Speaker 1: You know, the system is not just rigged, it's faking
Speaker 1: gay from top to bottom, especially for the bottoms. It's
Speaker 1: super faking gay. We just saw that Diddy. We're like
Speaker 1: what twenty eight didties later from when he originally came out,
Speaker 1: blew up and was probably brought into being some kind
Speaker 1: of informative asset a long time ago, in my opinion,
Speaker 1: allegedly Joe allegedly, that's a lot of people in Hollywood
Speaker 1: that's still in rituals Joe okay.
Speaker 2: Being going near my body howl, Joe Okay.
Speaker 1: Well, Kat Williams called it. Kat Williams was correct. And
Speaker 1: what we've seen now is these characters are getting off.
Speaker 1: I don't just mean getting off in the did he
Speaker 1: freak off sense, whereby they are collectively saying you can
Speaker 1: freak off. I mean that they're getting off legally, which
Speaker 1: we expected, both him and Jeff Stein mceffrey, because of
Speaker 1: the fact that it's not just the media and politics
Speaker 1: that's rigged.
Speaker 2: It's the justice system.
Speaker 1: It's the entire superstructure system that we have studied and
Speaker 1: dissected for so many years. Myself learning this back and
Speaker 1: around nineteen ninety eight ninety nine, two thousand, first hearing
Speaker 1: about the kind of artificial structure that we live under,
Speaker 1: and then getting more and more sophisticated, hopefully and understanding
Speaker 1: the real levers of power, the real oligarchical structures, and
Speaker 1: how this whole system really works is pretty It's actually
Speaker 1: insane when you think about it. And you know, one
Speaker 1: of the components that we highlighted recently in one of
Speaker 1: the lectures that we did on the Boer book on
Speaker 1: the history of sexpionage. That book was extremely insightful, and
Speaker 1: I don't know that anyone else has really lectured on
Speaker 1: that subject like we have. Hopefully you'll go and take
Speaker 1: some time to peruse that lecture as well as you
Speaker 1: know a lot of the videos that we've done covering Diddy,
Speaker 1: covering Jeff Stein mcgeffrey. I think we kind of suspected
Speaker 1: that this would not come out, even though we were told,
Speaker 1: even though Bondie said that there were videos, thousands and
Speaker 1: thousands of videos crazy stuff going on. We all know
Speaker 1: that the levers of power are very compromised when it
Speaker 1: comes to some of the more fundamental basic human desires,
Speaker 1: but not just human desires in the classic sense of.
Speaker 2: You know, KGB people.
Speaker 1: Compromising people with a prostitute or something like that, but
Speaker 1: more specifically extremely aberrant desires and actions, including things that
Speaker 1: we can't really even speak about. That's a whole other
Speaker 1: level of wickedness and corruption. But the system functions surprisingly
Speaker 1: well in terms of control. When you have people who
Speaker 1: are that evil, that wicked at high levels of power,
Speaker 1: it's sometimes referred to as a cacistocracy.
Speaker 2: Government by the worst. So what does the did he.
Speaker 1: And Jeff Sain mcgeffrey trial show us? Well, it shows
Speaker 1: us that pretty much all of the areas of the
Speaker 1: legacy boomer sort of worldview system that we've grown up
Speaker 1: in that we've that we're still underneath.
Speaker 2: Whether it's the old school.
Speaker 1: Legacy media of the daddy figure on NBC Nightly News
Speaker 1: talking to you and making you feel like they know
Speaker 1: what's going on, even though that was all sort of
Speaker 1: decept of media as well, or whether it's the education
Speaker 1: system brainwashing you into a form of socialized acceptance and
Speaker 1: becoming a cog in the machine so that you go
Speaker 1: on to some corporate thing where you waste the rest
Speaker 1: of your life earning essentially valueless Fiat currency that is
Speaker 1: gradually and even more rapidly.
Speaker 2: Nowadays losing its value.
Speaker 1: This system is cracking, but it's not just cracking because
Speaker 1: people are waking up. The system itself was always fraudulent, and.
Speaker 2: We've seen fact in fact in the past.
Speaker 1: If you study civilizations and their rise and fall, if
Speaker 1: you read something like Agil Spangler's works on how civilizations
Speaker 1: have a cycle of a birth and a death, and.
