1
00:00:00,400 --> 00:00:03,120
Speaker 1: All right, is that time of year. It is finally

2
00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:07,719
here Draft Day and we are here to talk about

3
00:00:07,719 --> 00:00:09,400
it with you folks on the Matt Thomas Show with

4
00:00:09,640 --> 00:00:13,320
Ross with Shane Hallam. We oh, thank him draft Strucks.

5
00:00:13,359 --> 00:00:14,279
We do need to thank him.

6
00:00:14,679 --> 00:00:15,039
Speaker 2: Shane.

7
00:00:15,080 --> 00:00:16,640
Speaker 1: Is like, before we get to the nuts and bolts

8
00:00:16,640 --> 00:00:19,800
of it, we have tried for many weeks to get

9
00:00:19,839 --> 00:00:22,039
people on the show and you are available nice enough

10
00:00:22,039 --> 00:00:24,239
to come out. So thank you to Houston from us

11
00:00:24,320 --> 00:00:26,199
for coming on the show. I know you've been busy time.

12
00:00:26,399 --> 00:00:29,280
How are you, sir? Thank you for being on our program.

13
00:00:29,719 --> 00:00:32,280
Speaker 2: Oh no, I appreciate you guys having me. It's like

14
00:00:33,119 --> 00:00:36,000
Christmas Eve here. You know. I'm just waiting to wake

15
00:00:36,079 --> 00:00:38,240
up and open the Presence and in a couple hours

16
00:00:38,240 --> 00:00:39,719
so I'm pumped up. All right.

17
00:00:39,759 --> 00:00:41,320
Speaker 1: So before we get to the to the nuts and

18
00:00:41,320 --> 00:00:43,200
bolts of the Texans and what they should be doing,

19
00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:46,000
how do you set up your day? You're in front

20
00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:49,359
of a television, you are making some phone calls. First

21
00:00:49,359 --> 00:00:51,520
of all, just generally speaking, do you think there's going

22
00:00:51,560 --> 00:00:54,000
to be a massive amount of up and down with

23
00:00:54,119 --> 00:00:57,240
guys and teams shifting draft oders or do you think

24
00:00:57,240 --> 00:00:58,679
things will stay pretty much sedentary.

25
00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:03,240
Speaker 2: I think we're going to see some movements just because

26
00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:06,519
this draft really falls off after the top three picks.

27
00:01:06,680 --> 00:01:09,000
I think maybe teams have kind of a second tier

28
00:01:09,519 --> 00:01:12,799
there in that four through twelve range. I think it's

29
00:01:12,799 --> 00:01:15,560
where you'll see some teams that jump up from maybe

30
00:01:15,640 --> 00:01:19,200
the late teams early twenties into that top twelve, and

31
00:01:19,239 --> 00:01:21,040
then I think it will kind of settle down. Then

32
00:01:21,079 --> 00:01:23,799
we get late in the first teams are going to

33
00:01:23,879 --> 00:01:25,760
be hitting the end of the who they great as

34
00:01:25,840 --> 00:01:28,280
first round draft picks, and that's when you see those

35
00:01:28,280 --> 00:01:30,599
teams popping. We saw last year the last two picks

36
00:01:30,760 --> 00:01:33,519
the first round. We're trade ups from the second round,

37
00:01:33,640 --> 00:01:35,879
so I think that might happen again tonight.

38
00:01:36,439 --> 00:01:38,159
Speaker 1: Yeah, and Shane, I'm also going to ask you just

39
00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:40,359
in general this draft, how do you see it in

40
00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:44,239
terms of it being top heavy players that you have

41
00:01:44,359 --> 00:01:48,000
with the first round grade and some positions of strength

42
00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:49,120
and weakness in this draft.

43
00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:52,920
Speaker 2: I think it's top heavy. I think there's kind of

44
00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:55,480
a big three in this draft. We have cam Ward

45
00:01:55,480 --> 00:01:58,840
who's obviously going to go number one, Travis Hunter, the

46
00:01:58,959 --> 00:02:02,200
receiver corner from Colorado who's probably going to go number two,

47
00:02:02,239 --> 00:02:04,159
and then I'm dum Carter of the edge from Penn State.

