Speaker 1: This is the Stone Zone with Roger Stone. People love
Speaker 1: him and respect him. Roger Stone.
Speaker 2: Now give him his zone. It's the Stone Zone. Here's Rogerstone.
Speaker 3: Welcome into the Stone Zone. Well, it looks to me
Speaker 3: like Heraldo Rivera just got busted. Back in twenty eighteen,
Speaker 3: Heraldo Rivera blasted President Donald Trump for his criticism of
Speaker 3: Haiti when Trump said that Haiti was an s whole country.
Speaker 3: But now when the courts have ruled that President Trump
Speaker 3: can legally return as many as one hundred and sixty
Speaker 3: to one hundred and eighty thousand Haitians who are in
Speaker 3: the United States illegally back to their home country, Heraldo
Speaker 3: blasts Trump, saying that sending them back to haities like
Speaker 3: sending them to hell. So this is kind of par
Speaker 3: for the course for Heraldo Rivera. I have a great
Speaker 3: Heraldo Rivera story that I have to reveal to you.
Speaker 3: You see, Lyndon Baines Johnson LBJED had a mistress named
Speaker 3: Madeline Brown. Madeline Brown bore Lyndon Johnson his son, Stephen Brown.
Speaker 3: If you saw a photo of Stephen Brown, you can
Speaker 3: see he is indisputably the son of Lyndon Johnson, who
Speaker 3: is not the most handsome guy whoever came along. The
Speaker 3: reason that Madeline Brown is significant, however, is because she
Speaker 3: came forward in an interview with HAROLDO. Rivera to say
Speaker 3: that on the night of November twenty first, nineteen sixty three,
Speaker 3: she spent the night with Lyndon Johnson in a Fort
Speaker 3: Worth hotel. And it was that night in the following
Speaker 3: morning that LBJ told his mistress Madeline Brown, after tomorrow,
Speaker 3: I will have to deal with those Kennedy sobs. Ever
Speaker 3: again the following morning he reiterated the same thing, although
Speaker 3: this time he said, I'll never have to deal with
Speaker 3: those with those Irish sobs again. And he said, that's
Speaker 3: not a promise, that's not a threat, it's a promise,
Speaker 3: and he squeezed her hand. Obviously, this is evidence of
Speaker 3: the theory that I wrote a New York Times bestselling
Speaker 3: book on that Lyndon Baines Johnson was the main orchestrator
Speaker 3: of the murder of John F. Kennedy in a conspiracy
Speaker 3: that included organized crime, the CIA, Big Texas Oil, and
Speaker 3: so on. And even I have seen the video clip
Speaker 3: of Heraldo Rivera interviewing Madeline Brown on YouTube multiple times
Speaker 3: I incorporated in my book. So the first time I
Speaker 3: met Herald de Rivero was in the green room at
Speaker 3: Fox and introduced myself. He knew who I was. This
Speaker 3: is part of my being ostracized and being a target
Speaker 3: of the Mother witch hunt. So I was a little
Speaker 3: less famous than I am today. And I congratulated him
Speaker 3: on this incredible piece of investigative journalism which he Haraldo
Speaker 3: Evera had located and interviewed the mistress of Lyndon Johnson again,
Speaker 3: whose son looks exactly like LBJ in this amazing interview.
Speaker 3: He looked at me very steraily, very blankly, and said
Speaker 3: he had no idea what I was talking about. I said,
Speaker 3: your interview with Madeline Brown. He said, who's Madeline Brown?
Speaker 3: Then he locked himself in the men's room and wouldn't
Speaker 3: come out until after I did my segment and I left.
Speaker 3: So Heraldo Rivera, I remember the big hype about al
Speaker 3: Capone's Safe that turned out to be a fraud as well.
