Speaker 1: And hello, how are you happy Thursday too? You welcome
to the Big Podcast on this twenty second day of January,
Year of Our Lord, twenty twenty six. My name is
Tom Sullivan. I looked over the list of things to
talk about today. In my list actually pretty long. Yesterday
it was pretty short. Yesterday was all about Davos and Greenland,
and then Greenland and Davos, and we followed that. But
when all was said and done, the rest of the
news barrel was pretty much empty. But today we're back
with We've got a little bit more on Davos. We've
got a whole bunch coming out of Minnesota. And the weather, Yeah,
we're going to have a little weather to do as well,
So let's start with Davos. Some of the reactions. Brit Hume,
the dean of DC Political Prognosticators, was asked what he
thought about what happened in Davos with the President.
Speaker 2: Well, what we're finding out is hearing is correct, and
the United States would gain control, maybe even sovereignty or
zones within Greenland to set up bases and for other
military purposes. That would certainly be a solution to the
to the issue, but it's not entirely clear to me
how it would matter practically, how different much difference it
would make between that and what we have now. We
have extensive basing right it's in Greenland under a treaty
reach in nineteen fifty one through NATO that allowed us
to have a lot of bases in Greenland. And we
did have a lot of bases in Greenland. They were
all all but one were taken down. So it's the
practical difference is a little unclear to me, but it
might be enough to get out of this controversy.
Speaker 1: So basically he's saying, I don't know what changed. We
had all these opportunities before we had that agreement. We
could go in there, build bases where we want. Well,
the President too was asked today about well, what happened.
You give us any details about where this is going
from here?
Speaker 3: This ultimately mean that the US will ultimately acquire Greenland.
Speaker 4: Well, I don't know if I can say that, but
it could be. I mean, it's possible. Anything's possible. But
in the meantime, we're getting everything we wanted, total security,
total access to everything, have as many bases, have all
the equipment that we want, and very importantly you know,
we're building the Golden Dome, we call it.
Speaker 1: That's why Brett Humes said, I don't know. I don't
see any difference. I don't either. It looks like it
was basically the President tried to acquire Greenland one way
or the other, threatened military, then took that off the table,
and then was going to buy it, and then that
they Basically he's been in deals. He throws it out
there on the table, he tries to get as much
as he possibly can, and if he runs up against
a brick wall, he backs off. And I think that's
really all that happened. I mean, they're going to get
together and have some sort of power ow to talk
about I don't know, maybe update the nineteen fifty one agreement.
But basically he tried and we're basically where we were
before the Davos, before this whole ruckus. What did Bridge
Hume say, get out of this controversy. That's where we are.
I have to play this for you too. This happened
today in Davos. Elon Musk is there and they're asking
him about the future of SpaceX and all these various things,
and he starts getting very philosophical here's Elon.
Speaker 5: But the overall goal of my companies is to maximize
the future of civilization, like basically maximize the probability that
civilization has a great future, and to expand consciousness beyond Earth.
So say SpaceX for example, that SpaceX is about both
advancing rocket technology to the point where we can extend
life and consciousness beyond Earth, to the Moon, to Mars,
eventually to other star systems. And I think we should
always view consciousness life as we know it as precarious
and delicate, because to the best of our knowledge, we
don't know if life anywhere else. You know, I'm often asked,
all there are aliens among us, and I'll say that
I am one, but or you're from the future. They
don't believe me, okay, So I think if anyone would
know if there are aliens among us, it would be
And we have nine thousand satellites up there and not
once have we had to maneuver around an alien spaceship.
So like, I don't know. Bottom line is, I think
we need to assume that life and consciousness is extremely rare,
and it might only be us.
Speaker 1: I don't know. They're kind of a serious Crowther but
I heard a little strugle when he talked about the
fact that he was an alien and nobody believes him.
But he got into life and consciousness and very philosophical.
But I mean, that's Elon man. He's thinking on a
different level than most of us do. Anyway, So that
was that's it for Davos. President got on the plane
and heading back to the US Minnesota. Nothing's changed, It
just stuck into going at each other. Last night on
Cuomo's show, he had the mayor, Mayor fry and well,
it doesn't sound like anybody's moving towards peace.
Speaker 6: You don't believe that the federal government is right that
the state of Minnesota, of course, through the governor's office,
refuses to give them access to the jails and prisons
to collect people that they say are criminal and not
supposed to be in the country.
