Speaker 1: On the war and some stations join us at six after,
Speaker 1: so I'm gonna go to Viva at six after we
Speaker 1: put the calls back on screen. I want to take
Speaker 1: a few more calls right now from folks. Some of
Speaker 1: the people disagree with me, and so I want to
Speaker 1: go to those callers. First. Let's go ahead and talk
Speaker 1: to John in Nebraska that disagrees, and we'll going to Doug,
Speaker 1: Tom and Jefferson. Bill intersperse those with a Viva fry.
Speaker 1: Go ahead, you're on the air, John.
Speaker 2: Yeah, John or Alex. This is John from Nebraska. I've
Speaker 2: talked to you like ten times. The last time you
Speaker 2: told me I sounded like William Cooper. I don't know
Speaker 2: if that jogs your memory. I do, yes, yeah, anyway, Yeah,
Speaker 2: I agree with you ninety nine percent. The only disagreement
Speaker 2: is simply the timing. Just like Steve quay All, he's
Speaker 2: been saying the end is nigh for the thirty years
Speaker 2: I've listened to him. Though I love him. Today, you
Speaker 2: it's inevitable. I just think we might have a little
Speaker 2: bit more time. I mean, it's all up to the Lord, right, Yes.
Speaker 1: I mean my issue is I don't control God, and
Speaker 1: I don't pretend to, but I have my conscience and
Speaker 1: God tells me fight this tyranny and that this war
Speaker 1: is a giant setup and we've been proven right. It's
Speaker 1: a disaster. So I mean, what do you disagree with
Speaker 1: I mean, do you think Trump's good or what are
Speaker 1: you saying?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 2: Oh, no, I'm in ninety nine percent agreement with you.
Speaker 2: That's why I've been listening to you for twenty seven years.
Speaker 3: I just think that.
Speaker 2: We might have a bit more time and it would.
Speaker 4: All be up to the Lord, totally rid of the.
Speaker 2: Main reason I call you, Alex, that I think this
Speaker 2: is just kick. I just took a forty four hundred
Speaker 2: and forty mile drive to the northeast to Boston from Omaha,
Speaker 2: and I got fewer bug stains when I came back
Speaker 2: to Omaha without ever cleaning the front license plate or
Speaker 2: the front bumper. The license fight has like one bug smear.
Speaker 2: I would have gotten more bug stains. Ten years ago
Speaker 2: in July driving from Omaha to Lincoln, and I drove
Speaker 2: to Western PA one thousand miles through the most fertile
Speaker 2: country in the world, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and I
Speaker 2: had three or four bug stains on my windshield and
Speaker 2: I decided to clean those off in Western PA. So
Speaker 2: we know kim Trail's frequencies, Kudo's wide. But I'm telling
Speaker 2: you that this is the book of revelation in the news.
Speaker 2: In reality, we're there. I mean, that's right.
Speaker 1: We have global insect collapsally in western countries. It's all
Speaker 1: the chemicals, it's the five G, it's the cell towers,
Speaker 1: the bees. It's all true. And then the media I'll
Speaker 1: have a study admitting it. Then letter, oh, it's a conspiracy.
Speaker 1: Dry again. I drive around in the city in Texas
Speaker 1: and happen to clean bugs off every day. I drove
Speaker 1: to see the family farm in East Texas, stop three
Speaker 1: times in the summer or spring to clean just bugs
Speaker 1: off everywhere. Now I can do a road trip in
Speaker 1: the summer of the spring and there's three bugs. And
Speaker 1: like you said, you drove through the fertile farm country
Speaker 1: in the middle of the summer. Normally there'd be bugs
Speaker 1: all over, the big ones, little ones, butterflies, moths, grasshoppers.
Speaker 1: Where are they? What's going on? And so we're looking
Speaker 1: at that. The new studios are getting built. All that
Speaker 1: stuff's going on. Thank you all for your support. I
Speaker 1: didn't plug last hour. The Alex Showstore dot Com the
Speaker 1: best supplements, it will change your life, the widest selection
Speaker 1: of Patriot a peril. The Alex Showstore dot Com got
Speaker 1: a new big sale up there where you get the
Speaker 1: iris seams for fifty percent off and amongst the other
Speaker 1: great products our seamas in the sexy name. What it
Speaker 1: does is sexy just to concentrate it. It's something like
Speaker 1: thirty grams per pill concentrate of what's in the sea moss.
Speaker 1: It's like a whole big bowl of it and just
Speaker 1: a one bite of Iris seamaas has just got more
Speaker 1: nutrients anything else out there. Ninety three vitamins, minerals, trace elements,
Speaker 1: the organic iet eye is the best of the clean
Speaker 1: it's it just does insane stuff. Veto stamina, energy, immune system, health,
Speaker 1: clarity focus. It's just insane. The gummy is the capsules.
Speaker 1: It's amazing. And we've got orders of one hundred dollars.
Speaker 1: Get a free Alice Jones Live murdered out cooler. There's
Speaker 1: just so much stuff going on. Oh I forgot this
Speaker 1: is the last week. I didn't even that already came
Speaker 1: back because there's only one week out of each month
Speaker 1: where one super vehicle. One month it's an American sports
Speaker 1: car souped up brand new. In another month it's a
Speaker 1: super truck or offer of a vehicle. I guess this
Speaker 1: month's actually two trucks. But there's only this one week
Speaker 1: period at the where you get once a month for
Speaker 1: one week. There's the crossover when everything you buy you
Speaker 1: get put in wayx more for the sweepstakes, and then
Speaker 1: you get a chance to win both vehicles and twenty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars in cash, not just one vehicle and ten
Speaker 1: thousand dollars in cash, because there's tax, title and license,
Speaker 1: and that's usually like six seven thousand dollars, so there's
Speaker 1: any time you want the vehicle, oh there's five thousand
Speaker 1: dollars cash on top of it, so your tax is
Speaker 1: taken care of and gas money for you to get
Speaker 1: back to wherever you got the vehicle. And as soon
Speaker 1: as we're back in the new studios, we'll have the
Speaker 1: winners each month in studio. Great to meet those people
Speaker 1: wanted an adventure, So that deals about to end. I
Speaker 1: didn't even really plug that or talk about that. That's
Speaker 1: always something people love. That's all at the alex shown
Speaker 1: store dot com, and we've also launched seventeen seventy six
Speaker 1: RX dot health seventy seventy six RX dot health and
Speaker 1: right now you can get the benzidol with the ivermectin
Speaker 1: combo that is total anti parasite, but does a lot more.
Speaker 1: Just look up men benzidol and what it's also known
Speaker 1: to knockout. This is pharmaceutical gray. There's a lot of
Speaker 1: fake stuff out there. You can get a discount of
Speaker 1: when you get a prescription, way off that price.
Speaker 3: There.
Speaker 1: That's all at seventy seventy six RX dot health, and
Speaker 1: it supports the broadcast to get the real stuff at
Speaker 1: support the broadcast seventy seventy six RX dot health. All right,
Speaker 1: I wanted to get Viva Fry on, and we've got
Speaker 1: Doug and Tom and Jeffers, and so when we get
Speaker 1: to the Iran war part of this discussion pretty quick,
Speaker 1: we'll also bring those in to get your takes. But
Speaker 1: I wanted to get him on routinely. But a few
Speaker 1: weeks ago he went on some shows and people took
Speaker 1: the clip out of context. I don't care if he criticizes, mean,
Speaker 1: that's what we're not in the Cultier and he said,
Speaker 1: I guess I could play the clip, but I didn't
Speaker 1: think to pull it up. He said, you know, it's
Speaker 1: this type of psychotic Alex Jones, Sandy Hook stuff, thinking
Speaker 1: everything with TPUSA and Erica Kirk and that they murdered
Speaker 1: him in all this, and this is the type of
Speaker 1: delusional blah blah blah. And I just want to be clear.
