kevin
Speaker 2: Moore US who financed most of the assault on me
Speaker 2: and Mayor Rudy Giuliani among others. Now as Miranda Divine
Speaker 2: has a New York post. This is not an organic
Speaker 2: redemption story. It is a deliberate effort to rehabilitate Underbide's image,
Speaker 2: monetize his notoriety, and recast the history of the laptop
Speaker 2: that exposed his conduct financial dealings and his sale of
Speaker 2: his proximity to his father's political power by trace himself
Speaker 2: as a misunderstood addict whose every failure should be used
Speaker 2: as a product of his use of crack cocaine. Now
Speaker 2: as a deal and destructive, but it does not explain
Speaker 2: away years of foreign business arrangements, complex corporate structures, unpaid taxes,
Speaker 2: suspicious financial transfers, or repeated invocation of the Biden name
Speaker 2: while seeking money and influence. Addiction may explain chaos, but
Speaker 2: it does not erase evidence. The laptop documented Hunter's dealings
Speaker 2: in China, Ukraine, Russia, Romania and elsewhere. It contained emailsges, photographs,
Speaker 2: some of them loot, financial records, and recordings that directly
Speaker 2: caught Joe Biden's repeated claims that he knew nothing about
Speaker 2: his son's businesses, references to the Big Guy, proposed equity splits,
Speaker 2: meetings with former associates, and Hunter's own complaints about paying
Speaker 2: his fossors, raising serial on how much of the media
Speaker 2: refused to examine this stuff honestly. Instead of addressing those questions,
Speaker 2: Hunter and his sugar daddy Kevin Morris have advanced an
Speaker 2: increasingly elaborate narrative involving Rudy Giuliani, Russian operatives, manipulated databases,
Speaker 2: fabricated recordings, Hunter's former psychiatrist Keith Ablow, myself, and my
Speaker 2: personal attorney, Tyler Nixon. It's an attempt to recast those
Speaker 2: who exposed the material as participants in a conspiracy against him.
Speaker 2: I've made it very clear, or say it yet again.
Speaker 2: I never possessed nor saw the contents of Hunter Biden's
Speaker 2: laptop until I read about it in the New York Post.
Speaker 2: His claim that I was somehow involved with the exposure
Speaker 2: of his laptop are the delusions of a crackhead. Origins
Speaker 2: of the laptop is not a mystery. A man identifying
Speaker 2: himself as Hunter Biden brought three damaged MacBook Pro computers
Speaker 2: to John Paul mcaaac's repair shop in Wilmington, Delaware, in
Speaker 2: April of twenty nineteen. Hunter Biden's signature appears on the
Speaker 2: repair authorization. He never paid the bill, and he also
Speaker 2: never came to retrieve his devices. Mac ISAAC, seeing the
Speaker 2: contents of the devices, provided the original computer to the FBI,
Speaker 2: which seized it under federal subpoena in twenty nineteen. Federal
Speaker 2: prosecutors later introduced material from the laptop during Hunter Biden's
Speaker 2: gun trial. An FBI agent testified the device was authentic
Speaker 2: through a serial number, and that investigators found no evidence
Speaker 2: or tampering or file insertion. The laptop was not just
Speaker 2: a media story, It became actual courts Independent analysis of
Speaker 2: Verify large portions of the data. Some emails were confirmed
Speaker 2: through cryptographic signatures, others through receipts and contemporaneous records. Hunter
Speaker 2: is gradually retreated from his blanket denials, acknowledging that much
Speaker 2: of the material is genuine, while still suggesting that unspecified
Speaker 2: portions may have been altered. This is a familiar but
Speaker 2: false pattern. Deny everything until denials become impossible, then concede
Speaker 2: selectively while casting doubt on the remainder. When the New
Speaker 2: York Posts first reported the laptop in October twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: the Biden campaign did not disprove the contents. Instead, fifty
Speaker 2: one former intelligence officers issued a letter claim the story
Speaker 2: had the quote classic year marks of disinformation, despite offering
Speaker 2: no evidence whatsoever that that was true. That claim provided
Speaker 2: justification for social media companies and major news outlets to
Speaker 2: suppress During the closing weeks of the twenty twenty presidential campaign.
