Speaker 1: It'll be fine, all right.
Speaker 2: Listen, Jake, Travis, Savage Dog and Jared and Aaron. I
Speaker 2: will take calls Sunday night, so if you're around, we'll
Speaker 2: call you then, I not Monday.
Speaker 1: If not, I'm sorry. Try to get to everybody, do
Speaker 1: the best I could.
Speaker 2: J Jason Allis is bestselling author, total expert on the
Speaker 2: globalist goes right at their own sources. He's got forty
Speaker 2: five minutes left, and then the War Room Today hosted
Speaker 2: by the mighty Harrison Smith coming up today right here
Speaker 2: on the Info Wars Network. And everybody's sick of hearing
Speaker 2: about hon't were under attack and all the things we
Speaker 2: survived everything else. So I'm not gonna even tell you
Speaker 2: what they're trying to do. Next Thursday, we'll just see
Speaker 2: what happens. But when you go to the all Show,
Speaker 2: Shore dot Com. I don't own that, so they can't
Speaker 2: shut that down. That's funding the backup systems and the
Speaker 2: products are amazing, A huge sale going right now, so
Speaker 2: please take action, all right, jadayre of Jason Allis, thanks
Speaker 2: for holding he takes over now.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Alex. It's glad to be back with you.
Speaker 3: I want to talk about the history of political assassinations
Speaker 3: from the vantage point of the global elite, not just
Speaker 3: the political assassinations, but the bigger picture in what the
Speaker 3: overall plan is, again from the vantage point of the
Speaker 3: books that they write. Of course, one of the key
Speaker 3: texts that you've heard me talk about, that I heard
Speaker 3: Alex talk about many years ago is Bill Clinton's mentor
Speaker 3: at Georgetown, and that's Tragi and Hope.
Speaker 1: Some years back I did.
Speaker 3: Oh, actually, it's almost a decade on now, so it's
Speaker 3: a ten year anniversary almost of reading through Tragy and
Speaker 3: Hope and lecturing through the entire thing in about sixteen
Speaker 3: hours worth of talks. You find that on my YouTube channel.
Speaker 1: There's a whole playlist on the front of the channel.
Speaker 3: But it's good to go back and review this and
Speaker 3: tie it into other texts as well. We're going to
Speaker 3: talk about the clergy Plan, We're going to talk about
Speaker 3: the banking system that was set up according to quickly
Speaker 3: and how this actually does tie into high profile political assassinations.
Speaker 3: And this of course is probably the most important high
Speaker 3: profile assassination since the late sixties with RFK and then
Speaker 3: of course JFK and others as well well, and then there's,
Speaker 3: you know, appendix, books that I think fill in the
Speaker 3: gap since Tragy and Hope and angle American establishment, like
Speaker 3: Joan Rotiu's book, which does get into the power structure
Speaker 3: and the faction of Israel Zionism, all of that, that
Speaker 3: kind of is left off because Quickly was writing in
Speaker 3: the midst of the Cold War. This book was printed
Speaker 3: in the nineteen sixties. But it's a very valuable insight.
Speaker 3: And every time I talk about this book, I have
Speaker 3: to always explain I don't because people just are dombin
Speaker 3: and they don't read books anymore, that I am not
Speaker 3: saying that it's true because Quickly says it. I am
Speaker 3: not saying that he's a good man. He is an
Speaker 3: apologist for the establishment perspective.
Speaker 1: And that's why the books are so valuable.
Speaker 3: Much like when we lecture through David Rockefeller's writings, or
Speaker 3: when we lecture through A.
Speaker 1: She Welles's books, or Bertrand Russell's books, or.
Speaker 3: Any of the elite Jacques Atali, they all lay out
Speaker 3: what their plans are, and they don't really have much
Speaker 3: shame in saying openly what the plan is.
Speaker 1: So let's go.
Speaker 3: Back to the beginning, because Well actually it's start in
Speaker 3: the middle, because there's an overlooks chapter that quickly talks
Speaker 3: about describing the banking system and structure that was set
Speaker 3: up after Bretton Woods after World War One and World
Speaker 3: War Two, that this same power structure set up. It
Speaker 3: is a Fiat debt based system and it has a name.
Speaker 3: It's called the Power Boss system of the Rothschild banking family.
Speaker 3: In fact, this was the network of banking that was
Speaker 3: set up, according to Quickly on page five twenty five,
Speaker 3: throughout Europe, particularly France and the Bank of England that
Speaker 3: becomes the model for the US failed to Reserve bank.
Speaker 1: And the chief economist behind all this.
Speaker 3: Is a guy you might have heard of named John
Speaker 3: Maynard Keynes Keynesian economic theory, which is Fabian socialist economic theory.
Speaker 3: In fact, you may not I've heard of this, but
Speaker 3: if you look at the party that Kure Starmer is
Speaker 3: a member of, he's a Fabian socialist. I just sent
Speaker 3: an interview with the guy in the UK. It's going
Speaker 3: to come out I think today on x and in
Speaker 3: some other platforms of a activist kind of in the
Speaker 3: vein of Tommy Robinson, maybe a little more on the
Speaker 3: right as we discuss the history of the Fabian society,
Speaker 3: its members, it's backers, people like Lord Rothchald and others
Speaker 3: which are mentioned in these texts as essentially funding this
Speaker 3: soft socialism or this soft communism. So it's communism allied
Speaker 3: with big capital, and that's the key thing to understand
Speaker 3: the powery boss system. And he says the whole system
Speaker 3: of the twentieth century was headed by Baron Edward de Rothchald.
Speaker 3: The active head, however, was Rene Meyer, manager of the
Speaker 3: Rothchild Bank. And he goes on to talk about this network.
Speaker 3: This system had control of news agency Pavas, was a
Speaker 3: monopolistic news agency in France. He goes on to talk
Speaker 3: about all the other structures and networks that they had
Speaker 3: set up and that ultimately this dealt with this Feller
Speaker 3: reserve Vacht type system. So let's go back then to
Speaker 3: the beginning of the text, and he talks about how
Speaker 3: the history of Western civilization, particularly after the classical liberal
Speaker 3: reformation of the Enlightenment, ended up with a gold standard.
Speaker 3: And the problem with the gold center is not that
Speaker 3: gold is itself bad or anything like that. It ended
Speaker 3: up being the best standard for those times, for that period. Eventually, however,
Speaker 3: the printing of and the making of gold notes was centralized,
Speaker 3: and it was centralized not in state power, but ultimately
Speaker 3: in private power. So although gold was the best possible
Speaker 3: standard for having a flourishing society for many centuries, and
Speaker 3: we just recently on my channel lectured through Seiphadinamas's famous
Speaker 3: book The Bitcoin Standard, most of that book is a
Speaker 3: critique of Kynesian economics and actually talking about the gold center. Eventually, however,
Speaker 3: the goald center becomes centralized, and it's centralized in an
Speaker 3: international ledger system that's modeled around this pariboss system and
Speaker 3: the Bank for International Settlements system. But quickly begins the
Speaker 3: book talking about that and that this is how the
Speaker 3: world is run and controlled by this network.
Speaker 1: And he even.
Speaker 3: Says he even goes so far as to say that
Speaker 3: if you look at Britain, when Disraeli, for example, captured
Speaker 3: the Suez Canal, he did that at the behest and
Speaker 3: at the actions of the Rathchild. He says on page
Speaker 3: one thirty three, Israeli purchased with Rathchild money the Suez
Speaker 3: Canal for three million, six and eighty thousand pounds. So
Speaker 3: are you starting to realize that really the British Empire.
Speaker 3: I mean, there's definitely factions, that's not all one sided.
Speaker 3: But as this family gains control and as they work
Speaker 3: together with their other relatives in the European banking structure,
Speaker 3: Carol Quigley notes that they really do take power, they
Speaker 3: really do control these countries, and it's not just them obviously.
Speaker 3: Eventually there's an alliance between the American industrialist families like
Speaker 3: the Rockefellers, the Carnegie, the Morgans. They're all allied together.
Speaker 3: But you might not know, or you might not recall,
Speaker 3: you might not have read that early on. Quickly says
Speaker 3: that the danger that they saw at this time was
Speaker 3: two competing powers, the Austro Hungarian Catholic power and Russia
Speaker 3: as the Orthodox power, and these two powers need to.
Speaker 1: Be destroyed, and the way to do that was through
Speaker 1: World War.
Speaker 3: He doesn't outright say that the Lusitania was a false
Speaker 3: flag on pitch two fifty one, but he hints at
Speaker 3: it because he says that there was a mysterious a
Speaker 3: second explosion that sunk the ship.
Speaker 1: And of course this begins US involvement.
Speaker 3: And we also have the assassination, the high profile assassination
Speaker 3: of got Rilo Prinshup of the Sorbian Black Hand, which
Speaker 3: was a nationalist secret society intent upon assassinating our Stuke
Speaker 3: friends fernand And I'm not saying that he was a hero.
Speaker 3: I'm very much pro serb. A lot of my audience
Speaker 3: are awesome based serbs. But there can be political machinations
Speaker 3: and false flag events and these kinds of things that's
Speaker 3: set off in stoke political violence or political sea change,
Speaker 3: and usually a high profile assassination is intended to do that.
Speaker 3: It might not always work in the favor of those
Speaker 3: trying to set it off, and again I don't exactly
Speaker 3: know what the real story is. We always know that
Speaker 3: when there's a big, high profile assassination. Of course, everyone
Speaker 3: will question it nowadays, which is a good thing because
Speaker 3: they used to not question these things.
Speaker 1: They just accepted the CIA's creation of.
Speaker 3: Conspiracy theory out of the JFK assassination as a dogma
Speaker 3: that you must accept. If you dare to question it,
Speaker 3: you're a bad person. And we know that through the
Speaker 3: JFK documents that did come out. Much of them were
Speaker 3: censored and blacked out, of course, but we did see
Speaker 3: some inklings that through James Jesus Engleton. He was definitely
Speaker 3: providing a lot of this information and info to Israel.
Speaker 3: So there is an Israeli involvement without question, especially through
Speaker 3: the Israeli file. James Jesus Engleton Angleton explicitly is said
Speaker 3: in the documents to be passing secrets to Israel. There's
Speaker 3: the Demona program, which was a big part of this.
Speaker 3: Perhaps JFK seemed to be opposed to that, and so
Speaker 3: there was a motive there, at least in terms of
Speaker 3: opposition on the part of Israel to the Kennedys. We
Speaker 3: don't know if exactly that's why it went down. There
Speaker 3: were other players of all as well. There's the mafia.
Speaker 3: There's also the Jewish mafia. There's also Cuban exiles. Many
Speaker 3: of these networks and figures seem to play a key
Speaker 3: role at some degree in what happened with JFK. But
Speaker 3: to go back to the issue of World War One
Speaker 3: and the banking elites and Gavrielo Princhep and the Black
Speaker 3: Hand and these secret societies and whatnot. Again, this is
Speaker 3: par for the course. I'm not I'm not saying that Charlie.
Speaker 3: I think Charlie Kirk was a righteous man who died
Speaker 3: for a wicked cause. I was gou be for it
Speaker 3: for at the hand of wicked people. So I'm not
Speaker 3: demoting or denigrating the power and the value of it,
Speaker 3: but I'm noting that in history this happens pretty frequently.
Speaker 3: And somebody was saying, oh, this is America as a
Speaker 3: history of Every nation has a history of violence when
Speaker 3: it comes to political elites, political assassinations. There was just
Speaker 3: a assassination of the Japanese politician Shinzo Abe not too
Speaker 3: long ago. There was Ben Azerbuto being assassinated some years back.
Speaker 3: Political assassinations happen everywhere all over the world. If you
Speaker 3: read history, and if you read geopolitical history, this is
Speaker 3: normal in the big picture. Again, I'm not saying it's good,
Speaker 3: it's terrible, it's a tragedy, but this happens. And the
Speaker 3: reason I say that is usually when this happens, it
Speaker 3: is for some bigger power players purpose.
Speaker 1: We don't know exactly who was involved.
Speaker 3: I'm aware of all the data about Charlie Kirk reportedly
Speaker 3: refusing millions of dollars from Israeli donors and whatnot.
Speaker 1: I'm familiar with all of this.
Speaker 3: We don't know exactly if that's any proof that that's
Speaker 3: who was involved. It could be. Again we're looking at
Speaker 3: possible motives. Is there a possible other shooter as possible.
Speaker 3: But the other thing, if you go back to nine
Speaker 3: to eleven, a lot of times people get lost in
Speaker 3: the detail. I'm not saying people can't investigate the detail,
Speaker 3: but people get lost in the details. And if you're
Speaker 3: the big picture and who actually had motives, get the
Speaker 3: PENAC documents. They forget Brazinski's Grand Chess Board, which talked
Speaker 3: about these types of things ahead of time, and those
Speaker 3: are I think the big things to keep in mind
Speaker 3: rather than getting sort of lost in analyzing you know,
Speaker 3: every little detail, every little AI clip that pops up
Speaker 3: on Twitter, and you know with AI, it's going to
Speaker 3: get harder and harder to analyze these events with manipulation
Speaker 3: of the imagery. So what I can say is that
Speaker 3: zooming out, we know that there is a power structure
Speaker 3: in the West. There is an Israeli faction to it.
Speaker 3: There is a growing technocratic, leftist insane faction.
Speaker 1: So there's these different factions and.
Speaker 3: They're all working towards a similar type of agenda of
Speaker 3: a one world government with some type of centralized religious
Speaker 3: and state power that can then dictate.
Speaker 1: Life and death.