Speaker 1: Viva knows because he followed the case. He's been a
Speaker 1: lawyer that I got set up, that I was defaulted
Speaker 1: by judges. I didn't even do the things they said.
Speaker 1: I did what I said and what he was talking about,
Speaker 1: but they did them. The full context in the clips
Speaker 1: was I said, there became a time, like I'd say,
Speaker 1: twenty years ago, where so much stuff turned out to
Speaker 1: be a false flag conspiracy that I on the whole
Speaker 1: Internet believed nothing was real, and so you can almost
Speaker 1: call like a type of psychosis. I was talking in general.
Speaker 1: Then they go Jones Admitchie as a psychosis. I said
Speaker 1: that before they ever even sued me, I said that
Speaker 1: I saw these professors saying it didn't happen. I saw
Speaker 1: this stuff going on. I covered it a few times.
Speaker 1: They never attacked me for that. There was no Google
Speaker 1: searches of my name until they demonized for me and
Speaker 1: sued me saying I was a Sandy Hook guy. So
Speaker 1: this was all the construction for them, the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: to raise three hundred million dollars off my name play
Speaker 1: victim claim we were peeing on graves. None of that
Speaker 1: stuff happened, but that got taken out of contact. People
Speaker 1: got really mad at Viva about it, and I personally
Speaker 1: just don't don't care because you know, I have my position.
Speaker 1: I know what I did. I know what went on
Speaker 1: and came out. The CIA and DJ ran all this
Speaker 1: against me. That criminal investigation is what they did under
Speaker 1: ed Martin and the Weaponization Task Force, and then that
Speaker 1: got killed by the new AG. It looks like he'll
Speaker 1: be the age acting AG at the time and Deputy
Speaker 1: AG at the time, Todd Blanche. But this was the
Speaker 1: model out take people out. People got really pissed about that,
Speaker 1: and I kind of got drafted into the whole Charlie
Speaker 1: Kirk thing. Here's what I have to say, Abut Charlie
Speaker 1: Hurt can go him on this and we'll go back
Speaker 1: to the war. Everybody has their right to say and
Speaker 1: think what they want about this. These are public figures.
Speaker 1: Erica Kirk became the head of a big political organization
Speaker 1: right off the batch. He's a public figure, and so
Speaker 1: I believe people have the right. I'm a big boy.
Speaker 1: I don't think Eric Kirk killed her husband. I don't
Speaker 1: think TVUSA was involved. You know, I know some of
Speaker 1: these people for ten years. These are like, these aren't spies,
Speaker 1: These aren't special operations people. Even the average special operations
Speaker 1: folks are going to kill their buddy. Do I have
Speaker 1: questions about the official story? Did Cash and Tel order
Speaker 1: a cover up of any foreign involvement? And of the
Speaker 1: ten trainee supporters that said he'll be dead when he
Speaker 1: comes here tomorrow? Yeah? Does the new video release show
Speaker 1: Tyler's face and bullet trigger?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: Does it show him a symbol or rifle?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: Can you throw a telescopic scope on even hit the paper?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: Something's wrong here. We're not getting the whole truth. Do
Speaker 1: I think Tyler Robinson couldn't have been up there and shooting?
Speaker 1: I mean all of that stuff. Has he supposed to confessed? Yeah,
Speaker 1: we haven't seen that yet. But the point is is
Speaker 1: that we all don't have to hate each other for
Speaker 1: disagreeing about different parts. We also, just because I question
Speaker 1: it doesn't mean I think there's special ops from France
Speaker 1: and maroon shirts and that Mitch Snow you know is
Speaker 1: and there's twelve kernels in a room planning as death
Speaker 1: the day before. That's not how that works. But when
Speaker 1: I say that, the pro Cannis people get mad. When
Speaker 1: I say I don't believe the official story, everybody else
Speaker 1: gets mad. I'm just calling balls and strikes on this.
Speaker 1: But there's no doubt that the majority of people think
Speaker 1: Israel killed Kirk. It's hurt Trump, bad cash Hotel's cover
Speaker 1: up has hurt him and this thing is not going away.
Speaker 1: So that's a long intro with Eva Frye, popular talk
Speaker 1: show host. And I didn't even mean to go off
Speaker 1: into this, but there was a bit controversy about it,
Speaker 1: so I thought we'd address it. We haven't talked since
Speaker 1: you were on last time.
Speaker 5: No, I'll tell you this. I don't mind being judged
Speaker 5: for the things I said. Where you get insulted is
Speaker 5: where you get judged for the things you didn't say,
Speaker 5: or the things you say get wrongly twisted. I'm not
Speaker 5: going to apologize to this. I've said it before, I'll
Speaker 5: say it again. And what can just did is hard
Speaker 5: evidence of it. If you want to be misled, you'll
Speaker 5: watch canvas and you'll have to move your targets from
Speaker 5: Egyptian planes to trapdoors, to French legionnaires to decoys wearing things.
Speaker 5: He couldn't have been there because he was at a
Speaker 5: restaurant in panguage. What I said in respect of the
Speaker 5: Sandy Hook analogy, and people say you brought it up
Speaker 5: at the same time a bunch of other people did.
Speaker 5: I didn't know that from a hole in the wall.
Speaker 5: I brought it up to highlight one particular point.
Speaker 1: Bring up all the time in defense of me. I
Speaker 1: see you on shows all the time defending me, so
Speaker 1: you talk about it a lot, Alex.
Speaker 5: I've been defending you, and not like you need a defense.
Speaker 5: I've been defending the side of righteousness, defense.
Speaker 1: The truth and needs to get out. Thank you for
Speaker 1: your defense.
Speaker 5: Well no, but since twenty eighteen, and you know I
Speaker 5: went to your trial on the Merits in Texas with
Speaker 5: that show trial after you were defaulted into liability. What
Speaker 5: I said about out Sandy Hook and how you got
Speaker 5: dragged into it is that there was an operation at
Speaker 5: the time, in my view, to trick people into repeating
Speaker 5: some of the outlandish claims that they could be so
Speaker 5: that they could be discredited and so that the lawfair
Speaker 5: could be weaponized against them. People don't seem to understand
Speaker 5: that's not an approval of it. That is an empirical
Speaker 5: observation as to what happened. They just needed you to
Speaker 5: say things once or twice, and they use that as
Speaker 5: the pretext to destroy you. And they had people who
Speaker 5: I believe were floating untenable, outlandish conspiracy theories to make
Speaker 5: the actual discussion as to what actually went wrong even
Speaker 5: more difficult. Much like nine to eleven, you have people
Speaker 5: saying the towers never existed, it was holograms. That makes
Speaker 5: actual discussion as to what happened more difficult. In Sandy Hook,
Speaker 5: they got a bunch of people to tow absolutely untenable lines.
Speaker 4: That doesn't mean that.
Speaker 5: They deserved to be dragged through the legal system. And
Speaker 5: I think it was wrong, and I'm not arguing that.
Speaker 1: Exactly like I've covered Candice in which she said I
Speaker 1: covered what other people said. They then distilled that out
Speaker 1: of context. Judges found me guilty and went forward and
Speaker 1: there's so many examples of this, but here's one. Obama,
Speaker 1: when he was the head of the Harvard Law Review, wrote,
Speaker 1: I was born in Kenya. Then he said in three speech,
Speaker 1: we have the clips that I was born in Kenya.
Speaker 1: Then they put out a fake passport in nine layers,
Speaker 1: still in photo shop an Adobe, so we would all
Speaker 1: know it was fake because it got proven by the
Speaker 1: great filmmaker who made Dreams of my real father that
Speaker 1: he literally is the son of Frank Marshall Davis, the
Speaker 1: famous communist pornographer. There's photos of his mother and the
Speaker 1: Betty pay Stall shoots. Frank Marshall Davis was best friends
Speaker 1: with his grandfather. They lived there in Hawaii. There's photos
Speaker 1: of him on the same couch where she shot the porn.
