Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the
Speaker 1: David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the thirteenth of August,
Speaker 2: year of Our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, last night
Speaker 2: there was a conversation. Wasn't an interview, they said, between
Speaker 2: Musk and Trump? And for nearly an hour it was
Speaker 2: under a cyber attack. Where did that come from? Coming
Speaker 2: from the same people in the UK who want to
Speaker 2: set up a Chinese style great firewall? Or was it
Speaker 2: coming from the EU? Who was it coming from? Was
Speaker 2: it coming from the US. But we're going to take
Speaker 2: a look at new research that's just been released talking
Speaker 2: about evidence of nanotech in the vaccines. That's right, focus
Speaker 2: on the fauci Chinese lab. Don't look at what's in
Speaker 2: the vaccines. I wouldn't want to have you do that.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back. Well, as I said, they were
Speaker 2: delayed for nearly forty minutes yesterday, it was under a
Speaker 2: d DOS attack nile of service and they finally got
Speaker 2: it underway. And as Elon mus said, it was going
Speaker 2: to be a conversation, wasn't going to be an interview?
Speaker 3: It is.
Speaker 2: I haven't seen anything really of any substance that came
Speaker 2: out of it. There's a couple of things that people
Speaker 2: pulled out. The Daily Mail went through and listened to
Speaker 2: it went for two hours. It started about an hour late,
Speaker 2: went for two hours. So I didn't listen to any
Speaker 2: of it. And I don't think I will be two
Speaker 2: hours of Elon Musk and Donald Trump. That's something that
Speaker 2: I can't imagine setting through. So must said right at
Speaker 2: the very beginning that he was a victim of a
Speaker 2: cyber attack. And yet as some people try to pour
Speaker 2: cold water on that, La La Harris immediately said, me too,
Speaker 2: me too. It happened to me too. She doesn't want
Speaker 2: to be left behind. She wants to do everything that
Speaker 2: Trump does. So you know, she's got the big crowds,
Speaker 2: she's got the tax cuts for tips, and she's got
Speaker 2: the cyber attacks at the same time. In a long
Speaker 2: winded discussion this I thought was interesting of climate change,
Speaker 2: Musk said that he believed the solar power would become
Speaker 2: the quote majority of US energy generation in the future,
Speaker 2: because you see, he's going to sell you the battery
Speaker 2: energy storage sites that are so important and for him,
Speaker 2: not for us, because when you look at these EVS.
Speaker 2: Yesterday I ended the program with electric vehicle fires. It
Speaker 2: was one of Mercedes that caught fire in a parking garage,
Speaker 2: burned down the entire garage. I talked about how that
Speaker 2: had happened in the past, multiple bus stations in Germany
Speaker 2: burned down by the electric buses. We've seen French buses
Speaker 2: just spontaneously combust. The Mercedes wasn't even charging at the time.
Speaker 2: We just had a cyber truck that was involved in
Speaker 2: an accident. Person couldn't get out and burst into flames.
Speaker 2: They were incinerated alive. And then we had the large
Speaker 2: semi truck that was on its way to Vegas with
Speaker 2: a truckload of lithium batteries and it rolled and the
Speaker 2: lithium batteries caught fire, and it went for forty eight
Speaker 2: hours before they could get that put out. Massive, massive
Speaker 2: traffic jam out in the middle of the desert, people
Speaker 2: running out of fuel, running out of water, in the
Speaker 2: middle of the desert. Without fire going, they wouldn't let
Speaker 2: people go. And then there's this which I didn't play yesterday.
Speaker 2: This is two electric vehicles colliding. Look at that one.
Speaker 2: It's been going on for some time, just explod after explosion.
Speaker 2: This is the first time I've seen two evs collide.
Speaker 2: Look at that, Like I said yesterday, you don't need
Speaker 2: to have planes flying the World Trade Center. Some EV's
Speaker 2: on fire. It burned the steel building down probably, and
Speaker 2: it goes on and on and on. That's really far away.
Speaker 2: I mean, look at one of those cars. Is there's
Speaker 2: another car there that is a little bit too close
Speaker 2: to that sploity mythly of that. I mean, it's just amazing.
Speaker 2: It just goes on on. Big pieces they're still flying
Speaker 2: off of it that haven't been incinerated yet. Yeah, well,
Speaker 2: you know, we could keep playing that. It went on for,
Speaker 2: of course, a very long time. You just have to
Speaker 2: let these things burn out until there's nothing left to burn.
Speaker 2: They don't really have a good solution for putting them out.
Speaker 2: As I said yesterday, burns at five thousand degrees, so
Speaker 2: that cyber truck, it melted the steel everything. You know,
Speaker 2: open air fire of jet fuel is only eighteen hundred
Speaker 2: degrees we're talking fahrenheit here, but you know, not hot
Speaker 2: enough to melt steel. But the battery lithium battery fires
Speaker 2: are so Trump listened very respectfully, and then he said,
Speaker 2: you know, when when Musk was talking about solar being
Speaker 2: the majority of US energy production, then Trump had to
Speaker 2: think of something that he could add to it, or
Speaker 2: he's kind of, you know, on the same page. So
Speaker 2: they said, maybe you can put solar panels on your cars.
Speaker 2: You know, I've seen that already on some of the
Speaker 2: battery operated cars.
Speaker 4: I have.
Speaker 2: The roof panel is solar. But Trump complained in the
Speaker 2: past about green energy, complained about windmills. Hey, I've got
Speaker 2: an idea. This is genius. I don't know why Trump
Speaker 2: didn't think of it. Put solar panels on the blaze
Speaker 2: of the windmills. I mean, just think about it, double everything, right,
Speaker 2: why not? I mean, we're just throwing away money here, right,
Speaker 2: genius idea. But here's here's a real deal. Here's why
Speaker 2: Musk is pushing that. He's not making the solar panels.
Speaker 2: The Chinese are making solar panels. He's putting together the
Speaker 2: big battery energy solar storage sites right best. And that's
Speaker 2: the reason I wanted to play those two evs colliding,
Speaker 2: because we've had these gigantic battery energy storage sites, you know,
Speaker 2: just like that truck that was carrying with him batteries
Speaker 2: or just like the two cars that hit each other,
Speaker 2: you know they or the buses who are the entire
Speaker 2: bus station goes, one of these things starts and if
Speaker 2: there's more batteries around there, they just feed on each
Speaker 2: other and they go forever. Now, we've had situations like
Speaker 2: that already with some of these battery battery energy storage sites.
Speaker 2: Then he wants to put these things in our neighborhoods.
Speaker 2: It's not enough to burn down our economy. It's not
Speaker 2: enough to line his pockets with government subsidies so he
Speaker 2: can become the richest man in the world. He wants
Speaker 2: to burn down our societies as well as make our
Speaker 2: energy unbelievable expensive. Amout just making energy affordable again, there's
Speaker 2: your slogan. It called yesterday about how the auctions in
Speaker 2: and around Maryland have gotten so expensive. They were up
Speaker 2: by sevenfold. It seems to be a common number that
Speaker 2: we keep seeing over and over again. The angus calf
Speaker 2: that's seven times more expensive than it was, the electricity
Speaker 2: that's seven times more expensive, and more things as well.
Speaker 2: When we look at the cost of things going up
Speaker 2: by factors of seven. But even with that, they still
Speaker 2: can't supply enough energy, because these people are destroying our
Speaker 2: grid at the same time, they're pushing everybody onto it,
Speaker 2: and at the same time they want to add their
Speaker 2: artificial intelligence to it. And that would include people like
Speaker 2: Elon Musk, who wants to make Twitter into what he
Speaker 2: called a hive mind. He's not doing Twitter because he
Speaker 2: is some benevolent billionaire. There's no altruism in this. He's
Speaker 2: doing it for political positioning, and he's doing it because
Speaker 2: he wants to be able to date of mind people.
Speaker 2: I don't have any problem with the things that he's done.
Speaker 2: He's stood up for the time being, at least appears
Speaker 2: to who don't really know if this is a real opposition.
Speaker 2: It is really strange to see him bowing and scraping
Speaker 2: before Theory Breton and then pretending to be defiant. So
Speaker 2: I don't know if this is all for show or not.
Speaker 2: I just think that he is focusing himself on politics
Speaker 2: for whatever reason. Either it's to be able to make
Speaker 2: more money, or maybe he wants to get into political
Speaker 2: office and figures that he can get he's popular enough,
Speaker 2: they'll change the laws so he can run. I don't
Speaker 2: know what his endgame is. I mean, he's talked about technocracy.
Speaker 2: He's talking about the merge of people, machines, everything that
Speaker 2: he does in terms of also conquering the stars and
Speaker 2: mankind and space. I mean, that's a whole bunch of
Speaker 2: new age, new age technocracy stuff. That's the same stuff
Speaker 2: that really always got Alex so excited. Too interesting, But
Speaker 2: that's just technocracy, And so when you look at it,
Speaker 2: I'm not sure what he is after. We just take
Speaker 2: things as they come. If he's going to fight these
Speaker 2: people on censorship, that's a good thing, I applaud that,
Speaker 2: But I don't know what his endgame is. He is
Speaker 2: definitely not just throwing money away in order to save
Speaker 2: free speech. And even if he saved free s bech
Speaker 2: on Twitter, that's not saving free speech. Nevertheless, as I
Speaker 2: pointed out, as they were being targeted, Harris jumped in
Speaker 2: and said it was also targeted. Everything that happens to Trump,
Speaker 2: She's got to be a part of it as well.
Speaker 2: The Washington Post was very concerned about this interview and
Speaker 2: even asked in a press conference because even though Biden
Speaker 2: is not doing a press conference and La La is
Speaker 2: afraid to do a press conference at all, none at all,
Speaker 2: they still have the press secretary for Biden doing press conferences.
Speaker 2: So there was a Washington Post reporter there who asked
Speaker 2: if Biden could stop this Trump Musk interview. He was
Speaker 2: afraid there might be misinformation. Well, we had to take
Speaker 2: a look at the subtext of the subtitle for the
Speaker 2: Washington Post. Democracy dies in darkness. You can't have democracy
Speaker 2: if you don't have discussion, if you only have one
Speaker 2: point of view allowed. Isn't that amazing? This is a reporter.
Speaker 2: And so this guy's name is Cleave Wootson. He sounds
Speaker 2: like a pja, like a Woodehouse, right, Bertie Wooster now
Speaker 2: Cleve Wootson, a Washington Post so called reporter. And this
Speaker 2: is in the same press conference where his press secretary,
Speaker 2: Jean Pierre denied that Biden had a medical emergency, even
Speaker 2: though audio tapes about the medical emergency have surfaced and
Speaker 2: been made public. So he said elon Muskus slated interview
Speaker 2: Trump tonight on X He says, I don't know if
Speaker 2: the President is going to tune in. Feel free to
Speaker 2: say if he is or not. And they laugh. But
Speaker 2: I think the misinformation on Twitter is not just a
Speaker 2: campaign issue. It's a you know, it's an American issue.
Speaker 2: What role does the White House of the President have
Speaker 2: in sort of stopping that, stopping the spread of that,
Speaker 2: or sort of intervening in that. He said some of
Speaker 2: that was about campaign misinformation, but you know it's a
Speaker 2: wider thing, right, And so Jean Pierre responds and says, well,
Speaker 2: First Amendment keeps us from censoring people. No, she didn't
Speaker 2: say that at all. Of course, she's very concerned about it. Yeah, yeah, No,
Speaker 2: You've heard us talk about this many times from here,
Speaker 2: and the responsibilities that social media platforms have when it
Speaker 2: comes to misinformation disinformation. You know, they paid to start
Speaker 2: these guys up. Don't they have any gratitude for that?
Speaker 2: Don't they realize how the government can make their life difficult?
Speaker 2: Nice business, you got, there'd be a shame if anything
Speaker 2: happened to it. I don't have anything to read out
Speaker 2: from here about specific ways that we're working on it.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to say it publicly what we're doing,
Speaker 2: but we believe that that they have the responsibility. These
Speaker 2: are private companies, so we're mindful of that too. Yeah, right,
Speaker 2: they really do respect private property. But yeah, I'm not
Speaker 2: going to say anything about our DDSS or whatever. Right,
Speaker 2: but when we look at what is happening in the
Speaker 2: UK and folks that is coming here, it is absolutely
Speaker 2: coming here.
Speaker 3: You have.
Speaker 2: This guy here, man's been jail for posting three memes
Speaker 2: over two days showing real images. This is not his opinion,
Speaker 2: it's not a cartoon, real images of Asian gangs with
Speaker 2: the words coming to a town near you, and he
Speaker 2: is put into jail for twelve weeks. Twelve weeks of
Speaker 2: jail for three memes. Here's another one, a couple of
Speaker 2: these talking about the two tier system, the double standard
Speaker 2: we would say here in the US. But you know,
Speaker 2: here's one person who is going free. He is asylum
Speaker 2: seeker who was ordered pay only two pounds a month
Speaker 2: for assaulting an emergency worker. They let him off with
Speaker 2: community service because he doesn't speak English. Oh wow, you
Speaker 2: know that's a if he spoke English, that'd be a
Speaker 2: an enhanced sentence, I guess because when you look at
Speaker 2: the second person, Steve Mallin is jailed for twenty six
Speaker 2: months for shouting and gesticulating at police. Jailed for twenty
Speaker 2: six months, two years, two months because he redressed his
Speaker 2: grievances with the police. I don't know what he shouted,
Speaker 2: and I don't know what his gestures were. I can imagine.
Speaker 2: I don't care. But you see, you're not allowed to
Speaker 2: offend certain groups anymore, but certain groups who come here. Again,
Speaker 2: this other guy is an asylum seeker. He's not a citizen.
Speaker 2: He's there. I don't know if he's there legally or not.
Speaker 2: But he actually physically assaulted someone and he basically gets
Speaker 2: two pounds a month fine for a while, and the
Speaker 2: other guy goes to jail for twenty six months because
Speaker 2: he shouted. And then we have NATO at the Oh
Speaker 2: wait before I get to that. Still in the UK,
Speaker 2: the British police just reportedly banned the political party Britain
Speaker 2: First from the city of Blackpool while they were out campaigning.
Speaker 2: Peter Sweden said, this is Soviet. It absolutely is. It's Soviet.
Speaker 2: It's maliced, it is Orwellian, it is the solitarian and
Speaker 2: we're seeing that in Germany as well. AfD is coming
Speaker 2: pretty close to being banned because it wants to do
Speaker 2: something about the borders, and they don't want anything done
Speaker 2: about the borders, as is a cataining and popularity. They said, well,
Speaker 2: we're going to debank the party. We're going to tell
Speaker 2: members if they've got the permission to own guns. And
Speaker 2: I don't know how in the world you get that
Speaker 2: in Germany, but we're gonna take the guns from them.
Speaker 2: And then this is what Mike Bens says. He says,
Speaker 2: the censorship is coming from NATO, of course, and who
Speaker 2: is NATO? Why that would be US as well, right,
Speaker 2: we run NATO. So the censorship, folks, is not really
Speaker 2: coming anymore from the EU or the UK as it
Speaker 2: is from the US. We has met the enemy and
Speaker 2: they is US NATO.
Speaker 5: Their quote was panic responsibly because there's we have two
Speaker 5: tricks of our sleeves still and they said we would
Speaker 5: be in full panic but for two things. And the
Speaker 5: first thing that they said was something called the EU
Speaker 5: Digital Services Act. And I would caution you not to
Speaker 5: think in your mind the bland Blase named EU Digital
Speaker 5: Services Act. This is the NATO censorship law. Okay, this
Speaker 5: is what is It's the NATO censorship law. The EU
Speaker 5: is basically the commercial arm of NATO. NATO wants to
Speaker 5: stop the rise of populist parties in the US and
Speaker 5: all across NATO, in the UK, in France, in Italy,
Speaker 5: in Spain, in Greece, in everywhere that there's an election
Speaker 5: this year and there's a populist party on the ballot,
Speaker 5: whether that's from the right or the left. They went
Speaker 5: after Jeremy Corbin on the for being left wing anti NATO.
Speaker 5: You know, it's just that left wing populaces have not
Speaker 5: had as much electoral success and don't post as much
Speaker 5: of a threat there. But this NATO censorship law is
Speaker 5: very nasty because what it does is it goes beyond
Speaker 5: the simple hate speech laws that Europe have and it
Speaker 5: imposes a new standard around about disinformation. So it's creating
Speaker 5: a new industry for disinformation compliance. Now, the EU is
Speaker 5: a larger market than the United States. There's five hundred
Speaker 5: and fifty million people in the EU. You cannot be
Speaker 5: a multinational tech platform without having access to the EU market.
Speaker 5: US companies operating in Europe are going to have to
Speaker 5: cooperate with this disinformation law. Now we know that people
Speaker 5: behind this are the same people who constructed the election
Speaker 5: censorship apparatus in twenty twenty. So, for example, NewsGuard has
Speaker 5: partnered with the EU for doing the rules making on this.
Speaker 5: So they basically cited two things. They said Thankfully, this.
Speaker 6: New NATO censorship law is going to force no matter
Speaker 6: what Elon wants to do, he's going to have to
Speaker 6: play ball. He's going to have to play ball with
Speaker 6: this new law, and he's going to have to put
Speaker 6: in place the censorship measures that NATO rolls out around
Speaker 6: election disinformation. So no matter what he's going to have
Speaker 6: to he's going to have to play ball with us.
Speaker 6: But we're still waiting for the final rules on that.
Speaker 6: The law has been passed, it will come into a
Speaker 6: fact before twenty twenty four. It's hard to pierce, you know,
Speaker 6: in advance of that. And then the second thing that
Speaker 6: they cited was the role of states, and that's both
Speaker 6: on state election disinformation censorship through the state secretary of
Speaker 6: State's offices, which are a major Soros project, I should add,
Speaker 6: and then also through these new state mandated laws around
Speaker 6: media literacy.
Speaker 2: If we go back to twenty eighteen again, it was
Speaker 2: August of six, twenty eighteen that the purge happened when
Speaker 2: I was in Info Wars, and two months later there
Speaker 2: were eight hundred sites. And you heard him begin he said,
Speaker 2: it's not just the right, it's the right and the
Speaker 2: left Jeremy Corbyn also attacked because he was anti NATO.
Speaker 2: The eight hundred sites that were hit just before the
Speaker 2: midterm were not all pro Trump's. A matter of fact,
Speaker 2: most of them weren't. The common thread it really is
Speaker 2: about this NATO stuff. It really is coming from the US.
Speaker 2: It really is opposition to the eternal war machine. Most
Speaker 2: of the sites of the eight hundred that were done,
Speaker 2: almost all of it. Some of them were pro Trump,
Speaker 2: and they picked that out because again populist, but the
Speaker 2: majority of them, left and right, were anti war, anti surveillance,
Speaker 2: anti police state. And it is the military industrial complex,
Speaker 2: intelligence community, it is the those are the people who
Speaker 2: want war, surveillance and a police state. They're the ones
Speaker 2: who control the Internet, They're the ones who control social media.
Speaker 2: They're the ones who are putting out censorship. So just
Speaker 2: understand that, but understand also how it matches with what
Speaker 2: the Democrats want. I think we need to push back
Speaker 2: on this.
Speaker 7: There's no guaranteed of free speech on misinformation or the
Speaker 7: other hate speech, and especially there is our democracy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there is extremism in defense of free speech is
Speaker 2: no vice. Moderation of content is no virtue. Not to
Speaker 2: save somebody's feelings, not to keep somebody from saying something
Speaker 2: that you disagree with. There is no excuse for that.
Speaker 2: He is absolutely disqualified. Look, that is a much bigger disqualifier.
Speaker 2: And you don't hear anything about much bigger disqualifier than
Speaker 2: the stolen valor and the character issues and leaving his mother.
