WEBVTT

1
00:00:09.640 --> 00:00:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, Welcome back to continue and brought to you

2
00:00:12.839 --> 00:00:15.919
<v Speaker 1>by Europe Media. I'm Keith Woods. I'm here at my

3
00:00:16.359 --> 00:00:19.359
<v Speaker 1>steam course Ryan. Today we're going to be discussing Carol

4
00:00:19.440 --> 00:00:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Popper and the Upper Society ran This was your idea

5
00:00:23.760 --> 00:00:27.039
<v Speaker 1>to cover this as a topic. What was it that

6
00:00:27.079 --> 00:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>put you on to Carol Popper as a thinker worked

7
00:00:30.320 --> 00:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about Well, it was Keith Woods. Really, Carl Proper,

8
00:00:35.920 --> 00:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know you really said that. No, no, To be.

9
00:00:37.960 --> 00:00:40.679
<v Speaker 2>Fair to you, you sort of said that Popper was

10
00:00:40.759 --> 00:00:44.520
<v Speaker 2>not spoken about nearly enough within the scene. You know,

11
00:00:44.560 --> 00:00:49.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people were describing the processes since you know,

12
00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:54.880
<v Speaker 2>the interwar period and post World War two as cultural Marxism,

13
00:00:55.000 --> 00:00:58.359
<v Speaker 2>very vague things like that that really missed the detail

14
00:00:58.799 --> 00:01:04.159
<v Speaker 2>of how modern democracy is defined and been enshrined legally.

15
00:01:05.599 --> 00:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>And you did a couple of excellent threads on on

16
00:01:08.359 --> 00:01:15.719
<v Speaker 2>Twitter sort of detailing Popper's influence. So yeah, I've I

17
00:01:15.879 --> 00:01:21.120
<v Speaker 2>since read The Open Society and Its Enemies. Obviously, I

18
00:01:21.159 --> 00:01:26.519
<v Speaker 2>was very aware of George Solas's Open Society Foundation and

19
00:01:26.599 --> 00:01:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the kind of activism slash destruction they have brought on

20
00:01:31.840 --> 00:01:36.319
<v Speaker 2>various Western countries. So I was intrigued to read it,

21
00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:41.959
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's definitely worth discussing in depth.

22
00:01:43.079 --> 00:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have. I don't know if I can take

23
00:01:44.840 --> 00:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>credit for it, but I have noticed some people on

24
00:01:47.159 --> 00:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>our side talking more about the idea of the open

25
00:01:49.560 --> 00:01:53.359
<v Speaker 1>society and liberal pluralism and kind of trying to get

26
00:01:53.400 --> 00:01:57.439
<v Speaker 1>to the roots of the postwar consensus rather than Yeah,

27
00:01:57.480 --> 00:01:59.519
<v Speaker 1>I think a few years ago it was very like,

28
00:02:00.200 --> 00:02:02.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, this theory of Marxist subversion. It was all

29
00:02:02.959 --> 00:02:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Gramsky and intellectuals that snuck into the institutions, and sometimes

30
00:02:09.319 --> 00:02:11.879
<v Speaker 1>there was a reluctance, i think, especially from people coming

31
00:02:11.919 --> 00:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>from a conservative background, to look at the deeper foundations

32
00:02:17.280 --> 00:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>within liberal thought thinkers that are considered more moderate or

33
00:02:22.319 --> 00:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>part of the liberal tradition. But then when you look

34
00:02:25.280 --> 00:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>at them, you know, you do find that there's this

35
00:02:26.960 --> 00:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>extremely strong current that isn't just confined to the left

36
00:02:30.599 --> 00:02:33.759
<v Speaker 1>after the post war, that is essentially built on this

37
00:02:33.800 --> 00:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>foundation of never again. Right, That's that's what Paper rebuilt

38
00:02:38.439 --> 00:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>his own his own theory on. But yeah, it's the

39
00:02:40.960 --> 00:02:46.439
<v Speaker 1>shock of the Second World War, the shock of you know,

40
00:02:46.599 --> 00:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the the idea of of racial science and totalitarianism and genocide.

41
00:02:52.599 --> 00:02:55.599
<v Speaker 1>On this mass scale. And we discussed this a little

42
00:02:55.599 --> 00:02:59.439
<v Speaker 1>bit in the in the Wokeness episode, But there we

43
00:02:59.439 --> 00:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>were talking about strains of new left thodd Popper doesn't

44
00:03:04.280 --> 00:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>really fall into that, you know, and some people sometimes

45
00:03:07.840 --> 00:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>he's cited as kind of a conservative or libertarian thinker.

46
00:03:11.120 --> 00:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Libertarians are quite friendly to his thought. But yes, you

47
00:03:15.159 --> 00:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>do find a lot of the problems we encounter now

48
00:03:18.599 --> 00:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to trying to kind of wrestle back

49
00:03:21.000 --> 00:03:25.039
<v Speaker 1>control of our own societies. You find that the whole

50
00:03:25.080 --> 00:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>structure of modern liberal democracy is very tied up with

51
00:03:29.039 --> 00:03:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Poperian ideas. So I think it's worth studying. But yeah,

52
00:03:32.479 --> 00:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his foundational ideas have really become omnipresent,

53
00:03:36.080 --> 00:03:46.319
<v Speaker 1>just in the way people talk about things like liberalism, democracy, populism, totalitarianism,

54
00:03:46.879 --> 00:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>just in the vocabulary of liberalism and what these terms mean. Now,

55
00:03:51.280 --> 00:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it can be traced back to Popper's thought.

56
00:03:54.840 --> 00:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But let's get into it. I think you can't have

57
00:03:57.400 --> 00:04:01.639
<v Speaker 1>this discussion about Popper without stay Marden with his biography,

58
00:04:01.639 --> 00:04:03.879
<v Speaker 1>because I think his life story is central to this.

59
00:04:05.439 --> 00:04:09.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he was born in Vienna at the start of

60
00:04:09.360 --> 00:04:12.520
<v Speaker 2>the twentieth century. He was twelve years old when a

61
00:04:12.560 --> 00:04:16.240
<v Speaker 2>little Serbian boy called Govrilla prince Hip shot the Archduke

62
00:04:16.279 --> 00:04:20.240
<v Speaker 2>of Austro Hungary. Obviously, the you know, the First World

63
00:04:20.279 --> 00:04:23.839
<v Speaker 2>War ensued, one of the bloodiest wars that had ever

64
00:04:23.879 --> 00:04:28.079
<v Speaker 2>been until that time. So at twelve years old, he

65
00:04:28.240 --> 00:04:32.079
<v Speaker 2>was you know, thrown in the deep end of experiencing

66
00:04:32.160 --> 00:04:36.759
<v Speaker 2>a brutal tribal warfare. Vienna is a very strange place.

67
00:04:37.120 --> 00:04:41.680
<v Speaker 2>I went there last year and you can just feel

68
00:04:41.920 --> 00:04:47.399
<v Speaker 2>the Empire lives on to this day. It's incredibly aristocratic,

69
00:04:48.759 --> 00:04:53.199
<v Speaker 2>very grand architecture everywhere, but you feel the multi ethnic

70
00:04:53.279 --> 00:04:59.079
<v Speaker 2>character very much, and I mean you hear Serbian, Hungarian,

71
00:05:01.000 --> 00:05:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Slovak and all the other new groups that are there now.

72
00:05:05.000 --> 00:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's you know, eventually we'll bring us back around

73
00:05:08.759 --> 00:05:13.519
<v Speaker 1>to Sous. But you know the European University that was

74
00:05:13.560 --> 00:05:17.879
<v Speaker 1>started by Sorous's Open Society foundation, it had moved to

75
00:05:18.160 --> 00:05:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Budapest and Hungary and because of the urban government it

76
00:05:21.519 --> 00:05:24.319
<v Speaker 1>was basically forest owed and it is in Vienna now,

77
00:05:24.360 --> 00:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of fit in.

78
00:05:25.639 --> 00:05:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it has a reputation as an intellectual center. Also,

79
00:05:31.920 --> 00:05:36.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, other intellectuals at the time that were pretty

80
00:05:36.000 --> 00:05:42.800
<v Speaker 2>forward thinking from there were Freud and Witgenstein. So you know,

81
00:05:44.079 --> 00:05:50.959
<v Speaker 2>modern multi ethnic empire, intellectual thought going on in that

82
00:05:51.079 --> 00:05:57.120
<v Speaker 2>area gets hit by war, and then, you know, as

83
00:05:57.160 --> 00:06:01.240
<v Speaker 2>as Popper's growing up, same thing starts happening when n

84
00:06:01.319 --> 00:06:05.160
<v Speaker 2>s Germany starts rising and he flees to New Zealand

85
00:06:05.480 --> 00:06:10.800
<v Speaker 2>in the late thirties and he publishes The Open Society

86
00:06:10.800 --> 00:06:15.639
<v Speaker 2>and Its Enemies in nineteen forty five, so his intellectual

87
00:06:15.680 --> 00:06:20.959
<v Speaker 2>defense of liberalism and never Again is published just in

88
00:06:21.040 --> 00:06:26.680
<v Speaker 2>time for new constitutions to be drawn, and you know,

89
00:06:26.800 --> 00:06:29.240
<v Speaker 2>hence its influenced this day.

90
00:06:29.639 --> 00:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna call you on the Vitgenstein pronunciation.

91
00:06:33.279 --> 00:06:35.879
<v Speaker 1>So it reminds me when I did a podcast with

92
00:06:35.959 --> 00:06:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a guy called Chrispond before in the entire two hours

93
00:06:39.560 --> 00:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>kept send desks. Its driven me crazy.

94
00:06:42.680 --> 00:06:46.519
<v Speaker 2>And hoped Chris Bond is a legend though I did

95
00:06:46.720 --> 00:06:48.800
<v Speaker 2>like him.

96
00:06:48.120 --> 00:06:51.519
<v Speaker 1>But because we're friendly enough, I'm just gonna, I'm just

97
00:06:51.560 --> 00:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna call you there.

98
00:06:53.639 --> 00:06:55.879
<v Speaker 2>He was smiling for the whole time while I was speaking.

99
00:06:58.839 --> 00:07:03.079
<v Speaker 1>Just bring him back some memories. But yeah, I mean,

100
00:07:03.399 --> 00:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>what's significant about that, though, is the Jewish element. There's

101
00:07:08.360 --> 00:07:12.959
<v Speaker 1>a biographer of Karl Popper called Malachi Hack Cohen, who

102
00:07:13.000 --> 00:07:16.319
<v Speaker 1>is himself an Israeli ju I think, I think he's

103
00:07:16.360 --> 00:07:19.399
<v Speaker 1>a Zionist. So these he has this interesting perspective on

104
00:07:20.319 --> 00:07:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Jewish intelligency in the twentieth century. But he wrote this

105
00:07:23.959 --> 00:07:26.079
<v Speaker 1>long biography of Popper and then he has a number

106
00:07:26.079 --> 00:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of papers on the intellectual influences on him. But one

107
00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:33.519
<v Speaker 1>thing he really emphasizes is that you can't understand the

108
00:07:33.600 --> 00:07:38.759
<v Speaker 1>work of Popper without understanding it coming from someone who

109
00:07:38.879 --> 00:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is living the life of cosmopolitan, urbanite jew who had

110
00:07:45.040 --> 00:07:49.199
<v Speaker 1>his social reality really transformed and you know, the foundation

111
00:07:49.360 --> 00:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>has just pulled out from under him, and that he

112
00:07:52.079 --> 00:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>came from a milieu of Jewish intellectuals and just a

113
00:07:57.040 --> 00:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Jewish community in Austria that, as you said, grew up

114
00:08:00.120 --> 00:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in a multi ethnic, cosmopolitan Habsburg Empire. Nationalism was this

115
00:08:11.000 --> 00:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>dangerous foreign thing, but usually had their place in that society, right.

