Speaker 1: Twins protest. It's gonna be a damn good show.
Speaker 2: Man.
Speaker 1: I slimmed up. I'm getting skinny. You know that damn
soul food is what he doing making me?
Speaker 2: Man?
Speaker 1: I mean, last time you like.
Speaker 3: Y'all talk like.
Speaker 1: Everyone. We got Jake. Everyone got Jake Diward back in
the house. Yeah, lots going on since the last time
you were the world went to ship Jay.
Speaker 3: We we saw Jeff Stin mcgeffrey come to the scene.
He showed up and he said, I'm gonna basically run ship.
The PDFs are in charge. So I'm just I'm trusting
the plan. The PDFs are in charge, They're gonna take
care of everything. And then we had a ran right right, Hey, So.
Speaker 1: We got attacked online on Facebook when we say we're
at war. If I ran, they said, when it's not
a war, it's a military operation. I was. I was
just like, you know what this? Oh, But it's just
I mean, on the left, there's a lot of people
that there's no objectivity, you just regurgitating whatever your politicis
to tell you. I found over the past month the
right has that very same problem. They don't want to
criticize Trump one iota. They even believe that we're not
at war right.
Speaker 3: Now, it's it's almost like it's tumutic in a way.
It's not a war. It's a kinetic action.
Speaker 1: It's not a war.
Speaker 3: What are you talking about?
Speaker 4: Right right?
Speaker 1: I'm like, I wanted to tell these guys, said, so,
if Iran Texas bombs us, we're not at war. That's
pretty much you're saying. No, that's a that's attack. It's crazy.
Do you feel like you're surrounded by crazy people?
Speaker 3: Well, they actually studied you can just change the words
to sell things, right, So, like the Department of War
was changed the Department of Defense, and now it's back
to the Department of War. But they thought it sounded
better to say it's the Department of Defense war. So
just reign rename a special operation, right, instead of a war.
Speaker 1: You heard about that school we bombed one hundred and
seventy well the girls school. Yeah, it's one hundred seventy girls.
When we posted on Facebook, the Taxa said, no, that
was that ranings They shot it down for Tomahawk.
Speaker 3: But then they admitted that, they admitted that it was us.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, but what's his name? Kennedy? Senator Kennedy said
it was a huge mistake. It's it's horrible. I posted
that on Facebook. It's like, no, he has the wrong information.
Speaker 3: Everything is fake, right, yeah, I mean everything anything you
put up, like you get attacked for it no matter what,
Like bots just go crazy. He said, y'all got bought before.
Speaker 1: Like yeah. It's like, like I always want to be objective,
Like I'm a Republican, I support the Republican Party. I
voted for Trump three times. But it's like I'm not
allowed to critique him or criticize him at all, and
that makes me fake maga, I'm not magic. It's crazy
started leaving us as woke.
Speaker 3: Well, that's like a cult, right yeah. I mean in
a cult, you can't criticize the leader. So it's like
a religious affiliation, you can't. It's dogmatic, right, But I
mean I kind of I remember back in two thousand
and seven when they basically excommunicated Ron Paul from being
part of the political process. I was like, all right,
politics is ridiculous. Not that I don't support a lot
of the policies, like if Trump does something good, I'm
for it. But that's the problem is like people get
you know, cult of personality, and then they just want
to follow him no matter what.
Speaker 1: That's a very interesting point you just made, because he's
been attacking Rand Paul Less like ever since he got
vote Massy. He's calling Mardorie Green a trader.
Speaker 3: Anybody with principles?
Speaker 1: Yeah, right, right, right, right right? I mean, okay, I
feel like I'm not going crazy. I just feel like
people is pissing on my head and they telling me
it's rain. Yeah you know what I mean?
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, Well again, like I mean, we have to
do what Israel says or else, right.
Speaker 1: That's what I'm thinking. Well, it happened back in what
was that was that? That was in the eighties, right,
weapons of WMD's turns out there was none now here
in twenty twenty six. They say the same thing and
they fall for it. It would be great if they
would show us the evidence. Why don't they show us
like evidence that they have they're working towards having a
nuclear bomb, or.
Speaker 3: At least some fake evidence or something. I mean, at
least I remember Donald Rumsfell and what was his name,
Colin Powell, and he's tried to have like some little
highlights magazine infographics of like the fake you know, they've
got these you know, gas tanks and they're going to
gas everybody. But they don't even do that anymore. And
they don't even like do the false flag. They just
do it.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 3: We were talking about that before, like do we not even
get a false flag anymore? Just get a war?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 3: But it's not a war.
Speaker 1: It's crazy because we bombed him. What it was what
last January said, we destroyed the nuclear cap it was
so obliterated. Yeah, it was abliterate, that's what he said.
And they're two weeks away from it again.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 1: It's like, how many times do these people have to
say this and lie to you and to you, like,
wait a minute, maybe my politician, maybe Trump is probably
he's not telling us the whole truth.
Speaker 3: Yeah. I mean there's a great clip that everybody forgets
where it ties into that book and not in Yahoo
is two thousand and one or two where he's he's
the four Congress. You might get find it on Twitter.
But they're like asking him questions about Iraq war and
all that, and he's like, if you want to change
the country, if you want to change someone, be Melrose
Place and none or two and oh. So he's talking
about Hollywood is a better force for changing than war,
and now it's just straight up war, which that's the
old o dead you know, I'm playing the Greater Israel project.
That's also the clean break strategy of LECUD. It's all
of those countries and those memos, right, and we've done
them all now except for one more in the one left. Yeah,
so that Egypt, Egypt is Turkey. It's getting Turkey's last one.
Speaker 1: So that goal is regime change. It's never worked anywhere.
Do you think Trump's going to be successful in a
regime changed? What before? Before you answered that there hasn't
been really a regime change. His son took over. Yeah,
but it's regime change. You gotta give it the program,
you fake MAGA. But they keep saying we need a
regime saying but his son took over. Yeah, it's not
a regime. I don't think it's I don't think it's over.
I think they're going to kill him.
Speaker 3: Too, exactly. It's you were correct to point to Iraq
and that being a repeat, and it's also a repeat
of nineteen fifty three with the first CIA regime q
change in right, Yeah, Yeah, with Operation Ajax. Kermit Roosevelt
and they didn't. They started with the student riots and
all that, and they thought it wasn't going to be successful.
And then the CIA was like, let us keep trying,
let us keep trying. And then that regime change failed though,
because they had to bring in the Iatolic after the Shah,
because the Shaw was a huge failure. So it's like
in that vacuum, they immediately have to bring in the
next Muslim cleric. So in other words, people don't realize
the British intelligence and the CIA had already put Iatola's
in power. You wouldn't have Iatolas without them making those deals.
That's declassified too, by the way. Oh wow, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1: So what's the whole purpose of them bombing and killing
that supreme leader? The son took over? I mean, and
Trump said he wants to pick the next supreme leader
of Iran, But how can you do that? It sounds
like to me, Israel and United States of America and
Trump they want to put a zionis.
Speaker 3: They want the son of the Shaw, the guy that
the CIA already tried back in the fifties, So they
want his son or grandson whatever it is, Paulavi, and
he's like massive pro Zionists. So that's that's why they
want that.
Speaker 1: That's the only way it will work. I've been bringing
it up. It's got to be a Zionist or you
won't have a regime change there. But how successful is
that going to be?
Speaker 3: In That's the thing is it's hard to gauge like
whether these people actually are or are not popular, because
all the stats are going to get are going to
be fake government intelligence stats anyway, right, so they're just
going to say, oh, this new guy is he's widely popular,
but who knows.
Speaker 1: I don't know, right, Yeah, I'm just thinking if that's
the only way we'll work for israel Is, if there's
a Zionis there, but they laybor Iran is like this
terroristic country that's bringing all this terrorism in the region,
but you're going to install the Zionist How is that
going to work out when you're surrounded by terrorists? I
don't get it.
Speaker 3: But also, uh, there's been if you read Victor Strowski's book,
like the Messade has sold weapons to Iran before, and
even even some of the Epstein files talked about that.
So it's not there's a deeper game even beyond that,
where sometimes they want destabilizing forces there. This is why
they created Hamas, right, because that gives an excuse. So
it just depends. I do think they did eventually want
some kind of regime change, but like, uh, if you
look at what they did with the Jilani and Syria,
like they specifically wanted, you know, an al Qaeda type
thing in Syria because that's a destabilizing force for Syria
and it gets Israel the excuse to do whatever they
want to do because all we're all we're in the
threat run a threat.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's been saying, we would they trying to make
Iran great again. Yeah, we're doing this for the Iranian people.
And I heard that and I was like, come on, well.
Speaker 3: They said the same thing in nineteen fifty three when
they did when the CIA did the coup and they
did the propaganda to free the Iranians because they were
also saying, well, the Soviets are going to come in
and through the you know, their influence, they're going to
take over ran, so we have to do it right.
It's the same excuse. But all of that in nineteen
fifty three was because Iran had nationalized the oil, so
they were trying to take possession of their own oil.
They were saying, we're not getting a good cut from VP,
or would eventually be VP. It was an angler Iranian
oil company, and so ultimately you can go back to that,
like the war was at that time at the behest
of the oil companies. Okay, and so now it's pretty
much probably the same, but also Israel.
Speaker 1: It's just trying to figure out that it's not for
the people. What I'm saying, yeah, because I see some
comments We're doing it for the Iranians, right, and then
the next comments like yeah, turn that place in the glass.
Speaker 3: I'm like, but look, it wouldn't it be that as Christians. Look,
the Iranians would not be under a terrorist leader if
there was no Iran or Iranians, right, if you got
rid of all the Iranians, there wouldn't been a terrorists.
So yeah, there, that's that's vegan logic too, because vegans
are like, well, if we get rid of all creatures,
then creatures won't suffer him. They actually make that.
Speaker 1: Argument, right, right.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I was watching Fox News and they was showing all
the people, all the protesters with holding up Iranian flags
and they're so happy that we bombed their country. And
I was like, how disingenuous is that? Because look, there
was millions of people protesting Donald Trump when he because
you're supposedly a king, right, and there was I think
it was from my point, but it looked like propaganda.
It's like, not everybody is happy that we're bombed, exactly,
but Fox News and a lot of Republicans, a lot
of Facebook pages were pushing the idea. Look the Iranians,
they're they're happy that we're bombing them. I was like,
how stupid and gumllible do you gotta be? Because they're
selling Donald Trump. That's why they're doing that. Like they
called us grifters. If I was like a crue grifter,
I would be glazing the hell out of Trump right now.
