WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Watching the Walls Harris debate confirmed some things I suspected

2
00:00:07.839 --> 00:00:11.279
<v Speaker 1>having a bit of a connection to Minnesota and Minnesota

3
00:00:11.279 --> 00:00:16.879
<v Speaker 1>politics via my in laws, and what I suspected was

4
00:00:18.640 --> 00:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Tim Walls is not a man for the big stage.

5
00:00:23.280 --> 00:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>He's a man for the small stage. I remember this

6
00:00:28.120 --> 00:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>very clearly with Scott Walker, the former governor of Wisconsin,

7
00:00:33.200 --> 00:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the Republican governor of Wisconsin, and there was this flurry

8
00:00:37.280 --> 00:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of excitement on the right when Walker became the governor

9
00:00:41.560 --> 00:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of Wisconsin, and a lot of libertarian leaning conservative money

10
00:00:47.119 --> 00:00:53.799
<v Speaker 1>was so thrilled about Walker because he took a lot

11
00:00:53.799 --> 00:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of steps after he came into office to break the

12
00:00:56.960 --> 00:01:01.079
<v Speaker 1>power of a lot of different unions within Wisconsin, especially

13
00:01:02.359 --> 00:01:05.239
<v Speaker 1>public sector unions. And that's the one, you know, the

14
00:01:05.560 --> 00:01:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Koch brother money that's out there. I mean, the one

15
00:01:08.200 --> 00:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that they're all very very much united on is

16
00:01:12.439 --> 00:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that unions are bad. So they loved Scott Walker, and

17
00:01:15.879 --> 00:01:18.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm a bit more ambivalent on that question. I certainly

18
00:01:18.760 --> 00:01:24.079
<v Speaker 1>not crazy about public sector unions and teachers' unions. Nonetheless,

19
00:01:24.079 --> 00:01:26.439
<v Speaker 1>there was all of this excitement about Scott Walker, and

20
00:01:26.480 --> 00:01:29.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, latter half

21
00:01:29.680 --> 00:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Obama years and everyone's like, this guy's running

22
00:01:34.560 --> 00:01:36.519
<v Speaker 1>for president, this guy's running for president, this guy's running

23
00:01:36.519 --> 00:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>for president. And then twenty sixteen rolls around and what

24
00:01:39.519 --> 00:01:44.719
<v Speaker 1>do we see? Eh, he was on the debate stage

25
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and completely dwarfed charisma wise by guess who, Donald Trump.

26
00:01:54.120 --> 00:02:00.519
<v Speaker 1>Some people are just not made for prime time. They're

27
00:02:00.519 --> 00:02:05.799
<v Speaker 1>not made for a national political stage. They're not national

28
00:02:05.840 --> 00:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>political figures. They are appealing to a statewide audience. They

29
00:02:11.680 --> 00:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>can get support from statewide donors, they can get political

30
00:02:16.759 --> 00:02:20.479
<v Speaker 1>and media coverage that's favorable, and you know, a breeze

31
00:02:20.520 --> 00:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>to their back from local media and local outlets. But

32
00:02:28.800 --> 00:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not ready for prime time. And that's who Tim

33
00:02:31.719 --> 00:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Walls is. Walls has been kind of bubble wrapped throughout

34
00:02:39.400 --> 00:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this process and with Democrat and media narratives telling us

35
00:02:43.560 --> 00:02:50.159
<v Speaker 1>how wonderful he is, but there's been no uncontrolled occasion

36
00:02:50.280 --> 00:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for actually seeing him face to face. And once we did,

37
00:02:56.319 --> 00:02:59.439
<v Speaker 1>what did we see? Well, he kind of looked dopey,

38
00:02:59.759 --> 00:03:03.599
<v Speaker 1>look like I saw someone on Twitter make the joke

39
00:03:03.639 --> 00:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>that he looked like Don Rickles, Don Rickles wimpy Lutheran brother,

40
00:03:09.199 --> 00:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was hilarious and dead on the other

41
00:03:14.879 --> 00:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>thing that I find hilarious is how, both for Walls

42
00:03:17.680 --> 00:03:22.199
<v Speaker 1>and then lately, for some reason, Kamala Harris's husband, Scott Emhoff,

43
00:03:24.560 --> 00:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>there's this constant effort by people on the left to

44
00:03:28.039 --> 00:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>want to identify their favored politicians as like family members

45
00:03:36.120 --> 00:03:42.599
<v Speaker 1>or like either either to grossly sexualize them like or

46
00:03:42.680 --> 00:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to portray them as like their father or something. Oh,

47
00:03:47.159 --> 00:03:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden's like our grandpa. Kamala Harris is Mamla. She's

48
00:03:51.360 --> 00:03:56.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, just like your fun aunt, and or to

49
00:03:56.919 --> 00:04:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the gross sort of there were different ways throughout the

50
00:04:00.439 --> 00:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Obama years where people were sexualizing bro Oh, he's so hot,

51
00:04:03.439 --> 00:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>he's so confident, he's so cool. With both Walls and

52
00:04:09.599 --> 00:04:11.759
<v Speaker 1>m Hoff, there was a recent story about Doug m

53
00:04:11.759 --> 00:04:15.599
<v Speaker 1>Hoff saying that, oh, Doug m Hoff, he's he's reshaping

54
00:04:15.639 --> 00:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>our concept of masculinity. So it's basically and similar things

55
00:04:22.160 --> 00:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>have been said of Walls, which is so hilarious to me,

56
00:04:27.319 --> 00:04:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Like a liberal man exists and liberals go, wow, this

57
00:04:31.879 --> 00:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is reshaping our entire concept of masculinity. I don't think

58
00:04:35.959 --> 00:04:41.079
<v Speaker 1>they're reshaping anyone's concepts of masculinity. They're guys. I mean whatever,

59
00:04:41.120 --> 00:04:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they're a good guy, maybe they're a bad guy.

