Speaker 1: Can you dig as.
Speaker 2: You dig as.
Speaker 3: Ladies, gentlemen, friends, phones, lurkers, regulars, g m O people, organic.
Speaker 2: People whom in bounds?
Speaker 4: Why to what.
Speaker 2: Going live?
Speaker 1: All right?
Speaker 4: I had to type that. I had to put that
Speaker 4: into our discord. We are going live here at Alternate
Speaker 4: Current Radio dot com. Bring that music down. Hello, thank
Speaker 4: you for joining us for this live broadcast. I'm Brian McLain,
Speaker 4: otherwise know as Hesher. This is boiler Room broadcasting live
Speaker 4: on YouTube, Rumble, Rock Finn and not X not X tonight.
Speaker 4: I lost my premium blue check mark and realized just
Speaker 4: as we were going live that we won't be able
Speaker 4: to go out live to X tonight. So hopefully we'll
Speaker 4: get that restored soon. But yeah, didn't make my payment
Speaker 4: to Elon, so I guess I can't broadcast to X tonight.
Speaker 4: So sorry to our ex people out there. Hopefully all
Speaker 4: of you watching will tweet out the Rumble link and
Speaker 4: the rock Fin link or the YouTube link whatever. Great
Speaker 4: to have you with us here. It is February the
Speaker 4: sixth of twenty twenty five, and just as I predicted,
Speaker 4: I got a very important message just as the show
Speaker 4: is starting. So let me introduce my guests here because
Speaker 4: they may actually have to take the mic and kick
Speaker 4: us off. So let me bring Adam Clark onto the stage.
Speaker 4: Here we got Ruckus. I guess what's up? Man? How's
Speaker 4: it going?
Speaker 5: Yo? How's it going? Good? Good?
Speaker 1: Good?
Speaker 5: Thanks for having me? I yeah, I think I know
Speaker 5: what that means. So yeah, who else we got?
Speaker 4: Yeah, Well, we're glad to have you and the Mystical Pharaoh,
Speaker 4: the ex infidel Mystical Pharaoh. What's up? Welcome to the
Speaker 4: boiler room.
Speaker 1: Thanks man. Sort of confusion for everybody today, but hopefully
Speaker 1: we'll get used as a new name.
Speaker 4: What happened there? Explain how you became the Mystical Pharaoh?
Speaker 5: I don't know.
Speaker 1: It's journey, right, it is. It's a journey about finding
Speaker 1: your true self and growing. I guess all right? Will
Speaker 1: there be open to possibilities?
Speaker 4: Was there was there any surgery involved in this transition?
Speaker 4: Or no?
Speaker 6: No?
Speaker 4: Okay, all right, inquiring minds would ask, So I'll just
Speaker 4: go ahead and get that one off the comments threads
Speaker 4: right now. All right, it's great to have you guys
Speaker 4: here with us. I was telling Rugus before the show,
Speaker 4: there's basically only one person I'm going to leave my
Speaker 4: phone open for tonight, and I have a feeling they're
Speaker 4: going to hit me up right when the show starts,
Speaker 4: and it looks like that might have happened, so I'm
Speaker 4: still kind of waiting. I'm expecting the phone to ring,
Speaker 4: So a big apologies to everybody out there, but I
Speaker 4: am probably going to step away from the mic at
Speaker 4: some point. Here. Spores not with us tonight, and we're
Speaker 4: having some issues with her studio, so she'll be back
Speaker 4: with us real soon, hopefully ruckus. Let's see here, I guess.
Speaker 4: Before I get hung up in something else, let me
Speaker 4: just ask you, in an icebreakery sort of way here,
Speaker 4: what happened to this great egg heist that you linked
Speaker 4: to in the icebreaker suggestions there one hundred thousand eggs stolen?
Speaker 5: Well, I mean, eggs are a hot commodity right now
Speaker 5: because they're incredibly expensive and all that. So apparently we
Speaker 5: had somebody pull off the greatest heist of our lifetime
Speaker 5: and they stole about one hundred thousand eggs. So I
Speaker 5: don't know this was in Pennsylvania. There's been a lot
Speaker 5: of things happening out there lately. Planes falling out of
Speaker 5: the sky and shit like that but yeah, but yeah,
Speaker 5: it says right here that the eggs were worth forty
Speaker 5: thousand dollars. Wow, that's Craig Gray. Wow, that's a lot
Speaker 5: of eggs.
Speaker 4: All right, I'm gonna hand it over to you, guys.
Speaker 4: I got to make this call.
Speaker 1: Be back.
Speaker 5: Yeah, sure, sure, I'll read the article here it says
Speaker 5: up and this is from reposted or this is from
Speaker 5: Tyler Durden on zero hedge. Of course, Pennsylvania State Police
Speaker 5: are investigating in egg heist in Greencastle, about sixty five
Speaker 5: miles southwest of Harrisburg, over the week, and the very
Speaker 5: thought of such a crime may seem unimaginable, but with
Speaker 5: wholesale egg prices reaching record highs, the thieves appear to
Speaker 5: have been paying close attention to recent developments surrounding the
Speaker 5: worsening nationwide egg shortage. Local media outlet WHPTV reported approximately
Speaker 5: one hundred thousand, not just any type of eggs, ladies
Speaker 5: and gentlemen, but one hundred thousand organic eggs, which are
Speaker 5: worth forty thousand. This is the good shit right here,
Speaker 5: This is the good stuff. They were stolen from the
Speaker 5: back of a truck. Basically says it was taken off
Speaker 5: the back of Peaton Jerry's Organics distribution trailer on Saturday
Speaker 5: night in Greencastle Wild. Let's see, we have a comment
Speaker 5: coming from Peaton Jerry, part of the better known egg
Speaker 5: distributor Nelly's Free Range. So these are free range eggs,
Speaker 5: quality quality stuff, they wrote in a statement quote, we
Speaker 5: take this matter seriously and are committed to resolving it
Speaker 5: as quickly as possible. Due to the ongoing investigation, we
Speaker 5: cannot comment any further on this matter. Of course, authorities
Speaker 5: did not offer any insight into how such a large
Speaker 5: theft could have occurred unnoticed, or if they had any
Speaker 5: potential leads in the case, I wonder if it was
Speaker 5: maybe an inside job. The egg heist comes as the
Speaker 5: latest wholesale data from Umor Barry shows that whole egg
Speaker 5: prices hit a new record this week on Monday, amid
Speaker 5: an ongoing and devastating of course, not climate change, this
Speaker 5: time the Avian influenza outbreak, which is straining the nation's
Speaker 5: egg producing hen capacity. So yeah, this is not good.
Speaker 5: Egg prices are through the Infidel mystical sorry what do
Speaker 5: we call you now? Just mystical pharaoh MP, just pharaoh
Speaker 5: In buying eggs lately, are you Are you paid?
Speaker 4: So?
Speaker 1: Number one? Actually I buy the petengerry or pasture raised
Speaker 1: eggs are actually pretty good eggs and they're actually cheap,
Speaker 1: like six six bucks for twelve little eggs. But anyway, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's been very hard to find eggs in stores recently,
Speaker 1: but gladly I always keep stack of eggs in my fridge.
Speaker 1: So I'm okay for now. But interesting you mentioned this
Speaker 1: because I just posted an article. If you want to
Speaker 1: pull it up.
Speaker 5: I don't think I can. No, you can't not in
Speaker 5: control of that part of the screen.
Speaker 1: Can I can I share my screen?
Speaker 5: You think you can try.
Speaker 1: Share screen?
Speaker 5: I didn't think that was gonna work.
Speaker 1: How about that? Nope? No, sorry, Yeah he has to anyway,
Speaker 1: So when when when Hasha come back? So basically that's
Speaker 1: basically an article and video we can play when you
Speaker 1: come back. Because com members fight over eggs, as whole
Speaker 1: delivery vanished in timmate, as shortest spark, panic buying and
Speaker 1: how long have we been talking about this, dude? But
Speaker 1: that's gonna happen.
Speaker 5: I mean, well, during the the you know what, we
Speaker 5: was all over toilet paper, So now I.
Speaker 1: Mean we know that they were epping up with the
Speaker 1: chicken supply for a while, right, you know the farms
Speaker 1: that start burning last year, right, the million million chicks
Speaker 1: that got vanished and or vaporized, and tech was in
Speaker 1: Texas or what was the somewhere in Texas I think,
Speaker 1: But anyway, yeah, yeah, right, and then the H one
Speaker 1: and one. So what is the solution? Maybe you can
Speaker 1: ask Bill Gates, maybe you have a solution for us.
Speaker 5: I'm afraid to ask what his solution and is today,
Speaker 5: honest with you. I'd also heard some sort of legislation,
Speaker 5: is he Noel I believe was telling me about this,
Speaker 5: that there's some sort of push for they want to
Speaker 5: get rid of caged chickens. So they want it to
Speaker 5: be only the free range chickens, which are the ones
Speaker 5: which were like in this icebreaker here the thiefs stole
Speaker 5: the good stuff. So I mean like, okay, so you
Speaker 5: were getting them on the cheap and it's the same brand,
Speaker 5: right this Jerry and Pete Right, yea Jerry.
Speaker 1: But they start disappeating from the Yeah, no, don't confuse
Speaker 1: and was Ben and Jerry? Yeah, they start I would say,
Speaker 1: like all foods, all the like organic stores, they have
Speaker 1: been out of eggs, the last two weeks. Literally I
Speaker 1: cannot buy eggs. It's pretty crazy.
Speaker 5: Well, you know what you could do, I don't know, I.
Speaker 1: Can get your chickens. That's the same. Well, that's exactly
Speaker 1: what i'm That's exactly what we're doing this summer. I
Speaker 1: just was not prepared yet for it. But that's exactly
Speaker 1: what we're doing.
Speaker 5: But not everybody's in a position to do that. You know,
Speaker 5: there's a lot of urban dwellers and I don't know
Speaker 5: how you're going to get away with that. Folks inside
Speaker 5: of a fifteen minute city, they're probably going to have
Speaker 5: some sort of regulation or ordinance that does not allow
Speaker 5: you to have chickens. And you might think, oh, well,
Speaker 5: I just keep them quiet. Well, unfortunately you need that
Speaker 5: loud ass rooster hanging around to make them produce their eggs. Basically,
Speaker 5: I'm not mistaken.
Speaker 1: Not necessarily. No, no, don't no, no, you don't know.
Speaker 1: You actually don't need a rooster. So here, for example
Speaker 1: where I am at, like, if you are in the
Speaker 1: city Bounce, they allow you to get maximum tin chickens
Speaker 1: and you cannot have roosters. But once in the county
Speaker 1: you can have whatever you want. But in the cities,
Speaker 1: they prevent you from having roosters. But no, you don't
Speaker 1: need actually a rooster. For you to have a rooster,
Speaker 1: I allow you to actually just you know, in cubate
Speaker 1: eggs and get your own chickens. But oh that's a
Speaker 1: good thing too, that absolutely, it is, absolutely, it is.
Speaker 1: That's the way to go since usually actually chicken or
Speaker 1: you're going to lose a bunch of chicken, either from
Speaker 1: just predators or you know, from other environmental things. But
Speaker 1: it's it's it's definitely good to have the trooster and
Speaker 1: incubate your own eggs.
Speaker 5: Rabbits are good too, not so good for eggs, but good.
Speaker 1: Ah really I thought that's how will you get Easter eggs?
Speaker 5: Yeah, exactly, that's the Cadbury bunny thing. I had rabbits
Speaker 5: when I was a kid on on the family farm.
Speaker 5: We had chickens, of course for eggs, but we had
Speaker 5: rabbits for the meat. And they it tastes just like chicken.
Speaker 5: I'm not gonna lie, but you know it's they produce
Speaker 5: themselves quicker than chickens. They don't need a rooster. The rabbits, well,
Speaker 5: they do it like rabbits. That's where that expression comes
Speaker 5: from apparently.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No, Actually, rabbit meat is pretty good. I'm a
Speaker 1: big fan. I grew up eating it. Not a lot
Speaker 1: of people do it here.
Speaker 5: It's terrible to slaughter them, though, because they're cute little rabbits.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's why I could pay tribute to them and
Speaker 1: just you know, you appreciate the sacrifice when you eat
Speaker 1: them and just enjoy it. So what what is there?
Speaker 1: As I guess, is there anything else for that article?
Speaker 5: Or just that was pretty much it. I mean, it's
Speaker 5: just this really big deal that they're they're trying to
Speaker 5: do this. I mean, there was this interesting picture. You
Speaker 5: can't see it, but it's got like a clearly it's
Speaker 5: an AI generated image here, but they're like armed guards
Speaker 5: surrounding like what would normally be like one of those
Speaker 5: armored vehicles with cash in the back. Instead it's them
Speaker 5: guarding crates of eggs, and it says coming soon to
Speaker 5: a supermarket near you. I thought that was kind of funny.
Speaker 5: But yeah, if you guard your hens everybody, if you
Speaker 5: happen to have chickens, guard your eggs closely. Do not
Speaker 5: let anyone know that you have eggs in your fridge.
Speaker 5: It could make you a target for egg thug eggs. Yeah,
Speaker 5: eggs use whatever we call them. It's crazy. It's like
Speaker 5: we had the toilet paper and eggs, right, I don't know, Infidel,
Speaker 5: do you remember, I mean there was a time not
Speaker 5: that long ago here in America where eggs and toilet
Speaker 5: paper were so plentiful we used it to decorate other
Speaker 5: people's houses on Halloween without their permission, of course.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I mean it's o no, man, it's I'm
Speaker 1: actually like I was reading today an article. I don't
Speaker 1: know how or not an article, a post on X.
Speaker 1: I don't know how good this is, but actually Tennessee and.
Speaker 5: A post on X is as good as an article
Speaker 5: these days, too.
Speaker 1: Know, right, well, especially when there are no sources because
Speaker 1: you cannot link sources, but so you have to trust sources.
Speaker 1: But anyway, so basically there was I guess Tennessee a
Speaker 1: bunch of other states. They are actually trying to ban
Speaker 1: the use of emma vaccines and livestock and on humans.
Speaker 1: I don't know how accurate this is, but we'll see,
Speaker 1: but I think that would be a good way to counteract.
Speaker 1: You know. The agenda was was was that many that
Speaker 1: they're going to do with this. Probably they're going to
Speaker 1: push for vaccination of those chicks right two one secret
Speaker 1: shortage the supply chain, and.
Speaker 5: You know they'll do something creative. It'll be like in
Speaker 5: their food pellets, like what they were doing with the
Speaker 5: cows out in the UK and everybody got pissed off
Speaker 5: and they started dumping their milk and their cheese when
Speaker 5: they found out about it Bouvier or something like that.
Speaker 5: But they're putting it in the feed.
Speaker 1: Now already, and they did not announce it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, a lot of it's like the yeah, people are
Speaker 5: just finding out about it, I guess. But yeah, for
Speaker 5: the cows, they were giving them something that's supposed to
Speaker 5: make them fart less to help with the climate change,
Speaker 5: of course, and I supposedly allegedly build Gates was involved,
Speaker 5: so you know, yeah, vaccines in the form of pellas
Speaker 5: for chickens. I imagine. I thought that they had been
Speaker 5: more concerned about the workers, the workers who are handling
Speaker 5: the chickens, So that might be one way out from
Speaker 5: all of this. It might be that they're going to
Speaker 5: start replacing what if the threat spread vector is the
Speaker 5: actual dirty humans and we just replaced the dirty humans
Speaker 5: with the AI and the robots and just more automation
Speaker 5: for farming. What do you think about that idea?
Speaker 1: I'm actually so here's the thing I was actually talking
Speaker 1: was Sacha about this. I'm contemplating starting something some kind
Speaker 1: of farming project was a friend of mine. And one
Speaker 1: of the biggest challenges actually finding people that can work
Speaker 1: on far It's one of the biggest challenges right now
Speaker 1: because even though it's actually where that is is in
Speaker 1: agricultural area, but it's very hard to find people that
Speaker 1: want to get paid and to just wake up early
Speaker 1: in the morning and take care of farm animals. So
Speaker 1: one of the solutions I'm actually looking at right now
Speaker 1: is how can I at least automate because I want
Speaker 1: to do some regenerative farming and some of that rotational grazing.
Speaker 1: How can I do some automation to actually minimize the
Speaker 1: need for for labor. So it's actually not a fully
Speaker 1: bad idea given that how you know, shortage of freely
Speaker 1: labor informing, and it is it is very it is
Speaker 1: very time consuming actually thing performing. But so I would
Speaker 1: and I wouldn't. I know you're skeptical of robots and automation,
Speaker 1: but I think this is actually one area where actually
Speaker 1: it can help quite a bit.
Speaker 5: Well I don't. I don't. Okay, well, it's all fine
Speaker 5: and dandy, but I believe that, Like here's the thing
Speaker 5: is like cause I know that, like you can just
Speaker 5: do your own farming like everyone if they were just
Speaker 5: like their own closely knit family and community and doing
Speaker 5: their own farming kind of like you know, like I
Speaker 5: lived on a small family farm. I grew up that way,
Speaker 5: and you know, whatever we raised, we would trade with
Speaker 5: other people for the stuff that they would raise, so
Speaker 5: with other local farmers and stuff like that. So we
Speaker 5: had a garden. So it's like that that is completely
Speaker 5: different and separate from what the current agriculture model is.
Speaker 5: It's already too big. I'm already not a fan of
Speaker 5: big agriculture. But since big agriculture already exists, then yes,
Speaker 5: the logical solution and better option, probably from the beginning,
Speaker 5: should have been more automation. And you're right, I mean,
Speaker 5: it's a lot of hard work to do farming, especially
Speaker 5: if you're trying to do such large scale kind of
Speaker 5: stuff what they're doing, and it's all ridiculous because it's again,
Speaker 5: we don't take care of ourselves. We don't grow our
Speaker 5: own food. We're not self sustainable, so we depend on
Speaker 5: like where does food come from? Oh it comes from
Speaker 5: the grocery store. Oh yeah, well okay, how did it
Speaker 5: get there? And then them? There's an entire economy built
Speaker 5: around that, and the transportation and the truckers and the
Speaker 5: oil and everything everything. So you know, it's not gonna
Speaker 5: big agra has in big food and all that. It's
Speaker 5: not just going to disappear overnight. As much as Klaus
Speaker 5: Schwab would like to make you think there's going to
Speaker 5: be some sort of great reset, I don't think.
Speaker 6: So.
Speaker 5: There's much writing all this people getting money, you know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And honestly, like there is more and more people
Speaker 1: and I don't know, maybe maybe what I'm living, but
Speaker 1: there's more and more people are actually more into small
Speaker 1: farms and small community based farming. That friend that I'm
Speaker 1: talking about, you know that we're going to go on
Speaker 1: a hopefully and the thing together. He actually is sitting
Speaker 1: row milk and it does pretty a lot of hard work,
Speaker 1: right because he has to wake up like mirk the cow.
Speaker 1: He also have one cow, but you have to make
Speaker 1: it like two times a day, and it's like like
Speaker 1: you know, ten degrees outside, and you have to wake
Speaker 1: up early in the morning and do it right. And
Speaker 1: you cannot just skip one milk, right, So and when
Speaker 1: you can't find help, you know, it's it's it is challenging,
Speaker 1: but at the same time, it's very rewarding. But there
Speaker 1: are more and more people are actually or start being
Speaker 1: skeptical of large corporation and and and how they just
Speaker 1: poisoned all the food around us and and and I
Speaker 1: think that's a really very positive trend, and I really
Speaker 1: hope it continues because I think that's how we can
Speaker 1: get back our health and and and and and try
Speaker 1: to take some control of this madness that created it. However,
Speaker 1: the question is how much, and I hope he will
Speaker 1: get to this is how much the Trump prate use
Speaker 1: the and and agriculture will deregulate and actually allow like
Speaker 1: small scale farming to continue right without how they were
Speaker 1: like you know, like in twenty twenty four and twenty
Speaker 1: twenty three, and how they were cracking down an amage,
Speaker 1: right and some of those small scale farms and raiding them, right,
Speaker 1: especially when they are trying to force vaccines and some
Speaker 1: of those other shitty like you know, policids that they
Speaker 1: were struggling to pushing them. So I'm looking forward to
Speaker 1: see how he will deregulate this industry, and not very
Speaker 1: deregulated in a bad manner, but actually deregulating by removing
Speaker 1: some of those unnecessary burden that actually they put to
Speaker 1: push for those large scale manufacturing to exist and kill
Speaker 1: any small scale like farming, right because all those regulations
Speaker 1: was put in place to just allow for those large
Speaker 1: scale farming to exist and kill anything else.
Speaker 5: Yeah, could you imagine, I mean, what would be that?
Speaker 5: I mean, because we're supposed to make America healthy again
Speaker 5: now allegedly, we'll see, like you can't just like pull
Speaker 5: the rug out from everybody without like at least educating
Speaker 5: them or showing them the alternatives or having the alternatives
Speaker 5: put in place for them to eat and be healthier.
Speaker 5: Otherwise they're just going to have nothing, I guess.
Speaker 1: And not everybody will can afford like a six dollars
Speaker 1: like like you know, twelve eggs, right, people can't have
Speaker 1: a lot of people can't afford that, especially the the
Speaker 1: with the inflation we're in right now. So it's a
Speaker 1: you know, we have to look at how we can
Speaker 1: address that on a larger scale, but at the same
Speaker 1: time really allow us to, as you say, like that
Speaker 1: make America healthy a great here's hasher. I think we
Speaker 1: held the mind pretty good.