I will be praising everything that he's doing. Yeah yeah, yeah,
but they called me a grifton when I criticize him. Yeah,
like I make more money grifting for Trump, not like
pretending to be a Democrat. It doesn't make any sense, Yeah,
it doesn't.
Speaker 3: It doesn't. No, you can't even trust you can't even
trust that protest stuff either, because you know that if
you go back to I think two thousand and eight
or nine, the CIA was beginning to try to push
for what they're doing right now, which was the Green Revolution.
So color revolutions are all National Endowment for Democracy, NED,
Gene Sharp and the Einstein Institute. They all push this
idea of color rebels, which we've done in all these
post Soviet countries. It's a CIA project. And they were
pushing the Green Revolution in Iran about twenty nine, ten eleven,
and it wasn't successful, but they've been trying to do
this for a long time to get this regime change.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think what we've done, I'm just, you know,
I'm hoping for the best, and I'm just I'm still
pulling for them. I don't want to see more soldiers die.
I don't want to see nothing, you know, I want
something good to come out of this. But can we
really get anything? That we killed that Supreme leader, we
destroyed the Navy, We've killed like thousands of their citizens.
I mean, this is a monk that the United States
is going to carry for a long time, forever, forever.
It's like it's no coming back from this.
Speaker 3: And also, I mean, you know, Shia Islam is a
little more amenable to you know, Christianity in the West
than has been say Sunni Islam. Sunnia Islam has a
tendency to be more you know, aggressive, and Iran's a
little more tolerant, but it's also an end Times cult,
so that will just embolden this kind of ideology of
the Shia to be more aggressive.
Speaker 1: I would think, is do you they say that's a
a terrorist state? Is Iran really a terrorist state?
Speaker 3: Well, anybody that the US doesn't like is a terrorist state.
I'm serious, Like they just designate whoever is just targing
And it's not consistent either, because it's like, well, wait
a minute, are we going to take out all the
terror And people were saying this back at the time
of Saddam. It's like if Saddam is the new terrorist,
he's a new hitler, Like, how come we're not going
to take out every dictator in the world. It just
happens to be places where there's strategic resources and you
know what I mean.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Venezuela exactly. They stopped blowing up boats. Yeah, they're
bringing drugs to America. It's like these little fisherman boats
to speed boat like two thousand miles from America and
they're blowing them up, and I was posed to, yeah,
blow them up, and they're not said they invade Venezuela.
The dictator. No, you would then got that old that's
why you did that. Damn I fail for that.
Speaker 3: Did you see the news came out right right away
to the walls, immediately going to Israel.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh yeah, yeah, yeah yeah, that from Venezuela's going
to Israel. It's going to Israel, everybody. This has nothing
to do.
Speaker 3: With Israel or socialism, freeing the Venezuelans from socialism, right, wow, man.
Speaker 1: Trump is ah, don't say it, don't say it? Is it?
I possible?
Speaker 6: Probably the best, wonderful great go ahead and say it,
go ahead, rift away, probably the best ever.
Speaker 1: Probably wow, man, I totally just I like.
Speaker 6: These two brown boys whatever, probably the best two brown
boys probably.
Speaker 1: But Trump is a nominally that ship he gets away with.
I can't I can't believe Republicans, his voters are not
pushing them back more probally. Yeah, I thought we were
the objective ones.
Speaker 3: Well. I started doubting America's wars about two thousand and three.
I watched a bunch of documentaries from Alex Jones, people
like that questioning nine to eleven, and then that made
me question, like all of our foreign policy and like
why are we why do we actually do these wars?
You know what I mean? Yeah, So to me, this
is literally like a repeat of two thousand and two three, right,
like Bush talking about we got to go after you
know whoever at that time it was you know, Saddam,
it was Operation Desert Storm, Operation Freedom, whatever nonsense, right
which they name it, they like even give it a
title like this one was what was Epic Fury, Epic
operation Yeah.
Speaker 1: Epic Einstein furyiin fury.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. They said it was so close to a nuclear weapon,
but we wiped out the military like what three days?
But they're close to a nuclear weapon? How complicated is
it to create a nuclear weapon?
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I mean it seems like they're making it in that backyard.
Speaker 3: I know, like apparently it's easy. But I mean, I
got Lord of the Rings here, I don't know, but
I got fantasy novels on here. I don't know about weapons.
But apparently it's easy because you could just you know, yeah,
every two weeks everything's about to pop off, right.
Speaker 1: I never believe they said issue has got the right
to defend themselves. They say they use it. It sounds
just sounds disingingenued. Well, it means sounds like a talking
When you say Israel has a right to defend themselves,
that actually means Iran has no cannot exist right, or
anybody that they feel that threatens Israel. That means that's
what that means, they don't have the right to exist. Yeah,
that's what that means. Yeah, And they keep saying, who
the hell Let me ask you a professional opinion. You
got a degree in philosophy. Does this make sense to you?
Someone creates a nuclear bomb to start a nuclear war
with two nuclear superpowers. How believable is that?
Speaker 3: It's not because, like you said, you know, people have
been all over Twitter sharing that clip of nat was
a ninety eight and he's like a little two weeks
away from a bomb. Two weeks away.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And then if you read you know, like the history
of Masaud operations in the last thirty years, like they're
constantly engaging in, you know, interior actions within Iran to
disable all those capabilities, but they're always still two weeks away.
So again it's like a convenient excuse, just like Saddam
had the weapons of mass destruction right, which he didn't.
But even if he did, that was what the CIA
gave him to fight in and he was trained by
the CIA. Right. So again, just like the Batolas and
I'm I got a clip of two weeks, is the
one in there took in a.
Speaker 1: Very short time.
Speaker 3: It could be a year, it could be within a
few months.
Speaker 4: They have the wherewithal, the stored up preserved knowledge to
make a bomb very quickly if they wanted to do it,
if you want is so dangerous weeks away from having
the solid material for an entire arsenal of nuclear bombs.
Speaker 3: They're right close.
Speaker 4: They're six months away from being about ninety percent of
having the rich uranium for an.
Speaker 3: Iran is gearing up to look at that where it's
a look at yah, that's a great time is running.
Speaker 1: Out, will be capable here we go ninety That is nuts.
Speaker 4: Place. Obviously, we'd like to see a regime change, at
least I would in Iran, just as I would like
to see in Iraq. The question now is a practical
question what is the best place to proceed. It's not
a question of whether Iraq's regime should be taken out
but when should it be taken out. It's not a
question of whether you'd like to see a regime change
in Iran, but how to achieve it. Iran has the
something that Iraq doesn't have. Iran has, for example, two
hundred and fifty thousand satellite dishes. It has the internet use.
I wanted said to the chair the heads of the
CIA when I was Prime Minister that if you want
to advance regime change in Iran, you don't have to
go through the CIA cloak and dagger stuff. What you
want to do is uh uh is take very large,
very strong transponders and just being Melro's place and Beverly
Hills two o five oh and all that into it.
Speaker 1: That's nuts.
Speaker 4: To Iran because that is subversive stuff. They watch it,
the young kids watch it. The young people. They want
to have the same nice clothes at the same houses
and swimming pool beam Hollywood.
Speaker 3: That's what he says.
Speaker 1: So just Puerica, yep, exact what it is.
Speaker 3: Slop.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I wonder what would she falling for it? I mean,
I think the probably, I say, one advantage that the
left has over the right. I think that constituency on
that side is figured for the most part, figured out
that Iran, I mean Israel is fully ship and I
mean it's people on the right of starting open eyes too,
but I think on the left they pretty much figured
out this is just a that's the only thing to
figured out.
Speaker 3: Though, well, and that's because they are tending to be
you know, atheistic in their mindset, and they didn't fall
for the Christian Zionist stuff of Americans and the Bible
belt to be taught for the last hundred years that
the nation state of Israel is was predicted in you know,
the Book of Revelation or whatever.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you see a lot of Christians preaching it, like
that one guy that came on the show, Pastor Locke.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you had him on.
Speaker 1: Yeah, like about three four years ago he came to
I think it's been longer than that. Yeah, it's probably
been longer than that. It's before all that this happened.
Oh yeah, And now I go I check him out
on Facebook.
Speaker 3: I'm like, Wow, Boomer bullshit. Boom Boomer evangelical bullshit.
Speaker 1: He's one of the nicetiests I ever met. But I
was like, wow, you're not preaching Christianity. I don't know
what that is his wife Jewish.
Speaker 3: I don't know anything about I mean, I've heard his name,
but I don't know.
Speaker 1: Even I met his wife. She's like she could be
wanted to know, you know, she looks like a tina.
I was thinking back then she was like a Latina
or something like that. But yeah, she probably is. She's
probably gonna shows you should lock that up. Joe. Hey,
we came across an idea soldier took a call some
butter up on this show. They wear the Third Temple
patches on them, have you Yeah, yeah, what is the
third Temple? What is that?
Speaker 3: Well, you know, in Rabbinic Judaism, they believe that in
order to properly make atonement you do have to have
the temple and animal sacrifices because that's what's in the Torah,
It's in the five Books of Moses. So they actually believe,
which it's not consistent because I had a debate with
a rabbinic Jew the other day on my call in
show that I do on AX, and I was asking him,
I'm like, doesn't your old testaments say that you can
make atonement without the temple? And he's like yeah, yeah, yeah,
Like well, then why do you need a temple because
God tolls us to because I say, you make atonement.
It's like, but Christianity teaches that the atonement can be
made spiritually because the fulfillment of you know what Christ
spraw of fulfilling all that animal sacrifice stuff. Right. So
in other words, they're stuck in that Old Testament mindset
of thinking that we got to do it because God
said it. But they even admit that you can make
atonement by good works and prayer, you know what I mean.
So it's not consistent. But they actually think that to
bring to build the temple will bring the Messiah, and
they can, and they convince the evangelical yeah, Antichrist, and
they convinced serious and they've convinced evangelicals that that's the
coming of Jesus. Is when you know, they build this
third temple.
Speaker 1: But it's actually the Antichrist. Yeah, so the Antichrist is
the God for the Jews.
Speaker 3: Well, they're gonna, Jesus says in John five, and if
another comes in his own name, him, you will accept,
but you don't accept me because I come in my
father's name right in John five. So in other words,
if there was this figure that comes in our day,
they would presumably be an antichrist.
Speaker 1: Okay, what's doing in days.
Speaker 3: Of Machias two thousand?