Speaker 3: I really think that Haraldo goes for the clicks at
Speaker 3: this point, but he's now been busted twice as far
Speaker 3: as I'm concerned. Yesterday I went online and I said,
Speaker 3: Jersey tomatoes are the best in the nation. It's amazing
Speaker 3: the backlash that I got from people as far away
Speaker 3: as Alabama, Arkansas and elsewhere. But the truth is New
Speaker 3: Jersey tomatoes are legendary for a reason. You see, New
Speaker 3: Jersey tomatoes have that perfect balance of sweetness and acidity
Speaker 3: with a deep, almost I don't know, meaty flavor that
Speaker 3: shines in everything, whether you use it in a sandwich
Speaker 3: or sauce. I guess it is. The garden State's sandy
Speaker 3: soil and coastal climate give us a real edge if
Speaker 3: you're growing tomatoes, and the shorter time from buying to
Speaker 3: table means they're picked ripe, not shipped green like some
Speaker 3: of the tomatoes you get in the grocery store. People
Speaker 3: call them Jersey tomatoes for a reason. They're absolutely special,
Speaker 3: and I'm not standing down on my defense of the
Speaker 3: New Jersey tomato. Also incredible news today, but fitting in
Speaker 3: a pattern, we learned days ago that the FBI had
Speaker 3: opened a counterintelligence investigation into Donald Trump. Immediately after he fired,
Speaker 3: FBI Director James Comby used to refer to the FBI
Speaker 3: as my FBI, not recognizing that the FBI belongs to
Speaker 3: the American taxpayers. We now know that they had no
Speaker 3: probable cause, no evidence that would indicate a rationale, the
Speaker 3: legal rationale for the opening of that investigation. And they
Speaker 3: even they even called it Oxford ox Ferd. They misspelled
Speaker 3: the name of the operation so that the documents would
Speaker 3: be hard to find in their filing system. But it
Speaker 3: was once again an incredible act of lawfare. But what
Speaker 3: we learned today is even more shocking. You see, remember,
Speaker 3: there could never been the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Muller,
Speaker 3: who tried to destroy the Trump presidency as well as
Speaker 3: my life and my family, along with General Flynn, if
Speaker 3: the Attorney General Jeff Sessions, appointed by Donald Trump had
Speaker 3: not recused himself from the Russian investigation, leaving Rod Rosenstein
Speaker 3: at the Deputy Attorney General, one of the principal actors
Speaker 3: in the efforts to destroy Trump. A guy appointed to
Speaker 3: the office of Deputy Attorney General on the advice of
Speaker 3: White House Chief of saff Wryn's previous came up with
Speaker 3: Rod Rosenstein. Rosenstein later actually got caught saying that he
Speaker 3: was willing to wear a wire in a conversation with
Speaker 3: President Trump in an effort to entrap him in the
Speaker 3: Russian collusion oaks in anyway, we now learned today, based
Speaker 3: on newly declassified documents, that the FBI opened an investigation
Speaker 3: into a sitting Attorney General and informed him he was
Speaker 3: being investigated over conversations that he, as a US senator,
Speaker 3: had had with the Russian ambassador, and on that basis,
Speaker 3: out of fear, Jeff Session recused himself, which in turn
Speaker 3: allowed Rod Rosenstein to become the acting Attorney General in
Speaker 3: the matters of Russian collusion, for which he then appointed
Speaker 3: Robert Muller, and the whole witch hunt went down. You
Speaker 3: can say it as many times as you want liberals online,
Speaker 3: due there was no evidence whatsoever of Russian collusion or
Speaker 3: interference or at least coordination with the Trump campaign in
Speaker 3: twenty sixteen. The whole thing is a fraud. It is
Speaker 3: the greatest single dirty trick in American political history, certainly
Speaker 3: the single greatest abuse of power in which the full
Speaker 3: authority of the United States government, the full legal authority,
Speaker 3: was used to destroy a sitting president, utilizing two pieces
Speaker 3: of evidence that they knew were fraudulent. The so called
Speaker 3: steer ildossier, paid for by Hillary Clinton and her campaign.
Speaker 3: She later paid a multi one hundred thousand dollars plus
Speaker 3: fine for that illegal action because she tried to hide
Speaker 3: it as legal feasts. And also the false claim that
Speaker 3: the Russians had hacked the Democratic National Committee and that
Speaker 3: information ended up in the hands of wiki leagues, a
Speaker 3: claim to which to this day there is still no
Speaker 3: forensic evidence or proof whatsoever, a claim essentially invented by
Speaker 3: John Brennan and the folks at the CIA. So every
Speaker 3: single week now, whether it is last week, whether it's
Speaker 3: this week, with this news that the FBI's number two man,
Speaker 3: Andrew McCabe had opened an investigation into it sitting Attorney
Speaker 3: General in order to pressure him to recuse himself so
Speaker 3: that they could clear the way to a point Muller,
Speaker 3: who would then spend three years trying to destroy Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: There is no evidence of Russian collusion. And when you
Speaker 3: go at those who defend the Mother investigation today, like
Speaker 3: Andrew Weissman, who was the de facto head of the
Speaker 3: Muller investigation, since Muller himself was at that point non compassmentus,
Speaker 3: he was really around the bend, they'll say, oh no,
Speaker 3: Paul Manifort shared Trump campaign polling data with a Russian
Speaker 3: intelligence officer whose name was Constantine Kalemnik, and that's the
Speaker 3: Russian collusion. There's only one problem with that, and that
Speaker 3: is that the Trump campaign had no proprietary poll information
Speaker 3: at that point their poster right after the convention, Tony
Speaker 3: Fabrizio had not gone into the field taken any polls,
Speaker 3: So any information Manifort would have shared with Colmbic would
Speaker 3: have been public polling information, hardly proprietary. But more importantly,
Speaker 3: Constantine Kolimnik is not has never been a Russian intelligence asset.