60
00:04:42.800 --> 00:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I highly doubt that the vice presidential nominee or the

61
00:04:47.279 --> 00:04:50.519
<v Speaker 1>current the husband of the current vice president, is really

62
00:04:50.519 --> 00:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>reshaping anyone's sense of masculinity. Although if we're going to

63
00:04:54.319 --> 00:05:02.199
<v Speaker 1>talk about Doug m Hoff, I mean, I don't know

64
00:05:02.240 --> 00:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that he's reshaping my concept of masculinity, given that his

65
00:05:05.399 --> 00:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>concept of masculinity is cheating on his wife with the

66
00:05:08.079 --> 00:05:11.519
<v Speaker 1>nanny and then marrying some other galp you know, so,

67
00:05:12.920 --> 00:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, doesn't strike me as a very appealing

68
00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>concept of masculinity. Now, it seems like the soft consensus

69
00:05:26.399 --> 00:05:30.439
<v Speaker 1>is that Vance did better, and a lot of the

70
00:05:30.519 --> 00:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>messaging from the left after the fact has been well,

71
00:05:35.199 --> 00:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the vice presidency isn't all that important. It's not like

72
00:05:37.519 --> 00:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the vice presidency such policy, which is an awkward thing

73
00:05:43.439 --> 00:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for liberals to argue right now, given who their nominee is.

74
00:05:47.600 --> 00:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's almost this impossible tightrope that liberals have to

75
00:05:50.600 --> 00:05:57.399
<v Speaker 1>walk with Kamala Harris. They have to portray her as

76
00:05:57.560 --> 00:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>smart and competent and part of the plan. They cannot

77
00:06:04.519 --> 00:06:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I think they have to pick one or the other. Either.

78
00:06:10.839 --> 00:06:15.879
<v Speaker 1>She was really heavily involved as a prominent key decision

79
00:06:15.920 --> 00:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>maker for Democrat policies for the last four years, in

80
00:06:21.720 --> 00:06:25.639
<v Speaker 1>which case, unfortunately for her, she has to bear a

81
00:06:25.639 --> 00:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of the blame for those policies. Or and frankly,

82
00:06:34.279 --> 00:06:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think this is more likely. She was

83
00:06:38.399 --> 00:06:42.959
<v Speaker 1>often left out in the cold, she was off And

84
00:06:43.240 --> 00:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Biden is saying she was involved. She

85
00:06:48.839 --> 00:06:51.439
<v Speaker 1>was involved with every just major decision I made. She

86
00:06:51.600 --> 00:06:54.199
<v Speaker 1>was there making it with me. So Biden is clearly

87
00:06:54.199 --> 00:06:57.199
<v Speaker 1>taking the posture I think I was a great president,

88
00:06:58.959 --> 00:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. And so I can't say that, and Biden

89
00:07:03.360 --> 00:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>can't say, yeah, she wasn't really involved in anything. It

90
00:07:06.319 --> 00:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>was all me, because the only reason to do that

91
00:07:09.720 --> 00:07:12.319
<v Speaker 1>would be to help Harris distance herself from Biden. He

92
00:07:12.360 --> 00:07:15.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't think he's he should be distanced from. He's very

93
00:07:15.319 --> 00:07:18.879
<v Speaker 1>proud of his presidency. He thinks he's this great historic figure.

94
00:07:19.480 --> 00:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>In his head, he has constructed this image of himself,

95
00:07:22.360 --> 00:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>so he's like, oh, yeah, she's deeply involved in all

96
00:07:25.800 --> 00:07:34.399
<v Speaker 1>my policy decisions. But I think and I think most

97
00:07:34.439 --> 00:07:37.879
<v Speaker 1>of the reporting that was out there prior to the

98
00:07:37.920 --> 00:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>big switcheroo in July when Biden dropped out and Harris

99
00:07:43.480 --> 00:07:47.639
<v Speaker 1>became the nominee all of a sudden. I think it's

100
00:07:48.079 --> 00:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>more likely true that Harris actually was sidelined most of

101
00:07:55.279 --> 00:07:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the time within the Biden administration. I think she was

102
00:07:59.319 --> 00:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a relative unimportant figure within the Biden administration. I think

103
00:08:04.800 --> 00:08:08.839
<v Speaker 1>lots of cabinet officials had more, say, more influence. Biden

104
00:08:08.879 --> 00:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>trusted them more, relied on them more than he did

105
00:08:12.680 --> 00:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>on Harris. And I think a lot of the reporting

106
00:08:15.720 --> 00:08:19.639
<v Speaker 1>that was coming out was indicating things like Biden can't

107
00:08:19.680 --> 00:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>stand Harris, Biden can't stand how she won't take anything

108
00:08:23.759 --> 00:08:27.879
<v Speaker 1>off his plate. Coming from the Harris camp was you

109
00:08:27.959 --> 00:08:31.439
<v Speaker 1>were hearing rumblings of frustration that Biden wouldn't give her anything,

110
00:08:32.240 --> 00:08:34.279
<v Speaker 1>that the stuff he did give her seemed like he

111
00:08:34.399 --> 00:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>was setting her up to fail. I mean, I don't

112
00:08:36.320 --> 00:08:38.159
<v Speaker 1>know that she's ever going to recover from the border

113
00:08:38.279 --> 00:08:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Zar thing, because like the the assignment Biden gave her,

114
00:08:44.519 --> 00:08:48.879
<v Speaker 1>he basically just did did not at all empower her

115
00:08:49.519 --> 00:08:52.519
<v Speaker 1>to actually fix anything that was wrong with the border.

116
00:08:56.600 --> 00:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So here she is. He's making this big enough. Oh,

117
00:08:59.519 --> 00:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting you're in charge of migration issues, root causes

118
00:09:04.240 --> 00:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of migration and problems of the southern border. This thing

119
00:09:06.879 --> 00:09:09.519
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, oh, she's in charge of this problem.

120
00:09:09.639 --> 00:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>She will never resolve that. There's no humanly possible way

121
00:09:14.759 --> 00:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>she will resolve it. Now, do I think Harris still

122
00:09:21.759 --> 00:09:25.879
<v Speaker 1>deserves some blame for Biden's policies? Well, yeah, she signed

123
00:09:25.919 --> 00:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>up for it. She signed up to be as vice president.

124
00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>She publicly supported everything he did. She's part of that administration.

125
00:09:37.320 --> 00:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>She's the incumbent. She has to take that blame. But

126
00:09:41.200 --> 00:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I could understand and if she wants to come out

127
00:09:45.000 --> 00:09:47.919
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow and say, listen, the reason why this country's not

128
00:09:47.960 --> 00:09:51.159
<v Speaker 1>doing well is because Joe Biden shunted me to the side.

129
00:09:51.240 --> 00:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's all the things I do differently from him. She

130
00:09:53.279 --> 00:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>can come out tomorrow and do that. But she's not

131
00:09:54.879 --> 00:09:58.519
<v Speaker 1>going to do that. She knows she can't or she

132
00:09:58.559 --> 00:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>feels she can't. So this is the tricky thing is

133
00:10:05.159 --> 00:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna say, well, the vice presidential debate is

134
00:10:07.559 --> 00:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of meaningless, I mean, how important is the vice president? Really?