Speaker 7: They will sell the Jews in great happiness. Let us
do for you anything you need. Just teach us the
wisdom of your toah. Now, I want to remind you
what we know today of the toah. It's not one
percent of all the secrets that in a toah. King
Salomon you know all the secrets except red cow. He said,
red cow is above my understanding. That means that all
the other things in the toa, I know all the
secrets from King Salomon. Until today, three thousand years, we
do not know one percent of one percent of one
percent of.
Speaker 1: What King Salomon knew.
Speaker 7: But when Masha come, we will know everything.
Speaker 1: You know why.
Speaker 7: Mala it's the ali ahshame come mime Lahassim, there will
know will be no more even inclination Asham's ladder of
the Satani Marasse. There's no more satan, no more yet rava,
no more fatigue, no more sicknesses, no more can say,
no more antisemitism, no more war. Nobody has any limitation.
No one is having problem waking up in the morning.
Nobody has to give birth anymore. You don't have to
raise children anymore. There's no more incarnation of wicked people anymore.
The world is going back to the level of Adam
before the scene.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he had me going there for a second. No
more sickness, no more fatigued. Then he said, no more
anti simity. What that means, I'm gone happy? Is I
don't exist?
Speaker 3: Yeah? Okay, west Side.
Speaker 8: Here's an idea of soldier, apparently an American by his accent,
describing why he's at war.
Speaker 3: Watch this.
Speaker 5: They call this operation the source of Iron.
Speaker 1: What are we really fighting for.
Speaker 5: We're fighting for the right of the Jewish people who exist,
the Jewish practist religion and be free. And one day
our true leader will come and will be united as
a whole Jewish nation. So we can reveald the beethavig dash.
Speaker 8: Bena' mcdush, probably mispronouncing it. That's the Hebrew term for
the Temple, the third Temple. We are doing this so
we can rebuild the temple. Now you'll notice he's pulling
off patches on velcro on his IDF uniform. These are
not civilian clothes. This is the uniform of the government
of Israel. Of its military, and he has patches on
that uniform, one of which is a symbol of the temple,
the Third Temple. So it just couldn't be clear. Why
are we doing this to rebuild the Third Temple? Now,
if you think we're just cherry picking this off the internet,
one guy wearing an unauthorized temple patch paid for by
the way, a uniform paid by US armaments, paid for
by US. The US taxpayer pays for all this stuff
one way or another. They're the US taxpayer pays for
the military of Israel.
Speaker 3: Boy does it?
Speaker 8: If you think we're being unfair and just like found
one guy, Well, here's a bunch of guys. It took
us about two minutes on the internet to find this.
Speaker 3: Today.
Speaker 8: Here here is a selection of IDF soldiers. Let's put
it on the screen.
Speaker 3: There you go, and.
Speaker 8: All of them have the same pass. Look for me,
look carefully at that. What is that? That's the temple,
That is the Third Temple.
Speaker 1: Chefs and papers in the background. So wow, you, I
don't know, do you think it's the reason why we
bombing Iran?
Speaker 3: I mean, there's an ultimate long term plan that relates
to that stuff. I don't know. If it's the immediate goal.
But it's funny you said that because I remember arguing
with people a year ago about whether there was a
plan or a move to build a third Temple, and
I had all of these comments, all these people calling, no,
Jews don't want a third temple. We don't want that.
That's a very minor, you know, group in Israel. But
you know that it's actually, I think, a pretty pretty
widespread idea. They love the majority.
Speaker 1: Yeah, what do you think all this in? I mean,
Trump said the war is pretty much done, That's what
he said. George Bush said the same thing. I remember it. Yeah,
they like bombed the hell out of I Raq and
d you say, yep, it's over. Were already won. Twenty
thousand shoulders showed, soldiers end up dying later.
Speaker 3: It's two weeks to flatten the Iran right, to flatten
the curve, and then it ends up being two years.
Speaker 1: Right, right, right? You think it's gonna be that long?
Speaker 3: Well, they were originally saying like twenty years, didn't they
And I mean it took fifteen to topple a sod so.
They started in what twenty ten or so with a
so od so, and they got They eventually got that. So,
I mean, this is a bigger player than Syria exactly,
So it seems like it would take a lot longer.
Speaker 1: I mean you look at Afghanistan, WHI was that what
two decades and since we left the Caliban's right back,
there was no regime change. It's nothing changed. Yeah, just
all these thousands of soldiers died for nothing. Yeah, not
for nothing. I'm sure they thought they were fighting for
our country.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: This stuff does not work.
Speaker 3: Right, same in Vietnam. Like Vietnam was a huge failure,
and some people argue it was a failure on purpose
because they were beginning to move America into globalism, that
it wasn't even about, you know, fighting communism.
Speaker 1: Man, it seems like net yahoo baby. It feels to
me that we are United States, avisral and I think
all our foreign policies, everything we just dictated to the
American citisen it has to go through Israel before because
they've been pushing back on a lot of freedom of
speech law. They've been pushing a lot of anti freedom
speech laws. You know, in America, you can't even criticize them.
They call it anti Semitism. It's like I didn't see
none of this coming. I mean I heard people suggesting,
I don't think I'm going to vote for him because
he might be he's going to start a world Rhiann.
All those people were true. All these people are proving
to be true, Like Nick foine is, It's like, no, man,
he's going to start a war, I'm not voting. And
it's like, man, that guy looks really smart right now.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, and he's correct because if you look at
the trajectory of our presidents, like, except in a few cases,
rarely do they disagree with what Israel wants in terms
of foreign policy. They almost always, I mean, even back
to Iraq War and even before that, like you can
go back to you know, what I've been lecturing through
recently on my channel is some of these old histories
of the OSS and CIA. And this is written by a
guy who's not a critic, but like he's from the
Council Form Relation. So this is like an official sort
of archive of the CFR account of the origins of
the CIA. And it was in World War Two that
the CIA began making alliances with under James Jesus Angleton,
who was a huge Israeli aphile. They had a lot
of these connections with At that time, it's called the
Jewish Agency. This is prior to the Masaude but that's
what would become Zionism as we know it today. It
was actually called the Jewish Agency of Palestine, so the
official name because they say, well, there was no Palestine,
that never existed, right, it's in the history books like
it was that. But point being is that Angleton. By
the way, when the JFK files came out, it was
clear that there was this back channel that he had
to Israeli intelligence and he was passing them a lot
of secrets. And this is why a lot of people
were thinking that it's vindicated that Israel had a motive
because of the Demoni program to take out JFK, That
the mafia had a motive, the CIA had a motive.
Point being is that all these people had motives. But
that's where we began to see the real shift in
American foreign policy, not so much being WASP based Wall Street,
but more and more Israeli. And there was a period
even under Bush Senior. I'm not saying Bush Senior was
a good guy. He was terrible, but he was not
happy with Israeli intelligence, and he wanted to move toward
towards what was called the Safari Club, which was a
lot more Arab intelligence and like UAE and that kind
of stuff, and that was a huge like Israel didn't
like that at all. So anytime there's any attempt to
shift away from that, then the blackmail all of that,
you know, comes to the four epste types.
Speaker 1: Of Yeah, I want to ask you this, Like I've
been listening to well recently Lindsay Graham and then you
hear Trump talk. It's like, I hate to say it,
it just feels like they're compromised, like someone has info
on them and they have to do what they're doing
right now. They have to say the things that they're
saying right now because if they don't, this is coming out.
Speaker 3: Yeah. I mean, I don't know about any specific blackmail,
but I wouldn't be surprised because this is part for
the course, you know what I mean. I mean, people
were even thinking that it came out that there was
a connection between Monica Lewinsky and who's the guy that
Huckaby had at the Jonathan Pollard, right, the Israeli spy
they were he was connected to Monica Lewinsky, and that's
presumably how Clinton. Yeah, it came out in the news
that they were connected, and so presumably then Monica Lewinsky
had that connection. That's that was the mailing of Bill
Clinton back in the day with you remember the whole
story with a cigar and all that. So in other words,
that's par for the course. But you know, I don't
it doesn't even necessarily have to be specifically on Trump
or something like that. They can just say like, look,
you know, family, we'll screw up anything that, right, And
and also it's not just Israel, it's also like the CIA,
Meritish intelligence, like they all the five eyes are all connected,
and they'll just basically put pressure on the presidency or
anybody who tries to at any point when you've looked
at a presidents who attempted to kind of veer a
little bit away, like with Reagan, well Reagan got a
pop right right, Yeah, and then you had Arry Goldwater
he got shut out just from merely criticizing the Council
on Foreign Relations. And then you know Trump has done
several good things. Uh, but then seems like the last
few months something shifted.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it's not even like the same person, like
we obviously we in bed with visual I don't, I don't.
I'm not feemliar with like other countries like Spain's beginning
a lot of being threatened by Trump and we're going
to entrade with you if you don't participate in a
little operation epic theory, and then I forget the other countries.
But it seems like the only real ally usual has
is US, would it be fair.
Speaker 3: To say it is? And then I think they're aware,
keenly of you know, what's happening with people beginning to
wake up to this relationship and not wanting it, And
so that's the push obviously for the censorship, but it's
also they've also been saying that they're happy to rely
on India. So if they lose the US, they think
they can rely on India for tack and for support.
So yeah, because there's Modi and a lot of a
lot of Indians have this weird, sort of almost cultic
like attitude towards Zionism, which is which is odd. Oh really, yeah,
there's there's a huge I don't know where this comes from,
but amongst Indians there is it's very popular.
Speaker 1: Really known for being poired like those pirates. Yeah, so
they don't have any other allies. But the USA, when
you take a heart look at it.
Speaker 3: Uh well, I mean by extension, all the five vised
countries would be to some degree allies. I mean, because
they're kind of attached at the hip. I mean there
might be some disagreement amongst elements of nations in the
West that disagree, but I mean Canada and the UK,
they're not ultimately gonna They're not going to go against Israel,
even if they're socialists.
Speaker 1: I mean, hey, what's up with this dude, Jake Lang.
He's he's Jewish, right.
Speaker 3: I've heard of those. Dude, I don't really follow. He's
like a agitator and it's like.
Speaker 1: I just he's a grifter there and it's so and
it's so obvious, but Republicans are falling for it. He's
out that out there trying to instigate things to paint
certain groups make them look bad. I mean, how easy
it would be to make Christians look bag if there's
some Muslim dude out there trying to goat them into
doing something, you know what I mean. It's it's just
it's not being adults.
Speaker 9: Been like pedophile.
Speaker 3: Yeah, this is like he would he would rap. Yeah,
he would wrap Karan's with bacon and shoot it. He
would shoot.
