WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday on the show, I admit I was struggling a

2
00:00:02.080 --> 00:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit with my thoughts and what I thought about,

3
00:00:06.200 --> 00:00:09.199
<v Speaker 1>certainly not what I thought about the Biden pardons, which

4
00:00:09.199 --> 00:00:15.599
<v Speaker 1>I thought were ridiculous and inexcusable. I was a little

5
00:00:15.599 --> 00:00:22.519
<v Speaker 1>bit struggling with the blanket Trump pardons for everyone involved,

6
00:00:23.120 --> 00:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone who's been convicted for January six and for all

7
00:00:26.039 --> 00:00:31.559
<v Speaker 1>the people with criminal cases surrounding the January sixth, twenty

8
00:00:31.600 --> 00:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty one riot at the Capitol. And I hopefully this

9
00:00:37.600 --> 00:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>is the last I have to do. This stupid genuflection

10
00:00:40.280 --> 00:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of January sixth was a bad thing, but not everyone

11
00:00:44.719 --> 00:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>involved in January six deserved to have the book thrown

12
00:00:46.960 --> 00:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>at them. And I genuinely think there was massive over

13
00:00:51.320 --> 00:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>prosecution of January sixth defendants. A lot of these people

14
00:00:56.840 --> 00:01:01.359
<v Speaker 1>were being prosecuted for stuff that nobody gets prosecuted for,

15
00:01:02.560 --> 00:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>heavily prosecuted for things that amounted to really nothing more

16
00:01:05.959 --> 00:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>than trespass type crimes. Basically, the chief crime that most

17
00:01:14.079 --> 00:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of the January sixth defendants in common got charged with

18
00:01:18.120 --> 00:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>was I think the term for it is parading. It's

19
00:01:21.040 --> 00:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>basically being on a patch of federal property that you're

20
00:01:24.400 --> 00:01:28.239
<v Speaker 1>not authorized to be on. So it's a little different

21
00:01:28.239 --> 00:01:31.159
<v Speaker 1>from trespass because it's public property, but you're not allowed

22
00:01:31.159 --> 00:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to be on all kinds of public property. You can't

23
00:01:34.560 --> 00:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>just walk onto a military base and just waltz in

24
00:01:37.239 --> 00:01:39.879
<v Speaker 1>and do stuff as a civilian. No, you have to

25
00:01:39.920 --> 00:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>be authorized to be there and to throw the book

26
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:48.799
<v Speaker 1>at people for crimes that are basically no more than trespass.

27
00:01:49.200 --> 00:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>When there is video evidence of in some cases police

28
00:01:52.040 --> 00:01:54.519
<v Speaker 1>officers sort of waving people in, or the whole crowd

29
00:01:54.560 --> 00:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>going in, and people like WHOA, Okay, I guess I'll

30
00:01:56.879 --> 00:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>just go in to aggressively throw the book at those

31
00:02:02.079 --> 00:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>people I thought was wrong. I was fine with prosecuting

32
00:02:07.480 --> 00:02:11.159
<v Speaker 1>anyone who beat up a cop or who assaulted a cop,

33
00:02:13.879 --> 00:02:19.719
<v Speaker 1>but I thought it was a ridiculous over prosecution to

34
00:02:19.800 --> 00:02:24.719
<v Speaker 1>make this one of the largest criminal prosecution efforts in

35
00:02:26.000 --> 00:02:30.039
<v Speaker 1>DOJ history, To have expended that much time, that much energy,

36
00:02:30.080 --> 00:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>that much effort, and to make January sixth as if

37
00:02:32.639 --> 00:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that was the single most horrific event in American history.

38
00:02:36.560 --> 00:02:42.919
<v Speaker 1>It's just ridiculous. The only person killed on January sixth

39
00:02:43.159 --> 00:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was a Trump protester. The you know that there were

40
00:02:51.039 --> 00:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>was a police officer who had a heart attack and

41
00:02:53.439 --> 00:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>died like the next day, and there was this massive

42
00:02:57.159 --> 00:02:59.759
<v Speaker 1>effort to not talk about in the media and in

43
00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>sources the medical examiners report on him, which said, no,

44
00:03:04.719 --> 00:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he died of natural causes. He didn't actually die from

45
00:03:07.000 --> 00:03:09.159
<v Speaker 1>anything having to do with January sixth. He wasn't killed

46
00:03:09.159 --> 00:03:16.159
<v Speaker 1>by the January sixth protesters. Now, so basically, what I'm

47
00:03:16.199 --> 00:03:18.039
<v Speaker 1>trying to say is it's not the worst thing. It's

48
00:03:18.080 --> 00:03:19.759
<v Speaker 1>not a good thing, but it's not the worst thing

49
00:03:19.800 --> 00:03:22.039
<v Speaker 1>that's ever happened in American history. And the idea of

50
00:03:22.080 --> 00:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>making it and prosecuting everyone who was there the centerpiece

51
00:03:27.280 --> 00:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>of the DOJ's agenda for four years was ridiculous, and

52
00:03:30.919 --> 00:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it was pointedly a kind of act of

53
00:03:33.919 --> 00:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>political vengeance that I thought was improper, especially given the

54
00:03:40.080 --> 00:03:43.319
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things that the federal government, that federal prosecutors

55
00:03:44.599 --> 00:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>patently just didn't really want to concern themselves with over

56
00:03:50.080 --> 00:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the last you know, eight years, even over the last

57
00:03:53.800 --> 00:03:58.719
<v Speaker 1>four years. You know, the people who were rioting outside

58
00:03:58.800 --> 00:04:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the Federal court House in Portland, Oregon during the George

59
00:04:03.960 --> 00:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Floyd riots for months and months and months and throwing

60
00:04:09.680 --> 00:04:13.319
<v Speaker 1>molotov cocktails into the courthouse. Oh no, we're not really

61
00:04:13.439 --> 00:04:17.879
<v Speaker 1>very aggressively prosecuting any of those people. There were all

62
00:04:17.959 --> 00:04:21.879
<v Speaker 1>kinds of people who got sweetheart easy deals for various

63
00:04:22.240 --> 00:04:27.519
<v Speaker 1>aspects of George Floyd protests. Protests where actual cops actually

64
00:04:27.560 --> 00:04:30.959
<v Speaker 1>got killed. Sorry, I don't want to imply the Capitol

65
00:04:30.959 --> 00:04:34.439
<v Speaker 1>police are not actual cops. Protests where cops actually did

66
00:04:34.480 --> 00:04:38.759
<v Speaker 1>get killed though in some cases, or where other people

67
00:04:38.839 --> 00:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>actually got killed, where people have not gotten as serious sentences.

