WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Podsave America is brought to you by Simply Safe. Everything's

2
00:00:02.960 --> 00:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>more expensive in twenty twenty six, but peace of mind

3
00:00:05.200 --> 00:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be simply say. It starts at about a dollar

4
00:00:07.320 --> 00:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a day without a long term contract. There's a reason

5
00:00:09.679 --> 00:00:12.439
<v Speaker 1>they were named best home security system of twenty twenty six.

6
00:00:12.960 --> 00:00:15.679
<v Speaker 1>It actually works for regular people, not just the elites.

7
00:00:15.759 --> 00:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Simply Safe as for regular folks like John Lovett,

8
00:00:19.039 --> 00:00:20.839
<v Speaker 1>that's right, Assault of the Earth folks, set one up

9
00:00:20.920 --> 00:00:23.879
<v Speaker 1>himself with ordinary American. It's like John Lovett, that's right,

10
00:00:23.920 --> 00:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>set it up himself. No drilling with simply say, Ie,

11
00:00:26.480 --> 00:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you can customize your system to fit your needs. Then

12
00:00:28.839 --> 00:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it ships fast directly to your door. The app guide

13
00:00:31.000 --> 00:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it set up is simple and there's no drilling required.

14
00:00:33.560 --> 00:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>He's very lonely at that time. It's true a dry spell.

15
00:00:37.439 --> 00:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a setting up the simply save and then he

16
00:00:41.000 --> 00:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>was done for the day. The drilling, no drilling required,

17
00:00:44.799 --> 00:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so you can install and arm your system in under

18
00:00:46.840 --> 00:00:49.079
<v Speaker 1>an hour. Simply Safe is more than just a security camera.

19
00:00:49.119 --> 00:00:52.679
<v Speaker 1>It's a comprehensive system of sensors, indoor and outdoor cameras.

20
00:00:52.719 --> 00:00:55.759
<v Speaker 1>In twenty four to seven, professional Monitoring. It's back by

21
00:00:55.799 --> 00:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Simply Saves twenty four seven professional monitoring agents who dispatch

22
00:00:59.359 --> 00:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>emergency help when you need it. Over five million people

23
00:01:02.320 --> 00:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>value and trust Simply Safe with their home security every day.

24
00:01:05.840 --> 00:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now, our listeners will get fifty percent off a

25
00:01:07.840 --> 00:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>new system when you sign up for professional monitoring and

26
00:01:10.439 --> 00:01:13.599
<v Speaker 1>your first month is free. Just visit simply Safe dot

27
00:01:13.640 --> 00:01:16.079
<v Speaker 1>com slash crooked. That's half off. It's simply safe dot

28
00:01:16.079 --> 00:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>com slash crooked. There's no safe like simply Safe. Welcome

29
00:01:41.959 --> 00:01:42.799
<v Speaker 1>to Applied Save America.

30
00:01:42.840 --> 00:01:44.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm John Favreum, I'm Dan Feiffer.

31
00:01:44.519 --> 00:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>On today's show, We're going to talk about how Donald

32
00:01:46.359 --> 00:01:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Trump's revenge tour is backfiring in a way that just

33
00:01:49.840 --> 00:01:53.359
<v Speaker 1>about everybody could have predicted, with everything from his ballroom

34
00:01:53.400 --> 00:01:57.319
<v Speaker 1>funding to his insurrectionist slush funds now in Jeopardy. We'll

35
00:01:57.319 --> 00:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>also talk about how Trump may have made things even

36
00:01:59.480 --> 00:02:02.079
<v Speaker 1>worse for US Party with his endorsement of Ken Paxton

37
00:02:02.120 --> 00:02:05.319
<v Speaker 1>over John Cornyn in Texas, and then, just to prove

38
00:02:05.359 --> 00:02:08.159
<v Speaker 1>that Republicans aren't the only ones stepping on rakes, we'll

39
00:02:08.159 --> 00:02:10.719
<v Speaker 1>talk about the long awaited release of the twenty twenty

40
00:02:10.719 --> 00:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>four DNC autopsy and whether Ken Martin's job as DNC

41
00:02:14.479 --> 00:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>chair is in jeopardy. We'll also talk about new results

42
00:02:17.360 --> 00:02:19.599
<v Speaker 1>from this week's New York Times poll focused on what

43
00:02:19.680 --> 00:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Democratic voters want from the Democratic Party. Then you'll hear

44
00:02:23.439 --> 00:02:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Tommy's interview with California gubernatorial candidate Matt Mahon, and finally

45
00:02:27.960 --> 00:02:30.039
<v Speaker 1>we'll explore the question none of us thought we'd have

46
00:02:30.080 --> 00:02:33.759
<v Speaker 1>to ask, is Donald Trump gonna skip his son's wedding?

47
00:02:36.560 --> 00:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Tune in to find out before we start. Go ahead

48
00:02:40.960 --> 00:02:43.759
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe to Friends of the Pod. Become a Cricket

49
00:02:43.800 --> 00:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>subscriber if you haven't already, because you get ad free

50
00:02:46.840 --> 00:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>episodes of all of these pods that you love and

51
00:02:49.479 --> 00:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>listen to. You get access to all of our excellent

52
00:02:52.280 --> 00:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Substeck newsletter. You get access to subscriber only podcasts that

53
00:02:56.319 --> 00:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you're missing out on if you're not a subscriber, like

54
00:02:58.639 --> 00:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Dan's Polarcoaster podcast where he dives deep into polls, and

55
00:03:02.400 --> 00:03:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Podzeve America Only Friends our extra secret episode of Potze

56
00:03:05.360 --> 00:03:08.479
<v Speaker 1>of America that we do every other week, so check

57
00:03:08.520 --> 00:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it out. And you also get to support pro democracy

58
00:03:11.439 --> 00:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>independent media, in this case US crooked media, so Crooked

59
00:03:15.919 --> 00:03:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Dot com slash friends, go subscribe today. All right, let's

60
00:03:20.439 --> 00:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>get to the news. It seems like just yesterday, because

61
00:03:23.280 --> 00:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it was that the White House warned us to never

62
00:03:25.919 --> 00:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>again doubt Donald Trump's political power, and certain journalists proclaimed

63
00:03:30.879 --> 00:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>an incredible few weeks for the president's political operation. This

64
00:03:35.120 --> 00:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is all because Trump's handpicked primary challengers defeated Louisiana Senator

65
00:03:38.560 --> 00:03:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Bill Cassidy in Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massey. Well, twenty four

66
00:03:43.199 --> 00:03:46.039
<v Speaker 1>hours later, here's a text from a Republican senator to

67
00:03:46.120 --> 00:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>punch Bowl News. Quote. Our majority is melting down before

68
00:03:50.680 --> 00:03:55.879
<v Speaker 1>our eyes. So what happened? What happened? Well, the Senate

69
00:03:55.879 --> 00:03:58.639
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be voting on Trump's bill to fund ICE,

70
00:03:59.240 --> 00:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>but then he also demanded one billion dollars for his ballroom,

71
00:04:04.879 --> 00:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and he announced that he's stealing two billion dollars from

72
00:04:08.039 --> 00:04:11.479
<v Speaker 1>taxpayers so that he can potentially hand out cash payments

73
00:04:11.800 --> 00:04:15.879
<v Speaker 1>to January sixth rioters who almost killed police officers, and

74
00:04:15.919 --> 00:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>basically anyone else he thinks has been mistreated by the

75
00:04:19.839 --> 00:04:23.959
<v Speaker 1>justice system. Neither of these things sat very well with

76
00:04:24.000 --> 00:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>some Republicans, including people like Bill Cassidy, whose career Trump

77
00:04:28.000 --> 00:04:32.079
<v Speaker 1>just ended, and after a reportedly tense meeting about the

78
00:04:32.120 --> 00:04:35.959
<v Speaker 1>insurrection of slush fund with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche,

79
00:04:36.279 --> 00:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>where some Republicans proposed restrictions on the slush fund sent

80
00:04:40.040 --> 00:04:43.439
<v Speaker 1>a majority. Leader John Thune canceled the vote entirely and

81
00:04:43.480 --> 00:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>told everyone to go home until June. Here's Blanche and JD.

82
00:04:48.199 --> 00:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Vance earlier in the week, refusing to rule out taxpayer

83
00:04:51.600 --> 00:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>funded payouts for violent insurrectionists.

84
00:04:55.240 --> 00:04:56.600
<v Speaker 3>You know who never.

85
00:04:56.480 --> 00:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Ever gets an ounce of sympathy when it comes to

86
00:05:00.199 --> 00:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>disproportionate sentencing is people who voted for Donald Trump and

87
00:05:03.639 --> 00:05:05.439
<v Speaker 1>participated in the January sixth protest.

88
00:05:05.759 --> 00:05:09.959
<v Speaker 4>Well, individuals who assaulted Capitol Hill police officers be eligible

89
00:05:10.040 --> 00:05:10.560
<v Speaker 4>for this fund.

90
00:05:11.279 --> 00:05:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, as it makes plain, any just let.

91
00:05:14.439 --> 00:05:16.319
<v Speaker 4>Me know if they're eligible for the fund.

92
00:05:16.439 --> 00:05:19.879
<v Speaker 3>As as as was made plain yesterday, anybody in this

93
00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:22.120
<v Speaker 3>country is eligible to apply.

94
00:05:22.800 --> 00:05:26.360
<v Speaker 4>You're not gonna submit this proposal to any federal judge

95
00:05:26.439 --> 00:05:29.120
<v Speaker 4>or there is no judge, any independent authority.

96
00:05:29.279 --> 00:05:31.480
<v Speaker 2>That an independent What does that mean an independent authority?

97
00:05:31.480 --> 00:05:33.959
<v Speaker 4>Well, it means not somebody who's getting to pick five

98
00:05:33.959 --> 00:05:36.759
<v Speaker 4>of the members. Who is the president's former personal attorney.

99
00:05:37.519 --> 00:05:39.319
<v Speaker 4>That would be somebody who would be independent on the

100
00:05:39.399 --> 00:05:42.079
<v Speaker 4>acting attorney general. Okay, the fact that I used to

101
00:05:42.079 --> 00:05:44.759
<v Speaker 4>be President Trump's lawyer is just a fact.

102
00:05:45.000 --> 00:05:46.399
<v Speaker 2>But I'm the acting attorney general.

103
00:05:46.399 --> 00:05:48.639
<v Speaker 4>So don't say the president's former personal lawyer will do

104
00:05:48.680 --> 00:05:51.600
<v Speaker 4>something the acting attorney general will do. Sister Attorney general,

105
00:05:51.720 --> 00:05:54.839
<v Speaker 4>you are acting today like the president's personal attorney. And

106
00:05:54.879 --> 00:05:56.160
<v Speaker 4>that's the whole problem.

107
00:05:56.319 --> 00:05:57.519
<v Speaker 3>That's the good shit right there.

108
00:05:57.879 --> 00:06:02.759
<v Speaker 1>It's a good shit. What a winer. Uh So, after

109
00:06:03.079 --> 00:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Senate Republicans were in revolts and the majority of melting down,

110
00:06:07.680 --> 00:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump was asked about it in the Oval on Thursday.

111
00:06:11.720 --> 00:06:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Here's what he said, Are you losing control on the

112
00:06:14.240 --> 00:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Senate Center?

113
00:06:15.360 --> 00:06:15.920
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

114
00:06:16.079 --> 00:06:16.920
<v Speaker 3>I really don't know.

115
00:06:17.040 --> 00:06:17.560
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you.

116
00:06:17.600 --> 00:06:18.639
<v Speaker 3>I only do what's right.

117
00:06:19.399 --> 00:06:20.120
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

118
00:06:20.439 --> 00:06:21.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't need money for the ball and you're not

119
00:06:22.000 --> 00:06:25.240
<v Speaker 2>making a gift to the ballroom. He's the biggest uh

120
00:06:25.759 --> 00:06:27.360
<v Speaker 2>misreporting that I've ever seen.

121
00:06:27.480 --> 00:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, we'll dig into that in a little bit.

122
00:06:30.680 --> 00:06:35.199
<v Speaker 1>An incredible week for Trump's political operation, Dan, It's incredible.

123
00:06:34.759 --> 00:06:36.519
<v Speaker 3>Incredible, truly unbelievable.

124
00:06:36.879 --> 00:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh, let's start with the slush fund. You and I

125
00:06:39.639 --> 00:06:43.439
<v Speaker 1>talked about this on last Friday's episode, and we talked

126
00:06:43.480 --> 00:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>about how Trump potentially settling the IRS lawsuit by personally

127
00:06:49.920 --> 00:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>pocketing billions in taxpayer dollars was maybe the worst political

128
00:06:56.839 --> 00:07:00.319
<v Speaker 1>move we could imagine. And then they did the slush

129
00:07:00.399 --> 00:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>fund right as we were finishing the recording, so we

130
00:07:03.560 --> 00:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>only briefly get to talk about it. What do you think?

131
00:07:06.839 --> 00:07:09.439
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about the political move of instead

132
00:07:09.439 --> 00:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of Trump just pocketing the cash, deciding to put it

133
00:07:12.680 --> 00:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in a fund with no accountability whatsoever so they can

134
00:07:15.279 --> 00:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>secretly pay out whoever they'd like.

135
00:07:17.680 --> 00:07:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Look, these brilliant fucking geniuses and the Trump political team,

136
00:07:20.720 --> 00:07:22.720
<v Speaker 3>the same ones who spent twenty million dollars to defeat

137
00:07:22.720 --> 00:07:24.920
<v Speaker 3>a congress Republican congressman a district that Trump won by

138
00:07:24.920 --> 00:07:28.600
<v Speaker 3>thirty five points, really figured this one out. So instead

139
00:07:28.639 --> 00:07:34.199
<v Speaker 3>of giving billions of dollars to one criminal, they're going

140
00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:38.560
<v Speaker 3>to give one point seven to seven six billion, which

141
00:07:38.639 --> 00:07:43.879
<v Speaker 3>is so clever to an untold number of criminals, many

142
00:07:43.879 --> 00:07:47.279
<v Speaker 3>of whom committed violent offenses, assaulting the Capitol and assaulting

143
00:07:47.279 --> 00:07:47.959
<v Speaker 3>police officers.

144
00:07:48.120 --> 00:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a it is.

145
00:07:50.240 --> 00:07:53.279
<v Speaker 3>It is a move so bad that even Republican senators

146
00:07:53.319 --> 00:07:55.319
<v Speaker 3>can figure out that it's bad politically.

147
00:07:55.519 --> 00:07:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Just so, I mean, part of this is it's such

148
00:07:57.839 --> 00:08:01.319
<v Speaker 1>a politically bad move that I've been and shocked by it.

149
00:08:01.720 --> 00:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I've been laughing about it because how could you be

150
00:08:03.759 --> 00:08:07.759
<v Speaker 1>so stupid. It's fun watching the Republicans freak out about

151
00:08:07.759 --> 00:08:12.319
<v Speaker 1>this and everything fall apart. But NPR did a story

152
00:08:12.319 --> 00:08:16.399
<v Speaker 1>about it where they started going through some of the

153
00:08:16.439 --> 00:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>potential January sixth convicted felons or people who were going

154
00:08:21.839 --> 00:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to be on trial until Trump pardoned them, to talk

155
00:08:24.519 --> 00:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>about how this would play out. This guy, Jake Lang,

156
00:08:28.759 --> 00:08:32.639
<v Speaker 1>he admitted to using a bat to attack police. He

157
00:08:32.720 --> 00:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>was on trial for assault when Trump pardoned him. He's

158
00:08:35.279 --> 00:08:38.039
<v Speaker 1>now a white power activist who's on video saying the

159
00:08:38.159 --> 00:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>N word and giving Nazi salutes. When NPR called to

160
00:08:41.480 --> 00:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>confirm that he plans to apply for a payout, which

161
00:08:45.639 --> 00:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>he did, he confirmed it. He answered the phone Jake

162
00:08:49.320 --> 00:08:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Lang's office America's newest billionaire, and he said that the message.

163
00:08:54.440 --> 00:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>He told NPR that the message Trump was sending what

164
00:08:56.639 --> 00:08:58.759
<v Speaker 1>the fund is. And this is a quote from the

165
00:08:58.759 --> 00:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>insurrectionist who beat police officers with a bat. Quote. If

166
00:09:03.480 --> 00:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you do the right thing in the face of evil,

167
00:09:05.519 --> 00:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you will be rewarded for your bravery and patriotism. That's

168
00:09:10.279 --> 00:09:14.799
<v Speaker 1>what's happening there. That's what's happening. Another January sixth rider,

169
00:09:14.840 --> 00:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Paul Johnson is currently serving a life sentence in

170
00:09:17.519 --> 00:09:21.799
<v Speaker 1>prison for sexually abusing two children who he tried to

171
00:09:21.879 --> 00:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>keep quiet by promising them quote my Trump bucks that

172
00:09:26.399 --> 00:09:29.799
<v Speaker 1>he expected to get as part of a restitution fund.

173
00:09:30.559 --> 00:09:34.919
<v Speaker 1>And then that exchange we watch between Van Holland and Blanche.

174
00:09:35.519 --> 00:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Van Hollend was asking about that case and asking Blanche

175
00:09:39.279 --> 00:09:43.039
<v Speaker 1>to rule out that that fucking guy could apply for

176
00:09:43.200 --> 00:09:46.159
<v Speaker 1>a payout from this slush fund. And you heard Blanche

177
00:09:46.200 --> 00:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like he just he won't rule it out.

178
00:09:47.519 --> 00:09:49.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's pretty clear what happened here is Trump

179
00:09:49.879 --> 00:09:53.360
<v Speaker 3>wanted his money. I think someone was able to convince

180
00:09:53.399 --> 00:09:56.600
<v Speaker 3>him that him directly taking the money was probably a

181
00:09:56.639 --> 00:09:59.639
<v Speaker 3>bridge too far politically, and plus he's made so many

182
00:09:59.720 --> 00:10:01.840
<v Speaker 3>other billions from so many other crooked schemes that he

183
00:10:01.840 --> 00:10:03.840
<v Speaker 3>could take a pass on this one. But he obviously

184
00:10:03.879 --> 00:10:06.720
<v Speaker 3>wasn't going to let it go. And they were facing

185
00:10:06.720 --> 00:10:09.440
<v Speaker 3>this deadline because if they didn't, because there's a quartered

186
00:10:09.480 --> 00:10:12.120
<v Speaker 3>post deadline. So right the day before the court post deadline,

187
00:10:12.200 --> 00:10:14.840
<v Speaker 3>they hatched together a poorly thought out plan that they

188
00:10:14.879 --> 00:10:19.000
<v Speaker 3>thought would appeal to Trump, right, it's not as bad

189
00:10:19.000 --> 00:10:21.360
<v Speaker 3>as Trump getting the money, although that is actually debatable,

190
00:10:22.000 --> 00:10:25.559
<v Speaker 3>but would you know, it would still fit with his

191
00:10:26.000 --> 00:10:28.919
<v Speaker 3>need for revenge, and it's print's like perfect Trump like

192
00:10:28.960 --> 00:10:30.720
<v Speaker 3>these people, these are my people. I'm gonna help my people.

193
00:10:30.720 --> 00:10:33.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to hook up my people. And they didn't

194
00:10:33.600 --> 00:10:36.000
<v Speaker 3>think through any of the consequences. They just assumed every

195
00:10:36.039 --> 00:10:39.159
<v Speaker 3>public would be for it. And they, as you said,

196
00:10:39.159 --> 00:10:41.840
<v Speaker 3>they stepped on a rake, like an very obvious, very clear,

197
00:10:41.960 --> 00:10:44.440
<v Speaker 3>very politically damaging rake. But they did it because they're

198
00:10:44.519 --> 00:10:45.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of morons.

199
00:10:45.360 --> 00:10:50.879
<v Speaker 1>And there's no oversight, no accountability over this fund whatsoever.

200
00:10:52.279 --> 00:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>We may never know who they pay, how much they

201
00:10:55.440 --> 00:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>pay them, who applies, who gets who gets accepted into

202
00:10:58.799 --> 00:11:01.639
<v Speaker 1>this fucking slush fund, who gets denied, none of that

203
00:11:01.759 --> 00:11:04.879
<v Speaker 1>because Trump picks the people on the board, except for

204
00:11:05.200 --> 00:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>one gets appointed by Congress, who you know, he can

205
00:11:07.480 --> 00:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>find a lackey in Congress to give him whoever he wants.

206
00:11:09.720 --> 00:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump can fire them at any time. The report is

207
00:11:12.519 --> 00:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>not required to be released to the public in any way,

208
00:11:15.759 --> 00:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>shape or form. So the whole thing is just a

209
00:11:18.639 --> 00:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>fucking scam. And it seems like it's I mean I

210
00:11:23.000 --> 00:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>guess two January sixth police officers file the lawsuit to

211
00:11:27.399 --> 00:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>try to stop this, But there are are going to

212
00:11:30.120 --> 00:11:33.159
<v Speaker 1>be I guess that's the best case they can make

213
00:11:33.200 --> 00:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>for standing right because they were police officers harmed in this.

214
00:11:36.440 --> 00:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But the challenge is to have like who has standing

215
00:11:38.480 --> 00:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to sue on this and the fact that it is

216
00:11:41.399 --> 00:11:44.879
<v Speaker 1>a It is legal because Congress passed a law to

217
00:11:44.960 --> 00:11:50.639
<v Speaker 1>give the Justice Department basically an unlimited fund for restitution

218
00:11:51.360 --> 00:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in the event that people sue the US government, and

219
00:11:54.759 --> 00:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>then the Justice Department would have to pay it out,

220
00:11:56.919 --> 00:11:59.039
<v Speaker 1>which is like, yeah, of course, right, if someone sues

221
00:11:59.080 --> 00:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the federal government and they and they win, the federal

222
00:12:01.440 --> 00:12:03.159
<v Speaker 1>government has to get the money from somewhere to pay

223
00:12:03.200 --> 00:12:07.399
<v Speaker 1>them out. But I don't think anyone envisioned that the

224
00:12:07.440 --> 00:12:09.039
<v Speaker 1>fund would be used in this way.

225
00:12:09.200 --> 00:12:12.039
<v Speaker 3>Nope, just driving a corrupt truck through another giant loophole

226
00:12:12.080 --> 00:12:12.639
<v Speaker 3>in our system.

227
00:12:13.039 --> 00:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's a statement on the on the fund. So the

228
00:12:15.799 --> 00:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>nation's top law enforcement official is asking for a slush

229
00:12:18.480 --> 00:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>fund to pay people who assault cops. Utterly stupid, morally wrong.

230
00:12:22.799 --> 00:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Take your pick. Guess who that came from.

231
00:12:24.519 --> 00:12:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Dan, I think I know the answer, So I'm supposed

232
00:12:27.360 --> 00:12:29.399
<v Speaker 3>to pretend like, I don't know that was that a

233
00:12:29.440 --> 00:12:33.559
<v Speaker 3>resistance Democrat? Was that someone on MS? Now? Was that?

234
00:12:34.159 --> 00:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Was? That?

235
00:12:35.120 --> 00:12:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Was that? On Wednesday's episode of Only Friends with You

236
00:12:37.080 --> 00:12:41.600
<v Speaker 3>and Tommy, it was subscribe now, Mitch McConnell.

237
00:12:42.320 --> 00:12:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell, Well, Mitch, the reason we're in this place,

238
00:12:46.679 --> 00:12:49.879
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is because of you. Nope, you would

239
00:12:50.039 --> 00:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>just just had the courage that could have could have

240
00:12:52.919 --> 00:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>been said, could have convicted him after January's sixth, and

241
00:12:55.840 --> 00:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>then none of these riders would be getting any money.

242
00:12:58.480 --> 00:13:00.399
<v Speaker 1>How likely do you think it is that Congress will

243
00:13:00.480 --> 00:13:03.759
<v Speaker 1>impose some kind of restrictions on the slush fund? Legislation

244
00:13:04.000 --> 00:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>was introduced today Thursday to ban the entire slush fund,

245
00:13:08.039 --> 00:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>not restrictions, just ban it was That was by introduced

246
00:13:12.080 --> 00:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>by Democrat Tom Swazi in the House and Republican Brian Fitzpatrick,

247
00:13:16.320 --> 00:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>who's in a swing district in Pennsylvania and who Trump

248
00:13:19.679 --> 00:13:24.039
<v Speaker 1>just threatened yesterday with a primary challenge in response to

249
00:13:24.080 --> 00:13:28.039
<v Speaker 1>a question he didn't like from Fitzpatrick's fiance. Fox News

250
00:13:28.039 --> 00:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>reporter Jackie Heiner.

251
00:13:29.200 --> 00:13:32.639
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's really clever of Trump to threaten a primary

252
00:13:32.720 --> 00:13:39.360
<v Speaker 3>challenge on Wednesday when the primary was Tuesday, which is

253
00:13:39.399 --> 00:13:43.320
<v Speaker 3>also notable that all of a sudden, Brian Fitzpatrick has

254
00:13:43.320 --> 00:13:45.360
<v Speaker 3>found his courage the day after his primary.

255
00:13:45.799 --> 00:13:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah do you think, I mean, I know that we

256
00:13:48.639 --> 00:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>were like not scheduled talking about this. But on that note,

257
00:13:51.360 --> 00:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>like I do wonder if a lot like we're suddenly

258
00:13:55.840 --> 00:13:59.159
<v Speaker 1>going to see an outbreak of courage among Republicans now

259
00:13:59.200 --> 00:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that most of the primaries have passed.

260
00:14:01.360 --> 00:14:04.120
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be an interesting political calculus. Like someone like Fitzpatrick,

261
00:14:04.120 --> 00:14:06.480
<v Speaker 3>who is in he might be the most vulnerable Republican

262
00:14:06.519 --> 00:14:07.679
<v Speaker 3>in the country, or.

263
00:14:08.639 --> 00:14:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Definitely he is.