Speaker 1: He does that too.
Speaker 3: That's another that's just copying what a previous provocatory it
used to do.
Speaker 1: That sounds like he's interested in taking down pedophiles. Is
he making any Has he been talking about the Epstein files?
Are all these people are still free? Noop, No, none
of that information is coming out, which is something I
want to segue into Epstein Files.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean I was thinking these women were going to
get justice, and it seems like nothing's going to happen
because they have all this information, who was involved, co conspirators,
people like that. But it's just a woman sitting in
jail for it. So what do you think?
Speaker 3: And they blocked out all the people involved?
Speaker 1: Yeah right, yeah, okay understand the victims.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but not the Yeah, propetrators.
Speaker 1: It's okay to redact the billionaires because they would make
them look bad.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Well, I mean this is the unfortunate nature of
how warfare and subversion and infiltration occurs. And you've got
you know, nations and people groups that have been doing
it for a long time. They're very proficient at it.
My publisher puts out Whitney Webbs' book BLACKMW Billime two
and this is about the whole history of Maxwell and
Epstein and all that. So I've been following that really closely.
And what's amazing. The first thing that came to mind
that was amazing to me that backs up your point
why they don't get in trouble was in the Rothschild's biography.
This is the official Morton biography of the family. But
then the first hundred pages it talks about how they
had advanced intelligence on what happened at Waterloo and they
were able to buy up the London stock market when
it crashed based on the advanced intelligence. Right, So if
you fast forward like two hundred years, if you saw
those emails between Oriander Rothschild and Epstein, it's the exact
same thing. They're like talking about having advanced intel on
societies and nations collapsing, buying it up. Like in the bailouts,
there was a whole email exchanged about Somalia, how they
could go in and buy it up when it collapses
and then send the Somalis here, right. So in other words,
it's like this is a long term strategy. They know
how to do this to basically have an international crime
syndicate that can then organize chaos in a region, get
advanced intelligence, go in and buy it up. Game to
stock market and he remember that one Epstein email was like, yeah,
the goam have like the normy view of like how
to invest in, Like we have the insider intelligence. And
that's what intelligence is is a lot of just insider
information on like getting you know, advanced stock tips that
kind of stuff. So that's too fast forward to hundred years.
That's why they don't get in trouble. It's like it's
an entrenched basically you know, James Bondville in situation for
the hundreds of years.
Speaker 1: And they used that term a lot throughout the Epstein
files go like repeatedly over and over a lot of
people like Christians that they're they're not even familiar with
that term cattle.
Speaker 3: Yeah right, so basically sheeple dummies.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so damn for the for the Jewish community, that's
what we are today.
Speaker 3: In the rabbinic philosophy because the Old Testament they'll talk
about the gentile nations like cattle. It's an analogy like
saying that the nations are like, you know, God's field,
he owns the sheet, the cows or whatever. But the
idea is that as you saw what you were, I
thought you're to play that clip of that rabbi talking
about how everybody when the mis Jewish Messiah comes, everybody
will every Jew will have two thousand, eight hundred gentile slaves.
If you see that, or it's one of them, it's away,
it's going around. It's like a viral clip. But so
two thousand and eight two hundred, yeah, look look up
the two thousand slaves. Anyway. But so the idea that
with the Webbinic philosophy is that Jews have a higher soul.
They're born with a higher soul and nefesh that gentiles
lack because they don't have the magical DNA, and so
that gives them kind of a right by hush him
to rule, especially in the Ascton. So they think that
that's what that gut was saying, like when Messiah comes,
will make everything right and then and then you won't
be able to exist anymore unless you want to be
a slave to you know, Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2: What like as me and me ken Marcato love madam.
Speaker 10: They look lock with madam lock queen lock, ma dam local.
Speaker 11: Damay women dam damn move.
Speaker 10: A damn show madam man as well as God better damn.
Speaker 2: That's moll Okay, that's man, Okay.
Speaker 10: That's a that's a loss him as an okay, should
low you. The show to bend was normally member for
you the loyer you go, you.
Speaker 12: Can issue show yes you got, I mean, thank you
about you that issue I'm.
Speaker 2: Thanking okay, but imagining no games the call it going
him the.
Speaker 11: Damn yeah dam is the shame. Im okay, okay, let
that national matter. I'm a dam damn moments a shame
my damka.
Speaker 3: What's age with my same?
Speaker 2: Yes, super.
Speaker 1: You do.
Speaker 3: There's another quote that says, you get two thousand.
Speaker 7: It's crazy as Amatil actually gonna.
Speaker 2: Yellows yellow.
Speaker 1: And what you need twenty eight hundred slaves for five
is probably enough. Wow, that's the people we call God's
chosen people. That is the right that we all. We're
a freaking beast. It's like supremacy, no supremacy, man, it's crazy.
Why do you think Christian support Israel so much when
they when they should. I'm sure they're aware of this. No,
they're not right.
Speaker 3: I didn't learn that until about two thousand and seven.
I mean I was raised, you know, Baptist and then
left Baptists eventually, but I didn't even know any of
the rabbinic philosophy until you know, mid two thousands, late
two thousands. So that was kind of hidden, I think,
from a lot of dumb Bible belt people for a
long time. And also they were indoctrinated with you know,
the Schofield Study Bible, which was promoted by Oxford University,
which is basically promoted by Rothchild's That's who was, you know,
funding a lot of that stuff, and they wanted America
inculcated with that idea so that they could push the
Balfour Declaration. So you get the Scofield Study Bible proliferating
through America. Prior to the Balfour Declaration. The nation state
of Israel right and in America was pushed by not
just Schofield, but Scofield was part of a group headed
up by a guy named Samuel Untermeyer, who was America's
most prominent Zionist. So the idea was, what can we
push as a Bible to get all these dumb evangelicals
on board with supporting the Nation of Israel at all costs,
and it was hugely successful, and even to this day,
like most of the Baptists, most of the Dallas Seminary,
like all these institutions, and it's even in fact that
like outside of Baptist evangelical circles, like even some you know,
Catholic circles are infected with this idea that they think
that you basically have to worship the nation state of Israel.
But they've they've forgotten that the Church is Israel according
to Galatians sixt sixteen. Right, Jesus fulfilled that. So why
would we be going back to something from the Old
Testament when that's the fulfillment.
Speaker 1: You would think more Christians today would know that we
have the Internet and it's all these avenues to learn
new things and got YouTube, got Jay Dyer, well, Matthew.
Speaker 3: Matthew twenty one to forty three. Jesus is talking about
the Pharisees and is parable and he says the Kingdom
of God will be taken from you talking to the
Pharisees of rabbinical Pharisees is given to a nation for
using the fruits they're up, meaning the mainly gentile Church,
not the Jews can't be saved, but they have to
convert to Christ. Right, so it's open to everybody. That's
the fulfillment of all these Old Testament prophecies to talk
about the gentile nations coming into the Church and worshiping
the Messiah. And that's why they hate Christ is because
he is the Messiah. But that means that they don't
have this supremacy anymore and ect exactly. And if you
remembering in the Gospels when Jesus interacting with the people
who are the zealots simon the Zealot right, they had
the same idea that we're going to get this political
power when we get the Messiah. Mesiah comes, he says, no,
I'm not here to give you political power. It's for
your salvation. And they chose to worship the nation state
of themselves versus the Messiah. So that's why they ended
up in the diaspora. According to Jesus in Matthew twenty
four and Luke twenty one, he says, this nation will
go into diaspora until the time of the gentiles is fulfilled,
meaning until all the gentiles.
Speaker 1: Out of Satan. They called us the dacent when they're
the animals.
Speaker 3: Well, it's funny because all the things that Jesus says
to the Pharisees in Matthew twenty three and in other passages,
it's exactly parallel to what Jeremiah is saying to the
scribes and the lawyers back in the time of the
Battylon captivity. And they took him and they put him
in stocks, and they lowered him down into a pit
of mud, right as punishment because he was calling out
the scribes and Pharisees for putting the traditions above what
God said. In Matthew twenty three, Jesus says exactly the
same things that Jeremiah said to the scribes and Pharisees
and lawyers. They persecute him, they put him in a tomb.
So Jeremiah is a parallel of what Christ went through.
Does that makes sense? And it's the same idea today,
like the rabbinic philosophy is the same as what the
Pharisees were teaching. And you would think Christians would know
this because it's all throughout the Gospels.
Speaker 1: Like constantly, yeah, right.
Speaker 3: Like every yeah, like all the time throughout the Gospels,
like and then they turn around. I'll got to watch
Basriel right the blood booms. John Hagees says, we got
a worship Beta Friel.
Speaker 1: Why do you think Trump said he don't think he's
going to heaven.
Speaker 3: He's probably making a joke. But Trump is also uh
influenced by I don't I mean, I don't know if
it's through Jared Kushner prior to that, Like he put
that crazy paula white woman as his as spiritual advisor.
She's obviously a grifter, crazy, So at some juncture he
got really influenced by Christian Zionism. I don't know exactly.
But in his old in his book I can't remember,
it's it's I don't think it's the part of the deal.
It's one of the older eighties books that he wrote.
In the first chapter, he says that he was studying Kabala. Yeah,
I didn't believe when I first heard that. I don't
think he's like super serious because he doesn't strike me
as somebody who's really into theology or esoteric stuff. It's
just like a passing comment, like, oh, yes, I met
this person and he taught me a little bit about
Kabbala and and then I think he's got this like
most boomers, they just have this default to Cold War stuff, right,
because in the Cold War, we had to have Israel
as our ally. That was a huge part of what
the os S and c I was setting up. Angleton
tapped all of the Masad or what would be Masad
networks to fight the Cold War because the idea was,
we need the Israeli's on our side. We don't want
Israel siding with Stalin. And since Stalin basically booted out
a bunch of rabbis, eventually Israel ended up siding with
the US during the Cold War. And I'm not saying
Solanin's a good guy. I'm just saying, like that's the
way it shook out. Maybe that's why Nick likes Stalin.
I don't know, I don't know, but I mean there
was also anti Symitism laws, you know, in Russia. So
I'm not saying Stalin's like a good guy. I'm just
saying that there was a Cold War kind of situation
where Angleton succeeded basically in assuring the US that Israel
would be on its side right during the Cold War.
But that eventually became more and more of Israel taking
over our foreign policy.
Speaker 1: Do you think Russia, China, do you think they have
friends of Israel.