Speaker 2: I mean, he's got a long list of character issuses,
Speaker 2: and they're talking about the character issues because he presents
Speaker 2: himself as your kindly uncle, that type of thing. But
Speaker 2: let me say that his job is to respect the
Speaker 2: Constitution and he just disrespected it there. He's absolutely disqualified,
Speaker 2: as all of these people who are running pretty much
Speaker 2: are on rumble snorbees. Thank you for the tip. I
Speaker 2: appreciate that. So the biggest thing to come from the
Speaker 2: elon Trump interview was Nick Fuintes capturing the top trending
Speaker 2: list with Israel first, Adelson, no war with Iran, and
Speaker 2: no more immigration hashtags. Well, those are issues that I
Speaker 2: agree with. I do not support Nick Fuenttes. I think
Speaker 2: he completely discredits those issues in the way that he
Speaker 2: presents them. But you know, he's got a big following,
Speaker 2: absolutely does and he's come out against Trump. But he
Speaker 2: tries to nuance it, just like Alex Jones does. I'm
Speaker 2: not really against Trump. I'm against the Trump campaign managers.
Speaker 2: I'm against Trump, okay. I'm against somebody who would kill
Speaker 2: our society, would kill main street businesses, who would kill
Speaker 2: people with his nanotech injections. I'm against that guy. He
Speaker 2: was responsible for it when he was there. I'm as
Speaker 2: much against him as I am. Tim Wallason, La La
Speaker 2: Harris and the rest of them. Come on, have a spine,
Speaker 2: little Nick epathetic. Well, I won't say it on air
Speaker 2: and disgust me. This sleazy little guy. I refused to
Speaker 2: interview him when he came to Info Wars. I wouldn't
Speaker 2: talk to that guy. I wouldn't give him two cents.
Speaker 2: Rumble m Sellers. Can you ask David if he knows
Speaker 2: that the Smoking Mountain National Park is officially part of
Speaker 2: the UNESCO World Heritage Site. They quietly did this, and
Speaker 2: I was shocked to by I think they are quite frankly.
Speaker 2: I think, you know, the UN has taken him all over.
Speaker 2: But guess what the United States government, The federal government
Speaker 2: controls the UN. Really, I mean, it's it meets here.
Speaker 2: We're the major funder of it. You know, we are
Speaker 2: probably now the major funder of the WHO. There was
Speaker 2: a moment there where Gates was because Trump pulled back
Speaker 2: a little bit from the funding, but not all of it.
Speaker 2: And you know, so we're funding all of these organizations
Speaker 2: out there. When you look at Builderberg, Builderberg is NATO,
Speaker 2: it's the globalist NATO people who were you know, making
Speaker 2: their their plots, any of them, but it's all NATO.
Speaker 2: It's all America and European nations, and it's the global
Speaker 2: technical elite from Europe and from the US in Canada
Speaker 2: and you know the five the five I nations and
Speaker 2: things like that. But it is the big companies, big media,
Speaker 2: big business, big media, big politics, and it's all the
Speaker 2: NATO countries. That's where the globalism is. We need to
Speaker 2: accept the fact that Washington d C is not going
Speaker 2: to protect us from the globalists because Washington d C
Speaker 2: is running and funding the globalists. And so yeah, they
Speaker 2: ESCO taking over the world sites and stuff like that.
Speaker 2: They love to create these phony conflicts, a Sagelian conflict.
Speaker 2: Like I said before, you know, is Elon Musk really
Speaker 2: trying to defend a free speech I'm skeptical. We'll see
Speaker 2: what happens with it. I've seen him bow to theory Breton.
Speaker 2: But you know, they love to have these visible things
Speaker 2: out there, and then some of the politicians will ally
Speaker 2: themselves with it. Others will pretend to oppose it. Yeah,
Speaker 2: Trump goes Sadavos and talks about nationalism. He doesn't attack
Speaker 2: their agenda, he doesn't attack them, he doesn't attack what
Speaker 2: they have done. So he didn't attack their agenda, he
Speaker 2: didn't attack what they've done. And then he comes back
Speaker 2: in a year he implements the globalist policy. He leads it.
Speaker 2: He leads it right. You know, we funded the development
Speaker 2: of those nanotech poisons and then helped to distribute them
Speaker 2: around the world, and we had the military was involved
Speaker 2: in the development, the distribution, all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 2: And Trump comes back and does that after pretending that
Speaker 2: he's against the globalists they create. It's just professional wrestling.
Speaker 2: It's just professional wrestling on Rumble Wild Niagara. Hi, David,
Speaker 2: I just did a fact check on the two evs
Speaker 2: that clided and it appears to be a fake. It
Speaker 2: turns out it was a truckload of propane cylinders. There's
Speaker 2: footage of the crash leading up to the fire. Well,
Speaker 2: thank you for correcting that that was the way it
Speaker 2: was presented on social media. Care and pass that on
Speaker 2: to me, not blaming her because people pass things on
Speaker 2: to me all the time. I should have checked it,
Speaker 2: but thank you for doing that. Let let's no, we'll
Speaker 2: do a retraction on that. I've just got to say
Speaker 2: that I've seen them spontaneously combust and we know that
Speaker 2: they've taken down freighters. Freighters, but well, yeah, freighters are
Speaker 2: large container ships transporting cars and the rest of this stuff,
Speaker 2: and it is an uncontrollable fire. I've just never seen
Speaker 2: one with multiple explosions like that, so propane and not
Speaker 2: evs on rumble. Michelle Obama, thank you for the tip,
Speaker 2: A tip from your friends we miss West Michigan gallows
Speaker 2: and stocks. Well, thank you very much. We're going to
Speaker 2: take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Stay with us s Defending the American Dream. You're listening
Speaker 1: to the David Knight Show on rock fan Eric, thank
Speaker 1: you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. I
Speaker 1: never get tired of that music and that scenery. Always
Speaker 1: enjoy that.
Speaker 2: Let's talk a little bit about what was happening with
Speaker 2: the pandemic, and let's talk a little bit about as
Speaker 2: I mentioned a study it's just been released looking at
Speaker 2: what they said, they believe that these jabs that Trump
Speaker 2: is so proud of are actually nanotech. And we've been
Speaker 2: seeing a lot of this for quite some time. It
Speaker 2: was always talked about the fact that we have assembling
Speaker 2: structures and so forth. And now there's another very detailed
Speaker 2: study talking about that. But before we do, when we
Speaker 2: talk about the pandemic, and we talk about contagion, and
Speaker 2: we talk about the passing on of disease, it is interesting,
Speaker 2: isn't it how they just look past certain things. As
Speaker 2: I said, when they looked at the same river, they said, well,
Speaker 2: you know, we're dumping raw sewage into the river. Now,
Speaker 2: of course that's going to make you sick one way
Speaker 2: or the other. Tomorrow have been reading a book in
Speaker 2: preparation for an interview tomorrow from some doctors out of
Speaker 2: New Zealand. The book is The Last Pandemic by Sam
Speaker 2: Bailey and her husband Mark. Her name is Samantha and
Speaker 2: he had originally done Both of them were medical doctors.
Speaker 2: He's a clinical researcher and he did a lot of
Speaker 2: research around viruses and around pandemics put out a four
Speaker 2: hundred page book, had fourteen hundred references on it, and
Speaker 2: then they did this one, the Last Pandemic, to make
Speaker 2: it a little bit more accessible to the general public,
Speaker 2: and so there's a lot of anecdotes there. They don't
Speaker 2: They do have quite a few references in the back,
Speaker 2: but certainly not as extensive, as detailed, as dense as
Speaker 2: a four hundred page book with fourteen hundred references. So
Speaker 2: I'm going to have them on tomorrow, and hopefully, if
Speaker 2: everything goes well tonight, if we're able to establish the
Speaker 2: connection with them, and we'll talk about that, because they
Speaker 2: call it the last pandemic. Because if you take away
Speaker 2: all the lies of virology, if you take away the
Speaker 2: lies about the PCR tests and all the rest of
Speaker 2: the stuff, but maybe even the lies about whether or
Speaker 2: not vaccine viruses even exist. We take away all of
Speaker 2: that stuff, they don't have anything to stand on to
Speaker 2: lock us down. Now, even though we may like for
Speaker 2: that to be true, we still have to look at
Speaker 2: that objectively, and so that's what we're going to do.
Speaker 2: I've got some questions about some things, but when they
Speaker 2: talk about we talk about the Sane River, and in fact,
Speaker 2: we now have three German swimmers who have been hospitalized
Speaker 2: after competing in the Sane River that they did not
Speaker 2: clean up. Question is do they have E. Coli? Do
Speaker 2: they get sick because of other things that they swallowed
Speaker 2: in the river. They're not really particular about what they
Speaker 2: put in the river there that runs right through the
Speaker 2: center of Paris. As they pointed out, in the past,
Speaker 2: they would have situations where they would some of these
Speaker 2: bacteria they can't isolate them, and they do have those
Speaker 2: isolated when they do a real when they do a
Speaker 2: real science and give a control group this, and another
Speaker 2: control group gets a placebo or whatever they didn't see
Speaker 2: that didn't see that with I think it was cholera
Speaker 2: or something, but we'll get into the details of it tomorrow.
Speaker 2: And so that raises some questions. And usually they don't
Speaker 2: do that, or usually they cut corners, or usually if
Speaker 2: they do something that is similar to that, they will
Speaker 2: not make it blind. So both the people who administering
Speaker 2: the test as well as the people who are getting
Speaker 2: the test stuff are going to perhaps have some psychosomatic
Speaker 2: symptoms that are there. Say they've got the symptoms, you know,
Speaker 2: you can suggest that to all of us, and we're
Speaker 2: all very suggestible. You tell somebody, well, you know, I
Speaker 2: think you've got such and such and these these are
Speaker 2: the things. Oh yeah, I've got that. I think I do.
Speaker 2: So when we look at what is happening with this,
Speaker 2: one person vomited nine times, had diarrhea three of them,
Speaker 2: and then said sarcastic, the water quality and the seine
Speaker 2: is approved. And so you've had some people in the hospital,
Speaker 2: you've had people being treated as outpatients. And yet they
Speaker 2: had fifty three swimmers, twenty nine men, twenty four women
Speaker 2: compete in the open water races. Most said the cleanliness
Speaker 2: of the water was not an issue. The gold medalist,
Speaker 2: Sharon van Rowdenwall of the Netherlands, said she actually took
Speaker 2: a few gulps of the river when she was feeling
Speaker 2: parched during her race. She said, it was cold, it
Speaker 2: was nice. So you know, your mileage may vary if
Speaker 2: you are swimming in an open septic tank. So meanwhile,
Speaker 2: we have the US is a little bit concerned, they
Speaker 2: said about candy, and so we've had and I've mentioned
Speaker 2: this to talk about the double standard, the two tiers.
Speaker 2: If you will, if you're British a way that they
Speaker 2: look at bird flu, which hasn't made anybody sick, and
Speaker 2: it's been conjunctive itis. They want to say it was
Speaker 2: a flu. There's no flu symptoms. But look at how
Speaker 2: they panicked about that, how the press was all over that,
Speaker 2: and yet they didn't talk at all about the listeria
Speaker 2: outbreak which killed several people and put about four dozen
Speaker 2: people in the hospital. Now we have a salmonella outbreak
Speaker 2: in Candy and we have seen the listeria. They identified
Speaker 2: that as an outbreak. Again, I'll talk to them about
Speaker 2: these types of things tomorrow. I'd like to get their
Speaker 2: take on it. But because it's not just viruses they
Speaker 2: are there against, they don't believe in any of these contagions.
Speaker 2: And of course you can make a pretty good case
Speaker 2: for coals that is not the result of rhinovirus. But again, well,
Speaker 2: we'll talk about listeria, We'll talk about salmonella, will talk
Speaker 2: about E. Coli, these other things. I talk about measles, smallpox.
Speaker 2: It's going to be an interesting interview because I've got
Speaker 2: a lot of questions and they've been This isn't something
Speaker 2: that they just came up with and there's a lot
Speaker 2: of other medical professionals who have questions about it. It's
Speaker 2: difficult for us to get past a particular paradigm that
Speaker 2: we've always lived with all of our life, and so
Speaker 2: we have a very strong bias to continue to believe
Speaker 2: what we've always been told. I think we need to
Speaker 2: keep our minds open and we need to try to
Speaker 2: objectively analyze it as well as we can. But when
Speaker 2: you look at the food contamination, let's just put it
Speaker 2: that way, whether it's the whether it is the bacteria,
Speaker 2: or whether it is something in the food. We've had
Speaker 2: soy milk, we've had boys had Daily or Deli, and
Speaker 2: we've had again with the soy milk, it was Walmart
Speaker 2: as well as silk, big name brand. And we've had
Speaker 2: produce and now we've got candy, and these things have
Speaker 2: been con Now, when you look at listeria, that's something
Speaker 2: you frequently see in an industrial setting, and Bluebell had
Speaker 2: that issue with ice cream. I said, maybe they don't
Speaker 2: get it cleaned and the nooks and crannies. But you know,
Speaker 2: when you're talking about food that is made in an
Speaker 2: industrial environment, there's other contaminations that could be in there
Speaker 2: as well. They could harm or kill people. So we'll
Speaker 2: see what they have to say. In May, more than
Speaker 2: one hundred people became ill due to what officials said
Speaker 2: was a salmonella outbreak among backyard poultry in twenty nine states. Now,
Speaker 2: why would that happen in twenty nine states? Even with
Speaker 2: their contagion model, that doesn't make sense that it would
Speaker 2: happen in backyard poultry. It's not in factory farms. I
Speaker 2: think they're coming after backyard poultry. I think they're coming
Speaker 2: after raw milk. I think they need an excuse. The
Speaker 2: only time they care about this stuff again, you might
Speaker 2: hear see one article in an obscure site instead of
Speaker 2: everybody talking about human bird flu. Everybody talking about it,
Speaker 2: even Breitbart pushing that idea. But the only time these
Speaker 2: people care in the press and the CDC and the
Speaker 2: FDA is if there is something or someone that they
Speaker 2: don't like and they want to shut it down, like
Speaker 2: raw milk and so Lala Harris claims that COVID is
Speaker 2: under control, but there is a summer surge that is
Speaker 2: sweeping America, says the editor of Breitbart, Joel Pollock. Folks,
Speaker 2: this is just pure fear porn from Breitbart. It is
Speaker 2: absolutely disgusting. I've seen these people push the vaccine when
Speaker 2: Trump was doing it. Now they're pushing because there's a
Speaker 2: political gain to be made. Oh look, we can own
Speaker 2: La La Harris, we can own the Libs. Well, you
Speaker 2: play that stupid game, and the globalists are going to
Speaker 2: own us, literally own us. We will own nothing if
Speaker 2: you're going to play that game, because this is the
Speaker 2: pandemic mcguffin to take everything. And so you've got Breitbart
Speaker 2: now saying we got a summer sage. We got a
Speaker 2: sage who needs fauci when you got conservative mainstream alternative media.
Speaker 2: This is what David Ike was talking about. The mainstream
Speaker 2: alternative media that is out there selling these talking points,
Speaker 2: just like the left, just like the government, who was
Speaker 2: funding these people? Where are they getting their information from?
Speaker 2: Who's controlling them when they put out garbage like this?
Speaker 2: And of course the mainstream alternative media has been pushing
Speaker 2: out this lab leak theory left and right and then
Speaker 2: patting themselves on the back saying we're right about this
Speaker 2: from the very beginning. No, you were wrong about it
Speaker 2: from the very beginning. Info Wars was wrong, Breitbart was wrong.
Speaker 2: Zero Hedge was wrong, was right. There was no lab leak.
Speaker 2: It was as phony as it could be. That's why
Speaker 2: it bears examining to take a look at entire virology
Speaker 2: industry as well as the entire medical industry. Folks, when
Speaker 2: people are falling down, you know these pretend falldowns, and
Speaker 2: when you got less than thirty days and nobody dying
Speaker 2: before they say that they've got the first case in China,
Speaker 2: you're going to believe things coming out of China. And
Speaker 2: then we got the American HHS director declaring right away
Speaker 2: an emergency in a pandemic along with the World Health Organization.
Speaker 2: Not even a month passed before they did that. There
Speaker 2: was no epidemic anywhere including China, including Italy, and certainly
Speaker 2: not in America. But they made it a worldwide pandemic.
Speaker 2: Why and why would info Wars and Breitbart and the
Speaker 2: rest of these people join in with it and prop
Speaker 2: it up for the skeptical conservatives by saying, you know,
Speaker 2: I think it came out of that game of Funk
Speaker 2: and Wu hand lab. I had that argument back and
Speaker 2: forth with Francis Boyle, and you know, Alexy actually put
Speaker 2: me on the show to do that. You know, well,
Speaker 2: you know Francis Boyle, he graduated from Harvard And with
Speaker 2: all due respect, David, you really don't know what you're
Speaker 2: talking about. You're full of sane excrement, is what you're
Speaker 2: full of. Okay, absolutely full of it. There was no
Speaker 2: lab link, Give me a break. It's a bunch of
Speaker 2: fear porn. And now Breitbart is doing it again. They're
Speaker 2: all doing it again. Like I said, See, we're right
Speaker 2: from the very beginning. Is this gain a function thing?
Speaker 4: Do they?
Speaker 2: You know? They notice that the establishment, the medical establishment,
Speaker 2: the press establishment, the government establishment has all said begrudgingly, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: you're right. See we're right, and they have to admit it. No,
Speaker 2: they're using this to push further pandemic. Look at all
Speaker 2: the stories you've seen from the mainstream alternative media about
Speaker 2: disease X. It's fear porn. And Breitbart is one of
Speaker 2: the worst outlets for this stuff. So Breitbart says, the
Speaker 2: American Medical Association, well, you can certainly trust them. And
Speaker 2: NBC News, well they're very trustworthy, aren't They say that
Speaker 2: the US is and what they may end up being
Speaker 2: the biggest summer wave of COVID yet with no end
Speaker 2: in sight. What the biggest yet, the biggest wave of
Speaker 2: COVID yet and no masks, no signs up. You have
Speaker 2: to walk in one particular direction, in single file through
Speaker 2: the grocery stores. They don't have any of that stuff.
Speaker 2: You don't have lockdown, you don't have denial of medical
Speaker 2: care until people get so sick they put them in
Speaker 2: a ventilator and kill them. You don't have any of
Speaker 2: that stuff. This is the Listen, the biggest summer wave
Speaker 2: of COVID yet with no end in sight. So why
Speaker 2: do we do all that stuff? Breitbart says. On the
Speaker 2: positive side, hospitalizations appear low mutations of the original coronavirus
Speaker 2: up here, less severe. You got any proof for that?
Speaker 2: You got any proof of that? No, you don't, And
Speaker 2: that's one of the reasons I want to talk to
Speaker 2: them tomorrow. There's absolutely no proof of any of this stuff.
Speaker 2: Let me tell you what. You got a mutation of
Speaker 2: You got a mutation of the original lie. You got
Speaker 2: a mutation of the original message. There wasn't any science
Speaker 2: done in this pandemic, zero zip, nada, zero science. So hey,
Speaker 2: we got net zero. You got net zero science, zero missions. Yeah,
Speaker 2: zero critical thought. That's what you have. There's none of that.
Speaker 2: There was no science except for behavioral science, and boy,
Speaker 2: they take that to the degree. The behavioral science. Now,
Speaker 2: this article that I said was coming up, this was
Speaker 2: put out July the eighteenth, so just a few weeks ago.
Speaker 2: And here's the title of this. This was posted on
Speaker 2: the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research. I
Speaker 2: saw this. Jane Ruby had a link to this on Twitter.
Speaker 2: Saw that this morning. So this is the International Journal
Speaker 2: of Vaccine Theory. This is the title of the study
Speaker 2: real Time self assembly of stereo microscopically visible artificial constructions,
Speaker 2: real time self assembly of artificial constructions and incubated specimens
Speaker 2: of mRNA products mainly from Pfizer and Moderna. And what
Speaker 2: they say here is that analyzes reported here consists of
Speaker 2: precise laboratory bench science aiming to understand why serious, debilitating,
Speaker 2: prolonged injuries and many deaths occurred increasingly without any measurable
Speaker 2: protective effect from the aggressively marketed products. They said, the
Speaker 2: contents of the COVID nineteen injectibles so called vaccines. I'm
Speaker 2: glad they call them injectibles instead of vaccines. It's just
Speaker 2: it's so funny anyway, They were examined under a stereo
Speaker 2: microscope at four hundred x magnification. Carefully preserved specimens were
Speaker 2: cultured in a range of distinct media to observe immediate
Speaker 2: and long term cause and effect relationships between the injectibles
Speaker 2: and living cells under carefully controlled conditions. In addition to
Speaker 2: cellular toxicity, our findings reveal numerous and they say on
Speaker 2: the order of three to four times ten to the
Speaker 2: six per milli liter of the injectable. In other words,
Speaker 2: per milli leader. They're saying three to four million of
Speaker 2: these things per milli lid. Three to four million. They said,
Speaker 2: this is much too high of a concentration for it
Speaker 2: to be contamination. Three to four million per milli leader
Speaker 2: of the injectible. Visible artificial self assembling entities ranging from
Speaker 2: about one to one hundred micrometers or greater of many
Speaker 2: different shapes. There were animated worm like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes,
Speaker 2: Right angle structures. Let me just pause there for a second.