135
00:10:10.279 --> 00:10:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, then now important is Kamala Harris? Really?

136
00:10:13.519 --> 00:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>What are we talking about? Then you can't out of

137
00:10:17.120 --> 00:10:19.399
<v Speaker 1>one side of your mouth because Wall's got you know,

138
00:10:19.440 --> 00:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the brakes beaten off of them. You can't say, oh,

139
00:10:22.080 --> 00:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the vice presidential debate is meaningless because the vice president doesn't,

140
00:10:26.879 --> 00:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, actually set polishy or anything. Well, yeah, I

141
00:10:31.600 --> 00:10:35.919
<v Speaker 1>mean the vice president is there supporting the president with

142
00:10:36.000 --> 00:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the president's policies. You can't pretend like it's not important

143
00:10:43.200 --> 00:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>when your nominee is the vice president. And again, this

144
00:10:47.279 --> 00:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>is the problem. You have to either say she was

145
00:10:49.559 --> 00:10:51.759
<v Speaker 1>intimately involved in everything, in which case she has to

146
00:10:51.759 --> 00:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>take the blame for everything that went wrong the last

147
00:10:53.720 --> 00:10:58.759
<v Speaker 1>four years, or you have to say, oh, she didn't

148
00:10:58.759 --> 00:11:01.519
<v Speaker 1>have anything to do with all those things. And Democrats

149
00:11:01.559 --> 00:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>are finding it's it's really hard to have it both ways.

150
00:11:04.360 --> 00:11:08.039
<v Speaker 1>And I think that might have been just, you know,

151
00:11:08.600 --> 00:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to get back to the actual analysis of the debate.

152
00:11:11.200 --> 00:11:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that might have been the strongest points that

153
00:11:15.759 --> 00:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Vance was making, which was bringing it back to Harris

154
00:11:23.000 --> 00:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>all the time that she's the incumbent, that she's the

155
00:11:28.039 --> 00:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>one who's done all these things, that she has to

156
00:11:32.120 --> 00:11:34.919
<v Speaker 1>bear the responsibility for all of these problems that we're

157
00:11:34.960 --> 00:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about that exist in the country, that her day

158
00:11:38.240 --> 00:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>one was. I think he had one line during the

159
00:11:41.480 --> 00:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>debate that you know, she keeps on day one, I'm

160
00:11:44.000 --> 00:11:45.519
<v Speaker 1>going to fix X y and z no no, no, no.

161
00:11:45.759 --> 00:11:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Your day one was fourteen hundred days ago. I mean

162
00:11:50.679 --> 00:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>she's been vice president now for about fourteen hundred days since,

163
00:11:53.679 --> 00:12:00.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, January twentieth of twenty twenty one. So I

164
00:12:00.279 --> 00:12:04.759
<v Speaker 1>thought that was really strong from Vance. And again it

165
00:12:04.879 --> 00:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>sort of showed, you know, maybe there's no strong rebuttal

166
00:12:09.159 --> 00:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that Walls can provide. But I just don't feel like

167
00:12:14.200 --> 00:12:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Walls was set for that stage being And you see

168
00:12:17.519 --> 00:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this kind of sometimes with other especially with Democrat governors.

169
00:12:20.879 --> 00:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I think in blue, deep blue states, you get elected

170
00:12:25.480 --> 00:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>as you win your primary for governor in a deep

171
00:12:30.720 --> 00:12:35.279
<v Speaker 1>blue state, and your life is pretty smooth sailing after that.

172
00:12:36.200 --> 00:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>There's no real threat or challenge to your seat. The

173
00:12:39.559 --> 00:12:42.399
<v Speaker 1>media will always back you. It will always be the

174
00:12:42.440 --> 00:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>wind beneath your wings. You're not ever really fighting for

175
00:12:47.480 --> 00:12:51.039
<v Speaker 1>your political life. You're sort of just the guy in

176
00:12:51.159 --> 00:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>charge and everyone's backing you. And I don't know that

177
00:12:56.399 --> 00:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Walls is prepared for like this kind of a combative

178
00:13:02.399 --> 00:13:07.159
<v Speaker 1>environment where you know it's him trying to duke it

179
00:13:07.159 --> 00:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>out with someone who has a real realistic chance of

180
00:13:09.200 --> 00:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>beating him. He's not made for the big canvas and

181
00:13:16.960 --> 00:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's he's getting in trouble also because of his

182
00:13:20.360 --> 00:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of serial stretching of the truth. He had a

183
00:13:26.440 --> 00:13:29.679
<v Speaker 1>he didn't really have a good answer for his frequent

184
00:13:29.799 --> 00:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>claims that he was in Hong Kong during the Tianas

185
00:13:35.279 --> 00:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>or Hong Kong or Taiwan. I can't remember. He kept

186
00:13:38.200 --> 00:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>making this claim that when Tianaman Square happened, that he

187
00:13:43.080 --> 00:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>was either in Hong Kong or in Taiwan. And all

188
00:13:46.320 --> 00:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>they records seem to indicate that people dug into this

189
00:13:48.960 --> 00:13:51.919
<v Speaker 1>and and there's seems to be a decent amount of

190
00:13:51.919 --> 00:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>evidence reporting on it that actually he was in Nebraska,

191
00:13:57.000 --> 00:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's oh, I was being dopey, I misremembered, misspoke.

192
00:14:05.039 --> 00:14:07.799
<v Speaker 1>He's got that he's got his kind of weird stolen

193
00:14:07.879 --> 00:14:10.759
<v Speaker 1>valor things where he's you know, claiming at one point

194
00:14:10.919 --> 00:14:14.799
<v Speaker 1>he is using weapons of war and that you know,

195
00:14:15.759 --> 00:14:21.039
<v Speaker 1>sort of embellishing his military service, which is a big

196
00:14:21.080 --> 00:14:25.919
<v Speaker 1>time no. No, he's you know, he And the thing

197
00:14:26.000 --> 00:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is little crap like that you can get away with

198
00:14:29.679 --> 00:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>when you're the governor of deep blue Minnesota, when you

199
00:14:33.399 --> 00:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>know you've got you know, this ten point electoral cushion

200
00:14:36.279 --> 00:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and that local media is really not

201
00:14:39.960 --> 00:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>going to challenge you about it, not that hard, but

202
00:14:44.320 --> 00:14:47.519
<v Speaker 1>on the big stage, he can't avoid that stuff, and

203
00:14:47.600 --> 00:14:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I think he looked pretty weak. The only things I

