Speaker 1: This is Jay Dyer from Jay's Analysis. You're listening to
Esoteric Hollywood. Esoteric Hollywood is where I deconstruct the biggest
films in an unparalleled way, from the classics of the
silver screen to today's blockbusters. Learned to watch film with
new eyes.
Speaker 2: As we enter Esoteric Hollywood, welcome.
Speaker 1: You're listening or watching Jay's Analysis, and today we're going
to look at a kind of overlooked book that I
think is relevant because it's almost kind of like a
Roman Catholic version of Tragy and Hope. Now, quickly we
know from Tragy and Hope it was some form of
Catholic at least. And if you haven't seen the Tragy
and Hope talks, I would encourage you to go to
Jay's Analysis and you can subscribe and you can hear
the full eight hour or eight part sixteen hour lecture
that I did on the totality of Tragy and Hope.
Today we're going to be diving into something new and
something a little bit different. Keys of This Blood by
Malachi Martin. And as you can see, I've read this
book as well. It's not made up. The ant these
aren't fake post it notes stuck in here. I didn't
underline just to pretend like I had read the book.
But there's a lot of crazy information in here. And
we also want to consider the character of Malachi Martin himself.
I don't. I think he was rather dubious. He's not
somebody that we want to particularly trust, and there are
many reasons for that. For one, if you read his
book Hastags to the Devil, which I have read I
do have. I've got thousands of books here. I couldn't
find it. I'm not sure where I put it. But
one of the weird things he does is remote the
New Age m D. M. Scott Peck in the book,
and he calls Peck. He says that Peck is this
good exorcist, but Peck is like a new Agers who
talks about taking demons into himself. So who knows what's
even true in regard to this. I don't know, but
I'm not buying a lot of that. I've also read
Malachi Martin's Malachi Martin's other book on the Jesuits, where
he talks about, you know, he was part of the
Jesuit Order for a period and then supposedly he went
his own way and went the car of his own
path because he I believe was playing the role of
the traditionalist. I don't believe that Malachi Martin was an
actual traditionalist, even though that's the role he presents himself as.
There's many reasons for that. For one, which we'll actually
get into, is in keys his blood, the double think
that he engages in, such as the idea that on
the one hand, the popes of the Second Vatican Council
are all more or less Satanic in the promote promoting
a Satanic agenda, as he says many times, but they're
good guys sor right, So you can promote Satanic agenda,
but he still be a good guy. So how in
Malachi Martin's head he justifies this double think is beyond me.
But when we really want to understand how he appears
to have had a role as a dubious pseudo traditionalist,
we look at his role at Vatican two, where he
was a paritus, which is one of the theological advisers,
and so he actually helped draw up the ecumenical documents
at the time of Vatican Two, which is very hypocritical
given the fact that we're supposed to take him as
a Syria, opponent of Acumenism and the majority of his works,
and he's obviously not now he was very close to
Cardinal Bay one of the Acumenists at Vatican two. So Martin,
I mean you go back to his first book that
he did, or one of his early first or second,
and if you read that, he'll talk about it's like
a compared to religion thing, and he basically says that
he uses little G for God, and he basically teaches
process theology. He also affirms global warming, climate change in here,
over population and these kinds of things. So no, he's
not a quote trad. He's playing the role of a
trad and I believe he is one of the wise
men that he talks about in this book. And by
the wise men, he's talking about these CFR Trilateral Commission
type level guys like Kissinger or John McCloy or Dean Atchison.
These are the characters that he talks about in this
book as basically the deep state controllers, the real minds,
if you will, not necessarily the banking banking aspect that's
funding all of this. But as the subtitle shows you,
John Paul the Second versus Russia and the West for
control of the new World order, as if John Paul
the second was somehow playing this anti globalist role versus
Russia in the West. Give me a break. So another
funny part of this is that it's also a Cold
war book that hypes up the phony dialectic of Russia
quote unquote versus the West and all this Fatoma nonsense
about how Russia is supposed to convert to Roman Catholicism.
And at no point are in this fatom a message.
Are we ever told that the London banking establishment is
who was actually behind the exportation of communition, communism Bolshevism
to Russia. Why didn't our lady awarn Us of London's
errors filling the globe? But no, we're supposed to believe
that the miraculous message was that Russia's errors. It's not
the errors of Russia. This is the New York Warburg
banking cliques that funded Lenin and Trotsky openly right. So
I guess Mary so called was unaware of this, or
rather does Fatima fit into the geopolitical agenda of the
Atlantis's establishment. And I believe that Malachi Martin was one
of the agents of the atlantisis establishment, so I mean
he's drawing up ecumenical documents. Right. There's documentation too of
him being paid by I think Jewish Committee or somebody
to be a part of this. I think you could
find that on old blogs. I'm not going to name
the blogs because I don't want to promote them, because
there were. But you can find that if you really
want to dig for it and find it. But the
other interesting element of this is that even though this
is a kind of a Cold War pipe piece of work,
it's like Quigley's in so far as it also admits
that it's a dialectic, a managed dialectic. And so we're
going to get towards the end of the book this
conclave of the statists, if you will, between George W
and Gorbachev at Malta and I think nineteen eighty eight,
and you can find it. This is an important globalist meeting.
And this was about convergence. This was about the Eastern
communism being merged with Western Atlanticism and that this would
be the overriding model for the coming global government. Now
Martin inadvertently, well actually pretty blatantly admits all that. So
it's a confusing bunch of incoherent positions in Martin's book,
where on the one hand, we're supposed to believe that
John Paul the Second at the time of this, but
I think this book is ninety one, ninety two, nineteen
ninety excuse me. So at this time, right towards the
close of the Cold War, we're supposed to believe that
John Paul the Second was somehow this hero that was
going to help fight communism. But he's not. John Paul
the Second was of course a rabid globalist, a rabbid liberal,
one of the main architects of radical promotion of Ecumenism
in the West across the board for all these these
so called churches. Now, the Orthodox Church is presently having
to go through this crisis of their own Vatican two,
so to speak, which is thank god, largely being resisted,
at least more so than in the Roman Catholic Communion.