Speaker 2: Right angled structures. Right angles are something like that. You
Speaker 2: can have a right angled structure can occur naturally, but
Speaker 2: it is not You know, when you start to see
Speaker 2: things like chains and right angle structures and things like that.
Speaker 2: It starts to look like it was artificially created, doesn't it.
Speaker 2: So chains, spirals, tubes, discs, right angle structures containing other
Speaker 2: artificial entities within them, and so forth. All these are
Speaker 2: exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of
Speaker 2: the COVID nineteen injectables and incubation studies revealed the progressive
Speaker 2: self assembly of many artificial structures as time progressed. During incubation,
Speaker 2: simple one and two dimensional structures over two or three
Speaker 2: weeks became more complex in shape and size, developing into
Speaker 2: stereoscopically visible entities and three dimensions. These things are growing
Speaker 2: and developing. They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes,
Speaker 2: some appearing as transparent, thin flat membranes and others as
Speaker 2: three dimensional spirals and beaded chain. Some of these seem
Speaker 2: to appear and then disappear over time. Our observations suggest
Speaker 2: the presence of some kind of nanotechnology, and the trump
Speaker 2: shots some kind of nanotechnology. As I said, for a
Speaker 2: long time. You look at the technologies that they are
Speaker 2: focused on, and the acronym is green genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence,
Speaker 2: and nanotech. The genetics and the nanotech are things that
Speaker 2: they can do and we can't even see it. We
Speaker 2: can't even tell it. It's only when somebody does careful
Speaker 2: study in a scientific in a bench setting that you
Speaker 2: can see some of this stuff. But for the public,
Speaker 2: we can't even tell that we're being messed with with
Speaker 2: this stuff. But these people have done a study and
Speaker 2: they said they see these things assembling, a increasing in
Speaker 2: complexity and dimensions over time, and they believe that it
Speaker 2: is nanotech. We don't know anything about. I mean, the
Speaker 2: general public knows nothing about nanotech, nothing at all. Fauci meanwhile,
Speaker 2: is admitting that he has been in fact through COVID
Speaker 2: for the third time after being vaccinated and boosted six times,
Speaker 2: and so you know, the mainstream alternative media will say,
Speaker 2: see see, you know garbage. Well, certainly that's enough to
Speaker 2: reject these vaccines not effective and we know that they're
Speaker 2: not safe. But it's better for Fauci to say that
Speaker 2: it failed and maybe you need to keep taking it, right,
Speaker 2: and we got these other you know, we got variants.
Speaker 2: It's constantly changing. You're going to have to take more
Speaker 2: of it all the time. It's better for people to
Speaker 2: see him fail. It's for people to see the nanotech
Speaker 2: in these things, isn't it The one thing they don't
Speaker 2: want people to see. Yeah, they want you to look
Speaker 2: at the Wuhan lamb and they want you to think
Speaker 2: the Fauci's creating bioweapons. They don't want you to see
Speaker 2: the jab is the bioweapon. We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knights show.
Speaker 2: Well on rumble b Turner one seventy. Thank you for
Speaker 2: the tip, says Elon brought up government over spending twice
Speaker 2: and how it is the cause of inflation. All Trump
Speaker 2: wanted to do was to talk about how much money
Speaker 2: he saved the US on the Boeing Air Force one contract. Yeah,
Speaker 2: his his plane. By the way, he's now flying around
Speaker 2: in Jeffrey Epstein's plane, just saying, you know, his plane
Speaker 2: had a problem, and I don't you know, I don't
Speaker 2: think this. There is a connection between Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2: It's not that plane. They were very well connected over
Speaker 2: the longest period of time. I doubt that he knew.
Speaker 2: One of the people who were putting that together knew
Speaker 2: that connection before they flew it. Who knows. But on
Speaker 2: Rumble marky Mark, New Jersey, thank you for the tip.
Speaker 2: If I'd been an Olympic swimmer. There's no way I'd
Speaker 2: swim in the same river. I'd care about my health
Speaker 2: too much to swim. And an open sewer like that,
Speaker 2: and an open sewer is probably cleaner than the samee Yeah. Probably.
Speaker 2: On Rumble DG eight, thank you for the tip, says David.
Speaker 2: God bless you and your family. Thanks for what you do.
Speaker 2: Great interview on The Last American Vagabond. I did enjoy
Speaker 2: talking to Ryan. And again you can see the interview
Speaker 2: there at the Last American Vagabond. I've also got a
Speaker 2: link to it on Twitter and on gab if you
Speaker 2: want to see it. But yeah, it was good. We're
Speaker 2: on the same page. We're not interested in getting caught
Speaker 2: up in this, you know, this phony election, and it
Speaker 2: is a phony election. Let me give you an example.
Speaker 2: New York City influencers charge three hundred and thirty three
Speaker 2: dollars per guest to attend their wedding. They looked at
Speaker 2: it and they said, well, you know, we are pretty
Speaker 2: important people. I think rather than paying for our guests
Speaker 2: to come to the wedding, you know, it's going to
Speaker 2: be pretty expensive. They looked they had very elaborate wedding.
Speaker 2: It was going to cost them seventy thousand dollars and expenses.
Speaker 2: And they said, well, you know, we've got three hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty guests and they're going to spend seventy thousand dollars.
Speaker 2: I mean that's so they said, let's let them bear
Speaker 2: the cost. We don't really want to make the decisions
Speaker 2: as we're going to have this person or that person.
Speaker 2: So let's just tell the guests that if they want
Speaker 2: to come, it's going to be an event. You know,
Speaker 2: they pay big bucks to go to concerts and stuff,
Speaker 2: and hey, we're influencers. They should come to watch our wedding. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it's a privilege. It's like going to a concert or something.
Speaker 2: Think of it that way. And so they had people
Speaker 2: who were who were willing to pay three hundred and
Speaker 2: thirty three dollars per guest to attend that wedding. Now,
Speaker 2: when I saw that, I thought that is so much
Speaker 2: like politics.
Speaker 1: Isn't it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there it is. Isn't that worth three hundred thirty
Speaker 2: three dollars to watch the two of them get married? Yeah,
Speaker 2: just amazing anyway. But you know, I think that when
Speaker 2: we look at political influencers. You know, Trump said when
Speaker 2: Hillary Clinton went to his wedding, he said, I paid
Speaker 2: her to be there. Well, I should have done it
Speaker 2: the other way around. That's I said. The problem with
Speaker 2: Trump is he realized after all these years he was
Speaker 2: paying politicians to do things for him, paying them to
Speaker 2: come to his wedding, paying them to you know, keep
Speaker 2: the unions quiet, they could get his buildings on whatever.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's but you know he was paying them.
Speaker 2: It's like, way, I don't want to I want to
Speaker 2: be in that position. I want them to pay me.
Speaker 2: It's kind of like, you know, we had the illegals
Speaker 2: coming in, and we had that Venezuelan guy, that obnoxious
Speaker 2: guy who was coming in is sneering and screaming and
Speaker 2: talking about how it's so easy to take over these
Speaker 2: homes and all those you know, to be a squatter,
Speaker 2: and you know you can these people, you can come
Speaker 2: in and you can live off of welfare and all
Speaker 2: the rest of this stuff. Come on in, this is
Speaker 2: how you do it. And they had an influencer Channel
Speaker 2: Right turned out that he worked for the Venezuelan intelligence.
Speaker 2: They hate this country in the same way the Democrats
Speaker 2: hate this country. Cloud and PIVT strategy. He's trying to
Speaker 2: help Cloud and PIVT strategy. Everybody, come on in, get
Speaker 2: on welfare, and we'll bring down America. It's a way
Speaker 2: to bring it down from the inside. So you know,
Speaker 2: he's Venezuela and intelligence, and he knows how to destroy America.
Speaker 2: The Democrats know how to destroy America. But I said,
Speaker 2: you know, that's a good name for the illegals. The
Speaker 2: Democrats don't like calling them illegals, so let's call them squatters,
Speaker 2: so much more descriptive squatters. And I think a better
Speaker 2: name for politicians is influencers if you stop and think
Speaker 2: about it. I mean they're paid by foreign governments, they're
Speaker 2: paid by big corporations to influence public opinion. They tell
Speaker 2: them what to do, and they're the ones who've got
Speaker 2: to sell it to everybody. The politicians really are influencers.
Speaker 2: They just got to figure out a way to get
Speaker 2: people to pay them. And because they're so important as influencers.
Speaker 2: So the number ten des dropped once they wanted to
Speaker 2: charge people, drop from three hundred and fifty to sixty
Speaker 2: and one person said, who would pay for that pathetic
Speaker 2: money grab? Nobody has class or manners anymore. Well, at
Speaker 2: least I got to say this about these influencers, unlike
Speaker 2: are political influencers. If you paid to go to this event,
Speaker 2: like the people who paid to support January the sixth,
Speaker 2: unlike the people gave money to Alex for Stop to
Speaker 2: Steal and the money to Trump for Save America and
Speaker 2: then went to stop the steal. At least these guests
Speaker 2: at the wedding didn't get thrown into jail for years
Speaker 2: and torture. Right, that is something to say for that.
Speaker 2: I mean, you know, it's better than support and a
Speaker 2: politician who will rip you off, steal your stuff, and
Speaker 2: torture you as well. The window is closing, as a
Speaker 2: GOP strategist says, Trump's got two tasks and he's failing
Speaker 2: at both of them. Trump has essentially two objectives to
Speaker 2: get back into a stronger position, wrote Mike Madrid. He's
Speaker 2: somebody who has been a long time Republican strategist. He
Speaker 2: is anti Trump. He says, Number one, he has to
Speaker 2: define LA law and they're losing that battle and that
Speaker 2: window is closing. And number two, he has to redefine himself.
Speaker 2: Good luck, you know, quite frankly, regardless what this guy
Speaker 2: thinks about Trump, and I'm no fan of Trump either,
Speaker 2: but I think the real challenge that Trump has, if
Speaker 2: you stop and think about it, in my lifetime, even
Speaker 2: presidents that I voted for, I was pretty sick and
Speaker 2: tired of seeing them after eight years. And that's where
Speaker 2: he is right now. I mean, he's been there and
Speaker 2: not portrayed the last over all those eight years, not
Speaker 2: portrayed by the media in a positive light. And so
Speaker 2: there's just kind of like, you know, the effect of
Speaker 2: the guests who would not leave, you know, they kind
Speaker 2: of wear out. They're welcome, people get tired of them.
Speaker 2: Especially in this society, we're always wanting something new. And
Speaker 2: even though there's absolutely nothing to La La Harris, she's
Speaker 2: just a new face. And quite frankly, that's his biggest issue.
Speaker 2: That's all this is about. It's about influencers, it's about celebrity.
Speaker 2: It's not really about issues at all. He says. Even
Speaker 2: Trump supporters are fearful that he's losing the plot. What plot?
Speaker 2: What plot? Except for the globalist agenda. There isn't a
Speaker 2: plot here. All right, they don't have a plot in
Speaker 2: order to restore the country. Somebody put up on social media.
Speaker 2: I don't know if it came from Trump or not,
Speaker 2: but it was a twenty point plan, very generic stuff,
Speaker 2: you know. For example, and when we talk about the
Speaker 2: tax thing, or we talk about inflation, well, we're going
Speaker 2: to stop inflation. That's a plan. Is that a plan?
Speaker 2: You've got a plan to stop inflation?
Speaker 3: Good?
Speaker 2: Does anybody like inflation? You know, Gerald Ford had a
Speaker 2: plan to stop inflation. Know what it was. They printed
Speaker 2: up these little buttons and handed them out said, whip inflation. Now, okay,
Speaker 2: well that's a plan, not a good one. That's not
Speaker 2: going to do anything, but it's a plan. It's not
Speaker 2: enough to recognize what the problems are, especially when you've
Speaker 2: been in the chair and haven't done anything to address those.
Speaker 2: The first two or three things were about immigration and
Speaker 2: things like that. Well he didn't build the wall. He
Speaker 2: didn't stop the magnet. And that's the big issue. He
Speaker 2: didn't stop the magnet, the welfare magnets pulling everybody in.
Speaker 2: The welfare magnets pulling in the squatters. And so you
Speaker 2: know they're talking now we're going to build the wall,
Speaker 2: we're going to deport people. They'll never do that. He
Speaker 2: didn't have the courage to do that the first time.
Speaker 2: That certainly won't have the courage the second time. That
Speaker 2: is a very very difficult thing to do to deport
Speaker 2: millions of people. The logistics of it and the other
Speaker 2: things that are happening and the resistance to it. They've
Speaker 2: got to stop them coming in, and they but the
Speaker 2: way you stop them is not even by erecting barriers.
Speaker 2: If there's enough of a pot of gold on the
Speaker 2: end of that rainbow, they're going to find one way
Speaker 2: or the other to get in. It's not that the
Speaker 2: advantages with them. When you're trying to prohibit some thing
Speaker 2: like that, you have to disincentivize it. The heavy incentives
Speaker 2: are what the problem is. And they won't stop that.
Speaker 2: They won't even talk about that. So, you know, absolutely clueless,
Speaker 2: absolutely clueless unless the military industrial complex, by the intelligence
Speaker 2: community tell him what they want him to do, and
Speaker 2: then he'll do it. And then this is the thing
Speaker 2: that really concerns me. You know, in his in his
Speaker 2: talk with Elon Musk yesterday, you know, one of the
Speaker 2: things he said, yeah, I'm a bit more of a
Speaker 2: believer in God. After the shooting, it's like, well, you're
Speaker 2: either a believer in God or you're not. Okay, there
Speaker 2: isn't some you know. Uh, you're either in or you're out.
Speaker 2: You're you're not. You're either committed or you're not committed.
Speaker 2: And so all of it is phony. And the thing
Speaker 2: that concerns me is how these people are wrapping themselves
Speaker 2: and using God for their own purposes. It disgusts me,
Speaker 2: and discuss me the fact that people are and what
Speaker 2: is really dangerous is that people who are so invested
Speaker 2: in this they U see talk all the time on
Speaker 2: both sides about a civil wars. I've said before, but
Speaker 2: for whoever you want. But none of these people are
Speaker 2: worth a civil war, none of them. They don't even
Speaker 2: have any principles that they want to stand for. But
Speaker 2: let's talk about the religious side of this. There's a
Speaker 2: guy named Jeremiah Johnson. This is not the guy that
Speaker 2: Jeremiah Johnson. I always think about the Robert Redfield movie.
Speaker 2: I liked that movie. But this is not Liver Eaton Johnson.
Speaker 2: This is a Liver Liver lillied liar who had pro
Speaker 2: Trump prophecies. His brother Josiah Johnson has begun opposing the
Speaker 2: self described prophet Jeremiah Johnson, publicly accusing his sibling of
Speaker 2: fab crocating prophetic visions and messages involving Donald Trump primarily see,
Speaker 2: this guy is an influencer. He's not a prophet, He's
Speaker 2: an influencer. He influenced some charismatic leaning Christians, according to
Speaker 2: The Washington Post. Early one morning, reflecting on his concerns
Speaker 2: as brother Josiah drafted a message to his social media followers,
Speaker 2: he questioned the integrity of those who might manipulate spiritual
Speaker 2: messages for personal gain, hinting at his brother's activities without
Speaker 2: direct accusation. His brother, Jeremiah Johnson leads a ministry that
Speaker 2: touts him as being a global prophetic voice with extensive
Speaker 2: outreach through social media, conferences, and he has an online
Speaker 2: course and for only nineteen dollars and ninety nine cents.
Speaker 2: It's not quite twenty dollars. I mean, it's nineteen ninety nine.
Speaker 2: You too can learn how to be a prophet. As
Speaker 2: soon as I saw that, I thought of Axe eight,
Speaker 2: where you know, the apostles going And then there's this guy,
Speaker 2: Simon the Sorcerer right, the magician. You know what the
Speaker 2: word for sorcerer used there is maga mago right, it's
Speaker 2: Simon the maga magician. And he saw what they were
Speaker 2: doing and he said, yeah, I see the power the
Speaker 2: Holy Spirit here says how much to buy that? And
Speaker 2: the apostles said, nineteen ninety nine, you can go to
Speaker 2: our website and you can learn to be an apostle
Speaker 2: and a prophet and a healer. No, that's not the
Speaker 2: way the story goes. I'll let you read it in
Speaker 2: acts eight. He didn't get that nineteen ninety nine special.
Speaker 2: This is just so ridiculous, and yet people are falling
Speaker 2: for these false prophets and liars. So the ninety nine
Speaker 2: course teaches you prophetic maturity, adding that his influence peaked
Speaker 2: with claims that God had chosen Trump to expose quote
Speaker 2: darkness and perversion in America. Well, how is Trump going
Speaker 2: to do that? I know that he wanted to have
Speaker 2: trans men in his beauty contest. Was that his real
Speaker 2: was that forty chess, I'm going to show people just
Speaker 2: how dark and perverse America is. I'm going to put
Speaker 2: men in my beauty contest. How's that genius? Isn't it fortyhs.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's the same thing that Alex is thinking
Speaker 2: about when he puts Blair White on his show. I'm
Speaker 2: going to show everybody just how corrupt this place is. Look,
Speaker 2: even I'm into this. A substantial following includes over three
Speaker 2: hundred and twenty eight thousand people on Facebook alone. Well, yeah,
Speaker 2: better be careful about what he says. Richard Dawkins, the atheist,
Speaker 2: the biologist just got deep platform from Facebook because he said, hey,
Speaker 2: you know, these people are biological men. You're gone, you know,
Speaker 2: competing against women in the Olympics. Despite their shared upbringing
Speaker 2: under a pastor father, Jeremiah's portrayal of their childhood as
Speaker 2: enchanted starkly contrasts with Josiah's claims of abuse and disillusionment,
Speaker 2: which he shared with his wife and close confidence confidants.
Speaker 2: Their father, a significant figure in their lives, purportedly favored Jeremiah,
Speaker 2: deepening the rift between the siblings. You know, kind of
Speaker 2: like the smothers brothers. Mom always liked you better. The
Speaker 2: conflict has spilled over into public forums, where supporters of
Speaker 2: both sides have engaged and heated exchanges. Josiah's frustrations with
Speaker 2: what he sees as Jeremiah's manipulation of spiritual authority for
Speaker 2: fame and political influence. See influencers, they'd keep coming back.
Speaker 2: Their influencers led him to severtire ties with the ministry.
Speaker 2: According to The Washington Post, his departure followed what he
Speaker 2: perceived as a betrayal when Jeremiah used a personal poem
Speaker 2: of Josiah's that he called the Boom and the Upper Room.
Speaker 2: Imagine it was more doctor SEUs than it was Jesus.
Speaker 2: There's more SEUs than Jesus. A prophetic mission message, and
Speaker 2: he didn't give him credit. And these guys are real prophets.
Speaker 2: They'd be giving God the credit. That would be finding
Speaker 2: each over each other, over these who gets their thing red.
Speaker 2: In the aftermath of the twenty twenty election, Jeremiah admitted
Speaker 2: to inaccurately prophesying Trump's victory. Well that's unusual. You know,
Speaker 2: most of these people, like Julie Green, said, no, Trump
Speaker 2: is still president. He did that for many, many months.
Speaker 2: Some of them are still saying it. What they did,
Speaker 2: You know, they didn't know he was going to run again.
Speaker 2: I was saying he was going to run again. No,
Speaker 2: he's still president. He's the rifle press. He won the election.