264
00:14:10.799 --> 00:14:13.559
<v Speaker 3>He he is up there. We got some people who

265
00:14:13.600 --> 00:14:16.440
<v Speaker 3>have been redistricted out of existence, but of the people

266
00:14:16.440 --> 00:14:19.679
<v Speaker 3>who remain in their previous district, he's quite vulnerable. And

267
00:14:20.120 --> 00:14:23.759
<v Speaker 3>but there is this challenge for Republicans which is, on

268
00:14:23.759 --> 00:14:28.279
<v Speaker 3>one hand, Trump attacking you would seem favorable, like just

269
00:14:28.519 --> 00:14:31.000
<v Speaker 3>hit if I was Fitzpatrick, I would think in that district,

270
00:14:31.039 --> 00:14:34.200
<v Speaker 3>I think about taking the the footage of Trump saying

271
00:14:34.240 --> 00:14:35.759
<v Speaker 3>that against all the time to put it in an

272
00:14:35.759 --> 00:14:40.919
<v Speaker 3>ad most But the challenge is they also need Republican turnout,

273
00:14:41.200 --> 00:14:44.000
<v Speaker 3>and if Trump is trashing you, are that people going

274
00:14:44.039 --> 00:14:46.039
<v Speaker 3>to turn out for you, and that's the that's the

275
00:14:46.080 --> 00:14:46.600
<v Speaker 3>real question.

276
00:14:46.720 --> 00:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is a good point. Well, so then what

277
00:14:48.240 --> 00:14:51.159
<v Speaker 1>do you think about getting restrictions on this slush fund,

278
00:14:51.200 --> 00:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>because it does seem like they're going for restrictions in

279
00:14:56.000 --> 00:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>this ice funding bill, which is reconciliation, which means that

280
00:14:59.840 --> 00:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you would only need, you know, fifty one votes in

281
00:15:02.519 --> 00:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the Senate.

282
00:15:03.159 --> 00:15:06.200
<v Speaker 3>There's two things happening here. One is, as we mentioned,

283
00:15:06.200 --> 00:15:09.799
<v Speaker 3>the Republicans recognize this is terrible politics and they don't

284
00:15:09.799 --> 00:15:11.559
<v Speaker 3>want to vote for it, and they know how bad

285
00:15:11.559 --> 00:15:13.120
<v Speaker 3>it is. They feel the same way about the ballroom,

286
00:15:13.120 --> 00:15:14.879
<v Speaker 3>which were talking about a second. The other thing that's

287
00:15:14.879 --> 00:15:17.919
<v Speaker 3>happening in the Senate is these people are just pissed

288
00:15:17.919 --> 00:15:21.919
<v Speaker 3>a Trump like he took out Tom Tillis, and you know,

289
00:15:22.000 --> 00:15:24.679
<v Speaker 3>Tom Tillis retired rather than face a primary challenge. But

290
00:15:25.399 --> 00:15:27.879
<v Speaker 3>Roy Cooper is much more likely the next Senator of

291
00:15:28.320 --> 00:15:32.919
<v Speaker 3>North Carolina because he's running against a anonymous RNC chair

292
00:15:33.159 --> 00:15:38.919
<v Speaker 3>that Trump installed as the nominee. They took out Bill Cassidy.

293
00:15:39.080 --> 00:15:41.600
<v Speaker 3>He just endorsed, as we'll talk about, just endorsed against

294
00:15:41.720 --> 00:15:45.039
<v Speaker 3>John Cornan, the number two person in the Senate for Republicans,

295
00:15:45.440 --> 00:15:47.120
<v Speaker 3>and so he's basically taking out other people. And so

296
00:15:47.200 --> 00:15:49.759
<v Speaker 3>they're both pissed, like on this personal level that he

297
00:15:49.799 --> 00:15:51.799
<v Speaker 3>keeps taking out their friends, but they're also he's making

298
00:15:52.000 --> 00:15:54.039
<v Speaker 3>in almost all these cases, he's making it less likely

299
00:15:54.039 --> 00:15:56.559
<v Speaker 3>they keep the majority. And so I think they're starting

300
00:15:56.600 --> 00:15:59.200
<v Speaker 3>to get restive here and are looking for some place

301
00:15:59.360 --> 00:16:02.679
<v Speaker 3>to show that they have some measure of spine. Now,

302
00:16:03.159 --> 00:16:04.720
<v Speaker 3>are the restrictions that are going to put in be

303
00:16:04.960 --> 00:16:07.320
<v Speaker 3>going to likely be pretty weak?

304
00:16:07.960 --> 00:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

305
00:16:08.919 --> 00:16:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's that's the case. But I would

306
00:16:11.480 --> 00:16:14.360
<v Speaker 3>be surprised. I would be surprised. And no one's ever

307
00:16:14.360 --> 00:16:16.600
<v Speaker 3>made a lot of money betting on correstionional Republicans to

308
00:16:16.600 --> 00:16:19.039
<v Speaker 3>do something brave, But I would be surprised if this

309
00:16:19.080 --> 00:16:23.279
<v Speaker 3>bill passed without some measure of something that at least

310
00:16:23.320 --> 00:16:25.960
<v Speaker 3>is a putative fig leave of restriction on the slush fund.

311
00:16:26.080 --> 00:16:27.679
<v Speaker 1>The challenge here is I don't think they get any

312
00:16:28.600 --> 00:16:31.159
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to get any Democratic votes for it, right,

313
00:16:31.320 --> 00:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>even though even though Democrats would want to ban this

314
00:16:34.080 --> 00:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>if it goes in the ice funding bill, the restrictions,

315
00:16:36.440 --> 00:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrats aren't going to vote for the Ice.

316
00:16:37.919 --> 00:16:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, you'll get it on the amendment in the in

317
00:16:41.039 --> 00:16:42.480
<v Speaker 3>the voterama to put.

318
00:16:42.360 --> 00:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh, so Democrats can get it in there and then

319
00:16:44.879 --> 00:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>not vote again. Okay, I just.

320
00:16:46.720 --> 00:16:50.039
<v Speaker 3>Way outstripped my expertise on Senate budget procedure. But I

321
00:16:50.039 --> 00:16:50.559
<v Speaker 3>think that's right.

322
00:16:50.600 --> 00:17:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that's good enough. That's good enough for this episode.

323
00:17:01.240 --> 00:17:04.039
<v Speaker 2>Today's show is sponsored by Strawberry dot Me. You think

324
00:17:04.079 --> 00:17:07.839
<v Speaker 2>of best switching jobs, maybe ask yourself these questions. Am

325
00:17:07.839 --> 00:17:10.519
<v Speaker 2>I growing or just repeating the same experience over and

326
00:17:10.559 --> 00:17:14.720
<v Speaker 2>over again? It's a tough question to ask doing this.

327
00:17:15.160 --> 00:17:17.279
<v Speaker 2>Do I feel energized by my work obviously? Or am

328
00:17:17.279 --> 00:17:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I constantly drained and counting the hours until it's over?

329
00:17:20.240 --> 00:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Can I do both?

330
00:17:21.079 --> 00:17:23.279
<v Speaker 2>Do I know what my next career move should be?

331
00:17:23.359 --> 00:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Or am I just.

332
00:17:23.839 --> 00:17:25.759
<v Speaker 2>Hoping something better shows up?

333
00:17:25.880 --> 00:17:26.839
<v Speaker 1>And I definitely don't know that.

334
00:17:27.079 --> 00:17:28.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's hard one. Am I going to stay here

335
00:17:28.759 --> 00:17:31.319
<v Speaker 2>for another year? Will I be proud of my progress

336
00:17:31.400 --> 00:17:33.599
<v Speaker 2>or regret staying comfortable?

337
00:17:33.680 --> 00:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not comfortable.

338
00:17:34.559 --> 00:17:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. These are tough questions said we were comfortable. If

339
00:17:37.400 --> 00:17:39.200
<v Speaker 2>you think it might be time for a change, you

340
00:17:39.240 --> 00:17:41.839
<v Speaker 2>should talk to a career coach. Through Strawberry dot Me.

341
00:17:42.200 --> 00:17:44.599
<v Speaker 2>The coaches work with you one on one to understand

342
00:17:44.599 --> 00:17:47.200
<v Speaker 2>your strengths, identify your gaps, and build a clear roadmap

343
00:17:47.200 --> 00:17:49.799
<v Speaker 2>towards a career you're actually excited about, because the bigger

344
00:17:49.839 --> 00:17:53.559
<v Speaker 2>risk isn't making the wrong move staying stuck without a plan.

345
00:17:53.920 --> 00:17:56.839
<v Speaker 2>Take control of your future at Strawberry dot me slash

346
00:17:56.839 --> 00:17:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Crooked Go today and get fifty percent off your first

347
00:17:59.319 --> 00:18:03.279
<v Speaker 2>coaching session. That Strawberry dot me slash Crooked.

348
00:18:03.279 --> 00:18:06.079
<v Speaker 1>Positive America is brought to you by Helix. We love

349
00:18:06.119 --> 00:18:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Helix mattresses. I think all three of us have one,

350
00:18:08.960 --> 00:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>at least one. I now have many, and.

351
00:18:10.640 --> 00:18:13.319
<v Speaker 2>They're very, very comfortable for kids. Everybody raves about it.

352
00:18:13.400 --> 00:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Kids love it. I think my in laws have one.

353
00:18:15.480 --> 00:18:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I've done a lot of Helix mattresses, no complaints yet,

354
00:18:17.839 --> 00:18:19.599
<v Speaker 1>in fact, plenty of compliments, and they.

355
00:18:19.480 --> 00:18:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Just mail us to your ass.

356
00:18:20.559 --> 00:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, crazy, and you take a sleep quiz and you

357
00:18:22.680 --> 00:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out what the right Helix mattress for you is

358
00:18:24.519 --> 00:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's fantastic. Helix makes buying a mattress easy. You

359
00:18:28.039 --> 00:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>take the Helix Sleep Quiz as I just said, and

360
00:18:30.000 --> 00:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it will match you with the perfect mattress based on

361
00:18:31.720 --> 00:18:35.839
<v Speaker 1>your personal preferences and sleep needs. Free shipping and seamless delivery.

362
00:18:36.319 --> 00:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Helix DELIVERSI you mattress right to your door with free

363
00:18:38.240 --> 00:18:41.039
<v Speaker 1>shipping in the US. The Happy with Helix guarantee offers

364
00:18:41.079 --> 00:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a risk free customer first experience designed to ensure you're

365
00:18:44.519 --> 00:18:47.880
<v Speaker 1>completely satisfied with your new mattress so you can rest

366
00:18:47.920 --> 00:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>easy with seamless returns and exchanges. Plus, Helix offers a

367
00:18:51.200 --> 00:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty nights sleep trial in limited lifetime warranty.

368
00:18:54.880 --> 00:18:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Do you think anyone does like one hundred and nineteen

369
00:18:56.839 --> 00:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>nights and they send that mattress back?

370
00:18:59.160 --> 00:19:02.079
<v Speaker 2>That would suck? It be funny, It'll be a funny bit.

371
00:19:02.279 --> 00:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, we're not saying that you can do that,

372
00:19:04.200 --> 00:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>but it is one hundred and twenty nights sleep.

373
00:19:05.839 --> 00:19:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Truk right, that's fair true.

374
00:19:07.680 --> 00:19:09.319
<v Speaker 1>How is your slipping an upgrade? Well, it's way more

375
00:19:09.359 --> 00:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>comfortable than the old one. And everyone who sleeps in

376
00:19:13.440 --> 00:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>our guest room and then our and our two boys,

377
00:19:14.960 --> 00:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>they're always like, I love I love my Helix mattress.

378
00:19:17.519 --> 00:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>It's so comfy. I had the best night of sleep.

379
00:19:19.279 --> 00:19:19.759
<v Speaker 2>Damn right.

380
00:19:19.920 --> 00:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Go to Helix sleep dot com slash cricket for twenty

381
00:19:21.880 --> 00:19:23.839
<v Speaker 1>seven percent off site wide. That's helix sleep dot com

382
00:19:23.839 --> 00:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>slash crooked for twenty seven percent off site wide. This

383
00:19:27.240 --> 00:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>offer is exclusive to our listeners. Make sure you enter

384
00:19:30.160 --> 00:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>our show name after checkout so they know we sent

385
00:19:32.160 --> 00:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>you Helix, sleep dot com slash crooked. Next up, the

386
00:19:38.240 --> 00:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars Trump wants for his ballroom, which he then

387
00:19:41.400 --> 00:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>just said he doesn't need. On Saturday, the Senate parliamentarian

388
00:19:45.240 --> 00:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>ruled that the money couldn't be included in the ICE

389
00:19:47.880 --> 00:19:51.039
<v Speaker 1>funding bill because it doesn't comply with the Senate's budget rules.

390
00:19:51.799 --> 00:19:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Trump then demanded that Republicans fire the parliamentarian, but Republicans

391
00:19:57.319 --> 00:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>decided to remove the funding instead of the parliamentarian, admitting

392
00:20:00.960 --> 00:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't have the votes anyway, probably because enough

393
00:20:03.359 --> 00:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of them realized that asking taxpayers to fork over a

394
00:20:05.559 --> 00:20:08.039
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars for a ballroom no one asked for is

395
00:20:08.319 --> 00:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>fucking crazy. Trump meanwhile took reporters on a tour of

396
00:20:11.720 --> 00:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the construction site this week, which is, you know, that's

397
00:20:14.279 --> 00:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>his passion, and he defended the project as a military necessity,

398
00:20:18.200 --> 00:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>and he said that the roof would be a drone

399
00:20:21.200 --> 00:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>port that protects all of Washington. Does he think it's

400
00:20:25.440 --> 00:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is there like an iron dome? Over the White House

401
00:20:28.000 --> 00:20:30.599
<v Speaker 1>now in Washington because of the because the that's what

402
00:20:30.640 --> 00:20:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the ballroom is.

403
00:20:31.599 --> 00:20:34.960
<v Speaker 3>He also announced how many stories deep the bunker would be,

404
00:20:34.960 --> 00:20:36.759
<v Speaker 3>which is probably not a piece of information you just

405
00:20:36.799 --> 00:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>want to hand out to the public.

406
00:20:38.519 --> 00:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>No, No, is the ballroom in jeopardy, like does Trump?

407
00:20:44.160 --> 00:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump then said he doesn't need the money. It seems

408
00:20:46.400 --> 00:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>like he wanted the money pretty badly, which is why

409
00:20:48.680 --> 00:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>he told them to fire the parliamentarian and is getting

410
00:20:50.920 --> 00:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>really pissed about this. Is he going to find a

411
00:20:53.119 --> 00:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>way to just steal the money from taxpayers like he's

412
00:20:56.440 --> 00:21:00.319
<v Speaker 1>been doing now with this slush fund for insurrectionists, or

413
00:21:00.640 --> 00:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe he just extorts more rich people with business before

414
00:21:03.240 --> 00:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the government to just give donations.

415
00:21:06.119 --> 00:21:09.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's hard to say. I once again, it seems

416
00:21:09.319 --> 00:21:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that no one in Congress wants to vote for a

417
00:21:12.079 --> 00:21:16.039
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars for a ballroom, and they're going to truse

418
00:21:16.039 --> 00:21:17.119
<v Speaker 3>Trump is trying to do the way I try to

419
00:21:17.119 --> 00:21:18.240
<v Speaker 3>do it. Well, it's not really for the bar with

420
00:21:18.240 --> 00:21:20.640
<v Speaker 3>the ballroom's paid for by all the rich people who

421
00:21:21.720 --> 00:21:24.839
<v Speaker 3>were buying access in terms in exchange for the ballroom,

422
00:21:25.319 --> 00:21:29.279
<v Speaker 3>but it's the security, the necessary security underneath the ballroom

423
00:21:29.319 --> 00:21:31.880
<v Speaker 3>that is the cost a billion dollars. It's too late

424
00:21:31.920 --> 00:21:33.640
<v Speaker 3>for that. It's the one billion dollar ball room. That's

425
00:21:33.599 --> 00:21:38.839
<v Speaker 3>so everyone understands. It an actual impressive democratic messaging victory

426
00:21:39.039 --> 00:21:40.880
<v Speaker 3>in this day and age. So we should applaud that.

427
00:21:42.319 --> 00:21:45.559
<v Speaker 3>Maybe Elon Musk, fresh off the SpaceX IPO, comes in

428
00:21:45.559 --> 00:21:47.559
<v Speaker 3>and gives a billion dollars to build the rest of it.

429
00:21:47.839 --> 00:21:49.400
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know how they're going to get it.

430
00:21:49.400 --> 00:21:50.839
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't seem like they're going to be able to get

431
00:21:50.839 --> 00:21:53.000
<v Speaker 3>money out of Congress for this this year. No one

432
00:21:53.000 --> 00:21:55.400
<v Speaker 3>wants to do this this close to the election. Maybe

433
00:21:55.440 --> 00:21:57.079
<v Speaker 3>they can throw something into an end of the year

434
00:21:57.079 --> 00:21:59.039
<v Speaker 3>deal after the election. I don't know, but.

435
00:22:00.039 --> 00:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>It seems hard and I don't think that. I think

436
00:22:03.440 --> 00:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that the reason they asked for ask Congress for the

437
00:22:05.240 --> 00:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>money in the first place is they can't necessarily they

438
00:22:07.440 --> 00:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>can't use private donations to fund like services and security.

439
00:22:13.000 --> 00:22:14.680
<v Speaker 3>But then that's as and southing. Before we did, I

440
00:22:14.720 --> 00:22:17.039
<v Speaker 3>was gonna say, I mean, who do we let do

441
00:22:17.079 --> 00:22:18.839
<v Speaker 3>we let Michael Dell pay our troops? Once?

442
00:22:21.039 --> 00:22:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Did you see the news that he also said he

443
00:22:22.799 --> 00:22:25.759
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need congressional approval to build his two hundred and

444
00:22:25.799 --> 00:22:27.799
<v Speaker 1>fifty foot uh arc.

445
00:22:28.079 --> 00:22:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I have to say I've tried.

446
00:22:29.319 --> 00:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Really we're calling it an arch or an arc arch.

447
00:22:32.319 --> 00:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an arch arch and it's an art

448
00:22:34.839 --> 00:22:39.640
<v Speaker 1>like the Arctic. Yeah, sorry, yes it is. We got arches,

449
00:22:39.799 --> 00:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we got ballrooms, we got Katari jets, we got I

450
00:22:44.160 --> 00:22:46.079
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I've lost track, we got can't we got

451
00:22:46.119 --> 00:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>new Kennedy Centers.

452
00:22:47.559 --> 00:22:49.400
<v Speaker 3>We have new marble arm rest of the Kennedy Center

453
00:22:49.480 --> 00:22:52.440
<v Speaker 3>right energy on that new helipad.

454
00:22:52.759 --> 00:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>We got a new helipad coming, the Drone Port.

455
00:22:54.759 --> 00:22:58.319
<v Speaker 3>I've tried really hard to not focus on the arch

456
00:22:58.960 --> 00:23:03.119
<v Speaker 3>as you call it. On the arch just seems I mean,

457
00:23:03.640 --> 00:23:07.839
<v Speaker 3>it seems crazy. I don't know it. I finally today,

458
00:23:07.880 --> 00:23:09.720
<v Speaker 3>because we're doing this on the podcast, I finally looked

459
00:23:09.720 --> 00:23:12.359
<v Speaker 3>at where the arch was going to be is in Virginia,

460
00:23:13.640 --> 00:23:14.519
<v Speaker 3>right across the river.

461
00:23:15.960 --> 00:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>But it also, like the New York Times did a

462
00:23:18.240 --> 00:23:20.799
<v Speaker 1>good like sort of AI rendering of of what the

463
00:23:20.880 --> 00:23:22.759
<v Speaker 1>views would be like, and it kind of just like

464
00:23:23.079 --> 00:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it blocks the view of the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington Cemetery.

465
00:23:26.640 --> 00:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like bigger than anything else in Washington.

466
00:23:29.240 --> 00:23:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's stupid.

467
00:23:30.039 --> 00:23:32.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, if I was a it was a

468
00:23:32.160 --> 00:23:33.839
<v Speaker 1>DC resident, I'd be fucking annoyed.

469
00:23:33.880 --> 00:23:36.000
<v Speaker 3>But well, like no one's asking for it.

470
00:23:37.000 --> 00:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't forget we forgot the reflect Yeah we are also.

471
00:23:40.039 --> 00:23:42.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we are repainting the reflecting pool once again at

472
00:23:42.559 --> 00:23:44.799
<v Speaker 3>taxpayer dollars. I believe it's.

473
00:23:44.680 --> 00:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Just it declining empire ship.

474
00:23:47.960 --> 00:23:52.920
<v Speaker 3>It just he is obsessed with home renovation projects like

475
00:23:53.000 --> 00:23:55.480
<v Speaker 3>this is like that is his true passion. He cannot

476
00:23:55.480 --> 00:23:59.599
<v Speaker 3>be bothered with a He like stealing money, revenge an

477
00:23:59.640 --> 00:24:00.559
<v Speaker 3>interior designed.

478
00:24:01.160 --> 00:24:06.079
<v Speaker 1>It's like the most cartoonish version of corruption by like

479
00:24:06.119 --> 00:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>an aging dictator. He's just stealing money cats, you know,

480
00:24:10.000 --> 00:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>smash and grab anywhere he can. He's just putting gold everywhere,

481
00:24:14.759 --> 00:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>ensconced in his fucking DC home that he's turning into

482
00:24:19.079 --> 00:24:22.599
<v Speaker 1>fucking Versailles on the Potomac, you know, pardoning all of

483
00:24:22.640 --> 00:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>his friends, punishing all of his enemies, doing nothing else,

484
00:24:26.440 --> 00:24:28.039
<v Speaker 1>decomposing before our eyes.

485
00:24:28.359 --> 00:24:28.960
<v Speaker 5>It's just like.

486
00:24:30.680 --> 00:24:35.039
<v Speaker 1>It's fucking great. It's fucking bleak man. One more vote.

487
00:24:35.039 --> 00:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump's having trouble with in part because he ended the

488
00:24:38.240 --> 00:24:41.799
<v Speaker 1>careers of Republicans whose support he needs a measure that

489
00:24:41.839 --> 00:24:44.079
<v Speaker 1>would force him to end the war in Iran. On Tuesday,

490
00:24:44.319 --> 00:24:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the Senate finally voted to take up the War Powers resolution,

491
00:24:47.160 --> 00:24:50.519
<v Speaker 1>with newly defeated Senator Bill Cassidy flipping to vote in favor.

492
00:24:51.079 --> 00:24:53.759
<v Speaker 1>The resolution now moves to the House, where retiring main

493
00:24:53.799 --> 00:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrat Jared Golden says he now plans to flip his

494
00:24:56.079 --> 00:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>vote in favor as well. And all this comes as

495
00:24:58.680 --> 00:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Iran is reviewing the latest US peace proposal, which Trump

496
00:25:02.000 --> 00:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>says he'll give them a few days to do. He

497
00:25:03.960 --> 00:25:06.279
<v Speaker 1>also said that the US and Iran are quote right

498
00:25:06.359 --> 00:25:09.839
<v Speaker 1>on the borderline between war and peace, and that he's

499
00:25:09.920 --> 00:25:12.759
<v Speaker 1>quote in no hurry to make a deal. Is the

500
00:25:12.759 --> 00:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>price of gas inches towards five dollars a gallon? What

501
00:25:17.160 --> 00:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>do you make of the latest developments in Iran and

502
00:25:19.200 --> 00:25:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the and the shift of Republicans now being in favor

503
00:25:22.920 --> 00:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of the War Powers resolution?

504
00:25:25.119 --> 00:25:29.119
<v Speaker 3>Just the cycle. It's every week we wake up on Monday,

505
00:25:29.519 --> 00:25:32.599
<v Speaker 3>there is a either a true social or an axios

506
00:25:32.599 --> 00:25:35.119
<v Speaker 3>post with multiple sirens that tells us that we're on

507
00:25:35.240 --> 00:25:38.680
<v Speaker 3>the verge of a deal. We are right there. They're

508
00:25:38.680 --> 00:25:44.119
<v Speaker 3>circling around it. That reality lasts like five hours. Then

509
00:25:44.160 --> 00:25:46.079
<v Speaker 3>we are on the verge of war. Trump is right,

510
00:25:46.119 --> 00:25:47.559
<v Speaker 3>We really are on the verge of both. Then we

511
00:25:47.640 --> 00:25:50.079
<v Speaker 3>are making more plans, we're threatening to bomb people, we're

512
00:25:50.160 --> 00:25:53.680
<v Speaker 3>ending civilizations. And then at the moment right before the

513
00:25:53.720 --> 00:25:57.240
<v Speaker 3>bombing is set to begin, things get tacoed and we

514
00:25:57.279 --> 00:26:00.400
<v Speaker 3>are back to stalemate. And it's just We've been rinse

515
00:26:00.440 --> 00:26:03.119
<v Speaker 3>and repeat of the cycle for weeks now.

516
00:26:03.240 --> 00:26:05.559
<v Speaker 1>I will say that each with each and each new

517
00:26:05.640 --> 00:26:09.519
<v Speaker 1>draft of the peace proposal looks less like peace and

518
00:26:09.559 --> 00:26:12.640
<v Speaker 1>more like a meaningless extension of a ceasefire.

519
00:26:12.960 --> 00:26:15.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well this, yeah, the latest one is.

520
00:26:14.960 --> 00:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>The latest one is just like this will be like

521
00:26:17.039 --> 00:26:21.559
<v Speaker 1>a memo that gives thirty days for peace negotiations, but

522
00:26:21.640 --> 00:26:24.559
<v Speaker 1>like nothing happens within those, like the strait doesn't open

523
00:26:24.680 --> 00:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in those thirty days. It's basically just where we are

524
00:26:27.799 --> 00:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, but a more formal ceasefire for another thirty days.

525
00:26:31.279 --> 00:26:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, what have they been doing for the last thirty days?

526
00:26:33.039 --> 00:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>I know what's different.

527
00:26:34.160 --> 00:26:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't even understand what the point of the memo is. Theoretically,

528
00:26:38.960 --> 00:26:41.000
<v Speaker 3>people are talking somewhere, right, People.

529
00:26:40.720 --> 00:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Are talking somewhere. People are talking somewhere well, and it

530
00:26:43.359 --> 00:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>seems like the Iranians, of course, have every incentive to

531
00:26:46.160 --> 00:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>continue to kick the ball down the road without having

532
00:26:48.400 --> 00:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to give anything up because they don't want to get

533
00:26:49.960 --> 00:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>bombed again. Because Trump keeps Echine closer to resuming just hostilities,

534
00:26:55.359 --> 00:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and BB is reportedly pushing him towards that as well.