Speaker 7: I won't speak for the state. I will let them
speak for themselves, but certainly that is what they have
relayed in Minneapolis. We will not cooperate with ICE or
any federal agency around immigration enforcement work. We will not.
Speaker 1: Well, that's their position. I don't think it's right. I
don't think you can I never understood it and they've
let it go. So now it's part and parcel of
our landscape. But there are federal laws, and there are
state laws, and there are city ordinances. Where did sanctuary
laws come from? This is a totally made up thing,
and so they are they could solve this whole problem.
There's some ICE is saying that there are homeland securities,
saying the ors something like thirteen hundred people in Minneapolis jails,
maybe it's Minnesota jails, thirteen hundred and some number that
are criminals that have been arrested by local police and
they're here illegally. They're not citizens. They snuck into our country.
Why can't they, in the quiet of the jail, turn
over these people to ICE and then they would deport
them and there would not be crowds out on the
street fighting with each other. It just would not happen.
So but they're stuck on this made up law about
sanctuary and the problems. I told you last week, there's
no leadership here. There's no leadership from the mayor of Minneapolis,
then no leadership from Tim Walls the bottom line, and
there's no leadership, if I may say, from Department of
Homeland Security. They need to re strategize how they're going
to go about the process of picking up illegals in Minnesota,
because what they're doing is not working, and all they're
doing is just creating more anger. And because you can work,
and it doesn't matter if it's logical or not, you
can work a crowd up. And remember how a lot
of this go back before all this stuff about ice
showing up. They're also looking at Minnesota from the fraud,
and I must tell you again, Minnesota, I think is
clearly caught red handed with fraudulent activities that they've known about.
This is all going to come out in the wash.
But I don't think Minnesota is alone. I think there's
a number of other states. I've heard the numbers from
California are maybe ten times the size of Minnesota's fraud.
So there's fraud everywhere in government. You see stories about
it almost every day. So there was this lady who
was arrested for fraud. She's in I believe the Minneapolis
jail awaiting her trial. I'm not going to use her name,
but she talked to one of the reporters from Fox
and claimed that everybody in government knew exactly what was
going on with the fraud.
Speaker 8: I have to believe that the governor's office and Keith
Ellison's office were aware of this. Dave said they were
involved in helping the FBI. They've said they were made aware,
but apparently I'm scary, so they couldn't do anything.
Speaker 1: Apparently what she did was she said up a bunch
of phony restaurants that did not exist and then claimed
that she was making meals for the hungry and got
all kinds of money. And they knew it, and they
knew that she didn't have any restaurants.
Speaker 8: It all went through a process, they were all approved,
they were all paid by the state. Yet all the
fingers are being pointed at me.
Speaker 1: So she's admitting that she basically did this fraud and
she had these phony restaurants. Paul Morrow, former NYPD guy,
weigh in on do you believe people that are in jail.
Speaker 9: Here's the thing. Obviously she has an incentive to say
what she's saying. She's looking at thirty years. She's very
involved with this. The danger for the people she's talking about, Waltz, Fry,
Ellison and others is the fact that she can serve
as a pointer. Whether we choose to believe her or not.
It comes down to will a grand jury or ultimately,
if it goes to trial, a pettitury, a jury of
our peers, twelve people potentially believing her testimony relative to
these other people. But when you have somebody like this
that was on the inside, we always called it an intelligence,
a pointer. She's there to tell you as you go
through a mountain of emails, a mountain of communications, which
we know they serve subpoenas to get those upenias for documents, right,
including electronic documents. As you ferre through a mountain of stuff,
if you have a quote unquote pointer to say no, no, no, no,
forget about that, look over here, saves you a lot
of time. It helps focus the investigation, and should he
might have to cut a deal so that she has
less time in order to testify in all of it.
But that's how cases have made. Anybody who's obviously in
a mafia movie knows not.
Speaker 1: So that's part of it is the fraud is still there,
and the investigation is supposedly still going on, and Ice
is still there, and they're running around trying to find
all the people that are illegal. And they had another
press conference today where somebody in a kind of a
military uniform but I think may have been part of ICE,
went through the list, kind of like President Trump did
two days ago in the White House, going through showing
photos of all the people that they have picked up,
and they're all, you know, heinous crimes that these people
have committed and ICE has picked them up, and they're
no longer on the streets of Minnesota. And people should
be cheering, but instead not so. And then one of
the stings that came out today was about ICE. A
memo from ICE that was dated months ago said that
ICE can go bust into people's homes without a warrant.