Speaker 2: Twitter actually blocked the New York Posts reporting, Facebook limited
Speaker 2: the distribution of its reporting. Major news organizations treated authenticated
Speaker 2: material as suspect while amplifying the unproven Russian narrative. Only
Speaker 2: after the election did many acknowledge the authenticity of the material.
Speaker 2: That they had previously dismissed. One poll actually showed that
Speaker 2: seventeen percent of voters say they would have voted differently
Speaker 2: if they had known that Hunter Biden's laptop was real.
Speaker 2: Hunter now argues the laptop proves only drug use and addiction.
Speaker 2: That claim is also false. The DICE detailed record of income, spending,
Speaker 2: foreign relationships, tax issues, firearms purchases, and business negotiations. It
Speaker 2: helped establish conduct that later resulted in multiple fessions. In
Speaker 2: June of twenty twenty four, a federal jury convicted Hunter
Speaker 2: Biden of three felonies related to the purchase and possession
Speaker 2: of a Colt revolver. The jury found helied on federal
Speaker 2: forms about drug use, made false statements requiring for required
Speaker 2: for arms purchase records, and possessed a firearm or not
Speaker 2: while unlawfully using controlled substances. These were not political accusations.
Speaker 2: These are criminal convictions reached tremanously by a jury. Three
Speaker 2: months later, Hunter Biden pled guilty to three felony tax
Speaker 2: offenses and six misdemeanors. Federal prosecutors alleged failed to pay
Speaker 2: at least one point four million dollars in taxes evaded
Speaker 2: assessments and filed forced returns over a four year period
Speaker 2: while spending heavily on drugs, escorts, luxury travel cars, clothing,
Speaker 2: five star hotel resorts, and other personal senses. He wasn't
Speaker 2: a destitute addict. He received millions of dollars from foreign
Speaker 2: business arrangements while ignoring tax obligations. In fact, the IRS
Speaker 2: let fifteen million dollars of unreported income lapse so they
Speaker 2: could not charge him. In my case, by the way,
Speaker 2: I had paid all of my pass new taxes with
Speaker 2: interest and penalty to the penny, and I got no
Speaker 2: break whatsoever from the IRS. So claims you see online
Speaker 2: that hunter Biden was a prosecuted to Stone and his
Speaker 2: wife were allowed to skip out on past two taxes.
Speaker 2: That's simply false, and addiction may explain some of his behavior,
Speaker 2: but it does not excludes deliberate tax violations or false filings.
Speaker 2: The laptop was central to this record, contained financial data
Speaker 2: and communications from the same period covered by the tax case,
Speaker 2: helping establish timelines and corroborate evidence later used in a
Speaker 2: federal court. Public also has legitimate questions about why foreign
Speaker 2: companies connected figures paid large sums to hunter Biden He
Speaker 2: had no background in Ukrainian energy policy. When he joined
Speaker 2: the board of Barisma, he lacked the experience typically required
Speaker 2: for sex compensation. His primary asset was his last name, Biden.
Speaker 2: Joe Biden was Vice President of United States, and Hunter
Speaker 2: monetized proximity to him Baris Munter while its owner faced
Speaker 2: scrutiny in Ukraine, and while US policy towards that country
Speaker 2: was under the Vice President's direct influence. Hunter has never
Speaker 2: provided a convincing explanation of why his role was necessary
Speaker 2: beyond that of access and for purposes of bribery. A
Speaker 2: similar pattern emerging in China. Hunter traveled with his father
Speaker 2: to Beijing aboard Air Force twenty thirteen, introduced him to
Speaker 2: a Chinese business associate. His firm later secured a stake
Speaker 2: in a Chinese investment entity. He also purchased part of
Speaker 2: a Chinese energy company company linked directly to the Chinese
Speaker 2: Communist One email reference dividing equity in a Chinese cluting
Speaker 2: quote ten held by Age for the Big Guy close Quote.
Speaker 2: Business partner Tony Bubbolinski has identified the Big Guy as
Speaker 2: Joe Biden. Whether or not the deal was completed, it was.
Speaker 2: The language reflects how has discuss the Vice president's role.
Speaker 2: In fact, Hunter Biden has not dispersed his own way
Speaker 2: with his interest in that Chinese energy company. He's merely
Speaker 2: transferred to one of his cronies. Hunter also sent a
Speaker 2: message to a Chinese associate saying he was with his
Speaker 2: father and demanding payment. Shortly afterwards, millions of dollars moved
Speaker 2: into accounts tied to Hunter Biden's network. He now claims
Speaker 2: his reference to his father was meaningless, while that explanation
Speaker 2: strains credibility. Congressional investigators traced more than twenty four million
Speaker 2: dollars from foreign sources to the Biden family members and associates.
