Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Epstein Chronicles. When it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, we've heard
every excuse in the book from people who are around
them who want to now deny that there were friends
with them. But one of the most ridiculous parts of
all of it are these billionaires that want to try
and tell us that they were around Epstein because he
was going to donate to their charity. You really mean
to tell me you needed Jeffrey Epstein's money. Bill Gates
bro has more money than God. He could fund these
projects on his own, but he's reaching out to Jeffrey
Epstein because he needs some money for his charity. It
was never something that was based in reality. We all
knew that there was something else going on there, and
of course we've come to find out that the things
that Bill Gates has been denying about Jeffrey Epstein have
turned out to be true, at least some of them.
We know the Bridge player is true, and we know
that there was at least one other affair that Bill
Gates was engaged in that was related to Epstein as well,
and that doesn't even begin to touch all the other
lies that Bill Gates has told over the years about
the relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and the nexus of that relationship,
And now that the speculation has been proven to be real,
a lot of these billionaires that have pledged to do
what Bill Gates is doing by giving away all of
his money and shit, well, they're running for the hills.
Nobody wants to be associated with Jeffrey Epstein's buddy, Bill Gates,
not anymore. And in my opinion, it's a long time coming.
How does a guy that creates a computer program sit
on an ivory tower and tell me about health issues? Like,
for real, here's an idea, make sure that windows stops crashing.
Don't worry about my health. The last thing any of
us want or need is some billionaire making pretend he
cares about the future of humanity. We all know he
doesn't care about humanity, and that Bill Gates, like all
these other people, cares about Bill Gates. So today we
have an article from the New York Post and the
headline billionaire's bolt from Bill Gates scandal scarred giving pledge
as critics branded Epstein adjacent. This article was authored by
Ariel Zilber. The Bill Gates back campaign urging billionaires to
donate most of their fortunes to good causes, is reportedly
facing backlash as tech moguls mock the Philanthropy Club and
Gates recently revealed ties to lay financier and sex offender
Jeffrey Epstein continue to shadow the initiative. Well, it was
probably Epstein's idea. All right, maybe that's a little too far,
but you get the drift right. Nobody wants the scent
of Jeffrey Epstein on them, nobody, And that should tell
you everything you need to know. And it's also disgusting
how the legacy media has largely forgot about the story.
All they want to talk about is Iran. And look,
I've been trying to tell you for a long time
that the legacy media they only care about this story
when it's driving clicks, right, when it's running engagement. But
when that goes away, so does their interest. It's all
about profiting for a lot of people. So when the
next disaster pops up, everybody just becomes an expert about
that topic. But when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, even
though this story is not the number one story right
now due to the war in Iran, it's not going away.
And roughly fifty percent of people in America, according to
a new poll, think that the war in Iran was
started to cover up for these files. And I think
that that is pretty reflective from what I'm hearing from
people out there who think that all of this is
nothing more then Donald Trump wagging the dog and look
very possible. I'm not going to sit here and tell
you it's not. But I'm also not going to sit
here and tell you that that's for sure what's going on,
because I don't have that kind of information and I
respect all of you too much to bullshit you. I'm
not here to drive engagement. I'm not here to get
a fat ass paycheck from insert sponsor here. I'm here
to drive this story home and hopefully open up a
few doors for people who might otherwise not have had
access to the story. And in my opinion, I don't
think that anything else can be dealt with until we
deal with this. This is the rot that is infecting
the actual heart of America and it needs to be
dealt with one way or the other. And I don't
care what kind of distractions they throw up, whether it's
a war, an alien ship, approach and earth whatever. I
don't care. This is what we're going to talk about
on this podcast. Because when I tell you that those
boats have been burned on the beach, I mean it.
There is no going back for me. Critics like Peter Thiel,
who is not a signatory, have derided the Giving Pledge
initiative as an Epstein adjacent fake boomers club and privately
urge fellow billionaires, including Elon Musk, to abandon the pledge.
According to The New York Times, well that's pretty funny.
Peter Thiel is calling somebody else Epstein adjacent, breaking news.