Richard Blumenthal, who is a Democrat senator from Connecticut former
Attorney General of Connecticut, was all upset.
Speaker 10: Americans should be terrified that this secret ICE policy authorizes
agents to break down doors and ransacked through their homes,
arresting or detaining people without a judicial warrant.
Speaker 1: Did you hear that you should be terrified? This is
what's going on. Bloomenthal has if he has the whole story,
he's not letting you know, but he's not maybe curious
enough to find out the whole story that no they're
not busting down doors and dragging people out of their
homes without a judicial warrant. I mean, the first day,
brand new Rookie Copp knows you can't do that. The
Fourth Amendment is pretty simple about the fact that you
are safe in your home. They cannot come in your
home without a search warrant unless there is one of
the exceptions to go through some of the exceptions. The
memo that they're talking about data back in May of
last year. It was from todd Lyons, the acting director
at ICE, and Blumenthal got a hold of it. It
says ICE agents are allowed to forcibly enter the home
of a person using an administrative warrant if a judge
has issued a final order of removal. So the administrative
warrants permit officers and agents to make arrest and are
different than judicial warrants, which a judge signs allowing entry
into the home. This memo says no, if they've already
been ordered by a judge to be removed, an administrative
warrant is satisfactory. So this is we're going to need
to go to the courts obviously to figure out what
the answer is on all of this. But there's also
plenty of exceptions when it comes to warrants. Police. For example,
they can enter into your home if they're chasing you
and you drive as fast as you can or run
as fast as you can to your home and run
in the door and close it. No, they can just
keep on coming. They will come right called a hot pursuit.
And if you're running from the police and you run
into anybody's house, they can follow you right in. If
you're arrested in your home, police can search the immediate
area without a warrant. They arrest you and they look
over over there in the corner of the room where
you are arrested, and there's a machine gun or something,
or a bag of drugs, they can do all of that.
The plane view doctrine that evidence of a crime in
plane view, they can seize that as well. I mean,
there's a number of exceptions that the police can use.
So we're going to wait to see this is probably
going to go back ground to some court somewhere. But
the other big legal stink in Minnesota is a couple
of days ago. I forget which day. It must have
been Sunday, but there was a church in in Minneapolis
and people were there on Sunday and they were attending
the service. I don't know what religion it was, but
it was a Christian church and there is a there
were a group of protesters that came into the church.
Now there's a dispute about did they how they came in,
but they were there and well, let me they definitely
were disrupting the service. Let me play just a little
snippet of some of the sound from that church once
the protesters arrived. This is from CNN last night Aaron
Burnett Show. She had the lady on who was the
head of disrupting, the head of Black Lives Matter Minnesota.
She is a lawyer, she's also an ordained minister, and
so she said, oh, no, they came in peacefully and
were part of the service. And then Aaron Burnett said, hold.
Speaker 8: On, I'll play that because we do have audio of
that here.
Speaker 11: First here it.
Speaker 10: Is renee go, renee go, renee go.
Speaker 1: So you can tell that they were disrupting the entire
church service. And there is a law I has passed
back in the nightties I told you the other day.
It's called the Face Act, and it was designed to
basically keep people from protesting in front of the doors
of abortion clinics so that women who want to go
get an abortion and could come and go without being
disrupted by protesters. And in order to get those the
Democrats push that. The Republicans said, yeah, well we'll go
along with that if you will also do the same
thing for not disrupting church services. And they said, okay,
so the law says you can't disrupt church services or
abortion facilities. So here's the lady she was arrested today.
Her name, let me find it here, is Nakima Levi Armstrong.
Speaker 11: She is.
Speaker 1: Proud of the fact that she led that demonstration. It
was in the city's church in Saint Paul, Minnesota. She
was also she was arrested today and also to others.
And then just as a side comment, Don Lemon, the
old CNN guy, was there proclaiming that he was a
journalist and that he therefore can't be arrested. And a
judge today was the asked issue an arrest warrant for
Don Lemon, and the judge said, no, I'm not going
to do that because Don Lemon proclaims he's a journalist.
But last time I checked in journalism, you can't violate
the law just by using the claim that you're a journalist. No,
you still have to obey the laws. But anyway, let's
get to this lady Nakima Levi Armstrong describing what went on.