116
00:08:16.160 --> 00:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>They were kind of culture bearers. There were culture leaders.

117
00:08:19.959 --> 00:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Vienna was this cosmopolitan place where they could engage in

118
00:08:23.600 --> 00:08:28.199
<v Speaker 1>intellectual activity and so Ha Cohen says that the idea

119
00:08:28.199 --> 00:08:36.519
<v Speaker 1>of the open society is really the universalization of the cosmopolitan,

120
00:08:37.240 --> 00:08:41.159
<v Speaker 1>internationalist Jews ideal way of being in terms of creating

121
00:08:41.200 --> 00:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a universal legalism that protects them and basically trying to

122
00:08:45.240 --> 00:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>recreate the conditions of the liberal Habsburg empire prior to

123
00:08:49.480 --> 00:08:53.919
<v Speaker 1>the rise of nationalism and authoritarianism and fascism and everything

124
00:08:53.960 --> 00:08:58.919
<v Speaker 1>that came with it. And I mean Popper is interesting

125
00:08:59.000 --> 00:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in that regard, in that you know, pretty much every

126
00:09:02.200 --> 00:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>liberal intellectual after the Second World War and kind of

127
00:09:05.639 --> 00:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>as part of the post war consensus. I mean, this

128
00:09:07.639 --> 00:09:09.759
<v Speaker 1>was like the post World War One consensus. You could

129
00:09:09.799 --> 00:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>say it was like national self determination. Popper is one

130
00:09:13.080 --> 00:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>intellectual that actually rejects that and just never accepted any

131
00:09:17.639 --> 00:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>degree of nationalism. Some liberal theorists will have a respect

132
00:09:24.240 --> 00:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>or idealize small nation states, smaller nationalisms. You don't even

133
00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>get that with Popper. He was contemptuous of all of it.

134
00:09:33.440 --> 00:09:37.919
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I mean the story really starts with him

135
00:09:38.000 --> 00:09:42.519
<v Speaker 1>living within this cosmopolitan Jewish community in a multi ethnic empire,

136
00:09:43.039 --> 00:09:47.039
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly the foundations of that are wiped out.

137
00:09:47.799 --> 00:09:51.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and George Soros the same he was in Hungary,

138
00:09:52.200 --> 00:09:55.320
<v Speaker 2>he suffered a similar kind of fate. He managed to

139
00:09:55.360 --> 00:09:59.399
<v Speaker 2>survive the war and then became a student of Popper

140
00:09:59.679 --> 00:10:03.759
<v Speaker 2>in at the London School of Economics. So what an

141
00:10:04.159 --> 00:10:08.679
<v Speaker 2>impact they've had on the world since their you know,

142
00:10:08.799 --> 00:10:12.039
<v Speaker 2>respective experiences not far from each other in Central Europe.

143
00:10:12.080 --> 00:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>There are so many stories like that that's remarkable. I mean,

144
00:10:15.519 --> 00:10:20.159
<v Speaker 1>i I've out in mind at times to write a

145
00:10:20.200 --> 00:10:21.639
<v Speaker 1>book on this. I mean, you could, if you could

146
00:10:21.679 --> 00:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>just go through all of the emigres and the intellectual

147
00:10:26.600 --> 00:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>impact they had and the common direction it went in.

148
00:10:28.919 --> 00:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Ernest Gllner is another one. Ernest Gelner is one of

149
00:10:32.519 --> 00:10:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the most influential sociologists of the twentieth century, some people

150
00:10:36.440 --> 00:10:39.879
<v Speaker 1>might say the most, and his theory of nationalism, his

151
00:10:39.960 --> 00:10:44.279
<v Speaker 1>modernist theory of nationalism, was the dominant and probably still

152
00:10:44.360 --> 00:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is the dominant theory of nationalism in sociology. You know,

153
00:10:47.399 --> 00:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>this idea that's a modern construction, creation of the Industrial

154
00:10:51.480 --> 00:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Revolution and so on. And he's a very similar story.

155
00:10:54.879 --> 00:10:57.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, he grew up in a Jewish family in

156
00:10:57.360 --> 00:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Prague again at the time, which was a very cosmopolitan,

157
00:11:02.720 --> 00:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>more multicultural city, and again they fled because of you know,

158
00:11:08.559 --> 00:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>tensions with Germany, and eventually, of course not to Germany

159
00:11:12.120 --> 00:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>invaded Czechoslovakia. But just again a very similar story of

160
00:11:16.360 --> 00:11:22.039
<v Speaker 1>these emigres that grow up in a more cosmopolitan Europe

161
00:11:22.120 --> 00:11:26.919
<v Speaker 1>of multi ethnic empires, see the rise of nationalism and fascism,

162
00:11:27.519 --> 00:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and have this impetus behind their work from that point

163
00:11:31.480 --> 00:11:36.639
<v Speaker 1>on where they go into sociology or philosophy or political

164
00:11:36.679 --> 00:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>theory and have this strong desire to deconstruct the impulses

165
00:11:42.120 --> 00:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that led to those forces.

166
00:11:43.720 --> 00:11:47.399
<v Speaker 2>That's quite a good segue because the first philosopher that

167
00:11:48.279 --> 00:11:52.759
<v Speaker 2>Poper addresses in his work is Plato. So some brief

168
00:11:52.879 --> 00:11:59.799
<v Speaker 2>background on Plato. He was an Athenian and he grew

169
00:11:59.879 --> 00:12:06.559
<v Speaker 2>up during the Peloponnesian War between Sparta and Athens. Sparta

170
00:12:06.639 --> 00:12:12.120
<v Speaker 2>eventually won that war. They put in a puppet government

171
00:12:12.279 --> 00:12:18.279
<v Speaker 2>which was ruled by what's called the Thirty Tyrants, of

172
00:12:18.320 --> 00:12:22.159
<v Speaker 2>which more than a couple of members were linked to

173
00:12:22.200 --> 00:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Plato because he had quite an aristocratic background. And Popper

174
00:12:31.000 --> 00:12:34.600
<v Speaker 2>for pages and pages, it was several hours I was

175
00:12:34.600 --> 00:12:38.679
<v Speaker 2>listening to the audio book. He just tries to destroy

176
00:12:38.919 --> 00:12:43.120
<v Speaker 2>and defame Plato, who's become a hero of mine, and

177
00:12:43.720 --> 00:12:49.639
<v Speaker 2>in the last few years, it really is just a

178
00:12:49.679 --> 00:12:56.440
<v Speaker 2>total defamation. He basically mates out that Plato's work is

179
00:12:56.919 --> 00:13:03.080
<v Speaker 2>covering for his tyrannical you know, family members, that is

180
00:13:03.120 --> 00:13:07.799
<v Speaker 2>a complete authoritarian. He kind of draws on the theory

181
00:13:07.840 --> 00:13:11.679
<v Speaker 2>of forms and the idea of philosopher Kings as you know,

182
00:13:11.759 --> 00:13:17.360
<v Speaker 2>being total like totalitarian in nature. You know, he decries

183
00:13:19.240 --> 00:13:25.679
<v Speaker 2>him as a Eugenesist, someone that would enforce a caste

184
00:13:25.679 --> 00:13:32.600
<v Speaker 2>system with no mobility, and and many other attacks. And

185
00:13:33.039 --> 00:13:35.879
<v Speaker 2>I when I was listening to it, I just thought

186
00:13:35.919 --> 00:13:41.080
<v Speaker 2>it was so intellectually dishonest. And you know, having read

187
00:13:41.080 --> 00:13:46.000
<v Speaker 2>this book recently, that clarifies certainly that it is a

188
00:13:46.000 --> 00:13:49.639
<v Speaker 2>dishonest work. I don't know what you thought of it yourself,

189
00:13:49.679 --> 00:13:51.840
<v Speaker 2>as as you were reading that first section on Plato.

190
00:13:52.399 --> 00:13:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is. It is a surprisingly polemical work. Whether

191
00:13:56.840 --> 00:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>he's attacking Plaid or letter Hegel. The one he goes

192
00:14:01.159 --> 00:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit easier on is Maerks actually, but especially with

193
00:14:03.840 --> 00:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Plato and Hegel, he's pretty he's pretty ruthless. And Harry

194
00:14:07.440 --> 00:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>writes and yeah, as you say, often unjustified. But you know,

195
00:14:11.159 --> 00:14:16.919
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to see that in constructing this liberal political project,

196
00:14:18.120 --> 00:14:20.559
<v Speaker 1>he's not just taking aim and Plato for his politics.

197
00:14:20.559 --> 00:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>He's taken aim at the idea of theory of forms

198
00:14:23.759 --> 00:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and of metaphysical realism and the idea of constructing metaphysics

199
00:14:29.360 --> 00:14:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and having your politics be downstream from that. So he's

200
00:14:32.759 --> 00:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>challenging the very foundations of classical political philosophy, which were

201
00:14:38.200 --> 00:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>based in the idea of there being a good life,

202
00:14:41.480 --> 00:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>there being an end towards which states should aim if

203
00:14:46.759 --> 00:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>there are four people's good and that we can use

204
00:14:49.159 --> 00:14:51.879
<v Speaker 1>reason to discover these collective goods and the purpose of

205
00:14:51.919 --> 00:14:54.519
<v Speaker 1>the state. So Paper wants to reject all of that,

206
00:14:54.559 --> 00:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, he wants to get to the ultimate foundations

207
00:14:57.279 --> 00:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of totalitarian thought, which comes down to people have competing

208
00:15:03.559 --> 00:15:06.679
<v Speaker 1>visions of the good life, and as long as that happens,

209
00:15:06.840 --> 00:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>someone can come and impose their vision on the masses.

210
00:15:11.000 --> 00:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And so he wants to cut the foundations of that

211
00:15:14.480 --> 00:15:18.519
<v Speaker 1>and say that this is off limits for human discourse.

