WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Open Teams today and suddenly couldn't find your team's tab.

2
00:00:02.560 --> 00:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>You're not alone. Thousands of professionals are asking the same

3
00:00:05.480 --> 00:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>question right now, Did Microsoft just remove teams completely? The

4
00:00:09.080 --> 00:00:12.279
<v Speaker 1>reality is nothing's lost, it's just hidden in plain sight.

5
00:00:12.560 --> 00:00:14.759
<v Speaker 1>In the next few minutes, I'll show you exactly where

6
00:00:14.800 --> 00:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>your teams and channels have gone, and more importantly, how

7
00:00:17.320 --> 00:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to rebuild an organized structure that keeps you sane in

8
00:00:19.559 --> 00:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the new interface. The familiar tab that vanished, Remember that

9
00:00:23.399 --> 00:00:25.679
<v Speaker 1>teams tab that used to live on the left side menu,

10
00:00:26.039 --> 00:00:28.879
<v Speaker 1>always staring back at you when you opened the desktop client,

11
00:00:29.280 --> 00:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>The one that acted like your compass, keeping all your projects, departments,

12
00:00:32.280 --> 00:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and channels one click away. Now it's gone overnight. The

13
00:00:35.280 --> 00:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>muscle memory we've built up over years has been broken.

14
00:00:37.920 --> 00:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>For many users. That missing button feels like hitting a

15
00:00:40.200 --> 00:00:42.719
<v Speaker 1>dead end while rushing to a meeting. You open the app,

16
00:00:42.840 --> 00:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>scan the sidebar, and suddenly realize the single entry point

17
00:00:45.679 --> 00:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>to your work groups isn't where your eyes expected. That

18
00:00:48.280 --> 00:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>initial moment of confusion is what makes the update feel

19
00:00:50.880 --> 00:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>more severe than it actually is. If you've been through it,

20
00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. The new version loads up,

21
00:00:54.920 --> 00:00:58.159
<v Speaker 1>you check the menu almost instinctively, but there's nothing labeled Teams.

22
00:00:58.560 --> 00:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>For a beat, you begin to question whether you press

23
00:01:00.679 --> 00:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the right application at all. Was it a glitch? Did

24
00:01:03.000 --> 00:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>your company remove functionality? Did Microsoft just decide to clean

25
00:01:06.519 --> 00:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>house without warning? That little jolt of panic is what

26
00:01:09.120 --> 00:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>countless users have experienced in the first days of this redesign.

27
00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:15.599
<v Speaker 1>It hits harder because our workflows weren't just adjusted, they

28
00:01:15.640 --> 00:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>were disrupted without a choice. Think about how many times

29
00:01:18.239 --> 00:01:20.879
<v Speaker 1>in a day you opened Teams and clicked that familiar tab.

30
00:01:21.280 --> 00:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Some of us navigated to it dozens of times, moving

31
00:01:23.680 --> 00:01:27.239
<v Speaker 1>between different groups to check files, updates, and meetings. Now,

32
00:01:27.280 --> 00:01:29.599
<v Speaker 1>after the redesign, every one of those steps has been

33
00:01:29.680 --> 00:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>nudged off course. It's similar to getting into your car

34
00:01:31.959 --> 00:01:34.519
<v Speaker 1>one morning and realizing the steering wheel has been relocated

35
00:01:34.560 --> 00:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to the passenger side. Sure, the car still drives, nothing

36
00:01:37.000 --> 00:01:39.239
<v Speaker 1>fundamental has been stolen, but you can't help but feel

37
00:01:39.239 --> 00:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>off balance. It's not just inconvenient. It challenges your sense

38
00:01:42.319 --> 00:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of control over a tool that was supposed to fit

39
00:01:44.640 --> 00:01:48.239
<v Speaker 1>seamlessly into your hands. Microsoft's official line around this change

40
00:01:48.280 --> 00:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is that the update was designed to simplify and streamline navigation.

41
00:01:52.200 --> 00:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Their intent was clarity. In reality, Day one didn't deliver clarity.

42
00:01:55.599 --> 00:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>It delivered a scramble. By shuffling core functionality. They traded

43
00:01:59.560 --> 00:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>one kind of problem and occasionally cluttered sidebar for a

44
00:02:03.079 --> 00:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>new one. Collective confusion. The irony is not lost on

45
00:02:05.680 --> 00:02:07.799
<v Speaker 1>most of us. It's like being promised a clean, open

46
00:02:07.840 --> 00:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>office layout, but arriving Monday morning to find your desk

47
00:02:10.919 --> 00:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>has been carried two floors away from the rest of

48
00:02:12.960 --> 00:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>your team. The long term goal may be efficiency, but

49
00:02:15.479 --> 00:02:19.039
<v Speaker 1>the immediate experience feels disjointed. We've all had that same

50
00:02:19.080 --> 00:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>habit driven hiccup where the hand floats to the left,

51
00:02:21.240 --> 00:02:23.039
<v Speaker 1>the cursor moves toward the bottom, and you click on

52
00:02:23.080 --> 00:02:26.759
<v Speaker 1>dead space, sometimes multiple times. You pause, glance again, and

53
00:02:26.800 --> 00:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>then go hunting through the interface while muttering under your breath.