Speaker 3: In fact, the independent journalist Matt Taibi proved definitively that
Speaker 3: Constant Klinik was a US intelligence esset. In fact, his
Speaker 3: name is redacted in all of the cables between our
Speaker 3: State Department and our embassy in Kiev. So the real
Speaker 3: question still remains the most basic one, and that is
Speaker 3: anyone going to be held responsible for this incredible crime
Speaker 3: against the constitution and this attempted coupdeta an attempt to
Speaker 3: destroy a sitting president. This is a continuing, seditious conspiracy.
Speaker 3: Here's why I say it is born in a White
Speaker 3: House meeting in twenty sixteen April of twenty sixteen, in
Speaker 3: the Obama White House, in meeting which Iraq Hussein Obama
Speaker 3: himself is chairing. Joe Biden is their FBI director. James
Speaker 3: Comi is their CIA director. John Brennan is there. The
Speaker 3: National Security Susan Rice is there. The Director of National Intelligence,
Speaker 3: James Clapper is in the room. It is in that
Speaker 3: meeting that the Clinton plan, as it was known, the
Speaker 3: plan to falsely charge Donald Trump with russianclusion, was born,
Speaker 3: and it continues. It not only fuels the appointment of
Speaker 3: Robert Muller under the shady circumstances I just outlined, but
Speaker 3: it also spills over to two impeachment trials in the Senate.
Speaker 3: What I believe is the theft of the twenty twenty election,
Speaker 3: the false claims against Donald Trump and others, including myself,
Speaker 3: regarding January sixth, in which Donald Trump clearly says that
Speaker 3: his supporters should peacefully and patriotically march to the Capitol.
Speaker 3: They take that piece of audio tape and videotape down
Speaker 3: off of all social media so that the American people
Speaker 3: can't see it. Then, of course, they raid mar Lago
Speaker 3: in an audacious attempt to get back the classified documents
Speaker 3: that prove their guilt. In my opinion, So we have
Speaker 3: a new Attorney General, Todd Blanche, and we have a
Speaker 3: continuing conspiracy. It takes you from Washington.
Speaker 4: D c.
Speaker 3: All the way to South Florida. So now there is
Speaker 3: under the US Attorney for South Florida an open investigation
Speaker 3: into this massive, seditious conspiracy. Todd Blanche has sent former
Speaker 3: prosecutor Joji Genova down to join that strike force, and
Speaker 3: the American people before they vote in the next selection,
Speaker 3: I think, are going to want to see whether anyone
Speaker 3: is going to be held accountable. We have a two
Speaker 3: tier justice system in the country. It is obvious James
Speaker 3: Comey was charged in the Southern District Apartment of the
Speaker 3: Eastern District of Virginia with the exact same crime that
Speaker 3: they charged me with. He was charged with lying under
Speaker 3: oath to Congress. That's the exact same thing they charged me,
Speaker 3: even though no mistatement I made to Congress, it was material.
Speaker 3: In other words, you have to have motive to violate
Speaker 3: the False Statements Act. Your statement has to not only
Speaker 3: be wilfully false, but it has to have a motive
Speaker 3: and underlying crime that you were hiding. Not true in
Speaker 3: my case, because there was no Russian collusion to lie about.
Speaker 3: But why was James Comy allowed to just stroll in
Speaker 3: and quietly turn himself in? No media show up with
Speaker 3: his lawyers. They gave him a grace period I think
Speaker 3: of ten days before we had to turn himself in.