535
00:26:59.400 --> 00:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Apparently there's a tense call between Trump and net and

536
00:27:03.039 --> 00:27:07.599
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo where Trump was like, give piece a chance and

537
00:27:07.759 --> 00:27:10.039
<v Speaker 1>uh and net Yah, who obviously was like, no, let's

538
00:27:10.039 --> 00:27:13.319
<v Speaker 1>bomb the shit out of them, and so yeah, like,

539
00:27:13.440 --> 00:27:15.559
<v Speaker 1>would I be would I be shocked if this time

540
00:27:15.599 --> 00:27:18.319
<v Speaker 1>we actually get some kind of a deal this weekend? No,

541
00:27:18.519 --> 00:27:20.079
<v Speaker 1>but I would be shocked if it was actually a

542
00:27:20.119 --> 00:27:22.319
<v Speaker 1>meaningful peace deal that ended the hostilities.

543
00:27:22.359 --> 00:27:25.759
<v Speaker 3>And actually, what do you think is more likely this

544
00:27:25.799 --> 00:27:30.000
<v Speaker 3>weekend we take a step towards peace? And I'm not

545
00:27:30.079 --> 00:27:31.839
<v Speaker 3>a bit not peace, but even like some like a

546
00:27:31.839 --> 00:27:34.599
<v Speaker 3>memo days or something, or are we invade Cuba?

547
00:27:35.640 --> 00:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

548
00:27:35.960 --> 00:27:37.359
<v Speaker 3>I think cub was highly more likely.

549
00:27:37.640 --> 00:27:40.079
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I think peace. I think I mean, can I

550
00:27:40.119 --> 00:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>just say the memo? Yeah, I say memo, I say

551
00:27:43.000 --> 00:27:43.799
<v Speaker 1>memo over Cuba.

552
00:27:43.839 --> 00:27:47.680
<v Speaker 3>But when we're doing rapid response three hours after this

553
00:27:47.920 --> 00:27:50.519
<v Speaker 3>uh REP response in the middle of its wedding about

554
00:27:50.519 --> 00:27:51.119
<v Speaker 3>the Cuban.

555
00:27:50.880 --> 00:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Invasion, yeah, they I will not be doing rapid response.

556
00:27:53.440 --> 00:27:55.400
<v Speaker 3>The tom Tommy has to do. He's got to speak

557
00:27:55.400 --> 00:27:55.559
<v Speaker 3>to that.

558
00:27:55.599 --> 00:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, well, you know what, we'll be at the bar.

559
00:27:57.240 --> 00:28:02.880
<v Speaker 1>We can wave to mommy or we have all right,

560
00:28:04.079 --> 00:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>one other rake Trump stepped on this week that we

561
00:28:05.920 --> 00:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>got to talk about. You mentioned this. The President has

562
00:28:07.799 --> 00:28:11.519
<v Speaker 1>endorsed scandal plagued Ken Paxton over John Cornyn in the

563
00:28:11.519 --> 00:28:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Texas Senate primary runoff, much to the delight of Democrats

564
00:28:15.440 --> 00:28:18.839
<v Speaker 1>in dismay of Senate Republicans. Trump called Cornyn quote a

565
00:28:18.839 --> 00:28:21.559
<v Speaker 1>good man, but said that he wasn't there for him

566
00:28:21.559 --> 00:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>when he needed him when times were tough, and then

567
00:28:24.279 --> 00:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>he dubbed Paxton a true MAGA warrior who would presumably

568
00:28:28.000 --> 00:28:30.880
<v Speaker 1>vote for all the ballroom funding and insurrection A payouts

569
00:28:30.880 --> 00:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that Trump.

570
00:28:31.200 --> 00:28:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Asked for in the Save Act.

571
00:28:33.079 --> 00:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the big one, Save Act, right, we remember the

572
00:28:35.720 --> 00:28:37.519
<v Speaker 1>Save Act we talked about forever and then that's just

573
00:28:37.599 --> 00:28:40.799
<v Speaker 1>that's dead. Yeah, I guess to Ken Paxton would revive

574
00:28:40.839 --> 00:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it in the next Congress runoff is Tuesday. What do

575
00:28:44.440 --> 00:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you make of Trump's decision?

576
00:28:45.680 --> 00:28:52.960
<v Speaker 3>What insane? A truly insane decision. It's in the immediate aftermath.

577
00:28:53.039 --> 00:28:54.599
<v Speaker 3>Let's just go back in time. A couple of months

578
00:28:54.680 --> 00:28:58.160
<v Speaker 3>to the Texas primary, which honestly feels like ten years ago,

579
00:28:58.400 --> 00:29:03.279
<v Speaker 3>but Cornyn did better than anyone expected. The assumption was

580
00:29:03.319 --> 00:29:04.960
<v Speaker 3>that Trump said he was going to make an endorsement.

581
00:29:05.160 --> 00:29:08.079
<v Speaker 3>Everyone assumed he was endorsed Cornyn Paxton was going to have.

582
00:29:08.200 --> 00:29:10.240
<v Speaker 3>If Trump had done that, Paxton would have probably had

583
00:29:10.240 --> 00:29:12.839
<v Speaker 3>to drop out, his campaign would have dried up, and

584
00:29:13.079 --> 00:29:16.839
<v Speaker 3>Cornyn would be the nominee. Instead, he invaded iron instead

585
00:29:16.880 --> 00:29:19.519
<v Speaker 3>of focusing on this, dithered for a long time. Could

586
00:29:19.519 --> 00:29:22.960
<v Speaker 3>have just stayed silent and then endorsed Ken Paxton with

587
00:29:23.640 --> 00:29:27.119
<v Speaker 3>a week to goo, almost ensuring that Ken Paxton will

588
00:29:27.119 --> 00:29:31.240
<v Speaker 3>be the nominee. Ken Paxton is by every measure less

589
00:29:31.240 --> 00:29:33.640
<v Speaker 3>electable than John Cornyn. We've seen this in the polling.

590
00:29:33.680 --> 00:29:37.279
<v Speaker 3>There is a slice of Republicans who will vote for

591
00:29:37.440 --> 00:29:40.319
<v Speaker 3>Cornyn over Tall Rico, but will vote for Tall Rico

592
00:29:40.400 --> 00:29:45.359
<v Speaker 3>over Paxton. And just like he is so like this

593
00:29:45.400 --> 00:29:47.880
<v Speaker 3>is the example, he's so focused on vengeance that he

594
00:29:48.279 --> 00:29:51.640
<v Speaker 3>decided to go after John Cornyn were already we already

595
00:29:51.640 --> 00:29:55.880
<v Speaker 3>just talked about the the consequences in the Senate, and

596
00:29:56.000 --> 00:29:59.640
<v Speaker 3>just even more practically like this day, I think there

597
00:29:59.680 --> 00:30:02.200
<v Speaker 3>were I think the Cook Political Report moved this to

598
00:30:02.599 --> 00:30:05.920
<v Speaker 3>lean Republican. They said they will if they will, they

599
00:30:05.960 --> 00:30:10.759
<v Speaker 3>will if if if Paxton is the nominee. But so

600
00:30:10.799 --> 00:30:14.119
<v Speaker 3>they probably still have advantages here. But the n RSC

601
00:30:14.640 --> 00:30:17.559
<v Speaker 3>all the superbacks are gonna have to spend ungodly amounts

602
00:30:17.559 --> 00:30:20.960
<v Speaker 3>of money in this race to try to just win

603
00:30:21.000 --> 00:30:22.759
<v Speaker 3>a state they should see they should have already won

604
00:30:23.319 --> 00:30:25.759
<v Speaker 3>all because Trump just could not help himself.

605
00:30:26.519 --> 00:30:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Could you make a political argument? And I realized it

606
00:30:29.799 --> 00:30:31.559
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be a good one. It's not one that I favor.

607
00:30:32.400 --> 00:30:36.759
<v Speaker 1>That it's possible John Cornyan would be a weaker candidate

608
00:30:36.799 --> 00:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to Ken Paxxon because like the Trump, like the hardcore

609
00:30:40.960 --> 00:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>MAGA base would be pissed and maybe stay home if

610
00:30:43.200 --> 00:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Cornyan was the nominee, And so you would sort of

611
00:30:46.359 --> 00:30:48.599
<v Speaker 1>and you need turnout in a midterm Like is that

612
00:30:48.759 --> 00:30:49.279
<v Speaker 1>is that a thing?

613
00:30:49.599 --> 00:30:51.799
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we would have made that argument of Cornyon. We

614
00:30:51.799 --> 00:30:53.799
<v Speaker 3>may make that argument corn wins the primary on Tuesday,

615
00:30:53.839 --> 00:30:57.559
<v Speaker 3>so stay tuned, tune in next week next week's Buller Coaster.

616
00:30:59.119 --> 00:31:02.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that argument is hard to support.

617
00:31:03.160 --> 00:31:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, if you all the polling shows that

618
00:31:07.079 --> 00:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Tallarico does better against Paxton than Cornyn, but only by

619
00:31:14.000 --> 00:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a point or two in some of this polling, which

620
00:31:16.359 --> 00:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in Texas could be everything, of course probably would be.

621
00:31:18.519 --> 00:31:20.519
<v Speaker 3>Ever he's not winning by more than a pointer or two.

622
00:31:20.720 --> 00:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>FYI, right, right, right, But I thought that the delta

623
00:31:23.480 --> 00:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>between the two in the polling would be bigger than

624
00:31:26.440 --> 00:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it has been now there haven't been that many polls,

625
00:31:28.440 --> 00:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>but you.

626
00:31:28.720 --> 00:31:31.759
<v Speaker 3>Know, and then there's also in these polls there's you know,

627
00:31:31.839 --> 00:31:34.400
<v Speaker 3>like ten to twelve percent undecided, and we have to

628
00:31:34.400 --> 00:31:36.039
<v Speaker 3>look and see who makes up that undecided, but then

629
00:31:36.160 --> 00:31:40.400
<v Speaker 3>decide if you are in Texas. I just I think

630
00:31:40.440 --> 00:31:43.200
<v Speaker 3>that it's just it's like, let's not over complicate this.

631
00:31:43.680 --> 00:31:47.279
<v Speaker 3>Ken Paxton is a man who is an absolute crucus

632
00:31:47.279 --> 00:31:50.799
<v Speaker 3>serial adult are a fucking lunatic, and he's terrible at

633
00:31:50.839 --> 00:31:51.400
<v Speaker 3>raising money.

634
00:31:51.480 --> 00:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>His own staff called the FBI on him, his own

635
00:31:54.640 --> 00:31:56.319
<v Speaker 1>That to me is my that's my favorite things. Like

636
00:31:56.359 --> 00:31:58.359
<v Speaker 1>how many people have their own staff called the FBI

637
00:31:58.440 --> 00:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>on him? No one here?

638
00:32:00.720 --> 00:32:04.279
<v Speaker 3>Right, nice checking.

639
00:32:05.599 --> 00:32:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Left.

640
00:32:06.319 --> 00:32:08.839
<v Speaker 3>But Packson is such a perfect foil for tell Rico,

641
00:32:09.119 --> 00:32:14.319
<v Speaker 3>this nice, thoughtful guy who can talks about his religions,

642
00:32:14.359 --> 00:32:17.200
<v Speaker 3>faithful like you just they're the exact opposite of each

643
00:32:17.240 --> 00:32:19.319
<v Speaker 3>other and that is that it really helps Telarco in

644
00:32:19.319 --> 00:32:21.680
<v Speaker 3>a way. That is, it's not just Republican Democrats like

645
00:32:21.680 --> 00:32:23.400
<v Speaker 3>a good person a bad person, and that that is

646
00:32:23.440 --> 00:32:25.680
<v Speaker 3>going to help Telarco. There's we can bring. We can

647
00:32:25.720 --> 00:32:28.599
<v Speaker 3>pretend like Cornyon because he sucks as a politician and

648
00:32:29.079 --> 00:32:30.720
<v Speaker 3>isn't very good on the stump and it's kind.

649
00:32:30.599 --> 00:32:30.759
<v Speaker 2>Of a.

650
00:32:32.240 --> 00:32:33.759
<v Speaker 3>He puts on a cowboy hat every year for an

651
00:32:33.759 --> 00:32:36.200
<v Speaker 3>ad and he looks fucking ridiculous in it. It looks

652
00:32:36.240 --> 00:32:41.480
<v Speaker 3>like it's basically photoshopped on his head. But Paxton running

653
00:32:41.680 --> 00:32:43.519
<v Speaker 3>Paxson is way better for tele Rico than Cornyan.

654
00:32:43.599 --> 00:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I get you make the argument that

655
00:32:45.359 --> 00:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Cornyan basically is generic Republican in a ballot and Paxton

656
00:32:50.359 --> 00:32:54.599
<v Speaker 1>is less, is more vulnerable than a generic Republican because

657
00:32:54.640 --> 00:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he again is committed bribery and corruption.

658
00:32:58.359 --> 00:33:01.599
<v Speaker 3>And think about how close Betto came to beating.

659
00:33:01.960 --> 00:33:04.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is what Ty and I talked about this

660
00:33:04.079 --> 00:33:05.799
<v Speaker 1>on Only Friends, which I was like, there's there's like

661
00:33:05.799 --> 00:33:09.839
<v Speaker 1>three factors here, right, It's three questions for does does

662
00:33:09.880 --> 00:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Tallerrico win? Do you think the overall national environment is

663
00:33:13.240 --> 00:33:15.559
<v Speaker 1>bluer than it was in twenty eighteen? Do you think

664
00:33:15.599 --> 00:33:18.079
<v Speaker 1>taller Rico is a better candidate than Beto? And then

665
00:33:18.119 --> 00:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>do you think Paxton is a worse candidate than Ted Cruz.

666
00:33:21.839 --> 00:33:24.240
<v Speaker 3>I think on all three measures, this is better for

667
00:33:24.240 --> 00:33:26.279
<v Speaker 3>Tealraco than it was for Betto and be okay, within

668
00:33:26.359 --> 00:33:27.559
<v Speaker 3>three points.

669
00:33:27.279 --> 00:33:28.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's probably right.

670
00:33:28.599 --> 00:33:30.839
<v Speaker 3>Well, now those last three points, that is a long.

671
00:33:30.640 --> 00:33:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Five mile I also said that that's where I came down.

672
00:33:33.559 --> 00:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, and he could do better than Beto and

673
00:33:35.759 --> 00:33:39.839
<v Speaker 1>still lose, like just a little. But you know, I

674
00:33:39.839 --> 00:33:41.519
<v Speaker 1>think he's a I think he's a special candidate. I

675
00:33:41.759 --> 00:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>have for a long time. I know you do too,

676
00:33:43.160 --> 00:33:45.519
<v Speaker 1>And like I think, you know everyone should.

677
00:33:45.519 --> 00:33:48.319
<v Speaker 3>If anyone can do it is James Talerico right now

678
00:33:48.359 --> 00:33:49.799
<v Speaker 3>in this environment against Can Paxton.

679
00:33:49.960 --> 00:33:57.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

680
00:33:58.079 --> 00:34:00.440
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by the Obama found Foundation.

681
00:34:00.839 --> 00:34:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Democracy doesn't defend itself, and these people willing to fight

682
00:34:04.000 --> 00:34:06.480
<v Speaker 2>for it. That's why the Obama Foundation is committed to

683
00:34:06.480 --> 00:34:09.840
<v Speaker 2>training the next generation of leaders, building communities, and strengthening

684
00:34:09.880 --> 00:34:13.480
<v Speaker 2>our democracy. This summer, the Obama Presidential Center opens as

685
00:34:13.519 --> 00:34:16.559
<v Speaker 2>a global hub for change, providing emerging leaders with the

686
00:34:16.599 --> 00:34:19.039
<v Speaker 2>tools and resources they need to make a real difference

687
00:34:19.079 --> 00:34:21.840
<v Speaker 2>in their communities, our country, and our world. But none

688
00:34:21.840 --> 00:34:24.199
<v Speaker 2>of that happens without you. These leaders need support now,

689
00:34:24.199 --> 00:34:27.119
<v Speaker 2>and your donation makes that possible. Years from now, when

690
00:34:27.159 --> 00:34:29.039
<v Speaker 2>you look back on this moment in history, you'll want

691
00:34:29.079 --> 00:34:30.559
<v Speaker 2>to say you stepped off the sidelines.

692
00:34:30.599 --> 00:34:32.679
<v Speaker 1>So don't wait. Join the Movement for change.

693
00:34:32.760 --> 00:34:36.599
<v Speaker 2>Donate to the Obama Foundation at Obama dot org, slash pod.

694
00:34:41.679 --> 00:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Dan, some breaking news this morning on the

695
00:34:43.880 --> 00:34:48.079
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four DNC autopsy, Ken Martin finally agreed to

696
00:34:48.119 --> 00:34:50.639
<v Speaker 1>release the full text of the report, which CNN published

697
00:34:50.920 --> 00:34:53.519
<v Speaker 1>after the uproar that followed his interview with US a

698
00:34:53.559 --> 00:34:57.519
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago. This is from Martin's statement, quote, I

699
00:34:57.559 --> 00:35:01.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to create a distraction, but by not putting

700
00:35:01.360 --> 00:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the report out, I ended up creating an even bigger distraction.

701
00:35:04.679 --> 00:35:08.199
<v Speaker 1>For that, I sincerely apologize. He also said, quote, it

702
00:35:08.239 --> 00:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>does not meet my standards and it won't meet your standards.

703
00:35:11.000 --> 00:35:12.599
<v Speaker 1>But I am doing this because people need to be

704
00:35:12.679 --> 00:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>able to trust the Democratic Party and trust our word. Well.

705
00:35:17.440 --> 00:35:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I agree with him there. The one hundred and ninety

706
00:35:19.719 --> 00:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>two page report is riddled with inaccuracies, at times incoherent,

707
00:35:25.679 --> 00:35:31.280
<v Speaker 1>ultimately incomplete. The section headlined conclusion comes with an annotation

708
00:35:31.400 --> 00:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that says this section was not provided by the author.

709
00:35:36.920 --> 00:35:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Still is all you need to know. There's also no

710
00:35:39.599 --> 00:35:45.039
<v Speaker 1>mention of Biden's decision to run again his age Gaza inflation. Dan,

711
00:35:45.119 --> 00:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you have some thoughts you'd like to share. I feel

712
00:35:47.480 --> 00:35:48.480
<v Speaker 1>like I've said plenty on this.

713
00:35:48.920 --> 00:35:53.960
<v Speaker 3>You'll have more to say. I hope this is so

714
00:35:54.559 --> 00:35:58.159
<v Speaker 3>fittingly stupid. It was like, this is what we suspected

715
00:35:58.199 --> 00:36:02.880
<v Speaker 3>all along, which is Ken Martin hired the wrong person

716
00:36:02.880 --> 00:36:05.280
<v Speaker 3>to do the report. The wrong person did a terrible job.

717
00:36:05.840 --> 00:36:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Instead of starting the report over or saying that Ken

718
00:36:08.480 --> 00:36:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Martin just started lying, couldn't stop lying, and just got

719
00:36:12.920 --> 00:36:15.960
<v Speaker 3>himself into this incredible hole. And then he doesn't get

720
00:36:16.000 --> 00:36:21.119
<v Speaker 3>points or transparency here because that CNN got some parts

721
00:36:21.239 --> 00:36:24.719
<v Speaker 3>they were able to get from some sources parts of

722
00:36:24.760 --> 00:36:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the report. And once the CNN had that, then the

723
00:36:28.079 --> 00:36:30.320
<v Speaker 3>DNC made the decision, which was the right decision, to

724
00:36:30.320 --> 00:36:35.400
<v Speaker 3>release the rest of it. Like it's so it's it

725
00:36:35.400 --> 00:36:39.719
<v Speaker 3>could not have been handled more poorly, just every part

726
00:36:39.719 --> 00:36:42.119
<v Speaker 3>of it. So I'm going to go through a couple

727
00:36:42.159 --> 00:36:47.320
<v Speaker 3>of things here. One, this is just a management disaster.

728
00:36:47.599 --> 00:36:49.280
<v Speaker 3>This was supposed to be a huge priority for Ken Martin.

729
00:36:50.159 --> 00:36:54.159
<v Speaker 3>He hired someone to work for free who no one

730
00:36:54.199 --> 00:36:56.360
<v Speaker 3>in the Democratic Party would have picked for this role.

731
00:36:56.800 --> 00:36:58.960
<v Speaker 3>There was no actual process set up. There was clearly

732
00:36:59.000 --> 00:37:01.840
<v Speaker 3>no monitoring of the process or oversight or anyone working

733
00:37:01.840 --> 00:37:04.000
<v Speaker 3>on or tracking what was happening. Because when he got

734
00:37:04.000 --> 00:37:05.960
<v Speaker 3>he was shocked when he got the report, Well, why

735
00:37:05.960 --> 00:37:08.360
<v Speaker 3>weren't you getting in? Where weren't their calls every week?

736
00:37:08.519 --> 00:37:10.679
<v Speaker 3>Why wasn't someone on your staff in charge of doing this?

737
00:37:10.920 --> 00:37:13.199
<v Speaker 3>Why wasn't there a committee of people. I can think

738
00:37:13.199 --> 00:37:16.519
<v Speaker 3>of dozens upon dozens of very very qualified, very very

739
00:37:16.599 --> 00:37:20.920
<v Speaker 3>smart Democrats who would have volunteered to be part of

740
00:37:20.960 --> 00:37:22.960
<v Speaker 3>this process to do it right. And I know this

741
00:37:23.039 --> 00:37:25.719
<v Speaker 3>because there have been a bunch of other autopsies that

742
00:37:25.760 --> 00:37:28.360
<v Speaker 3>have come out where they've gotten really really smart people

743
00:37:28.400 --> 00:37:29.559
<v Speaker 3>to do it and completed the work.

744
00:37:30.400 --> 00:37:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Someone that we know reached out to me and said,

745
00:37:35.079 --> 00:37:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we wrote a seven hundred page post mortem on the

746
00:37:38.400 --> 00:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve campaign, the Obama campaign, and it was done

747
00:37:41.960 --> 00:37:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in January. Becaise she was in November.

748
00:37:45.440 --> 00:37:50.239
<v Speaker 3>And so like that, just the just absolute management disaster.

749
00:37:51.280 --> 00:37:54.679
<v Speaker 3>The second piece is the line like it's the biggest thing,

750
00:37:54.719 --> 00:37:57.559
<v Speaker 3>the lining is so crazy. And I go back to

751
00:37:57.599 --> 00:38:00.679
<v Speaker 3>the interview with you, which is we talked you talked

752
00:38:00.679 --> 00:38:01.960
<v Speaker 3>about this when we did the interview, we talke about

753
00:38:01.960 --> 00:38:05.239
<v Speaker 3>since I just want everyone to fully understand, we did

754
00:38:05.239 --> 00:38:07.239
<v Speaker 3>not seek out Ken Martin for the purpose of talking

755
00:38:07.239 --> 00:38:09.280
<v Speaker 3>to about the autopsy. We had no interest in talking

756
00:38:09.320 --> 00:38:14.320
<v Speaker 3>to Ken Martin about the autopsy. He complained to you

757
00:38:15.199 --> 00:38:17.119
<v Speaker 3>about tweets sent by someone who's not you.

758
00:38:17.519 --> 00:38:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Nop. Yep, Ben Road's tweet. Ben Road's tweet kicked it off.

759
00:38:21.320 --> 00:38:24.800
<v Speaker 3>And then he came up to you at the Grinder party. Yep,

760
00:38:24.960 --> 00:38:28.639
<v Speaker 3>sure did and expressed his di met. You can talk

761
00:38:28.639 --> 00:38:31.119
<v Speaker 3>about how he expressed it. And so the response was

762
00:38:31.519 --> 00:38:33.239
<v Speaker 3>that he would come on the podcast and discuss it.

763
00:38:33.400 --> 00:38:35.960
<v Speaker 3>He like sought out the opportunity to do it, to

764
00:38:36.480 --> 00:38:40.280
<v Speaker 3>continue to push the lie because the argument that they

765
00:38:40.320 --> 00:38:43.039
<v Speaker 3>were making. Ken Martin had two points in this about

766
00:38:43.039 --> 00:38:47.679
<v Speaker 3>the autopsy. It's done, it was helpful, it has informed

767
00:38:47.679 --> 00:38:49.719
<v Speaker 3>our playbook. He said the word playbook ten thousand times.

768
00:38:49.760 --> 00:38:53.639
<v Speaker 3>I'd interview, and we can't release it because it would

769
00:38:53.679 --> 00:38:57.679
<v Speaker 3>be a distraction and divide the party before the election.

770
00:38:58.519 --> 00:39:01.159
<v Speaker 3>The last part is, yes, it would be a distraction,

771
00:39:01.280 --> 00:39:03.239
<v Speaker 3>but the main reason that's released. It is embarrassing to

772
00:39:03.280 --> 00:39:07.719
<v Speaker 3>Ken Martin or not to come come clean with why

773
00:39:07.800 --> 00:39:09.880
<v Speaker 3>you didn't you you weren't releasing this because it would

774
00:39:09.880 --> 00:39:11.440
<v Speaker 3>be embrassing to Ken Martin, not because it'd be bad

775
00:39:11.480 --> 00:39:11.960
<v Speaker 3>for the party.

776
00:39:12.400 --> 00:39:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's and it is. If it was just

777
00:39:17.559 --> 00:39:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the autopsy and this was like just one incident here,

778
00:39:23.079 --> 00:39:25.079
<v Speaker 1>that would be one thing. But the fact that it

779
00:39:25.119 --> 00:39:28.679
<v Speaker 1>goes to trust issues and credibility, and as Ken says

780
00:39:28.679 --> 00:39:30.519
<v Speaker 1>in his statement, we need to be able to trust

781
00:39:30.559 --> 00:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party and people need to be able to

782
00:39:32.480 --> 00:39:36.840
<v Speaker 1>trust us. Again, it is indicative of a larger issue

783
00:39:37.079 --> 00:39:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that he has had since taking this role as chairman

784
00:39:42.400 --> 00:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>at the DNC. And it looked no further than the

785
00:39:47.480 --> 00:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>April fundraising reports that came out the same day today

786
00:39:52.000 --> 00:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that say, once again, the Democratic National Committee has negative

787
00:39:56.519 --> 00:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>three million dollars in the bank when you account for

788
00:40:00.079 --> 00:40:02.519
<v Speaker 1>or the debts that they owe, and the Republican National

789
00:40:02.559 --> 00:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Committee has one hundred and twenty four million dollars in

790
00:40:04.519 --> 00:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the bank. And then when you look at the fundraising

791
00:40:08.519 --> 00:40:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of the RNC versus the DNC, the RNC has raised many, many, many,

792
00:40:13.760 --> 00:40:17.280
<v Speaker 1>many many more times the amount of money as the DNC.