You're all Epstein adjacent stupid, and it all plays into
their nonsense. Whenever they think they can weaponize Epstein against
an enemy, they most certainly will. But when they think
that the weaponization is harmful to them or their narrative,
oh it's just a big hoax. And I'm getting tired
of that shit too. The old told Musk he should
pull out of the initiative because his money would go
to left wing nonprofits that will be chosen by Bill Gates,
The Times reported, citing a recent speech that pil gave. Now, look,
I'm certainly not giving my money to Bill Gates, and
if I was some kind of billionaire, I'd be the
shepherd of that money. I'd be deciding where it was
gonna go. And frankly, if I wanted to give it away,
I'd go to the neighborhoods I grew up in, and
I'd go door to door and I'd give that money
away to the people, not to some big ass corporation
or some big ass five oh one three c or
whatever They're just gonna waste the money. I'd go right
back to my neighborhoods in South Yonkers, the South Bronx,
and East Las Vegas, and I'd give that money to
the people directly. The difference between me and Bill Gates, though,
is that Bill Gates didn't grow up poor. But the
point still stands, give it to the people directly. Why
do you want to give it to these corporations or
these charities or only pennies on the dollar end up
in the hands of the people that need it the most.
So I've always said that if I ever get a bag,
if I ever become rich, that's that's what I'm gonna do.
I'll go to my local Walmart and pay lay away
for people and just boogy out without anybody knowing it
was me. Or like hospital bills, right, go to the hospital,
find out who's in dereliction, and just pay those bills.
If you want to help people and you want to
help the most vulnerable amongst us, that's how you do it,
giving it to charities so they can do whatever they
want with it. Zero chance. Gates has come under fire
in recent weeks after he admitted to cheating on his
then wife, Melinda Frenchgates with two Russian women that he
met through the late Jeffrey Epstein, and he lied about it.
So if you lie about that, what else is he
lying about. I keep saying this all the time, and
I'll continue to say it. When you show me and
tell me who you are, I'm gonna believe you, because
when I meet somebody, I go into that introduction thinking
that the person's a decent person. Right. I always give
everybody enough rope to hang themselves. But when you're out
here lying and bullshitting and telling me you have no
idea who Jeffrey Epstein is and that you guys only
had a cup of coffee together and talked about philanthropy,
and then we find out it's something different. Well, my friend,
you are now on the clock, and what was speculation
previously has now been confirmed. The pledge has also drawn
criticism from some tech investors, who argue that modern philanthropy
has intertwined with progressive politics. Well, there's no doubt about that.
A lot of these organizations are nothing more than money
laundering foundations, and people like Jeffrey Epstein and people like
Bill Gates, they wrap themselves in philanthropy and use it
as armor so that later on down the road when
they get nailed, they can be like, oh, look what
I did for humanity. I'm such a great person. I
donated so much money. I would never do this. Unfortunately
for them, we're onto their bullshit. It and that shield
of armor that they've had previously when it comes to philanthropy,
that's been pierced. So I don't care how much money
you give or how many righteous causes you champion, because
it's all fugeesy. You don't really believe in that, you
don't really feel that way. You're just trying to buy credibility.
You're just trying to shift the narrative. You're just trying
to make yourself out to be the good guy, when
in reality, all these people are the true villains. Critics
say that many of the nonprofits and foundations favored by
major donors, particularly those tied to global health, climate initiatives,
and diversity programs, reflect left leaning priorities, fueling claims that
giving pledge has become associated with what causes rather than
political neutral charity. And this is what I'm talking about.
Why would you want your money to be managed by
somebody else. Shouldn't you just take that money and put
it to a cause that's close to your heart, something
that you want to help out with, something you think
you can make a difference with. That seems like the
way to go. Venture capitalist Mark and Dreesen has argued
that philanthropy once functioned as kind of a reputational bargain
for billionaires, allowing them to wash away all your sins
and be recast as virtuous donors. Since then, however, the
social contract has broken down as criticism of the tech
sector has intensified. Well, here's an idea. Stop diddling kids
and supporting people that do. Oh woe is me, nobody's
buying or bullshit anymore. Whah, go spend your billions and
shut up. But you're not going to blackmail the American
people anymore with your financial givings, and you're certainly not
going to change the narrative. We know what you people are,
and the rest of the world, well, they're waking up
to it as well. Brian Armstrong, the air founder of coinbase,
quietly exited the initiative in twenty twenty four, removing his
name from the pledge's website five years after signing on.
The Times reported even some of the early supporters are
said to be rethinking there are commitments. Larry Ellison, the
Oracle co founder and one of the original signatories, said
last year that he was amending his pledge to focus
more heavily on for profit research ventures. The Times reported,
Now he'll tell you because this is a financial decision.