48
00:02:04,239 --> 00:02:06,200
It's probably going to go number three. I think those

49
00:02:06,239 --> 00:02:10,159
guys are the elite prospects in this draft. And then honestly,

50
00:02:10,199 --> 00:02:12,719
from there it really falls off. You know, Ashton Jt,

51
00:02:12,759 --> 00:02:14,840
the running back from Boise State, if he wasn't a

52
00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:17,280
running back, I think would be in that conversation. But

53
00:02:17,400 --> 00:02:19,719
positional value, you know we're hearing he's probably going to

54
00:02:19,759 --> 00:02:22,240
go in the top five. Because after those big three

55
00:02:22,520 --> 00:02:24,240
it kind of falls off. I mean, I think it's

56
00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:28,840
a strong draft in certain areas. Running back, offensive line,

57
00:02:29,039 --> 00:02:33,120
corner are all pretty strong, but not you know, not

58
00:02:33,199 --> 00:02:36,280
necessarily players that you look at and you say, wow,

59
00:02:36,280 --> 00:02:39,319
this is a blue chip, can't miss prospect. Everyone kind

60
00:02:39,319 --> 00:02:41,479
of has flaws after those top three, and that's what

61
00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:42,800
makes this draft difficult.

62
00:02:43,280 --> 00:02:45,960
Speaker 1: Shane, if the Texas day at twenty five, would you

63
00:02:46,039 --> 00:02:50,479
be satisfied with a potential tackle guard available to them

64
00:02:50,599 --> 00:02:52,520
or do you think if they really want to make

65
00:02:52,560 --> 00:02:55,639
a difference maker get a guy that could start potentially

66
00:02:55,680 --> 00:02:57,879
Week one, they've got to move up in the draft.

67
00:02:59,400 --> 00:03:01,960
Speaker 2: I think it's want that difference maker. He has to

68
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:06,319
move up probably for Kelvin Banks out of Texas or

69
00:03:06,960 --> 00:03:10,759
Arma Membo out of Missouri, and those two are projected

70
00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:12,919
to go in the top twelve. So I think if

71
00:03:12,919 --> 00:03:16,000
Houston's probably making those calls gauging how much it would take.

72
00:03:16,599 --> 00:03:18,639
And you know, we know that the next area has

73
00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:21,199
been aggressive in the past, so it certainly could happen.

74
00:03:21,919 --> 00:03:24,680
But I'm kind of comfortable with the choices they may have.

75
00:03:24,800 --> 00:03:28,439
Josh Connery, the tackle from Oregon, maybe doesn't have this

76
00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:31,879
kind of upside that those top guys have, but it

77
00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:35,240
really rock solid in a major program going up against

78
00:03:35,280 --> 00:03:38,000
pass rushers that are going to get drafted today and tomorrow.

79
00:03:38,680 --> 00:03:41,800
I'd be comfortable with taking him. I think Josh Simmons,

80
00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:43,719
the off stack of Ohio State, it really depends on

81
00:03:43,759 --> 00:03:46,479
the medical on his knee that he injured this year

82
00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:49,439
is a pretty devastating injury. So you could have those

83
00:03:49,479 --> 00:03:51,840
options sitting there. The question is do you want to

84
00:03:51,879 --> 00:03:53,719
wait and maybe just see those off of the tackles

85
00:03:53,719 --> 00:03:55,639
fly off the board and get stuck. Yeah.

86
00:03:55,639 --> 00:03:58,080
Speaker 1: And another position of need that the Texans a lot

87
00:03:58,080 --> 00:04:01,280
of people have them getting mocked is wide receiver. How

88
00:04:01,280 --> 00:04:05,560
do you have the top of your wide receiver board ordered,

89
00:04:05,599 --> 00:04:07,639
and who do you think that the Texans could get

90
00:04:07,639 --> 00:04:08,400
around twenty five.

91
00:04:11,159 --> 00:04:14,280
Speaker 2: I have Teed McMillan, the receiver from Arizona, just after

92
00:04:14,400 --> 00:04:17,199
Travis Hunter from Colorado. I think ket McMillan is going

93
00:04:17,240 --> 00:04:19,519
to go in the top twelve. I'd be surprised if

94
00:04:19,519 --> 00:04:22,279
he falls past the Dallas Cowboys. I think for the

95
00:04:22,319 --> 00:04:25,639
Texans at twenty five, you're looking at Anika Guka, the

96
00:04:25,639 --> 00:04:28,639
wide receiver from Ohio State. It's probably the staatest option.