Speaker 2: The money moved through multiple entities before reaching individuals connected
Speaker 2: to the Biden family. While not every one of those
Speaker 2: criminal structure warranted serious scrutiny, Banks filed more than one
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty suspicious activity reports or stars involving Hunter
Speaker 2: Biden and the related accounts. These reports are not proof
Speaker 2: of wrongdoing, but they are indicators that financial activity may
Speaker 2: require investigation. A politically connected family recent transfers should not
Speaker 2: be shield from scrutiny. Joe Biden repeatedly denied discussing business
Speaker 2: with his son during the twenty twenty campaign. That claim
Speaker 2: was undermined by testimony and records showing calls, meetings, and
Speaker 2: shared appearances with foreign associates. Devin Archer, another one of
Speaker 2: Hunter Biden's partners, testified that Joe Biden was placed on
Speaker 2: the speaker phone during various business meetings. Hunter arranged dinners
Speaker 2: where his father met his foreign partners. Joe Biden's president
Speaker 2: self was not the product of being sold, sessnot policy
Speaker 2: was the commodity here. The defense offered by the Bidens
Speaker 2: relied on a narrow definition of corruption that no specific
Speaker 2: policy change directly exchange for payment. Influence operations rarely work
Speaker 2: that way, of course. They depend on access, expectation, and
Speaker 2: implied leverage rather than explicit contracts. Hunter and his uncle
Speaker 2: Jim Biden were part of a broader financial network. Money
Speaker 2: moved through associates and entities before reaching family members. Joe
Speaker 2: Biden received payments labeled as loan repayments from his brother
Speaker 2: after business related transactions. These arrangements demand scrutiny rather than dismissal.
Speaker 2: A House impeachment inquiry concluded that Joe Biden engaged in
Speaker 2: conduct involving influence petting that benefited his family on not
Speaker 2: a criminal conviction. The findings were based on records, testimony,
Speaker 2: financial data view. If you want to get a copy
Speaker 2: of Hunter Biden's actual laptop, you can go to Marco
Speaker 2: Polo dot org. That's Marco Polo dot org. I'm Roger Stone.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the Stone Zone. I think we just
Speaker 2: demolished Hunter Biden's phony narrative regarding his laptop and me,
Speaker 2: and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: The Stone Zone entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 1: podcast networks.
Speaker 3: He's kept going, and he's smart, and he's strong, and
Speaker 3: people love him. Not everybody, but people love him and
Speaker 3: respect him. Rogers Stone, when's Roes.
Speaker 1: Here's Rogerstone.
Speaker 2: You are now back in the Stone Zone. While the
Speaker 2: Dallas Fort Worth International Airport is moving ahead with planes
Speaker 2: to install Islamic ritual foot washing stations inside terminal D restrooms,
Speaker 2: sparking a sharp debate among Texans over all religious accommodations
Speaker 2: in public spaces. The project, filed with texts regulators on
Speaker 2: July thirty, first calls one so called WODO station in
Speaker 2: both the men's and women's restrooms. The privately funded project
Speaker 2: is expected to cost roughly three hundred thousand dollars and
Speaker 2: can be completed by the end of the year.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 2: Wudoo is an Islamic cleansing ritual performed before prayer, and
Speaker 2: the low level basins are designed to allow Muslim travelers
Speaker 2: to wash their feet without ordinary sinks. I've actually sometimes
Speaker 2: seen that in the bathrooms and airports. I find it disturbing.
Speaker 2: While this may seem innocuous to some, what this represents
Speaker 2: is the Islamification of our society. My opinion, we should
Speaker 2: not our airports to accommodate the customs of any particular religion.
Speaker 2: Think what it would be like if Catholics advocated putting
Speaker 2: is for holy water in the airports. There would be
Speaker 2: a public uproar. The concern here is parcisely striking in Texas,
Speaker 2: whose voters have repeatedly rejected progressive efforts to reshape public
Speaker 2: institutions around identity, politics, and special They've attempted to make
Speaker 2: Muslim only communities that operate under de facto Sharia law.