68
00:04:45.519 --> 00:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And the DJ did not make the George Floyd riots

69
00:04:49.519 --> 00:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the kind of centerpiece of their enforcement in nearly the

70
00:04:52.319 --> 00:04:55.079
<v Speaker 1>same way that they did January sixth, And it's because

71
00:04:55.079 --> 00:04:59.759
<v Speaker 1>of the politics involved. They just decided, well, they were

72
00:04:59.759 --> 00:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>going to characterize January sixth because it was a right

73
00:05:04.160 --> 00:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>wing effort that this is the worst thing in the world,

74
00:05:09.040 --> 00:05:11.199
<v Speaker 1>and Merrick Garland came out and said it. First. They

75
00:05:11.279 --> 00:05:19.519
<v Speaker 1>characterized it as a white supremacist terrorism, which is ridiculous. Again,

76
00:05:19.879 --> 00:05:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not here saying any of it was good, but

77
00:05:21.959 --> 00:05:28.079
<v Speaker 1>the idea that it was white supremacist motivated anything was ridiculous.

78
00:05:28.319 --> 00:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a bunch of Trump supporters who were convinced

79
00:05:30.560 --> 00:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that the election had been stolen from him. It didn't

80
00:05:34.560 --> 00:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>have anything to do with white supremacism. But Merrick Garland

81
00:05:42.000 --> 00:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>comes out and says white supremacist terrorism is the single

82
00:05:44.560 --> 00:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>biggest national security threat to the United States. He said that,

83
00:05:48.120 --> 00:05:53.759
<v Speaker 1>not me. He said that. We then proceeded to have

84
00:05:53.879 --> 00:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>plain old normal terrorism in the last week of the

85
00:05:57.040 --> 00:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration. And you know, Karreeine Jean Pierre got the

86
00:06:00.360 --> 00:06:04.639
<v Speaker 1>excellent question, does the Biden administration still think that white

87
00:06:04.680 --> 00:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>supremacist terrorism is the single biggest threat facing the country. Now,

88
00:06:12.240 --> 00:06:17.439
<v Speaker 1>with all that said, I totally supported the idea of

89
00:06:17.439 --> 00:06:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Trump pardoning everyone involved with January sixth who is being

90
00:06:21.639 --> 00:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>aggressively over prosecuted for trespass. I wasn't crazy about the

91
00:06:28.879 --> 00:06:34.879
<v Speaker 1>idea of just pardoning anyone who was being prosecuted for

92
00:06:36.079 --> 00:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>assault assaulting police officers because I think from the right

93
00:06:44.000 --> 00:06:46.959
<v Speaker 1>and as someone who has appreciated a lot of a

94
00:06:47.000 --> 00:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of the Trump certain ways in which Trump has

95
00:06:51.959 --> 00:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>changed the Republican Party for the better. As far as doctrine,

96
00:06:56.040 --> 00:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I've been vastly disappointed in Trump two point zero on

97
00:06:59.360 --> 00:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the kind of seeming retreat on abortion. I guess we'll

98
00:07:02.560 --> 00:07:05.399
<v Speaker 1>see what Trump two point zero is actually going to

99
00:07:05.439 --> 00:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>do with regards to abortion. I have been angered at

100
00:07:12.360 --> 00:07:15.959
<v Speaker 1>the way that a couple of dufuses in the front

101
00:07:16.040 --> 00:07:19.759
<v Speaker 1>row at January sixth started fighting cops and gave this

102
00:07:19.920 --> 00:07:25.319
<v Speaker 1>black eye to the entire conservative movement. So I didn't

103
00:07:25.360 --> 00:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>necessarily want clemency for those people. Trump gave it to everybody.

104
00:07:35.360 --> 00:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And I read this, this opinion by this guy named

105
00:07:39.040 --> 00:07:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Sean Trendy who works for Real Clear Politics, and he

106
00:07:45.839 --> 00:07:47.959
<v Speaker 1>had this to say that I thought was really insightful

107
00:07:50.360 --> 00:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to understand the rights attitude regarding January sixth. They believe

108
00:07:56.199 --> 00:07:59.639
<v Speaker 1>that the reason the dividing line between January sixth protesters

109
00:07:59.680 --> 00:08:05.079
<v Speaker 1>getting prosecuted and say, the Portland rioters not getting prosecuted

110
00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is because the quote norms are set by liberals to

111
00:08:12.680 --> 00:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>protect liberal in groups while allowing the prosecution of out groups.

112
00:08:21.480 --> 00:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>This is also the dividing line between Trump aligned populace

113
00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and GOP establishment types. The latter. The establishment types say well,

114
00:08:30.800 --> 00:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>we should prosecute the goons. We should prosecute the goons

115
00:08:36.600 --> 00:08:41.519
<v Speaker 1>in Oregon. Also, so the Republican establishment he types people

116
00:08:41.559 --> 00:08:44.639
<v Speaker 1>like me, I guess, would say, hey, I think we

117
00:08:44.679 --> 00:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>should prosecute the people who did violence on January sixth,

118
00:08:47.240 --> 00:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and we should prosecute the people who committed violent acts

119
00:08:50.080 --> 00:08:51.919
<v Speaker 1>during the George Floyd riots, or the Portland or the

120
00:08:51.960 --> 00:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Oregon courthouse riots, et cetera. The Trump folks say that

121
00:08:57.759 --> 00:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a hopelessly naive perspective, because again, the lines

122
00:09:03.240 --> 00:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>are set by liberals to protect their in groups. So

123
00:09:07.039 --> 00:09:09.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is the one thing that makes me think

124
00:09:09.320 --> 00:09:13.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm naive. A Trump aligned person would say, you

125
00:09:14.000 --> 00:09:17.039
<v Speaker 1>want to not pardon the people who did violence on

126
00:09:17.120 --> 00:09:22.399
<v Speaker 1>January sixth, I say, yes, I don't want to pardon

127
00:09:22.440 --> 00:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the people who assaulted cops. What about the people in Oregon, Well,

128
00:09:26.480 --> 00:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say, I think those people should be prosecuted too. Well,

129
00:09:28.960 --> 00:09:29.919
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna.

130
00:09:29.639 --> 00:09:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Be because the norms, the rules that have been drawn

131
00:09:34.039 --> 00:09:36.679
<v Speaker 2>up have been drawn up by liberals, by the liberals

132
00:09:36.720 --> 00:09:40.039
<v Speaker 2>who are still obviously controlling things within the Department of

133
00:09:40.200 --> 00:09:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Justice during the first Trump administration, who didn't initiate those prosecutions.