Speaker 3: It's a complex thing because you saw that putinklip where
he was like, I can't attack Israel because it's a
bunch of Russian Jews in Israel. He's like, then I
would be attacking Russians. So and then China. I mean,
Israel has sold American secrets to China for a long time,
so there's there are deals that all the nations make.
There's even backdoor deals, so it's hard to know. But
I mean a bunch of Russian Jews in Ukraine. Yeah, sure,
a bunch.
Speaker 1: Of Russians in Ukraine doesn't.
Speaker 2: Have a problem.
Speaker 3: Oh well, that's a good point.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It was about right before two weeks two weeks
before they started bombing Iran. In Iran, they were showing
his big statue of ball with the Jewish star, and
he started burning it. Did you see that? And then
two weeks later, yeah, Israel and America started bombing them.
I don't think that's a coincidence.
Speaker 3: Well, uh, and then people made that It's hard to
tell if it was a type or not. But that
Epstein email that said that he named his bank account
bay All.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, but how do you pronounce that?
Speaker 3: Yeah? But I mean but like ball's a bob. There's
a video, but I don't know if that was a
typo or not. I could have been a typo.
Speaker 1: But accountant Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, hello a coincidence?
Speaker 3: Well, I mean they have a point that, uh, you know,
the West does have this you know, satanic ethos to
it because people think that, you know, like Christian Zionism
and all these things are Christian or not. So ultimately,
if it's like a molect genocide, then it's satanic.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: Another thing that proves this too is even if you
are a Christian Zionist, if you read like Deuteronomy and
the Passages and Deuteronomy where it talks about coming back
into the land after God has chastised them and put
them in diaspora, it says you can't come back until
you've repented and become righteous. So unless you think that
the Rothchild setting up a socialist, atheist nation state, it
makes no sense.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 3: So as even on Christians Zionist grounds, they haven't repented
and become righteous, which is why some of the what
are they called the Naturi Karta, the Orthodox Jews that
don't agree with Zionism. They make this point that Zionism
can't be right because we haven't repented. So like, none
of it makes any sense. And that's why it's all
geopolitical stuff. It has nothing. Really, Religion is just kind
of a tool that they use to exactly.
Speaker 1: Trying to get into Yeah, they said when they burnt
that ball, they said that strike to the killed one
hundred and seventy school girls. That was like on the
first day he said a lot of people on Twitter,
I don't know much truth is bond and said that's
no coincidence they bombed at school after the perform after that, Yeah,
huh yeah, well it's like a sacrifice.
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, well Trump said, what do you said the
other day, like, uh, those are blessed Israel bihble bless
those are blessed is real quote in the Old Testament.
But again, if you saw the Tucker Huckaby debate, which
was hilarious, he just demolished Huckaby, right right, I mean
it just destroyed him and just with basic questions too.
It wasn't even like some kind of you know, insane
got your question, it was, but what if you paid
attention like he was leading Huckeby to admit blood and
soil doctrine, Like he was like, we have genetic testing
for living in this land. Well that would be the
Nazi right like idea, which was essentially you know, he
didn't explicit admit that. But point being is just that, like, uh,
you know, Huckabee is an idiot who doesn't understand that
everything that is this promise to Israel, according to the
entire New Testament, is the Church, Like the Church is
the inheritor of those promises. Galatians three. Paul says, if
you're baptized in Christ, you're the seat of Abraham. So
you can't go back to some genetic lineage as if
it gets you anywhere, right, because I mean, the even
the Rabbis admit that, like the Muslims are the descendants
they would say of Hagar, and that's a descendant of Abraham.
So does that apply to them because they're so then
they'll say no, Okay, Well then it's not genetic. If
it's not genetic, then it's based on faith. Well, if
it's based on faith, then how come most of the
Jews are atheistic in America. Right, So it's it's whatever
needs to be at the time, right, that's what it is.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Yeah, there's a lot in the Epstein Files they're
maxing beef jerky a lot. How many times was that
was that max? It was a lot, just like thousands
of times beef. Who the hell talks about beef jerky?
Like that's gotta be some kind of code code.
Speaker 3: Yeah, what do you think.
Speaker 1: It was code for?
Speaker 3: I mean it sounds like, uh, bringing people youth to people,
which could be anything from sexual things or it could
be consuming.
Speaker 1: Right because uh, in that movie Shell Shank Redemption, they
call all the new prisoners fresh meat. That's the first
thing that put in my head. Maybe they keep saying
drinky because they got new new meat, new meat, fresh meat.
That was that cod Yeah, taste of his new jerky recipe?
Who the Hills like talking about jerky.
Speaker 3: Like that, especially when you're a billionaire supposedly right? Like right,
I mean interested that interested.
Speaker 1: In beef jerky?
Speaker 3: Maybe that is really like the jerky boys, Like they
like prank calls. They just really want to do the
jerky boys.
Speaker 1: It's got to be talking about girls and it's just
Frank Rinzau. Yeah, that's gotta be girls, It's got to be.
But he's thinking it was consuming kids.
Speaker 3: I think I'm saying, yeah, I think it could either
be just the delivering a code for the prostitute or
the young person, or perhaps it could be because I
do think there are degenerate elites who will consume flash.
Speaker 1: Eating regular food. Again, So he's definitely talking about his
wife right there. Definitely talking about banging his wife. Yeah.
Then they bring up dentists. What's some of the dentist
stuff they're talking about the dennist. Who the hell talks
about the dentists that much? You never sent the email
with the with the with the word dennist in it.
Speaker 3: Be Jery has sucking your teeth. I don't know, I
mean collaborating dentist.
Speaker 1: Mm, well they found some dentist chairs. Collaborating dentist. That's
somebody that's complicit.
Speaker 3: That's somebody exactly. Yeah, a compromised dentists.
Speaker 1: Why New York he's talking about politicians. M hm, he's
not using their names. Hey, I want to ask you,
is what is the star of David? Where does David
have a star in the Bible.
Speaker 3: It's not in the Bible.
Speaker 1: It's not.
Speaker 3: No, no, the closest thing I can think of to
where it might have and I don't I don't even
know if scholars even know where that. I mean, the
hexagram is an ancient basic geometric form, so it probably
existed in a lot of cultures, just like the cross
or the you know, pentagram or what cool looking.
Speaker 1: Yes, but it wasn't in Africa. They didn't even find
firing up.
Speaker 3: They didn't have shapes in Africa.
Speaker 1: They didn't even have to wheelding.
Speaker 2: Now, so.
Speaker 1: Game, now some fun up ship We love it. I
see it on Facebook. Somebody posted up, this is Rome
two thousand years ago. This is Africa right now. It
was some black kids hit outside the ship hold. But
they showed a picture of Rome two thousand years ago.
How long ago it was, and it was like this
big fortress and it was like formidable and it was
amazing architecture.
Speaker 3: Well that's because uh Yakoub Yakoub built that. Yeah, and
the white people stole it from from Yakub. Yeah, were
we talking about? Oh sorry, that was funny. The closest
thing I found to where that might And I'm just
going from memory. Uh is Josephus talks about in his
Antiquities of the Jews. He says that there was a
magic ring that Solomon had and it had some kind
of a star on it. But if I recall, I
think Josepha said it was a pentacle like a five
pointed star. But it might have grown to become the
tradition of a hexagram. But by the Middle Ages, Rabbinic
tradition that was into kabbala, they adopted the idea that
it was a hexagram, and then that became the star
of the the Rothschilds, I think was the that's their
shield was the hexagram, right, So yeah, it's it's even
on here on this and this is a book by
a famous cobblist, by the way, Curse from Shulam's book
From Francism to Jacobinism. So this is like the frankest
Satanic sect amongst the Sabbatians. You've probably heard of that
the Jewish there was a sect that followed a false
rabbi in the sixteen hundreds and uh they were called
the Frankest and they believe that you had to do
evil to bring good. So yeah, damn, that's the Sabbatians
and this he's a cabalistic scholar, Gerstma schol and Jewish coblist.
He is probably the most prominent one of the last century.
And he's arguing in this book that there was an
influence from the Frankest to the French Revolution, the Jacobins
and the French Revolution. So when they're all lopping off
heads with the guillotines, he's arguing that there was an influence,
not that they controlled it, but there was an influence
on the Jacobins from the frank the Sabatan Francis. But
so that's like Satanism right there.
Speaker 1: So Jews are are the inventors of guillotines.
Speaker 3: I don't know they invented the guillotine, but probably did.
I mean, well, it is kind of like a big
like circumcised it's circumcise in your head, right, It's it's
like a big circumcised thing, right, fit.
Speaker 1: Your circumci.
Speaker 3: Certumcized this head and circumcized this head.
Speaker 1: So yeah, Well, Trump has said over and over and
over that he's been he's been proven that he's innocent.
I'm not an I is any truth to that. I mean,
half of the stuff from what I was able to
get dig up as like a majority of I'll say
fifty of the files haven't even been released and then
is just redacted. You can't even it's not even legible, right.
Speaker 3: I mean I've looked. I spent thirty hours live streaming
as it was coming out, like a couple of weeks ago,
when it was popping off, and I didn't see anything
directly implicating Trump himself. So I've not seen that yet.
But I think obviously the biggest mistake so far has
been to cover that up mmm for the perpetrators. So
that's that's a huge mistake. And I think that the
intelligence agencies put pressure on Trump. I think Alex is
correct about that to get him to not to push
to not have this come out, and to protect these people.
So ultimately, like whether he's a compromised or not, like
if he's if he's covering, if he's like not, you
know what I mean, if he's yeah, it would be implication. Yeah, right,
I think that's a huge mistake. I mean, it's it's
like warp speed level mistake. I thought it was a
huge Trump mistake too.
Speaker 1: In the first Yeah, there's this woman that's in the news.
She claims that I Trump and Epstein raped her when
she was thirteen or whatever. But now she's in the
news for like she's going to jail for fraud or something.
Speaker 3: That's the thing. A lot of the tips, a lot
of the stuff that was coming out in the first
couple of days was you could tell what wasn't legit.
For example, they would even they were putting out like tips.
Anybody can call it a tip. And there was that
one dude. It was so obviously bullshit, but everybody's going
crazy with that when it had like millions of views
when it when it came out, it was like I
was put I was taken to a yacht and they
were eating intestines and George Bush Senior humped me in
my booty hole. Yeah, and then they cut my feet
with a simper that doesn't make scars. It was obviously bullshit,
but everybody was sharing that on It's like that's just
some crazy dudes.
Speaker 1: You know, yeah, tip trying to people up.