Speaker 5: They should reward They should instead of like the organic
Speaker 5: and the good food costing more, that shit should cost less,
Speaker 5: or you should get tax break or something.
Speaker 1: There is no reason for why organic farming should cost more. Right,
Speaker 1: But they sadly they turned around.
Speaker 4: Yeah they did. Man, I missed what you guys were
Speaker 4: talking about. Sounds like we're still talking about food though,
Speaker 4: But I noticed that one of our local grocers here
Speaker 4: they have notices up on the front windows saying, you know,
Speaker 4: we may not have eggs or going to be limited eggs.
Speaker 4: I was like, what is this? Are we back to
Speaker 4: twenty twenty here? Like what's going on?
Speaker 5: And then they're adding surcharges for food if it has
Speaker 5: egg You're like, fuck.
Speaker 1: Hey, Husha, can you pull that Costco video? I posted
Speaker 1: a link like in the.
Speaker 4: Chat, absolutely all right, what do we got? Carton crisis
Speaker 4: cost Co members fighting over eggs as whole delivery vanishes
Speaker 4: in ten minutes as a shortage sparks panic buying. Let's
Speaker 4: see what we got.
Speaker 5: Hell, have you ever seen this before?
Speaker 1: Like, dude, why are you buying all that daggs?
Speaker 4: What are you doing?
Speaker 1: I know that that's but this is the madness they do.
Speaker 1: That's what they did was toilet paper. I remember the
Speaker 1: days of Costco life was toilet paper.
Speaker 5: Yeah, hell, have you ever seen this before?
Speaker 4: Wow? I mean there's no fighting, but.
Speaker 5: Who Yeah, it's probably just one person who was using
Speaker 5: the eggs or something like as they're filming a scene
Speaker 5: in a TV show or a movie or something, and
Speaker 5: somebody sees them doing it and they get worried and
Speaker 5: like should I do it too? And the next thing
Speaker 5: you know, everybody's doing it?
Speaker 4: Right? Oh man, Well, a lot of people I see sometimes.
Speaker 4: I mean I haven't stopped at Costco in years, but
Speaker 4: I used to see people like that with you know,
Speaker 4: big like that, and you could tell they were, you know,
Speaker 4: like running a Mexican restaurant or something like that. Like
Speaker 4: some people you can tell like, okay, they're they're definitely
Speaker 4: stalking like a large kitchen or a church or something
Speaker 4: like that. But yeah, when you see the whole store
Speaker 4: doing it, that's a little odd.
Speaker 5: I should have gone with restaurants. That makes more sense.
Speaker 5: Than a TV show. I don't know, I don't know
Speaker 5: why Love Island or something. And there's a challenge and
Speaker 5: it involves eggs.
Speaker 4: Who knows of the newest like Jackass style show. Let's
Speaker 4: go egging maybe the TP too. It's gonna be like
Speaker 4: that they'd be buying the TP as well, right, I
Speaker 4: mean those aren't even like really great quality eggs.
Speaker 1: Over there, the ones they are buying just trigger eggs, right.
Speaker 1: But yeah, so we'll see how that ends up.
Speaker 4: It sure? Do you think do you guys think that
Speaker 4: there's like a like sort of a little bit of
Speaker 4: like predictive programming about bird flu going on here? Is
Speaker 4: this related to all this? Because we're seeing it. Spoor
Speaker 4: and I are seeing some weird bird flu headlines and
Speaker 4: we're seeing we were looking at one earlier today and
Speaker 4: it was about I think somewhere it might have been
Speaker 4: in the UK. Uh. They're talking about how they're going
Speaker 4: to use three D printed chicken and start putting it
Speaker 4: on the shelves, like it's just.
Speaker 1: Three D printed chicken to lay eggs or three D
Speaker 1: printed chickens to.
Speaker 4: Eat, like like you know, print mush that is made
Speaker 4: to look like chicken parts to eat. I mean, hasn't
Speaker 4: that stuff failed completely?
Speaker 1: I mean mostly that's complete. I mean, dude, even that,
Speaker 1: even that crab beyond meat ship. Yeah, actually, people are
Speaker 1: not even buying that.
Speaker 4: No, no, like they're don't want it.
Speaker 5: What if what if just hear me out, what if
Speaker 5: Elon Musk and Donald Trump got together and made one?
Speaker 5: I think it would be a hit. I think people
Speaker 5: would like it.
Speaker 1: You think we would eat it? To moss? My baby
Speaker 1: needed to. Can you grow chicken the moss?
Speaker 5: You have to be branded space food.
Speaker 4: Ex Chicken Mars Edition X Chicken Shit Mars. Addition, we
Speaker 4: don't care if it's three D printed. Put it in
Speaker 4: a bag we can squirt out into our mouths in
Speaker 4: low gravity.
Speaker 5: Spoiler alert, it's called spam.
Speaker 4: Yeah. See, we already have this perfected. This is old
Speaker 4: technology all right.
Speaker 5: Now of ten cannibals can't tell the difference.
Speaker 4: Jeffrey Dahmer's favorite.
Speaker 1: Um okay, I mean, but we're talking about that Hasha
Speaker 1: like a minute ago. That actually that that bird flu.
Speaker 1: They've been floating that for a while, right, and last
Speaker 1: year there was a bunch of like large scale like
Speaker 1: chicken farms that got burned out right, that million chicken
Speaker 1: that just got smoked.
Speaker 4: Due hundreds of millions.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so it was crazy and they killed like millions
Speaker 1: of them last year or two. So it's been in
Speaker 1: the works for a while, and the question was like,
Speaker 1: what what they are pushing for and what kind of
Speaker 1: solutions are they going to come up with.
Speaker 4: Well, let's go, let's go check in on the dreaded CDC.
Speaker 4: Here see what they have to say. Just updated H
Speaker 4: five bird flu current situation. What to know. H five
Speaker 4: bird flu is widespread in wild birds worldwide and is
Speaker 4: causing outbreaks in poultry in US and dairy cows, with
Speaker 4: several recent human cases in US dairy and poultry workers.
Speaker 4: We'd love to see the proof of that second bullet
Speaker 4: point there. While the current public health risk is low,
Speaker 4: CDC is watching the situation carefully and working with states
Speaker 4: to monitor people with animal exposures. Uh. That's code for
Speaker 4: sending out weirdos in lab coats to go check some
Speaker 4: poop or some water on a farm and then put
Speaker 4: it in a PCR test and spin it too many
Speaker 4: times if they feel like it, so they can add
Speaker 4: a case to it a case count. Remember we've seen
Speaker 4: this before, right anyone remember and then lastly, CDC is
Speaker 4: using its flu surveillance systems, the aforementioned surveillance systems to
Speaker 4: monitor for H five bird flu activity in people.
Speaker 1: So yeah, so actually go back up the very very
Speaker 1: fairy start. You see that banner in the top from
Speaker 1: one of the very top, Yeah, that's yellow one. He
Speaker 1: actually like asks the CDC and FDA to take down
Speaker 1: most of the Republican Yeah, because he's looking through those
Speaker 1: right now to make sure there's not a lot of shit.
Speaker 1: Then yea, So we'll see what comes out from that.
Speaker 1: It might be a good thing actually getting those Asians
Speaker 1: and agencies under control. But I'm really interested to know
Speaker 1: what is their flu surveillance, So I'm going to google
Speaker 1: this up right now.
Speaker 4: Yeah, well, they told us what their their virus surveillance
Speaker 4: was going to look like, you know, in the last
Speaker 4: thing that happened, the two week event, and so we
Speaker 4: got a good look at that. It's contact tracing, it's PC,
Speaker 4: it's mass PCR, mass lateral flow. You know that that
Speaker 4: kind of silly Shenanigan.
Speaker 5: They observed the cows and the chickens sneezing.
Speaker 4: Yep, right, they check their snot and they put it
Speaker 4: in their little their little Chinese plastic test machine and
Speaker 4: spin it around a bunch of times and then blast
Speaker 4: that with some radioactive dirt and put some boogers on it.
Speaker 4: And then they put it back in the PCR tester
Speaker 4: and they say, yep, look look at that. There it is.
Speaker 4: Put it in their little computer model computer will tell
Speaker 4: them everything. Yeah. I am glad to see that, though,
Speaker 4: Mystical Pharaoh. I've noticed a similar thing on a number
Speaker 4: of government websites. I was looking at the they had
Speaker 4: I forget the name of it, but it was like
Speaker 4: a firearms anti fire you know, anti two, a firearm
Speaker 4: coalition sort of thing that was set up under the
Speaker 4: last administration, and went looking for some of the directives
Speaker 4: on there, and there were four or four errors on
Speaker 4: like all of the pages. I was like, this is wonderful, Wow, excellent,
Speaker 4: great job.
Speaker 5: Remember when the wayback machine went down?
Speaker 4: Everybody Yeah, yep, so yeah, bird flu. Is the public
Speaker 4: gonna buy it? I don't know, but we've certainly seen
Speaker 4: them talking about it with their in the confirmation hearing
Speaker 4: there with RFK.
Speaker 5: But I think the question here ultimately is like the
Speaker 5: plan with this one is not to get us to
Speaker 5: lock down. This is just to affect the food supply thing.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it looks it does look a lot like that,
Speaker 4: and it already is, and arguably they were already experimenting
Speaker 4: with that in twenty twenty and twenty twenty one a
Speaker 4: little bit.
Speaker 5: So the and the and the they spun out like
Speaker 5: so quick and so fast with the whole like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 5: it's bird flu. But yes, cows are getting it. Cat's
Speaker 5: got it, like right, and nobody batted an eye and
Speaker 5: they're like, oh and the humans got it now, like.
Speaker 4: Yeah, hold on a second, so they've got They say
Speaker 4: that currently before this website gets uh nuked or updated
Speaker 4: or left alone. It currently says sixty seven confirmed total
Speaker 4: reported human cases in the United States and one death
Speaker 4: associated with a bird flu infection.
Speaker 5: Confirm. Where's the little asterisk and the link to the
Speaker 5: source to this? Yeah, is there any.
Speaker 4: No, they never provide that, of course, not confirmed by
Speaker 4: the aforementioned stupid PCR test.
Speaker 5: It'd be funny if they did. And it's a link
Speaker 5: to a tweet from Mario in their minds, right, what's
Speaker 5: that guy's name?
Speaker 4: You got it?
Speaker 1: They called it flu View. That's the name of the system.
Speaker 4: Flu View is it an app you put on your cows.
Speaker 4: But I mean, how does that work?
Speaker 1: Like that's their system?
Speaker 5: That sounds too close to fools you. Yeah, yeah, I'm
Speaker 5: telling you.
Speaker 4: It's probably on the same review list for government apps,
Speaker 4: like just a little bit further down than CBP one.
Speaker 5: Right, flu view, you're definitely trolling us.
Speaker 4: Oh my gosh. All right, let's see, And what's what's
Speaker 4: this with what happened? How did info Wars sneak back
Speaker 4: into the FBI spying stuff? That what happened there ruckus?
Speaker 5: I don't know. That was all over the feed today.
Speaker 5: I was like, this, this is actually news. I guess
Speaker 5: the Trump administration because there's a lot of funky stuff
Speaker 5: going on. But I guess just at random, there was
Speaker 5: some foi A requesting that was put out there. I
Speaker 5: don't know why or by whom, but turns out that
Speaker 5: the FBI was spying on info Wars and has been
Speaker 5: for quite a long time. So Alex of course had
Speaker 5: to do some sort of emergency broadcast about it in
Speaker 5: between the other two or three or five that he
Speaker 5: did today. But yeah, I'm just curious if you guys
Speaker 5: had seen that or knew anything about it.
Speaker 4: No, it's news to me. But like, I don't know
Speaker 4: why I should be surprised on that. I mean, why
Speaker 4: wouldn't they be. I assume there have been busy spying
Speaker 4: on all kinds of Americans and he's on that list.
Speaker 5: Well, yeah, I don't like how that's it's a little
Speaker 5: one of those this is close to home kind of
Speaker 5: things because of what we did.
Speaker 4: I know, it's just like I don't even want to
Speaker 4: say it, Like I imagine anyone with a public presence
Speaker 4: in this swim lane has a dossier sitting around somewhere.
Speaker 4: At least the dossier, well, uh, you know, maybe that'll
Speaker 4: come out in the wash. Maybe he can get off
Speaker 4: the government hit list, the government weaponization list.
Speaker 1: Maybe what do you think about that us A documents
Speaker 1: that came out and showed that the US government was.
Speaker 5: Actually that was Wiki leaks, right, Who did that one was?
Speaker 1: I thought it was it was lask.
Speaker 4: I thought it was.
Speaker 5: I think it's two sideways conjoining things happening at once here.
Speaker 4: Yeah, there was another journalist too, I can't remember his
Speaker 4: name right now.
Speaker 1: But yes, that was in China after all.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I love this. I love this, how this is
Speaker 4: all coming out of the woodworks.
Speaker 1: It's like it's like, didn't we say this like a
Speaker 1: long time ago to the the US. I agree to that.
Speaker 4: This, This has been the point, This has been one
Speaker 4: of the major theses of the Boiler Room for ten
Speaker 4: freaking years, is that your reality is being manipulated by
Speaker 4: the CIA, by the government. They're using mind control on you.
Speaker 4: They're stealing your tax dollars, our tax dollars and giving
Speaker 4: them to media organizations through NGOs and and all this
Speaker 4: other shit, uh, to skull plug us and to turn
Speaker 4: us against each other and to give us a reality
Speaker 4: that doesn't represent actual reality. And now everybody's realizing it.
Speaker 4: And I think that's fricking glorious. I absolutely love that. Like,
Speaker 4: there's so much we've talked to We've been talking about
Speaker 4: us AID for for years, for years talking about that
Speaker 4: and uh yeah, so yeah right, let's let's ask uh
Speaker 4: ed editorial. We've got Ed's editorial, the uh our journalist
Speaker 4: here tonight Ed, Welcome to the boiler Room.
Speaker 2: Good to be here. In one of my many versions,
Speaker 2: I have so many cousins and we all look alike.
Speaker 2: It's confusing.
Speaker 4: I feel like I feel like you. The bat signal
Speaker 4: went up or something. I started talking about the narrative
Speaker 4: and stuff, and I look down and there's an extra
Speaker 4: window in the stream here, and I'm like, who's Oh,
Speaker 4: he's here, So Mark, we're just starting to talk about
Speaker 4: this whole thing with us ai D, and it now
Speaker 4: becomes mainstream narrative, mainstream knowledge that usai D is a
Speaker 4: CIA front for one. They've been involved in regime change,
Speaker 4: they've been involved in human trafficking by many people's account.
Speaker 5: Yeah, the Bloomberg, BBC.
Speaker 4: Funding all these agencies, you know, what's what do you
Speaker 4: think about this?
Speaker 2: It reminded me, although I've known about it a long time,
Speaker 2: probably a decade or more, it reminds me a little
Speaker 2: bit of BBC media action that UK Colin talks about.
Speaker 2: Although it seems like, correct me if I'm wrong, that
Speaker 2: us AID has more tentacles. It's not just media action
Speaker 2: and some sort of kind of fake media that tries
Speaker 2: to change the culture of a country and almost overthrow
Speaker 2: it from the inside out. Although that's probably on USA's agenda.
Speaker 2: They seem to have more of a multifaceted approach. Yes,
Speaker 2: with the money going into all sorts of cultural activities,
Speaker 2: maybe not all of it is even bad, A little
Speaker 2: bit of truth, a little bit of good can be seductive.
Speaker 2: You know, they got to put lipstick on the pig,
Speaker 2: as it were, so they've got to make it look good.
Speaker 2: So they probably did some good programs that did some good,
Speaker 2: but you know, the underbelly is what matters.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, you're right. They are like a multitool, like
Speaker 4: a intelligence agency multi toool been used for all kinds
Speaker 4: of stuff. I was watching a documentary about their involvement
Speaker 4: in Guatemala and claims about human trafficking, you know, going
Speaker 4: through It's it's nuts, man, It's absolutely nuts. And you know,
Speaker 4: you look at all the countries they've been involved in,
Speaker 4: all the regime change going on. It's so. Yeah, that's
Speaker 4: definitely been an interesting facet of this week's news cycle.
Speaker 4: And you know I was when you jumped in. I was,
Speaker 4: I don't know how long you've been sitting back there backstage,
Speaker 4: but I was making the point that like this, this,
Speaker 4: this has been the thesis, one of the main thesises
Speaker 4: of the boiler Room the whole time it's existed, is
Speaker 4: that media mass media, as as you have called it,
Speaker 4: is predatory and weaponized and is taking our own money
Speaker 4: into these machines and and spitting lies back out at
Speaker 4: us and creating a reality that is does not represent
Speaker 4: actual reality, you know. And it's behind all the polarization,
Speaker 4: all the misunderstanding, so much of the war and the
Speaker 4: hatred and the you know now the power politics and
Speaker 4: the culture wars. It's just like there it is. There's
Speaker 4: the receipts, and more people are seeing them this week
Speaker 4: than never have before, I guess.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And like it or not, hold our nose or not,
Speaker 2: we can thank Donald Trump for the main thrust of that.
Speaker 2: We've been in the trenches and in the digital ghetto,
Speaker 2: the media ghetto as it were, talking about these sorts
Speaker 2: of things for years. As I mentioned tomorrow morning, and
Speaker 2: you can Collum dot org live a brief mention. We're
Speaker 2: not on the show.
Speaker 4: Yet, right, Oh we are, actually, oh we are.
Speaker 2: Okay, sorry, I beg your pardon at any rate. A
Speaker 2: cheap plug here, shameless plug, but right now, ending tomorrow
Speaker 2: started it started February third, and it ends tomorrow on
Speaker 2: the seventh, is National News Literacy Week by the Script's
Speaker 2: Company aka Scripts Howard News. And they've got a few
Speaker 2: different tentacles educating kids, educating adults mainly about detecting and
Speaker 2: doing something about disinfo and miss info. But at the
Speaker 2: very same time, their main TV broadcasts, their main news broadcasts,
Speaker 2: not counting live streaming and streaming services, is being closed down.
Speaker 2: I believe it's based in Cincinnati, Ohio. They have a
Speaker 2: digital arm. I believe it's based in Atlanta, Georgia. But
Speaker 2: right as they're telling us look out, here comes the
Speaker 2: disinfo and miss info, and it's always social media that's
Speaker 2: at fault. It couldn't possibly be them. It's only social media,
Speaker 2: and social media is really just a platform. There's not
Speaker 2: a news organization called social media. It's just a it's
Speaker 2: just a conduit. So the whole thing that watch out
Speaker 2: for social media is something of a misnomer. Correct. That's
Speaker 2: like saying watch out for the water pipe without talking
Speaker 2: about what's in the water pipe. Maybe it's sewage, maybe
Speaker 2: it's bilge. But it's just a delivery system. That's all
Speaker 2: social media really is, even though there's dominant people that
Speaker 2: control that delivery system in a monopolistic way, and that's
Speaker 2: the problem. But the main thing is that as scrips
Speaker 2: Howard is warning us about disinfo and misinfo, their main
Speaker 2: News Broadcast is apparently going out of business, and this
Speaker 2: is according to their own reports. So the mass media
Speaker 2: cartel is warning us that that disinfo is not associated
Speaker 2: with them, even as they lose market share, even as
Speaker 2: their main things close. Now, so all I can say
Speaker 2: is I'll cheer as it happens.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, we've seen CNN do another round of
Speaker 4: over one hundred layoffs. Some people are speculating CNN is
Speaker 4: about to fold. People at Politico were saying they didn't
Speaker 4: get their paychecks right after some of this stuff happened,
Speaker 4: and you got to wonder why, like how many paychecks
Speaker 4: were direct tied to federal subsidies you know, hmmm or USA.
Speaker 1: They were trying to spin it to say that the
Speaker 1: lift is saying, oh no, this is a conspiracy theory.
Speaker 1: They were not getting like kickbacks. No, there was actually
Speaker 1: the federal government just buying like thirty thousand dollars like
Speaker 1: uh ads in political right for for a total of
Speaker 1: eight million do I mean come on, yeah.
Speaker 4: And that's just one invoice, you know what I mean?
Speaker 4: That's yeah, that's one invoice for one one time period
Speaker 4: or one you know, one item, and it's just like,
Speaker 4: can we get a full disclosure on this. Can we see?
Speaker 4: I think this is a great move. I love it,
Speaker 4: but again I'm I'm concerned it's one of those Overton
Speaker 4: window things and a rebranding thing, right. It's like, yeah,
Speaker 4: so everybody has been talking about this for ten years,
Speaker 4: so let's just build it into the you know, political
Speaker 4: platform here and just like they did with Jack Dorsey
Speaker 4: Twitter one point. Oh, it's like, okay, here are here
Speaker 4: are our sins? Uh, have fun, have fun analyzing our sins.
Speaker 4: We won't do it again. But I'm already seeing like
Speaker 4: the shift of this A lot of the functionality of
Speaker 4: U S A I D go directly to the the
Speaker 4: D I think the d o J or the.
Speaker 1: State no state Department, which is actually really worries me
Speaker 1: that it goes under freaking Robbio, right because we know
Speaker 1: that Robbio is in Yukon and it's hard.