Speaker 11: Oh, we were welcomed inside of a church. I am
a Christian woman. My faith informs my activism, and I
think the question should be what would lead a church
like city church to have someone in a role that
presents an inherent conflict of interest as being both a
pastor as well as not just an ICE agent, but
the director of ICE in Minnesota. Now, if you have
been watching the media reports, you already know that over
three and ICE agents have descended upon the Twin City.
So if we want to talk about busting into somewhere
and descending upon a place, then we need to be
talking about what ICE has done and that they have
been extremely brutal towards residents of the Twin Cities and
across the state of Minnesota.
Speaker 1: So her side of the story went on for about
five minutes, and at the end, Aaron Burnett just said,
thank you very much. Now, it wasn't going to put up.
The question is did you break in? Did you bust
into this church service or not, and was clear they
weren't welcomed and they were screaming that these people and
called them white supremacists. Why because they're mostly white people.
Maybe all of them were white, But I don't know
about why going to church meets or a white supremacist.
But she pulled that hat, pulled that out of her
hat because she also runs Black Lives Matter. Black Lives Matter.
She's an activist, that's what she does. And if you
look at how she makes her money, she's got a
bunch of different grants that have been given to her
for which she has spent very little on what the
grant was supposed to be done with. But that's how
she makes her money. So this is what she does. Anyway,
she never disputed the fact that they busted, they disrupted
the service, and there's video and audio of it. But
all she wants to do is say Ice is bad
and we don't like them, and we don't like Trump too,
if he threw that in there. So that's what's going
on in Minnesota. Paul Morrow again weighs in on this lady, and.
Speaker 9: You know, look that there's going to be very very
little that they can do in defense of this because
it's on filming. For once, they didn't cover their faces.
Now here is the thing that's going to come out
of this. You have her under arrest. Now you're going
to get the communications. And this is where it starts
to spider web about you start to see who's talking
to who, who showed up in regard including Don Lemon.
How much did they all know going in? That imports
things like conspiracy charges which can be quite quite heavy.
There's civil rights criminal civil rights charges that are implicated
in the church incident.
Speaker 5: This is also because one of the things that we
found out about that was that they were targeting them
because they were privileged white supremacists.
Speaker 9: We talked about that earlier in the week. Not only
did that come out in the video and that they
said something like that in the church, but then after
the fact Lemon talks about exactly that, putting a racial
overtone in the whole thing, which potentially could import a
hate crime.
Speaker 1: So Paul said, this is this is going to uncover
a whole bunch of other problems. And the fact that
this lady is this is what she's a professional agitator.
She gets grants lots of different grants than that's the
money that she uses to support herself. So it's getting
to be messier by the minute. In Minneapolis, speaking of messy,
it really wasn't messy today. Jack Smith, a former special
prosecutor that went after Donald Trump, he was he had
already testified before the Judiciary Committee behind closed doors, but
he wanted to testify in the public, so they had
him come in today. And it's all about politics, the
fact that he's a political animal, and Jim Jordan is
the chairman of the committee and he's a political animal.
Tom Dupree for Federal Prosecutor said, nothing really knew was
going to come out of this. This was all performance.
Speaker 3: Sure, it means that he is going to be severely
respected and what specifically he can say about his Marlago
classified documents investigation. Keep in mind that he is not
similarly constrained with regard to his January sixth and investigation.
So my guess is that we'll probably have today a
more robust, a more searching session on questions on the
January sixth instigation. And I think when it comes to
the marra a Lago investigation, it wouldn't prize me if
one of the refrains we hear today from Jack Smith
is look, I'd love to talk about it, but I
simply can't under that court order.
Speaker 1: And that happened because the corridor regarding mar A Lago
is everything he's on a big hush hush. Judge Cannon
said that. But the jan sixth Committee again sixth investigation
by Jack Smith was wide open. But again, no new
turf was uncovered in all of that today. And speaking
of politics, Ram Emmanuel, who I think he's sniffing around
to see whether or not he has enough support to
run for president on the Democrat ticket. I mean, he
was Obama's chief of staff, he was a congressman, he
was the mayor of Chicago. He knows his way around politics,
and he came up with something that I kind of like.
He wants an age restriction on anybody that is an
elected official.
Speaker 12: Listen, five years you're out. You're seventy five years old.
Speaker 1: Done.