212
00:15:19.440 --> 00:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>We're supposed to just focus on, you know, rational argumentation

213
00:15:24.200 --> 00:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>about empirical matters, not drift off into this kind of

214
00:15:29.399 --> 00:15:33.879
<v Speaker 1>mystical discussion about realms of forms or you know, objective

215
00:15:34.000 --> 00:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>moral goods or any of these things. Of course, he

216
00:15:36.759 --> 00:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>falls into the same problem any relativists do when they're

217
00:15:41.080 --> 00:15:43.519
<v Speaker 1>trying to do this, is he's obviously proposing his own

218
00:15:43.639 --> 00:15:48.519
<v Speaker 1>moral scheme while you know, just not justifying it and

219
00:15:48.759 --> 00:15:51.639
<v Speaker 1>saying we should take it as given, which is, you know,

220
00:15:51.679 --> 00:15:54.759
<v Speaker 1>obviously ridiculous. And what is moral system comes down to

221
00:15:55.320 --> 00:15:59.399
<v Speaker 1>at Rude is this kind of negative utilitarianism. He says

222
00:15:59.440 --> 00:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>again and again that the only the only moral guide

223
00:16:02.559 --> 00:16:07.919
<v Speaker 1>is basically reduced and suffering. But yeah, I think it's

224
00:16:07.960 --> 00:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it's notable that in trying to once and for all

225
00:16:13.320 --> 00:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>remove totalitarian good and establish liberalism, he has to launch

226
00:16:17.799 --> 00:16:20.919
<v Speaker 1>really a full attack on metaphysics. You know, it shows

227
00:16:20.960 --> 00:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the the negative tendency of liberalism as as kind of

228
00:16:25.240 --> 00:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>an anti ideology that if you remove meaning, if you

229
00:16:28.679 --> 00:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>remove search for transcendence or higher purpose, but then what

230
00:16:34.399 --> 00:16:37.759
<v Speaker 1>you're left with is this kind of liberal proceduralism that

231
00:16:37.840 --> 00:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>people just accepted for utilitarian reasons.

232
00:16:41.200 --> 00:16:44.320
<v Speaker 2>I think a trick he makes as well is he

233
00:16:44.919 --> 00:16:51.440
<v Speaker 2>strongly endorses Socrates. I think he's forced into that position

234
00:16:51.559 --> 00:16:55.960
<v Speaker 2>because you know, between Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, they you know,

235
00:16:56.000 --> 00:16:59.559
<v Speaker 2>they are the titans of Western for they are the

236
00:16:59.559 --> 00:17:02.720
<v Speaker 2>ones that developed reason. They are the foundation of you know,

237
00:17:02.799 --> 00:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>all of Western civilization. So he has to lean on something,

238
00:17:07.480 --> 00:17:10.839
<v Speaker 2>and he he makes this play where he basically says

239
00:17:10.880 --> 00:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>that Socrates is actually the democrat, He's actually the father

240
00:17:15.079 --> 00:17:19.319
<v Speaker 2>of the open society. He's debating down in the piaeas

241
00:17:19.519 --> 00:17:23.400
<v Speaker 2>port with you know, the common man, while Plato's in

242
00:17:23.440 --> 00:17:31.200
<v Speaker 2>the academy with his elite. But in reality, Socrates was

243
00:17:31.319 --> 00:17:36.519
<v Speaker 2>the tutor of the main players of the tyrants, critias,

244
00:17:39.160 --> 00:17:45.519
<v Speaker 2>comedies is It and Alcibiades, you know, and he was

245
00:17:45.519 --> 00:17:50.079
<v Speaker 2>a soldier himself, you know, very anti democratic in his sport.

246
00:17:50.599 --> 00:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's very good reason to think this

247
00:17:54.279 --> 00:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is a whole other topic, but you know the story.

248
00:17:57.480 --> 00:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So sometimes people that dislike playto on Socrates, like Nietzschean's

249
00:18:02.599 --> 00:18:05.039
<v Speaker 1>we'll say, well, that was you know, putting Socrates to

250
00:18:05.079 --> 00:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>death was totally justified because he was this subversive liberal,

251
00:18:08.480 --> 00:18:12.559
<v Speaker 1>pro democratic thinker. It actually seems now like he was

252
00:18:12.640 --> 00:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>most likely put to death if you look past you know,

253
00:18:17.759 --> 00:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the spin maybe Plato puts in, he was most likely

254
00:18:20.279 --> 00:18:23.319
<v Speaker 1>to put to death because of that connection to tyranny,

255
00:18:23.359 --> 00:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that one of the fact that his students

256
00:18:25.920 --> 00:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>had been involved in the tyranny of the dirty and

257
00:18:28.000 --> 00:18:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that it was seen that he was esoterically teaching an

258
00:18:31.640 --> 00:18:36.039
<v Speaker 1>anti democratic message, and that he was justifying that. You know,

259
00:18:36.079 --> 00:18:38.559
<v Speaker 1>there was a after that ended. It was a very

260
00:18:38.599 --> 00:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>brutal tyrannical period, and there was kind of an amnesty

261
00:18:42.359 --> 00:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>where there was an agreement to kind of you know,

262
00:18:44.920 --> 00:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>forget about that and cease hostilities to stop Athens turning

263
00:18:48.319 --> 00:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>into complete civil war. But there was a constant distrust

264
00:18:52.319 --> 00:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of Socrates from that point on, and I think, you know,

265
00:18:56.759 --> 00:19:01.599
<v Speaker 1>I think his thought coming troop Plato is anti democratic.

266
00:19:01.640 --> 00:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>It was. I mean, there was obviously there was obviously

267
00:19:04.880 --> 00:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a basis for that suspicion.

268
00:19:06.759 --> 00:19:10.480
<v Speaker 2>It was all about the amnesty because yeah, they wanted

269
00:19:10.519 --> 00:19:14.559
<v Speaker 2>to end the blood feud effectively, so they put on

270
00:19:14.599 --> 00:19:17.160
<v Speaker 2>trial for corrupting the youth. I mean, it's not much

271
00:19:17.279 --> 00:19:21.000
<v Speaker 2>different from modern day lawfare, is it. But yeah, I

272
00:19:21.039 --> 00:19:24.400
<v Speaker 2>mean they had good reason to be anti democratic in

273
00:19:24.440 --> 00:19:29.119
<v Speaker 2>my opinion. I mean Plato saw in his life growing

274
00:19:29.200 --> 00:19:35.079
<v Speaker 2>up that I think he said that in ancient Athens,

275
00:19:36.160 --> 00:19:41.359
<v Speaker 2>honor replaced wisdom, and money replaced honor, and it became

276
00:19:41.480 --> 00:19:45.799
<v Speaker 2>a rule of the mob. Obviously, the Peloponnesian War was

277
00:19:46.519 --> 00:19:51.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, expensive and chaotic. There were you know, constant

278
00:19:52.599 --> 00:19:56.319
<v Speaker 2>there was a constant need to democratize power or whatever,

279
00:19:57.200 --> 00:20:05.440
<v Speaker 2>and Plato saw many problems with But Popper completely neglects

280
00:20:05.640 --> 00:20:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the latter part of Plato's life where he traveled to

281
00:20:10.519 --> 00:20:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Syracuse as a philosopher to try and teach the tyrants

282
00:20:16.759 --> 00:20:20.680
<v Speaker 2>of Syracuse how to become philosopher kings how to become

283
00:20:20.759 --> 00:20:27.359
<v Speaker 2>moral men. And he actually offended Dionysius the first to

284
00:20:27.400 --> 00:20:30.559
<v Speaker 2>the point where he was sold into slavery, so Plato

285
00:20:30.720 --> 00:20:34.519
<v Speaker 2>himself became a slave. I think he said something like,

286
00:20:35.240 --> 00:20:39.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking for a good man. And Dionysus was so

287
00:20:39.480 --> 00:20:42.640
<v Speaker 2>offended by the fact that he wasn't already considered a

288
00:20:42.640 --> 00:20:45.960
<v Speaker 2>philosopher king that he had had enough of Plato and

289
00:20:46.119 --> 00:20:49.759
<v Speaker 2>got rid of him. And then Plato was invited back

290
00:20:50.400 --> 00:20:54.119
<v Speaker 2>by his friend dion to try and teach the son

291
00:20:54.160 --> 00:20:58.799
<v Speaker 2>of Dionysius to become a philosopher king a moral man.

292
00:20:59.640 --> 00:21:02.440
<v Speaker 2>But again and the son was also a tyrant. So

293
00:21:03.440 --> 00:21:07.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, Plato's whole life and everyone he was connected

294
00:21:07.960 --> 00:21:15.200
<v Speaker 2>to were you know, these fighting men without reason, and

295
00:21:15.799 --> 00:21:20.519
<v Speaker 2>his life's work was trying to develop a philosophy of

296
00:21:20.519 --> 00:21:25.839
<v Speaker 2>the good. And you know, we, as you know, sons

297
00:21:25.839 --> 00:21:29.160
<v Speaker 2>of Western Europe owe him an enormous step for what

298
00:21:29.240 --> 00:21:34.039
<v Speaker 2>he did. And you know, Popper, as a cosmopolitan Jew,

299
00:21:34.319 --> 00:21:39.240
<v Speaker 2>has destroyed him in an attempt to you know, create

300
00:21:39.319 --> 00:21:43.559
<v Speaker 2>something new to benefit you know, his group or his

301
00:21:43.640 --> 00:21:46.880
<v Speaker 2>own view of the world based on his experiences. So

302
00:21:48.200 --> 00:21:50.039
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's my perception of it.

303
00:21:50.400 --> 00:21:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and getting into it, I mean, Plato becomes the

304
00:21:54.799 --> 00:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>ultimate embodiment of the thinker of the clause society. And

305
00:21:59.720 --> 00:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>this is the big binary that Popper establishes, is the

306
00:22:04.480 --> 00:22:08.319
<v Speaker 1>open society and the closed society. And you know, explain it.