54
00:02:29.680 --> 00:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the heart of the disconnect between what we expect

55
00:02:32.039 --> 00:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and what we've been handed. Software evolves, but our brains

56
00:02:35.120 --> 00:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>are wired to resist sudden change, especially when something as

57
00:02:37.919 --> 00:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>central as navigation shifts overnight. It's worth pausing to notice

58
00:02:41.439 --> 00:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the design tension here. On one side, Microsoft wants the

59
00:02:44.439 --> 00:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>bulk of collaboration to happen inside a unified interface that

60
00:02:47.960 --> 00:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't split your attention between chats, teams, and apps. They

61
00:02:50.840 --> 00:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>see this as future proving the client for integrations that

62
00:02:53.280 --> 00:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>go beyond the traditional team and channel model. On the

63
00:02:55.560 --> 00:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>other side, longtime users still define the product by those

64
00:02:58.080 --> 00:03:00.759
<v Speaker 1>very structures. Teams and channels are its DNA. The result

65
00:03:00.800 --> 00:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is a mismatch where the intended clarity ends up feeling

66
00:03:03.840 --> 00:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>like hidden doors in a house you've lived in for years.

67
00:03:06.520 --> 00:03:10.039
<v Speaker 1>But here's the crucial point. Nothing actually disappeared. Your teams

68
00:03:10.039 --> 00:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>weren't deleted, your channels weren't archived, and none of the

69
00:03:13.280 --> 00:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>shared files vanished. They've simply been reorganized under a new framework.

70
00:03:17.520 --> 00:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Once you know where the entry point sits, the pieces

71
00:03:19.680 --> 00:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>fall into place again. The difficulty lies in bridging that

72
00:03:22.560 --> 00:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>gap between old habits and new logic. Right now, most

73
00:03:25.400 --> 00:03:28.719
<v Speaker 1>people are still standing in that gap, wondering if Microsoft

74
00:03:28.719 --> 00:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>broke what wasn't broken, And that leads us to the

75
00:03:31.000 --> 00:03:33.759
<v Speaker 1>real question, what does this new system actually look like?

76
00:03:34.039 --> 00:03:36.199
<v Speaker 1>And why did Microsoft choose to take such a bold

77
00:03:36.199 --> 00:03:38.639
<v Speaker 1>step with something so fundamental. To answer that, we'll need

78
00:03:38.639 --> 00:03:41.599
<v Speaker 1>to examine the reasoning behind the redesign and uncover the

79
00:03:41.599 --> 00:03:46.199
<v Speaker 1>logic hidden beneath the surface changes. Why Microsoft changed the system.

80
00:03:46.439 --> 00:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>If nothing was broken, why did Microsoft decide to fix it?

81
00:03:48.879 --> 00:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the question almost every IT admin and regular user

82
00:03:52.159 --> 00:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>asked when the new Teams interface first rolled out. On

83
00:03:54.719 --> 00:03:57.319
<v Speaker 1>the surface, the old navigation seemed to work fine. You

84
00:03:57.360 --> 00:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>had a clear team's tab, lists of groups, expandable channels.

85
00:04:01.560 --> 00:04:04.599
<v Speaker 1>It was simple, predictable, and everyone knew where to click.

86
00:04:04.919 --> 00:04:07.879
<v Speaker 1>But Microsoft wasn't aiming to solve an obvious bug. Their

87
00:04:07.879 --> 00:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>focus was scalability and making sure that as more features

88
00:04:11.039 --> 00:04:13.319
<v Speaker 1>keep being packed into the app, the navigation doesn't turn

89
00:04:13.319 --> 00:04:16.519
<v Speaker 1>into a cluttered mess. To them, moving where Teams lives

90
00:04:16.560 --> 00:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in the client is just a step toward a broader vision,

91
00:04:19.079 --> 00:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>integrating chat channels and third party apps more tightly in

92
00:04:22.519 --> 00:04:24.959
<v Speaker 1>a way that a sidebar full of tabs wasn't designed

93
00:04:24.959 --> 00:04:28.079
<v Speaker 1>to handle. The problem is that user expectations almost always

94
00:04:28.199 --> 00:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>lean towards stability. For people relying on Teams daily, major

95
00:04:32.120 --> 00:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>visual changes to navigation feel unnecessary at best and disruptive

96
00:04:35.399 --> 00:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>at worst. You log in, you expect certain anchors to

97
00:04:37.720 --> 00:04:40.759
<v Speaker 1>stay in place. When those anchors shift without warning, the

98
00:04:40.800 --> 00:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>psychological impact is larger than the actual technical change. Microsoft

99
00:04:44.560 --> 00:04:47.519
<v Speaker 1>may have been trying to pre empt future issues in scalability,

100
00:04:47.879 --> 00:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>but for the day to day user, the adjustment felt

101
00:04:49.839 --> 00:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>like a self inflicted obstacle. That's where the gap lies.

102
00:04:52.480 --> 00:04:55.079
<v Speaker 1>The company thinks long term, but users think in day

103
00:04:55.120 --> 00:04:57.199
<v Speaker 1>to day workflows. If you put the old and new

104
00:04:57.279 --> 00:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>navigation side by side, the difference doesn't look dramatic on paper.