Speaker 3: But I mean, yeah, I didn't see anything directly about
Trump himself. But I mean again, like at the end
of the day, if they're just going to cover all
this up, like and it shows that were ruled by
you know, degenerate bond villains. Like this communicates to conspiracy.
Speaker 1: Theorist, I mean the the so far the files that
they released, it doesn't really prove anything one way or
the other because it's so redacted.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, I mean you mean specifically about like this
or that person. I think it proves that there's a conspiracy,
like a real conspiracy of elites to control the nations.
And it's international and it's finance. I mean, it's even
the Vatican Bank. Did you see that email where he
was expos into Larry Summers how the inner workings of
the Vatican Bank are. Yeah, He's like yeah, and you
would think Larry Summers, being a Clinton banker, would know
the Vatican Bank how it works. But Epstein's basically explaining
that no, this is a secret like Black Ops bank
that you can launder money through for intelligence purposes. And
he was hanging out with the Vatican with John Paul
the second according to Yeah, according to three of the emails. Wow,
so he and again what was going on with the
Vatican throughout John Paul the second PDF trafficking is.
Speaker 1: A crew that Lix Wexner and Leon Black gave Epstein
billions of dollars.
Speaker 3: Well, Whitney has a couple of chapters on that, specifically
on Wexner, and I don't know the exact number because
it's still kind of debated exactly what Epstein was money manager,
which yeah, I mean, and then he's like, oh, but
he's a math teacher. Oh but he's this and this,
and oh but he's a philosopher. I mean, it's just
all over the place, and it's not exactly very how
much money he had or how he got the money,
so a lot of that's still I think unknown.
Speaker 1: But oh how he made his money.
Speaker 3: But it would appear that Wexner and Brunell and these
characters were using him as some kind of basically organized
crime consultant. That's what he seems to be to me.
And he's he's higher up than I think a lot
of people thought, because in the bann An interview he
says at the beginning that David Rockefeller and Kissinger basically
recruited him to be the chair of the Trilateral Commission,
which was created just for Razinski to run. So he
was pretty high up. He wasn't the top of the pyramid,
but he was high up, and so I think he
was basically some sort of organized crime consultant person who
if you I know, like the second or third day
the emails that were coming out, he was like about
to go meet like fifteen heads of state throughout the
world before he Yeah, so he had all this, Like
he was even calling from prison, he tells me and
in the interviews like, oh yeah, I was telling people
what to do when when the bailouts were happening from prison.
So he was like consulting on the prison phone like
a mobster like in Goodfellows. If you see Good Fellows,
like PAULI, the mobsters like cooking and the he's like
cooking you know, meatballs in the prison, like tell and
he's still running the organized crime syndicate from prison. Epstein
was doing the same thing. So it's an international organized
crime syndicate run by these people.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, do you think he's dead?
Speaker 3: I wouldn't be surprised either way.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I mean, Israel has the ability to expeltrate people. They
have the ability to go and find Nazi war criminals
fifty years later. And there's a famous story of one
if you watch that movie with Helen Miren, it's called
the Debt. It's about a Masaude operative. It's it's not
true story, but it's kind of loosely I think, based
on true story. But that's where they find some Nazi
guy like fifty years later living in Brazil or somewhere,
and they basically like drug him. And the real story
is that when they found that guy, they like drugged
him and they put him on a plane and snuck
him out like weekend at Bernie Style. He's just passed out,
he had too much to drink and they yeah, I'm serious,
and they they took him back to Israel for for trials,
so I wouldn't be surprised. I have no idea, though,
what do y'all think.
Speaker 1: There's some bitches in to leave someone, you think so
parting up kids?
Speaker 3: They sent him to a false flag island with with
with Elvis and Tupac Biggie.
Speaker 1: Yeah. People still didn't to still trying to deny the
fact that there's no connection with Israel because laying next
with her her father's massat he was ISRAELI. I mean,
it comes straight straight from.
Speaker 3: Israel's It's odd to me that anybody would would deny that.
I was supposed to have a debate with some guy,
and he decided to not have that debate. It was
going to be whether Epstein was connected to international intelligence
particularly right, and that debate didn't happening. But yeah, right.
I mean, first of all, Ewod Barock visits the place
in New York like a dozen plus times, Israel wired
his whole mansion on record, So I mean, this is
like a no brainer here, Like that right there, it
tells you. I mean, he literally is talking to Iod Barrock.
Did you hear the audio where he's talking about Peter Tiele.
Oh you didn't hear that? Oh man, you got to
hear that. So basically, he's just it's a window into
how all this stuff works. He's like, he calls Eod
Barock and he's like, it's Epstein explained to him who
Peter Teel is. And it's weird because they don't know
how to spell palanteer. They have this really hard time
spelling it and then pronouncing it. And Iod Barrock doesn't
know who Peter Teel is, which is kind of weird,
and he's like, what do you what do you mean
Silicon Valley. It's a weird conversation. But basically He's just saying,
this is that tech up and comer. We want to
get him, and we want him on our side. We
want to trap him. So that's one window into like blackmail, blackmailing.
They're trying to blackmail. I don't know that there is
any but they're trying to blackmail a CEO.
Speaker 1: Basically, it brings to mind Bill Gates. He got caught
up in he said, he said that was false. He
has some STD and he sent an email to Epstein's, Hey,
you got anything I can put my wife's drink. I
won't give it a clap or something or.
Speaker 3: That was crazy. Yeah, I mean I was surprised. I
mean I was, but I wasn't surprised to see that.
But and then do you see Melnda Gates was commenting
on that. She was like, he's just he's something else.
But yeah, yeah, I mean I think obviously like Bill
Gates is another great example of how they look for anybody,
not just in tech, but like anywhere. Right, So you
you find high profile people in science, did you notice
all the new atheists too? Just how happened to be
very close friends and flying on Epstein's plan. So you
had Dawkins. Uh, Dennett, uh Lawrence Krause right, very closely
associated with Epstein. And I've always argued that like the
New Atheists, they're really popular in two thousands, they're not
so popular anymore. But like I've always argued that that's
that's more than just skepticism and agnosticism. That's actually an operation,
like it's a scion, right, And I think this shows that.
I think, yeah, that's it.
Speaker 13: He thought there was two cyber companies look at and
even though I know Peter, I've never met Peter TiAl
and everybody says he sort of jumps around and actually
like a drugs. Yeah, however, he is a company called Pallenteer.
Wow p A l l E n.
Speaker 4: T I e R.
Speaker 13: Palenteers Peter Teal's company. Lookout p A n A n
t I. Yes, how I T t h I t.
Speaker 3: H I l.
Speaker 13: L l y no t h I e l.
Speaker 3: L Okay they can't.
Speaker 13: So he thought that Peter would put you on the
board of Parenteer. I've never met him. He's going to
come here next week, so I wanted to talk to
him and talk to you. He and Andreason it's called
Andres and Horowitz. And that's what they pay Larry a
million dollars a year just advice and a n d
R e E.
Speaker 3: Here he's telling them how to consultant. He's like, when
you leave government service and consult h consulting.
Speaker 13: Harrowitz hor.
Speaker 3: Well, the said low beast.
Speaker 13: What they are the biggest venture capital people in Silicon.
Speaker 3: Valley, bigger than Sequo Plan.
Speaker 13: These are these, These are the new planet Perkins everybody,
these are the smart boys.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so just a window into you know, him explaining
how to get Peter Thiel into the Spider's web.
Speaker 1: That's crazy, that's that sounds like a huge operation. They
know any any and everybody that was influential, had a
lot of money, want to be somebody one day exactly.
Speaker 3: It's definitely spotting trends, right, and like who's going to
be the next wave of that?
Speaker 1: And no one man runs that operation.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Like I've seen some emails about Epstein, their fascination with
vaccines and pandemics, like.
Speaker 3: Well, there was two before COVID. There was a twenty
seventeen email where he sends an email to He tags
Bill Gates in the email and he says, oh, by
the way, here's some articles you should read on running
pandemic simulations from JOHNS Hopkins twenty seventeen. Yeah, isn't that crazy?
Speaker 1: It was an email to Falsey too, right, who to
falsey doctor false Faucci?
Speaker 3: Oh uh, probably yeah it was one was he tagged
in that?
Speaker 1: Probably it was a different one. It was like there
was planning for a pandemic. I forget the burbage. Do
you find an email, Joe? Yeah, it seemed like it
was at least two prior to yeah, right, yeah, it
seems like there was a planned.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, absolutely, yeah, yeah, and.
Speaker 1: Huh yeah, yeah, that's crazy. He knows everybody.
Speaker 3: Well. He was a David Rockefeller's like right hand man.
He was the legate of the Rockfeller in the Rothschews.
There's an email where he emails Peter Tilney says, you
realize that Rapper and the Rothschilds, assuming that Peter till
would know, like oh shit, you know this is like
a serious dude here. I mean, you wouldn't be recruited
into that position at age thirty unless you were, you know,
literally a high level organized crime consultant, right I did.
I did an interview a while back with Sammy the
Boll the gangster who was the underboss of John Gotti.
And like people think of gangsters and organized crime like, oh,
that's just a bunch of hoods, but they actually have
like really intelligent members and some of them are like
PhDs in crime. Right, So there's people who are, you know,
really good but at organizing crime. If you don't know.
Maya Lansky, for example, is who actually organized the Sicilian
mafia in America. So Lucky Luciano was wanting to take
the mafia to the next level, so he went to
the Jewish mafia and he says, tell us how to organize,
how do we do it? And he set it up.
They set up the mafia in America. So there's literal,
you know, PhDs in crime. I think that's that's really
what Epstein's strength was was being this sort of international
sort of consultant at that level. Because he's even even
explaining to Ewood Barrock, like how this shit works.
Speaker 1: It's so weird. I only think that man never had
a honest in his life. I think he was raised
into it.
Speaker 3: He was. Yeah, he was recruited very early on into
the Dalton School by bar who wrote a book about
sex trafficking.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Bill Barr's dad.
Speaker 3: Recruited Epstein to Dalton School, where Epstein got his start,
and then Maxwell and those people got a hold of him,
and then they brought him into the Rothchild operation because
Maxwell was a front for roth Child's as well. That's
why Epstein is still saying I represent the Rothchilds because
it's above even the Nation States. I mean, there is
an Israeli connection, but he also was flying CIA planes
for decades, so he's he's able to work with British intelligence.
CIA Israelly intelligence, right, but he's also above that at
the tier of like Council on Foreign Relations to Ailateral
Commission people.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's what I don't think he's dead.