Speaker 4: So yeah, Marco Rubio, So it's right. I mean, that's
Speaker 4: that's a concern. It's like, I love this news. You know,
Speaker 4: US A I D is is odious and and it's
Speaker 4: just one of many things that that do that. But yeah,
Speaker 4: to see it all go under, you know, is that
Speaker 4: just shifting of money to back to the State Department
Speaker 4: under Rubio. You know, that's that's you know, arguably Trump's worst,
Speaker 4: uh worst political zionist that he's has picked.
Speaker 2: Ye One thing I'll mention that I noticed, and I
Speaker 2: think it was different in Trump's first term. Correctly, if
Speaker 2: I'm wrong, in his first term he spoke about the
Speaker 2: fake news more than he is now. But that's not
Speaker 2: my main point. The difference there is probably small. But
Speaker 2: in his first term he actually entertained the idea of
Speaker 2: and actually did I believe, follow through with having a
Speaker 2: little bit of alternative media at the press conferences.
Speaker 5: Yea, and yeah, I heard something about that.
Speaker 2: I managed to get all the emails from Trump. I
Speaker 2: get all the emails of all his travels, everything, And
Speaker 2: one of the things I noticed was they sent a
Speaker 2: press list. It just was a formality about who's in
Speaker 2: the press corps at the White House, and it's all
Speaker 2: mainstream media, every one of them. There's no more talk
Speaker 2: about well, let's even though it was controversial, and maybe
Speaker 2: it was tongue in cheek, let's get Alex Jones or
Speaker 2: info wars in there that they used to talk about
Speaker 2: in some others I believe, and I could be totally
Speaker 2: wrong about this, but I believe Gary Francie. If you
Speaker 2: happen to know who Gary Franchie is, I believe the
Speaker 2: first time around he came very close to having somebody
Speaker 2: in there. I used to work for Gary about ten
Speaker 2: years ago. I did some news reports for him. We
Speaker 2: did some TV stuff that was pretty high impact in fact,
Speaker 2: but I'm not hearing that now now. It's a little early,
Speaker 2: I realized. But so far it's just NPR CBS. I
Speaker 2: think the most alternative they have in there is BuzzFeed.
Speaker 1: And they had the war room. They were they have
Speaker 1: someone from Bennon war Room. But who's that from Bennon
Speaker 1: war Room? Steve Bennon and Steve Bennon Chile.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but that that's sort of a gimmy because he's
Speaker 2: an old friend of Trump.
Speaker 1: So yeah, you know.
Speaker 5: I'd heard he was going to allow people who are
Speaker 5: just like who run X spaces anybody?
Speaker 4: Yeah, like Mark Anderson should get a press passage.
Speaker 5: Absolutely.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I vote for Rugus to be a boiler room
Speaker 1: representative in there.
Speaker 5: I'll do it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, let's let's get Rucas and I both in there.
Speaker 2: We can be standing outside the White House, not green
Speaker 2: screen and doing well today was quite to day, wasn't it, Rucus, Yes,
Speaker 2: it was Mark. We could go back and forth maybe
Speaker 2: and it.
Speaker 1: Will ask good questions. You guys will ask good questions.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Absolutely, they're supportive of these onesies.
Speaker 2: Even with Trump would be a question of how quickly
Speaker 2: we might get thrown out because you know, there's something napoleonic.
Speaker 2: Even though there's a lot of laudable things going down
Speaker 2: with some of the executive orders and certain things that
Speaker 2: look pretty good, there's something very seize our sees oaristic
Speaker 2: slash napoleonic about the Trump administration. It's it's definitely it
Speaker 2: has an imperial tinge to it, even though it seems
Speaker 2: to have a constitutional whiff to it. There's an imperial
Speaker 2: part of this.
Speaker 5: You know what, even Depress Secretary, what do you think
Speaker 5: about her?
Speaker 2: You know, I haven't watched her much. I mean, not
Speaker 2: bad to look at. I hate to sound like just
Speaker 2: an average guy, but I'll just leave.
Speaker 5: She looks she looks weird, Like. I keep looking at
Speaker 5: her and I'm like, there's something off about her, and
Speaker 5: I finally it hit me the other day. I was like,
Speaker 5: she looks like a cabbage patch doll.
Speaker 2: Oh, I thought you were going to breach the the
Speaker 2: the unbreachable, the unspeakable.
Speaker 4: I did see that Candice Owens put her her video
Speaker 4: out about Macron's Macron's wife.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I did not see her latest one.
Speaker 4: I haven't had a chance to watch any of it yet,
Speaker 4: but I'm sort of looking forward to that in a
Speaker 4: I don't know, in a trolley sort of way.
Speaker 2: So he's married to a woman, Well, good for him.
Speaker 4: I think that, Yeah, that myth may get busted on
Speaker 4: her new documentary things she's doing. You know, she's like
Speaker 4: number five or something like that in podcast popularity in
Speaker 4: the country right now. Like, I was shocked to see that.
Speaker 4: I was like, holy shit, she was right up there.
Speaker 4: Big sponsors though. I noticed. I was watching one of
Speaker 4: her clips and I noticed that one of her sponsors
Speaker 4: is Oracle. I was like, really that was that was
Speaker 4: a surprise Larry Ellison's company.
Speaker 5: Huh Okay, he's got some money to burn, hasher? He
Speaker 5: can afford it?
Speaker 4: Yeah, I guess.
Speaker 2: So I would call that the surprise that isn't.
Speaker 4: Yeah right kidding?
Speaker 6: Is he is?
Speaker 4: He wants to know did she prove she was a man?
Speaker 4: Referring to mccrone's wife. I don't know. That's definitely the
Speaker 4: implication there, so it should be interesting. I've seen enough
Speaker 4: Twitter threads on this to know there's enough meat on
Speaker 4: that bone to probably make a documentary show.
Speaker 5: So just speaking a meat on bones. If you're in
Speaker 5: the discord channel, feel free to check out this channel
Speaker 5: called Tranced and Confused and there's a nice video of
Speaker 5: Lady Gaga. Uh and you tell me that's all I'm saying.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's a that's a fun place to share your
Speaker 4: your theories in videos for analyses. We have a place
Speaker 4: for that.
Speaker 2: Put that in the in the text chat if you would.
Speaker 5: Adham, Oh you don't want to see this, Mark.
Speaker 2: Well, later on I'll drink something that has the word
Speaker 2: proof on it.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 5: It makes it makes the Michelle Obama dance from Look,
Speaker 5: that's kindergarten stuff.
Speaker 3: Bro.
Speaker 5: This is full on full Monty, Lady Gaga, full Monty.
Speaker 5: That sounds weird to say, but it is what it is.
Speaker 2: I can handle it. I can handle it.
Speaker 4: All right. We'll hook you up with a link there. Mark.
Speaker 4: You'll definitely want some numbing agents beforehand. Okay, all right,
Speaker 4: let's see here. Where did we leave off where did
Speaker 4: we leave off? Yeah, Usa, I d the media. This
Speaker 4: is going to be interesting. I do have concerns about just,
Speaker 4: you know, rebranding. That seems to be the the name
Speaker 4: of the game right now is like the cultural zeitgeist
Speaker 4: has has shifted a We've entered a new sort of zeitgeist.
Speaker 4: And it's okay to talk about the things that weren't
Speaker 4: okay to talk about anymore. And world leaders and superstars
Speaker 4: on X are you know, talking about it, and mommy
Speaker 4: bloggers are tiktoking about it and it's all good now,
Speaker 4: so you know, don't worry about that anymore. Don't worry
Speaker 4: about censorship and nation building and color revolutions and culture wars.
Speaker 4: It's all good. I don't know. I'm not trying to
Speaker 4: be negative about it. I am very appreciative to see
Speaker 4: these things shifting, don't get me wrong, But I gotta
Speaker 4: wonder what's next, Like is there a reason for all
Speaker 4: this that this is all happening right now? And is
Speaker 4: it just being rebranded? You know, much like many of
Speaker 4: our politicians right ed, Like I pick on Tulca Gabbard
Speaker 4: a lot. I know that she rebranded herself very good,
Speaker 4: not fantastic. Like Elon and not a train wreck like Zuckerberg.
Speaker 4: But she did very good.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the powers that be. One thing that generally keep
Speaker 2: in mind is there very good at getting us to
Speaker 2: celebrate something prematurely or to back something that they secretly
Speaker 2: want us to back, and make us think that we're
Speaker 2: in a winning position when we're not. An example of
Speaker 2: that is when they passed the Federal Reserve Act, they
Speaker 2: they pumped it into the newspapers that the Federal Reserve.
Speaker 7: Uh.
Speaker 2: And in the income tax that same year, they created
Speaker 2: this mythical thing that the rich, the super rich, the barons,
Speaker 2: you know, the money barons were finally going to get
Speaker 2: their just desserts and the income tax and this fairer
Speaker 2: money system were coming in and happy times are here again. Uh.
Speaker 2: These mountebanks, these these robber barons are going to pay
Speaker 2: their fair share finally. But what they did was they
Speaker 2: coaxed us into the income tax, thinking it would put
Speaker 2: the super rich under control. We walked into the snare.
Speaker 2: They tightened the snare around our legs. They retrofit the
Speaker 2: income tax so it applied to poorer people, the middle
Speaker 2: and lower classes, and then they dump their moneys into
Speaker 2: the text exem foundations that they created in another year
Speaker 2: or two. So it was bade and switch. Oh yeah,
Speaker 2: go ahead and go for that income taxt Ooh we're scared.
Speaker 2: You're finally going to get you know, you're going to
Speaker 2: get us under control. But all it was was a
Speaker 2: trap for the lower classes. And then they put their millions,
Speaker 2: and then the Rockefeller Foundation was born and the Carnegie
Speaker 2: Corporation was born. That this is how they work. They're
Speaker 2: very good at getting us to support something that benefits
Speaker 2: them when we think it's something that's going to keep
Speaker 2: them down.
Speaker 4: Yeah. And these things come and go in cycles, right,
Speaker 4: and yes, we're about at the end of one hundred
Speaker 4: year cycle on this.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's you got to be very careful. It's all
Speaker 2: it is is reverse psychology with an extra twist. That's
Speaker 2: that's all it is.
Speaker 4: And now we're in an environment where these tactics have
Speaker 4: been developed. It's you know, it's it's weaponized human psychology.
Speaker 4: It's uh, it's population control, it's eugenics, it's cultural engineering,
Speaker 4: you know all those, and and controlling food supply. But
Speaker 4: now there's and of course, you know, the the operations
Speaker 4: of places like USA, AI D carrying out the plans
Speaker 4: of you know, those that fund them, if you will,
Speaker 4: doing their work in other nations and here at home,
Speaker 4: which we've seen people like John Kerrey admit and talk about.
Speaker 4: But now there's this technical overlay. There's there's this this
Speaker 4: interwoven system of feedback loops via the social media. So
Speaker 4: it's like, on the one hand, they try to blame
Speaker 4: social media for stuff when they can't control the narrative,
Speaker 4: but on the other hand, they're creating so much more
Speaker 4: narrative by propagating it through social media and using the
Speaker 4: algorithms to to you know, boost it in a way
Speaker 4: that they can clearly tell and age you know, how
Speaker 4: many people hold you know, whatever different political worldview, attributes
Speaker 4: and predict how they're gonna react to, you know, certain events.
Speaker 4: So you know, we're in a new age of that
Speaker 4: where this can be done globally. And you know, look
Speaker 4: what happened in twenty twenty and twenty twenty one and
Speaker 4: the way that they used said media that was getting
Speaker 4: said money, lots of it, you know, so you know,
Speaker 4: we know that they're more than willing to do worldwide
Speaker 4: narrative operations like that that are are are focused you know,
Speaker 4: that's the first time we've seen that. Usually it's a
Speaker 4: struggle of narratives, right, but with that one, it was like, everybody,
Speaker 4: this is the thing.
Speaker 2: Indeed, Yeah, it's this is a very interesting time we're
Speaker 2: living in. You know, there's a lot of things that
Speaker 2: Trump did that again have a good ring to them,
Speaker 2: a good a good over all thrust to them, especially
Speaker 2: the executive orders, the Sovereign wal Fund. The Sovereign walf
Speaker 2: Fund has that. I gotta go turn the TV down.
Speaker 2: The Sovereign wal Fund has a lot of merit.
Speaker 1: Let me.
Speaker 2: I'll be right back. I need to turn the TV.
Speaker 4: Down, all right, Okay, ruckus, you drop me a link
Speaker 4: here about usaid, Let'll put that on the screen real
Speaker 4: quick here.
Speaker 5: Oh, it's like, no, don't do the Lady Gaga.
Speaker 4: No, that one I'm not putting up. Don't worry. Folks
Speaker 4: can find that one on their own. It's out there
Speaker 4: on Twitter. We don't we don't have anything to do
Speaker 4: with its existence, creation or persistence. So please don't sue us.
Speaker 5: Probably AI just tell yourself.
Speaker 4: Sure, it's a cheap fake, so don't come after us.
Speaker 4: Lady Gaga all right, No, we had this one though,
Speaker 4: only two hundred and ninety four out of fourteen thousand
Speaker 4: USAID personnel identified as actually essential cakes. So you know,
Speaker 4: with with that, you could almost say, yeah, dog is
Speaker 4: getting some low hanging fruit credit here. Uh, this is
Speaker 4: this is an easy one. But I don't see the
Speaker 4: deep State letting go of their capabilities.
Speaker 5: What's that Big Bulls nineteen year old kid?
Speaker 4: Yeah, no, I haven't seen this. What is this?
Speaker 5: That's the guy's name. There's this nineteen year old uber
Speaker 5: genius that that musk put in charge of something, and
Speaker 5: his name is big.
Speaker 1: And then one like X is Big Bulls. Okay, alright,
Speaker 1: and CNN was melting over it.
Speaker 4: As they're losing viewership by the second they're they're upset
Speaker 4: about someone's user handle. Huh.
Speaker 5: They were people who was saying that somebody was saying
Speaker 5: something stupid like they these kids, they don't even know
Speaker 5: how to drive, and they're in charge of doge.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and Big Balls probably has more viewers on anything
Speaker 4: that he like.
Speaker 1: If you want like to actually find shit like and
Speaker 1: and and and and you know, data mining, what do you
Speaker 1: need like a bunch of like nerds like zoomers to
Speaker 1: actually like go into it and just find all this crap.
Speaker 1: That's that's the best way to do it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: Actually finding like looking at a little a Swarren like
Speaker 1: she was melting over in a s NBC the other
Speaker 1: day on on on This whole Doge thing was just epic.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I did see some of that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we know speak but it's it's it's sort of
Speaker 1: sort of just just go ahead, just mentioned something because
Speaker 1: I know people like you know, in some of those
Speaker 1: like you know, like government like different positions and what
Speaker 1: One of the things that he did actually to make
Speaker 1: sure that they don't subver time is they went directly
Speaker 1: and plugged like servers and communication and start sending emails
Speaker 1: and actually by passing some like cranks and some of
Speaker 1: those agencies, so they actually go directly to the employees
Speaker 1: to make sure that they don't do what they did
Speaker 1: the first time. And having the resistance from the ranks
Speaker 1: and some of those agencies, which again it's not a
Speaker 1: bad thing, knowing that how ridiculous that hole like apparatus
Speaker 1: of the government this is the only way you can go, but.
Speaker 4: That you shouldn't have to do that. First of all,
Speaker 4: that's really saying something about the state of affairs. I
Speaker 4: think that's outside of it protocol. I'll just I don't
Speaker 4: know where that falls into all this, but that sounds
Speaker 4: like the kind of thing that could get someone in trouble.
Speaker 4: But I guess if it's coming from the right person,
Speaker 4: you could do that as a serf.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean he's in charge of the whole brand
Speaker 1: executive branch, right, so he can Trump can do whatever
Speaker 1: he wants.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, No, that's that's that's pretty crazy.
Speaker 5: Yeah, well I do what I want.
Speaker 4: All right, Sorry, gentlemen, that's all right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, anyway, I don't want to just awkwardly just punch
Speaker 2: in there. What were you guys just talking about?
Speaker 4: No, that's what we were just we went back to
Speaker 4: USAID for a minute here, because we had this this
Speaker 4: headline here at a national pulse, only two hundred and
Speaker 4: ninety four of fourteen thousand USAID personnel identified as actually essential.
Speaker 5: So wow. So like, and it's not just this this
Speaker 5: everything right with this whole doge government efficiency thing. They're
Speaker 5: like the CIA, there are people who are like getting
Speaker 5: their pink slips. Basically, they're like, okay, well, well there's
Speaker 5: there's a few things here. Is one of them is
Speaker 5: that they have to go back to work in the office.
Speaker 5: They can't work from home. And if they have a
Speaker 5: problem with that, tough titties, here's your paycheck. Bye bye.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 5: And then there's there's this new scheme too. With all
Speaker 5: these these they're just saying, hey, you can stick around
Speaker 5: if you want. You're probably eventually going to lose your job,
Speaker 5: or you can choose to quit now, and we're going
Speaker 5: to hook you up with this this pay package deal.
Speaker 5: Have you seen all this kind of stuff.
Speaker 4: Yeah, like a like an early retirement offer basically with
Speaker 4: eight months of pay or something like that. It's actually
Speaker 4: a pretty nice offer, I guess if you're looking to
Speaker 4: get out of your federal job. I mean I certainly
Speaker 4: didn't get offered anything like that.
Speaker 1: They won't be just looked just looked at today. Oh
Speaker 1: really yeah, but I mean there will be a lot
Speaker 1: of yeah exactly, that'll be like back, a lot of
Speaker 1: back and forth there. But I agree with you. It's
Speaker 1: it's I mean, listen, I'm not I feel bad for people,
Speaker 1: but at the same time, we they allow this government
Speaker 1: to come to be at this out of control, right,
Speaker 1: there's no reason for this federal government to be that bluten. Yeah, dude,
Speaker 1: we have to do it. There is no.
Speaker 4: Anyone who works in government, especially government civilians on long
Speaker 4: term billits or GS positions like you know, come on,
Speaker 4: I mean really admit it. Like walk around the place,
Speaker 4: make a list. You know how many pointless bags of
Speaker 4: protoplasm there are just sitting in there warming seats, all right,
Speaker 4: Like I'm sorry, but uh, there's a lot. I would have.
Speaker 4: You know, I could have been a doge where I worked.
Speaker 4: For sure. I've been like, you're pointless, You're pointless. You know,
Speaker 4: some days I looked in the mirror and go, oh,
Speaker 4: maybe you're pointless too, you know, like is this really necessary?
Speaker 4: But there's so much bloat and like what's left in
Speaker 4: the the government has gotten so big. And I don't
Speaker 4: blame people for wanting to be government employees. I mean
Speaker 4: it's one of the best things you can do if
Speaker 4: you want to have, like become a GS employee, if
Speaker 4: you want to have a kick ass retirement and a
Speaker 4: kick ass medical plan and a Kicks dental plan and
Speaker 4: all that stuff, like becoming a GS civilian employee or
Speaker 4: you know, even more opportunities if you're a veteran or
Speaker 4: a wounded veteran. You know, there's all these different routes
Speaker 4: into the federal government, and it's just like businesses can't
Speaker 4: really compete they you know, some can that that fortune
Speaker 4: five hundred tier can, but you know, the the mom
Speaker 4: and pops and the medium sized businesses in America they
Speaker 4: can't compete with with the kind of benefits that come
Speaker 4: with that. And then when these organizations just you know,
Speaker 4: mushroom cloud into red tape generators and you know, have
Speaker 4: entirely new political branches installed in them, like all these
Speaker 4: DEI groups that were funded and paid with our tax
Speaker 4: dollars for so long, it just gets bigger and bigger
Speaker 4: and bigger and bigger, and that problem becomes bigger and
Speaker 4: the opportunities become smaller for people that don't want to
Speaker 4: work in the government, can't work in the government, or
Speaker 4: you know, want to do something they actually like instead
Speaker 4: of whatever. Uh there you know employer has them doing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, if you have a second something funny, you can
Speaker 1: play the clip.
Speaker 5: I'm really looking forward to sitting down with you and
Speaker 5: finding out more about what you do here anytime?
Speaker 6: What do you do here?
Speaker 5: Excuse me? What is wrong with this woman? She's asking
Speaker 5: about stuff that's nobody's business.
Speaker 2: What do I do?
Speaker 5: Really?
Speaker 1: What do I do here?
Speaker 5: I mean you should have written it down quaw something.
Speaker 2: Qua quad qual.
Speaker 5: Quabity quality Ashwitz.
Speaker 4: No, no, no, no, no, But I'm getting close, Yeah.
Speaker 5: Looking forward to sitting down with you and finding out.
Speaker 4: Yeah, a lot of government employees are feeling that one
Speaker 4: right now. It sucks for some people too, you know,
Speaker 4: Like I have a friend who's been a federal contractor
Speaker 4: for a long time and from back in the day,
Speaker 4: and he got hit, you know, and he was you know,
Speaker 4: he was like us. You know, he was not liking
Speaker 4: the old regime. Didn't want to see where the world
Speaker 4: was going to go if you know, the old regime
Speaker 4: came in. You know, politics shifted over the years, especially
Speaker 4: after seeing you know, the way that the Democrats behaved
Speaker 4: in leading up to twenty twenty and everything after that.