105
00:05:00.560 --> 00:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>The old version gave you a left hand bar with

106
00:05:02.879 --> 00:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly labeled icons in a static order, and the team's

107
00:05:05.959 --> 00:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>tab sat there waiting for whenever you needed it. The

108
00:05:09.000 --> 00:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>new version consolidates that flow. Instead of a dedicated destination,

109
00:05:12.600 --> 00:05:15.439
<v Speaker 1>team's activity now lives closer to the chat view, essentially

110
00:05:15.480 --> 00:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>grouping all collaborative activity under fewer navigation layers. It streamlines

111
00:05:20.040 --> 00:05:22.199
<v Speaker 1>the app from a design perspective, but it breaks years

112
00:05:22.199 --> 00:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of habit. Part of the reasoning comes down to data

113
00:05:24.800 --> 00:05:28.439
<v Speaker 1>about how people actually use the platform. Across organizations, chat

114
00:05:28.480 --> 00:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>has become the most frequent activity. Many employees spend more

115
00:05:31.879 --> 00:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>than half their time in direct conversations and only dip

116
00:05:34.319 --> 00:05:38.199
<v Speaker 1>into teams and channels intermittently. Microsoft is adapting to that reality.

117
00:05:38.480 --> 00:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>They want to prioritize the areas with the heaviest daily use,

118
00:05:41.560 --> 00:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>while making sure that project based channels still exist. But

119
00:05:44.160 --> 00:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>feel better integrated rather than separated. Think of it as

120
00:05:46.800 --> 00:05:50.079
<v Speaker 1>the platform trying to align its emphasis with what most

121
00:05:50.079 --> 00:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>people are already doing. It's a bit like rearranging your

122
00:05:52.600 --> 00:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>office desk while you're still working at it. Suddenly the

123
00:05:55.079 --> 00:05:57.439
<v Speaker 1>stapler and pens are tucked into a drawer to give

124
00:05:57.519 --> 00:05:59.879
<v Speaker 1>more space on the surface for your laptop. The desk

125
00:06:00.160 --> 00:06:02.439
<v Speaker 1>is technically neater, but the first time you need a pen,

126
00:06:02.519 --> 00:06:04.879
<v Speaker 1>you end up opening three drawers before you remember where

127
00:06:04.879 --> 00:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it went. It's efficient if you adjust, but infuriating if

128
00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you expect everything to stay where it's always been. That's

129
00:06:10.480 --> 00:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the trade off Microsoft has taken on behalf of millions

130
00:06:12.920 --> 00:06:15.879
<v Speaker 1>of users. That said, there are real advantages hidden beneath

131
00:06:15.879 --> 00:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the confusion. With teams now folded more closely into Chat,

132
00:06:18.680 --> 00:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you can move between one to one conversations, group chats,

133
00:06:21.600 --> 00:06:25.959
<v Speaker 1>and channels without constant context switching. It reduces those overlapping clicks,

134
00:06:25.959 --> 00:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>like bouncing back and forth across tabs just to check

135
00:06:28.600 --> 00:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a document link while keeping a chat thread open. It

136
00:06:30.800 --> 00:06:33.639
<v Speaker 1>also lays the groundwork for tighter integration with apps and

137
00:06:33.720 --> 00:06:37.399
<v Speaker 1>workflows across the suite. This consistency is especially important in

138
00:06:37.480 --> 00:06:41.959
<v Speaker 1>larger organizations. Where teams sits next to Outlook, OneDrive and Planner.

139
00:06:42.319 --> 00:06:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft is trying to unify that sprawl. Of course, the

140
00:06:45.000 --> 00:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>catch is that this new structure will demand usage changes

141
00:06:48.160 --> 00:06:51.639
<v Speaker 1>over time. Users who treat teams as rigid silos will

142
00:06:51.680 --> 00:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>need to adapt to a more fluid chat first approach.

143
00:06:54.199 --> 00:06:57.319
<v Speaker 1>That means pinning the projects or departments most relevant to you,

144
00:06:57.560 --> 00:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>managing notifications more proactively, and developing habits that reduce the

145
00:07:02.160 --> 00:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>noise of constant chat activity. The potential efficiency is there,

146
00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't come automatically. You'll need to retrain yourself

147
00:07:08.600 --> 00:07:10.839
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of it. So while it initially feels

148
00:07:10.879 --> 00:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>like Microsoft took something away, the reality is different. They

149
00:07:14.040 --> 00:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't strip out functionality. They reorganized it to mirror where

150
00:07:17.040 --> 00:07:20.519
<v Speaker 1>collaboration is actually happening. At the intersection of chat channels

151
00:07:20.560 --> 00:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and apps. You still have your same groups and files,

152
00:07:22.560 --> 00:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>They're just accessed through a slightly different door. Now that

153
00:07:25.639 --> 00:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we know this shift was less about removal and more

154
00:07:27.600 --> 00:07:30.839
<v Speaker 1>about restructuring, the next step is practical. Where exactly can

155
00:07:30.879 --> 00:07:32.879
<v Speaker 1>you find your teams and channels in the new layout,

156
00:07:33.160 --> 00:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and how do you navigate them without wasting time hunting

157
00:07:35.600 --> 00:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>around finding your teams in the new layout. The number

158
00:07:39.800 --> 00:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>one question everyone has been asking is where did my

159
00:07:42.199 --> 00:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>teams go? That single missing tab sparked confusion across companies,

160
00:07:46.879 --> 00:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>with users assuming whole structures just vanished into thin air.

161
00:07:50.439 --> 00:07:52.879
<v Speaker 1>The good news is that your teams and channels never left.