Speaker 3: Yet twenty nine heavily armed FBI agents in full swap gear,
Speaker 3: wearing night goggles and brandishing fully automatic assault weapons with
Speaker 3: a CNN camera crew in tow storm my home at
Speaker 3: six o'clock in the morning. Now, they said that I
Speaker 3: was plight risk and that I had to be arrested
Speaker 3: in this manner. But if I were a flight risk,
Speaker 3: first of loggy, they knew I had no passport, so
Speaker 3: I wasn't a flight risk. Also, I'm pretty recognizable thanks
Speaker 3: to them. I wasn't a flight miss. But if I
Speaker 3: was a flight risk, why then when I was arraigned
Speaker 3: at the Fort Lauder Courthouse did they not ask for
Speaker 3: any cash bond? So you can see just in that
Speaker 3: example how FBI Director James called me and Roger Stone,
Speaker 3: who did nothing wrong, were treated completely and totally differently.
Speaker 3: So the question remains, is anybody going to be held
Speaker 3: responsible for these crimes? The New York Times says Trump
Speaker 3: is on a tear for revenge and retaliation. No, it's
Speaker 3: not revenge and retaliation. Those who violated the law, those
Speaker 3: who violated the Constitution, and their manic desire to destroy
Speaker 3: Donald Trump, need to be accountable in the interests of justice.
Speaker 3: So it's not about revenge and retaliation. It's about accountability
Speaker 3: and justice. And the American people are waiting. Many Republicans
Speaker 3: or many Trump voters, will not turn out this November
Speaker 3: if there is not a demonstration of commitment when it
Speaker 3: comes to holding those who violated the law, those who
Speaker 3: perpetrated the Russian collusion oaks are being held responsible. I'm
Speaker 3: Roger Stone. How to get that off my chest? You're
Speaker 3: in the Stone Zone. Don't go away, because we'll be right.
Speaker 5: Back the Stone Zone entertaining and informative on the Red
Speaker 5: Apple podcast network.
Speaker 2: This is the Stone Zone. Now give him a zone.
Speaker 2: It's the Stone Zone.
Speaker 6: A man who's gone through hell, but he's kept going,
Speaker 6: and he's smart, and he's strong, and people love him.
Speaker 6: Not everybody, but people love him and respect him.
Speaker 1: Roger Stone, where's rogues? Here's Roger Stone.
Speaker 3: Well. President Donald Trump has named a good friend of
Speaker 3: mine will Sharf, who is a very dynamic, young conservative
Speaker 3: attorney and has become a trusted confidant to the President,
Speaker 3: to serve as the new White House Legal Counsel beginning
Speaker 3: September first. Will Sharf will replace David Warrington, also a
Speaker 3: long time friend of mine. We were in Young Americans
Speaker 3: for Freedom together back in the seventies. But he Warrington
Speaker 3: is returning to the private sector. That will also hold
Speaker 3: and Sharf will also hold the title as Assistant to
Speaker 3: the President as well as the White House Legal Council.
Speaker 3: President Trump praised his incoming council correctly as tough, strong,
Speaker 3: and smart, adding that Will Sharff loves our country and
Speaker 3: respects the law. The appointment elevates one of the administrations
Speaker 3: I think most accomplished young conservative legal minds. He's a
Speaker 3: graduate of Princeton University and Harvard Law School. Sharf actually
Speaker 3: briefly served as a federal prosecutor in Saint Louis and
Speaker 3: he worked on the confirmation of efforts for Supreme Court
Speaker 3: Justice Brett Kavanaugh as well as unfortunately Amy Coney Barrett.
Speaker 3: He actually ran for Attorney General of the State of Missouri,
Speaker 3: campaign which I endorsed and supported, and campaigned for him,
Speaker 3: so I think it is a very very appropriate. I'm
Speaker 3: very pleased for will Shore. It's snow small part to
Speaker 3: Sharf's I think a dept Legal maneuvering against the Biden
Speaker 3: nowity era law era attempts against the president, where he
Speaker 3: represented President Trump. So I'm very pleased by Sharf's appointment.
Speaker 3: He's a very solid individual and I wish him the
Speaker 3: very best in the meantime, listening to Stone Zone, we
Speaker 3: know the insiders in Washington, and we bring you the
Speaker 3: news right here. We'll be right back.
Speaker 5: The Stone Zone entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 5: podcast networks.
Speaker 2: This is the Stone Zone. Now give him a zone.
Speaker 2: It's the Stone Zone.
Speaker 6: A man who's gone through hell, but he's kept going
Speaker 6: and he's smart, and he's strong, and people love him.