Speaker 3: So whether you're a rabbinical minded person who believes that
Speaker 3: the Talmud teaches that everyone else is cattle and that
Speaker 3: you should, you know, subjugate them, or whether you're George
Speaker 3: Bernard Shaw and you believe that the technocratic elite are
Speaker 3: superior and everybody must come to you, as George Bernard
Speaker 3: Shaw the socialist, to decide whether or not they get
Speaker 3: deliver or not. That's actual quote he says, in the technocracy,
Speaker 3: you will come to us to convince us why we
Speaker 3: should let you live and whether you are advantageous to
Speaker 3: the state.
Speaker 1: If you're in nineteen.
Speaker 3: Eighty four, That's who George Orwell is picturing. That's who
Speaker 3: he's talking about, is people like Shaw and Ingsock is
Speaker 3: English Fabian socialism. Isn't it interesting that with kir Starmer,
Speaker 3: with the socialists collapse of the UK that we're seeing,
Speaker 3: this is actually what Orwell was talking about. He was
Speaker 3: talking about the very thing happening right now. This is
Speaker 3: the Alexi Johns Shewn your guest host, Jada I or
Speaker 3: jas Nelson's not go anywhere.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back.
Speaker 4: What really makes a nutraceutical work? What is a nutraceutical?
Speaker 4: What is a supplement? Yeah, I mean, let's just talk
Speaker 4: about power plant for example. So drive is something that everyone,
Speaker 4: whether they're twelve or whether they're ninety, they.
Speaker 1: Should all take it.
Speaker 4: Power Plant is a little bit more specific. It's good
Speaker 4: for both men and women. I would say it has
Speaker 4: a stronger, more pronounced fact factor on the younger side,
Speaker 4: especially people that are into high intensity exercise. Key ingredient
Speaker 4: and that is cord aceps, which increases your oxygen carrying capacity,
Speaker 4: but it also increases ATP and it also helps you
Speaker 4: make new mitochondria. So imagine taking something like cordiceps found
Speaker 4: in power plant and then combining it with methyl drive.
Speaker 4: But oh wait, there's also total male mineral support. In
Speaker 4: power plant. We've got zinc, which increases lutinizing hormone, which
Speaker 4: makes you produce more testosterone. But then to counteract the
Speaker 4: rise in sexualone binding globulin, we include boron in it
Speaker 4: to increase your free testosterone. That's something that normal formulas
Speaker 4: don't do. We've got the thing that creates free testosterone
Speaker 4: in your body in power plant.
Speaker 1: According to studies, that's mainline. You can google it and
Speaker 1: not all coke to is the same. Right, everyone should
Speaker 1: take coq ten.
Speaker 4: Listen, and if you're going to take coq ten, you're
Speaker 4: going to go to some store, some pharmacy, and they're
Speaker 4: going to try to sell you a bottle with the
Speaker 4: same amount that's in here.
Speaker 1: For like fifty bucks.
Speaker 4: You get coke ten plus four other ingredients with this
Speaker 4: and the same amount, same amount.
Speaker 1: It's incredible. We make this stuff for you and for ourselves.
Speaker 4: Everyone at the N four's office is gobbling these supplements
Speaker 4: left and right.
Speaker 1: That's why I made these is so I could take them.
Speaker 1: And then you designed it to go with our older
Speaker 1: methylene blue. Absolutely, that's the key.
Speaker 4: Before any man or woman, young and old, if you're
Speaker 4: on methylene blue, you gotta take it.
Speaker 2: Everybody loves the formulas, and I've noticed I take both together.
Speaker 1: The energy is totally insane. Each one is very strong
Speaker 1: on its own.
Speaker 4: Methyl drive is something that every person in the country
Speaker 4: should take.
Speaker 2: So the bethylene blue is like the engine and gasoline.
Speaker 2: These products together is ancrosoxide exactly turbo charges.
Speaker 1: Welcome back to the alex Jonzoe.
Speaker 3: We're talking about the history of high profile assassinations in
Speaker 3: the last century, and that the unfortunate event with Charlie
Speaker 3: Kirk is probably the most high profile ones since the
Speaker 3: late sixties. And what place do these events play in
Speaker 3: the bigger picture. I think the intention again, judging by
Speaker 3: what we do know in regard to this being the
Speaker 3: trans shooter and all that, as far as we know
Speaker 3: so far, that seems to back up the idea that
Speaker 3: the left believes perhaps that this would be a catalyst
Speaker 3: for kicking off or triggering more radical social violence from
Speaker 3: their perspective, from their side, and Alex is absolutely right.
Speaker 3: When you get out in the wild, when you go
Speaker 3: to political conventions, when you see people out there protesting whatever,
Speaker 3: you really will encounter these sort of demonically possessed leftists.
Speaker 3: They do exist. They're out there and they're unhinged. And
Speaker 3: you know, there's all these groups that we've discussed when
Speaker 3: we interviewed BX. Even here on the fourth hour of
Speaker 3: the Augs shown show the seven six for the CAMM groups,
Speaker 3: the Satanic online trans groups, these networks, these are also real.
Speaker 3: You even had cash Betel mention these, I think in
Speaker 3: one of his discussions before Congress. So you know, the
Speaker 3: FBI is even aware of these things. And again, who
Speaker 3: exactly is running all these things and provoking these things,
Speaker 3: It's unclear, but that's definitely a pool from which one
Speaker 3: could easily draw unstable types of patsies if that is
Speaker 3: the case. I think back to the World War two
Speaker 3: events and we have the famous Reichstag event where the
Speaker 3: Reichstag is burned down and it's blamed on the slow boy,
Speaker 3: the retarded individual that was supposed to be a communist.
Speaker 3: I'm not pro communist at all. Again, this whole lecture
Speaker 3: is against socialism. But again, this is a a very
Speaker 3: common tactic in politics, not just a false flag, but
Speaker 3: high profile assassinations are common. Even in the case of
Speaker 3: you know, Hitler, there was Operation Valkyrie right with the
Speaker 3: account what was the name Stelfenberg. So this happens all
Speaker 3: the time again in politics, high profile geopolitical stuff, and
Speaker 3: it's not difficult to find idealize or indoctrinated, you know,
Speaker 3: over the ideological individuals who are willing to do these
Speaker 3: kinds of actions that they think, because they're usually not
Speaker 3: very smart, they think is going to trigger some kind
Speaker 3: of world changing events. So that usually it's a person
Speaker 3: with a kind of delusion that believes that their action
Speaker 3: will magically change the world or will trigger some you know,
Speaker 3: see change, some big revolution.
Speaker 1: But as I said, I think that in this case.
Speaker 3: It's actually working more so on the part of waking
Speaker 3: people up to the reality of how vicious and radicalized
Speaker 3: the left has become.
Speaker 1: And that was not a wise move.
Speaker 3: If that's that was the intention, was to trigger copycats
Speaker 3: on the part of the left, that's not going to work.
Speaker 3: This has definitely made people, I think, awake even more
Speaker 3: so to how radical the left actually is, and people
Speaker 3: on our side of things, Alex and others, we've actually
Speaker 3: been saying, I mean, what people are waking up to,
Speaker 3: we should have woken up to this ten fifteen years ago.
Speaker 3: You're talking about people who were willing to not just
Speaker 3: get you fired or canceled or whatever. But I mean
Speaker 3: they were hitting people with bike locks at Gavin mcinnis's
Speaker 3: MAGA stuff ten years ago.
Speaker 1: I mean they were.
Speaker 3: Violent ten years ago. So they're not going to stop
Speaker 3: being violent. You're not going to reason what demonic possessed
Speaker 3: people like. They've already surrendered the use of their reason.
Speaker 1: That's why we.
Speaker 3: Talked about last time those who are sons of blial right,
Speaker 3: they're wicked, worthless persons, as the Old Testament says.
Speaker 1: Now they could still be saved.
Speaker 3: But the more wicked you get, the more vile you get,
Speaker 3: the less likely you are to repent. And usually it
Speaker 3: takes some kind of serious type of event for a
Speaker 3: person that advanced in wickedness to actually repent again. We
Speaker 3: don't know the ways of grace and so forth. But
Speaker 3: that's why the death penalty was always there in Western
Speaker 3: civilization was there was a recognition of the reality of
Speaker 3: not just evil but excessively evil and vile people. They're
Speaker 3: a danger to themselves and to society, and that's why
Speaker 3: there was a much broader use of the death penalty. Again,
Speaker 3: it's in Romans thirteen. I'm not saying we worship the state.
Speaker 3: I'm just saying that the death penalty is very clearly
Speaker 3: elucidated there, and most people don't know that. The Church fathers,
Speaker 3: and throughout the history of Christian civilization, most Christian countries, nations,
Speaker 3: kings had the death penalty, especially for vile and heinous actions.
Speaker 1: And it's not just a deterrent, it's.
Speaker 3: Also an inducement that those people will that's the last
Speaker 3: medicine that that kind of a person could have to induce.
Speaker 3: Repentance is something that's severe. And that's why again, even
Speaker 3: if you haven't read the Book of Genesis, I mean,
Speaker 3: Jesus is the one speaking to Noah, right, Jesus is
Speaker 3: the god of the Old Testament. Jesus is the one
Speaker 3: that gave the death penalty to Noah. Maybe you've forgotten Genesis,
Speaker 3: but if you believe the Book of Genesis, then that's
Speaker 3: the revelation that we have.
Speaker 1: So it's not antithetical to what Jesus teaches.
Speaker 3: Jesus is the one that taught Paul in Romans thirteen
Speaker 3: that the state has the right of the sword for
Speaker 3: Timothy one Paul talks about the state has this authority to.
Speaker 1: Deter evil doers.
Speaker 3: So it's not an orthodox Christian or a historic Christian
Speaker 3: position to think in these radical, sort of Anabaptist types
Speaker 3: of views.
Speaker 1: That's what we talked about last time.
Speaker 3: But to get back to the twentieth century, when we
Speaker 3: look at the survey of the political landscape and the
Speaker 3: type of world that the elites want to bring in.
Speaker 3: This mentioned multiple times in the text. This is not
Speaker 3: a competing story or narrative to what the Zionist vision
Speaker 3: of the world is. In other words, if we look
Speaker 3: at what Moses Hes talks about as one of the
Speaker 3: key founders of modern political Zionism, he talks about the
Speaker 3: fact that he has this idea that he and others
Speaker 3: that the free Masonic lodges will be the means by
Speaker 3: which the world's religions will be brought into a single cult,
Speaker 3: and this single cult will eventually work at the behest
Speaker 3: of fostering a single religious center in Jerusalem. So it's
Speaker 3: almost like the world religions will continue sort of being
Speaker 3: pseudo religions or covers or fronts, but they'll really be
Speaker 3: working at the behest of some supra relig and controlling
Speaker 3: things in Jerusalem. He then goes on to talk about
Speaker 3: the fact that in his day, this is in the
Speaker 3: eighteen sixties, he says he's already met with the Rothschilds
Speaker 3: who intend to eventually purchase the Holy Land and return
Speaker 3: it to Jewish ownership and Jewish power to bring about
Speaker 3: the advent.
Speaker 1: Of the Marchiach the Messiah, that is for the Jews.
Speaker 3: So this isn't me, this isn't a anti Semitic conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 3: This is a very famous book written by Moseses. It's
Speaker 3: called The Revival of Israel, Rome and Jerusalem. And it
Speaker 3: was written not after nineteen seventeen the Balfour Decoration, not
Speaker 3: after nineteen forty eight. It was written in eighteen sixty two. Okay,
Speaker 3: So it's time to stop being ignorant and stupid and
Speaker 3: unaware of the actual history and what people themselves write about.
Speaker 1: In fact, he says.
Speaker 3: That the world religion that's coming is a world religion
Speaker 3: of socialism. He says it's dialectics and the movement of
Speaker 3: eternal matter. And he says in his mind that Jews
Speaker 3: will save the world through worshiping the Jewish race and
Speaker 3: the Jewish dialectical materials to religion. Now, I'm not saying
Speaker 3: that's the case. He says that the god of this
Speaker 3: religion is a relativistic, subjectivistic, pantheistic deity. And he says,
Speaker 3: if you want to understand my theology, it's Hegel and Spinoza.
Speaker 3: I'm not saying that every Jew believes that, or that
Speaker 3: every Jewish a is a atheist zionistic Spinosa is Jew.
Speaker 3: I understand that there's other positions. I'm aware of all that.
Speaker 3: I'm just pointing out that one of the most important
Speaker 3: founders of political Zionism himself says that in his book.
Speaker 3: Now is that antithetical to what I read.
Speaker 1: In the Fabiance?
Speaker 3: Socialists like George Bernard Shaw or Sydney Webb or David
Speaker 3: Rockefeller himself a almost Fabian socialist. Now it's the same
Speaker 3: type of ideology.
Speaker 1: There might be a.
Speaker 3: Little bit of a twist over here that oh no,
Speaker 3: it's going to be Spinoza, Hegel, Karl Marx, dialectical socialist materialism,
Speaker 3: that is the world religion.
Speaker 1: That we all worship.
Speaker 3: No, no, no, it's going to be the super state itself.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: So, in other words, if you read Brave New World,
Speaker 3: it's not empathetical to what you just read there. It's
Speaker 3: essentially the same overall plan. And you know, I've said
Speaker 3: this forever, So I don't know why people get hung
Speaker 3: up on, oh, you won't talk about this, you won't
Speaker 3: talk about that. I mean, we're literally talking about the
Speaker 3: VIAS system right here. Quickly has entire chapters talking about
Speaker 3: the bank for a national settlement system is the global
Speaker 3: Federal Reserve, and that's pages three twenty four and three
Speaker 3: twenty five in his Magisterial Tragedy. Now maybe you say
Speaker 3: I don't have time to read these giant, boring books.
Speaker 3: I don't blame you. That's why I did your homework
Speaker 3: for you. I actually went and read this extremely boring text.
Speaker 3: It's not even as boring as other texts. I mean,
Speaker 3: it's actually readable in a sense, like there's a lot
Speaker 3: of fascinating history and it so if your a history
Speaker 3: buff you could make your way through it.