134
00:09:50.600 --> 00:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Now. Sean Trendy writes, this isn't a defense of the

135
00:09:55.960 --> 00:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>populace at all. This is just to explain, and I

136
00:10:00.639 --> 00:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>think this does a better job of explaining this idea

137
00:10:03.080 --> 00:10:05.799
<v Speaker 1>than anything else. This is to explain the burn it

138
00:10:05.879 --> 00:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>all down mindset. It is a rigged game with rules

139
00:10:11.840 --> 00:10:15.159
<v Speaker 1>set by liberals. If this sounds like left critiques of

140
00:10:15.200 --> 00:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the past decade, well that's why we're getting this horseshoe

141
00:10:17.960 --> 00:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>effect where Trump and RFK are all of a sudden allies.

142
00:10:27.960 --> 00:10:33.159
<v Speaker 1>And obviously for Trump supporters people on the right to

143
00:10:33.360 --> 00:10:36.879
<v Speaker 1>argue that January sixth was so much worse somehow than

144
00:10:37.559 --> 00:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the Portland, Oregon riots or all the George Floyd riots,

145
00:10:41.000 --> 00:10:45.639
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, that's not gonna That doesn't work. That doesn't

146
00:10:45.679 --> 00:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>make any sense. Even if you were to admit somehow

147
00:10:48.919 --> 00:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that January sixth was worse, which I don't think it

148
00:10:51.440 --> 00:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was worse than the George Floyd riots or anything else.

149
00:10:58.080 --> 00:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Trump aligned people will pull to the dividing line. The

150
00:11:01.720 --> 00:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>dividing line between whom we punish and whom we don't

151
00:11:06.519 --> 00:11:11.159
<v Speaker 1>is always magically set to excuse people on the left

152
00:11:12.039 --> 00:11:19.399
<v Speaker 1>and to punish people on the right. The populist right,

153
00:11:19.480 --> 00:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the Trump right. Their main deviation from the establishment is

154
00:11:24.159 --> 00:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a belief that they can and should use their power

155
00:11:27.519 --> 00:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to set what are viewed to be arbitrary rules to

156
00:11:30.720 --> 00:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>their benefit when they have the chance. That to me,

157
00:11:35.519 --> 00:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a That was I think the most

158
00:11:38.279 --> 00:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>powerful argument I've read about why Trump pardoning all those

159
00:11:45.000 --> 00:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>people makes a lot of sense. Now again, I guess

160
00:11:49.960 --> 00:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a part of me that admits, yes, I think

161
00:11:53.000 --> 00:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the Trump people are totally correctly aggrieved at January sixth

162
00:11:57.399 --> 00:12:01.759
<v Speaker 1>getting punished wholesale. George Floyd riots not getting punished hardly

163
00:12:01.799 --> 00:12:04.919
<v Speaker 1>at all. Sweetheart deals being given to George Floyd, Rioders,

164
00:12:04.919 --> 00:12:09.639
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. You know, some rich liberal lawyer

165
00:12:09.639 --> 00:12:12.279
<v Speaker 1>in Manhattan who fire bombs a police car and somehow

166
00:12:12.840 --> 00:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>gets a sweetheart deal, doesn't get prosecuted all that hard,

167
00:12:17.440 --> 00:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Now I guess my preference, my initial instinct

168
00:12:24.360 --> 00:12:29.799
<v Speaker 1>would have been, listen, the Trump team needs to come in.

169
00:12:30.360 --> 00:12:34.399
<v Speaker 1>They should actually do a review of every individual January

170
00:12:34.399 --> 00:12:38.039
<v Speaker 1>sixth case. If it's something, and the dividing line should

171
00:12:38.039 --> 00:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>be did you assault a cop? If you assaulted a cop,

172
00:12:43.440 --> 00:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can have your sentence commuted to something a

173
00:12:47.360 --> 00:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>little less severe, something that's in line with other prosecutions

174
00:12:54.399 --> 00:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of other kinds of crimes throughout the country. Everyone who

175
00:12:58.200 --> 00:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>was just being charged with effectively trespassed who normally the

176
00:13:02.919 --> 00:13:05.759
<v Speaker 1>federal government would not pursue prosecutions like that. Basically, I

177
00:13:05.879 --> 00:13:08.919
<v Speaker 1>just want to actually treat the January sixth protesters the

178
00:13:08.919 --> 00:13:12.919
<v Speaker 1>way that federal prosecutors treat others similarly situated people. And

179
00:13:12.960 --> 00:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the problem maybe that I'm I'm up against it might

180
00:13:15.519 --> 00:13:18.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe my naivete is that there we're never going to

181
00:13:18.879 --> 00:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>do that. They're not going to do that, They're not

182
00:13:22.360 --> 00:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>going to treat them similarly situatedly, And it's naive to

183
00:13:27.000 --> 00:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>expect it that our side should be calling balls and

184
00:13:32.240 --> 00:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>strikes while the other side is not doing that. I

185
00:13:38.200 --> 00:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know. There's a part of me that says we

186
00:13:40.840 --> 00:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>should still do that, and there's another part of me

187
00:13:43.679 --> 00:13:47.919
<v Speaker 1>that's naive. Now the other side maybe the third option

188
00:13:48.080 --> 00:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>here that maybe makes sense, and maybe this is what

189
00:13:52.120 --> 00:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe this is what Trump is thinking. Maybe

190
00:13:57.840 --> 00:13:59.399
<v Speaker 1>we just need to kind of turn the page on

191
00:13:59.480 --> 00:14:07.039
<v Speaker 1>January as a whole pro con good, bad, indifferent. It

192
00:14:07.200 --> 00:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the defining political event of the decade. It wasn't

193
00:14:13.720 --> 00:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the single worst event in human history. It wasn't a

194
00:14:17.360 --> 00:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>good thing. And maybe the combo, honestly of one Biden

195
00:14:25.480 --> 00:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>pardoning all the members of the January sixth Committee, which

196
00:14:29.759 --> 00:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I did not like which he did on the morning

197
00:14:32.720 --> 00:14:36.519
<v Speaker 1>of January twentieth, and Donald Trump pardoning all of the

198
00:14:36.559 --> 00:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>January sixth defendants the afternoon of January twentieth. Maybe that

199
00:14:42.559 --> 00:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>combo allows us to just kind of turn the page

200
00:14:45.639 --> 00:14:48.919
<v Speaker 1>on it and just stop talking about January sixth in general.

