Speaker 1: And we are live good morning everybody over on Rumble,
Speaker 1: Twitter and ftjmedia dot com. I'm here with Diego Garcia
Speaker 1: and he is the creator of Bulletproof Pub and I'm
Speaker 1: gonna publications. I'm gonna go ahead and show you that
Speaker 1: right now. I like that. Apparently there we go and
Speaker 1: he did an amazing, amazing work that everybody should be
Speaker 1: looking at. And I showed you guys this last night
Speaker 1: actually on the other live stream. But this right here,
Speaker 1: these are the articles. This is brandeis and this is
Speaker 1: Rise of the Expert series. There's ten parts to this.
Speaker 1: These are the blogs beneath that. You'll see him discussing
Speaker 1: this on the Deep Share podcast. And then his Missing
Speaker 1: Link interviews, which last night we were watching one of
Speaker 1: them with Max Egan, and Diego happened to pop in
Speaker 1: and asked a few questions, a lot of good ones.
Speaker 1: Actually it was part of the conversation. So that's it
Speaker 1: was kismet. I guess that we happened to be watching
Speaker 1: that the night before Diego comes on and again, bulletproofpub
Speaker 1: dot com is where you will find his work. How
Speaker 1: are you doing today, sir.
Speaker 2: Buddy, I'm doing great. Thanks for having me on and
Speaker 2: giving us an opportunity to talk. And so I watched
Speaker 2: a couple of year episodes. There are two part of
Speaker 2: that you did on Frankism, and I loved it, and
Speaker 2: I thought, what a great time to come in and
Speaker 2: talk about how it infiltrated into America in the West,
Speaker 2: and what it really has evolved into throughout the twentieth century,
Speaker 2: and then what it looks like today, and really what
Speaker 2: it is is the progressive movement, right. I've been saying
Speaker 2: for a long time that progressivism is the new world
Speaker 2: order that they infiltrated us through our liberal sentimentalities and
Speaker 2: our want for everybody to have a fair shot at life.
Speaker 2: And so Frankism, you know, is established like this US
Speaker 2: Supreme Court justice that we talked about, Lewis Brandeis, he's
Speaker 2: a Francist. And so this really it's my mission to
Speaker 2: try to get Louis Brandei's as a household name and
Speaker 2: these fathers of progressive ism as household names, because they're
Speaker 2: really the catalysts to all of this chaos that's going on,
Speaker 2: and they've had over one hundred years now. This progressive
Speaker 2: movement started, you know, in the eighteen hundreds. But what
Speaker 2: we're particularly looking at is nineteen hundred and nineteen twenty
Speaker 2: the Woodrow Wilson administration, the eight years there specifically, and
Speaker 2: this is where they really impose. First in the first
Speaker 2: four years of his administration, the domestic progressive policies, total overhaul,
Speaker 2: social reform of America, the US constitutions being experimented on.
Speaker 2: And then his final term, his final four years is
Speaker 2: really to a lablish that same progressivism but on an
Speaker 2: international sort of writ large long view. And so this
Speaker 2: is really the world we live in today. We talk
Speaker 2: about the matrix, and that we live in a matrix.
Speaker 2: We show how they literally created a pseudo environment in
Speaker 2: which most people live in, especially those that watch television,
Speaker 2: and so we've really kind of cracked the code in
Speaker 2: some ways as far as the history goes. We've shown
Speaker 2: brand eise and then we've shown also that nobody wants
Speaker 2: to talk about this. And so I've come to the
Speaker 2: conclusion that this is the information that's being kept from us.
Speaker 2: This is integral to our victory. To understand how progressivism
Speaker 2: fooled us the first time is going to help us
Speaker 2: beat it this time. Because fool me wants shame on you,
Speaker 2: fool me twice. Shame on me, right, So this is
Speaker 2: kind of the approach that we've taken. So I want
Speaker 2: to sort of show how Frankism is actually starting to
Speaker 2: come into the mainstream. We're seeing you know, right wing
Speaker 2: conservative talking heads, people that I don't necessarily trust, but
Speaker 2: you know, people like Glenn Beck, Candice Owen, you know,
Speaker 2: these are obvious social influencers. But we're seeing that they're
Speaker 2: actually bringing up this subject. And it is rare that
Speaker 2: I see anybody mentioned brand Eise and so when I
Speaker 2: hear that name, my earperks and I get interested. And
Speaker 2: so you can see that they're they're they're talking about Frankism,
Speaker 2: they're talking about brand eyes, they're talking about scientific management.
Speaker 2: But it just hasn't reached a critical mass with us
Speaker 2: on the alternative side. But as soon as it's general knowledge,
Speaker 2: we are going to flip the plane on this whole game.
Speaker 1: So here's here's my theory on that, is that these
Speaker 1: people who are put in the position of quote unquote
Speaker 1: influencer and built up like this, when they address a
Speaker 1: topic that independent people who have no stake in it,
Speaker 1: they're not getting paid by somebody, have been talked about
Speaker 1: for a long time, it's basically to steal the thunder
Speaker 1: away from them and basically own that topic because it's
Speaker 1: the first time when the majority of people are going
Speaker 1: to hear about it. So all the stuff that you've
Speaker 1: said that nobody that less people have heard, all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, it's brand new news to these people. It
Speaker 1: takes away the the effect, it takes away the edge,
Speaker 1: it takes away the reality of it because now they
Speaker 1: can steer it however way they want. And that's what
Speaker 1: I'm seeing. If you know, you're starting to hear people
Speaker 1: talking about frankisms because they're trying to control the topic.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're getting out in front of it. This is
Speaker 2: exactly what I've been saying for the last well since
Speaker 2: I saw this Glenn back, that's been three weeks or something.
Speaker 2: And it was Facebook follower friends of miney that brought
Speaker 2: it to my attention. So I thank those people that
Speaker 2: are doing that.
Speaker 1: And this was on you know, Mike Adams a couple
Speaker 1: of times, so it was on a big enough platform. Awesome, man,
Speaker 1: it was a big enough It was on a big
Speaker 1: enough platform for you know, it to be taken notice of.
Speaker 1: And there was a lot that I discussed with the
Speaker 1: Frankism in that history too, so it's possible that they're
Speaker 1: doing a little you know, stop loss on that as well.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's like a detour, right, You're going down this
Speaker 2: road of research and there and then a slight little
Speaker 2: turn in the curve and if you follow it, you're
Speaker 2: gonna end up way off track, right.
Speaker 1: So, and it will be vague discussed once and then
Speaker 1: they'll put a little ribbon on it and that's it.
Speaker 1: That'll be back in their memory.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you'll see candacone she she mentions the secret
Speaker 2: society at Yale but can't remember the name. And I
Speaker 2: think all of your viewers are right now saying yes,
Speaker 2: scull and boats. So you can see that they're not
Speaker 2: they're steering you in a direction and they're admitting some
Speaker 2: things and maybe it's going to be self evident one day,
Speaker 2: but uh yeah, you can see that there's a push
Speaker 2: to get out in front of it. And so if
Speaker 2: you don't mind not going to share a screen, and
Speaker 2: we'll start with the black So Glenn Beck put together
Speaker 2: this Control Freaks and it's he's talking about out once
Speaker 2: doing multiple episodes. Can you see that now? Okay? Perfect?
Speaker 1: It is on all right, we do have sixty five
Speaker 1: people watching over on over on what do you call it?
Speaker 1: Ftjmedia dot com? And here is yours? You want like that?
Speaker 1: Or do you want it like that? How would you
Speaker 1: prefer like that?
Speaker 2: That's cool? That's a righty cool. Okay, now, so we're
Speaker 2: just gonna start this. It's actually runs for about five minutes.
Speaker 2: It goes through a two and a half three minute
Speaker 2: intro and then it deeply explains what I just said.
Speaker 2: So we'll just let her go. If if you've got
Speaker 2: something to do in the next couple of minutes, I
Speaker 2: would recommend you doing it now, all right, So here
Speaker 2: we go. Uh and if there's no volume leg right away? Yep.
Speaker 2: Can you hear them? No?
Speaker 1: I don't hear reathing.
Speaker 2: Okay, So just before I go to share or I
Speaker 2: think I've got to click.
Speaker 1: On some Yeah, Sometimes in an audio slide it should
Speaker 1: be it should be okay if you're doing the the
Speaker 1: exact screen share, but if you're doing the the one
Speaker 1: where you're just doing the entire screen, then you'll have
Speaker 1: to slide a little audio bar. So on the present
Speaker 1: there should be like you can do the chrome tab
Speaker 1: and select the specific one where you go to the entire screen.
Speaker 1: But if you do the entire screen, the audio share
Speaker 1: tab has to be manually changed.
Speaker 2: It shows that it doesn't actually give me the volume option.
Speaker 2: H hang on, so now you can see the screen,
Speaker 2: it says the backstory, right, I'm just gonna press play.
Speaker 2: You let me know. Yep, we'll just need it.
Speaker 3: Wonder why things are the way they are in America?
Speaker 3: Welcome to The Beckstory, my podcast on power. Past inform
Speaker 3: are Present, charts our future? How did we get here?
Speaker 3: The first season is about the cult of expertise in America,
Speaker 3: how it permeated our government, how this allegiance to so
Speaker 3: called expertise has clauses they still for our nation right now.
