Speaker 1: Good morning, good morning, and happy Friday to everybody. It's
Chad's last day with me, everybody. Daisy's back on Monday.
Everybody just needs to give like a big fat thank
you to Chad for filling in this week because you've
been a trooper.
Speaker 2: I love it and I appreciate it. And if you
guys want to see more of my stuff, check out
my YouTube, go like and subscribe. It helps me out.
And it's been so much fun. So you're like, it's
your last air, you're happy, I'm like, no, actually, I
actually told it.
Speaker 1: It has been fun. It has been fun, and I
just I just really really really really appreciate it, really
appreciate you because I know you do radio alone. And
I was telling you before the show was I could
never do that. I could never just do a show
talking to nobody like that. That is my eternal nightmare.
So the fact that you can do both is awesome.
Speaker 2: It's an interesting thing, I will tell you, because you know,
you're in a room by yourself and you're just talking
into a microphone and you're having a conversation with everybody
yet nobody.
Speaker 1: And you're not getting feedback, which I need, I need
to have you know, I need it to be a conversation.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So here's one of the This is one of these
days that I wake up in the morning and I think, Man,
I like the level of success that this show has
right now, because when you get bigger, you have to
worry about things like getting swatted, which is apparently happening
to like a whole mess of conservatives, some of which
I am familiar with and others less so. But regardless,
they're all like far more successful and influential in this
space than this show is. And so it's one of
those things where I'm like, this is it's good to
be at this level, you know what I mean, like
kind of under the radar, where you're not like super
setting people off to the point where they're doing crazy
shit like swatting your house. But that has happened to
Joe PAGs. That happened to Joe PAGs. That happened to
the guy that does the hilarious Trump impressions, Sean fair Rush.
I'm not even sure if I'm saying his last name right,
but he's the Captain Deplorable, I think, is how he's
better known. Nick Sordor, who we constantly show his tweets
Gunther Eagleman, cat Turd Chase Geyser. I think he's from
info Wars, Like this is crazy and it should be.
Speaker 3: How did somebody find out where cat Turd lived?
Speaker 1: I don't, I don't know. I think he got docks
like forever ago.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there's a lot of people out there that have been.
Speaker 3: Dosed.
Speaker 2: I mean, how they docks the hospital the other day.
Speaker 1: This is the thing. I there's there are seriously whack
job people out there with and swatting is such a
dangerous thing. I mean, essentially, I feel like that should
be treated the same as attempted murder because that's ultimately
what you're hoping happens, is that there's some sort of
melee with the cops showing up that's going to end
up in violence. And so I don't know, the Department
Justice needs to get like a firmer hold on this
kind of crime because it doesn't seem like anything ever
comes of these cases. And it's scary. It's scary times
to be a conservative right now. It's just scary times.
And so I'm just glad to be at this level.
This is fine. I'm fine staying right here.
Speaker 3: Right here, all good right here.
Speaker 1: Yes, Also some breaking news this morning is that Hamas
apparently has agreed to release four bodies for dead bodies
as well as the living body and the living person
of the remaining American Israeli hostage. So that is fantastic news.
Eden Alexander is his name. I'm not sure when that
I'm not sure when that release is happening, but obviously
they're feeling some heat and we can't do anything but
celebrate the fact that he is going to be coming home.
So that just happened this morning, which is fantastic news.
And you know what else is fantastic news is that
if you have dogs, you have a way of bringing
their dead dry kibble to life. And it's with this
right here, rough Greens. Rough Greens is a premium nutritional
supplement for your dog or cat. They now have meal
greens for kiddy cats too, And this is a way
of transforming your pets health naturally by giving them the
extra ooph that they need in their diet that they're
not They're not getting it from their kibble, you guys,
They're just not. And the best part about this green
health powder for dogs and cats is that when you
sprinkle it on their kibble. They love it, They love
the taste of it. It makes them crazy. They just
love it. It gives them all kinds of shiny coats,
better breath, better health, overall, more energy. It helps with
their joints and mobility. There's even some studies that apparently
show that it can help reduce inflammation, improve their heart health,
lower their risk for cancer. So this is just like
any multivitamin that you would want to take as a person.
Your pets need that extra help too. So try the
rough Greens ninety day challenge where you can actually see
at day thirty, day sixty ninety huge changes in your
pet and you can get a free Jumpstart trial bag.
That's the size right here. You just cover shipping costs
when you go to rough chicks dot com. That's r
u f F chicks dot com. Rough chicks dot com
is how I like to say it at post chicks
at roughchicks dot com. All right, let's get to some
stuff and some things. Trump came out like with guns
blazing yesterday about tariffs because he heard that Europe was
like they were gonna put a tariff on whiskey, and
he was like, oh no, you don't he tweeted out
or truthed out. I guess I should say he said
the EU, one of the most hostile and abuse of
taxing and tariffing authorities in the world, which was formed
for the sole purpose of taking advantage of the US,
has just put a nasty fifty percent tariff on whiskey.
If this tariff is not removed immediately, the US will
shortly place a two hundred percent tariff on all wine, champagne,
and alcohol products coming out of France and other EU
representative countries. This will be great for the wine and
champagne business in the US. So he's really really fine
about like throwing out the tariffs. But when somebody is like, oh, yeah,
we see your tariff and we raise you, he's like,
oh no, you don't, and he comes out with all
of the tariff tacularity.
Speaker 2: I just why did they put a fifty percent tariff
on because it seems like they fired the first shot.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know, I don't know. This has all
become I can't keep up at this point, like it's
just it's become so ridiculous, and Howard Lutnik I do
feel kind of bad for him because of course he's
the guy as Commerce secretary who is answering all the
questions about this, and so he was now either he
was on one of the talk shows talking about ultimately
how he doesn't like seeing this back and forth either.
But really the goal is about balancing trade. Here he
is to explain.
Speaker 4: The President has made it crystal clear that he finds
this tit for tat really abusive and aggravating. Right his
objective is steel and aluminum tariffs. Let him build his
steel and aluminum business in America, because that's important. And
then you know, they say, okay, we're going to tax whiskey.
And look, I find all this back and forth really
off the topic. The key topic is rebalancing American trade.
We're going to spend lots of time together, you know.
But the President was totally annoyed that the Europeans did this.
And so you go in a year back from someone
who emotionally cares about America. He cares about America and
he wants to take care of Americans.
Speaker 2: Like he has no idea. You've asked him, hey, what
tariffs are we haveing on right now?
Speaker 3: He probably can't go have no idea. What time is it.
Speaker 2: I mean I could I cause I don't know. During
my local show, I asked, I asked jokingly. Throughout the day,
I'll stop in the middle of I ran and go, hey, Ken,
and who's our news guy? What tariffs we have on
right now? He goes, So, let me check brother Chad,
and they'll go and look at it. Right now we
have this, this, and this, but they canceled this, this
and this.
Speaker 3: I'll get back in a little bit because I don't
know what's on.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't need aluminum and steal. Then the next thing,
you know, we're talking to two hundred percent tariff on
Champagne'm like, how well will we get here?
Speaker 1: It does seem to escalate quickly when another country starts in,
so like, yeah, and.
Speaker 2: Even pretend he's like, we're gonna put a twenty five
percent tariff on your butter. Trump's all, okay, we're gonna
put a four thousand percent tariff on your tennis shoes.
Speaker 5: What.
Speaker 1: So meanwhile, I think America, I think everybody just needs
to just go and shop like you normally do and
just see what happens, because I like the rest of us,
right because at this point, there's no telling how this
is all going to shake out. So we're just all
here for the ride, okay, and we're just going to see.
We're just going to see what happens, and hopefully, ultimately,
like Letnick says, there will be a balance. We're going
to get to a point where instead of these giant swings,
we're just going to be like this, you know what
I mean, it's all going to be this happy medium.
Speaker 2: If we don't produce it, we should never tear if.
If we do produce it and they tear if us,
we should tear iff them.
Speaker 3: It's just that simple. And so you know, I know,
the whole thing is like we're going to bring back
manufact We're not.
Speaker 2: We're gonna bring back the things that you think we're
going to bring back. But I understand what you're trying
to do. You're trying to bounce. You're also using it
as a way to negotiate certain things that have nothing
to do with tariff and have all to do with
others things.