Speaker 4: So but at the same time, he's been enjoying the
Speaker 4: ability to work remotely, and he's like an og remote worker.
Speaker 4: He's someone that was working remotely like before it was
Speaker 4: you know cool because of the koof and all that stuff.
Speaker 4: So you know, this is like forcing him to have
Speaker 4: to move back to you know that work site, that city,
Speaker 4: that date, or you know, maybe losing the job. So
Speaker 4: it's it's it's more complicated than it sounds, for sure,
Speaker 4: and there's gonna be some pain for sure for people.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, absolutely, and and we we you know, we
Speaker 1: feel the pain. But sometimes it just again like yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean we have to go through some pains, you know,
Speaker 1: to get things under control.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Frankly, it's like I can empathize and sympathize because
Speaker 4: that happened to me under Obama's presidency. Like I've been there,
Speaker 4: I've been squashed out of my career under the thumb
Speaker 4: of the federal government.
Speaker 1: It's happened, I know, and every everybody in America at
Speaker 1: some point, not everybody, but a lot of people in
Speaker 1: America at some point got laid up from their job
Speaker 1: if they are working in the private industry. Right, So
Speaker 1: there is there is you know, it's again it's something
Speaker 1: that happened when a business have to downsize to survive,
Speaker 1: right Yeah, It's there's just no difference.
Speaker 4: And this is an actual downsizing that can help the
Speaker 4: American economy quite frankly, you know. So it's like, yeah,
Speaker 4: some people are going to have to you know, take
Speaker 4: it on this one, and I don't like that. But
Speaker 4: are I don't know that our economy is fixable either,
Speaker 4: you know that that may be debatable, but it's better
Speaker 4: than the what was happening. Yeah, I mean what would USA,
Speaker 4: what would usaid be spending their money on this year,
Speaker 4: their next you know, nine million, ten million, hundred million
Speaker 4: dollar contract.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's definitely a mixed bag. The the congressman in
Speaker 2: the thirties, right Patman, had an exchange with the Federal
Speaker 2: Reserve chairman at the time, a gentleman with an unusual name,
Speaker 2: Mariner Eccles, and so right Patman, who shared the currency
Speaker 2: the Banking and Currency Committee at the time. He said,
Speaker 2: he said to mister Eccles, he said, so, you mean,
Speaker 2: if there's no debt, there's no money, And the Fed
Speaker 2: chairman replied, yes, if there's no debts in the system,
Speaker 2: there isn't any money. So it's sort of a twilight
Speaker 2: zone thing. The way the monetary system, which is very defective,
Speaker 2: the way it's set up. The way it works is
Speaker 2: that the federal government gets x amount of revenue through
Speaker 2: taxes through all its revenue sources, but it always spends
Speaker 2: more than it takes in right, and that's called each year,
Speaker 2: that's called the deficit. Well, the cumulative effect of the
Speaker 2: deficit is the debt, the amount of the shortfall between
Speaker 2: what the government brings in through taxes and what it
Speaker 2: actually spends. But the differential between what it brings in
Speaker 2: for taxes and what it spends is a gargantuan amount
Speaker 2: of money. That does, even though it doesn't in a
Speaker 2: way that's not really desirable, but it does stimulate a
Speaker 2: lot of economic activity that It's like coal into the furnace.
Speaker 2: So now a lot less coal is going to be
Speaker 2: shoveled into the furnace in a relatively short amount of time.
Speaker 2: So the individuals who works for the government will be affected,
Speaker 2: but also the economy will too. That is a sort
Speaker 2: of ill gotten middle class that lives around Virginia, Maryland
Speaker 2: and that environment. There's a lot of people that are
Speaker 2: constituting middle class from government jobs. And so that's not
Speaker 2: maybe a sustainable thing. It's probably something that cannot be
Speaker 2: sustained forever because the government's so stupid it borrows money
Speaker 2: that it could produce itself. If the government produced its
Speaker 2: own currency interest free, you wouldn't have to borrow and
Speaker 2: you wouldn't have that big gap between what's brought in
Speaker 2: and what is spent. The government would just simply spend
Speaker 2: what it needs to spend as long as it has
Speaker 2: as long as it bears some relationship to the GDP.
Speaker 2: If it spends way over the GDP, you'll have what's
Speaker 2: called demand pull inflation, printing too much money versus the output.
Speaker 2: But if you were to spend right around the GDP
Speaker 2: production level, you'd have an equilibrium without any interest. You
Speaker 2: wouldn't have any borrowing going on. But there's so much
Speaker 2: ignorance when it comes to economics that they've been caught
Speaker 2: in this debt cycle ever since the FED and even before,
Speaker 2: and so they've been borrowing money to pay these employees.
Speaker 2: Those employees, all of them in total, are not paid
Speaker 2: out of the tax take. They've had to borrow money
Speaker 2: and go into debt for decades to pay them.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and they just did a massive round of that
Speaker 4: in twenty twenty one. They're like five year buckets of money,
Speaker 4: what seven trillion dollars printed or something like that, majority
Speaker 4: of that going out on dodgy government loans.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, the Constitution is right there. Congress shall
Speaker 2: issue and coin and regulate the value of money. And
Speaker 2: Congress doesn't do that. Now, No, I know, it sounds
Speaker 2: archaic and weird and even fantastic to suggest that Congress
Speaker 2: could do such a thing. Maybe the Congresses of yesteryear
Speaker 2: would have had the wisdom. I don't know about our
Speaker 2: Congress emeritus right now. I almost intempted to call it
Speaker 2: Congress emeritus. It's almost like they're the Congress that was.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure that they're there for any reason other
Speaker 2: than to fund the defense industry, make sure they get
Speaker 2: their fat contracts, pay the interest on the national debt,
Speaker 2: make sure the bankers get their huge take. What else
Speaker 2: does Congress really do? I mean of a substantive.
Speaker 5: Nature, yieldwall, pharma, big pharma.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah. They keep the defense industry alive. And
Speaker 2: think think about the number of bombs and naval ships.
Speaker 2: How many of those ships and planes and bombs will
Speaker 2: ever see war unless we ship them to Israel then
Speaker 2: they're used.
Speaker 4: Right away, right Yeah.
Speaker 2: But I mean we all know that there's mothballs fields
Speaker 2: full of bombers that probably never dropped the bomb in
Speaker 2: a war, that are just rotting in fields. I mean,
Speaker 2: they just build that stuff for the sake of building it,
Speaker 2: and we have this massive Roman Empire military. I mean,
Speaker 2: what was that old saying from Alexander the Great? Alexander
Speaker 2: wept because there were no more countries to conquer, right,
Speaker 2: So what's the US going to do? I mean how
Speaker 2: much conquering?
Speaker 4: Yeah, we're going for planets now.
Speaker 2: I guess that explains the space war.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, you know.
Speaker 2: But the comedy with a what's his name, Steve Carroll,
Speaker 2: he did that thing called Space Farce even before even
Speaker 2: before Space Force was created. And think about it, what
Speaker 2: is the Space Force for? I mean I would think
Speaker 2: they have almost zero mission.
Speaker 4: I mean, I know they managed satellite stuff, they do
Speaker 4: satellite stuff. I mean, we had, you know, people to
Speaker 4: do that before they came along that weren't wearing multiicams.
Speaker 4: So I'm not sure what that's about. I do know
Speaker 4: we have a at least one Space Force listener out there,
Speaker 4: So if you want to answer marks question, you can
Speaker 4: feel free to leave it in the comments or email us.
Speaker 4: We'd be curious to hear someone that are actually wearing
Speaker 4: those boots take on that.
Speaker 2: But yeah, yeah, I'm not dising anyone that's in there,
Speaker 2: but I wonder about the institutional per of it. I mean,
Speaker 2: what what can they do that the Air Force can't do? Right?
Speaker 2: And yeah, okay, so you go up to where the
Speaker 2: amosphere becomes space. Okay, then what okay.
Speaker 5: It's the ultimate high ground mark.
Speaker 4: Yeah, oh my gosh.
Speaker 5: Yeah, like literally how they see it. That's I'm not
Speaker 5: I wasn't even trying to be funny. That's literally how
Speaker 5: the military views out, or so I used space is
Speaker 5: it's the ultimate high ground there. There's like this. Ever,
Speaker 5: they're always on this mission to have the higher ground
Speaker 5: than their enemy. It's it's insane, but ultimately, at the
Speaker 5: end of the day, they're just spying on everybody and everything.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and and no one's higher. No one's ground is
Speaker 4: higher than the Van Allen radiation belt. What's up with that?
Speaker 4: I was curious about that. I can't No one wants
Speaker 4: to go up there anyway.
Speaker 5: It's not real. It's fake.
Speaker 2: Elon's car, that Sedan, that that Tesla car. It's probably
Speaker 2: exceeded that by now, although I'm going to say it
Speaker 2: just flatly, it isn't there.
Speaker 5: Okay, there's there's new there's new footage from the Mars Rover.
Speaker 5: Did you guys see it.
Speaker 1: It did.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I was like, what the hell am I looking at?
Speaker 5: Like, this is ridiculous. It's just like float, it's just rocks.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's all just like this.
Speaker 5: Is Mars everybody, And I'm like, dude, that could be
Speaker 5: anywhere on Earth. Seriously, I was.
Speaker 2: Gonna say, that's California.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it looks like Death Valley.
Speaker 2: HM, just saying one of these days an empty popcan
Speaker 2: is going to roll into the to the view of
Speaker 2: the camera. Oh yeah, or a Snickers rap or something.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's probably made by AI.
Speaker 4: We just watched a movie recently, Scarlett Johansson movie, and
Speaker 4: it was like one of those what if like rewriting
Speaker 4: history things, and it was, you know, set in that era,
Speaker 4: and they were fair. They were doing a moon landing
Speaker 4: and faking a moon landing at the same time in
Speaker 4: this particular science fiction, you know, quasi historical what if movie,
Speaker 4: and that exact thing happened. A cat got onto the
Speaker 4: set and they're like, you know, the brass thinks that
Speaker 4: they're beaming the moon landing out. You know, the brass
Speaker 4: thinks they're beaming the fake out to the public live,
Speaker 4: and you know, they see this cat come down out
Speaker 4: of the rafters and it's just like, oh shit. But
Speaker 4: it turns out the like heroic astronaut and Scarjoe set
Speaker 4: up the actual moon landing cameras and that's what the
Speaker 4: public's seeing and the moon landing's real. But the government
Speaker 4: would fake it if they wanted to. It's kind of wacky.
Speaker 4: I don't I don't remember the name of it. Maybe
Speaker 4: maybe I'll find it while we're chatting here.
Speaker 2: Well, the fact that the moon landing probably didn't happen
Speaker 2: does not set a very good precedent for a space force,
Speaker 2: because if the moon landing didn't happen, then the idea
Speaker 2: that we can or should go to Mars becomes that
Speaker 2: much more untenable.
Speaker 4: Doesn't it. I mean kind of a if then else
Speaker 4: sort of statement, right, I mean, it's pretty pretty simple.
Speaker 5: Quick, we need a new black hole to throw all
Speaker 5: this money into Project star gyt.
Speaker 1: Yes to the Moon.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, there you go. Fly Me to the Moon
Speaker 4: is the name of that movie. It came out last year,
Speaker 4: So if anyone listening and can't see the poster up there,
Speaker 4: it's worth a watch.
Speaker 5: It's uh, you'd had me a Scarlett Johannah.
Speaker 4: There you go, you had.
Speaker 2: Me there too. Yeah, who cares what it's about?
Speaker 4: Well, what do you need to say? Yeah, so we
Speaker 4: had we also. I guess there's also been some speaking
Speaker 4: of there's been some incidents with SpaceX rockets and Amazon
Speaker 4: Bezos rockets. There's a lot of rocket stuff going on lately.
Speaker 5: Did they collide with each other?
Speaker 4: Oh no, I don't think so. One of them is.
Speaker 5: A piloted black Hawk helicopter with a passenger away. Sorry, yeah,
Speaker 5: conspiracy theory. I don't know.
Speaker 4: Oh my god.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the collision hasn't happened yet. I feel that one coming.
Speaker 5: That would be bad. I've done a lot of these
Speaker 5: reports are looked into. Or if you believe everything is
Speaker 5: above board, there's all these floating there's all this space
Speaker 5: junk everywhere, and it's like there's so many pieces of it,
Speaker 5: there's so many near misses. Allegedly, this is what some
Speaker 5: of these organizations such as Space Force and NASA pay
Speaker 5: attention to, is to prevent satellites and space junk colliding
Speaker 5: with each other and falling down on Earth and causing
Speaker 5: a problem. Wait a minute, you mean things flying around
Speaker 5: above our heads can fall down and hurt us. Oh,
Speaker 5: I'm sure there's no there there.
Speaker 4: What if the what if Elon's tesla that he's sent
Speaker 4: up there actually hits Mars but it takes you know
Speaker 4: a number of years to hit and it breaks our base,
Speaker 4: like our Project Stargate base up there gets hit, but
Speaker 4: you know, accidentally by Elon's space trash. I mean, could
Speaker 4: that happen?
Speaker 5: And then Cern fires up and we do a time
Speaker 5: travel thing and Baron Trump saves the world.
Speaker 4: So just like a any like it, any cheap Marvel movie,
Speaker 4: basically we'll just run that plot.
Speaker 2: Okay, yeah, sort of a rerun or a re reinvention
Speaker 2: of Flash Gordon type thing.
Speaker 4: But yeah, yeah, there's a lot you could unpack about
Speaker 4: the whole space thing.
Speaker 2: It. It seems like a real super duper boondoggle. One
Speaker 2: thing I did a couple of years ago is and
Speaker 2: I'm only forty five miles from Bocachica Space Axis about well,
Speaker 2: if you drive all the way out there, it's about
Speaker 2: fifty miles from where I'm sitting. And when I went
Speaker 2: out there, and I want to go out there again,
Speaker 2: but the roads are really bad, I mean some terrible potholes.
Speaker 4: You need a cyber truck, dude.
Speaker 2: When I went out there, I'm just going to tell
Speaker 2: you that it looks surreal. It looked like a movie set.
Speaker 2: And those things they call a starship look a little
Speaker 2: like little more than grain silos with fins on them.
Speaker 2: I'm not exaggerating. It just doesn't look right.
Speaker 4: Huh wow.
Speaker 2: And I Uh, after forty years in journalism, you get
Speaker 2: you get a bit of a gut in you. You
Speaker 2: get a bit of a spidery sense. And if I
Speaker 2: was Colombo, I just you know how I can't get this.
Speaker 5: Out of how many? How many spaceships have you seen
Speaker 5: up close and personal in your lifetime?
Speaker 3: Well?
Speaker 2: Not many?
Speaker 5: Well, well I wouldn't consider you an expert that I'm
Speaker 5: just kidding.
Speaker 2: Well, no, nor would I that far from it. Uh.
Speaker 2: There's knowledge, you know, knowledge like you've learned everything, the engineering,
Speaker 2: everything from the inside out. And then there's just instinct, intuition, logic.
Speaker 2: Uh you know that that hunch thing you know, Uh,
Speaker 2: the inquiring mind wants to know and it just doesn't
Speaker 2: smell right or look right. And and and Elon has
Speaker 2: been accused of uh you know, boondoggles and and major scams.
Speaker 2: You know that those accusations have arisen, and I won't
Speaker 2: say anything with any finality to it, but it deserves
Speaker 2: another look that. You know, he's taking the taxpayer on
Speaker 2: a big ride. I know he bemoans people that get subsidies,
Speaker 2: but I believe he gets or has gotten massive subsidies
Speaker 2: for Tesla and or SpaceX.
Speaker 5: I can't wait till he gets the subsidiaries and the
Speaker 5: green light for the brain chip.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, that's the right, that's the next, the
Speaker 2: next frontier.
Speaker 5: I guess luckily there's probably no boondoggle there. We're finally
Speaker 5: we're probably safe for good.
Speaker 4: Well, that's just going to be to help the parapolice.
Speaker 4: That's why he needs enough robots to do six billion people.
Speaker 4: I don't know. I'm trying to make it make sense.
Speaker 4: I'm trying to using using what I read, but it
Speaker 4: doesn't make a lot of sense. But yeah, Mark, that's
Speaker 4: that's something we've talked about a lot here. It's just
Speaker 4: even even like take subsidies out. Just look at the
Speaker 4: amount of contracts and agreements like like, I don't know
Speaker 4: anybody who's I mean, I guess you could say the
Speaker 4: closest thing, so like someone like Elon Musk being given
Speaker 4: you know, a place like Vandenberg Air force base to
Speaker 4: just come and go from you know, or or where
Speaker 4: wherever else, you know, like places that have you know,
Speaker 4: military infrastructure there if you will, the multiple of those
Speaker 4: like these, these public I guess this is supposed to
Speaker 4: be our top example of a public private partnership, right,
Speaker 4: something like that, or government partnership with But it's just like,
Speaker 4: how does that even happen? How do you how do
Speaker 4: you end up with? And you know, okay, everyone would say,
Speaker 4: because he's brilliant, he's he's brilliant. Mind, that's how that happened.
Speaker 4: But okay, but we were told that about Zuckerberg, you know,
Speaker 4: and given a little bit of scandal with the Wassle
Speaker 4: Wastle brothers, Wastle twin brothers, whatever their names are. But
Speaker 4: as it turns out, it was more likely that it
Speaker 4: was the lifelog. The CIA Lifelog project is what's actually
Speaker 4: running behind that most you know, anyone that's looked into
Speaker 4: it can find wherever that rabbit hole ends and have
Speaker 4: enough shadow of doubt. So it just doesn't make sense,
Speaker 4: you know what I mean, But it makes great sense
Speaker 4: for a lot of these characters, you know, Larry Ellison
Speaker 4: included Zuckerberg and Sergey Brinn and so many others.
Speaker 2: Yeah, all these Golden boys, it might just be frontman
Speaker 2: for Intel.
Speaker 4: Right, is they have to rebrand the entire government. I
Speaker 4: mean what we're witnessing right now with you know, Mitch
Speaker 4: McConnell falling down the stairs and people freezing and glitching
Speaker 4: up and you know, just displaying like levels of octogenarianism
Speaker 4: and dementia and and like geopolitical illiteracy and you know
Speaker 4: what I mean, cultural irrelevances. As this grand technocracy is unfolding,
Speaker 4: Like these people all gotta go, They all gotta go,
Speaker 4: and they all have to be replaced by the new breed.
Speaker 4: And the new breed has to be a breed that
Speaker 4: understands technology. So you know, people like Ellison, even though
Speaker 4: he's sort of in that octogenarian category. More importantly, maybe
Speaker 4: your Musks, your Zuckerberg's, your Peter Thiel's, like these are
Speaker 4: gonna be political players that they already are and they
Speaker 4: probably have been for a long time because of exactly
Speaker 4: the reason that you're getting out here, Mark, that that
Speaker 4: would be my guess, well.
Speaker 2: That may that maybe that's the switcher room, is that
Speaker 2: you get rid of the civil service people and you
Speaker 2: get rid of the old bureaucracy, and you bring the
Speaker 2: technocracy into the government in a more full fledged way.
Speaker 2: You make it not just a partnership but kind of
Speaker 2: a fusion, and then you have fewer people getting more money.
Speaker 4: Mm hmm.
Speaker 2: So maybe. And then again they have us kind of cheering,
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, get rid of USA. Boy boom boom boom.
Speaker 2: You know, we're really glad to see it, and and
Speaker 2: there are benefits to getting rid of it, and it
Speaker 2: should be closed down. But be careful what you wish for. See,
Speaker 2: this could be the very thing I was talking about earlier.
Speaker 2: They get us cheering for something that they're okay with
Speaker 2: behind the scenes. In other words, the establishment maybe wanted
Speaker 2: to close USA.
Speaker 4: Right, And it's like, I, yes, I want it to
Speaker 4: be closed. Yes, I'm super pleased that normis are having
Speaker 4: dinner table and water cooler table discussions about how awful
Speaker 4: usaid is. I love that. That's awesome, But can we
Speaker 4: please like hold them accountable for what they have done?
Speaker 4: Can we just pump the brakes for a minute and say, oh,
Speaker 4: it's shut down, yay, hurrah, everybody tweet about it. You know, well,
Speaker 4: hold up, pump, pump the brakes. What about the ninety
Speaker 4: thousand children that went missing from Guatemala? Where are they?
Speaker 4: Who was involved in that? What do you mean us
Speaker 4: AID has been shut down? Fuck you? What are you
Speaker 4: talking about? I've heard allegations and stories about what they've
Speaker 4: done with these tax dollars, and it's caused direct harm
Speaker 4: to entire countries, to large batches of children, to some
Speaker 4: people's account, human trafficking, all kinds of like terrible heartbreaking
Speaker 4: stories that you know are are high crimes against humanity.
Speaker 4: So if if that happened on our tax dollars, can
Speaker 4: we look into that? Can we not just say, oh,
Speaker 4: we closed it down. It's all good. Marco Rubio's taking
Speaker 4: overall operations that they were doing that are important. Don't
Speaker 4: worry about it. Are you fucking kidding me? Like you know,
Speaker 4: I don't mean to piss And everybody's cereal about being
Speaker 4: glad about this. Trust me, I'm glad about this. This
Speaker 4: would not have happened under Kamala Harrison, Tim the Tampon regime.