Speaker 1: He said, Frank Marshall Davis is like my father. In
Speaker 1: his book, it looks just like him. It is. So
Speaker 1: they did all of that as an elaborate cover for
Speaker 1: the Frank Marshall Davis, just like what really happened at
Speaker 1: Sandy Hook, which we now know, which when I talk
Speaker 1: about it, they don't talk about this, which is all
Speaker 1: on their subject. And I know I'm ranking, but let
Speaker 1: me just tell what happened. God did this. I'm in
Speaker 1: Connecticut whenever it was four years ago whatever, fighters ago,
Speaker 1: being deposed for two days by their lead lord of
Speaker 1: the former Ferol prosecutor, Chris Manny, and he has me
Speaker 1: for hours reading police reports and other people's emails from
Speaker 1: my inbox i'd ever opened that were saying mean things.
Speaker 1: That's all they had was people send me emails I
Speaker 1: didn't open. You know that they would copy emails. They
Speaker 1: send harassing families to me, and that was the only
Speaker 1: proof they have was unopened emails. And he goes and
Speaker 1: I'm sitting there reading and I'm bored, and all of
Speaker 1: a sudden and lateraline these are redacted, not release police reports.
Speaker 1: And so officer goes in blah blah blah, trivees open
Speaker 1: bathroom door, won't open, forces it open a pyramid of
Speaker 1: dead children with no blood. Officers believe they've been moved there.
Speaker 1: Maddie goes like this and reaches over and grabs it.
Speaker 1: They run and have the deposition sealed with the court,
Speaker 1: and I was like, what is this? And then later
Speaker 1: I went back and research what the kids said of
Speaker 1: men shooting through the windows. Another shooter and Camo they grabbed.
Speaker 1: It was on the news. That was an off duty
Speaker 1: copp from the town over and I and so now
Speaker 1: you see, what do you cover up? What really went
Speaker 1: on is you have these crazy liberal professors put out
Speaker 1: their story. Then we cut and that's uses the cover,
Speaker 1: just like Pizzagate. In the emails, we're delivering seven eight
Speaker 1: to nine year olds for your entertainment, to the to
Speaker 1: the hot tub in the pool in the woods, John Podesta,
Speaker 1: for your entertainment. We're doing Alistair Crowley rituals. It's all
Speaker 1: in there. They changed to the Ping Pong pizza. Say
Speaker 1: there's a basement, say they're doing all this, nothing's going
Speaker 1: on there. The weirdos do go there. Then they kill
Speaker 1: the real story with that story and then said that
Speaker 1: I'm the one that send people to commet Ping Pong,
Speaker 1: when all I did was cover the New York Times,
Speaker 1: CNN covering Comet Ping Pong and four chance see how
Speaker 1: that works. Sorry, go ahead, I'm ranting, you're the.
Speaker 5: Guest, and don't worry about it. And you get the
Speaker 5: one guy who shows up with a gun. And now
Speaker 5: they get to write it off, all of Pizzagate as
Speaker 5: a lunatic type fringe theory, ignoring John Podesta's email at
Speaker 5: the time about a map shaped handkerchief with pizza related
Speaker 5: subjects on it. I mean, that is what they try
Speaker 5: to do with Sandy Hook, and I can see that
Speaker 5: there's a certain element of that right now with Sandy Hook.
Speaker 5: The people who said nobody died there, you know that
Speaker 5: they were all fake and etcetera, etcetera, And that's why
Speaker 5: they tore the school down. They make it more difficult too,
Speaker 5: and in fact allow people to disregard the actual arguments
Speaker 5: that they tore the school down, albeit nine months later
Speaker 5: to conceal the fact that the school hadn't implemented proper
Speaker 5: safety protocol that would have mitigated that abject disaster. There
Speaker 5: is a certain element of that going on right now,
Speaker 5: where you know, people say, Viva, you're towing the narrative
Speaker 5: fed slap official narrative, And I'm like, what is that
Speaker 5: narrative even in the first place. If it's that Tyler
Speaker 5: Robinson took the shot, is the loan actor and it's
Speaker 5: a slam dunk case. No, I don't believe that whatsoever.
Speaker 5: You know, they'll make the evidence as to whether not
Speaker 5: Tyler Robinson took the shot I believe Charlie Kirk was shot.
Speaker 5: I do not for a second believe that nobody else
Speaker 5: was involved. And now when you have people saying outlandish
Speaker 5: things like Egyptian sniper planes or meetings at Ford Wachuka
Speaker 5: to plan this assassination trap doors, you make it actually
Speaker 5: more difficult to say. Why did cash Betel allegedly shut
Speaker 5: down the Joe Kent investigation? Oh, because they didn't want
Speaker 5: to get Israel involved. It would have proven Israel was involved,
Speaker 5: or hypothetically it might have proved another government was involved,
Speaker 5: or a domestic element was involved something.
Speaker 1: Again, I'm not trying to act cool or brag. This
Speaker 1: is actually not something we're proud of. Though when they
Speaker 1: died they weren't really by it. I had multiple family
Speaker 1: members who were army assassins, and the way this works
Speaker 1: is their officers once they're out of the military officially
Speaker 1: they're sheep dipped, and they worked for the CIA and
Speaker 1: the and they talked about when they were dying. But
Speaker 1: the well told my dad about it. His cousin and
Speaker 1: call him his uncle. He's older but lived across the street.
Speaker 1: Great guy, you used to run nuclear Nike missiles and
Speaker 1: all the rest of it, and he told them, so
Speaker 1: it's first, you know, jobs like you're running nuclear weapons,
Speaker 1: and then he gets out of the army and then
Speaker 1: he would basically just be given a target. He could
Speaker 1: choose the mission if he wanted to. It wasn't even
Speaker 1: given to him by an officer. It would be delivered
Speaker 1: like in a spy deal. Then he'd be given the
Speaker 1: next piece he was supposed to get, and then he
Speaker 1: could do the mission however he wanted, and he could
Speaker 1: choose the mission if he wanted. And he told my
Speaker 1: dad he refused submissions at the end and got out
Speaker 1: of it. That live, you can't get out of it. No,
Speaker 1: he got out of it. And the other family member
Speaker 1: totally separate side of the family, same deal. So, and
Speaker 1: his main thing wasn't that. But all those guys are
Speaker 1: tasked that. If you're told to do that, do it.
Speaker 1: If you want to see what it looks like when
Speaker 1: the assassination planning, watch Apocalypse now written by Millis who did
Speaker 1: his research. When when the captain goes in and he's
Speaker 1: there with the head of the whole Vietnam forces, there's
Speaker 1: one CIA guy and then one ATTA and they won't
Speaker 1: even say they're going to kill him. They never say
Speaker 1: that she's like the mafia, like take them to the
Speaker 1: train station. And I'm just telling you, you don't have twelve
Speaker 1: colonels in a meeting and a guy walks in the
Speaker 1: day before and Erica Kirk's there. That's just it's and
Speaker 1: I'm not trying to attack Candice. It's just not true. Sorry,
Speaker 1: go ahead.