Speaker 1: But I mean it is.
Speaker 3: It's thirteen hundred pages, and no one else has done this, Okay, Now,
Speaker 3: shout out.
Speaker 1: To Richard Grove.
Speaker 3: I mean, he talks about the book a lot, so
Speaker 3: he's probably the closest to what we do in terms
Speaker 3: of this.
Speaker 1: Type of approach.
Speaker 3: But there's literally no one else out there has lectured
Speaker 3: through this text in all thirteen hundred pages. I went,
Speaker 3: I did it for you ten years ago. Almost nobody
Speaker 3: out there has actually listened to those lectures, at least
Speaker 3: as far as I could tell. I know, Alex was
Speaker 3: way earlier than me in terms of being familiar with
Speaker 3: this stuff, but this book literally tells you everything. I mean,
Speaker 3: the entire twentieth century from the vantage point of the
Speaker 3: global elite. It tells you all of it, and when
Speaker 3: you see it from their perspective, you begin to say, oh,
Speaker 3: now I understand, and why there is a pirate Boss
Speaker 3: Rothschild system.
Speaker 1: That is the banking system of the whole world.
Speaker 3: That's the bis ft, a reserve for the whole Oh,
Speaker 3: I understand why the New Deal was a socialist fabian
Speaker 3: attack on America. That wasn't FDR being a good guy
Speaker 3: saving everybody. Was actually a banker scam. The New Deal
Speaker 3: is a banker scamp pages five thirty four and five
Speaker 3: thirty five. Now, again, Quigley is not a good man.
Speaker 3: He's a defender of this. He says, this is the
Speaker 3: best hope that we have to end world wars. Is
Speaker 3: global democratic monopoly capitalism is essentially what he says.
Speaker 1: But I want to take issue again.
Speaker 3: I know Alex is a big proponent of being a
Speaker 3: classical liberal, but quickly does say that classical liberalism was
Speaker 3: essentially the economic theory of the banking elite. That is
Speaker 3: the perspective that they had at that time, and that's
Speaker 3: what allowed for the gold Stander, which was good for
Speaker 3: that time. But once the elite concentrate all the control
Speaker 3: of the gold and they print the gold notes. Just
Speaker 3: going back to a gold center is not going to do.
Speaker 3: If the Queen of England and Lord Rothshaw controlled the gold.
Speaker 1: Then what's the point of a gold center.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's not the hard to figure out, right,
Speaker 3: But in principle, yes, the gold standard was way better
Speaker 3: than the other stuff. That's what we saw in the
Speaker 3: Seipho Deine book that we lectured through. But now we're
Speaker 3: talking about a global system of a dollar backed gold,
Speaker 3: a gold backed dollar that then removes itself from gold
Speaker 3: in nineteen seventy one, and now it becomes FIA, and
Speaker 3: now we're in this disaster of money printing, black hole,
Speaker 3: spiraling debt which can't be solved. Even Elon in a
Speaker 3: recent clip admitted that if you understand that we can't
Speaker 3: even pay the interest on this debt, and by the way,
Speaker 3: who's it too. What's to the people I'm talking about
Speaker 3: is to the international private banking elite. That's where all
Speaker 3: the debt is owed. It can never be paid back.
Speaker 3: And what happens is there's a boom bus cycle. And
Speaker 3: quickly talks about this boom bus cycle in the FDR chapters,
Speaker 3: and he says that the purpose of the boom bus
Speaker 3: cycle he kind of hints it this. He doesn't explicitly say,
Speaker 3: but it says basically, it seems to be to put
Speaker 3: the future generations into debt. So you have a boom
Speaker 3: that happens, there's a bubble, the bubble pops, there's a
Speaker 3: massive amount of debt that can't be paid, and then
Speaker 3: the banking league come in and say, we will bail
Speaker 3: you out this decade, but you're going to owe us
Speaker 3: a giant bunch of debt in the next decade. So
Speaker 3: it's putting the future generations into debt in a seemingly
Speaker 3: structured boom bus cycle. How controlled it is is up
Speaker 3: for debate, But it seems like they already figured out
Speaker 3: a long time ago that you could gain the boom
Speaker 3: bus cycle system and not just benefit from it in
Speaker 3: a monetary way because they print them money.
Speaker 1: They don't need the Fiat dollars.
Speaker 3: The Fiat dollars are a tool to gain actual assets.
Speaker 1: So laise fair.
Speaker 3: Liberal economic theory, according to Quigley, was the older strategy
Speaker 3: of the power elite, the banking elite that has now
Speaker 3: caved to what he talks about on pages five to
Speaker 3: fifty and five to fifty one the third wave system.
Speaker 3: Now again, he was writing this back decades ago, and
Speaker 3: he was the mentor to Bill Clinton. And Bill Clinton
Speaker 3: and Tony Blair had a third wave view of combining
Speaker 3: capitalism with socialism out of the dialectic perhaps even of
Speaker 3: the Cold War. What's the dialectical synthesis that we can
Speaker 3: get out of Eastern communism and Western capitalism. Oh well,
Speaker 3: it turns out page five fifty two to fifty three,
Speaker 3: it's large scale state technocracy for every state.
Speaker 1: China is a perfect example of this. Right, and then the.
Speaker 3: Ends that chapter, I'm saying, well, what's the key issue
Speaker 3: that the global technocratic government will have to deal with?
Speaker 3: Page five fifty four to fifty five over population. So again,
Speaker 3: don't be stupid. I'm not saying quickly, is a good
Speaker 3: person exposing the conspiracy?
Speaker 1: No, he's a defender of this. Is he's Bill Clinton's mentor.
Speaker 3: Uh So, when we talk about the liberal world order,
Speaker 3: he says, the liberal world order, Neoliberalism is an economic theory.
Speaker 3: It's neoliberal is economics. That is Laise Fair, classical, that
Speaker 3: is classical liberalism, rejecting the classical Christian worldview of firewalls,
Speaker 3: nation states, boundaries, and even things like tariffs. Tariffs were
Speaker 3: an old strategy that even the kings used to do
Speaker 3: to keep from cheap labor coming in and destroying the
Speaker 3: people in your kingdom because they can price gouge and
Speaker 3: do the labor for much cheaper because they were very poor,
Speaker 3: they would do it for half price. And so the
Speaker 3: cobbler who charges two gold coins right would be put
Speaker 3: out of business because the Asian cobbler who comes in
Speaker 3: does it for one gold coin.
Speaker 1: It's right.
Speaker 3: So having immigration control and having tariffs and blocks on
Speaker 3: these kinds that was to protect the people. Liiz fair
Speaker 3: liberal economic theory which comes out of people like Locke
Speaker 3: and Ricardo and Adam Smith and all these kinds of characters.
Speaker 3: And I'm not saying that they're wrong in every point
Speaker 3: that they had, but part of the problem was that
Speaker 3: they are part of the revolutionary ethos, and quickly explicitly
Speaker 3: says the French Revolution was funded by Protestant and Jewish
Speaker 3: banking elites.
Speaker 1: Why why would they fund this?
Speaker 3: Because they wanted to remove the existing power structure of
Speaker 3: thrown and altar, particularly in the in this case France,
Speaker 3: the French Revolutions funded by Protestants, Swiss and Jewish banking
Speaker 3: houses to change the landscape of France to what to
Speaker 3: the French revolutionary atheistic, secular government, removing God from society.
Speaker 1: Again, I've had multiple grade.
Speaker 3: Classes on French Revolution taught by guys who actually weren't
Speaker 3: even liberal. I had the one conservative professor had was
Speaker 3: teaching French revolutionary grad and undergrad classes, and so we
Speaker 3: went really deep into the way, deeper than I ever
Speaker 3: even wanted to go into the history of the French Revolution.
Speaker 3: And you have a right wing and left ring of
Speaker 3: the French revolutionary provisional government, the Jacobins and the Grondins.
Speaker 3: The Grondins were also revolutionary, and I'm not saying that
Speaker 3: they weren't good in some aspects. The Founding Fathers very
Speaker 3: much influenced by the Girondins. A lot of good things,
Speaker 3: a lot of good principles. But there is still this
Speaker 3: free Masonic Enlightenment deistic idea coming out of the Enlightenment,
Speaker 3: coming out of the scientific Revolution, that you can have
Speaker 3: world governance that's positive and will work through free trade
Speaker 3: and economic liberalism.
Speaker 1: And I don't think that makes any sense. So that's
Speaker 1: my main critique.
Speaker 3: If you read, for example, in Manual CONTs Enlightenment essay
Speaker 3: on free trade and global government, he says, oh, if
Speaker 3: we just have everybody having free exchange, then we won't
Speaker 3: have world wars anymore. It's just so naive, as if
Speaker 3: world wars are just all about economic theory and not
Speaker 3: about human avarice and wickedness. It's a false analysis, it's
Speaker 3: a false anthropology. It doesn't take into account that, well,
Speaker 3: human beings don't just act on the basis of economic choices.
Speaker 3: They also act on the basis of irrational evil motivations
Speaker 3: and decisions.
Speaker 1: Right, So, Enlightenment.
Speaker 3: Economic and anthropological theory is based on man not being fallen.
Speaker 3: It's based on a Pelagian view of man as a
Speaker 3: interchangeable economic unit that is a blank slate. Well guess what, Ever,
Speaker 3: since the last one hundred years or so of genetic
Speaker 3: theory and a lot of prominent famous geneticists, we know
Speaker 3: now that the Enlightenment theory that man's.
Speaker 1: A tabula ross is false.
Speaker 3: You are actually imprinted with characteristics from your parents and
Speaker 3: from genetic ancestor memories. Well, that means then that you're
Speaker 3: not a blank slate when you're born, and that means
Speaker 3: that you don't just imprint on people the external stimuli.
Speaker 3: They actually have an internal component to them that's already
Speaker 3: part of them. So the Enlightenment anthropology is just not true.
Speaker 3: Even the Darwinian people who I disagree with, have shown
Speaker 3: and don't believe this Enlightenment tabula ross of you anymore. Otherwise,
Speaker 3: I mean, they didn't have genetics back then. That's the point.
Speaker 3: So if genetics is true, then we know that the
Speaker 3: Enlightenment tabular rossoview is false. Well, guess what the Enlightenment
Speaker 3: tabular rosso view is? What underlies all of the Enlightenment
Speaker 3: theorists about world government and economics, And yes, they believed
Speaker 3: in world government. Emmanuel Kant has an entire essay on
Speaker 3: world government the New World Order, which he says will
Speaker 3: be a utopian, free exchange, free trade world order. Von
Speaker 3: Hayek and the appendix to Rhad to Serfdim says the
Speaker 3: exact same thing. He says, we'll have world government and
Speaker 3: an international world policing body to worship free trade.
Speaker 1: Basically, I mean I'm joking, which is worship.
Speaker 3: He says that we'll get world peace through this is
Speaker 3: just so naive, and it's just so silly to think that,
Speaker 3: especially after we see all of these demonic Antifa people.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is the end.
Speaker 3: Result of a century centuries of Enlightenment. Liberalism is just
Speaker 3: classical liberalism leads you to nihilism because there's nothing to
Speaker 3: ground it in other than what natural law, natural rights,
Speaker 3: natural ethics. Well, when you look at nature, you see
Speaker 3: predators in prey. So without the theological basis, it's just
Speaker 3: power struggles. It's just Nietzschean dominance. It's just predator and pray.
Speaker 3: If it's just predator and pray, then there's nothing wrong
Speaker 3: with what the insane Antifa people do. Or there is
Speaker 3: a God, there is truth, there is a church, there
Speaker 3: is a right and wrong, and we're not born as
Speaker 3: Enlightenment tabula rosso blank slates. We have souls. So you
Speaker 3: understand that, like right right from the outset, if you
Speaker 3: believe in the fall and that man fel, that's going
Speaker 3: to affect the rest of your anthropology. You're not going
Speaker 3: to have unrealistic expectations about Oh well, I guess if
Speaker 3: we can just like there was a rapper who you know,
Speaker 3: was strangling a white girl on one of his rap
Speaker 3: videos in Europe, and it was a symbolic a doll
Speaker 3: that they're supposed to be looking like a realistic white
Speaker 3: girl doll.
Speaker 1: Right, Oh, well, did he not read the federalist papers?
Speaker 3: I mean, do we not accurately instruct him in the
Speaker 3: nuances of Jeffersonian theory like constitutional law? Like did he
Speaker 3: not take enough constitutional law classes? Or are some people
Speaker 3: just savages? Some people are just acting out of demonic, savage,
Speaker 3: instinctual behavior. And you're probably not going to convince all
Speaker 3: the world to accept constitutional democratic republics. You're probably not
Speaker 3: going to get people in Pakistan and Afghanistan to accept
Speaker 3: totally quality the sexes and women's rights. It's probably not
Speaker 3: going to happen. It's unrealistic. But the enlightenment attitude of
Speaker 3: everybody has the same nature because we're all men, yeah,
Speaker 3: but we're not all created equal. So even in the
Speaker 3: in the you know, Founding Documents, which is all coming
Speaker 3: out of John Locke, by the way, men are not
Speaker 3: created they're equal before the law, but they're not onto
Speaker 3: logically and physically equal, So it's not true. Well, where
Speaker 3: did that come from? It comes from John Locke? Where
Speaker 3: John locket it. Well, he's an Enlightenment philosophy. Believe in
Speaker 3: the tabula rossa blank slate. We're all just these pieces
Speaker 3: of putty and we're molded by external similar That is
Speaker 3: the Enlightenment perspective.
Speaker 1: Well, guess what genetics has has proven that?