Speaker 2: This has caused Attorney General Ken Paxton to initiate a
Speaker 2: crackdown against this mission creep of radical Islam. Religious freedom
Speaker 2: means Americans should be free to worship without government interference.
Speaker 2: It should not mean public institutions gradually reorganize themselves around
Speaker 2: the customs of different cultural groups. This is how multiculturalism
Speaker 2: destroys societies, little by little. The Dallas Fort work controversies
Speaker 2: therefore about more than simple bathroom fixtures. It's a test
Speaker 2: to whether America remains America or becomes a different and
Speaker 2: much worse country. Meanwhile, the newly released intelligence records are
Speaker 2: shown that the FBI and other federal agencies profiled more
Speaker 2: high profile Republicans and Trump supporters than once believed. According
Speaker 2: to doction by the White House Government Transparency Task Force,
Speaker 2: a secret counterintellition knows that Round River was conducted by
Speaker 2: the FBI in order to discredit Hunter Biden's laptop and
Speaker 2: to shut down any discussion of its contents among those
Speaker 2: who were targeted in this operation or Secretary of State
Speaker 2: Mike Pompeo, former Attorney General Bill Barr, Congress Jim Jordan,
Speaker 2: the late Lindsay Graham, Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Fox News, and
Speaker 2: other conservative outlets, all of whom were determined as co
Speaker 2: Russian disinformation. Meanwhile, Democrats, including Barack Obama Hillary Clinton, George Soros,
Speaker 2: and members of the Biden family were classified as tart.
Speaker 2: It is clear that the FBI and the deep State
Speaker 2: were weaponized and ready to destroy the lives of prominent
Speaker 2: supporters of Donald Trump during this era. FBI Director Cash
Speaker 2: Battel says the bureau is now investigating whether information from
Speaker 2: that operation was used to underminor influence investigations involved in
Speaker 2: the Biden family. Pattel has also determm into the Foreign
Speaker 2: Intelligence Task Force that was responsible for this overreach and
Speaker 2: shut it down. Government agency's charge of protecting Americans should
Speaker 2: never become ideological political forces working to mind political opponents
Speaker 2: based on biased propaganda narratives. I'm Roger Stone. You're listening
Speaker 2: to the Stone Zone, and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: The Stone Zone entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 1: podcast network.
Speaker 3: A man who's gone through hell, but he's kept going,
Speaker 3: and he's smart, and he's strong, and people love him.
Speaker 3: Not everybody, but people love him and respect him. Roger Stone.
Speaker 2: Where's Roches.
Speaker 1: Here's Roger Stone.
Speaker 2: We are now re entering the Stone Zone. The Democrats
Speaker 2: are escalating their pressure campaign against Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison,
Speaker 2: as is control of Warner Brothers Discovery with it CNN
Speaker 2: House Judiciary Committee ranking Democrat Jamie Raskin one of the
Speaker 2: most odious figures in Washington. He announced the press conference
Speaker 2: saying that the January sixth committee would produce suitable proof
Speaker 2: that I was involved in some untourd activity on January sixth,
Speaker 2: when they produced nothing of the kind. But Raskin, one
Speaker 2: of the most disgraceful anti Trump lawmakers in all of
Speaker 2: Washington d C, has demanded that Ellison sit for a
Speaker 2: transcribed interview, accusing him of colluding with President Trump to
Speaker 2: undermine media independence and suppressed descent. This is almost laughable.
Speaker 2: Raskin has also raised alarms about whether As News and
Speaker 2: the possibility that changes there and that CNN could move
Speaker 2: away from its long standing far left editorial posture under
Speaker 2: the new ownership. As I've said many times, I don't
Speaker 2: get my news from CNN for the same reason I
Speaker 2: don't drink out of the toilet. But in other words,
Speaker 2: Raskin wants to protect the hold of liberal propaganda that
Speaker 2: attacks his enemies and attempted to abuse his power to
Speaker 2: stop a new owner who may take it in a
Speaker 2: new direction. The hypocrisy here is stunning. Democrats spent years
Speaker 2: defending supposedly independent, legacy media outlets, while those same institutions
Speaker 2: routinely spouted leftist propaganda, amplified anti Trump narratives, including the
Speaker 2: Russian collusion hoax, divided the country needlessly, and treated any
Speaker 2: viewpoint other than their rision. Now that a new only
Speaker 2: could bring greater ideological balance, or simply demand more straight
Speaker 2: down the middle journalism, democratic politicians like Raskin are suddenly
Speaker 2: involving and invoking government power and congressional scrutiny. Ellison has
Speaker 2: publicly said he doesn't want newsrooms bending to his political
Speaker 2: views and that organizations like CNN and CBS should serve
Speaker 2: audiences across the political spectrum. Yet Democrats appear deeply concerned
Speaker 2: about what happens existing culture changes. If politicians are comfortable
Speaker 2: with the media organization when it consistently tilts in their
Speaker 2: ideological direction, but threatned investigations when ownership might challenge that too,
Speaker 2: this is not a good faith debate about media independence.