97
00:04:28,720 --> 00:04:31,759
He's going to be a solid pro slot receiver. He's

98
00:04:31,759 --> 00:04:33,720
not going to be a number one. Texans don't need

99
00:04:33,839 --> 00:04:35,839
number one. They have Nico Collins, So I think that

100
00:04:35,959 --> 00:04:37,720
buk would be a really good choice if he's there,

101
00:04:38,160 --> 00:04:40,639
or do you swing for the upside Matthew Golden out

102
00:04:40,639 --> 00:04:43,040
of Texas. I have Rayton as a second round pick.

103
00:04:43,240 --> 00:04:45,240
I'm not a big fan, but he did run a

104
00:04:45,279 --> 00:04:48,360
four two nine, did play with some inconsistency at quarterback

105
00:04:48,399 --> 00:04:50,879
with Queen Evers. The Texas had a great college football playoff.

106
00:04:51,079 --> 00:04:53,800
I think those are the first round possibilities at receiver.

107
00:04:54,120 --> 00:04:56,000
If I was the Texans, I would wait. I like

108
00:04:56,120 --> 00:04:59,240
DA two in that wide receiver mix just as much

109
00:04:59,360 --> 00:05:00,000
as some of those ways.

110
00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:03,279
Speaker 1: First, guys, I'm curious, Yeah, you and a lot of

111
00:05:03,279 --> 00:05:06,240
people are down on Matthew Gold and I guess is

112
00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:08,920
it just the lack of consistent production that bothers you

113
00:05:09,040 --> 00:05:09,879
or what else would it be.

114
00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:13,680
Speaker 2: I think the lack of consist of productions there. He's never

115
00:05:13,759 --> 00:05:16,639
led his team in receptions in college, and you know,

116
00:05:16,639 --> 00:05:20,120
played at Houston, so I think you wanted to see

117
00:05:20,120 --> 00:05:22,040
a little bit more of that earlier in his career.

118
00:05:22,319 --> 00:05:25,800
The other thing is he doesn't separate really well for

119
00:05:25,959 --> 00:05:29,560
his athleticism. I want to see a main coverage if

120
00:05:29,600 --> 00:05:31,120
you have that kind of speed app lessons and that

121
00:05:31,199 --> 00:05:33,839
you're getting away from these corners and slays on out

122
00:05:34,079 --> 00:05:37,000
on ends, and he's not doing that. Too many contested

123
00:05:37,079 --> 00:05:39,800
catches for his speed. My other question with him is

124
00:05:39,920 --> 00:05:41,759
I don't think he plays at four two nine. I mean,

125
00:05:41,759 --> 00:05:44,240
he got caught multiple times this season. I think he's

126
00:05:44,279 --> 00:05:46,639
more of a four to four speed player. So all

127
00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:48,879
these things mixed, I would rather be more comfortable with

128
00:05:48,920 --> 00:05:49,600
him in round two.

129
00:05:50,199 --> 00:05:53,480
Speaker 1: Shane Hallum joining US Shane P. Hallam on Twitter, Draft

130
00:05:53,519 --> 00:05:56,920
Sharks dot Com as the website, Shane shad Or Sanders

131
00:05:56,959 --> 00:05:58,519
everybody's got an opinion, what's yours.

132
00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:03,360
Speaker 2: I'm not there with with youador I have him. He's

133
00:06:03,399 --> 00:06:06,360
thirty ninth on my big board. I haven't readen this

134
00:06:06,480 --> 00:06:09,160
the second round pick. I think he's I think he's good,

135
00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:12,800
but it feels to me like this quarterback class outside

136
00:06:12,800 --> 00:06:15,920
of cam Ward, is a lot of reaching for what

137
00:06:15,959 --> 00:06:18,759
you hope can become a franchise quarterback instead of a

138
00:06:18,800 --> 00:06:21,560
player with the traces of a franchise quarterback. I think

139
00:06:21,600 --> 00:06:24,000
Sanders is really smart between the ears. He knows how

