Speaker 1: Fox Station empower Youamerica dot org. You are going to
Speaker 1: want to register and attend virtually. This is a virtual
Speaker 1: only class empower You America dot org. And I know
Speaker 1: my listeners are going to be keen and interested in
Speaker 1: this particular one. Welcome to the fifty five Cars Morning Show,
Speaker 1: Doctor Robert Malone an internationally recognized scientists, physician, bestselling author, ethicist,
Speaker 1: political commentator of public figure. He spoke out early about
Speaker 1: the risk associated with COVID nineteen vaccines and against public
Speaker 1: health and medical mandates, actively campaigning against censorship and propaganda
Speaker 1: campaigns led by the governments and globalists. And of course
Speaker 1: we've talked to other guests who struggled and suffered themselves
Speaker 1: as a consequence of them speaking truth to power. Some
Speaker 1: of them had their licenses pulled. Welcome to the fifty
Speaker 1: five carsy Morning Show doing the Empower You seminar tomorrow night,
Speaker 1: beginning at seven pm. Doctor Malone. It's a pleasure to
Speaker 1: have you here on the program today.
Speaker 2: Well, thanks for having me on. I hope it's a
Speaker 2: great day where you are. It's looking like we're going
Speaker 2: to get a little bit of rain here in Virginia.
Speaker 2: So what do you want to talk about.
Speaker 1: I want to talk about Moderna doing mass clinical trials
Speaker 1: on the entire universe of people here in the world
Speaker 1: with untested vaccines. As you point out, emergency use authorization
Speaker 1: was given because oh my god, it's a pandemic. We
Speaker 1: got to let these vaccines come out because we need
Speaker 1: them to stave off this pandemic. But we're going to
Speaker 1: free the pharmaceutical companies from any liability associated with these.
Speaker 1: As you point out, and I know you're going to
Speaker 1: talk about at length tomorrow evening, these were not tested.
Speaker 1: And what I learned from your materials is that they
Speaker 1: had tried mRNA technology and they had failed and never
Speaker 1: could get FDA approval when they started using them and
Speaker 1: endeavoring to treat other conditions they were working on. Can
Speaker 1: you explain a little bit of that to my listening audience.
Speaker 2: So, Maderna's business model was originally focused on cancer and
Speaker 2: cancer vaccines, and you'll recalled this is the area that
Speaker 2: was highlighted during the first day after President Trump became president,
Speaker 2: when there was the whole discussion and controversy around the
Speaker 2: Stargate initiative for artificial intelligence, the promise, let's say, or hope,
Speaker 2: and we all wish that we had something like a
Speaker 2: personalized cancer vaccine that would take away our risk of
Speaker 2: this deadly disease. But the history of cancer vaccines has
Speaker 2: been one of, let's say, gently broken promises or dashed hopes.
Speaker 2: And that's a very long history of decades, literally my
Speaker 2: entire career. And there are fundamental underlying issues having to
Speaker 2: do with the role of the immune system human immune system,
Speaker 2: which basic is our main defense against cancer, particularly cellular immunity.
Speaker 2: And I don't want to get too deep into the
Speaker 2: science here for Radio Hit, but it turns out that
Speaker 2: things are a lot more complicated than Wall Street investors
Speaker 2: are often sold on. But it's a reliably potent strategy
Speaker 2: to try to pitch these cancer vaccine companies. So that's
Speaker 2: where Maderna started, and predictably, that business model failed and
Speaker 2: they really only got rescued when Tony Fauci, largely with
Speaker 2: the NIH Vaccine Research Center, together with backing from DARPA,
Speaker 2: Defense Reduction Agency and a number of others now we
Speaker 2: know USAID, pushed forward these mRNA products I'm going to
Speaker 2: call them for ostensibly preventing COVID disease, and unfortunately those
Speaker 2: products were promoted without adequate pre clinical or clinical studies
Speaker 2: that normally would take up to a decade, and not
Speaker 2: too surprisingly, a number of unexpected consequences let's say, you know,
Speaker 2: the technical term would be adverse events which include death
Speaker 2: by the way ensued and nobody was allowed to question it,
Speaker 2: and nobody was provided informed consent. I think the most
Speaker 2: powerful statement I've heard come out of d C about
Speaker 2: all this was a Secretary Heggs, the Defense Secretary of
Speaker 2: Defense Hexworth's comment that these were never licensed, the products
Speaker 2: that were deployed in the DoD and these mandates were illegal.