Speaker 4: But you know, it's like what we've been pointing out
Speaker 4: for all these years about this agency and so many others,
Speaker 4: is that yes, number one, close it down. Okay, Step one,
Speaker 4: now show us Step two. Step two open open an investigation,
Speaker 4: you know, Step three, write some indictments, if crimes have
Speaker 4: been committed, full discovery, full disclosure, none of this redacted bullshit.
Speaker 4: You know. It's it just seems logical to me, like
Speaker 4: if everything that has been said about this organization is
Speaker 4: true and on the books, that there's more work to
Speaker 4: be done than just shutting it down, and people in
Speaker 4: red hats are happy, and then and then we move
Speaker 4: on to the next thing to shut down and just
Speaker 4: wait to react to the next you know. Black swan
Speaker 4: event of the week.
Speaker 2: Very well said that that pretty much compliments what I
Speaker 2: was saying. In other words, the powers that be can
Speaker 2: tolerate or maybe even support shutting this down, thinking that
Speaker 2: that will please or satisfy those like us, in other words,
Speaker 2: kind of placate us. But at the same time it
Speaker 2: allows them to sweep all that under the rug and
Speaker 2: hide the criminality and prevent anyone from being brought to justice.
Speaker 2: And then the new technocracy kings kind of replace what
Speaker 2: the civil service had done, and so they it's a
Speaker 2: reconstruction of government, not not really so much a shrinking
Speaker 2: of government. It would involve some shrinking. But if justice
Speaker 2: is not served as you suggest, hash the missing Chouldren
Speaker 2: being a major point, then they throw us a bone,
Speaker 2: They give us something to talk about. They placate us
Speaker 2: a little bit, but they also do a little bit
Speaker 2: of switch arou a little bit of fake left go
Speaker 2: right kind of thing, and they maneuver around and they
Speaker 2: avoid being brought to justice.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Yeah, that's just you know, the infidel, I mean, mystical.
Speaker 4: It seems like just pure logic, right, Like, you have
Speaker 4: a situation like that, this comes out that this much
Speaker 4: taxpayer waste has happened, and that there could be connections,
Speaker 4: you know, by many people's estimation to illegal operations happening
Speaker 4: that that harm people and harm governments, you know, covertly.
Speaker 4: What do you think about that? Man, It's just I
Speaker 4: guess we're supposed to just forget about that and be
Speaker 4: glad we got some a few less reactions on the
Speaker 4: JFK files this time around.
Speaker 1: No, I agree with you, guys. I think that there
Speaker 1: should be accountability, and there should be how the counter
Speaker 1: of the question is how much can they do about it?
Speaker 1: For example, like like legally, how like what how can
Speaker 1: they go after it? Like and what can he do?
Speaker 1: But I think, I think without putting a mechanism to
Speaker 1: ensure or giving us as as as as as citizens,
Speaker 1: some mechanism that he explained or the government explained to us,
Speaker 1: how can we prevent this from happening again? As we said,
Speaker 1: like rebranding some of those programs, right, and after the
Speaker 1: next administration comes in, it's going to sweep under something else, right,
Speaker 1: how can we prevent that from happening? And the issue
Speaker 1: is we have been openating in the dark for so
Speaker 1: long that that government tried to openating in the dark
Speaker 1: for so long that you cannot really hold anybody accountable
Speaker 1: because you just can't see it. And I don't know
Speaker 1: how you can provide that transparency to ensure that that
Speaker 1: doesn't happen again, right, Because that's the only way you
Speaker 1: can prevent this from happening again, is to ensure that
Speaker 1: our mechanism to provide enough transparency for us to prevent
Speaker 1: that from happening. Right.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Well, I mean, like I'd like to see something similar.
Speaker 4: I would have liked to have seen something similar with
Speaker 4: the Twitter files. You know, Twitter files is another great example.
Speaker 4: It's like, you know, why, no, like we see all
Speaker 4: this evidence of this collision, right, where's the rest of it?
Speaker 4: Why is why is no legal action, no discovery taken
Speaker 4: that looks at you know, all the different organizations, all
Speaker 4: the differferent servers, the emails, like seeing because there are
Speaker 4: things that are patently provable with proper discovery and legally
Speaker 4: actionable if you know, something illegal, if a crime had
Speaker 4: been committed. And it's just like, you know, I agree
Speaker 4: with you, like if the next the next best thing
Speaker 4: would be to like have it gone and have a
Speaker 4: level of you know, accountability and transparency that wouldn't allow
Speaker 4: it to happen again. But it's like it's gotten to
Speaker 4: the point where it's destroyed lives, you know, and and
Speaker 4: sent people into trafficking. So it's like that's the kind
Speaker 4: of thing I think a lot of Americans would be
Speaker 4: stoked to see, like seen seen through.
Speaker 1: So let's let's take another example. Rate. So now they
Speaker 1: just found out he's been tracking those FBI and DUG
Speaker 1: agents that were involved in the GIT six investigation, and
Speaker 1: they found out that there are five thousand out of
Speaker 1: the fourteen southern employee of the dj and FBI were
Speaker 1: involved in the j sex investigation. Five thousand.
Speaker 4: I thought it was only twenty four. I thought it
Speaker 4: was only forty. Oh, this number keeps changing.
Speaker 1: Five thousand, now five thousand that came out. And he's
Speaker 1: trying to go after exposing all these guys and held
Speaker 1: them accountable. So right now he's getting some resistance and
Speaker 1: the ABI ranked and they are trying to do some
Speaker 1: lawsuits to prevent him from going after those five Southern people.
Speaker 4: Who wait, who are you talking about? Trump? Or like
Speaker 4: Elon v.
Speaker 1: Dogm Trumpka, okay, Trump, duj no trom d uj right
Speaker 1: now and so but some ranks right now, they just
Speaker 1: actually filed an anonymous lawsuit in DC to prevent them
Speaker 1: from going and actually going after because they wanted to
Speaker 1: expose the name of those five Southern Asian claiming that
Speaker 1: that will put them in danger right by exposing their
Speaker 1: names and knowing who they are. And at the same time,
Speaker 1: basically they are saying, well, they were just following orders.
Speaker 4: Is there danger any worse than the like two thousand
Speaker 4: people they imprisoned and put in jail.
Speaker 1: Exactly right, and and and the and and the violation
Speaker 1: of the constitution they did so. But this is the
Speaker 1: kind of ship that I think we're going to find
Speaker 1: out and the kind of resistance that we're going to
Speaker 1: see as we're starting unraveling this madness that we're seeing
Speaker 1: in get right now. And that's a perfect example that
Speaker 1: that J six five thousand agent is a perfect example
Speaker 1: of people we know that they directly violated the Constitution
Speaker 1: and went after Americans. They didn't do anything, but they
Speaker 1: weaponize them against them, right, and we'll see what happens.
Speaker 1: We'll see like if they get blocked or it's going
Speaker 1: to be able to you know, at least fire them
Speaker 1: and held them accountable for it.
Speaker 4: Uh. Yeah, Well Biden pardoned them all right in the
Speaker 4: like least legal sounding pardon ever basically in the whole
Speaker 4: committee and anybody involved and didn't name any names. I mean,
Speaker 4: that was such a that was a bizarre flash of
Speaker 4: weirdness at the end of the Biden administration there, uh
Speaker 4: doing those those pardons like that, and and here we're
Speaker 4: maybe we're seeing why now because this information is coming out,
Speaker 4: Like also, they they destroyed all the evidence. Uh you
Speaker 4: know that's being looked into. So you know again, uh,
Speaker 4: I'm pretty sure in some cases destroying evidence of of
Speaker 4: a crime scene is uh illegal for people to do. Uh.
Speaker 4: And you know, we just as a public, we just
Speaker 4: want to see those email chains. We want to know
Speaker 4: who's in on those decisions. We want to know who's
Speaker 4: pulling those strings and giving those directions, you know. Uh
Speaker 4: so yeah, this is uh, this is going to be
Speaker 4: interesting to see if this goes anywhere.
Speaker 8: Man.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And this, this this DUG and FBI reforming is
Speaker 1: one of the biggest things for us to restore confidence
Speaker 1: again in the governments is that has to be under
Speaker 1: control and people have to be held accountable. Right for
Speaker 1: us to restore any confidence in the government that that
Speaker 1: us as citizens, we cannot just be sitting at home
Speaker 1: and and the government coming after us because as we know,
Speaker 1: we're opposing certain different views from from from what they
Speaker 1: want to push, right.
Speaker 4: Uh huh yeah, he uh. He pardoned the pro life
Speaker 4: protesters to the old ladies.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that Ladea that they throw in jail right for
Speaker 1: being a prolufe.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think she prayed or something.
Speaker 2: You're talking about Trump partnering pro lifers yeaheah.
Speaker 1: I was talking about the five thousand Asians that they
Speaker 1: found that they were involved in the Jes six investigation.
Speaker 1: And he's trying to go after them, and then they
Speaker 1: just filled the alowsuit to block him from doing that.
Speaker 1: And then we'll get into that, you know, him pardoning that.
Speaker 4: I was I was making. I was making the comment
Speaker 4: mark that that you know, when Biden did those pardons
Speaker 4: for Fauci and pardons for the J six Committee, like
Speaker 4: they were very they didn't name names. So I'm wondering, like, yeah,
Speaker 4: five thousand fad boys not surprised. Are they gonna be
Speaker 4: able to block those names from getting to the Trump administration.
Speaker 4: I don't know. Are they included in that that mass pardoning?
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 2: Well, you can't pardon people that were not accused and
Speaker 2: dieted or convicted of a crime. There's no such thing
Speaker 2: as a what do you call it, advanced pardon, pre pardon?
Speaker 2: I don't know what term they use.
Speaker 4: Preemptive maybe, Yeah, that's.
Speaker 2: If you take someone that was never convicted or even
Speaker 2: brought to trial and say well, I'm going to pardon you,
Speaker 2: and they they never had a crime against Uh, they
Speaker 2: never committed a crime spent time anyway. To me, that's
Speaker 2: just outright fakery.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's like monopoly or something that I get out
Speaker 4: of jail free card, Like what are you talking about?
Speaker 2: Yeah, so all Trump would have to do is say, look, Biden,
Speaker 2: you so called pardon people that had no crimes, that
Speaker 2: committed no actual crimes I mean technically speaking, from which
Speaker 2: to be pardoned, for which to be pardoned. It's almost
Speaker 2: like it's almost like a surgeon putting a band aid
Speaker 2: on a body where there's no wound. Right, there was
Speaker 2: no there was no injury to begin with. So all
Speaker 2: Trump could take that apart like nothing. I mean, it's
Speaker 2: just it's just legal fakery.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, it does not make any sense. Here's no
Speaker 4: here's the associated article here out of New York Post.
Speaker 4: FBI provides the Trump Justice Department with details about five
Speaker 4: thousand employees who worked January six cases. So this isn't
Speaker 4: necessarily people that there on the grounds, but it could be.
Speaker 4: It should include them, and it just goes to show
Speaker 4: how big that network is, even if some of these
Speaker 4: are desk jockeys and logistics people and whatnot, Like, that
Speaker 4: is a massive force right there.
Speaker 1: That third of the FBI. There is fourteen Southern Asians nationwide.
Speaker 1: They used five thousand of them for the j six
Speaker 1: Imagine that crazy.
Speaker 4: So it says, the FBI complied with an order from
Speaker 4: President Trump's Justice Department on Tuesday and provided DOJ officials
Speaker 4: with information about more than five thousand employees who worked
Speaker 4: on investigations related to January sixth on The demand made
Speaker 4: by the Acting Deputary Deputy Attorney General in mil Bove
Speaker 4: last week sparked concern and triggered lawsuits, arguing that the
Speaker 4: list could put the safety of FBI agents and their
Speaker 4: families at risk. However, the information furnished by the bureau
Speaker 4: does not include employees names. So but it does. Yeah.
Speaker 4: They reported that employee ID numbers, job titles, and their
Speaker 4: role in J six investigations were included in the information
Speaker 4: submitted to the d o J. So uh, yeah. If
Speaker 4: I imagine if cash Patel ends up in the boss's seat there, uh,
Speaker 4: there'll be a big pile of stuff in the shredder
Speaker 4: when he gets there. But I think through word of
Speaker 4: mouth he can figure out who these people were. Yeah,
Speaker 4: I mean, you know, if that is something they're going
Speaker 4: to pursue, we shall see. We shall see, we shall see.
Speaker 4: So let's see any other comments on that before we
Speaker 4: roll on. I got another one. I'll throw you guys away.
Speaker 1: I have a question for for Mark.
Speaker 4: Shoot it you're muted there, Mark though, so when you
Speaker 4: come back on be sure and unmute.
Speaker 2: Yeah, go ahead.
Speaker 1: Have you been to the border. Have you seen any
Speaker 1: more action around that deportation or yeah?
Speaker 4: What's it like ou Texas?
Speaker 2: In my area? There's not much going on. Most of
Speaker 2: it seems to be at least as far away as
Speaker 2: Laredo and Eagle Pass. And there's been a lot of
Speaker 2: activity in El Paso, which is twelve hours from here.
Speaker 2: Texas being such a big place that being said, I
Speaker 2: haven't had as much time to look at all the
Speaker 2: spots as i'd like. There are a lot of unerected,
Speaker 2: unused fence sections. They call them ballards. They're large metal
Speaker 2: sections of border fence that are laying in fields. One
Speaker 2: is about four miles away in Alamo, west of here,
Speaker 2: and then an even larger field of these fence sections
Speaker 2: that were either taken down or never put up in
Speaker 2: the first place, is about eight miles west of here
Speaker 2: in a city called far pha ar R and thousands
Speaker 2: of fence sections, and I have seen a few of
Speaker 2: them have been moved around a bit, but they have
Speaker 2: not been taken out of those storage fields on mass
Speaker 2: or in large quantities. Yet I've got some people I
Speaker 2: need to call to discuss these matters. I did talk
Speaker 2: to a CPB official the other day. I asked him
Speaker 2: at the Nuevo Progressive Port of Entry into Mexico out
Speaker 2: of Hidago County, Texas. His last name is Garcia. I
Speaker 2: asked this Customs and Border Protection agent. I said, is
Speaker 2: it better to be in this kind of job under
Speaker 2: the Trump administration compared to Biden? And he said it's
Speaker 2: far and away better. They can their hands are largely untied,
Speaker 2: they can do their jobs, and they're safer. And I
Speaker 2: asked them about the border fence sections. He had heard
Speaker 2: a little bit about it, but he told me to
Speaker 2: call the border patrol offices in either McCallen, Texas or Weslico, Texas.
Speaker 2: But he did say that the morale is much higher
Speaker 2: among ICE and CPB and border patrol.
Speaker 4: Interesting, and have you been into McCallan. I recall going
Speaker 4: to the like near the bus station and that like
Speaker 4: that Catholic Resource center and it was just, you know,
Speaker 4: they were pretty busy. Lines out the door, looked like
Speaker 4: they were doing a lot of processing. I'm wondering if
Speaker 4: things like that have calmed down.
Speaker 2: I need to get down there. Yeah, that that's an
Speaker 2: area that I have not been to lately, and I
Speaker 2: would think in a couple of weeks I could squeeze
Speaker 2: that in. So I'll let you know that that's a
Speaker 2: very good question. I've been keeping a close eye on
Speaker 2: those border fence sections mainly and talking to different people,
Speaker 2: trying to trying to I know where a lot of
Speaker 2: the Border Patrol and National Guard have coffee. Once in
Speaker 2: a while. I'll talk to them at the coffee joints
Speaker 2: as long as I don't use any names, they don't
Speaker 2: mind talking usually. But I haven't been to those same
Speaker 2: coffee joints very much, so I need to get back
Speaker 2: in the in the groove in that regard. So I
Speaker 2: appreciate you bringing it up.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Absolutely, Just don't walk in there and tell them
Speaker 4: your name is the truth hound. That might scare them off.
Speaker 2: Now usually I don't even say I'm with the media.
Speaker 2: Usually it's just citizen asking the Border patrol type thing.
Speaker 2: I only fly that flag if I have to, because,
Speaker 2: as you know, people talk differently to you if they
Speaker 2: suspect that what they say may be rebroadcasts and they
Speaker 2: parse their words too much, so it's usually better not
Speaker 2: to fly that flag and just be the inquisitive citizen,
Speaker 2: you know.
Speaker 4: Yeah, definitely, man, just the way it works. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: what do you think in Fidel does that I mean
Speaker 4: mystical pharaoh to answer your question for now?
Speaker 1: Yeah, thank you.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we're curious to hear from all of you too,
Speaker 4: So if any of you live in border towns or
Speaker 4: cities that were highly affected by the influx, uh, we'd
Speaker 4: love to hear about any changes you may have noticed
Speaker 4: in your locations. Let's see here. I want to thank
Speaker 4: everybody for hanging out in the chat rooms over there
Speaker 4: at Rumble, at YouTube and on Rock Finn tonight, not
Speaker 4: necessarily keeping up with all the chats. Very good, same
Speaker 4: with the discord. Good to see everybody. Let's uh, let's
Speaker 4: shift gears a little bit here. Mark, did you see
Speaker 4: yesterday that Trump backed out of the UN Human Rights
Speaker 4: Council as Beebe's plane was landing, and after that did
Speaker 4: this strange prepared speech about Gaza and how the US
Speaker 4: is going to take over Gaza and we're going to
Speaker 4: build like a riviera there, like resorts and all this stuff.
Speaker 4: Did you see that.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, talk about something that generates mixed feelings. On
Speaker 2: the one hand, you could look at it like here,
Speaker 2: here's the imperial force of the world at this point
Speaker 2: in history, the United States, it's the Roman Empire, it's
Speaker 2: the imperium. And it is a way and I hope
Speaker 2: this is what Trump is thinking. It is a way
Speaker 2: to get the Israeli IDF forces out of Gaza proper
Speaker 2: and kind of shift them off to the side and
Speaker 2: supplant that with something else that would not consists of
Speaker 2: bombing the rubble, bouncing the rubble as it were. It
Speaker 2: is a way to kind kind of corral net and
Speaker 2: Yahoo in a sense. And I think that's part of
Speaker 2: the strategy is Bbe will come in and you know, hey,
Speaker 2: it's gonna be great. It's gonna beautiful. The ocean views
Speaker 2: will be stunning. And by the way, Bibe, you got
Speaker 2: to get your forces out of there, and you got
Speaker 2: to kind of you know, you got to knock off
Speaker 2: this violence thing. It's it doesn't look good, but it
Speaker 2: also comes across if you look at it more deeply,
Speaker 2: as rather crass. I mean, there's bodies buried under that rubble. Okay, Yeah,
Speaker 2: lots of bodies and there's children under there blown to pieces.
Speaker 2: I mean, okay, if you don't talk about that, and
Speaker 2: you just say, let's build a resort.
Speaker 4: Let's just clean it up. We'll clean it up, but
Speaker 4: it'll be great. Are you kidding me? I know, it's crazy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it sounds really really crass and completely. I can't
Speaker 2: even find words for it, because I don't think the
Speaker 2: words have been invented invented yet. But it comes across
Speaker 2: as how much more can we dehumanize the Palestinians? I mean,
Speaker 2: you know what I mean it there's there's some people.
Speaker 2: I mean, if you believe in the Christian Bible and
Speaker 2: you believe in the afterlife, when JC sees you and
Speaker 2: and that's been your attitude, I don't think you're going
Speaker 2: to get a very good review before you go through,
Speaker 2: Before you don't go through the early gates. I mean,
Speaker 2: you know, that's no way to get to Heaven from
Speaker 2: a Christian standpoint. It's that's that's just really cold. I mean,
Speaker 2: quicksilver in the veins cold. You know what I'm saying.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, they neglect to acknowledge all the Christians that
Speaker 4: suffer throughout these actions too, you know, ancient pieces of history,
Speaker 4: Christian history, all all the you know, ancient theologies. So
Speaker 4: much history there just being deleted. It's happening as we
Speaker 4: speak right now in Syria too, which is a whole
Speaker 4: nother WTF moment for where we're at right now. It's
Speaker 4: like everything in the Middle East is just it's like
Speaker 4: the the nasty pill that that Trump supporters have to
Speaker 4: swallow right now. They have to either deal with the dissonance,
Speaker 4: make excuses for this this kind of stuff, or accept that,
Speaker 4: you know, political Zionism has its roots in our government
Speaker 4: and it's not going anywhere, and you know, to buckle
Speaker 4: up because it's gonna get wonky as other things get better.
Speaker 4: I know, it's it's a it's a mixed bag and
Speaker 4: mystical pharaoh. I know, you gotta ride that screaming American
Speaker 4: bald eagle out of here and get some sleep pretty soon.
Speaker 4: But definitely want to get your thoughts on this particular topic.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, it's it's it's a it's a mixed
Speaker 1: feeling topics, right the topic actually, and I do agree
Speaker 1: was was Mark there that I don't think conventional thinking
Speaker 1: about that situation is going to solve it. And I
Speaker 1: do believe that Trump is trying to create a new
Speaker 1: way that he can create almost like a buffer zone
Speaker 1: between Israel and and and and that new development or whatever,
Speaker 1: this new Gazza place that is gonna come in. Also,
Speaker 1: it's a way I see it as a way for
Speaker 1: them really to force those who oppose him from the
Speaker 1: government from the Arab side. Hey, what is a solution? Right?
