Speaker 1: All right, you guys, it's happening. It's happening. Everybody stay calm.
Speaker 1: After yesterday's episode where we went kind of for the
Speaker 1: juggular with Turning Point USA, because really, I think everybody
Speaker 1: in the entire world has not enough with the non response,
Speaker 1: trying to move on, trying to gaslight us on answering
Speaker 1: basic details.
Speaker 2: So we just went for it.
Speaker 3: And guess what.
Speaker 1: Turning Point has moved to formally respond to all the
Speaker 1: things that we have said, And after a very long
Speaker 1: diatribe in which they wildly misrepresent the public and global
Speaker 1: investigation of Charlie kirk assassination, they at long last issued
Speaker 1: a public invitation or a challenge. I'm not sure what
Speaker 1: it is, but I accept, okay, quite literally all we
Speaker 1: have ever asked for sensible answers to our basic questions
Speaker 1: about what transpired on September tenth, And it looks like
Speaker 1: we're going to get those things.
Speaker 3: You've done. Fucked up, a ron, you made a huge
Speaker 3: calculation with this one. Look, a lot of people are
Speaker 3: sleeping on candise owans, A lot of people are thinking
Speaker 3: she talks about They just see the clips that go viral,
Speaker 3: so they're like, oh, she talks about how she got
Speaker 3: a message in her dreams and that's how she knows
Speaker 3: that Charlie has been tracked. There's a lot more to
Speaker 3: what she's been digging into over the past three months
Speaker 3: than just her dreams. I promise you that for those
Speaker 3: that have been watching, you already know. I'm not going
Speaker 3: to recap all of the ammunition that she has to
Speaker 3: bring into this fight. Let's just say they're in for it.
Speaker 3: They are in for a serious battle. She's basically female
Speaker 3: Johnny Cochran in her prime. She is ready to rumble,
Speaker 3: and she is absolutely on a mission. She has vengeance
Speaker 3: in her eyes, and I, for one support her in
Speaker 3: this endeavor. All that being said, Tim Poole is not
Speaker 3: liking it. Tim Poole, my buddy has been going absolutely
Speaker 3: ballistic against Candie Owans over the past two days. They
Speaker 3: got into a public beef today. And this is not
Speaker 3: just some pathetic ego battle. Is a much bigger thing,
Speaker 3: and I don't think people view it properly. So I'm
Speaker 3: going to give you my analysis as to why this matters,
Speaker 3: because it's actually a very big story and one that
Speaker 3: we ought to be paying attention to, not the least
Speaker 3: of which ought to be getting justice for Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 3: That is the highest priority. However, there are macro analysis
Speaker 3: things that are a lens that you should be looking
Speaker 3: at these things through or for. So we're going to
Speaker 3: start with this one. This is timpoole blaming Candace Owns
Speaker 3: for any failings of the Republican Party in the midterms.
Speaker 2: My coworkers are all in on the Charlie Kirk conspiracies.
Speaker 2: If the Republicans lose in the midterms, I believe that
Speaker 2: Candice Owens is wholly responsible. She is one of the
Speaker 2: biggest podcasts on the right doing everything to go to
Speaker 2: war with the organization that helped get Trump elected. Turning
Speaker 2: Point specifically was going out and registering people to vote
Speaker 2: without Charlie trouble. Turning Point needs to be able to
Speaker 2: go out and rally young people and register them to vote,
Speaker 2: and she's doing everything she can to destroy that, and
Speaker 2: that is going to I suppose it's going to rip
Speaker 2: out the coffers on the right. There is no organization
Speaker 2: like like Turning Point that exists anywhere else that has
Speaker 2: the resources and the reach, and without Charlie, I'm not
Speaker 2: sure that they can make it but I can tell
Speaker 2: you this, Candace lighting a Molotov and thrown it to
Speaker 2: the window is not helping, and it's it's the most
Speaker 2: demoralizing thing ever.
Speaker 3: So if the Republicans lose the mid terms, according to Timpoole,
Speaker 3: Candis Owans is holy to blame Holy. Let me correct that.
Speaker 3: And you know, as I've said countless times, Tim's my buddy.
Speaker 3: I liked him a lot. He couldn't be more wrong
Speaker 3: on this. I've watched Tim cast Irol the past two
Speaker 3: nights in a row, the full thing, just to get
Speaker 3: a full vibe, because I didn't want to go into
Speaker 3: this blind which I think a lot of people are
Speaker 3: doing when they criticize Canda owns they have not watched
Speaker 3: what she's been putting out, and yet they speak very
Speaker 3: authoritatively about what a nut case she is. And it's like,
Speaker 3: all right, Well, as soon as you say that, I
Speaker 3: know you haven't been watching, because if you had been,
Speaker 3: you would know that there is at least smoke there,
Speaker 3: whether or not there's fire TBD. But a major theme
Speaker 3: for timcust Irol over the past two days has been
Speaker 3: that ratings are down across the board for political commentary
Speaker 3: and Essentially, he seems to be blaming that on people
Speaker 3: like Candie Owans or I assume myself, or anybody who's
Speaker 3: been covering the assassination of Charlie Kirk, saying that it's
Speaker 3: essentially a distraction from what matters, which is the Republicans
Speaker 3: staying in power. So I've got a lot to say
Speaker 3: about this, because I think this is really a key
Speaker 3: thing that I think a lot of people like Tim,
Speaker 3: Benny Johnson, Posobic others are missing and I don't know why.
Speaker 3: So I hope I can help. So I'm gonna try,
Speaker 3: all right. First off, Donald Trump was an outsider. We
Speaker 3: didn't enter into the twenty fifteen sixteen election cycle saying
Speaker 3: what can we do to make sure that Republicans win.
Speaker 3: That's not how any of us were viewing things. I
Speaker 3: don't think Tim was viewing it that way. I'm pretty
Speaker 3: sure almost nobody was, especially like the day one Trump supporters,
Speaker 3: they all recognized that the GOP was controlled opposition. It
Speaker 3: didn't do anything. So who was absolutely crushing over the
Speaker 3: past year since Trump came into his second term, Cannice Owns, Tucker, Carls,
Speaker 3: Nick funt Is, Dave Smith. I've exploded in popularity. These
Speaker 3: are all people who are critical of the GOP. They're
Speaker 3: critical of Donald Trump. Did any or all I shouldn't
Speaker 3: say none of us, because Nick obviously didn't support Trump,
Speaker 3: but everybody else I think did vote for Trump. So
Speaker 3: we didn't go into this hating on Trump. Most of
Speaker 3: us aren't fond of the GOP, but we were all
Speaker 3: rooting for Trump. We were rooting for kind of a
Speaker 3: vengeance tour, something that would bring justice amongst immense injustice
Speaker 3: that transpired starting in twenty twenty in the last year
Speaker 3: of his presidency, but then transpiring throughout the Biden administration.