Speaker 1: It's just we're here for the whiplash.
Speaker 3: That's it.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's all we can do. And then Trump
had the NATO Secretary General in the Oval office yesterday
and he was at He talked about the EU very openly,
right in front of the NATO Secretary, you know, saying
that this the EU was literally set up to be
hospital the United States. He talked about how unfair all
of the financial policies have been, and then he also
revisited the topic of Canada and whether or not he
planned to back down on Canada tariffs. And here's what
he said.
Speaker 6: Look, we've been ripped off for years, and we're not
going to be ripped off anymore now. I'm not going
to bend at all. Aluminum or steel or cars, We're
not going to bend. We've been ripped off as a
country for many, many years. We've been subjected to costs
that we shouldn't be subjected to. In the case of Canada,
we're spending two hundred billion a year to subsidize Canada.
You know, the United States can't said, as a country
for two hundred billion dollars a year, we don't need
their cars, we don't need their energy, we don't need
their lumber, we don't need anything that they.
Speaker 5: That they give.
Speaker 6: We'd do it because we want to be helpful, but
it comes a point when you just can't do that.
You have to run your own country. And to be
honest with you, Canada only works as a state. It
doesn't We don't need anything they have as a state.
It would be one of the great states anyway, This
would be the most incredible country visually.
Speaker 1: Visually it would be, he went on to say, because
like if you look at it on a map, it
would just be really cool if this was all one country.
That was my favorite.
Speaker 3: What do you think Mexico's thing?
Speaker 2: Like, why don't you why you never talk about making
us a day.
Speaker 1: You talk about that. That's a great point.
Speaker 2: He's very talking about the Hirachis.
Speaker 1: He means business when it when it comes to making
Canada a state. Man, he is not giving up on
this idea. He just isn't.
Speaker 2: And speaking that's just such a troll, because first of all,
become a state. They they've already got their state. They're Providence,
those are their states. They're they're not going to just
want to be one big state. They'd want to be
broken up into some and you know, and then you're starting,
you know, as we've talked about, you start giving up
senate seats and congressional seats, and you just talked you've
already hurt uh what's his name's chance probably of being
the next prime minister.
Speaker 1: Pierre.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, Pierre. You've you've pretty much talked him out
of that, which I'm sure you know if you've thought,
he would have been a lot easier to deal with.
Uh So, which is again it's just as it's bizarre
because I don't think you.
Speaker 1: Feel bad for him. I feel really bad from Pierre
because he was he was leading in the polls and
then now he's being at I mean now he's being
unfairly sort of attached to Trump and so his his
polls are going down.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and this guy that the interim guy who's going
to probably continue to be PM, is awful. He's absolutely awful.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and he's going to be who's going to be
easier to work with, right.
Speaker 1: I mean, it definitely would have been Pierre, because Pierre
is like minded. I mean, they have the same goals.
So this just sucks all the way around. I guess
the only good news is that it was justin Trudeau's
last day yesterday, and he could not help himself. He
decided to post a video just to get on camera
one last.
Speaker 7: Time, so proud of Canadians. I'm proud to have served
a country full of people who stand up for what's right,
rise to every occasion, and always have each other's backs
when it matters most. This may be my last day
here in this office, but I will always be boldly
and unapologetically Canadian. My only ask is that no matter
what the world throws at us, you will always be
the same.
Speaker 2: He's so creepy, Oh my god, like a vampire from
one of those European like Blade would go fight, you know,
like a corporation of vampires.
Speaker 1: Oh god, he's just the worst. I mean, just just
he gives me the creeps like I get a I
get the you know, the chicken bumps, right like I.
Speaker 2: That's that's man. You don't want That's not good for anyone.
Speaker 1: No, it's not good for anybody. Speaking of which, did
you how did you did you get through like the
whole October through today period without getting sick? Or did
you ever did you get like because I had the
flu really bad when we first moved here in November. No,
you didn't get sick at all? How did you do that?
Speaker 3: My mom?
Speaker 2: First of all, with Gen X second game and I
wasn't just kind of gen X. Like, if you want
to go back, I raised myself and my mother's big
thing in life was you know, basically you know, wherever
go to my mom's house, it's like, oh, I see
why you don't get sick because you had to build
up a immunity. Do everything ever right, Like it's it's
you know, because my mom moving with twenty dogs, you know,
like it's it's you know, it's it was always chaos.
But it's I just I never got sick. I drank
out of the hose, right, I didn't.
Speaker 1: I don't know what's going on then, because usually I
stay away from all the colds that go around. I
do pretty well, but man.
Speaker 3: That's why I should get more colds.
Speaker 2: Well, No, my mom just like she's my mom's the
kind of person just she would throw you in, just
get there.
Speaker 3: Get sick.
Speaker 2: After a while, it's like, you know what, so we
were blessed. I mean nothing, right, you know.
Speaker 1: Knock all the wood. I hope you stay healthy, but
I know it continues to be hard for people. There's
a lot of people that are getting sick, a lot
of people catching all the just the gunk that's going.
Speaker 3: Around the fluid.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh my gosh, it was awful, absolutely awful. But
I was so grateful to All Family Pharmacy dot Com
slash chicks because thanks to them, I had antibiotic on hand.
I like to have just the antibiotics that I know
are sort of general for things like bronchitis. There's other
antibiotics that are specific for like UTIs. Just the kinds
of things that are typically a common affliction that is
the last thing that you want to have to go
to an urgent care for, or that you want to
have to wait for an appointment with your doctor for.
Those are the kinds of things that you know you
can just nip in the bud with an antibiotic. You
know that it's just easy to have them on hand,
and you can order them at any time and have
them at the ready at All Familypharmacy dot Com slash chicks.
You do not have to sit in an urgent care
with a bunch of other coughing, hacking people when you
know that all you need is medication and they have
like over two hundred different medications they ship immediately. It's
just nice to be able to have that at the ready,
and so you can visit All Familypharmacy dot Com slash chicks.
When you use code chicks ten that chicks one Z row,
you will get ten percent off of your entire order.
It's again Allfamilypharmacy dot Com slash chicks and the code
is chicks ten. So in that same Oval Office reporter
fest that Trump was in, he also addressed this impending
potential shutdown. So today's Friday. You know, we got to
get the government funded by eleven fifty nine pm tonight.
And now there seems to be some movement to avoid
that shutdown. But yesterday afternoon, this is what Trump was
saying about.
Speaker 6: It a shutdown, and ultimately that might lead to very
very high taxes because we're talking about a shutdown, we're
talking about getting to work immediately on the greatest.
Speaker 5: Tax bill ever passed. That was the one we did.
It's a renewal and it's an.
Speaker 6: Addition to it, and we're going to cut people's taxes.
And of the if we don't open, the Democrats are
stopping all of these good.
Speaker 5: Things that we're providing.
Speaker 6: We're providing the greatest package of benefits that this country's
ever provided.
Speaker 5: The biggest part of that's going to.
Speaker 6: Be tax cuts for the middle class and for businesses,
small businesses, employers, people that hire people, jobs, And if
it's shut down, it's only going to be.
Speaker 5: If there's a shutdown, it's only.
Speaker 6: Because of the Democrats, and they would really be taking
away a lot from our country and from the people
of our country.
Speaker 2: Man, if you cut middle class taxes for real, and
that that's a tough thing for Democrats to fight against.
You know, it's like, yeah, this just goes to show
you that's not what you're you're interested in.
Speaker 3: And if you.
Speaker 2: Really you know, I've said it over and over again,
if I'm him, I don't do anything with the billionaires
and the millionaires. They don't get regular paychecks. They live
in a much different world. And I focus on small
business and the middle class and giving them a break.
And you watch what happens. I mean, you know, you
pitch that dream because there's only so much bolognia.
Speaker 3: Like they're taking away Social Security and then everyone read
the bill. No they're not.
Speaker 2: None of that is true, not what you think of
that is true.
Speaker 5: I know.
Speaker 1: It's so frustrating that these are the things that they
can Their only game at this point is to use
profanity and fear monger. This is their new messaging strategy.
I know some people can get away with it and
they don't look ridiculous, But then the other people just
look ridiculous.