Speaker 1: But I don't think that people that believe that Israel
Speaker 1: is just going to give Gaza back to the Palestinians
Speaker 1: and everything is going to go back the way it was,
Speaker 1: It's not going to happen this way. And I think
Speaker 1: the way he's doing it, it might be actually one
Speaker 1: of the creative solutions to do that. I agree, it
Speaker 1: doesn't sound right, right, and if you take that on
Speaker 1: a faith value, it sounds very crass and very harsh,
Speaker 1: and you can take it out of context. But at
Speaker 1: the same time, today he actually clarified and a tweet
Speaker 1: he is not intending on sending US troops Singasa. He
Speaker 1: never he said that.
Speaker 4: Actually, how well, so you're going to get those skyscrapers built, though,
Speaker 4: like I see no way to like send people there
Speaker 4: to rebuild it and have them not be at odds,
Speaker 4: you know what I mean, there's still so many people
Speaker 4: there just to clean up. The cleanup would not go
Speaker 4: okay without some sort of armed force there.
Speaker 1: And I don't know, I don't know what's his plan.
Speaker 1: So that's why I'm interested to see more details how
Speaker 1: he's going to carry it before I judge actually what
Speaker 1: his intentions are out of it. But I think we
Speaker 1: have to think outside of the box if we really
Speaker 1: want to solve that solution, Because.
Speaker 5: Gentlemen, have you not seen the drone technology with the
Speaker 5: graviton and unlimited payload capacity? Get it all done.
Speaker 4: I'm all about it on the Sean Ryan podcast. Bro.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, you.
Speaker 2: Know this situation. I'm glad Mystical Pharaoh aka Infidel said
Speaker 2: that a buffer zone is a good way of describing it.
Speaker 2: But the claim that you can do this without the military,
Speaker 2: I mean, at a bare minimum, it would seem to
Speaker 2: me that the Army Corps of Engineers would play a role,
Speaker 2: and that if you're going to disarm bombs. One problem
Speaker 2: I have with it is, okay, so after all that
Speaker 2: mess was made by the barbaric IDF forces, then it's
Speaker 2: up to our tax dollars and our men and women
Speaker 2: to go clean up the mess. Yeah, okay, I understand
Speaker 2: that if we pay for it, we control it. You know,
Speaker 2: the golden rule is he who has the gold rules.
Speaker 2: I understand that. But by the same token, paying for
Speaker 2: it with blood and treasure and having more maimed veterans
Speaker 2: come up on commercials where they give you a blanket
Speaker 2: if you give send them nineteen dollars a month, and
Speaker 2: you have more maimed veterans on TV for wounded warrior projects.
Speaker 2: I don't know. I mean a lot of that ordinance
Speaker 2: was shipped to Israel through our massive, massively unjust and
Speaker 2: overpaid and inflated military and other foreign aid to Israel.
Speaker 2: All this foreign aid is being frozen, except the foreign
Speaker 2: aid to Israel, and some of that buys a lot
Speaker 2: of bombs. Then Israel drops American made bombs, and then
Speaker 2: we got to go clean it up. I mean, they
Speaker 2: better use robots because disarming two thousand pounders, I mean,
Speaker 2: you want to talk about a hard day's work.
Speaker 4: Yeah, they just sent another batch of was it eighteen
Speaker 4: hundred or eighteen thousand? I think it was eighteen hundred
Speaker 4: two thousand pound bombs just got released over there, and
Speaker 4: you know, like the whole idea of a buffer zone,
Speaker 4: Like the problem with that is you're looking at a
Speaker 4: country where where they've had buffer zones in the past,
Speaker 4: they send settlers into those buffer zones, and those buffer
Speaker 4: zones become settlements instead of buffer zones. And you know
Speaker 4: everybody's well aware of that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's an interesting point.
Speaker 1: Yeah, No, I I agree, I agree, and and that's
Speaker 1: why I'm interested to see the details of the proposal.
Speaker 1: What what are the guarantees that this is not going
Speaker 1: to be a full displacement of these of everybody out
Speaker 1: and and and but but I don't know if I
Speaker 1: can fully judge that yet, Pharaoh.
Speaker 2: Let me ask you a question, based on what Trump
Speaker 2: said with BB the war criminal to his right. Did
Speaker 2: Trump actually say that all the Palestinians would have to
Speaker 2: leave or did he mean that he knows that some
Speaker 2: would have to leave, at least the worst areas because
Speaker 2: there's no other way around it. But those living in
Speaker 2: the relatively functional areas, if there are such a thing,
Speaker 2: could stay. In other words, some could simply just stay there,
Speaker 2: while while others who have nothing left, maybe they would
Speaker 2: be the ones that unavoidably would have to leave. Was
Speaker 2: there more nuance to it or.
Speaker 1: That that that that's that, That's what I understood because
Speaker 1: because to do because he mentioned you know, tunnels and
Speaker 1: clean up right and unexploded bombs. So I think for
Speaker 1: you to do this job in a faster manner, you
Speaker 1: you would have to do some evacuations, right. I don't
Speaker 1: think you can do that with civilians and in places
Speaker 1: and think about that in his head?
Speaker 2: Yeah, who'd want to live there? I mean, would you
Speaker 2: want to live in some broken town with nothing almost
Speaker 2: nothing left, just out of national pride, with bombs all
Speaker 2: around you, possibly unexploded. I mean, you know, there comes
Speaker 2: a point where you just got to let it go, right.
Speaker 2: I'm just trying to look at all the angles.
Speaker 4: But then it comes the where do they go? And
Speaker 4: does it fall into the definition the UN definitions of
Speaker 4: ethnic cleansing if they're forced into countries that don't want them,
Speaker 4: like Egypt and Georgia.
Speaker 1: Because I agree, I agree with you, I agree with you.
Speaker 1: The question is is it temporary displacement or it's a
Speaker 1: permanent displacement? Right? That's I think, and that's where I
Speaker 1: want to know more of what is proposal, right, But
Speaker 1: at the same time, I mean, I mean, guess I
Speaker 1: was under egypt control actually from forty eight to sixty
Speaker 1: seven until Israelis took it back right after the Seven
Speaker 1: Days War, and then they give it to you know,
Speaker 1: back to Palestinians in the nineties. Right, So it's them
Speaker 1: like having like like control over that area with us.
Speaker 1: It might be the guarantee that Israel is not gonna
Speaker 1: fuck again was was was was this area. But again,
Speaker 1: let's here's the the proposal, DiDia. I don't want to
Speaker 1: jump to the conclusion and and and and and then see,
Speaker 1: but I agree on its surface, it can appear that
Speaker 1: it's you know, can be taken as it's ethnical cleansing,
Speaker 1: that he wants to kick everybody out. But I don't
Speaker 1: think that's his intention. And I don't think his intention
Speaker 1: is to keep US troops because I truly believe that
Speaker 1: he wants to get the US out of the freaking
Speaker 1: Middle East. I think that's that's why he just he's
Speaker 1: just he's he's just starting taking the Pentam, gonna start
Speaker 1: moving and taking the troops out of Syria. Right, So
Speaker 1: I think I, I do truly believe that he does
Speaker 1: not want to get US tangled that and and I
Speaker 1: don't think he will want us us And I'm just
Speaker 1: talking about US citizen right now, not like you know
Speaker 1: that that he wants us to pay money and not
Speaker 1: taking something out. It's as bad as it sounds, right,
Speaker 1: But I don't think Trump necessarily thinks this way. I
Speaker 1: think you will. You will try to get some benefit
Speaker 1: out of it.
Speaker 4: I'm saying, right, I know you got to get out
Speaker 4: of here pretty soon. But one more thing, do you like,
Speaker 4: do you think Trump just doesn't have much long term
Speaker 4: is there's no long term vision here because it kind
Speaker 4: of seems like the US government has been there in
Speaker 4: Syria basically allowing the you know, former al Kada and
Speaker 4: Isis it's HST whatever the hell they're called these days,
Speaker 4: to just you know, lurk there and and steal oil
Speaker 4: and do all the training and stuff. And then they
Speaker 4: come in and they take Syria. And now they're letting,
Speaker 4: you know, they have this piece deal with with Israel.
Speaker 4: They're letting Israel set up shop in parts of Syria.
Speaker 4: I mean, it kind of seems like they're setting up
Speaker 4: a situation in the longer term where, uh, they're going
Speaker 4: to have you know, prob like it's helping Israel kneecap
Speaker 4: Iran put it that way, and all that that could
Speaker 4: lead to.
Speaker 1: I think I'm go ahead.
Speaker 2: I was just going to briefly interject that Basha al
Speaker 2: Asad in the final analysis, may have been a straw man.
Speaker 2: He may have been in there and he through the fight,
Speaker 2: and that might have been the plan all along. It
Speaker 2: was always curious how ten, twelve, fourteen years ago there
Speaker 2: was all these forces just viciously attacking his country and
Speaker 2: he never looked like he missed a shave. He always
Speaker 2: was perfectly dressed, clean as a whistle, calm, a beautiful
Speaker 2: wife next to him, dressed to the hill. They never
Speaker 2: looked like they missed a meal or had the slightest anxiety.
Speaker 2: You know, he might have been some prop leader all along,
Speaker 2: or or later on he was convinced to be a
Speaker 2: prop leader, you know, Samuel Johnson, I think, set a
Speaker 2: gun to the head will sharpen. You'r thinking real real, well, right,
Speaker 2: So I don't know, And why did Syria fall so easily?
Speaker 2: Why were they able to resist so much a decade ago?
Speaker 2: And now it was almost like a you know, crapshoot.
Speaker 4: There wasn't even any shots fired. They just rolled in.
Speaker 2: He rolled in, and and and the Syrian government rolled over.
Speaker 2: I mean it it looks to me like they were
Speaker 2: eating from the inside out by intel termites, you know.
Speaker 2: And Aside was either given a deal he couldn't refuse,
Speaker 2: or or he was on the take for a long
Speaker 2: time and just uh you know, made it look good
Speaker 2: for a while, because which would explain if if the
Speaker 2: fall of Syria actually was a slow motion overturning of
Speaker 2: the country, that would explain how it changed hands, as
Speaker 2: opposed to telling us that it suddenly was just overthrown,
Speaker 2: which would be a way of covering up the fact
Speaker 2: that it was more gradually subverted. I'm just trying to
Speaker 2: think like outside the box sort of you know, wag
Speaker 2: the dog.
Speaker 4: Type of thinking, Yeah, something went down there. I mean,
Speaker 4: he had enough notice to get him and his family
Speaker 4: out of there safely to Russia. You know, go figure
Speaker 4: funny how that happens with uh former leaders and whistleblowers
Speaker 4: and stuff, And that's a whole other.
Speaker 5: Rat like a shift change at work.
Speaker 2: Yeah, really, I gotta I'm sorry, Well I got to
Speaker 2: hit the hay too. But I just have a journalistic fantasy,
Speaker 2: as it were. I'm seeing myself in the press corps
Speaker 2: at the joint press conference with Net Yahoo and Trump,
Speaker 2: and in front of Net Yahoo, I say to Trump,
Speaker 2: Donald Trump, but you're making some very dramatic changes in government.
Speaker 2: You're RECOGNI nicing things that Biden didn't have the courage
Speaker 2: to recognize. I know you're a big supporter of our veterans,
Speaker 2: and rightly so, how would you address the Israeli attack
Speaker 2: in nineteen sixty seven on the USS liberty and what
Speaker 2: would what what you, mister nan Yaho, What might you
Speaker 2: have to say about that? Was it really a case
Speaker 2: of mistaken identity? We still have survivors from that ship
Speaker 2: that want to know they're good Americans. They deserve the truth.
Speaker 2: Mister Trump, I know you, You're you treasure the truth
Speaker 2: you're bringing, You're bringing all these things forward. You're doing
Speaker 2: unprecedented things in government. Imagine lobbing that turret in front
Speaker 2: of those two.
Speaker 4: Right, Oh my gosh, yeah.
Speaker 1: A nation.
Speaker 5: Trump will promise them a nice chunk of beachfront property
Speaker 5: in Gaza.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Well, I was going to.
Speaker 2: Say, that's one way never to get asked back as
Speaker 2: a reporter. But other than that, it would been it'd
Speaker 2: be interesting to see what the other response would be
Speaker 2: besides permanently being barred from ever entering there again.
Speaker 5: Yeah, we'll see pictures of Mark Anderson with his fingers
Speaker 5: clawed to the desk because they try to remove him.
Speaker 4: Physically removing the truth.
Speaker 2: Pound that would just be. But like I said, you know,
Speaker 2: the press corps there is all just the conventional people
Speaker 2: with almost no exceptions. And you know, I thought Trump,
Speaker 2: I mean, I know he likes to spar with him,
Speaker 2: but you know, what do they say in fencing Perry
Speaker 2: and what all these? You know, but you know, why
Speaker 2: have these half wits in there? You know that he
Speaker 2: can tell them, yeah, I'm going to take Greenland, and
Speaker 2: they take it literally, Oh he's going to take Greenland.
Speaker 4: It's just.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 5: One of our chatters noticed that the photos from mars
Speaker 5: allegedly look like parts that he's seen in Greenland, and
Speaker 5: he put two and two together to suggest maybe that's
Speaker 5: why Trump wants Greenland to help Musk get to mars See.
Speaker 2: And and the the military, the Space Force has a
Speaker 2: base there.
Speaker 5: There you go, We're ready to go.
Speaker 4: Yep, yep. See every everything's come full circle. Yeah, I
Speaker 4: gotta go, guys, all right later, Mark.
Speaker 2: Tomorrow morning is painfully early. It hurts sometimes.
Speaker 4: I know that.
Speaker 3: Mark.
Speaker 5: If you do make it to the press corps, just
Speaker 5: don't accept any gifts of pay that are pagers coming
Speaker 5: from Israel, which is what what BB gave to the president.
Speaker 1: Especially golden ones.
Speaker 4: Look at this?
Speaker 2: Who put this magnet out of the taxi? Oops, it's
Speaker 2: not a magnet.
Speaker 4: Look at this before you go. Mark this. Patrick Henningson
Speaker 4: posted this. Any US president who would accept something as
Speaker 4: depraved of this from a wanted war criminal has got
Speaker 4: moral issues. What a sick, deranged psychopath gloating over the
Speaker 4: bodies of dead children people named for life blood soaked
Speaker 4: mafia bost Net and Yahoo is said to have given
Speaker 4: real Donald Trump this golden pager mounted on a looted
Speaker 4: Lebanese olive tree cross section. A sick joke by Net
Speaker 4: and Yahoo made it the expense of thousands of dead Lebanese.
Speaker 4: The Israelis have murdered and maimed in this one pager
Speaker 4: attack supposedly target HESBLO officials, which killed thirty seven people
Speaker 4: and injured thousands, including random bystanders. Pure act of you
Speaker 4: know what by you know who, and there's a picture
Speaker 4: of it if you're watching one of our streams.
Speaker 2: Is that real? That was that actually created and given
Speaker 2: to Trump?
Speaker 4: Do we know this? Can you believe that? Crazy?
Speaker 2: WHOA?
Speaker 4: I'll send you the link.
Speaker 7: Man.
Speaker 1: I actually give him two. He got to gold, he
Speaker 1: got to one very good analysis.
Speaker 4: A good one, all right, Mark, thanks for joining us, man.
Speaker 5: Yeah, if that suckers gold? Is that like some sort
Speaker 5: of bribe from a foreign country? We saw what happened
Speaker 5: to Bob Menendez, right.
Speaker 4: Yeah, seriously, I assume it's a nerd but like it's
Speaker 4: a little on the nose to have the press with
Speaker 4: both hands on the on the front face of it there.
Speaker 5: It's very weird.
Speaker 4: Wow, all right, infidel, I know you got to get
Speaker 4: out of here too, man, So I'll hand it over
Speaker 4: to you for any thoughts on that or final thoughts
Speaker 4: for tonight.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think I think that you were asking
Speaker 1: about his long term vision. I think his long term
Speaker 1: vision he tried to do that in the first term,
Speaker 1: and and and and and I really liies around just
Speaker 1: tralleyings uh obnations, around uh normalizing relationship with Israel. He
Speaker 1: started to do Saudia Arabia, right, and I think MBS
Speaker 1: is open to it. I think that the question is
Speaker 1: how to create the right environment so that when they
Speaker 1: normalize relationship, they don't have a back from their people, right.
Speaker 1: And I think that's a game that's going to be
Speaker 1: played between Trump and all those other nations. But that's
Speaker 1: I think that's in his head. That's a long term vision,
Speaker 1: is reducing the influence of Iran and increasing the influence
Speaker 1: of those other nations. And that's why you see the
Speaker 1: city in prison, right he was he was just visiting
Speaker 1: Saudia Arabia like a few days ago, right, Yeah, just
Speaker 1: declaring shift away from Iran. So I think that's that's
Speaker 1: a that's a I would say that that's a long
Speaker 1: term vision, but we'll see how it plays out.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, all right, man, I'm really glad you were
Speaker 4: able to join us tonight. We missed you last couple
Speaker 4: of times, and we'll look forward to having you on
Speaker 4: again real soon. And I'll talk to you this weekend,
Speaker 4: all right, Thank you, bro.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and and maybe maybe I will be online for
Speaker 1: a for a magic carpet tride. We'll see. I'll let
Speaker 1: you know soon.
Speaker 4: All right, cool, yeah, join us on Saturdays for mixtapes
Speaker 4: here at also in the current radio join our discord,
Speaker 4: get notifications, all that good stuff. Infidel might be there
Speaker 4: busting out a magic carpet ride for you. You never
Speaker 4: know what you're gonna get, but it'll be cool. All right,
Speaker 4: later dude.
Speaker 1: Listening and cheers everybody in the chat.
Speaker 5: Right on.
Speaker 4: Later, dude, there it goes mystical Pharaoh. Oh boy, let's
Speaker 4: see here. Also, yeah, ruckus over to you. Any thoughts
Speaker 4: on you don't say anything about this, uh this right here?
Speaker 5: Or I don't know what to think about it. I
Speaker 5: mean it's like this gift is like no matter how
Speaker 5: you look at it, I mean that's very weird. That's
Speaker 5: very very weird. And you know, leave all the politics
Speaker 5: out of it, Like who does that? That is so strange.
Speaker 5: I mean like and what did Trump have to do
Speaker 5: with any of that?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 5: And why why get him involved? It makes no sense.
Speaker 5: His whole treatment of this thing is just so so
Speaker 5: nonchalant and quite literally insane in my opinion. But like
Speaker 5: it's very very incendiary his decision to do this. It's
Speaker 5: also very historical. I mean, this this completely changes like history.
Speaker 5: I mean, never before has America taken some this type
Speaker 5: of a foreign policy stance about lands that don't belong
Speaker 5: to us. But he's been on this kick with the
Speaker 5: Greenland thing, and he wants to take back Panama Canal.
Speaker 5: I guess that's a different story, but yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 5: And then to be gifting him this weird pager that's
Speaker 5: related to this bizarre one of a kind of historical
Speaker 5: kind of attack. It's just it's very strange to me.
Speaker 5: I don't get it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, definitely one of those things where you're just
Speaker 4: being you know, the twid. The acts lately, it's just
Speaker 4: been like drinking from the fire hose. Is just like
Speaker 4: unbelievable thing after unbelievable thing.
Speaker 5: Well and then that that's the other thing too, is
Speaker 5: just like after this type of an incendiary comment. I mean, like, sure,
Speaker 5: we had this one strong reaction coming from Senator al
Speaker 5: Green was it? He wants to impeach the president. He's
Speaker 5: going to put forward articles of impeachment against Trump over
Speaker 5: the Gaza thing. I think specifically, I think that was
Speaker 5: this thing before the Gaza comments, before BB landed here,
Speaker 5: there's been lots of protests. We've seen a lot of
Speaker 5: protests going on against Trump, not just Trump, but also
Speaker 5: mister Elon Musk. There there seems to be now a
Speaker 5: now everybody's worried about it, huh okay, but yeah, there
Speaker 5: seems to be quite a number of concern coming from
Speaker 5: the left side of the political spectrum, and that media screaming,
Speaker 5: holy hell, like, why are we giving so much power
Speaker 5: and exposure to the inner workings of our government to
Speaker 5: one person? And that's a very very valid argument.
Speaker 4: That's unelected person. Yeah, exactly who.
Speaker 5: But the thing is, now, if we question that, we're
Speaker 5: lumped in with the aocs and the Senator Warrens and
Speaker 5: the Chuck Schumer's and now we're one of them. I
Speaker 5: guess it did to us.
Speaker 4: How blind are they? Like, you can't reverse it on
Speaker 4: us like that. We've been saying that about these people
Speaker 4: for years, for years, and it's like you're you're mad
Speaker 4: about like you're you're such a newbie that you're mad
Speaker 4: about Elon Musk right now and you haven't even thought
Speaker 4: about all the unelected officials and bureaucrats that have been
Speaker 4: running all the horror that we've been seeing and causing
Speaker 4: all these wars. I mean, we could just do an
Speaker 4: entire episode where we run through the list of those
Speaker 4: people and give like one example. We have so many
Speaker 4: unelected fuck wits out there running policy and shit, it's
Speaker 4: it's it's mind boggling. It's mind boggling. Like this u
Speaker 4: usai D thing, it's just one of hundreds, maybe thousands
Speaker 4: of like NGOs that are are working at the at
Speaker 4: the behest of you know, whoever's pulling the strings on
Speaker 4: us ai D.