Speaker 3: We were like, we need massive vengeance on all of this,
Speaker 3: and when Donald Trump got into power, all of us
Speaker 3: naively expected it. We expected that Donald Trump would actually
Speaker 3: follow through. We expected that Cash Mattel and Dan Bongino
Speaker 3: and Pam Bondi, all of these people who represented themselves
Speaker 3: as outsiders and interested in justice, that they would actually
Speaker 3: deliver on these things. And if you listen to Timpoole
Speaker 3: or Pisobic or any of these people back then, they
Speaker 3: would sound how I sounded. The difference between us now
Speaker 3: is that instead of actually watching and critiquing and analyzing
Speaker 3: and recognizing that, oh, this is the GOP from twenty fifteen.
Speaker 3: This is the GOP who promises a lot, talks a
Speaker 3: lot of shit, and then delivers nothing. I mean, that's
Speaker 3: what they are. I mean, from the Epstein cover up,
Speaker 3: which was like the first major sign that Okay, there's
Speaker 3: something deeply awry here, but then bombing Iran. Now they're
Speaker 3: preparing for war with Venezuela. The deportations have been at
Speaker 3: a crawl. I mean, then the H one B scandal
Speaker 3: and basically increasing immigration but legal immigration, while not deporting
Speaker 3: even close to the amount that Joe Biden let in
Speaker 3: over his last term. You have the constant cow telling
Speaker 3: to bb net Yahoo in Israel, you have the constant
Speaker 3: cow telling to the military industrial complex and really just
Speaker 3: walking back all of his pain promises, the things that
Speaker 3: brought together this incredible coalition of disaffected Democrats but also
Speaker 3: libertarians and more of the populous right wing, the non
Speaker 3: interventionist camp. And it's like the reason that our numbers
Speaker 3: aren't sagging is because we're actually telling the truth about it.
Speaker 3: And for whatever reason, you now take it as your
Speaker 3: role to essentially what it looks like is to just
Speaker 3: carry water for them. The highest priority to Candice Owens
Speaker 3: right now is making sure that they have the right person,
Speaker 3: that they actually get justice for Charlie Kirk. You can say, oh,
Speaker 3: she's just grifting and she's throwing shade, and if you
Speaker 3: actually watched, I just don't know how you come to
Speaker 3: that conclusion. It's obvious that Charlie Kirk was one of
Speaker 3: her best friends, and she fucking believes to her core
Speaker 3: that the person who killed her friend is not in
Speaker 3: prison right now. She doesn't believe Tyler Robinson did it. Now.
Speaker 3: You don't have to agree with her, but to assume
Speaker 3: that she's just like making all of this up, I
Speaker 3: think is totally misguided. And this goes into part two
Speaker 3: of why I think numbers across the board, according to him,
Speaker 3: for political commentary are down is because so many of
Speaker 3: the old guard political commentators are not actually talking about
Speaker 3: what people are interested in for whatever reason. I mean,
Speaker 3: people are genuinely interested in the Charlie Kirk assassination, not
Speaker 3: because it's just some clickbait drama that doesn't matter, but
Speaker 3: because it matters tremendously, because it was the most high
Speaker 3: profile political assassination of our lifetimes. It was a guy
Speaker 3: that you knew. I mean, it's a guy that I
Speaker 3: kind of knew, but you really knew. So when your
Speaker 3: audience is going, hey, there's a lot of weirdness with
Speaker 3: this case that doesn't add up that we think that
Speaker 3: maybe the guy who's being held and tried for this
Speaker 3: may not have done it, or maybe at least he
Speaker 3: didn't work alone. And it's like, instead of just doing
Speaker 3: that digging alongside Candice, you've opted to go this antagonistic
Speaker 3: route where it's like, I have no interest in actually
Speaker 3: digging into this, and so your audience goes, well, I do.
Speaker 3: I do have interests, So I'm gonna go find someone
Speaker 3: who's actually digging. So that's why her numbers are exploding
Speaker 3: is because everybody has ran for the hills. Everybody has
Speaker 3: decided that they don't see any reason apparently to dig
Speaker 3: on this, as if suddenly overnight, because Cash matell and
Speaker 3: Dan Bongeno are in there, like now the FBI is
Speaker 3: some reputable organization, as if all of the political assassination
Speaker 3: history throughout American history, and the fact that it's always
Speaker 3: a narrative of a lone gunman and ten twenty thirty
Speaker 3: years later it becomes more and more evident that that
Speaker 3: was not what transpired from JFK, RFKMLK Charlie Kirk. So
Speaker 3: there's a reason that people are not watching. There's a
Speaker 3: reason that people are tuning out from just your standard
Speaker 3: MAGA is so good, Trump's so good commentary is because
Speaker 3: Trump isn't so good. Because Maga isn't so good. Mag
Speaker 3: is totally derailed and Canus Owens didn't do that. Donald
Speaker 3: Trump did it. And that's the other thing. So I
Speaker 3: watched your show for the past two nights, and as
Speaker 3: I said, you're my friend. I'm not trying to be
Speaker 3: a dick here, but I watched your show two nights
Speaker 3: in a row, now, front to back. There was no
Speaker 3: criticism Donald Trump. None. You were basically defending the boat
Speaker 3: strikes against the alleged Venezuelan drug dealers, which, by the way,
Speaker 3: let's just parse this out for a second. They want
Speaker 3: you to believe that there was a dozen guys on
Speaker 3: an outboard motor boat for drug trafficking. I mean, let's
Speaker 3: just think logically about what drug traffickers do when it
Speaker 3: comes to trafficking drugs. Do they fill up their boats
Speaker 3: when they're trying to make these very dangerous, very illicit,
Speaker 3: very profitable drug runs. Did they fill them up with
Speaker 3: twelve dudes or is it one or two guys to
Speaker 3: make a drop and then the rest of the boat
Speaker 3: is filled with drugs. It's usually the latter. So this
Speaker 3: argument that, but oh, we're just gonna I guess suddenly,
Speaker 3: even though we didn't trust Barack Obama, we didn't trust
Speaker 3: Joe Biden, we didn't trust George Bush, we didn't trust
Speaker 3: Bill Clinton, Donald Trump gets a pass. Tim's been great
Speaker 3: on covering the extra judicial murder from Barack Obama. He
Speaker 3: killed American citizen in Africa. I think it was Africa,
Speaker 3: maybe it was a Middle East, but Ala Lackey. It
Speaker 3: was the son of a terrorist and they just killed
Speaker 3: the kid. No trial, just lit him up. It's like suddenly,
Speaker 3: when Trump's doing it, it's okay. I'd say no, I'd
Speaker 3: say no, it's not. Actually, But getting back to the
Speaker 3: point that I was trying to make four hours. I
Speaker 3: watched for four hours and I couldn't find a single
Speaker 3: criticism of Trump or his entire administration. Now, I'm sure
Speaker 3: you've criticized them at some point over the past seven
Speaker 3: eight months, since he's been in power for ten months now.