Speaker 5: Well, it's also you know, Robbie Starbuck put out a
Speaker 5: good one hour you know analysis, and I understand where
Speaker 5: people are going to pick holes in his analysis. If
Speaker 5: you're going to kill someone like Charlie Kirk and it's
Speaker 5: going to be Israel, they're not going to do it
Speaker 5: in this way. Now, even still it could have been Israel,
Speaker 5: you need to provide the slightest shred of evidence above
Speaker 5: and beyond a hypothetical motive which would have inspired them
Speaker 5: to take out Charlie Kirk if he was turning against
Speaker 5: Israel and was going to change his political influence with
Speaker 5: the next generation of young conservatives. It's not that the
Speaker 5: theory is necessarily false, it's that there's absolutely zero evidence
Speaker 5: to substantiate it right now, above and beyond an ever
Speaker 5: moving target which includes you know, Egyptian planes, trapdoors, Charlie
Speaker 5: Kirk's team doing it, Erica Kirk doing it, Israel doing it,
Speaker 5: and in the process, by the way, you may or
Speaker 5: may not be absolving the actual entity, which would be
Speaker 5: trans radicals in America who may be motivated or radicalized
Speaker 5: online by foreign or domestic elements.
Speaker 4: And as a result of the nonsense.
Speaker 5: That has been spewed, and everybody has the right to spute,
Speaker 5: they have the right to believe it, and I've got
Speaker 5: a right to comment on it. As a result of
Speaker 5: the nonsense that has been spewed, we now have a
Speaker 5: plausible reason for the authorities to say we're not looking
Speaker 5: into this anymore. Israel had nothing to do with it,
Speaker 5: And your fixation on Israel is the pretext that we
Speaker 5: use to not tell you what we looked into or
Speaker 5: didn't as relates to the discord chats, as relates to
Speaker 5: the online groups, as relates to a potential domestic nexus
Speaker 5: to online radicalization. We had confidential human sources, FBI agents
Speaker 5: and assets more than defendants in the Gretchen Whitmer fed
Speaker 5: napping plot.
Speaker 4: We know what was going on in January sixth.
Speaker 5: It could be that cash hotel shut down Kent's in
Speaker 5: a request for an investigation because of Israel.
Speaker 4: It could also be because.
Speaker 5: It might have revealed a domestic nexus, which if it
Speaker 5: existed and it resulted in government agents or assets knowing
Speaker 5: of having a hand in what turned out to be
Speaker 5: the assassination of Charlie Kirk, people would be burning buildings
Speaker 5: down right now. But we don't get to have those
Speaker 5: conversations because the conversation has been distracted with unsubstantiated theories
Speaker 5: and ever moving targets that get disproven and they just
Speaker 5: move on. Whatever happened with that receipt from the steakhouse
Speaker 5: in Panguage.
Speaker 1: The photos of Erica Kirk at the hotel.
Speaker 4: It's one thing after mother.
Speaker 5: And when I question those who are just asking the questions,
Speaker 5: When I say, hey, Candace, do the Egyptian plane still
Speaker 5: hold the keys to the Charlie Kirk assassination people, well,
Speaker 5: she glibally says yes. The audience says, well, she's you know,
Speaker 5: learnt new information and has now you know, started asking
Speaker 5: different ones.
Speaker 1: He there's another example. I'm not trying to undermine Candace
Speaker 1: because I think she means well, and I think engaging
Speaker 1: in the fight only makes it worse. And then people
Speaker 1: think we're trying to cover up. What's going on is
Speaker 1: obviously they're going to cover up. They said it was
Speaker 1: an exploding microphone, and I look at it and the
Speaker 1: whole thing looks weird. And then now, oh no, this
Speaker 1: is the proof. It's another shooter up there. So now
Speaker 1: it is a shooter on the roof. And then Erica
Speaker 1: doesn't know that you can't put a telescopic side up
Speaker 1: to your eye. She thinks he'll give you a black eye.
Speaker 1: I'm not putting her down. It just shows no knowledge
Speaker 1: of guns. She's from Connecticut, great lady. We discovered her basically,
Speaker 1: so he can blame me or Paul Watson. But but
Speaker 1: I don't mean that meanly. But she doesn't understand this stuff.
Speaker 1: But what I could tell you, I know, you know guns.
Speaker 1: Can you get a thirty odd six and slap a
Speaker 1: telescopic scope on it and then hit on paper? No, No,
Speaker 1: you can't do that. I can't do that.
Speaker 5: Look, I I wouldn't say that I know guns. I
Speaker 5: believe I've I've fired some. I took my firearm.
Speaker 4: License up in Canada.
Speaker 5: I know I've had the discussion with people who say
Speaker 5: you can and you can't.
Speaker 4: I know that. I've had the discussion.
Speaker 3: Body.
Speaker 1: We're telling you a red dot you can do. You
Speaker 1: cannot take a ten power you cannot do it.
Speaker 5: But Alex, the shot that hit Charlie in the neck
Speaker 5: might probably was destined for the center mass torso and
Speaker 5: it was actually a bad shot. So maybe you're right,
Speaker 5: you can't do it easily, and maybe it was the
Speaker 5: most unfortunate accident that the shot missed center mass.
Speaker 4: And caught him in the neck and.
Speaker 1: They didn't go through the throat.
Speaker 5: But well, and this is another thing, you know, I've
Speaker 5: I've had the discussion now with people who know who
Speaker 5: I would come that.
Speaker 1: Hot caliber SA and it's still going through a bro.
Speaker 5: Well, you say that, and then you get Phoenix ammunition,
Speaker 5: you get the other you know, AMO experts out there.
Speaker 5: I get people who hunt that say, you know, I've
Speaker 5: shot a deer and it didn't go through.
Speaker 4: And then you know, you have.
Speaker 5: The Martin Luther King example where you say he got
Speaker 5: shot in the face with a thirty odd six. It
Speaker 5: didn't blow his head off, it hit his chin and
Speaker 5: it went down. So everybody's saying, I know how bullets
Speaker 5: behave one hundred percent of the time.
Speaker 4: It doesn't need to happen one another.
Speaker 1: Animals, you know what I mean, animals. I've shot more.
Speaker 4: Than me Alex, that's for sure. But the bottom line probably.
Speaker 1: There probably four hundred big ones.
Speaker 5: Well yeah, well, I mean, I won't ask the anecdotal question.
Speaker 5: The bottom line is that when you have avid hunters,
Speaker 5: military men who say it's possible and those who say.
Speaker 4: It's impossible, when you go to court.
Speaker 5: I used to be a lawyer, you always have experts
Speaker 5: that somehow say what their clients want them to say.
Speaker 4: At the end of the day, if you have bona fide.
Speaker 5: Recognized experts, one saying it's impossible, the other one saying
Speaker 5: it's possible.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: Definitionally, every Green Beret, every Navy seal I know says
Speaker 1: that you do not slap. And I don't even know
Speaker 1: this myself. Let me tell you something. You take a
Speaker 1: telescopage scope off of a high caliber rifle, you put
Speaker 1: it back on. It's always if you're lucky, seven eight
Speaker 1: inches off, usually not even on the paper. You gotta
Speaker 1: start shooting, you gotta boor side it. Then you got
Speaker 1: to walk it in. And you're talking about the fastest
Speaker 1: guy on earth at one hundred yards to assemble the rival,
Speaker 1: put the thing on load four cartridges, start shooting walking
Speaker 1: it in three minutes. Maybe the best delta forced guy
Speaker 1: could could do this in three minutes, get it sided
Speaker 1: in and make the shot.
Speaker 5: I've heard people who I would consider to be far
Speaker 5: more knowledgeable than me say no, it's by no means impossible.
Speaker 5: And by the way, if it's off by seven or
Speaker 5: eight inches, because of that, maybe that's why the shot
Speaker 5: hit Charlie in the neck and not the torso, which
Speaker 5: I would presume any assassin want to go for it.
Speaker 5: And also the bottom line, we now know it was
Speaker 5: a cheap frangible round allegedly that is intended to mushroom
Speaker 5: and oftentimes fragments.
Speaker 1: The frangible rounds cost more money.