You'd probably see Orthodoxy maybe split down the middle when
it comes to this stuff, although the Ecumenists are pushing
very hard in the Orthodox Church. But I mean, everybody
notes that, you know, our saints and athos in these
different places, they're all obviously one anti ecumenism. Then there's
no question about it. So it's going to be much
more difficult given the decentralized nature of Orthodoxy as opposed
to how simple it was on the part of the West,
the Rockefeller institutions. And that's all in this book. As
to who was behind Ecumenism and who was behind getting
the Vatican to become a big global promoter of Ecumenism,
it was much easier, I guess you could argue in
a certain way because of the top down structure of
the Catholic communion with the papacy to get everybody to
accept the Kumenism when previous Vatican two popes had already
condemned it. So it's very ridiculous. Roman Catholics ought to
be aware of this. But Roman Catholics I found that
I was in that communion for about ten years. They
don't even know their own doctrines. They don't know what
their church teaches, and it's all up in the air,
and it's people get PhDs and twisting and practicing casustri on.
How something in the nineteen thirties is apostasy and you
know whatever, ecumenism and indifferentism, and then now it's the
movement of the spirit fifty years later. Right, Well, there's
no there's no making sense of that. And what's neat
in a way is that even though Martin I believe
is ultimately an agent of the deep State, what he's
going to show us in this book is an admission
of all these things. So even in the midst of
his spin, and just like we saw so many times
with Tragedy and Hope, that giant tone was so much
of a in large part a spin operation. It was
quickly doing an apologetic and spinning all this stuff to say, oh,
how great the banker's wars of the twentieth century were,
and how it's all going to save everybody, and the
world's going to be saved for liberalism, the global liberal order,
which we see every day Foreign Affairs and Foreign Policy
Magazine are touting and worried about losing. In the same way,
you can't overestimate the role of a communion with nare
a billion people, the Roman Catholic Church. You can't overestimate
or underestimate, excuse me, the role of the papacy in geopolitics. Now,
how many of these people even talk about the role
of the Catholic Church and the payacy and geopolitics nowadays
hardly any I don't. I mean, you have all these
guys on the internet that do analysis, and they talk
about all this stuff, and they talk about Russia, and
they talk about the West, and they talk about the CIA,
but they don't talk about this giant church with a
billion people roughly that is now a huge player and
has for a long time been a huge player in geopolitics.
So what how what kind of analysis are you going
to be giving when you're not even talking about like
the biggest unified communion supposedly it's not really, but for
practical geopolitical purposes, the world's largest religious body maybe next
to Islam, well next to Islam or Islam is maybe
up there, almost close to the size of numbers, even
though the numbers of the Catholic Church are dropping, And
you're going to try to do your analysis and you're
not even going to talk about this stuff, Like how
what are you talking about? You're missing giant puzzle pieces here.
But that's I mean, you know, what do you expect?
These people don't know what they're talking about. They've never
they haven't lived this stuff. They haven't they haven't dialogue
with theologians from the Vatican. I have of dialogue with
the Vatican's head of Eastern Theology, Commission for Eastern Theology
or whatever it's called.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I mean I knew, I've known priests, theologians, people who
were friends with John Paul the second I know I was.
I debated actually one of Malachai Martin's confidants. I'm not
going to name him on the air, but or on
the internets, but I mean, I've done this for a while.
This is none of this is new to me, so
I know what I'm talking about. And there's a lot
of people out there in Internet world trying to do analysis,
trying to understand these topics, and they don't know anything
about the Vatican. So I think that's all I'm saying
is that one of the advantages of what you're going
to get through my analysis is that it's very broad scope.
So I'm going to be able to talk about Orthodox
theology in the East and Roman Catholic theology and the West,
as well as all the espionage and geopolitical tie ins,
and you're not really going to get that many other
websites at all. Most of them are other ones that are
very limited in their scope. So let's get into keys
of this Blood. And of course if you're watching, the
first hour is always free for those who follow my
work if you come across this. The second hour is
by subscription at Jays Analysis. And this is how partly
I make my living. So if you'd like to hear
this or watch this in the full two hour form,
you can go to Jays Analysis and subscribe for four
ninety five a month or for sixty dollars a year,
and I would also direct you if you like what
you hear here. There's a lot of relevant aspects in
my book that relate to this. My book is esotery, Hollywood, sex,
cults and symbols in film. I have about fifty five
star reviews within three months of release now across markets Goodreads, Amazon,
Amazon UK, et cetera, et cetera. So definitely a book
that if you like this kind of stuff as well
as film. There's the poster up here. You can get
that at my site for thirty dollars inside the US
or for sixty dollars outside the US, and please do,
if you are interested to get the book from me,
because it's a lot better for authors when you get
the book from them and not through Amazon. We don't
make a whole lot of money as authors through Amazon.