201
00:14:51.519 --> 00:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And maybe there's wisdom there, you know, maybe there's wisdom there,

202
00:14:56.159 --> 00:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the combination of people pursuing their own particulular political

203
00:15:01.519 --> 00:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>preferences and desires. You know, Biden not wanting Lynn Cheney

204
00:15:06.879 --> 00:15:09.559
<v Speaker 1>to have to face any kind of music for you know,

205
00:15:09.720 --> 00:15:14.679
<v Speaker 1>was she tampering with witnesses or whatever. Trump basically saying, look,

206
00:15:14.759 --> 00:15:17.759
<v Speaker 1>these people supported me, They've gone through hell the last

207
00:15:17.759 --> 00:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>four years. That's enough. Maybe that combo will just allow

208
00:15:24.000 --> 00:15:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the country to sort of turn the page. And maybe

209
00:15:25.960 --> 00:15:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the combo of those two pardons from Biden and Trump

210
00:15:29.480 --> 00:15:33.639
<v Speaker 1>has the effect of we turned the page on Watergate

211
00:15:33.960 --> 00:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>when Gerald Ford pardons Richard Nixon. We turned the page

212
00:15:37.000 --> 00:15:40.639
<v Speaker 1>on Vietnam when Jimmy Carter pardons all the Vietnam War

213
00:15:40.759 --> 00:15:49.559
<v Speaker 1>draft dodgers. Maybe maybe that's what happens. I hope that's

214
00:15:49.600 --> 00:15:53.519
<v Speaker 1>what happens. So I will say again, maybe There's there's

215
00:15:53.519 --> 00:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a part of me that still is like, I don't

216
00:15:55.080 --> 00:15:56.759
<v Speaker 1>know that I would have pardoned anyone who beat up

217
00:15:56.759 --> 00:15:59.559
<v Speaker 1>a cop on January sixth, specifically because of how it

218
00:15:59.639 --> 00:16:02.639
<v Speaker 1>hurt the right in no small part, and just you know,

219
00:16:02.679 --> 00:16:09.039
<v Speaker 1>beating up cops is not a good thing. But there's

220
00:16:09.120 --> 00:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>also this part of me that understands that, that kind

221
00:16:11.840 --> 00:16:15.559
<v Speaker 1>of understands the idea of maybe doing this just the

222
00:16:15.559 --> 00:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>combo of Biden partnering all the January sixth committee members

223
00:16:19.080 --> 00:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump pardoning all the January sixth defendants. It's a clean slate,

224
00:16:23.240 --> 00:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and we move on as a country from this whole

225
00:16:24.840 --> 00:16:31.879
<v Speaker 1>episode when we return a couple of more Biden pardoned

226
00:16:31.960 --> 00:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and a thought on how to reform the pardons

227
00:16:34.720 --> 00:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>system next on the John Girardi Show. After the Biden

228
00:16:39.519 --> 00:16:44.399
<v Speaker 1>pardons and the disgraceful pardoning of his own family members, like,

229
00:16:44.639 --> 00:16:49.639
<v Speaker 1>with literally minutes left to his administration, he pardons all

230
00:16:49.679 --> 00:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the other members of his family, which which I sort

231
00:16:52.240 --> 00:16:55.039
<v Speaker 1>of knew was happening, I will confess the morning of

232
00:16:55.120 --> 00:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>January twentieth, I was thinking, Wow, he still hasn't pardoned

233
00:16:58.919 --> 00:17:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Jim Biden and the the other family members he pardoned

234
00:17:02.720 --> 00:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>people that morning. He pardoned the January sixth committee members,

235
00:17:05.680 --> 00:17:09.559
<v Speaker 1>and he pardoned Anthony Fauci, and he had a big

236
00:17:09.720 --> 00:17:13.079
<v Speaker 1>statement about those two pardons Biden did that he released,

237
00:17:14.319 --> 00:17:17.279
<v Speaker 1>but there was no pardon yet for Jim and the

238
00:17:17.319 --> 00:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>other Biden family members. And I was sitting there thinking, Wow,

239
00:17:19.839 --> 00:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is he really going to pardon Hunter for all the

240
00:17:21.960 --> 00:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>stuff he did but not pardon Jim. And then of course,

241
00:17:25.160 --> 00:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like I think it was literally within an hour, because

242
00:17:28.599 --> 00:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the new president is sworn in at noon on January twentieth,

243
00:17:32.920 --> 00:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it was, and so nine o'clock our time.

244
00:17:35.640 --> 00:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the pardon came down maybe literally at eight

245
00:17:39.279 --> 00:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty or eight forty our time, so you know, eleven

246
00:17:43.039 --> 00:17:48.519
<v Speaker 1>thirty eleven forty East Coast time. So at any rate,

247
00:17:50.440 --> 00:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe pardons his family. The flurry of pardons from both sides,

248
00:17:57.559 --> 00:18:02.279
<v Speaker 1>I think has led to some people sort of looking

249
00:18:02.400 --> 00:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>at the presidential pardon power, which is, you know, it's

250
00:18:06.440 --> 00:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>been a feature of the Constitution from the beginning. It's

251
00:18:08.400 --> 00:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a holdover from the British Constitution, the unwritten British Constitution

252
00:18:13.039 --> 00:18:17.319
<v Speaker 1>that where the monarch had the ability to pardon people

253
00:18:17.799 --> 00:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for crimes. And I talked about this on the show

254
00:18:20.519 --> 00:18:24.799
<v Speaker 1>how it was famous about Queen Victoria had very particular

255
00:18:25.119 --> 00:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about the pardon power and how she would exercise

256
00:18:28.000 --> 00:18:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it for people who committed voluntary manslaughter. And so this

257
00:18:33.559 --> 00:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is a power that the monarch had in Great Britain,

258
00:18:36.359 --> 00:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Founding Fathers retained it within our constitution, the

259
00:18:40.240 --> 00:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>idea being well, this is sort of like a safety

260
00:18:42.200 --> 00:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>release valve in the event of, you know, a bad prosecution.

261
00:18:47.960 --> 00:18:49.279
<v Speaker 1>But there's a couple of things to think about with

262
00:18:49.279 --> 00:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the pardon power. One, when the Founding Fathers put the

263
00:18:54.160 --> 00:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>pardon power in place, they didn't have the expansive body

264
00:19:00.359 --> 00:19:06.559
<v Speaker 1>of federal law that we current have currently have. In fact,

265
00:19:06.599 --> 00:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>like the total number of federal crimes at that time

266
00:19:10.480 --> 00:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was like treason and it was pretty much yet, I mean,

267
00:19:14.039 --> 00:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the body of federal law just was not especially federal

268
00:19:16.720 --> 00:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>criminal law was not a very well developed thing. We

269
00:19:23.480 --> 00:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>had an Attorney General from pretty early on. The office

270
00:19:26.720 --> 00:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Attorney General was created very shortly after the

271
00:19:30.720 --> 00:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>adoption of the new Constitution, but we didn't even have