Speaker 2: A remarkably consistent.
Speaker 3: Through line extends from the original progressive movement right through
Speaker 3: to the actions of left wing elites today. How many
Speaker 3: times lately have you heard, well, do you have a
Speaker 3: doctorate in that? Oh? Are you an expert? Oh you
Speaker 3: must be a scientist. No, I'm not any of those things.
Speaker 3: I am somebody who's a reasonable thinking American. I have
Speaker 3: a right to question, and I also have a responsibility
Speaker 3: to be involved in all of the decisions that now
Speaker 3: seem to be being made for me? So how did
Speaker 3: we get here? How many times in the past few
Speaker 3: years have you heard some version of this. Health experts say,
Speaker 3: your time might be running out.
Speaker 1: The experts say, it's happening experts, health experts say, some experts.
Speaker 1: Experts follow the science, follow the science, to be driven
Speaker 1: by science.
Speaker 3: Listen to the scientists. But if we now have access
Speaker 3: to so many experts and so much science, why is
Speaker 3: it that everything seems to be breaking down and basic
Speaker 3: common sense is gone? Answer? Expertise killed it. Every day now,
Speaker 3: decisions are being made by a class of experts that
Speaker 3: have a direct bearing on your life and the future
Speaker 3: of not only your nation, but the world, and no
Speaker 3: one is asking you about any of it. As the
Speaker 3: world learned in twenty twenty, expertise, untethered from humanity and
Speaker 3: combined with a cult like devotion to the science end quote,
Speaker 3: can have disastrous, far reaching consequences. But again, how did
Speaker 3: we get to this point? That's the journey I want
Speaker 3: to take you on this season. How the experts rose
Speaker 3: to such power, how they wielded that power and struggling
Speaker 3: with the fallout.
Speaker 2: It's almost like they looked at my work and want
Speaker 2: and read everything. It's like they're co opting it. Yep.
Speaker 3: Our story begins with Louise Marie Taylor. She had traveled
Speaker 3: all over Europe numerous times, but she had never seen
Speaker 3: a lavish spectacle quite like the one that greeted her
Speaker 3: in Rome in nineteen twenty seven. Lou as her family
Speaker 3: called her, was in Rome for the third International Management Congress.
Speaker 3: The pageantry and the crowds surrounding the conference demonstrated the
Speaker 3: power of her life eight husband's legacy, Frederick W. Taylor.
Speaker 3: He'd been dead now for twelve years, but he was
Speaker 3: a legend in the field known then as scientific management,
Speaker 3: a field that he basically invented in more ways than one.
Speaker 3: Frederick Taylor's most famous book, called The Principles of Scientific Management,
Speaker 3: was first translated into Italian in nineteen fifteen, the year
Speaker 3: because just eleven years later.
Speaker 1: Yes, all right, so I just checked on your bulletproof
Speaker 1: pub So your first publication on this topic came out
Speaker 1: in December December fifth, twenty twenty three. I just want
Speaker 1: to make sure that that's clear to our audience that
Speaker 1: this has been out there long enough for them to
Speaker 1: establish a retort in a sense, and if they're doing
Speaker 1: a whole series. It's almost as if they're probably going
Speaker 1: to follow a line by line and maybe make a
Speaker 1: rebuttal in a sense, but in conservative way of doing
Speaker 1: so all throughout it, and steer the like you said,
Speaker 1: steer it off the rails, because I don't think you've
Speaker 1: ever spoken about this woman tailor have you?
Speaker 2: So what's that I've never spoken of Frederick Winslow Taylor's mother.
Speaker 2: And this meeting here in Rome is very interesting. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and I think we were talking about Principles of Scientific
Speaker 2: Management even before then. I just hadn't put the whole
Speaker 2: thing together. But I'm going to show you. We'll go
Speaker 2: into Bulletproof pub Brandi's part two and Scientific Management, and
Speaker 2: I'll show you the cover of the Principles of Scientific
Speaker 2: Management and some of the pages inside. And yeah, I.
Speaker 1: Nobody know that book that you were talking about. Yeah,
Speaker 1: for sure, but you've absolutely just definitely discussed that. All right, Sorry,
Speaker 1: didn't mean an interrupt I just was, yeah, wanted to
Speaker 1: establish the timeline here for the people who are listening.
Speaker 2: Right, And what we're seeing here as you listen is
Speaker 2: the entrance of fascism into America. So we're going to
Speaker 2: also get into that here.
Speaker 1: Mm hm, oh, I think you need to put it
Speaker 1: back on the screen.
Speaker 2: It's not I'm getting there.
Speaker 1: Okay, Yeah, Fascism is a is a strange object because
Speaker 1: that was co opted as well, were positive qualities of
Speaker 1: that that were that were sort of hijacked.
Speaker 2: And so what we're really talking about is the union
Speaker 2: between public and private enterprise, right right. They're changing the
Speaker 2: definition of everything together. And that's really what we see
Speaker 2: today is corporations in this run by the scientific uh expert,
Speaker 2: you know, Helper Orla, the head of Pfizers, only a
Speaker 2: veterinarian with a business degree, and he created the chemical
Speaker 2: castration vaccine. These are the words that they used to
Speaker 2: control pig populations. And this is one of the guys
Speaker 2: that was telling your family to take vaccines a couple
Speaker 2: of years ago.
Speaker 1: Right yeah, And I'm sure he'll he'll do the revolving
Speaker 1: share into the FDA at some point too, right, Okay.
Speaker 3: Here, we Italian bureaucrats were so taken with Taylor's principles
Speaker 3: that they created a government agency to promote scientific management.
Speaker 3: At the closing ceremony of the conference, banners, flags, soldiers
Speaker 3: all provided a regal atmosphere in the Italian Senate chamber.
Speaker 3: Lou was moved when a photo of Frederick, her husband,
Speaker 3: was projected on a big screen. Then the leader of
Speaker 3: the conference rose to speak and gave a full throated
Speaker 3: endorsement of scientific management, and the crowd roared with approval.
Speaker 3: After the closing ceremony, Lou received a special invitation from
Speaker 3: the revered conference leader to his private office. He was
Speaker 3: eager to present Lou with a photo of himself in
Speaker 3: in exchange for a photo of her husband, Frederick Taylor,
Speaker 3: whom he said was a great man and had revolutionized management.
Speaker 3: Lou thanked the man who happened to be a little
Speaker 3: bit more than just the Italian leader of the management
Speaker 3: COmON friends. In fact, he was the new leader of
Speaker 3: everything in Italy. He was Benito Mussolini.
Speaker 2: What okay? So this this was new information to me
Speaker 2: that the wife of Frederick Winslow Taylor was meeting with
Speaker 2: Mussolini in Italy in nineteen twenty seven. But I know
Speaker 2: that that book was translated into every language nearly as
Speaker 2: soon as it was published in nineteen eleven originally, and
Speaker 2: before it was published in nineteen thirteen for the general public.
Speaker 2: I would imagine that it had already been translated into
Speaker 2: Russian Chinese, you know both, you know Stalin Trotsky, Lenin Mao.
Speaker 2: All of these communist leaders, they have all openly advocated
Speaker 2: for Taylorism, and they point to that scientific management of
Speaker 2: their own people as a key aspect to their own
Speaker 2: history and the control of their society. So we're seeing
Speaker 2: a revolution in the imposition of this perfection of man
Speaker 2: across the board, not just in America in the Industrial Revolution,
Speaker 2: in this progressive era, but simultaneously in Europe being used
Speaker 2: by these murderers, mass murderers. Now actually a member of Yale, yeah,
Speaker 2: probably Bones, Yep, he was driven. The Yale China relationship
Speaker 2: is the oldest relationship between America and China ever. Obviously,
Speaker 2: Yale is far older than America.
Speaker 1: Anthony Sutton brought that up in his work.
Speaker 2: Right, So it's very interesting what he says there, right,
Speaker 2: that Mussolini is using this book. And so when we
Speaker 2: talk about nineteen seventeen, okay, so like this book is
Speaker 2: published in nineteen eleven, it's published finally to the public
Speaker 2: in nineteen thirteen. Ten seventeen, America goes to war and
Speaker 2: through executive order Woodrow Wilson basically creates his military through
Speaker 2: the War Industries Board and whod and right puts at
Speaker 2: the head of the War Industries Board. This guy, Bernard Baruke.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: You can see him there, Yep, this handsome fella. These
Speaker 2: are the guys that have really created chaos in our world,
Speaker 2: and to a large degree, they're still admired in the
Speaker 2: general you know, mainstream sort of narrative with these people.
Speaker 2: He was a consultant to several presidents.
Speaker 1: Yeah, in surprise, surprise. His dad was a doctor and
Speaker 1: he I mean, if you've if you follow the background,
Speaker 1: he quite literally could be could be a Frankist himself,
Speaker 1: but certainly a Jew.
Speaker 2: This is what I just said this morning to my wife,
Speaker 2: is that Baruk is most definitely a Frankest follower. Or
Speaker 2: you know what these guys all are are reformists, like
Speaker 2: reform Judaism. Another word for that is progressive Judaism. Right
Speaker 2: when you look it up, that's a sin. So there's
Speaker 2: his data. Physician, Confederate soldier, and a member of the
Speaker 2: ku Ku Klux Klan. He's a city of college Phi
Speaker 2: Beta Kappa. So Phi Beta Kappa is William and Mary College,
Speaker 2: and all of these men are Phi Beta Kappa and
Speaker 2: William and Mary is one of the three universities older
Speaker 2: than the United States itself the other days Daniale.