Speaker 2: These are liberal Democrat officials abusing their authority to protect
Speaker 2: their political machine. CNN does not need government protection diversity,
Speaker 2: it needs credibility. Or eventually go bankrupt. Its audiences are
Speaker 2: already down sharply, Ellison is coming in to save CNA
Speaker 2: and like he's saving CBS News, but Democrats would rather
Speaker 2: CNN go away completely than present a fair and balanced perspective. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: Vice President JD. Vance is a Justice Department to investigate
Speaker 2: whether hospitals and doctors committed fraud while providing gender transition
Speaker 2: treatments to minors. The move follows a new Department of
Speaker 2: Health and Human Services report alleging that some providers may
Speaker 2: have used inaccurate medical billing codes or diagnosed to secure
Speaker 2: insurance reimbursements for hormones, puberty blockers, and surgeries otherwise might
Speaker 2: not have been covered or paid for by the taxpayers.
Speaker 2: HHS says that evidence could provide and ray attential civil
Speaker 2: or criminal liability, although the allegations have not yet been adjudicated.
Speaker 2: Vans referred to the findings to Attorney General Todd Blanche,
Speaker 2: asking the Department of Justice to define whether providers violated
Speaker 2: federal fraud, conspiracy, food and drug or false claim ect statutates.
Speaker 2: The Vice President argued that intentional miscoding designed to obtain
Speaker 2: medicaid or private insurance payments should carry serious consequences. This
Speaker 2: is exactly the kind of accountability he has been missing
Speaker 2: from the pediatric gender medicine debate from the highest levels
Speaker 2: of our government. Parents deserve to know what doctors are
Speaker 2: putting children's welfare ahead of leftist, woke ideology, institutional pressure,
Speaker 2: or financial incentives. Taxpayers deserve assurance that Medicaid dollars are
Speaker 2: not being obtained through misleading diagnosis or fraudulent billing practices.
Speaker 2: Trump administrations make it clear that intends to reverse the
Speaker 2: federal government's previous promotion of medical gender transition for minors.
Speaker 2: The new HHS report notes that political, ideological, and financial
Speaker 2: pressures help drive the rapid expansion of these treatments, which is,
Speaker 2: if anything, is a drastic understatement if these hospitals nor
Speaker 2: only manipulated billing rules while performing irreversible procedures on children.
Speaker 2: While taxpayers have a right to demand accountability, medicine should
Speaker 2: not be should be about healing children, not naming for
Speaker 2: the life in the name of some cult. As I
Speaker 2: said yesterday, White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt will her
Speaker 2: spot at the end of August, closing a remarkable chapter
Speaker 2: and what she became one of President Trump's most effective
Speaker 2: defenders against an overwhelmingly hostile press corps dedicated to tearing
Speaker 2: down the administration at every turn. Now, in my fifty
Speaker 2: year career in American politics, I've known five presidential press secretaries.
Speaker 2: Some were good, a few were great, but Caroline Levitt
Speaker 2: may be the greatest. President Trump himself announced Wednesday that
Speaker 2: Levitt is leaving stepping away to spend more time with
Speaker 2: her two young children after recently returning from maternity leave.
Speaker 2: Levitt will remain one of Trump's outside advisors and an
Speaker 2: influential Republican voice heading into the midterm elections. President Trump
Speaker 2: himself praiseder is one of the best press secretaries in
Speaker 2: White House history. Praised it's extremely well. Levitt deserves to
Speaker 2: be appreciated for a job exceptionally well done with grace
Speaker 2: and dignity under fire. She first came to my attention,
Speaker 2: which she waged a valiant campaign for Congress in her
Speaker 2: native and she is among the standouts in the Trump administration.