Speaker 3: Yeah it's the trying. You look like you're trying.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they look like trihards. Yeah, that's exactly right, Joe,
It is a joke. Scott Bessant, Treasury Secretary, also warning
Democrats yesterday afternoon about how this would be on them
if the government shuts down.
Speaker 8: Okay, what's not good for the economy is this government shutdown.
I don't know what Democrats are thinking here, because they're
going to own it and to the extent that it
hurts confidence, hurts the American people. We have had incredible
Republican uni since January twentieth, and the fact that the
Democrats are in disarray, they're flailing, and this is the
best they can do that. I think this is the
economic story for the next few.
Speaker 1: Days, and it kind of was for the rest of yesterday.
In fact, there was a report that as the Senate
Democrats were meeting and caucusing or doing whatever they were doing,
there were reports from Isishah Hasni at Fox News that
Kris and Jillibrand was literally screaming behind the closed door meeting.
She was screaming so loud that reporters could hear everything
she was saying, and she was saying she opposed the
shutdown and was concerned that it would be falling back
on Democrats. So I think what happened with Schumer is
that ultimately he saw on Twitter all of the reposts
of him saying how dangerous shutdowns are during the last
four years, and he realized this was not going to
serve him well. And then later in the evening yesterday
he came out and said, Yeah, I'm going to go
ahead and allow this vote to happen after all. Here's
what he said in part on the Senate floor.
Speaker 9: This, in my view, is no choice at all. While
the CR bill is very bad, the potential for a
shutdown has consequences for America that are much much worse.
For sure, the Republican bill is a terrible option. It
is not a clean CR it is deeply partisan, it
doesn't address far too many of this country's needs. But
I believe allowing Donald Trump to take even more, even
much more power via a government shutdown is a far
worse option. And before I explain why, let me be
clear about one thing. No one on my side of
the isle wants a government shutdown. Members who support this
CR do not want a government shutdown. Members who opposed
this CR do not want a government shutdown.
Speaker 1: What do you think is gonna happen?
Speaker 2: They're gonna get it across the uh the I think
he'll get across the finish line. I think he also
pointed out yesterday, guys, you know, not only is gonna
have more power, but he's gonna be able to then run,
you know, keep certain things open, do certain things, and
and you may not get your gig back, although we're
seeing now more and more through court everybody's getting their
gig back. But he realizes, you know, you and I
talked about yesterday. That's a guy that looks around and goes,
all right, what's everybody saying here? Oh my god, Oh,
they're saying it's going to be our fault, aren't they
They are. They're saying it's going to be our fault
because they passed the bill and everybody kind of knows
we were a part of that.
Speaker 3: Bill way back in the day.
Speaker 2: So and it's basically the same bill that we had
last year with just a few little things here and
there that are taken out or put back in, and
the other thing too, and I and I don't think
people realize this. And this is what pisses me off.
The holy Kristen Gilibrand thing it is. You hear, She's
not going, we can't. We gotta fight this bill. We
gotta get a bipartisan bill. We gotta fight for the
things we want. Her big thing is they're gonna blame us, right,
It's not like, well, do you think this is a
shitty bill?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Do you think that there should be some other stuff
in there?
Speaker 3: Absolutely? Do you No.
Speaker 2: It's just are they gonna blame me? Well, if they're
gonna blame me, then I'll do whatever you guys want.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: It's always about politics, always, That's all it's ever about.
And Schumer then was after you know, he made his
floor speech, he went on talk shows, including with Chris
Hayes on MSNBC, where he explained further the reason that
he caved, essentially and because because now the new Democrats
messaging strategy, as we mentioned, is fear mongering and profanity,
he made sure to do both of those things during
his time with Chris Hayes check this Out's.
Speaker 9: Going to conflict with them on everything. On the tax
cuts for the billionaires, they've become a plutocracy and oligarchy.
On Medicaid, we have plans to conflict them with all
of that. If the shutdown occurred, we wouldn't be able
to do that because they would fill up both the
Senate and the discussion on whether we should cut this
and not cut that of things that they want to cut.
So to have the conflict on the best ground we
have summed up in a sentence that they're making the
middle class pay for tax cuts for billionaires, it's much
much better not to be in the middle of a shutdown,
which to divert people from the number one issue we
have against these bastards, sorry these people, which is not
only all these cuts, but they're ruining democracy and one
other thing on a shutdown. On a shutdown, the courts
could close or at least be totally totally disabled, and
the courts are one of the best ways we've had
to go after these guys.
Speaker 2: The bastards they apologize, although you know what, I look
at him and I think, yeah, he probably says bastards
a lot, right, Like some people they look like they're trying,
you know, but some people you look like, yeah, you
look like you drop the bastard every once in a while.
He recognizes, first of all, everything with them goes back
to democracy, like January sixth, democracy, And if they shut
down January sixth, democracy will be ruined.
Speaker 3: And then people won't get.
Speaker 2: Their Medicare report, Medicaid reports, and they won't get their
payments for Social Security, and snap won't get paid. And
bastards and January six and democracy and who's going to
feed the kids at school?
Speaker 3: January sixth, You're like.
Speaker 1: Well, don't forget now they're throwing plutocracy and oligarchy in
there too.
Speaker 3: New one right there.
Speaker 2: And you know what, this is what I'll tell you guys,
this is what you want to know. Stop using words
that people have to look up.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 3: What the hell?
Speaker 5: What?
Speaker 3: What?
Speaker 2: What?
Speaker 3: Plutocracy? What is that?
Speaker 1: Even John Fetterman said that I can't remember who he
was talking. He was in an interview where he was
saying he was telling his fellow Democrats just stop throwing
that word around. It's not it's not a relatable word.
Speaker 3: It's not real.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right, you know it's it's I feel like you're
that person who reads a you know, a Thesaurus word
today and then wants to use it in every conversation.
Speaker 1: Right, that is what it totally feels like. Okay, we
got to move on to other things because also part
of the big news cycle yesterday was what is happening
with Russia and Ukraine. So we knew yesterday. We talked
during the show about how Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, everybody
had come to an agreement with Ukraine for this thirty
day ceasefire. It was a big deal because Ukraine was like, okay,
like we're down, We're down to clown with this ceasefire
the way that you guys have written it up. So
then we had to wait for Russia to respond. And
initially as we were waiting, there was this rumor, and
rumor is probably not the right word, but there was
a report from Mark Tison who was saying that Trump
had cut off all Russian oil sales to the EU
and that the way that he did that is that
the Treasury ended a Biden exemption or waiver that allowed
sanctioned Russian banks to process European payments for their oil sales,
and that when they ended that waiver, no one in
Europe now could purchase Russian oil, which would obviously be
a huge blow to Russia. And so when that rumor
or whatever, when that story got out there, Jackie Heinrich
from Fox News was immediately on the case and she
said Trump has not reissued that waiver as of now,
but nobody in the administration has stated that this was
a choice rather than just an oversight. Everybody we ask
the White House, State Treasury says that they're looking into
it and we'll get back to us. We have been
asking about it for two days with no answer. And
then a little while later she updated that and she
cause she'd gotten an answer, and she said, admin source
tells Edward Lawrence that President Trump let the waiver expire
in pursuit of ending the war end quote, will continue
to implement sanctions, which remain one of the key levers
to facilitate this goal. So it does seem like that
might be what Trump was referring to several days ago.
Remember when we had that video of him going, I
have like this secret you know, strategy, So this could
be it. I mean, I don't know that for sure,
but this could be it. But did it sway Russia? Well,
that's the big question, right, because it depends on what
headline you read. There was one headline, this was from
the New Post, that said Putin rejects Trump proposed ceasefire
demands that the US stop arming Ukraine ahead of Witcough
meeting in Moscow. But then when you listen to Putin
be asked about this by reporters, he seemed somewhat more
amenable to at least negotiating. Here's a little bit of
his presser.
Speaker 10: We agree with the propositions to stop facilities, but we
proceed from the fact that such ceasefire should be such
that would lead to a permanent peace and remove the
initial original causes of the crisis.