Speaker 1: That's another thing that I think it was Sir Patrick
Speaker 1: mac kind of brought attention to, is the the Greek
Speaker 1: letter fraternities and sororities having you know, their influence on
Speaker 1: the world stage, and that it's like, you know, that's
Speaker 1: your first initiation into the into the first level of
Speaker 1: what do you want to call it if you want
Speaker 1: to call it like a secret society or whatnot. But yes,
Speaker 1: those are all interconnected as well. Also you may as
Speaker 1: well call it. You may as well call it whatever
Speaker 1: you want to call it, because you have people even
Speaker 1: like when I wrote in my book about Sam Walton
Speaker 1: or even James cash Penny. You know, these these heads
Speaker 1: of mega eventually heads of mega corporations, you know, these
Speaker 1: big you know, department store conglomerates and there you all
Speaker 1: have some sort of connection to a fraternity that they
Speaker 1: went through in college and stuff like that. So even
Speaker 1: if you don't see on paper that they're quote unquote freemason,
Speaker 1: it doesn't necessarily mean that they're not interconnected by some
Speaker 1: sort of brotherhood.
Speaker 2: Right, and so in you can find our sort of
Speaker 2: documentary work on YouTube. Still it's called the History of Propaganda.
Speaker 2: You did that, that was you. That's your stuff, the
Speaker 2: History of Propaganda. We're we're putting these together in videos.
Speaker 2: So we're trying to, you know, make as much content
Speaker 2: that is, you know, so we do an audio that
Speaker 2: you can listen to while you're at work.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so are you. So what's the name of the channel?
Speaker 1: Is still bulletproof? Is it called Bulletproof pub the.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Bulletproof pub is our main place to go. That's
Speaker 2: the hub of everything, uh on YouTube. It's the name
Speaker 2: on YouTube. It's the History of Propaganda.
Speaker 1: So that's the actual name of that. Okay, gotcha. I
Speaker 1: didn't know if that was the name of the video,
Speaker 1: if there was the name of the channel. So since
Speaker 1: since you brought that up, let me let me interject
Speaker 1: this real quick because I think it's uh, I think
Speaker 1: it's important to do. So I'm going to just share
Speaker 1: this real quick and I'll just do it the regular shares.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we're trying to do it in several forms of
Speaker 2: content to appeal to everybody.
Speaker 1: So this is us right here on FTJ Media right now.
Speaker 1: FTJ Media is kind of like the reincarnation of josh
Speaker 1: U TV. Josh is behind the construction of this. This
Speaker 1: is taking off like crazy. We only had a soft
Speaker 1: launch so far. We're not on We're not on a
Speaker 1: hard launch. When there's lots of people already paying attention
Speaker 1: to this. There is no absolutely, no uh what do
Speaker 1: you call it, danger of anything ever being deleted an
Speaker 1: he strikes, anything like that. This is a free speech platform.
Speaker 1: So if you were considering, you know, what's going to
Speaker 1: happen to me on YouTube? I just got It's funny
Speaker 1: because as we were trying to figure out the audio,
Speaker 1: I just got a message saying that they took down
Speaker 1: one of my doctor Peter Glinten videos because of medical misinformation.
Speaker 1: And it's been out there for like a year. So
Speaker 1: they just so their AI is scrubbing again. And you
Speaker 1: know these this is my business account for my Hot
Speaker 1: Sauce business, so they're they're potentially you know, attacking that
Speaker 1: at the moment. So ftjmedia dot com this would be
Speaker 1: a great place to keep your stuff, you know, visible,
Speaker 1: but also you'll be able to preserve it here as well. Sure,
Speaker 1: And that's just just a heads up on that, because
Speaker 1: it's it's taken off and it's going to be something
Speaker 1: and it already is. It seems like, so we're we're
Speaker 1: really proud of it, and we're all, you know, it's
Speaker 1: kind of like an invite only at the moment. But yeah,
Speaker 1: I would definitely put the word in for sure, and
Speaker 1: then just changes the permissions and then you're in it.
Speaker 1: And it's really cool because you can import. So if
Speaker 1: you already have the videos on YouTube, you just click
Speaker 1: the import button. You don't have to do any just
Speaker 1: copy the r L and it'll pull up the video. Beautiful,
Speaker 1: really easy to do. Yeah, that's one of the features
Speaker 1: that in a lot of the other sites don't have
Speaker 1: because they want to scrub it. They want they want
Speaker 1: to they want to test it to see if it
Speaker 1: has any of their you know, just like YouTube. They
Speaker 1: won't have an import button because that import overrides them
Speaker 1: being able to test it for copyright, test it for
Speaker 1: all this other bullshit medical misinformation things like that. So
Speaker 1: that's why they don't do that.
Speaker 2: Well that's cool. Yeah, I've never heard of that spot before. Yeah,
Speaker 2: FTJ media dot com ahead of our time once again.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Joshua was seven seven years doing the josh U
Speaker 1: TV and now this is a I guess you could
Speaker 1: call the bulletproof version of it.
Speaker 2: So we went through the beck and I encourage everybody
Speaker 2: to find that, search that out and actually listen to
Speaker 2: the whole hour of long program. Yeah, I'm not sure
Speaker 2: he mentions brand Eyes, how.
Speaker 1: Many has he put out so far?
Speaker 2: Is that? Like, sorry, that's the only one. But he
Speaker 2: said at the end of that video that if there
Speaker 2: was interest in people were watching it and liking it,
Speaker 2: that he would continue to do that. But you heard
Speaker 2: him say throughout the season they were going to start
Speaker 2: to veil their story, right, So there. I don't think
Speaker 2: that there's been one since I have kind of been watching,
Speaker 2: But yeah, very eager to see if he puts out
Speaker 2: a part two or a part three and how deep
Speaker 2: he actually goes, Right.
Speaker 1: And here's what I recognize from bigger platforms, right, they
Speaker 1: talk down to a certain you know, mass audience. The
Speaker 1: way they deliver things very simplistic. It's almost condescending, but
Speaker 1: they don't have that tone in their voice, but it
Speaker 1: is kind of condescending the way they they very you know,
Speaker 1: the parts that they don't want you to understand, might
Speaker 1: be a little bit more tech, might be a little
Speaker 1: bit more detailed, but when they're trying to convey a
Speaker 1: simple message, I mean, maybe this is a good tactic,
Speaker 1: but I would feel, you know, like just listening to it,
Speaker 1: I feel like they were talking, they were oversimplifying a
Speaker 1: few things, like it was an ignorant delivery, playing down
Speaker 1: to a dumbed down audience. And then it talks about
Speaker 1: common sense right after that, but talking to the audience
Speaker 1: like their children. Yeah, and then they have that dramatic
Speaker 1: novelist way of using words to whereas now it's like
Speaker 1: creative writing too, because that they have to entertain at
Speaker 1: the same time, right, so they have to use you know,
Speaker 1: you know, you know, fluffy language, and I just these
Speaker 1: are just things that I pick up when I hear
Speaker 1: other people's deliveries.
Speaker 2: Yep. And so when you look at this, remind yourself
Speaker 2: also that if they're not providing evidence to substantiate what
Speaker 2: they're saying, they are then the authority. We see this
Speaker 2: in a lot in the alternative media too, is that yes,
Speaker 2: you know that you're sharing, but you're not sharing them
Speaker 2: the actual books. So people can open the book themselves
Speaker 2: and read, because I see it a lot that people
Speaker 2: want to be the source of that information and attach
Speaker 2: their name as a brand or whatever. Yeah, so you know,
Speaker 2: we just were actually open source. We just want to
Speaker 2: you know, we provide as much as we can so
Speaker 2: that we can't be accused of being an authority on
Speaker 2: any of this information because I think we all need
Speaker 2: to research it. We all need to look into this
Speaker 2: for ourselves and read. The primary source material.
Speaker 1: We're what we're delivering is our conclusions based on you know,
Speaker 1: our analysis of it. And that's again a lot of
Speaker 1: times I know people who are responsible like you and
Speaker 1: I will say if this is like the if right,
Speaker 1: if this is accurate, and if this is true, then
Speaker 1: this is what would be the conclusion, always leaving it
Speaker 1: out to be you know, potentially corrupted data and understanding
Speaker 1: that it could be. You know, that way, you leave
Speaker 1: room for like figuring new things out about it.
Speaker 2: And that is the scientific expert aspect. You're creating a
Speaker 2: level of apathy still if you're just going to trust
Speaker 2: what Glenn Beck says or candae oone says, that's no
Speaker 2: better than just blindly following expert opinion.
Speaker 1: Right and there's such influencers that as they're talking about
Speaker 1: this rise of the expert, they're actually playing that part
Speaker 1: that role. Well, it's pretty cool.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah. And so he went through that whole one
Speaker 2: hour or whatever it is talking about the term about
Speaker 2: scientific management, and he doesn't mention the guy that coins
Speaker 2: the term. So you can see there I just put
Speaker 2: in who coined the term scientific management. It was Brandeis
Speaker 2: who created the term scientific management to refer to Taylor's research.