162
00:07:53.000 --> 00:07:55.759
<v Speaker 1>They're still right there in the client, just hidden behind

163
00:07:55.759 --> 00:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a new doorway you weren't told about. The First time

164
00:07:58.120 --> 00:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you open the updated interface, it feels like someone remove

165
00:08:00.759 --> 00:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the labels from the map. You know the territory is

166
00:08:02.800 --> 00:08:04.759
<v Speaker 1>still there, but you don't see the sign posts you've

167
00:08:04.800 --> 00:08:08.279
<v Speaker 1>always relied on. That moment of uncertainty has led plenty

168
00:08:08.279 --> 00:08:11.959
<v Speaker 1>of people to think entire groups, projects, and conversations were deleted,

169
00:08:12.040 --> 00:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>when in fact nothing of the sort happened. To think

170
00:08:14.279 --> 00:08:16.319
<v Speaker 1>of it as a treasure hunt where the treasure hasn't moved,

171
00:08:16.319 --> 00:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>only the entrance has. Instead of pressing one obvious tab,

172
00:08:19.439 --> 00:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you now have to understand how Microsoft wants you to

173
00:08:21.639 --> 00:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>navigate through layers. What's changed is not the data itself,

174
00:08:24.639 --> 00:08:27.879
<v Speaker 1>but the entry point. The redesign collapses teams and channels

175
00:08:27.920 --> 00:08:30.639
<v Speaker 1>more tightly into the same visual space as chats, which

176
00:08:30.680 --> 00:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is a major shift in how the sidebar functions, so

177
00:08:33.559 --> 00:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>instead of a static teams marker positioned in its own lane,

178
00:08:37.919 --> 00:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you start by clicking on the chat or teams icons,

179
00:08:40.480 --> 00:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and the sidebar adjusts its view to show you the

180
00:08:42.759 --> 00:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>relevant context. Teams and channels are present, You just have

181
00:08:46.559 --> 00:08:50.039
<v Speaker 1>to arrive there by walking through a slightly new route.

182
00:08:50.080 --> 00:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's the exact path on the left hand menu. You'll

183
00:08:52.440 --> 00:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>still see the familiar list of icons, chat, calendar calls, files,

184
00:08:56.120 --> 00:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and so on. In the new version, Teams doesn't scream

185
00:08:58.480 --> 00:09:00.919
<v Speaker 1>for attention the way it used to. Instead, you select

186
00:09:00.960 --> 00:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the teams icon further down, and the entire sidebar switches

187
00:09:04.320 --> 00:09:09.039
<v Speaker 1>context surfacing sections like your team's expandable channels, pinned conversations,

188
00:09:09.320 --> 00:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and hidden groups you haven't expanded in a while. At

189
00:09:12.440 --> 00:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>first glance, it feels like that team's only space disappeared,

190
00:09:15.759 --> 00:09:18.159
<v Speaker 1>but all it did was relocate into a full pain view.

191
00:09:18.200 --> 00:09:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Once you click into it, everything you remember, general channels, subtopics,

192
00:09:21.320 --> 00:09:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and custom areas comes back into site. Microsoft essentially merged

193
00:09:24.960 --> 00:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>the look and feel of chats and teams, so interactions

194
00:09:27.600 --> 00:09:30.639
<v Speaker 1>feel closer together. The sidebar tries to act more like

195
00:09:30.639 --> 00:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a flexible workspace. When you're in chat, it shows one

196
00:09:33.279 --> 00:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to one and group messages. Tap the team's icon and

197
00:09:36.399 --> 00:09:39.759
<v Speaker 1>it redraws, showing channel structures. It's not unfamiliar information, but

198
00:09:39.799 --> 00:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the shift means you need to re anchor where your

199
00:09:41.960 --> 00:09:44.879
<v Speaker 1>main workspace begins. The hope is that over time this

200
00:09:44.960 --> 00:09:47.879
<v Speaker 1>becomes second nature, but until then, expect a short period

201
00:09:47.879 --> 00:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of clunky navigation where you feel two steps behind. The

202
00:09:51.279 --> 00:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>best way to picture it is with a desk analogy.

203
00:09:53.519 --> 00:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Before every document for every project set in piles directly

204
00:09:56.360 --> 00:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>on your desk, easy to see but often messy. The

205
00:09:58.679 --> 00:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>new layout move those papers into labeled draws. Now the

206
00:10:01.519 --> 00:10:03.879
<v Speaker 1>papers are sorted by project. You can still reach them

207
00:10:03.879 --> 00:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in seconds, but it requires opening the draw first. Suddenly,

208
00:10:06.519 --> 00:10:08.919
<v Speaker 1>what looks like hiding is actually a form of organization.