Speaker 5: Viba, Well, this Remington one, from what I understand, is
Speaker 5: a very cheap one that people don't actually use to
Speaker 5: hunt precisely because it tends to break up when it
Speaker 5: hits a game.
Speaker 4: But all that plus.
Speaker 1: Round is full metal jacket. That's what you use for
Speaker 1: target practice. He was criticizing Israel. He was against the
Speaker 1: war publicly and privately. He was calling me up thinking
Speaker 1: he's trying to stop the order and non Hammer say,
Speaker 1: you're asolutely right. They want to go to full war,
Speaker 1: called me up and thank me for pushing Epstein and
Speaker 1: the cover up stopping. He says, this is killing us
Speaker 1: and it's wrong. And I mean I talked to him
Speaker 1: like a month before and he was like, you know,
Speaker 1: how do we help you? What's happened in to your operation?
Speaker 1: You know what have you out of our events? Just
Speaker 1: a great guy, and we owe it to him to
Speaker 1: find out what really happened. And I think saying the
Speaker 1: official story is true hurts what happened to him and
Speaker 1: everybody else. And I think then just believing every wild thing,
Speaker 1: and you have to believe each new piece of BS
Speaker 1: is wrong. But people love Easter egg hunts, they love
Speaker 1: treasure hunts, and so this is the ultimate who done it?
Speaker 1: And normally I can figure things out. I got to
Speaker 1: tell you if I cannot figure things out, because I've
Speaker 1: known the TBS USA people pretty good for a long time,
Speaker 1: been to quite a few of their events and things.
Speaker 1: These are like I'll mean, Christian nerds. They are, you know,
Speaker 1: literally well you would you like us to pray with us? Alex?
Speaker 1: And that's all the stories they're having parties and hookers
Speaker 1: and cocaine, and I mean I've been at dinners with them.
Speaker 1: They're like, how loox do you really need that double vodcub?
Speaker 1: You know? Would you like to go to AA with me?
Speaker 1: And that was back when I was drinking, and I'd
Speaker 1: be like, ah, shut up, you know, wimp uh. But
Speaker 1: my point is, these guys really are the goodie two shoes.
Speaker 1: And then everybody saw them respond after, you know, with
Speaker 1: all the glitz, and I think that's what they did,
Speaker 1: and they were going to put a good face on it,
Speaker 1: and I think they should have thought that out a
Speaker 1: little bit better. That was when everybody really turned on them,
Speaker 1: and I was calling them up, saying, you guys need
Speaker 1: to ditch the leather pants. You need to ditch the
Speaker 1: you know, the glitz and the and the and the
Speaker 1: sparkler shooting out everybody's butts. And but that's what they
Speaker 1: did before. So the point was it wasn't something new
Speaker 1: that they did, you know, off of this, just like
Speaker 1: you constantly on almost every show, bring up when it's
Speaker 1: even on another topic, you bring up how I got
Speaker 1: screwed over Sandy Hook and warn everybody about them planning
Speaker 1: stories so as soon as I saw like a twenty
Speaker 1: second clip, if you were a ten second clip, I said,
Speaker 1: that's out of context, and even some of the crew
Speaker 1: got mad again. I said, why don't you go watch
Speaker 1: the full clip. That's not what's going on, And of
Speaker 1: course it wasn't, but I already understand that. But that's
Speaker 1: the way the nature of this works, with these internet deceptions.
Speaker 1: It was like three days into October seventh. I'm on
Speaker 1: with Eric Prince and Steve Bannon and the Attorney General
Speaker 1: Ken Paxton. They're together an event and I think seapack
Speaker 1: or something, and I'm remote, and I was wargaming, saying,
Speaker 1: China stands to gain. You know, if Israel totally destroys
Speaker 1: guys and carpet bombs, then Iran's going to get involved.
Speaker 1: China wants us to go to war with Iran, will
Speaker 1: end up losing this war. That's going to lead to
Speaker 1: an Iran war. Israel's gonna try to go into eleven
Speaker 1: and go into Syria. This is a terrible idea. I
Speaker 1: was already wargaming and all, but I said, if they
Speaker 1: really want to win, they can't just sit in their
Speaker 1: regular military. They've got a carpet bomb the whole place,
Speaker 1: from top to bottom, but that will be genocide. The
Speaker 1: whole world will turn against Israel. They took a ten
Speaker 1: second clute to me saying Israel needs to carpet bomb
Speaker 1: from the north of Goza to the south, but they
Speaker 1: didn't have me saying don't do it. It's a moral
Speaker 1: to destroy Israel in the world's view, which all came true.
Speaker 1: Then I just went and got the full clip and
Speaker 1: played it. But again that's how people do this gotcha thing.
Speaker 1: So if the public just has to they see a
Speaker 1: clip pisses them off, you better go find the full
Speaker 1: context because when you're seeing a ten second clip, chances
Speaker 1: are you're being deceived.
Speaker 5: Vima fry Well that clip that Candice took and then
Speaker 5: played it and then added her own commentary that I
Speaker 5: was endorsing the lawfair because of harassment. I never even
Speaker 5: used the word harassment. That wasn't my point doesn't matter.
Speaker 5: It was a twenty three minute interview with the folks
Speaker 5: at TPUSA or Andrew Corved on the Charlie Kirk Show.
Speaker 5: Alex Tyler Robinson is going to have his trial and
Speaker 5: if there are this many holes in it, as people
Speaker 5: believe that will come out at trial time. People, are
Speaker 5: you talking about beyond a reasonable doubt?
Speaker 4: Right now?
Speaker 5: Right now, the prosecution has its theory of the case,
Speaker 5: and they'll test it when it gets to court. You know,
Speaker 5: I understand people's cynicism, skepticism. I understand their questions. Then
Speaker 5: the question is only what better theory are you putting
Speaker 5: forward at this point in time that is not you know,
Speaker 5: the evidence is the absence of the evidence.
Speaker 4: There was a second shooter. There could be a second shooter.
Speaker 5: I personally would have zero problem believing Lance Twigs is
Speaker 5: intimately and heavily more involved than you know is currently known.
Speaker 4: And then I can understand people saying.
Speaker 5: Why was he given use immunity for a statement he
Speaker 5: can still face charges. I don't believe everything he's saying
Speaker 5: in his video, and I would zero difficulty believing. In fact,
Speaker 5: I do believe he had advanced knowledge, much more knowledge
Speaker 5: than he's letting on, and that they did in fact
Speaker 5: talk politics, because it's impossible that they didn't. But there
Speaker 5: will be a trial for Tyler Robinson, and if there
Speaker 5: are massive gaping holes, it'll come out at trial time.
Speaker 4: As far as the rest goes, If you have a better.
Speaker 5: Theory, You've got to put it out there, and it's
Speaker 5: got to be more than the absence of evidence.
Speaker 4: Is the evidence. I know Israel did it because they're
Speaker 4: so good at doing it.
Speaker 5: They've left no shred of evidence that's an unfalsified there's
Speaker 5: no doubt.
Speaker 1: There's no doubt that it. Just in general, they put
Speaker 1: out theories. You must accept each one, even though they
Speaker 1: all contradict each other. And I'm agreeing that there's a
Speaker 1: cover up. But here's the problem. When you have a
Speaker 1: lot of the influencers who a lot of them are
Speaker 1: my friends and I like by Jack Psobach and Bennie Johnson.
Speaker 4: Bennie Johnson him, Yeah, come out and.
Speaker 1: Say we saw the footage. You can see him pull
Speaker 1: the trigger and you can tell it's him, and obviously
Speaker 1: see he's convicted off of the pre trial hearing. And
Speaker 1: then people get the footage and it doesn't really show that.