Speaker 6: Not everybody, but people love him and respect him.
Speaker 3: Rogers Stone, Where's Rogers.
Speaker 1: Here's Roger Stone.
Speaker 3: Welcome back into the Stone Zone. A Congresswoman Alexandria or
Speaker 3: Cazio Tortes, a top presidential contender for the Democrats in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty eight, if you didn't decide to run for
Speaker 3: the US Senate, is turning one of the most I
Speaker 3: don't know personal decisions a woman can make into another
Speaker 3: political attack on President Trump. The New York City Democrat
Speaker 3: announces that she's freezing her eggs and documenting the fertility
Speaker 3: process public shame. She wants to encourage more openness about
Speaker 3: women's reproductive health and give herself greater control of her future. Okay,
Speaker 3: so far, so good. She's entitled to do that, I guess.
Speaker 3: But then AOC quickly transformed this intensely private subject into
Speaker 3: a partisan spectacle. AOC said, this administration has made pregnancy
Speaker 3: more dangerous than probably at any point in the last
Speaker 3: thirty years. We're going to take our power back. The
Speaker 3: result is bizarre, even by the standards of modern political theater.
Speaker 3: In other words, AOC rivals Laura Lomer in this department treason.
Speaker 3: One's eggs is a personal, medical and family planning decision.
Speaker 3: Yet AOC is presenting her own fertility treatment as part
Speaker 3: of a sweeping political narrative about life under President Donald Tripe,
Speaker 3: life under which, if anyone will look at the crime
Speaker 3: statistics in every major city in the country, things are
Speaker 3: measurably better. AOC also shared weird footage and details from
Speaker 3: the process on social media. Arguing that women should have
Speaker 3: more information about fertility and their reproductive choices. There's nothing
Speaker 3: inherently political, I guess about a woman choosing to preserve
Speaker 3: a fertility, but AOC, already thirty seven, perhaps be wiser
Speaker 3: for to settle down just have kids now instead of
Speaker 3: pushing socialist nonsense, utilizing their own fertility as the vehicle. Nevertheless,
Speaker 3: there's something voyeuristic and almost, I don't know, perverted about
Speaker 3: filming this process and making it public. AOC's determination to
Speaker 3: make Trump a simple character in the stupid in the
Speaker 3: story is kind of stupid, but I guess it's to
Speaker 3: be expected. The Democrats have so much Trump derangement syndrome
Speaker 3: that every personal, cultural, or medical issue has to be
Speaker 3: used to portray Republican governance as an existential threat to democracy,
Speaker 3: when in fact, those who are our threat democracy are
Speaker 3: the liberals themselves, those who would limit our free speech
Speaker 3: and our free choice. AFC may call this move empowering,
Speaker 3: but this spectacle is more like a medical decision being
Speaker 3: shoehorned into an anti Trump campaign message by a low
Speaker 3: IQ demagogue with stars in her eyes. What was shocking
Speaker 3: to me is a new Pew Research Center survey that
Speaker 3: was just produced, and it shows a deeply troubling finding.
Speaker 3: Forty four percent of Muslim Americans who were polled said
Speaker 3: they hold a favorable view of Hamas. The terrorist terror
Speaker 3: organization has rule Gaza and spent decades waging war against Israel.
Speaker 3: That number should alarm Americans across the political spectrum. Frankly,
Speaker 3: Hamas is not simple a controversial political movement or a
Speaker 3: generic resistance organization. It has a long record of terrorism,
Speaker 3: including suicide bombings, rocket attacks, kidnappings, and the deliberate targeting
Speaker 3: of Israeli citizens. It's October seventh, twenty twenty three assault
Speaker 3: on Israel included some of the most brutal mass killings,
Speaker 3: hostage taking, and triggered the devastating war that followed. Yet,
Speaker 3: Pew's May twenty twenty six pole found that Hamas was
Speaker 3: viewed favorably by nearly half of the Muslim despondents in America,
Speaker 3: compared with just ten percent of Americans overall. Interestingly, among
Speaker 3: Jewish respondents, only two percent viewed Hamas favorably. I guess
Speaker 3: you would expect that among white Evangelical Protestants in number
Speaker 3: was four percent. This I think demonstrates the vast difference
Speaker 3: in values between US and those in the Muslim American community.