209
00:10:09.279 --> 00:10:11.759
<v Speaker 1>You give up the immediate visual cueue of seeing everything

210
00:10:11.799 --> 00:10:14.879
<v Speaker 1>at once, but you gain structure in exchange. As you explore,

211
00:10:14.919 --> 00:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you'll also notice small but useful features that are easy

212
00:10:18.120 --> 00:10:20.799
<v Speaker 1>to miss at first. Pinning channels keeps them at the top,

213
00:10:20.840 --> 00:10:22.879
<v Speaker 1>so you don't have to scroll through a long hierarchy

214
00:10:22.879 --> 00:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>every time. Pinned items can include active projects, frequently used groups,

215
00:10:26.720 --> 00:10:29.639
<v Speaker 1>or anything that regularly needs your attention. There's also the

216
00:10:29.679 --> 00:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>ability to reveal hidden teams. Many organizations accumulate dozens of

217
00:10:33.559 --> 00:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>inactive channels over time, and in the new layout they

218
00:10:36.440 --> 00:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>are collapsed by default to reduce visual clutter. That doesn't

219
00:10:39.480 --> 00:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>mean they've vanished, It just means you choose when to

220
00:10:41.480 --> 00:10:45.159
<v Speaker 1>surface them again. And here's an important reassurance. Microsoft confirmed

221
00:10:45.159 --> 00:10:47.399
<v Speaker 1>that no data or channels are lost during this transition.

222
00:10:47.720 --> 00:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Nothing has been deleted or archived automatically. Every message file

223
00:10:51.399 --> 00:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and subchannel is still in the tenant. The adjustment is

224
00:10:54.240 --> 00:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>purely interface based. The panic that spreads when someone thinks

225
00:10:57.519 --> 00:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>months of collaboration disappeared is understandable but unnecessary. Any missing

226
00:11:02.279 --> 00:11:04.879
<v Speaker 1>piece you're looking for can be surfaced again by exploring

227
00:11:04.879 --> 00:11:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the layout and tweaking a few visibility settings. In practice,

228
00:11:07.840 --> 00:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it now only takes two or three clicks to reach

229
00:11:09.879 --> 00:11:12.919
<v Speaker 1>the same destination you used to access with one. Once

230
00:11:12.960 --> 00:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you've pinned your high priority channels and become comfortable with

231
00:11:15.519 --> 00:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the new entry point, navigation smooths out again. The team's

232
00:11:18.720 --> 00:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>tab as you once knew it is gone, but what

233
00:11:20.799 --> 00:11:24.159
<v Speaker 1>it represented hasn't actually changed. Your old structures are intact.

234
00:11:24.240 --> 00:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>You just need to adapt to the reshuffled map. Now

235
00:11:26.240 --> 00:11:28.799
<v Speaker 1>that we've located where everything lives. The next challenge is

236
00:11:28.879 --> 00:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>clear rebuilding workflows so you're not stuck repeating old habits,

237
00:11:32.799 --> 00:11:34.879
<v Speaker 1>because if you keep clicking where the button used to be,

238
00:11:35.120 --> 00:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>this redesign will continue to slow you down instead of

239
00:11:37.399 --> 00:11:40.519
<v Speaker 1>helping you adapting workflows to the new system. If you

240
00:11:40.600 --> 00:11:42.639
<v Speaker 1>keep approaching the new teams with old habits, you will

241
00:11:42.720 --> 00:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>end up fighting the interface instead of working with it.

242
00:11:45.360 --> 00:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the first reality users need to accept. The redesigned

243
00:11:48.360 --> 00:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>layout isn't going anywhere, so clicking on the same empty

244
00:11:51.120 --> 00:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>space where the old teams tab used to be day

245
00:11:53.480 --> 00:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>after day will only slow you down. Every misclick is

246
00:11:56.000 --> 00:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a tiny interruption, and while it seems harmless in isolation,

247
00:11:59.360 --> 00:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>multiplied a cross dozens of moments each day, you start

248
00:12:02.240 --> 00:12:04.799
<v Speaker 1>to see the cost. A small stall becomes a broken

249
00:12:04.840 --> 00:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>rhythm that affects focus. It's not the kind of problem

250
00:12:07.279 --> 00:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that feels major at the time, but by the end

251
00:12:09.600 --> 00:12:12.399
<v Speaker 1>of the week, it's minutes of wasted productivity that add

252
00:12:12.519 --> 00:12:16.159
<v Speaker 1>up simply because navigation didn't align with muscle memory anymore.

253
00:12:16.360 --> 00:12:19.799
<v Speaker 1>The hard part is retraining years worth of instinct. Most

254
00:12:19.840 --> 00:12:22.159
<v Speaker 1>of us never thought about how often we clicked teams

255
00:12:22.159 --> 00:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>before we just did it. Now the action is different.

256
00:12:25.320 --> 00:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>That raises the larger question, how do you stay efficient

257
00:12:28.399 --> 00:12:30.759
<v Speaker 1>while teaching your brain a new set of steps. You

258
00:12:30.759 --> 00:12:32.759
<v Speaker 1>can't simply wait for time to fix it. You need

259
00:12:32.799 --> 00:12:36.039
<v Speaker 1>small tactical adjustments that reshape workflows around the new system.