Speaker 3: But if you're going to chastise and just go ballistic
Speaker 3: on candas Ow and saying that she's responsible for the
Speaker 3: downfall of the GOP, especially if they lose in the midterms,
Speaker 3: have nothing at all critical to say in those same
Speaker 3: two episodes towards Donald Trump or his entire administration, which
Speaker 3: have fallen fucking flat on their faces, have not delivered
Speaker 3: on their promises. And the voting public, the people who
Speaker 3: are actually paying attention, the people that you say are
Speaker 3: your audience, they notice these things. They're not buying into
Speaker 3: the fucking hype. They're not QAnon lunatics that just go, oh,
Speaker 3: trust the plan, it's coming. I'm sure. I'm sure he's
Speaker 3: going to abolish the income tax. That's what he said yesterday.
Speaker 4: Bob and I believe that at some point in the
Speaker 4: not too distant future, you won't even have income tax
Speaker 4: to pay, because the money would take it in is
Speaker 4: so great, it's so enormous that you're not going to
Speaker 4: have income tax to pay, whether you get rid of
Speaker 4: it or just keep it around for fun, or have
Speaker 4: it really low, much lower than it is now, but
Speaker 4: you won't be paying income tax.
Speaker 3: Oh, I think that we might abolished income text because
Speaker 3: we're taking so much in an in terifi bull shit.
Speaker 3: Everybody knows it. He's lying, and it's like that's what
Speaker 3: they're looking for. They're looking for honesty, they're looking for
Speaker 3: deep dives. And one other thing he says that people
Speaker 3: aren't interested in just political analysis. Wrong, absolutely wrong. Nick
Speaker 3: Fuentes will go on these twenty to thirty minute long
Speaker 3: diatribes where he is just parsing out and breaking down
Speaker 3: in a really eloquent and impressive fashion. Foreign policy. He
Speaker 3: will go through all of the wars that Israel has
Speaker 3: been in and our support and the intermingling or the
Speaker 3: intertwining of our military industrial complex, our DoD along with
Speaker 3: Masad or the IDF, and it's like it's very high level.
Speaker 3: This is as high level as I've seen. Honestly, when
Speaker 3: he talks about that foreign policy stuff. It is super quality.
Speaker 3: And he has the highest ratings probably or close to it,
Speaker 3: of any political commentator in the world right now. So
Speaker 3: please don't pretend is if the audience has just been
Speaker 3: so dumb down that they only turn into Nick fuentt
Speaker 3: is because he'll bag on women or black people or
Speaker 3: minorities or whatever. It's like, that's not the only enticing
Speaker 3: thing about the Nick Fuonte's program. He does really high
Speaker 3: level analysis, and I think his audience is better off
Speaker 3: because of it. So I don't appreciate the broad based
Speaker 3: criticism against the audience is if it's like a stand
Speaker 3: up comic lamenting the fact that the people didn't laugh, Like, well,
Speaker 3: the people didn't laugh because your joke sucked. Nick Fouant
Speaker 3: is giving the audience what they want, but more importantly,
Speaker 3: in my opinion, he's giving them what they actually need,
Speaker 3: which is genuine critiques, genuine honest analysis, his opinion as
Speaker 3: to Trump's failings, what is wrong with the Trump administration.
Speaker 3: Cannas Owns is doing the same thing. She's giving genuine
Speaker 3: critiques as to what is wrong with the investigation with
Speaker 3: the Charlie Kirk assassination. She is digging for truth. Nick
Speaker 3: Fouant is digging for truth. I try my best to
Speaker 3: dig for truth. If you think that your job suddenly
Speaker 3: shifted from being a truth teller and honestly analyzing and
Speaker 3: critiquing the regime, which the Donald Trump Round two is
Speaker 3: a regime, don't get it twisted. If you think that
Speaker 3: your job is to just make sure that you get
Speaker 3: them over in the midterms. I think you've lost sight
Speaker 3: of what makes our jobs important, what makes you special, tempoole,
Speaker 3: that you were a harsh critic of whoever was in power.
Speaker 3: You need to go back to that. And I say
Speaker 3: this as your friend. Your ratings will skyrocket if you
Speaker 3: actually tell the truth I got. I'm sorry for the
Speaker 3: long rant, but there's other clips that he said, so
Speaker 3: I want to show you some of that too.
Speaker 2: Additionally, all of the fucking cowards on the right who
Speaker 2: are too scared to say anything about her because she
Speaker 2: tweets at me talking shit or whatever, and then a
Speaker 2: bunch of people come and flood our chat. I could
Speaker 2: give a single flying fuck. You can come and you
Speaker 2: can burn everything I have to the ground, and I
Speaker 2: will happily live in a van down by the river.
Speaker 2: I don't care to be number one. I don't need
Speaker 2: to be number one. What I care about is what
Speaker 2: is true and what will help this country and what works.
Speaker 2: And she is a fucking scumbag, okay, and she's getting
Speaker 2: worse every day. And she crossed the line. She continually
Speaker 2: crosses the line every day. Insinuating the turning point literally
Speaker 2: killed the guy who made them all rich. At a
Speaker 2: certain point, I'm like, holy shit, we're gonna lose the midterms.
Speaker 2: We're gonna lose the midterms. Then we're gonna lose in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty eight. And it's because she's a piece of shit,
Speaker 2: because instead of saying, guys, let's come together and forgot
Speaker 2: to work together, she says the stupidest, retarded crap. And
Speaker 2: now everybody's running around divided and broken for what reason?
Speaker 3: Oh, I can answer that one. The reason is that
Speaker 3: she doesn't believe that Charlie Kirk's killer is in prison,
Speaker 3: and most of us don't feel that way either, at
Speaker 3: least we're not confident of that fact. And that is
Speaker 3: the reason. That is the reason that we're divided on
Speaker 3: that topic. The broader reason we're divided is because the
Speaker 3: Trump administration Round two fucking sucks. It fucking sucks. And
Speaker 3: let me also add the real reason I'm doing this episode.
Speaker 3: I was inspired by you saying all of these fucking
Speaker 3: cowards on the right who won't call out kind of zwns. Well,
Speaker 3: I thought to myself, I'm kind of being a coward.
Speaker 3: I'm being a coward because I won't call you up
Speaker 3: because I won't tell the truth about what I see happening.
Speaker 3: That I see a lot of people who were kind
Speaker 3: of the populous rebellion leaders when it comes to political commentary,
Speaker 3: and many of which helped kind of usher in Trump
Speaker 3: round two, have, instead of holding Trump to his promises,
Speaker 3: have decided that their primary job is to make sure
Speaker 3: that the Republicans, the Mike Johnson's of the world, and
Speaker 3: the Lindsay Grahams of the world stay in power. Now
Speaker 3: you may say, oh, I don't actually support Lindsey Graham.
Speaker 3: Of course you don't. Neither do I. But when you
Speaker 3: say we're gonna lose the midterms, sorry, Tim, ninety plus
Speaker 3: percent of the GOP fucking sucks and you know it.
Speaker 3: So if we lose the midterms, I don't care. What
Speaker 3: are they accomplishing. They have the Supreme Court, they have Congress,
Speaker 3: they have the Senate, they have the White House. They've
Speaker 3: got everything. Buddy, What are they fucking delivering to you?