Speaker 1: So I don't know what to make of this. There
was this tweet about what their what their demands to
the US are, and there I don't know how you
move forward with this because there saying no NATO membership
for Ukraine, which is given no NATO peacekeepers in Ukraine,
which Ukraine would be like, but wait, how are we
gonna where's our security guarantees? They want Ukraine denaxified and demilitarized. Yeah,
and then the.
Speaker 2: Base, get rid of your military, you can't have any peacekeepers,
and we get these four regions. That's a it's a
starting point. But no, you know what, they gave up
their nuclear weapons. Nobody will ever do that again. Uh.
If you learn anything out of this, it's keep your
nuclear weapons. But to think that you're going to be demilitarized.
Speaker 3: And by the.
Speaker 2: Way, this is probably why yesterday Poland's like, hey, can
we have some nuclear weapons?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 2: They're like, hey, why we don't trust them? M hm,
you know, I mean we don't. We don't trust them
at all. But you're not giving it. Okay, the NATO
thing was probably never gonna happen. That was always something
angle just to piss them off. Peacekeepers, he's already by
the way, Trump's already said no, the peacekeepers NATO, as
long as they're the Europeans, they should be there.
Speaker 3: And the demilitarized No, I mean.
Speaker 1: I don't know how the I mean, I guess this
is the starting point because both Trump and Putin say
they want to talk to each other. Yeah, and you know,
at no other there's no other president that could do that.
And so we you know, Trump is still in this
place where he's basically the entire world is relying on
him to have a way of getting through this and
putting this conflict behind us. But with this being the
list of demands, I mean, we got a long ways
to go.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I was talking to somebody yesterday and they're like,
Trump's going to get this done, and Ukraine has to
realize they're going to give up something.
Speaker 3: I go, let me ask you a question.
Speaker 2: If you were run in the country and they said
you can't have any peacekeepers and you have to give
up all of your military after being in a fight
with your neighbor, and they get to keep all of theirs,
would you do it?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 1: I'm like, okay, then, I mean it does look the
reet position.
Speaker 3: The other thing just to surrender.
Speaker 1: So what do you think, I mean, do you think
that there's an outcome that can work or so? So
what is it? Is it just giving up the territory
and then Russia maybe concedes on the other things that
they're allowed to have.
Speaker 2: The military or whatever other things. It probably won't be peacekeepers,
but there will be some promises by Russia. Again, you
can you know, take that for what it's worth.
Speaker 8: It is.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they won't have to, you know, cut their military
because that's just stupid, because you can't. Okay, fine, we
cut our military, but then we're getting peace keepers or
we keep our military. You don't get both. So that
will be give up some of the territory, not all
of it. You know, they had ten percent, then it's
now twenty percent. Fifteen might be good and then you know,
no no members to uh you know NATO. That but
that was again, I don't think that was ever gonna happen.
I think I think you get it done there, we
lift the sanctions, everybody goes back to to you know,
to their corners, and we get on with our life. Yeah,
you know, I mean it's with kaf is the key
to this. He is the key to all of this.
He's the guy that gets stuff done. He's the guy
that goes in and negotiates the hell out of all
these deals. He is a no nonsense guy. Everybody says
he's affable. He just wants to come and he wants
to get a job done. He stays under the radar.
He's a billionaire businessman that people say, you.
Speaker 3: Want to talk about a negotiator. This is hit and he.
Speaker 2: Knows nothing about geopolitical stuff, Like he knows about it,
but he doesn't know the the here's the decorum.
Speaker 3: He just like, let's get this done. Period.
Speaker 1: Interesting. Well, we'll see, we'll see what answers.
Speaker 2: Just be Pootin dressed up in all his fatigues.
Speaker 1: I know that doesn't That was good charring.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know he's walking around, he's freaking riding aroun
on the back of.
Speaker 3: A bear or whatever he does. You know, if it's weird.
Got a shirt on, Cary, I mean.
Speaker 1: He was not topless, so that we had that going
for us, you guys. Quick reminder before we move on
to another topic, and that is that if you're concerned
about your online data and it's safety, and you probably
should be, because the Internet is a wild, wild place,
and there's this whole other part of it called the
dark web, which is super sketch and scary. I don't
know how to get there. I don't want to know
how to get there. But there's people out there, and
you know what they want. They want your data, and
so you need to protect it. And there's a way
that you can do that. If you visit Aura dot com.
It's a U r a Aura dot com slash chicks.
You can start a fourteen day free trial and immediately
find out if your data has been subject to any breaches.
They can remove your information from the dark web. They
provide all kinds of other services wrapped into their program,
which a lot of people pay separate comempanies for, so
for example, identity theft protection, financial fraud protection. This includes
a million dollars in identity theft insurance. They offer VPN services,
anti virus, password managers, certified data security and privacy plus
twenty four to seven US based that's important US based support.
You can't meet that, and there's no reason not to
at least give it a try. And you can do
that again for free for fourteen days just by visiting
Aura dot com slash Let's talk about how crazy and
violent and obnoxious so many people on the left have
become the vances Usha and JD wanted to take in
the symphony last night at the Kennedy Center. Couldn't even
do that without a bunch of weirdos booing them. Here's
what that looked like instead of the next.
Speaker 3: Bab you know what, it's stupid.
Speaker 1: I mean, it was full people really wanted to enjoy.
Speaker 2: The symphony, just super white liberals.
Speaker 1: I don't know my parents like the symphony. They're not
liberal symphony.
Speaker 3: Good cud.
Speaker 1: Be granted I have, it's not it's not my preferred
way of spending time.
Speaker 2: No, it's not. I'd rather have a root canal.
Speaker 1: Okay, I wouldn't go that far. I'll take an a
symphony before rukenel. What's to dislike about.
Speaker 2: Music I've It's just it's just you know what, you know,
why you guys played this music from the eighteen hundreds
because you didn't have you know, guitars and shit that rock.
Speaker 10: I mean it.
Speaker 1: It just depends on your mood, right, Like, sometimes you
need a little you need some music that's a little
more chill and.
Speaker 3: Hold, like when you get a massage.
Speaker 1: Okay, totally different, but that's fine. That's fine. So let's
get to Let's get to the ridiculous protests in at
Trump Tower in New York City yesterday because there was
this very organized, highly organized they all had their matching
T shirts and they were ostensibly Jewish people in favor
of letting this mahmood Khalil guy free, not deporting him
and just blasting the entire Trump administration about that. Here
is what that looked like. It they just invaded essentially
Trump Tower. It's so well financed, you know.
Speaker 3: That won't need to know.
Speaker 1: So that's what the protests look like. They totally thick
over the lobby. What's that?
Speaker 3: It's not a hot one in the bunch.
Speaker 1: They all have a look, don't they.
Speaker 2: They don you go straight to central casting?
Speaker 3: All right, what do I need?
Speaker 2: I need a woman who probably has armpit hair, definitely
looks a little unkept shot, you know, you know, probably
a prius if they even have.
Speaker 3: That, definitely goes to Whole Foods.
Speaker 2: And has the cat and is angry at everybody and
everything and all sex is rape for sure, I mean
you know it's they've got a look. And we also
need the older lady, right, that one, that lady's always there,
and you know we've we've well and the guys low
t for sure.
Speaker 1: And there's hardly any of them, hardly hardly any guys.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, yeah, so not real guys. And but the
the outfits fantastic. Where'd you get those? Well?
Speaker 1: Exactly right? I mean, so it's clearly a well funded operation.
And ultimately, because I know when the protests started breaking out,
there was all these videos going around on social a
lot of people in my feet at least I saw
going where are the police? Like, where are the arrests?
What is going on? Why are they being allowed to
do this? And so ultimately arrests started to happen, as
you can see, and they were very docile about it,
most of them. They were just they allowed themselves to
be carried out or they walked out, and then they
were loaded on the budts and I think it ended
up being like ninety eight of them. Yeah, ninety eight
of them were arrested. So what happens to them after arrest?
Speaker 3: That's New York City.
Speaker 2: They're just going to release them on their own recognis,
let's just get out of here. They don't arrescue for
stealing shit. Why are they going to restue for sitting
there inside of a room?
Speaker 1: I know, and they know exactly how far to go
in order to not face, like, you know, really bad,
serious charges. And one of the people though that I
was surprised to hear about who participated was somebody I'd
completely forgotten about, and that is actress Deborah Winger.