793
00:40:17.639 --> 00:40:20.119
<v Speaker 1>But when you look at the fundraising between the d

794
00:40:20.199 --> 00:40:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Triple C and the Republican Congressional Campaign Committee, when you

795
00:40:25.800 --> 00:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the two House committees, you know the Republicans have outraised

796
00:40:29.880 --> 00:40:33.039
<v Speaker 1>Democrats by little, but not as much as RNC versus DNC.

797
00:40:33.360 --> 00:40:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with the Senate committees. So it's not a

798
00:40:36.360 --> 00:40:41.079
<v Speaker 1>Democratic party wide problem fundraising problem. It's a DNC problem.

799
00:40:41.440 --> 00:40:43.559
<v Speaker 3>And d in one of the reasons why the DNC

800
00:40:43.800 --> 00:40:46.719
<v Speaker 3>is not able to raise money, and Ken Martin has

801
00:40:46.719 --> 00:40:48.840
<v Speaker 3>disputed this, but many, many the owners have said otherwise

802
00:40:49.280 --> 00:40:53.119
<v Speaker 3>is the autopsy, because the autopsy has bred just frustration

803
00:40:53.199 --> 00:40:55.800
<v Speaker 3>the DNC didn't do it. Questions of trust about Ken Martin.

804
00:40:55.800 --> 00:40:57.480
<v Speaker 3>What are we giving our money for for night getting it?

805
00:40:57.559 --> 00:40:59.599
<v Speaker 3>And this is I mean bury the lead here. But

806
00:40:59.639 --> 00:41:01.840
<v Speaker 3>this is why I think Ken Martin should step down.

807
00:41:02.119 --> 00:41:04.559
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a bridge too far. He cannot

808
00:41:04.599 --> 00:41:07.840
<v Speaker 3>repair the trust here. He's not Everything we've seen here

809
00:41:07.880 --> 00:41:09.920
<v Speaker 3>is he's not the right person for the job. I'm

810
00:41:09.920 --> 00:41:11.679
<v Speaker 3>sorry that seems like a harsh thing to say, but

811
00:41:11.760 --> 00:41:15.800
<v Speaker 3>it is clear Will there's he is an impossible job

812
00:41:16.119 --> 00:41:20.280
<v Speaker 3>being even under we have worked with many many DNC chairs,

813
00:41:20.760 --> 00:41:23.880
<v Speaker 3>even under the best circumstances. The job sucks, ass. It

814
00:41:24.000 --> 00:41:25.960
<v Speaker 3>is really really hard. No one has ever seen a

815
00:41:25.960 --> 00:41:29.079
<v Speaker 3>successful dnch chair if people are hammered for it. But

816
00:41:30.239 --> 00:41:31.880
<v Speaker 3>the thing is is that Ken Martin is now the

817
00:41:31.920 --> 00:41:33.880
<v Speaker 3>distraction that he did not he was trying to avoid.

818
00:41:34.239 --> 00:41:37.679
<v Speaker 3>And because you're the distraction, then you should go like

819
00:41:37.960 --> 00:41:40.280
<v Speaker 3>he said it, Like he says in his post, my

820
00:41:40.400 --> 00:41:42.920
<v Speaker 3>job is winning elections. Well, the best thing for the

821
00:41:43.000 --> 00:41:45.000
<v Speaker 3>d for the Democrats who win elections is to have

822
00:41:45.000 --> 00:41:47.519
<v Speaker 3>a fresh start at the DNC, both now and in

823
00:41:47.519 --> 00:41:50.599
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty eight, where the trusted issue matters so much more.

824
00:41:51.079 --> 00:41:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Because the DNC is going to run the presidential primary.

825
00:41:54.119 --> 00:41:56.960
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna pick, they're gonna set up the debates, they're

826
00:41:56.960 --> 00:41:58.960
<v Speaker 3>going to pick the calendar, which is a huge thing.

827
00:41:59.360 --> 00:42:01.559
<v Speaker 3>They are going to to make decision about how delegates

828
00:42:01.559 --> 00:42:03.360
<v Speaker 3>are alligated. They're going to deal with states to try

829
00:42:03.360 --> 00:42:06.480
<v Speaker 3>to jump the calendar. All of this matters, and when

830
00:42:06.480 --> 00:42:08.960
<v Speaker 3>people don't trust the DNC, as happened in twenty sixteen,

831
00:42:09.519 --> 00:42:11.440
<v Speaker 3>when all of the emails came out as part of

832
00:42:11.519 --> 00:42:16.239
<v Speaker 3>the Russian hacks of DNC emails that show that people

833
00:42:16.239 --> 00:42:19.639
<v Speaker 3>at the DNC were favoring Hillary over Bernie. People didn't

834
00:42:19.639 --> 00:42:21.679
<v Speaker 3>trust the DNC. They didn't trust the process. They thought

835
00:42:21.679 --> 00:42:23.519
<v Speaker 3>it was ragged, and it hurt. It hurt in the

836
00:42:23.519 --> 00:42:26.960
<v Speaker 3>general election. We need people to trust the process. And

837
00:42:27.000 --> 00:42:28.320
<v Speaker 3>I say that as a success fan, but we need

838
00:42:28.320 --> 00:42:29.280
<v Speaker 3>people to trust the process.

839
00:42:29.760 --> 00:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Well. And what he has opened up to now is

840
00:42:33.840 --> 00:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>any candidate who runs for president in twenty twenty eight

841
00:42:36.760 --> 00:42:41.079
<v Speaker 1>who complains about unfairness to the DNC, whether those accusations

842
00:42:41.119 --> 00:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>are fair or not accurate or not. Like, no one's

843
00:42:45.480 --> 00:42:48.519
<v Speaker 1>going to believe Ken Martin because he has this credibility issue, right,

844
00:42:48.719 --> 00:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And same thing with the excuses on the money. Right.

845
00:42:53.079 --> 00:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>He did a whole thing with me in the interview

846
00:42:55.000 --> 00:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>about like you know, at we're actually fine and we're

847
00:42:57.400 --> 00:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>investing in state parties and you need to spend and

848
00:42:59.440 --> 00:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>all this kind off. But like, I don't know, can

849
00:43:02.000 --> 00:43:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe that now? I don't know. He had this

850
00:43:04.360 --> 00:43:07.039
<v Speaker 1>other lie for a long long time and tried to

851
00:43:07.360 --> 00:43:09.119
<v Speaker 1>tried to hide it. I had to cover up this report,

852
00:43:09.760 --> 00:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I guess. After it was released today, there

853
00:43:13.519 --> 00:43:17.599
<v Speaker 1>was a call for DNC members, a private colleges for

854
00:43:17.639 --> 00:43:20.079
<v Speaker 1>the all the all the DNC members and talk to

855
00:43:20.079 --> 00:43:23.559
<v Speaker 1>some people who are on the call, and he basically

856
00:43:23.639 --> 00:43:28.159
<v Speaker 1>just read the statement that he gave CNN essentially and

857
00:43:28.679 --> 00:43:32.599
<v Speaker 1>apologized again, and then also said that that Paul Rivera,

858
00:43:32.679 --> 00:43:35.239
<v Speaker 1>who did who he put in charge of this report,

859
00:43:35.800 --> 00:43:38.119
<v Speaker 1>is no longer helping out at the DNC, because part

860
00:43:38.159 --> 00:43:40.239
<v Speaker 1>of the CNN story said that even after he fucked

861
00:43:40.280 --> 00:43:42.800
<v Speaker 1>up the autopsy, Paul Rivera was still walking around the

862
00:43:42.880 --> 00:43:46.239
<v Speaker 1>DNC like demoralizing staffers just by his presence because they

863
00:43:46.239 --> 00:43:48.360
<v Speaker 1>all knew that he had fucked up so badly. So

864
00:43:48.360 --> 00:43:50.480
<v Speaker 1>he said that Paul Vera is no longer working and

865
00:43:50.519 --> 00:43:54.119
<v Speaker 1>then no questions on the call, no questions from many

866
00:43:54.159 --> 00:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of the DNC members. After this, I also got something

867
00:43:58.000 --> 00:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>from someone of the DNC saying that a lot of

868
00:43:59.880 --> 00:44:03.199
<v Speaker 1>the outlets are mistaken and saying that there's no pathway

869
00:44:03.239 --> 00:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>to removal for Ken, that it's actually just a simple

870
00:44:05.280 --> 00:44:09.079
<v Speaker 1>majority vote of the DNC. So that's interesting. And there's

871
00:44:09.320 --> 00:44:13.079
<v Speaker 1>at least one congressman, Representative Mark Vezi, said that it's

872
00:44:13.119 --> 00:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>time for Ken Martin to go. So I don't know,

873
00:44:15.079 --> 00:44:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I tend to think, do you think his

874
00:44:17.320 --> 00:44:20.559
<v Speaker 1>job is safe? Do you think he'll resign? Like it

875
00:44:20.960 --> 00:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>seems it seems like a tall order, But I don't know.

876
00:44:24.079 --> 00:44:25.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I hope he would be willing to look

877
00:44:25.960 --> 00:44:29.239
<v Speaker 3>at the reality situation and recognize that because of the

878
00:44:29.239 --> 00:44:31.159
<v Speaker 3>mistakes that he made, that the best thing for the

879
00:44:31.199 --> 00:44:34.000
<v Speaker 3>party would be two step down. I don't think he's

880
00:44:34.000 --> 00:44:35.639
<v Speaker 3>going to do that. We're in this mess because he

881
00:44:35.719 --> 00:44:41.360
<v Speaker 3>was trying to protect himself, not the party. So hard

882
00:44:41.360 --> 00:44:44.039
<v Speaker 3>to say. I mean, you know, is the are we

883
00:44:44.039 --> 00:44:46.159
<v Speaker 3>really going to take the even if it's easy, it's

884
00:44:46.159 --> 00:44:48.880
<v Speaker 3>an extraordinary step to remove the DNCA chairs. They didn't

885
00:44:48.880 --> 00:44:51.159
<v Speaker 3>want to do that five months before the midterms. I'd

886
00:44:51.199 --> 00:44:54.239
<v Speaker 3>be surprised. And then I think if he doesn't that

887
00:44:54.599 --> 00:44:58.199
<v Speaker 3>it's a real question before the twenty twenty eight calendar

888
00:44:58.280 --> 00:45:00.000
<v Speaker 3>is set as to whether we have to do something

889
00:45:00.079 --> 00:45:00.800
<v Speaker 3>thing different here.

890
00:45:00.880 --> 00:45:01.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

891
00:45:01.039 --> 00:45:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Also, the other problem is no one seems to want

892
00:45:02.400 --> 00:45:02.719
<v Speaker 3>the job.

893
00:45:02.800 --> 00:45:05.440
<v Speaker 1>That's so you need someone else who would want the job.

894
00:45:05.440 --> 00:45:08.119
<v Speaker 1>You need someone else who You need the donors to

895
00:45:08.159 --> 00:45:10.119
<v Speaker 1>say that if someone else takes the job, then the

896
00:45:10.199 --> 00:45:13.079
<v Speaker 1>money will start flowing again and they'll start donating, right

897
00:45:13.280 --> 00:45:14.800
<v Speaker 1>because you don't want the new You don't want a

898
00:45:14.840 --> 00:45:17.239
<v Speaker 1>new chair to still be stuck at the same problem financially,

899
00:45:17.760 --> 00:45:20.159
<v Speaker 1>and it does. You know, people have been complaining this

900
00:45:20.199 --> 00:45:22.559
<v Speaker 1>is a distraction. Distrection like it does at some point

901
00:45:22.639 --> 00:45:25.400
<v Speaker 1>eat up a lot of time and energy, you know,

902
00:45:25.639 --> 00:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>as we're getting close to the midterms. But the challenges

903
00:45:28.880 --> 00:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>after the midterms happen. If they are as expected and

904
00:45:32.880 --> 00:45:36.440
<v Speaker 1>things go well again, you can just you can hear

905
00:45:36.519 --> 00:45:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the DNC taking credit for it in advance, and they

906
00:45:39.519 --> 00:45:41.519
<v Speaker 1>will have nothing to do with the victory. Again. If

907
00:45:41.519 --> 00:45:43.280
<v Speaker 1>things don't go well, it's still not the DNC's fault.

908
00:45:43.320 --> 00:45:45.079
<v Speaker 1>They just don't have that much to do with with

909
00:45:45.199 --> 00:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>midterm elections at all. But as soon as the midterms

910
00:45:47.960 --> 00:45:51.880
<v Speaker 1>are over, we're fucking into the presidential primary and people

911
00:45:51.880 --> 00:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>are gonna start putting their campaigns together and you're gonna

912
00:45:53.880 --> 00:45:55.280
<v Speaker 1>need the calendars and all the stuff that you were

913
00:45:55.280 --> 00:45:58.320
<v Speaker 1>just talking about. And so I don't know, it's just

914
00:45:59.280 --> 00:46:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it's fucking mess, fucking mess. That's so stupid, And we're

915
00:46:04.000 --> 00:46:06.119
<v Speaker 1>not digging into the actual autopsy because it's a joke.

916
00:46:06.440 --> 00:46:10.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, it's not worth talking about anything in it

917
00:46:10.199 --> 00:46:12.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's not endorsed by the DNC or anyone else.

918
00:46:12.960 --> 00:46:16.599
<v Speaker 1>Is just like Paul Rivera's ramblings that are the basis

919
00:46:16.599 --> 00:46:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of him talking to just some people involved with the

920
00:46:19.840 --> 00:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four campaign who aren't even most of the

921
00:46:21.920 --> 00:46:23.039
<v Speaker 1>senior people on the campaign.

922
00:46:23.079 --> 00:46:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's been a lot, I would say, to people

923
00:46:24.840 --> 00:46:26.400
<v Speaker 3>who are interested in what happened. There's been a lot

924
00:46:26.440 --> 00:46:29.440
<v Speaker 3>of actual autopsies from outside groups. Way to Win has

925
00:46:29.440 --> 00:46:33.280
<v Speaker 3>one Catalyst has their report. We talked about Rob Flaarerty's

926
00:46:33.280 --> 00:46:37.639
<v Speaker 3>Bullwark piece the other day. There's one from uh I

927
00:46:37.679 --> 00:46:39.760
<v Speaker 3>think the Shooting Victory Fund, if I'm saying that correctly,

928
00:46:40.440 --> 00:46:43.639
<v Speaker 3>has has one. There's actually some pretty good, pretty exhaustive

929
00:46:43.639 --> 00:46:45.559
<v Speaker 3>work about what happened twenty twenty four. That's that people

930
00:46:45.559 --> 00:46:47.639
<v Speaker 3>want they should go look at. But looking at this

931
00:46:47.760 --> 00:46:50.440
<v Speaker 3>version is not worth doing because you could look for

932
00:46:50.480 --> 00:46:52.199
<v Speaker 3>you could try, I would say, read the executive summary,

933
00:46:52.199 --> 00:46:53.320
<v Speaker 3>but that was also not provided.

934
00:46:53.400 --> 00:46:56.519
<v Speaker 1>So right, right, all right, Well you think you'll come

935
00:46:56.519 --> 00:46:58.119
<v Speaker 1>back on the pod?

936
00:46:58.719 --> 00:47:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe open.

937
00:47:00.920 --> 00:47:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you guys will meet up again at next year's grander.

938
00:47:02.760 --> 00:47:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Party, fingers crossed. Maybe they'll be alcohol this time, all right.

939
00:47:06.920 --> 00:47:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Speaking to democrats being unhappy with Democrats, the New York

940
00:47:09.880 --> 00:47:12.519
<v Speaker 1>Times released new results from their latest poll that we

941
00:47:12.559 --> 00:47:16.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about on Tuesday. This installment is focused on Democrats

942
00:47:16.760 --> 00:47:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and independents who say they're planning to support Democratic candidates

943
00:47:21.360 --> 00:47:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in the fall. Overall, more than half of these voters

944
00:47:24.559 --> 00:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>disapprove of the Democratic Party. More than half also said

945
00:47:27.519 --> 00:47:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the party should move to the center rather than move

946
00:47:29.800 --> 00:47:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to the left, in order to win the twenty twenty

947
00:47:31.800 --> 00:47:35.679
<v Speaker 1>eight presidential election, but when asked that question about specific issues,

948
00:47:36.320 --> 00:47:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the results were more varied. On economic issues, thirty six

949
00:47:40.800 --> 00:47:43.840
<v Speaker 1>percent said move to the left, pretty competitive with the

950
00:47:43.880 --> 00:47:46.199
<v Speaker 1>forty two percent who said moved to the center. And

951
00:47:46.239 --> 00:47:49.519
<v Speaker 1>on healthcare, forty five percent of Democratic voters want to

952
00:47:49.519 --> 00:47:51.599
<v Speaker 1>move to the left, compared to just twenty seven percent

953
00:47:51.840 --> 00:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>who said move to the center and twenty six percent

954
00:47:55.000 --> 00:47:57.320
<v Speaker 1>who said don't move in either direction. Health Care was

955
00:47:57.360 --> 00:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the issue where the biggest percentage of voters thought the

956
00:48:01.000 --> 00:48:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Democratic parties should move to the left. And then I

957
00:48:04.760 --> 00:48:07.159
<v Speaker 1>would say economy was next. And then when you get

958
00:48:07.159 --> 00:48:11.199
<v Speaker 1>to issues like crime, I think was the top issue

959
00:48:11.320 --> 00:48:13.840
<v Speaker 1>where the most the highest percentage of Democrats said that

960
00:48:13.840 --> 00:48:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the party should move to the right or at least

961
00:48:15.840 --> 00:48:20.599
<v Speaker 1>moved to the center. Sorry, and then immigration and actually,

962
00:48:20.639 --> 00:48:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you know we can talk about this too, but trans

963
00:48:23.280 --> 00:48:27.079
<v Speaker 1>issues was not as there weren't as many people and

964
00:48:27.159 --> 00:48:29.159
<v Speaker 1>this would go against sort of the prevailing narrative. But

965
00:48:29.199 --> 00:48:31.239
<v Speaker 1>there weren't as many Democrats who wanted the party to

966
00:48:31.280 --> 00:48:34.440
<v Speaker 1>move to the center on trans issues as there were

967
00:48:34.440 --> 00:48:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on crime and immigration is still the top two. So

968
00:48:38.840 --> 00:48:42.559
<v Speaker 1>what did you make of this novel line of questioning

969
00:48:42.639 --> 00:48:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in the poll which they did ask voters like, how

970
00:48:45.480 --> 00:48:47.639
<v Speaker 1>do you personally feel about the direction of the party

971
00:48:47.679 --> 00:48:49.559
<v Speaker 1>on these issues and what direction do you think the

972
00:48:49.559 --> 00:48:52.719
<v Speaker 1>party should move in? And then they asked which direction

973
00:48:52.800 --> 00:48:56.079
<v Speaker 1>you think the party should move to win? So they

974
00:48:56.079 --> 00:48:59.239
<v Speaker 1>did both, but the move to win basically asking voters

975
00:48:59.280 --> 00:49:02.039
<v Speaker 1>to be pundits is a is a new one.

976
00:49:02.519 --> 00:49:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I generally hate that idea, like it's always it's

977
00:49:05.760 --> 00:49:08.760
<v Speaker 3>just it's just I'm much rather more, much more interested

978
00:49:08.760 --> 00:49:12.519
<v Speaker 3>in what voters actually think, because you would like to

979
00:49:12.559 --> 00:49:16.800
<v Speaker 3>believe that that's what informs voting behavior. But I will

980
00:49:16.840 --> 00:49:23.159
<v Speaker 3>say that this is a very interesting finding one. It

981
00:49:23.280 --> 00:49:28.039
<v Speaker 3>just proves that among Democrats, the narrative that Democrats lost

982
00:49:28.119 --> 00:49:31.000
<v Speaker 3>because we were too far the left, too woke to

983
00:49:31.199 --> 00:49:34.760
<v Speaker 3>liberal has taken hold among Democrats that the you know, a

984
00:49:34.800 --> 00:49:38.440
<v Speaker 3>plurality of Democrats believe that, at least on a core

985
00:49:38.480 --> 00:49:40.760
<v Speaker 3>set of issues. And so it's just it's like, that's

986
00:49:40.760 --> 00:49:42.800
<v Speaker 3>an interesting to out of point that that has. You know,

987
00:49:42.840 --> 00:49:45.800
<v Speaker 3>there was this battle after the election. We were we

988
00:49:45.880 --> 00:49:49.480
<v Speaker 3>two moderate or two left, and at least for the

989
00:49:49.519 --> 00:49:52.239
<v Speaker 3>people responding to this poll, it was clearly the problem

990
00:49:52.320 --> 00:49:55.000
<v Speaker 3>was we were too left, not left enough. And the

991
00:49:55.079 --> 00:49:57.000
<v Speaker 3>other reason why I think this is somewhat informative is

992
00:49:57.400 --> 00:50:01.440
<v Speaker 3>electability is become the pre eminent issue in democratic politics.

993
00:50:02.400 --> 00:50:04.559
<v Speaker 3>You know, it was a huge issue in the Texas

994
00:50:04.559 --> 00:50:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Senate primary. It was a huge issue in the main

995
00:50:07.840 --> 00:50:10.559
<v Speaker 3>Senate primary before Janet Mills dropped out. It's a giant

996
00:50:10.599 --> 00:50:14.360
<v Speaker 3>issue in the Iowa primary that happened a couple of weeks.

997
00:50:14.360 --> 00:50:17.000
<v Speaker 3>And it's it's a big issue in the Michigan Senate

998
00:50:17.039 --> 00:50:21.679
<v Speaker 3>primary that is in August. And so it's interesting to

999
00:50:21.719 --> 00:50:26.119
<v Speaker 3>know what voters think makes someone electable or in this case,

1000
00:50:26.159 --> 00:50:29.840
<v Speaker 3>may make them think someone is less electable. You know,

1001
00:50:29.960 --> 00:50:31.559
<v Speaker 3>looking at the numbers, it.

1002
00:50:31.320 --> 00:50:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Is did you dive into the cross tabs?

1003
00:50:34.599 --> 00:50:37.719
<v Speaker 3>The cross stabs are not that they're not that surprising.

1004
00:50:38.639 --> 00:50:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I figured you did, but I did too. Yeah, I

1005
00:50:42.119 --> 00:50:44.320
<v Speaker 1>was ready to nerd out about some crosstabs if people.

1006
00:50:44.199 --> 00:50:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Some real nuggets, but it's sort of it's what you is.

1007
00:50:48.280 --> 00:50:50.239
<v Speaker 3>The findings are kind of across the board. What would

1008
00:50:50.239 --> 00:50:52.400
<v Speaker 3>be interesting would be if there was one group who

1009
00:50:52.440 --> 00:50:54.159
<v Speaker 3>really thought they should move to the left, but really

1010
00:50:54.239 --> 00:50:56.119
<v Speaker 3>just come of across the board people or not move

1011
00:50:56.159 --> 00:50:58.400
<v Speaker 3>to the right or whatever it is, but that everyone

1012
00:50:58.480 --> 00:51:02.119
<v Speaker 3>kind of all feels the same way, just in varying degrees.

1013
00:51:02.760 --> 00:51:07.079
<v Speaker 1>The college split on these issues is notable to me. Yeah,

1014
00:51:07.360 --> 00:51:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that non college voters tend to want the party to

1015
00:51:11.519 --> 00:51:15.480
<v Speaker 1>move towards the center, and college voters want the party

1016
00:51:15.519 --> 00:51:18.119
<v Speaker 1>to move to the left, and then it splits on

1017
00:51:18.800 --> 00:51:22.280
<v Speaker 1>racial and education lines in a very interesting way, which

1018
00:51:22.320 --> 00:51:26.719
<v Speaker 1>is non college black voters and non college Latino voters

1019
00:51:26.840 --> 00:51:29.440
<v Speaker 1>along with non college white voters very much want the

1020
00:51:29.480 --> 00:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>party to move to the center. And really the only

1021
00:51:33.039 --> 00:51:36.400
<v Speaker 1>demographic group that most wants the party to move to

1022
00:51:36.400 --> 00:51:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the left is white college grads. Also some black and

1023
00:51:41.320 --> 00:51:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic college grads, but it's just a larger chunk of

1024
00:51:43.639 --> 00:51:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the electorate is white and more with.

1025
00:51:45.360 --> 00:51:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Younger people all sq younger.

1026
00:51:47.559 --> 00:51:52.320
<v Speaker 1>And all these Yeah, and particularly on issues again against

1027
00:51:52.360 --> 00:51:56.159
<v Speaker 1>the prevailing narrative on issues of immigration, and crime. Yep,

1028
00:51:57.440 --> 00:52:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you see you see that, you see black and you know,

1029
00:52:00.679 --> 00:52:03.199
<v Speaker 1>non college Democratic voters say they want the party to

1030
00:52:03.239 --> 00:52:03.840
<v Speaker 1>move to the center.

1031
00:52:04.159 --> 00:52:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yes, yes, I mean that is the I guess

1032
00:52:07.440 --> 00:52:09.360
<v Speaker 3>I thought I felt like we were past that prevailing

1033
00:52:09.400 --> 00:52:11.920
<v Speaker 3>narrative or that even that narrative is kind of but

1034
00:52:11.960 --> 00:52:14.159
<v Speaker 3>I guess, I guess it depends on where you're getting

1035
00:52:14.159 --> 00:52:15.199
<v Speaker 3>your news these days.

1036
00:52:15.000 --> 00:52:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, just way till we get to the next primary.