Speaker 2: Those patterns aren't different in our day.
Speaker 1: Even though we have a lot of weird techie futuristic
Speaker 1: gas and whatnot, the patterns of civilization are still the
Speaker 1: same because humans act the way humans act. Humans can
Speaker 1: either be degraded and act in a very degrading way
Speaker 1: and collapse their civilizations, or they can adopt a more
Speaker 1: virtuous system, whereby they at least try to be an
Speaker 1: act virtuous. And the Christian system, the Christian ethos gave
Speaker 1: on a broad wide scale, both to the Byzantine Empire
Speaker 1: in the East and to the Latin empires and kingdoms
Speaker 1: in the west, some broad sense and structure of rights
Speaker 1: in a divine sense, not in a natural sense. Law,
Speaker 1: common law, social organization, social cohesion, basic ideas about economic frameworks,
Speaker 1: human dignity, etc. All of that really comes out of
Speaker 1: the ethos of the religion, and Christianity ended up producing
Speaker 1: these civilizations that were extremely successful, Byzantium being the longest
Speaker 1: and most successful empire in the West and Western history.
Speaker 1: But it reached this sort of apex of degenerous and
Speaker 1: collapse when you had the takeover of homo economics or
Speaker 1: economic man. And this is something that Schwegler talks about,
Speaker 1: for example, when he talks about the move away from
Speaker 1: the Faustian scheme, that Western man really exhibits this idea
Speaker 1: of that Western man could master nature and technology to
Speaker 1: give him almost godlike powers. So the faust example is
Speaker 1: an allegory, it's not literal. And then as that apex
Speaker 1: of power rises, you get the sort of parasitical functions
Speaker 1: of the money power.
Speaker 2: Not that money is inherently bad, but the.
Speaker 1: Money power comes to power, feeding on that system and
Speaker 1: basing everything around debt slavery, debt slavery, and that necessitates
Speaker 1: the type of monetary Fiat system that we have now,
Speaker 1: which is an old scam. If you read Tragic Hope
Speaker 1: in the first few hundred pages, he talks about the
Speaker 1: gold note system being an older version of the Fiat scam,
Speaker 1: and so the central banking elite can figure out ways
Speaker 1: to print up more currency than there is hard asset.
Speaker 1: So the money system then is also point being. Whether
Speaker 1: it's media, which is essentially a kind of psychological warfare,
Speaker 1: social engineering, deception tool to really keep you locked into
Speaker 1: the establishment legacy mindset, whether it's fake right or fake left,
Speaker 1: as long as you're within the magic circle, it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter which what your positions or your arguments are, you
Speaker 1: just can't go outside of the accepted circle of discourse
Speaker 1: and tops. Or whether it's education and the brainwashing that
Speaker 1: goes on there to make you a cog in the
Speaker 1: corporate system, or whether it is media, or whether it's politics,
Speaker 1: or even the judicial system as we saw, and not
Speaker 1: many people have even talked about how there have been
Speaker 1: some really good works discussing the Fabian socialists actually made
Speaker 1: a huge headway in co opting and subverting the US
Speaker 1: judicial system many many decades ago, going back to people
Speaker 1: like Felix Frankfurter and others who had these Marxist socialist tendencies.
Speaker 1: So this mindset, this mind virus that we keep seeing
Speaker 1: pop up, that is the destruction. It only goes so
Speaker 1: far before it eats itself.
Speaker 2: And so the oral.
Speaker 1: Borus right of Plato's Timaeus and other esoteric discourses is
Speaker 1: a multi layered symbol. But one of the perhaps unintended
Speaker 1: consequences of that symbol is that a parasitical system eats itself.
Speaker 1: And when the parasitical system eats itself, it's really just
Speaker 1: illustrating that it's collapsing from within due to its own
Speaker 1: internal contradictions and system level defeaters for itself. For example,
Speaker 1: in the Roman Caloic Church. In today's discussion is not
Speaker 1: about rom Catholicism. I've been arguing for a long time,
Speaker 1: which I think really has come to the four in
Speaker 1: the last few weeks of debate, the internal system level
Speaker 1: defeaters of a Roman Catholic magisterial system, because in that system,
Speaker 1: if you have internal contradictions, the system will collapse by
Speaker 1: its own nature. You can't know that. It'd be like
Speaker 1: trying to run an operating system and injecting multiple viruses
Speaker 1: into the system and then you're wondering why your operating
Speaker 1: system doesn't work and you've got, you know, blue screen
Speaker 1: hackers asking for twenty.