Speaker 2: Among the people in there, is the former celebrity actress
Deborah Winger. Evidently she's upset about uh, I guess January seventh.
Maybe she doesn't realize realize it actually happened.
Speaker 1: So this is so Deborah Winger man from Officer Gentlemen.
Speaker 2: Yeah, if I saw her, I would just start doing
breaking at Joe Cocker.
Speaker 1: I loved her. I did love her in movies. That
was a long time ago.
Speaker 3: I'd be honest with you. I know Susan Sarandon was somewhere,
you know, Yeah, that's right. I think sometimes I don't
know was she somewhere?
Speaker 2: Was she just walking by and everybody figure as well,
you know how you're here to be.
Speaker 1: She was at a protest, but not this one. I
think she was at one, not yesterday, but the day before,
which was not like she was just like out of
Mike screaming and stuff. But she wasn't disrupting a building.
Speaker 2: No, no, well, you look, you have your right to
the free speech.
Speaker 3: There you knock yourself out.
Speaker 2: All of you guys need to leave, and you know,
we're going to get on with it.
Speaker 1: Because it was interesting because Emily Campangno on Fox News.
She's a lawyer, and she was talking about the fact
that these people were allowing themselves to be very you know,
gently taken out in order to avoid resisting arrest. That
would be an extra charge, but that is not what
the chief of police said. So I'm just gonna let
these two clips run together, first Emily and then the
chief of police, because their stories seemed pretty different.
Speaker 11: I am sure as we see the massively affable way
that these protesters are submitting to the arrest means that
there's no way you can tie it to resist an arrest.
Speaker 2: We've seen them.
Speaker 11: I mean, it's sort of like watching someone try to
lift a mannequin like.
Speaker 1: They're very pliable.
Speaker 11: So I don't see resisting being any part of this,
which is a positive because obviously the safety and security
of our law enforcement is penultimate.
Speaker 12: We gave warnings, and ultimately of the roughly one fifty
that we hear, ninety eight chose to stay in the
cafeteria area.
Speaker 3: We made those arrests.
Speaker 12: Those arrested me for violation, trespass, but also strutting Gilbert
administration and resisting arrests, which a class that missed it
mean is due to the fact that we had to
carry them out. I will say, from start to finish,
this was a two hour operation making ninety eight arrests.
Speaker 2: The carried out I could maybe see what government job
did they?
Speaker 3: Is their government stuff that goes on there?
Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't know.
Speaker 3: Obstructing a government.
Speaker 2: I'm like, it's Trump Tower, Like, what's the the cafeteria.
What's happening at the cafeteria?
Speaker 1: Well, that's the thing. It's I hate that that these
are getting to be so organized that they're overwhelming to
police forces. I mean, think about how many police had
to deal with that nonsense and this is now becoming
I mean, it's going to be it's going to continue
to be a huge, huge problem across the country. And
I don't like it. I don't like it.
Speaker 2: It's going to be it's going to be a much
bigger you know, if the resistance is out there, it's
going to be a much bigger problem, especially because they're
paid well, yeah, especially, I mean we're looking at you
know what, I'm still looking for that you know, two
three thousand dollars. See who's going to pay me to
go to the highest bidder? I mean we're pretty much
hoping to it.
Speaker 1: Well, and now you know, and we talked about this,
you and I a little bit before pre show this
whole my mood khalil thing. Him becoming so martyred, I
don't think is going to end up being a positive
for the administration. I think you and I disagree about
whether or not he should be booted out of this country.
You still haven't seen enough evidence that leads you to
I should see. I saw it like there was somebody
that posted a video on Twitter yesterday of him talking
to a class and talking about needing to be violent,
and then the whole encampment that was at Columbia. He
was the spokesperson for making the demands, telling the university
we will not move until you divest from Israel and
do all these other things. So ultimately he was responsible
for a lot of the illegal behavior because he was
the spokesperson for that group. Now, whether you consider that
to be speech or actionable evidence that he shouldn't be here,
I guess we can see.
Speaker 2: Well, again, you could kick him out just for the
hell of it. By the way, he could have done nothing.
You could watch, a Swedish person could walk by, he's
got a VSA or something.
Speaker 3: You grab kick him out. You don't need a reason.
Speaker 2: We still't want you, you know, so.
Speaker 3: And I think they're going to do that.
Speaker 2: I think they're going to start blowing people out all
over the you know, they they raided overnight Colombia. Djerly
DHS went in there rated Columbia overnight into the student's dorms.
Speaker 1: Is that why this is a headline because this was
yesterday too that Mamood Khalil sued to block Columbia and
Barnard from releasing student records to Congress. Congress apparently was
asking for records so that they could identify students that
needed to face consequences. And he you know, he's got
nineteen lawyers, which isn't sketch at all, who are helping him.
And so I saw this headline, I was like, what
the hell is going on with this? I don't know, man,
that is super sketchy. And then that organization Columbia University
Apartheid Divest, which is the organization on campus that was
super responsible for all of the mayhem. That X account
has been oddly silent for the entire four days that
he has been in custody. So there's no question that
he is behind this really violent not at all peaceful group.
Speaker 13: You know.
Speaker 2: You know again, I'm a due process guy because you
got to think about this if you've turned him into
a martyr.
Speaker 3: Now, the interviews that I've.
Speaker 2: Seen really have been very vanilla. There's nothing that several
of these groups say, we know who the guy is,
but we're not a he's not a part of our
group that he has been accused of. And I say,
measure twice, cut once, and do it in such a
way where there is no doubt.
Speaker 3: Because once you start leaving that you start putting.
Speaker 2: You know, if you go and you fail and you
turn this guy into a martin that ends up staying.
That's only going to energize people, and you know, don't
So that's my thing because and do I want them
raiding college campuses?
Speaker 3: Dhs? Hell noo? Does anybody want that? I mean, are
we going to kick out every foreign student?
Speaker 2: Is that just you know, well, only if they're antism,
medic or only if there's this yeah, okay, if they're violent,
if they're some of these things you say. But I
feel like they're going to overreach and everybody out there
is looking for something and don't become exactly what they
say you are. If that makes sense because you you know,
and that's my my issue. You know, I'm a due
process guy. I want to see this thing because I
think the going to the court and doing these things
is going to expose so much of the insanity on
college campuses, which I think needs to be exposed. I
think it's going to suppose and I think it's going
to hurt colleges, and I think it's going to hurt
the professors and the staff as much as anybody. But
you've got to do you know this, You've got to
do it right. And if you just want to get
rid of the guy, they knock yourself out, you know.
Speaker 1: I mean, and that's that's where I stand. As you know,
I don't want him here at all. I want him gone.
I mean, there's that visceral part of me that wants
him and anybody else that would ever say death to Israel,
death to a Maria, get out, like get out of our shirt.
Speaker 2: I'm a Jew, you know.
Speaker 1: Right, but I do, I do, hear you, because I
don't want him to become this famous face of the resistance,
and that's exactly what's happening. I would have preferred, actually,
if maybe Marco Rubio would have maybe picked him and
whoever else all the other people that are just as
bad as him, and they just remove them, you know
what I mean, without making it this spectacle, because now
it's become a bit of a spectacle.
Speaker 2: But I still see that way. I know, and you
know it's the the it's frustrating because you look and
you go, Okay, you're anti this, you're anti that, you're all.
Speaker 3: Of the things.
Speaker 2: We do have to prove these things, and if we're
just going to decide to retroactively just get rid of
people who have a different opinion kind of thing. You know.
Even Laura Ingram asked, well, okay, so what happens when
you're not in power and you guys didn't like what
the administration?
Speaker 3: What comes to the next person. And we have conservative
students that are.
Speaker 2: Here and you know they want to, you know, kick
them out.
Speaker 3: Uh don't you run the risk of that? And you
know you do.
Speaker 1: I I think there, I think where I follow is
that this is just purely anti American. You know, like
there's no there's no gray area when you say death
to America, Like there's there's no wondering about like what
your ultimate goal is and I think Melissa Chen had
a great tweet about this. She said, the First Amendment
is not a magical shield against immigration laws that trigger deportation.