204
00:14:49.639 --> 00:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>think he did let me close with this, the only

205
00:14:53.399 --> 00:14:55.799
<v Speaker 1>points where I think it seemed as though he was

206
00:14:55.840 --> 00:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>doing better than Vance, because I don't think Vance had

207
00:14:58.120 --> 00:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a great answer for it, was the January sixth stuff

208
00:15:02.600 --> 00:15:07.559
<v Speaker 1>and democracy, which first, that stuff happened at least, gosh,

209
00:15:07.639 --> 00:15:09.879
<v Speaker 1>what time was that happening. Seemed like that was like

210
00:15:09.879 --> 00:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>about forty or fifty minutes into the debate, which I

211
00:15:12.360 --> 00:15:15.399
<v Speaker 1>feel like probably half the audience had turned off the

212
00:15:15.440 --> 00:15:21.559
<v Speaker 1>debate by that point. But it's also this, I don't

213
00:15:21.759 --> 00:15:24.679
<v Speaker 1>get the sense that Americans really give a crap about

214
00:15:24.759 --> 00:15:29.039
<v Speaker 1>January sixth anymore. For the most part, I just don't

215
00:15:29.039 --> 00:15:32.919
<v Speaker 1>think they do. And the Democrats had really put a

216
00:15:32.960 --> 00:15:36.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of eggs into the basket of thro We got

217
00:15:36.159 --> 00:15:41.799
<v Speaker 1>to protect democracy, we need to be protecting democracies about democracy,

218
00:15:43.519 --> 00:15:47.559
<v Speaker 1>and I always thought that that messaging it just seems

219
00:15:47.759 --> 00:15:50.639
<v Speaker 1>so vague that I just don't think it's going to work,

220
00:15:50.720 --> 00:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>And most of the polling indicates it hasn't worked. When

221
00:15:54.360 --> 00:15:57.159
<v Speaker 1>you ask voters about who's the best for protecting democracy.

222
00:15:57.200 --> 00:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>It's about a fifty to fifty split, just like the

223
00:15:59.679 --> 00:16:09.159
<v Speaker 1>election overall. So I just don't think it is really working.

224
00:16:09.399 --> 00:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>The one thing where I think Walls probably did a

225
00:16:12.120 --> 00:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit better than vance don't think it was working.

226
00:16:16.919 --> 00:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>When we return a little bit about tribalism, loving your

227
00:16:22.480 --> 00:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>own tribe and Tim Walls's visit to the University of

228
00:16:27.120 --> 00:16:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Michigan and the Big House for the Minnesota Michigan football

229
00:16:30.720 --> 00:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>game next on The John Girardi Show, The big Tim

230
00:16:35.519 --> 00:16:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Walls story was not the debate last night. The bigger

231
00:16:38.879 --> 00:16:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Tim Walls story was the football game on Saturday. Tim

232
00:16:46.240 --> 00:16:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Walls went to Michigan. It's obviously spending a lot of

233
00:16:50.919 --> 00:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>time in Michigan. All the presidential vice presidential candidates, they're

234
00:16:54.120 --> 00:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>all spending a lot of time in Michigan. He goes

235
00:16:56.879 --> 00:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to Ann Arbor, home of the stud of Michigan. He

236
00:17:03.799 --> 00:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>goes to the Michigan versus Minnesota football game the University

237
00:17:11.440 --> 00:17:16.599
<v Speaker 1>of Minnesota. The Gophers are playing the University of Michigan

238
00:17:16.799 --> 00:17:22.519
<v Speaker 1>in the Big House, playing the Wolverines. Now, before I

239
00:17:22.680 --> 00:17:28.559
<v Speaker 1>discuss this, I have to preface this with my own

240
00:17:28.960 --> 00:17:37.759
<v Speaker 1>history with Michigan. I despise Michigan. I despise the University

241
00:17:37.799 --> 00:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>of Michigan football team. I hate it with the fury

242
00:17:42.200 --> 00:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of a thousand suns. I despise them and all their works,

243
00:17:48.559 --> 00:17:54.759
<v Speaker 1>and all their pomps, and all their empty promises. This

244
00:17:54.799 --> 00:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is due to some PTSD from a couple of Michigan

245
00:17:59.440 --> 00:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame game, Michigan's kind of a long time on

246
00:18:02.000 --> 00:18:05.880
<v Speaker 1>again off again rival of Notre Dame. I had two games,

247
00:18:05.920 --> 00:18:11.799
<v Speaker 1>in particular, the twenty ten and twenty eleven Michigan Notre

248
00:18:11.880 --> 00:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Dame games, in which Michigan's quarterback must have thrown for

249
00:18:18.880 --> 00:18:22.319
<v Speaker 1>three hundred yards and ran for two hundred year, must

250
00:18:22.359 --> 00:18:24.839
<v Speaker 1>have thrown for basically half of a mile and ran

251
00:18:24.880 --> 00:18:29.279
<v Speaker 1>for another half of a mile against Notre Dame. Denard Robinson,

252
00:18:29.359 --> 00:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that was his name, Denard Robinson, who was Michigan's quarterback

253
00:18:32.519 --> 00:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>during that time, And looks like they would always play

254
00:18:36.000 --> 00:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame early in the season, like maybe the second

255
00:18:38.799 --> 00:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>or third game of the season, and he would play

256
00:18:42.519 --> 00:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame and it's like he took football pills. He

257
00:18:45.680 --> 00:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>would look like the greatest college football player in the country.

258
00:18:49.079 --> 00:18:51.599
<v Speaker 1>He'd shoot up to the top of the Heisman watch

259
00:18:51.720 --> 00:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>list and then proceed to play incredibly mediocre football the

260
00:18:55.559 --> 00:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>entire rest of the year. So it was like, only

261
00:18:57.039 --> 00:18:59.839
<v Speaker 1>against Notre Dame he looked like an absolute world beater.

262
00:19:01.160 --> 00:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So I and he won two extremely close games against

263
00:19:05.200 --> 00:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame, where again he gained about one mile worth

264
00:19:08.519 --> 00:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of yardage single handedly. So I despise Michigan. So many

265
00:19:16.400 --> 00:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>games we played against Michigan, so much heartbreak, anger, resentment, sadness, whatever.