Amazon's great for certain things like getting you a book
used cheap, but not great for authors because even though
it might expand your readership, you're not going to make
a whole lot of money on that. And I put
a lot of work into that. I put a lot
of effort into you know, four hundred ish pages with
the sidebars in my book, and four hundred and four footnotes,
so there's a lot of effort put into that. But
everybody loves it. Ninety five percent love it, five star
ratings so far. So if you would go ahead and
get a copy of that from me, and we'll move
from that now and get into Keys of This Blood
Pope John Paul the Second versus Russia and the West
for Control of the New World Order by Malachi Martin. Now,
as we get into the book, we want to remember
that this was written in nineteen ninety, so close of
the Cold War, but still relevant for all of the
information that Martin is going to give pertaining to things
like the creation of or the intention of creating a
one world religion. And Martin is actually going to talk
about that. He gets into that early on page three
ninety excuse me, thirty nine, and he talks about these
different vehicles that have been set up for the creation
of a one world religion through the New Age Movement. Again,
I think a lot of people in the nineties thought that,
you know, the New Age was the last, the end
times religion or whatever. And it's more so, I guess
the question of how successful something's been. I don't know
that the New Age movement has been as successful successful
as they hoped. So it may or may not be
the vehicle for the creation of a one world religion.
It certainly was an attempt at that. But has it
been successful maybe somewhat. I mean, it's definitely re engineered
the West in a large degree, and that was all
by design. That was through Rockefeller funding, as Martin we'll
talk about as we'll see. So, you know, the religion
has always been a great tool for the state or
for the oligarchs to try to get their message across
or to try to engineer humanity into some other type
of view. So this is where we see alien cults
play a large part of that. We've talked about that
in many interviews, many discussions the CIA usage and infiltration
of alien colts. I discussed some of that in my
book as well, if you want to get my book
and read some of the chapters on that. But Martin
gives some examples like the Temple of Understanding and what
he calls the mega religionists, and these are the people
who would like to merge all the religions into one. Well, absolutely,
if you're going to have a global religion or global government,
you need a global state. It's global church confirmed by
the global state. And page forty he mentions at first
the wise men of the West, and he says that
they likewise proceed in the hope that they have always
shared of the animating spirit that will be sufficient to
propagate egalitarian democracy to the rest of the globe. Well,
there you go, right, the liberal world order. Right, the
goal supposedly is to extend liberal democracy to the entire world.
And he calls these people the inside powers, he calls
them the shadow This is the shadow government for all
intents and purposes. It's not completely Zionist. A lot of
these people, especially that he's talking about here, are not
necessarily Zionists. Brazinski's not a Zionist. However, they will at times,
of course, work with different lobbying groups and different power groups,
different infrastructures and entities, and you know, to achieve their ends.
So it's not an either or. And he mentions on
page forty, in this drive to create a global order,
they we're very successful in impiltrating, in grabbing members of
various hierarchies, and in particular here he's talking about, of course,
the papacy, the office of the papacy, and he says,
from a georeligious and geopolitical perspective, the office of the
papacy is a tremendous role, has tremendous power and influence. Obviously,
so if you're the CIA, if you're the CFR, wouldn't
you be interested in the papacy? Of course you would, right,
And so he says that their goal was always to
take the keys from Peter and to take into to
win over that office. Now this is perfectly in line
with what we read in the Alta Vendita, right, And
this is what I've talked about many times, this little
short document that you can get. I think John Venari
is the one who publishes and put it out by
the Alta. Venditza talks about the older lodge plans and
structures of the p two and Grand orient Masonry to
take over and use the office of the papacy, not
to destroy it, but to use it as an instrument
of the revolution. Now, a lot of these well meaning
cold warrior types, and again this book is set in
that milieu for these cold warrior types, these neocon types. Nowadays,
a lot of these guys might have been well, well
meaning and thinking that they were fighting communism, and Martin
is going to unfortunately partly prop up that mythology of
this all being a giant battle with godless communism. However,
he's also going to admit, as we see from Quigley,
as we see from Antony Sutton, that the promotion of
the liberalism to destroy the West is not being done
out of Moscow. It's not being done by black days
wearing berets in Africa that fight under the banner of
some amorphous term called the Liberation Front of some kind
or whatever. That's not who's running all this. It's not
the relatively small number thousand communists in the so called
Communist Party in the United States, that's not too who's
running all this Obviously, these low level nobody's with no money,
they don't have the ability to create giant foundations and
think tanks and to run giant corporate operations that put
millions or billions of dollars into things like open borders,
into things like the ecumenical movement. I mean, these low
level communists don't have you money for that. Of course,
not all of that is coming from up top oligarchs,
moneyed oligarchy, the bankers, right, that's who's funding all this. Now,
Martin actually will reveal all that. However, it's still in
the context of a little bit of spin and deception. Wow,
a lot of bit of spin and deception that oh,
this is all coming out of Moscow. Yeah, there's a
lot of big bankers that like all that idea and
they put their money into it. But it's all coming
out of Moscow. I promise, it's all the it's all
the evil russ Rooskies. The end game, right, what is
the end game for the new millennium? He says, the
papacy wants to be on top of the new world order.
Now again, the funny part about that is that the
papacy is long being captured by the New World Order,
so to speak, by the West, and you even have
pre Vatican to Pope's writing about that. I've done talks
on this. I did a popular talk just out of
my car. It's had like I don't know, seven eight,
ten thousand views, where I discussed the decline of the
papacy as a result of Vatican two, not itself, but
from a long span of Masonic infiltration into the Vatican.
And that is not necessarily to be read as just
quote Masonry, but actually a long plan of oligarchic families
bankers to run the office of the papacy. I mean,
the Rothchilds have been the papal bankers since I think
the seventeen hundreds. You don't think that they have some
interest or influence in being the bankers of the papacy.
Give me a break. So Martin goes on in the
next chapter. He talks about the Grand Design. What is
the Grand Design? It's the design of the Masonic Enlightenment
revolutionaries to create a one world, rational, republican democratic order.
That is the Grand Design, and the the what do
we want to say, the means by which this is done?