Speaker 2: See I told you that straight from God, and he
Speaker 2: did win the election, and I'm not wrong. Then some
Speaker 2: other ones took the position, well, that was a message
Speaker 2: from God. You just didn't pray hard enough for Trump,
Speaker 2: so it didn't happen. It's your fault. So these people
Speaker 2: are just something else, a confession that led to considerable
Speaker 2: backlash from his followers, including he got death threats because
Speaker 2: he said I was wrong about Trump. People said, no,
Speaker 2: Trump is president, you know, death threats and a significant
Speaker 2: loss of support, reported The Christian Post. He wrote at
Speaker 2: the time, over the last seventy two hours, I received
Speaker 2: multiple death threats and thousands upon thousands of emails from
Speaker 2: Christians saying the nastiest, most vulgar things I've ever heard
Speaker 2: toward my family and ministry. I have been labeled a coward,
Speaker 2: sell out, a traitor to the Holy Spirit, and cussed
Speaker 2: out at least five hundred times. Is that all tell
Speaker 2: me about it? I was not a worshiper of Trump,
Speaker 2: and I didn't make any prophecies about Trump what I
Speaker 2: saw happening. I told the truth to people. I was
Speaker 2: right about Jay six and stopped steel. But that didn't
Speaker 2: stop these people from coming after me. Even when that
Speaker 2: stuff happened. They told me I was a liar. They
Speaker 2: told me what really was happening with Steve A. Chennick
Speaker 2: and Alex Jones were saying from two days after they
Speaker 2: liked that this was really happening still February March, things
Speaker 2: like that. It's like seriously, and then of course, you
Speaker 2: know there's all the rest of the stuff that they
Speaker 2: threw at him, you know, but anyway, he said. He
Speaker 2: also said, I would like to repent for inaccurately prophesying
Speaker 2: that Trump would win a second term as president. I
Speaker 2: refused to blame the Saints and say it didn't come
Speaker 2: to pass because they didn't pray enough. Nor will I
Speaker 2: proclaim that Donald Trump actus one. So I was right.
Speaker 2: See that's what Julie Green did with that stuff, but
Speaker 2: now it has been stolen from him. I'm not going
Speaker 2: to say that. He said, I specifically want to apologize
Speaker 2: to any believer in whom I have now caused potential
Speaker 2: doubt concerning the voice of God. I don't think any
Speaker 2: of us doubt the voice of God. We doubt the
Speaker 2: voice of Jeremiah Johnson and the voice of Julie Green
Speaker 2: and the voice of Alex Jones and other people like that,
Speaker 2: we don't doubt the voice of God. Where do we
Speaker 2: find the voice of God? Well, he does finish up
Speaker 2: with that. He says his written words should always be
Speaker 2: the foundation of the source of our lives as Christians.
Speaker 2: That's all we need. We don't have to buy prophecy
Speaker 2: classes from him. Maybe he should stop selling those classes
Speaker 2: as well. And so, you know, they got angry with
Speaker 2: him because he said that he had inaccurately prophesy. At
Speaker 2: least he owned up to it, but of course that
Speaker 2: discredits him as a prophet. God never gives prophecies that fail,
Speaker 2: so he's not speaking for God anyway. Yeah, when I
Speaker 2: am they called me all kinds of stuff, including disgruntled employee.
Speaker 2: When I tell people the truth about January the sixth,
Speaker 2: it truly is amazing. And so the unrest in Venezuela.
Speaker 2: This is from Free Thought Project, actually is an article
Speaker 2: from Popular Resistance. Many people have said that this election
Speaker 2: in Venezuela was a US led coup all along. Now,
Speaker 2: of course it is possible. I don't trust the people
Speaker 2: in Venezuela. However, as I said all along, the elections.
Speaker 2: He used these people who, as I announced yesterday, have
Speaker 2: just been indicted, the founders of Smartmatic, just indicted for
Speaker 2: fraud and money laundering and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 2: He used those guys, three friends of his, in Venezuela
Speaker 2: to create Smartmatic, the electronic voting machine. And in every
Speaker 2: other country except for Venezuela, they've been accused of all
Speaker 2: kinds of skullduggery in the elections, whether it's Philippines or
Speaker 2: Brazil or Mexico. All over the world issues with them.
Speaker 2: And so I said, well, I could easily believe that
Speaker 2: they rigged this election, and Edison Research was the same
Speaker 2: people do the exit polls here in the United States.
Speaker 2: But of course it's also possible that just like the
Speaker 2: Venezuela has got their guys rigging the election and the
Speaker 2: machines there, we also do the same thing. Edison Research
Speaker 2: could be a rigged thing. They could be working for
Speaker 2: the CIA. One of the big issues is that they
Speaker 2: do use Edison Research to evaluate whether or not they
Speaker 2: believe the elections are stolen. If there's a big enough
Speaker 2: difference between the official results and what they did with
Speaker 2: their exit polling, they believe that the election was stolen.
Speaker 2: But of course that these people are working for the CIA,
Speaker 2: all bets are off. And as I've said many times,
Speaker 2: why didn't either the Democrats or the Republicans appeal to
Speaker 2: Edison Research? They do exit polls and they're the only
Speaker 2: ones who do the exit poll at election time. Now,
Speaker 2: when I had was it ken Block. I think he
Speaker 2: was hired by the Trump people to audit the elections.
Speaker 2: And he said Trump and his people hired exit polls
Speaker 2: as well, and the exit pole guy told him that
Speaker 2: they lost. They didn't want to talk about that. So
Speaker 2: the question is, if we have Edison Research, why didn't
Speaker 2: either the Democrats or Republicans use that. Well, they don't
Speaker 2: want to tell you what the totals are. They'll give
Speaker 2: you all the demographic cross tabs, how many men, how
Speaker 2: many women, how many of this group and that group?
Speaker 2: Demographic groups voted for this Canada or the other, But
Speaker 2: they won't compare the official results to their exit polls
Speaker 2: except in foreign countries. And so Popular Resistance quotes the
Speaker 2: Venezuelan constitutionalist expert, maybe somebody who works for maduro It's government.
Speaker 2: There no Venezuelan party that alleges to have forty percent
Speaker 2: more votes than President Maduro would hesitate to present the
Speaker 2: evidence to the National Electoral Council. Whoever cries election fraud
Speaker 2: must irrefutably prove it. The onus is on them, not
Speaker 2: on CNE, to prove that there wasn't. Is that true?
Speaker 2: Is it true that the onus is on the challenger
Speaker 2: to prove that it wasn't what the incumbent says it was.
Speaker 2: I don't think so. I think the onus is on
Speaker 2: the incumbent to be transparent. I think the onus is
Speaker 2: on the government to build people's trust that the election
Speaker 2: is honest and fair and so. Yes, if you're making
Speaker 2: an accusation, you do need to be able to prove it.
Speaker 2: You know, Michael Lindell was not able to prove any
Speaker 2: of this stuff. Trump was not able to prove any
Speaker 2: of it. But the Biden administration was equally at fault
Speaker 2: because they arrogantly refused to prove their side of it
Speaker 2: as well. Both signs if they really want to govern,
Speaker 2: if they really want to trust to the people, both
Speaker 2: signs should be proving their point. But of course in Venezuela,
Speaker 2: they destroyed the ability of people to audit the election.
Speaker 2: That was part of the challenge to it. And so
Speaker 2: one of them says we got seventy percent of the vote.
Speaker 2: The other one says we got eighty percent of the vote.
Speaker 2: The two different signs there. How do you know what
Speaker 2: to believe? Well, quite frankly, I don't trust Venezuelan communists.
Speaker 2: I don't trust Washington politicians of either party. I don't
Speaker 2: trust smartmatic, I don't trust the CIA, and neither should you.
Speaker 2: They need to earn that trust, and none of those
Speaker 2: people are interested in trying to earn your trust for
Speaker 2: these elections, and so they don't deserve it. But when
Speaker 2: you look at what David Ike said, you know, it
Speaker 2: was the middle of July. He responded to Alex Jones
Speaker 2: who said America is ready for the war. CIA surrender. Now,
Speaker 2: what a bunch of lunacy. This is the same kind
Speaker 2: of stuff he's running around doing prior to January the sixth.
Speaker 2: Biden will be removed one way or the other, he said,
Speaker 2: one way or the other. Is it interesting that he's
Speaker 2: the one who got the permit for January sixth, He's
Speaker 2: the one who ran stop the steal. He's the one
Speaker 2: who's saying we're ready for war with the CIA, really,
Speaker 2: and of course nothing happens to him, nothing happens. Oh yeah,
Speaker 2: you got that one a half million dollar judgment. But
Speaker 2: has he paid a penny of it.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 2: You look at the contributions that he's got, legal fees,
Speaker 2: big legal fees. But you look at the contributions. He
Speaker 2: got one contribution alone nine million dollars in bitcoin that
Speaker 2: he testified to on the stand. Nobody ever asks all
Speaker 2: these enemies that he's got in the mainstream media, never
Speaker 2: asked where that came from. Isn't that interesting? Nobody wants
Speaker 2: to know where that came from. No questions asked, no
Speaker 2: charges there. As David Ike says, they want a war
Speaker 2: alex they want a civil war, and country after country
Speaker 2: they want a civil war. As I've been warning for
Speaker 2: so many years, we should not give it to them.
Speaker 2: I guess David Ike's just a disgruntle former employee. Right,
Speaker 2: This is what you have to be concerned about. The
Speaker 2: same people who pushed this for January sixth, got so
Speaker 2: many people's lives destroyed, same people who pushed the pandemic,
Speaker 2: who pushed the vaccine and got people's lives destroyed, are
Speaker 2: now pushing that if Trump doesn't get elected, it's over.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, Trump just says, we're just
Speaker 2: talking about Venezuela, and what a basket case it is there.
Speaker 2: Trump just said with Musk, he said, if something happens
Speaker 2: with his election, which would be a horror show, well
Speaker 2: we'll meet the next time in Venezuela. Why would he
Speaker 2: pick that place to go to. Isn't that interesting that
Speaker 2: he would pick it. I mean, he's talking about Venezuela
Speaker 2: before saying it's very good in venezuel because they've sent
Speaker 2: all of their prisoners here to the United States. Well,
Speaker 2: no Venezuela and Caracas has as I had pointed out,
Speaker 2: and many people reminded everybody of the fact that in
Speaker 2: Venezuela they have many different metrics of crime are the
Speaker 2: highest in the world in Venezuela because it starts with
Speaker 2: the authoritarian, totolitarian communist government that is nothing but a kleptocracy.
Speaker 2: It's about theft. So why would you think in a
Speaker 2: country where the government is organized around theft, why would
Speaker 2: you think that everybody else is going to be stealing?
Speaker 2: So Trump said to us, if I lose this election,
Speaker 2: which would be a horror show. Maybe we'll meet next
Speaker 2: time in Venezuela. So maybe you know, he'll skip out
Speaker 2: and leave everybody else to fight in the civil War force?
Speaker 2: Is that the plan? He said? So okay, so we'll go,
Speaker 2: You and I will go and we'll have a meeting
Speaker 2: and we'll have dinner in Venezuela. Wow. So there you go.
Speaker 8: You.
Speaker 2: Meanwhile, we'll be left behind to face the music. We're
Speaker 2: going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show. Rumble DG eight
Speaker 2: says David. What is pathetic about Musk yesterday?
Speaker 8: Is it?
Speaker 2: Nobody questioned Trump on his red flag gun laws, COVID failures,
Speaker 2: Fauci awarded Father of the vaccine, eight trillion more in debt,
Speaker 2: and not jailing Hillary. And we could go on and on. Right,
Speaker 2: of course, not this is Orwellian double speak and double think.
Speaker 2: It didn't happen, but we don't care. You know, it
Speaker 2: wasn't him, It was a Democrat governors and so forth. Well,
Speaker 2: it's take a look at the democrats mentioned earlier, and
Speaker 2: several states have done this. You had James O'Keefe did
Speaker 2: it around Virginia, Maryland or something, wenthouse to house and
Speaker 2: asked people that reported on Act Blue if they had
Speaker 2: really donated thousands of times and given tens of thousands
Speaker 2: of dollars. And these are people living in very, very
Speaker 2: modest means, many of them retired and on Social Security,
Speaker 2: and said, well, you know, I've donated to Act Blue.
Speaker 2: I'm a Democrat. I wish I could, wish I had
Speaker 2: twenty thousand dollars to get but I don't have anything
Speaker 2: like that. That's crazy. Why would I donate multiple times
Speaker 2: a day. It's just the most obvious fraud. And so
Speaker 2: we've seen that he did that, and then somebody else
Speaker 2: did it in another area. I forget what state it
Speaker 2: was in. And now in Tennessee, The Tennessee Star, a
Speaker 2: state Republican newspaper, said an eclusive Tennessee woman donated to
Speaker 2: Act Blue four thousand, two hundred times since last year.
Speaker 2: The Tennessee Star has identified seven people who the leftist
Speaker 2: political donation platform Act Blue reported to the campaign finance
Speaker 2: authorities donated more than a one thousand times. Seven people
Speaker 2: donated more than a thousand times since the beginning of
Speaker 2: twenty twenty three. Further adding to suspicions that the company
Speaker 2: is committing fraud. Okay, I know they have to do that,
Speaker 2: allegations leff Front. I've never seen anything more fraudulent than that,
Speaker 2: and especially because the Texas can Paxson said, well, we've
Speaker 2: talked to them and they promised that they're going to
Speaker 2: ask people what the three digit code is on the
Speaker 2: back of their card, you know, the CVV thing. I've never,
Speaker 2: as I said yesterday, I've never made an online purchase
Speaker 2: where I didn't have to provide that. I don't know
Speaker 2: how they're able to process the credit cards without that, frankly,
Speaker 2: but they don't. That's a good question. Why are they
Speaker 2: allowed to process credit cards without getting that information? The
Speaker 2: purpose of that is to make sure that you're real,
Speaker 2: to make sure that the credit card isn't stolen, or
Speaker 2: maybe to make sure that there's not fraud and money
Speaker 2: laundering going on with Act Blue. Margaret Maher a sixty
Speaker 2: eight year old woman who is listed as not employed
Speaker 2: as according to documents filed with the Federal Election Commission
Speaker 2: by the Democrats supporting nonprofit corporation Bactblue, she has this
Speaker 2: not unemployed sixty eight year old woman gave almost thirty
Speaker 2: three thousand dollars to the largest political action committee through
Speaker 2: a total of four thousand, two hundred individual donations over
Speaker 2: the past twenty months. Now, the time of this writing,
Speaker 2: has been five hundred and eighty nine days since January
Speaker 2: the first. If we divide the forty two hundred individual
Speaker 2: donations by the five hundred ninety eight days, that means
Speaker 2: that she's donating on average seven point one times a day,
Speaker 2: seven times a day. She's donating. Why would anybody do that?
Speaker 2: Come on, this is obviously fraud. Dividing the total amount
Speaker 2: of donations by the five hundred and eighty nine days
Speaker 2: says that she was giving on average fifty six dollars
Speaker 2: seven times a day. They call these people ghost donors.
Speaker 2: I call it fraud. Better call Saul. It's yeah, that's
Speaker 2: exactly what this is. We attempted to reach out to
Speaker 2: her to the Tennessee Star, but her phone number was disconnected.
Speaker 2: Imagine that you can't get through to the ghost donor
Speaker 2: or these other people either. And as we look at
Speaker 2: Tim Walls, I like to call him Waltz. He's kind
Speaker 2: of dancing through this stuff. Former Minnesota bar owned calls
Speaker 2: him an evil man who ripped up my small business
Speaker 2: and many others during COVID. Yeah, absolutely, absolutely evil, very
Speaker 2: zealous in what he did with that. And many other governors,
Speaker 2: both Democrat and Republican. That's the other thing. You know, Well,
Speaker 2: let's talk about you know COVID, Well, it was just
Speaker 2: a Democrat governors. Well, actually there's a lot of Republican
Speaker 2: governors who do that. And guess what, both the Republican
Speaker 2: and Democrat governors were paid by Trump to do it.
Speaker 2: And it was a plan that had been practiced for
Speaker 2: twenty years, plan practice and paid. That's what PPP stands for.
Speaker 2: It's not payroll protection thing or whatever they called it.
Speaker 2: It was a we planned it, we practiced it, and
Speaker 2: now we're paying you governors and bureaucracies at the state
Speaker 2: level to enact this. And of course the first one
Speaker 2: of those planning practice sessions was months before nine to eleven.
Speaker 2: Dark Winter, a former Minnesota bar owner who faced more
Speaker 2: than three hundred thousand dollars in fines during the pandemic
Speaker 2: so called described Walls as an evil man who had
Speaker 2: taken small businesses and ripped them up. In an interview
Speaker 2: with a New York Post, Lisa Zarza now runs an
Speaker 2: outpost bar and grill in Wisconsin, described Walls as having
Speaker 2: overstepped his role as the governor. She had to go
Speaker 2: to another state. She had two bars in Minnesota. She
Speaker 2: lost them both and paid three hundred thousand dollars, so
Speaker 2: she opened a bar in Wisconsin as a small owner.
Speaker 2: After months of having her two bars in Minnesota shut
Speaker 2: her during the pandemic, she along with other small restaurant owners,
Speaker 2: decided two to five shutdown orders and were threatened with
Speaker 2: arrests with fines. She told the outlet, I think he's
Speaker 2: an evil man who overstepped his role as governor. He
Speaker 2: took small businesses, ripped them up. He destroyed us. She
Speaker 2: told the outlet she had to leave the state in
Speaker 2: order to earn a Liverpool wage. I had to leave
Speaker 2: the state to be able to legally work and make
Speaker 2: a living. She's in Wisconsin now. She and other bar
Speaker 2: owners ended up defying the shutdown order in October of
Speaker 2: twenty twenty. I was threatened with arrest, I was threatened
Speaker 2: with fines. At the end of the entire lawsuit, my lawyer,
Speaker 2: my lawsuit, including attorney general fees, was over three hundred
Speaker 2: thousand dollars and I had to file personal bankruptcy. She
Speaker 2: also ran a hotline. Rather he did. He ran a
Speaker 2: hot line where citizens could snitch on other people. He's
Speaker 2: very proud of that. He refused to shut it down
Speaker 2: when the Republicans and the legislature called him on it.
Speaker 2: But here's the thing that really bothered her, and it
Speaker 2: really bothered me. She said that during the shutdown, places
Speaker 2: like Target, Walmart, Home Depot had been opened one hundred percent.
Speaker 2: She said, everybody was All these big stores were open
Speaker 2: one hundred percent. The same exact order that shut us
Speaker 2: down opened them up. And it wasn't just walls, it
Speaker 2: was Joe, the governors, it was everywhere. And it was
Speaker 2: Trump who said the small businesses were not essential. If
Speaker 2: you're a big box Wall Street company, you're essential. If
Speaker 2: you are a small, mainstream mom and pop, you're not essential.
Speaker 2: And that same thing happened to us thirty plus years ago.
Speaker 2: As I said, we had one time, let our store
Speaker 2: is shut down. We didn't shut down. When there was
Speaker 2: a snowstorm. I would get in the jeep and I
Speaker 2: would pick people up. I'd say, you know where do
Speaker 2: you live, I'll come get you. And we never shut
Speaker 2: down except one time, and it was when hurricane came
Speaker 2: through and took out power throughout the triangle. But then
Speaker 2: when we got power back at one of the stores,
Speaker 2: we got it open, and the cops came in and
Speaker 2: shut us down, and yet Walmart was open. They said, well,
Speaker 2: you can't be open, you're going to be drawing people in.
Speaker 2: I said, you got Walmart open and people can't even
Speaker 2: see us in here across the street, and they're the
Speaker 2: ones who are getting people to come in. And but yeah,
Speaker 2: that I lived that, so I know that, and to me,
Speaker 2: it's worse to be. What Trump did was worse than
Speaker 2: what Hillary did when she called people deplorable. He said,
Speaker 2: you're non essential because I guess you know he's gonna
Speaker 2: do what he wants to do for these people who
Speaker 2: pay him. But getting back to Walls, you even bragged
Speaker 2: about abandoning his mother after heart surgery. So away we're
Speaker 2: going to leave food on her doorstep.