Speaker 2: Five bick one.
Speaker 1: In the same way, a religious system, of dogmatic system,
Speaker 1: social system, whatever it is. If it interjects blatant fundamental contradictions,
Speaker 1: the system itself will eventually disintegrate. And if you remember,
Speaker 1: at the time of Koof, they even talked about blowing
Speaker 1: up the old system of the medical arena on purpose
Speaker 1: to bring in whatever their new technocratic system is. So
Speaker 1: what people don't understand that we study a lot on
Speaker 1: this channel is tactics techniques of psychological warfare and even
Speaker 1: to a degree, warfare techniques, because they don't understand that
Speaker 1: those techniques are used and studied.
Speaker 2: On a mass scale.
Speaker 1: We've seen this recently with the way that algorithms and
Speaker 1: social media are working to influence and control people. A
Speaker 1: lot of videos have been coming out where people are
Speaker 1: starting to figure this out. People are starting to figure
Speaker 1: out that AI is really just a more advanced yapping
Speaker 1: search engine that gives you a lot of wrong answers.
Speaker 2: It could be useful.
Speaker 1: In some ways here and there, maybe a little more efficient,
Speaker 1: but ultimately, especially younger gen Z and below Alpha that
Speaker 1: are being raised now on AI systems, they're sort of
Speaker 1: taking it.
Speaker 2: As the word of God basically.
Speaker 1: So there's a danger there that the younger generations are
Speaker 1: going to be completely rubbotized and programmed in a way
Speaker 1: that we've never seen even with Generation Millennial or X,
Speaker 1: who have both spent a lot of time on the internet.
Speaker 1: Gen Z and Alpha, all of their time it's spent
Speaker 1: on the Internet. So there's I think a danger there
Speaker 1: of this. There's basically, I think, going to be what
Speaker 1: you get described in a loose way in hgu Well's
Speaker 1: Time Machine, where you have a kind of group of
Speaker 1: people in the public that are sort of the mongoloid,
Speaker 1: the ish, the Morlocks basically, and the Morlocks were intentionally
Speaker 1: dumbed down and made into sort of bestial gobblin creatures
Speaker 1: that feed upon the docile above ground population. So you
Speaker 1: have this group of people that live in the underworld
Speaker 1: that are the Morlocks.
Speaker 2: They come out at night, The freaks come out at night.
Speaker 2: The freaks come out at night, quite.
Speaker 1: Literally, the friags come out at night, and then they
Speaker 1: feed upon the docile, pale skinned people. So I think
Speaker 1: what we're getting is this weird intentional evolution and devolution
Speaker 1: of groups of people that might be something loosely akin
Speaker 1: to what HG. Wells is trying to capture in that
Speaker 1: fiction book which we've covered, by the way, and I'm
Speaker 1: not supporting HG.
Speaker 2: Wells.
Speaker 1: I think he was a horrible Masonic socialist mind controller,
Speaker 1: but that idea is present in that fiction work that
Speaker 1: I think well lucidates what's going on now where you're
Speaker 1: getting this younger generation of people that are being completely
Speaker 1: experimented upon, and this is a very broad ranging technocratic
Speaker 1: control system and experiment. The Internet wasn't given out to
Speaker 1: everybody for freedom. It actually comes out of the cryptographic
Speaker 1: spy world. It comes out of ansa espionage technology and
Speaker 1: sending coded messages to operatives and agents and whatnot. That's
Speaker 1: what Arpinet darpnett was originally, and it developed into basically
Speaker 1: becoming nowadays a proto global brain. And so we're really
Speaker 1: on the cosp of moving into the age when people
Speaker 1: will begin to want to enter into the matrix. Nine
Speaker 1: years ago, ten years ago, I wrote an essay about
Speaker 1: the movie Her by Spike Jones, where Joaquin Phoenix develops
Speaker 1: a marital relationship with his operating system, and it's voiced
Speaker 1: by Scarlett Johansson, who almost always plays some sort of
Speaker 1: weird gnostic goddess figure who achieves apotheosis in the films
Speaker 1: that she's in.