As a Green Card holder, which is a provisional status,
Khalil is subject to immigration law in a way that
citizens are not. The last thing that right wingers care
about is free speech rights for someone who's not a citizen.
If sovereignty and borders are to mean anything, then a
government should be able to determine who should and shouldn't
have the privilege of attaining lawful residents in America. And
then this was my favorite line, The Constitution is not
a suicide pact. And I love that because we see
what happens in the UK. We see what happens when Islam,
at radical Islam invades a country and becomes a loud,
loud voice. We see what happens, and it's not good.
None of it is good.
Speaker 3: It's it's it's awful.
Speaker 2: But we want to be you know, I was talking
to my buddy Jim last night and Kennedy and sent
public policy researcher wonderful guy. Sheim and I were chatting
last night, he says, and he's super uber conservative, and
his thing is, you don't want to end up being
the Democrats. Don't be the Democrats, don't be the the
You want.
Speaker 3: To do it. You want to check all the boxes.
You want to do it right, because.
Speaker 2: You set the example, and that way you shut the
people up. It's like, you know, if you if you
make the martyr, if you just toss him out, then
you know, and your goal is just to scare a
bunch of kids to shut up. That's not good, you know.
I mean, you know it's it's so let's it and
it's not I mean, by the way, we can kick
them all out. Even if you're a good person and
you're a conservative, we toss your ass out.
Speaker 3: You have no right to be here, so you know. So,
I mean, my thing is, do it right.
Speaker 2: Don't put the administration, Marco Rubio and and everybody else
into a position where they're fighting something that's taking up
too much time, sucking up too much oxygen and giving
people the martyrdom status and then causing more issues across
the country when you've got other things you need to do.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, the problem is is that we're not
dealing with sane, rational, normal people. We're dealing with lefty,
crazy lunatics, and so they make everything hard. And the
worst part is that Columbia and other universities too, but
obviously Colombia is the one everybody's talking about. They have handled,
they have mishandled this from day one. They have been
so bad at just allowing illegal protests to just continue
on their campus. They've done nothing to protect their Jewish students.
It's been awful and hopefully, if nothing else, that will change,
and we are starting to say a little bit of
movement in that direction.
Speaker 2: That's why I said the due process is important because
exposing these colleges in front of everybody, as you know,
this guy may say, look, you know, Columbia gave us
the thumbs up, they were fine.
Speaker 3: Exposing these colleges.
Speaker 2: In all of these things is going to be brought
to court to say, hey, we were there, they were
telling us something different, They allowed us to have a
seat at the table.
Speaker 3: They were the ones who started the negotiations.
Speaker 2: And so that's going to put their professors, that's going
to put the administrators, that's going to put all of
these people on you know, on blast. And I think
that's also the bigger picture because I think everybody's knee
jerk reactions like let's just get rid of them now,
let's settle down instead of trying to kill the you know,
the two, you know, just one one bird.
Speaker 3: Let's see if we can eat a whole.
Speaker 2: Flock of birds here and take a little time and
you know, you want to just toss them out, calm down,
you know, let's see what this looks like on the end,
you know, at the other side of this, where they
can't bitch because you've got due process. We've exposed the
colleges across the board, not just here, because you know,
once you make an example of them, all the other
colleges go, we better get a shit together.
Speaker 1: Well, a lot of other colleges have their shit together.
And I don't understand why it's so hard for Columbia
or you know, and there's and there's other examples aside
from Columbia, but some of these universities and absolutely negligent.
Speaker 2: It's also has to do where you are, right Like
if you're in New York and you're in Los Angeles, yeah, yeah,
you know, if you're in Iowa and you only got
you know, five hundred or a thousand students, that even
care about this, and and half of them aren't there
that day. It's it's a much different thing New York.
You're gonna also pull people from New York in LA
if you're there outside of there, that are going to
come there. So that's why it became such a huge deal, uh,
you know. And and so that's why I think slowing
it down and making it bigger and doing it correctly
is better than a knee jerk will just toss him out.
Speaker 1: I still wanted to get tossed out.
Speaker 2: Well, but the thing is, the game is the end
game is the exact same. Yeah, but instead of catching
one and exposing it, you expose the whole system.
Speaker 3: Because you just toss him out and a few others.
Speaker 2: The systems still there and they haven't been embarrassed in
front of the country outside of you know what people
have seen on the campus and people go Columbia stupid.
Speaker 1: Well I do. I do think that changes are afoot
good ones. One of the things that Mark Levin pointed
out on Twitter yesterday was just about this group because
we saw how organized it was at the at the
Trump Tower, and he said, Jewish Voice for Peace, this
is the organized group. He said, this is the truth
about this sickening organization. The group that reportedly flooded into
Trump Tower, which the media are calling a Jewish group,
is a horrendous anti Jewish organization. For those who don't know,
the notoriously anti Semitic Yes and anti israel Yes Jewish
Voice for Peace is a radical left Marxist organization that
seeks the elimination of the State of Israel and is
a major force behind the BDS movement. It has received
funding from, among others, George Soros. It's a huge embarrassment
to the vast majority of Jews who know this group
uses Jewish identity as a cover for its hatred and radicalism,
and it often organizes with the Islamist student groups in
their protests. Today, it's insisting on the return of the
alien who is among the leaders of the riotous events
at Columbia University on behalf of Hamas. That tells you
all you really need to know. So it was good
for him to expose the organized group with the stupid
red Shirts, and we need more of that for sure.
And we also need to see more of consequences that
Trump's administration is making happen, because when he said to Columbia, Hey,
we're going to cancel four hundred million dollars that you
currently get in federal funding. All of a sudden, they
were able to say, hey, we've expelled, suspended, and or
revoked degrees from some of the students who seized a
building during their pro Palestinian protest. So it's not like
they couldn't do it. It's just now that there's this
threat that they might have, you know, big daddy money
taken away from them, they're all like, oh god, we
got to do this million.
Speaker 2: And did you see what Fetterman. You know, he chimed
in and he said, good. They don't deserve it.
Speaker 3: They're a bunch of assholes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know. I I look, I am. I stand
with Israel. Like I said, I found out it was
Jewish few years ago. Was totally like a jock to
us because we did our little thing and I'm like,
oh my god, no way, and it was you know,
and it was. But my my thing is with them,
it's money is always the big thing. But also embarrassing
these people and showing how insane they are, because I've
been saying this since the beginning. Juxtapose the Jews with
any other quote unquote minority group or underrepresented group.
Speaker 3: You put it a woman, you put the.
Speaker 2: LGBTQ plus IABCDFT barbecue, you put the the you know,
a black or hispanic or whatever career adjacent. You put
anybody else in that situation, and those people are tossed
off campus in two seconds. But because Israel's guilt as
far as like why this is what it is, it's
two things. First of all, it's always the colonialism, and secondly,
it's because they're white.
Speaker 3: If they look like the Palestinians.
Speaker 2: People are like, oh, who cares, you know, the the
angry white people will be like ah, whatever, because they
don't care about what happens in Africa.
Speaker 3: They don't care about what happens in Yemen.
Speaker 1: No, they've been quiet about that black on.
Speaker 3: Black over there.
Speaker 2: It's like, well, I don't even know who to support, no,
because you don't. No.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is so the fault of this is
so the fault of universities who've allowed their campuses to
be completely overrun by these psychopaths, and they're complicit and
so now that they're getting threatened by an administration who
actually means business I'm hoping to see more stuff like
this where there's actual consequences and hopefully some deterrence for
more of these riots to continue, because this is out
of control, and it's not allowing students who pay good
money to get educated by these universities. It's not allowing
them to get what they paid for. Enough is enough
already eighty.
Speaker 3: Thousand a year, by the way, to go to Columbia.
Speaker 2: Oh my god, yeah, eighty five thousand.
Speaker 1: I can't believe anybody.
Speaker 3: People don't pay that.
Speaker 2: But yeah, even if you're paying twenty or thirty grand,
by the time all said and done, you're walking out
of there the one hundred gees, even with grants.
Speaker 3: And with loans and with you know whatever.
Speaker 2: It's freakin' you know, I mean, eighty five you walk
out with eighty or one hundred grand towards the debt,
you know. And look, these are a small group of
people that go to these schools that do this.