Speaker 2: Day after day, Levitt walked into a briefing room filled
Speaker 2: with reporters itching to harm President Trump's agenda or otherwise
Speaker 2: smear him. She never played by the old Washington rules.
Speaker 2: Never allowed herself to become flustered. She pushed back, forcefully,
Speaker 2: challenged semisies, defended the administration's policies, and reminded Americas that
Speaker 2: the America that the establishment media's version of events is
Speaker 2: well usually false. That toughness mattered to me. It made
Speaker 2: a difference and helped President Trump achieve his successes. For decades,
Speaker 2: republic officials too often treated hostile media coverage as something
Speaker 2: they simply had to endure. Caroline Levitt showed America that
Speaker 2: the press can and should be challenged when it's reporting
Speaker 2: or assumptions are false or contemptible. Levitt ultimately concluded she
Speaker 2: could not give both the demand a role of a
Speaker 2: press secretary and her young family the attention that both
Speaker 2: deserved at just twenty eight years old. This clearly is
Speaker 2: not the end of her political story. In fact, in
Speaker 2: my opinion, it is only the beginning. Meanwhile, a former
Speaker 2: top official at the Southern Property Law Center has been
Speaker 2: arrested as federal prosecutors widened a fraud and money laundering
Speaker 2: case that is finally cracking down against the sinister far
Speaker 2: left scam organization. One Heidi Bairich, who once headed the
Speaker 2: Southern Property Law Center's Intelligence project, bass charges including conspiracy
Speaker 2: to commit wire fraud, conspiracy to make false statements to
Speaker 2: a federally insured bank, and conspiracy to conceal money laundering.
Speaker 2: Prosecutors allege that the Southern Property Law Center secretly funneled
Speaker 2: donor money through fictitious entities to paid informants and baited
Speaker 2: into extremist groups including the klu Kluck's Klan, the Aryan Nation,
Speaker 2: and the National Alliance. Reminds me of what one veteran
Speaker 2: FBI agent once told me. He said, if he went
Speaker 2: to a Ku Klux Klan member and there were ten
Speaker 2: people there, nine of them would be Federal informants. According
Speaker 2: to the indictment, some informants were not merely observing extrements,
Speaker 2: but were allegedly helping promote or organize racist activity while
Speaker 2: receiving the money from the Southern Poverty Law Center. So,
Speaker 2: in other words, the Center was creating the problem that
Speaker 2: they could then go out and fundraise off of. They
Speaker 2: were essentially fomenting the threat that fearmongered about in order
Speaker 2: to bleed money out of their gullible small dollar leftist flock.
Speaker 2: Prosecutors say more than three million dollars in donated funds
Speaker 2: went to at least eight informants between twenty fourteen and
Speaker 2: twenty twenty three. Bay Rich has also been accused of
Speaker 2: sharing a bank account with one informant who allegedly received
Speaker 2: Southern Property Loss Center funds while in filtrading a neo
Speaker 2: Nazi organization. Southern Popy Law Center has pleaded not guilty
Speaker 2: and argues the government's mixed characterizing legitimate intelligence gathering work.
Speaker 2: But frankly, that rationale is not going to fly with
Speaker 2: the Trump administration. Finally, there is a glaring spotlight on
Speaker 2: an organization's spent years judging others and fomenting extremism while
Speaker 2: engaged in treacherous double dealing. Remember how they profiled Charlie
Speaker 2: Kirk in Turning Point USA as a eight group in
Speaker 2: the lead up to assassination. Now they're finally reaping what
Speaker 2: they have sown. Doubt that ICE is prepared to give
Speaker 2: officers a new tool designed to stop violent suspects without
Speaker 2: immediately resorting to deadly force. This is good news. According
Speaker 2: to a Department of Homeland Security, ICE plans to spend
Speaker 2: up to twenty million dollars on specialized gloves capable of
Speaker 2: delivering electric shock through direct skin contact. These devices, called
Speaker 2: the CTG five glove, also described as conductive distraction and
Speaker 2: de escalate tools, are expected to be delivered by March
Speaker 2: of twenty twenty seven. The gloves are intended for situations
Speaker 2: where it becomes violent and poses a threat to officers
Speaker 2: of the public. They're not going to be used on defiance, punishment,
Speaker 2: or torture, and officers have yet to be trained and
Speaker 2: certified before they can be deployed. The manufacturer also pays
Speaker 2: restrictions on their use against vulnerable populations. Predictably, of course,
Speaker 2: the fire left ACLU is already warning about abuse. The
Speaker 2: critics would be up in arms about any decision that
Speaker 2: protects ICE officers and gave them better ability to deport
Speaker 2: illegal immigrants, but the left wing critics ought to be happy.