Speaker 12: And that would be in the legislative branch, it'd be
in the executive branch, including Cabinet, and it'd be also
in the Supreme Court and all the federal courts up
and out.
Speaker 1: I don't think it has a prayer of actually becoming
anything because the people that are involved not going to
vote for that. But he was a seventy five year
old age limit, and I can see that. I think
that's good. Carl Rove was asked if he likes it.
Speaker 13: Does makes a sense to a lot of people, And
it's interesting rama Manuel, the ultimate insider, is attempting to
be the ultimate outsider, offering up suggestions like this which
are going to fall, particularly in his party, on a
lot of deaf ears. Remember, the Democrats are much older
in the House. There are Republican counterparts. Take a look
at the senior Democrat on a committee and the Republican chairman,
and the Republican chairman in each and every instance is
going to are most I think almost every instance is
going to be significantly younger than their Democrat counterpart. And
that's because the Republicans say you can only be a
chairman for a certain period of time and then you're
done with being chairman of that committee, and the Democrats
have no similar rules. So members stay and stay and stay,
hoping that their party gets back in power and they
get to be chairman again. But there's a lot of
people in Congress that are retiring this cycle, and Karl
has some interesting things about Republicans are generally younger than Democrats. Well, look,
people retire for different reasons. A lot of people retire
because they're running for higher office or a different office US.
And you'll notice the key was how many are in
races that are up for grabs? And they're essentially three.
So this is not where we ought to be looking.
It's one thing that you know, retirements are important because
they suck up money. Let me give you an example.
I live in Texas Congressional District ten. Our member Mike McCall,
who's been chairman of Intel, Foreign Affairs and Homeland Security,
is retiring because he's not going to be a chairman again,
so he's retiring, and they're like twelve candidates running. I
can't even you know, I don't even know who any
of these people are. And I live in the district
and lots of money has been spent to send mailers
to my house and to do all the things that
you do in a campaign, to send me digital ads,
et cetera. And that's why open seats is because they
take resources that might otherwise be be applied to the
general election. What really matters, particularly for Republicans, is there
are three districts that Kamala Harris carried in the Republican
member got re elected, and there are nineteen districts that
were won by Joe Biden in twenty twenty that are
occupied by Republican I've been taking a look at them.
There at least ten of those seats that are risked
this year, and maybe more. We've had some redistricting in
some of these states, so some of these districts got
a little bit better for Republicans. But there are at
least ten of those that are risked this years. Several
of them are open. Arizona one is open, but Nebraska
two is open. But the rest have an incumbent running.
But let's be honest, that's where the races for the
House is going to be settled is primarily in these
seats that are held by Republican but either were one
by Kamala Harris or Joe Biden or in which the
race was very close in and either one of those
two presidential races in that district.
Speaker 1: Well, really the focus is on the midterms. It's ten
months away, and usually the party opposite the president is
the one that gains seats. So Carl, is that going
to hold true or is it two?
Speaker 13: Or to tell yeah, it's too early, but let's look
at it. Since the end of World War Two, there
have only been two elections mid term elections in which
the White House Party gained seats nineteen ninety eight, in
which the Democratic President Bill clin had a sixty three
percent approval rating in October of that year, and two
thousand and two, when George W. Bush had a sixty
one percent approval rating in October that year. The president's
approval rating today is between twenty two and twenty extually
between forty two and forty four percent. Let's see if
this aggressive campaign schedule helps move him up or stabilizes
the decline that he's seen in recent months. But the
presidential approval rating is going to matter, and that's going
to depend on the economy primarily, and how people feel
about their personal circumstance. In fact, Susan Wilds, the chief
of staff to the President, said that the trip to Davos,
that's it. No more foreign trips between now and November.
They're arranging a schedule for him to go and hit
the campaign trail. She said something like it's going to
be like a presidential election to him, like it was
in twenty twenty four. He's going to be hitting the
campaign trail hard between now and the midterms. So, like
Carl said, we'll see if it makes any difference.
Speaker 1: So how are you? How's it going? Are you keeping warm?
Are you keeping dry? They're really hyping up this storm
that is coming for some of you this evening. Most
of you it will be this weekend. But this big
storm will apparently impact everyone because the air travel is
going to be just a mess. So even if you're
flying from Seattle to Los Angeles and you're nowhere near
this storm, where is your plane coming from? And if
it's stuck in some airport in Boston or in Washington,
d C. So this storm is from Albuquerque through Texas
all the way up to Maine. It is the Cawshie prediction.