Speaker 3: Most people just want to go to get their freaking degree.
Get the hell out of there, right like you're.
Speaker 2: Pissed at Israel whatever, you know what. I just want
to get to math. Okay, all right, I don't even
like math, but they're making me take you this stupid
math class or this freaking class over here on health.
I just want to get that for my so I
can get my degree and get the hell away from
your people.
Speaker 1: I just there needs to be more consequences like what
we're seeing now from Columbia. Finally, there needs to be
like serious consequences for people who break protesting protocol. Peaceful
protest is fine, like going and getting a permit and
finding your place on campus where you're allowed to protest.
Not overrunning buildings, not throwing chairs into windows, not overtaking buildings,
not threatening or intimidating other students. Those things have to
be met with serious consequences in order for it to stop.
And unfortunately, we've still got Democrats who not only encourage this,
but they're actually promoting violence on a larger scale irrespective
of the whole Israel Palestinian issue. We've got idiots like
Maxine Waters who are essentially calling for violence in not
so many words. Here's how she did it just yesterday.
This is like unacceptable, this kind of talk. But here's Maxine.
Speaker 14: What does Pump expect? Oh, I believe he expects violence.
I believe he expects confrontation. I believe he's working toward
a civil war.
Speaker 1: Why do you think she says that? Because she wants
people to take to the streets.
Speaker 2: Now, you know what I saw Ron Wood, the comedian.
He said the same thing I've been saying for years.
It's going to be a short one because we're all
out of shape. I've said this for years. Like you know,
I was joking about the South Rise again. Not really,
not very not without Somemo's empic right like most If
we're going to have a civil war, it'd better be
on an app on my phone because otherwise I'm not
doing it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, a lot of people don't have the uh, the
wherewithal to engage in a civil war.
Speaker 2: Like you go back and look at the Civil War.
I mean those people to fight each other, They had
to march for days just to see another person to fight.
We can't go ten minutes without our phone.
Speaker 1: You think we're gonna get into a war that just
crashing that there's gonna be like a civil war.
Speaker 3: APP.
Speaker 2: I'm going to fight you you Downlo? The app be awesome? Right,
let's go, oh right, I want all right, what'd you get?
Speaker 3: I don't know? We want that was good.
Speaker 2: I mean, what like what, Oh my god, it's for
people to talk about, because everybody wants stuff talking about.
Speaker 3: We're not having a civil war. First of all, who's
gonna have the civil wars? Just out of curiosity?
Speaker 2: Because everybody in the right has a gun and everybody
in the left is terrified of them.
Speaker 3: So I don't know what kind of civil war you
think you're gonna have.
Speaker 2: But if the protesters are any any kind of of
of study of who that the right would be fighting
in this of a war, you don't even need a gun.
We're just gonna come in, We're gonna punch you in
the face, and then we're gonna walk away.
Speaker 1: Well. Still, the point is, Maxine should not be using
that kind of inflammatory language.
Speaker 2: It's your fellow man and they may have a different
opinion in you and whatever they be whack of dos,
but you're not gonna sit down and fight them.
Speaker 3: Stop with that crap. We're all adults.
Speaker 1: Here, our favorite Scott, Jenny Scott, you need to perr.
I I can't perr. So Daisy always does honors lonely.
He had to fight with Abby Phillips and the rest
of her you know, gaggle of liberal weirdos about Maxine
Waters comments, here is him last night, I.
Speaker 3: Bring it up.
Speaker 13: I mean, she's hardly the first Democrat to bring it up.
Hackeen Jeffrey said earlier this year, We're going to fight
in the streets on a Pressley jasmine rocket. Other members
of the Democratic Conference have continuously alluded to violence because
they're so angry about the true.
Speaker 15: I don't I think it's unfair to say that they're
alluding to violence. When when Jeffreys was saying that he
was talking about going to the streets in protest, which
with some political fight that's clearly not then.
Speaker 8: But if Trump uses the word fight everyone losing.
Speaker 3: I want to remind you, Yeah, that's just it. I do.
I think Hakim really meant go throw down in the street.
Speaker 14: No.
Speaker 2: But juxtaposed that with if Trump would have said fight,
everybody's like, well, that's because he wants you to beat
the hell out of everybody, right, So let's let's let's
like you we want to balance trade, let's balance the
reality of he says it.
Speaker 3: You here, go and hide because Trump's people are coming
to kill you.
Speaker 2: They say it, and and you're like, no, it's only
like fight hard against the you know, the evil that
is Trump and all that he wants to do and
fight in the court rooms in front now, so let's
just balance it out.
Speaker 1: That's fair. That is fair. Did you hear that today
Trump is going to be going to the Department of Justice.
I guess making some sort of speech or announcement from there,
and I don't know what it's about. But Pam Bondi
posted yesterday morning looking forward to welcoming Potus to the
Department of Justice tomorrow. He plans to speak ostensibly about
his plans to restore law and order. That's according to Axios.
But some people I saw on social media were speculating
that maybe this is he's going to talk about Epstein files,
other files that are coming out, just to kind of
give a little bump up to Pam Bondy, who's you know,
been on this on the bus a little bit a
little bit. I don't think he's going to fire her.
I don't think he's going to do that, but this
is happening today.
Speaker 3: He's been there for like an hour and a half.
Let's give her a little bit more.
Speaker 1: Time, right, I Mean, I'm I'm trying to be patient,
but and I don't know if that has anything to
do with why he's going to be there. It sounds
like he's going to be making comments about Alien Act.
Speaker 3: Is that what I've heard?
Speaker 1: The Alien Act?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Yeah, And at first I was like, oh my god,
they're going to tell us there's aliens and he's actually
building a wall in space.
Speaker 3: I don't know, but it goes back to like.
Speaker 2: Seventeen, like you know, eighty nine or eighty seven or
seventy eight something like that way back in the day.
That essentially says that you know, anybody, we deem any
kind of threat week and they they this is what
they used around up The Japanese put him in tournament camps.
Same thing for the Germans in World War One here
to put them in camps. And you know, it's like
it has and you're only supposed to use it during wartime.
But there's speculation that that he is going to invoke
it today.
Speaker 1: Really okay, well, then today could be very very interesting.
So Epstein, nobody knows. All we know is that he's
going to be speaking at the DOJ today and we
just have to wait and see, I guess. Earlier, we
played a clip of Chuck Schumer talking about how one
of the reasons that he wants that he's not fighting
this cr.
Speaker 3: Fighting you said, fighting civil war, civil.
Speaker 1: War, but one of the reasons is that he's worried
about the courts because, as he said, they Democrats are
using the courts like crazy to try to thwart basically
anything that Trump is trying to do, and unfortunately they
are having some success with that. And so yesterday there
was a federal judge who ordered six federal agencies to
reinstate thousands of terminated probationary employees. So all of the
cuts that happened thanks to Elon and Doge are getting undone.
This includes, unfortunately, USAID and Charlie Kirk was absolutely raging
about this yesterday and he tweeted Clinton appointee Judge William
Alsup says the Trump administration has to rehire thirty thousand
laid off probationary hires. He says that trying to cut
headcount is a sham and actually it's legally mandatory for
taxpayers to keep paying them. What will blue judges come
up with next? Will they order Trump to declare war
on Russia, micromanage troop movements, dictate what Trump eats for breakfast.
This is not judicial review. It is dictatorship by a
big ego with a gabble. Scotus must intervene.
Speaker 2: I have said, and you know yesterday you talked, you
and I talked about it. The way that this thing
is set up because of the bureaucracy, the fact that
the government's biggest lobbyist is government itself, that they have
put themselves in position through not just the unions, but
through contracts that are legally so tough to break that getting.
Speaker 3: Rid of so many of these people.
Speaker 2: And this is nothing new, by the way, every administration
that's tried to do anything has run into something like this,
and it has gotten much worse over the years because
they've made the contracts so much stronger and tighter. And
I said, you watch, he's going to run up to
bureaucracy in a way that the people have never seen before.
And we're going to get us a real look that
you're being essentially told you can't. And it's they're not
at will employees.
Speaker 3: They're not. This is the that's the thing.
Speaker 2: And these they not only they've got the unions, but
they're also these these contracts they have are so ironclad.