Speaker 3: When Muslims enter into a country, they don't do it
Speaker 3: to assimilate, unlike the Irish, or the Hungarians, or the Italians,
Speaker 3: or the Poles or even the Asians who have assimilated
Speaker 3: when they come here. When they come to the United States,
Speaker 3: they bring their own values, and they have the mentality
Speaker 3: of conquerors. Not those who wish to join our country
Speaker 3: become Americans. They are at war with the Judeo Christian
Speaker 3: underpinnings of our nation and our civilization. Admiration for Hamas
Speaker 3: is morally indefensible under any circumstances. This is a terrorist
Speaker 3: movement responsible for massacres, hostage taking, in decades of attacks
Speaker 3: on civilians, and it deserves nothing but condemnation, not rehabilitation,
Speaker 3: not romantization or excuses. The fact that American Muslims do
Speaker 3: not agree shows that we are diametrically opposed. The compromise
Speaker 3: is in fact untenable, and we must make sure that
Speaker 3: they never get a demographic a vandage over us in
Speaker 3: our own homeland, which of course, I think was the
Speaker 3: whole purpose of Joe Biden's open border policy. We may
Speaker 3: have taken as many as thirty million illegals into the country.
Speaker 3: I remember in the twenty sixteen campaign, President Trump briefly
Speaker 3: said that he would put a stop a hold on
Speaker 3: all Muslim immigration into the country. I wish he had
Speaker 3: done so during his first term. I wish he would
Speaker 3: do so. Now. What is interesting is AOC would have
Speaker 3: us believe that things are terrible in the United States,
Speaker 3: but that's not really the truth. After one year, Donald
Speaker 3: Trump's launched a sweeping federal crime crackdown Washington, d C,
Speaker 3: for example. Numbers are hard to ignore, and the critics
Speaker 3: of his use of the National Guard in DC have
Speaker 3: been effectively silenced. The Make DC Safe and Beautiful Task
Speaker 3: Force has now made up more than sixteen thousand arrests
Speaker 3: since August of twenty twenty five, according to administration officials. Today,
Speaker 3: this includes thirty five homicide suspects, more than one hundred
Speaker 3: known gang members, and over thirty two hundred narcotics arrests.
Speaker 3: Authorities also seize nearly two thousand illegal firearms and located
Speaker 3: twenty five missing children. See this is what law and
Speaker 3: order looks like when a government actually decides to enforce
Speaker 3: the law. President Trump's decision to surge federal agents and
Speaker 3: the National Regard deployment was immediately attacked by everyone of
Speaker 3: the Democrat Party and their handmaidens in the mainstream media.
Speaker 3: Warned the move was unnecessary. Some even argue that it
Speaker 3: was unlawful, but the administration says the crackdown has helped
Speaker 3: drive down violent crime, restore dangerous offenders from the streets,
Speaker 3: and restore order in the nation's capital. I can tell
Speaker 3: you that when I have reachedly visited Washington, d C.
Speaker 3: It is cleaner, quieter, and safer than it has ever been.
Speaker 3: It's interesting that when you actually pull the residence of DC,
Speaker 3: who are overwhelmingly African American, even they by huge numbers
Speaker 3: say the city is safer and cleaner than it was
Speaker 3: prior to this crackdown by President Trump. It's interesting the
Speaker 3: whole Trump Crusader crime came after a string of high
Speaker 3: profile violent crimes, including the killing of a congressional intern
Speaker 3: and other attacks that really intensified concerned about public safety
Speaker 3: in our nation's capital. I guess the lesson here is
Speaker 3: not complicated when prosecutors prosecute, when the police are allowed
Speaker 3: to police and when violent criminals face consequences, communities become safer.
Speaker 3: The Biden Gang chose to empower and enable criminals. Leftist
Speaker 3: politicians pushed software enforcement, reduced penalties, and policies often seem
Speaker 3: more concerned with coddling the offenders than providing justice for
Speaker 3: the victims. The New York cashless bonding system is a
Speaker 3: perfect example. President Trump took the opposite approach law and order.
Speaker 3: After one year his administration's pointing to thousands of arrests
Speaker 3: and countless weapons and pounds of drugs removed from the
Speaker 3: streets as evidence and enforcing the laws still works. There
Speaker 3: really are no more excuses. President Trump needs to replicate
Speaker 3: this program in virtually every other major city across the
Speaker 3: country that had been devastated due to the Democrats. Meanwhile,
Speaker 3: former President Barack Obama is apparently ready to help unite
Speaker 3: Democrats behind one of the party's most far left senate nominees.