1037
00:52:17.599 --> 00:52:20.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, and it's like, obviously liketability is going

1038
00:52:20.159 --> 00:52:23.719
<v Speaker 3>to hang over the twenty twenty eight primary in a

1039
00:52:23.800 --> 00:52:27.480
<v Speaker 3>massive way, and so this this will inform that. I

1040
00:52:27.519 --> 00:52:30.920
<v Speaker 3>think the healthcare one is very interesting. On economic issues,

1041
00:52:30.920 --> 00:52:34.119
<v Speaker 3>it's only a six point spread, which I think is

1042
00:52:34.159 --> 00:52:36.800
<v Speaker 3>also notable. And then what I found also interesting is

1043
00:52:36.840 --> 00:52:42.440
<v Speaker 3>that there is they ask people if they asked Democrats

1044
00:52:42.480 --> 00:52:44.960
<v Speaker 3>if they thought the economic system in the country was

1045
00:52:45.360 --> 00:52:48.000
<v Speaker 3>generally unfair to most Americans eighty eight percent yes, only

1046
00:52:48.039 --> 00:52:50.639
<v Speaker 3>eleven percent said fair to most Americans, and whether the

1047
00:52:50.679 --> 00:52:55.800
<v Speaker 3>political and economics system needs to be changed in maybe eighties,

1048
00:52:55.880 --> 00:52:58.519
<v Speaker 3>So sixty three percent said major changes, twenty percent said

1049
00:52:58.519 --> 00:53:01.280
<v Speaker 3>torn down completely, in fifteen per sense said minor or

1050
00:53:01.639 --> 00:53:04.199
<v Speaker 3>minor changes. And one percent said no changes. Who that

1051
00:53:04.239 --> 00:53:06.639
<v Speaker 3>person is which Democrat thinks there has no changes, I'll

1052
00:53:06.639 --> 00:53:10.559
<v Speaker 3>be interested in. But I think there is this paradox here,

1053
00:53:10.599 --> 00:53:12.880
<v Speaker 3>which is you have people saying we think the party

1054
00:53:12.920 --> 00:53:16.360
<v Speaker 3>should move right on certain issues, but there is an

1055
00:53:16.440 --> 00:53:21.320
<v Speaker 3>appetite and it for big, bold ideas on the economy

1056
00:53:21.360 --> 00:53:25.880
<v Speaker 3>and healthcare and like, people want real change, and so

1057
00:53:26.639 --> 00:53:31.039
<v Speaker 3>nibbling around the edges is not going to be sufficient.

1058
00:53:31.559 --> 00:53:35.039
<v Speaker 3>Both in the Democratic primary and the general people want

1059
00:53:35.039 --> 00:53:37.599
<v Speaker 3>to see that you understand the scale of the problems

1060
00:53:37.599 --> 00:53:39.719
<v Speaker 3>affecting their lives, the ways in which the system is

1061
00:53:39.719 --> 00:53:41.760
<v Speaker 3>broken and corrupt, and you have big ideas. So the

1062
00:53:41.840 --> 00:53:45.000
<v Speaker 3>sort of you know, not to pick on Kamala Harris's

1063
00:53:45.000 --> 00:53:48.000
<v Speaker 3>economic team, but like this is what not to do.

1064
00:53:48.360 --> 00:53:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Is we're going to offer credits tax credits for home

1065
00:53:52.519 --> 00:53:55.679
<v Speaker 3>for first time home buyers. It's a good policy theoretically,

1066
00:53:55.719 --> 00:53:59.559
<v Speaker 3>but it just seems small compared to what people actually want.

1067
00:53:59.679 --> 00:54:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Build more houses would be a better problem.

1068
00:54:01.559 --> 00:54:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, that would be a better That would be a

1069
00:54:02.920 --> 00:54:03.480
<v Speaker 3>better policy.

1070
00:54:03.639 --> 00:54:07.079
<v Speaker 1>You can do both, Yeah, you can do both. But yeah,

1071
00:54:07.079 --> 00:54:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean there was a line in here in the

1072
00:54:08.320 --> 00:54:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in the right up of the piece of the poll,

1073
00:54:10.039 --> 00:54:13.679
<v Speaker 1>which was when presented with two opposing economic visions, more

1074
00:54:13.719 --> 00:54:16.760
<v Speaker 1>than two thirds of Democratic supporters now sixty five sixty

1075
00:54:16.760 --> 00:54:19.119
<v Speaker 1>six percent said they favored a candidate who would go

1076
00:54:19.199 --> 00:54:22.559
<v Speaker 1>after corporate monopolies and price gouging. Well, just thirty percent

1077
00:54:22.559 --> 00:54:25.599
<v Speaker 1>preferred candidate who promised to lower prices by easing housing

1078
00:54:25.679 --> 00:54:29.480
<v Speaker 1>regulations and expanding energy production. Now you know some of

1079
00:54:29.519 --> 00:54:31.519
<v Speaker 1>this is in wording that that doesn't that doesn't sound

1080
00:54:31.599 --> 00:54:35.039
<v Speaker 1>very exciting to ease housing regulations and expand energy production,

1081
00:54:35.400 --> 00:54:37.679
<v Speaker 1>but just to get people a baseline, because I thought

1082
00:54:37.679 --> 00:54:40.119
<v Speaker 1>this was interesting, So they asked, like, where do you

1083
00:54:40.360 --> 00:54:41.960
<v Speaker 1>how do you think about the party? Is it too

1084
00:54:42.000 --> 00:54:43.800
<v Speaker 1>far left, is it too far right? Or is it

1085
00:54:43.840 --> 00:54:47.400
<v Speaker 1>not too far either way? Fifty five percent said not

1086
00:54:47.480 --> 00:54:51.400
<v Speaker 1>too far either way, twenty percent said too left, seventeen

1087
00:54:51.480 --> 00:54:55.199
<v Speaker 1>percent said to right. So right there, you're a candidate

1088
00:54:55.239 --> 00:54:58.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to win the party's nomination. You got like a

1089
00:54:58.280 --> 00:55:01.639
<v Speaker 1>little more than half of the electorate that you're trying

1090
00:55:01.679 --> 00:55:05.559
<v Speaker 1>to get who thinks the party is ideologically good where

1091
00:55:05.559 --> 00:55:08.639
<v Speaker 1>it is right now, and then you've got almost similar

1092
00:55:08.679 --> 00:55:11.679
<v Speaker 1>percentages on either side. So that is a tough thing

1093
00:55:11.679 --> 00:55:15.559
<v Speaker 1>to navigate. I also thought the delta between when they

1094
00:55:15.559 --> 00:55:18.280
<v Speaker 1>ask people what would you personally liked where would you

1095
00:55:18.360 --> 00:55:21.239
<v Speaker 1>personally like to see the party move and to win,

1096
00:55:21.280 --> 00:55:22.920
<v Speaker 1>where would you like to see the party move was

1097
00:55:22.920 --> 00:55:27.639
<v Speaker 1>actually not that different. So twenty eight percent said they

1098
00:55:27.719 --> 00:55:30.119
<v Speaker 1>personally like to see the party move to the left,

1099
00:55:30.519 --> 00:55:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and twenty five percent said that to win, the party

1100
00:55:34.000 --> 00:55:37.800
<v Speaker 1>should move to the left. And then forty seven percent

1101
00:55:37.840 --> 00:55:40.239
<v Speaker 1>said they personally wanted to move to the center, and

1102
00:55:40.320 --> 00:55:43.719
<v Speaker 1>fifty two percent said to win, they want to move

1103
00:55:43.719 --> 00:55:46.199
<v Speaker 1>to the center. So you do have a percentage of

1104
00:55:46.239 --> 00:55:49.079
<v Speaker 1>people who were saying, oh, personally, I want the party

1105
00:55:49.159 --> 00:55:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to be more left, but to win it should move

1106
00:55:51.519 --> 00:55:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to the center. But not a ton It's the delta

1107
00:55:54.519 --> 00:55:55.679
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as big as I thought it would be.

1108
00:55:56.519 --> 00:55:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's I mean for the reasons we talked about

1109
00:55:59.039 --> 00:56:01.440
<v Speaker 3>for many years, which is the media and Democrat is

1110
00:56:01.480 --> 00:56:05.159
<v Speaker 3>a as a voter that didn't go to college, and

1111
00:56:05.199 --> 00:56:08.559
<v Speaker 3>it's more moderate than most people listening to this podcast,

1112
00:56:08.599 --> 00:56:12.199
<v Speaker 3>and we are personally and that that's the party that

1113
00:56:12.280 --> 00:56:17.400
<v Speaker 3>nominated Joe Biden in twenty twenty, and that that remains true.

1114
00:56:17.400 --> 00:56:19.159
<v Speaker 3>I think these questions are a little confusing and how

1115
00:56:19.159 --> 00:56:22.719
<v Speaker 3>they're awarded like, but it is. It is just notable

1116
00:56:22.760 --> 00:56:24.840
<v Speaker 3>that fifty hid percent are generally okay with the direction

1117
00:56:24.840 --> 00:56:27.239
<v Speaker 3>of the party. Is now, how many of those fifty

1118
00:56:27.280 --> 00:56:28.960
<v Speaker 3>percent can name what the direction of the party actually

1119
00:56:28.960 --> 00:56:29.760
<v Speaker 3>fucking is right now?

1120
00:56:30.039 --> 00:56:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's good. I was just gonna say. The other

1121
00:56:32.280 --> 00:56:33.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that stands out in some of the questions that

1122
00:56:33.960 --> 00:56:36.920
<v Speaker 1>they asked is, and we always talk about this, but

1123
00:56:36.920 --> 00:56:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a good reminder for everyone, is how like, those

1124
00:56:39.840 --> 00:56:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of you listening to this podcast, you are so different

1125
00:56:44.519 --> 00:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>than like seventy percent of the rest of the electorate

1126
00:56:48.079 --> 00:56:51.199
<v Speaker 1>in that you pay closer attention to politics and know

1127
00:56:51.320 --> 00:56:54.360
<v Speaker 1>more about what's going on in politics day to day

1128
00:56:54.559 --> 00:56:57.119
<v Speaker 1>than most of the people who will show up and

1129
00:56:57.199 --> 00:57:02.679
<v Speaker 1>vote in elections. So they asked about Schumer and Schumer's

1130
00:57:02.679 --> 00:57:06.840
<v Speaker 1>approval rating in this poll among just Democrats and independence

1131
00:57:06.840 --> 00:57:09.199
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to vote Democrat is twenty six percent

1132
00:57:09.400 --> 00:57:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in favor, thirty one percent opposed. And you're like, well,

1133
00:57:14.920 --> 00:57:17.199
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of low. Thirty five percent never heard of

1134
00:57:17.239 --> 00:57:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer, Joe Rogan eleven percent approved, forty eight percent disapproved,

1135
00:57:23.159 --> 00:57:26.039
<v Speaker 1>the rest never heard of Joe Rogan, Nick what is it?

1136
00:57:26.119 --> 00:57:28.039
<v Speaker 3>Nine percent approve approved.

1137
00:57:28.039 --> 00:57:30.079
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even see Fuentas in there. Yeah, is in

1138
00:57:30.119 --> 00:57:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the crosstabs they asked, I guess, just for fun, have

1139
00:57:33.000 --> 00:57:35.559
<v Speaker 1>you heard maybe Ezra got this question? And have you

1140
00:57:35.599 --> 00:57:39.639
<v Speaker 1>heard of the abundance movement? Ninety one percent of people

1141
00:57:39.800 --> 00:57:42.679
<v Speaker 1>in that they pulled, all of whom again, all these

1142
00:57:42.679 --> 00:57:44.800
<v Speaker 1>people said they're going to vote in the midterms. Ninety

1143
00:57:44.800 --> 00:57:48.679
<v Speaker 1>one percent never heard of the abundance movement. So it's

1144
00:57:48.719 --> 00:57:53.199
<v Speaker 1>just it's it's a good a good reminder that people

1145
00:57:53.199 --> 00:57:56.199
<v Speaker 1>who are even in Democratic even in mid terms, right,

1146
00:57:56.199 --> 00:57:59.000
<v Speaker 1>which is a more engaged electorate, even mid term voters,

1147
00:57:59.000 --> 00:58:01.159
<v Speaker 1>are just not paying as much attention to all the

1148
00:58:01.199 --> 00:58:05.400
<v Speaker 1>shit that we talk about every week. These are registered voters, right, yeah,

1149
00:58:05.440 --> 00:58:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but registered voters who said they're going to vote in

1150
00:58:07.480 --> 00:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the midterm. The Israel numbers crazy. Only twenty percent favor

1151
00:58:12.840 --> 00:58:16.760
<v Speaker 1>more aid to Israel, seventy four percent do not, fifteen

1152
00:58:16.880 --> 00:58:23.000
<v Speaker 1>percent sympathize with Israel over the Palestinians, and sixty percent

1153
00:58:23.920 --> 00:58:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Palestinians over Israeli's The highest group of support for Israel

1154
00:58:29.239 --> 00:58:33.039
<v Speaker 1>of any demographic is sixty five plus. Unsurprising, there even

1155
00:58:33.039 --> 00:58:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that group sixty five plus only twenty seven percent, so

1156
00:58:35.880 --> 00:58:39.079
<v Speaker 1>that they have more sympathy for Israel than the Palestinians.

1157
00:58:39.079 --> 00:58:42.519
<v Speaker 1>That is just a just a massive shift on that issue.

1158
00:58:43.119 --> 00:58:45.599
<v Speaker 3>Thank Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and BBNET Yaho for that.

1159
00:58:46.000 --> 00:58:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is true. And then forty nine percent favor socialism,

1160
00:58:51.880 --> 00:58:55.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty two percent no socialism, and then the rest had

1161
00:58:55.599 --> 00:58:56.159
<v Speaker 1>no opinion.

1162
00:58:56.320 --> 00:58:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Every age group of Democrats has a favoralle opinion, so

1163
00:58:59.559 --> 00:59:01.960
<v Speaker 3>they'll support socialism. They have a favorable opinion of it.

1164
00:59:01.960 --> 00:59:03.960
<v Speaker 1>That's which I think, thank you, Which is that is important.

1165
00:59:04.079 --> 00:59:05.559
<v Speaker 3>That maybe a distinction a lot of difference in the

1166
00:59:05.599 --> 00:59:07.719
<v Speaker 3>ads that will be running, but I think it does

1167
00:59:07.840 --> 00:59:10.320
<v Speaker 3>matter on what people say. But yeah, even voters over

1168
00:59:10.360 --> 00:59:13.239
<v Speaker 3>sixty five, if I remember correctly, Democrats over sixty five

1169
00:59:13.760 --> 00:59:17.599
<v Speaker 3>by a more narrow margin, have a favorable view of socialism.

1170
00:59:17.760 --> 00:59:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh, last one, I wanted to ask you about forty

1171
00:59:21.800 --> 00:59:24.119
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of voters that it was important to choose

1172
00:59:24.199 --> 00:59:28.480
<v Speaker 1>leaders with a fresh approach. Forty eight percent want to

1173
00:59:28.519 --> 00:59:30.159
<v Speaker 1>choose leaders with proven experience.

1174
00:59:30.239 --> 00:59:31.239
<v Speaker 3>It's a real.

1175
00:59:33.119 --> 00:59:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And guess which guess what young people wanted experience? Yeah,

1176
00:59:39.440 --> 00:59:41.760
<v Speaker 1>by like a lot more than other age groups. It

1177
00:59:41.800 --> 00:59:43.000
<v Speaker 1>was a sort of like I think that.

1178
00:59:43.000 --> 00:59:46.400
<v Speaker 3>This one is. I think this is a confusing question,

1179
00:59:46.599 --> 00:59:48.199
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think it says exactly what you think

1180
00:59:48.199 --> 00:59:54.000
<v Speaker 3>it says. I think the backdrop for this is our

1181
00:59:54.039 --> 00:59:56.719
<v Speaker 3>reality TV show president who has no real experience in

1182
00:59:56.760 --> 00:59:59.440
<v Speaker 3>his fucking app leftion right every single day, and so

1183
00:59:59.599 --> 01:00:03.440
<v Speaker 3>I think I think the better of the question that

1184
01:00:03.559 --> 01:00:06.199
<v Speaker 3>will be more interesting as we think about the twenty

1185
01:00:06.280 --> 01:00:09.519
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight Democratic crimeries inside do you want someone who

1186
01:00:09.559 --> 01:00:12.360
<v Speaker 3>is a part of the establishment or agn'tscy establishment? I

1187
01:00:12.400 --> 01:00:15.320
<v Speaker 3>think that's a because everyone is, everyone who's running is

1188
01:00:15.360 --> 01:00:17.960
<v Speaker 3>going to have some answer on experience. It's just what

1189
01:00:18.079 --> 01:00:20.920
<v Speaker 3>experience means, Like we saw this in two thousand and eight,

1190
01:00:21.360 --> 01:00:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Like everyone can define experience the way they do, and

1191
01:00:23.320 --> 01:00:24.840
<v Speaker 3>then you either sell it or you don't, because if

1192
01:00:24.840 --> 01:00:27.519
<v Speaker 3>you don't, no one wants someone with insufficient experience.

1193
01:00:28.559 --> 01:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>That is true. That is true. While we're on this topic,

1194
01:00:31.800 --> 01:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit of a mess brewing in the Democratic

1195
01:00:33.480 --> 01:00:37.679
<v Speaker 1>primary in Texas's redrawn thirty fifth district, where sheriff's deputy

1196
01:00:37.760 --> 01:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Garcia is now in a runoff with a sex

1197
01:00:40.280 --> 01:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>therapist named Maureen Galindo, who has posted wildly anti Semitic

1198
01:00:44.880 --> 01:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>comments online. Including calling Judaism the Synagogue of Satan and

1199
01:00:49.320 --> 01:00:52.639
<v Speaker 1>promising to turn an ICED attention center into quote a

1200
01:00:52.679 --> 01:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>prison for American Zionists and former ICE officers, adding quote

1201
01:00:57.400 --> 01:01:00.719
<v Speaker 1>it will also be a castration processing center for pedophiles,

1202
01:01:01.039 --> 01:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>which will probably be most of the Zionists. Disgusting. I'm

1203
01:01:04.679 --> 01:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a serious superPAC called Lead Left, which was formed earlier

1204
01:01:07.800 --> 01:01:10.119
<v Speaker 1>this month and whose website initially linked to the Republican

1205
01:01:10.159 --> 01:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>platform win Red, has now spent about six hundred thousand

1206
01:01:13.920 --> 01:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars to boost Galindou. Demoline super PACs have now just

1207
01:01:17.920 --> 01:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>about matched that spending to defeat Galindo, and everyone from

1208
01:01:21.480 --> 01:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>James Tellerico to Hakim Jeffreys to AOC has condemned her.

1209
01:01:26.400 --> 01:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of this?

1210
01:01:27.639 --> 01:01:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Uh, it's a mess.

1211
01:01:31.320 --> 01:01:34.159
<v Speaker 3>It's an absolute mess. I mean, good for everyone for

1212
01:01:34.199 --> 01:01:37.400
<v Speaker 3>speaking up and trying to defeat this person. The Republicans

1213
01:01:37.440 --> 01:01:39.800
<v Speaker 3>are pretty devious in what they're doing. They're going to

1214
01:01:39.880 --> 01:01:42.000
<v Speaker 3>do this in multiple places around the country. I've already

1215
01:01:42.000 --> 01:01:43.679
<v Speaker 3>tried to do it in a couple of states, including Pennsylvania.

1216
01:01:44.400 --> 01:01:46.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we have been involved in democratic groups, have

1217
01:01:46.679 --> 01:01:49.199
<v Speaker 3>been involved in primaries before, so this is not beyond

1218
01:01:49.239 --> 01:01:52.239
<v Speaker 3>the bound beyond the bounds of what's acceptable or what's appropriate.

1219
01:01:53.079 --> 01:01:55.000
<v Speaker 3>But add us to the list of people condemning her

1220
01:01:55.039 --> 01:01:56.079
<v Speaker 3>and hoping she does not win.

1221
01:01:56.440 --> 01:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and if you are in that district, if you're

1222
01:01:58.360 --> 01:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a voter in that district, if you know voters in

1223
01:01:59.840 --> 01:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that restrict, like tell them to go vote for Johnny Garcia.

1224
01:02:03.039 --> 01:02:04.800
<v Speaker 3>She got more votes in the primary.

1225
01:02:04.880 --> 01:02:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, that's what That's what we're all

1226
01:02:06.719 --> 01:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>worried about. This is on this is on Tuesday. She

1227
01:02:09.119 --> 01:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>got so this is the runoff, and she got more

1228
01:02:11.400 --> 01:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>votes than him the first time around, and so, you know,

1229
01:02:14.320 --> 01:02:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I think I can't even begin. The most generous explanation

1230
01:02:20.400 --> 01:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is that people who voted for her did not know

1231
01:02:23.440 --> 01:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>about all the comments and all the positions I hope,

1232
01:02:27.119 --> 01:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and that maybe and that she obviously had a lot

1233
01:02:29.480 --> 01:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>of money and spending behind her, so her name ID

1234
01:02:31.760 --> 01:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>was better than Johnny Garcia, so he needs better name ID.

1235
01:02:35.639 --> 01:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this controversy getting kicked up will help sort of

1236
01:02:38.840 --> 01:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>focus people, and people in that thirty fifth district will

1237
01:02:41.480 --> 01:02:43.159
<v Speaker 1>we'll hear about this and be like, oh, that's crazy,

1238
01:02:43.199 --> 01:02:45.199
<v Speaker 1>We've got to vote for Johnny Garcia. But anyway, we

1239
01:02:45.199 --> 01:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>should everyone should get the word out, because this isn't

1240
01:02:48.440 --> 01:02:52.039
<v Speaker 1>just someone who's like crazy lefty, this is like a

1241
01:02:52.559 --> 01:02:56.119
<v Speaker 1>fucking concentration camps for Zionists. Are you fucking kidding me?

1242
01:02:56.280 --> 01:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Like it's awful? And Republicans of course are so fucking

1243
01:02:59.800 --> 01:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>say and having a field day with this and being like, oh, Democrats,

1244
01:03:03.480 --> 01:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are the ones voting for the anti Semites and

1245
01:03:05.840 --> 01:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the people who want to put Jews in camps, not Republicans.

1246
01:03:09.400 --> 01:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And meanwhile, of course not saying anything about the fact

1247
01:03:11.880 --> 01:03:14.679
<v Speaker 1>that there's this like mysterious super pac linked to the

1248
01:03:14.719 --> 01:03:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Republican group when read that is spending too on this race,

1249
01:03:18.719 --> 01:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>which is just crazy. So Johnny Garcia go check it out.

1250
01:03:23.800 --> 01:03:27.159
<v Speaker 1>All right, One last topic today. There are two very

1251
01:03:27.199 --> 01:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>notable weddings taking place this Memorial Day weekend. As we've said,

1252
01:03:30.679 --> 01:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>One is our own John Lovet and Ari Schwartz, which

1253
01:03:33.079 --> 01:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we're all very excited to attend. The other is Donald

1254
01:03:35.519 --> 01:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump Junior and Palm Beach socialite Bettina Anderson, which Donald

1255
01:03:40.480 --> 01:03:46.199
<v Speaker 1>Trump Senior is maybe skipping. Let's listen to what he

1256
01:03:46.239 --> 01:03:47.239
<v Speaker 1>said in the Oval.

1257
01:03:47.039 --> 01:03:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Having your son's buddy in this movie, by the way,

1258
01:03:49.960 --> 01:03:50.760
<v Speaker 3>he'd like me to go.

1259
01:03:51.480 --> 01:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's going to be just a small, little private affair,

1260
01:03:53.840 --> 01:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to try and make it.

1261
01:03:55.800 --> 01:03:58.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm in the midst, I said, you know, this is.

1262
01:03:58.880 --> 01:04:01.039
<v Speaker 4>Not good timing for me. I have a thing called

1263
01:04:01.079 --> 01:04:02.480
<v Speaker 4>the rad and other things.

1264
01:04:03.800 --> 01:04:06.559
<v Speaker 3>That's when I can't win on. If I do attend,

1265
01:04:07.559 --> 01:04:09.920
<v Speaker 3>I get killed. If I don't attend, I get killed.

1266
01:04:10.239 --> 01:04:13.239
<v Speaker 1>What don him still I saw this this morning. I

1267
01:04:13.280 --> 01:04:15.719
<v Speaker 1>am it is four o'clock in the afternoon. I'm still

1268
01:04:15.800 --> 01:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>stunned by this.

1269
01:04:17.719 --> 01:04:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we have joked for many, many years about

1270
01:04:20.280 --> 01:04:22.199
<v Speaker 3>how Donald Trump does not love his children and they

1271
01:04:22.239 --> 01:04:23.840
<v Speaker 3>act this way because he does not love them and

1272
01:04:23.880 --> 01:04:26.960
<v Speaker 3>he can barely identify them and really did no parenting.

1273
01:04:27.519 --> 01:04:28.480
<v Speaker 3>This kind of proves the point.

1274
01:04:28.880 --> 01:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just generational trauma, just in action. We're just we're

1275
01:04:31.960 --> 01:04:33.679
<v Speaker 1>just watching it unfold right in that clip.

1276
01:04:34.079 --> 01:04:36.639
<v Speaker 3>It's just also, you know, I.

1277
01:04:36.599 --> 01:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Got to know. Donald Trump's famous for skipping festivities and

1278
01:04:42.559 --> 01:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>any kind of leisure activity because he likes to be

1279
01:04:44.920 --> 01:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>focused on the nation's business. He's well known for that.

1280
01:04:48.119 --> 01:04:52.480
<v Speaker 3>No one would kill him for going to his son's wedding.

1281
01:04:53.719 --> 01:04:57.840
<v Speaker 3>That's one. Like he does a lot of dumb show golf.

1282
01:04:58.360 --> 01:04:59.920
<v Speaker 3>This this would free pass for this one.

1283
01:05:00.719 --> 01:05:03.239
<v Speaker 1>It's in the Bahamas. I guess he can't. Like air

1284
01:05:03.239 --> 01:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Force one can go to the Bahamas.

1285
01:05:04.960 --> 01:05:05.599
<v Speaker 3>He can go anywhere.

1286
01:05:05.639 --> 01:05:08.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can go anywhere. They could bring a fucking.

1287
01:05:08.960 --> 01:05:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Is not at mar A Lago because he wanted to

1288
01:05:10.599 --> 01:05:11.199
<v Speaker 3>charge his son.

1289
01:05:11.519 --> 01:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>That is I can't even imagine. I can't imagine married.

1290
01:05:17.360 --> 01:05:20.119
<v Speaker 1>And also not like he also wasn't even It would

1291
01:05:20.119 --> 01:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>have even been different if he was like, oh, I'm

1292
01:05:22.880 --> 01:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>so like, I can't make it, you know, like he

1293
01:05:24.800 --> 01:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>was definitive and he had the excuse. But he did

1294
01:05:27.360 --> 01:05:29.559
<v Speaker 1>the worst of all worlds was to just be like, Eh,

1295
01:05:29.679 --> 01:05:31.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna try to make it, but I don't know.

1296
01:05:31.679 --> 01:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's not good. I told him, it's yeah,

1297
01:05:34.880 --> 01:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>not good timing for me. Not good timing for me.