What did the judge said, it was a gimmick, And
he didn't say they couldn't be fired. He said, you
have to essentially, you know, you're going to have to
give a reason other than we're going to get rid
of this agency. Okay, why are you getting rid of
these people? Is kind of the what what it was?
But these this is all going to last months and
months and probably years, Oh my god, through the court systems.
Speaker 1: Then what what does it even mean to be probationary
if you're a government employee? What's the point of having
that word if you cannot be fired?
Speaker 2: You know what's weird too, some of these people probationary.
How long is the probationary period last? I think it's
a year, it's two years in some cases.
Speaker 1: Are you sick? That's crazy.
Speaker 3: Some of these people were in their second year.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, that's crazy. That's crazy. Well the Caroline
Lovett fired back as soon as this happened. She was
furious and rightly so, and so she made a statement saying, quote,
a single judge is attempting to unconstitutionally seize the power
of hiring and firing from the executive branch. The president
has the authority to exercise the power of the entire
executive branch. Singular district court judges cannot abuse the power
of the entire judiciary to thwart the president's agenda. If
a federal district court judge would like executive powers, they
can try and run for president themselves. The Trump administration
will immediately fight back against this absurd and unconstitutional order,
and I hope that they do because this is.
Speaker 2: But they knew this was ridiculous.
Speaker 3: They knew this was coming.
Speaker 2: They knew that the Democrats everybody does Democrat as a Republican.
Speaker 3: They all judge shop.
Speaker 2: Who's gonna get There's a reason that the Khalil is
in is in Louisiana, right, there's a reason he's there,
and he's not in.
Speaker 3: New Jersey or New York wherever everybody judge shops.
Speaker 2: But this is all needs to get done so it
can get to the Supreme Court and they can rule
on it.
Speaker 1: And and true, I mean, I just hope that has.
Speaker 2: Fat Well, it's got to be you know, there's there's
a way. It's got to be appealed to here, and
then it's got to be appealed to here.
Speaker 3: You know how it goes.
Speaker 2: It'sn't you know, it's and and and hope that they
take it too. It might be the other thing they
you know, I mean I think they will, uh, which
is good.
Speaker 3: I mean, you know, in theory, but you know.
Speaker 5: It is.
Speaker 2: Is all the things because not all of them have
the same contracts. Some of them are a little bit different.
But this fight is is is far from over, and
it is going to take a long time for these
things to work through. They're going to be fighting this
fight for months and months and months.
Speaker 1: Because for you as an employee, do you hang around
and wait or do you just go and get another
job where you know what I mean, Like, are all
these I'm sure the union is advising everybody to hang tight.
Speaker 2: Probably like you can only do that. Yeah, some of
them they're advising you hang tight. Other ones they may
say this is this is gonna you know, your contract's
not like theirs. But for the most part, a lot
of these these contracts are so ironclad and it is
like California here's a perfect example of if you guys
want know how strong unions are. The union in California
for teachers is so powerful that to fire a teacher.
And to go through all of that stuff cost about
a half a.
Speaker 3: Million dollars.
Speaker 2: And it takes anywhere between a year to thirty six months.
Speaker 1: That's ridiculous.
Speaker 2: And you know what they do with the teacher when
they say that, they move them into a place where
they all just go and sit there inside of the
place at the district where they don't teach anybody.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, that is infuriating.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's why they asked.
Speaker 2: I forgot who was one of their big administrators. So
there's a reason we don't fire people. It's just impossible.
Speaker 3: And so think about that on the federal level now.
And yeah, and.
Speaker 2: I don't want to be a dounter. I'm just looking
at it reality. I knew exactly was I said it
from day one. Don't sounds great, you're going to cut
around the edges, But when you want to get into
the meet, you're going to run into lawyer after lawyer,
lawsuit after lawsuit. And you know, money is cutting it
a little bit different, right, But the human you know,
because we're going to take this away, or we're going
to put it over here and implement it for something else,
or but there's no law for this. You know, there's
law for some of it, but there's no lawyer back
in that dollar up outside of a few things. But
when it comes to the people and the unions, you know, yeah.
Speaker 1: It is going to be a long fight. But I'm
still holding out hope because Trump's got lawyers too, I know.
Speaker 3: But I think, like everything we want it done today, Yeah,
I know.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. Problem with government is and which is also the
good thing that was set up with government is we
didn't want extremes running everything, so we wanted to have
checks and balances. But we didn't think checks and balances
was you know in situations it was going to end up.
Speaker 1: In a bureaucratic nightmare. Yeah. Have you been hearing this?
I mean, I'm sure you have. Like this whole Andrew
Tate story has become kind of a big story. There
are there are surprising conservatives who are platforming the Tate brothers.
Speaker 3: What's that He's a scumbag?
Speaker 1: Oh my god, he's the worst of the worst and
one of the people that's getting some flack for her
kind of over gushing about Andrew Tate as Alena Haba
the reason for my name today and back in early January.
I guess it was she popped on to the Benny
Johnson Show while Andrew Tate was on there like gushing
about what a huge fan she was, And now she's
getting a lot of pushback. Why are you? Why are
you fan girling over someone that vile? And you know,
regardless of what his how all of his criminal cases
turn out. Because I know there's investigations here, there, everywhere
about him, however those turn out, none of that even
matters when it just comes to what kind of a
person he is in general. All you need to do
is listen to words that have come out of his
own face, and you'll know that he is a complete scumbag.
So it is a little jarring to hear someone like
Alena going, oh my god, I'm such a fan. And
so yesterday but the Epic Times UH interviewed her to
push her on this and find out why she fangirled
the way that she did. I want to know if
you think what you think of her explanation. So first
you're going to hear the clip of her doing the fangirling,
and then yesterday's explanation.
Speaker 2: Oh nice to meet you.
Speaker 1: I'm a big fan.
Speaker 2: Well, nice to me, you're I'm a Flan, You're the
one saving Trump. You're doing work.
Speaker 16: The accusations against the Tape Brothers are stomach churning, they
are disturbing, and as I will say, you know, and
I've said many times since then, that is for the
court to handle and they should handle it.
Speaker 5: Basically.
Speaker 13: People have told me you said you're you're a fan
or something like that.
Speaker 16: Yeah, that was what I said, was it's it's it's
some great manipulation. So the Tape Brothers, you know, have
a tremendous social media presence in terms of in what
we were discussing were politics in the UK. He was
talking about running and I am always passionate about people
that are vocal against certain things.
Speaker 1: Now that is very separate.
Speaker 16: I want to be very clear than accusations of human trafficking,
accusations of anything, rape, whatever the accusations are against them,
you have to put that in one bucket. And that
really is a very disturbing charge. Now I don't know
the status of I'm also a lawyer. I know better
than to talk about somebody's case, but I will say
that it is there is no part of me that
condones at all that behavior.
Speaker 7: Buy it.
Speaker 3: No, I don't buy it.
Speaker 1: I don't either.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: Your credibility is every day is shrinking. And that is
I heard what you said. I'm a big fan. You
didn't say, I'm a big fan of the way that
you want to stand up for Western culture values except
for the fact that you like trafficking women in Romania allegedly.
Speaker 1: Allegedly.
Speaker 3: Well, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: He's not a trial here, so yeah, I mean to me,
it has nothing to do with the criminal accusations at all.
It's literally about the words that he has said. It's
about the way that he has talked about women, the
way that he has demeaned women, the way that he's
talked openly about having sex with women that are underage.
Now he can say that it was a joke, and
maybe it was, but the fact that he jokes about
it should put up red flags for people. And conservatives
right now are in this weird position where some of
them are defending him simply because he has said things
that they agree with, which is like saying, well, Hitler
loved dogs, I don't care. He was still a horrible, awful,
terrible person. That's how I feel about this guy. And
I could not believe it. When Alena was gushing over
him the way that she was, it was.
Speaker 2: Her excuse, her thing. It was, it was stupid, you're
not equating yourself. Well here, the two times i've seen
you in the last couple it's been awful. And he
is And if you guys don't know who Andrew Tate is,
he's young men like him And part of that's on
the culture of the fact that we've basically neutered young
men and now manage this guy's saying