Speaker 3: So why are we still arguing and promoting theories of
Speaker 3: anthropology that are like two hundred years old, three hundred
Speaker 3: years old, that are outdated and false. We're in a
Speaker 3: post genetics world where we know that that's not true. Now,
Speaker 3: I'm not saying that we need to have eugenics and
Speaker 3: the eugenics super state regime. I'm not saying, and I'm saying, well,
Speaker 3: we need is Christianity. We need traditional classical orthodox Christianity.
Speaker 3: It's the only thing that has the provisions, the stipulations,
Speaker 3: the sacraments, the philosophy of church and state, the ethics,
Speaker 3: the rule of law. All those things come out of
Speaker 3: Christian tradition. And you're not going to find it in
Speaker 3: pagan philosophers and Cristicism and Zionism and Talmudism and atheism
Speaker 3: and socialism and all the isms are not going to
Speaker 3: give you what we've already had and experienced and built
Speaker 3: in the last two thousand years in the West and
Speaker 3: in Orthodox civilization byzanthiem Et Center. This says the Alex
Speaker 3: Johnschewmer guests Jay Diary. You follow me on YouTube, Twitter
Speaker 3: and everywhere else. Go to the Enforce store and get
Speaker 3: those products the out shown store and I will see
Speaker 3: you later.
Speaker 1: Look when you realize how fake it all is.
Speaker 5: The football, the basketball, the Lady Ga guy, the Justin Bieber.
Speaker 1: You know who gives you these carbon tax messages.
Speaker 5: They tell your kids they got to love Justin Biebler,
Speaker 5: and then Biebler says, and in your guns, pass the
Speaker 5: Cybersecurity Act.
Speaker 1: And you know of the police state's good.
Speaker 6: And then your children are turning to mindless vassals who
Speaker 6: now they look up to some twit instead of looking
Speaker 6: up to Thomas Jefferson or or looking up to Nicola
Speaker 6: Tesla or looking up to Magellan.
Speaker 5: I mean, kids, he's circumnavigated with one ship the entire planet.
Speaker 1: He was killed by wild.
Speaker 5: Natos before and they got back to Portugal, and when
Speaker 5: they got back there was only like eleven people alive
Speaker 5: of the two hundred and something crude and the entire ship.
Speaker 1: Was rotting down to the water line.
Speaker 5: That's destiny, that's will, that's striving, that's being a trailblazer
Speaker 5: and explore, going into space, mathematics, quantum mechanics.
Speaker 1: We secrets on a universe.
Speaker 3: It's all there.
Speaker 1: Life is Fiery with its beauty.
Speaker 5: It's incredible detail.
Speaker 2: Today is the one year anniversary of the auction store
Speaker 2: dot Com. Took six months to set it up, but
Speaker 2: we are launching Life is Fiery with its Beauty. That's
Speaker 2: saying I said many years ago. One year anniversary fundraisers saled,
Speaker 2: and we are doing really good in court, big victory.
Speaker 2: You're going to see a bunch of stuff in the
Speaker 2: news very very soon. I'll just leave it at that.
Speaker 2: Involving the boj and what they've done to us, I'll
Speaker 2: stop right there. In celebration of the Allo show store
Speaker 2: dot Com officially becoming open for business for a year,
Speaker 2: we are launching the Life is Fire with its Beauty
Speaker 2: one year anniversary fundraise your sale for this week only,
Speaker 2: all shirts and hats are just twenty five dollars. They
Speaker 2: cost like fifteen a pieces of such equality instead of
Speaker 2: the regular thirty five plus.
Speaker 1: We're giving everyone a free.
Speaker 2: Eleven dollars to spend on the store this week only
Speaker 2: with no code required on all orders above seventy five
Speaker 2: just to check out, eleven dollars comes off the price
Speaker 2: and it doesn't stop there. All orders of Ultimate Burn
Speaker 2: or fifty percent off an amazing natural fat burning private
Speaker 2: level of the top seller, So sorry, top coming it
Speaker 2: Totally works certified twty percent off. To celebrate the fire
Speaker 2: of liberty burning within the heart of every Info warrior,
Speaker 2: go now to the Alex showstore dot com and take
Speaker 2: advantage of the incredible fundraiser sale now for incredible discounts
Speaker 2: on all of our merch including the new Holy Wars
Speaker 2: line of Light is Fire with its beauty. It's all
Speaker 2: based on the Crusades, which were a defense to over
Speaker 2: one hundred Islamic attacks on Europe. If you don't go now,
Speaker 2: you won't be able to use the free eleven dollars
Speaker 2: we are offering this week only, and you may miss
Speaker 2: out on the Old Burn, which is about to sell out.
Speaker 2: Life was Fire with this beauty one year anniversary fundraiser
Speaker 2: sale to tails all hats and shirts site wide or
Speaker 2: just twenty five dollars and a thirty five get a
Speaker 2: eleven dollars to use anywhere on the site, no code
Speaker 2: needed for all orders above seventy five. Get additional fifty
Speaker 2: percent off on all one time orders of Ultimate Burn,
Speaker 2: and there's a bunch of other fifty percent off on
Speaker 2: methylene blue and so much more. Remember every dollar you
Speaker 2: spend the alshow short dot com is a round in
Speaker 2: the heart. Information Wise peacefully of the new World Order.
Speaker 2: Satanic globalist cabal be the reason we will always be
Speaker 2: on the air while you still have a chance to
Speaker 2: save free speech, humanity itself. We've really gotten traction against
Speaker 2: the globalists. We're having major victories, but we've got to
Speaker 2: go over the top. Here. I am in state court today,
Speaker 2: federal court next week. We're deposing these people. I met
Speaker 2: with the just Department last week. Major stuff you will
Speaker 2: see within days on the quick side, within a week
Speaker 2: on the long side. You want action, you want it's happening.
Speaker 2: We could only stand in the fight because of you,
Speaker 2: So I salute you. You are the spirit of seventeen
Speaker 2: seventy six. You are the answer to the nineteen eighty
Speaker 2: four tyranny. You are the resistance. The answer to nineteen
Speaker 2: eighty four is seventeen seventy six.
Speaker 1: And I salute you all for your support.
Speaker 2: You're worried about your prayer, and I salute this crew,
Speaker 2: the best crew ever.
Speaker 1: They are so amazing, So keep them in the.
Speaker 2: Fight as well. Go now to the Allow show store
Speaker 2: dot com. Be the reason we always stay on the air.
Speaker 3: It's hard to say exactly what's going on in this
Speaker 3: it's just too early to figure out exactly what's going on.
Speaker 3: But it's not wrong or bad to consider all the
Speaker 3: possibilities in different different theories and different possibilities.
Speaker 1: So that's all I could say on that.
Speaker 3: But it does bear a lot of similarities to things
Speaker 3: like Gladiol that did include high profile assassinations, mass public shootings,
Speaker 3: terror campaigns. Bolognia bombing is an example, so it's.
Speaker 1: Not really an issue. Well, but that was right wing stuff.
Speaker 3: The point is that that's a techn that's a strategy,
Speaker 3: that's a structure of terror that can be used, and
Speaker 3: we see that, for example with al Qaeda, the techniques
Speaker 3: that al Qaeda and its proxies another place is Isis,
Speaker 3: et cetera. The techniques and strategy that they've done. They're
Speaker 3: not just similar to Hassan Albana, even though he was
Speaker 3: a Shiite from a thousand years ago. They're very similar
Speaker 3: to the structure of things like Gladio, and in fact,
Speaker 3: some of the Gladio people the train, for example, Gladio
Speaker 3: cells and people in Turkey. They were then flown to
Speaker 3: train people in al Qaeda or in the KLA, the
Speaker 3: same entities that would train the KLA in Serbia, the
Speaker 3: same entities working with and training the Mujahadin, and as
Speaker 3: people from the CIA, people from the US military Pentagon.
Speaker 3: I'm not saying that that means that that's who did this.
Speaker 3: We don't know, but it just seems to be typically
Speaker 3: the case when you study high profile assassinations, especially the
Speaker 3: jfk assassination, right, we do get indicators of.
Speaker 1: Bigger players involved.
Speaker 3: To go back to this issue of the state in
Speaker 3: a just state, I was reflecting on the principles that
Speaker 3: most Christian states had in place, and I want to
Speaker 3: be very clear, I'm not calling for an immediate Christian state.
Speaker 3: I don't think that's realistic, and again, it wouldn't work
Speaker 3: with thirty thousand different churches, sects, groups, and denominations all
Speaker 3: trying to have a Christian state. Historically, the only Christian
Speaker 3: states that have really lasted and flourished were Orthodox Catholic
Speaker 3: states of some fashion, even the Protestant states. Originally the
Speaker 3: German princes were the ones that supported, for example, Martin Luther.
Speaker 3: Lot of Martin Luther's success, at least in terms of numbers,
Speaker 3: was really responsible. The responsible party wasn't Luther's ideas so
Speaker 3: much as the German princes that supported him and didn't
Speaker 3: like the pope. So there was a lot of geopolitical
Speaker 3: motivations behind even Luther's reformation.
Speaker 1: And you'll notice that the Protestant.
Speaker 3: States didn't last very long, right, It was only a
Speaker 3: few maybe a few hundred years before they collapsed to
Speaker 3: liberalism and to secularism and to the Masonic revolutions.
Speaker 1: And they were absolutely Masonic. Made a mistike about it.
Speaker 3: All the revolutions to get rid of thrown an altar
Speaker 3: were free Masonic across the board.
Speaker 1: Really, I don't think you.
Speaker 3: Can have a just society without some basic Christian principles.
Speaker 3: It's not the job of an Orthodoxtrician or of the
Speaker 3: church to start with's trying to convert the state and
Speaker 3: make some sort of top down political thing.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: I don't think we're going to get a Byzantine emperor
Speaker 3: next year.
Speaker 1: If we can convert jd Vance. That's kind of ridiculous.
Speaker 3: Rather, what happens is if you look at the Roman
Speaker 3: Empire as an example, let's talk about three undred years
Speaker 3: to convert the Roman Empire before we began to see
Speaker 3: the emergence of Christian kings, states and rulers. That's possible.
Speaker 3: We don't know where history is going. It might be
Speaker 3: the end of the world. We don't know, but we
Speaker 3: do have a duty to try to speak to all
Speaker 3: areas of life in the way that it should be governed.
Speaker 3: And the teaching of traditional Christianity, even if you're a
Speaker 3: Roman Catholic, even if you're a Latin Roman Catholic, has
Speaker 3: always been that there needs to be a Christian principled state.
Speaker 1: That's just the facts.
Speaker 3: So you can hate that, you can disagree with that,
Speaker 3: you can believe whatever you want. But what I'm trying
Speaker 3: to explain is that if you don't believe that, then
Speaker 3: what you get is you don't get a Protestant state,
Speaker 3: you get a secular state. And the secular state ends
Speaker 3: up being the God state. The government bears Alex Jones,
Speaker 3: who has the largest audience in the country, bigger than
Speaker 3: any of the networks the biggest megaphone in the country.
Speaker 3: A Deep State hates Alex Jones with a vengeance.
Speaker 1: Alex Jones is the most extraordinary person I've ever met.
Speaker 3: Welcome back to the fourth hour of the Alex Jones
Speaker 3: from your guest host and Jay Dyer of Jay's Analysis.
Speaker 3: I've been reflecting quite a bit on the events of
Speaker 3: the last week, as I'm sure everybody is, and really
Speaker 3: trying to put it in the big picture.
Speaker 1: Not many people are giving the big picture, so that's
Speaker 1: what I'd like to do.
Speaker 3: We did this on my YouTube channel the past couple
Speaker 3: of days, trying to zoom out, and as Harrison noted
Speaker 3: early on in the show, today, this is probably the
Speaker 3: most high profile assassination since the late sixties, if we
Speaker 3: don't count the investigation into the jonestown, and so these
Speaker 3: types of high profile events are necessary to investigate, but
Speaker 3: also necessary to place within the bigger picture. Some of
Speaker 3: the basics that I'm sure everybody's kind of come to
Speaker 3: the same conclusions about is that this is perhaps a
Speaker 3: pivot point. This is a change in the direction that
Speaker 3: I think a lot of people are going to wake
Speaker 3: up to see the ineptitude of coxservatism and con inc
Speaker 3: and their inability to deal with and to be up
Speaker 3: to par with where we actually are in the culture war.
Speaker 3: We're way past the time of thinking that you're going
Speaker 3: to educate adiq illegal immigrants on principles of constitutional law
Speaker 3: and the federalist papers.
Speaker 1: They don't care about that.
Speaker 3: We are essentially being invaded with a kind of foreign force.
Speaker 3: You could say, then, I'm beginning more and more to
Speaker 3: think is actually as Alex has known it for many years.
Speaker 3: I don't I don't doubt that there is a long
Speaker 3: term plan for the collapsing of the country in a
Speaker 3: civil war. But we're beginning, I think, to see the
Speaker 3: architecture of that mechanism of collapse.
Speaker 1: How would they actually do that. It's not just the left,
Speaker 1: because you need.
Speaker 3: A complicit, emasculated, fake right wing and controlled opposition to
Speaker 3: really aid in that collapse and that furthering of this
Speaker 3: invasion force, so to speak. That doesn't mean that everybody
Speaker 3: involved in being an illegal immigrant as some conscious warrior.
Speaker 3: We're speaking of generalities here, As somebody noted recently, which
Speaker 3: I thought was a really perceptive comment.
Speaker 1: Anytime you start to talk about.
Speaker 3: Generalities, there's always some midwa that has to chime in
Speaker 3: with the exception to the rule, as if that disproves
Speaker 3: the rule.
Speaker 1: So midwits, that's another big problem.
Speaker 3: In this country is dealing with a massive uneducated population
Speaker 3: that is essentially being being gradually turned into a giant
Speaker 3: zombie force. That's the people that you see cheering and
Speaker 3: likening this too, you know, some sort of revolutionary event
Speaker 3: that they see as a trigger for perhaps copycat events,
Speaker 3: and I don't doubt that that's going to happen.