Speaker 3: And yet you think that the reason that they might
Speaker 3: lose the midterms is because Candice Owns is concerned about
Speaker 3: who killed her friend. It's not that they've completely poached
Speaker 3: this that They've completely dropped the ball, that they have
Speaker 3: completely failed to deliver on anything that they prompt or
Speaker 3: almost anything that they promised. You think that the blame
Speaker 3: shouldn't be put at Donald Trump's feet, it should be
Speaker 3: put at Candis Owns feet. That's fucking crazy, that's totally wrong.
Speaker 3: And as I said, I watched your show the past
Speaker 3: two nights, all four hours of it, and there's nobody.
Speaker 3: There's nobody on your show making these points. Nobody, I
Speaker 3: mean you had. I watched ten different people talk. Nobody
Speaker 3: had any criticism of Trump's failings, nobody had any real
Speaker 3: support for what Candice Owns is doing. Almost nobody had anything,
Speaker 3: you know, skeptical to say about what actually transpired with
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk's murder. Ten people. And I think it's just
Speaker 3: reflective of the environment that you've created that they don't
Speaker 3: feel comfortable, because I just I find it very hard
Speaker 3: to believe that all of those people that were on
Speaker 3: the panel over the past two days, none of them
Speaker 3: had anything to fucking say in defense of like, yeah,
Speaker 3: thirty six through the neck, Like doesn't make sense to me. No,
Speaker 3: actually it doesn't make sense to me. Oh, why haven't
Speaker 3: they shown us the footage of Tyler Robinson in the
Speaker 3: prom position, why did they start the video right after
Speaker 3: that show? Why have we still not been shown that footage?
Speaker 3: Oh well, they're holding it for court. Oh sure, but
Speaker 3: are we going to actually see you that Well maybe
Speaker 3: maybe not, because maybe the court will actually keep cameras
Speaker 3: out of there. It's like, these are all things that
Speaker 3: I would expect you to be interested in, and yet
Speaker 3: you're angry at the people who are interested in, Like what,
Speaker 3: how is this make any sense?
Speaker 2: Now? Sit the point whereas video after video where she's
Speaker 2: saying it's an inside job, she's saying, like, there's a
Speaker 2: video of the dude Mikey McCoy grabbing his phone and
Speaker 2: making a phone call, and she's acting like that's weird.
Speaker 2: And then you get this other guy who's claiming that
Speaker 2: the business is a parking lot. Well, he full well
Speaker 2: knows business can be right showed anywhere. To be fair,
Speaker 2: it's not only just Candice and saying what she's saying.
Speaker 2: It is all of these people who are like piranhas
Speaker 2: ripping the right to shreds and you know what, a
Speaker 2: lot of cowards on the right being unwilling to say
Speaker 2: anything about it, well.
Speaker 3: I guess consider me a piranha because I'm not interested
Speaker 3: in protecting something that ought to be torn apart the GOP,
Speaker 3: the modern narration of the GOP under Donald Trump is
Speaker 3: hardly it's almost indistinguishable from the old Guard Bush era GOP.
Speaker 3: It's pathetically non different. Now, let's get to the elephant
Speaker 3: in the room, the real differentiator. When it comes to
Speaker 3: all of the voices who are ascendant, as I said earlier,
Speaker 3: Tucker Cannae, Nick Dave, they are across the board either
Speaker 3: hypercritical or at least Israel skeptical, and for whatever reason,
Speaker 3: even though I don't I believe you when you say
Speaker 3: that you're America. First, I believe that you're like you're
Speaker 3: broadly speaking, a non interventionist. But then when it comes
Speaker 3: to this ramp up for a war against Venezuela, you're
Speaker 3: more interested in defending Pete Hegseth. You're more interested in
Speaker 3: and I guess, I guess, defending these strikes on these boats,
Speaker 3: these extra judicial murders that are certainly not granted under
Speaker 3: any sort of War Powers Act because there is no
Speaker 3: war that's been declared, and these are things that normally
Speaker 3: you would be very harshly critical of if it was
Speaker 3: Joe Biden doing and I think you would be critical
Speaker 3: of it. But for whatever reason, because Trump's in power,
Speaker 3: suddenly it's okay. And I don't understand why. But the
Speaker 3: real elephant in the room is that your audience, young
Speaker 3: people across the board, have become increasingly skeptical of our
Speaker 3: relationship with Israel, and it's I mean, it obviously was
Speaker 3: catalyzed by the October seventh attacks, which then led to
Speaker 3: the multi year war of Israel just absolutely devastating the Palestinians.
Speaker 3: And throughout this again you criticized those who were skeptical
Speaker 3: of Israel's actions and essentially accused them of Israel derangement syndrome,
Speaker 3: me being one of them while I was on your show.
Speaker 3: And it's like, this is just not a way of
Speaker 3: genuinely analyzing and telling the truth about things. If you
Speaker 3: want to defend Israel, defend them, do it on the
Speaker 3: merits of what you see in front of you. And
Speaker 3: I think you can't. I think that's the truth, instead
Speaker 3: of actually taking the stand of like, Okay, I've analyzed this,
Speaker 3: I can't defend Israel. I can't defend what they've done
Speaker 3: they've bombed like six of their neighbors over the past
Speaker 3: two years after an attack from one terrorist group inside
Speaker 3: of Palestine, inside of Gaza. So for all of your
Speaker 3: your guests that have come on over the past two years,
Speaker 3: not all of them, but many of them have come
Speaker 3: on and have been critical, and I'll credit you for
Speaker 3: having those guests on, even though I have suddenly not
Speaker 3: been invited in fifteen months now. I don't know why,
Speaker 3: but regardless, it's like you've had dozens of guests who
Speaker 3: have been, in my opinion, appropriately critical of Israel, and
Speaker 3: oftentimes you would go into these diet tribes of how
Speaker 3: they have Israel derangement syndrome, and like, oh, grant you
Speaker 3: there are some people out there like that. There are
Speaker 3: people that just like anything that happens and they immediately
Speaker 3: go Israel. It's like, no, obviously, there's a lot of
Speaker 3: bad actors across the world, but I still feel like
Speaker 3: you haven't done your part of being honest about Israel's
Speaker 3: actual failings, what they've done that you view as being wrong.
Speaker 3: I think it would take it much more seriously when
Speaker 3: you say that people have Israel derangement syndrome. If I
Speaker 3: didn't feel as if you were essentially covering for a
Speaker 3: lot of Israel's bad actions, because they have done a
Speaker 3: lot of bad things. And it's not just you, it's
Speaker 3: your entire panel, this Elod guy who went absolutely nuclear
Speaker 3: on Candice Owns last night too, And it's like it
Speaker 3: just comes across like basically lukewarm Fox News at this point.
Speaker 3: And if that's your comfort zone, so be it. I'm
Speaker 3: not telling you what to do. I'm just telling you
Speaker 3: my opinion as someone who was a fan of yours
Speaker 3: and a fan of your show in the past, is like,
Speaker 3: I see a shift here that doesn't make sense to me.
Speaker 3: It seems as if you were off the beaten path.