Speaker 2: For years, activists have demanded that law enforcement find alternatives
Speaker 2: to lethal force. Here's ICE doing exactly that, as they
Speaker 2: use technology to give agents another option between physical restraint
Speaker 2: and using a firearm. No tool, of course, eliminates risk,
Speaker 2: and strict training remains essential. But when federal officers can
Speaker 2: in front violent resistance, they need practical ways to protect themselves,
Speaker 2: the public, and even the suspect. If these gloves can
Speaker 2: safely end a dangerous confrontation a bullet being fired, well
Speaker 2: then that's not an escalation. It is precisely the kind
Speaker 2: of de escalation technology law enforcement critics claim they want.
Speaker 2: We should applaud Ice as they use these tools to
Speaker 2: enforce the law and to make the country safer. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: President Trump is taking Americans public health policy back from
Speaker 2: the globalist control, this time by reshaping childhood vaccination recommendations.
Speaker 2: Despite the World Health Organization's objections, President Trump signed an
Speaker 2: order directing much needed changes a childhood vaccination schedule, as
Speaker 2: urged by Secretary of Health and Human Services for Kennedy,
Speaker 2: including spacing out the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccinations rather
Speaker 2: than relying exclusively on a comblined MMR shot. His administrations
Speaker 2: made the case that the changes are necessary to get
Speaker 2: parents more flexibility while aligning US recommendations with scientific evidence
Speaker 2: and practices in other developed nations. Predictably, the World Health Organization,
Speaker 2: with which the United States is no longer a member,
Speaker 2: lashed out of the Trump administration, defending this recomization to
Speaker 2: a pump as many as seventy nine big pharma shots
Speaker 2: into the bodies of children, all at one time. This
Speaker 2: response from the World Health Organization is music to the
Speaker 2: ears of the MAGA faithful. The COVID nineteen pandemic badly
Speaker 2: damaged public confidence in global health authorities, which is led
Speaker 2: by the World Health Organization. Guide Repeatedly, LEGITIMATEFIC inquiry was
Speaker 2: purposely stifled, and fear monitoring propaganda warped the public psyche
Speaker 2: in ways were only today beginning to comprehend. Whatever one's
Speaker 2: view of vaxations may be, and I'm for health freedom.
Speaker 2: You should have as many vaccinations as you choose, but
Speaker 2: you should be mandated to take any. Americans should never
Speaker 2: outsource critical health policy decisions to an unaccountable and discredited
Speaker 2: international bureaucracy. President Trump's orders indicates that public health will
Speaker 2: now answer to America families, American doctors, American institutions, not
Speaker 2: global organizations obsessments and forced compliance. The World's Health Organization
Speaker 2: can feel free to offer advice, but will likely follow
Speaker 2: on deaf ears of the Trump administration. Rightfully, so, we're
Speaker 2: making America healthy again. If that offends enemies of the
Speaker 2: United States, so be it. But going from seventy nine
Speaker 2: required vaccinations to a mere eleventh. Those that I support
Speaker 2: seems to be common sense. I'm Roger Stone. You're listening
Speaker 2: to the Stone Zone. Don't go away, because we'll be
Speaker 2: right back. Harvard University has been exposed for their ties
Speaker 2: to the Chinese Communist Party, and you're going to want
Speaker 2: to hear all about it once again. You're joining me
Speaker 2: in the Stone Zone right here on the Red Apple
Speaker 2: Audio Networks where we talk news, history, politics, style, and
Speaker 2: well once in a while food. Don't go away. We'll
Speaker 2: be right back.
Speaker 1: The Stone Zone, entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 1: Podcast network.
Speaker 3: Sure people love them and respect him. Rogers Stone.
Speaker 1: Where's Here's Rogerstone.
Speaker 2: You're now back in the Stone Zone, and I'm Roger Stone.