Speaker 1: I do agree with the comment that Vance said.
Speaker 3: I appreciate people beginning to say, hey, it's not really
Speaker 3: these local ground, organic leftists on the street. This is
Speaker 3: actually vast inngo, think tank foundation networks. Alex pointed out
Speaker 3: a few months ago that there's around a million NGOs
Speaker 3: out there and ninety five percent of them are left wing.
Speaker 1: So this is speaking globally.
Speaker 3: This is the real locus of influence and power, not
Speaker 3: even the media, not even the politicians that come and go.
Speaker 3: The real locus of power is the networks of think tanks,
Speaker 3: inngos and foundations. So I appreciate Vance saying and acknowledging
Speaker 3: that and pointing out that the left wing ones are
Speaker 3: going to have to be rooted out, but probably easier
Speaker 3: said than done. We know that, for example, the Soros
Speaker 3: Foundation a few years ago, according to New York Times,
Speaker 3: became the biggest most influential foundation in the world, surpassing
Speaker 3: even in the Ford Foundation, and I would assume the
Speaker 3: Rockefeller Foundation as well. So all of these NGOs think tanks, foundations,
Speaker 3: and yes, I'm well aware that Israel has its own
Speaker 3: foundations and think tanks and influenced groups.
Speaker 1: I'm very aware of all that.
Speaker 3: They all tend to work together and collude, not necessarily
Speaker 3: every single one, but many of them in general. And
Speaker 3: the reason for that is that there are techniques and
Speaker 3: strategies for taking down nations and empires.
Speaker 1: When I was in the war room.
Speaker 3: The other day with Rob Doo, we had a great
Speaker 3: discussion about the history of Byzantium in the history of
Speaker 3: the fall of the Roman Empire. Byzantium is the Roman
Speaker 3: Empire if you don't know, we think of Old Rome
Speaker 3: collapsing in four four ten or whatever, to the barbarians,
Speaker 3: to the vandals.
Speaker 1: Welcome back to the Alex Johns Show.
Speaker 3: I'm your Guysso Jay diy or Jays analysis you can
Speaker 3: find me on all the social media's under my name.
Speaker 3: I was thinking about the course of the nation and
Speaker 3: the invasion force, weapons of mass migration, techniques and strategies
Speaker 3: that have been used. That's what we were discussing, and
Speaker 3: how that ties into the left and so forth, and
Speaker 3: really trying to get people to pay attention to the
Speaker 3: fact that it's not the leftists on the ground. Those
Speaker 3: are sort of foot soldier minions. It really is a
Speaker 3: network of NGO's think tanks and foundations, and that's really
Speaker 3: been called out and noticed by a lot of people.
Speaker 3: But people just seem to always get deflected back into
Speaker 3: the political sphere. The political sphere matters, it has a
Speaker 3: degree of power and influence for sure, but the politicians
Speaker 3: come and go, but nobody knows and pays attentions to
Speaker 3: pays attention to who's running these think tanks and foundations,
Speaker 3: although it is becoming more and more known. But how
Speaker 3: do nations and empires fall? What are the means and
Speaker 3: the methods that bring them down? A lot of philosophers
Speaker 3: and geopolitical thinkers and historians have.
Speaker 1: Discussed this for many many years.
Speaker 3: You have all the Old Testament profits, for example, you
Speaker 3: have people like Osbald Spangler who wrote about the Decline
Speaker 3: of the West, and he identified certain patterns that matched
Speaker 3: up with ancient civilizations and empires and the patterns that
Speaker 3: they also experienced as they went through cycles of growth,
Speaker 3: flourishing and then peaking and then the death phase. And
Speaker 3: in many of these situations, the death and collapse phase
Speaker 3: centered around the surrendering of the power structure to those
Speaker 3: that were the working class or the slave class in
Speaker 3: the case of ancient empires, and how those classes eventually,
Speaker 3: because of the decadence of those in power and those ruling,
Speaker 3: how they eventually took over.
Speaker 1: And then get a collapse.
Speaker 3: And there's actual strategies, techniques, patterns that are identifiable. Again,
Speaker 3: we were talking about Rome, same with Byzantium, and it's
Speaker 3: not just Spangler, even Austrian economic theorists. We just lectured
Speaker 3: through Seiphodine Almus's book The Bigcoin Standard on my channel
Speaker 3: the other day, and we noticed that he also picked
Speaker 3: out certain patterns of collapse.
Speaker 1: And those patterns.
Speaker 3: Include decadence amongst the political class or amongst the culture
Speaker 3: bearing class, and that decadence then sort of filtering down
Speaker 3: to the rest of population when you get a wealthy
Speaker 3: oligarchical elite that promotes degeneracy, leftism, socialism and all that
Speaker 3: almost out of a kind of a necessity of death
Speaker 3: spiral that they've adopted when they adopt these.
Speaker 1: Deadly ideologies. I guess we could say, and we're just
Speaker 1: say the death cult.
Speaker 3: We find that a lot of these parallels existed in
Speaker 3: ancient empires. Jamie has been reading through some books that
Speaker 3: deal with the history of Mesopotamian empires, the history of Egypt,
Speaker 3: these kinds of countries, and what we find these empires,
Speaker 3: excuse me, what we find is that they would begin
Speaker 3: to adopt the same types of practices of radical castration
Speaker 3: and transgender groups.
Speaker 1: Temple prostitutes in fact, had.
Speaker 3: A guild and a cult in many of these ancient
Speaker 3: empires that operated in exactly the same way, and they
Speaker 3: could actually be sort of radical, terrorizing factions. If you
Speaker 3: don't believe it, you can look into this as academic research,
Speaker 3: not conspiracy research. And I think Jamie will come on
Speaker 3: and we'll talk about that in the near future. If
Speaker 3: we look at the Old Testament as another case study,
Speaker 3: in the historical books, we find a lot of Game
Speaker 3: of Throne style intrigues of political conspiracies, assassinations, all kinds
Speaker 3: of things.
Speaker 1: That aren't really new.
Speaker 3: And I don't mean to downplay I think that in
Speaker 3: many ways, you know, He's Charlie Kirk stood for what
Speaker 3: was righteous, what was virtue, what was good, and so
Speaker 3: that death definitely symbolizes an attack on the right and
Speaker 3: the good by the demonic, and in fact, that's exactly
Speaker 3: what you see in the historical books when you read
Speaker 3: the books of the Kings, the books of Samuel, Chronicles,
Speaker 3: et cetera. What we find is that there's an identification
Speaker 3: of these people who engage in these kinds of plots
Speaker 3: against church and state, and I'm speaking of the ancient
Speaker 3: Israeli church and state. Within the nation of Israel, they're
Speaker 3: called sons of blil, They're called worthless persons.
Speaker 1: And although it's right that we have an.
Speaker 3: Idea of Christian virtue and mercy and grace, and we
Speaker 3: definitely hope for and pray for the repentance of people,
Speaker 3: we can't forget that there's also divine justice. There's also
Speaker 3: imprecatory prayers all throughout the psalms as well. In the
Speaker 3: Orthodox Church, it is historically continued to pray and utilize
Speaker 3: those same prayers. In fact, Russian Orthodox prayer books from
Speaker 3: about one hundred years ago continued to utilize prayers for
Speaker 3: the Christian king and the Christian Emperor to have victory
Speaker 3: against the Islamic hordes. The idea that that's Unchristian is
Speaker 3: rather a rebuke against today's Kokianity. So if you have
Speaker 3: a problem with that, the problem isn't the church two hundred,
Speaker 3: three hundred four or five hundred and six undred, seve
Speaker 3: hundred eight or nine undred years ago. The problem is
Speaker 3: with you. Problem is that you have a false idea
Speaker 3: of what Christianity is. Definitely Christianity is first and foremost
Speaker 3: the Kingdom of God, which deals with the spiritual life
Speaker 3: of the Church. I believe that's the Orthodox Church. That's
Speaker 3: the only existing true church. Doesn't mean that there's not
Speaker 3: grace for people that aren't aware of that or outside
Speaker 3: of that, but that's really the only church that exists
Speaker 3: in the first thousand years, and it's the only church
Speaker 3: that's going to continue to exist until the end of
Speaker 3: the world in the same manner, pattern and structure that
Speaker 3: exists in the first thousand years. If we're identical to
Speaker 3: that that's a pretty strong argument that we're that church. Now,
Speaker 3: that doesn't mean we get to be prideful in parisaical,
Speaker 3: because there's grace for everybody. But when it comes to
Speaker 3: the notion of the state, many people misunderstand when they
Speaker 3: hear about something like Christian nationalism. You see people like
Speaker 3: Doug Wilson talking about Christian nationalism, and a lot of
Speaker 3: these ideas sound good, but you can't have Christian nationalism
Speaker 3: without a church. And in the first thousand years of Christianity,
Speaker 3: every nation state that converted and king that converted or
Speaker 3: emperor that converted, they weren't a thousand different faiths. They
Speaker 3: didn't hold their kingdom together with thousands of different sects.
Speaker 3: They needed a faith that was universal and consistent, but
Speaker 3: also applicable to the nation state. And behold, if we
Speaker 3: look at the Council of Nicea, we see bishops from Alexandria, Egypt,
Speaker 3: we see bishops from Antioch in Syria, we see bishops
Speaker 3: from Rome coming. So all throughout the imperium, all throughout
Speaker 3: the nation states, we find national representative churches coming to
Speaker 3: a universal council at Nicia called by the first Christian Emperor,
Speaker 3: Saint Constantine. That tradition continues for the next thousand years
Speaker 3: in Byzantium until Byzantium falls through internal decay and corruption,
Speaker 3: subversives opening the door to the Muslim hoards, bringing down
Speaker 3: the borders, and the debasement of the currency through usury
Speaker 3: and money clipping. These techniques and strategies are pretty ironclad
Speaker 3: and repeatable for taking down a nation. They do seem
Speaker 3: to evidence a kind of pattern, but they can also
Speaker 3: be weaponized as strategies.
Speaker 1: And if you don't know, there's play books on.
Speaker 3: This, even books by people at Army War College, people
Speaker 3: at Cornell University, the CIA ethnographies, They've written tons and
Speaker 3: tons of books on these types of techniques and strategies
Speaker 3: for weakening and taking down nation states.
Speaker 1: And that can be done and is done by most states.
Speaker 3: So false flag terror assassinations, these are not unique to
Speaker 3: American history. They're pretty much throughout history. And I don't
Speaker 3: mean to demean this recent event.
Speaker 1: I think this is highly significant. Far from demeaning it.
Speaker 1: I think it is a.
Speaker 3: Massive change, and I'm not proud or happy that Charlie
Speaker 3: Kirk was taken down. I think it's horrible, but I
Speaker 3: do think that the opposition is going to miss They're
Speaker 3: going to misunderstand what this is going to do. This
Speaker 3: is going to further sift the wheat from the chaff
Speaker 3: and put people into harder and harder defined and that's
Speaker 3: not always a bad thing. You know, we think of
Speaker 3: Jesus as this sort of hippie person. Jesus said I
Speaker 3: came to bring a sword. He doesn't mean open political violence.
Speaker 3: He means to divide households. He says, I will set
Speaker 3: one member of a household against another. I will set
Speaker 3: brother against brother, mother against daughter, et cetera. And that's
Speaker 3: because truth divides. Boundaries are good, they're not bad. The
Speaker 3: idea that Christianity is some sort of pacifist gay religion
Speaker 3: is just not true. It is attempted to be co
Speaker 3: opted and turned into that by the same ingios thing
Speaker 3: tanks and foundations that have funded everything from the Royal
Speaker 3: Council churches to the Ecumenist movement to all the open
Speaker 3: border stuff that we're talking about. Hence, for example, the
Speaker 3: Soros organizations working hand in hand with Catholic charities. And
Speaker 3: everybody now knows this. So where is this authentic Christianity. Well,
Speaker 3: in the Old Testament, as we pointed out, you have
Speaker 3: church and state, but defined roles. It's not proper for
Speaker 3: the most part, and the Old sessment, for example, for
Speaker 3: Saul to start to offer things at the altar. In fact,
Speaker 3: he's rebuked by Samuel when he does that because it's
Speaker 3: overstepping the normative boundaries of church and state. Likewise, the
Speaker 3: priests don't become kings, right. And when we look at
Speaker 3: the history of religion, especially in the West and its
Speaker 3: encounter with Eurasia and the East, there's two things that
Speaker 3: happened in the eleventh century that are pretty fascinating. We
Speaker 3: get amongst Islam, which was always a political religious ideology,
Speaker 3: particularly early on in the Quran, it talks about the
Speaker 3: Quran being the revelation for the Arab people. The idea
Speaker 3: was that the Jews had the Torah and the Talmud
Speaker 3: Christians had the Gospels, and early on this was going
Speaker 3: to be the revelation of that God to the Arab peoples.
Speaker 3: Eventually this evolved though, as you get later on in
Speaker 3: the Quran and the stages of the Quran, and that
Speaker 3: many orians and analysts talk about where we get a
Speaker 3: more militant, organized war lord type of religion. Eventually, in
Speaker 3: the eleventh century we get a faction called the Hashashim,
Speaker 3: the Order of Assassins, founded by Hassan al Sabah, and
Speaker 3: in the mountains of Persia.
Speaker 1: They were a Shiite sect.
Speaker 3: They sort of set up a an Ismaili state that
Speaker 3: came to believe that you could really hone and strategize
Speaker 3: this policy of assassination. Now there's a lot of debate
Speaker 3: about exactly where they're using hashish, where they mind controlling
Speaker 3: their people to do these assassinations. There's some fictional legend
Speaker 3: aspects to this, and there's again some manner of debate
Speaker 3: about it.