As he said in chapter one, is so the expansion
of liberal democracy throughout the world. This is why I've
been saying for years now in so many interviews and
talks that the goal of Masonry is as a revolutionary
force to bring the democratic republics. Now you think, well,
what's wrong with that? Democratic republic says? That sounds fair,
That sounds no. See, this is all about removing religion
from public sphere of public life, and then ultimately also tradition,
because tradition is also grounded. I think in those kind
of religious categories, there's not really a quote tradition that
you can point to that's organic and healthy, that's going
to be purely secular, right. I mean, Rousseau is not
going to get you, Thomas Paine is not going to
get you your quote traditionalism that you would like to
have as a natural rights theory. Libertarian. Now, all that
stuff is part of the revolution. And I mean, I
don't know none. When are you people going to understand this,
all you libertarian types, When are you going to grasp
that Thomas Paine and Thomas Jefferson and all these characters
are just participants in the bank of revolution. That's what
quickly says, now here's another character, deep state operative who's
going to tell you the same thing, are you When
are you going to believe it that when the deep
state operatives tell you that their enlightenment rationalist Masonic guys
are illuminists, that's what they are, when are you going
to start believing it? Now? Martin sets up this kind
of true idea of the creation within the Roman Catholic
body of the anti church, he calls it, and this
is the forces of revolution that have bought into the
doctrines of Masonry, the doctrines of being your own little
God being. Liberation theology is a big part of this
that will play a big, big, big role in his
history of the Jesuits and what happened to them. Of course,
the Rockefellers and these same people that funded Ecumenism are
the ones that fund the liberation theology. Now, if they
fund the Ecumenism and they fund the liberation theology, these
big moneyed oligarchs, and we're told almost everybody agrees and
knows that liberation theology and Ecumenism are intimately tied into
Marxism and the World Council of Churches and so forth,
and so on right now, we've all know. So if
all of these are funded by the if these two
are funded by the bankers, then this one I'm not
flipping you off, I'm just messing around. Then the Marxists
who are part of this class of the ecumenists and
the liberation theologists, well they're probably funded by the same people.
You see. Are you starting to make the connections here?
It's the same power players in the background. And it's
amazing because Martin's gonna admit this. So there's this creation
of the anti church intimately tied into ecumenism, that has
a long connection in history to revolutionary democratic, republican movements
back to the Enlightenment and Masonry of that period, which
he will talk about in an entire chapter. Quigly talked
about all that, and who do you quickly say was
behind it? Who does Martin says? Behind it? Moneyed banking,
oligarch families. They run the Masonic groups, they run the
intelligence groups, and they do it all through their foundations
and through their giant banks and through their tax free
blah blah blah blah blah. It's the same thing. This
is the whole kitten. This is all of it. This
is who's creating the global government, and it was imperative
that they capture the office of the papacy and they
have so for those of you that don't grasp that, Now,
what does this all of this mean? And now he
goes back in the next chapter chapters part one, I
guess is what this is part one the arena, And
he's talking about the arena. We're in this giant battle
for the papacy and for the new world orders happening.
And he says, Oh, this is all under the guise
of revolutionizing the church and bringing it up today. And
this is all what that I could do was about,
right the opening the doors of the church to the
world according to John the twenty third and the idea
that first of all, the church must be separated from
the public sphere. We got to have a secular sphere
where in the religion is not effect or influence anything
to do with the daily lifestyle. Right, so you can
be the pro abortion politician who is also a quote
Catholic and received communion. This is all birthed from that. Now,
there were a lot of cardinals and a lot of
archbishops and bishops who were for a long time involved
in this revolution, and he names plenty of them. I mean,
these guys that are so bad that they actually think
that John Paul the Second and Cardinal Ratzinger, Benedict the sixteenth,
that they were actually conservatives. They're not there. They're revolutionaries
who play the roles of conservative And just like John
Paul the second, and just like Paul the sixth, and
just like John the twenty third, and just like Benedict
the sixteenth, and now Bargoglio, but Francis who was a Jesuit,
just like Martin, they are playing the role of the
traditionalist right. They have mastered the office of the bureaucracy.
They they have mastered bureaucracy to the extent that they can.
And I've watched this for many, many years. They can
throw a bone to the trads every now and then, oh,
we'll give you the motu proprio, which allows you to
have a Latin mass uh, and then charge forward into
the most absurd revolutionary doctrines that are completely antithetical to
everything in the history of Christianity and Catholicism especially. But
they they're able to fool you by every now and
then throwing you a bone and they play these roles.
They played these roles very well because they really do
believe they're either true believers in their their revolution, so
to speak, they really are many of them are Masons,
and they really do believe in perennial philosophy or theology
to some point, to some extent, which is actually understandable
given the fact that Western Latin theology from you know,
a thousand the last thousand years, is just another branch
of perennial philosophy.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: It literally teaches this intmism. Right, there's no difference between
when Aristotle says the unmoved mover the great architect, right,
Thomas Aquinas says, Oh, he's talking about the same God
as we are. No, he's not. That's he's talking about
an impersonal force. Right. That is not what's in Exodus
three fourteen. That's not an impersonal force. That's a personal God.
So this is why, for example, Orthodoxy traditionally has rejected
the last thousand years of Roman Catholic theology as well
as its tonism in its official ideology and it's quote palamism.
Palamism is a rejection of those ideas because we believe
that it leads to this stuff. It leads to ecumenism,
it leads to all the religions basically being the same,
just variations and flavors. Baskin Robbins, thirty two flavors are
the same corn syrup undergirding nonsense. Right now, he goes
into talking about how John Paul the Second was, so
he's so great because he's going to move past the
left right paradigm and all this kind of stuff. And
then he's not a radical traditionalist, but he's also not
a radical liberal. Well that's just because he was playing
the role that he needed to play. And what's also
interesting is that Martin talks about this group within the church.
He calls it a Satanic super force, and he also
says that John Paul the Second was a humanist. I'm
almost sounds like a secular humanist. Yeah, I know. I've
been talking about this for a long time because it's
in his encyclicals. I believe it. What is it? Redempt
or haminies one of these one of these old old
John Paul the seconds and cyclicals where he says that
it basically just defines everything in terms of man right.