Speaker 2: Taylor summed up his own work with these words, true
Speaker 2: scientific management requires a mental revolution on the parts of
Speaker 2: management and of workers. This is the perfectibility of man.
Speaker 2: This is leading to the singularity movement, technocratic movement, the AI.
Speaker 2: This is kind of like the first steps of combining man.
Speaker 1: And machine and secular humanism. That's a that's a Masonic
Speaker 1: theme as well. So that's that's.
Speaker 2: Interesting to elaborate on what you just said there. What
Speaker 2: was the term that you.
Speaker 1: Used, secular humanism? Man is God? So are they trying
Speaker 1: to and it's it's it's the the concept that also
Speaker 1: like this plays into it, and that nature is something
Speaker 1: that can be overcome.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: A certain man in Germany actually mentioned this in the
Speaker 1: in his Nefarious book, nefarious because people don't want you
Speaker 1: to read it, but he talks about how you know,
Speaker 1: this idea, this misconception that that you can wield your
Speaker 1: power over nature is going to be the downfall of
Speaker 1: man because it'll catch.
Speaker 2: Up to you. Right. And so we have traced it
Speaker 2: back to at least the enlightened absolutists that were in
Speaker 2: Sweden and Prussia in the seventeen hundreds, and this is
Speaker 2: where they decide to do censuses and gather statistics and
Speaker 2: facts on society, compile that information, and then apply it back.
Speaker 2: So this is really the origins of the feedback loop,
Speaker 2: Norbert Wiener's feedback loop. They're just gathering as much information,
Speaker 2: they're studying human behaviors, and then they're applying it back
Speaker 2: in to steer society. This is happening in the seventeen
Speaker 2: hundreds with the enlightened absolutists.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that crazy how far back they were doing that.
Speaker 2: And so this is where they borrow everything from.
Speaker 1: And then that seven hundreds era led the mid of that.
Speaker 1: You have Jacob Frank in the seventeen fifties coverting baptized,
Speaker 1: getting baptized and having twenty six thousand as far as
Speaker 1: baptized baptized so they could infiltrate all Catholicism. And you
Speaker 1: know that's when the Brethren started popping up too, not
Speaker 1: too long after that, the Asiatic, the Bohemian, the Aravian,
Speaker 1: and so on and so on.
Speaker 2: Yep. And I think there's a connection to Albert Pike too.
Speaker 1: His definitely with him.
Speaker 2: Yeah, three world wars that he talks about, there's definitely
Speaker 2: a lot of parallels there. I would also include Abraham
Speaker 2: Lincoln in all of this. He was, you know, one
Speaker 2: of the original progressives in the emancipation of the slaves.
Speaker 2: But what we're showing is that he just released the
Speaker 2: slaves or the blacks into the general population of the
Speaker 2: overall prison that included everybody.
Speaker 1: Yeah, of course, right, and then the consent of the
Speaker 1: government was the thing that they were really at war
Speaker 1: with is so you don't you don't get to you
Speaker 1: don't get to secede, buddy, right.
Speaker 2: And all of these guys to a man, don't like nature,
Speaker 2: whether it's human nature, natural law, any of these things.
Speaker 2: They totally are abhorrent to these these guys, whether it's
Speaker 2: Oliver Wendell Holmes us Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, US
Speaker 2: Supreme Court Justice, and Lewis brandeis US Supreme Court Justice.
Speaker 2: Two of those are reform judaeis. They're not even they're
Speaker 2: secular essentially, they weren't religious at all yet. Brandeis in
Speaker 2: his fifties, late fifties or early sixties. Changed is his
Speaker 2: name in honor of his Zionist uncle who was in
Speaker 2: the Lincoln administration.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and then have you ever heard of the Abraham
Speaker 1: Lincoln Brigade that's straight of communism?
Speaker 2: No, they have, But that's what I'm sensing from a
Speaker 2: little bit of research now in him. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they picked the right They pick the right guy
Speaker 1: for that. People don't. People think, oh, it's that's an inversion. Well,
Speaker 1: and I was like, technically in this particular instance, it's
Speaker 1: really not. Because I mean, if you ever want to
Speaker 1: think of a Roman agent or whatever, the banking agent,
Speaker 1: then you got that. You got your guy right there.
Speaker 2: Right. So also I want to show who founded the
Speaker 2: Harvard Law Review. Lewis D. Brandeis founded in eighteen eighty
Speaker 2: seven by future Supreme Court Justice Lewis D. Brandeis. The
Speaker 2: Harvard Law Review is an entirely student edited journal that
Speaker 2: is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Now we've
Speaker 2: shown also that he is the founder of Harvard Law
Speaker 2: Review Association. This is actually one of the sources that
Speaker 2: I use in our in our article on the science
Speaker 2: of Law. I think that's where we talk because Harvard
Speaker 2: Law School is sort of the central point to spreading
Speaker 2: this throughout America. Harvard Law Schools especially is like the
Speaker 2: primary mover here. Brandeize Frankfurt established the next wave of
Speaker 2: sociological jurisprudence practicing lawyers, Dean Atchison Corker In These guys
Speaker 2: end up being FDR's brain trust, and there you can
Speaker 2: read about them in the Wise Men, So you can
Speaker 2: see Brandeis is influencing Woodrow Wilson nineteen twelve to nineteen twenty.
Speaker 2: And then they have to kind of sit out, Well,
Speaker 2: it's Republican presidents up until Roosevelt, and these guys have
Speaker 2: known Roosevelt from his days under Woodrow Wilson and Bernard
Speaker 2: Brewke at the War Industry Board. So these guys are
Speaker 2: old buddies, and so Brandeis is really one of the
Speaker 2: main formulators of the FDR brain trust and the new deal,
Speaker 2: which is kind of the real finalizing moves of this
Speaker 2: progressive movement that was first established for presidents prior to
Speaker 2: that with Woodrow Wilson.
Speaker 1: And as you pointed out, also you know basically the formulator,
Speaker 1: the person who structured the Balfour Declaration for belfour, he
Speaker 1: was not just a what do you call it, the consultant.
Speaker 1: He was pretty much the lead man on that.
Speaker 2: Yes, it was through his hands that the final drafting
Speaker 2: was done. They were in according to the British Papers
Speaker 2: nineteen nineteen to nineteen thirty nine, the British Foreign Office
Speaker 2: papers or whatever I can show you these those are
Speaker 2: receipts for it that he's in a room with Arthur Balfour,
Speaker 2: He's getting cabled from Rothschild's, the British government and the
Speaker 2: American government, and it is Brandeis who makes the final
Speaker 2: sale on the language that's included. There actually a big
Speaker 2: battle between the Anglo American establishment, specifically Lord Milner and
Speaker 2: Robert Cecil in putting the one key sentence in the
Speaker 2: Balfour Declaration, and Rothschild didn't want it in there, the
Speaker 2: one that says it being easily understood that nothing shall
Speaker 2: be done to prejudice the religious or the civil and
Speaker 2: religious rights of the already existing non Jewish communities in Palestine.
Speaker 2: So that is it's a direct contradiction.
Speaker 1: Pardon is not favery telling of the future at all, right.
Speaker 2: Right, And so when you go back to the Founding
Speaker 2: Document of Israel November Tewo, nineteen seventeen, I often share this,
Speaker 2: and it's that sentence is underlined because it shows you
Speaker 2: undeniably that there's a contradiction in their behavior today and
Speaker 2: what they promised then. And contradictions are evidences of lies.
Speaker 2: So then you have to determine which one's the lie. Well,
Speaker 2: it's easy to see today which one's the lie, right
Speaker 2: and right?
Speaker 1: I mean for people right exactly and for people who
Speaker 1: don't it like fully grasp what it means to be
Speaker 1: a frankist. I try to. I try to add a
Speaker 1: little little meat to this because when you're when you're
Speaker 1: talking about Louis brandeis being a frankest and coming from
Speaker 1: a frankest family. I've seen on YouTube a woman describing
Speaker 1: that as some wonderfully religious family and how how how
Speaker 1: you know, endeared he was to his family. Those people
Speaker 1: pass around their own children, they they incest is one
Speaker 1: of their one of their duties, so is drinking and
Speaker 1: consuming of blood and flesh, typically of a child. This
Speaker 1: is all stuff goes down to Talmudic and Babylonian bullshit.
Speaker 1: But I mean this is all incorporated into the Frankest too.
Speaker 1: And you know the orgies, the white swapping, the drug taking,
Speaker 1: the mysticism, all that, but child abuse is one of
Speaker 1: the main things. And if you think that they had
Speaker 1: a close family, you don't. Yeah, I'm sure they did,
Speaker 1: and that's who That's the type of mindset this person
Speaker 1: had that was behind so much of them moving and
Speaker 1: shaking in the nineteen tens all the way up to
Speaker 1: the thirties and completely reshaped America. At the Helm was
Speaker 1: a Francist who was tied very closely to the Rothschild
Speaker 1: family through his.
Speaker 2: Family from before he was born. His father, Adolf was
Speaker 2: a Rothschild agent. Came to the Midwest to open it up,
Speaker 2: that is admitted, and that.