266
00:19:24.720 --> 00:19:29.079
<v Speaker 1>So I despised Michigan. And I'd like to believe if

267
00:19:29.079 --> 00:19:31.839
<v Speaker 1>I were running for president and I needed to campaign

268
00:19:31.880 --> 00:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in Michigan, that I, as a Notre Dame graduate, if

269
00:19:35.799 --> 00:19:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame went to Michigan for a football game and

270
00:19:40.960 --> 00:19:45.599
<v Speaker 1>I was campaigning, there is not a snowballs chance in

271
00:19:45.680 --> 00:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>hell that I would wear a Michigan jersey. I would

272
00:19:49.319 --> 00:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sooner die than wear a Michigan jersey. Never. I don't care.

273
00:19:55.519 --> 00:19:58.519
<v Speaker 1>If I'm campaigning to be the mayor of ann Arbor,

274
00:19:58.559 --> 00:20:01.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to root for Michigan. I hate Michigan.

275
00:20:01.519 --> 00:20:07.559
<v Speaker 1>I despise a Michigan so much. And this, this guy,

276
00:20:07.720 --> 00:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Tim Walls, the governor of Minnesota, goes to Michigan for

277
00:20:12.480 --> 00:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a football game, and whose jersey does he put on?

278
00:20:15.519 --> 00:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>A Michigan jersey? Disgusting, despicable, outrageous. In the words of

279
00:20:24.519 --> 00:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Childs, the Johnny Cochrane imitation attorney from Seinfeld, I

280
00:20:30.319 --> 00:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>cannot express how this, how much this revolts me, and

281
00:20:35.079 --> 00:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's a move that's gonna backfire on

282
00:20:37.440 --> 00:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Walls because I don't think any self respecting Michigan fan

283
00:20:41.759 --> 00:20:46.519
<v Speaker 1>would want a Minnesota fan to wear a Michigan jersey

284
00:20:46.599 --> 00:20:50.039
<v Speaker 1>when they go to Michigan. Like, how does any Michigan

285
00:20:50.079 --> 00:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>voter respect that? Like, wouldn't you respect it more if

286
00:20:56.680 --> 00:20:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the guy was saying, Hey, I want your vote, but

287
00:20:59.400 --> 00:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I got a room for my Gophers today. Sorry, Like

288
00:21:04.960 --> 00:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't wouldn't that be your preference as a Michigan voter, Like, Okay,

289
00:21:08.799 --> 00:21:11.559
<v Speaker 1>at least this this man is being authentic, Like I

290
00:21:11.640 --> 00:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>understand he's not from Michigan. He's got to support his

291
00:21:14.960 --> 00:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>guys when he comes to the big house. Okay, that's

292
00:21:17.720 --> 00:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>like a real guy. No, Walls is such a panderer

293
00:21:21.559 --> 00:21:25.599
<v Speaker 1>that he would put on that jersey, that jersey of

294
00:21:25.640 --> 00:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>all jerseys. Oh my god, just ah, that tells you

295
00:21:33.880 --> 00:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>all you need to know about Tim Wolson. I'm not

296
00:21:35.440 --> 00:21:38.279
<v Speaker 1>sure what it tells you, but it tells you something

297
00:21:38.279 --> 00:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>about inauthenticity, possibly not really understanding football at all, which

298
00:21:45.519 --> 00:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, old Tim Wallas is redefining what it means

299
00:21:48.160 --> 00:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to be masculine. I'm not sure that that's true anyway.

300
00:21:51.599 --> 00:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Holly and I were so disgusted by that, Like

301
00:21:56.240 --> 00:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>what a revolting thing to do. Like, I don't care

302
00:22:02.160 --> 00:22:06.839
<v Speaker 1>if I'm running for mayor of Los Angeles or you know,

303
00:22:06.880 --> 00:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>if I'm running for governor of cal I'm never gonna

304
00:22:08.920 --> 00:22:10.759
<v Speaker 1>run for governor of California. It don't be ridiculous. But

305
00:22:10.799 --> 00:22:13.039
<v Speaker 1>if I'm running for governor of California, let me guarantee

306
00:22:13.079 --> 00:22:16.799
<v Speaker 1>you one thing you will catch me. I would sooner

307
00:22:16.960 --> 00:22:21.599
<v Speaker 1>die than wear a USC jersey. Never, never, in a

308
00:22:21.759 --> 00:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>million billion years would I wear a USC jersey. Like

309
00:22:29.759 --> 00:22:33.039
<v Speaker 1>that's like what I might wear a presdent statee jersey,

310
00:22:33.039 --> 00:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>given that President State has never played Notre Dame. Ever,

311
00:22:35.440 --> 00:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not really rivals in any way. But Minnesota plays

312
00:22:38.200 --> 00:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Michigan every single year. How they hate Michigan. How I

313
00:22:43.519 --> 00:22:47.039
<v Speaker 1>cannot fathom the brain of someone who does that. So

314
00:22:47.079 --> 00:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that is the most significant Tim Wall's story of the

315
00:22:50.440 --> 00:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>weekend was not his debate performance the fact that he

316
00:22:53.319 --> 00:22:57.759
<v Speaker 1>stooped so low as to wear a Michigan jersey. The

317
00:22:58.200 --> 00:23:02.839
<v Speaker 1>kinds of oh gosh, the kinds of moral compromises politics

318
00:23:02.960 --> 00:23:07.319
<v Speaker 1>forces on you is disgusting. When we return, Should the

319
00:23:07.359 --> 00:23:12.039
<v Speaker 1>City of Clovis move to district based voting for its

320
00:23:12.079 --> 00:23:17.279
<v Speaker 1>city council members? Next on the John Girardi Show. One

321
00:23:17.319 --> 00:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>thing some of you may notice is happening with different

322
00:23:20.680 --> 00:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>local election bodies differ different local government bodies, and you

323
00:23:28.079 --> 00:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>probably haven't noticed it unless you're a real local political

324
00:23:32.559 --> 00:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>junkie kind of the way I am, so I am

325
00:23:35.160 --> 00:23:39.519
<v Speaker 1>here to explain it to you. There's a huge push

326
00:23:40.319 --> 00:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>all up and down the state to try to change

327
00:23:47.279 --> 00:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the groundwork for local elections and voting in local elections

328
00:23:53.680 --> 00:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in order to advantage liberals, and the way that they

329
00:23:57.960 --> 00:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>are trying to do so is by using the California

330
00:24:05.079 --> 00:24:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Voting Rights Act and the Federal Voting Rights Act to

331
00:24:09.279 --> 00:24:12.319
<v Speaker 1>manipulate things. Basically, to try to argue that the current

332
00:24:12.480 --> 00:24:20.319
<v Speaker 1>setup of a given political entities, districts, given political entities boundaries,

333
00:24:20.720 --> 00:24:25.559
<v Speaker 1>that they are set up in a way that violates

334
00:24:25.599 --> 00:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the civil rights of minority voters. I am interested in

335
00:24:34.680 --> 00:24:40.759
<v Speaker 1>this as a Clovis resident due to a letter sort

336
00:24:40.759 --> 00:24:45.079
<v Speaker 1>of threatening this could turn into a lawsuit. Letter that

337
00:24:45.240 --> 00:24:47.759
<v Speaker 1>was sent to the City of Clovis by a voting

338
00:24:47.839 --> 00:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>rights attorney from Malibu named Kevin Schenkman. So on August

339
00:24:54.039 --> 00:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty third, this guy, Kevin Shankman, sent a letter to

340
00:24:58.960 --> 00:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>the Clovis City Council arguing that its method of electing

341
00:25:02.160 --> 00:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>city council members is illegal. He asks for an October

342
00:25:10.160 --> 00:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth date for a response. Now, how is it illegal?