But the truth is he knows that doing this charity
shit isn't going to provide him the cover that it
used to. So he's out. That's it, moving on to
something different. Everything's a hustle to these people. You have
to understand everything's a transaction and you and I, well,
we're the currency. Critics have argued the undertaking lacks teeth,
noting it carries no enforcement mechanism and does not track
how much money signatories actually donate, allowing billionaires to fulfill
the promise decades later through their estates. Yeah, after everybody
got their dough, folks. It's all a hustle. And this
is what I'm trying to tell you all the time.
All these really rich people, they don't care about you,
None of them do. Once you get to that level,
it's all about profit, that's it, and everything is a
means that justifies the end. Skeptics also note that much
of the pledge wealth is routed into private foundations or
donor advise funds, vehicles that can allow billions to sit
for years before reaching operating charities. The Times reported, just
like I was saying earlier, take the money to the people,
give it to them directly. The kind of shit that
crime bosses do. Right, Oh, it's Thanksgiving, let's give out
turkeys in the neighborhood. But no, these people aren't even
that smart. They really think that everybody's so stupid that
we're just going to go along. They're nonsense and their
narrative and think they're these great guys and gals because
they're donating money. And that's because for years and years,
that's how the game was played. Do whatever you want
as a degenerate, then donates the money, and it wipes
all the sins away. Taren Jensen, the interim head of
The Giving Pledge, defended the initiative, telling the Post in
a statement that debate over philanthropy is inevitable and welcome,
and noting the campaign now includes more than two hundred
and fifty donors across thirty countries, many of whom have
already met their commitments or are steadily working toward them.
Jensen added the goal is to keep building a culture
where giving is the norm, while helping signatories turn their
pledges into actions such a Hustle where givings the norm
to other organizations whose board members, by the way, are
friends with these billionaires. Talk about a circular system. Launched
in twenty ten by Bill Gates, Molinda French Gates, and
Warren Buffett, the Pledge asked the world's wealthiest people to
commit to giving away the majority of their fortunes to charity,
either during their lifetimes or after death. Imagine being the
kid of one of these dudes, and you hear that
your fortune is being given away thanks Dad appreciate you, Bud.
Bill Gates has said Epstein, who died by suicide in
jail in twenty nineteen while awaiting trial on federal sex
trafficking charges, was one of the factors behind his split
from his wife of twenty seven years. Gates has acknowledged
meeting Epstein several times after the latter's two thousand and
eight conviction for so eliciting sex from a minor, saying
he regretted the encounters. Oh yeah, he regretted it so
much that he continued to do it. He regretted it
so much that he had Epstein took him up with women.
Does anyone really believe Bill Gates brow your wife to
did you because you are hanging out with Captain Diddle Supreme?
But the rest of us should just forgive you French.
Gates stepped away from the foundation that administers the Giving
Pledge in twenty twenty four, three years after the divorce.
I firmly believe in the Giving Pledge and consider it
quite a success, though my physical limitations have eliminated my
participation in the annual get together. The ninety five year
old Buffett, who recently stepped down as CEO of Berkshire.
Hathaway told The Times, I've continued to contact possible members,
but only on a minor scale. In recent years, Bill
Gates has continued major efforts. French Gates has acknowledged that
the results of the pledge have been uneven. She recently
told Wired that some participants have donated at a massive scale,
while others have moved more slowly. Wait a minute, we're
shocked that billionaires are bullshitting and they're going back on
their pledges. Well, who would have thought that the smarmy
ass bankers and the smarmy ass rich people are going
to be smarmy. Some are doing it and some are
trying or aren't ready to, she said. French Gates added
that the initiative has not progressed as far as she
once hoped. I wish we had been even more successful
with the pledge than we have been to date, she said.
It's a problem to continue working on the post. I
saw a comment from Gates. French Gates feel Ellison, Armstrong
and Buffett. You know, Bill Gates is his own worst
enemy here. He should have just been honest from the
very beginning about Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah, I asked him for
some money. And yes he did introduce me to a
couple of women, but everything was contensual, you know, something
along those lines. But no, Bill Gates had to continue
to lie, had to deny had the office gate instead
of just being a man and own an up. And
of course that's now leading to these people bounce in
from the initiative. But at the end of the day,
does it really matter to Bill Gates? Is it going
to affect them financially? Is it going to affect them
at all? It's not, And that's because consequences are only
for people like you and me, never for people like
Bill Gates. All the information that goes with this episode
can be found in the description box.