Speaker 3: Former President Barack Obama held what was described as an
Speaker 3: encouraging phone call Friday with Michigan Democrats Senate candidate Abdul
Speaker 3: l sa Ed, discussing the November elections and ways to
Speaker 3: bring the party together behind the l Saad's campaign. That
Speaker 3: matters because L. Sayad has back to abolishing ice, medicare
Speaker 3: for all paid for by you and I, and in
Speaker 3: all US aid to Israel, as well as abolishing the
Speaker 3: electoral College and the US Senate, positions that any common
Speaker 3: sense voter should see as extreme, and I imagine positions
Speaker 3: that will get highlighted as Michigan voters decide who will
Speaker 3: represent them in the Senate. Now, Obama's involvement suggests that
Speaker 3: Democrat leaders I'm moving very quickly from bruising primaries like
Speaker 3: the ones they had here, in which L. Sayad verly
Speaker 3: narrowly defeated Congresswoman Hailey Stevens, who was a more I
Speaker 3: wouldn't say mainstream, but a more conventional establishment liberal Democrat,
Speaker 3: had the support of the city governor of Gretu Wittmayer,
Speaker 3: had the support of the outgoing Senator Gary Peters, had
Speaker 3: support of the powerful United Honor Workers, but who nonetheless
Speaker 3: lost to L. Sied. It's very clear that this is
Speaker 3: going to be one of the key Senate races in
Speaker 3: the country. Republicans have nominated former Congressman Mike Rodgers and
Speaker 3: what is a crucial election contest. The problem of course,
Speaker 3: is that Stevens has already circled the wagons around el sayed.
Speaker 3: It now appears now most of the mainstream Democrats will
Speaker 3: be doing the same for republicansustry, come as no surprise
Speaker 3: that Barack Obama and Abdul Elsaia have a lot in common.
Speaker 3: Obama persuaded the American people that he was a moderate,
Speaker 3: he hid his radical agenda. Nearly twenty years after Obama's
Speaker 3: elected president, Elsaad doesn't have to hide his extremism. He
Speaker 3: is much more upfront about his hatred of America and
Speaker 3: his wishes to see it transformed into something that is
Speaker 3: not al Saad. He's the natural progression of the Democrat
Speaker 3: Party embraced Obama. We need to end this man's political
Speaker 3: career before he proves to be a destructive to our
Speaker 3: national policy, says Obama was, or even worse. The problem,
Speaker 3: as we have discussed, is that many voters look at
Speaker 3: the promises of a mam Dami the promises of an
Speaker 3: l Saad the way they looked at the promises of
Speaker 3: Barack Obama hope and change without much specificity, free healthcare,
Speaker 3: subsidized free food, and city owned grocery stores. Free transportation,
Speaker 3: free this, free that. Well, there is a such thing
Speaker 3: as a free lunch. The Democrat Party has enormous problems
Speaker 3: going into this election in their radicalization. But as I
Speaker 3: said the other day in an interview, it is not
Speaker 3: enough just to say, oh, they're socialists or their Marxists
Speaker 3: and expect that to repel people. Part of our problem
Speaker 3: is that younger voters this country, you've never been taught
Speaker 3: anything about history, don't understand the harsh lessons of socialism.
Speaker 3: They don't understand the gulag that was created in China
Speaker 3: or Russia or Cuba. They don't understand that this leaves
Speaker 3: in the end to oppression, poverty, and when you get
Speaker 3: right down to it, death. So I do think they
Speaker 3: are the Republicans, and Trump's instincts to pit this as
Speaker 3: a contest between democracy and authoritarian Marxism is correct. But
Speaker 3: you have to lay out for people what the result
Speaker 3: of those high tax, soft on crime, defund the police,
Speaker 3: do away with the criminal justice system, do away with
Speaker 3: our penitentiaries. These are all in the Democratic Socialists for
Speaker 3: America platform. So it's there for all Americans to see,
Speaker 3: and as I have said many times, to say it,
Speaker 3: yet again, the old Democrat Party, the Party of Harry Truman,
Speaker 3: the Party of John F. Kennedy and Robert Kennedy both
Speaker 3: ardent anti Commanies, the Party of Ed Koch, the Party
Speaker 3: of Senator Daniel Patrick Monnehan. That Democrat Party no longer exists.