Speaker 7: And this is what we do in my family. But
Speaker 7: we can't my eighty seven year old mother at heart surgery.
Speaker 7: We isolated her. Our goal was to bring her up
Speaker 7: here and live with us for a while. We can't
Speaker 7: bring her, so she is alone. We're dropping groceries at
Speaker 7: the door. We have to because otherwise what that front
Speaker 7: page story is going to go on after day after day.
Speaker 2: He's a coward. He is a lover of self. He
Speaker 2: loves himself more than he does his mother. Yeah, and
Speaker 2: this is shows his character. This is a guy who
Speaker 2: believes that this world is all that there is. He
Speaker 2: only loves himself, and he only loves what's in this
Speaker 2: world in this short life. And this is the kind
Speaker 2: of attitude that makes a person in power dangerous. And
Speaker 2: I would say this about all of them. They all
Speaker 2: want the power and the money and the prestige that
Speaker 2: they get. They love it more than anything, love it
Speaker 2: more than their family, love it more than God. He,
Speaker 2: by the way, created you're talking about his character. This
Speaker 2: whole stolen valor thing just keeps going on and on.
Speaker 2: He created challenge coins that had a higher military rank
Speaker 2: on him than he had earned. So when he was
Speaker 2: in Congress, he minted a coin and commemoration of himself
Speaker 2: showing that he was a congressman and that he had
Speaker 2: a military rank which he didn't have. Just keeps going
Speaker 2: and JD. Vance got into a back and forth with
Speaker 2: Dana Bash on CNN, and he's the only one that
Speaker 2: seems to be able to be able to take on
Speaker 2: these questions. Trump's afraid and Lala Harris is running scared
Speaker 2: big time. Tim Walls is not taking any questions. Jd.
Speaker 2: Van says, And even though I don't support him, he
Speaker 2: can certainly defend himself if I can find that. Here
Speaker 2: it is on the.
Speaker 9: Question of when he left the National Guard. He filed
Speaker 9: his election paperwork February tenth, two thousand and five. That
Speaker 9: was a month before the National Guard even announced that
Speaker 9: it was possible they would deploy to Iraq, and it
Speaker 9: ended up being two months. He retired two months before
Speaker 9: they actually got the paperwork.
Speaker 10: But on CNN last night, Dana, one of the people
Speaker 10: who was actually in charge of him, said they knew
Speaker 10: they were going to deploy to Iraq in February of
Speaker 10: two thousand and four or fall of two thousand and four,
Speaker 10: So he knew he was going to Iraq. He decided
Speaker 10: to quit, to retire, whatever word you want to use, retire,
Speaker 10: because whatever, because he wanted to run for Congress.
Speaker 2: He lied about that.
Speaker 10: He said that when he decided to retire, he did
Speaker 10: not know that he was going to Irack. That is
Speaker 10: another untruth, as even his senior military officer said.
Speaker 2: Like I said, he's the only one who can handle
Speaker 2: himself in a question. Isn't it amazing that these other
Speaker 2: people can't or won't truly is amazing. Trump has got
Speaker 2: nothing to say. The two Democrats are running away from
Speaker 2: the press and any interviews. Of course, he's also the
Speaker 2: employee Peter Thiel. That's a whole nother issue. Campaign is
Speaker 2: also elevating Walls to a position that he didn't have.
Speaker 2: They said he chaired veterans affairs. Well, he didn't do
Speaker 2: that either. Not only has he inflated his rank in
Speaker 2: the military, but he never chaired veteran affairs. While he
Speaker 2: spent a decade in the House and he was on
Speaker 2: the Veteran Affairs Committee, he eventually rose to become the
Speaker 2: ranking member of that committee. At no time, however, was
Speaker 2: he ever the chairman. So again, always elevating himself above
Speaker 2: his position. I think the issue with his mother as
Speaker 2: an even bigger issue. With all that and what he
Speaker 2: did to people, all these lockdown things. Walls has also
Speaker 2: called for gun control on the grounds that quote, we
Speaker 2: can make sure those weapons of war that I carried
Speaker 2: in war are only carried in war. The candidate did not, however, ever,
Speaker 2: serve in a war zone, so he didn't carry those
Speaker 2: weapons of war in a war. And I don't get
Speaker 2: to say, this really bothers me, this is a zero
Speaker 2: Hedge article. It really bothers me to see this over
Speaker 2: and over again. It doesn't matter who it is. It
Speaker 2: could be bright parts done the same stuff to The
Speaker 2: Republicans are making a big issue about the fact, well,
Speaker 2: he didn't carry that gun in a war. The GUP
Speaker 2: needs to stop playing this goatcha game, and they need
Speaker 2: to defend the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment is not
Speaker 2: there so that we can have a standing army that
Speaker 2: has a monopoly on arms. The Second Amendment is there
Speaker 2: for the right of the people. And the purpose of
Speaker 2: the Second Amendment is fundamentally about protecting ourselves from an
Speaker 2: armed government, to make sure that government doesn't have all
Speaker 2: the power. Mal said power comes out of the barrel
Speaker 2: of a gun. Well, the founders understood that as well.
Speaker 2: They didn't want government to have a monopoly on power.
Speaker 2: There is absolutely no reason and I absolutely detest this
Speaker 2: argument for gun control. I've seen it used by generally crystal.
Speaker 2: I've seen it used now by Walls and the Republicans
Speaker 2: will not push back on this. Second Amendment is not
Speaker 2: about a standing army having weapons. It's exactly the opposite.
Speaker 2: And I'd say this over and over again, Well he
Speaker 2: didn't really go to a war. Well did we ever
Speaker 2: really have a declaration of war to start with? This
Speaker 2: same government that doesn't bother to follow the constitution and
Speaker 2: actually declare war, is the same government's going to go
Speaker 2: to war with you. So the armed citizenry that is
Speaker 2: there as a deterrent the government tyranny, and it deters
Speaker 2: government tyranny. I've had this argument with members of the
Speaker 2: president ran for a political office, and why do you say,
Speaker 2: and who are very clear about it back in the
Speaker 2: late nineteen eighties, in the early nineties. Second women, it's
Speaker 2: not about hunting, it's not even about self defense. It's
Speaker 2: about restraining an out of control government. Well, you think
Speaker 2: you're going to win the same stuff I've heard from
Speaker 2: Eric Swallwell and Joe Biden and Beto or Warick. You know,
Speaker 2: we got the planes, we got the military, we're going
Speaker 2: to you know, you can't use this stuff. It's a
Speaker 2: big deterrent it's a deterrent in the same way that
Speaker 2: nuclear weapons have and should be a deterrent to nuclear war,
Speaker 2: because if you've got an armed citizenry and you decide
Speaker 2: that you want to have a civil war, it's going
Speaker 2: to be a very costly civil war, and so it
Speaker 2: serves as a deterrent without anybody doing anything. The mere
Speaker 2: presence of firearms restrains evils at Washington, and that is
Speaker 2: absolutely the purpose of an armed militia. The Yeomanry from
Speaker 2: the ages of sixteen to sixty very clearly defined what
Speaker 2: a militia meant at that time. It is there as
Speaker 2: a deterrent. It's a government aggression, and it can deter
Speaker 2: government aggression without anything even being done. That's the whole point.
Speaker 2: You don't want to have a war, and it's to
Speaker 2: discourage them from having it. Meanwhile, Lalla, she's talking about
Speaker 2: this tax tip thing again. She's just copycat. You know,
Speaker 2: when there is a cyber attack on Twitter because of
Speaker 2: the Musk Trump interview, we were attacked too. I know
Speaker 2: you aren't. I don't believe that for a moment, and
Speaker 2: I don't believe her on the removing tax on tips either,
Speaker 2: because she casts the tie breaking vote to let the
Speaker 2: IRS track workers tips so they can be taxed. I'm
Speaker 2: gonna have to start calling her liar instead of lalla.
Speaker 2: She voted as recently as twenty twenty two. Maybe she
Speaker 2: might remember that to pass legislation that allowed the IRS
Speaker 2: to track down workers tips so they could be taxed.
Speaker 2: On August the seventh, almost exactly two years ago, she
Speaker 2: cast the tie breaking vote to pass the so called
Speaker 2: Inflation Reduction Act that provided eighty billion dollars of additional
Speaker 2: funding to the IRS, whose entire budget is thirteen billion.
Speaker 2: So they went from thirteen billion to ninety three billion
Speaker 2: to make it seven times larger. And she said, two
Speaker 2: years ago, I proudly cast a tie breaking vote to
Speaker 2: pass our Inflation Reduction Act. On this vote, it was
Speaker 2: fifty to fifty, the Senate being equally divided. The Vice
Speaker 2: President votes in the affirmative, and the bill is a
Speaker 2: minute as passed, she said, as she put out the
Speaker 2: video showing her casting that vote. So if Joe Biden
Speaker 2: provided eighty billion dollars and the GOP many and the
Speaker 2: GOP sided with him of additional funding to the IRS,
Speaker 2: and of course you know, Mike Johnson doesn't have any
Speaker 2: problem with it either. Kevin McCarthy pushed back more on
Speaker 2: this funding for the IRS than conservative Mike Johnson, just
Speaker 2: so you know. In February twenty twenty three, the IRS
Speaker 2: then released a proposed revenue procedure known as the Service
Speaker 2: Industry Tip Compliance Agreement Program. They said, ultimately, the goal
Speaker 2: is to go and grab as much revenue as possible
Speaker 2: from whoever they can. Saturday Representative for Americans for Tax
Speaker 2: Reform at the time, because that's why they're adding eighty
Speaker 2: thousand agents at eighty billion dollars. Because you the plan
Speaker 2: is for you to own nothing. You will eat zeebugs.
Speaker 2: How they're going to get that stuff from you, Well,
Speaker 2: the IRS is very capable in that way. They told
Speaker 2: us that they're not going to be coming after people
Speaker 2: earning four hundred thousand dollars or less, he said. The
Speaker 2: Biden administration did, well, here's a new IRS rule that's
Speaker 2: focused on bringing in tips and wide. They said that
Speaker 2: two years ago. As Reason magazine reported in twenty twenty three,
Speaker 2: the White House touted the legislation's eighty billion with a
Speaker 2: B and new funding for the IRS, claiming it would
Speaker 2: make our tax code fair by cracking down on millionaires,
Speaker 2: billionaires and corporations that evade their obligations. But you know
Speaker 2: who always pays the taxes. It isn't those millionaires billionaires
Speaker 2: in corporations they pay zero taxes. You pay all the taxes.
Speaker 2: When are people going to wake up to that dodge?
Speaker 2: Come on, They've been selling that since nineteen thirteen when
Speaker 2: they passed the income tax is only going to be
Speaker 2: for the multimillionaires. You're not going to workingman's not going
Speaker 2: to pay any taxes. It now appears that some of
Speaker 2: those resources will quite predictably be aimed at individuals earning
Speaker 2: considerably less. Said reason Well, I'll just say this, the
Speaker 2: Democrats are not serious about getting ready of any of
Speaker 2: these taxes. LA Law is not serious about it, the
Speaker 2: GOP's not serious about it. Trump's not serious about it.
Speaker 2: They were serious about it, they would be talking about
Speaker 2: first of all, they need to end the income tax
Speaker 2: and abolish the irs full stop right there. But if
Speaker 2: they won't do that, they can at least stop increasing
Speaker 2: it by sevenfold. They want to make it seven times bigger,
Speaker 2: and they're still on the path to make it seven
Speaker 2: times bigger. They're not going to get rid of any taxes.
Speaker 2: This is sheer demagogery. They're growing the irs, making it
Speaker 2: seven times bigger than it was. And it's both the
Speaker 2: Republicans and the Democrats. So they can talk all you
Speaker 2: want to about her being a copycat, and she is.
Speaker 2: She's copying Trump's lies and she's lying to people. It's
Speaker 2: Trump's lies. Those are my lies. You can't use my
Speaker 2: lies with that. I came up with that lie. That's
Speaker 2: not fair, by the way, Biden says, he also backs
Speaker 2: Trump's plan to and taxes. Now, here's an interesting thing.
Speaker 2: If the GOP was serious about this, if they really
Speaker 2: wanted to help us, they would call his bluff on it,
Speaker 2: wouldn't they. Oh, you say you want to do it. La,
Speaker 2: La wants to do it. Trump wants to do it.
Speaker 2: Let's all do it. Let's end the taxes on tips.
Speaker 2: Let's do it right now. Why wait, Well, they only
Speaker 2: won an issue. Like I said, Yes, it's the same
Speaker 2: thing we saw in North Carolina with a Democrat Speaker
Speaker 2: of the House, damn Blue, when we said let's end
Speaker 2: the sales tax on food. How about that just to
Speaker 2: begin ending the sales tax on food, and we ran
Speaker 2: a few commercials on cable and immediately the Speaker of
Speaker 2: the House, dam Blue, comes out, Democrat says, if we win,
Speaker 2: we're going to take a look at ending the sales
Speaker 2: tax on food. He's not going to do it, but
Speaker 2: that's you know, but he can't. He thought, that's a
Speaker 2: good idea. I'll promise people I'll get rid of the
Speaker 2: sales And they never even looked at it, never even
Speaker 2: looked at it. And so people are upset about the
Speaker 2: fact that la Law stole Trump's idea. It's just an idea.
Speaker 2: He's not going to do anything about it. He's not
Speaker 2: going to push Biden to do something about it. They're
Speaker 2: upset that he sold his idea. They're not upset that
Speaker 2: he's stealing their money. Isn't that interesting You can't steal
Speaker 2: Trump's idea. Well, the IRS steals our money and continues
Speaker 2: to do so at another eighty billion dollars. They're stealing
Speaker 2: our money to give eighty billion dollars to the IRS.
Speaker 2: But now this stuff is going to balance the budget
Speaker 2: thirty five trillion dollars. A test, I said, I give
Speaker 2: you a thirty five trillion reasons why we don't need
Speaker 2: an income tax and we don't need the IRS because
Speaker 2: they don't even care about coming close to it. Democrats
Speaker 2: brag about it. They have this thing called the modern
Speaker 2: monetary theory, the magic money tree. They don't think that
Speaker 2: it has to be balanced, but of course the Republicans
Speaker 2: don't either. The income taxes never come close. All of
Speaker 2: our taxes combined don't come close to paying for what
Speaker 2: they spend, but certainly the proportion of it, the in
Speaker 2: income tax doesn't come close at all. This is just
Speaker 2: class war, it's partisan war. They're not going to do
Speaker 2: anything for you. Wake up. I mean remind you before
Speaker 2: we go to break. Please like the stream if you're watching,
Speaker 2: that helps our visibility, and it has helped I notice
Speaker 2: that stream has gone up a bit, and I think
Speaker 2: it's because people have been liking it. So that really
Speaker 2: does help us, especially in an environment here where we
Speaker 2: are so heavily suppressed. Shadow band is another word for it,
Speaker 2: and I just want to remind you as we're going
Speaker 2: to be coming in at the top of the hour.
Speaker 2: Eric Peters is going to join us and we're going
Speaker 2: to talk about cars. He's had a lot of interesting
Speaker 2: articles about classic cars and classic tyranny. I guess we
Speaker 2: could say he's about liberty and mobility. But he's also
Speaker 2: about classic cars in classic tyranny and spot in them
Speaker 2: from a long distance. I just remind you that if
Speaker 2: you want to protect yourself from these types of systems
Speaker 2: that are setting up, I mean, when you look at
Speaker 2: what is going to break after the election, who knows
Speaker 2: it might break before the election. You know, we might
Speaker 2: have a major stock market crash. I said, when we
Speaker 2: had this week ago yesterday, when there was a big
Speaker 2: market drop, I said, that's kind of unusual. This stuff
Speaker 2: usually waits until October to happen. Well, October hasn't happened yet,
Speaker 2: and it may happen. But if it doesn't happen the
Speaker 2: way that it's not going to happen, they're going to
Speaker 2: kick the can down the road with a lot more inflation.
Speaker 2: Either way. You want to make sure you got some
Speaker 2: wealth insurance. You want to make sure that you've got
Speaker 2: privacy insurance. And of course gold and silver are just that.
Speaker 2: If you go to Davidknight dot Gold, that'll take you
Speaker 2: to Tony Ardeban's Wise Wolf and you can get gold
Speaker 2: silver small or large transactions and you can begin accumulating
Speaker 2: if you wish on a regular basis by being a
Speaker 2: part of Wolfpack, a buying group, you pick the level
Speaker 2: that you want to save each month and you get
Speaker 2: a discount as part of that bigger buying group. So
Speaker 2: you can just set yourself up on a regular savings program.
Speaker 2: They're at Wisewolf and you can find it with Davidnight
Speaker 2: dot Gold. We're going to take a quick break and
Speaker 2: we'll be right back.
Speaker 3: They're doing what in the place they named after me?
Speaker 2: Good thing.
Speaker 7: I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed
Speaker 7: on the plots of these traders.
Speaker 2: Making sense common again, this is the David Knight Show. Well,
Speaker 2: the sorry I came, I've got the wrong thing here.
Speaker 2: Let me go to some listeners. I was going to
Speaker 2: talk about climate, but I don't know what happened in
Speaker 2: my climate thing. Here. This is from Will and he said,
Speaker 2: here's a tally of individuals that we personally know in
Speaker 2: our family, and they're vaccine reactions and symptoms. Two people
Speaker 2: with Gillam beret, three people with sudden blood clots, three
Speaker 2: people with chronic heart issues including myocarditis and spiking blood pressure,
Speaker 2: one person with aggressive fatal cancer after the shot, two
Speaker 2: people with itching, shaking, and other neurological issues, one person
Speaker 2: with brain fog, two people with recurring flu every few
Speaker 2: months from a weakened immune system. We only have a
Speaker 2: small circle of friends and relatives, so these numbers are frightening.
Speaker 2: The really sad part of this is that out of
Speaker 2: all of these folks, only one grudgingly admits that the
Speaker 2: JAB may have been the cause. All of them are
Speaker 2: in denial. Is it pri that prevents them from seeing
Speaker 2: the connection or is it ignorance. Additionally, it seems that
Speaker 2: from my end, there's no point in discussing it with them,
Speaker 2: as it's too late and the damage is done. Well again, yeah,
Speaker 2: I agree, I mean it is not. You know, it's
Speaker 2: kind of an I told you so and people don't
Speaker 2: want to hear it, but you know, quietly they may understand.
Speaker 2: You never really know, but there's no point at that point,
Speaker 2: and you know, when somebody is sick with it to
Speaker 2: say anything about it is. What is I think even
Speaker 2: more disturbing is the the willful denial, self denial about
Speaker 2: what is happening with the with the policy issues that
Speaker 2: we talked about earlier the other listener, But it was
Speaker 2: never about the pandemic. It was always about depopulation. It
Speaker 2: was always about establishing martial law. It was always establishing compliance.
Speaker 2: It was always condition people for universal basic income, and
Speaker 2: it was always about a global ID. It had a
Speaker 2: lot of different purposes, you know, the global ID through
Speaker 2: the vaccine passport, and then to use that to say
Speaker 2: that we will control whether you're allowed to move, We
Speaker 2: will control whether or not you can have a job
Speaker 2: or have a business. We have reached the outer limits
Speaker 2: of tyranny here. We will control the horizontal, we will
Speaker 2: control the vertical. You're not in control of your TV set.
Speaker 2: As I said, and this is from Jackie who has
Speaker 2: sent this to me. I have several times I've talked
Speaker 2: about real ID in Tennessee and in other places in general,
Speaker 2: and she says, I'm saying this to you so that
Speaker 2: you know that it is not mandatory and there is
Speaker 2: an opt out, and I know that, and maybe I
Speaker 2: don't mention that every time. And I figured, well, maybe
Speaker 2: I need to clarify this because there are exceptions. Even
Speaker 2: though they are closing the loop holes that are there,
Speaker 2: and they are really doubling down on the flying aspect
Speaker 2: of it. But even with the flying aspect of it,
Speaker 2: you do not have to there are alternatives if you've
Speaker 2: got a passport or other documentation, even if you want
Speaker 2: to take a plane. I just I talk about it
Speaker 2: because I just find it so incredibly outrageous that they
Speaker 2: would impose this. And when I talk about real ID
Speaker 2: and what happened in Tennessee, they did it to me
Speaker 2: and didn't tell me. You know, well do you they
Speaker 2: Here's what's important. They will present it as if there
Speaker 2: is no alternative, or they won't even tell you about it.
