Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Epstein Chronicles. When it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, there's a
lot of questions that remain unanswered. But I don't think
there's any question that we're witnessing one of the biggest
cover ups in the history of America. And the person
at the helmet that cover up is Pam Bondy. Now,
of course she gets her marching orders from Donald Trump,
but she doesn't have to follow his directions if she
doesn't want to. She's doing it willingly. She's doing it
because she cares more about protecting Donald Trump, the administration,
and the donors than she does about justice. And she's
brazen about it. It's not like she's, you know, being COI.
She showed up to that hearing ready to scrap, right,
had a hit list the whole thing out here, like
it's a battle. Rap lady. We're talking about thousands of
people who were abused and a whole last country who
is onto your bullshit and who is tired of being
lied to and deceived. And she gets up there with
so much contempt for the rest of us, right, Oh,
she'll couch it as I'm just being somebody who's strong
for the administration. But that's not your job. Your job
is to pursue justice wherever it leads, even if it
leads to the White House. That's your job. Your job,
Todd Blanche's job is not to protect the administration from embarrassment.
It's to follow the law and to do as Congress
instructs you. But of course Poumbondy and the rest of
the wild out of controlled knuckleheads that are running the DOJ,
they're doing whatever they want. So once again I ask you,
when is Congress going to step in and stop them?
Today we have an article from USA Today and the
headline it's up to Congress to disrupt paum BONDI is
Epstein cover up. This article was authored by Chris Brennan.
US Attorney General Pammondy and the Department of Justice have
been openly violating a federal law for two and a
half months to shield President Donald Trump from transparency in
the metastasizing Epstein file scandal. One hundred percent. And look,
let me say it again, I don't think that we've
seen the evidence that points to Donald Trump taking part
in this abuse, not concrete evidence, But I do think
that there was certainly enough of an allegation and strong
enough allegations for there to have been a real investigation
into those allegations made against Donald Trump. And the big
problem here is that that information, the three to zero two's,
and the corresponding documentation that go along with it, were
hidden from us. So that's a big problem, and it
leads people to ask the question, if there's nothing to see,
why are you hiding it? And that's why I'm telling
you that the cover up is going to be worse
than anything for all of these people that are involved,
mark my words. And now Bondi will get a second
chance at explaining herself in Congress, but based on her
last performance before the US House Judiciary Committee in February,
expect only more pathetic theatrics and zero acceptance of accountability.
At some point, that has to end. And you know
what's going to happen, right The next administration's gonna take
the reins, and then when their person gets up there
to be questioned, they're gonna have the same exact theatrics,
the same historiotics, and then the other side is going
to cry about that. But remember that you're cheering for
Pam Bondi and her bullshit, So that means that you're
approving it, right, So when it happens from the other side,
I don't want to hear shit, but you know you're
going to because that's the way it goes. If my
quote unquote teams doing it, it's okay. But if the
other side does it, time to throw a fit. Meanwhile,
those of us who haven't been ensorcelled by either side
are looking at both sides saying, you're ruining the country.
Stop your bullshit. It's time to come to the middle
and have some discussions. But no, let's just dig those
bunkers deeper. It's all hell attire some honestly, and it's
exactly what these people want. Still, something is shifted since
Bondi rolled into that February eleventh House hearing with pre printed,
dim witted insults for the Democrats who wanted to know
why so many documents from the Epstein files, especially ones
naming Trump, have been withheld from public release or deleted
from the DOJ's website soon after being released. Hold up,
are these the same Democrats that just voted for us
not to see the hush fund? You know, the one
that other buddies used to pay off accusers who accused them.
Talk about hypocrisy, and this is what I mean. It's
both sides playing politics, trying to throw some red meat
to their base, and it's all getting very, very tiresome.
And at some point the adults need to step up
and take the reins back. The problem is we don't
have any adults left in the room, just a bunch
of wanna be influencers plan politics. Republicans largely Backbondie after
her last hearing, even after the Attorney General inadvertently revealed
that her department was secretly tracking what members of Congress
searched for when given private access to unredacted Epstein files.