343
00:25:17.200 --> 00:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, the city of Clovis has five city council members.

344
00:25:23.160 --> 00:25:28.559
<v Speaker 1>Unlike Fresno, which has city council members plus a mayor. Clovis,

345
00:25:28.799 --> 00:25:32.559
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of small town governments in the San

346
00:25:32.640 --> 00:25:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Jauquin Valley, Clovis doesn't have a strong mayor who kind

347
00:25:37.880 --> 00:25:42.039
<v Speaker 1>of functions almost like a president. So the way the

348
00:25:42.079 --> 00:25:43.759
<v Speaker 1>president of city council works, it's almost like there's a

349
00:25:43.799 --> 00:25:46.599
<v Speaker 1>city council that functions kind of like Congress, and the

350
00:25:46.599 --> 00:25:48.759
<v Speaker 1>mayor kind of functions like the president. The president can

351
00:25:48.880 --> 00:25:54.039
<v Speaker 1>veto certain decisions by the city council. He's sort of

352
00:25:54.079 --> 00:25:58.599
<v Speaker 1>the executive anyway, Clovis is not set up that way.

353
00:25:58.680 --> 00:26:02.079
<v Speaker 1>Clovis basically just has city council. City council votes for

354
00:26:02.880 --> 00:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>proposed measures they oversee different they oversee as a council,

355
00:26:08.559 --> 00:26:13.799
<v Speaker 1>various different city services. The city manager, et cetera, and

356
00:26:14.160 --> 00:26:21.519
<v Speaker 1>city council members in Clovis are voted for in an

357
00:26:21.599 --> 00:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>at large process. That means Clovis is not divided up

358
00:26:26.160 --> 00:26:30.400
<v Speaker 1>into city council regions the way Fresno is. So. In Fresno,

359
00:26:31.000 --> 00:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Gary Brettefeld, for example, is a city council member, and

360
00:26:33.720 --> 00:26:38.079
<v Speaker 1>he's representing presidents who live in his district. I believe

361
00:26:38.119 --> 00:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it's District six, which is most of North Fresno. On

362
00:26:44.599 --> 00:26:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Perea, she's representing people who live more in the

363
00:26:49.680 --> 00:26:54.079
<v Speaker 1>Tower district. Miguel Arius is representing more people. I forget

364
00:26:54.079 --> 00:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly where his district is. I think he's kind of

365
00:26:55.880 --> 00:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>more downtowny different. So different city council members represent different

366
00:27:01.480 --> 00:27:03.559
<v Speaker 1>parts of the city, and the city is broken up

367
00:27:03.880 --> 00:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>into regions. So Gary Brettefeld is not. Nobody who lives

368
00:27:09.200 --> 00:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Tower District is voting for or against Gary Brettefeld.

369
00:27:13.119 --> 00:27:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Nobody who lives in Woodward Park is voting for or

370
00:27:15.880 --> 00:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>against Analisa Prea. They have their one city council member.

371
00:27:19.839 --> 00:27:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Clovis is not that way. Clovi City Council members are

372
00:27:23.759 --> 00:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>elected at large. All five of the city council members

373
00:27:27.559 --> 00:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are subject to a vote by all of the voting

374
00:27:32.240 --> 00:27:37.079
<v Speaker 1>citizens of the entire city of Clovis. So it doesn't

375
00:27:37.119 --> 00:27:40.519
<v Speaker 1>matter where they live, where the individual city council members live.

376
00:27:41.799 --> 00:27:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Everyone in Fresno, excuse me, everyone in Clovis gets to

377
00:27:46.640 --> 00:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>vote for all five of the Clovis City Council members.

378
00:27:49.960 --> 00:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And they sort of stagger their terms of office, so

379
00:27:52.000 --> 00:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I think every two years you're voting for either two

380
00:27:54.440 --> 00:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>or three spots, so they're five spots total. Now, the

381
00:28:00.720 --> 00:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>argument that's being made by this attorney is that at

382
00:28:07.119 --> 00:28:17.599
<v Speaker 1>large elections disadvantage minority voters in Clovis. At large elections

383
00:28:18.440 --> 00:28:21.759
<v Speaker 1>disenfranchised minority voters in Clovis. And here's the basic argument.

384
00:28:23.680 --> 00:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Most members of the Clovis City Council live east of

385
00:28:29.480 --> 00:28:35.519
<v Speaker 1>Clovis Avenue. Most of the poor and minority residents of

386
00:28:35.599 --> 00:28:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Clovis live west of Clovis Avenue. They're about thirty percent

387
00:28:42.960 --> 00:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of voters in Clovis are Latinos. Therefore, Latinos by having

388
00:28:50.079 --> 00:28:57.279
<v Speaker 1>at large voting are structurally kept out of power and influence.