Speaker 1: People then get pissed and think they're involved in an
Speaker 1: active cover up and they go, well, what we meant
Speaker 1: is him going up the stairs. We can see all this,
Speaker 1: and I'm just like, guys, I understand you think Tyler
Speaker 1: Robinson really did it. That's an issue. But then I
Speaker 1: say to the candae Owens crew. Three days before, two
Speaker 1: days four, one day before, you had ten people in
Speaker 1: the town, a bunch of them Trans supporters and trans
Speaker 1: and you have the weird trans militia saying he'll be
Speaker 1: dead when he comes. He's dead. They made a song
Speaker 1: in the town about it. They're gonna kill Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 1: Then you have this Zen guy with George Zen, a
Speaker 1: known weird political operative, jump up and say I killed him.
Speaker 1: I killed him, sow the shooter quot can get away.
Speaker 1: A bunch of the liberals there as soon as the
Speaker 1: shot goes out, go yeah, we told you, they're all celebrating.
Speaker 1: And then I talked to the high level TBSA. They said, well,
Speaker 1: we asked Cash why they're not trying to charge or
Speaker 1: investigate those guys, and Cash's like, well, they probably did
Speaker 1: know or might have been involved, but we can't prove it,
Speaker 1: so we want to have a clear conviction, so we're
Speaker 1: not we're not doing it. Well, why don't you drag
Speaker 1: him in his witnesses? I mean, this is so so.
Speaker 1: Then I'm like whoa, And I'm being told this by
Speaker 1: high level TBUSA that talked to cash Betel, so we
Speaker 1: know there's a cover up of that as well, and
Speaker 1: that just sends off even more alarms. So let me
Speaker 1: ask Candas this question. I'm serious, I like Cannas, Candace,
Speaker 1: why how are the trans people involved? How did they
Speaker 1: know he'd be dead? There is a bunch of trans
Speaker 1: violence connected to the left. The left did stand a
Speaker 1: game from this too. I'm not covering up for Israel.
Speaker 1: I'm saying I think we don't know what happened here.
Speaker 1: This is the ultimate who done it?
Speaker 6: No?
Speaker 5: I mean yes, I say the Alton who'd done it?
Speaker 5: Evidence certainly points a certain way, and then you have
Speaker 5: to pick apart that evidence.
Speaker 4: Who benefits from this?
Speaker 5: By the way, Israel in theory could have benefited Israel
Speaker 5: as a matter of fact, just not benefiting from right now,
Speaker 5: because if they were behind it, everybody thinks they're behind it,
Speaker 5: So that's not a hell of a way to do
Speaker 5: an assassination. Russia benefits with increased instability in America, China benefits,
Speaker 5: the Left benefits. It was a preemptive presidential assassination because
Speaker 5: Charlie Kirk was presidential material and he would have gone
Speaker 5: on to become president, and he would have been a
Speaker 5: great influential unifier. And so obviously the left stands to
Speaker 5: benefit people saying something big is going to happen, posting
Speaker 5: on social media. And then you get George Zinn, a
Speaker 5: man who then subsequently gets convicted of or pleads guilty
Speaker 5: to child sex abuse. Material on his phone happens to
Speaker 5: be there, and his first reaction after the shot is
Speaker 5: to say I did it, and then he later admits
Speaker 5: that he said that to let Tyler Robinson or the
Speaker 5: real shooter get away. That indicates a lot of people
Speaker 5: had advanced knowledge of this. And Alex, you said, Richard
Speaker 5: Barriss said it on X and then he came on
Speaker 5: my channel to explain him when he was outraged at
Speaker 5: what was going on, that it looked like they were
Speaker 5: shutting down or limited the investigation just to ensure that
Speaker 5: they get a conviction against Tyler Robinson, because who knows,
Speaker 5: maybe if you get more people involved in the plot,
Speaker 5: it becomes more difficult to pin it on any one individual.
Speaker 4: And he was livid about this.
Speaker 5: So you do I believe what the FBI says, No
Speaker 5: more than when they said Jeffrey Epstein killed himself. We
Speaker 5: got a video proving it, and then that video comes
Speaker 5: out not only doesn't prove it, raises more questions than answers,
Speaker 5: but there are certain anomalies in this case that make
Speaker 5: zero sense.
Speaker 4: And unfortunately nobody has any.
Speaker 5: Faith in the FBI when they say, yeah, we investigated
Speaker 5: everyone on those discord chats, trust us.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, we investigated George in. He had no advanced
Speaker 4: knowledge of this.
Speaker 5: He's just a local crazy person whose first reaction after
Speaker 5: the shot goes off as though he knew what even happened,
Speaker 5: is to play decoy so the real shooter can get away.
Speaker 5: And then the real shooter, alleged real shooter gets away
Speaker 5: and then goes back and visits his boyfriend and they
Speaker 5: don't talk about anything that night. I mean, I agree
Speaker 5: a lot of that doesn't make sense. There will be
Speaker 5: a trial, which is where all this evidence or lack
Speaker 5: their right area. And for the time being, you know,
Speaker 5: this has caused not just the rift in the right
Speaker 5: in conservatives, it's caused infighting that is itself totally catastrophic,
Speaker 5: totally destructive.
Speaker 1: And to tell you for investigating it, I think we should.
Speaker 1: But literally half of X and other channels just debate
Speaker 1: this while there's nuclear war and Russia's getting ready to
Speaker 1: hit NATO. They said they have. I don't just agree
Speaker 1: with NATO and the Pentagon saying this is emminent. I
Speaker 1: mean this is insane. I mean, look at Drudge. It's
Speaker 1: the ballroom getting blocked by a judge is the top story,
Speaker 1: and way down here is nuclear war. I'm just like,
Speaker 1: can we spend a little time on nuclear war or inflation?
Speaker 1: I hear what you're saying, Let's shift gears. I want
Speaker 1: to go to Stoops and Doug and Tom and Jefferson,
Speaker 1: folks who have been holding the longest. That would be Jefferson,
Speaker 1: and then that would be Tom, and then that would
Speaker 1: be other folks will get to But on the war,
Speaker 1: you give a cert take. But what is your take
Speaker 1: on Iran? On Russia, on the out of control escalation,
Speaker 1: on the inflation, on the midterms? I mean, this is
Speaker 1: a disaster. And in this case, Israel is swinging it's
Speaker 1: twenty foot long Johnson around saying we're the boss, not
Speaker 1: caring how much they're hated worldwide. I mean, this is terrible.
Speaker 1: And then Israel's doubling down with the world turning against them,
Speaker 1: saying we got nukes I don't want to be on
Speaker 1: Israel all the time. I don't have some vengeance. But
Speaker 1: the current group running it is bragging, they're running our
Speaker 1: foreign policy, and that's treeson us that our Congress is
Speaker 1: going along with it. So what do we do about
Speaker 1: this fiasco? You agree with what I said or you disagree?
Speaker 4: I mean in large part yes, I mean I agree
Speaker 4: with what jd.
Speaker 5: Vance said and how he categorized it, like it's not
Speaker 5: antisemitic to say. Right now, Israel and at least the
Speaker 5: government of Israel is at its all time lowest in
Speaker 5: my lifetime. And you can't blame anybody for it because
Speaker 5: when you see what's happening, whether or not it's Israel's war,
Speaker 5: whether or not Trump got dog walked into it by
Speaker 5: Netan yeaho, or whether or not Trump is using Netan
Speaker 5: yeah who as a.
Speaker 4: Pretext to go after Irun. What month are we in now,
Speaker 4: this non war war?
Speaker 1: We're going to almost six months?
Speaker 4: I think, yeah, six seven months.
Speaker 1: It was not many days out a bus screen how
Speaker 1: many days we win?
Speaker 5: I thought it was February to August, so I thought
Speaker 5: we were like close to seven months.
Speaker 1: Wow, okay, wow, I thought. So it's one hundred and
Speaker 1: sixty days.