307
00:22:08.359 --> 00:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a very simplistic scheme, right, I mean, essentially,

308
00:22:14.680 --> 00:22:22.559
<v Speaker 1>people are individualistic, we're atomistic individuals, we have reasoning capacities,

309
00:22:22.799 --> 00:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we kind of naturally tend towards liberal, individualist societies, but

310
00:22:28.000 --> 00:22:32.039
<v Speaker 1>we also have tribal impulses. Our worst impulses are tribal

311
00:22:32.079 --> 00:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and collectivists. And true history, there are nefarious thinkers like Plato,

312
00:22:38.880 --> 00:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Aristotle and then later on Hegel and other German thinkers

313
00:22:42.519 --> 00:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>who take advantage of this negative tribal nature and encourage

314
00:22:47.279 --> 00:22:50.559
<v Speaker 1>the closed society. And the closed society is where one

315
00:22:50.680 --> 00:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>vision of the good is imposed on society, true totalitarian methods,

316
00:22:55.839 --> 00:23:01.759
<v Speaker 1>where our individual rights are individual conscience or sacrificed for

317
00:23:01.960 --> 00:23:05.559
<v Speaker 1>this idea of a greater good. And this is the

318
00:23:05.599 --> 00:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>source of the great evils of history. This is the

319
00:23:08.440 --> 00:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>cause of totalitarianism, and this is the cause of the

320
00:23:11.119 --> 00:23:16.079
<v Speaker 1>terrible twentieth century totalitarianism that Popper is reacting against, and

321
00:23:17.160 --> 00:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>because of which there's such a large audience for Propper

322
00:23:20.519 --> 00:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>when he turns to political philosophy. Now, Popper's idea of

323
00:23:25.319 --> 00:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the open society, again, it's taken as given individual rights,

324
00:23:31.039 --> 00:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>individual conscience, anatomized individual entering into liberal society. And what

325
00:23:38.559 --> 00:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>makes it different from you know, your standard liberal democracy

326
00:23:42.519 --> 00:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>up to that point is Popper really emphasizes institutions and

327
00:23:47.039 --> 00:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>emphasizes the pluralless nature of a proper democracy. So the

328
00:23:53.160 --> 00:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>open society, it's not just that you have, you know,

329
00:23:55.759 --> 00:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>elections every four or five years, but you have to

330
00:23:58.480 --> 00:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>create the values of the open society and people. People

331
00:24:01.279 --> 00:24:05.599
<v Speaker 1>have to believe in openness, tolerance, pluralism. These are the

332
00:24:05.920 --> 00:24:09.799
<v Speaker 1>foundational beliefs. And it also has to be institutionalized, right,

333
00:24:09.880 --> 00:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>you have to protect minority individual rights. Rights become more

334
00:24:15.119 --> 00:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>important than the collective will, which in later years politicians

335
00:24:20.720 --> 00:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>will use this a lot and equated with populism. And

336
00:24:23.759 --> 00:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this is where really we get this idea that there's

337
00:24:26.200 --> 00:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a conflict between populism and democracy. This is very much

338
00:24:30.240 --> 00:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a poparian idea because you know, for him, you know,

339
00:24:34.319 --> 00:24:37.160
<v Speaker 1>just the mass democratic will freed. Well, that can be

340
00:24:37.240 --> 00:24:41.079
<v Speaker 1>taken advantage of by tyrants, bye detalitarians that direct that

341
00:24:41.720 --> 00:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of the closed society. What really matters

342
00:24:45.079 --> 00:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is pluralism. What really matters is preserving as liberals will

343
00:24:50.000 --> 00:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>say out, democratic values, and the democratic values are basically

344
00:24:53.279 --> 00:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the values of the open society. It's the values of openness.

345
00:24:57.720 --> 00:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course, this is where another famous idea

346
00:25:01.920 --> 00:25:05.559
<v Speaker 1>from Proper, the paradox of tolerance comes in that to

347
00:25:05.920 --> 00:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>uphold a tolerant open society, you can't tolerate intolerant ideas.

348
00:25:10.960 --> 00:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>So anti democratic, anti pluralist ideas need to be stamped out.

349
00:25:15.440 --> 00:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Parties that promote them can be banned, Individuals can be

350
00:25:18.440 --> 00:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>silenced that promote these ideas, and so you get this

351
00:25:22.119 --> 00:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>scheme that leads you towards institutionalized pluralism. That pluralism has

352
00:25:27.480 --> 00:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to be enforced through the legal system, through civil society,

353
00:25:32.759 --> 00:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the Open Society Foundation being the perfect example actually, and

354
00:25:36.400 --> 00:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>they fund media organizations and journalists across the world. It

355
00:25:40.759 --> 00:25:44.519
<v Speaker 1>needs to be enforced through international bodies that can cooperate

356
00:25:44.599 --> 00:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to ensure individual nation states aren't taking the way the

357
00:25:49.079 --> 00:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>rights away the rights of individuals. It needs to be

358
00:25:51.519 --> 00:25:56.039
<v Speaker 1>enforced through human rights agreements and treaties. And again, the

359
00:25:56.559 --> 00:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>European Convention on Human Rights are very kind of poper

360
00:26:00.200 --> 00:26:04.759
<v Speaker 1>document and something that the Open Society Foundation has pushed

361
00:26:04.759 --> 00:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>for heavily is to base national constitutions and national law

362
00:26:08.920 --> 00:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>on the European Convention and human rights. That's a very

363
00:26:11.480 --> 00:26:15.599
<v Speaker 1>Poperian way of looking at law and stagecraft. And so

364
00:26:15.640 --> 00:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>this is the Poperian ideal. And this is why you

365
00:26:18.640 --> 00:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>say that Popper's ideas are really what have won out

366
00:26:23.160 --> 00:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>in the twentieth century. You know, there's kind of a

367
00:26:25.440 --> 00:26:27.839
<v Speaker 1>there's a more leftist approach and a more right approach.

368
00:26:27.880 --> 00:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And he was he was friendly with Hiek, and like

369
00:26:31.039 --> 00:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I said, libertarians looked to him. He was more of

370
00:26:33.920 --> 00:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a social democrat himself. But the foundational pluralism and understanding

371
00:26:41.000 --> 00:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of democracy has really become taken for granted as outlined there,

372
00:26:46.440 --> 00:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, by the fact that we see populism and

373
00:26:49.480 --> 00:26:52.559
<v Speaker 1>democracy as two things that are maybe not just separate,

374
00:26:52.599 --> 00:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>but potentially even incompatible.

375
00:26:54.279 --> 00:26:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Now, well, yeah, that's all coming to the forefront with

376
00:26:58.960 --> 00:27:03.319
<v Speaker 2>the antagonism in Germany at the moment. You know, AfD

377
00:27:03.480 --> 00:27:08.319
<v Speaker 2>are rising through the polls and now the German State

378
00:27:08.400 --> 00:27:14.960
<v Speaker 2>is saying, well, actually, you're a threat to democracy. A

379
00:27:15.000 --> 00:27:18.759
<v Speaker 2>lot of people don't understand what that means. A lot

380
00:27:18.799 --> 00:27:22.039
<v Speaker 2>of people don't understand that the German constitution is actually

381
00:27:22.079 --> 00:27:28.079
<v Speaker 2>based on Carl Popper. So we're in a situation now

382
00:27:28.599 --> 00:27:36.960
<v Speaker 2>where majoritarian rule, the idea of national recovery is seen

383
00:27:37.000 --> 00:27:43.480
<v Speaker 2>as beyond the pale by these European institutions, German State

384
00:27:46.160 --> 00:27:51.240
<v Speaker 2>or the EU EHR. So you know that that debate

385
00:27:52.240 --> 00:27:59.279
<v Speaker 2>is going to be had. You know, it's interesting times ahead,

386
00:27:59.279 --> 00:28:02.079
<v Speaker 2>and I think this needs to be out in the open.

387
00:28:03.279 --> 00:28:05.599
<v Speaker 2>You know, if Germany is to survive as a nation,

388
00:28:06.119 --> 00:28:13.359
<v Speaker 2>they need to understand the foundation of the modern constitution.

389
00:28:14.160 --> 00:28:18.480
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I guess that brings us to the other

390
00:28:19.599 --> 00:28:25.319
<v Speaker 2>great philosopher. The Popper attacks in the work is his

391
00:28:25.440 --> 00:28:29.119
<v Speaker 2>attack on Hegel, who many people might not know, but

392
00:28:29.200 --> 00:28:33.599
<v Speaker 2>Hagel is the philosophical origin of you know, later theories

393
00:28:33.720 --> 00:28:39.119
<v Speaker 2>of of Marxism and fascism. So yeah, I guess we'll

394
00:28:39.119 --> 00:28:39.880
<v Speaker 2>get into that now.

395
00:28:41.480 --> 00:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we're worth mentioning in that regard as well.

396
00:28:43.480 --> 00:28:48.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean German legal theorists and political theorists that explicitly

397
00:28:48.519 --> 00:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>ciged Popper's paradox of tolerance to justify you know, constitutional

398
00:28:54.039 --> 00:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>bands on on parodies and these institutions in Germany, you know,

399
00:29:00.039 --> 00:29:03.519
<v Speaker 1>the special like institutions to protect the constitution and so on,

400
00:29:03.599 --> 00:29:08.559
<v Speaker 1>that have this incredible overarching power to ban parties and

401
00:29:08.680 --> 00:29:12.279
<v Speaker 1>organizations to to enforce democracy, and that they were often

402
00:29:12.359 --> 00:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>citing Popper directly. Because it's funny because sometimes I've brought

403
00:29:16.480 --> 00:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>up Opper in the past and you see people say, oh,

404
00:29:19.680 --> 00:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the paradox of tolerance is like misunderstood and he didn't

405
00:29:23.440 --> 00:29:25.119
<v Speaker 1>really mint it the way people say he did. But

406
00:29:25.680 --> 00:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, that is that was the interpretation that

407
00:29:29.079 --> 00:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>was used by by German jurists to justify these really

408
00:29:32.759 --> 00:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>anti democratic actions the liberal state has taken there. But yeah,

409
00:29:37.279 --> 00:29:40.839
<v Speaker 1>with with Hegel, I mean with Hegel, you really see

410
00:29:40.839 --> 00:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>this critique of historicism, which again is kind of a

411
00:29:45.000 --> 00:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe the unique aspect to Popper's political thought where we

412
00:29:49.519 --> 00:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>discussed you know what Plato, He's opposed to an idea

413
00:29:52.759 --> 00:29:57.599
<v Speaker 1>of a theory of forms or metaphysical realism or or

414
00:29:57.680 --> 00:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>ground in political theory and in great metaphysical ideals. He

415
00:30:03.079 --> 00:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>also opposes playedoff for his historicism and this idea that

416
00:30:08.200 --> 00:30:11.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, nature and history was tending towards the ideal state,

417
00:30:12.000 --> 00:30:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and of course you get that usually with Hegel. Hegel

418
00:30:14.880 --> 00:30:18.839
<v Speaker 1>is often it's like equated with the historical method and

419
00:30:19.920 --> 00:30:23.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, thesis as anti thesis synthesis. This is like

420
00:30:23.680 --> 00:30:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the you know shorthand that people associate with Hegel. And yeah,

421
00:30:30.400 --> 00:30:33.039
<v Speaker 1>he's he's he's blistering in his attacks on Hegel.

422
00:30:33.319 --> 00:30:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's attacks on historicism. You know, I lost count.

423
00:30:38.000 --> 00:30:42.680
<v Speaker 2>He must have attacked historicism about thirty times. But yeah,

424
00:30:43.200 --> 00:30:50.039
<v Speaker 2>in terms of you know, introduction to Hegel, you know,

425
00:30:50.119 --> 00:30:58.240
<v Speaker 2>he has his dialectical methods, which is the thesis antithesis, synthesis.

426
00:30:58.880 --> 00:31:02.200
<v Speaker 2>It's based in the idea that you know, every idea

427
00:31:02.279 --> 00:31:06.079
<v Speaker 2>has an internal contradiction and then you resolve the contradiction

428
00:31:06.359 --> 00:31:11.440
<v Speaker 2>and create the synthesis. And this manifest as what he

429
00:31:11.559 --> 00:31:16.640
<v Speaker 2>calls an absolute spirit, which is basically the will of

430
00:31:16.720 --> 00:31:24.960
<v Speaker 2>God unfolding through the nation state. It's obviously very statist idea,

431
00:31:25.839 --> 00:31:32.160
<v Speaker 2>it's very German in character, but it's also very progressive.