Speaker 3: Right now, wherever he is, Chuck Schumer is sweating bullets
Speaker 3: about the fact that AOC may challenge him for a
Speaker 3: US Senate seat he has had for decades. And if
Speaker 3: she does challenge him, he knows that he will lose.
Speaker 3: So the corporate liberal Democrats, you can't call them monitors,
Speaker 3: because they're not moners. The corporate liberal Democrats are scared
Speaker 3: to death because they see their party being taken over
Speaker 3: wholesale by radical socialists who have a radical agenda and
Speaker 3: no longer hide it. That will be the face of
Speaker 3: the Democrat Party going into these mid term elections, and
Speaker 3: that is why those who insist the Republicans will definitely
Speaker 3: lose both houses I believe are completely and totally wrong.
Speaker 1: Cousy around.
Speaker 4: This is the seventy seven w ABC mini cast.
Speaker 2: This is the stone Zone. Now game his zone. It's
Speaker 2: the Stone Zone.
Speaker 6: A man who's gone through hell, but he's kept going,
Speaker 6: and he's smart, and he's strong.
Speaker 1: And people love him.
Speaker 6: Not everybody, but people love him and respect him.
Speaker 3: Rogers Stone, Where's Rogers?
Speaker 1: Here's Roger Stone.
Speaker 3: Welcome back into the Stone zone. I think this one's
Speaker 3: pretty funny. Former NBA players Ennis Freedom Canter and Royce
Speaker 3: White are openly trolling the Women's National Basketball League. In
Speaker 3: the process, they're putting the league between a rock and
Speaker 3: a hard place. You see, White and Canter have announced
Speaker 3: that they intend to declare for the twenty twenty seven
Speaker 3: WNBA draft, with White sarcastically telling Fox and Frends that
Speaker 3: he's enjoying his feminine era and now sometimes identifies as
Speaker 3: a transgendered woman for the purposes of professional basketball. Legal action,
Speaker 3: of course, is a possibility if a league refuses these
Speaker 3: two nearly christened ladies the opportunity to play professional ball. Now,
Speaker 3: obviously this is a publicity stunt and it's deliberately provocative,
Speaker 3: but it's hitting the mark. You see, White and Canter
Speaker 3: are forcing the WNBA to confront the immense woke hypocrisy
Speaker 3: they now have to broke the subject. If biological sex
Speaker 3: is no longer the decisive standard for women's athletics. Where
Speaker 3: exactly is that line? I think the league now will
Speaker 3: find itself in a very rough spot. They could just
Speaker 3: reject the White and Cancer outright, and officials could face
Speaker 3: uncomfortable questions about what standards they are using to determine
Speaker 3: to qualifies for women's competition. If they entertained their claim,
Speaker 3: the absurdity of allowing former NBA calible male athletes into
Speaker 3: a women's game becomes impossible to ignore. They'll wipe the
Speaker 3: floor with all the women players, even though both of
Speaker 3: them have been out of the NBA for many years
Speaker 3: or actually no longer in their primes. Controversy comes as
Speaker 3: the WNBA is already facing growing scrutiny over this issue.
Speaker 3: Indiana Fever player Sophie Cunningham is publicly criticized allowing transgendered
Speaker 3: identifying athletes men into women's competition, while Commissioner Kathy Engelbert
Speaker 3: recently told teams that the league would hold additional discussions
Speaker 3: and listening sessions on the matter. This announcement by the
Speaker 3: former NBA players White and Cancer may just be a troll,
Speaker 3: but it might be very interesting to see how far
Speaker 3: they decide to take it If they suit up with WNBA.
Speaker 3: The comedy potential here is undeniable and will be a
Speaker 3: national scene in which people understand the idiocy the lunacy
Speaker 3: of men playing in women's professional sports. I well, thank
Speaker 3: you for joining us today in the Stone Zone. We
Speaker 3: talk politics, news, history, style and food five days a
Speaker 3: week until tomorrow. God bless you and God speed.
Speaker 7: Thanks for listening to the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
Speaker 7: You can hear The Stone Zone with Roger Stone weeknights
Speaker 7: at eight on seventy seven WABC.
Speaker 1: If you like the podcast, share it with your friends
Speaker 1: and listen anytime at.
Speaker 7: Wabcradio dot com and download the WABC Radio app. Hit
Speaker 7: that subscribe button on all major podcasts platforms. Plus, follow
Speaker 7: WABC on social on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and X see
Speaker 7: you next time for a new episode, so you never
Speaker 7: have to wonder
Speaker 1: What the heck is going on here