Speaker 3: I mean very plausible.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I've seen I guess you could call it propaganda.
They said he was not a very impressive guy. He
was like rather stupid Epstein was.
Speaker 3: It's weird because in that bandoned interview, I livestream that
whole interview when it popped up, he comes up. You
know what a suede is.
Speaker 2: Like in.
Speaker 3: Younger internet terminology, a sue is somebody who tries to
portray themselves as like a real big intellectual, big shot. Yeah,
but they're not really intellectual. They're just using words to
sound you know, smart or whatever. And like, for example,
I study philosophy. So when there's a whole section where
they start going into philosophy, like I could tell Epstein
doesn't really know what he's talking about. He's trying to
sound like he's this philosophy, you know, expert. And then
there's another part where he's talking about I don't know
about tech stuff, but he's talking about AI, and people
that study AI are like, he doesn't know what he's
talking about. He's just trying to sound smart. So I
think that he's a con man. Right. There's the element
of con man going on with Epstein as well, obviously
at that level. But what he is good at is
a networking and consulting for crime. But I don't think
he's like some savant or genius because lot of stuff
he was saying was retarded and he couldn't spell. It's like,
how are you going to be a bond?
Speaker 1: Spell?
Speaker 3: Right? How are we ruled by people that can't spell?
Speaker 1: Do you think this war has anything to do with
the Epstein files? Was I guess a democrat talking because
a lot of searches is down.
Speaker 3: I think yeah, I think that. I mean the war
was already kind of being strapped planned out, and the
CIA and Masade have wanted something like the our elements
of it have wanted something like this for a long time,
because going back to even under Obama, Uh, they were
pushing the Green Revolution in Iran, which was like the
Democrats usually favor that kind of stuff rather than outright war.
They'd rather do proxy stuff or like the Color Revolution stuff.
So that didn't work. So there's been a plan like
that for a long time. And then we had, you know,
as you pointed out, those strikes a while back that
were supposed to neutralize their capabilities. But now we're back
to two weeks again to flatten Iran. But I think
the timing is also very odd too, because nobody's talking
about Epstein anymore, because now there's a war. It's not
a war.
Speaker 1: It's almost like it's uh, it's like we're attacking him
because they crossed the line. It's like an ego thing
to me, what's going on?
Speaker 3: You know?
Speaker 1: Yeah, but no real reason why we bombing them? Yeah,
but we're they I'm sitting on here on the right deck.
Iran is in the find out phase of fucking around.
And I was like, but what did they what did
Iran do to warrant this besides just existing?
Speaker 3: Well, they had Amadnejad say that he would drive the
Zionis virgin into the sea, and that was taken Remember
that that was taken as oh, they're gonna they want
to genocide all of the Jews, even though what he
said was that he wanted to drive his honest regime
into the sea. But I mean, and I'm not like
a fan of Amadinjad like he was a like she had.
Religion is it's crazy, It's it's a cult, just kind
of almost Yeah, it's a crazy End Times religion, but
kind of like Christian Zionism is. But I mean, it's
not not much better. But uh, and by the way,
what killed in one of these strikes too? I think
they I think he died he's former president, But no,
I don't. It has nothing to do with what's deserved.
It just has to do with long term strategy for
a great Israel project. That's what it is.
Speaker 1: Well, hoo could be said that he said we should
give them all the.
Speaker 3: Land from the now to the sea, right right right,
And then yeah, talker. That was a great way to
catch him in a contradiction because as soon as he
starts asking like, well, so could they then take ordin
in Iraq and anywhere they want?
Speaker 10: Not?
Speaker 3: Could be bit the bullets like yeah sure. But it's like,
but I thought we weren't going to war to take
all these lands. Well, but they could or they want to, right,
So it's just it's none of it makes any sense
unless you think about just geostrategic power. That's that's really
the only thing that makes sense. I mean, obviously there's
anti christ spiritual element too.
Speaker 1: How do you think the Muslim community is going to
react to the long term about the atoll of being assassinated?
Speaker 3: So again, like a lot of the Sunnis and she
has hate each other, right, like they they've been at
war for centuries, So the Sunnis would probably be I mean,
they've never attacked Israel, at least not the al Qaeda
Salafi right, they seem to consistently. And by the way,
E'vesteeing in those emails was talking about being able to
use some of these groups as proxies. So that vindicates
you know, the thesis that I mean, you even had
the prime Minister of Israel or one of the former
Massad guys saying that, yeah, of course, you know, we
run some of these groups, sure, the radical Muslim groups.
So I mean I would expect that most Muslims are
not Shia, so they probably I don't know, they could
go either way. I mean, they probably don't like the
idea of Islam in general being attacked, so it just
sort of ramps up that fervor. But they also don't
care about Iran because they've been fighting each other for centuries.
So regardless of America, it just gives the impression that, oh,
we're going to fight the crusade again, we're crusaders and
all this nonsense.
Speaker 1: And when a person they can really sell it is Trump.
He can sell anything, great, great point.
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah.
Speaker 1: And for them to take Iran, well, I keep saying
that I ran, it's either one, it's one hundred and seventy
million people living there, let's let's let's Forgod came across.
Speaker 3: And also it's it's been under Islam for a long time.
So I suspect there might be people who don't want
to be under under Islam. I mean, the probably is
a legitimate opposition to to some of that. But I
mean again, especially with the iatola, is like the the
religion is a tool, and people don't know that. Iran
is also a huge hub for for transgender surgeries. It's
the it's Theran is the world capital for that. And
there's that too, Yeah, there is. And that's because Shia
Islam believes that you can be a different gender by soul,
not according to your body, so you can they believe
you can have that transition.
Speaker 1: Which which who believe that.
Speaker 3: That's why that's why Tehran is a huge transgender capital.
People will fly there from all over the world to
get a transition. Now that's weird. So they're not pro gay,
they have anti homosexuality laws, but they are pro trans
I get it. Weird.
Speaker 1: That's really weird. It's like a contradiction.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean, Shia Islam is a bizarre branch of Islam.
I mean, that's why it's not the majority for a
lot of reasons, one of which is they believe you
have to have like a genetic descent from Muhammad to
to have legitimacy and authority. Soon He's don't believe that.
They think anybody could be.
Speaker 1: So you have Shi Saudi Arabish is sunny soon?
Speaker 3: Almost right?
Speaker 1: Oh that cures it? Well, not a dude, no more,
I'm not gay crazy.
Speaker 3: You could get a transition and then be a lesbian
and then you're then you're still You're still into the same.
I don't know.
Speaker 1: Well, I guess what's his face?
Speaker 3: Still going? A?
Speaker 2: Hell?
Speaker 3: Was his name?
Speaker 1: He's a lesbian? So how do you how do you
think that the rest of Trump's term is going to
play out?
Speaker 3: He can be a success, right, He's probably trying to
make the deals before he with the establishment, before he retires,
you know what I mean. So, probably trying to secure
not too much systemic opposition. I'm guessing if since we've
seen this change in the last six months, so he's
probably projecting that he's not going to be able to
really get a lot of what he campaigned on done.
So why not just go ahead and kind of make
peace with the establishment, That would be my guess, because
there's a lot of money at stake.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, yeah, this whole border peace thing he's trying.
Speaker 3: The peace is that like his? Is that his like
new un or whatever?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah, I don't know what that is. You gotta
the internet I think you gotta you gotta put some
real money into.
Speaker 3: It, billions, right, yeah, yeah, yeah, Well, I mean again,
like if you think about it from a business perspective,
that's probably what he's thinking is, Okay, what can I
do in the next couple of years. That was to
cure not just his own business legacy, but also what's
good for the kids. Right, But you had all those
crypto projects that made a bunch of money.
Speaker 1: He's got plenty of money.
Speaker 3: Now, Well, that's what I'm saying, is like, so if
you if you're not going to be able to get
rid of the Federal Reserve, then then what's the point
of that fight?
Speaker 1: So I don't know, Yeah, what do you think is
gonna happen in the mid terms? You think it's gonna
I think we would get.
Speaker 3: Let probably, I mean I be honest with that, Like
I don't vote at the gauge, right, voting to me
is just kind of retarded itself, you know what I mean.
So I'm not telling people to vote Democrat, but I
mean I think, well, so again, like back in two
thousand and seven eight, I remember I was really into
into Ron Paul Ram Paul, right, And I remember campaigning
for Ron and Rampaul, and then you just saw how like,
even though he had a huge amount of popular support,
when the mainstream media just sidelined him and they didn't
even let him in the debates. Do you remember that
he wasn't even allowed to there, Like they were just like, no, sorry,
even though he had a huge popularity, he was like
pulling thirty percent, very close to the main I.
Speaker 1: Don't know what they did to Bernie Sands on the left.
Speaker 3: Kind of yeah, they just say you're not even you
don't count. So it's like the whole party politics stuff
itself is just faking gay. I mean, I understand that pragmatically,
you have to be part of the party to get
I understand all that, but like to be honest with it,
like I focus on a lot of the history and
the bigger picture. I don't really even think about the
midterms and that kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: I forgot what was going to ask. I was going
to ask you, fuck, do you think? Okay? I remember?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 1: Do you think a lot of people who voted for
Trump is going to be turned off when it comes
to the midterms?
Speaker 3: Probably? But I mean I kind of feel like an
old school I mean, I'm not black pill, but I
had my black pill phase back in the two thousand
and seven eight Ron Paul Errow wars like man, politics
is retarded, So I would imagine that probably a lot
of people are down. But it's also I mean, I've
been hearing politicians lot since I was a kid. You know,
it's almost like, why are.
Speaker 1: You surprised it's nothing new?
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's like I remember no new taxes when I
was a kid, and Bushes saying that, and that was
like and then Trump Trump Alex played a clip of
Trump saying like ten times you know, no new wars,
no wars.
Speaker 1: Right, yes, the that's the new No new taxes, exactly, exactly,
no more wars. I'm not going to start to work
to stop wars. No more wars, little disruptions. We will
have prosperity and we will have peace.
Speaker 3: And that's why they just didn't call it a wary.
Speaker 6: Disruptions, that we will have prosperity and peace for all.
Speaker 2: I am the candidate of peace.
Speaker 4: I am peace.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to start to work to stop wars. Yeah,
nobody on the right, I mean, the majority of his
his disciples, though not pushing back at all. He's not
starting the war. He's he's in in the forty seven
year war exactly. I was like, I was like, what
what kind of mental gymnastics you play?
Speaker 3: Right? Well, you guys started, like I know, because you
guys were big maga first time around, right, Yeah, And
then it was usually it's the foreign policy Israel issue
that starts to kind of cause a rift in maga. Right.