432
00:31:32.559 --> 00:31:37.680
<v Speaker 2>It has a very internal progressive logic, and you know

433
00:31:37.799 --> 00:31:44.440
<v Speaker 2>many traditionalists critique it from that angle. But yeah, he

434
00:31:45.119 --> 00:31:53.279
<v Speaker 2>again he attacks Hegel. Hegel's character as he attacks Plato.

435
00:31:54.559 --> 00:31:58.400
<v Speaker 2>He leans very much into Schopenhauer's critiques. Keith is a big,

436
00:31:58.519 --> 00:32:01.519
<v Speaker 2>big fan of Schopenhouer, so it made me smile when

437
00:32:01.559 --> 00:32:05.160
<v Speaker 2>I was listening to the work. But you know, he

438
00:32:05.240 --> 00:32:11.400
<v Speaker 2>accuses Hegel of being an asset of the Prussian monarchy, basically,

439
00:32:11.440 --> 00:32:20.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, endorsing the militaristic, fascistic Prussian state. He accuses

440
00:32:20.799 --> 00:32:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Hegel of being an obscurantist. You know, many people make

441
00:32:24.799 --> 00:32:29.920
<v Speaker 2>that critique that his language is very difficult. So yeah,

442
00:32:29.960 --> 00:32:33.319
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of how he starts his critique on Hegel.

443
00:32:33.400 --> 00:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>The philosophy sprogue are going to be all over this.

444
00:32:36.319 --> 00:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>If we don't point out that Hegel doesn't actually mention

445
00:32:39.440 --> 00:32:44.039
<v Speaker 1>thesis and esus synthesis, they always jump on at it.

446
00:32:44.039 --> 00:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It is technically true with the dialectic is in Hegel.

447
00:32:48.039 --> 00:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's why Popper has such an issue as he

448
00:32:50.319 --> 00:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>sees any any strain of thought that sees that there's

449
00:32:53.920 --> 00:32:58.079
<v Speaker 1>a purpose or progress history is necessarily dangerous to him

450
00:32:58.640 --> 00:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>because then you can use this big other you can

451
00:33:03.759 --> 00:33:07.079
<v Speaker 1>use this metaphysical entity or this tell us to history

452
00:33:07.720 --> 00:33:11.559
<v Speaker 1>to justify constraints on the individual. You know, we're doing

453
00:33:11.559 --> 00:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this for the progress of history. We're doing this to

454
00:33:14.119 --> 00:33:19.799
<v Speaker 1>establish utopia. We're doing this for the bring about the

455
00:33:19.839 --> 00:33:22.559
<v Speaker 1>proletarian revolution in the classical States. So this is why

456
00:33:22.559 --> 00:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>he has a problem with all of these strains of thought,

457
00:33:25.039 --> 00:33:28.279
<v Speaker 1>which again for his time, was an interesting way to

458
00:33:28.839 --> 00:33:32.799
<v Speaker 1>attack totalitarianism, to find that there's these there's these meta

459
00:33:32.880 --> 00:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>ideas underneath. Now, of course, I think it becomes problematic

460
00:33:36.240 --> 00:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>because I think he engages in a lot of this himself.

461
00:33:38.720 --> 00:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, even of course when he's attacking totalizing systems.

462
00:33:44.000 --> 00:33:47.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can't get outside creating some kind of

463
00:33:47.279 --> 00:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>meta system having some kind of objective moral ground, which

464
00:33:52.680 --> 00:33:56.079
<v Speaker 1>he does when he establishes this negative utilitarian principle. But

465
00:33:56.160 --> 00:34:00.759
<v Speaker 1>even with the historicism, you know, it's in his philosophy,

466
00:34:00.759 --> 00:34:05.079
<v Speaker 1>we've progressed to liberal pluralist societies. There's clearly got of

467
00:34:05.119 --> 00:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>progress to history there. But I think his big issue

468
00:34:08.519 --> 00:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is given this any kind of metaphysical content. But one

469
00:34:11.519 --> 00:34:13.679
<v Speaker 1>of the things that surprised me actually, but his critique

470
00:34:13.719 --> 00:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>of Hegel is he blames hegel and associated German idealist thinkers,

471
00:34:20.280 --> 00:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>specifically Herder and Ficta. He blames them not only for

472
00:34:25.000 --> 00:34:28.679
<v Speaker 1>inventing German nationalism, which is a charge you'll hear sometimes

473
00:34:28.719 --> 00:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>that Ficta basically invents German nationalism in the nineteenth century,

474
00:34:32.440 --> 00:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>but he actually blames him for inventing nationalism itself and

475
00:34:37.000 --> 00:34:39.800
<v Speaker 1>again at its time. I mean, this is before the

476
00:34:39.840 --> 00:34:44.119
<v Speaker 1>modernist theories of nationalism became really popular, where nationalism is

477
00:34:44.239 --> 00:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>just this modern idea invented either after the French Revolution

478
00:34:48.559 --> 00:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>or as a function of the Industrial Revolution to aid

479
00:34:53.480 --> 00:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>in modernization and the production of mass culture. So Popper,

480
00:34:58.760 --> 00:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in some way he's ahead of his time. I'm with

481
00:35:01.000 --> 00:35:03.599
<v Speaker 1>the theories that are about to come. But I mean,

482
00:35:03.639 --> 00:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>this is an incredibly radical claim that that a group

483
00:35:07.280 --> 00:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of German idealist philosophers just invented nationalism one Thursday mornings.

484
00:35:13.400 --> 00:35:16.519
<v Speaker 1>It's quite something. So he's really radical. I mean, he

485
00:35:16.559 --> 00:35:21.519
<v Speaker 1>goes further than most modernist theorists even would go in

486
00:35:21.599 --> 00:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>his understanding of nationalism. So in the Open Society, at

487
00:35:24.480 --> 00:35:26.679
<v Speaker 1>one point he says, none of the theories which maintained

488
00:35:26.760 --> 00:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that a nation is united by a common origin or

489
00:35:29.519 --> 00:35:32.519
<v Speaker 1>a common language or a common history is acceptable or

490
00:35:32.559 --> 00:35:36.280
<v Speaker 1>applicable in practice. The principle of the national state is

491
00:35:36.320 --> 00:35:39.800
<v Speaker 1>not only inapplicable, but it has never been clearly conceived.

492
00:35:39.880 --> 00:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>It is a myth. It is an irrational, romantic and

493
00:35:43.039 --> 00:35:48.559
<v Speaker 1>utopian dream, a dream of naturalism and of tribal collectivism.

494
00:35:49.440 --> 00:35:54.519
<v Speaker 1>And then elsewhere he celebrates cosmopolitan empire as the ideal,

495
00:35:55.599 --> 00:36:00.679
<v Speaker 1>and again it's just a remarkably simplistic understand and of history.

496
00:36:00.679 --> 00:36:05.519
<v Speaker 1>At one point he says that after Aristotle's student Alexander

497
00:36:05.559 --> 00:36:10.320
<v Speaker 1>created his empire, that we basically had two millennia where

498
00:36:10.320 --> 00:36:17.119
<v Speaker 1>there was no nationalism, tribalism, ethnic collectivist politics. It's incredible,

499
00:36:17.159 --> 00:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>he says, But this early development of nationalist political theory,

500
00:36:21.880 --> 00:36:24.559
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about the work of Plato there stops short

501
00:36:24.599 --> 00:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>with Aristotle. With Alexander's empire, genuine tribal nationalism disappears forever

502
00:36:31.199 --> 00:36:34.519
<v Speaker 1>from political practice and for a long time from political theory.

503
00:36:34.880 --> 00:36:38.159
<v Speaker 1>From Alexander onward, all the civilized states of Europe and

504
00:36:38.199 --> 00:36:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Asia were empires, embracing populations of infinitely mixed origin. European

505
00:36:44.119 --> 00:36:47.679
<v Speaker 1>civilization and all the political units belonging to it have

506
00:36:47.800 --> 00:36:52.519
<v Speaker 1>remained international or more precisely inter tribal. Ever, since where

507
00:36:52.559 --> 00:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>do you even start with that? I mean, you know,

508
00:36:54.920 --> 00:37:00.280
<v Speaker 1>if you want to talk about ethnic collectivist tribal politics,

509
00:37:00.320 --> 00:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>since Alexander, I mean, you know, we talk about the

510
00:37:03.360 --> 00:37:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Spanish reconquists, that talk about, you know, the Middle Ages.

511
00:37:06.840 --> 00:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Medieval historians recognized now that the modern European nation states

512
00:37:11.719 --> 00:37:14.039
<v Speaker 1>basically all existed in some form by it by the

513
00:37:14.079 --> 00:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Middle Ages. But I mean you can go on and on.

514
00:37:17.320 --> 00:37:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can talk about the you know, you

515
00:37:18.679 --> 00:37:21.320
<v Speaker 1>can talk about the Jewish revolts his own people, right,

516
00:37:21.400 --> 00:37:23.760
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, I think for our audience we probably

517
00:37:23.760 --> 00:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>don't even need to get into the case that from

518
00:37:28.679 --> 00:37:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Alexander the Great to Hegel there has been ethnic, tribal

519
00:37:34.440 --> 00:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and racial politics. It's quite an incredible claim.

520
00:37:38.239 --> 00:37:41.199
<v Speaker 2>Saint Bede must have made a mistake when he defined

521
00:37:41.199 --> 00:37:43.679
<v Speaker 2>the English in the seventh century or whatever it was.

522
00:37:44.119 --> 00:37:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like I said, it's an incredible claim. Even the

523
00:37:47.440 --> 00:37:51.159
<v Speaker 1>most radical anti nationalist theorists, I mean to just say

524
00:37:51.199 --> 00:37:56.159
<v Speaker 1>that there's he says, there's no foundation. He says nations

525
00:37:56.159 --> 00:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>are infinitely mixed. Even the you know, the modern constructors

526
00:38:01.079 --> 00:38:03.639
<v Speaker 1>of nation states, you know, they say your country doesn't

527
00:38:03.679 --> 00:38:07.519
<v Speaker 1>exist because you're you're actually angles and Saxons and Normans

528
00:38:07.519 --> 00:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and Vikings. Popper has going further. It's just like it's

529
00:38:10.480 --> 00:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>an infinity mix. It's like every single individual and I

530
00:38:13.320 --> 00:38:15.559
<v Speaker 1>guess then you can break down the individuals as well.

531
00:38:17.320 --> 00:38:20.679
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he also makes this argument that nationalism is

532
00:38:20.280 --> 00:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>pos is impossible because no one can clearly define where

533
00:38:25.039 --> 00:38:28.519
<v Speaker 1>the nation starts and ends, and even if you could,

534
00:38:28.639 --> 00:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>no one can exactly match the borders to that. Again,

535
00:38:33.000 --> 00:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>just such a juvenile argument, like the kind of thing

536
00:38:35.719 --> 00:38:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that if you encountered it on, you know, in your

537
00:38:38.360 --> 00:38:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Twitter comments, you'd like block the person and move on,

538
00:38:40.840 --> 00:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>because it's just so juvenile. It is a fallacy. It's

539
00:38:43.719 --> 00:38:48.039
<v Speaker 1>this nirvana fallacy that well, you can't establish perfectly some

540
00:38:48.199 --> 00:38:51.199
<v Speaker 1>perfect map of exactly what you want to utopia, so

541
00:38:51.280 --> 00:38:55.039
<v Speaker 1>therefore this political project is ridiculous. It's like, you know,

542
00:38:55.079 --> 00:38:58.199
<v Speaker 1>no one is saying we're gonna have like a perfect

543
00:38:58.320 --> 00:39:02.559
<v Speaker 1>ethnic boundary with like one one hundred percent ethnic group

544
00:39:02.639 --> 00:39:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in said country, but it's like, who's making this argument?