Speaker 2: I played for you a couple of weeks ago a
Speaker 2: person who is an activist against biometric databases and did
Speaker 2: not want to have her face scanned at the airport,
Speaker 2: and she recorded the interaction with the TSA agent who
Speaker 2: was telling her that she had to do it. She said, no,
Speaker 2: I don't have to do it. There's your sign right there.
Speaker 2: Read the sign right next to you, and it says
Speaker 2: that you don't have to do it, And so he
Speaker 2: finally relented, but he had an attitude about it, right,
Speaker 2: but he was trying to tell her that she had
Speaker 2: to do it, even though there was a sign that
Speaker 2: said you don't have to. She said a lot of times,
Speaker 2: there's no sign, and they intimidate people tell them they
Speaker 2: have to do it. The other thing they don't do
Speaker 2: is they don't tell you that you've got a choice.
Speaker 2: When I went in to get license here in Tennessee,
Speaker 2: they wanted all this documentation and didn't tell me that
Speaker 2: I could have provided less documentary. I said, wow, this
Speaker 2: is a lot of stuff. You know. They just keep
Speaker 2: getting worse and worse about this. Unless you're an illegal
Speaker 2: alien you don't speak English, then I guess it just
Speaker 2: kind of skate through. But you know, so we gave
Speaker 2: him all the stuff that they asked for and then
Speaker 2: she says, oh, congratulations, and look you got a real ID.
Speaker 2: S he's got the little yellow star like the Z
Speaker 2: he's used to use. It's like great. And I was
Speaker 2: telling a friend at church about it. He said, he
Speaker 2: pulled out his license and he goes, oh, I've got
Speaker 2: a yellow star two on mine. They didn't tell you
Speaker 2: about it. This is from Bill, he says. Since I've
Speaker 2: been through two corrupt court systems in Indiana over the
Speaker 2: identity theft known as real ID, I know a little
Speaker 2: bit about it. The first date was the first date
Speaker 2: that the real ID was supposed to have been implemented.
Speaker 2: Was in twenty fifteen. That date was canceled, and they
Speaker 2: have set subsequent implementation dates several times, but they've all
Speaker 2: been canceled. The new date set, I've always thought that
Speaker 2: they will never actually implement it because it was designed
Speaker 2: to execute illegal surveillance without a warrant, which certainly some
Speaker 2: would take an issue with not anymore. Right, isn't it
Speaker 2: crazy that the States have been stealing americans biometric data
Speaker 2: for fourteen years and I'll bet more than nine to
Speaker 2: nine percent of us have no idea it ever happened,
Speaker 2: nobody ever talked to know anything about it. And so
Speaker 2: he says, I'm writing this while watching Thursday's show. So
Speaker 2: this is a week ago. What Tony said about the
Speaker 2: crypto people doing because someone brought up the mass murderer's
Speaker 2: flip flop on crypto is very disturbing. But again it
Speaker 2: is people not willing to take a look at what
Speaker 2: the consequences are, what they're actually supporting. And so where
Speaker 2: are we with this real ID and driver's licenses? Well,
Speaker 2: this is from the mainstream press, and this is they said.
Speaker 2: It's previously reported the Department of Homeland Security will finally
Speaker 2: require Americans traveling and again this is flyers. But of
Speaker 2: course they want to get all of our travel shut down,
Speaker 2: whether you're taking an airplane, a bus, a train, or
Speaker 2: they don't want you to have a private car. To
Speaker 2: have a real ID for domestic travel. They've got a
Speaker 2: date on it now of May the seventh is pushing
Speaker 2: back on it this time around because we've all been conditioned,
Speaker 2: I guess through the pandemic even if people know about it.
Speaker 2: But again, there are other alternatives that you can use,
Speaker 2: even for flying. What I thought was interesting was that
Speaker 2: this real ID Act was pushed in two thousand and
Speaker 2: five in response to the nine to eleven Commission's recommendation.
Speaker 2: You know what else was part of that the prep
Speaker 2: act we had in nineteen eighty six. Fauci pushed through
Speaker 2: the childhood vaccination legal immunity for the pharmaceutical companies that
Speaker 2: they could not be sued in two thousand and five
Speaker 2: as part of this, again that the pandemic lockdown is
Speaker 2: intricately tied to nine to eleven. It's all part of
Speaker 2: the same thing. The first one of these germ games
Speaker 2: two months before nine to eleven, the anthrax attack one
Speaker 2: week later, two months later, the model legislation sent to
Speaker 2: the States, and then in two thousand and five the
Speaker 2: Press Act, which was even more restrictive on lawsuits against
Speaker 2: pharmaceutical companies if it was a vaccine done in preparation
Speaker 2: or in response to a so called pandemic. And at
Speaker 2: the same time in two thousand and five that they
Speaker 2: put in the Prep Act for that, they also put
Speaker 2: in this real ID just like when they ran through
Speaker 2: the pandemic, they started talking about vaccine patports and you know,
Speaker 2: IDs help IDs and things like that. One of the
Speaker 2: acts gold was goal was to add a layer of
Speaker 2: security to commercial aviation. Why why Well, because if FED
Speaker 2: controls the airports, they do it because they can. And
Speaker 2: the TSA knew at the time when they were doing
Speaker 2: this stuff, they knew that there were no threats to
Speaker 2: airports aeroplanes. They set it in their own documents and
Speaker 2: that was revealed in a court case. But we also
Speaker 2: know the TSA doesn't work, and that in and of
Speaker 2: itself is proof that there was no threat. So the
Speaker 2: bottom line is is that in Tennessee, you can still
Speaker 2: drive without it, you can still vote without it, you
Speaker 2: can still buy alcohol and tobacco without it. You can
Speaker 2: still get a You still get your Social Security and
Speaker 2: veteran benefits without real ID. You cannot go into military
Speaker 2: or federal facilities without a real ID as of next year,
Speaker 2: but you'll still be able to go to the post office.
Speaker 2: It is a loop that is gradually closing. Just like
Speaker 2: fact you said, how do we get people do stuff?
Speaker 2: You do it with disruption, You do it from the inside,
Speaker 2: and you do it iteratively. And so this is an iterative stage.
Speaker 2: So generally, just like the Nazis, they'll give you a
Speaker 2: yellow star or some kind of a cutout or something
Speaker 2: like that. And it is all fifty states are issuing
Speaker 2: compliant IDs. They have all backed into all of this stuff.
Speaker 2: And if you again, if you don't have this ID
Speaker 2: and you want to fly, you can still use a passport,
Speaker 2: you can use your if your illegal alien, you can
Speaker 2: use your border crossing cards anything like that. And so
Speaker 2: this gradually closing in on us, and it is despicable
Speaker 2: and it is part of the the manipulation that they're
Speaker 2: using on us. Again, visualizing the death of cash transactions
Speaker 2: around the world. Cash projected drop from twenty nineteen to
Speaker 2: twenty twenty seven is amazing around the world, and you
Speaker 2: need to make sure that you preserve that, and you
Speaker 2: need to make sure that you've got something that is
Speaker 2: real money that is outside of their control if you
Speaker 2: don't use cash. I like what Katherine Austin Fitz does.
Speaker 2: She suggests that everybody make an issue out of using
Speaker 2: cash and cash only on Fridays. Just think, every Friday,
Speaker 2: whatever I buy, I'm going to use cash to do it,
Speaker 2: And it's one way of keeping that alive. If nobody
Speaker 2: uses it, they're gonna they're gonna shut it down. So oh, okay.
Speaker 2: I thought Eric was ready, but I see that Eric
Speaker 2: will not be able to make it today. So okay.
Speaker 2: We had a confusion on the days, same thing that
Speaker 2: we had with the people in New Zealand. But of
Speaker 2: course we're in the same time zone. But that's that
Speaker 2: sort of thing. Does happen. Uh, Well, we're going to
Speaker 2: take a quick break and we will be right back.
Speaker 3: Stay with us.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show. I found my
Speaker 2: climate thing here. I put it in the wrong folder.
Speaker 2: The Guardian is absolutely astounded that climate denis climate infidels.
Speaker 2: They don't believe in that religion make up nearly a
Speaker 2: quarter of the US Congress and I am astounded that
Speaker 2: they only make up a quarter of the Congress. That
Speaker 2: means it's seventy five percent of the people believe this nonsense,
Speaker 2: or at least say that they do. I don't know
Speaker 2: how rational person could believe this with all the false prophets,
Speaker 2: these and everything else. I mean, these people are worse
Speaker 2: than Jeremiah Johnson that I was talking about earlier in
Speaker 2: the show. They're constantly making predictions that don't pan out.
Speaker 2: Twenty three in the Senate and one hundred in the House.
Speaker 2: All Republicans are climate denialists. Again, infidels, the infidels of
Speaker 2: this green religion. It makes the US an outlier internationally. Well,
Speaker 2: I think we need to out the liars. We need
Speaker 2: to out these people who continue to push this nonsense
Speaker 2: for which they don't have any proof. You know, when
Speaker 2: I look at this and they say, well, you know,
Speaker 2: seventy five percent of Congress believes US climate nonsense. About
Speaker 2: a decade ago, when I went to the American Meteorological Association,
Speaker 2: they had it in Austin, Texas, and they were all
Speaker 2: doing real science, and they were some of them were
Speaker 2: just pure research people. There were a lot of meteorologists
Speaker 2: there that were TV weathermen, you know, that type of thing.
Speaker 2: But it was like a giant science fair, and some
Speaker 2: of them were giving presentations and some of them just
Speaker 2: had big displays there where they were talking about their
Speaker 2: computer model and they would have an idea that we
Speaker 2: could measure this, and we could measure that, we could
Speaker 2: put that into the model, and then we could make
Speaker 2: predictions about what was going to happen, and then we
Speaker 2: would make observations. Did our model accurately predicted? And they
Speaker 2: could do that with the weather because they're only doing
Speaker 2: it a couple of days out, and they were all
Speaker 2: talking about what they got right and what they got wrong,
Speaker 2: and everybody's looking at everybody else's models and trying to
Speaker 2: learn from each other. But it was experimental, it was
Speaker 2: real science. And then he had an organization that had
Speaker 2: a booth and it was supplied by money was supplied
Speaker 2: by a SOURUS organization, and they were there to shame
Speaker 2: meteorologists who did not believe climate change, who didn't preach
Speaker 2: it to the TV listeners. And so they had all
Speaker 2: these charts and they said, we have done these polls
Speaker 2: and people can be persuaded by TV weather men to
Speaker 2: believe in climate change, but eighty percent of you guys don't.
Speaker 2: What's the matter with you that type of thing? And
Speaker 2: so we've gone from a situation in ten years where
Speaker 2: you had eighty percent of the meteor andologists rejected all
Speaker 2: this alarmism to situation where about eighty percent of the
Speaker 2: Congress agrees with it. Not that they've done any science,
Speaker 2: not that they've done any critical thinking. They have been
Speaker 2: essentially paid to do this. As what's up with that?
Speaker 2: Says well, I know this might be a difficult concept
Speaker 2: for climate activists and some climate scientists to grasp, but
Speaker 2: if your model disagrees with the observations, you should keep
Speaker 2: the observations and discard the model. But they do exactly
Speaker 2: the opposite, don't they. Brussels, by the way, you know,
Speaker 2: it's not just about one thing. Brussels has helped bent
Speaker 2: on destroying European farming, because that's what this is all about.
Speaker 2: All of it is about population control in every sense
Speaker 2: of the word. They want to limit what you do,
Speaker 2: and they want to limit the number of people, and
Speaker 2: part of it is by limiting food and making us poor,
Speaker 2: a repeal of the Industrial Revolution. Brussels has helped beent
Speaker 2: on destroying European farming. The EU, under control of the
Speaker 2: global elite, is systematically crushing agriculture through its policies. This
Speaker 2: is happening not only in Europe, but also across Western civilization,
Speaker 2: which soon will not be civilized. We're losing all the
Speaker 2: different aspects of civilization. The EU policy is threatened to
Speaker 2: destroy what has provided us with our daily bread and food,
Speaker 2: make it impossible for farmers to survive, and of course
Speaker 2: the old adage of no farmers, no food is true.
Speaker 2: Without them, we will starve to death. You know, there's
Speaker 2: not that many people who are really good at growing food,
Speaker 2: and very few people are on the farms. It's all
Speaker 2: been taken over into a kind of industrialized the situation,
Speaker 2: and everything is being centralized and concentrated. Then, Mark has
Speaker 2: recently announced they will introduce cattle, pig and sheep taxes
Speaker 2: in twenty thirty. What if we say that we're giving
Speaker 2: them tips instead of food, could we get that tax free?
Speaker 2: They say these animals cause huge damage. They are they
Speaker 2: out roaming through the villages and you know, uprooting everything. No, no,
Speaker 2: it's not like feral pigs or anything. It's just the
Speaker 2: huge damage is from CO two, which, by the way
Speaker 2: humans breathe out CO two. They want to eliminate us
Speaker 2: as well as the cattle and the pigs. The measures
Speaker 2: that EU and individual Western Country are putting in place
Speaker 2: or diverse, but they all point in the same direction
Speaker 2: to forest farmers, not to cultivate, to clear the land,
Speaker 2: to stop their activities in order to protect the climate.
Speaker 2: And this is part of one of the problems that
Speaker 2: I have with the big solar panels. Of the biggest
Speaker 2: problem I have with the solar farms is the fire
Speaker 2: threat that is there. But the other big part of
Speaker 2: it is is that they're taking farmland and destroying the
Speaker 2: farmland in order to put the solar panels up, taking
Speaker 2: it out of production. And it is all so unnecessary.
Speaker 2: So the problem is none of these these twenty five
Speaker 2: percent of the people in Congress, they're not going to
Speaker 2: oppose the fundamental lie. They're skirt around the issue. Well,
Speaker 2: how do is there another way that we can minimize
Speaker 2: our CO two?
Speaker 3: Yet?
Speaker 2: Don't need to minimize CO two, It's already minimized. It's
Speaker 2: only zero point zero four percent of the atmosphere, and
Speaker 2: only three percent of that zero point zero four percent
Speaker 2: is man made. The release of and here's another example. Okay,
Speaker 2: the release of Ukrainian agricultural products into the European market
Speaker 2: is a concrete, tangible crime by Brussels. It poses a direct,
Speaker 2: clear and present danger to European farmers. Destroy the economics
Speaker 2: of this for them. They have done this to they say,
Speaker 2: to help the Ukrainians, and it's especially true in Eastern Europe.
Speaker 2: They're bringing these things in at very discount prices, very
Speaker 2: lax controls, very permissive compared to what they do to
Speaker 2: the European Union farmers. And I see a similarity to
Speaker 2: what they're doing with China and with industrial production. They're
Speaker 2: going to give Ukraine big advantages in terms of agriculture
Speaker 2: and farming. And of course Ukraine was a big bread
Speaker 2: basket for the Soviet Union and even for Europe. So
Speaker 2: they're going to give them a big advantage in terms
Speaker 2: of agricultural production, give them all kinds of economic advantages,
Speaker 2: in the same way that they give China all kinds
Speaker 2: of economic advantages in industrial production. They get cheaper energy,
Speaker 2: they get no regulation whatsoever. Same thing with China with
Speaker 2: Ukraine isn't interesting, you know, food as well as industrial production. Oh,
Speaker 2: they've got their special friends, don't they, that they're going
Speaker 2: to favor crony capitalism. It's clear therefore that every move
Speaker 2: by Brussels and the European leaders who serve the globalist
Speaker 2: lade in Brussels are deliberately destroying European agriculture. Normal leaders
Speaker 2: would not do this, as this article from zero Hedge,
Speaker 2: well they, I think a better way to describe that
Speaker 2: would say that national leaders would not do this. Right. Obviously,
Speaker 2: all these people doing it, they realize that this is
Speaker 2: to the detriment of their own country. But if you
Speaker 2: try to do what is right for your own country,
Speaker 2: then you are vilified. You are called a populist, you
Speaker 2: are called a right winger, you're called a fascist, and
Speaker 2: they attack you. Any political party, whether you're talking about
Speaker 2: the UK or Germany or America, if they focus on
Speaker 2: that country's interests, then of course they're evil. And if
Speaker 2: they're not nationalists, then what are they. They're globalists. We
Speaker 2: have in almost all of the countries of the West.
Speaker 2: The globalists have marched through the institutions. They've taken them over,
Speaker 2: they've taken over our governments. You could clearly see it
Speaker 2: with what happened in twenty twenty four. That is precisely
Speaker 2: what is happening, and they've taken it over as enemies
Speaker 2: of the nation. They work against the interests of their
Speaker 2: own people. I will take a quick break and will
Speaker 2: be right back. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Well on Rockman, Douglegg, thank you very much. I appreciate
Speaker 2: the tip. On rock Fan, Nancy Chambers says, I renewed
Speaker 2: my driver's license but did not get real ID. Now
Speaker 2: I can't fly or travel. Fortunately, I don't plan to
Speaker 2: go it. Don't plan too anyway. Well again, you can
Speaker 2: if you have some other documents, but you know that
Speaker 2: would require you getting a passport, which is all the
Speaker 2: same information. Anyway, it's so redundant, all the stuff that
Speaker 2: they have, And don't worry, they're going to consolidate it
Speaker 2: all into one handy little biometric application. Rumble self, patriot,
Speaker 2: If all you can do is work to pay skyrocketing
Speaker 2: food prices, then they think you'll be too distracted to
Speaker 2: focus on their criminality. That is the purpose of taking
Speaker 2: everything away from us. That's why class Schwab would say
Speaker 2: that rumble Ephesian six twelve, we fought against a solar
Speaker 2: company here where I live, and we beat them in
Speaker 2: our rural area, but we lost to them in the city.
Speaker 2: Well that's good. I imagine you're talking about a solar
Speaker 2: farm that is happening there. It's interesting because these solar
Speaker 2: you know, so they're talking about this. Well, we just
Speaker 2: had one of the oldest and biggest solar installation companies
Speaker 2: in California, as I talked about the other day, went bankrupt,
Speaker 2: the biggest and oldest doing rooftop solar. I don't know
Speaker 2: when we look at it, nobody is bothering.
Speaker 3: Too.
Speaker 2: This is new technology, so nobody talks about the shortcomings.
Speaker 2: They talk everybody knows the shortcomings of the systems that
Speaker 2: are here, whether this brand new stuff. All you see
Speaker 2: is the shiny promises that are there. Nobody talks about
Speaker 2: what is the full energy cycle to produce this stuff?
Speaker 2: How do we dispose of it? Is there a way
Speaker 2: to dispose of it? All the rest of the stuff
Speaker 2: that they are so focused on with everything else, they
Speaker 2: don't care about recycling. When it comes to these windmill blades,
Speaker 2: which are not recyclable, reusable, they don't care about any
Speaker 2: of that. Let's take a look at what the scientists
Speaker 2: are saying, humans will reach the singularity within twenty one years.
Speaker 2: This is again popular mechanics. You see this from all
Speaker 2: the g whiz science outlets, and it always goes back
Speaker 2: to Ray Kurzweil. He is the one who has been
Speaker 2: the evangelist for this.
Speaker 1: He is.
Speaker 2: A lot more optimistic and nicer in a Pollyanna kind
Speaker 2: of way. He's not the nasty futurist like Juvil Harari
Speaker 2: who just cannot hide his contempt for other people. But
Speaker 2: Ray Kurzweil is really kind of Pollyanna. He has invented
Speaker 2: a lot of things, and he's a chief scientist at Google.
Speaker 2: And as I said, I've talked many times to Hugo
Speaker 2: to Garis, who wrote the art like War. Hugo to
Speaker 2: Garris also worked in artificial intelligence, trying to come up
Speaker 2: with generalized AI. But he looks at it and he says,
Speaker 2: you know, this may not go right for us. He's
Speaker 2: one of these people who believes that they're going to
Speaker 2: that he's creating a godlike intelligence, which I absolutely don't believe.