Speaker 1: Was out of Prussia, right but you know, people, yeah,
Speaker 1: again that's basically Germany in a sense because depending on
Speaker 1: where it is. But that's you know, you're also probably
Speaker 1: looking right around like the Frankfurt, frankfort On the main
Speaker 1: area and stuff like that too often. Bach, that's all
Speaker 1: A lot of this stuff comes from.
Speaker 2: Right, exactly. That whole region of Prussia is where nearly
Speaker 2: everything of our Western culture comes from. Right. And so
Speaker 2: Brandeis comes from from a place called Brandeis on the Elb.
Speaker 2: So it's a city on the Elbe river of Prague.
Speaker 2: So they're they're aristocratic if their their name is the
Speaker 2: city right there, there's some sort of reverence there, some
Speaker 2: sort of uh, you know, aristocratic nobility.
Speaker 1: You should you should do a hyphenated title to one
Speaker 1: of your one of your next presentations, like Prague gnosis, right,
Speaker 1: getting getting into the depth of like why that was
Speaker 1: such a hotbed, you know.
Speaker 2: Yep. And so our social science has come from there, psychology, philosophy,
Speaker 2: or entire Western education K through twelve comes from there.
Speaker 2: We've proven this through all of our work. This is
Speaker 2: really just self evident. There's no debate. It's irrefutable that
Speaker 2: a lot of our Western culture was adopted from the
Speaker 2: Prussian Reformation. After they lost to Napoleon, they totally overhauled
Speaker 2: their whole entire government to be more lataristic and have
Speaker 2: more patriotic population that help establish and build things through factories, right,
Speaker 2: so you can see that they totally directly adopt this
Speaker 2: into America and we call it the Industrial Revolution.
Speaker 1: So, if I'm not mistaken, wasn't Harvard like founded in
Speaker 1: the sixteen hundreds, like it's one of the oldest institutions
Speaker 1: in America.
Speaker 2: Harvard is the oldest of the three, I think, and
Speaker 2: it's well older than the United States. Same with Yale,
Speaker 2: same with William and Mary. And I think that this
Speaker 2: is the trifecta that we need to really establish that
Speaker 2: a lot of this direction and you can talk about
Speaker 2: the illuminati or whatever it is, it's the directive that's
Speaker 2: going on that we're feeling today really comes out of
Speaker 2: those three universities. And then, as we've shown, I think
Speaker 2: in part nine The Rise of the University, that the
Speaker 2: entire Association of American Universities was established with this idea
Speaker 2: of having the expert governed society, you know, and then
Speaker 2: the land on that is a truth bomb. That's incredible,
Speaker 2: But go I encourage you to go read chapter nine.
Speaker 2: If you don't believe that, we show that, you know,
Speaker 2: the university was key and the elimination of the liberal arts,
Speaker 2: our ability to chain reasoning together and and you know,
Speaker 2: ask the who, what, why, we're when, and know when
Speaker 2: somebody's lying to you, you know, the logical fallacies, knowledge
Speaker 2: of all of those things was removed from our schooling
Speaker 2: and what went in place with but Pavlovian bells and
Speaker 2: whistles and forty five minute classes that you don't quite
Speaker 2: grasp and you end up with a seriously dumbed down
Speaker 2: population deliberately And you know, there's been books obviously written.
Speaker 1: Not problem solving, not not critical thinking, but memorization effect
Speaker 1: and that means accepting whatever someone's telling you. And there
Speaker 1: you rise of the expert all over again.
Speaker 2: Right. And so John Taylor Gatto, your viewers and listeners
Speaker 2: are probably familiar with, same with Charlotte Izzerbeat. The deliberate
Speaker 2: dumbing down of America is sort of they've corralled that
Speaker 2: whole piece of information. We use that them as source material. Now,
Speaker 2: what I just heard on a recent video was that
Speaker 2: John Taylor Gaddo was actually a descendant of Frederick Winslow Taylor.
Speaker 2: So I haven't been able to confirm that, but that
Speaker 2: is interesting. And so in the video it says that
Speaker 2: John Taylor Gaddo was trying to push back against his
Speaker 2: family familial lineage of trying to control societies, trying to
Speaker 2: sort of blow the whistle on this. And so this
Speaker 2: is the first blush. Is just in the last forty
Speaker 2: eight hours, I've discovered this. So just sort of rolling
Speaker 2: that around in my mind, I went and looked to
Speaker 2: see if I could make that connection. I had. It's
Speaker 2: not going to be easy, it's not on the surface,
Speaker 2: but we maybe be able to do that.
Speaker 1: So the Frankfurt School was moved around a few times,
Speaker 1: but it basically dissolved into Harvard and Columbia University did not.
Speaker 2: Well Columbia, I would, I couldn't verify Harvard, but that
Speaker 2: makes a lot of sense. I know Columbia because that's
Speaker 2: where the University of Exile is and that is where
Speaker 2: they moved to Frankfurt School the invitation of Columbia's president
Speaker 2: at the time. So that's moving Marxism right into one
Speaker 2: of your most important and oldest universities, one that actually
Speaker 2: has a teacher's college too conveniently, which is.
Speaker 1: Which is funny when you talk, when you know you're
Speaker 1: trying to if there's any question whether or not there's
Speaker 1: uh this protest the Palestinian thing was concocted or not.
Speaker 1: I mean, look at the history of Columbia. There's they're
Speaker 1: showing you optics that they want you to see so
Speaker 1: they can steer that conversation too, so that they can
Speaker 1: make people who don't like genocide into some liberal idiots, right,
Speaker 1: and then you'll denounce that and you'll go progural. It's
Speaker 1: it's it's in none of those mind games, yep.
Speaker 2: And I also want to say about the liberal arts
Speaker 2: here is that they moved they removed the liberal arts
Speaker 2: and Greek and Latin from general education and put it
Speaker 2: at the highest echolons of universities, especially Harvard, so only
Speaker 2: those that could afford to be there would get that uh,
Speaker 2: that null of asking the who, why we're a when,
Speaker 2: and the logical process and being able to change reasoning
Speaker 2: together and then they understand logical fallacies so they're not
Speaker 2: going to be lied to and they become that twenty
Speaker 2: percent of the management class that is social influencers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, limited hangout or a price to get in. That's
Speaker 1: what they do with allopathy too. When the when the
Speaker 1: Rockefellers take over, you know, the education of homeopath and
Speaker 1: things like that. Which was the predominant medicine in this
Speaker 1: country at one point. They make it more exclusive, they
Speaker 1: make it more difficult to get through, and by that
Speaker 1: alone gives you this again logical fallacy, this idea that
Speaker 1: it's so prestigious that you don't actually question the information
Speaker 1: that you're given because it must be something of value
Speaker 1: if it's behind so many pay windows, and you know,
Speaker 1: held that such a high regard, even though that's all fabricated.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I really do think that this is what
Speaker 2: they are gatekeeping. When we look could gate gatekeepers. Rarely
Speaker 2: do people ask specifically what it is that they're gatekeeping.
Speaker 2: And I think it is this general progressive era that
Speaker 2: leads back to you know, the seventeen hundreds and all
Speaker 2: of this. I mean, once you get into this this
Speaker 2: vein of research, all of a sudden everything happening today
Speaker 2: makes a lot of sense. The Luciferian aspects of our politicians,
Speaker 2: and the adrenochrome and all of these things that are
Speaker 2: sort of talked about.
Speaker 1: The child, all those our details of a Francis too right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So I would do all those people that are
Speaker 2: into that that vein of research to look into Frankism
Speaker 2: because you're going to find the origins of all of it.
Speaker 2: You know, abarahma bitch and all of these people that's
Speaker 2: the right, the que Tartaries and all of that they're
Speaker 2: talking about. This is the origins of it. Is Francism,
Speaker 2: I would say.
Speaker 1: And if you when people talk about Illuminati, I mean,
Speaker 1: although they've destroyed that word because of misuse and uh,
Speaker 1: you know whatever, you really can think about it as Okay,
Speaker 1: when the Jesuits were dissolved in seventeen seventy three or
Speaker 1: whatever it was, and they were at one time the
Speaker 1: greatest enemies of the Protestants and the Freemasons. Now all
Speaker 1: of a sudden they're showing up in lodges. And this
Speaker 1: Frankism was it was Francis and Jesuits that basically co
Speaker 1: opted and restructured the Masonic lodges. So that's where you
Speaker 1: get this development of quote unquote the perfectibilist in or
Speaker 1: the Illuminati. And that's so it's easier for people to
Speaker 1: see it like that than it is to say, oh,
Speaker 1: just because it's too vague to just say illuminati, because
Speaker 1: then you can throw that lab on everything. But if
Speaker 1: you see how it was building up, and you know,
Speaker 1: John Robison in Proofs of Conspiracy describes how they changed,
Speaker 1: how they added a bunch of different degrees. And you know,
Speaker 1: at one time the French Lodge had like forty five
Speaker 1: degrees to their thing, and it's like some of it
Speaker 1: was just it's just hoity twity. But also they were
Speaker 1: very subversive and that's the only place they could discuss
Speaker 1: this stuff. They would denouncing religion. They were going against
Speaker 1: everything that he saw as a freemason. What they used
Speaker 1: to stand for was turned on its head. It was
Speaker 1: completely inverted backward, and it was very anti monarchy, very
Speaker 1: anti really no ruling class, and that was on purpose
Speaker 1: to destroy what was there so they could build their
Speaker 1: own right.