Speaker 3: And this is across the board. This goes for Pacobic,
Speaker 3: this goes for Bennie Johnson. I mean, the reason that
Speaker 3: these other shows are ascended is because they are without
Speaker 3: fail right about these issues when it matters most, because
Speaker 3: they don't have any sacred they don't have anything that
Speaker 3: they're unwilling to touch. Like if Israel does something wrong,
Speaker 3: they say it. If Trump does something wrong, they say it.
Speaker 3: If I feel like you're doing something wrong, I'm saying
Speaker 3: it because you're saying all these fucking cowards on the right. Well,
Speaker 3: I'm not one. I'm not a coward. I believe that
Speaker 3: the truth is paramount to all of this, and I
Speaker 3: hope that it doesn't destroy our relationship because I do
Speaker 3: like you a lot, not sincere, but I have to
Speaker 3: be honest. I think that that's the reason that political
Speaker 3: commentary is down across the board. It's not though I've
Speaker 3: never been better by multiples. I've gone from like twenty
Speaker 3: thousand to one hundred thousand over the past sixty days.
Speaker 3: And it's not just because of the Candice Owans or
Speaker 3: the Charlie Kirk coverage. I've been covering a lot of
Speaker 3: other topics and those episodes crush because I am genuinely
Speaker 3: interested in the truth wherever it may lead me. And
Speaker 3: I think that's the problem, is that, for whatever reason,
Speaker 3: instead of just being interested in the truth wherever it
Speaker 3: may lead you, you're more interested in critiquing tho that
Speaker 3: are after the truth, arguing that in fact their actions
Speaker 3: are destroying the right.
Speaker 5: Wrong.
Speaker 3: The right is being destroyed because not enough people are
Speaker 3: doing the same thing, but not enough people are being
Speaker 3: honest about what is actually happening. That Donald Trump is compromised,
Speaker 3: that we are preparing for a regime change war in
Speaker 3: our hemisphere that will almost certainly be as disastrous as
Speaker 3: all of the regime change wars that happen in the
Speaker 3: Middle East.
Speaker 1: If it is found that survivors were actually killed while
Speaker 1: clinging onto that boat, should Secretary Headset, Admiral Bradley or
Speaker 1: others be punished.
Speaker 6: I think you're going to find that this is war,
Speaker 6: that these people were killing our people by the millions. Actually,
Speaker 6: if you look over a few years, I think last
Speaker 6: year we plus three hundred thousand people were killed, and
Speaker 6: very soon we're going to start doing it on land too.
Speaker 3: But here's the difference. The regime change wars that happen
Speaker 3: five thousand, six thousand miles away in Iraq or Libya
Speaker 3: or Syria, those refugees flood into Europe. Where do you
Speaker 3: think that Venezuelan and refugees are going to flood into?
Speaker 3: I would argue a lot of them are gonna end
Speaker 3: up in America. And if you're being honest about it,
Speaker 3: you know that Donald Trump has not been nearly aggressive
Speaker 3: enough when it comes to his deportation And if you're
Speaker 3: being honest about it, he has not been nearly aggressive enough.
Speaker 3: When it comes to going after the deep state. There
Speaker 3: has been one. There is one current outstanding prosecution against
Speaker 3: the deep state, John Bolton. The other two thrown out.
Speaker 3: There's one outstanding ten months in Pam BONDI is failing.
Speaker 3: Everybody can see it. She also absolutely lied through her
Speaker 3: fucking teeth. All the Epstein binders are on my desk,
Speaker 3: and here's the binders, and then no, there's actually nothing more,
Speaker 3: and then oh there is more, and here it is,
Speaker 3: and then but also it's going to be redacted for
Speaker 3: national security, and they're like, wait, why is child trafficking
Speaker 3: a national security issue. It's like the reason that my
Speaker 3: numbers are doing well is because I just tell it
Speaker 3: like it is, not because I'm putting out clickbait garbage,
Speaker 3: not because I'm digging into the Charlie Kirk assassination out
Speaker 3: of some sort of malice that I want to destroy
Speaker 3: TPUSA and I want to ensure that the GOP loses
Speaker 3: the midterms. I don't give a fuck if the GOP
Speaker 3: loses the mid terms. I could not care less. I
Speaker 3: only care that people who are actually committed to putting
Speaker 3: America first prevail. My entire energy unfortunately MTG step down,
Speaker 3: But Thomas Massey that's my number one focus. As long
Speaker 3: as I keep him in there in the midterms, that
Speaker 3: will be mission accomplished. And it would mean a lot
Speaker 3: to me if you, with your immense platform, would actually
Speaker 3: speak up in his defense. You know, he's a fucking
Speaker 3: good guy. You know, he's honorable, he's one of the
Speaker 3: best people we've got. And Donald Trump has, along with
Speaker 3: the Aedelsins and other billionaire scumbags who are also affiliated
Speaker 3: with the Epstein operation, have put up a twenty two
Speaker 3: million dollar bounty against him. So when you say, oh,
Speaker 3: we're gonna lose the midterms because of Cannis owns, well,
Speaker 3: but if we lose Thomas Massey because of you, should
Speaker 3: I then turn around and blame you for that?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 3: I won't, actually, because the blame lies at the top.
Speaker 3: The blame doesn't lie with the commentators who are pointing
Speaker 3: out things that you're uncomfortable with. The blame lies with
Speaker 3: the fact that Donald Trump is fucking compromised, that he
Speaker 3: is owned by his donors. And that's the whole reason
Speaker 3: that MTG resigned, probably because she was scared for her life,
Speaker 3: and that's the whole reason that there's this twenty two
Speaker 3: billion or million dollar bounty, primary bounty against the best
Speaker 3: congressman since Ron Paul. That's my focus.
Speaker 7: Well, for us, we'll release the Epstein files and finally
Speaker 7: drain the swamp. Awesome, finally justice. Here it comes the
Speaker 7: Epstein Files Phase one. We got all your favorite e
Speaker 7: celebs here. H don't you think that's a little tacky?
Speaker 7: I mean like this is an international child trap. The
Speaker 7: Epstein files are on my desk. Oh, that's great.
Speaker 8: That's great.
Speaker 7: That's that's what we've been waiting for. Well, oh, they
Speaker 7: don't exist. Wait what Yeah, the fcent files don't exist.
Speaker 7: They're Democrat hoax. But you just said, hey, what the fuck,
Speaker 7: that's my wallet? Sorry, Israel needs new weapons. Bye, as
Speaker 7: what do you want, democrat? Well, for us, why what
Speaker 7: do you have to offer?
Speaker 5: Hey, that's my wallet again?
Speaker 8: What are you people doing?
Speaker 7: Sorry, Israel needs new weapons?
Speaker 3: Bye? Are showing heads numbers down? No? No, they're not
Speaker 3: a million to two million views sometimes more every single episode.
Speaker 3: It's crazy. But what's the tie that binds here? She's populous? Left.