272
00:19:33.920 --> 00:19:38.079
<v Speaker 1>a Department of Justice until I think was the late

273
00:19:38.160 --> 00:19:44.519
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth early twentieth century. The body of federal criminal law

274
00:19:44.640 --> 00:19:52.079
<v Speaker 1>just was not really developed yet, and thus, as a result,

275
00:19:52.559 --> 00:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the scope of the kinds of things that the president

276
00:19:55.240 --> 00:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>could pardon people for was a lot smaller. At the

277
00:19:58.000 --> 00:20:06.319
<v Speaker 1>time of the founding, most criminal prosecution, and as a result,

278
00:20:06.559 --> 00:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>pardoning was happening in the United States at the level

279
00:20:09.880 --> 00:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>of the states. Okay, Most criminal law enforcement in America

280
00:20:14.440 --> 00:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is done through state level prosecutors. Okay. Lisa Smith Camp,

281
00:20:19.759 --> 00:20:23.079
<v Speaker 1>who's the DA of Fresno County. She is not a

282
00:20:23.119 --> 00:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>federal prosecutor. She's a California state prosecutor. Okay. She prosecutes

283
00:20:29.039 --> 00:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>people who violate California criminal law within Fresno County. Sally

284
00:20:35.960 --> 00:20:40.039
<v Speaker 1>Moreno does that within Madera County. Okay. Most of American

285
00:20:40.079 --> 00:20:44.559
<v Speaker 1>criminal laws handled at the state level, and the governors

286
00:20:44.680 --> 00:20:47.759
<v Speaker 1>of the various states have the pardon power for people

287
00:20:47.799 --> 00:20:53.799
<v Speaker 1>who violate California law, Arizona law, New Mexico law, Hawaii law,

288
00:20:53.839 --> 00:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Alaska law, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. The governor can pardon people

289
00:20:57.640 --> 00:20:59.839
<v Speaker 1>who violate state crimes the way the president can violate

290
00:20:59.839 --> 00:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>people who violate federal law. Can pardon people who violate

291
00:21:03.759 --> 00:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>federal law. But what we've seen with the presidents is Honestly,

292
00:21:10.279 --> 00:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the last five or six presidents have issued pardons that

293
00:21:15.240 --> 00:21:18.039
<v Speaker 1>were really pretty questionable, and a lot of it's happening

294
00:21:18.079 --> 00:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in this sort of interregnum period between election day and

295
00:21:22.240 --> 00:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>inauguration day, specifically being done because there won't be political

296
00:21:28.319 --> 00:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>ramifications for it. Biden doesn't pardon Hunter or his family

297
00:21:34.279 --> 00:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>until after election day, as everyone predicted. Why well, because

298
00:21:39.240 --> 00:21:41.079
<v Speaker 1>if he did it before election day, he would suffer

299
00:21:41.119 --> 00:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>some bad political result. This is the best proposal I've

300
00:21:45.720 --> 00:21:49.079
<v Speaker 1>heard for amending the constitution to sort of reduce the

301
00:21:49.119 --> 00:21:53.759
<v Speaker 1>pardon power, because you would have to amend the constitution,

302
00:21:53.960 --> 00:21:57.519
<v Speaker 1>and I think at this point both Democrats and Republicans

303
00:21:57.559 --> 00:22:01.079
<v Speaker 1>can point to instances of a president from the other

304
00:22:01.160 --> 00:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>party using the pardon power in a way they didn't like.

305
00:22:07.640 --> 00:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I think a great proposal for limiting the pardon power

306
00:22:12.400 --> 00:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>would be to keep it from being like venal a

307
00:22:16.559 --> 00:22:20.599
<v Speaker 1>venal personal political a venal personal use of the pardon

308
00:22:20.640 --> 00:22:24.279
<v Speaker 1>power to prevent against the Joe Bidens of the world

309
00:22:24.359 --> 00:22:29.559
<v Speaker 1>pardoning his son and his family and thereby protecting himself.

310
00:22:30.839 --> 00:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the real thing is Biden is kind of protecting

311
00:22:33.319 --> 00:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>himself for his potentially criminal involvement in his son and

312
00:22:38.000 --> 00:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>his brother's shady business dealings. Here's the proposal that I like,

313
00:22:44.640 --> 00:22:50.519
<v Speaker 1>no pardons between election day and inauguration day. No pardons

314
00:22:50.519 --> 00:22:54.759
<v Speaker 1>between election day and inauguration day. I think that's a

315
00:22:54.799 --> 00:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>really sensible idea. In fact, maybe a month before election,

316
00:23:00.359 --> 00:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>just to account for the fact that so many states

317
00:23:01.880 --> 00:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>have early voting. No pardons between the election and inauguration day.

318
00:23:07.319 --> 00:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>If you want to pardon someone, you need to be

319
00:23:09.240 --> 00:23:15.799
<v Speaker 1>able to take the political hit that results. I think

320
00:23:15.839 --> 00:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a sound idea. Now, you can't just do that

321
00:23:18.200 --> 00:23:21.519
<v Speaker 1>by executive order, you wave a magic wand you would

322
00:23:21.559 --> 00:23:24.839
<v Speaker 1>need to amend the Constitution, get two thirds majorities in

323
00:23:24.839 --> 00:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>both houses of Congress, get three fourths of the states

324
00:23:26.960 --> 00:23:28.759
<v Speaker 1>to vote for it. But I think that would be

325
00:23:28.759 --> 00:23:32.319
<v Speaker 1>a really sensible way to limit the pardon power. Now,

326
00:23:32.480 --> 00:23:35.759
<v Speaker 1>when we return talking about amending the Constitution, I want

327
00:23:35.759 --> 00:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk about two ways in which two consecutive presidents

328
00:23:41.640 --> 00:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>are trying to argue that the Constitution says something different

329
00:23:47.359 --> 00:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>than we'd think. Biden's saying that the era is now

330
00:23:50.759 --> 00:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>a new amendment to the Constitution, and President Trump trying

331
00:23:54.359 --> 00:23:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of birthright citizenship via the Fourteenth Amendment.

332
00:23:57.920 --> 00:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>That's next on the John Girardi Show. Two significant constitutional

333
00:24:04.559 --> 00:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>efforts were issued by two different presidents over the course

334
00:24:09.920 --> 00:24:11.519
<v Speaker 1>of a couple of days, and I'm going to talk

335
00:24:11.519 --> 00:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>about them in turn and the issues pro and con

336
00:24:15.039 --> 00:24:17.519
<v Speaker 1>for both of them. One is Joe Biden trying to

337
00:24:17.680 --> 00:24:21.039
<v Speaker 1>argue that the Equal Rights Amendment is in fact a

338
00:24:21.079 --> 00:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>real amendment to the Constitution is now the twenty eighth Amendment.