1298
01:05:38.360 --> 01:05:40.239
<v Speaker 1>It's really it's your fault. I'm not coming to your

1299
01:05:40.239 --> 01:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>wedding son. Good stuff anyway. Anyway, Congrats to John Junior.

1300
01:05:46.840 --> 01:05:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Congrats to John Junior well and and John Love. Yes,

1301
01:05:51.199 --> 01:05:53.079
<v Speaker 1>just cut from the same cloth. When we come back.

1302
01:05:53.119 --> 01:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>California gubernatorial candidate Matt Mahon.

1303
01:06:03.199 --> 01:06:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Pazave America is brought to you by a neutrifol. Real

1304
01:06:06.440 --> 01:06:08.639
<v Speaker 2>change comes through the small, healthy habits you do every

1305
01:06:08.679 --> 01:06:11.239
<v Speaker 2>day that quietly add up to big improvements. That's the

1306
01:06:11.320 --> 01:06:14.679
<v Speaker 2>idea behind Neutraphil. It's built around a simple, consistent approach

1307
01:06:14.719 --> 01:06:17.280
<v Speaker 2>to hair health that works from within and delivers visible

1308
01:06:17.320 --> 01:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>results over time, not overnight. Neutraphil is the number one

1309
01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:23.800
<v Speaker 2>dermatologists recommended hair growth supplement brand, and it's the number

1310
01:06:23.800 --> 01:06:27.719
<v Speaker 2>one hair growth supplement brand personally used by dermatologists. Neutrafols

1311
01:06:27.760 --> 01:06:31.039
<v Speaker 2>hair growth supplements are peer reviewed, NSF certified for sport

1312
01:06:31.079 --> 01:06:34.199
<v Speaker 2>and clinically tested. It's not a one size fits all approach.

1313
01:06:34.320 --> 01:06:37.599
<v Speaker 2>Neutriphil offers multiple formulas for men and women, tailored to

1314
01:06:37.679 --> 01:06:41.119
<v Speaker 2>different life stages like postpartum or menopause, and lifestyle factors

1315
01:06:41.159 --> 01:06:43.320
<v Speaker 2>such as a plant based diet, so you get personalized

1316
01:06:43.320 --> 01:06:46.000
<v Speaker 2>support that's right for you. Adding neutrafl to your daily

1317
01:06:46.039 --> 01:06:49.239
<v Speaker 2>routine is easy, order online, no prescription needed, with automated

1318
01:06:49.280 --> 01:06:52.440
<v Speaker 2>deliveries and free shipping to keep you on track. This

1319
01:06:52.480 --> 01:06:55.679
<v Speaker 2>whole their pitch of results over time, not overnight. I

1320
01:06:55.719 --> 01:06:57.760
<v Speaker 2>think that makes a lot of sense because remember the

1321
01:06:57.800 --> 01:07:01.320
<v Speaker 2>other options for this sort of thing, or one day

1322
01:07:01.400 --> 01:07:03.280
<v Speaker 2>you'd just be totally bald and the next day the

1323
01:07:03.280 --> 01:07:05.199
<v Speaker 2>commercial has a guy like jet skiing with a full

1324
01:07:05.199 --> 01:07:06.440
<v Speaker 2>head of hair and a sick mullet.

1325
01:07:06.559 --> 01:07:10.079
<v Speaker 1>There's that, or there's just you're standing outside of a

1326
01:07:10.079 --> 01:07:12.239
<v Speaker 1>press conference and it's a little warm, and suddenly you've

1327
01:07:12.239 --> 01:07:15.199
<v Speaker 1>got you got the new hair dripping down your face face.

1328
01:07:15.559 --> 01:07:18.039
<v Speaker 2>His head just melted a good.

1329
01:07:17.920 --> 01:07:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Old days, I know.

1330
01:07:19.159 --> 01:07:21.239
<v Speaker 2>Let your hair become one less thing taking up space

1331
01:07:21.280 --> 01:07:23.639
<v Speaker 2>in your head and see thicker, stronger, faster going hair

1332
01:07:23.639 --> 01:07:25.880
<v Speaker 2>with less shedding in just three to six months with Neutrafol.

1333
01:07:26.280 --> 01:07:28.559
<v Speaker 2>For a limited time, Neutrafol is offering our listeners ten

1334
01:07:28.599 --> 01:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>dollars off your first month subscription and free shipping. When

1335
01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>you visit neutrofold dot com, enter the promo code crooked.

1336
01:07:34.119 --> 01:07:37.440
<v Speaker 2>That's neutrifold dot com spelled n U t r a

1337
01:07:37.719 --> 01:07:45.239
<v Speaker 2>f o l dot com promo code crooked. My guest

1338
01:07:45.239 --> 01:07:47.679
<v Speaker 2>today is the mayor of San Jose. He's running to

1339
01:07:47.760 --> 01:07:50.320
<v Speaker 2>be the next governor of the great state of California.

1340
01:07:50.480 --> 01:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>That man.

1341
01:07:51.199 --> 01:07:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Great to see you, Thanks for me, Thank you for

1342
01:07:53.480 --> 01:07:56.719
<v Speaker 2>coming into the Crooked Media Grand offices.

1343
01:07:56.800 --> 01:07:58.199
<v Speaker 1>What do you think it's beautiful?

1344
01:07:58.280 --> 01:07:59.039
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I love the art.

1345
01:07:59.320 --> 01:08:02.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm really digging compliments today. All right, let's cut to

1346
01:08:02.440 --> 01:08:05.239
<v Speaker 2>the chase. So I got a motley, crowded field. The

1347
01:08:05.280 --> 01:08:08.679
<v Speaker 2>candidates in this race. Election days fast approaching, people already voting.

1348
01:08:08.920 --> 01:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I got my ballot at the house. I'm an undecided voter.

1349
01:08:10.800 --> 01:08:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk to you about it in a bit.

1350
01:08:12.880 --> 01:08:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Why are you the best candidate to lead this state?

1351
01:08:16.760 --> 01:08:18.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, thanks for having me on. I think I'm the

1352
01:08:18.840 --> 01:08:21.039
<v Speaker 5>best candidate to lead the state because I'm the only

1353
01:08:21.079 --> 01:08:23.399
<v Speaker 5>Democrat in the race who has a track record of

1354
01:08:23.560 --> 01:08:26.880
<v Speaker 5>challenging the establishment within my own party to make our

1355
01:08:26.920 --> 01:08:30.079
<v Speaker 5>government deliver for people. And at a time when we've

1356
01:08:30.079 --> 01:08:33.399
<v Speaker 5>got authoritarian president who is trying to take the country

1357
01:08:33.399 --> 01:08:36.159
<v Speaker 5>in a very dangerous direction, we need Democrats who can

1358
01:08:36.199 --> 01:08:40.520
<v Speaker 5>govern and make people's lives better. The way we win

1359
01:08:40.600 --> 01:08:43.520
<v Speaker 5>in the long run is proving that we can implement

1360
01:08:43.560 --> 01:08:47.880
<v Speaker 5>policies that make people's neighborhoods safer and cleaner, their schools better,

1361
01:08:48.199 --> 01:08:52.920
<v Speaker 5>make housing more affordable. If we're delivering bad outcomes and

1362
01:08:53.199 --> 01:08:56.640
<v Speaker 5>people are dissatisfied with our leadership, it becomes very hard

1363
01:08:56.680 --> 01:08:59.880
<v Speaker 5>to fight for democracy and get people to care about

1364
01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:02.479
<v Speaker 5>climate change and many of the kind of longer term

1365
01:09:02.520 --> 01:09:03.199
<v Speaker 5>goals that we have.

1366
01:09:03.800 --> 01:09:05.760
<v Speaker 2>So I agree with a lot of what you're saying.

1367
01:09:05.800 --> 01:09:08.159
<v Speaker 2>But just you know, we're in LA we have this

1368
01:09:08.279 --> 01:09:11.199
<v Speaker 2>mayoral race happening that's kind of goofy. Sure you've seen.

1369
01:09:11.239 --> 01:09:13.640
<v Speaker 2>We got Karen Bastian come into the Democrat just got

1370
01:09:13.640 --> 01:09:16.239
<v Speaker 2>a challenge from the left from Nythia Rahman, and then

1371
01:09:16.319 --> 01:09:19.600
<v Speaker 2>a challenge from the right from like a washed up

1372
01:09:19.800 --> 01:09:22.359
<v Speaker 2>reality TV participant I don't even want to call him

1373
01:09:22.359 --> 01:09:26.279
<v Speaker 2>a star, Spencer Pratt, who lost his home in the

1374
01:09:26.279 --> 01:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Palisades fire, and I think has channeled very understandable anger

1375
01:09:30.119 --> 01:09:33.680
<v Speaker 2>about the response into a surprisingly effective campaign, and he's

1376
01:09:33.720 --> 01:09:37.399
<v Speaker 2>like tapped into this rage at the government, rage at

1377
01:09:37.439 --> 01:09:40.119
<v Speaker 2>the system I think was bubbling below the surface for

1378
01:09:40.159 --> 01:09:42.199
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people and like not just you know,

1379
01:09:42.239 --> 01:09:44.760
<v Speaker 2>people who are feeling like the economic pinch, Like a

1380
01:09:44.760 --> 01:09:47.439
<v Speaker 2>lot of rich, powerful people in this city are like

1381
01:09:47.560 --> 01:09:48.159
<v Speaker 2>pro Pratt.

1382
01:09:48.199 --> 01:09:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Now, are you hearing.

1383
01:09:50.600 --> 01:09:53.159
<v Speaker 2>That anger on the campaign trail? And if so, how

1384
01:09:53.159 --> 01:09:56.119
<v Speaker 2>did Democrats address it and speak to it? Like when

1385
01:09:56.159 --> 01:09:58.239
<v Speaker 2>we're in charge of everything here and have been for

1386
01:09:58.319 --> 01:09:59.560
<v Speaker 2>a while, I.

1387
01:09:59.520 --> 01:10:02.880
<v Speaker 5>Am here in that frustration and in some cases outright anger.

1388
01:10:02.920 --> 01:10:05.520
<v Speaker 5>And that's exactly what I'm talking about. When I ran

1389
01:10:05.560 --> 01:10:07.960
<v Speaker 5>for mayor of San Jose, which is the third largest

1390
01:10:08.000 --> 01:10:11.159
<v Speaker 5>city in the state. I was hearing deep frustration with

1391
01:10:11.199 --> 01:10:14.359
<v Speaker 5>the most basic things. There's crime in my neighborhood, sprawling,

1392
01:10:14.399 --> 01:10:17.319
<v Speaker 5>tent encampments, our schools are failing. I can't afford the rent.

1393
01:10:17.319 --> 01:10:19.319
<v Speaker 5>I mean the stuff that really keeps people up at

1394
01:10:19.399 --> 01:10:23.159
<v Speaker 5>night and affects them in their daily lives. And I

1395
01:10:23.199 --> 01:10:25.560
<v Speaker 5>realized very quickly when I was out knocking on doors

1396
01:10:25.600 --> 01:10:28.960
<v Speaker 5>and talking to people, that we have to own those

1397
01:10:29.640 --> 01:10:35.159
<v Speaker 5>shortcomings and offer people change that is pragmatic and responsible.

1398
01:10:36.359 --> 01:10:40.720
<v Speaker 5>I believe we are almost continuously in a change election

1399
01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:46.960
<v Speaker 5>mode because government today is failing to get the basics right.

1400
01:10:47.520 --> 01:10:50.520
<v Speaker 5>In San Jose, I focused on things that are very

1401
01:10:50.560 --> 01:10:54.520
<v Speaker 5>simple but have an outsized impact. Speeding up permitting, creating

1402
01:10:54.560 --> 01:10:57.279
<v Speaker 5>a neighborhood quality of life unit within our police department,

1403
01:10:57.319 --> 01:11:01.560
<v Speaker 5>building basic dignified interim housing, and when it's available, requiring

1404
01:11:01.560 --> 01:11:04.359
<v Speaker 5>people come indoors, partnering with our county to get more

1405
01:11:04.359 --> 01:11:08.000
<v Speaker 5>people into drug treatment. By focusing on very basic issues

1406
01:11:08.039 --> 01:11:11.039
<v Speaker 5>that people see and feel every single day, that you

1407
01:11:11.359 --> 01:11:14.359
<v Speaker 5>sadly see go viral on next door and everywhere else,

1408
01:11:15.000 --> 01:11:18.920
<v Speaker 5>we've increased trust in city hall by forty percent in

1409
01:11:18.960 --> 01:11:21.800
<v Speaker 5>my time as mayor. I think that's the playbook. It'll

1410
01:11:21.840 --> 01:11:25.119
<v Speaker 5>look different in different cities and different states. But again,

1411
01:11:25.199 --> 01:11:27.119
<v Speaker 5>I go back to this core premise that we have

1412
01:11:27.199 --> 01:11:29.000
<v Speaker 5>to be outcome focused. We have to look at the

1413
01:11:29.039 --> 01:11:31.439
<v Speaker 5>outcomes that matter most to voters. And they're pretty clear.

1414
01:11:31.520 --> 01:11:34.319
<v Speaker 5>They're telling us it's how it's cost of living, it's

1415
01:11:34.399 --> 01:11:37.600
<v Speaker 5>quality of schools, it's public safety issues, it's it's very

1416
01:11:37.640 --> 01:11:40.479
<v Speaker 5>basic issues. Now it's the cost of gas. And yeah,

1417
01:11:40.520 --> 01:11:42.720
<v Speaker 5>we could spend all of our time arguing how much

1418
01:11:42.760 --> 01:11:46.680
<v Speaker 5>of the cost of gas is Trump's war A lot

1419
01:11:46.720 --> 01:11:49.279
<v Speaker 5>of versus a lot of it. Yeah, the last dollar

1420
01:11:49.359 --> 01:11:52.079
<v Speaker 5>and a half two dollars something like that is thanks

1421
01:11:52.079 --> 01:11:55.079
<v Speaker 5>to Donald Trump. But the dollar fifty before that is

1422
01:11:55.199 --> 01:11:57.880
<v Speaker 5>largely our own policy decisions, and we need to be

1423
01:11:57.920 --> 01:12:00.199
<v Speaker 5>honest about that. I've argued that the gas has and

1424
01:12:00.279 --> 01:12:04.439
<v Speaker 5>California has become the most regressive tax. It affects people

1425
01:12:04.520 --> 01:12:06.279
<v Speaker 5>living in the kinds of communities I grew up, and

1426
01:12:06.319 --> 01:12:07.960
<v Speaker 5>I grew up in a small farming town on the

1427
01:12:07.960 --> 01:12:12.039
<v Speaker 5>Central Coast. People who can't afford an ev Californians who

1428
01:12:12.039 --> 01:12:14.279
<v Speaker 5>are driving farther because they live in rural communities are

1429
01:12:14.319 --> 01:12:17.119
<v Speaker 5>out in the suburbs and they're commuting every day, and

1430
01:12:17.520 --> 01:12:20.760
<v Speaker 5>we should keep it, but we should right size it.

1431
01:12:20.800 --> 01:12:22.800
<v Speaker 5>In fact, I would convert it into a flat fee

1432
01:12:22.840 --> 01:12:25.279
<v Speaker 5>that makes sure ev owners are paying their fair share.

1433
01:12:25.399 --> 01:12:27.960
<v Speaker 5>That would be fair. You'd provide some relief to people,

1434
01:12:28.159 --> 01:12:30.479
<v Speaker 5>and you'd show that the Democratic Party is still fighting

1435
01:12:30.880 --> 01:12:33.560
<v Speaker 5>for working people and trying to make a real impact

1436
01:12:33.600 --> 01:12:35.000
<v Speaker 5>in their daily lives.

1437
01:12:35.800 --> 01:12:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Lend me annoying and ask a process question and we'll

1438
01:12:37.640 --> 01:12:39.840
<v Speaker 2>get geek out a little bit. So you got into

1439
01:12:39.840 --> 01:12:42.159
<v Speaker 2>their race pretty late. It was a crowded field.

1440
01:12:43.600 --> 01:12:44.199
<v Speaker 3>But now you've been.

1441
01:12:44.159 --> 01:12:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Running for a couple months and there was a poll

1442
01:12:45.800 --> 01:12:47.520
<v Speaker 2>out earlier this week that had you at four percent

1443
01:12:47.520 --> 01:12:50.560
<v Speaker 2>of the vote. How do you turn things around if

1444
01:12:50.600 --> 01:12:52.880
<v Speaker 2>that poll is accurate between now an election day, when

1445
01:12:52.880 --> 01:12:54.960
<v Speaker 2>it's what a month out less less?

1446
01:12:55.000 --> 01:12:56.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean, look, there's a lot of fluidity in the polls.

1447
01:12:56.880 --> 01:12:59.199
<v Speaker 5>We also recently had a poll that showed us at

1448
01:12:59.199 --> 01:13:02.680
<v Speaker 5>ten percent. I'd mean, look, when it's a low turnout

1449
01:13:02.760 --> 01:13:06.119
<v Speaker 5>race and voters are holding onto their ballots, it means

1450
01:13:06.159 --> 01:13:09.840
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot of uncertainty and therefore variability in terms

1451
01:13:09.880 --> 01:13:13.680
<v Speaker 5>of what can happen. I believe people are listening they're

1452
01:13:13.720 --> 01:13:16.479
<v Speaker 5>not thrilled with the choices that they perceive to be

1453
01:13:16.600 --> 01:13:19.439
<v Speaker 5>the front runners today because they have some very legitimate

1454
01:13:19.479 --> 01:13:24.800
<v Speaker 5>concerns about Tom Steyer and Javierbasera and certainly Steve Hilton,

1455
01:13:25.199 --> 01:13:30.560
<v Speaker 5>and I'm offering an alternative that is resonant with those

1456
01:13:30.560 --> 01:13:32.800
<v Speaker 5>who have heard it. What we see in our data

1457
01:13:33.319 --> 01:13:36.159
<v Speaker 5>is when people have seen our ads and heard our message,

1458
01:13:36.359 --> 01:13:38.600
<v Speaker 5>we go above twenty percent and we're in the top two.

1459
01:13:39.159 --> 01:13:42.960
<v Speaker 5>So my focus is on communicating directly with voters through

1460
01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:46.079
<v Speaker 5>every possible channel, including thank you very much, this is

1461
01:13:46.479 --> 01:13:50.079
<v Speaker 5>opportunity today. I want to talk to people about what

1462
01:13:50.119 --> 01:13:53.359
<v Speaker 5>we've done to get housing under construction, to make San

1463
01:13:53.439 --> 01:13:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Jose the safest big city in the country, to reduce

1464
01:13:56.000 --> 01:13:58.960
<v Speaker 5>homelessness faster than any other city in the state of California,

1465
01:13:59.399 --> 01:14:02.279
<v Speaker 5>and off a different view of how we make Sacramento

1466
01:14:02.439 --> 01:14:04.520
<v Speaker 5>work for them. I mean, we have to own as

1467
01:14:04.560 --> 01:14:07.680
<v Speaker 5>Democrats the fact in the last six years we have

1468
01:14:07.760 --> 01:14:11.000
<v Speaker 5>increased spending in Sacramento by seventy five percent. That's one

1469
01:14:11.079 --> 01:14:14.000
<v Speaker 5>hundred and fifty billion dollars per year more than we

1470
01:14:14.039 --> 01:14:16.439
<v Speaker 5>had six years ago, and none of the outcomes that

1471
01:14:16.479 --> 01:14:19.279
<v Speaker 5>people care most about have gotten better. That is a

1472
01:14:19.319 --> 01:14:23.279
<v Speaker 5>systemic breakdown, and that's why I'm trying to offer very

1473
01:14:23.359 --> 01:14:28.640
<v Speaker 5>concrete solutions. Fun Prop thirty six expand treatment capacity, do

1474
01:14:28.760 --> 01:14:31.520
<v Speaker 5>high dosage tutoring when children are falling behind, to make

1475
01:14:31.560 --> 01:14:33.920
<v Speaker 5>sure every child's on grade level for reading by the

1476
01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:36.560
<v Speaker 5>end of third grade. These are things that work that

1477
01:14:36.640 --> 01:14:41.239
<v Speaker 5>we have not done, largely because of special interest capture

1478
01:14:41.520 --> 01:14:44.159
<v Speaker 5>in Sacramento. We don't build condos in the state of

1479
01:14:44.159 --> 01:14:47.119
<v Speaker 5>California anymore because the trial lawyers like the fees they

1480
01:14:47.119 --> 01:14:52.640
<v Speaker 5>collect from using construction defect laws to sue builders of condos.

1481
01:14:52.680 --> 01:14:54.960
<v Speaker 5>So the city of Miami builds more condos every year

1482
01:14:54.960 --> 01:14:57.680
<v Speaker 5>than the entire state of California. Why does that matter.

1483
01:14:58.000 --> 01:15:00.920
<v Speaker 5>That's the most accessible form of homeowner ship for young people,

1484
01:15:00.960 --> 01:15:02.760
<v Speaker 5>and we wonder why people are getting priced out of

1485
01:15:02.760 --> 01:15:06.079
<v Speaker 5>our state. So I'm running against the special interest capture

1486
01:15:06.119 --> 01:15:09.000
<v Speaker 5>and Sacramento and the status quo. I've done that as

1487
01:15:09.039 --> 01:15:11.079
<v Speaker 5>the mayor of a large city, and it's worked. We've

1488
01:15:11.079 --> 01:15:12.920
<v Speaker 5>delivered meaningful outcomes.

1489
01:15:12.960 --> 01:15:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you more about home ownership and

1490
01:15:14.840 --> 01:15:17.479
<v Speaker 2>young people in the state. Just one more process thing,

1491
01:15:17.479 --> 01:15:20.199
<v Speaker 2>which is like, look, I'm literally an undecided voter in

1492
01:15:20.199 --> 01:15:22.760
<v Speaker 2>this race in part because, as you know, we have

1493
01:15:22.840 --> 01:15:27.279
<v Speaker 2>this stupid fucking jungle primary system here where there's a runoff.

1494
01:15:27.279 --> 01:15:29.039
<v Speaker 2>There's a first round in June, second the top two

1495
01:15:29.039 --> 01:15:32.720
<v Speaker 2>candidates go to the runoff, So that leads to strategic voting.

1496
01:15:32.800 --> 01:15:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Right there was all this anxiety about Democrats splitting the

1497
01:15:35.359 --> 01:15:37.479
<v Speaker 2>vote to Republicans ascending, and right then we have a

1498
01:15:37.479 --> 01:15:41.000
<v Speaker 2>defecto Republican governor. That probably won't happen now because the

1499
01:15:41.319 --> 01:15:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Chad seems to touch cuckoo and Trump has chosen the

1500
01:15:44.640 --> 01:15:47.520
<v Speaker 2>British Shortking is his guy in shocking what's going on there?

1501
01:15:47.560 --> 01:15:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I guess Fox. But then but then there's people like

1502
01:15:51.680 --> 01:15:54.119
<v Speaker 2>me who are just like overthinking it, right because I

1503
01:15:54.119 --> 01:15:57.439
<v Speaker 2>have candidates that appeal to my heart, and I worry

1504
01:15:57.479 --> 01:16:00.119
<v Speaker 2>though that if they can't win, then maybe I'm doing

1505
01:16:00.119 --> 01:16:03.039
<v Speaker 2>a harm reduction vote because I have candidates that I

1506
01:16:03.079 --> 01:16:05.319
<v Speaker 2>think are bad and I want to vote for someone

1507
01:16:05.359 --> 01:16:09.399
<v Speaker 2>to displace them. Why do we have this dumb system?

1508
01:16:09.600 --> 01:16:10.159
<v Speaker 2>I hate it?

1509
01:16:10.479 --> 01:16:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, I hope I'm speaking to your heart.

1510
01:16:12.680 --> 01:16:15.239
<v Speaker 2>We we'll find out. We have but fifteen more minutes.

1511
01:16:15.119 --> 01:16:18.479
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you let me know at the end. I don't

1512
01:16:18.520 --> 01:16:22.479
<v Speaker 5>think people should overthink it it is almost statistically impossible

1513
01:16:22.520 --> 01:16:24.600
<v Speaker 5>for two Republicans to get through. There are not that

1514
01:16:24.680 --> 01:16:27.800
<v Speaker 5>many Republican votes in the state of California. Donald Trump

1515
01:16:27.840 --> 01:16:29.840
<v Speaker 5>is not on the ballot, which means turnout will be

1516
01:16:29.920 --> 01:16:33.279
<v Speaker 5>lower than it would otherwise. Be Bianco is hanging in

1517
01:16:33.319 --> 01:16:36.119
<v Speaker 5>there with his third of the Republican Party, but not

1518
01:16:36.239 --> 01:16:38.640
<v Speaker 5>any more than that. And I just I think it's

1519
01:16:38.680 --> 01:16:42.399
<v Speaker 5>more likely we'll have two Democrats then we will have

1520
01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:45.399
<v Speaker 5>two Republicans. By far, it's just not going to happen.

1521
01:16:45.720 --> 01:16:48.159
<v Speaker 5>So I think people should vote for the Democrat who

1522
01:16:48.199 --> 01:16:50.279
<v Speaker 5>they believe will do the best job, and.

1523
01:16:50.199 --> 01:16:52.079
<v Speaker 2>I get rid of this process at some point, though

1524
01:16:52.680 --> 01:16:53.279
<v Speaker 2>the voters can.

1525
01:16:54.319 --> 01:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>They can.

1526
01:16:55.000 --> 01:16:57.359
<v Speaker 2>It's annoying. No one likes this. Who is this four?

1527
01:16:58.159 --> 01:17:01.800
<v Speaker 5>Well? The theory I do want try articulated because look

1528
01:17:01.840 --> 01:17:07.199
<v Speaker 5>that they're trade offs. Partisan primaries also tend to drive

1529
01:17:07.319 --> 01:17:10.439
<v Speaker 5>candidates to the extreme. Agreed, And so I don't know

1530
01:17:10.479 --> 01:17:13.520
<v Speaker 5>that there's a I've heard another interesting alternative, which is

1531
01:17:14.920 --> 01:17:16.720
<v Speaker 5>I know this is going to sound crazy, but I

1532
01:17:16.760 --> 01:17:18.960
<v Speaker 5>was intrigued when someone pitched me on this the other day.

1533
01:17:19.520 --> 01:17:22.560
<v Speaker 5>Having the top three or four candidates advance and then

1534
01:17:22.640 --> 01:17:24.920
<v Speaker 5>in the final the second round, do rank choice photo.