260
00:12:36.159 --> 00:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>The easiest way to think about this is not to

261
00:12:37.919 --> 00:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>chase the old structure, but to set up shortcuts inside

262
00:12:41.000 --> 00:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the new one so that your go to actions feel

263
00:12:42.960 --> 00:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>as quick as they used to. Pinning teams is the

264
00:12:45.480 --> 00:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>most straightforward habit shift. With groups pinned, you turn what

265
00:12:48.799 --> 00:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>might have been three clicks into one. Managers, for example,

266
00:12:51.879 --> 00:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>who used to tap on teams and scroll to find

267
00:12:53.960 --> 00:12:56.279
<v Speaker 1>their department now need to make sure they pin that

268
00:12:56.360 --> 00:12:59.279
<v Speaker 1>group at the top. Once pinned, every check in with

269
00:12:59.320 --> 00:13:02.879
<v Speaker 1>their projects is immediate again. It no longer requires extra

270
00:13:02.919 --> 00:13:05.759
<v Speaker 1>scanning or hunting. It's not glamorous, but it makes the

271
00:13:05.799 --> 00:13:08.639
<v Speaker 1>new design function like the old workflow you were comfortable

272
00:13:08.639 --> 00:13:11.919
<v Speaker 1>with without actually rolling back the update. The same goes

273
00:13:11.960 --> 00:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>for customizing tabs. If your group uses a plannerboard or

274
00:13:14.960 --> 00:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a one note file daily, there's no need to go digging.

275
00:13:18.559 --> 00:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Leave it pinned in the channel view so it's permanently

276
00:13:21.120 --> 00:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>one click away. Notification settings are another lever not everyone

277
00:13:24.639 --> 00:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>bothers to adjust, but they matter more now because the

278
00:13:27.279 --> 00:13:31.279
<v Speaker 1>redesign leans toward chat first. When Chat opens by default,

279
00:13:31.519 --> 00:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>notifications can start to feel louder and more chaotic. Without filters,

280
00:13:35.440 --> 00:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you're pulled into every small ping the second you open

281
00:13:37.879 --> 00:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the app, and the real risk is that important channel

282
00:13:40.159 --> 00:13:44.399
<v Speaker 1>updates get buried. By tuning notification preferences. Deciding which teams

283
00:13:44.399 --> 00:13:47.519
<v Speaker 1>need banner alerts versus which ones only need activity feed markers,

284
00:13:47.519 --> 00:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you quiet down the noise and restore balance. It's the

285
00:13:49.840 --> 00:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>difference between drowning in constant chatter and staying aware without

286
00:13:53.360 --> 00:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>constant interruptions. But of course Microsoft did add some features

287
00:13:56.159 --> 00:13:58.039
<v Speaker 1>in the new built worth using to bridge the gap.

288
00:13:58.559 --> 00:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>The Compact Chatview, while not revolutionary, makes it easier to

289
00:14:01.720 --> 00:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>scroll through conversations when Chad takes center stage, and keyboard shortcuts,

290
00:14:05.759 --> 00:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>something most of us overlook, can drastically cut down navigation steps.

291
00:14:09.879 --> 00:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Learning Even a handful of key commands like control plus

292
00:14:12.320 --> 00:14:14.399
<v Speaker 1>two to jump into teams or control plus three for

293
00:14:14.480 --> 00:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>calendar removes a lot of mouse driven searching in a

294
00:14:17.559 --> 00:14:21.559
<v Speaker 1>layout that has reoriented navigation. These shortcuts act as anchors

295
00:14:21.600 --> 00:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>back to crucial areas. One team I worked with went

296
00:14:24.519 --> 00:14:27.279
<v Speaker 1>through the same frustration everyone else did. Their sales lead

297
00:14:27.399 --> 00:14:29.879
<v Speaker 1>kept wasting time trying to find the right pipeline channel

298
00:14:29.919 --> 00:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>because she'd click on chat first, then get lost scanning

299
00:14:32.240 --> 00:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>messages before eventually navigating back into teams. After two weeks

300
00:14:36.360 --> 00:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of struggle, the group made small adjustments. They pinned their

301
00:14:39.080 --> 00:14:42.639
<v Speaker 1>main pipeline channel, agreed on consistent naming for side projects,

302
00:14:42.879 --> 00:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and shortened notification preferences to stop constant pinging. Within a month,

303
00:14:47.519 --> 00:14:49.919
<v Speaker 1>they measured an average of four to five minutes saved

304
00:14:49.960 --> 00:14:52.799
<v Speaker 1>per person each day. It didn't sound like much until

305
00:14:52.840 --> 00:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they realized that across a ten person team that was

306
00:14:55.480 --> 00:14:58.399
<v Speaker 1>almost an hour a day regained simply by building new

307
00:14:58.440 --> 00:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>habits within the interface micro Soft handed them, so the

308
00:15:01.480 --> 00:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>mini payoff is straightforward. Once you embrace these adaptations, the

309
00:15:05.200 --> 00:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>layout stops feeling like a fight and starts running smoother

310
00:15:08.000 --> 00:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>than before. Chats and channels stop blending into chaos, key

311
00:15:11.279 --> 00:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>spaces become one click accessible, and the flood of notifications

312
00:15:15.000 --> 00:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>comes under control. The rhythm of work feels calmer again,

313
00:15:18.200 --> 00:15:20.919
<v Speaker 1>with less wasted searching and less noise pulling you off track.

314
00:15:21.159 --> 00:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not about resisting change. It's about shaping your environment

315
00:15:24.159 --> 00:15:27.039
<v Speaker 1>so the tool finally supports rather than interrupts you. That

316
00:15:27.080 --> 00:15:29.279
<v Speaker 1>brings us up to the bigger principle behind all of this.

317
00:15:29.840 --> 00:15:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Adjusting to today's update is important, but it's not enough.