140
00:06:24,000 --> 00:06:26,680
to manipulate safetyes. He does a lot of advanced things well,

141
00:06:26,720 --> 00:06:29,720
but his arm is average. And in today's NFL, where

142
00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:32,519
the defense is like the two deep safeties, you have

143
00:06:32,639 --> 00:06:34,600
to have a cover two beater on the sideline, you

144
00:06:34,639 --> 00:06:36,839
have to have a cover three beater, and I don't

145
00:06:36,839 --> 00:06:38,360
think he has the arm to do that at the

146
00:06:38,480 --> 00:06:40,959
NFL level. And a lot of the just just tendencies

147
00:06:41,000 --> 00:06:45,160
in the pocket, bad habits of drifting backwards when there's

148
00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:47,240
no one wide open. I think there's a lot of

149
00:06:47,279 --> 00:06:49,360
development that he needs. So if he goes in the

150
00:06:49,360 --> 00:06:51,639
top ten, I think it's a mistake. Now he goes

151
00:06:51,720 --> 00:06:53,720
late first, or we've seen some mocksers fall into the

152
00:06:53,759 --> 00:06:57,560
second round, then I'm all for it. Draft them, developm

153
00:06:57,600 --> 00:06:59,720
and sit them behind someone. But I don't think he's

154
00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:01,319
ready to be an NFL quarterback yet.

155
00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:04,600
Speaker 1: So as you know, teams can find some good value

156
00:07:04,639 --> 00:07:07,360
in the third and fourth rounds. I see you have

157
00:07:07,759 --> 00:07:11,000
Jalen Royals of the Utah State mock to the Texans

158
00:07:11,000 --> 00:07:13,240
in the third round. Who are some guys? Can you

159
00:07:13,279 --> 00:07:15,199
just tell us some more about him? And then some

160
00:07:15,240 --> 00:07:17,160
other guys you think they could provide some value in

161
00:07:17,160 --> 00:07:18,360
those middle rounds.

162
00:07:19,680 --> 00:07:21,560
Speaker 2: I'm a really big fan of Jalen Royals out of

163
00:07:21,639 --> 00:07:24,040
Utah State. I think he'll be a solid third round pick.

164
00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:26,480
Turns into a running back with the ball in his hands.

165
00:07:26,639 --> 00:07:28,800
Their whole offense was get the ball to him and

166
00:07:28,839 --> 00:07:31,920
let him do great things. I questioned his route running,

167
00:07:31,920 --> 00:07:33,759
and then as a Senior Bowl he tore it up.

168
00:07:33,800 --> 00:07:37,279
He beat first round corners in one on one route.

169
00:07:37,639 --> 00:07:39,920
So I think Runs could be a Rashi Rice type

170
00:07:39,920 --> 00:07:43,279
of player that you're using in different ways and can

171
00:07:43,319 --> 00:07:46,000
have a lot of production. I really like some of

172
00:07:46,000 --> 00:07:49,480
the tight ends too. On Day two, which the Texans

173
00:07:49,480 --> 00:07:53,519
could potentially look at. Terence Ferguson the tight end of

174
00:07:53,639 --> 00:07:57,879
Organ is really interesting. He's explosive. Organ's offense doesn't really

175
00:07:57,959 --> 00:08:00,639
utilize the tight end. He was so good old stick

176
00:08:00,720 --> 00:08:03,600
Jason Whitten route that they had to use him and

177
00:08:04,079 --> 00:08:06,240
force the passes that way. So I like him, and

178
00:08:06,319 --> 00:08:09,079
I'll drop one more name, Charles Grant. You ot to

179
00:08:09,120 --> 00:08:11,800
the tackle out of William and Mary is getting a

180
00:08:11,800 --> 00:08:14,800
lot of push up the board. I played almost surely

181
00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:17,079
its own blocking scheme of William and Mary added some weight.

182
00:08:17,279 --> 00:08:19,519
Looks really good in this offseason. So for a small

183
00:08:19,519 --> 00:08:21,639
school player, I think he someone's going to go in

184
00:08:21,639 --> 00:08:23,319
the top one hundred and be a difference maker on

185
00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:25,319
the office line through Day one.