Speaker 2: So we mentioned Candice Owens bringing this up, So we're
Speaker 2: going to just there's a couple three or four quick
Speaker 2: little clips that I want to show because it is
Speaker 2: cracking the mainstream. The fact that they're actually bringing these
Speaker 2: things up means that we are winning on some levels
Speaker 2: for sure that we don't get to see. But when
Speaker 2: the conclusion is that they better start getting out in
Speaker 2: front of this message, it shows that we're directly over
Speaker 2: the target. So here she talks about all faiths being
Speaker 2: infiltrated by Frankism. Interesting, and let me know, if you
Speaker 2: can't hear anything.
Speaker 4: Here, the implications there are quite severe, quite severe. So,
Speaker 4: like I said, I can show you how all of
Speaker 4: our faiths have been infiltrated. And I say this, the
Speaker 4: Jewish faith, the Christian faith, and of course the Muslim
Speaker 4: faith has been infiltrated by people with the explicit aim
Speaker 4: as sabotized you by had of taking over the world,
Speaker 4: that through sin, they would be redeemed. That they had
Speaker 4: to commit sins. It's a form of gnossism. The more
Speaker 4: that you sin, the more egregious your sin.
Speaker 1: We will inherit the earth.
Speaker 4: And I want to take a quick pause right here
Speaker 4: because I want to thank one of our sponsors.
Speaker 1: It's a great one.
Speaker 2: Okay. So that's the general summary of what Frankism is.
Speaker 2: Their mission is to take over the world through Antinomianism,
Speaker 2: and the greater the sin, the quicker it's going to happen.
Speaker 1: So what do you think they're corrupting? You know, the
Speaker 1: perversions and stuff like that, and the transgender push and
Speaker 1: all this, right, because if people, you know, give them
Speaker 1: a ridiculous thing to follow, and the people who followed.
Speaker 1: Those are the people that you, you know.
Speaker 2: You lead.
Speaker 1: It's just you know, everybody has their their what do
Speaker 1: you call it, their vice, and they'll they'll supply that
Speaker 1: vice and then they'll really destroy all that is good.
Speaker 1: And if they have to get rid of the people
Speaker 1: who are not corruptible, then they have no problem with
Speaker 1: that either.
Speaker 2: Yes, And so you know that corruption that you're talking about, transgenderism,
Speaker 2: that all comes from Prussia to and the Ymar Republic
Speaker 2: after the First World War. Oh, of course see the
Speaker 2: Berlin babble on Berlin one hundred thousand prostitutes in Berlin
Speaker 2: and who brought that? And so we're living in YMR
Speaker 2: two point zero yep. So here she mentions Brandie the.
Speaker 4: Jews around time obviously because as we're talking about spirituality,
Speaker 4: for those of you who are thinking about praying, don't
Speaker 4: even know where to start. Well, I can't recommend enough
Speaker 4: hallow the app hollow in the summer, and you know,
Speaker 4: I like to spend time with my family to travel.
Speaker 4: There's one routine that I really never like of and
Speaker 4: I have seen that when you look into the individuals
Speaker 4: who are definitively frankest, who practiced like I said in
Speaker 4: your own time research Lewis brandeis he came from a
Speaker 4: family of Francis Cio.
Speaker 2: She mispronounces his name. Yes, this is one one pattern
Speaker 2: I see. If they mentioned Walter Lippman, the founding father
Speaker 2: of modern journalism, they'll say Walter Lippmann or Louis Brandy's
Speaker 2: or you know, they just they mess it all up.
Speaker 1: It may be. It may be a way to get
Speaker 1: people who might be curious enough to do googleseners not
Speaker 1: know how to spell something. Sure, you know, just a little.
Speaker 4: It's explicit. You can find this everywhere. This cannot be contested.
Speaker 4: No one can tell you. No, it's not a conspiracy theory.
Speaker 4: This man, Okay, was a Francist. He kept a photo
Speaker 4: of a portrait of Ava Frank, the unholy Virgin, the
Speaker 4: non virgin Giva Frank, who was considered a messiah, first
Speaker 4: female messiah to the mystics, on his desk, the tops
Speaker 4: of our government, who's supposed to be married into.
Speaker 2: The proper orientation towards moral and ethical practices. No, isn't
Speaker 2: that sort of what we're supposed to be thinking? Us
Speaker 2: Supreme Court justice does right, and it's it's inverting it all,
Speaker 2: and it's very telling of you know, if if the
Speaker 2: leader of the of the movement, Jacob Frank was passing
Speaker 2: around his own daughter like that and probably ancestuously having
Speaker 2: you know as well.
Speaker 1: I mean, what do you think they do to their
Speaker 1: children and what do you think they'll do to yours?
Speaker 2: Yep. And brandeis married a second cousin.
Speaker 1: Yeah, a frank Gist family.
Speaker 4: So this faith made to America and when you start
Speaker 4: to research these people, they committed a lot of their
Speaker 4: time to the Zionist cause.
Speaker 1: Makes me uncomfortable. She doesn't mention. Here is how the
Speaker 1: Jesuits are also infiltrating literally almost at the same time.
Speaker 1: In the eighteen hundreds actually prior to and uh, Samuel Morris,
Speaker 1: the guy who created a telegraph in morse code yep,
Speaker 1: documents this through the Leopold Society. Out of what the
Speaker 1: hell ever was I forgot some a bitch I can't
Speaker 1: remember now, But but he's which which whis? When you
Speaker 1: if you're gonna say that it came to America like
Speaker 1: on the backs of Jesuits and Roman Catholics who were
Speaker 1: quote unquote converts from the from the Frankest movement itself,
Speaker 1: which she's a Roman Catholic, So I think there's a
Speaker 1: reason why that's not being just that part, that element
Speaker 1: of that of the Jesuit Frankest connection is not being
Speaker 1: made here.
Speaker 2: Right, And uh, people are calling her a Pilgrim society
Speaker 2: plant that she's probably a member of the Pilgrim society.
Speaker 2: So you'll see that they'll be like knowledge shadows that
Speaker 2: she creates. Like you're talking. They'll talk about a subject,
Speaker 2: but they won't talk about, you know, certain areas of
Speaker 2: it specifically. And that's what we're seeing here.
Speaker 1: No, I don't know about it Kendae too much. She
Speaker 1: does she express Christian Zionus views when it comes to Israel.
Speaker 2: Yes, she does. In this video, she says that Christians
Speaker 2: and Jews must get together and help stop this. She
Speaker 2: says that somewhere here in this fifty two and a
Speaker 2: half minutes, I just heard it again this morning.
Speaker 1: We need the devil and God to get together to
Speaker 1: fight the devil. Right, sounds good.
Speaker 2: You're talking about them not bringing up certain things. Listen
Speaker 2: to her. When she tries to bring up stolen bones,
Speaker 2: her mind just blanks on it. And so how do
Speaker 2: you actually blank on I would say the most famous
Speaker 2: secret society that we have in the United.
Speaker 4: States in that club, the Yale Club. The name is
Speaker 4: escaping me right now. But these were the elites, Okay,
Speaker 4: these were not people that were on the fringes, this
Speaker 4: person writes.
Speaker 2: So we show the creation of the CFRs through this
Speaker 2: group called the Inquiry. And they're all Phi beta Kappa.
Speaker 2: They're all magna cum laude a ssuma cum laude cum laudes.
Speaker 2: They are the top of class masters sometimes double masters
Speaker 2: of arts. All of them have Bachelor of Arts degrees.
Speaker 2: So they've weaponized knowledge and gave it to these tools
Speaker 2: of the trade. And you know, these men, largely driven
Speaker 2: by a noble lie. They helped establish all of this
Speaker 2: through progressivism. Right, We've always heard this term the road
Speaker 2: to hell is paved with good intentions. This is really
Speaker 2: what happened throughout the twentieth century is that we were
Speaker 2: fooled by these nice sounding words that it looks like
Speaker 2: we're being fooled by again. So this is where history repeats,
Speaker 2: and if we understand this, we won't condemn ourselves to
Speaker 2: repeating it. So it's interesting that you know, she blanks
Speaker 2: on skull and bones, So you know, there's some gate
Speaker 2: keeping there, I would say. And so then at forty
Speaker 2: eight minute mark, we're gonna she has a viewer listener
Speaker 2: right in and.
Speaker 1: Oh, Voodoo Rangers says she she blinks because, like usual,
Speaker 1: she doesn't know the subjects she's talking about, just what
Speaker 1: she's been told to say.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Sure, ah, so you see Candice owns there. Oh yep, yeah, okay,
Speaker 2: So I'm just gonna play this. This is where she
Speaker 2: mentions the Rothschild's involvement in creating Israel.
Speaker 4: Child's created Israel I do not have that as a fact,
Speaker 4: or locals dot com and find me there.
Speaker 1: This person sold. Second, she says she doesn't have the
Speaker 1: sheets on the Rothschilds creating. It's in the freaking declaration, so.
Speaker 2: Right exactly, and so we'll get to that in a
Speaker 2: sect here.
Speaker 4: This person says, the Rothschild's created Israel I do not
Speaker 4: have that as a fact. But I'm reading your comment,
Speaker 4: this person says, acts.