He says, sin is just an act of uh harming man. Well,
that's not the Catholic traditional doctrine of what sin is.
He's uh, he says, the Gospel is the greatness of Man, right,
And I'm not taking that out of context, because it's
not really clarified, you know, in like a limited sense
where he's saying this. He's he says, he's very bizarre things.
And the idea here is that there's an attempt supposedly
that he wants to reach out to Communism and Communism's
concerns and all this kind of stuff. But I'm not
buying any of that, especially given the fact that the
entirety of his papacy was one gigantic blast, nuclear blast
of ecumenism. Just look at the Ascesi meetings, right, You'd
never seen anything like this in the history of Christianity.
And he's up there by the altar, praying with every
religion imaginable, including Voudoun, including Dalai Lama types. I think
the Dalai Lama was there anyway, Tibetan, Buddhist. It's like
it's all religions are one up there. So interestingly, Vatican
Bank comes up a little bit. There's cryptic statements about
the New World Order, and Big Brother, the rise of
these things and how they're going to take over, and
even obviously the Vatican itself was aware of this. They
don't seem to be fighting it, however, they seem to
be going along with it. And as I've proposed in
several articles and talks, I think the Guardian was accurate,
and the Guardian is not always accurate. I'm not saying that,
but in regard to this story of what was going
on with the resignation of Benedicuta sixteenth that appear probably
had to do with blackmail and all the pedophilia, and
the pedophilia and the Satanic stuff is going to play
into this too, because that's a huge part of what's
going on in the Second Vatican post Vatican two is
the infiltration of Masonic and Satanic luminous type groups. Now
you say, well, who takes Satanism seriously? Well, I think
some of these people really do. Martin will claim that
at least, and he says that the goal of all
of this syncretism is ultimately Satanic to create a new
world religion. Interesting almost like what almost like what Dostyevsky
prophesied in the Grand Inquisitor chapter in Brothers Caramansov right,
the pope would rise to power as the new world
spiritual leader and toss out Jesus because they don't need Jesus.
That's what he says. You can create a babble on earth. Right,
So he argues that the See of Peter is now
the means by which democracy can be exported to the world.
And the title of the book Keys of the Blood
of this Blood is this reference to Catherine of Siena,
one of these Roman Catholic saints. And the idea is that, oh,
we've preserved the faith supposedly through the Keys of Peter
and his blood, the blood of Jesus, supposedly in the
Roman papacy, and in this poem or this dialogue with
a Catherine of Sienna has supposedly God the Father talks
to her, which is Nonsense's God, the Father's not talking
to her. The idea is the Keys of Peter will
never be weakened because the blood of Jesus can never
be diluted. And I think what Martin as a deep
state operative sees as so so ironic in that statement
is that he himself is one of the operatives who
believes that he has aided in diluting and taking over
the office of the papacy, you see. So he goes
on to talk about different religions, more of his comparative
religion type stuff. Talks about Judaism, the Bahaigh New Age faith.
He talks about nationalism and why orthodoxy is no good
because orthodoxy is it still believes in nation states, and
nation states are failed because we're moving towards the global order.
We can't have nations anymore. That's old that's old stuff, right,
And so the true geopolitical leader in the world, Martin argues,
is the Pope. So in order for the Church to
take on this role of geopolitical leader, this is Martin's analysis,
page one forty three, Vatican two had to happen. So
Vatican two is a geopolitical motive in part, Martin argues,
which is interesting because we almost always hear the theological
motivations and conspiracies related to Vatican Two, which are all true,
but it's always overlooked oftentimes the geopolitical motivation behind Vatican
two to quote update the Church to be the vehicle
for the coming world world order, world religion. That's what
he's arguing and this, he says, is why John Paul
the second agreed not to condemn communism. Excuse me, John
the twenty third agreed not to condemn communism at the
time of Vatican two. And at the time of Vatican
two there were already two thirds of the bishops Martin
claims in rebellion against the papacy. So at the time
of Vatican two, already two thirds of the Roman Catholic
Church was done with papal teaching. So this is all
the more absurd. You know that when you get into
this and you try to figure out the claims of
Roman Catholicism that the Church is grounded in union and
communion with the opposite Peter for the last fifty years,
two thirds of their own bishops don't even believe that,
which technically speaking, would actually make them heretics and in
schism and you're not supposed to commune with a heretic
or schismatic. So the whole thing just falls apart. Now
Martin thinks that's all kind of funny, I think in
the big picture, because he had a big hand in that.
He had a big hand and again authoring and promoting
these ecumenical documents, while at the same time and helping
to get them past a Vatican two, while at the
same time playing this role of phony traditionalist by which
he dupes all the dummies who actually believe this stuff
into continuing to follow the popes who are the agents
of anti christ revolution according to him. So again, I mean,
i lived in this world for ten years, and I'm
not just talking about the Malchi Martin world. I'm talking
about all of these worlds, the FSSP, the SSPX, the cMRI,
the SSPV, these all these groups. It just becomes ludicrous.