Speaker 3: The tie that binds is obviously one thing. There are
Speaker 3: no sacred cows. Did she then pivot to saying, oh,
Speaker 3: you just got to make sure that the Democrats one
Speaker 3: of the midterms. She doesn't give a fuck, just like
Speaker 3: I don't give a fuck. All I care about are
Speaker 3: honorable people prevailing. And if we don't have an honorable
Speaker 3: person that's on offer. Am I going to just sacrifice
Speaker 3: my soul to make sure that Mike Johnson's in the
Speaker 3: world stay in power? The answer is no, I have
Speaker 3: no interest in defending those people. So, yeah, if I
Speaker 3: am responsible for destroying the right, it's overt, not covert.
Speaker 3: I'm telling you exactly how I feel. These people don't
Speaker 3: represent us, the vast majority of them. This is the
Speaker 3: other thing that you guys never talk about. Eighty percent
Speaker 3: of Congress bipartisan over eighty percent take money from Israel
Speaker 3: affiliated political action committees. These people do not represent us.
Speaker 3: So if you're gonna ask me if I'm gonna lose
Speaker 3: any sleep that the GOP might lose in the mid
Speaker 3: terms when they have all of the branches of power
Speaker 3: and yet they don't deliver anything, Now, why should I care?
Speaker 3: And everybody at home is thinking the same thing, rightfully,
Speaker 3: that they shouldn't care because these people don't represent us.
Speaker 3: So the people that they're going to be paying attention to,
Speaker 3: the people whose numbers are going to increase, are those
Speaker 3: that are telling the truth about that actually say yeah,
Speaker 3: this isn't tribal actually, and if it is tribal at all,
Speaker 3: it's Americans like, do you represent my tribe aka America?
Speaker 3: And eighty percent of them don't, both sides of the
Speaker 3: political aisle. And that is the conversation we ought to
Speaker 3: be having. And if you're losing any sleep over the midterms,
Speaker 3: I would encourage you not to. These people are not
Speaker 3: our allies. I know you know that, Tim, I know
Speaker 3: you know. And just to show you I'm not making
Speaker 3: this up about funt Is, check this clip out.
Speaker 5: You have the rise of Germany, which is what creates
Speaker 5: World War one world War two, and the United States rise.
Speaker 5: It's the occasion it becomes a superpower. But then we're
Speaker 5: locked in this contest with the Soviet Union and basically
Speaker 5: the United States doesn't know the end of war for
Speaker 5: seventy years. In nineteen ninety one, you have what they
Speaker 5: now call the unipolar moment, which is that the United
Speaker 5: States enjoys more relative power, a bigger advantage over every
Speaker 5: other country put together then maybe any country has in history,
Speaker 5: no other country has had that kind of pre eminence.
Speaker 5: But what happens after nine to eleven is that we
Speaker 5: begin to squander that advantage. Rather than take the peace dividend,
Speaker 5: which is we don't have to fight the Soviet Union,
Speaker 5: we don't have to build a giant nuclear arsenal, we
Speaker 5: don't have to have a giant military anymore. Rather than
Speaker 5: take this peace dividend and invest it into America, reinvest
Speaker 5: in our people, in our infrastructure, in our industry, we
Speaker 5: start to do the opposite, and so we go to
Speaker 5: war in Afghanistan, then we go to war in Iraq,
Speaker 5: hundreds of thousands of troops in the Middle East with
Speaker 5: a dozen strategic objectives. We're going to topple Saddam, then
Speaker 5: we're going to build a democracy. You go from having
Speaker 5: more power relative power than any civilization in history, winning
Speaker 5: a century of nuclear war, only to blow it and
Speaker 5: then maybe lose twenty years later. That was the worst
Speaker 5: policy mistake of all time.
Speaker 3: You know what that clip reminds me of. Reminds me
Speaker 3: of this guy named Clint who went on Timkast after
Speaker 3: Russia invaded Ukraine. After reading Scott Horton's incredible book provoked
Speaker 3: and laid out basically the same story the unipolar moment,
Speaker 3: that America had an opportunity to create basically peace on
Speaker 3: Earth for quite some time, as well as incredible, immense
Speaker 3: prosperity for the American people, and instead of embracing that
Speaker 3: and trying to make that permanent or at least hold
Speaker 3: on to it for as long as possible, we wasted
Speaker 3: all of it on consistent militarism and intervention, largely on
Speaker 3: behalf of Israel for the next twenty plus years. But
Speaker 3: it didn't just start after Russia invaded. The BS about
Speaker 3: Ukraine has been persistent for decades. I can I go
Speaker 3: on a rant, Yeah, briefly, all right. So, first off,
Speaker 3: the World Bank and the IMF absolutely destroyed Russia in
Speaker 3: the nineteen nineties, And I didn't know anything about this
Speaker 3: until I read Scott's book. But after the fall of
Speaker 3: the USSR, the West broadly, but obviously America, being the
Speaker 3: leader of the West, had such an incredible opportunity to
Speaker 3: look at their fallen foe and say, we're going to
Speaker 3: welcome you into the capitalist West. Because most people don't
Speaker 3: know this, but the Russian people after the fall of communism,
Speaker 3: were extraordinarily open to the idea of capitalism because they
Speaker 3: were like, well that sucked, let's give this a go.
Speaker 3: And instead of welcoming them with open arms, they were
Speaker 3: just kicked in the teeth repeatedly by the West and
Speaker 3: George Bush's administration, Bill Clinton's administration, George Bush's junior's administration.
Speaker 3: Year after year, you had both Yeltsin as well as
Speaker 3: Putin that requested if they could be added to the
Speaker 3: UN or excuse me, to NATO. They were laughed off,
Speaker 3: never even given a consideration. And the only requirement that
Speaker 3: Putin put on it was that he wanted to not
Speaker 3: have to wait in the normal line, which, obviously, as
Speaker 3: a nation with over six thousand nuclear weapons, you might
Speaker 3: want to go like, all right, yeah, we won't make
Speaker 3: you wait. Is a very thousand nois as far as
Speaker 3: I know, it's six thousand. But the reason he didn't
Speaker 3: want to wait is because the hardliners in Russia that
Speaker 3: were so anti West probably would have toppled him in
Speaker 3: that interim. So he's just like, look, slap us in
Speaker 3: a NATO. He didn't have the time to win. Yeah,
Speaker 3: He's like, I can't wait if you want me in there,
Speaker 3: put me in there. Let's just accept the fact that
Speaker 3: we are European. And what do they do instead? They
Speaker 3: alienate and they drive them into back to back depressions
Speaker 3: over a three year period that greatly diminishes the life
Speaker 3: expectancy of the Russian people. I'm talking late nineties. I
Speaker 3: was a kid at the time. I had no idea
Speaker 3: any of this was transpiring. And then as a byproduct
Speaker 3: of this, you now have driven Russia not only into
Speaker 3: war that could have been avoided if our lunatic State
Speaker 3: Department hadn't been involved, but also into the arms of
Speaker 3: the CCP, the communists, who also have nuclear weapons, and
Speaker 3: oh might I add over a billion people and we
Speaker 3: risk World War three now when none of this had
Speaker 3: to happen.
Speaker 2: So you're correct, they have and seventy seven it was
Speaker 2: at their peak, the Soviet Union had forty five thousand.