318
00:15:32.720 --> 00:15:35.799
<v Speaker 1>If teams keeps evolving, and evidence suggests it will, the

319
00:15:35.840 --> 00:15:38.559
<v Speaker 1>real goal should be creating structures that survive redesigns. The

320
00:15:38.600 --> 00:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>next phase is about future proofing how you organize your

321
00:15:40.960 --> 00:15:43.919
<v Speaker 1>teams so that the next time Microsoft shifts the furniture,

322
00:15:44.159 --> 00:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't waste more hours relearning the basics all over again.

323
00:15:48.480 --> 00:15:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Building a resilient structure for the future. Change isn't stopping here.

324
00:15:51.879 --> 00:15:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft has been clear that Teams is going to keep evolving,

325
00:15:55.279 --> 00:15:57.559
<v Speaker 1>and what we just went through with the navigation is

326
00:15:57.600 --> 00:16:00.279
<v Speaker 1>only an early stage in a much longer journey. The

327
00:16:00.320 --> 00:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>redesign was not a one off experiment. It's part of

328
00:16:02.759 --> 00:16:05.399
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing plan to tie teams more directly into the

329
00:16:05.440 --> 00:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>rest of Microsoft three sixty five and the newer wave

330
00:16:08.399 --> 00:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of AI driven features they want to normalize across the suite.

331
00:16:11.279 --> 00:16:13.279
<v Speaker 1>That means the interface we're looking at now won't be

332
00:16:13.320 --> 00:16:16.279
<v Speaker 1>the last overhaul. Users who cling to static habits will

333
00:16:16.279 --> 00:16:18.879
<v Speaker 1>find themselves struggling again with the next shift. The question

334
00:16:19.000 --> 00:16:21.519
<v Speaker 1>is not whether teams will change, but how we can

335
00:16:21.559 --> 00:16:24.679
<v Speaker 1>position ourselves to make those changes far less disruptive when

336
00:16:24.679 --> 00:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>they arrive. The current update makes sense once you put

337
00:16:27.600 --> 00:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it in context. The Microsoft is building toward a system

338
00:16:30.200 --> 00:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>where chat channels, tasks, and external integrations move together instead

339
00:16:34.320 --> 00:16:37.519
<v Speaker 1>of acting as separate spaces. Think of copilot features that

340
00:16:37.559 --> 00:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>pull in data from outlook, or loop components that flow

341
00:16:40.879 --> 00:16:43.519
<v Speaker 1>between teams, meetings, and one note pages. None of these

342
00:16:43.519 --> 00:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>tools can thrive if teams remains rigid in structure. The

343
00:16:46.679 --> 00:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>navigation reshuffle is one symptom of this bigger integration push.

344
00:16:50.159 --> 00:16:52.759
<v Speaker 1>And if you respond to every version change by restructuring

345
00:16:52.759 --> 00:16:55.559
<v Speaker 1>your environment from scratch, you bleed both time and energy.

346
00:16:55.919 --> 00:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>That cycle is exhausting, and it's preventable. So what's the alternative?

347
00:16:59.240 --> 00:17:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Instead of chasing interface changes, shift to what you might

348
00:17:01.919 --> 00:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>call a system's thinking mindset. The aim is to design

349
00:17:04.640 --> 00:17:08.799
<v Speaker 1>your team's environment around principles resilient enough to outlast cosmetic updates.

350
00:17:09.079 --> 00:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>At the user level, that means focusing less on where

351
00:17:11.599 --> 00:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>icons happen to sit today and more on how your

352
00:17:13.799 --> 00:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>team's channels and content are structured internally. If the navigation

353
00:17:17.519 --> 00:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>pain changes against six months down the road, you shouldn't

354
00:17:20.200 --> 00:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>need to rebuild the way you communicate. Your setup should

355
00:17:22.480 --> 00:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>survive intact. There are some concrete steps to get there.

356
00:17:25.079 --> 00:17:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Naming conventions are one of the most boring topics in IT,

357
00:17:28.119 --> 00:17:30.799
<v Speaker 1>but they save more time than almost any other practice.

358
00:17:30.920 --> 00:17:33.599
<v Speaker 1>A simple standard like prefixing every project with a department

359
00:17:33.640 --> 00:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>code or using consistent year markers makes navigation predictable even

360
00:17:37.720 --> 00:17:41.519
<v Speaker 1>if Microsoft rearranges the interface again. Alongside naming, you want

361
00:17:41.559 --> 00:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>standardized channel use. For example, decide as a team that

362
00:17:44.480 --> 00:17:47.519
<v Speaker 1>general is strictly for announcements while project work sits in

363
00:17:47.559 --> 00:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly labeled channels. That removes ambiguity, and once you bake

364
00:17:51.000 --> 00:17:54.039
<v Speaker 1>that discipline into your environment, the UI around it can

365
00:17:54.039 --> 00:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>shift without throwing off workflows. Archiving inactive groups is another

366
00:17:57.440 --> 00:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>underrated habit. Many tenants carry a graveyard of unused teams

367
00:18:01.000 --> 00:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that distract from current work. By archiving or deleting what

368
00:18:04.519 --> 00:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>no longer needs to be active, you shrink the environment

369
00:18:06.920 --> 00:18:09.759
<v Speaker 1>into something easier to maintain. It also means that when

370
00:18:09.759 --> 00:18:12.559
<v Speaker 1>new navigation drops, you're not digging through dozens of forgotten

371
00:18:12.559 --> 00:18:15.079
<v Speaker 1>groups just to find the handful you actually need and