Speaker 2: So that's where things stand right now. DC remains and
Speaker 2: deny denial over what they have their fingers all over.
Speaker 2: I mean, Tony Fauci didn't do this in a vacuum.
Speaker 2: It was actively enabled by many powerful people in both
Speaker 2: houses in it.
Speaker 1: I'm troubled by so much of this information, and I
Speaker 1: have been for a while. But as you point out,
Speaker 1: and you're going to talk about this again tomorrow night,
Speaker 1: seven pm in Poweroamerica dot org, they had tried these
Speaker 1: mRNA based treatments on a variety of different things, maybe
Speaker 1: cancer is one of them. As you're suggesting before at
Speaker 1: the animal testing phase, and they had to stop them
Speaker 1: because they were far too dangerous to test on humans.
Speaker 1: Is it the mr in a type of vaccine that
Speaker 1: in and of itself poses these challenges, or that just
Speaker 1: that they didn't get it right as to whatever particular
Speaker 1: disease state they were working on. Because if all this
Speaker 1: information suggests mRNA based treatments are dangerous, why in the
Speaker 1: hell would they push to advance them on the general population.
Speaker 2: So, in terms of your question, it's kind of all
Speaker 2: of the above, and particularly in a case of COVID,
Speaker 2: because clearly the spike protein is a toxin, and that's
Speaker 2: another thing that was suppressed, considered controversial, not allowed to
Speaker 2: be said. But it's true. It's another unfortunate truth. But
Speaker 2: you ask why why all the impetus for this is
Speaker 2: a number of them, and one of them is that
Speaker 2: this represents a whole new domain for product development, which
Speaker 2: is which basically creates a gold rush for pharma because
Speaker 2: they can circumvent prior art and prior patents by using
Speaker 2: this new technology or composition of matter, which is now
Speaker 2: freely available. Because the patents that I worked on back
Speaker 2: in the late eighties and early nineties have all expired
Speaker 2: and so the fundamental underlying tech that underpins all of
Speaker 2: this is now public domain because the patents have expired.
Speaker 2: So for pharma, this is a gold rush. And the
Speaker 2: positioning has been from the let's say, by defense industrial
Speaker 2: complex that this technology will scratch their itch, solve a
Speaker 2: major pain point, which is that it takes up to
Speaker 2: a decade to develop a new vaccine, and that it's
Speaker 2: the combination of those two things. The gold rush in
Speaker 2: the pharmacy perception that this represents a whole big area
Speaker 2: of commercial opportunity and the logic that this solves this
Speaker 2: huge problem that it takes a decade to develop a
Speaker 2: new vaccine, and we're constantly bombarded by all this fear
Speaker 2: promoted fear from the industry that we're going to get
Speaker 2: overwhelmed by highly pathogenic infectious diseases coming out of the
Speaker 2: jungle because of global warming.
Speaker 1: I mean, the narrative just goes on, oh yeah, I've
Speaker 1: heard it all before. Or you build them in in
Speaker 1: a wuhan instead of virology, and you unleash them on
Speaker 1: the globe by accident or by intention. Now, but if
Speaker 1: these mRNA vaccines are inherently dangerous or post them inherently
Speaker 1: dangerous risks based on the technology is being used. They're
Speaker 1: not necessarily going to get emergency use authorization for any
Speaker 1: new vaccines they roll out. Those will be subject to
Speaker 1: obligations to do clinical trials, and if history is any guide,
Speaker 1: then they'll probably fail in the clinical trials and never
Speaker 1: be rolled out. Isn't that sort of true?