186
00:08:25,360 --> 00:08:27,920
Speaker 1: Shane, Tonight will be the biggest night for at least

187
00:08:28,040 --> 00:08:31,040
the casual fan to watch the draft, not so much

188
00:08:31,120 --> 00:08:33,600
to the Friday and Saturday. So tonight, as we're sitting

189
00:08:33,639 --> 00:08:35,879
back having a couple of cold pops and joining this thing,

190
00:08:36,639 --> 00:08:38,720
give me one or two names that you're going to

191
00:08:38,840 --> 00:08:41,159
hear in the first round to night. But you're thinking

192
00:08:41,879 --> 00:08:45,320
this is a mistake. Now maybe not well, maybe you'll

193
00:08:45,360 --> 00:08:49,720
be in the NFL, but way overrated. Way shouldn't be

194
00:08:49,720 --> 00:08:52,559
a Day one pick. And ultimately, remember if you if

195
00:08:52,600 --> 00:08:54,799
you goof up on first round picks, it does cost you.

196
00:08:54,879 --> 00:08:56,440
Are there one or two names on that list, or

197
00:08:56,440 --> 00:08:58,799
maybe you don't have one that you go tonight? Better

198
00:08:58,879 --> 00:09:00,519
not hear those names of those hes are gonna be

199
00:09:00,519 --> 00:09:00,840
in trouble.

200
00:09:02,559 --> 00:09:04,320
Speaker 2: I always have a couple of those things, so but

201
00:09:04,440 --> 00:09:08,159
don't worry. Michel Williams, the edge rusher out of Georgia.

202
00:09:08,840 --> 00:09:10,879
It looks like he's probably going to go in the

203
00:09:10,879 --> 00:09:13,480
top twelve. I think it's a big mistake. Never had

204
00:09:13,480 --> 00:09:18,159
the production there with a five star recruit. Long, big, rangy, explosive,

205
00:09:18,440 --> 00:09:20,480
but he gets pushed out of so many plays with

206
00:09:20,600 --> 00:09:23,200
just bad technique. Often want to get their hands on him.

207
00:09:23,279 --> 00:09:25,679
He's down for the count. I think he's a rotational

208
00:09:25,679 --> 00:09:29,240
pass rusher. At bet you're taking him that high. I

209
00:09:29,240 --> 00:09:33,159
think it is a big mistake. And I'll mention another

210
00:09:33,240 --> 00:09:35,600
name that may pop into the first round. We'll see

211
00:09:35,759 --> 00:09:39,559
Trey Amos, who's a corner out of Mississippi. I have

212
00:09:39,679 --> 00:09:42,320
rated more as a third round pick. He's big, he's physical,

213
00:09:42,399 --> 00:09:44,720
he can jam up the line, but he's so stiff

214
00:09:45,080 --> 00:09:47,480
turning and running. I think it's day's NFL. Some of

215
00:09:47,480 --> 00:09:50,080
these smaller receivers. He's going to really struggle if he

216
00:09:50,120 --> 00:09:52,480
doesn't get them at the line. I think that would

217
00:09:52,519 --> 00:09:54,080
end up being a mistake if he's drafted in the

218
00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:54,639
first round.

219
00:09:55,080 --> 00:09:58,679
Speaker 1: Shanehallum draft sharks dot Com. Thanks for the time, Shane.

220
00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:00,720
I'll just let the folks know where they can find

221
00:10:00,720 --> 00:10:02,919
your stuff at.

222
00:10:02,720 --> 00:10:04,960
Speaker 2: Go to draftsharts dot com. You can see my seven

223
00:10:05,080 --> 00:10:07,639
round mock draft pick for every single pick in the

224
00:10:07,720 --> 00:10:11,240
NFL draft, so check that out before it launchess tonight, Shane.

225
00:10:11,279 --> 00:10:13,279
Speaker 1: Thank you for the time and enjoy this evening. All

226
00:10:13,279 --> 00:10:14,879
this hard workship pay off for you this evening.

227
00:10:14,879 --> 00:10:17,960
Speaker 2: Thanks for the visit, No thanks, thanks for having me.

228
00:10:17,960 --> 00:10:20,200
Speaker 1: You got it, Shane Hallim Shane P. Hallim on Twitter

229
00:10:20,240 --> 00:10:20,960
Follow him tonight.