Speaker 2: But this is the standard line from the people who
Speaker 2: work in the field and from popular mechanics. And places
Speaker 2: like that. But what made you go to Garris interesting,
Speaker 2: I thought, was that he saw before that would happen,
Speaker 2: that there would be an awareness of the general population
Speaker 2: that the technological elites, the technocrats had essentially were exploiting
Speaker 2: people and trying to control people, and there'd be a
Speaker 2: pushback against it, and there would be a war between
Speaker 2: these technocrats and the common people. And he called it
Speaker 2: the art liked wars and talked about how that might
Speaker 2: play out. And I thought that was very interesting, because
Speaker 2: you know, these would be the people who have the
Speaker 2: advanced technology, who have artificial intelligence against the common people.
Speaker 2: But again, and he said, he thought raker aswhile only
Speaker 2: saw the positive sides of any positive consequences of this stuff,
Speaker 2: But he's also one of these people who believes that
Speaker 2: science is God. A scientist says humans will reach the
Speaker 2: singularity within twenty one years, a concept borrowed from the
Speaker 2: world of quantum physics. They say, well, I don't think
Speaker 2: it has anything to do with quantum physics, and I
Speaker 2: think it has everything to do with satan. He's written
Speaker 2: another book, is why they wrote this article. He had
Speaker 2: written a few years ago book called The Singularity Is Near.
Speaker 2: He wrote that in nineteen ninety nine. Now he's got
Speaker 2: a sequel to it that says the Singularity is nearer nearer.
Speaker 2: It's the sequel, And again when you look at the Singularity,
Speaker 2: it's something that he runs the Singularity. He's got a
Speaker 2: conference about Singularity that he runs every year. Peter Keel, however,
Speaker 2: is one who funds it, who funded the work that
Speaker 2: Kurzwel was doing about the Singularity. He gave a Ted
Speaker 2: talk where he said he thinks that humans are going
Speaker 2: to achieve a millionfold intelligence by twenty forty five. So
Speaker 2: we're going to become like God. When you say you're
Speaker 2: going to have a millionfold intelligence, that's pretty much what
Speaker 2: they're trying to talk about. He said. It'll be aided
Speaker 2: by brain interfaces formed with nanobots non invasively inserted into
Speaker 2: our capillaries. Again, nanotechnology, as we're just talking about, maybe
Speaker 2: we've already had a lot of for better worst, a
Speaker 2: lot of the population has had nanobots inserted into them.
Speaker 2: We're going to be a combination of our natural intelligence
Speaker 2: and our cybernetic intelligence, Kurzweil said. And this is the
Speaker 2: same thing that Elon Musk has said that's another reason
Speaker 2: why he's doing neuralink. And he's saying, we're all going
Speaker 2: to become cyborgs. And he said if we don't, if
Speaker 2: you don't become a cyborg, you're not going to be
Speaker 2: able to have a life. You're not going to be
Speaker 2: able to compete in this world or do anything if
Speaker 2: you're not jacked in to the matrix with neuralink. That's
Speaker 2: the world that they have in mind for us. That's
Speaker 2: why I say, people who look to Elon Musk, he's
Speaker 2: going to save our free speech. This is a guy
Speaker 2: whose profile picture is still a a Satanic Baphomet costume
Speaker 2: that he wore for Halloween. He's proud of that. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's right there neuralink. The things that he says, the
Speaker 2: things that he does is goals as aspirations. They're all Antichrist,
Speaker 2: and yet people don't see it. It's all going to
Speaker 2: be rolled into one. We're going to expand intelligence a
Speaker 2: millionfold by twenty forty five, and it's going to deepen
Speaker 2: our awareness and our consciousness. And you see this all
Speaker 2: the time. It was an interview that I had with
Speaker 2: Bradley Dean where we were talking about that very thing
Speaker 2: I mean, this is the same kind of stuff that
Speaker 2: Alex sells on Reset Wars. You know, he's got a
Speaker 2: course there. You know, it's more expensive than if you
Speaker 2: want to become a profit you know, if you want
Speaker 2: to become a prophet. It's only nineteen ninety nine. I
Speaker 2: think Alex's course is like one hundred and fifty dollars
Speaker 2: or something. And it's a New Age course where you
Speaker 2: can learn how you know to and you can go
Speaker 2: to Reset Wars and greet it yourself. You know, we're
Speaker 2: all just consciousness and shared consciousness and energy, and we
Speaker 2: got to figureigure out how to get that energy together
Speaker 2: so that we can win and defeat the globalist you know,
Speaker 2: that type of thing. But it's all New Age bs
Speaker 2: and it's the same kind of stuff that Elon Musks
Speaker 2: sign We're going to go to the stars all the
Speaker 2: rest of the stuff. We're going to be like God,
Speaker 2: We're going to live forever. Could we possibly live forever?
Speaker 2: That's this article well from The Guardian. In the interview
Speaker 2: with the Guardian, Kurzweil highlights the ideal the idea of
Speaker 2: universal basic can come as a necessity rather than a
Speaker 2: fringe idea that was one of the other clues that
Speaker 2: Trump was playing for the other team. We started doing
Speaker 2: these stimulus checks, locking everybody. Now you'll not work, you'll
Speaker 2: not have a job or business. You'll get a universal
Speaker 2: basic income. That's it. You will own nothing, you'll be
Speaker 2: dependent on us for money. And of course, in the
Speaker 2: twenty twenty election cycle that began before the pandemic, remember
Speaker 2: that we had actually a big fee of Democrats that
Speaker 2: were calling Andrew Yang was there at the very beginning.
Speaker 2: His single issue when he began this campaign was universal
Speaker 2: basic income, and he was heavily funded and praised by
Speaker 2: Elon Musk for that. And as I said before, universal
Speaker 2: basic income and artificial intelligence go hand in hand. There
Speaker 2: are two sides of the same coin. They all want
Speaker 2: to contend that they're going to take your job. It's
Speaker 2: what Bloomberg said. He said, yeah, you had farmers, and
Speaker 2: then they had their jobs are taken away. They went
Speaker 2: to work in the factories. And now those of us
Speaker 2: who are smart are figuring out how we're going to
Speaker 2: take everybody's jobs. And we just need to figure out
Speaker 2: how we're going to do universal basic income to keep
Speaker 2: everybody pacified so they don't come after those smart ones
Speaker 2: of us, you know, the globalist elite technocrats, so they
Speaker 2: don't come after us with guillotines. That's what Bloomberg said,
Speaker 2: and it was spuned by everybody. Look, he's criticized in
Speaker 2: the farmers, well yeah, farmers, people who work in factories,
Speaker 2: anybody that's not him. He wants to control. It was
Speaker 2: absolutely amazing to me that nobody caught on to what
Speaker 2: he was doing. The big picture is not being talked
Speaker 2: about here. So Kurzweil said, universal based skincome is a necessity.
Speaker 2: It's not a fringe idea. AI will bring unprecedented advancements
Speaker 2: in medicine, meaning the very idea of immortality isn't out
Speaker 2: of the realm of possibility. And again, you know, I
Speaker 2: must just saying the same thing. You know, you're either
Speaker 2: you're going to have to take universal based skincome, You're
Speaker 2: going to have to become a cyborg, you know, or
Speaker 2: I guess I'm going to have to kill you. I
Speaker 2: don't know. In the early twenty thirties, we can expect
Speaker 2: to reach longevity escape velocity, says Kurzweil, Longevity escape velocity
Speaker 2: to live forever. What does he mean by that, Well,
Speaker 2: he says, where every year of life that we lose
Speaker 2: through aging, we get back that year through scientific progress.
Speaker 2: It isn't the Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away. No,
Speaker 2: science giveth and taketh away. Science the giver of life,
Speaker 2: Science their god, Kurzlil said to the Guardian. He said,
Speaker 2: and as we move past that longevity escape, velocity will
Speaker 2: actually get back more years. It isn't a solid guarantee
Speaker 2: of living forever. There are still accidents, but your probability
Speaker 2: of dying will not increase from year to year. He
Speaker 2: says that as he is rapidly aging himself, he is
Speaker 2: hoping that he is going to be able to He's
Speaker 2: nervously looking behind him at the coming grim reaper and
Speaker 2: thinking that he can outrun him. He's whistling through the graveyard.
Speaker 2: So is all that is happening? Yeah, it's just onward
Speaker 2: and upward, always right, always getting better. Cisco is preparing
Speaker 2: a second round of layoffs amid increasing AI skepticism. Cisco
Speaker 2: is not necessarily buying this. We've had Intelligence laid off
Speaker 2: fifteen thousand people, Cisco four thousand layoffs in February. You know,
Speaker 2: people talk about are we in a recession. They said, well,
Speaker 2: we've got a poll. Republicans are pushing this because they
Speaker 2: want people to see this as not a good economy,
Speaker 2: so they don't vote for La LA. And they said,
Speaker 2: fifty nine percent of the people believe that we are
Speaker 2: in a recession. Well, I would say it's an even
Speaker 2: higher percentage of the big tech people who believe that
Speaker 2: because they're doing massive layoffs. There's just one problem. AI
Speaker 2: is not intelligent, and that is a systemic risk, says
Speaker 2: Charles Hughes of Two Minds blog. And he says that
Speaker 2: memicry of intelligence is not intelligence. It's not artific. It's
Speaker 2: artificial intelligence, artificial in the sense that it's fake, that
Speaker 2: it's mimicking it right. It doesn't think, it doesn't reason.
Speaker 2: What it does is it does pattern matching, which doesn't.
Speaker 2: That's not really general intelligence. And the honest people will
Speaker 2: tell you that AI has not achieved AGI status yet,
Speaker 2: but it is still The fact that it can mimic
Speaker 2: and the fact that it can recognize patterns so well
Speaker 2: makes it the ultimate tool of a police state biometric
Speaker 2: identification and surveillance of people and snitching on people. That's
Speaker 2: what makes it so reprehensible and of course, it's very
Speaker 2: good at lying as well, which makes it perfect for
Speaker 2: propaganda and also makes it perfect for identifying certain narratives
Speaker 2: that it should flag for people. So it makes it
Speaker 2: the perfect surveillance tool of both our life and our speech.
Speaker 2: Aimmicry is a powerful tool, but it is not intelligence.
Speaker 2: The myth of technology has a special altar for AI
Speaker 2: artificial intelligence. You know, when we go back and liok
Speaker 2: of what Arthur C. Clark said, the author of two
Speaker 2: thousand and one Space Odyssey, He said, technology that is
Speaker 2: sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic. And that's the way
Speaker 2: they treat this. They do treat it as god like,
Speaker 2: they treat it as magic. He said. If we pull
Speaker 2: aside the curtain, we find that AI mimics human intelligence.
Speaker 2: The programs have limited capacity to discern truth from falsehood.
Speaker 2: And there's also a systemic risk generated by relying on
Speaker 2: black box AI to operate systems to the point that
Speaker 2: humans lose the capacity to modify or to rebuild the systems.
Speaker 2: Think of a forbidden planet, right, whether you have this
Speaker 2: big machinery and it's just the guy and his daughter
Speaker 2: that are there in the astronaut's land, and all this
Speaker 2: stuff is self repairing and all the rest, and they
Speaker 2: don't have a clue as to how it even works.
Speaker 2: They just came there and it was all there, so
Speaker 2: they started using it. But they don't have any idea
Speaker 2: how it works, how to fix it if anything breaks.
Speaker 2: So the purpose of all this stuff is really just
Speaker 2: about control. What is AI really well, Brandon Smith says,
Speaker 2: it is digital illusions, it is false promises, it is
Speaker 2: mass re education. It is the ultimate tool of the
Speaker 2: police state. And that's why the police state kicked off
Speaker 2: the development of it. This stuff is coming from and
Speaker 2: funded by the military industrial complex, especially DARPA, for those
Speaker 2: very purposes. And you know, again, they see it as
Speaker 2: an all powerful god. U Will Harari sees it that
Speaker 2: way in a mocking way. Ray Kurzweil sees it that
Speaker 2: way in a kind of Pollyanna way. But they both
Speaker 2: see it as God. We're going to take a quick
Speaker 2: break and we'll be right back before we go on
Speaker 2: rock Fann Jason Barker says many of the massive solar
Speaker 2: farms are reaching end of life right now. Silver will
Speaker 2: be in high demand when they go to replace them.
Speaker 2: Rumble Chevron three two one, Alex Jones could say I
Speaker 2: have Jesus in black magic on my side, and the
Speaker 2: info Warriors witied it up. Well, he actually does at
Speaker 2: different times. He actually does say essentially that we're going
Speaker 2: to take a quick break. We'll be right.
Speaker 1: Back making sense common again.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show. Population control. Of course,
Speaker 2: that's what they're very interested in, isn't it. And there's
Speaker 2: more than one way to get to that, isn't it.
Speaker 2: More us women are getting permanently sterilized because they never
Speaker 2: want to have children. You can physically damage people, You
Speaker 2: can lie to them about the economic issues, you can
Speaker 2: get them focused on other things to where they give
Speaker 2: them a lot of different reasons that they don't want
Speaker 2: to have children. You know, Greta and her tribe, how
Speaker 2: dare you tribe? They don't want to have children because
Speaker 2: they believe that the sky is falling, and why bother
Speaker 2: to have kids when we're all going to die from
Speaker 2: climate change in no time at all. So you can
Speaker 2: give people any number of reasons not to have children.
Speaker 2: Large numbers of young women in their twenties and thirties
Speaker 2: are getting permanently sterilized in order to make absolutely certain
Speaker 2: they never get pregnant. It used to be extremely rare
Speaker 2: to hear of a young woman getting sterilized during her
Speaker 2: prime child bearing years, but now it's very common. A
Speaker 2: national study published in the Journal of the American Medical
Speaker 2: Association's Help Forum is the first to evaluate the effects
Speaker 2: of Dobbs versus Jackson ruling on permanent sterilization measures among
Speaker 2: young adults, and in it, they say, looking at an
Speaker 2: abrupt nationwide increase in tubal sterilizations of aseectomies among adults
Speaker 2: ages eighteen to thirty, they don't want to have children,
Speaker 2: anything but no children. A twenty five year old nursing
Speaker 2: student was recently asked why she decided to get sterilized,
Speaker 2: and she rattled off a long list of reasons why
Speaker 2: she never is to get pregnant. She said. Different scenarios
Speaker 2: pop to mind. Were the horrors of childbirth, risks associated
Speaker 2: with pregnancy, a flighty potential partner, an exorbitant child care costs.
Speaker 2: These are except for the horrors of childbirth, you know,
Speaker 2: that's part of the curse that's there. But the rest
Speaker 2: of these things, you know, we talk about a flighty
Speaker 2: potential partner, exorbitant childcare costs, those are lifestyle choices. Maybe
Speaker 2: you ought to invest a little bit of time in
Speaker 2: finding a real partner. Maybe this is a symptom of
Speaker 2: an illness that is in our society, a lack of character,
Speaker 2: a desire. When we talk about exorbitant child care costs,
Speaker 2: what if you were to have a trustworthy partner, what
Speaker 2: if you two of you were to raise the child yourself.
Speaker 2: A novel idea used to be why things like a
Speaker 2: marriage are so important for people. First doctor she consulted
Speaker 2: refused to remove her Philippian tubes because she was only
Speaker 2: twenty five, insisting that she might change her mind after
Speaker 2: meeting her soulmate. But she continued with that she's not
Speaker 2: going to be able to de transition back to having kids,
Speaker 2: and the same type of thing that we see with
Speaker 2: the trans people. You know, maybe you want to think
Speaker 2: about this. This is not reversible. US births are alarmingly
Speaker 2: the lowest level since nineteen seventy nine, and of course
Speaker 2: we are not at the replacement rate either, And this
Speaker 2: is something that Elon Musk has talked about.
Speaker 4: There are certainly some big risks that humanity faces. Population
Speaker 4: collapse is a really big deal that I wish more
Speaker 4: people would think about. The birth rate is far below
Speaker 4: which needed to sustain civilization at its carent level. We
Speaker 4: need to take action on climate sustainability, which is being done,
Speaker 4: and we need to secure the future of consciousness by
Speaker 4: being a multipen of species.
Speaker 8: We need to address the Essentially, it's important to take
Speaker 8: what interactions we can think of to address the existential
Speaker 8: risks that affect the future of consciousness. Most people in
Speaker 8: the world are operating under the false impression that there.
Speaker 11: Are too many people. This is not true. The birth
Speaker 11: could maintain a population many times. It's the current level,
Speaker 11: and the birth rate has been dropping like crazy unfortunately,
Speaker 11: Like we have these like ridiculous population estimates from the
Speaker 11: un that need to be updated because there just don't
Speaker 11: make any sense. Really, you can just look at say
Speaker 11: what was the birth rate last year, how many kids
Speaker 11: were born, to multiply that by the life expectancy and
Speaker 11: to say, okay, that's how many people will be alive
Speaker 11: in the future, and then say is the trend for
Speaker 11: both rate positive or negative? It's negative, so that's the
Speaker 11: best case unless something changes with the birth rate.
Speaker 2: And so it's important to understand that even when somebody
Speaker 2: agrees with us on certain things. It's also important to
Speaker 2: understand why they agree with this and what are you
Speaker 2: talking about when you here is rhetoric again, it brings
Speaker 2: up this preserve consciousness and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 2: What he's talking about is to preserve of life and
Speaker 2: a multi until we get to be multi planet or whatever,
Speaker 2: you know, until we propagate throughout the universe. Who've got
Speaker 2: to do this? He is purely a technocrat, and that
Speaker 2: is the position where he's coming at this from. We
Speaker 2: may again coincide with some of these things that we
Speaker 2: need to have more kids, but to what purpose does
Speaker 2: it really help to have, for example, an education if
Speaker 2: the person has no character, that can actually make them
Speaker 2: even more dangerous. Character is a real issue. Our relationship
Speaker 2: to God is a real issue. It isn't how many
Speaker 2: people we've got. It isn't you know. For his purposes
Speaker 2: as a technocrat, he wants that, which is an interesting
Speaker 2: position and contrast to a lot of these globalists who
Speaker 2: are not technocrats. They want fewer people. And a report
Speaker 2: from the US National Center for Health Statistics says US
Speaker 2: births have continued a multi decade slide to level is
Speaker 2: not seen in more than forty years. America's declining total
Speaker 2: fertility rate peaked at three point seventy five bursts per
Speaker 2: woman after World War Two and has since collapsed to
Speaker 2: one point six and so well below the replacement level
Speaker 2: of two point one. It's less than half of what
Speaker 2: it was after World War II. And so where does
Speaker 2: this come from? And it is not just the fact
Speaker 2: that we don't want kids. It is a general disregard
Speaker 2: for life and that has the potential to affect each
Speaker 2: and every one of us, because at some point in
Speaker 2: our life, we're all going to be olderly, we're all
Speaker 2: going to be free, we're all going to be not
Speaker 2: an optimal health. And if we have a society that
Speaker 2: is contemptible of that, that calls the people who are sick,
Speaker 2: or to say, kills the helpless children, they will kill
Speaker 2: you as well when you reach that point. Here's a
Speaker 2: good example of this. This is from Christian Concerns sent
Speaker 2: to me by listener Cian. A landmark win in a
Speaker 2: court of appeals case for a family at the end
Speaker 2: of life. This was a trial in the UK and
Speaker 2: they said that a Justice Baker overturned the decision by
Speaker 2: a quart of Protection which declared that the nineteen year
Speaker 2: old Sudiksha and I don't know how to pronounce her
Speaker 2: last name, lacked mental capacity to make decisions about her
Speaker 2: medical treatment. She was nineteen years old. Last year the
Speaker 2: Christian Legal Center supported her and her family, as doctors
Speaker 2: argued that it was in her best interest for her
Speaker 2: lifensted any treatment to be withdrawn so that she would
Speaker 2: die rather than have her suffering prolonged. But she wanted
Speaker 2: to die, trying to live and to pursue further treatment,
Speaker 2: but they decided that it'd be in her best interest
Speaker 2: to die. Two psychiatrists said that she had full meddle capacity,
Speaker 2: but the Court of Protection sided with the doctors, who
Speaker 2: argued that she was delusional traditionally, or rather tragically. She
Speaker 2: died shortly after the decision was made in September twenty
Speaker 2: twenty three, but her family has kept on fighting. In
Speaker 2: today's judgment, the Justice King said that the Trust was
Speaker 2: trying to shoehorn in. The trust. By that they mean
Speaker 2: the medical bureaucracy in the UK was trying to quote
Speaker 2: shoehorn into the term delusional, what in reality they regarded
Speaker 2: as a profoundly unwise decision on her part used to
Speaker 2: move to palliative care. The Justice concluded by saying that
Speaker 2: she was entitled, that Sudiksha was entitled in law to
Speaker 2: be assumed to have capacity, and this remarkable young woman
Speaker 2: therefore had her wish to die trying to live. So
Speaker 2: the family responded and said, we are grateful to the
Speaker 2: Court of Appeal for an opportunity to challenge the frightening
Speaker 2: and unfair judgment made against Sudiksha even after her death,
Speaker 2: and for setting the law straight. A patient's right to
Speaker 2: disagree with her doctors, not to relinquish hope, and to
Speaker 2: still have her decisions respected will now be a part
Speaker 2: of Sudiksha's legacy. This case had never been taken to
Speaker 2: the courts. Sudiksha clearly had capacity to make her own decisions,
Speaker 2: and it was only the toxic paternalism toxic paternalism of
Speaker 2: the trust which caused them to seek to override her
Speaker 2: wishes in the courts. We did not want this legal battle,
Speaker 2: which ruined our lives and deprived her of her chance
Speaker 2: to raise funds and to see if nucleoside treatment could
Speaker 2: save her a last The related recognition of some of
Speaker 2: the errors made in her case cannot bring her back. Well,
Speaker 2: it's very much like what we saw years and years
Speaker 2: ago with a Bush family with Terry Chavo. It was
Speaker 2: in Florida. You had Jeb Bush's governor, he had w
Speaker 2: Bush as president, and it truly was amazing to me
Speaker 2: to see them literally execute this woman whose parents wanted
Speaker 2: to help her. Her husband wanted her dad, and he
Speaker 2: went to a probate court and the probate judge says, no,
Speaker 2: you can take her off of life support. She needed
Speaker 2: a little bit of life support, but she was interacting
Speaker 2: with the family. They put out videos showing that they
Speaker 2: literally arrested people who were trying to give her a
Speaker 2: drink of water or any food, and she was capable
Speaker 2: of taking it. And of course the executives who could
Speaker 2: have done something about it, the governor could have done
Speaker 2: something about it, he didn't do anything about it. Truly
Speaker 2: is amazing to say that at the time I didn't
Speaker 2: realize the Bush family's connection to planned parenthood. Then it
Speaker 2: all made sense why Christians must challenge the culture of death.