Speaker 1: But what seems to be the case is that this
Speaker 1: is really.
Speaker 3: The beginning of kind of the study and the inception
Speaker 3: of modern state terror. And although Hassan was not originally
Speaker 3: a state, he kind of eventually became his own kind
Speaker 3: of king. So he developed a sort of state, you
Speaker 3: could say, And if I remember, he had a few
Speaker 3: palaces out in the desert, and he kind of set
Speaker 3: up a stronghold where he could be his own kind
Speaker 3: of Islamic state, so to speak. After that period in
Speaker 3: Western civilization right actually right around the same time in
Speaker 3: the eleventh century in the West, you had an overstepping of
Speaker 3: this boundary when the papacy in the eleventh century, specifically
Speaker 3: under the Gregorian Papacy under Dictatus Pope.
Speaker 1: And eventually a few hundred years later.
Speaker 3: With when I'm Sanctum, the papacy says that it is
Speaker 3: now a geopolitical power that has the right to have
Speaker 3: standing armies. And really we've never seen this before when
Speaker 3: a bishop I remember the Church starts to have public
Speaker 3: war against nation states and standing armies. In fact, in
Speaker 3: the Canons of Chalcedon, it's actually forbidden for clergy to
Speaker 3: have a state role. That's because if you look at
Speaker 3: the symbolism of the Byzantine double headed eagle, it's not Masonic.
Speaker 3: This is way before there was any Scottish Rite Masonry
Speaker 3: or free Masonic co opting of those symbols. It's a
Speaker 3: symbol of church and state with two heads with one body.
Speaker 3: And that's the Byzantine model that church and state operate
Speaker 3: in what's called symphonia. That's the idea that you find
Speaker 3: in the Old Testament between church and state. In the
Speaker 3: nation state of Israel, there's the priesthood, the Levites, etc.
Speaker 3: The Iaronic priesthood, and then there's the Royal House of David,
Speaker 3: and this is a symphonia. They don't overlap. The priest
Speaker 3: typically is not really supposed to ever be a king,
Speaker 3: and that's because Christ is the fulfillment of these prophecies,
Speaker 3: types and symbols. Is the prophet, priest and king comes.
Speaker 3: Many Evangelicals and many people after the Reformation adopted the idea,
Speaker 3: more particularly after the Radical Reformation, adopted the idea that
Speaker 3: God has nothing to do with the state. The state
Speaker 3: isn't is a secular institution. With people like Roger Williams,
Speaker 3: the famous Baptist, we get the idea that the state
Speaker 3: has absolutely nothing to do with God whatsoever. And that's
Speaker 3: really the beginning of the idea of the separation of
Speaker 3: God from the state. There's always been a degree of
Speaker 3: separation of church and state, except for perhaps the Hashashim
Speaker 3: or classical Islam, Real Islam, or the papacy in the
Speaker 3: Gregorian period or in the Renaissance period. Right outside of
Speaker 3: those examples, there's typically been an understanding of a separation
Speaker 3: of church and state, and they're supposed to work in tandem,
Speaker 3: and they govern in different ways different spheres.
Speaker 1: Right if you think of man as a body and
Speaker 1: a soul.
Speaker 3: Well, the state deals with the af fears of the body,
Speaker 3: the protect of the nation, warfare, et cetera. The Church
Speaker 3: dealing with the affairs of the soul, the spiritual man,
Speaker 3: the spiritual side.
Speaker 1: The spiritual is higher.
Speaker 3: In authority when it comes to the ultimate power, but
Speaker 3: the Church still has a role of speaking to the state,
Speaker 3: and in fact, classically in Christianity. I know this is
Speaker 3: going to blow a lot of your minds, but the
Speaker 3: Church coronated kings. Up until about the seventeen hundreds, everybody
Speaker 3: in the world was under some kind of king for.
Speaker 1: The most part.
Speaker 3: There's a Italian republic, there's an ancient Roman republic, and
Speaker 3: a lot of people worship republics, and they worship the
Speaker 3: idea of Platonism and Plato's ideal republic. But the people
Speaker 3: that really worship Plato's republic are called communists. Do you
Speaker 3: know the Soviets were called the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
Speaker 3: Republicanism and the Soviet idea all have their origins in Plato.
Speaker 3: So I'm not trying to knock the American constitution because
Speaker 3: it has a lot of Christian influence. It has influenced
Speaker 3: from Roman common law, it has influenced from Christian Church law,
Speaker 3: canon law, and it has influence from everybody from Machiavelli
Speaker 3: to ancient Roman writers.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's got a lot of influences, and I'm
Speaker 1: not knocking it.
Speaker 3: But one of the problems, one of the flaws, is
Speaker 3: this idea that we're not going to have a specific deity,
Speaker 3: We're going to have a generic deity.
Speaker 1: And that generic.
Speaker 3: Deity is so inculate and so ambiguous and elastic, that
Speaker 3: could really be any kind of God you want.
Speaker 1: It could be the deistic deity of the Freemasons. It
Speaker 1: could be Hell, it could be Satan.
Speaker 3: If you're a Satanist, that's not going to work for
Speaker 3: a Christian nationalist movement. You've got to have a single
Speaker 3: type of Christianity. And that might be a hard pill
Speaker 3: for people to swallow. It might be a hard message,
Speaker 3: but it's time to look into Christianity. It's time to
Speaker 3: look at how was Christianity functioning operating for the first
Speaker 3: thousand years. Wasn't Mormonism, It wasn't Evangelicalism, or wasn't Calvinism,
Speaker 3: wasn't any of these things. It was Orthodox Christianity, kings
Speaker 3: and emperor's throne and altar. In the seventeen hundreds, the
Speaker 3: Free Masonic movements, funded by both Catholic excuse me, by
Speaker 3: Protestant and Jewish banking power. According to Carol Quigley, funded
Speaker 3: and fostered a movement to destroy throne and altar throughout
Speaker 3: Western civilization and throughout much of the world. This was
Speaker 3: called the French Revolution, and it tried to bring about
Speaker 3: radical atheism, socialism, communism, Jacobinism, all those things are the
Speaker 3: same thing. This movement exceeded pretty much succeeded for the
Speaker 3: next couple centuries to remove most of the world's monarchs
Speaker 3: and the power of the Church in the social sphere.
Speaker 3: And we've heard for so long how bad the Church
Speaker 3: was in the Dark Ages, And did you know that
Speaker 3: these terms are actually invented by atheists, people like Voltaire,
Speaker 3: who hated Christianity. He's the one that came up with
Speaker 3: the idea of the Dark Ages, the idea that the
Speaker 3: Middle Ages were this dark retrogade time before Hume and
Speaker 3: Kant and Lock and these enlightenment goblins who themselves are
Speaker 3: kind of enlightenment, just degenerates, especially David hume, Well, these
Speaker 3: people decided to enact and bring about a kind of
Speaker 3: republic democratic, secular ideology based around constitutional principles. And I'm
Speaker 3: not saying constitutions are bad. I understand magna carta, I
Speaker 3: understand all that stuff. But the problem is that this
Speaker 3: doesn't work on the basis of natural rights theory. Once
Speaker 3: natural rights theory is tossed out, because people begin to realize, well,
Speaker 3: there's not a specific God. There's really no basis for
Speaker 3: the natural law, the natural right. So this leads people
Speaker 3: towards the direction of more and more progressive liberalism and nihilism.
Speaker 3: While the Sarah from Rose wrote a famous book called
Speaker 3: Nihilism Roots of the Revolution. In that book, he tracks
Speaker 3: the phases that revolutionary philosophy goes through. It begins as
Speaker 3: a kind of enlightenment, universal utopian kind of idea, We're
Speaker 3: going to change the world through economics and teaching everybody
Speaker 3: the Federal's papers and making everybody in the world constitutional,
Speaker 3: democratic republic governments. And of course none of that worked
Speaker 3: when you try to import that to Afghanistan or Sub
Speaker 3: Saharan Africa.
Speaker 1: So what's the problem.
Speaker 3: Maybe the problem is the enlightenment ideologies themselves. Doesn't mean
Speaker 3: everything about the Enlightenment is wrong, but the root assumptions
Speaker 3: of the Enlightenment might have serious flaws.
Speaker 1: And unfortunately, that might also.
Speaker 3: Mean that there's problems in the American Enlightenment experiment. If
Speaker 3: America is a confluence of multiple interests, Enlightenment, deists, Episcopalians, Catholics, Protestants, Congregationalists,
Speaker 3: radical reformers, all of these things go into what we
Speaker 3: call the ethos of Americanism. Eventually something's going to win
Speaker 3: out right Enlightenment, atheism and deism or Christian principles. Well,
Speaker 3: America has not gone in the direction of the Christian principles.
Speaker 3: In fact, it's been a long continual dissent and slide
Speaker 3: away from those types of principles into more and more
Speaker 3: generic freedoms and rights.
Speaker 1: And now freedoms and.
Speaker 3: Rights are supposed to be castrating children. I'm a whatever
Speaker 3: I want to.
Speaker 1: Say, I am. That's how far we've come.
Speaker 3: But nobody, ever, except for myself, other people on the internet,
Speaker 3: Andrew Wilson and others, are beginning to People don't think
Speaker 3: about critiquing the idea of rights themselves. What are these rights?
Speaker 1: Where are they? Are they under a microscope.
Speaker 3: Are they as scientifically studied thing if you have the
Speaker 3: attitude of empiricism and scientism.
Speaker 1: There's no such thing as rights. They don't exist. They
Speaker 1: either are.
Speaker 3: Made up, there are social conventions, or they are given
Speaker 3: to you, afforded to you by the state, and thus
Speaker 3: they can be removed by the state. So the scary
Speaker 3: thing that the left doesn't want to realize is maybe
Speaker 3: all of these principles require a transcendental foundation, namely a God.
Speaker 3: And if that's the case, then all of that worldview collapses.
Speaker 3: And as we move into the sort of postmodern America
Speaker 3: where the Enlightenment narratives are collapsing, the World War two
Speaker 3: narratives and stories are collapsing. Everything we've been told the
Speaker 3: last the twentieth century as a whole, It's narrative is
Speaker 3: collapsing because it tried to blend basic principles of the
Speaker 3: Ten Commandments or natural law or whatever you want to
Speaker 3: call it with Enlightenment atheism and oil and water don't mix. Eventually,
Speaker 3: one of these ideas, one of these world views, is
Speaker 3: going to come to fruition and to dominate. And since
Speaker 3: that Enlightenment idea had already assumed and presupposed that the
Speaker 3: church should be severed from any relationship with the state
Speaker 3: and society as a whole, that we're going to have
Speaker 3: a secular state somehow based on natural law. It's only
Speaker 3: inevitable that atheism would win out eventually. And after atheism
Speaker 3: wins out, as Father Seff from Rose says, you move
Speaker 3: from the paradigm of utopian enlightenment principles to nihilism. Eventually,
Speaker 3: nihilism and postmodernism are the end result.
Speaker 1: And everything is irony.
Speaker 3: Everything is ship posting, Everything is trolling, including your whole life,
Speaker 3: including even the actions of targeted assassinations and school shootings
Speaker 3: by the last seven or eight trans shooters.
Speaker 1: This is the Alex Jones show. Don't go Anywhere and
Speaker 1: we goes host Jadier of Jasonalysis.
Speaker 2: Go to the olives shown store dot com and experience
Speaker 2: these It's like ultramethylene blue.
Speaker 1: It will change your life.
Speaker 2: It will be so empowering for you, and then you'll
Speaker 2: be hooked and keep buying it so we can stay
Speaker 2: on the air and expand, which is my plan.
Speaker 1: In the face of all these globals attacks.
Speaker 2: So I'm pronouncing this On Tuesday, September ninth, We're only
Speaker 2: running this till next Tuesday. It is a giant, multifaceted sale.
Speaker 2: Ultra Methylene blue the best medical grade quality out there.
Speaker 2: The raver views are insane. Such good energy, such clarity,
Speaker 2: such focus, no letdown. Fifty percent off. Same thing for
Speaker 2: the Shilogy, the Irish Semas, the Detox super Empowering System
Speaker 2: for your cardiovascular system, Ultimate life Force. Everybody should be
Speaker 2: taking us. It's the best formula out there, made from
Speaker 2: the two top best selling formulas fuse together.
Speaker 1: You need it. It is amazing. Just hit it.
Speaker 2: Know you're supporting the broadcast so you can't lose, and
Speaker 2: then you'll be pleasantly invigorated, not surprised. I don't bs
Speaker 2: when you get great benefits, but when you really feel
Speaker 2: quick and see the assets is Golds by the name Lube.
Speaker 2: There's also another big sale going until next Tuesday. That's
Speaker 2: the get free ten dollars Ultimate Fundraiser Sale. When you
Speaker 2: spend seventy five dollars or more at checkout, ten dollars
Speaker 2: is taken off. So if you spend seventy five dollars
Speaker 2: when you check out at sixty five, on top of
Speaker 2: all the discounts, twenty five percent off store wide, the
Speaker 2: widest selection of Patriot apparel. Wanted an adventure to wear it.
Speaker 2: The ball caps, a T shirts, all of it. That's
Speaker 2: twenty five percent off, and then ten dollars off at
Speaker 2: check out. On top of that, the Alix Shown store
Speaker 2: dot com. The Alix shown store dot com, the coordinates
Speaker 2: to keep this broadcast on the air. I don't own it,
Speaker 2: so they shut down.
Speaker 1: M four wars.
Speaker 2: That's our sponsor with the Alitions network and what comes after.
Speaker 2: So we need the funds, their incredible products. The only
Speaker 2: you fail it's not taking action.
Speaker 7: Take action now, d awesome store dot com.
Speaker 3: Welcome back to the fourth hour of the Auction Shown
Speaker 3: Strummer guest host jaydy Er Jase.