545
00:39:06.360 --> 00:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>So he has these you see it slipped through when

546
00:39:09.079 --> 00:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>he's arguing against these topics. He's clearly very passionate about it. It's

547
00:39:12.360 --> 00:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>just very kind of lazy argumentation, and that really comes

548
00:39:17.000 --> 00:39:20.960
<v Speaker 1>true with his explanation for how nationalism emerges. And so,

549
00:39:21.039 --> 00:39:23.519
<v Speaker 1>as you said, he says Hegel is employed in the

550
00:39:23.599 --> 00:39:29.039
<v Speaker 1>service of Prussian statesman, and then he cites Herder and

551
00:39:29.119 --> 00:39:33.159
<v Speaker 1>his idea of a German culture, and then Ficta kind

552
00:39:33.199 --> 00:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of solidifies the idea of a German nation, and really

553
00:39:36.519 --> 00:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in three four pages of the Open Society he skims

554
00:39:41.000 --> 00:39:44.159
<v Speaker 1>through it and says, this handful of German intellectuals just

555
00:39:44.199 --> 00:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>invented nationalism. And you know, that's really as deep as

556
00:39:48.000 --> 00:39:51.119
<v Speaker 1>it goes. As well, they wrote a nation state exists,

557
00:39:51.199 --> 00:39:54.639
<v Speaker 1>and then people started believing in nationalism because they had

558
00:39:54.800 --> 00:39:57.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, they had done what Plato did and tapped

559
00:39:57.119 --> 00:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>into people's worst tribalistic urges. And again even makes this

560
00:40:02.119 --> 00:40:05.400
<v Speaker 1>argument against Kta that Ficta says that the nation is

561
00:40:05.559 --> 00:40:09.639
<v Speaker 1>united by common language, that's the root of the common culture.

562
00:40:10.360 --> 00:40:12.719
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he again he makes this kind of

563
00:40:12.760 --> 00:40:15.880
<v Speaker 1>purity argument of well, what is every German speaking person

564
00:40:15.960 --> 00:40:20.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be included in Germany? Very unimpressive, but again

565
00:40:20.400 --> 00:40:23.639
<v Speaker 1>there's a problem with this theory that plagues all of

566
00:40:23.639 --> 00:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>these modernist theories of nationalism is he's saying, well, Ficta

567
00:40:28.440 --> 00:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>appealed to the idea of German nationalism, and that created

568
00:40:32.440 --> 00:40:36.519
<v Speaker 1>the German nation, that created nationalism. But it's like, well, clearly,

569
00:40:36.679 --> 00:40:40.719
<v Speaker 1>if these intellectuals could appeal to a sense of germanists,

570
00:40:40.880 --> 00:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>then a sense of Germanists already existed, right. There was

571
00:40:43.440 --> 00:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>something there to tap into. There was a sense of

572
00:40:45.480 --> 00:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a German people common culture. This wasn't something that intellectuals

573
00:40:50.840 --> 00:40:53.400
<v Speaker 1>had to construct and explain to people if they were

574
00:40:53.480 --> 00:40:56.159
<v Speaker 1>part of the group or not. This was obviously a

575
00:40:56.239 --> 00:40:58.800
<v Speaker 1>lived experience. And in so far as you start to

576
00:40:58.840 --> 00:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>see intellectuals tap into it and describe it more, and

577
00:41:01.920 --> 00:41:03.679
<v Speaker 1>as far as you start to see it use more

578
00:41:03.719 --> 00:41:07.079
<v Speaker 1>for political purposes, well that's really because more people are

579
00:41:07.119 --> 00:41:10.519
<v Speaker 1>becoming politicized, more people are becoming literate, more people are

580
00:41:10.679 --> 00:41:15.800
<v Speaker 1>entering into these mass democratic systems we have. And this

581
00:41:15.880 --> 00:41:19.800
<v Speaker 1>is just such an obvious contradiction that exists throughout this

582
00:41:19.920 --> 00:41:23.239
<v Speaker 1>explanation where he's talking about, well, then this thinker came

583
00:41:23.320 --> 00:41:25.719
<v Speaker 1>up with this element of German culture and this sinker

584
00:41:25.760 --> 00:41:28.280
<v Speaker 1>appeal to this, and it's like, well, what, there's obviously

585
00:41:28.360 --> 00:41:32.039
<v Speaker 1>this huge background that they're appealing to. And again it's

586
00:41:32.079 --> 00:41:34.760
<v Speaker 1>this problem like I discussed with Jordan Peterson before, where

587
00:41:34.760 --> 00:41:40.559
<v Speaker 1>sometimes intellectuals are overly reductive in how much history is

588
00:41:40.599 --> 00:41:44.079
<v Speaker 1>determined by intellectuals. You know, when you blame you blame

589
00:41:44.159 --> 00:41:49.880
<v Speaker 1>modern leftism on French neo Marxist theory. And it's the

590
00:41:49.920 --> 00:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>same thing here where he's looking to a group of

591
00:41:53.000 --> 00:41:57.280
<v Speaker 1>intellectuals and philosophers that were only ever read or understood

592
00:41:57.320 --> 00:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>by a very tiny percentage of the pop and he's

593
00:42:01.400 --> 00:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>saying that somehow, this incredibly potent, powerful force of nationalism

594
00:42:05.480 --> 00:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that has come to dominate the world over most states

595
00:42:09.480 --> 00:42:12.159
<v Speaker 1>in the world are nation states that are ethnically based.

596
00:42:12.800 --> 00:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>He's attributed that to a handful of German intellectuals in

597
00:42:17.239 --> 00:42:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the eighteenth to nineteenth century that you know, used some

598
00:42:21.800 --> 00:42:24.119
<v Speaker 1>dangerous ideas. And it's like, well, what does that say

599
00:42:24.159 --> 00:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>about the power of whatever national identities were pre existing

600
00:42:29.039 --> 00:42:35.159
<v Speaker 1>there and the weakness of the liberal cosmopolitan idea. If

601
00:42:35.599 --> 00:42:39.639
<v Speaker 1>three four German philosophers can strength some words together and

602
00:42:39.679 --> 00:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it creates this massive, totalizing, globe spanning force that overtrows

603
00:42:47.000 --> 00:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>all the empires in the world.

604
00:42:49.199 --> 00:42:52.280
<v Speaker 2>He just made me think of the story of Arminius.

605
00:42:53.239 --> 00:42:59.639
<v Speaker 2>He was a German boy taken into the Roman legions

606
00:43:00.079 --> 00:43:05.159
<v Speaker 2>because the Germans had to pay tribute, and he ended

607
00:43:05.239 --> 00:43:10.480
<v Speaker 2>up returning to the blood betraying the Roman legion. And

608
00:43:11.000 --> 00:43:13.920
<v Speaker 2>you know that was the victory of tudor Burgh Forest,

609
00:43:14.000 --> 00:43:18.440
<v Speaker 2>which is you know, legendary in German history, and you

610
00:43:18.480 --> 00:43:21.480
<v Speaker 2>know Spengler always references it, so you know that as

611
00:43:21.559 --> 00:43:26.199
<v Speaker 2>yet another example of nationalism against you know, what was

612
00:43:26.199 --> 00:43:29.960
<v Speaker 2>by then a multi ethnic empire. So you know, Popper

613
00:43:30.079 --> 00:43:35.559
<v Speaker 2>is just constantly cherry picking all over the place to

614
00:43:35.719 --> 00:43:44.000
<v Speaker 2>present this absurd, you know, completely atomizing thesis that you

615
00:43:44.039 --> 00:43:48.440
<v Speaker 2>know is basically just a result of his upbringing in

616
00:43:48.559 --> 00:43:55.679
<v Speaker 2>a cosmopolitan intellectual environment and you know, his systematizing brain,

617
00:43:55.800 --> 00:43:59.760
<v Speaker 2>which you know can you know, infinitely deconstruct things which

618
00:43:59.760 --> 00:44:02.400
<v Speaker 2>don't suit him. So that's my I have.

619
00:44:02.559 --> 00:44:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I actually wrote something on this before Ethno Politics of

620
00:44:05.519 --> 00:44:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the Holy Roman Empire showing that because I think it's

621
00:44:08.239 --> 00:44:10.639
<v Speaker 1>an interesting case study because the Holy Roman Empire is

622
00:44:10.719 --> 00:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>taken as this ultimate medieval state rights it's fragmented into

623
00:44:15.039 --> 00:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a thousand different duchies and principalities and little provinces and

624
00:44:19.880 --> 00:44:22.519
<v Speaker 1>so on, and it's the ultimate like oh, nationalism as

625
00:44:22.559 --> 00:44:25.159
<v Speaker 1>a modern invention, because this is what the medieval map

626
00:44:25.199 --> 00:44:27.360
<v Speaker 1>looked like. You know, try and find Germany on that map.

627
00:44:29.000 --> 00:44:30.679
<v Speaker 1>But then you look at it and well, there actually

628
00:44:30.760 --> 00:44:33.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a strong sense of German identity and there

629
00:44:33.440 --> 00:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>was a sense of German nation such that not long

630
00:44:37.000 --> 00:44:39.760
<v Speaker 1>into the empire's existence. For most of the empire's existence,

631
00:44:39.760 --> 00:44:42.599
<v Speaker 1>it was known as the Holy Roman Empire of the

632
00:44:42.639 --> 00:44:45.360
<v Speaker 1>German nation. That's the bit that that's usually left out.

633
00:44:45.360 --> 00:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, most of the rulers were German. You know,

634
00:44:49.079 --> 00:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the Council of Princes that that elected and emperor was

635
00:44:53.559 --> 00:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly dominated by German. Yeah, there was a German vernacular.

636
00:44:59.039 --> 00:45:03.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, there were national theater and literature that encompassed

637
00:45:04.280 --> 00:45:08.480
<v Speaker 1>all of these provinces, and way before the advent of

638
00:45:08.800 --> 00:45:13.039
<v Speaker 1>when people say nationalism was invented, before Hegel and fiktas

639
00:45:13.119 --> 00:45:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Popper describes it, I mean, you know, centuries prior, you

640
00:45:16.199 --> 00:45:18.599
<v Speaker 1>had thinkers that were talking about the future of the

641
00:45:18.639 --> 00:45:21.800
<v Speaker 1>German nation and if it would be better that eventually

642
00:45:21.840 --> 00:45:25.199
<v Speaker 1>it were united and the fragmentation of the Holy Roman

643
00:45:25.239 --> 00:45:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Empire was ended. You know, there was strong ethnic based

644
00:45:29.679 --> 00:45:34.320
<v Speaker 1>theories about the lineage from the Roman Empire, the inheritance

645
00:45:34.559 --> 00:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Roman Empire to the Germans. German scholars began

646
00:45:39.079 --> 00:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to take pride in the way the Romans had described

647
00:45:42.000 --> 00:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the character of the German race, as written about by Tacitus,

648
00:45:45.719 --> 00:45:49.159
<v Speaker 1>another Roman historian. So it's all there, the sense of

649
00:45:49.239 --> 00:45:52.679
<v Speaker 1>an ethnic collective, of a national group, it's all there.