And then once you understand the geopolitical stuff and you
understand the banking Vatican banking stuff, it just it's just
like it becomes preposterous. Really, now, So what he does
in the next section, we get into around page one
sixty two hundred, starts discussing the wise Men, and these
are these CFR, big big time player foundation types that
we've been talking about, and their global chess piece moves
in terms of geopolitics, and the whole thing is about
creating a global government. That's the whole goal. Now, that's
all correct. We all know about that. And Gorbachev becomes
an agent of the West to open up Eurasia to
the synthesis of the dialectic of East and West. Now
you'll hear a lot of people in geopolitical comments and
analysts and all this kind of stuff who say, oh, no,
there was this older idea of convergence, you know this,
Alvin Toffler, this never happened, right, this was a fail
that's an old seventies failed plan. No, no, no, though
it's happened, it has happened, and it did happen through
many of these meetings that a lot of people aren't
aware of. Right, there's the big one with Brazenski in
the seventies and Kissinger and all these people, and all
these neo cons that Golden fitz year old talk about
in the interview I did with them. There's this nineteen
eighty eight one that Malaka Martin's going to talk about
between Gorbachev and w at Malta. And you should also
listen to the interview that Tim Kelly did with Mark
Hackard on Mota and CIA spies in Malta. That's all true. Now, again,
this is not to say that, oh, that means that
the West was the good guys. Gorbachev was the bad guys.
This is not to say, oh, the West were the
good guys and the Bolshevik Ruskies and these characters were
all the bad guys, and Stalin was or Stalin was
a good guy and the West is the bad guy. No, no,
it's not like that. It's big players being utilized by
big money and big international interests, and these international interests
have a stated long term goal, long term plan. As
we've said, how many times of moving you use a
dialectic of East versus West, of conservative versus liberal, and
you smash these things together over time. And what you
get after you do this for a long time is
this a blending, a synthesis, right, because you fought for
so long us against them, and then after a while,
maybe a few generations, you're like, it's time to stop
the fighting. It's time to come together. We've got to
come together, right, some sort of moralistic plea or some
bullshit like this, And the idea becomes that both sides
have to give away a little bit, right, So what
you've actually done is move the whole I guess you
could use that Overton window term. You've moved a whole
spectrum over to liberal democracy. The left so to speak. Right,
this is what quickly says, and tragedy and hope that
the reason for all of the money to oligards and
the big foundations funding leftist movements, communist movements, socialist movements,
liberal liberal, liberal liberal, the reason they were doing that
is not because they were really tied to the ideology,
but that it was a tool most useful for getting
their long term plans into play. That's the key. And
it happens not just in the US, in the political
theater of the US, it happens globally. They do the
exact same things because nobody ever catches on to dialectics
and these false paradigms. So the bankers in Latin America,
and this is all talked about here. This is great,
this whole section on Shell big Oil. These are the
people who are running all this stuff, IMF. He talks about,
and the globalists in their endgame. He says, this is
pages one sixty to seventy five in terms of reorganizing,
re engineering the West, and he says what I've been
saying the whole time as well. Free trade was a
huge goal towards erecting this coming world order. You can't
have a world order without a world market, and a
world market has to be based on free trade. And Mark,
by the way, was a huge proponent of free trade
precisely for this reason. I've decided it many times. You
can go to Marxist dot org and find the articles
to discuss it. Ingles has tracks on why free trade
is a good thing. So, all of you idiots out
there libertarians who keep bitching about this, I'm sorry that
you're ignorant of that. I mean, how many times you
have to point out so now quickly, interestingly excuse me,
uh malk I Martin interestingly pictures FDR as a COMI.
Now he doesn't go into the detail and depth that
we get in quickly, which is good where we learned
that FDR was a banker COMI right. So again, a
lot of this is still set in the Cold War dialectic.
And now there's pros and contents to either Tragy and
Hope or Key's of this Blood. There's there's I mean,
if you want a Catholic perspective roughly speaking of the
church in depth and you understand the controlled dialectic, than
Keys of this Blood is great. It's going to show
you a lot if you want a more geopolitical perspective,
that's better at showing you the controlled dialectic tragic and
hope is what you want. But again both are good,
and both are overlooked because all of this, all of
this stuff is well. Interestingly, he does systems analysis in
this book, so he says both of these systems, you know,
the Eastern communism and Western democratic so called capitalism, don't
see the errors in the He's actually says sinfulness of
their systems. So Martin knows and points out that both
of these systems are false, including democratic capitalism. It's false.
It has all kinds of aspects that are exploited to
legitimately and ultimately that set man against one another. And
it's the only way to make sense of this is
social Darwinism. And that's why the traditional capitalists out of
England and so forth, they're all Darwinists, because that is
the ideology of monopoly capitalism. And it's hard to see
exactly how classic free market capitalism doesn't lead to monopoly capitalism.
I mean, you can try to interject all these moral
limitations and qualms and all this kind of stuff, but
the entire system is built on the economic lens dominating
all of life, all of man's being in life and
existences is to be read first and foremost primarily first presupposition,
first maxim starting point through economic theory, and so invisible
hand is supposed to take care of everything. Uh, but
we don't start with economic theory as the way to
understand man and his existence. That is not the way
that revelation starts an understanding man. That's why that is
a secular theory. I'm talking about classical free market capitalism
that is just as doomed to failure as the socialist
Marxist secular theory. Then they're all predicated on Darwinism. And
none of your Darwinian theories are ever going to get anywhere.
They're all going to fall apart, They're all going to collapse.
They all lead to transhumanism, right, Marxism and capitalism lead
to transhumanism. I mean they have to, that's the inherent determinist
logic of both of them. Now, he goes on to
say that in the modern world is characterized by monetarism
and relativism. Yeah, exactly. And the big lie is he
even calls it a big lie, is relativism. Now, here's
an interesting quote here, and it's all set, of course,
in this bogus dialectic that he talks about. But if
we understand that, then we can understand what's going on.
Nothing short of the religious and moral conversion of the
people of Russia and a similar conversion in the West
will solve the ever intensifying geopolitical crisis and allow the
fierce millennium endgame of the new world order he's talking
about to result in a peace. This judgment of the
ever continuing papacy comes reinforced by the memory of the
papacy which from the beginning of the Soviet Party state
was watched by the champions of the Hammer and the
sickle and fully comprehended what was involved in the Leninist
creation of the seventy three year history from Lenin to Gorbachev.