Speaker 2: See. So now one of the great misbeliefs that is
Speaker 2: going on right now is that Israel was founded in
Speaker 2: nineteen forty eight. It was founded thirty one years before that,
Speaker 2: right nineteen seventeen, the Balfour Declaration okay.
Speaker 1: And they were working at us since nineteen oh five
Speaker 1: give or take when.
Speaker 2: For sure, even before that there was work towards a
Speaker 2: Jewish homeland in Palestine. And you know, Christians were largely
Speaker 2: at the tip of the spear there, as we've shown
Speaker 2: in evangelical or Christian dispensationalism in the social.
Speaker 1: Gospel, right, which would which would lead right back to
Speaker 1: the Francis again and their infiltration.
Speaker 2: Sure, and that's Crowley is involved there. You know, these
Speaker 2: we start to connect some really interesting people together, you know, Huxley,
Speaker 2: Crowley and Christopher Risherwood. We're all in Berlin together at
Speaker 2: the same moment that Berlin fell. All of those men bisexuals.
Speaker 1: Did I tell you about, you know his Croley's connection
Speaker 1: to Frakism, like Hiss were also the Christian Brethren that
Speaker 1: they were in the the Exclusive Brethren.
Speaker 2: Which was the exclusive one.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, there's exclusive in Plymouth. You know Darby I
Speaker 1: think was the exclusive but ye, that came out of
Speaker 1: that's the Christian Zionist quote unquote Francis, that's what there was.
Speaker 1: One of the people who established those brethrens. So and
Speaker 1: when you have this exterior of like puritanical upbringing. You know,
Speaker 1: you have Crowley could very well have been getting the
Speaker 1: same treatment if it was you know, as far as
Speaker 1: being passed around and stuff like that. And he was
Speaker 1: very close to his father, and when his father died
Speaker 1: of like I think it was like tongue cancer or
Speaker 1: something like that, he was he was destroyed and uh
Speaker 1: went a little haywire. But there's probably more to that,
Speaker 1: you know, there's probably more to the dynamics of that
Speaker 1: relationship and that family. And they were wealthy because of
Speaker 1: the croly Ale and all that stuff like that. So
Speaker 1: that that is that alone, but in addition to that,
Speaker 1: well you see happening a lot and how it's a
Speaker 1: good way to like track these people is that you know,
Speaker 1: Beta Francis or Beta Jesuit is the perfect what do
Speaker 1: you call it?
Speaker 2: Training to be a spy And Crowley was a diplomat, Yeah,
Speaker 2: sure was.
Speaker 1: It was. It wasn't prior to m I five. I
Speaker 1: forgot what it's called, but it was he was. He
Speaker 1: was a spy for the b for Britain, yep.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And he was probably a double agent, maybe even
Speaker 2: a triple agent.
Speaker 1: And a lot of people and a lot of people
Speaker 1: that are these things are either from a Jesuit background
Speaker 1: or a Franca's background, because that is who they were created.
Speaker 1: That is, you know, they want those people in these
Speaker 1: positions to be spies because they're never to be outwardly,
Speaker 1: but they are inwardly and that's that's a signature of
Speaker 1: the Frankis the Jesuits.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So this is the article that I wrote Brandei's
Speaker 2: Part two, Scientific Management and his influence on Taylor, the
Speaker 2: Taylor Society, and how he actually threw the skull and
Speaker 2: Bones funded National Consumers League established the legislation because Brandeis
Speaker 2: was known as the People's Attorney. So not only is
Speaker 2: a u is he a U S Supreme Court justice,
Speaker 2: but he is one of the He's really the founding
Speaker 2: radical US Supreme Court justice. We see those today now
Speaker 2: a lot. But he was also the people's attorney, so
Speaker 2: he sort of had a he had built a reputation
Speaker 2: from nineteen hundred to nineteen ten, nineteen twelve.
Speaker 1: It's always the people's something or the workers say something
Speaker 1: when it comes to communism.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And so there's the book The Principles of Scientific Management,
Speaker 2: and in behind his Midville steel works where he first
Speaker 2: started experimenting on the perfectibility of Matt and so we
Speaker 2: introduce everybody to the National Consumers League. And these are
Speaker 2: women of the progressive movement. These are famous women of
Speaker 2: the progressive movement that a lot of people admire today.
Speaker 2: And they'll share means of their famous quotes. But what
Speaker 2: that is evidence is of is us getting fooled again
Speaker 2: feminism right, So we have to be more sophisticated in
Speaker 2: our understanding of this world, more mature in our perspectives
Speaker 2: to understand it in order to make better moves and
Speaker 2: be successful. So he gets together with the National Consumers League.
Speaker 2: All of the literature is paid for by Russell Sage,
Speaker 2: which is the executive arm of Skull and Bones. So
Speaker 2: brandeis is Phi beta cap. I haven't been able to
Speaker 2: tag him Skull and Bones, but he's a member of
Speaker 2: all of these gentlemen's clubs. Cosmos.
Speaker 1: Living into David Quake Gildman will be another another way
Speaker 1: to yeah, yeah, the Russell Trust and gaining all those
Speaker 1: yashes together.
Speaker 2: Too, for sure. So you can see that they meet
Speaker 2: him and ask him to advocate for their their movement.
Speaker 2: And this is the official story that they met at
Speaker 2: his place. So I included a picture of his place.
Speaker 2: So yeah, efficiency, And I can't remember the title of
Speaker 2: this book now, but it's written by Josephine Goldmark. And
Speaker 2: Josephine Goldmark's father is a father of seven sisters back
Speaker 2: in the same area Prague that the Brandies grew up
Speaker 2: in and brand Eyes. They're related, the goal Marks and
Speaker 2: the Brandeises and and Brandeis marries his second cousin m Yeah.
Speaker 2: And it was a revolutionary liberal, revolutionary aristocratic, you know,
Speaker 2: in the mid eighteen hundreds too, social influencer. You can
Speaker 2: see Joseph gold Mark's work as a reformer in the
Speaker 2: progressive area did much to redesign the American social contract.
Speaker 2: This is why we say that a US Supreme Court
Speaker 2: justice is really the maker of our modern day social contract,
Speaker 2: this modern day shit show that we're all just totally
Speaker 2: frustrated with. And that is left you.
Speaker 1: Sorry, I said, you do go great work explaining the
Speaker 1: social contract too.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: And so I would also steer people towards Larkin Rose's uh,
Speaker 2: mister Jones's plantation he talks about that's really about Stadism,
Speaker 2: but you can really apply it to the scientific expert
Speaker 2: and how he's you know, Walter Lippman called him the
Speaker 2: entering wedge. This is where where middle management comes from.
Speaker 2: It's why it goes against our very human nature to
Speaker 2: have a micromanaging middleman, always looking over our shoulder while
Speaker 2: we're at work. This is an extension of tailorism.
Speaker 1: And for those of you who are wondering what statism is,
Speaker 1: you're living in it right now.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And it's a it's a cult religion too. Yeah,
Speaker 2: to believe that you're going this is a progressive. This
Speaker 2: comes directly out of this era to believe in patriotically
Speaker 2: and so much in your country. And then it's US
Speaker 2: foreign policy. This is progressivism. This is the veils that
Speaker 2: have been put over our eyes that we cannot see
Speaker 2: that Morpheus talks about.
Speaker 1: And I noticed a Fabian society being mentioned there. How
Speaker 1: much of a dive have done into their influence.
Speaker 2: Huge deep dive into the Fabian society. They totally connect.
Speaker 2: This is the big thing here to understand is that
Speaker 2: the Fabian society connects with the American progressives through Walter Littman,
Speaker 2: Lewis Brandeis, and they establish the book that Sidney Webb
Speaker 2: wrote and the other book that Graham Wallace wrote, and
Speaker 2: those are two founders of the Fabian Society. So what
Speaker 2: are those two books? Titles Industrial Democracy by Sydney Webb
Speaker 2: and The Great Society by Graham Wallace. Graham Wallace dedicates
Speaker 2: that book to his best friend, Walter Littman, the founding
Speaker 2: father of modern journalism. So when you're looking at our
Speaker 2: journalism and you're shaking your head and you're like, this
Speaker 2: is just punditry. These are just opinions. We're not supposed
Speaker 2: to have reporters with opinions. But that's all it is. Now,
Speaker 2: well you can thank one of these fathers of progressivism,
Speaker 2: Walter Littman.
Speaker 1: Isn't that funny that Johnson's program is called the Greek Society.
Speaker 2: Yes, this is very interesting connection because a lot of
Speaker 2: the bands that were coming out of the Woodwork hate
Speaker 2: Ashbury in the sixties counter Revolution were called the Great
Speaker 2: Society too.
Speaker 1: Oh that's nice and you know, oh and I noted,
Speaker 1: I learned and when I was reading that, Daniel whatever McGowan,
Speaker 1: David Gowen, Yeah, that people like Jack Nicholson and the
Speaker 1: Fonda and stuff like that were called the Young Turks.
Speaker 1: Why would you pick that name? Why the hell?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Yeah, And if you're not educated. You don't understand what's
Speaker 2: going on. That's just just a nickname.