389
00:28:58.960 --> 00:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>If Clovis were to adopt a regionally based city council

390
00:29:04.400 --> 00:29:08.079
<v Speaker 1>where you had different city council districts and people running

391
00:29:08.119 --> 00:29:14.079
<v Speaker 1>within those different districts, then you would have more equitable

392
00:29:14.599 --> 00:29:25.559
<v Speaker 1>racial representation, all right. That's the argument, And the argument

393
00:29:25.680 --> 00:29:31.039
<v Speaker 1>is that the California Voting Rights Act mandates basically it

394
00:29:31.079 --> 00:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>tries to mandate against historic racist practices that happened in

395
00:29:39.160 --> 00:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of communities in the South. So in the South,

396
00:29:41.799 --> 00:29:44.559
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of different practices that were undertaken

397
00:29:44.640 --> 00:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to lessen eliminate the political influence of African Americans, whether

398
00:29:52.279 --> 00:29:54.759
<v Speaker 1>it was you know, taking you know, putting all the

399
00:29:54.799 --> 00:29:58.279
<v Speaker 1>African American vote into one district so that none of

400
00:29:58.279 --> 00:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the other districts would have any African American representation, or

401
00:30:02.880 --> 00:30:08.079
<v Speaker 1>like almost dividing up the African American neighborhood like almost

402
00:30:08.119 --> 00:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like twenty different pizza slices, so that all of these

403
00:30:11.160 --> 00:30:14.519
<v Speaker 1>different districts would have a very small number of African

404
00:30:14.519 --> 00:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>American voters and there would be no one district where

405
00:30:17.480 --> 00:30:22.079
<v Speaker 1>African American voters had any influence whatsoever. Or basically African

406
00:30:22.119 --> 00:30:25.519
<v Speaker 1>Americans would have very little influence in a lot of

407
00:30:25.519 --> 00:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>different districts. So there were a lot of ways in

408
00:30:27.720 --> 00:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the South, in ways that were probably motivated by race,

409
00:30:32.079 --> 00:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>where African American voters were in various ways disenfranchised. Now

410
00:30:38.519 --> 00:30:45.279
<v Speaker 1>the problem is, though, when politics and the political art

411
00:30:45.480 --> 00:30:48.519
<v Speaker 1>of redistricting, which has always been something that's reserved for

412
00:30:48.559 --> 00:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the political process, where people do redistricting very consciously thinking

413
00:30:53.400 --> 00:30:56.119
<v Speaker 1>about elections, and the party in power who's in charge

414
00:30:56.160 --> 00:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of the redistricting thinks about politics and they think about, well, well,

415
00:31:00.960 --> 00:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to create a safe Republican district here. That's

416
00:31:04.400 --> 00:31:08.759
<v Speaker 1>the advantage of winning, you know. And we're looking at

417
00:31:08.839 --> 00:31:11.519
<v Speaker 1>voting trends. This neighborhood tends to vote Democrat, this neighborhood

418
00:31:11.519 --> 00:31:14.599
<v Speaker 1>tends to vote Republican. And the problem seems to be

419
00:31:15.279 --> 00:31:18.319
<v Speaker 1>when that overlay of which neighborhoods vote Democrat, which neighborhoods

420
00:31:18.359 --> 00:31:24.039
<v Speaker 1>vote Republican, if that overlay is really consistent with racial demographics.

421
00:31:25.319 --> 00:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think what Democrats have done is throughout California

422
00:31:30.960 --> 00:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>they are pushing for reforms on the premise that over here,

423
00:31:35.319 --> 00:31:42.559
<v Speaker 1>just we can't disenfranchise Latino voters. We can't disenfranchise the

424
00:31:42.640 --> 00:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Latino community in this place this place. What they actually

425
00:31:46.920 --> 00:31:50.559
<v Speaker 1>care about is they want more Democrats to win. Even

426
00:31:50.559 --> 00:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>if people are drawing these maps with no racial animus,

427
00:31:53.519 --> 00:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they're drawing these maps based on political desires. Nonetheless, Democrats

428
00:32:00.279 --> 00:32:04.039
<v Speaker 1>are trying to use these mechanisms to ensure that they

429
00:32:04.039 --> 00:32:07.759
<v Speaker 1>get Democrat outcomes. So what they want, what this guy

430
00:32:07.839 --> 00:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is thinking is that Clovis could get a couple of

431
00:32:10.720 --> 00:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats on the Clovis City Council if they just split

432
00:32:14.759 --> 00:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>up the way they did the vote differently. Now, one

433
00:32:19.680 --> 00:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things that hasn't been accounted for is that

434
00:32:22.200 --> 00:32:26.519
<v Speaker 1>we've had Latino representation on the Clos City Council for

435
00:32:26.559 --> 00:32:31.119
<v Speaker 1>a long time. The arguments made, well, there isn't a

436
00:32:31.160 --> 00:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>single Latino on the Clos City Council right now. Yeah,

437
00:32:33.240 --> 00:32:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Jose Flores was on the Clovis City Council for like

438
00:32:37.839 --> 00:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>over twenty years. And by the way, Jose had a

439
00:32:42.680 --> 00:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>statement in respond to GV wire at a piece on it.

440
00:32:45.759 --> 00:32:52.359
<v Speaker 1>They interviewed Flores about it, who said, basically, he does

441
00:32:52.440 --> 00:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>not support breaking Clovis up into separate districts for city

442
00:32:57.960 --> 00:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>council members. He says it's not a formula for fairness.

443
00:33:01.359 --> 00:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not a formula for equality, and it's not a

444
00:33:03.680 --> 00:33:08.839
<v Speaker 1>formula for democracy. Flores now serves as the police chief

445
00:33:08.839 --> 00:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of the State Center Community College District. He basically is like, yeah,

446
00:33:14.400 --> 00:33:17.119
<v Speaker 1>this wouldn't help and because a couple of things that

447
00:33:17.160 --> 00:33:24.079
<v Speaker 1>will happen if this is adopted. One territorialism. Gary Bradefeld

448
00:33:24.160 --> 00:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>always gets hit with charges, well, you don't care about

449
00:33:28.000 --> 00:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>people in South Fresno. You don't because you're just caring

450
00:33:31.279 --> 00:33:35.759
<v Speaker 1>about you're a lily white North Fresno Woodward Park constituents,

451
00:33:36.200 --> 00:33:38.599
<v Speaker 1>which I think has always been an unfair thing for Gary,

452
00:33:38.640 --> 00:33:41.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think his record is indicated he wants to

453
00:33:41.160 --> 00:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>do things to help South presdo But that is, ah,

454
00:33:46.240 --> 00:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that is the kind of thing that will naturally happen

455
00:33:49.240 --> 00:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>when you have individual regional district voting. Also, it's sort

456
00:33:55.039 --> 00:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of a thing of you know, Clovis is not that

457
00:33:57.200 --> 00:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>large of a city yet, I mean he's got one

458
00:33:58.559 --> 00:34:02.359
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty thousand people, so it is it's gotten

459
00:34:02.400 --> 00:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot bigger in the last twenty years. Maybe you

460
00:34:05.240 --> 00:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>can make the argument that at large voting made more

461
00:34:08.480 --> 00:34:11.360
<v Speaker 1>sense when Clovis was the city of sixty thousand people

462
00:34:11.440 --> 00:34:13.280
<v Speaker 1>rather than one hundred and twenty thousand people like it

463
00:34:13.320 --> 00:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>is now. I don't know. I think the system makes

464
00:34:19.639 --> 00:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>sense now, and I think the only reason this challenge

465
00:34:22.039 --> 00:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is being brought forward is because the closed City Council

466
00:34:25.039 --> 00:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>is pretty conservative, although I'd say it's not nearly as

467
00:34:28.400 --> 00:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>conservative as people think. I think Diane Pierce is a

468
00:34:31.440 --> 00:34:36.559
<v Speaker 1>real conservative. I think Vung one to two is pretty conservative.