339
00:24:28.359 --> 00:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>And then President Trump arguing that the Fourteenth Amendment does

340
00:24:32.400 --> 00:24:38.079
<v Speaker 1>not protect birthright citizenship, just the Fourteenth Amendment does not

341
00:24:38.440 --> 00:24:41.279
<v Speaker 1>protect the idea that just because you're born on American soil,

342
00:24:41.319 --> 00:24:45.559
<v Speaker 1>that does not automatically make you an American citizen. Let's

343
00:24:45.559 --> 00:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>dig into it first. Let's talk about Biden's era argument. Now.

344
00:24:52.720 --> 00:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I talked about this a little on the show earlier

345
00:24:54.519 --> 00:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>this week. The Equal Rights Amendment was this effort by

346
00:24:57.200 --> 00:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>liberals to sort of shoehorn in of ticking constitutional time

347
00:25:03.200 --> 00:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>bomb into the Constitution, a very simple text that guarantees

348
00:25:11.119 --> 00:25:14.079
<v Speaker 1>no discrimination on the basis of sex, putting that into

349
00:25:14.119 --> 00:25:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution. And when it was first introduced, everyone supported it.

350
00:25:18.079 --> 00:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe President Nixon supported it, President Ford supported it.

351
00:25:22.359 --> 00:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Carter supported. Everyone supported it. Republicans liked it, Democrats

352
00:25:26.480 --> 00:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>liked it. It got the necessary two thirds majorities in

353
00:25:30.160 --> 00:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>both houses of Congress and was well on its way

354
00:25:32.440 --> 00:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to ratification by the state legislatures. Again, it's two thirds

355
00:25:35.920 --> 00:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>majorities in both houses of Congress plus three quarters of

356
00:25:39.240 --> 00:25:41.759
<v Speaker 1>all the state legislatures have to vote for something to

357
00:25:41.839 --> 00:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>be included into the Constitution as an amendment. By the way,

358
00:25:47.039 --> 00:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a little basic civics thing, there's some people who don't

359
00:25:49.759 --> 00:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>understand what an amendment to the Constitution actually is. They'll say, well,

360
00:25:53.119 --> 00:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not in the constitution, it's just an amendment. No.

361
00:25:56.039 --> 00:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>It an amendment means we are changing the constitution to

362
00:26:01.039 --> 00:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>say this. Everything that's in an amendment to the Constitution

363
00:26:05.400 --> 00:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is part of the Constitution, unless like a subsequent amendment

364
00:26:09.880 --> 00:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>is repealing a prior amendment, like with prohibition for example.

365
00:26:14.160 --> 00:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So if it's an amendment to the Constitution, it's in

366
00:26:16.279 --> 00:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the constitution. Just a basic thing that some people screw up.

367
00:26:23.640 --> 00:26:26.319
<v Speaker 1>So it got the necessary two thirds votes in both

368
00:26:26.319 --> 00:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>houses of Congress, it was well on its way to

369
00:26:27.920 --> 00:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>three quarters of the state legislatures ratifying it. The era itself,

370
00:26:32.160 --> 00:26:35.319
<v Speaker 1>though had a provision saying it had a seven year

371
00:26:35.359 --> 00:26:40.039
<v Speaker 1>window in which it needed to be ratified, needed to

372
00:26:40.039 --> 00:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>get the necessary three quarters of the states to ratify

373
00:26:43.200 --> 00:26:50.319
<v Speaker 1>it within seven years. Along comes Phyllis Schlaffley. Phyllis Schlaffley,

374
00:26:50.359 --> 00:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>who single handedly shifted the whole Republican Party on the

375
00:26:53.960 --> 00:26:56.759
<v Speaker 1>issue of the Equal Rights Amendment by pointing out that

376
00:26:56.839 --> 00:26:59.599
<v Speaker 1>this would be interpreted by the courts to lead to

377
00:26:59.680 --> 00:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of disastrous left wing ideas. It would further

378
00:27:04.200 --> 00:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>buttress the idea of abortion being part of the Constitution,

379
00:27:07.599 --> 00:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>It could get rid of any kind of legally recognized

380
00:27:11.759 --> 00:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>differences on the basis of sex, whether it's within accommodations,

381
00:27:15.480 --> 00:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>within sports, within bathrooms, within this, within that. And she

382
00:27:19.000 --> 00:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>paraded out this list of horribles things that actually became

383
00:27:23.319 --> 00:27:27.279
<v Speaker 1>true over time, because it's how the liberals wound up

384
00:27:27.319 --> 00:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>interpreting other aspects of American law protecting people from discrimination

385
00:27:33.599 --> 00:27:36.759
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of sex. It's literally what Justice Gorsuch

386
00:27:36.839 --> 00:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>did with the Bowstock decision. So Phylish Laughley incredibly prescient,

387
00:27:45.319 --> 00:27:47.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe not in exactly the way that she foresaw, but

388
00:27:47.880 --> 00:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely was prescient on this question. And because of Phylishlaffley's

389
00:27:54.680 --> 00:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>efforts at the grassroots level. The Equal Rights Amendment was

390
00:27:59.000 --> 00:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>not able to get the necessary thirty eight states to

391
00:28:02.839 --> 00:28:07.279
<v Speaker 1>ratify it prior to the seven year deadline. In fact,

392
00:28:07.359 --> 00:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>many states undid their prior ratification. They voted again and said, well, now,

393
00:28:16.240 --> 00:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>after further consideration, we the state of whatever, have decided

394
00:28:20.440 --> 00:28:27.559
<v Speaker 1>to withdraw our state's support for ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment. Now,

395
00:28:30.960 --> 00:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, Virginia became if you don't count the

396
00:28:34.200 --> 00:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>states that deratify and you ignore the seven year timeframe

397
00:28:38.720 --> 00:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that's in the text of the era, Virginia became the

398
00:28:42.960 --> 00:28:45.519
<v Speaker 1>thirty eighth state to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment in

399
00:28:45.559 --> 00:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. Okay, under a Democrat, you know, state legislature.

400
00:28:56.000 --> 00:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>When that happened, a bunch of liberals started trying to

401
00:29:00.480 --> 00:29:03.319
<v Speaker 1>push and they pushed for this throughout the Biden administration,

402
00:29:05.200 --> 00:29:09.119
<v Speaker 1>push for the idea that Biden should recognize the RA

403
00:29:09.440 --> 00:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>as having been ratified. And the big push was always

404
00:29:13.440 --> 00:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on the National Archivist, who it's not a very partisan

405
00:29:19.400 --> 00:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>job being the National Archivist, but for example, for example,

406
00:29:24.079 --> 00:29:27.519
<v Speaker 1>Senator Kirsten Gillibrand from New York was really aggressively pushing

407
00:29:27.519 --> 00:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that the National Archivist needed to publish the Equal Rights

408
00:29:31.440 --> 00:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Amendment as the new twenty eighth Amendment of the United States.