That is the key to the accurate interpretation of the
present events. So in this bullshit that Martin has here,
he says that both the papacy and the Soviets have
got to repent and convert, and the democratic capitalism of
the West has got to embrace traditional Catholicism, I guess,
and Russia has got to embrace traditional Catholicism because they're
both now agents of the dialectic. Now that's true, they
are agents of the dialectic. I'm talking about Red Communism
and the papacy. But they're not agents of the dialectic
the way that Martin is describing it. Martin wants you
to think that it's Moscow versus Vatican City. It's not
Moscow versus Vatican City right now. And interestingly, he does
talk about the bankers in their role, but the bankers
in their role is never connected to the history of
communism in Martin's book, which is interesting. It is, however,
connected to the wise men of the West, who he
says also want to control the papacy. But again, the
problem here is that Martin never seems to connect Western
banking capitalists as the power behind Marxism, and David Rockfeller
brags about it. Right, we have many, many instances and
examples of this. So that's why this is a very
complex spin job on the part of Martin to portray
this situation as something that was all Moscow versus Vatican.
And then he said he thinks that ultimately the Vatican
defeated and the Vatican and the bankers defeated Moscow, and
so now it's the papacy and the bankers fighting for
the world controlled world government. I mean, that's kind of ridiculous.
But again that's not true because the Western banking elite
CIACFR have been infiltrated into and in long, long time
control of the Vatican for decades. It's hard to say
exactly when, but you have popes, even back to the
seventeen hundred's warning of the infiltration of Freema into Vatican. Right,
there's been a whole string of these encyclicals from the
popes warning about Masonic infiltration into the papacy. Now, next
few chapters, Martin goes on at length to detail the
different communist systems and the NKVD and Kerensky and v
I Lenin and how the propaganda works, and then it
goes into Stalin and the Cheka and I don't know,
excuse me, the checkup with Lenin and then the KdV
with Stalin, and he says, I'm not going to bore
you with all this classic communist red stuff. He'll talk
about the differences too, and why the Stalinists don't like
the Trotskyites and so for But Anyway, we're gonna set
all that aside, because that's not really what we're getting
into all of that. If you want that in depth,
to go to the Tragy and Hope talks. What we're
concerned with here mainly is what Martin's going to say
about the coming global order and the infiltration of the papacy.
Now he portrays it as all these communists. Now, there
were communists that infiltrated the papacy and the bishoprics and
all this kind of stuff. There were Masons that did this, right,
Grand orient types, Occultists, Otochroleians, Right, Colonel Rampola. If you
haven't heard that story, you can read about that. Probably true.
I think that's probably true. But what does this mean now?
So was it really the communists that took down the papacy?
This is what Martin would have us believe, Right, there's
all these communists that are taking over there. Now, wait
a minute, who was touting that line throughout the Cold War?
The CIA and the CIA made this deal, I believe,
under Colby with John Paul the Second. Now, the CIA
obviously had interest prior to Colby, but uh, I think
it's I think it's golden Fitzgerald that mentioned Colby and
his templars and the deals with the Vatican and John
Paul and maybe mentioned in here, and then I think
it's also mentioned in the Gordon Thomas's book on the
Massaud I think is also where it's mentioned with the
CIA having direct sort of communicate discussions with John Paul
the Second, and that was all under the auspices of oh,
we got to fight at the commies or the commedies
are going to get it. They're gonna take over everything,
They're going to destroy the church. And this is why
we have the P two stuff and then the Gladio
stuff right in Italy that all ties into this. But
the problem again is that Russia is not running all
this stuff. Now. Russia, Russia right has this system that's
not organic to it, laid over it in Bolshevism and
then ultimately in Stalinism, which is weird because it becomes communism,
but Stalin becomes kind of the Tzar figure type thing,
so that's a little different. But the Red Terror model
that he's talking about here in pages two thirty four
to two thirty five, the genocide the Specter Smursh type
organization which was Soviet counterintelligence in the real world. That's
in the Bond novels. Martin's talking about all that. He
talks about all the Red tactics, and they're all right,
so they've got all these dirty tactic tactics and techniques.
And we're supposed to believe that the West, of course,
is the saintly angel types, and they don't use sex
operatives and sex kittens. Only Stalin and the NKV did that. Yeah, right,
it's in the freaking movie north By Northwest. The West
was the osays. Of course they use sex operatists. So
that's just all gobbledegook nonsense. But now we have to
be careful here because again, the large movements of socialism
and communism and liberalism that Martin is talking about, it's
true that they are the degradation of the West and
ultimately of tradition, but it's not true that it's all
run as some gigantic secret system out of Moscow. That's
the key here, So when he talks about HG. Wells
and George Bernard Shaw, those aren't guys run out of Moscow.
The biggest promoter of communism prior to Lenin and Trotsky
has always been London to the control of global socialism
and liberalism and democracy. It's not Moscow, it's the city
of London. And that's what you're never going to hear
Malachai Martin tell you. That's where he's wrong. Now you
do begin to kind of get that inkling in Tragy
and Hope, right, And of course this is where Sutton's
so good. Right, So that is going to cover I
think about the first third of this book. We're trying
to deconstruct Malchai Martin's Keys of This Blood and how
it is a Roman Catholic quasi Tragian hope, an almost
Tragian hope for the for the Roman Catholic in its
many admissions. So it's very relevant in that regard. And
the next chapter we're going to talk about gram She.