372
00:18:15.119 --> 00:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>don't forget pinning. Critical teams or channels should be pinned

373
00:18:18.480 --> 00:18:20.559
<v Speaker 1>so they remain top of mind no matter how the

374
00:18:20.599 --> 00:18:23.599
<v Speaker 1>sidebar gets redesigned. Those pins travel with the user, so

375
00:18:23.640 --> 00:18:25.759
<v Speaker 1>the familiar shortcuts will still be there even if the

376
00:18:25.759 --> 00:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>broader interface morphs around them. Looking at the roadmap, it's

377
00:18:29.160 --> 00:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>also obvious that Microsoft is steering teams into tighter integration

378
00:18:32.519 --> 00:18:36.839
<v Speaker 1>with loop components, AI through Copilot, and higher governance capabilities

379
00:18:36.880 --> 00:18:40.759
<v Speaker 1>for large organizations. All of those depend on structured environments

380
00:18:40.759 --> 00:18:43.519
<v Speaker 1>where content can be tracked and surfaced intelligently. If your

381
00:18:43.519 --> 00:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>workspace is a chaotic pile of misnamed teams, random channels,

382
00:18:46.400 --> 00:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and left over projects no one archived, those advanced features

383
00:18:49.000 --> 00:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>won't deliver value. The AI can't pull insights from sloppy data,

384
00:18:52.200 --> 00:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>but an intentional structure, consistent naming, clear usage policies, archives,

385
00:18:55.920 --> 00:18:58.279
<v Speaker 1>kept tidy sets you up to take advantage of whatever

386
00:18:58.319 --> 00:19:01.599
<v Speaker 1>intelligent layer Microsoft adds on top next year. There's a

387
00:19:01.680 --> 00:19:04.839
<v Speaker 1>key difference in how people respond to these changes. Reactive

388
00:19:04.920 --> 00:19:08.559
<v Speaker 1>users chase every visual tweak, spending hours trying to replicate

389
00:19:08.559 --> 00:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the old interface, or complaining that nothing makes sense anymore.

390
00:19:11.920 --> 00:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Productive users accept that redesigns will keep coming, and instead

391
00:19:15.000 --> 00:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>invest in architecture that makes those shifts a minor annoyance

392
00:19:18.640 --> 00:19:20.799
<v Speaker 1>at most. It's the same problem we've seen in other

393
00:19:20.880 --> 00:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>tools over the years. Those who organize their systems well

394
00:19:23.759 --> 00:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>barely flinch when updates happen. The ones who build everything

395
00:19:26.720 --> 00:19:29.279
<v Speaker 1>on short term habits are forced into a cycle of relearning.

396
00:19:29.400 --> 00:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Think about it like city planning. If you lay roads

397
00:19:31.480 --> 00:19:33.799
<v Speaker 1>in a predictable grid, it doesn't matter if buildings get

398
00:19:33.880 --> 00:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>replaced over time. The infrastructure still supports the flow of traffic.

399
00:19:37.319 --> 00:19:39.599
<v Speaker 1>Teams should be treated the same way. A strong internal

400
00:19:39.599 --> 00:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>framework makes individual UI adjustments matter far less. When Microsoft

401
00:19:43.519 --> 00:19:45.880
<v Speaker 1>drops the next change, you'll still know exactly where your

402
00:19:45.880 --> 00:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>critical conversations and files live, even if the window dressing shifts.

403
00:19:49.759 --> 00:19:52.559
<v Speaker 1>The real payoff here is peace of mind. By designing

404
00:19:52.599 --> 00:19:55.640
<v Speaker 1>resilient structures today, you remove the panic that comes with

405
00:19:55.720 --> 00:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>each new release. Productivity doesn't collapse every time a button

406
00:19:58.680 --> 00:20:01.079
<v Speaker 1>moves because your environment has organized in a way that

407
00:20:01.119 --> 00:20:04.319
<v Speaker 1>survives the surface changes. That's the mindset needed to make

408
00:20:04.359 --> 00:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>teams sustainable long term, and it leads naturally to a

409
00:20:07.480 --> 00:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>larger idea, adapting to technological change is less about chasing

410
00:20:11.319 --> 00:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>updates and more about shaping habits that keep you steady.

411
00:20:14.200 --> 00:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>No matter how the tools evolve. Your team's never actually disappeared.

412
00:20:18.319 --> 00:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>What disappeared was the shortcut you were used to. The

413
00:20:20.880 --> 00:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>workflow didn't vanish, it just got mapped differently, and that

414
00:20:23.720 --> 00:20:26.519
<v Speaker 1>shift forces us to think beyond single buttons or tabs.

415
00:20:26.640 --> 00:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Instead of chasing interface tweaks, the smarter approach is to

416
00:20:29.440 --> 00:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>design your environment so it can handle whatever Microsoft change

417
00:20:32.000 --> 00:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is next. Clear naming rules, pinned priorities, and tidy archives

418
00:20:35.200 --> 00:20:38.079
<v Speaker 1>survive redesigns far better than muscle memory does. If this

419
00:20:38.119 --> 00:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>breakdown helped, subscribe for more practical Microsoft three sixty five

420
00:20:41.519 --> 00:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>insights and let me know in the comments how you're

421
00:20:43.759 --> 00:20:45.759
<v Speaker 1>adapting to the new team's experience.