409
00:29:35.319 --> 00:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>The argument from Senator Gillibrand was, hey, three fourths of

410
00:29:38.240 --> 00:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the states have now ratified it. Now Here are the

411
00:29:41.680 --> 00:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>obvious problems with that? One, The ERA has a seven

412
00:29:46.519 --> 00:29:52.119
<v Speaker 1>year ratification window in its own text. In order to

413
00:29:52.200 --> 00:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>say that the ERA is part of the Constitution, you

414
00:29:54.519 --> 00:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>would have to somehow argue that that seven year ratification

415
00:29:57.200 --> 00:29:59.359
<v Speaker 1>window that's in the text of the ERA is meaningless.

416
00:29:59.480 --> 00:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Now there's some argument maybe for that. The Constitution itself

417
00:30:03.960 --> 00:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't give like a time frame within which you need

418
00:30:07.720 --> 00:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to get those three quarters of the states to ratify

419
00:30:10.279 --> 00:30:15.279
<v Speaker 1>something for it to become part of the Constitution. But

420
00:30:15.640 --> 00:30:18.279
<v Speaker 1>it is there in the text, and that's the terms

421
00:30:18.319 --> 00:30:22.279
<v Speaker 1>by which the thing was proposed to everyone. So I

422
00:30:22.279 --> 00:30:27.519
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you just ignore that. Secondly, you only

423
00:30:27.599 --> 00:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>get to that thirty eight number if you ignore the

424
00:30:29.440 --> 00:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>states that de ratified. If within whatever window you need

425
00:30:35.240 --> 00:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to get to thirty eight, you have some states that

426
00:30:37.799 --> 00:30:40.359
<v Speaker 1>de ratify, then you don't have thirty eight. You need

427
00:30:40.400 --> 00:30:43.039
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight states to ratify a constitutional Amendment before it

428
00:30:43.039 --> 00:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>can become part of the Constitution. They don't have thirty eight.

429
00:30:52.039 --> 00:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>So you have these two really difficult legal questions that

430
00:31:02.359 --> 00:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to kind of get over if you're going

431
00:31:05.519 --> 00:31:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to say that the Equal Rights Amendment is going to

432
00:31:08.880 --> 00:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>be part of the law of the land. I've heard

433
00:31:10.880 --> 00:31:13.359
<v Speaker 1>a smart lawyer describe this to me by saying, basically,

434
00:31:13.440 --> 00:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you need a royal flush. You need to pull a

435
00:31:16.039 --> 00:31:21.480
<v Speaker 1>royal flush. Excuse me, you need to pull a royal

436
00:31:21.559 --> 00:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>flush of winning several difficult to win legal arguments in

437
00:31:26.319 --> 00:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>order to arrive at the conclusion that the ERA is

438
00:31:30.519 --> 00:31:33.759
<v Speaker 1>part of the Constitution. And if you know, you've got

439
00:31:33.799 --> 00:31:35.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Ace of Spades, King of Spades, Queen

440
00:31:35.559 --> 00:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of Spades, Jack of spades, if one of them is off,

441
00:31:40.000 --> 00:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>if that last one is a nine of hearts, no dice, okay.

442
00:31:44.319 --> 00:31:46.799
<v Speaker 1>If any one of these difficult to win, difficult to

443
00:31:46.839 --> 00:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>convince arguments goes south, the ERA is not part of

444
00:31:51.440 --> 00:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution. And who would be the body ultimately deciding

445
00:32:00.200 --> 00:32:03.359
<v Speaker 1>is the Era part of the Constitution or not? Well,

446
00:32:03.440 --> 00:32:07.039
<v Speaker 1>obviously that would be the Supreme Court. And let me

447
00:32:07.079 --> 00:32:11.039
<v Speaker 1>ask you, do you really think that, John Roberts, even

448
00:32:11.079 --> 00:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>John Roberts, who you might think he's a waffling liberal.

449
00:32:14.759 --> 00:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>But one thing John Roberts is is he's kind of

450
00:32:16.680 --> 00:32:20.839
<v Speaker 1>an institutionalist, and he doesn't like He's not gonna like

451
00:32:20.880 --> 00:32:24.759
<v Speaker 1>this kind of a Shenanigan. There's no way that you're

452
00:32:24.799 --> 00:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna get five of that nine to agree that all

453
00:32:29.680 --> 00:32:32.559
<v Speaker 1>of those difficult to win legal arguments all go one way.

454
00:32:33.000 --> 00:32:41.599
<v Speaker 1>There's just no way that's gonna happen. The most gutless

455
00:32:41.640 --> 00:32:45.039
<v Speaker 1>aspect of Biden doing this, by the way, well, the

456
00:32:45.039 --> 00:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>two aspects of it that are gutless. One is that

457
00:32:48.279 --> 00:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>he says he thinks that the era should be is

458
00:32:52.759 --> 00:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>recognized as part of the Constitution, but he doesn't do

459
00:32:56.319 --> 00:33:00.519
<v Speaker 1>anything to mandate it. He was still president at the time.

460
00:33:00.519 --> 00:33:03.839
<v Speaker 1>It was like over the weekend, it was before January twentieth,

461
00:33:05.240 --> 00:33:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't say, I am ordering the National Archivist

462
00:33:08.920 --> 00:33:13.039
<v Speaker 1>to publish it. I am demanding that all aspects of

463
00:33:13.119 --> 00:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the federal government recognize and I'm demanding the DOJ recognize it,

464
00:33:17.759 --> 00:33:21.759
<v Speaker 1>as you know, as part of the Constitution. I'm directing

465
00:33:21.799 --> 00:33:25.119
<v Speaker 1>any lawsuits that regard this topic to consider that. Blah

466
00:33:25.160 --> 00:33:27.119
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. No, he didn't do any of that.

467
00:33:29.519 --> 00:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Not only did he not do that with his statement

468
00:33:31.720 --> 00:33:34.359
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend, so basically it was just virtue signaling.

469
00:33:34.400 --> 00:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>It was him just saying, yeah, I definitely think it is.