Now Grahmcy is relevant because graham She said, take over
the capitalist institutions. Don't worry about trying to fight and
destroy these capitalists, infiltrate their institutions. So that's true. There
is this infiltrationist modicum that comes out of the gram
she An idea and the graham She was part of
the the the illuminists. So when we talk about the
original Adam weisshopped Illuminati. If you read Terry Mullanson's book,
what you're getting there is how this is communism Jacobinism
out of the Enlightenment, and it is often tied into masonry,
and it meshes very well with Grand orient Masonry, which
is more radical, right. And so what we get in
Moscow is that kind of masonry generally speaking, not British Freemasonry.
But what we learned, I think ultimately in the big picture,
is that these are controlled dialectics, so that the Grand
orient Masonry might be a little bit more radical, but
it's still just it's just there's two wings of the bird.
Right wing revolution or left wing revolution. Do you want
Adam bishopped or do you want Thomas Jefferson right? Should
we have private property or should it just be total
everybody share everybody's wives, right? I mean literally, I'm not joking,
by the way, but so Illuminism, the Illuminati literally historically
do have progenitors in characters like Marx and Lenin Trotsky,
and they are members of these radical lodges. That's the
real Illuminati, so to speak. And in their philosophy they're
totally anti supernatural. They're supposedly anti superstition, but in actual effect,
their rationalism is just another branch of superstition. So basically,
the Illuminati are just the successors to Voltaire and Dittero.
That's who the Illuminati are. Now these other kinds of
occult groups like Crollianism or whatever they might call themselves Illuminati.
A lot of these different groups use that terminology. But
Grahams she and you know, this is a guy who
is a direct descendant of Giuseppe Mazzini. And these are
guys who are involved in Italian lodges. Right. The Alta
Vendita is a plan from this kind of lodge for
the infiltration and takeover of the Vatican to use that office,
so to speak, for its own designs. And that's what
we we've been talking about, and that's what Martin's talking about,
and he is correct in that regard. But it's incorrect
to think that these revolutionary organizations and these revolutionary lodges
are sort of independent, organic forces in the world that
are not funded and fostered by gigantic billionaire banking money.
That's the key here. All of this is funded by
gigantic billionaire trillionaire banking money. For the purpose of social engineering.
So the revolutionaries at this layer of the pyramid are
the dumbos. You have like the masses of the people
who participate in the so called revolution I'm speaking of here, right.
So above them you have the handlers. And these are
the people who might be involved in the lodges, who
might be involved in foundation work. The philosopher types what's
his name, the rules for radicals, Saul Lensky, Okay, Sao
Lensky's above the cells and the groups and the masses
and the protester radical idiots. Right, and so you've got
the But now who's behind Saul Lensky? Now, where do
you know? Where does he come from? Where does Bill
Ayers kind of guy come from?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: The the guys who promote the radicals, right and now again,
now some of these people too believe the ideology. They
really do believe that they're gonna change the world and
bring the revolution and all this kind of stuff. And
just like the idiots that they handle underneath them, the
college students and all this kind of stuff. But above
them is another level of people, and these are the brains.
These are the real philosophers, the real geopolitical strategists, movers
and shakers, controllers, the Alvin Tofflers, the Kissingers, the David Rockefellers,
the It's bring New Brazinski's, the Dean Atchison's, the John J. McCloy's. Okay,
these are the wise men that Martin's talking about. And
they're above the level of the academic handler types, or
the FBI handler types, or any of these any of
these handler whatevers. Now, a lot of these guys, they're
going to be above the Masonic type, right, because they're
above even the intelligence agencies. They're above the CIA operative types. Right.
They have a lot more sway, they know a lot more.
They've been at it a lot longer than you know,
some low level CIA guy stationed in Kabul or somewhere. Right,
they're not going to know what Brazenski knows. So that's
how a lot of this works. And it is again,
it is accurate to talk about it kind of in
a pyramid, because it's compartmentalization of knowledge and understanding at
the different levels and layers of the pyramid as you
move up. And it is again it's it's central tool
for the last several hundred years is revolution. Revolution, But
none of these revolutions have anything to do ultimately with
what they're packaged and sold at. They're not about the people.
They're not about democracy. They're not about egalitarianism or equality,
no matter how many of the members of the revolutionary
movements believe that, that's not what the movements are about
in terms of the people and the power players and
the money that directs and funds them. You see what
I'm saying. That's what's crucial to understand, and you don't
start to grasp that until you've really spent a lot
of time in these big, fat tones. And I'm not bragging,
I'm just saying that's how it is, right until you've
read Tragy and Hope, until you've sat down and read
this boring, dated tone. It's not until you start to
see that that you understand the dialectics is a much
bigger game, and a much longer game than just GOP
and democrat in America, that's one manifestation of this. But
whether Italy ends up with an Italian Republic run by
socialists or run by so called fascists, it's not going
to matter. One might be a little more revolutionary than
the other one. They're both revolutionary. That's the key same
with America. The American ideology is revolutionary, right, and so
I welcome postmodernism destroying it, because postmodernism is the inevitable
breakdown of the false left right paradigm. So we've covered
then the first big chunk of Malachi Martin's book. Again,
this is written in nineteen ninety, and what we're going
to see in section two hour two is a lot
of prophetic statements, a lot of things that unless Martin
was on the inside, there's just no way he could
have known this. There's a particularly phenomenal prediction that he
made in nineteen ninety that I don't know how there's
any way he could have known this. He obviously didn't
have a crystal ball, but if he is connected to
the wise men of the West and the intelligence apparatus apparatics,
it's very very plausible how he would have known what
was going to happen, particularly in the Roman Calthoalty communion
from nineteen ninety up to today twenty seventeen, and predict
presumably into the near future as well. So that's what
we're going to deal with in an hour two. For subscribers,
this has been the first hour Keys of This Blood.
I'm Jayder from Jason Elysis. Thank you for watching or listening,
and if you'd like to hear the rest, please go
to Jasonalysis and subscribe four ninety five a month, sixty
dollars a year. Nobody else gives you this kind of analysis.