Speaker 2: Harvard University is facing fresh scrutiny after a congressional investigation
Speaker 2: uncovered more than one hundred and forty research papers co
Speaker 2: authored by Harvard affiliated scholars and researchers connected to Chinese
Speaker 2: universities tied to Beijing's military and defense establishment. The House
Speaker 2: Select Committee on Chinese Commerce Party Activities says those universities
Speaker 2: include members of China's so called Seven Sons of National
Speaker 2: Defense institute, identified by US officials as playing a major
Speaker 2: role in China's military modernization. The report highlights research involving robotics,
Speaker 2: magnetic materials, and other technologies with potential military applications. One
Speaker 2: study involved Harvard and China's National University of Defense Technology,
Speaker 2: reportedly receiving partial support from the US Army Research Office
Speaker 2: in The financial ties are just as troubling. According to
Speaker 2: federal disclosure data cited by the Committee, Harvard has reportedly
Speaker 2: received more than six hundred million dollars from communist China
Speaker 2: and any other American university. This is exactly why America's
Speaker 2: elite university deserve far greater scrutiny. Whether deliberate or not,
Speaker 2: They've opened the door to China to infiltrate and put
Speaker 2: the future of our nation in grave jeopardy. Institutions like
Speaker 2: Harvard receive enormous prestige, influence, and taxpayer support while repeatedly
Speaker 2: insisting they know what a country. This makes for an
Speaker 2: unacceptable for their weak safeguards, allowing American research and expertise
Speaker 2: to benefit a commune adversary actively building its military power.
Speaker 2: American university should put American national security first, or else
Speaker 2: they should not receive a dime of federal funding. To me,
Speaker 2: it's that simple academic freedom is important, but woke Marxists
Speaker 2: on campus have turned these universities into thought prisons, so
Speaker 2: the crackdown is more than warranted. The Trump administration is
Speaker 2: off to a great start, but going the extra mile
Speaker 2: to root out the communist impasies. While that must be achieved,
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court is preparing for a consequential November docket
Speaker 2: that could strengthen religious liberty and further reran in the
Speaker 2: power of the federal bureaucracy. On November three, the Justices
Speaker 2: will hear a challenge evolving Catholic preschools excluded from Colorado's
Speaker 2: universal preschool program because participating schools must comply with state
Speaker 2: rules on sexual orientation and gender identity. The Catholic schools
Speaker 2: require families to support traditional church teachings on sex and gender.
Speaker 2: The principle is straightforward. The government should not force religious
Speaker 2: institutions to surrender their beliefs as price of participating in
Speaker 2: a generally available public benefit. Court will also hear a
Speaker 2: major separation of powers case involving the Labor Department. A
Speaker 2: New Jersey farm was fined more than a half million
Speaker 2: dollars through an in house agency tribunal over alleged violations
Speaker 2: of the H two A temporary farmer worker program. A
Speaker 2: federal appeals court ruled that process was unconstitutional. That case
Speaker 2: could build on recent Supreme Court decisions limiting the ability
Speaker 2: of unelected federal agencies to act as an investigator, prosecutor,
Speaker 2: and judge all at once. A third case, the Court
Speaker 2: will consider whether federal prisoners consue the US government employees
Speaker 2: over allegedly inadequate medical treatment. Taken together, these cases go
Speaker 2: to the heart of our constitutional government, religious freedom, individual rights,
Speaker 2: limits on administrative power. For years, conservatives have worn the
Speaker 2: bureaucracies cannot be allowed to write the rules enforcement and
Speaker 2: then punish Americans with minimal judicial accountability. This November, the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court has another opportunity to restore those constitutional bounds
Speaker 2: in the country in ways it will help the say
Speaker 2: of the Republic for generations to come. Thank you for
Speaker 2: joining us today in the Stone Zone. I'm Roger Stone.
Speaker 2: We're here five days a week where we talk history, politics, news, style,
Speaker 2: and from time to time food till tomorrow. God bless
Speaker 2: you and God speed.
Speaker 4: Thanks for listening to The Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
Speaker 4: You can hear The Stone Zone with Roger Stone weeknights
Speaker 4: at eight on seventy seven WABC. If you like the podcast,
Speaker 4: share it with your friends and listen anytime at wabcradio
Speaker 4: dot com and download the WABC Radio app. Hit that
Speaker 4: subscribe button on all major podcast platforms. Plus, follow WABC
Speaker 4: on social on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and X see you
Speaker 4: next time for a new episode, so you never have
Speaker 4: to wonder
Speaker 2: What the heck is going on here