Speaker 1: Now we're talking about history. We're talking about Western civilization.
Speaker 3: We're talking about the development of Enlightenment, secularism and the
Speaker 3: end result of the postmodernism in the nihilism that would
Speaker 3: come when we severed ourselves from historic Christianity, and that
Speaker 3: includes the state. There's a famous Russian philosopher and statesman
Speaker 3: named Pabinatziav and he wrote a book about the role
Speaker 3: of church and state. And he was writing right around
Speaker 3: the time of the assassination of the Czar by the Bolsheviks,
Speaker 3: and he pointed out that the message that is always
Speaker 3: given by people who want the eradication of any relationship
Speaker 3: of church and state, or any anything for God to
Speaker 3: do with society in general, is that it's based around freedom. However,
Speaker 3: what ends up happening isn't that you actually get freedom.
Speaker 3: You actually get the state becoming a new de facto church.
Speaker 3: The state then becomes the determiner and the arbiter of
Speaker 3: life and death. The state decides all these key issues
Speaker 3: without any firewalls or checks or any other competing firewalls
Speaker 3: or division of power.
Speaker 1: So to speak.
Speaker 3: Right, and I think the idea behind the American government
Speaker 3: structure was, of course divisions of power in as many
Speaker 3: ways as possible, and I definitely believe in that kind
Speaker 3: of decentralization to a degree. Well, the problem is that
Speaker 3: in the radical religion of equalitarianism and egalitarianism that has
Speaker 3: been adopted today, it assumes that everybody is an interchangeable
Speaker 3: economic unit. If you watch the Sam Hyde Show, the
Speaker 3: first episode, Dear Elon was dealing with that. I contributed
Speaker 3: to that one and the most recent one. As you
Speaker 3: guys have been seeing the clips today also speaks to this,
Speaker 3: with this idea that everybody can just be kind of
Speaker 3: integrated into some you know, global blob of the same culture,
Speaker 3: the same religion, the same whatever, without retaining their unique
Speaker 3: distinctive qualities or recognizing disparities.
Speaker 1: It's not wrong or you're not.
Speaker 3: Bad for recognizing things that are real and they're factual.
Speaker 3: I went to Jamestown a few weeks ago after speaking
Speaker 3: in DC at an event at the Ludwell Conference, and
Speaker 3: I'd never been to the museum and visited the you
Speaker 3: know Jamestown before, and if I recall, it is a
Speaker 3: Rockefeller funded big complex, so I'm not surprised at all
Speaker 3: the woke stuff.
Speaker 1: But the majority of.
Speaker 3: The exhibit of the museum is actually really a testament
Speaker 3: to the worship of new gods of civic equality and blackness,
Speaker 3: which has really nothing to do with people fleeing from
Speaker 3: England to try to create the Jamestown colony. It's just weird.
Speaker 3: There was a whole apologetic of the place was anti colonialism.
Speaker 3: But if you really study history, and I have a
Speaker 3: history degree, you'll notice actually from a libtard college, I
Speaker 3: was taught history by the most ridiculous libs. It actually
Speaker 3: made me, helped make me not live to study history
Speaker 3: and understand that we have the idea that Christian nations
Speaker 3: and empires were evil. Well, they were not near as
Speaker 3: evil as everything else going on. And Christianity helped to
Speaker 3: try to temper and to change civilization and brought a
Speaker 3: lot of actually civilizing elements to many, many degenerate cultures.
Speaker 3: For example, Aztecs, Mayans and others sacrificing tens of thousands
Speaker 3: of people on high holy days. I think Catholicism, at
Speaker 3: the least Spanish Catholicism in those centuries, maybe not Catholicism now,
Speaker 3: but Spanish Catholicism and back in those centuries was way
Speaker 3: better than that kind of hideous demonic practice. And now
Speaker 3: people are wanting to return to some kind of hideous
Speaker 3: demonic type of practice like that.
Speaker 1: That's what we see with.
Speaker 3: The outbursts of these physically disgusting people reflecting what's on
Speaker 3: the inside.
Speaker 1: It's not an.
Speaker 3: Infallible rule that the external reflects the interior, but in
Speaker 3: many cases and many times it does. For example, one
Speaker 3: of the vices is gluttony. If you have a problem
Speaker 3: with gluttony, will that will be shown in the exterior
Speaker 3: that will be significantly overweight. Please don't be in midwit
Speaker 3: and try to correct me about how some people have
Speaker 3: viroid problems.
Speaker 1: I'm aware of that.
Speaker 3: I'm speaking in generality, so you don't need to bring
Speaker 3: in the exception to the rule to try to sound smart.
Speaker 3: Intelligent people should be able to speak in generalities without
Speaker 3: having to qualify and define every single term. Now, if
Speaker 3: you have a problem with gluttony, then it's probably going
Speaker 3: to be reflected in the exterior. We've all seen the
Speaker 3: mugshots of people in these radical leftist groups and they.
Speaker 1: Look like demons, they look like goblins.
Speaker 3: Are you surprised that the exterior is reflecting the interior.
Speaker 3: We're not gnostics, and so we would absolutely expect that
Speaker 3: the interior would be reflected in the exterior. Again, it's
Speaker 3: not infallible. You can have a beautiful person who's very
Speaker 3: wicked and evil, but in many cases the vices tend
Speaker 3: to manifest even in a physical and physiognomy type of way.
Speaker 3: It's not accidental, for example, that many leftists and social
Speaker 3: revolutionaries in history have been physically ugly, demented and deformed
Speaker 3: and outcast individuals. I did interview while back with an
Speaker 3: English historian, doctor Ed Dutton, and maybe he's the English,
Speaker 3: so I call it.
Speaker 1: I forget the executives degree is.
Speaker 3: But he was pointing out how the history of witchcraft
Speaker 3: in Europe evidence is a long history of very hideous,
Speaker 3: ugly women being the witches, who then have a resentment
Speaker 3: against the rest of society because they are unattractive and
Speaker 3: as thus they become kind of parasitical on the society
Speaker 3: and they resent it. There is something to that right
Speaker 3: that you then see this evidenced, and a lot of
Speaker 3: the people on the sort of the ground of the left,
Speaker 3: and even amongst the ranks of the left, there's something
Speaker 3: about that worldview. Because that person begins to hate humanity,
Speaker 3: it's very easy for them to then adopt ideologies of
Speaker 3: anything that would call or kill humanity.
Speaker 1: Thus it becomes amenable to recruit.
Speaker 3: People into a death cult, and it's accurate to call
Speaker 3: it a death cult. Many of the religions and sex
Speaker 3: that we've been talking about end up being kinds of
Speaker 3: death cults that want to end humanity when they reach
Speaker 3: that nihilism stage of their development. And unfortunately, unfortunately, empires
Speaker 3: and nations can also develop in that same way. If
Speaker 3: you read the Proverbs, it talks often about nations that
Speaker 3: choose justice and righteousness, and nations that choose wickedness and evil,
Speaker 3: and the end goals and the end states of those
Speaker 3: peoples and nations. But we have to also take into
Speaker 3: account that in our era, we don't live in the
Speaker 3: Middle Ages, we don't live in a period when we
Speaker 3: can actually expect some immediate Christian state.
Speaker 1: That's why a lot of these movements are ripe.
Speaker 3: They're ripe for honey trapping people and for you know,
Speaker 3: ideologically misguided young people who oftentimes are the tools and
Speaker 3: the pawns of revolutionary movements, whether far right or far left.
Speaker 1: They get used, they get dupes.
Speaker 3: They're the patsies that are used in these kinds of operations.
Speaker 3: And that's probably what's going on in the case of
Speaker 3: Tyler Robinson, although we don't know all the details yet,
Speaker 3: but my guess would be that he was some sort
Speaker 3: of radicalized patsy and some sort of probably seven sixty
Speaker 3: four Calm Satanist trainee group. Those are the things that
Speaker 3: we've interviewed BX about here on the al Stones Show.
Speaker 3: My guess would be that that's probably an element of this,
Speaker 3: but there might be other individuals or other players, other
Speaker 3: actors that will probably become clearer over time that benefited
Speaker 3: from this major political, high profile event.
Speaker 1: Assassination and terror then are.
Speaker 3: Meant to neutralize and they're meant to create fear and
Speaker 3: see change, sometimes in one direction towards the right, sometimes
Speaker 3: wraps in the direction of the left. If we look
Speaker 3: at operations that I've covered, like Gladio extensively, I'm well
Speaker 3: aware that Gladio was a so called far right or
Speaker 3: a right wing move against the Soviets. This was the
Speaker 3: idea that you could have so all throughout Europe that
Speaker 3: were in place to engage in assassination, black ops, ter bombing,
Speaker 3: high profile mass shootings, all those things are part of Gladio.
Speaker 3: In the event of the NKVD or Stalin invading Europe,
Speaker 3: I don't think it was really plausible that Stalin would
Speaker 3: or could invade Europe. But regardless, that's the older Gladio
Speaker 3: networks that still exist in the sense of the strategy
Speaker 3: and the technique. So what do we see in these
Speaker 3: types of mass shootings and event Well, we see a
Speaker 3: lot of Patsy's that are very useful in the case
Speaker 3: of especially the trans movement, with people who are mentally unstable.
Speaker 3: That's a kind of a perfect type of person to
Speaker 3: be put in a position to do that. Now, I'm
Speaker 3: not even saying that this necessitates that there was some handler.
Speaker 3: He could have just been easily provoked or agitated himself
Speaker 3: to do this on his own. I think Alex said
Speaker 3: a few days ago something that I've been saying for
Speaker 3: a long time. We don't really need mk ultra mind
Speaker 3: controled assassins per se. I think for a high profile event,
Speaker 3: you probably would need some kind of Patsy or some
Speaker 3: kind of person in that role. But in general, I
Speaker 3: mean people are becoming mk ultra in mass through the
Speaker 3: pop culture and through.
Speaker 1: Living every day on the Internet.
Speaker 3: I think the younger you go, the more people have
Speaker 3: been raised on the Internet with immediate access to the
Speaker 3: most degenerate stuff right away. If this is the recipe
Speaker 3: for disaster, I don't know what the answer is exactly
Speaker 3: on all of these things, but that's I think where
Speaker 3: we are. That's factual in the case of high profile
Speaker 3: assassinations and events like this. Again, I interviewed Sammy the Bull,
Speaker 3: the most famous living hit man probably out there. He
Speaker 3: was John Gotti's number two. I've known multiple podcasts maybe
Speaker 3: even eight seven eight podcasts with Sadi the Bull.
Speaker 1: I've talked to him a lot.
Speaker 3: And he made the point that any there will be
Speaker 3: an event or a hit like this. He said what
Speaker 3: he would have done to arrange a high profile thing
Speaker 3: was to have the real people who were the shooters
Speaker 3: or the killers, and then the dupe or the patsy
Speaker 3: who thought he was involved in some kind of thing
Speaker 3: but he was misled and he would take the fall again,
Speaker 3: the patsy, the dupe.
Speaker 1: I don't know again if.
Speaker 3: That's exactly what happened here, but my guess would be
Speaker 3: that in a high profile event like this, it's very
Speaker 3: likely that there would be some larger entity involved. Most
Speaker 3: high profile assassinations involve other entities. I don't know if
Speaker 3: Israel is involved, it's definitely possible. Israel does have a
Speaker 3: long history of high profile political assassinations. Is very well known.
Speaker 3: They write books raging about it. You can read Victor
Speaker 3: Strowski's books that talk about these kinds of things by
Speaker 3: way of deception. But there's other nation states, there's other powers,
Speaker 3: there's other entities, there's other groups, other cults, all of
Speaker 3: which could have had a.
Speaker 1: Motive, and even individual lone gunman.
Speaker 3: I'm not saying it was a long gun I'm just
Speaker 3: saying like, we don't know all the details yet. And
Speaker 3: I've watched and paid attention to mass shootings and mass
Speaker 3: casualty events and high profile events for all the way
Speaker 3: back to nine to eleven, and the first thing I've
Speaker 3: noticed is that everyone rushes to try to construct.
Speaker 1: The story to make it the opponent.
Speaker 3: Everybody knows this all the way back to decades ago,
Speaker 3: and a lot of times we don't really get a
Speaker 3: lot of the details until two, three, four weeks later.
Speaker 3: But unfortunately then it's already moved out of the news cycle.
Speaker 3: And you know, Prasenski even talked about that that they
Speaker 3: won't really have to worry about people figuring things out
Speaker 3: because the way the news cycle works is is so
Speaker 3: immediate and so constant, and people have, you know, rabbit brain.
Speaker 3: They don't remember bird brain, they don't remember stuff from
Speaker 3: two weeks ago. So it's hard to say exactly what's
Speaker 3: going on in this it's just too early to figure
Speaker 3: out exactly what's going on.
Speaker 1: But it's not wrong or bad.
Speaker 3: To consider all the possibilities and different different theories and
Speaker 3: different possibilities. So that's all I could say on that.
Speaker 3: But it does bear a lot of similarities to things
Speaker 3: like Gladio that did include high profile assassinations, mass public shootings,
Speaker 3: terror campaigns. Bolognia bombing is an example. So it's not
Speaker 3: really an issue. Well, but that was right wing stuff.
Speaker 3: The point is that that's a technique, that's a strategy,
Speaker 3: that's a structure of terror that can be used, and
Speaker 3: we see that, for example with al Qaeda. The techniques
Speaker 3: that al Qaeda and it's proxies in other places isis,
Speaker 3: et cetera. The techniques and strategies that they've done, they're
Speaker 3: not just similar to Hassan al but even though he
Speaker 3: was a s from a thousand years ago, they're very
Speaker 3: similar to the structure of things like Gladio. And in fact,
Speaker 3: some of the Gladio people the train for example, Gladio
Speaker 3: cells and people in Turkey, they were then flown to
Speaker 3: train people in al Qaida or in the KLA. The
Speaker 3: same entities that would train the KLA in Serbia, the
Speaker 3: same entities working with and training the Mujahadeen, and as
Speaker 3: people from the CIA, people from the US military, Pentagon.