650
00:45:53.159 --> 00:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>And Popper just kind of waves away that by saying,

651
00:45:56.280 --> 00:46:00.840
<v Speaker 1>there's just something called tribalism that is there somewhere. It's

652
00:46:00.880 --> 00:46:04.320
<v Speaker 1>some kind of dark matter. It doesn't have any particular

653
00:46:04.440 --> 00:46:07.760
<v Speaker 1>group that it's attached to, there's no real reality for it.

654
00:46:07.840 --> 00:46:12.440
<v Speaker 1>But there's just this something underneath the surface called tribalism.

655
00:46:12.639 --> 00:46:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And then thinkers kind of construct that into nation state

656
00:46:16.440 --> 00:46:20.559
<v Speaker 1>or national culture with their dangerous ideas. It doesn't stand

657
00:46:20.639 --> 00:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>up to scrutiny at all. And yeah, I mean, this

658
00:46:23.599 --> 00:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is what you find again and again is whether you know,

659
00:46:26.599 --> 00:46:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the way he deals with history, the way he deals

660
00:46:28.719 --> 00:46:35.599
<v Speaker 1>with competing political theories, it's extremely intellectually sloppy. It's quite

661
00:46:35.639 --> 00:46:39.119
<v Speaker 1>incredible sometimes when you look at how lacking and rigorous

662
00:46:39.119 --> 00:46:42.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the you know, some very prominent public intellectuals

663
00:46:42.760 --> 00:46:45.679
<v Speaker 1>there when they look at anything outside the narrow field

664
00:46:45.679 --> 00:46:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they're working on.

665
00:46:47.039 --> 00:46:51.760
<v Speaker 2>I know he was involved in some other areas like epistemology,

666
00:46:52.400 --> 00:46:55.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, being his main field. But do you think

667
00:46:55.239 --> 00:46:59.400
<v Speaker 2>he built his clout in that domain and was then

668
00:46:59.440 --> 00:47:03.599
<v Speaker 2>able to transfer into politics and he was kind of

669
00:47:03.719 --> 00:47:05.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of running off that reputation.

670
00:47:05.760 --> 00:47:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so. I think Bertrand Russell was actually

671
00:47:10.199 --> 00:47:13.119
<v Speaker 1>a big part of the reason that the Open Society

672
00:47:14.559 --> 00:47:16.840
<v Speaker 1>became popular. He did a lot to popularize it and

673
00:47:16.920 --> 00:47:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to help with Popper's reputation. And yeah, and in the

674
00:47:21.039 --> 00:47:23.800
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirties, I mean he was close to the Vienna Circle,

675
00:47:23.880 --> 00:47:28.679
<v Speaker 1>which was the school of again dominated by Jewish thinkers

676
00:47:28.679 --> 00:47:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that were focused on verificationism and this kind of positivistic

677
00:47:32.880 --> 00:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>trend in philosophy. And that was Popper's contribution was a

678
00:47:37.960 --> 00:47:42.320
<v Speaker 1>theory of science, of scientific realism, that science progresses through

679
00:47:42.840 --> 00:47:48.920
<v Speaker 1>verificationism and falsifiability is the key of a good scientific theory,

680
00:47:48.920 --> 00:47:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's how we can know what's true and false

681
00:47:52.119 --> 00:47:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in science is to falsify theories. Now, even that is

682
00:47:57.280 --> 00:48:01.079
<v Speaker 1>not really accepted as a good theory about pistemology. Now,

683
00:48:01.679 --> 00:48:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the best theories we have, they get falsified

684
00:48:04.800 --> 00:48:09.480
<v Speaker 1>all the time. In certain aspects. Newtonian physics was falsified

685
00:48:09.480 --> 00:48:12.679
<v Speaker 1>again and again certain elements of it. But we keep

686
00:48:12.800 --> 00:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the paradigm, we keep the structure because the core, the

687
00:48:15.760 --> 00:48:20.559
<v Speaker 1>important assumptions, are still useful to explain other things. So

688
00:48:20.679 --> 00:48:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, this idea of you know, Thomas Kuhne, that

689
00:48:23.840 --> 00:48:27.400
<v Speaker 1>science operates on paradigms and you have paradigm shifts where

690
00:48:27.440 --> 00:48:30.599
<v Speaker 1>we change the meta level assumptions. That's a much more

691
00:48:30.719 --> 00:48:34.519
<v Speaker 1>powerful explanation of how science works. But yes, he was.

692
00:48:34.760 --> 00:48:37.880
<v Speaker 1>He was part of that tendency in philosophy and in

693
00:48:37.960 --> 00:48:46.159
<v Speaker 1>science of trying to establish a rigorous verificationist, fully empirical

694
00:48:47.039 --> 00:48:50.079
<v Speaker 1>modeling of reality that didn't require any of the you know,

695
00:48:50.119 --> 00:48:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the philosophers or the metaphysicians. It was a deeply flawed project,

696
00:48:54.920 --> 00:48:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and I think he carried over a lot of the

697
00:48:56.679 --> 00:48:59.639
<v Speaker 1>same kinds of flaws to his political project again and

698
00:48:59.639 --> 00:49:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world way that he just so much is

699
00:49:02.360 --> 00:49:06.239
<v Speaker 1>assumed in terms of the assumption of you know, the

700
00:49:06.280 --> 00:49:11.400
<v Speaker 1>negative utilitarianism and the good of reducing suffering, and of

701
00:49:11.400 --> 00:49:15.840
<v Speaker 1>individual liberty and individual conscience, and the evils of tyranny

702
00:49:15.880 --> 00:49:18.599
<v Speaker 1>and nationalism and stalitarianism. I mean, so many of these

703
00:49:18.639 --> 00:49:21.239
<v Speaker 1>things are just not spelled out like it's a it's

704
00:49:21.320 --> 00:49:24.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of a guidebook for people that already agree with them.

705
00:49:24.480 --> 00:49:29.079
<v Speaker 1>It's an explanation of why people that disagree with the

706
00:49:29.119 --> 00:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>liberal model have have been able to gain power or

707
00:49:32.000 --> 00:49:35.760
<v Speaker 1>what the force of their ideas has been. But is

708
00:49:35.920 --> 00:49:39.440
<v Speaker 1>fundamental kind of guiding ethos. It does just rest on

709
00:49:39.519 --> 00:49:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this kind of you know, post Christian foundation that role

710
00:49:45.320 --> 00:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>meant to take for granted, this basic liberal individualism. And

711
00:49:49.320 --> 00:49:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of course at the same time he's proposing a pluralist

712
00:49:53.400 --> 00:49:58.079
<v Speaker 1>institutional framework that in the long run, it hollows out

713
00:49:58.239 --> 00:50:01.719
<v Speaker 1>national identity, it hollows out sense of any sense of

714
00:50:02.119 --> 00:50:05.400
<v Speaker 1>civic pride or shared understanding. And these are all things

715
00:50:05.400 --> 00:50:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that are necessary to have the common foundations for us

716
00:50:10.000 --> 00:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to come together and reason and be rational beings and

717
00:50:13.159 --> 00:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>establish institutions and trust and scientific reproducibility. I mean all

718
00:50:19.239 --> 00:50:21.519
<v Speaker 1>of these things that he says are necessary for the

719
00:50:21.559 --> 00:50:27.480
<v Speaker 1>successful open society. They require high trust societies. They require

720
00:50:27.599 --> 00:50:30.599
<v Speaker 1>shared culture and understanding and a shared value for the

721
00:50:30.639 --> 00:50:33.840
<v Speaker 1>things that he values, And never does he explain what

722
00:50:33.880 --> 00:50:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the source of that is. How do you inculcate those values?

723
00:50:36.400 --> 00:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you inculcate those morals, how are people going

724
00:50:39.039 --> 00:50:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to continue believing the things that he believes are important

725
00:50:42.039 --> 00:50:45.440
<v Speaker 1>are important? And of course most of the world does

726
00:50:45.440 --> 00:50:52.280
<v Speaker 1>not value scientific investigation and objective reason, and you know,

727
00:50:52.440 --> 00:50:59.079
<v Speaker 1>value lessening the suffering of the poorest over the excellence

728
00:50:59.079 --> 00:51:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of the highest, these kinds of things, and these are

729
00:51:02.440 --> 00:51:05.800
<v Speaker 1>very Western, narrow cultural values. And you can see at

730
00:51:05.840 --> 00:51:08.039
<v Speaker 1>the time of the Cold War and after the Second

731
00:51:08.079 --> 00:51:10.400
<v Speaker 1>World War, how you can imagine they're universal. But of

732
00:51:10.400 --> 00:51:14.639
<v Speaker 1>course now we see partly open societies are breaking down

733
00:51:14.719 --> 00:51:19.480
<v Speaker 1>because of imported diversity. And this is obviously you can

734
00:51:19.480 --> 00:51:21.960
<v Speaker 1>see that even people that agree with Popper, you'll see

735
00:51:21.960 --> 00:51:25.920
<v Speaker 1>guys like Sam Harris then well, actually, course, correction, we

736
00:51:26.000 --> 00:51:30.079
<v Speaker 1>can't have the open society and import tens of millions

737
00:51:30.079 --> 00:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of Muslims that are going to engage in ethnic collective

738
00:51:33.000 --> 00:51:36.559
<v Speaker 1>as politics. Popper doesn't have an answer for any of this.

739
00:51:36.679 --> 00:51:39.159
<v Speaker 1>He never even he never even considers it. But this

740
00:51:39.239 --> 00:51:42.719
<v Speaker 1>is obviously fundamental, is what is the basis for any

741
00:51:42.800 --> 00:51:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of this and what is the kind of societal glue

742
00:51:45.960 --> 00:51:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that's going to hold all of it together.

743
00:51:47.480 --> 00:51:52.800
<v Speaker 2>So it's amazing how far this theory has got. You know,

744
00:51:53.480 --> 00:51:57.840
<v Speaker 2>immediately after the end of World War two, West Germany

745
00:51:57.960 --> 00:52:05.320
<v Speaker 2>starts creating a new constitution, and we see the godfather, well,

746
00:52:05.360 --> 00:52:12.239
<v Speaker 2>the father of that constitution, drawing heavily on on Popper's

747
00:52:12.960 --> 00:52:16.679
<v Speaker 2>open society. He was a man named Carlo Schmid, not

748
00:52:16.840 --> 00:52:18.760
<v Speaker 2>to be confused with Carl Schmidt.