469
00:34:39.000 --> 00:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Not as sure about the other folks. So anyway, in short,

470
00:34:47.760 --> 00:34:51.199
<v Speaker 1>I hate all of these initiatives by liberal some left

471
00:34:51.199 --> 00:34:56.679
<v Speaker 1>wing attorney from Beverly Hills swooping in and he's making

472
00:34:56.719 --> 00:34:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it well that he's got a couple of constituents who

473
00:34:58.840 --> 00:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>live in clothes. I won't reveal them names for fear

474
00:35:00.920 --> 00:35:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of retaliation. Retaliation. Please, come on, you're filing a lawsuit

475
00:35:06.920 --> 00:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>about at large voting. This is not an issue that's

476
00:35:09.920 --> 00:35:12.679
<v Speaker 1>going to inspire people to have pitchforks and torches outside

477
00:35:12.679 --> 00:35:16.119
<v Speaker 1>your client, your alleged client's house. Which basically what this

478
00:35:16.159 --> 00:35:19.079
<v Speaker 1>guy is doing is he's trolling different cities all up

479
00:35:19.079 --> 00:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and down the state of California, sending threatening demand letters

480
00:35:26.199 --> 00:35:29.639
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of clients. So he'll find two or three

481
00:35:29.639 --> 00:35:32.760
<v Speaker 1>people from some Democrat operative. Probably we're like, oh, will

482
00:35:32.760 --> 00:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you be my client to represent me for trying to

483
00:35:35.000 --> 00:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>get the Clover City Council to change its representation? Uh? Sure,

484
00:35:38.480 --> 00:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Do I have to do anything? No? To sign this paper?

485
00:35:40.480 --> 00:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, and then he can collect attorney's fees from

486
00:35:44.280 --> 00:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit that likely follows. So I find the whole

487
00:35:49.239 --> 00:35:54.599
<v Speaker 1>thing sleazy. This is purely a Democrat attempt to get

488
00:35:54.599 --> 00:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>more seats on the Clovis City Council. And I think

489
00:35:56.880 --> 00:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the Clovis City Council members think we're

490
00:35:59.000 --> 00:36:00.559
<v Speaker 1>doing a pretty good job with that. He serves as

491
00:36:00.599 --> 00:36:03.920
<v Speaker 1>we're doing this pretty well run city as it is.

492
00:36:04.239 --> 00:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>It's good that all the city council members care about

493
00:36:06.760 --> 00:36:09.800
<v Speaker 1>all of Clovis. They have to care about all of

494
00:36:09.880 --> 00:36:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Clovis because they're at large. They're all accountable to all

495
00:36:13.679 --> 00:36:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the voters of Clovis. Speaking of redefining masculinity, which is

496
00:36:20.320 --> 00:36:23.679
<v Speaker 1>what the left keeps saying about Kamala Harris's husband, some

497
00:36:23.760 --> 00:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>more shady stories about maybe Doug m Hoff forcefully slapping

498
00:36:28.480 --> 00:36:34.360
<v Speaker 1>his ex girlfriend. Next on the John Girardi Show, so

499
00:36:34.519 --> 00:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>there was this barf worthy interview between Jen Saki, the

500
00:36:41.480 --> 00:36:45.519
<v Speaker 1>former press secretary for President Biden, who immediately parlayed her

501
00:36:45.639 --> 00:36:50.800
<v Speaker 1>quick stint as press secretary into an MSNBC show. This

502
00:36:51.079 --> 00:36:53.400
<v Speaker 1>bar for the interview between her and Doug m Hoff,

503
00:36:53.400 --> 00:36:56.079
<v Speaker 1>where she said, Oh, you're like redefining our concept of

504
00:36:56.079 --> 00:36:58.559
<v Speaker 1>what it means to be masculine by being a supportive

505
00:36:58.719 --> 00:37:04.119
<v Speaker 1>husband to your wife. Kamala Harrinth and I've been laughing

506
00:37:04.159 --> 00:37:06.840
<v Speaker 1>at this idea that like a liberal man exists and

507
00:37:06.880 --> 00:37:11.280
<v Speaker 1>immediately liberals are like, oh, he's redefall I'm a fauci sexual.

508
00:37:11.320 --> 00:37:14.039
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, she's redefining the whole concept of what

509
00:37:14.079 --> 00:37:19.119
<v Speaker 1>it means to be masculine. So here's some of the

510
00:37:19.159 --> 00:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>ways in which Doug Hemoff has redefined what it means

511
00:37:22.519 --> 00:37:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to be masculine. First, let's not forget he got divorced

512
00:37:26.760 --> 00:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>from his first marriage because he cheated on his wife

513
00:37:31.880 --> 00:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>with his daughter's nanny, got her pregnant, and it appears

514
00:37:36.320 --> 00:37:39.079
<v Speaker 1>she had an abortion. I don't know the full details

515
00:37:39.079 --> 00:37:42.199
<v Speaker 1>of all involved he was. Anyway, there's now this story

516
00:37:43.119 --> 00:37:46.559
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris's husband Doug m Hoff. According to dailymail dot

517
00:37:46.599 --> 00:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Com the UK Daily Mail, Kamala Harris's husband Doug m

518
00:37:49.880 --> 00:37:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Hoff forcefully slapped his ex girlfriend for flirting with another

519
00:37:53.719 --> 00:37:58.079
<v Speaker 1>man in a booze fueled assault after a date to

520
00:37:58.159 --> 00:38:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a star studded gallop. This was back in twenty twelve,

521
00:38:02.360 --> 00:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>before he was with Harris. Now this is kind of

522
00:38:07.960 --> 00:38:12.679
<v Speaker 1>seems a little tabloidy, but they've got apparently three sources

523
00:38:12.679 --> 00:38:18.039
<v Speaker 1>who asserted this not redefining my concept of masculinity. That'll

524
00:38:18.039 --> 00:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>do it. John Gierlady shows you next time on Power Talk.