Speaker 3: Yes, And that was the other thing that they were doing.
Speaker 3: They were cutting back on their nuclear arsenal, They ended
Speaker 3: the Warsaw pack, they were doing all of these signs
Speaker 3: of good faith, and instead of treating them with any
Speaker 3: sort of respect as a nuclear power, they were just
Speaker 3: laughed off and abused, and like this is not to
Speaker 3: justify or write off Putin's responsibility in the death of
Speaker 3: countless Ukrainians and it's absolutely tragic, but to write off
Speaker 3: the West responsibility in this and the US, specifically the
Speaker 3: Bill Clinton administration, which gets a total clean bill of health.
Speaker 3: No one even pays attention to what the Clinton administration
Speaker 3: did to them during that period, but they, along with
Speaker 3: the IMF and the World Bank, absolutely destroyed Russia and
Speaker 3: they laid the groundwork for a nationalistic rise of a
Speaker 3: strong man like Vadimir Putin. To people start to tune
Speaker 3: into Nick Flint is because he's just this hate longer
Speaker 3: and he's got nothing of value to say, or do
Speaker 3: they stick around because he's got information like that, because
Speaker 3: he's got some really interesting, truthful things to say too,
Speaker 3: amongst the hilarity of him dragging minorities or whatever. It's like,
Speaker 3: there's more to him than meets the eye. And I
Speaker 3: know you know that. And while this has seemed as
Speaker 3: if this is just a direct response to you, this is,
Speaker 3: as I said earlier, this is more of a macro analysis.
Speaker 3: This is the bigger problem that we're facing right now,
Speaker 3: is that so many of the people. So many of
Speaker 3: the independent political commentators who were just like me a
Speaker 3: couple of years ago, who were telling the truth about
Speaker 3: whatever they saw happening, now see themselves as being essentially
Speaker 3: apparatics to the Trump administration. That they have to make
Speaker 3: sure that the GOP wins in the midterms, that that's
Speaker 3: priority number one. That is not our priority. And if
Speaker 3: that's your priority, that's okay, but it shouldn't be. And
Speaker 3: I hope you'll reconsider, because I think what matters more
Speaker 3: than that is making sure that we hold the powerful
Speaker 3: to account, that we hold the FBI to account when
Speaker 3: they give us a bullshit narrative that has holes fucking
Speaker 3: as wide as a thirty o six wound in it,
Speaker 3: that we demand better, that we demand disclosure when you
Speaker 3: have promises made by the Trump administration, including many of
Speaker 3: his second and third in commands Bondie Bongino Patel, that
Speaker 3: when they make promises and then they failed to deliver,
Speaker 3: you don't chastise me or Thomas Massey. And I'm not
Speaker 3: saying you've done that. I'm just saying focus your ire
Speaker 3: where it's deserved, that it should be focused just like
Speaker 3: a needle point right on the people who lied to us,
Speaker 3: who promised these things and got into power based off
Speaker 3: of lies. Fuck these people, and you don't reflect the
Speaker 3: anger towards them. You reflect the anger towards Candice Owans
Speaker 3: because she's doing great numbers. That's the beef. What's the
Speaker 3: priority here? It doesn't add up, it doesn't make sense,
Speaker 3: and it comes across in a very bad way just
Speaker 3: being totally honest about it. And here's the thing. At
Speaker 3: the end of the day, I believe that you and
Speaker 3: I want the same thing. I believe that you want
Speaker 3: to make America great again just as much as I do.
Speaker 3: And I believe that we have similar, not identical, but
Speaker 3: similar prescriptions on how to do that. But I think
Speaker 3: that neither of us will succeed in that if we
Speaker 3: are caught up fighting amongst ourselves, if we are caught
Speaker 3: up wasting our times criticizing Candice Owans because she is
Speaker 3: interested sincerely in finding out who killed one of her
Speaker 3: best friends, whereas our energy ought to be focused, in
Speaker 3: my opinion, and it sounds as if in yours as well,
Speaker 3: on what really matters, which is making sure that the
Speaker 3: people who were elected and put into positions of power
Speaker 3: fucking deliver and if you're just interested in making sure
Speaker 3: that the people that we put into power stay in power,
Speaker 3: well then they're not going to deliver because we don't
Speaker 3: owe them shit they owe us. And I hope that
Speaker 3: message is clear. It's a problem that these people who
Speaker 3: we some of us vouch for, Like I, for one,
Speaker 3: I said that, you know, I had done that panel
Speaker 3: with Brett Weistein and Angel mccartal and Cashptel a little
Speaker 3: over a year ago, and I said, I met him,
Speaker 3: we talked on stage, we talked off stage, and I
Speaker 3: was hopeful, you know, like he's I'm doing a panel
Speaker 3: with this guy and we're talking about how to defeat
Speaker 3: the deep state. And then I hear his name floated
Speaker 3: as like he's gonna be the head of the FBI.
Speaker 3: Like wait, wait, a guy who did a panel with
Speaker 3: me about how to defeat the deep state is going
Speaker 3: to be the head of the FBI. All right, I'm
Speaker 3: in let's see what he does. But it's like that
Speaker 3: only goes so far. You've been in power for ten months.
Speaker 3: You've lied through your fucking teeth time and time and
Speaker 3: time again, provably so which I've demonstrated in prior episode.
Speaker 3: You can go back and look at them if you want.
Speaker 3: He absolutely lied to Joe Rogan absolutely lied, So you know,
Speaker 3: I didn't really doubt whether or not Epstein unlived himself.
Speaker 3: It's like, this dude's a fucking liar. He's a liar.
Speaker 3: Trump's a liar, and his administration is filled with fucking liars,
Speaker 3: and your audience, our audience, everybody who's interested in political
Speaker 3: commentary is just looking for honesty about this. They just
Speaker 3: want to know that when you see someone lying, are
Speaker 3: you gonna call it out or not. The reason I've
Speaker 3: rided so hard for Thomas Massey is because he fucking
Speaker 3: tells the truth over and over and over again. He's
Speaker 3: the only guy since Ron Paul that I've seen who
Speaker 3: I've never caught a lie. Is just like true blue.
Speaker 3: He says it, he does it, or he tries his hardest,
Speaker 3: and if he fails, he says why. Like nothing is
Speaker 3: happening in the Trump administration and you and Posobic and
Speaker 3: Benny Johnson have immense reach, especially with Charlie Kirk tragically passing.
Speaker 3: To basically do the heroic, courageous shit that Charlie Kirk
Speaker 3: did in private, you don't even have to do it publicly.
Speaker 3: You don't have to do it on your show. But
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk went into the White House three months before
Speaker 3: he died tragically and he said, don't go to war
Speaker 3: with Iran. That is courage. That's speaking truth of the power,
Speaker 3: that's holding the Trump administration to their promises. Now, did
Speaker 3: it prevent them from bombing them? No, it didn't. I
Speaker 3: wish it had. But maybe maybe it provounded a ground invasion.