That was happened like two their years ago, and it
just seems like that rift has just kind of gotten bigger.
And then the last few months is just like, yeah,
there's a divorce, right, would you say?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 3: What do y'all? How do y'all feel about it?
Speaker 1: I'm fucking pissed a yeah, Like I feel like I've
been lied to, yeah for like a simp. But then
I like make my comments on Facebook and everybody's attacking me.
So won't y'all just go be democrats? I'm like, why
would I do that?
Speaker 3: Facebook's all boomers, right, I mean, so do you have
like I think so? Yeah? Yeah, because a lot of
the younger crowd is a little more like they don't
give a shit about this Cold War stuff.
Speaker 1: And yeah, it's mainly boomers attacking us.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and what Yeah, the bots.
Speaker 1: You can't teach old dog new tricks. They're gonna be
stuck in their ways because he's been brainwashed ever since
there was you know, Fox News, Israel, God Shows people.
Speaker 3: And the Cold War too, that was he was a
huge for brainwashing. The Cold War was all about that.
Like they were just teaching the boomers like at any moment,
nukes are going to go off. You know, stop drop roll,
get on your desk.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so I guess you're a baber, you a pink miss,
even that scorched mess. Yeah, it's crazy, man. I just
I just thought people in the right wle you would
think they'd of just hardened to be more objective and
critical thinking, just like they left, but opposite direction.
Speaker 3: It's something about human nature that we want to follow
leaders to death from what I mean, a hero and
we will go to you know whatever they say, that's
just how humans are.
Speaker 4: Ye.
Speaker 1: Look at the Democrats. They said Joe Biden was a
great president. That dude was a complete mess, right yeah, yeah.
What do you think about what Nick Fintez is saying,
vote Democrat? I mean, he's really pissed.
Speaker 3: I don't know that that again, like I understand he's saying, oh,
that will send a message, and but I mean the
the the it's a un a party anyway, Yeah, who
you sending a message to. It's the same you know,
fake and gay retards that run both parties. So it's
not sending a message to anybody. So I don't Again,
it's just like I don't really think or cover voting
and this kind of stuff because dude, that's just the
game that that they dangle before the.
Speaker 1: Boomers, this false opposition.
Speaker 3: Now, I mean, I'm not anti I wasn't anti Trump
because I think he had a lot of the right rhetoric, right, so.
Speaker 1: I think he's did some great things with the board
and stuff like that, absolutely bombin that country and killing us.
Speaker 3: You just can't get a different foreign policy. Just like
it's like the foreign policy and the Feller Reserve, right,
and he's said a lot of good things about the
Fellaw Reserve, but nothing happens. It's just like, still, the
dollar's gonna die, right, you can't fix the dollar without
you know, fixing the Feller Reserve.
Speaker 1: Some adults how he was cutting saving all this money.
Speaker 3: It was Yeah, it's like as soon as you start
to get a little bit of something good happening, and
then right there's something swept, switch gets flipped and something happens.
Speaker 1: I think I think when he went off the debt
was a thirty four trillion, it's almost a thirty nine.
I mean he's doing the worst of job than Joe
Biden did, is he? Oh? Hell yeah, he's spending all
kinds of money. He's Joe Biden times ten. You are
fake Maga.
Speaker 3: Doing it for the faga.
Speaker 1: We was it thirty nine trillion? Those terriffs? Uh, what
do you think about those turrets? I actually thought that
was a great idea.
Speaker 3: I did too. I mean it's a classic strategy. It's
a classic way for yeah, for all that, right, and
it's actually goes. But it's like the reason that they
used to have tariffs was that in say the Middle Ages,
like a king would have that because foreign workers could
come in and undercut the native people. Right, So you
need to have some kind of you know, stronghold or
or wall there for that safety guard. And it makes
sense if you think about that. So it's really weird that,
you know, all the Democrat policies are typically policies that
are intended to destroy the country openly, right, So it
makes sense, but also like, oh, well the tariffs will
you know, fix the dollar or that they'll help the
Like it's the fellow reserved that's the problem. The money printer,
which is based on fiat money, that's the root of
the problem. So yeah, tariffs makes sense, but they're not
going to fix the debt. And even Elon when he
he you know, came out of the dose situations like
we'll never fix this that like, right, you can't start
I tell you, fix the money printer, you can't fix that, right.
The terriffs didn't make sense.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I actually like that policy. Yeah, it was like
actually a left wing policy. Taxing. Yeah, if you're gonna
have a business United States, you're gonna get cheap labor.
We bring those products in, you gotta pay a tarff
because you robbing then American worker. Right, Yeah, it makes sense. Yeah,
but he's he can still institute teriffs. Is just a
different mechanism he can. It's a different route. He's the
wrong route. This is what the Supreme Court said. But
now he's got to pay back all that money. Supposedly
he switched to a different route. Well, you gotta pay
the money back. I'm just gonna well, those women on
the Supreme Court got him. I don't believe there's a
sex stand as a conservative woman. I really don't like
when he picked that white woman and I said, she's
got a black kid that's like alone bills. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
she's woke. I'm just waiting for that kid to be
in a damn dress next time. Well it is, it's
a black girl. It's black. Oh say god, it's not
a boy waring a dress. That's what Hollywood likes.
Speaker 3: Did suck it well? Does seem like? Yeah? Like, Usually
in the public sphere, when women get into positions of power,
they're typically not going to be conservative because the whole
drive to do that right, it is kind of against
the whole idea of well aren't you at home with
the kids? You know what I mean.
Speaker 1: It's totally not in a woman's nature to be conservative,
totally not in their nature. They could be republic but
they're nowhere near conservatives. Soon as a woman run, I'm
voting for the woman. It's not time to shine.
Speaker 3: Well, most of the you know, so called the conservative women,
they always end up getting out of as feminists.
Speaker 1: So yeah, m h yeah, yep, frauds except for you
can serve the ladies watching. But you are an anomaly.
Truly are an anomaly, all of you. Yeah, it's like
being a black Republican. I'm an anomo, you know what
I mean? Forgetst our nature for me to be.
Speaker 3: Were you all libs that became.
Speaker 1: I voted for Gore Cherry. I remember standing in line
to vote right and it would be like I we
see the white pole workers. Look at them. They're looking
at me. They're trying to keep me from voting. I
was so brainwashed, and now I switched over to being
a Republican. And now.
Speaker 3: What was it? What was the catalyst for all that
made you change?
Speaker 2: Barack?
Speaker 1: Well, just listening to both sides, Yeah, but it was Barack.
When because us being self employed, our insurance rates went up.
When Obamaca and he sent us a letter explained to
us while we losing coverage and why premiums went up,
I said, damn, it's my first taste of socialism. And
older brother, who was a Republican, I thought he was
just uncle Tom. He was always planting that bug in
my ear. But when that happened to me, I started
really paying attention. Yeah, but it's just common sense, Like
the left is like they're freaking nuts.
Speaker 3: Well it is. And also when you have a business,
you start to learn, right, like how much theft goes on.
Speaker 1: You have to learn. And all this money and now
I got to give it to who him the lazy
guy over here because she's trying to pass that wealth
tax in California. All these billionaires leaving going to Florida.
It's no state tax. It makes sense why I'm gonna
stay here and pay you an extra twenty five billion
dollars a year.
Speaker 3: But and it's also it's a strategy to take down
countries and places too, leftism because they know that when
you pass those taxes, the intelligentsia and you know, the
wealthy who provide jobs, they leave. So it just makes
the country in that area worse, which then requires welfare,
which then requires people being on the doll being controlled.
So it's like it's a cloward and pivot strategy to
actually control and and turn countries into worse places, which
benefits certain elites. Wow, that is social socialism has always
been promoted by wealthy people, really really wealthy people. Yeah,
like Rothchild's.
Speaker 1: Wow, that's dob ball. Hey, look, we got him to
move makes us more powerful, Like they're doing this. You know,
if we got that hat and got those curls, wely
just like a Jew and a brown Jews.
Speaker 3: You can yeah say say you're mis Rahi or a
Sofartia or whatever.
Speaker 1: You know what, man, I got my wife's DNA test
right because something was up with her and I came
home one day. My kid was sitting on the couch.
She's just doing this. I was like, what the hell?
He shut out there? So I ran the blood results, right,
got the ancestry. Bitch is a Jew? Yeah, she's almost
twelve percent farty Jews. Yeah, that doesn't make your juice.
That's a little jewey to me. She's do my sons
because he got about half, so he's like seven.
Speaker 3: What's what's the what's the Is there a state tax
here on purchases? Is it like nine percent?
Speaker 1: No state income tax?
Speaker 3: Okay, but is there a sales tax?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 3: Yeah, okay, Well that's how you know the percentage because
if it's above that, then it's then you're Jewish. Okay,
I'm just showing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, hey man, this has been a great show. Anything
you want to plug. Where can people find you?
Speaker 3: Yeah, you can find me at anything under my name
on all the social media's Jay Dyer. And then I
had my third Hollywood book out a circulate with Part three.
That's that one right there, audience. That one. Took a
long time to write that one and put a lot
of extra time and effort into it. So it's going
to be a treat. We cover a lot of the
movies that I didn't cover in the first two. So yeah,
check that out my website, jays and I'll start calming
the shop. Get signed copies from me, and you can
find me on the four at the hour of the
Ox Show and show most fridays, you can find me
writing for the Sam Hide Show. Check out the season
one of Sam Hide show that we're pretty much complete
or we've done now. You can find me also on
x J Dyer and uh yeah, pretty much everything.
Speaker 1: That's gonna be pretty amazing working with Sam Hide.
Speaker 3: It's a lot of fun, you guys. Yeah, was that fun?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 1: Yeah, it was fun. I just couldn't gauge him. I
could read that fucking guy.
Speaker 3: Was he trolling your tripping out?
Speaker 1: No, it's just like out the glasses and he's like
a huge dude. I know, right, he's fucking humungous dude.
Speaker 3: When I went when I was on PGL year two ago,
and they took a picture and then everybody thought, all,
look at that dude, dires short as hell. I'm no,
you don't understand. You don't understand. Sam Hide is like
six six beasts, dude.
Speaker 1: He's a giant.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and he's not like Skinny the dude solid he's
he is tall. That's a big dude. Yeah, but he's
not fat. No, it's like jeezus, flicker, damn Viking.
Speaker 3: A line bicker or something.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, it's a damn good show.
Speaker 3: Damn good show.