Speaker 2: You see, if we Elon Musk is right, if we
Speaker 2: don't have children, our culture dies, our nation dies, our
Speaker 2: planet dies, And it is in the process of doing
Speaker 2: that now in the West because people don't want children.
Speaker 2: Why because they don't value life, They don't value other people.
Speaker 2: Walls is a great example of it. And so as
Speaker 2: La La Harris and their support of abortion. When Laala
Speaker 2: Harris was the first vice president, sitting vice president to
Speaker 2: go to an abortion clinic that was in Minister Soda
Speaker 2: and he accompanied her. And he doesn't value the life
Speaker 2: of his mother. He does value his life, but nobody
Speaker 2: else's life. And that's what is fundamentally behind this whole agenda.
Speaker 2: They don't value the lives of children as they push
Speaker 2: to mutilate them. They don't value families. All of this
Speaker 2: is a package deal. It all comes together. It's the
Speaker 2: same mindset responsible for all these different symptoms. So Christians
Speaker 2: are the ones who have to challenge this culture of
Speaker 2: death pro life. Christians cannot stop at abortion rites Nadya
Speaker 2: Williams and she said it's twilight on a cold wintersday
Speaker 2: in Cappadocia Province in the Roman Empire the year sometime
Speaker 2: in the three hundred and sixties. The Roman Empire, the
Speaker 2: same pagan stuff that people were worshiping and honoring at
Speaker 2: the Olympics, the crisp feel of air threatens to snow,
Speaker 2: threatens to snow, and a young woman is walking briskly
Speaker 2: the purpose through the mostly abandoned town street to the
Speaker 2: local rubbish heap. But her goal is not to take
Speaker 2: out the trash. What she has in mind, brother, is
Speaker 2: a matter of life and death. These rubber rubbish heaps,
Speaker 2: the equivalent of our modern recycling centers, were not just
Speaker 2: places to take out the trash or various other scraps
Speaker 2: that outlive their usefulness. In addition to collecting refuse, there
Speaker 2: were also designated locations for abandoning unwanted infants, most often girls.
Speaker 2: Same things on communist China, or it was the girls
Speaker 2: it would be abandoned in the one child policy at
Speaker 2: a time of famine. In particular, why keep around more
Speaker 2: than one mouth to feed? And what use were girls
Speaker 2: anyway when you have to pay a diary when they
Speaker 2: get married, they're nothing but a resource drain. This practice
Speaker 2: of exposing infants was not unique to Cappadocia. We speak
Speaker 2: of it though, because we know the story of this woman.
Speaker 2: Her name was Macrina, and in the middle of the
Speaker 2: fourth century, while quite young, she decided to dedicate her
Speaker 2: life to Christ. As part of this mission, she never married,
Speaker 2: but began rescuing abandoned infants, mostly girls, from rubbish heaps
Speaker 2: and adopting them as her own. Is it not pro life? Also? Then,
Speaker 2: after all, to care for grown men and women who
Speaker 2: are hurting, who are outcasts, whom death is otherwise ready
Speaker 2: to claim as their own. If Tim Wallas won't do
Speaker 2: this for his own mother, well he do to you.
Speaker 2: Well he do to your family, and he won't have
Speaker 2: a conscience about it either. I had occasion to think
Speaker 2: about the Christian's comprehensively pro life ethic as I was
Speaker 2: writing my new book, Mothers, Children and the Body Politic,
Speaker 2: Ancient Christianity and the Recovery of Human Dignity. My overall
Speaker 2: argument is that the valuing of mothers and motherhood and
Speaker 2: children in our post Christian society bears remarkable similarities to
Speaker 2: the attacks on the worth of women and children in
Speaker 2: the pre Christian pagan world. Yeah, it's an interesting you know,
Speaker 2: you don't see the politicians out there kissing babies. They're
Speaker 2: figuring out how they can rip them to pieces. Now.
Speaker 2: They don't honor motherhood and apple pie. You know, they
Speaker 2: hate mothers, hate motherhood. I don't know what they think
Speaker 2: about apple pie. They're silent on that, but I mean,
Speaker 2: this is what we have as politicians. They know to
Speaker 2: even feel the need to give a nod to the
Speaker 2: things that we have traditionally valued that have been the
Speaker 2: foundation of our civilization and society. Our civilization and society
Speaker 2: will never prosper if it's founded on interplanetary discovery or
Speaker 2: any of that stuff. It's going to thrive if it
Speaker 2: is founded of Lord Jesus Christ. In the Roman world,
Speaker 2: the code of Caesar we would call it, the preciousness
Speaker 2: of any person was not guaranteed, but it was in
Speaker 2: the eye of the beholder. If Caesar said, and sometimes
Speaker 2: he did, that a group of people ought to be
Speaker 2: wiped out, well that was what was done. Christianity, by contrast,
Speaker 2: brought something revolutionary into the ancient world, a world so
Speaker 2: comfortable with casual cruelty towards the week of all ages
Speaker 2: and life stages. Is that not where we are now?
Speaker 2: When you have Ralph Northam say, well, you know, if
Speaker 2: a baby survives the abortion, we just stick it over
Speaker 2: on the side and let it die. It's called comfort care.
Speaker 2: And that is not just to him that was part
Speaker 2: of the Kermit Gosnel trial up in Pennsylvania. People were
Speaker 2: mazed to have that defined for them. They had to
Speaker 2: be pro abortion to set on that jury, and that
Speaker 2: was just an amazing revelation to these people that that
Speaker 2: was standard process. As a matter of fact, they were
Speaker 2: coming up Kermit Gosnel because he didn't do that. He
Speaker 2: so I'm going to kill the baby and put it
Speaker 2: out of his misery. Oh well, you can't do that
Speaker 2: according to our ethics, according to the so called ethics
Speaker 2: of planned parenthood. No, you have to do what the
Speaker 2: Romans did, right. We don't actually want to strangle the baby.
Speaker 2: We want to leave the baby on a rubbish heap
Speaker 2: and let it die, or set it over on the
Speaker 2: table and let it die. We call that comfort care.
Speaker 2: We can pretend that we didn't have anything to do
Speaker 2: with it. That's what we are as a society in
Speaker 2: the midst of a culture of death, a culture that
Speaker 2: viewed all people as disposable should the right circumstances present themselves.
Speaker 2: There was a sharp contrast to the manifesto by which
Speaker 2: Jesus and his followers lived that every single human being
Speaker 2: is precious in God's eyes because She's made in God's
Speaker 2: very image. So I worry today that whenever we focus
Speaker 2: our own rhetoric on rescuing only the unborn a worthy cause,
Speaker 2: to be sure, we miss the larger picture of what
Speaker 2: Christ has called has follow us to do and preserving
Speaker 2: and promoting life and flourishing. We are missing challenging the
Speaker 2: entire culture of death. And as I said before, and
Speaker 2: I'll say it again, that includes war. And if we
Speaker 2: do not honor the culture of life, if we do
Speaker 2: not honor families, if we do not honor Christ, then
Speaker 2: what we're going to find is that each and every
Speaker 2: one of us is going to be abandoned in our
Speaker 2: old age and sickness. We are going to have war
Speaker 2: come to our land that we have been spared for
Speaker 2: such a long time, if we are casual about the
Speaker 2: war that we inflict on other areas, if we have
Speaker 2: allies who continue to murder civilians long after the threat
Speaker 2: to them has ceased. These have long been held as
Speaker 2: Christian principles, and I would say that they're even broader
Speaker 2: than Christian principles, because this is something that we all
Speaker 2: understand as human beings. There are certain natural laws that
Speaker 2: God has written into our hearts. I had somebody contact
Speaker 2: me and wrote me a letter, and so they were
Speaker 2: very upset about the fact that I had said, well,
Speaker 2: I understand a lot of people have had abortions, have
Speaker 2: been deceived. They said, well, that's not the standard. We
Speaker 2: will all be held accountable for God for what we
Speaker 2: say and do. And I agree with that. I absolutely
Speaker 2: agree with that. At the same time, just as we
Speaker 2: talk about somebody who is maybe they got to the
Speaker 2: JAB and maybe they are suffering some kind of complication
Speaker 2: from it. I can't look at that, and I don't
Speaker 2: think we should look at that and say, well, you
Speaker 2: should have known better. When I saw Laura Lumer say
Speaker 2: that about the job, it just made my blood boil. Oh,
Speaker 2: you want to criticize Trump for the JAB, Well, I
Speaker 2: did get the job, I knew better, and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff. And it's like, and you're defending
Speaker 2: the guy who put the JAB out there. As I've
Speaker 2: said many times, it's like that movie where the crazy housewife,
Speaker 2: bored out of her mind and kind of nihilistic, puts
Speaker 2: poison and some milk and puts it in front of
Speaker 2: the dog and said, well, there's poison in there. If
Speaker 2: you drink it. It'll kill you. But I wouldn't do
Speaker 2: it if I were you. But I'm going to leave
Speaker 2: it up to you. I said, that's exactly what Laura
Speaker 2: Lumer is doing. And when we look at I have
Speaker 2: you know, I understand that people are responsible for the
Speaker 2: decisions that they made, and I understand that God holds
Speaker 2: us responsible for that. Even if there is someone who
Speaker 2: is tricking and deceiving us out of an evil tricked hire.
Speaker 2: Humanity was cursed because they they went along with that,
Speaker 2: They're held responsible for it. There's consequences for our disobedience always,
Speaker 2: but I think that we as human beings, we as Christians,
Speaker 2: should always have the attitude there but for the grace
Speaker 2: of God go I. And when I looked at that,
Speaker 2: I mean I did not really pay attention to abortion.
Speaker 2: I didn't really think about it until I was running
Speaker 2: for Congress, and then the issue of partial birth abortion
Speaker 2: came up in the midst of it, and it completely
Speaker 2: changed my mind. And so I understand how somebody could
Speaker 2: be deceived over that.
Speaker 3: There was.
Speaker 2: A great video tape I haven't played it here on
Speaker 2: this show of a young Asian boy who was his
Speaker 2: mother tried to abort him and it didn't. It didn't work,
Speaker 2: and he had just like a part of an arm
Speaker 2: on his left side. Very bright, very intelligent, great personality.
Speaker 3: He was.
Speaker 2: Adopted by a pastor and his wife had to biological kids,
Speaker 2: and they adopted I can't remember if the total count
Speaker 2: was twelve, or if they adopted another twelve, or if
Speaker 2: all of them together was twelve. They adopted kids from
Speaker 2: all over the world, and only a couple of them
Speaker 2: they decided that, you know, they sought it out. All
Speaker 2: the rest of these kids were brought to them and
Speaker 2: they adopted them. And he said he never realized that
Speaker 2: he was a survivor of an abortion, and he had
Speaker 2: never really thought about abortion. He was, I guess eighteen
Speaker 2: or something, and his parents said, we need to talk
Speaker 2: about something we've never talked to you about before, but
Speaker 2: old enough to hear it now, and they told him
Speaker 2: that he had survived an abortion, and it completely It
Speaker 2: made a big difference to him, and so it became
Speaker 2: a focus of his life to talk to people about
Speaker 2: how precious life is and we should always hold it
Speaker 2: in that way, and we should always have compassion on
Speaker 2: other people even when they fail, and we should remind
Speaker 2: them that even though there are consequences for what happens
Speaker 2: in this life, there's always forgiveness of the Lord Jesus
Speaker 2: Christ on Rumble Moonhawk. He really needed a rocket engineer
Speaker 2: to tell us that if we don't reproduce, will die out. Amazing. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's right. I don't know if he is a rocket engineer.
Speaker 2: I don't know if he is a rocket scientist. He's
Speaker 2: hired rocket scientists, but you know he's hired automotive scientists
Speaker 2: as well. I don't know that he's an engineer. I
Speaker 2: don't know what his background is. Frankly, don't care. On
Speaker 2: Rock Fan Jason Barker, good to see again, Jason, he
Speaker 2: says the stuff Elon says, that's popular. It's all part
Speaker 2: of his act. He's yet to fulfill any of his
Speaker 2: over promises to a one hundred percent solution. He just
Speaker 2: moves to the next grift and he leaves his crap incomplete.
Speaker 2: That's like the self driving stuff a good example of that. Right, Yeah,
Speaker 2: we've got full self driving mode and I still don't
Speaker 2: have it, do They They're going to rush that stuff
Speaker 2: through in China and they really don't care what happens
Speaker 2: there just as the government here doesn't they partner together.
Speaker 2: It is a symbiotic relationship. Rumble, do not obey. As
Speaker 2: the pandemic began with an Inconvenient Truth, a two thousand
Speaker 2: and six environmental documentary by al Gore. It was well
Speaker 2: received by world leaders and olive archs and led to
Speaker 2: the Paris Climate Accord. Yep, I remember what was his
Speaker 2: name though, Lord Monkton. He's got a title, and very
Speaker 2: intelligent guy. He made a lot of money doing some puzzle,
Speaker 2: some mathematical puzzle that people can't solve. You know, he's
Speaker 2: the big there's a big bunch of money, and it
Speaker 2: took a very long time for anybody to say. I
Speaker 2: think somebody eventually solved it. But he made many, many
Speaker 2: times more than you had to to buy the thing
Speaker 2: in order to take a crack at it. Says a
Speaker 2: smart guy. And he focused on al Gore's lie that
Speaker 2: he called an Inconvenient Truth, because they were teaching it
Speaker 2: in the UK classrooms and he wanted that stopped, and
Speaker 2: he took it to court and he got the court
Speaker 2: to agree that they would not teach it. Well, no,
Speaker 2: they got him to they would still teach it. But
Speaker 2: then what they did was they showed the movie to
Speaker 2: the kids, and then the judge said, and now you've
Speaker 2: got to show them Lord Monkton's rebuttal. How do you
Speaker 2: think that went? You think they're going to read a
Speaker 2: comprehensive technical rebuttal by an adult or are they going
Speaker 2: to be influenced by the movie. I remember how the
Speaker 2: thing started, and I used it as part of the
Speaker 2: video of the group that was trying to get the
Speaker 2: emails for Climategate released. And I showed the beginning of
Speaker 2: the movie where al Gore has got this chart that's
Speaker 2: blown up to like two stories in a warehouse, and
Speaker 2: that was Michael Mann's hockey stick where it shows that
Speaker 2: as CO two goes up temperature goes up, that they
Speaker 2: track each other. Well, they don't. CO two went up
Speaker 2: and temperature did not go up. And so Michael Mann
Speaker 2: was completely wrong in his model, as we see over
Speaker 2: and over again. But he blew it up really big,
Speaker 2: and he got on a lift and stood on this
Speaker 2: lift and then to emphasize how high that was and
Speaker 2: all the rest of it. It was fundamental to his lie.
Speaker 2: And we could not get that data from Michael Mann.
Speaker 2: And of course to just you know, show us your science.
Speaker 2: He would not show the science. He fought and court
Speaker 2: the group I was with, and he won. He won
Speaker 2: even though he did everything on a government at a
Speaker 2: university government job. He did it while he was at work.
Speaker 2: He published the results of it. We're all published and
Speaker 2: it was used for public policy. But he would not
Speaker 2: make the information public, kept at private and the judge
Speaker 2: supported him on that. It was a total eye He
Speaker 2: was part of climate Gate. There were emails going back
Speaker 2: and forth where they were conspiring. It was a real
Speaker 2: conspiracy to alter and to deceive people, to alter their data,
Speaker 2: to conceal their data and to deceive people. How do
Speaker 2: we hide the fact that the temperatures not going up
Speaker 2: based on these factors, but it's actually declined in some cases.
Speaker 2: On Rumble Redbeard John, the womb should be the safest
Speaker 2: place for unborn children, not the most dangerous, you know,
Speaker 2: Rumble Star shadow Boxer. My brother died last month. I'm sorry,
Speaker 2: as long was damaged by a ventilator that he did
Speaker 2: not want. My other brother has the clots. So that's
Speaker 2: just said. You know, when we look at this pandemic stuff,
Speaker 2: you know, I knew something was up. I knew that
Speaker 2: you know, we didn't have more people who were dying
Speaker 2: of COVID than we had of heart attacks and other things,
Speaker 2: and we knew that the hospitals were largely empty. We
Speaker 2: had a lot of people going to the big hospitals
Speaker 2: in New York. We had the twenty five hundred bed
Speaker 2: Army Field Hospital that was never used in New York.
Speaker 2: He had the big hospital ship in New York and
Speaker 2: La they were sent away, they were not used. What's
Speaker 2: going on all these citizen journals showing up the hospitals
Speaker 2: and they're empty. Well, it was letting people get really
Speaker 2: sick and then putting them on the ventilator. And the
Speaker 2: pandemic in twenty twenty, we didn't have as many people die,
Speaker 2: but they were dying from those measures of the ventilator
Speaker 2: as well as rim Dezevir. So I'm very sorry to
Speaker 2: see that, friend Edwards, thank you very much for the tip.
Speaker 2: And someone else writes, I lost my youngest brother to
Speaker 2: the vaccine twenty eight years old. I am so sorry.
Speaker 2: That's why I cannot support Trump. I will never support
Speaker 2: that man. He has blood on his hands, just like Biden,
Speaker 2: just like La La, all of them, and the GOP
Speaker 2: Democrat senators and congressmen as well. Have a good day.
Speaker 12: Let me tell you the David Knight Show you can
Speaker 12: listen to with your ears. You can even watch it
Speaker 12: by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me,
Speaker 12: that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now.
Speaker 2: Yeah, good job.
Speaker 13: And you want to know something else. You can find
Speaker 13: all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to
Speaker 13: the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 9: That's a website.