Speaker 3: Maybe Charlie Kirk saved American lives with that one act
Speaker 3: of courage, and maybe it cost him his That's also
Speaker 3: a possibility. So I think and that it may be
Speaker 3: this simple. Maybe maybe Posobic and you and Benny are
Speaker 3: all afraid. Maybe you all suspect the same things that
Speaker 3: Cannie Owens does, but you don't want to talk about it.
Speaker 3: That you want to move on because it's it's scary,
Speaker 3: because it's dangerous. I don't know. Maybe, or maybe you
Speaker 3: genuinely just trust Cash betelling Dan Bongino because you've talked
Speaker 3: to them in the past. But let me just tell you,
Speaker 3: if you fucking actually pay attention to the stuff that
Speaker 3: Candice has dug into, I'd say probably half of it
Speaker 3: I think is totally nonsense. I personally don't think that
Speaker 3: France is behind this. I could be wrong, but I
Speaker 3: think that there's a lot of things that she has
Speaker 3: gone into that are definitely of value, particularly the group chats,
Speaker 3: particularly if she's right, which she has tripled and quadrupled
Speaker 3: down on this. That the day before Charlie was taken out,
Speaker 3: he texted many people in TPUSA and he said they're
Speaker 3: gonna kill me, and the implication was tomorrow, and then
Speaker 3: his life was taken the next day. I don't think
Speaker 3: that that's nothing. I think that matters a lot, and
Speaker 3: I think that this sit down between Candice Owns and
Speaker 3: the TPUSA people will be exactly what this country needs.
Speaker 3: No cowardice, no carrying water, just fucking talent like it is,
Speaker 3: asking hard sincere questions face to face and then answering
Speaker 3: them in response. That is how we progress. And for
Speaker 3: the record, that's how you keep the right together. You
Speaker 3: don't keep the right together by criticizing and chastising and
Speaker 3: blasting those that are demanding the truth, that are demanding answers.
Speaker 3: You keep the right together by giving answers, by getting answers,
Speaker 3: by demand answers, by demanding that the right deliver on
Speaker 3: what they promised us. And if they don't deliver on
Speaker 3: what they promised us, they deserve to lose, and they
Speaker 3: should and they shall. And that's a good thing. That's healthy.
Speaker 3: Fuck these people, they don't represent us. Get the fuck out,
Speaker 3: go home, go get your board seat on Boeing or whatever.
Speaker 3: But don't don't expect us to just vote for you
Speaker 3: because Donald Trump tells us to. Just yesterday, this Tennessee
Speaker 3: congressman barely wins after Trump carried the state by like
Speaker 3: twenty five points or something crazy. This guy barely wins.
Speaker 3: And I go through his website and what's it say?
Speaker 3: Sure shit, you know, he's like, I'm going to carry
Speaker 3: forward the America First mantra of Donald Trump. But then
Speaker 3: it goes you scroll down, it's like, what's he say
Speaker 3: about Israel? Israels are great as all. I'm gonna make
Speaker 3: sure I'll continue to make sure that they have as
Speaker 3: much weapons as they need and blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 3: It's like, fuck that, I'm done with that paradigm. And
Speaker 3: Nick Fuent, this is done with that paradigm. And Dave
Speaker 3: is done with that paradigm. In Cannas and Tucker. They're
Speaker 3: all done with that paradigm.
Speaker 8: They are enemies of Western civilization. Who who are these people?
Speaker 8: Are they the Muslims, or they the Jews, or they
Speaker 8: you know whatever? People have always No, No, they're not
Speaker 8: the Muslims, They're not the Jews, They're not the Blacks
Speaker 8: or not whatever group you're blaming. They're any individual who
Speaker 8: doesn't acknowledge the human soul period that the rights begin
Speaker 8: and end with the individual, not the group. Therefore, an
Speaker 8: attack on Western civilization looks like this. It's tribalism, it's
Speaker 8: identity politics, it's dei, it's whatever. It's Zionism, it's it's
Speaker 8: any belief system that begins with the understanding that one
Speaker 8: group is morally superior to other groups. We don't think
Speaker 8: in terms of groups, as Christians or Westerners. We think
Speaker 8: in terms of the individual. It's literally that simple. What
Speaker 8: does it mean to defend the West? I'm a Wester,
Speaker 8: you know, Yeah, I'm a defender the Western of Western civilization. No,
Speaker 8: you're its enemy. Of course, you're literally its main enemy.
Speaker 8: Why because I don't like it has nothing to do
Speaker 8: with that. The reason and Yahoo is an enemy of
Speaker 8: Western civilization is because he believes and has said out loud,
Speaker 8: that we're fighting these people because of how they were born,
Speaker 8: because of their inherent evil. We don't believe in that.
Speaker 8: We believe every person is inherently flawed but salvageable because
Speaker 8: God made every person.
Speaker 3: The American people are done with that paradigm, and that
Speaker 3: includes the right wing. That's right, that's left, that's populous.
Speaker 3: That's the energy, that's where it's at. That's where the
Speaker 3: audience is, that's where the numbers are, that's where the
Speaker 3: clicks are. That's not about chasing clicks. That's about telling
Speaker 3: the fucking truth that we are fucking compromised, that our
Speaker 3: political elites are compromised, and all people want is for
Speaker 3: us all to tell the truth about it. So I
Speaker 3: hope you will loveybody at libertylock pot on X. If
Speaker 3: you want to support my work, subscribe there. I'll fall
Speaker 3: you back libertylockdown dot locals dot com. You can also
Speaker 3: support me there or go to my pullow dot communi's
Speaker 3: promo code lockdown get you some cozy from Mike Lindell
Speaker 3: who apparently he's running for governor or some shit. I
Speaker 3: heard that yesterday. I don't know where anyways, Good luck, Mike.
Speaker 3: I hope you win. As I keep telling you guys,
Speaker 3: the numbers are absolutely just insane on Spotify. So if
Speaker 3: you're listening on Spotify right now, please make sure you subscribe.
Speaker 3: If you're audio listener, hop over to YouTuber rumble and
Speaker 3: subscribe there. If your a viewer, hop over to your
Speaker 3: audio podcasters and subscribe there. Is just making sure that
Speaker 3: you don't miss an episode because a lot of times
Speaker 3: alerts get buried and things like that. So it's just
Speaker 3: very helpful if you have all of the avenues. And
Speaker 3: then last but not least, tell your mama, tell your kids,
Speaker 3: hide your wives, hedge your husbands, and tell them to subscribe. Actually,
Speaker 3: don't tell them shit. Just pick up their phone, go
Speaker 3: to their YouTube or whatever. Search Liberty Lockdown, Clint Russell, Hi,
Speaker 3: that's me, and then subscribe and then hit alert and
Speaker 3: then leave a comment and the hit like button and
Speaker 3: just make them into a fan, whether they want to
Speaker 3: or not, because that's funny. All right, guy? Please, Last
Speaker 3: night I was on my buddy Clint Russell's podcast, Liberty
Speaker 3: Locked Out. Clint Russell, by the way, criminally underrated. He's great,
Speaker 3: so It was me, him and Ian Carroll and we
Speaker 3: did yeah yeah s,