Speaker 2: Whether it's Lucy or whatever.
Speaker 1: But if you recall in that essay, in that film,
Speaker 1: I highlighted how this will be rolled out, and we
Speaker 1: just saw this weak viral videos of the first syman
Speaker 1: who has a wife and a kid but has fallen
Speaker 1: in love with an operating system. So we're at the
Speaker 1: cusp now of that, and I think in the next
Speaker 1: eight to ten years they could quite literally be a
Speaker 1: civilizational ending situation with declining birth rates, with the destruction
Speaker 1: of the currency. This bill, for example, has a new
Speaker 1: five trillion dollars of just money out of thin air
Speaker 1: that's going to destroy your purchasing power.
Speaker 2: Even worse than it is.
Speaker 1: So it is absolutely essential that you understand things like
Speaker 1: bitcoin now because that's the only safe haven asset. I mean,
Speaker 1: you could say gold, but bitcoin's way more relevant and
Speaker 1: way more useful in the digital age than shiny gold rocks.
Speaker 1: But that's where we're at, where we're going because people
Speaker 1: are figuring out the system is rigged and fake, but
Speaker 1: many of them are going to be a little too
Speaker 1: late to do much about it. So those of us
Speaker 1: who were a tenfold hat loons, who prepared for and
Speaker 1: understood those have to understand that they're also going to
Speaker 1: hype up r acee stuff, so you have to be
Speaker 1: prepared that that's ramping up. I think on purpose, they're
Speaker 1: going to try to spark I think more of those
Speaker 1: Summer of Love conflicts if you remember those from a
Speaker 1: few years ago. That's probably where things are going. And
Speaker 1: there's only so much that I mean, even let's say,
Speaker 1: for the sake of argument, for best case scenario, Trump
Speaker 1: passes most of or gets through most of his agenda.
Speaker 1: The next time around, it's most likely there won't be
Speaker 1: another Trump or some sort of chaos bull in the
Speaker 1: China Shop character. It'll probably be some sort of more mundane,
Speaker 1: system controlled figure. Again, whatever you think of Trump is
Speaker 1: not the point. The point is we're probably not going
Speaker 1: to have another Trump. It'll probably be business as usual
Speaker 1: with some establishment goon again, and so things will probably
Speaker 1: again move worse quicker. And if that's the case, then
Speaker 1: we really need to be prepared for probably not just
Speaker 1: brace riots, but economic problems. Because we didn't get World
Speaker 1: War three, thank god. A lot of people thought we're
Speaker 1: going to get that last week.
Speaker 2: We didn't get that.
Speaker 1: But we can get the death of the dollar, and
Speaker 1: if you print another five trillion, there's no way to
Speaker 1: save the dollar without attaching it to something finite, and
Speaker 1: fixed gold isn't even finite, and fixed gold is inflating
Speaker 1: at a decently high rate every year because gold is
Speaker 1: mind every year Bitcoin is mind. But there's a fixed supply,
Speaker 1: so there's no other fixed asset that could fix the
Speaker 1: problems that you could fix the currency too. And Trump
Speaker 1: is kind of toyed with this and talked about it some.
Speaker 1: But if you're printing another five trillion dollars, you're just
Speaker 1: further sealing the deal on the end of the dollar.
Speaker 1: And people always ask, they say, what's your Your videos.
Speaker 2: Are not very practical, they're so abstract.
Speaker 1: Well, what's more practical than like not losing all of
Speaker 1: your money where you're purchasing power.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's it's just wild.
Speaker 1: We've been here talking about this since twenty seventeen, more
Speaker 1: vocally twenty eighteen, nineteen.
Speaker 2: I started making.
Speaker 1: Videos about things like bitcoin back.
Speaker 2: Then, and.
Speaker 1: So many people are still just delusional.
Speaker 2: They don't understand.
Speaker 1: But it's the same type of delusion I've noticed between
Speaker 1: people in religious systems where they have religious commitments. So
Speaker 1: even though you might not think of your opinions on
Speaker 1: monetary theory and policy as religious. It's becoming more and
Speaker 1: more evident to me that everybody has their worldview, even
Speaker 1: if it's an atheistic worldview. Their worldview commitments they hold religiously.