Markets are even talking about what a giant storm this
is going to be. Spans two thousand miles thirty five states.
Talk to one of my boys who lives in Texas.
He says, they're predicting one quarter to one half inch
of ice. And I don't know about you I'd rather
drive in deep snow than I would in a quarter
of inch of ice. There will be power outages for day,
for days here in New York. We're supposed to get
hit Sunday and Monday, so it won't even clear until
Monday evening by the time they can get around to
blowing the roads and things like that. But here's one
of the weather people from Fox Weather talking about the storm.
Speaker 14: Oh my gosh, you get very very for a lot
of folks throughout the South. I mean, temperatures are going
to be dropping about twenty degrees below normal by the
time we get into the middle of the weekend. But
for right now here in Dallas, Texas, its temperatures are mild.
I mean we're in the upper forties right now. But tomorrow,
completely different story. We are going to be expecting those
temperatures to drop tomorrow afternoon into the evening, and once
we start to get that precipitation, that's and we'll see
the shift from rain into that wintery mix, which is
potentially going to be that ice impact. So let's take
a closer look at those snow totals first, because we
are going to potentially see very impactful snow throughout the
South up towards Oklahoma City could be seeing record breaking
snow up to a foot in some places. Isolated, but
still something to watch you out for. This band of
snow will continue into parts of Kentucky, Tennessee, and even
farther up towards the northeast once all is said and
done by the end of the weekend and into next week. Now,
I will say this, the forecast is ebbing and flowing.
It is going to be changing as continue to move
throughout the next couple of days, just because this system
is so complex with these temperatures. Now talking more about
the ice impact, because this is going to be an
incredibly dangerous situation for folks that are going to be
in the South. Here in Dallas, we could see close
to a quarter of an inch to half an inch
of ice accumulating on those surfaces. In areas like Arkansas,
Louisiana could see up to three quarters of an inch
of ice accumulating on those roadways, which is going to
be dangerous for possible power outages that could last days.
Because the thing is even though the system will move
on out of here, especially for the South later on
Saturday and Sunday. Everything that's gonna fall, it's gonna stick
around because those temperatures are going to be so cold,
nothing is going to have time to melt. So here
in Dallas, I mean, we could see temperatures remaining in
the teens even the single digits Monday and into our Tuesday.
So all of that ice, all of that snow that accumulates,
it's going to stick around for a while, so it
could be pretty dangerous. But on top of this too,
this system is going to continue to try towards the
east and up to the northeast, where we could see
potentially double digits worth of snow near New York City.
So I'll say, maybe get the snow shovel ready just
in case. We'll keep an eye on this forecast as
we continue throughout the rest of the week. But long
story short, just make sure folks in the South are
preparing for this weekend because ice and snow it's on
the way.
Speaker 1: That is. I mean, I'm looking at the local forecast
here in New York City, and she's right, it's not
only going to be double digit snow. They're talking about
a foot and a half to two feet of snow
for the New York City area, and then after that
the temperatures really plunge. We're supposed to have overnight temperatures
Tuesday seven degrees, Wednesday six degrees, Thursday zero degrees, Friday
six degrees. I mean, it's just going to be solid, solid, frozen.
So trying to get planes in and out of airports,
trying to travel on the roadways, it's going to be
a weather week that miles f I'll try and stick
close to home. All right, what happened on Wall Street today?
It wasn't the rebound that we had yesterday, but it
was positive. So after I guess we should learn that
they're calling it again. The taco trade is that Liberation Day?
Remember the stock market took a big dive, and if
you had invested on that big dip, after the next morning,
you saw it come roaring back. Same thing with the
all the scary talk about Greenland, and the market took
a big dive. And then once all that was settled
supposedly yesterday, market jumped sharply yesterday, and it jumped again today,
the Dow up three hundred and six to forty nine
thousand and three eighty four s and p up thirty seven.
Nazdak up two hundred eleven gold a huge day, up
one hundred and one dollars to fourth one thousand and
nine thirty eight. We're closing in on five thousand for
gold and oil. Down a buck today to fifty nine
dollars and some change for one barrel of oil. Thank
you for coming by today. We'll be back here again tomorrow.
It doesn't matter about the weather. We'll be here and
I hope you are too. We'll see you that