Oh I'm pretty sure they're searching everybody. So if you
access those files, they're probably logging it. Oh what you
think that's above them? I don't remember who we're dealing
with here. People that would actually try and glaze over
what Jeffrey Epstein did. They're capable of anything. Now. Five
Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee joined
all of the Democrats on March fourth to vote twenty
four to nineteen to subpoenal Bondi to explain why she
has been instrumental in orchestrating the White House's cover up
of the Epstein files. Well, let's be very clear, Okay,
She's just doing what she's told to do. The person
at the head of this whole entire cover up is
Donald Trump. He's the one giving all the orders. He's
the one telling these people what they should and shouldn't do.
And in my opinion, the buck should stop with him. Now.
Of course Pam Bondi should go. There's no doubt about it.
She's not capable of doing this job. Where all those
arrests for, you know, the election. I thought the election
was stolen. What happened to that? I thought Letitia James
was going to prison and James Gomi and everybody else
anybody in prison. How those prosecutions going. But the good
news is the Dow was over fifty for a minute.
US Representative Nancy Mace, a Republican from South Carolina who
was pushed for the release of the Epstein files, said
in a social media post, the committee wants to know
why the DOJ is more focused on shielding the powerful
than delivering justice. Pretty simple, her boss told her to.
I mean, are they really that dense. They don't understand
what's going on here. We know the answer to that.
They know what's going on, but they're playing politics. Notice
none of them talk about the NPA or getting rid
of it. Instead they focus on this shit. And I
got to tell you it's all performative. What's going to
happen to Bondi anyway? Even if she perjures herself again,
nobody's going to do anything, not like she's going to
be sanctioned, not like anyone's going to step up to
the table and do their job from an oversight standpoint,
So what's it even matter? It looks like Bondi will
finally face some tough questions from members of her own
political party about she has botched the release of the
Epstein files and that's long overdue. Well, I would say so,
but I have my doubt if the Republicans are going
to hold her accountable. They haven't done so yet, but
they're going to now. And frankly, as terrible as Christy
Nome is at her job, Pam Bondy is just as bad.
I mean, you're going to get rid of Christine Ome,
you might as well get rid of Pam Bondy. Right.
Let them both go and be part of the Shield
of Americas, whatever the fuck that is. And speaking of
the Shield of Americas, how much does that cost in me?
US Representative Thomas Massey, a Republican from Kentucky who co
sponsored the Epstein Files Transparency Act, was the only member
of his party who challenged the Attorney General in the
February eleventh hearing. Massy later mock Bondi's performance on social
media and then did news interviews to criticize her. And now,
of course they're coming at Massy hard. A whole bunch
of people with Arab or Islamic last names donated to
Massy and they're trying to make it out like it's
Hesbela who who is donating to Massi, or like Hamas
showed up in mass No pun intended to give Massi
some money. But the truth is it's citizens who gave
him this money, who happened to be Arabic or happen
to be Muslim, who agree with what Massi's doing and
what's wrong with that, But they're not entitled to do
the same thing. They can't donate money because they're a
different religion or something. I don't get it. What's the
beef here, especially as they rake in a bunch of
foreign money of their own. So I don't understand the
criticism when it comes to that, especially because it's private
citizens who are donating the money. Now, if the country
of Katar was donating money to Thomas Massey, you better
believe I'd have some questions. But when you have private
citizens doing it, people should mind their business. Worry about
your own bag, worry about your own money, worry about
who you're donating to, worry about what you're doing. Probably
a good idea. Bondi made herself an easy target for critics,
and that hearing. Her testimony was all about defending Trump
well dodging questions about the Epstein files. At one point,
she declared that the Dow Jones Industrial average is over
fifty thousand right now, and that's what we should be
talking about at a hearing about Epstein. Let's talk about
the Dow. Nah, there's no cover up here. You have
to be head all the way in the sand to
not see that there is a cover up here, that
there's been a cover up here and there continues to
be one. And unless we force the issue, that shit's
going to continue. The Dow Jones is now below forty
eight thousand. By Bondi's logic, if you dare to call
it that, we're now free again to talk about the
Epstein files. Well, isn't that nice? The Pambondi rules, the
rule of the Dow will call it. If it's over
fifty thousand, hush, hush, we can only talk about the Dow,
nothing else. But if it's under fifty thousand, we'll all
bet her off. Is this lady insane? Like? Seriously, what
is wrong with her? The Epstein Files Transparency Act was
passed in the House and Senate in November, with all
Democrats in support and just one Republican voting against it.