Speaker 5: Right now it is we're in one hundred and sixty
Speaker 5: days into the war. That's not a war. It's just
Speaker 5: tactical strikes. It's not a never ending war. But it's
Speaker 5: six months in. It's been one and one and ended,
Speaker 5: I don't know twenty times to the point where it's
Speaker 5: impossible to follow. The only thing that's much more possible
Speaker 5: to follow are the direct, immediate political and economic consequences
Speaker 5: back home. And you know when when Trump declares the
Speaker 5: war's over, and then they celebrate the fact that oil
Speaker 5: goes down to eighty bucks of barrel as if it's
Speaker 5: had time to you know, incorporate the actual value or
Speaker 5: cost of the oil goes back up. One thing that
Speaker 5: is for certain people are gonna have to convince me
Speaker 5: that this is what people voted for. At the risk
Speaker 5: of letting some of my arguments out of the bag
Speaker 5: before I get to this debate that I'm attending. You know,
Speaker 5: everyone's saying, now we've been at war with Iran for
Speaker 5: forty seven year.
Speaker 4: Trump has always said we got to take care of this.
Speaker 5: That forty seven years tagline motto only hit the ground
Speaker 5: in February ish twenty twenty six. Before then, it had
Speaker 5: barely ever, if never, been stated publicly before because it
Speaker 5: wasn't part of what people.
Speaker 4: Thought they were voting for.
Speaker 5: Nobody wanted this. It was a bad idea from the
Speaker 5: strikes back in July, when Me, Robert Barnes, Richard Barris
Speaker 5: and others were sounding the alarm, Oh, it's not a war,
Speaker 5: it's just tactical strikes, Get in, get out. Operation Midnight
Speaker 5: Hammer accomplished its goals. Six months later, you start a
Speaker 5: war that wasn't a war. All of those talking heads saying,
Speaker 5: we're not in a war right now, guys stopping pannikins.
Speaker 5: All right, we're now in six months of the war
Speaker 5: and it's not a never ending war. It just hasn't
Speaker 5: ended yet, or at least it's ended for the twenty
Speaker 5: second time. And now you've got inflation back home, you
Speaker 5: got people who can't afford living back home. And then
Speaker 5: you got the GOP Dan Crenshaw and other scoundrels, Mark
Speaker 5: Tieson telling them to shut up, suck it up, buttercup,
Speaker 5: pay more for your burritos. And it went from short
Speaker 5: term pain to long sorry, short term pain for long
Speaker 5: term gain. When it came to gas prices to now
Speaker 5: shut up, get a job, eat raw and new toodles
Speaker 5: like I did back in college, which I doubt Dan
Speaker 5: Crenshaw did in any event, or at least out of necessity.
Speaker 5: It's political disaster, and nobody can say that they weren't warned.
Speaker 5: Nobody can say that there were people sounding the alarms.
Speaker 5: And what's going to happen is when the disaster comes
Speaker 5: in November, they're not going to accept responsibility for not
Speaker 5: adhering to.
Speaker 4: The warning signs.
Speaker 5: They're going to go and blame the people who were
Speaker 5: sounding the alarm and saying, you guys didn't get behind us,
Speaker 5: and that's why.
Speaker 1: The people absolutely perfectly said. And now Russia's getting ready
Speaker 1: because they've said they are to hit NATO countries and
Speaker 1: then if NATO escalates there, we're talking nuclear war. I mean,
Speaker 1: I can't believe just watch what.
Speaker 4: Just happened on the beach in Russia.
Speaker 5: I mean, I don't even understand how a drone can
Speaker 5: take out seven people like that on a beach.
Speaker 4: Whose drone it was who took it down?
Speaker 5: I mean, this is exactly how like out of Viva Vendetta,
Speaker 5: things escalate to the point of you know, irreversible damage
Speaker 5: and irreversible escalation. Everybody was warning about this from the
Speaker 5: get go. It's difficult to say that anything's better now
Speaker 5: as a result of this than it was a year ago.
Speaker 5: You know, if Iran had their nuclear facilities or their
Speaker 5: nuclear capabilities wiped out with Operation Midnight Hammer, what's left
Speaker 5: of it after six months?
Speaker 1: Man, before we go to some calls, real quick, them
Speaker 1: and holding want to talk about this is what your
Speaker 1: take on what they say? What's the off ramp?
Speaker 5: Then the off ramp is get out and declare victory.
Speaker 5: I mean, the bottom line. And it's the problem with
Speaker 5: not having a stated objective, or at least having a
Speaker 5: perpetual moving goalpost of a state of objective. No one
Speaker 5: even knows if you've achieved that objective. If it was
Speaker 5: to disable Iran's nuclear program, if you haven't done it
Speaker 5: after Midnight Hammer, and after six months.
Speaker 4: Of a war, that's not a war. There are bigger problems.
Speaker 1: It was really regime change, and that's what it is.
Speaker 5: Yeah, or or or just destabilize Iran the way they
Speaker 5: destabilize Syria. There'll be one regional beneficiary to that destabilization,
Speaker 5: and that will further Confirmer, solidify certain beliefs that people
Speaker 5: have in America as to on behalf of whom this
Speaker 5: war was being waged. Absolutely, go for go if you
Speaker 5: have I'm achieved. If you haven't achieved the goal yet,
Speaker 5: and after all of this, there's bigger problems, So at
Speaker 5: least pretend that you've achieved the goal, get out and
Speaker 5: get back to domestic policy and hopefully mitigate the damage
Speaker 5: for November.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and making fun of those of us that are
Speaker 1: have the right position and are have eighty plus pers
Speaker 1: on the public on our side, making fun of us
Speaker 1: like Ben Garrison did of me saying I jumped the
Speaker 1: shark being against the war. No, dude, you jumped the shark.
Speaker 1: That's retarded. Let's go away.
Speaker 5: Says you were right, you were right, you were too early,
Speaker 5: you didn't have the right information at the time.
Speaker 4: They said that about the people who got COVID right
Speaker 4: as well.
Speaker 1: It's I just I mean, I'm just bizarre. They would
Speaker 1: just want to say we're with Trump, not you good dude,
Speaker 1: give me a break. I'm not in junior high pal.
Speaker 1: Let's go ahead and talk to Doug in Wisconsin, affiliate
Speaker 1: with the Marine Corps thanks for holding so long. Yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: take on the Pentagon saying Russia is getting ready to
Speaker 1: strike NATO.
Speaker 3: Hey, Alex, thanks for taking my call. Yes, sir, longtime
Speaker 3: listener used to pay five ninety five a month back
Speaker 3: in the day, so that's back ole memory. Yeah, I
Speaker 3: was just wondering did they ever find those couple of nukes?
Speaker 3: Where was it in South Carolina? Back in what twenty
Speaker 3: twelve or so? Are on there? Could he be that.
Speaker 1: Nukes out missing out of a couple of bases? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's a good point.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I was just wondering if they could couldn't be
Speaker 3: using that against them somehow, and that's why he's going sideways. Yeah,
Speaker 3: I'm just wondering if they ever phoned those.
Speaker 1: Well, it happened a couple of times nukes went missing
Speaker 1: under Obama and under Bush. If you remember, there was
Speaker 1: a big freak out down Louisiana when they came out
Speaker 1: of the Dakotas. That's a good point. I think you're
Speaker 1: alluding to false flags. Is the deep state holding Trump hostage,
Speaker 1: threading to set off a nuke and blame I ran
Speaker 1: or something like that. I think that is speculation. But
Speaker 1: now on the globalist. It's entirely plausible. You got a
Speaker 1: bunch of is really operative saying, boy, he was shutting
Speaker 1: a new nine to eleven to get America behind this war.
Speaker 1: And that's why I say we entered this area of
Speaker 1: false flags.