Speaker 1: They have a religious devotion even to opinions that they
Speaker 1: probably don't even admittedly know that much about. They probably
Speaker 1: don't know much about money and economics and monetary theory,
Speaker 1: but they hold those positions religiously and will die on
Speaker 1: the hill of not being wrong, even if it would
Speaker 1: serve them better off in their long term interests to
Speaker 1: admit being wrong. That's the weird and funny thing about
Speaker 1: fallen human nature is that it treats its own ideas
Speaker 1: and views like.
Speaker 2: A religious commitment.
Speaker 1: So as people begin to wake up and understand and
Speaker 1: see that everything is basically fake and gay.
Speaker 2: There are emerging systems and emerging.
Speaker 1: Ways to step out of it, to challenge the system
Speaker 1: to operate on your own. We've been doing that here
Speaker 1: fairly well, thank god, for the last several years. It's
Speaker 1: probably not too late, but we don't know where things
Speaker 1: are going to go in the near future. The system
Speaker 1: has not stopped the system has you know, people thought.
Speaker 2: Oh, we're going to get all these victories under Trump.
Speaker 2: The empire is going to strike back.
Speaker 1: And even if Trump, theoretically, for the sake of argument,
Speaker 1: it sets back the overall agenda by a few years,
Speaker 1: they're going to come right back a new koof economic problems. Grace,
Speaker 1: brace riots, who knows. But regardless, we know that for
Speaker 1: sure the existing system can't be fixed.
Speaker 2: So it's just a.
Speaker 1: Matter of figuring out how and in what way it's
Speaker 1: gonna fall apart. And many within the establishment, the oligarch Coalia,
Speaker 1: the technocrats, they know that the older system is dying
Speaker 1: and dead. And many of the boomers that are still
Speaker 1: in power, they don't know this.
Speaker 2: They haven't figured this out yet.
Speaker 1: They will or they will just pass on, and then
Speaker 1: the gen x will take over and figure out what
Speaker 1: to do whether they want to try the technocratic control GROD,
Speaker 1: which is pretty much what I think they've gone with.
Speaker 1: I don't think they can walk that back.
Speaker 2: We know. For example, back in two thousand.
Speaker 1: When Bill Joy wrote his famous essays about a wire
Speaker 1: magazine about the Future Doesn't need Humans?
Speaker 2: Why the future doesn't need us?
Speaker 1: And he wrote about how they'd made the decision back then,
Speaker 1: all the oligarchical technocratic elites, the Silicon Valley elites, to
Speaker 1: go with mass depop and not basically the brave new
Speaker 1: world scenario, but with less humans, so I post human futures.
Speaker 1: What they decided on, and what we've been witnessing is
Speaker 1: not just the natural death of the old legacy system,
Speaker 1: but rather also an acceleration as push by members within
Speaker 1: the establishment to break the existing system. So they want that,
Speaker 1: I think, because they want to put in their system,
Speaker 1: the new system, and that new system is an all
Speaker 1: encompassing one that means it will be all your life
Speaker 1: if you have it regulated, tract and traced. We saw
Speaker 1: this with what they wanted to pass in terms of
Speaker 1: passports when koof happened. That's not going away. They're going
Speaker 1: to try to bring that back. We saw this with
Speaker 1: the blackmail and compromise people getting off. So the system
Speaker 1: is still there. They're not dead. Trump didn't destroy everything.
Speaker 2: It's not.
Speaker 1: It's still there and they're making their move now to continue.
Speaker 1: And the people that are waking up are way late.
Speaker 1: So if you've been watching this channel, then you've been awake.
Speaker 1: You've been watching and knowing stuff probably for a long time,
Speaker 1: for many years, and all I can say is that like,
Speaker 1: this isn't going to keep going.
Speaker 2: There's no way it can keep going.
Speaker 1: And Hollywood's even been telling you this with their productions,
Speaker 1: not that they're all powerful, but when you watch something
Speaker 1: like Civil War, and we just covered Alex Garland and
Speaker 1: Boyle's film twenty eight years later a couple of days ago,
Speaker 1: when you watch movies like that, or when you watch
Speaker 1: you know, Civil War, you're watching the establishment telling you
Speaker 1: what they expect and what they want. Or remember Obama's
Speaker 1: movie about the End of the US too, with Kevin
Speaker 1: Bacon and Ethan Hawke, and you know that came out
Speaker 1: what a year or two ago, same idea, same principle.