Speaker 5: They're everywhere, right, So now they're politicizing this thing and
Speaker 5: couching it under this Like the right we'll say, oh, like, oh,
Speaker 5: the only reason that the lefty are concerned about this
Speaker 5: as is exposing their crimes. Like well maybe, but the
Speaker 5: thing is, like, again, would you guys feel comfortable if
Speaker 5: it was say, Bill Gates doing this, that's the thing.
Speaker 5: They feel comfortable if it was Klaus Schwab doing this.
Speaker 5: Jeff Bezos, Well, I guess Jeff Bezos is one of
Speaker 5: us now because he's got the wife with the big boobies,
Speaker 5: and Mark likes to look at the big boobies, and
Speaker 5: Elon Musk likes to look at the sailing, and.
Speaker 4: He gets to sit on Trump's right hand side as
Speaker 4: he's inaugurated all these guys. You know, that's the grand
Speaker 4: rebranding of government. That's the grand rebranding. That's planning the
Speaker 4: flag for what technocratic governance is going to look like.
Speaker 4: That group, that group right there and those that incircle them.
Speaker 5: Does this stop at musk? Does the bucks stop at musk?
Speaker 5: His musk is a it's all, it's all musk. He
Speaker 5: just comes up with these ideas all by himself? Or
Speaker 5: does he? Does he have influences in his life?
Speaker 4: And yeah, or Vonner or Vonner abilities right, compromising things perhaps,
Speaker 4: you know, rich people tend to, you know, have some
Speaker 4: idle time to do some compromising things. Sometimes sometimes they're
Speaker 4: born into it.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 4: You start looking at you know, that kind of thing,
Speaker 4: and like this all goes back to what Mark asked earlier.
Speaker 4: It's like full circle once again. Like if if that
Speaker 4: technocrat crowd was is really sort of a shadow set
Speaker 4: of avatars for the CIA and they're embedded in government
Speaker 4: like that, as we're watching, you know, politics and government
Speaker 4: rebrand and everything that was conspiracy now become mainstream. Okay
Speaker 4: to talk about, okay to shut down blah blah blah.
Speaker 4: You know, and it's political now that like they've mastered
Speaker 4: politicizing things that shouldn't be politicized, to the point where
Speaker 4: even the political class is now politicized in a way
Speaker 4: that's all about personality and labels, and nobody seems to
Speaker 4: really look at the bigger picture, at least not enough
Speaker 4: people look at the bigger picture. That's what I'm seeing.
Speaker 5: And flagrant like obvious again again again in case of
Speaker 5: conflict of interests going on here. I think they learned
Speaker 5: their lesson during the thing the shutdowns and all that,
Speaker 5: right where like, oh, we see what you're doing. Now
Speaker 5: that's like now nobody sees what they're doing is crazy.
Speaker 5: I mean, we see what they're doing. But I mean,
Speaker 5: like so Elon Musk and his buddies stand, they are
Speaker 5: the ones who stand to benefit from this, all these
Speaker 5: good things that are there happening. Sure, they're good, but
Speaker 5: they're ultimately only being done not because anybody gives it
Speaker 5: flying f about whether or not this is good. It's
Speaker 5: because they're going to benefit. They're going to reap the
Speaker 5: rewards by offering that, hey, we've got this nice, shiny,
Speaker 5: new digital packaged solution for you, ready to go for
Speaker 5: your problem. How do I know you have a problem. Well,
Speaker 5: you're going to let me look at it, dig deep
Speaker 5: and proof to you that you have a problem. But
Speaker 5: don't worry. I've got the solution. And the solution is
Speaker 5: all of this AI that they've poured billions and billions
Speaker 5: and billions and billions of dollars and time and energy into,
Speaker 5: whether or not as real. I mean, even if it's
Speaker 5: just snake oil. This is the next big thing, and
Speaker 5: this is the eminent solution. We're gonna let go all
Speaker 5: of these jobs. Well, and the government. It's not going
Speaker 5: to fall apart, but we're going to hand it over
Speaker 5: to AI. And then what and then what? Then where
Speaker 5: are we at?
Speaker 4: Yeah, it depends what pieces of narrative we get handed
Speaker 4: to go with it that we're going to be reacting to.
Speaker 4: I suppose, so we'll stand by for that. That'll be fun.
Speaker 4: I've noticed Bill Gates has been making the rounds again.
Speaker 5: I said, well, okay, let me let me, let me
Speaker 5: set this up. Because he made the rounds twice in
Speaker 5: a row. There's a reason is because he had to
Speaker 5: do the whining tour of like, oh no, how dare
Speaker 5: you take money away from usaid? Because of Gobby and vaccine.
Speaker 5: So he was screaming bloody hell about the next pandemic
Speaker 5: and how we're all ft now because they shut down USA, YadA, YadA, YadA.
Speaker 5: But this right here that I just sent you, I'm like,
Speaker 5: they brought up the AI thing and this is where
Speaker 5: I got quite concerned.
Speaker 4: All right, So here's him on the dreaded Fallon show.
Speaker 4: Let's see here.
Speaker 2: Everyone's talking about AI and that's that's the big topic.
Speaker 1: Everyone has is going to take over and and all this.
Speaker 2: Stuff and it's it's bad or it's good or we
Speaker 2: don't know what are the pros and cons for in
Speaker 2: Layman's terms, for someone like me.
Speaker 7: Yeah, So the era we've come to is sort of
Speaker 7: the vision that computing was expensive and it basically became free.
Speaker 7: The era that we're just starting is that intelligence is rare.
Speaker 7: You know, a great doctor, a great teacher, and with AI,
Speaker 7: over the next decade, that will be come free commonplace.
Speaker 7: You know, great medical advice, great tutoring, and it's kind
Speaker 7: of profound because it solves all these specific problems like
Speaker 7: we don't have enough doctors or you know, mental health professionals.
Speaker 7: But it brings with it kind of so much change.
Speaker 7: You know, what will jobs be like? Should we you know,
Speaker 7: just work like two or three days a week. So
Speaker 7: I love the way to drive innovation board, but I think,
Speaker 7: you know, it's a little bit unknown. Will we be
Speaker 7: able to shape it? H And so legitimately people are like, wow,
Speaker 7: this is this is a bit scary. It's completely new territory.
Speaker 1: I mean, we still need humans, not for most things.
Speaker 7: You know, we'll decide.
Speaker 1: I mean, hop thing it talks you.
Speaker 7: Definitely gonna really well, we'll decide, you know, like baseball.
Speaker 7: We won't want to watch computers play baseball. Yeah, and
Speaker 7: you know, so there'll be some things that.
Speaker 1: We reserve for ourselves.
Speaker 7: But in terms of making things and moving things and
Speaker 7: growing food, over time, those will be basically solved problems.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I know what he means when he says growing food.
Speaker 4: It is not what you think.
Speaker 5: Yeah, exactly when he says will decide, I know we
Speaker 5: Does he mean us as humans or does he mean
Speaker 5: him and his buddies.
Speaker 4: Like just sandwich eating baseball people will drive the market
Speaker 4: or the actual him and his Buddi's wi.
Speaker 5: And I hate to disagree with him, but I think
Speaker 5: that we will swiftly come to nobody will want to
Speaker 5: watch humans playing baseball if you if you talk, okay,
Speaker 5: listen the kids. The kids love to watch other people
Speaker 5: play video games. This is a huge, huge thing. And
Speaker 5: they don't They don't even show interest in wanting to
Speaker 5: play the games themselves. That is the new entertain they
Speaker 5: so we moved from like instead of playing baseball, we
Speaker 5: digitally play baseball and video games. And now we just
Speaker 5: watch other people play the digital version of baseball. But
Speaker 5: it gets worse. I will find a link to this
Speaker 5: so you can include in the show notes. My jaw
Speaker 5: hit the floor when I saw this video on YouTube.
Speaker 5: Somebody did a deep dive into this. There's there's something
Speaker 5: going on with call of duty. Did they change some
Speaker 5: of their terms of service? And somebody did some deep
Speaker 5: dives into this, and apparently I'm pretty sure it's call
Speaker 5: of duty. But basically, what they're doing is you are
Speaker 5: you are allowing you are somehow they basically learned that
Speaker 5: you are you the player in the damn video game
Speaker 5: are training artificial interro intelligence how to play the video
Speaker 5: game and get better at beating you is allegedly this concept.
Speaker 5: But the theory is that at some point, you're not
Speaker 5: going to know if you're actually watching a human being
Speaker 5: playing the video game, if you're just watching NPC on
Speaker 5: NPC action. So we could very well see in an
Speaker 5: instance where yes, we're not we're not not only are
Speaker 5: we not watching real life humans playing baseball, we're not
Speaker 5: even watching humans playing a video game version of baseball,
Speaker 5: and we're just all simply entertained by the AI. Where
Speaker 5: that leaves us, I'm not so sure, because I don't
Speaker 5: think we're part of the big club that's going to
Speaker 5: be enjoying the virtual baseball has.
Speaker 4: Sure, Yeah, I don't really mind if they want to
Speaker 4: train their their AI bots in the game on my gameplay,
Speaker 4: because I get better every fucking round, so they can
Speaker 4: suck it. They'll have to get better too, And I
Speaker 4: hope I would encourage all game people to follow the
Speaker 4: lead of Battlefield. Like if you play Battlefield, it tells you, like,
Speaker 4: you know, like you see the players handle when you
Speaker 4: put them under your radical, you see their handle, And
Speaker 4: if it's a bot, it says, you know, bracket bracket
Speaker 4: AI and you know, you know, there's not enough people
Speaker 4: to fill this server, so they threw in so bots
Speaker 4: and like that's fine. I don't mind grinding bots, but
Speaker 4: I do want to know that their bots I'm playing against,
Speaker 4: you know, and I have noticed that the real players
Speaker 4: are the ones you really need to watch out for.
Speaker 4: The bots are pretty good. They seem to get a
Speaker 4: little bit better, but at the same time like the
Speaker 4: people that you know, because in that game, they delineate.
Speaker 4: So yeah, I would hate to see it go the
Speaker 4: way of them grifting people into not knowing if they're
Speaker 4: playing bots or not. But I'm sure plenty of them would.
Speaker 5: I don't see why, only only possibly if there's a
Speaker 5: lot of money involved, if that's a motivating factor somehow.
Speaker 4: Oh well, that's funny. You should mention it because we
Speaker 4: know video game companies get Pentagon money and Pentagon approval
Speaker 4: for narratives and stuff.
Speaker 1: So hmm, there's.
Speaker 5: Always that do they get money from us?
Speaker 7: Eight?
Speaker 5: I guess we're to.
Speaker 4: Wait, not anymore. They don't.
Speaker 5: That great happened to that big game I was waiting to, Like,
Speaker 5: they just disappeared. Their Twitter's gone, they're ghost of us.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that that gravy train has sailed for now at least,
Speaker 4: or at least moved.
Speaker 5: I would suggest maybe we might see a sudden end
Speaker 5: to all the weird DEI Star Wars and Disney series
Speaker 5: and Netflix and things. I don't know. It just might
Speaker 5: get back to normal all of a sudden. Yeah, some
Speaker 5: strange reason, I don't know.
Speaker 4: I heard I heard Disney had to close down one
Speaker 4: of their Star Wars things.
Speaker 3: Not all.
Speaker 4: Yeah, people just started. You know, the backlash is real.
Speaker 4: You know, the bud Light effect is uh is hitting
Speaker 4: businesses now.
Speaker 5: Well good, be nice to go back to an era
Speaker 5: where the customer's opinions actually matter. Yeah, when you can
Speaker 5: walk with that don't even care about what you're doing.
Speaker 5: They just want to make a name for themselves.
Speaker 4: Right, they'll just see people walking and voting with their
Speaker 4: wallets again instead of just forcing them to accept you know,
Speaker 4: a polarizing political and cultural thing.
Speaker 5: Is maybe now it's the time to invest and bud
Speaker 5: Light stock. Maybe they're going to have a comeback.
Speaker 4: Well, Kid Rock still drinks it, and I think Joe
Speaker 4: Rogan drank it. I wonder how much bud Light gave
Speaker 4: him to forgive them.
Speaker 5: But how much does Elon Muscow. He's in the diet coke.
Speaker 5: That's how smart that guy is.
Speaker 4: Don't drink that stuff. It will rot your brain. Let's
Speaker 4: take a look at what Billy Boy had to say
Speaker 4: on the view. I think he made some comments here
Speaker 4: that kind of circle back to something we were talking
Speaker 4: about earlier, the dreaded view. Here we go. I apologize
Speaker 4: in advance, but I want to see what Billy had
Speaker 4: to say. Same sweater, Yep, same sweater. How about that?
Speaker 6: Spent the most sleepless nights worrying about pandemics after COVID
Speaker 6: has that change? And if it has, what keeps you
Speaker 6: up now? Because we all need to know.
Speaker 7: Yeah, the pandemic sadly was fairly predictable, and it won't
Speaker 7: be the last pandemic. The next one could be far
Speaker 7: more severe one. It killed millions.
Speaker 1: It was awful.
Speaker 7: Uh, we got the vaccine, you know. Actually President Trump's
Speaker 7: leadership was a factor in getting that out quickly. And
Speaker 7: and so I when I spoke to him, I said, Okay,
Speaker 7: here's some other medical innovations, including the thing called an
Speaker 7: HIV cure that could be accelerated, so we should be
Speaker 7: more prepared.
Speaker 1: Both for a pandemic.
Speaker 7: I'd say that's still number one. You know, you can
Speaker 7: worry about nuclear war, you can worry about AIS.
Speaker 1: Planning, to worry about overall. I'm an optimist.
Speaker 7: No, I mean, you know, it's up to the government
Speaker 7: to think ahead on behalf of the citizens. So pandemic,
Speaker 7: there's a lot that we should be doing that. Hopefully
Speaker 7: we'll get our act together before.
Speaker 1: The next one comes, you know.
Speaker 7: Overall, the innovation and health both in the develop in countries,
Speaker 7: the ritual, you know, I I love being part of that.
Speaker 6: I was reading though that you said the next pandemic
Speaker 6: you are predicting within maybe twenty five years.
Speaker 7: Oh, certainly will have one in the next twenty five years.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 7: You know, there's even some pathogens out there that we're
Speaker 7: watching over right now. You know, so maybe ten percent
Speaker 7: chance in the next four years.
Speaker 4: So he just telegraphed that was in the next four
Speaker 4: years again by the end of a Trump presidency. Hey,
Speaker 4: that sounds like, uh who Dabo Man. I haven't seen
Speaker 4: Dabu in a while. Glad he's still out there.
Speaker 5: Yeah, So they're going not Bill Gates. I think that's
Speaker 5: a clone. They think they replaced him. He seems a
Speaker 5: little more got some more pep going. He's a little
Speaker 5: a little youthful. His voice is a little deeper. He
Speaker 5: doesn't sound so much like Kermit.
Speaker 4: Maybe he took the ozempic.
Speaker 5: I don't know, maybe brain chips.
Speaker 4: Yeah, maybe Elon blessed him with a neuralink. Or maybe
Speaker 4: it's just another dude in a mask who knows that.
Speaker 4: That's yeah, but I love it.
Speaker 5: I love how they like, you tell us what we
Speaker 5: need to be afraid of, because we need to know.
Speaker 4: Yeah, And then his.
Speaker 5: Answer is like, well, government, government's the answer. Now it's not.
Speaker 4: Did you like why does he always smile when he
Speaker 4: gets asked about the next pandemic? He can't help but
Speaker 4: like just cheese completely when talking about the quote unquote
Speaker 4: next pandemic.
Speaker 5: He gets paid every time they use the word pandemic
Speaker 5: around him.
Speaker 4: Oh if only we got paid every time we said
Speaker 4: pandemic industrial complex, that would be amazing.
Speaker 5: Well, actually he doesn't anymore because that payment came from us.
Speaker 4: Oh oh, now you got to go ask Marco Rubio
Speaker 4: for that one man. Yeah, so he's making the rounds
Speaker 4: doing the AI thing, and he said nothing about AI
Speaker 4: that was funny, like a bunch of word soulid about AI.
Speaker 4: Same with this one pretty much. But yeah, he has
Speaker 4: so much glee about that, doesn't he? He must love.
Speaker 5: But he's I mean he even though he's not the
Speaker 5: owner of Microsoft anymore, he's heavily involved still with Microsoft
Speaker 5: and and you know, in case he doesn't read the news,
Speaker 5: the thing that Microsoft has been interested in in doing
Speaker 5: and working on for like the last two years is AI.
Speaker 5: But anyway, yeah, big lawsuit and thing and battle and
Speaker 5: competition between him and this little company called Open Ai.
Speaker 5: You know, but he's just like nonchalantly like AI. Ask him,
Speaker 5: we don't need humans much of any yeah, because you know,
Speaker 5: you know what's coming, you dirty little f about the
Speaker 5: AI agents and replacing everybody's jobs and and all of
Speaker 5: these things. Even the stuff that Trump's doing that sounds good,
Speaker 5: like the terriffs, this little terriff, the terriff war that
Speaker 5: lasted what less than twenty four hours with Canada and Mexico.
Speaker 5: That was kind of funny though.
Speaker 4: Oh man, yeah, I saw some some small businesses that
Speaker 4: have stuff sourced from China talking about sorry, sales are halted.
Speaker 4: You know, we we.
Speaker 5: Guess that's that's the big one. Still, we don't know
Speaker 5: what's going to happen there. But the Canada and Mexico
Speaker 5: thing went pretty quick and easy.
Speaker 4: They caved yeah, I don't think. I don't think you
Speaker 4: can keep the the Timu stuff from your American entrepreneurs
Speaker 4: for very long. There, they're they're gonna get feisty on you.
Speaker 5: Yeah, there's there's a little pullback right now about that.
Speaker 5: But we have to wait and see. I guess in
Speaker 5: about a month we're gonna know what's going on with
Speaker 5: the China thing that's going to affect the economy.
Speaker 4: And then about it will and in about two months
Speaker 4: we're gonna find out if his second idea for when
Speaker 4: to stop the Ukraine Russia war is going to happen
Speaker 4: or not. They're saying April.
Speaker 5: Now we have something, some some weird thing by April.
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 5: Last time he said that we got a we got
Speaker 5: an official lockdown announced.
Speaker 4: So that's it was day one. But okay, that's all right,
Speaker 4: other things happening, we get it. I guess we'll wait
Speaker 4: till April on that.
Speaker 5: You know what. And here's something he didn't make this promise,
Speaker 5: but I would think with all of his executive orders
Speaker 5: and all of the good things he's doing, by now,
Speaker 5: gosh darn it, shouldn't we know exactly who's cocaine baggy
Speaker 5: that was that they found in the White House.
Speaker 4: Oh you just wait, I'm sure we will. It's gonna
Speaker 4: be funny.
Speaker 5: Well, it's gonna be Musk Doge, nineteen year old big
Speaker 5: balls is going to get to the bottom of it.
Speaker 4: I don't care who had it in that administration. I
Speaker 4: want to know who's walking around with it right now
Speaker 4: in the White House. Which one of these ballers in
Speaker 4: there is balling it?
Speaker 5: Well? I mean Mark, Mark was talking about you guys
Speaker 5: are talking about how the government like this, this will
Speaker 5: affect the economy, like because the government workers now will
Speaker 5: be out of jobs. But the thing is, like, what's
Speaker 5: that going to do for like the underground economy, like
Speaker 5: because these people are into the drugs and I'm not
Speaker 5: talking about the cocaine. I mean, this is going to
Speaker 5: hurt the adrenachrome market like you wouldn't believe.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, watch out, yep.
Speaker 5: And that has repercussions. It's like a pot of rock
Speaker 5: being dropped in a pond, and there's this ripple effect.
Speaker 5: These dreaochrome dealers aren't going to make money, and they're
Speaker 5: gonna not gonna be spending money at your local mom
Speaker 5: and pop stores. It's not good.
Speaker 4: I know the squid games will end and they won't
Speaker 4: be harvesting organs quite as much. I mean, geez, what
Speaker 4: are they all going to do? Oh? Speaking of AI,
Speaker 4: what's this Google lifting a ban on weaponization of AI?
Speaker 5: That was nice timing. They had dug there. They had
Speaker 5: dug their heels into that one for the longest time.
Speaker 5: But uh, I guess they said no more. I don't
Speaker 5: know what their reasoning is. So remember just because it's Trump.
Speaker 4: Remember, just a couple of months ago we talked about, uh,
Speaker 4: the sam Altman board. Uh does allvolving their more AI
Speaker 4: morality department or they had to ethics department, Ethics of
Speaker 4: AI department or something like that. So we've gone from
Speaker 4: dissolving the department of ethics to lifting the ban on
Speaker 4: weaponizing AI in a couple of months between two companies. Here.
Speaker 5: It's been in place since twenty eighteen, and it was
Speaker 5: because there was a pushback criticism over its involvement, so
Speaker 5: people actually protested. I remember, actually I remember this now.