749
00:52:18.760 --> 00:52:20.440
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a funny irony, isn't it. Like the

750
00:52:21.159 --> 00:52:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like the two polarities of the German mind, cal

751
00:52:24.400 --> 00:52:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Schmidt and Carolo Schmid is like, yeah, one is the

752
00:52:27.400 --> 00:52:31.639
<v Speaker 1>ultimate like you know, pluralist, institutionalized values, and the one

753
00:52:31.719 --> 00:52:33.159
<v Speaker 1>is the ultimate decisionist.

754
00:52:33.559 --> 00:52:38.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. It's very strange to me that a legal scholar

755
00:52:38.800 --> 00:52:42.320
<v Speaker 2>with that kind of responsibility, you know, draws on what

756
00:52:42.440 --> 00:52:48.039
<v Speaker 2>I would consider a very sloppy work, a very intellectually

757
00:52:48.039 --> 00:52:54.039
<v Speaker 2>dishonest work, and then sets about, you know, the writing

758
00:52:54.079 --> 00:53:00.719
<v Speaker 2>the legal foundation of his nation, which could define, you know,

759
00:53:00.760 --> 00:53:02.599
<v Speaker 2>whether it even exists into the future.

760
00:53:02.920 --> 00:53:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

761
00:53:03.320 --> 00:53:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Popper also had a teaching job at the London School

762
00:53:08.440 --> 00:53:12.639
<v Speaker 2>of Economics. George Soros was one of his students, and

763
00:53:14.239 --> 00:53:18.519
<v Speaker 2>George Soros, you know, after his trauma in World War Two,

764
00:53:20.159 --> 00:53:24.280
<v Speaker 2>was very interested in the ideas that Popper was presenting.

765
00:53:24.480 --> 00:53:28.519
<v Speaker 2>He had a very similar background in a cosmopolitan city

766
00:53:28.719 --> 00:53:33.599
<v Speaker 2>in the Austro Hungarian Empire. And George Soros went on

767
00:53:33.719 --> 00:53:37.039
<v Speaker 2>to make a lot of money in finance and then

768
00:53:37.119 --> 00:53:41.519
<v Speaker 2>he used that money for philanthropy. He you know, created

769
00:53:41.599 --> 00:53:49.480
<v Speaker 2>the Central European University. He hired you know, jurist legal

770
00:53:49.519 --> 00:53:55.679
<v Speaker 2>scholars to influence the constitutions of the Warsaw Pac countries

771
00:53:56.000 --> 00:53:59.199
<v Speaker 2>after the Berlin War came down, and the you know,

772
00:53:59.239 --> 00:54:06.079
<v Speaker 2>the modern German constitution. So you know, this, this, this work,

773
00:54:06.360 --> 00:54:10.639
<v Speaker 2>which I would you know, consider very sloppy, intellectually dishonest,

774
00:54:10.719 --> 00:54:16.119
<v Speaker 2>has just had this huge impact literally changing the definition

775
00:54:16.199 --> 00:54:24.280
<v Speaker 2>of democracy itself. And people are only just realizing what

776
00:54:24.599 --> 00:54:28.480
<v Speaker 2>it's going to take to reverse this course. The decline

777
00:54:28.519 --> 00:54:31.880
<v Speaker 2>in birth rates, the the lack of meaning we seem

778
00:54:31.920 --> 00:54:36.480
<v Speaker 2>to have in our lives now, the you know, the

779
00:54:36.559 --> 00:54:42.480
<v Speaker 2>ever progressive multiculture that you know confuses and depresses people

780
00:54:42.559 --> 00:54:46.400
<v Speaker 2>and puts them in danger. This is you know, all

781
00:54:46.440 --> 00:54:54.360
<v Speaker 2>downstream of Popper's work, of George Soros's activism, and it yeah,

782
00:54:54.559 --> 00:54:58.000
<v Speaker 2>very important to you know, set out how how this

783
00:54:58.079 --> 00:55:02.960
<v Speaker 2>has happened and you know, critique it. And you know,

784
00:55:03.239 --> 00:55:06.159
<v Speaker 2>Popper's work came at the right time in history. He

785
00:55:06.320 --> 00:55:12.559
<v Speaker 2>was able to instantiate his will on the world because

786
00:55:12.599 --> 00:55:17.079
<v Speaker 2>he presented and an argument, an idea at the right time.

787
00:55:18.199 --> 00:55:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I believe now is our time. We need to be

788
00:55:20.920 --> 00:55:25.039
<v Speaker 2>doing the same in the opposite direction. You know, maybe

789
00:55:25.079 --> 00:55:29.920
<v Speaker 2>even we'll we'll translate this episode into German via AI,

790
00:55:31.880 --> 00:55:34.719
<v Speaker 2>because you know, many Germans might may not even realize

791
00:55:34.800 --> 00:55:40.440
<v Speaker 2>the you know, kind of legal prison they are now in.

792
00:55:41.800 --> 00:55:44.519
<v Speaker 2>And you know, there's going to be a reckoning. And

793
00:55:44.760 --> 00:55:50.480
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of other intellectuals, you know, desperate

794
00:55:50.599 --> 00:55:57.599
<v Speaker 2>to maintain this version of pluralism, you know, from Anne Apple, Balm,

795
00:55:58.360 --> 00:56:02.519
<v Speaker 2>Sam Harris, as you've meant. I've even got a book here,

796
00:56:03.719 --> 00:56:10.920
<v Speaker 2>How Democracies Die by is it Levitsky and Ziblat. This

797
00:56:10.960 --> 00:56:17.360
<v Speaker 2>is a very kind of normy accessible book that basically

798
00:56:17.400 --> 00:56:21.840
<v Speaker 2>paints the Republican Party as you know, a fascist party

799
00:56:21.960 --> 00:56:26.159
<v Speaker 2>and sort of talks about the polarization of American politics

800
00:56:26.239 --> 00:56:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and the need for very strong institutions. And you know,

801
00:56:29.519 --> 00:56:32.440
<v Speaker 2>these people always go on about the need for very

802
00:56:32.440 --> 00:56:36.719
<v Speaker 2>strong institutions and democratic norms, and you know, it's all

803
00:56:36.760 --> 00:56:39.440
<v Speaker 2>a very delicate game that we're playing, and we need

804
00:56:39.480 --> 00:56:43.920
<v Speaker 2>to nudge it around. And you know, but Popper himself

805
00:56:44.039 --> 00:56:50.119
<v Speaker 2>uses this phrase piecemeal social engineering. And the people that

806
00:56:50.199 --> 00:56:53.400
<v Speaker 2>are in control of our political systems, now that is

807
00:56:53.440 --> 00:56:58.480
<v Speaker 2>how they see the world. They see our existence as

808
00:56:58.599 --> 00:57:04.639
<v Speaker 2>nations is just the technocratic project. The you know, the

809
00:57:04.760 --> 00:57:08.840
<v Speaker 2>system you know, takes on a kind of divine character

810
00:57:09.599 --> 00:57:14.199
<v Speaker 2>and they see it as their job to nudge it around.

811
00:57:14.519 --> 00:57:20.880
<v Speaker 2>And you know, have strong institutions to prevent the ever again,

812
00:57:21.039 --> 00:57:27.679
<v Speaker 2>prevent the specter of authoritarianism, and you know all these

813
00:57:27.719 --> 00:57:31.440
<v Speaker 2>other things, and you know, it just fills up. We're

814
00:57:32.559 --> 00:57:39.400
<v Speaker 2>trapped in this stasis without meaning, without the you know,

815
00:57:39.480 --> 00:57:41.960
<v Speaker 2>even the legal right to express our feelings.

816
00:57:42.000 --> 00:57:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So reading it back today, the up in society, I mean,

817
00:57:47.719 --> 00:57:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like havn't researched some of these topics, more like the

818
00:57:50.079 --> 00:57:54.119
<v Speaker 1>nationalism section for example, where he's talking about these guys

819
00:57:54.159 --> 00:57:56.519
<v Speaker 1>inventing nationalism and where he's talking about it, there's this

820
00:57:56.599 --> 00:57:59.920
<v Speaker 1>long period of where there's there's no ethnic politics in Europe.

821
00:58:00.000 --> 00:58:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like you can go true sentence by

822
00:58:02.760 --> 00:58:06.119
<v Speaker 1>sentence and there's just so many problems. There's such a

823
00:58:06.199 --> 00:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>lack of historical knowledge or just intentionally misleading or even lying,

824
00:58:11.760 --> 00:58:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, there's no arguments presented against any of

825
00:58:15.960 --> 00:58:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the philosophy of Plato against played Inis metaphysics or pistemology

826
00:58:19.840 --> 00:58:22.360
<v Speaker 1>or any of these things. And you know, the point

827
00:58:22.480 --> 00:58:25.719
<v Speaker 1>is he didn't win because he has the better arguments, Like,

828
00:58:25.920 --> 00:58:28.880
<v Speaker 1>none of this is rigorous, none of this is comprehensive,

829
00:58:29.480 --> 00:58:33.599
<v Speaker 1>there's no foundation for any of his own beliefs. He

830
00:58:33.639 --> 00:58:35.760
<v Speaker 1>can't really ground any of it. It's it's sort of

831
00:58:35.840 --> 00:58:39.119
<v Speaker 1>just taken for granted that the reader will appreciate this

832
00:58:39.280 --> 00:58:43.000
<v Speaker 1>package of open society beliefs that he's presenting. But he

833
00:58:43.039 --> 00:58:45.079
<v Speaker 1>influenced the right people, Like you said, it came at

834
00:58:45.079 --> 00:58:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the right time. George Soros is a student of his.

835
00:58:49.519 --> 00:58:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Influential legal theorists and jurists, there are students of his,

836
00:58:53.159 --> 00:58:56.039
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's again, you find again and again

837
00:58:56.119 --> 00:58:59.519
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you go back to the foundation of the postwar

838
00:58:59.639 --> 00:59:07.480
<v Speaker 1>order of post war liberal progressive theory, and it's just

839
00:59:07.719 --> 00:59:12.840
<v Speaker 1>profoundly lacking in depth and historical understanding and philosophical rigor.

840
00:59:13.719 --> 00:59:16.119
<v Speaker 1>But yet it is and will remain one of the

841
00:59:16.119 --> 00:59:20.000
<v Speaker 1>most influential texts of any kind, not just political philosophy,

842
00:59:20.079 --> 00:59:22.639
<v Speaker 1>but of any kind of of the twentieth century, and

843
00:59:22.960 --> 00:59:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Popper's legacy endurers. But yeah, it's it's important for us

844
00:59:26.840 --> 00:59:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to understand the foundations of the open society, pluralism and

845
00:59:32.639 --> 00:59:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the attack on on on real democracy and on nationalism

846
00:59:36.159 --> 00:59:39.639
<v Speaker 1>that this system has given way to. Now that will

847
00:59:39.639 --> 00:59:43.079
<v Speaker 1>be the battle of our age. They recognize it, the

848
00:59:43.119 --> 00:59:47.719
<v Speaker 1>authors of how democracies are recognized, and yeah, that's that's

849
00:59:47.800 --> 00:59:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the new playing field. But yeah, that's it for now.

850
00:59:51.519 --> 00:59:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for tuning in, Thanks run as always, and take care.