Speaker 2: Well, so this is why all of the uproar over
Speaker 2: the HHS and Bobby Kennedy and Marty McCarty initiatives that
Speaker 2: all new vaccines are going to have to be tested
Speaker 2: against a true placebo or negative control. The industry hates
Speaker 2: this because they have been masking some of the adverse
Speaker 2: events associated with a wide variety of vaccines which are
Speaker 2: intrinsically inflammatory by comparing them to other vaccines rather than
Speaker 2: comparing them to a true control. The book Turtles All
Speaker 2: the Way Down is just a fantastic discussion of how
Speaker 2: this has been built and what the modern consequences are.
Speaker 2: It's kind of a house of cards that's been built
Speaker 2: up over decades. And I got to admit I bought
Speaker 2: into that. I bought into the logic that it was
Speaker 2: unethical to test a new vaccine against a true placebo.
Speaker 2: This is what I've been taught again and again and again.
Speaker 2: It was all you know, drilled into you. But I've
Speaker 2: come to recognize that that was wrong, that ethically, that
Speaker 2: logic is flawed.
Speaker 1: I certainly understand that that's where the control population is
Speaker 1: supposed to come from. So you can compare it against
Speaker 1: the general public who have not gotten the new vaccine.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, doctor, you know I could talk to
Speaker 1: you for hours. I think, doctor Malone, We're going to
Speaker 1: get an hour and change tomorrow night, seven pm. And
Speaker 1: I know, for example, red flag for you have to
Speaker 1: dress it. A lot of my listeners believe this, this
Speaker 1: was rolled out for the purposes of population control. I've
Speaker 1: talked to some physicians who know about thousands of patients
Speaker 1: who lost their babies in utero and mothers have had
Speaker 1: at menstrual problems and things along. So is perhaps something
Speaker 1: is there a connection there? Perhaps?
Speaker 2: So my position on that is, at first, you know,
Speaker 2: like I used to say that the Great Reset. I
Speaker 2: used to think the Great Reset was a conspiracy theory,
Speaker 2: and then I read Klaus Schwab's book called The Great Reset. Right, Okay,
Speaker 2: so it's population control. A conspiracy. If you read the
Speaker 2: Henry Kissinger report that is now a fundamental aspect, it
Speaker 2: is integrated into American foreign policy that talks about population control,
Speaker 2: you'll realize that this is a real thing. That that
Speaker 2: connecting that federal policy position about really depopulation to what
Speaker 2: happened here.
Speaker 1: Is speculation, but it's a It's a logical leap for
Speaker 1: a few people out there, and.
Speaker 2: I can fully understand why people make that connection, but
Speaker 2: uh it, it has all kinds of implications and until personally,
Speaker 2: until I see you know, some email.
Speaker 1: Proof right.
Speaker 2: Then then I'm going to kind of hold hold, keep your.
Speaker 1: Powder dry, Keep your powder dry. I wish you had
Speaker 1: more time, doctor Lin. We are way out of time.
Speaker 1: We'll listen to you tomorrow night, seven pm and power
Speaker 1: you America dot org folks, get registered. Thanks for your
Speaker 1: time today, sir, it's been fascinating and riveting. Coup up
Speaker 1: an E fifty three fifty five kcitytalk station, Save up
Speaker 1: to fifteen hundred and fifty dollars new carrier comfort system
Speaker 1: for my friends at Zimmer Heating and Cooling. You need
Speaker 1: to turn to the experts at Zimmer Heating and Colling
Speaker 1: who've been making CINCINNTI homes safe, efficient and comfortable for
Speaker 1: than seventy five years. Family on an operated at third
Speaker 1: generation Chris Zimmer. The team will take excellent care of you.
Speaker 1: Give them a call fifteen hundred and fifty dollars on
Speaker 1: a new carrier unit. It's that time to swap ears out.
Speaker 1: Go Zimmer dot com to schedule the appointment and learn
Speaker 1: more about the services they offer. Go Zimmer dot com
Speaker 1: five one three, five two one ninety eight ninety three.
Speaker 2: Fifty five KRC dot com.
Speaker 1: What if you had