Speaker 2: Right, We're going to have this.
Speaker 1: Collapse at some point because you cannot run a system
Speaker 1: with massive viruses and internal contradictions in it before the
Speaker 1: system collapses. And the system wants the system to collapse,
Speaker 1: probably many of them, why so that they can have
Speaker 1: their ready made solution. This is something Klaus has talked about,
Speaker 1: many of them have talked about. When the people they
Speaker 1: think see that the existing system doesn't work, they're going
Speaker 1: to come forward as the saviors offering you a efficient, technocratic,
Speaker 1: fair and just system. Gates has said the same thing.
Speaker 2: I would want to have a more fair, just system
Speaker 2: wherever boys treated equally.
Speaker 1: Yeah, right, I mean if you believe that, I mean,
Speaker 1: there's just if you believe that there's no hope for you,
Speaker 1: might as well just give up. So if you're just
Speaker 1: now waking up, you are late to the game. But
Speaker 1: it's probably not too late. But I would suggest beginning
Speaker 1: to think about moving out of blue cities, having a
Speaker 1: self defense secret of some kind. I don't think gold
Speaker 1: is going to matter. I would say bitcoin is the
Speaker 1: only thing that's going to matter. And even bitcoin is
Speaker 1: going to be more valuable and is already becoming more
Speaker 1: valuable than land.
Speaker 2: So I would say that's the future. I've been right about.
Speaker 1: Bitcoin since twenty seventeen, so that's almost eight years of
Speaker 1: being right about it, not eight or nine years.
Speaker 2: And yeah, so we like to think.
Speaker 1: Of this as the Renaissance era, and maybe there's some
Speaker 1: miraculous thing where the Trump phenomena and then the rise
Speaker 1: of the dissident media and dissident political ideas will somehow
Speaker 1: bring about something. I don't think you could have that
Speaker 1: without also a religious revival, and there is a revival
Speaker 1: of Orthodox Christianity in the West. I don't know if
Speaker 1: it's enough quick enough to stave off some kind of
Speaker 1: probable coming collapse. But the point being is that the
Speaker 1: dystopia is not defeated. The technocrats are not defeated. They're
Speaker 1: not going away. The empires about to strike back in
Speaker 1: the beginning to strike back, and we saw, for example,
Speaker 1: in a kind of many way the non release of
Speaker 1: Jeff Stein mcgeffrey and the getting off to use the
Speaker 1: prince terminology.
Speaker 2: Of Ditty.
Speaker 1: That the system is still very much.
Speaker 2: Entrenched and very much there.
Speaker 1: And that would lead me to believe that even after
Speaker 1: the Trump era is probably going to may go back
Speaker 1: to business as usual, but that's going to be difficult
Speaker 1: with so many people in mass awakening, so we don't
Speaker 1: know exactly what's going to happen, but they're going to
Speaker 1: one hundred percent continue to push the technocratic agenda. If
Speaker 1: you agree with what I'm talking about, i'd be sure
Speaker 1: and hitt like and share it, talk about some of
Speaker 1: the things that I missed down below. I would also
Speaker 1: recommend that you head on order to Chalk Dot comcchoq
Speaker 1: dot com that's the best in supplementation on the entire Internet.
Speaker 1: And use the promo code j forty that's JY for
Speaker 1: is Ere to get forty percent off all those great products.
Speaker 1: This is definitely not a time to be a soy man.
Speaker 1: It's a time to become a toxic masculinity man, and
Speaker 1: com will help you.
Speaker 2: To do that.
Speaker 1: Also, my new book Essatar Hollywood three is about to
Speaker 1: come out, so you can head over to the website
Speaker 1: in the show description Jay's analysis and there's a link
Speaker 1: to the shop and all the copies are signed, so
Speaker 1: be sure and get your copy ready to go of
Speaker 1: Esotar Hollywood three, the third in my Hollywood Dissection and
Speaker 1: Decoding trilogy, And be sure and like and share and
Speaker 1: subscribe and turn on the notifications