1535
01:17:24.920 --> 01:17:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I would do rank choice for sure. Yeah, yeah, I

1536
01:17:26.880 --> 01:17:28.399
<v Speaker 2>feel like that solves the problem.

1537
01:17:28.079 --> 01:17:30.479
<v Speaker 5>If you if you winnow the field from sixty two,

1538
01:17:30.560 --> 01:17:32.560
<v Speaker 5>which is literally what we have on our ballot today, which.

1539
01:17:32.399 --> 01:17:35.479
<v Speaker 2>Isn't someone named Barack Obama, I believe, Yeah, yeah, good

1540
01:17:35.479 --> 01:17:38.359
<v Speaker 2>move on his well plates are.

1541
01:17:38.520 --> 01:17:41.199
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, if you narrow it to say the top four,

1542
01:17:41.560 --> 01:17:45.520
<v Speaker 5>then you're almost certain to have ideological and partisan variety.

1543
01:17:45.680 --> 01:17:47.760
<v Speaker 5>And then because it would then theoretically if you did

1544
01:17:47.800 --> 01:17:50.479
<v Speaker 5>rank choice, you would then optimize for whoever's kind of

1545
01:17:50.520 --> 01:17:53.079
<v Speaker 5>the best overall choice. So I'm orson something like that.

1546
01:17:53.439 --> 01:17:55.479
<v Speaker 5>I worry if you go back to a partisan primary,

1547
01:17:55.479 --> 01:17:58.399
<v Speaker 5>you get the most extreme Republican, the most extreme Democrat.

1548
01:17:58.880 --> 01:18:01.279
<v Speaker 5>It's a it's all just in the primary. And that's,

1549
01:18:01.319 --> 01:18:03.000
<v Speaker 5>by the way, looking at the other side, that's how

1550
01:18:03.039 --> 01:18:06.159
<v Speaker 5>you ended up with the Ted Cruz in Texas. He

1551
01:18:06.239 --> 01:18:09.800
<v Speaker 5>got five percent of the vote, but because it was

1552
01:18:09.920 --> 01:18:12.560
<v Speaker 5>enough to make him the top candidate in a hyper

1553
01:18:12.600 --> 01:18:16.560
<v Speaker 5>partisan Republican primary in a red state, he became the

1554
01:18:16.720 --> 01:18:19.000
<v Speaker 5>de facto senator for years to come.

1555
01:18:19.279 --> 01:18:21.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, he has a very appealing human being, so I

1556
01:18:21.159 --> 01:18:24.600
<v Speaker 2>can see that for that five percent drew that five

1557
01:18:24.600 --> 01:18:29.000
<v Speaker 2>percent in you have come out against this proposed one

1558
01:18:29.079 --> 01:18:32.079
<v Speaker 2>time billionaires tax of five percent, well tax on billionaires

1559
01:18:32.840 --> 01:18:36.079
<v Speaker 2>in California. This could be on the ballot this fall.

1560
01:18:36.119 --> 01:18:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Why what's your opposition to this plan?

1561
01:18:37.960 --> 01:18:42.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so it's not because I don't think billionaires should

1562
01:18:42.199 --> 01:18:44.399
<v Speaker 5>shouldn't be paying more. I mean, look, I think there

1563
01:18:44.439 --> 01:18:47.279
<v Speaker 5>are a lot of loopholes in the tax code we

1564
01:18:47.319 --> 01:18:51.359
<v Speaker 5>should close. I'll give you one example. Today, very wealthy

1565
01:18:51.399 --> 01:18:56.439
<v Speaker 5>people can borrow against their stock options or other assets

1566
01:18:56.439 --> 01:18:59.359
<v Speaker 5>that they have not yet paid capital gains on, and

1567
01:18:59.399 --> 01:19:04.279
<v Speaker 5>then deloy use those dollars as a way of funding

1568
01:19:04.439 --> 01:19:07.279
<v Speaker 5>their lifestyles, their investments, and then never having to pay

1569
01:19:07.319 --> 01:19:11.239
<v Speaker 5>capital gains. That's a loophole we should close that. Actually,

1570
01:19:11.319 --> 01:19:13.239
<v Speaker 5>give you one more Elon Musk, if you were to

1571
01:19:13.279 --> 01:19:16.199
<v Speaker 5>die today, would pass his stock onto his heirs five

1572
01:19:16.279 --> 01:19:19.560
<v Speaker 5>hundred billion or whatever it is, and it would automatically

1573
01:19:19.760 --> 01:19:23.640
<v Speaker 5>get repriced at market rate, meaning they even if they

1574
01:19:23.640 --> 01:19:25.560
<v Speaker 5>turned around and sold it the next day, would never

1575
01:19:25.600 --> 01:19:28.880
<v Speaker 5>pay capital gains on It. Fundamentally unfair. So there are

1576
01:19:28.920 --> 01:19:30.640
<v Speaker 5>a whole bunch of things in the tax code I

1577
01:19:30.640 --> 01:19:34.800
<v Speaker 5>would fix. I also think with automation, capital gains will

1578
01:19:34.840 --> 01:19:37.199
<v Speaker 5>probably need to go up so that we can lower

1579
01:19:37.319 --> 01:19:40.239
<v Speaker 5>income tax on those who are working for a living.

1580
01:19:41.119 --> 01:19:44.199
<v Speaker 5>But when it comes to this wealth tax, the concern

1581
01:19:44.279 --> 01:19:46.720
<v Speaker 5>I have is it's going to punish the middle class.

1582
01:19:46.720 --> 01:19:50.159
<v Speaker 5>In California, we've seen about a trillion dollars of capital

1583
01:19:50.159 --> 01:19:53.239
<v Speaker 5>flight from the state already. And this is right in

1584
01:19:53.279 --> 01:19:55.760
<v Speaker 5>line with what we've seen in every other place that's

1585
01:19:55.800 --> 01:19:56.680
<v Speaker 5>try a wealth tax.

1586
01:19:56.920 --> 01:20:02.199
<v Speaker 2>Trillion dollars in wealth asset value val right, not taxation.

1587
01:20:02.279 --> 01:20:06.880
<v Speaker 5>Correct, A trillion dollars worth of wealth of assets that

1588
01:20:06.920 --> 01:20:10.600
<v Speaker 5>people hold that no longer reside within the state of

1589
01:20:10.600 --> 01:20:14.680
<v Speaker 5>California because their owner now has a primary residence in another.

1590
01:20:14.439 --> 01:20:15.600
<v Speaker 2>State like Arino or something.

1591
01:20:15.760 --> 01:20:20.079
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, Nevada, Florida, Texas, whatever. And that's what we've seen.

1592
01:20:20.079 --> 01:20:23.359
<v Speaker 5>So there are fourteen European countries that have tried wealth

1593
01:20:23.439 --> 01:20:26.920
<v Speaker 5>taxes at the national level, not even the provincial or

1594
01:20:26.920 --> 01:20:31.199
<v Speaker 5>state level, and what they have generally rolled them back

1595
01:20:31.319 --> 01:20:34.000
<v Speaker 5>or had to significantly modify them for a couple of reasons.

1596
01:20:34.079 --> 01:20:36.520
<v Speaker 5>One they have seen the overall tax based shrink is

1597
01:20:36.520 --> 01:20:39.600
<v Speaker 5>they've had capital flight, people with high, very high networths

1598
01:20:39.640 --> 01:20:42.159
<v Speaker 5>moving their assets and their primary residents out of the

1599
01:20:42.159 --> 01:20:42.920
<v Speaker 5>country or out.

1600
01:20:42.760 --> 01:20:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Of the state.

1601
01:20:43.640 --> 01:20:47.199
<v Speaker 5>The other is to assess people's wealth is not a

1602
01:20:47.199 --> 01:20:50.439
<v Speaker 5>trivial thing. You actually need to have an army of

1603
01:20:50.479 --> 01:20:53.960
<v Speaker 5>assessors go out and go through people's belongings and figure

1604
01:20:54.000 --> 01:20:56.560
<v Speaker 5>out what all these things worth and value them and

1605
01:20:56.600 --> 01:20:59.319
<v Speaker 5>then tax them. And there's a lot of distortionary effects.

1606
01:20:59.399 --> 01:21:02.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm I just think it's likely to backfire. It's like

1607
01:21:02.720 --> 01:21:04.640
<v Speaker 5>going to be very costly, and ultimately, I think it's

1608
01:21:04.640 --> 01:21:06.359
<v Speaker 5>the middle class that's going to be left holding the.

1609
01:21:06.279 --> 01:21:08.479
<v Speaker 2>Bag because there will just be less revenue.

1610
01:21:08.479 --> 01:21:11.119
<v Speaker 5>You think so, And that's not just me. The Legislative

1611
01:21:11.159 --> 01:21:15.840
<v Speaker 5>Analyst Office, the Independent Policy Shop in Sacramento says that

1612
01:21:15.840 --> 01:21:18.800
<v Speaker 5>we've probably already taken ten billion a year off of

1613
01:21:18.840 --> 01:21:21.640
<v Speaker 5>our future revenues based on the capitol that's already left

1614
01:21:21.640 --> 01:21:22.000
<v Speaker 5>the state.

1615
01:21:22.319 --> 01:21:24.359
<v Speaker 2>Right, But if we could recoup that with this one

1616
01:21:24.399 --> 01:21:26.239
<v Speaker 2>time tax, I mean, there's estimates that it could bring

1617
01:21:26.279 --> 01:21:28.279
<v Speaker 2>in up to one hundred billion. I mean, it's hard

1618
01:21:28.319 --> 01:21:30.239
<v Speaker 2>to pencil out the math, right, because we just don't

1619
01:21:30.319 --> 01:21:32.119
<v Speaker 2>know how many people will leave. As I feel like

1620
01:21:32.319 --> 01:21:34.520
<v Speaker 2>there's this concert we're talking about like two hundred people, right,

1621
01:21:34.600 --> 01:21:38.720
<v Speaker 2>like two hundred billionaires in California. If they all left

1622
01:21:38.760 --> 01:21:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the state, do they all really have that much income

1623
01:21:41.800 --> 01:21:45.039
<v Speaker 2>that gets taxed? Like Jeff Bezos famously pays himself eighty

1624
01:21:45.079 --> 01:21:47.880
<v Speaker 2>grand or something and has since nineteen ninety eight, but

1625
01:21:47.920 --> 01:21:52.720
<v Speaker 2>all of his wealth is in often unrealized gains in

1626
01:21:52.760 --> 01:21:55.199
<v Speaker 2>Amazon stock, right, which is not getting tax no matter

1627
01:21:55.239 --> 01:21:58.279
<v Speaker 2>what happens. It's like, how do we get at that money?

1628
01:21:58.359 --> 01:22:00.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's why I point to those other to reforms

1629
01:22:00.800 --> 01:22:03.760
<v Speaker 5>that I think make a lot more sense. One is,

1630
01:22:04.119 --> 01:22:07.920
<v Speaker 5>if he's borrowing against those unrealized gains at there should

1631
01:22:07.960 --> 01:22:10.399
<v Speaker 5>be a cut off at which point it's considered realized

1632
01:22:10.399 --> 01:22:12.760
<v Speaker 5>and you have to you can't just endlessly borrow against

1633
01:22:12.760 --> 01:22:15.560
<v Speaker 5>your realized assets. I think that's a way smarter way

1634
01:22:15.600 --> 01:22:17.760
<v Speaker 5>to do it, that's less distortionary, and I would, I

1635
01:22:17.760 --> 01:22:21.000
<v Speaker 5>mean really ideally that would be a federal policy. The

1636
01:22:21.079 --> 01:22:26.279
<v Speaker 5>other is inheritance. The best wealth tax is a one

1637
01:22:26.319 --> 01:22:29.159
<v Speaker 5>time inheritance tax when you pass things on. And if

1638
01:22:29.199 --> 01:22:32.079
<v Speaker 5>you don't want to actually force people to sell assets

1639
01:22:32.119 --> 01:22:34.720
<v Speaker 5>because it's a family business or a farm, that's fine,

1640
01:22:34.760 --> 01:22:38.079
<v Speaker 5>but don't re base the value of it at market

1641
01:22:38.159 --> 01:22:41.359
<v Speaker 5>rate at the moment the person dies. Leave the original

1642
01:22:41.359 --> 01:22:44.000
<v Speaker 5>cost basis, so that when your airs sell, they pay

1643
01:22:44.039 --> 01:22:45.640
<v Speaker 5>capital gains. That seems only fair.

1644
01:22:45.760 --> 01:22:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And there's so many carve outs for farms, and

1645
01:22:49.119 --> 01:22:51.880
<v Speaker 2>it's like tens of millions of dollars is already exempted

1646
01:22:51.920 --> 01:22:54.159
<v Speaker 2>from the wealth tax. It's insane that we are not

1647
01:22:54.199 --> 01:22:56.319
<v Speaker 2>focusing more on that. So you're in the Nerve, a

1648
01:22:56.399 --> 01:22:58.800
<v Speaker 2>city at the heart of the American tech industry. In

1649
01:22:58.840 --> 01:23:02.840
<v Speaker 2>a past life, you worked tech industry. Americans I think

1650
01:23:02.960 --> 01:23:06.920
<v Speaker 2>increasingly have a negative view of a lot of tech companies, right,

1651
01:23:06.960 --> 01:23:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean as recently as twenty fifteen, Pugh found that

1652
01:23:10.039 --> 01:23:12.560
<v Speaker 2>seventy one percent of Americans thought technology companies had a

1653
01:23:12.560 --> 01:23:15.680
<v Speaker 2>positive effect on the country. By twenty nineteen, that was

1654
01:23:15.720 --> 01:23:19.159
<v Speaker 2>down to fifty percent. Now you're seeing like AI explode

1655
01:23:19.199 --> 01:23:21.319
<v Speaker 2>onto the scene. People are worried about the data centers.

1656
01:23:21.880 --> 01:23:24.800
<v Speaker 2>There's polling that finds an increasing number of Americans are

1657
01:23:24.800 --> 01:23:28.720
<v Speaker 2>more concerned than excited about AI. You've got people getting

1658
01:23:28.760 --> 01:23:32.600
<v Speaker 2>booed for mentioning AI at college commencements this past weekend.

1659
01:23:33.359 --> 01:23:35.960
<v Speaker 2>What would you say to voters who are furious at

1660
01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley because you know certain, you know, tech CEOs

1661
01:23:40.720 --> 01:23:43.880
<v Speaker 2>got fabulously wealthy while they did not. The news media

1662
01:23:43.920 --> 01:23:46.800
<v Speaker 2>got hollowed out. They feel like harms were done by

1663
01:23:46.840 --> 01:23:50.600
<v Speaker 2>social media, and now it just feels like the same companies,

1664
01:23:50.920 --> 01:23:54.159
<v Speaker 2>the same people they're getting to run it back with AI,

1665
01:23:54.439 --> 01:23:58.800
<v Speaker 2>which we're all told is this unbelievably powerful, like step change,

1666
01:23:58.920 --> 01:24:01.000
<v Speaker 2>new thing. And I don't trust those people. I don't

1667
01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:04.159
<v Speaker 2>trust Elan or Mark Zuckerberg or Sam Altman to be

1668
01:24:04.199 --> 01:24:04.760
<v Speaker 2>in charge of it.

1669
01:24:05.199 --> 01:24:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1670
01:24:06.199 --> 01:24:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think it's a very real fear, and I

1671
01:24:08.800 --> 01:24:11.319
<v Speaker 5>understand it, and on some level I share it. I

1672
01:24:11.319 --> 01:24:13.760
<v Speaker 5>don't I have little kids. I don't want them on

1673
01:24:13.840 --> 01:24:18.439
<v Speaker 5>social media or AI. I've argued that, and as governor

1674
01:24:18.640 --> 01:24:22.399
<v Speaker 5>I would fight for policies that require parental consent for

1675
01:24:22.560 --> 01:24:27.720
<v Speaker 5>using social media, ban cell phones in public schools. I've

1676
01:24:27.760 --> 01:24:31.880
<v Speaker 5>actually got experience with regulating technology because as a mayor,

1677
01:24:32.760 --> 01:24:36.239
<v Speaker 5>our city is procuring and using technology and constantly thinking

1678
01:24:36.239 --> 01:24:40.279
<v Speaker 5>about the trade offs. New tools can give us new

1679
01:24:40.640 --> 01:24:44.840
<v Speaker 5>capabilities to improve things. We've sped up our public buses,

1680
01:24:45.199 --> 01:24:49.720
<v Speaker 5>We've improved language translation in our meetings, We're identifying potholes proactively.

1681
01:24:49.800 --> 01:24:51.960
<v Speaker 5>We've done a number of things that are making government

1682
01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:54.880
<v Speaker 5>more responsive and efficient, which is great. That's really cool stuff.

1683
01:24:55.159 --> 01:25:00.880
<v Speaker 5>On the other hand, people's fears around privacy, manipulate of elections,

1684
01:25:00.880 --> 01:25:05.760
<v Speaker 5>and just misinformation. More broadly, job loss, environmental destruction are

1685
01:25:05.800 --> 01:25:09.399
<v Speaker 5>all very legitimate, and that's why we created something called

1686
01:25:09.439 --> 01:25:12.720
<v Speaker 5>the gov AI Coalition. San Jose is the founding member

1687
01:25:13.359 --> 01:25:17.039
<v Speaker 5>of a platform that helps over nine hundred public agencies

1688
01:25:17.359 --> 01:25:20.600
<v Speaker 5>navigate technology adoption. And it's all about the ethical and

1689
01:25:20.640 --> 01:25:24.800
<v Speaker 5>responsible use of AI. So we use license plate readers,

1690
01:25:24.800 --> 01:25:27.600
<v Speaker 5>but we don't allow facial recognition. We don't sell data

1691
01:25:27.840 --> 01:25:29.560
<v Speaker 5>to third parties. We don't even share it with the

1692
01:25:29.560 --> 01:25:31.960
<v Speaker 5>federal government because we don't trust how they will use it.

1693
01:25:32.239 --> 01:25:34.920
<v Speaker 5>We delete it every thirty days. On the other hand,

1694
01:25:35.760 --> 01:25:38.479
<v Speaker 5>it's helped us solve murders and kidnappings and rapes and

1695
01:25:38.520 --> 01:25:41.359
<v Speaker 5>all kinds of horrible crimes. So striking that balance of

1696
01:25:41.439 --> 01:25:45.560
<v Speaker 5>how do we harness the value of tools, and I

1697
01:25:45.560 --> 01:25:48.279
<v Speaker 5>think we want to continue to be a state that

1698
01:25:48.439 --> 01:25:51.199
<v Speaker 5>is innovative and that is at the cutting edge, but

1699
01:25:51.800 --> 01:25:55.479
<v Speaker 5>we have to regulate and protect people from these changes

1700
01:25:55.560 --> 01:25:58.279
<v Speaker 5>data centers you mentioned. I believe this should be a

1701
01:25:58.399 --> 01:26:01.920
<v Speaker 5>national standard, but certainly for California, any new data center

1702
01:26:02.199 --> 01:26:05.800
<v Speaker 5>needs to pay the full cost of the infrastructure, they require,

1703
01:26:05.880 --> 01:26:08.520
<v Speaker 5>the full cost of energy. They should be required to

1704
01:26:08.600 --> 01:26:12.119
<v Speaker 5>use the cleanest energy. Their investment should help facilitate the

1705
01:26:12.159 --> 01:26:15.720
<v Speaker 5>clean energy future that we all want. They should have

1706
01:26:15.720 --> 01:26:18.079
<v Speaker 5>to use recycled water. So I think that we can

1707
01:26:18.239 --> 01:26:20.560
<v Speaker 5>praise the bar. Some people want to pause on building those,

1708
01:26:20.640 --> 01:26:22.239
<v Speaker 5>so that's too far from and that's kind of my point.

1709
01:26:22.279 --> 01:26:25.760
<v Speaker 5>You have this sort of much more laisse fair approach

1710
01:26:25.920 --> 01:26:28.680
<v Speaker 5>on the right that is sort of like, oh, you know,

1711
01:26:29.079 --> 01:26:32.359
<v Speaker 5>business is good, capitalism is always good, and let's just

1712
01:26:32.399 --> 01:26:34.800
<v Speaker 5>have this sort of unbridled capitalism and see what happens.

1713
01:26:34.880 --> 01:26:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, David Sachs approach. We're laissez faire until Silicon Valley

1714
01:26:38.520 --> 01:26:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Bank is going to collapse and then.

1715
01:26:39.920 --> 01:26:44.680
<v Speaker 5>We're screening welfare. Yeah, exactly. So I reject that mindset

1716
01:26:44.720 --> 01:26:48.039
<v Speaker 5>and approach. I also think, though, that there is a

1717
01:26:48.119 --> 01:26:53.720
<v Speaker 5>more extreme version within my party that wants to just

1718
01:26:53.800 --> 01:26:57.479
<v Speaker 5>hit the brakes, and I think I just believe we

1719
01:26:57.520 --> 01:26:59.560
<v Speaker 5>were better served and I think historically we have been

1720
01:26:59.560 --> 01:27:05.960
<v Speaker 5>better regulating, managing shaping technological change. But having the authority

1721
01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:09.000
<v Speaker 5>to do that then just saying no and having it

1722
01:27:09.079 --> 01:27:12.000
<v Speaker 5>happen elsewhere, and I think there's a balance to strike there.

1723
01:27:12.039 --> 01:27:14.600
<v Speaker 5>I put out an AI accountability plan that's all about

1724
01:27:14.600 --> 01:27:18.520
<v Speaker 5>striking that balance. It's about investing in workforce development, putting

1725
01:27:18.560 --> 01:27:22.880
<v Speaker 5>strict guardrails on the way that children interact with technology,

1726
01:27:23.359 --> 01:27:28.079
<v Speaker 5>accountability for data centers and robotics companies. We need to

1727
01:27:28.119 --> 01:27:32.319
<v Speaker 5>have an AI shared prosperity fund. That is pain that

1728
01:27:32.359 --> 01:27:36.399
<v Speaker 5>is taking tax revenue from these hyperscalers, these big tech companies,

1729
01:27:36.880 --> 01:27:41.159
<v Speaker 5>and pain for the upskilling and reskilling. We need to

1730
01:27:41.159 --> 01:27:43.199
<v Speaker 5>make sure that people are prepared for the jobs of

1731
01:27:43.239 --> 01:27:45.560
<v Speaker 5>the future. And look, if it gets really dire. We

1732
01:27:45.600 --> 01:27:48.479
<v Speaker 5>haven't seen this yet, but we should have a plan

1733
01:27:48.680 --> 01:27:51.960
<v Speaker 5>b if if job loss increases, we're going to have

1734
01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:53.920
<v Speaker 5>to talk about things like a UBI. We need to

1735
01:27:53.920 --> 01:27:56.039
<v Speaker 5>have a whole other set of tools, a totally different

1736
01:27:56.359 --> 01:27:59.439
<v Speaker 5>safety net. If this plays out in a way that

1737
01:27:59.520 --> 01:28:00.920
<v Speaker 5>some of us.

1738
01:28:00.920 --> 01:28:03.520
<v Speaker 2>What's your what's your AI drug? A choice? You a

1739
01:28:03.560 --> 01:28:07.319
<v Speaker 2>groc guy, Claude, chat GPT, What do we using?

1740
01:28:07.520 --> 01:28:11.560
<v Speaker 5>I go between Claude and Chat and yeah, chat GPT mostly,

1741
01:28:11.600 --> 01:28:14.359
<v Speaker 5>although I end up by default on Gemini a lot,

1742
01:28:14.439 --> 01:28:15.399
<v Speaker 5>just because of the browser.

1743
01:28:15.560 --> 01:28:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but then it's always wrong. You know, you're just

1744
01:28:17.640 --> 01:28:21.560
<v Speaker 2>getting bullshitted. I'm a Claude guy. I was using Chat

1745
01:28:21.560 --> 01:28:24.119
<v Speaker 2>GPT and then Sam Mamma did something shitty when he

1746
01:28:24.399 --> 01:28:26.840
<v Speaker 2>when he swooped in, was like, I'll take your Pentagon

1747
01:28:26.920 --> 01:28:29.720
<v Speaker 2>contract to build the autonomous killer robots. I was like,

1748
01:28:29.760 --> 01:28:30.079
<v Speaker 2>I'm out.

1749
01:28:30.119 --> 01:28:31.479
<v Speaker 5>And then you went to Claude and see you buddy.

1750
01:28:31.560 --> 01:28:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, who's just secretly building the autonomous killer robots? Who knows?

1751
01:28:35.800 --> 01:28:37.359
<v Speaker 2>So you raised a bunch of money from folks in

1752
01:28:37.359 --> 01:28:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the tech world.

1753
01:28:38.359 --> 01:28:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

1754
01:28:38.640 --> 01:28:41.319
<v Speaker 2>Ceo is a Google, drop Box, Snapchat, Twitch. I think

1755
01:28:41.359 --> 01:28:44.960
<v Speaker 2>some prominent venture capitalists. What's your response to people who worry, look,

1756
01:28:44.960 --> 01:28:48.079
<v Speaker 2>when you take all that money, there are strings and

1757
01:28:48.119 --> 01:28:50.319
<v Speaker 2>it could make you beholden to the tech industry.

1758
01:28:50.960 --> 01:28:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1759
01:28:51.159 --> 01:28:54.399
<v Speaker 5>I mean it's a very fair question, and my response

1760
01:28:54.520 --> 01:28:57.399
<v Speaker 5>is one I've regulated tech and as an elected official

1761
01:28:57.399 --> 01:28:59.800
<v Speaker 5>over the last six years, I have never done one

1762
01:28:59.840 --> 01:29:04.159
<v Speaker 5>thing to benefit the biggest employers in Silicon Valley over

1763
01:29:04.199 --> 01:29:06.119
<v Speaker 5>the people of San Jose, and I sure as heck

1764
01:29:06.119 --> 01:29:08.079
<v Speaker 5>I'm not going to do that in Sacramento. I'm actually

1765
01:29:08.159 --> 01:29:12.159
<v Speaker 5>running against special interest capture in Sacramento, and I'm not

1766
01:29:12.199 --> 01:29:15.239
<v Speaker 5>going to replace one set of interest with another. I

1767
01:29:15.279 --> 01:29:20.239
<v Speaker 5>have been very willing and have consistently put restrictions on

1768
01:29:20.279 --> 01:29:23.279
<v Speaker 5>how we use technology, how we interface with tech, companies.