Speaker 3: I'm not saying that that means that that's who did this.
Speaker 1: We don't know, but.
Speaker 3: It just seems to be typically the case when you
Speaker 3: study high profile assassinations, especially the GfK assassination, right, we
Speaker 3: do get indicators of bigger players involved. To go back
Speaker 3: to this issue of the state in a just state,
Speaker 3: I was reflecting on the principles that most Christian states
Speaker 3: had in place, and I want to be very clear,
Speaker 3: I'm not calling for an immediate Christian state.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's realistic.
Speaker 3: And again, it wouldn't work with thirty thousand different churches, sects, groups,
Speaker 3: and denominations all trying to have a Christian state. Historically,
Speaker 3: the only Christian states that had really lasted and flourished
Speaker 3: were Orthodox Catholic states of some fashion, even the Protestant states. Originally,
Speaker 3: the German princes were the ones that supported, for example,
Speaker 3: Martin Luther, and a lot of Martin Luther's success, at
Speaker 3: least in terms of numbers, was really responsible.
Speaker 1: The responsible party.
Speaker 3: Wasn't Luther's ideas so much as the German princes that
Speaker 3: supported him and didn't like the pope. So there was
Speaker 3: a lot of geopolitical motivations behind even Luther's Reformation. And
Speaker 3: you'll notice that the Protestant state didn't last very long, right,
Speaker 3: It was only a few maybe a few hundred years
Speaker 3: before they collapsed to liberalism and to secularism and to
Speaker 3: the Masonic revolutions.
Speaker 1: And they were absolutely Masonic. Made a mistick about it.
Speaker 3: All the revolutions to get rid of throne and altar
Speaker 3: were free Masonic across the board. But speaking of the
Speaker 3: Christian state, really, I don't think you can have a
Speaker 3: just society without some basic Christian principles. It's not the
Speaker 3: job of an Orthodoxtrician or of the church to start
Speaker 3: what's trying to convert the state and make some sort
Speaker 3: of top down political thing.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: I don't think we're going to get a Byzantine emperor
Speaker 3: next year if we can convert jd vance, that's kind
Speaker 3: of ridiculous. Rather, what happens is if you look at
Speaker 3: the Roman Empire as an example, lets talk about three
Speaker 3: hundred years to convert the Roman Empire before we began
Speaker 3: to see the emergence of Christian kings, states and rulers.
Speaker 3: That's possible. We don't know where history is going. It
Speaker 3: might be the end of the world. We don't know,
Speaker 3: but we do have a duty to try to speak
Speaker 3: to all areas of life in the way that it
Speaker 3: should be governed. And the teaching of traditional Christianity, even
Speaker 3: if you're a Roman Catholic, even if you're a Latin
Speaker 3: Roman Catholic, has always been that there needs to be
Speaker 3: a Christian principled state.
Speaker 1: That's just the facts.
Speaker 3: So you can hate that, you can disagree with that,
Speaker 3: you can believe whatever you want.
Speaker 1: But what I'm trying to explain is that if you
Speaker 1: don't believe that, then what you get is you.
Speaker 3: Don't get a Protestant state, you get a secular state.
Speaker 3: And the secular state ends up being the god state.
Speaker 3: In a just society, the death penalty, for example, that
Speaker 3: is legally exercised with basic Christian principles. For example, if
Speaker 3: you look at the Code of Justinian, a Christian law text,
Speaker 3: Codex to Justinian, the laws that Saint Justinian put in place,
Speaker 3: we're pretty based. They were pretty Christian. But remember that
Speaker 3: was the name majority Christian society. So we're not going
Speaker 3: to try to have a political revolution and force Christian
Speaker 3: laws on the masses of pagan peoples and demonic people
Speaker 3: that are not going to submit to any Christian laws.
Speaker 3: But it is correct that the idea that Christianity should
Speaker 3: have no role in the state or in society in general.
Speaker 1: Is absolutely false.
Speaker 3: That's an Enlightenment presupposition. And anybody that claims that they're
Speaker 3: Orthodox and believes that that's almost heretical. There are no
Speaker 3: orthodox Christian Saints that are democrats or Americanists or secularists.
Speaker 1: All of them are monarchists.
Speaker 3: In a just society, the death penalty is largely exercised
Speaker 3: in a way that is loving. In other words, for
Speaker 3: very wicked people. It is just for there to be
Speaker 3: the death penalty because those people they're not just a
Speaker 3: danger to society, they're a danger to themselves as well.
Speaker 1: And so the death penalty and.
Speaker 3: If you read anybody prior to I don't know, nineteen hundred,
Speaker 3: they will speak in this way that it's a great deterrent.
Speaker 3: It's also a great determinent deterrent and a inducement to
Speaker 3: to repentance. If you know that you are going to
Speaker 3: die for, you know, raping people, then you're probably not
Speaker 3: going to.
Speaker 1: Go out and rape people.
Speaker 3: But a society that doesn't have those principles and becomes unjust.
Speaker 3: You get corrupt and unjust laws, as Ezekiel talks about.
Speaker 1: So there's no.
Speaker 3: Antipathy between justice and love. In fact, you can't have
Speaker 3: love without boundaries and justice.
Speaker 1: The two go together.
Speaker 3: A father that loves his children chastises them, as says,
Speaker 3: and doesn't let them do everything they want. That's raising
Speaker 3: goblins and demons. If you let them do whatever they want.
Speaker 3: You have to have boundaries. You don't have to be
Speaker 3: a tyrant, but you've got to have boundaries. And wisdom
Speaker 3: is the balance there that you can figure out, hopefully
Speaker 3: in time as you.
Speaker 1: Progress in age and gain some wisdom. But remember there
Speaker 1: is no.
Speaker 3: Antipathy again between the death penalty and that being exercised
Speaker 3: against very wicked people. They're not all sins are equal.
Speaker 3: All sins are sins, but not all sins are crimes,
Speaker 3: and not all crimes are equal. To murder a million
Speaker 3: people is far worse than murdering one person. But murder
Speaker 3: is murder, and killing is not murder. Not all acts
Speaker 3: of killing aren't murder. Paul and rome Is thirteen teaches
Speaker 3: very clearly that the emperor, the king, the magistrate has
Speaker 3: the sword for the exercising of justice as a punishment
Speaker 3: against evildoers, to deter those types of wicked actions. A
Speaker 3: sword chops heads off, it puts people to death. And
Speaker 3: so the state has that role, and the state has
Speaker 3: a duty to God, even if it doesn't accept it.
Speaker 3: When Paul wrote that he was writing about a pagan emperor,
Speaker 3: right about Nero. Nero didn't care about Christ, didn't care
Speaker 3: about God. In fact, he hated Christ. He is Antichrist
Speaker 3: in the Book of Revelation, it's Nero. So if Nero
Speaker 3: is Antichrist, but he still has a duty and is
Speaker 3: still in a providential role, that doesn't mean that because
Speaker 3: there's abuse, you get rid of that role. Right, there's abuse.
Speaker 3: Fathers abuse their roles as fathers and as husbands. Well,
Speaker 3: I guess we got to get rid of fathers because
Speaker 3: some of them abuse that role. That's preposterous, This is idiotic.
Speaker 3: This is the thinking of the left.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: So, no, you can't have a functioning, healthy society without
Speaker 3: some kind of state with some kind of authority to
Speaker 3: exercise things like the death penalty for certain heinous offenses.
Speaker 3: And this is how Western civilization functioned. Byzantheum wouldn't have
Speaker 3: been as successful as it was without its religion, its
Speaker 3: gold currency, and it's Christian laws. Those things together made
Speaker 3: for a healthy society. But remember, the state isn't God.
Speaker 3: We don't put state in politics first. As Orthodox Christians,
Speaker 3: we put Jesus first. We put the religion first. In fact,
Speaker 3: I was listening to some of the minor prophets. I
Speaker 3: was listening to Hagi and zeph and Aiah and other
Speaker 3: texts from the Old Testament, and God rebukes them for
Speaker 3: putting politics first. He says, you worry about your wages,
Speaker 3: and you worry about this and that, and you don't
Speaker 3: put the house of God first.
Speaker 1: You were lazy about the House of God.
Speaker 3: And so he says, you put your money in your bags,
Speaker 3: and the bags have holes, and the money runs out,
Speaker 3: and you can't keep up with the inflation. Think the
Speaker 3: bags and the money, the bags with holes in the month.
Speaker 3: That's referring to the devaluate the valuing of the currency.
Speaker 3: He's saying that you can't keep up with the inflation
Speaker 3: because of usury, and because the nation is wicked. And
Speaker 3: why are they wicked? Because they're putting politics first. They
Speaker 3: trust in kings and princes and sons of men, as
Speaker 3: the Psalm says, as we listen in every Orthodox liturgy,
Speaker 3: trust not in princes and sons of men. God first,
Speaker 3: But the state has a duty to God, and if
Speaker 3: the state doesn't recognize that duty, then they're out of
Speaker 3: order with the divinely appointed order. It's not our job
Speaker 3: to go after them or try to get rid of them.
Speaker 3: We're not political revolutionaries. But we remind them of the
Speaker 3: duty that they have, and if they go out of
Speaker 3: that duty, then that's on their conscience and they're going
Speaker 3: to have to deal with that and the resurrection at
Speaker 3: the judgment. So that's my thoughts for today, and hopefully
Speaker 3: that resonates with some of you. Hopefully you think about
Speaker 3: what I'm saying and don't just react to what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: Take a look at some of the books. You can
Speaker 3: go to Jay's Analysis and get my books in the shop.
Speaker 1: Well, join our regularly scheduled program after these messages. Here's
Speaker 1: the deal.
Speaker 2: We are winning in court, we're defeating the democrats, we're
Speaker 2: defeating their law firms.
Speaker 1: All this powerful stuff's happening.
Speaker 2: I can tell you they are under criminal investigation by
Speaker 2: the DJ, and the DJ is not just looking at
Speaker 2: just played games. Okay, I'm gonna stop right there. I'm
Speaker 2: gonna be gone for a few days, Errol, Let's leave
Speaker 2: it at that. So there's a lot going on. But
Speaker 2: we are literally maxed out in the bills. And what's
Speaker 2: going on because eighty percent of the funding goes into
Speaker 2: legal because we are suing them and depositions and just
Speaker 2: constant warfare and filings.
Speaker 1: And just I mean we are winning. I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: going to battle, but I'm run out of AMO.
Speaker 2: Go to the aloshowstore dot com and get twenty five
Speaker 2: percent off on all the apparel, the widest selection of
Speaker 2: T shirts, hundreds and hundreds of hundreds, ball caps, you
Speaker 2: name it. The vary by supplements that will change your live.
Speaker 2: Fifty percent off, limited time. It's only to go for
Speaker 2: four or five days more maximum of the ultramethylene blue,
Speaker 2: the very best you've pir of my methlane blue with
Speaker 2: this is the best. We have, the very best shilogy,
Speaker 2: the very best Irish cemuts, the very best cardiovascular tetox
Speaker 2: spike protein detox. Even if you didn't take the shots,
Speaker 2: everybody's at detox at least once a year. I have
Speaker 2: so many friends of a family that are chronically sick
Speaker 2: and stuff. Even though they didn't take the shots, they
Speaker 2: got it shedded on them and they take the other
Speaker 2: two big blood cleaner things that were.
Speaker 1: The highest certified put out by scientists.
Speaker 2: We just got with formulators and combined both formulas together,
Speaker 2: so it's like a horse bill. This is hands down
Speaker 2: the best and just for general cardiovascular HILP held. You
Speaker 2: need it Ultimate Life Force. You can get it for
Speaker 2: fifty percent off. It's all their limited time Valli shown
Speaker 2: store dot com. Also free ten dollars Ultimate Fundraisers sale.
Speaker 2: If you spend over seventy five dollars in the store,
Speaker 2: you get ten dollars off at checkout.
Speaker 1: Immediately. Got that.
Speaker 2: So you spend seventy five dollars, seventy five dollars and
Speaker 2: one cent. Suddenly year bill is sixty five.
Speaker 1: Got it.
Speaker 2: Just another giant discount of of everything. But you really
Speaker 2: want to get the ultramethylne blue. You want to get
Speaker 2: the bovine coloster in March of two thousand milligram per scoop.
Speaker 2: It is and grow don't know about bobine clossroom. It
Speaker 2: is the super food nutrient hottest thing for a decade,
Speaker 2: now ultra hot, the oddest thing, we have, the best.
Speaker 2: It's all there at the Alex Jones store dot com.
Speaker 2: But this is only running, they're telling me until next Monday,
Speaker 2: maybe Tuesday, because the Bovine.
Speaker 1: Clossrooms selling out.
Speaker 2: The capsules of Betherline Blue is selling out, the shilogy
Speaker 2: gummies aren't selling out, the Ira Semas capsules are selling out,
Speaker 2: and so a lot of these won't be available just
Speaker 2: in the next few days. So take advantage of it now.
Speaker 2: But I'm telling you, I think your information is powerful.
Speaker 2: You want to get the ultra Methylene Blue because if
Speaker 2: this is a free you take it, it's powerful. You've
Speaker 2: seen the rave reviews, You've seen what's happened. This is
Speaker 2: hands down the most incredible thing I've ever taken. I
Speaker 2: took other Bethline Blue before, didn't really feel it because
Speaker 2: it wasn't medical grade.
Speaker 1: This does it? This is it yet? Yours now theoloshone
Speaker 1: store dot com. Now back to our program
Speaker 4: M.