470
00:33:37.400 --> 00:33:39.839
<v Speaker 1>It's like, okay, well the president can think whatever he wants,

471
00:33:39.920 --> 00:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>unless he's going to order people to do stuff. It

472
00:33:42.240 --> 00:33:46.519
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. I mean, it has no more impact than

473
00:33:46.559 --> 00:33:50.359
<v Speaker 1>me thinking that, you know, the sky is made out

474
00:33:50.359 --> 00:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of cotton candy. The other gutlass thing about it is

475
00:33:56.480 --> 00:34:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Biden doing this the weekend before he leaves office. As

476
00:34:02.559 --> 00:34:05.599
<v Speaker 1>I said, the last state, the state that ratified the

477
00:34:05.640 --> 00:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>ERA in such a way as to bring them over

478
00:34:07.759 --> 00:34:10.519
<v Speaker 1>the hump of thirty eight if you exclude the states

479
00:34:10.559 --> 00:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that you know deratified, was Virginia in twenty twenty. So

480
00:34:15.400 --> 00:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>all throughout Biden's four years in office, he could have

481
00:34:17.880 --> 00:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>done this. He could have argued, well, I think the

482
00:34:20.880 --> 00:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>ARA is law of the land. Go pursue it, federal government,

483
00:34:24.599 --> 00:34:27.800
<v Speaker 1>publish it, national archivist, you know, pursue it. Department of Justice.

484
00:34:28.159 --> 00:34:31.039
<v Speaker 1>He never did that for four years. In fact, his

485
00:34:31.239 --> 00:34:38.199
<v Speaker 1>own DOJ issued opinions saying the ERA is not part

486
00:34:38.239 --> 00:34:42.639
<v Speaker 1>of the constitution. His own DOJ didn't support the idea

487
00:34:44.480 --> 00:34:48.039
<v Speaker 1>for four years, but now all of a sudden, the

488
00:34:48.119 --> 00:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>weekend before he leaves office, he's saying that it's part

489
00:34:51.400 --> 00:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of the I think it's part of the constitution. No,

490
00:34:54.000 --> 00:34:56.039
<v Speaker 1>it's just a gutless way for Biden to kind of

491
00:34:56.079 --> 00:34:58.639
<v Speaker 1>save face and act like he's, Oh, I'm so pro woman,

492
00:34:58.679 --> 00:35:03.039
<v Speaker 1>look at me. And he obviously if he actually wanted

493
00:35:03.079 --> 00:35:05.079
<v Speaker 1>the era to be part of the constitution, he should

494
00:35:05.119 --> 00:35:07.639
<v Speaker 1>have tried to do something about it. I don't know

495
00:35:07.719 --> 00:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>on day one when he took office in twenty twenty one,

496
00:35:11.039 --> 00:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>he could have done something he never did for four years.

497
00:35:15.480 --> 00:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>When we returned, we'll quickly talk about President Trump's executive

498
00:35:18.960 --> 00:35:21.679
<v Speaker 1>order on birthright citizenship the legal issues there next on

499
00:35:21.679 --> 00:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>The John Gerardy Show. President Trump issued an executive order

500
00:35:26.920 --> 00:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>on day one directing the federal government to not recognize

501
00:35:31.559 --> 00:35:38.159
<v Speaker 1>entirely birthright citizenship. This stems from the Fourteenth Amendment. The

502
00:35:38.159 --> 00:35:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Fourteenth Amendment, says the first sentence in Section one of

503
00:35:41.599 --> 00:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the Fourteenth Amendment. Fourteenth amendmentless remember, was ratified after the

504
00:35:45.239 --> 00:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Civil War, and its chief effect at the time, among

505
00:35:50.920 --> 00:35:54.320
<v Speaker 1>various other things, was to grant citizenship and rights to

506
00:35:55.440 --> 00:36:02.039
<v Speaker 1>the newly freed slaves. It was ratified in conjunction with

507
00:36:02.079 --> 00:36:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the thirteenth Amendment, which freed the slaves. Fourteen Amendment made

508
00:36:04.679 --> 00:36:10.599
<v Speaker 1>them citizens. Fifteenth Amendment made them voters. He uh da

509
00:36:10.679 --> 00:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>da da da da. The text of the fourteenth Amendment,

510
00:36:13.480 --> 00:36:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Section one says, all persons born or naturalized, all persons

511
00:36:19.039 --> 00:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>born or naturalized in the United States and subject to

512
00:36:24.960 --> 00:36:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and

513
00:36:29.159 --> 00:36:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of the state wherein they reside. Now, Supreme Court opinions

514
00:36:38.599 --> 00:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at this, and more relevantly, federal statutes looking at this,

515
00:36:47.639 --> 00:36:52.280
<v Speaker 1>have interpreted this as just if you're born here, you're

516
00:36:52.320 --> 00:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a citizen, even if you're And the only exception that's

517
00:36:59.400 --> 00:37:02.639
<v Speaker 1>recognized by Supreme Court decisions or by federal law is

518
00:37:03.159 --> 00:37:09.119
<v Speaker 1>if the child of say, if the French ambassador to

519
00:37:09.199 --> 00:37:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the United States is in Washington, d C. And the

520
00:37:12.679 --> 00:37:15.760
<v Speaker 1>French ambassador he and his wife have their baby in

521
00:37:15.920 --> 00:37:18.760
<v Speaker 1>America in Washington, D C. That baby is not an

522
00:37:18.800 --> 00:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>American citizen. That baby is a French citizen. Now ambassadors

523
00:37:25.360 --> 00:37:27.679
<v Speaker 1>are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

524
00:37:28.159 --> 00:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Is the child of two illegal immigrants who come into

525
00:37:31.480 --> 00:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the country illegally but have a baby in America. Is

526
00:37:33.960 --> 00:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that baby subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

527
00:37:38.079 --> 00:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the central constitutional question. Maybe maybe not. But there's

528
00:37:45.480 --> 00:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>another problem, which is an executive order like the one

529
00:37:47.960 --> 00:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>President Trump issued cannot contradict a federal statute, something that's

530
00:37:52.039 --> 00:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>actually passed by Congress and signed into law by a president.

531
00:37:55.360 --> 00:37:59.760
<v Speaker 1>And we have federal statutes on the books that just

532
00:37:59.760 --> 00:38:04.280
<v Speaker 1>said you're a citizen if you're born here, without discriminating

533
00:38:04.320 --> 00:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of where you're born of the legal

534
00:38:06.039 --> 00:38:08.360
<v Speaker 1>alien parents. That's where President Trump, I think, is going

535
00:38:08.400 --> 00:38:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to have the most difficulty. Maybe you could interpret the

536
00:38:10.760 --> 00:38:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Constitution differently, but those federal statutes are very clear and

537
00:38:13.960 --> 00:38:16.239
<v Speaker 1>they're on the books. So we'll see. That'll do it.

538
00:38:16.320 --> 00:38:18.079
<v Speaker 1>John di' already show see next time on Power Talk.