1769
01:29:23.640 --> 01:29:27.720
<v Speaker 5>I think the honest reason that there are tech employees,

1770
01:29:27.800 --> 01:29:31.760
<v Speaker 5>tech leaders, investors, etc. Who have contributed to the campaign

1771
01:29:32.079 --> 01:29:34.960
<v Speaker 5>is I lead the largest city in Silicon Valley and

1772
01:29:35.039 --> 01:29:39.159
<v Speaker 5>they've seen that we have led the state in reducing crime,

1773
01:29:39.399 --> 01:29:44.760
<v Speaker 5>reducing homelessness, building housing, fixing our problems. And I think

1774
01:29:44.840 --> 01:29:49.279
<v Speaker 5>people are drawn to results in competent leadership. And I'm

1775
01:29:49.319 --> 01:29:51.680
<v Speaker 5>just better known in the Bay Area where we have

1776
01:29:51.720 --> 01:29:54.520
<v Speaker 5>a number of tech companies. But that's why I'm spending

1777
01:29:54.560 --> 01:29:57.359
<v Speaker 5>so much time traveling around the state, getting to know

1778
01:29:57.439 --> 01:30:00.880
<v Speaker 5>people in other places and really making the case for

1779
01:30:01.039 --> 01:30:05.520
<v Speaker 5>good government. But I put out a very clear AI

1780
01:30:05.560 --> 01:30:07.920
<v Speaker 5>accountability plan that is based on everything I've done in

1781
01:30:07.960 --> 01:30:10.960
<v Speaker 5>San Jose over the last six years and is where

1782
01:30:11.079 --> 01:30:13.359
<v Speaker 5>I am on these issues. And I put that out

1783
01:30:13.399 --> 01:30:17.159
<v Speaker 5>transparently for everyone from voters to my donors to see it.

1784
01:30:17.520 --> 01:30:20.359
<v Speaker 5>And if donors don't like it, they can find another candidate.

1785
01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:22.800
<v Speaker 2>One donor name that surprised me was a guy named

1786
01:30:22.840 --> 01:30:26.479
<v Speaker 2>Joe Lonsdale. He's a co founder Palenteer, big Republican mega donor.

1787
01:30:26.479 --> 01:30:28.640
<v Speaker 2>He's like a big Elon stand gave a million to

1788
01:30:28.680 --> 01:30:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Elon's like pro Trump superpack maxed out to you, what's

1789
01:30:32.520 --> 01:30:34.439
<v Speaker 2>up with that guy? He seems a little crazy.

1790
01:30:34.920 --> 01:30:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

1791
01:30:35.399 --> 01:30:36.880
<v Speaker 5>You'd have to ask him. I mean I have I

1792
01:30:36.920 --> 01:30:38.800
<v Speaker 5>have probably thousands of doors.

1793
01:30:38.920 --> 01:30:40.279
<v Speaker 2>He's not like someone you do back in the day

1794
01:30:40.319 --> 01:30:41.439
<v Speaker 2>when he's a Palenteer or something.

1795
01:30:41.720 --> 01:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>No.

1796
01:30:41.960 --> 01:30:43.800
<v Speaker 5>I know he's from He's from the Bay Area, and

1797
01:30:43.840 --> 01:30:45.439
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

1798
01:30:45.479 --> 01:30:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I Look, he's just an aggressive tweeter. I've we've come,

1799
01:30:47.960 --> 01:30:48.600
<v Speaker 2>We've crossed paths.

1800
01:30:48.600 --> 01:30:50.199
<v Speaker 5>That's what you guys have been tweeting at each other.

1801
01:30:50.640 --> 01:30:53.359
<v Speaker 2>You know, Look, we all have our weaknesses, and that's

1802
01:30:53.359 --> 01:30:56.920
<v Speaker 2>one of mine. It does feel like though, like the

1803
01:30:56.920 --> 01:30:59.560
<v Speaker 2>there was a time, look I was in the Obama

1804
01:30:59.680 --> 01:31:02.840
<v Speaker 2>in and like the kind of eight through twenty thirteen

1805
01:31:02.880 --> 01:31:07.319
<v Speaker 2>phase of like the there's a lot of excitement around tech.

1806
01:31:07.399 --> 01:31:11.039
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of cooperation between the administration and tech industry,

1807
01:31:11.159 --> 01:31:13.520
<v Speaker 2>probably too much to our you know, discredit in the

1808
01:31:13.520 --> 01:31:16.319
<v Speaker 2>Obama world. Now it seems like a lot of the

1809
01:31:16.359 --> 01:31:20.159
<v Speaker 2>tech industry guys are like, gloves are off, Fuck this,

1810
01:31:20.479 --> 01:31:23.600
<v Speaker 2>We're battling regulation right, like Indrease and Horowitz. According to

1811
01:31:23.600 --> 01:31:26.039
<v Speaker 2>The New York Times, is made more than one hundred

1812
01:31:26.079 --> 01:31:29.119
<v Speaker 2>and fifty million, one hundred and fifteen million dollars worth

1813
01:31:29.159 --> 01:31:32.720
<v Speaker 2>of disclosed federal contributions to candidates or entities working on

1814
01:31:32.760 --> 01:31:37.359
<v Speaker 2>the upcoming midterms. That's like fifty mil for like a

1815
01:31:37.359 --> 01:31:42.359
<v Speaker 2>AI pack, another forty seven million for crypto super pack. Like.

1816
01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:45.319
<v Speaker 2>Does that wor you? Does that disgust you that like

1817
01:31:45.399 --> 01:31:48.920
<v Speaker 2>this one VC firm can dump one hundred million to

1818
01:31:49.039 --> 01:31:52.760
<v Speaker 2>advocate for like its you know, book of portfolio companies.

1819
01:31:53.119 --> 01:31:56.079
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Absolutely, I mean I'm I'm worried about concentrated power

1820
01:31:56.079 --> 01:32:00.960
<v Speaker 5>and politics in all forms. The biggest donor and tech

1821
01:32:01.039 --> 01:32:06.199
<v Speaker 5>now is becoming one of the largest industries or donor

1822
01:32:06.239 --> 01:32:08.800
<v Speaker 5>bases in the country of any industry you've had oil

1823
01:32:08.840 --> 01:32:11.159
<v Speaker 5>and gas in the state of California. It is worth

1824
01:32:11.199 --> 01:32:13.880
<v Speaker 5>noting there are other groups as well, from public sector

1825
01:32:13.960 --> 01:32:17.600
<v Speaker 5>unions to trial lawyers, who spend a tremendous amount of money,

1826
01:32:18.279 --> 01:32:20.119
<v Speaker 5>sometimes for things I agree with that I think are

1827
01:32:20.159 --> 01:32:23.520
<v Speaker 5>generally good for society, Sometimes for narrow or interests are

1828
01:32:23.680 --> 01:32:26.600
<v Speaker 5>that are not always good for society. I actually got

1829
01:32:26.640 --> 01:32:29.319
<v Speaker 5>involved in the way I ended up in tech was

1830
01:32:29.479 --> 01:32:35.159
<v Speaker 5>building tools for grassroots organizing. The early petitions like the

1831
01:32:35.239 --> 01:32:38.960
<v Speaker 5>change dot org tools, early fundraisers, go fundme, These kinds

1832
01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:44.479
<v Speaker 5>of early tools to try to basically help people organize

1833
01:32:44.479 --> 01:32:48.960
<v Speaker 5>at a grassroots level and make the system more accountable

1834
01:32:49.000 --> 01:32:51.880
<v Speaker 5>to the people than to the donors. I've always been

1835
01:32:51.880 --> 01:32:55.840
<v Speaker 5>worried about the influence of concentrated money and power and

1836
01:32:55.880 --> 01:33:00.279
<v Speaker 5>our politics, so it does worry me. I do think think, though,

1837
01:33:00.319 --> 01:33:04.520
<v Speaker 5>that the Democratic Party has to also recognize there's a

1838
01:33:04.560 --> 01:33:08.199
<v Speaker 5>split within the party right now, and we have also

1839
01:33:08.479 --> 01:33:14.800
<v Speaker 5>driven away many people who are have started companies. All right,

1840
01:33:14.800 --> 01:33:17.319
<v Speaker 5>I'm not just talking about in tech. I mean generally speaking,

1841
01:33:17.359 --> 01:33:19.560
<v Speaker 5>as I go around the state, just set tech aside

1842
01:33:19.560 --> 01:33:22.520
<v Speaker 5>when I go talk to people in agriculture, in Hollywood,

1843
01:33:22.920 --> 01:33:28.039
<v Speaker 5>in manufacturing, in a wide range of industries. The regulatory

1844
01:33:28.079 --> 01:33:31.000
<v Speaker 5>burden in California is a real issue, and I think

1845
01:33:31.039 --> 01:33:34.880
<v Speaker 5>we become very dismissive of it as deregulation is a

1846
01:33:34.880 --> 01:33:38.960
<v Speaker 5>Republican thing that's just because they want more profit. I

1847
01:33:39.000 --> 01:33:41.840
<v Speaker 5>don't think that's the case. I mean, we broke the

1848
01:33:41.880 --> 01:33:46.720
<v Speaker 5>housing market by overregulating it in California. That's building more

1849
01:33:46.720 --> 01:33:50.159
<v Speaker 5>housing and creating room for new people for future generations.

1850
01:33:50.199 --> 01:33:53.159
<v Speaker 5>Making housing more affordable is actually a very progressive aim.

1851
01:33:53.479 --> 01:33:54.880
<v Speaker 2>I totally agree, but I feel like we're just so

1852
01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:58.640
<v Speaker 2>far from over regulating social media companies. I think Australia

1853
01:33:58.720 --> 01:34:01.479
<v Speaker 2>is banning accounts for kids under sixteen, right, I mean,

1854
01:34:01.479 --> 01:34:02.640
<v Speaker 2>we're just we're doing.

1855
01:34:02.479 --> 01:34:04.960
<v Speaker 5>Nothing right, and that's part of my proposal is actually

1856
01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:08.680
<v Speaker 5>to require at least parental consent up to up to sixteen.

1857
01:34:09.760 --> 01:34:12.159
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, I think that's I think that's fair. But

1858
01:34:12.279 --> 01:34:18.239
<v Speaker 5>I do think we risk losing natural allies of the

1859
01:34:18.279 --> 01:34:22.479
<v Speaker 5>party if our answered every problem is another regulation and

1860
01:34:22.520 --> 01:34:25.800
<v Speaker 5>other attacks. And I think look within tech, maybe it's appropriate.

1861
01:34:25.880 --> 01:34:28.279
<v Speaker 5>The regulatory environment is not very mature at this point,

1862
01:34:28.560 --> 01:34:31.760
<v Speaker 5>but there are plenty of other industries like housing and agriculture,

1863
01:34:31.800 --> 01:34:36.960
<v Speaker 5>where you could argue we're punishing, we're actually restricting economic

1864
01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:39.119
<v Speaker 5>opportunity and pushing people out of state.

1865
01:34:40.399 --> 01:34:43.920
<v Speaker 2>You've criticized government avenues for the kind of focusing too

1866
01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:45.800
<v Speaker 2>much on trolling Donald Trump. I think you said he

1867
01:34:45.840 --> 01:34:49.920
<v Speaker 2>made a quote blind leap into Memeland. Gavin and Trump

1868
01:34:49.960 --> 01:34:52.199
<v Speaker 2>have kind of a ross and Rachel will they won't

1869
01:34:52.199 --> 01:34:56.199
<v Speaker 2>they frenemies? You know, antagonistic thing going. It's probably unique

1870
01:34:56.199 --> 01:34:59.079
<v Speaker 2>to them, right, They're big, larger than life people. But

1871
01:34:59.279 --> 01:35:02.199
<v Speaker 2>Trump and the conservative media they love to beat up

1872
01:35:02.239 --> 01:35:04.920
<v Speaker 2>on California. Right, Fox News all day is like some

1873
01:35:05.119 --> 01:35:07.399
<v Speaker 2>video of something that happened on the street. So I

1874
01:35:07.399 --> 01:35:10.640
<v Speaker 2>don't think that Trump attacks end when Gavin is gone.

1875
01:35:11.079 --> 01:35:14.760
<v Speaker 2>How would you manage that relationship differently than him or

1876
01:35:15.119 --> 01:35:17.840
<v Speaker 2>or continuity would I.

1877
01:35:17.800 --> 01:35:21.079
<v Speaker 5>Mean, the way I think about it is there's a

1878
01:35:21.119 --> 01:35:24.479
<v Speaker 5>set of things that are just redlines for me and

1879
01:35:24.520 --> 01:35:27.079
<v Speaker 5>for the state of California. We're going to fight to

1880
01:35:27.159 --> 01:35:30.640
<v Speaker 5>protect our vulnerable neighbors. We're going to push back on ICE.

1881
01:35:30.720 --> 01:35:33.680
<v Speaker 5>We're going to fight to protect constitutional freedoms. We're going

1882
01:35:33.680 --> 01:35:35.960
<v Speaker 5>to fight for our fair share federal funding. There are

1883
01:35:35.960 --> 01:35:40.880
<v Speaker 5>a number of areas where, unfortunately, we are going to

1884
01:35:40.880 --> 01:35:43.359
<v Speaker 5>have to fight fire with fire, As Governor Newsom has said,

1885
01:35:43.439 --> 01:35:45.640
<v Speaker 5>and in San Jose, I've led us to sue the

1886
01:35:45.640 --> 01:35:50.279
<v Speaker 5>Trump administration multiple times. We've used our budget to backfill cuts.

1887
01:35:50.399 --> 01:35:56.279
<v Speaker 5>We've were funding legal services for immigrant neighbors who are

1888
01:35:56.439 --> 01:36:00.520
<v Speaker 5>at risk of deportation. We've banned ICE's use of masks

1889
01:36:00.600 --> 01:36:05.680
<v Speaker 5>and their use of public property. So I will use

1890
01:36:05.720 --> 01:36:09.840
<v Speaker 5>every tool in the toolbox, legal, budgetary, bully pulpit, whatever

1891
01:36:09.880 --> 01:36:14.000
<v Speaker 5>tools we have to fight back. I do want to

1892
01:36:14.119 --> 01:36:17.560
<v Speaker 5>go back to the place I started, which is I

1893
01:36:17.600 --> 01:36:20.520
<v Speaker 5>also think that we've got to take ownership of our

1894
01:36:20.560 --> 01:36:25.119
<v Speaker 5>shortcomings and start solving highly visible and visceral problems that

1895
01:36:25.199 --> 01:36:29.600
<v Speaker 5>affect people every day. I mean this may sound superficial,

1896
01:36:29.680 --> 01:36:32.720
<v Speaker 5>but when people drive around Los Angeles and see the

1897
01:36:32.760 --> 01:36:35.319
<v Speaker 5>state of the freeways and see thousands of people living

1898
01:36:35.319 --> 01:36:39.000
<v Speaker 5>outside in misery and tents and trash and fires and graffiti,

1899
01:36:39.079 --> 01:36:42.199
<v Speaker 5>it just undermines our credibility. It underminds trusting government. It

1900
01:36:42.199 --> 01:36:45.439
<v Speaker 5>makes it that much harder to stand for something different

1901
01:36:45.520 --> 01:36:47.319
<v Speaker 5>that people can believe in. And I'm not pretending that

1902
01:36:47.359 --> 01:36:49.319
<v Speaker 5>the Republicans have got it all right. They've got plenty

1903
01:36:49.319 --> 01:36:51.840
<v Speaker 5>of problems, and Red states have plenty of problems. We

1904
01:36:52.399 --> 01:36:55.439
<v Speaker 5>do a better job in many ways at being economically

1905
01:36:55.439 --> 01:36:59.439
<v Speaker 5>inclusive and certainly more welcoming socially and politically. But I

1906
01:36:59.640 --> 01:37:02.920
<v Speaker 5>just I think we've got to also fix our fundamental problems,

1907
01:37:02.960 --> 01:37:05.520
<v Speaker 5>starting with the high cost of housing. Until we grapple

1908
01:37:05.560 --> 01:37:06.760
<v Speaker 5>with that, I don't think we're going to be a

1909
01:37:06.880 --> 01:37:08.279
<v Speaker 5>very effective resistance.

1910
01:37:08.359 --> 01:37:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. My last question for you is about housing, which

1911
01:37:10.760 --> 01:37:14.199
<v Speaker 2>is in California, we have something called Prop thirteen. I'm

1912
01:37:14.239 --> 01:37:16.520
<v Speaker 2>sure you know about it. Listeners naturally don't as passed

1913
01:37:16.520 --> 01:37:20.079
<v Speaker 2>in the late seventies, Younger Californians mostly hate it because

1914
01:37:20.079 --> 01:37:23.159
<v Speaker 2>it means that new home buyers pay much higher property

1915
01:37:23.199 --> 01:37:26.399
<v Speaker 2>taxes on like the identical house to someone who bought

1916
01:37:26.399 --> 01:37:28.079
<v Speaker 2>it forty years earlier. You can correct me if I'm

1917
01:37:28.079 --> 01:37:30.199
<v Speaker 2>getting the deatos or I'm shorthanding this. It creates this

1918
01:37:30.279 --> 01:37:33.920
<v Speaker 2>general unfairness and it can lock up housing supply because

1919
01:37:33.960 --> 01:37:36.560
<v Speaker 2>if you're a senior, you're not going to downsize if

1920
01:37:36.600 --> 01:37:39.000
<v Speaker 2>that means you're going to pay a much higher property tax, right,

1921
01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:42.000
<v Speaker 2>you want to lock in that privileged tax rate over time.

1922
01:37:42.039 --> 01:37:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Prop thirteen is gutted revenue for California's public schools, and

1923
01:37:45.600 --> 01:37:48.520
<v Speaker 2>like smart, kind of wonky people I know almost literally

1924
01:37:48.560 --> 01:37:51.159
<v Speaker 2>will blame it for like all of California's problems. Right,

1925
01:37:51.199 --> 01:37:53.199
<v Speaker 2>there are number of books to that, yes, and so

1926
01:37:53.520 --> 01:37:58.239
<v Speaker 2>like Sadly, it feels politically impossible to repeal the thing

1927
01:37:58.439 --> 01:38:02.520
<v Speaker 2>because propensity to vote. Seniors like it because it keeps

1928
01:38:02.560 --> 01:38:05.520
<v Speaker 2>their property taxes low. So like, what do we do here?

1929
01:38:05.600 --> 01:38:08.079
<v Speaker 2>How do we bring some fairness to property tax collection

1930
01:38:08.560 --> 01:38:12.039
<v Speaker 2>and unfreeze the housing market with this anchor around our neck?

1931
01:38:12.279 --> 01:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

1932
01:38:12.560 --> 01:38:13.399
<v Speaker 5>How many hours do you have?

1933
01:38:14.520 --> 01:38:15.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean Thursday?

1934
01:38:15.880 --> 01:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

1935
01:38:16.600 --> 01:38:20.560
<v Speaker 5>I think one is just across the board. Our housing

1936
01:38:20.600 --> 01:38:22.720
<v Speaker 5>issues come down to a lack of supply, so we

1937
01:38:22.720 --> 01:38:25.159
<v Speaker 5>need to build more housing, and that will slow down

1938
01:38:25.279 --> 01:38:28.279
<v Speaker 5>the rate at which the value of housing goes up,

1939
01:38:28.319 --> 01:38:31.439
<v Speaker 5>which will help moderate property tax increases. The reason Prop

1940
01:38:31.479 --> 01:38:35.600
<v Speaker 5>thirteen was passed was property tax increases were happening so

1941
01:38:35.760 --> 01:38:37.600
<v Speaker 5>fast that people were literally getting pushed out of their

1942
01:38:37.600 --> 01:38:40.000
<v Speaker 5>homes because they couldn't keep pace with the rising costs.

1943
01:38:40.039 --> 01:38:42.079
<v Speaker 5>So it doesn't freeze it, but it caps it at

1944
01:38:42.119 --> 01:38:44.079
<v Speaker 5>a one and a half percent increase per year, which

1945
01:38:44.079 --> 01:38:46.920
<v Speaker 5>you could argue is too low. Maybe to properly have

1946
01:38:46.960 --> 01:38:50.039
<v Speaker 5>a more functioning market, it should be higher, Right, That's

1947
01:38:50.039 --> 01:38:52.680
<v Speaker 5>a debate you could have. I think there are some

1948
01:38:52.800 --> 01:38:56.279
<v Speaker 5>pragmatic things that it could be politically feasible. One is

1949
01:38:57.399 --> 01:39:00.960
<v Speaker 5>we should enable older residents to take their property tax

1950
01:39:01.039 --> 01:39:04.680
<v Speaker 5>benefit with them if they downsize, so that we can

1951
01:39:04.760 --> 01:39:09.359
<v Speaker 5>free up that housing stock. So if you're an older couple,

1952
01:39:09.600 --> 01:39:11.960
<v Speaker 5>or you're living alone and you've got four bedrooms and

1953
01:39:11.960 --> 01:39:15.920
<v Speaker 5>a suburban neighborhood somewhere, if we could incentivize you to

1954
01:39:16.159 --> 01:39:18.840
<v Speaker 5>capture that benefit and continue to have low property taxes

1955
01:39:18.880 --> 01:39:21.319
<v Speaker 5>by moving into a condo by the beach, like great

1956
01:39:21.359 --> 01:39:24.840
<v Speaker 5>we should allow for that flexibility and fluidity in the market.

1957
01:39:25.279 --> 01:39:28.039
<v Speaker 5>Another thing that could be done is you could say, well,

1958
01:39:28.479 --> 01:39:30.680
<v Speaker 5>having property taxes go up more than one and a

1959
01:39:30.680 --> 01:39:33.720
<v Speaker 5>half percent per year could price people out. But what

1960
01:39:33.840 --> 01:39:36.720
<v Speaker 5>if some of that actually accrued over time and then

1961
01:39:36.840 --> 01:39:38.720
<v Speaker 5>was assessed at the time that you sold the home,

1962
01:39:39.359 --> 01:39:41.760
<v Speaker 5>And so that way you're not getting hit each year

1963
01:39:41.840 --> 01:39:44.319
<v Speaker 5>with a larger, larger property tax bill that you can't

1964
01:39:44.359 --> 01:39:46.840
<v Speaker 5>afford when you're raising kids or whatever else you're doing.

1965
01:39:47.119 --> 01:39:50.720
<v Speaker 5>But when you eventually sell the house, presumably the house

1966
01:39:50.760 --> 01:39:53.479
<v Speaker 5>has appreciated. That's why your property taxes are going up.

1967
01:39:53.880 --> 01:39:56.000
<v Speaker 5>That then gets paid back in. But I would also

1968
01:39:56.159 --> 01:39:59.479
<v Speaker 5>just note I don't I think Prop thirteen reform is

1969
01:39:59.520 --> 01:40:03.159
<v Speaker 5>about fairness and distortions in the market. I think it's

1970
01:40:03.159 --> 01:40:06.880
<v Speaker 5>a mistake for Democrats to make it a big revenue generator,

1971
01:40:06.920 --> 01:40:10.279
<v Speaker 5>because the truth is, while it did reduce revenues to

1972
01:40:10.560 --> 01:40:13.359
<v Speaker 5>the state and to school districts, after it passed, we

1973
01:40:13.399 --> 01:40:16.000
<v Speaker 5>went and found a bunch of other sources of revenue.

1974
01:40:16.039 --> 01:40:18.960
<v Speaker 5>We created an income tax, we tax capital gains, we

1975
01:40:19.039 --> 01:40:23.560
<v Speaker 5>tax businesses, We tax everything. So our overall tax burden

1976
01:40:23.960 --> 01:40:26.079
<v Speaker 5>is the second highest or third high, depending on you

1977
01:40:26.079 --> 01:40:29.000
<v Speaker 5>measure it third highest in the country I've noticed. Yeah, yeah,

1978
01:40:29.039 --> 01:40:31.760
<v Speaker 5>so you're experiencing it. We found other ways to tax.

1979
01:40:32.119 --> 01:40:34.600
<v Speaker 2>You're right, we could talk about this forever, but you

1980
01:40:34.640 --> 01:40:36.600
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of things to do. Where can people

1981
01:40:36.960 --> 01:40:40.199
<v Speaker 2>find your campaign if they want to get involved, support you, knockdoors,

1982
01:40:40.199 --> 01:40:40.880
<v Speaker 2>donate whatever.

1983
01:40:41.079 --> 01:40:44.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, thanks for the opportunity. I appreciate all great questions.

1984
01:40:44.920 --> 01:40:50.319
<v Speaker 5>And my website is Mayhean Maha n for California dot com.

1985
01:40:50.359 --> 01:40:52.399
<v Speaker 5>You can find me on social media. If you have

1986
01:40:52.399 --> 01:40:55.920
<v Speaker 5>any follow up questions to this interview, shoot me an email. Otherwise,

1987
01:40:55.920 --> 01:40:57.039
<v Speaker 5>hope to see folks out there.

1988
01:40:57.079 --> 01:40:59.239
<v Speaker 2>Excellent, mister Mary, thank you so much for coming.

1989
01:40:59.039 --> 01:40:59.840
<v Speaker 5>In, Thanks for having me.

1990
01:41:06.640 --> 01:41:08.359
<v Speaker 1>That's our show for today. Thanks to Matt Mahon for

1991
01:41:08.399 --> 01:41:10.199
<v Speaker 1>stopping by. Alex will be back on the feed on

1992
01:41:10.239 --> 01:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Sunday with a conversation with our buddy norm Eiazen about

1993
01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the slush fund and all of Trump's other self dealing.

1994
01:41:15.640 --> 01:41:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Check it out everyone else, have a.

1995
01:41:17.359 --> 01:41:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Good weekend by everyone.

1996
01:41:19.319 --> 01:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Positive America is a Crooked Media production. Our show is

1997
01:41:21.680 --> 01:41:24.359
<v Speaker 1>produced by Austin Fisher, Saul Ruben, McKenna Roberts, and Faris

1998
01:41:24.359 --> 01:41:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Safari with Reed Jerling, Elijah Cone and Adrian Hill. Our

1999
01:41:27.039 --> 01:41:29.800
<v Speaker 1>team includes Matt de Groat, Ben Hethcote, Jordan Kantor, Charlotte

2000
01:41:29.840 --> 01:41:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Landis Krol pel Avive, David Toles, Mia Kelman, Ryan Young

2001
01:41:32.439 --> 01:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and Naomi Single. Our staff is probably unionized with the

2002
01:41:34.640 --> 01:41:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Writers Guild of America East