That was four hundred and twenty seven to one, and Trump,
who desperately tried to defeat the legislation, reluctantly signed it
into law while insisting the files were some sort of hoax,
a show of disrespect to the women who accused Epstein
of abuse and are still calling for justice. And that's
one of the biggest problems. When this dude came out
and called it a hoax and called people traders, he
declared war and the independence out there they were listening,
and that's why he's losing all that support. With independence. Now,
of course, with the war popping off, that's going to
get some people rallied around them. There's no doubt that's
what war does, right, People rally around the flag, rally
around their country, and they want to win the war.
I get it, But me personally, I'm not getting thrown
off the scent. I'm going to continue talking about this,
continued demanding transparency, continued demanding justice, just like I have
been for the last seven years. And guess what, when
the hostilities with Iran finally come to an end, and
they will, this story's still going to be there. It's
not going anywhere. The law set a December nineteenth deadline
for the DOJ toor release the documents compiled during investigations
into Trump's former friend, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein,
who died in federal prison in twenty nineteen during Trump's
first term while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. The
files also cover the crimes a convicted sex trafficker, Gallaine Maxwell,
Epstein's longtime accomplice, who is now serving a twenty year
prison sentence. While Trump openly muses about pardoning her bro
That would just be one of the worst decisions in
the history of worst decisions. Imagine pardoning Glaine Maxwell. Good God.
The law call for tans parency, But the DOJ has
released only about half the six million documents in the
Epstein files, and Bondi insisted in a February letter to Congress,
just three days after her disastrous Judiciary Committee stunt, that
all the Epstein files had been released. Clearly, the job
is not done if the only job is protecting Trump,
and I honestly have no idea how you can look
at this is anything but that at this point, protecting
Trump and the people that donated to Trump and the
people around them. Media outlets for weeks have been scrutinizing
the Epstein files as they trickled out in batches well
passed the December nineteenth deadline. Some documents that mentioned or
picture Trump vanished from the DOJ website after journalists viewed them.
And if you don't think that they're logging us as well,
you're crazy. They are. I wouldn't be surprised if they're
making a database. On February twenty sixth, the Justice Department
said that it would investigate whether it improperly withheld or
deleted files, including FBI interviewed summaries of a woman who
told agents in twenty nineteen that Trump had sexually assaulted
her when she was a minor. The Wall Street Journal
on March third reported that the DOJ had withheld more
than four forty thousand documents from the Epstein files, including
that woman's unverified allegations against Trump. A spokesperson told the
journal that forty seven thousand, six hundred and thirty five
files were taken offline and that the department was conducting
a review. Another review. Huh. I guess all that time
you had previously with all those lawyers wasn't good enough,
or is it? You guys just missed it and you
had to go back and reevaluate. God forbid. President Trump
is embarrassed. And just to be clear, I'm not saying
that those allegations are true. I don't know what I
am telling you, and what I'm confident about is that
no real investigation took place. My beef, and I know
I sound like a broken record at this point, but
time for special counsel. The Department of Justice on March
fifth told USA Today that it was restoring about fifty
thousand documents that had been removed from its website. After
media scrutiny drew attention to the matter. On March six,
DOJ released FBI interviews with a woman whose accusations the
White House called completely baseless and look they might be.
Can we have a real investigation? Though? Is that too
much to ask? God forbid? What if it was your daughter?
Let's date the obvious point here. A government agency credibly
accused of running a cover up to protect the president
can't credibly review the behavior of the people accused of
running the cover up, point blank period. Bondi proved that recently, when,
in response to a growing tide of ethics complaints file
with the state Bar Association against DOJ lawyers, she proposed
a way to stall independent investigation into that behavior. She
offered a new federal regulation that would suspend bar association
probes until the DOJ first investigated a complaint, with no
timeline for how long that could take. The DOJ of
the cover up, baby, they never met a cover up
they didn't like, especially if that means it's going to
protect Donald Trump and his buddies. You see the theme
here Bondie's not in the justice business. She's in the
cover up business. And if protecting Trump requires tossing a
childish tantrroom in Congress or using government regulation to hide
bad behavior, that's exactly what she's going to do. And
that's exactly what the House Oversight Committee members, Republicans and
Democrats should question her about, plow through her theatrics to
disrupt her cover ups. Well, I hope, so, I really
hope they do, but I don't have any faith in it.
The Democrats are going to play politics and the Republicans
are going to play cover and the rest of us, well,
we're just gonna get played. All of the information that
goes with this episode can be found in the description box.