Speaker 3: Yes, sir, Yeah, it was just it's got to be
Speaker 3: something like that. The COVID shot the nukes for him
Speaker 3: to go sideway. He's like that, doing a one eighty
Speaker 3: like you.
Speaker 1: Famously say, well, you've been a supporter a long time
Speaker 1: if you were a prison planet dot TV subscriber, Doug, So,
Speaker 1: thank you very much, and god bless anything else.
Speaker 3: Uh No, I really like the colossrum gummies. Uh. I
Speaker 3: take them almost every day now opposed to the powder.
Speaker 3: You know, guy gets a little lazy and doesn't want
Speaker 3: to mix it up and everything. So I really like
Speaker 3: the gummies and uh and the methylene blue and the iodine.
Speaker 3: So yeah, thanks for all your products.
Speaker 1: Well appreciate you. You're the reason we're on air. Thank you,
Speaker 1: Thank you, don't thank me, thank you, Doug. Wow. Uh yeah,
Speaker 1: what do you what do you think about wild cards,
Speaker 1: false flags or things like that? Before I who if you.
Speaker 5: Can you can imagine any number of possibilities, you know,
Speaker 5: whether it's let it happen on purpose, make it happen
Speaker 5: on purpose, or just allow it and then weaponize it.
Speaker 4: There's endless possibilities.
Speaker 5: But it just an off ramp has been there for
Speaker 5: the longest of times, and JD has been trying to
Speaker 5: get it. It's just it seems that the powers that
Speaker 5: be don't want anyone getting off this rollercoaster right now
Speaker 5: until they've gotten to the scariest part.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. Well, Trump's so unpopular now that his endorsement of
Speaker 1: JD Evans is almost like a strikeing gifst Vance. But
Speaker 1: Advance is way superior to Marco Rubio anybody that denies
Speaker 1: that it's living on another planet. Let's go ahead and
Speaker 1: talk to Tom in Florida, affiliated with the Navy. Tom, what's
Speaker 1: your view on this fiasco?
Speaker 6: Well, I just was like, well, it's horrible. Right now
Speaker 6: Ukraine is involved in attacking Iranian vessels.
Speaker 1: That's not good.
Speaker 6: So what you were saying is that road spectrum it's
Speaker 6: moving out. My question is where I live. I know
Speaker 6: the players live on Palm Beach Island obviously, and if
Speaker 6: it is going down to the final solution or whatever
Speaker 6: that they got, I mean, everyone living around here is
Speaker 6: going to be affected. But would they do it when
Speaker 6: they were in you know, in season. I mean, how
Speaker 6: would we know, Like would everybody be gone?
Speaker 3: You know what I mean.
Speaker 6: It's like, what's the endgame for these guys? I mean
Speaker 6: that we're not going to get attacked, you know. That's
Speaker 6: where I'm at with it.
Speaker 1: I mean, is targeting civilian targets in Russia to push
Speaker 1: them into full war that is truly psychotic?
Speaker 6: Well it is because, like I said, I talked to
Speaker 6: you before, I worked on submarines, and I know the
Speaker 6: boats are everywhere, and the Soviets are making making gains
Speaker 6: in their.
Speaker 2: Technology and submarine technology too.
Speaker 3: Along with the Chinese.
Speaker 6: And I'm sure they shared with the Iranians, you know.
Speaker 6: So that's something for us to think about that we're
Speaker 6: not thinking about. If you're just you know, throwing weapons
Speaker 6: into Russia, I just don't get that.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's not three D chess, that's megalomanium.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 6: So I mean those the players and the powers that
Speaker 6: be are pretty much like, Hey, if you came out here,
Speaker 6: I would take you to Palm Beach Island. You could
Speaker 6: just observe and you would see Wow, This place is whacked.
Speaker 2: You know what I mean.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the elites are drugged out of their minds. They've
Speaker 1: lost connection to reality. Nobody ever hit Iran like this before,
Speaker 1: not because they liked Iramic, because it wasn't gonna work.
Speaker 1: It isn't working. Even if you're for this, it isn't working.
Speaker 1: NATO is losing against Russia. Now they want to escalate that.
Speaker 1: It's like a degenerate gambler that's losing at the table,
Speaker 1: so he mortgages his house. God bless you next for
Speaker 1: the call Viva Fry. We can talk about it all day,
Speaker 1: but I mean, this is one hell of aton to
Speaker 1: be alive.
Speaker 4: It is.
Speaker 5: It is indeed interesting times, which I'm told is actually
Speaker 5: a curse, not a Chinese proverb. But it also does
Speaker 5: explain this sudden one eighty where Ukraine is now attacking
Speaker 5: Iran and allying so to speak with Israel, because it's
Speaker 5: going to turn into now an attack on Israel is
Speaker 5: an attack on America. An attack on Ukraine is an
Speaker 5: attack on Israel as an attack on America. And it's
Speaker 5: a way of sort of coalescing that triangle to broaden
Speaker 5: this political conference.
Speaker 1: There's a name for that it's called the World War.
Speaker 5: It rhymes with how World War one got started. I
Speaker 5: had to refresh my memory, but it rhymes with how
Speaker 5: World War one got starts.
Speaker 1: Always about chain reactions and alliances. Let's go to Let's
Speaker 1: go to Jefferson in Virginia, real fast. You disagree, go
Speaker 1: ahead and tell us we disagree about Hello, Jefferson in Virginia.
Speaker 1: Come on down, Thomas. Jefferson in Virginia, going once, going twice. Bye. Look,
Speaker 1: I'm out of time. Stoops and Bob want to talk
Speaker 1: to you, but they just called in recently, so I
Speaker 1: don't feel too bad. Well Stoops in Indiana, you're calling
Speaker 1: for Viva Fry. We'll go to Stoop. Sorry, by we're
Speaker 1: out of Tomas hour. Go ahead.
Speaker 2: Steve's Oh hey, Alex, can you hear me?
Speaker 1: Yes?
Speaker 4: I can't go ahead?
Speaker 7: Okay, cool. So I'm trying to make it quick. I
Speaker 7: noticed that you were just talking about the era of
Speaker 7: false flags that we live in, and which I agree.
Speaker 7: And I've noticed that everyone talks about the angle of
Speaker 7: the of the curve shooting with that guy that you
Speaker 7: have on there, just talk about Israel and trains about
Speaker 7: the possibility that it was fake and Charlie Kirk faith
Speaker 7: and he's alive somewhere. So I have I have a
Speaker 7: bunch of resources that show that that is possibility.
Speaker 3: Uh, I don't.
Speaker 7: I mean, I feel like you're an open minded guy
Speaker 7: and you might be willing to like look at that perspective.
Speaker 7: But there was a lot of stuff pointing towards and
Speaker 7: it would make sense. Who benefits, right, lots of people,
Speaker 7: lots of people.
Speaker 1: So a bunch of military I know, a bunch of
Speaker 1: special operations people. They say they're not even saying that's
Speaker 1: what happened when they say that's what makes sense, because
Speaker 1: nothing else makes sense.
Speaker 7: Well, if you look at it from that, you go
Speaker 7: back and look at the videos, which nobody shows the
Speaker 7: original clips anymore, with the sounds and everything. One there's
Speaker 7: a huge rifle crack, okay, and nobody shows that anymore.
Speaker 7: That right there, it proves the microphone is bunk because
Speaker 7: when you hear the shot go off, everybody in the
Speaker 7: front row closest to the stage turns around to look
Speaker 7: for the shot. So there's a sound that comes from
Speaker 7: behind it.
Speaker 3: I hear you.
Speaker 1: I appreciate your call. Well, now Candice of them have
Speaker 1: dropped the exploding microphone and moved on the other thing.
Speaker 1: Given a fry, you're going to the debates that are
Speaker 1: being taped, and I guess Aaron weak or so is
Speaker 1: a