Speaker 5: The recent protests, of course in the name of the
Speaker 5: Gaza thing in front of Microsoft and other companies has
Speaker 5: not gone so well. But yeah, there was this I
Speaker 5: think you have the story there it is.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so yeah, this is from yesterday. Google removes ban
Speaker 4: on weaponizing AI significantly revised its artificial intelligence principles, removing
Speaker 4: early restrictions on using the technology for developing weaponry and
Speaker 4: surveillance tools. The update, announced on Tuesday, altered the company's
Speaker 4: prior stance against applications that could cause overall harm. Can
Speaker 4: we just stop right there for a moment and talk
Speaker 4: about you know, companies like Google who have put a
Speaker 4: lot of money into disarming the American public, uh, disarming
Speaker 4: us literally, right, with money going to political packs that
Speaker 4: do gun control activities and censoring us for you know,
Speaker 4: allegedly potentially causing harm with words we type on the
Speaker 4: Internet or post on our websites or say on platforms
Speaker 4: that they own, like they're they're not cool with any
Speaker 4: of that, right, And that's that's a bouncing ball that
Speaker 4: you can't really follow, this sort of a behind the
Speaker 4: under the hood, you know, set of decisions you're not
Speaker 4: involved with. You're not even told how in what way
Speaker 4: they would like you to self censor yourself. You just
Speaker 4: find out the hard way. But now, like, what does
Speaker 4: Google have to do with weapons? Anyways? That's what I'm
Speaker 4: getting at, Like, what why do Google? Why does Google
Speaker 4: need to even be in the business of making a
Speaker 4: decision about whether AI should be used to enhance weaponry
Speaker 4: create weaponry? Uh and and weaponry is quite a word,
Speaker 4: that's a pretty all in weapon. What do you mean
Speaker 4: by that? Could are we talking nine millimeter? Are we
Speaker 4: talking weapons of mass distraction? Are we talking, you know,
Speaker 4: doxing systems, shadow banning systems? I mean, these are these
Speaker 4: are all things that could be considered weapons and weaponized.
Speaker 4: I mean, some would argue Google that your algorithms themselves
Speaker 4: have been weaponized against your own users. So what is
Speaker 4: it you're looking to enhance? What was the original document
Speaker 4: looking to stop from happening? Oh? Looky here. In twenty eighteen,
Speaker 4: Google established a set of AI principles in response to
Speaker 4: criticism over its involvement in military endeavors, such as a
Speaker 4: US Department of Defense project that involved the use of
Speaker 4: AI to process data and identify targets for combat operations. Again,
Speaker 4: with these companies, are they really private companies when they're
Speaker 4: doing stuff like that in the background, Like they're massive
Speaker 4: government contracts to that level, creating a surveillance grid. I mean,
Speaker 4: conflict of interest with all that title two thirty stuff
Speaker 4: right there.
Speaker 5: And it's said here. There was an interesting line that
Speaker 5: Margaret Mitchell, who previously co led Google's ethical AI team
Speaker 5: Not Anymore, told Bloomberg, who got caught receiving funding from
Speaker 5: usaid that the removal of the harm clause may suggest
Speaker 5: that the company may suggest that the company will now
Speaker 5: work on quote deploying technology directly that can kill people
Speaker 5: end quote. So wow did you do that? How did
Speaker 5: you do that?
Speaker 4: It's one of my new settings. I found all was like.
Speaker 5: Shit, I thought, did I do that on my obs?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 5: That's neat thing is like what you just said, like
Speaker 5: the words, the words are weapons, the algorithms are weapons.
Speaker 5: And whether or not Google was involved in that, well
Speaker 5: now they can be right, So I think that that's
Speaker 5: I think this has to do more with the fifth
Speaker 5: generational warfare stuff than the traditional warfare stuff. And it's
Speaker 5: just it's a red herring to suggest, Oh, the people
Speaker 5: are angry about the data being fed to the satellite systems,
Speaker 5: to the Elon musks, the starlink, to the Pegasus that's
Speaker 5: killing boys in Gaza because they're male or whatever, the
Speaker 5: giant terrible thing is that they're all involved with doing.
Speaker 5: But maybe this is more, This is bigger because we're
Speaker 5: moving towards this, maybe there is another big P word coming,
Speaker 5: just as Bill Gates is coming sometimes the next twenty
Speaker 5: five years, and well, social media is not going away, right,
Speaker 5: So let's just imagine that we're all locked down again
Speaker 5: and the only source of information we have is online
Speaker 5: and we're all on X and we get our ex
Speaker 5: payment and our UBI and wearing our six face masks
Speaker 5: and staying six feet apart from ourselves I guess inside
Speaker 5: the metaverse. But yeah, the weaponization is the propaganda that
Speaker 5: they're going to use against us, which will be tailor
Speaker 5: made for each one of us individually, buy the AI.
Speaker 5: That's just the theory I have.
Speaker 4: Let's say you, yeah, yeah, totally X payments. We're not
Speaker 4: on X tonight because I didn't make my payment to X,
Speaker 4: like they want my money watching the people with their accounts,
Speaker 4: you know, just making money a handover fist and they're like,
Speaker 4: now you can't livestream on here anymore unless you pay us.
Speaker 4: It's just like, I got to think about that for
Speaker 4: a minute. You guys, I noticed this one too. This
Speaker 4: is one more interesting tidbit in this article. Googles. This
Speaker 4: reversal of its policy comes amid continued concerns over the
Speaker 4: dangers posed by AI to humanity. Jeffrey Hinton, a pioneering
Speaker 4: figure in AI and a recipient of the twenty twenty
Speaker 4: four Nobel Peace Prize in physics, warned late last year
Speaker 4: that the technology could potentially lead to human extinction within
Speaker 4: the next three decades, a likelihood he sees as being
Speaker 4: up to twenty percent. Hinton has warned that AI systems
Speaker 4: could eventually surpass human intelligence, escape human control, and potentially
Speaker 4: cause catastrophic harm to humanity. He has urged significant resources
Speaker 4: be allocated towards AI safety and ethical use of the technology,
Speaker 4: and that proactive measures be developed. So that's what that
Speaker 4: whole board at Altman's Open AI was supposedly for. Altman
Speaker 4: is in beef with Musk. Both have competing AIS. Zuckerberg's
Speaker 4: bought up a bunch of AI. Google obviously AI Oracle.
Speaker 4: You know they've got theirs or their deal with whoever
Speaker 4: palanteer works through to AI. So you know we've got
Speaker 4: the you know, warring technologies here, all of which lead
Speaker 4: to Panopticon discussions and according to Jeffrey Hinton to Terminator
Speaker 4: Skynet discussions.
Speaker 5: Yeah, no matter who wins this particular war between all
Speaker 5: of the AI companies, we lose. Yeah and yeah, And
Speaker 5: this is the ship that Hinton is describing. This is
Speaker 5: the same stuff that Elon Musk used to warn about, right. Remember, Yeah,
Speaker 5: this is the whole premise originally for his Neuralink before
Speaker 5: he spun that into no, we're just helping paraplegics or
Speaker 5: kill monkeys or whatever we're doing. Sorry, look that one up, folks.
Speaker 5: But the thing is, like the idea was, we're not
Speaker 5: going to be able to compete with the fast developing AI.
Speaker 5: The machines are going to get smarter than us. And
Speaker 5: the only chance that humanity has has left and if
Speaker 5: we have any chance of survival is we have to
Speaker 5: merge with the machines. That was his whole premise, with
Speaker 5: the whole Neuralink thing, and he used to warn against
Speaker 5: a He wanted the full stop. All of these people
Speaker 5: signed this letter. Remember they all got together and they
Speaker 5: said full stop. And then we had whistleblowers and they're
Speaker 5: like full stop and or they had a fire. They
Speaker 5: fired Altman and then they re hired him as crazy
Speaker 5: and now they're all working towards the same end goal here,
Speaker 5: but I don't know what that end goal is. Like,
Speaker 5: I think Elon Musk is very much interested in replacing
Speaker 5: the government with his GROC, with his Xai company. I
Speaker 5: think he wants groc for government. Open Ai has a
Speaker 5: special chat GPT version exclusively for government's plural So maybe
Speaker 5: maybe open Ai gets this portion of the world. Maybe
Speaker 5: they get Greenland, maybe Anama Canal, I don't know, and
Speaker 5: Elon Musk gets the US government and Mars I don't know.
Speaker 4: In Canada, probably can oh Man. Yeah, okay, that's all
Speaker 4: very interesting, very interesting.
Speaker 5: Of course Musk. Musk has expressed and words and action
Speaker 5: and deeds an interest in the healthcare sector as well,
Speaker 5: So you know, move over Bill Gates. The next billionaire
Speaker 5: doctor wannabe might be mister Musk.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Larry Also, Larry Ellison's up in there on that
Speaker 4: one for sure.
Speaker 5: That guy is just yeah, he's all over, he's whatever
Speaker 5: he just said, he's all money money.
Speaker 4: Yeah, got a Hawaiian island for sale. I'll take it.
Speaker 4: That's right. I don't like the one next to me.
Speaker 4: I'd like that town over. That's a great place for
Speaker 4: a oracle town. We need to build an oracle smart
Speaker 4: city where Lehaina is. Wouldn't it be a bummer if
Speaker 4: it wasn't there anymore Pacific Palisades? Who owns property there
Speaker 4: right next to it? Or the Malibu fire with Oh yeah, Larry, Larry,
Speaker 4: I don't know. I don't know. A lot of smart
Speaker 4: city real estate opportunities pop up around him all the time.
Speaker 5: Did you see this session. I'm gonna find you a
Speaker 5: story about this here it is the gun shops are
Speaker 5: using AI facial recognition to track your purchases.
Speaker 4: I don't know any gun shop owners that would be
Speaker 4: into that. That sounds like something the ATF agent would come.
Speaker 8: By theref Okah, all right, yeah, so the ATF had
Speaker 8: access to and was utilizing facial recognition technology to identify
Speaker 8: gun owners.
Speaker 5: Apparently this was something from Gun Owners of America reprinted
Speaker 5: by zero Hedge. So I will send you that article.
Speaker 5: I thought this probably came across your desk. This is crazy, though.
Speaker 4: Okay, let's see here zero Hedge says is ATF using
Speaker 4: AI powered facial recognition to id gun owners. I don't
Speaker 4: know why they need to. First of all, they have
Speaker 4: their own little illegal gun registry already as it is,
Speaker 4: several reports now indicate that ATF has access to and
Speaker 4: utilizes facial recognition technology to identify gun owners. In fact,
Speaker 4: to Government Accountability Office reports confirm that ATF does have
Speaker 4: access to various facial recognition systems, including Clearview AI, Vigilant solutions,
Speaker 4: and other systems owned by other federal, state, local, tribal,
Speaker 4: or territorial law enforcement agencies. So yeah, not just the ATF,
Speaker 4: but basically anyone in law enforcement you could think of.
Speaker 4: The GAO described the Clearview AI database as a web
Speaker 4: based facial recognition service using thirty plus billion facial images
Speaker 4: sourced from publicly available websites, including news media mugshots, and
Speaker 4: you guessed it's social media websites, so yay Internet.
Speaker 5: Well, and then people are going to be walking around
Speaker 5: with those smart glass devices.
Speaker 4: And yeah, yeah, I know, you can get a pair
Speaker 4: of uh like wayfarers now with smart all the smart
Speaker 4: de hickeys in there. So there you go. There's your
Speaker 4: matrix of snoopers and peekers.
Speaker 5: And wait, now, people, we know you're sick and tired
Speaker 5: of us telling you if you see something, say something anymore,
Speaker 5: because we'll do it for you.
Speaker 4: Right that that phrase will go away if Larry Ellison
Speaker 4: and the technocrats have their way, right, if there won't
Speaker 4: be If you see something, the AI will tell us something.
Speaker 4: If the AI sees something, it will tell us something.
Speaker 5: And I'll do you one step better. If you even
Speaker 5: think of something, we'll know that you were thinking of
Speaker 5: it before you even thought about it.
Speaker 4: Yep, yep, yep exactly. Uh yeah, all right. Uh that's
Speaker 4: all I got ruckus? What about you?
Speaker 5: I think?
Speaker 7: So?
Speaker 5: Is there anything big from Did Trump do any other
Speaker 5: big things today? Did he make any significant changes on
Speaker 5: the world? Oh? That's right? This was this was crazy,
Speaker 5: I mean unheard of. I was like, wow, wow, where
Speaker 5: do these people get these ideas? But he did the unthinkable,
Speaker 5: something nobody ever, ever, in their right mind, would have
Speaker 5: ever thought to do. He's not allowing men to play
Speaker 5: in women's sports.
Speaker 4: Oh right, yeah, that's crazy.
Speaker 5: Who does he think he? I mean, wow, genius?
Speaker 4: Wow, Oh my goodness, what will the I was gonna say,
Speaker 4: what will the feminists do? But feminists would agree, I think.
Speaker 5: But I will say, did you see the signing of
Speaker 5: that one?
Speaker 4: No? No, I didn't see that one.
Speaker 5: He surrounded himself with a bunch of girls like children,
Speaker 5: girls like presidents of the United States, was surrounded by
Speaker 5: females of all ages and various shapes and sizes, including
Speaker 5: little one and dude. No lie, the President of the
Speaker 5: United States of America was not sniffing a single one
Speaker 5: of them. So amazing, I say, I'm happy for that
Speaker 5: kind of a change.
Speaker 4: Amazing, amazing.
Speaker 5: He's actually really good with them too. I was like amazed.
Speaker 5: I was like, man, what a huge night and day
Speaker 5: difference right here between the two administrations.
Speaker 4: I know, I feel like we've seen and heard more
Speaker 4: like footage and words and just like presence in the
Speaker 4: first you know, whatever twenty did less than twenty days,
Speaker 4: then we did in the entire four years of Biden.
Speaker 4: Like if you were to category like compact all of
Speaker 4: his media appearances, like they might have already been overtaken.
Speaker 5: Let's just we won't talk about how many executive orders
Speaker 5: he's done, which.
Speaker 1: Is a lot.
Speaker 4: Dude. I was trying to find the complete list today,
Speaker 4: and all my complete lists are like days old. It's
Speaker 4: just like no one's able to keep up with them.
Speaker 4: It's crazy.
Speaker 5: The dude's gonna like I'm worried about his wrists there
Speaker 5: because of all the signing of his name and everything.
Speaker 4: I want one of those sharpies. Where do I get
Speaker 4: one of those cool black sharpies because all all I
Speaker 4: get to the gray ones with black caps. I want
Speaker 4: Trump sharpie. But yeah, there was that. That was good
Speaker 4: news though, I guess technically.
Speaker 5: Although although Bob Moran did did did did point something
Speaker 5: out on his Twitter feed. I don't have it in
Speaker 5: front of me, but it was a paraphrasing here. He
Speaker 5: was like, yes, this is a good thing that Trump
Speaker 5: did that. But at the same time, you know, hey,
Speaker 5: ha ha, because when you drop dead on the sports
Speaker 5: field from these new AI vaccines that were gonna rush
Speaker 5: and make available to you, it's okay. At least you
Speaker 5: won't have been beaten by a man.
Speaker 4: So like, wow, yeah, good point back to red that.
Speaker 5: I guess.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's good to have those voices always pull us
Speaker 4: back to reality. Hey, thanks Anna, we got a tip
Speaker 4: from Anna on the Rock Fan.
Speaker 1: You rock.
Speaker 4: Everybody rocks out there on the Rock Fan. Everybody rumbles
Speaker 4: out there on the Rumble, everybody that would be with
Speaker 4: us on X. You've been xed out tonight. Sorry about that.
Speaker 4: My bad and YouTube. Great to be out here on
Speaker 4: the YouTube. Thanks everybody for being over there and helping
Speaker 4: us with comments and all that good stuff. Do the
Speaker 4: YouTube things like button subscribe all that we want to
Speaker 4: see that. We appreciate that. When you folks do that
Speaker 4: lets us know that we should keep coming back to
Speaker 4: these platforms. So definitely do that and what else we'll
Speaker 4: be doing Sunday Wire This Sunday. Patrick has been doing
Speaker 4: these midweek wires during the middle of the week. He
Speaker 4: just did one today. Trump annexes gaza usaid him and
Speaker 4: Freddie Ponton, so check that out. There's a fairly new
Speaker 4: edition of the Daily Ruckus on Alternate Current Radio website,
Speaker 4: So visit our website and hit the support links there
Speaker 4: if you want to support us, join our discord any
Speaker 4: other housekeeping Ruckus I might be forgetting.
Speaker 5: Oh no, I said, I should have a new episode
Speaker 5: up sometime tomorrow or worst case scenario, by Sunday. I
Speaker 5: don't know yet. It's a rather large episode that I
Speaker 5: got to wrap up here with my twelve days of Ruckus.
Speaker 5: It's going to be twelve bummers coming, so use your imagination.
Speaker 5: There last one for me real quick before I forget
Speaker 5: and I might be miss I might be reporting two
Speaker 5: things as one, but I don't think I am. Trump
Speaker 5: issued an executive order another one I know, but this
Speaker 5: one for the establishment of a sovereign wealth fund, which
Speaker 5: is something brand new for this country. Historically speaking, other
Speaker 5: nations do this type of thing. It's kind of unheard
Speaker 5: of for the United States of America because we don't
Speaker 5: really have wealth like that. We've got a lot of
Speaker 5: We've got a lot of debt checked out the debt clock.
Speaker 4: Yeah, the debt is like, uh, shouldn't I would think
Speaker 4: somebody could come and say, oh, your sovereign wealth fund, Well,
Speaker 4: you're we're gonna break your kneecaps if you don't give
Speaker 4: it to us.
Speaker 5: So, but so, here's where it gets interesting. I'm pretty
Speaker 5: sure I'm right here. When he announced this one, he
Speaker 5: had two He had two people say something about it.
Speaker 5: The people who are involved, I forget their names, but
Speaker 5: it's it's the It might have been the cryptos ar guy,
Speaker 5: David Sachs, but it was the other Howard Lutnik. It
Speaker 5: was Howard Lutnick who said, so is who's he's? He
Speaker 5: is he the commerce chief guy? Who's Howard Lutnick? What
Speaker 5: did he just get Let's see, we're going to look
Speaker 5: him up. But it was this guy who said something
Speaker 5: incredibly disturbing.
Speaker 4: Okay, let's see here, Secretary of Commerce.
Speaker 5: Thank you. Yeah so, And I'm pretty sure that this
Speaker 5: is what it was brought up in with the the
Speaker 5: Sovereign Wealth Fund thing. This dude, Lutnix says, well, this
Speaker 5: is great because the American like this is a chance
Speaker 5: for like the if the that the American people can
Speaker 5: profit off of off of the things that are developed
Speaker 5: in the government like it's always been. He said, this
Speaker 5: is a good thing that he says like that that
Speaker 5: private public companies, private companies are the ones who are
Speaker 5: benefiting off of some of the hard good work that
Speaker 5: the government did. And he veered that immediately into warp
Speaker 5: speed and he says, if the government, if we're gonna
Speaker 5: if the government, if he was saying that the government
Speaker 5: should profit off of the manufacturing of the jibby jabs.
Speaker 5: He literally said that, And I was like, what, Yeah,
Speaker 5: it was pretty messed up. I wish I had the
Speaker 5: clip to show you, but I don't.
Speaker 4: But I thought they already were first of all. But yeah,
Speaker 4: way to get that that passive income on the jab jeez.
Speaker 5: Yep, he's like, yeah, why should big Pharma have all
Speaker 5: the fun right America needs can deserve to make mon
Speaker 5: off that too, yehaw wow wow bold pretty crazy stuff.
Speaker 4: Bold and idiotic.
Speaker 5: Okay, so but do your research on that one, folks.
Speaker 5: I'm pretty sure I'm right. But that's all I got
Speaker 5: for tonight, Hasha, Thanks for having me so yeah, brand
Speaker 5: new episode of the Daily Ruckus. Keep an eye out
Speaker 5: for that, and then you'll probably see me doing something
Speaker 5: maybe an X Space with Patrick Kenningson over the weekend.
Speaker 5: I might hook up with doctor Clown for Media Bear
Speaker 5: and do something over there. Who knows. I might even
Speaker 5: try to hook up with Weaponized News and help them
Speaker 5: out once or twice a week. So I do have
Speaker 5: some plans. You'll see Ruckus around and you can always
Speaker 5: find me here on the boiler Room of course, whenever
Speaker 5: we do that, which is usually Thursday nights at eight
Speaker 5: pm Ish ISH emphasis on Ish Central time. Thanks for
Speaker 5: having me. God bless each and every one of you,
Speaker 5: and may God save this Republic or trump Ruckus out.
Speaker 4: All right, there goes Ruckus. Thanks everybody for hanging with
Speaker 4: us tonight. It was great to have everybody with us,
Speaker 4: and sorry again to our X viewers out there. We'll
Speaker 4: see if we can't get that sorted as well as
Speaker 4: our live audio player. We need to get that sorted
Speaker 4: as well. So we've got a lot going on over
Speaker 4: here at Alternate Current Radio. We're constantly improving it and
Speaker 4: making some changes around here. We're gonna get a better
Speaker 4: audio streaming platform, slash podcasting platform and all that good stuff.
Speaker 4: So we'll see you again next week and we'll do
Speaker 4: it again another boiler room right here at Alternate Current Radio. Everybody,
Speaker 4: have a great rest of the week. Peace out. That's it.
Speaker 7: Go ahead and run, run home and pry to mama.