Speaker 1: Right, and why the right, yeah, exactly, and why and
Speaker 1: why would a new like a liberal news broadcast or
Speaker 1: or or uh, you know network want to call themselves
Speaker 1: the Young Turks based off of a horrific and by
Speaker 1: the way, that ties right back to the Donma, which
Speaker 1: were Saboteans, because the leaders of the Young Turks were
Speaker 1: sabotean fracists. They were they were really Muslim.
Speaker 2: And they still exist today as the Dame. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So, so when you hear about all these Muslim groups
Speaker 1: a lot of times that's headed by just another form
Speaker 1: of Judaism, right, the radical Judaism.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right. And so you we can check all of
Speaker 2: our sources at the bottom of each article. We've usually
Speaker 2: got about twenty of them, and throughout the body we'll
Speaker 2: even just provide the sources like we did here with
Speaker 2: the Fabian Freeway high Road to Socialism in the US.
Speaker 1: That's funny.
Speaker 2: We get some of our sources from this book. So
Speaker 2: Miss Josephine Goldmark states that the brandeis brief in the
Speaker 2: Moler case, reprinted together with Judge Brewers opinion, was in
Speaker 2: great demand from law schools and universities as well as
Speaker 2: from labor unions and libraries. Gone was the deadening weight
Speaker 2: of legal precedent. So this is where they sort of
Speaker 2: inspired by the enlightened absolutists with their censuses, and they're
Speaker 2: gathering as statistics and facts and social science which was
Speaker 2: originally called sociology coming from the German historical school. This
Speaker 2: is the creation of the brandeis brief. It's discarding the
Speaker 2: weight of legal precedents. So you're not arguing law anymore
Speaker 2: on legal arguments, you're just establishing stats and facts which
Speaker 2: are manipulatable.
Speaker 1: That's in fact.
Speaker 2: We're not objection of Uh, they're not objective. They aren't.
Speaker 2: You can't trust those as if they are the truth.
Speaker 2: And I see this again in a lot of people,
Speaker 2: even in alternative media. They'll say that's a fact, and
Speaker 2: they'll use the word fact as if it's irrefutable. But
Speaker 2: this is the trick the fact according to the expert. Yeah,
Speaker 2: they've got as many perspectives as there are eyeballs looking.
Speaker 1: At it, right, So it's the trick consensus. And that's
Speaker 1: and that's not how you get it's truth anyway, It's
Speaker 1: not truth by consensus.
Speaker 2: Right, that's a logical fallacy. That's that's a following the bandwagon.
Speaker 2: You don't want to go with the flow man.
Speaker 1: The intellectual mob rather than the not so intellectual mob.
Speaker 1: It's just another form of mob rule.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And so Judge Brewer, this is a case where
Speaker 2: he established precedent that hasn't changed to.
Speaker 1: That's a problem too, is once you get to that,
Speaker 1: that that the expert you know, or the facts or
Speaker 1: whatever they're talking about there, rather than the rule of law.
Speaker 1: Then after you set that once, you can always revert
Speaker 1: back to that with precedents. And you're not supposed to
Speaker 1: deal do that either, supposed to go right back to
Speaker 1: the rule of law.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And what it did was relegate the judge to
Speaker 2: a spectator. M hm. He's a scientific expert. Now ruled
Speaker 2: the whole conversation exactly. So that is right. See how
Speaker 2: they enter in and they wedge apart the things that
Speaker 2: get us to source, whether that's income, knowledge, faith, spirituality.
Speaker 2: There's always somebody in the middle of our connection, you know,
Speaker 2: from ourselves directly to the source. This is why they
Speaker 2: want to get rid of cash and anything that sort
Speaker 2: of empowers the rugged individual. So in this case, Judge
Speaker 2: Brewer stating in his final assessment before examining the constitutional question,
Speaker 2: because he's He's like, well, how is this supposed to
Speaker 2: work with the Constitution? Because the Constitution is immovable and
Speaker 2: you're trying to create a living, moving law. So you
Speaker 2: can see why they experimented on the constitution to notice
Speaker 2: the course of legislation as well as expressions of opinions
Speaker 2: from other than judicial sources.
Speaker 1: And really by nineteen thirteen there was no there was
Speaker 1: no constitutional republic anymore. Anyway, I would ye, so far
Speaker 1: as I say, eighteen sixty five it died, it died
Speaker 1: at Appomatics Courthouse. But to see it actually take it
Speaker 1: take shape in the new form of government by you know,
Speaker 1: banking conglomerates, I think you're looking at nineteen thirty for
Speaker 1: the final blow, the final kill kill Federal Reserve. And
Speaker 1: then by nineteen thirty three with the bankruptcy that that
Speaker 1: was another nail on the coffin.
Speaker 2: And now the New Deal, the Federal Reserve and the
Speaker 2: New Deal both Brandeis is credited with being largely the
Speaker 2: architect of So when people talk about the creation of
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve, they often will bring up the jackal
Speaker 2: the what is it Jecko Island?
Speaker 1: Yeah, uh, I've got the book.
Speaker 2: Here, the Creature from Jackyl Island. I've got it, and
Speaker 2: there's not it's so it's it's a huge book, but
Speaker 2: there's no brandise.
Speaker 1: In it, right, And that's that's one of the problems.
Speaker 1: You have to go to Secrets of the Federal Reserve
Speaker 1: by Eustasmoles, which I which I believe was the I
Speaker 1: think I think that book is actually the whitewashed version
Speaker 1: to control that information came from came out of g.
Speaker 1: Edward Griffin, you know, John Birch Society, Rockefeller funded, uh
Speaker 1: controlled opposition. So what you're looking at there is what
Speaker 1: what's what's passable for the masses?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Weird, Yeah, weird. Seen inside the Canyon, Yep. There's a
Speaker 1: lot of there's a lot of that going on with
Speaker 1: the military intelligence and shaping our minds and basically co
Speaker 1: opting what was actually a legitimate movement away from government.
Speaker 1: And then you know, let's a bunch of acid on
Speaker 1: these people and give a bunch of Marxist leaders and
Speaker 1: stuff like that and steer them into the other opposite direction,
Speaker 1: and you know, and then create colts everywhere because those
Speaker 1: are the byproducts of all their experimentation. So why not
Speaker 1: why not see where this heads us? How how far
Speaker 1: can we take people's minds and how can we manipulate
Speaker 1: them to do things? And then we'll just call that
Speaker 1: a cult. So we're far away from it, right right,
Speaker 1: We've got We've got about ten minutes. I want to say,
Speaker 1: because I've got to run out to San Diego, but
Speaker 1: we should also just uh maybe try to do this again,
Speaker 1: maybe in a week or two.
Speaker 2: And yeah, I got that. Yeah, if you want to
Speaker 2: do it every Wednesday morning, however we want to do it. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: it would be great to get all.
Speaker 1: Of this out, so you do that would be great.
Speaker 1: If you want to do if you want to do
Speaker 1: Wednesday recurring, that's awesome.
Speaker 2: Okay, we'll do that. And so you can see Russell Sage.
Speaker 2: We got five minutes to go. Here, there's their emblem
Speaker 2: and we're showing. I encourage everybody obviously to go to
Speaker 2: Bulletproof pub and start looking at these.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's only invaluable information. You can read it. You
Speaker 1: can watch it like I want to. I want to
Speaker 1: catch up on your I'm probably gonna do this as
Speaker 1: I drive is your missing link interviews?
Speaker 2: Right, yeah, and I've actually i'll also this morning after
Speaker 2: we get off here, I'll upload the last couple ones.
Speaker 2: They're actually not on Bulletproof pub dot com. But Jesse
Speaker 2: Howl is a friend of mine, and uh, he's been
Speaker 2: really great to us. I think I've been on that
Speaker 2: show now twelve times. We went through the whole series
Speaker 2: like we did with the Deep Share and who knows, uh,
Speaker 2: with any luck, Jesse's going to drop by the farm
Speaker 2: here in the next few days. I know that they're
Speaker 2: coming through and not nice. And yeah, it's the last
Speaker 2: year of our farm here. We've got some great news
Speaker 2: on the horizon. It is incredible, but Sue don't have
Speaker 2: the time here to get into it.
Speaker 1: You got you guys rent Land, and that's basically you're
Speaker 1: you're you're doing Are you doing it for sale or
Speaker 1: for for yourself or both? Or how does that work?
Speaker 2: Yep? So we were a market garden, okay, and we
Speaker 2: grow like thirty different varieties of things awesome.
Speaker 1: And did you ever get any hot peppers? Let me know,
Speaker 1: because I make Oh yeah, we're great.
Speaker 2: We do a lot of hot peppers. You know. We're
Speaker 2: a sort of a canner's corner too, so a lot
Speaker 2: of people will come to us for preserving pickles, tomatoes,
Speaker 2: all of those kinds of things. We established this seven
Speaker 2: years ago. I just built this farm out of my
Speaker 2: mind and we ended up leasing land from an aging
Speaker 2: couple that were actually walking away from this year. This
Speaker 2: will be our last year, and we're.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I know the drama there, that's that's kind of
Speaker 1: shitty that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, And so over time I'm going to
Speaker 2: start talking about that. It's just kind of sensitive right now.
Speaker 2: But if you've watched any of the I go actually
Speaker 2: pretty deep into it, a little further than maybe I
Speaker 2: wanted to in one of those missing links. So if
Speaker 2: you ever want to know sort of the update of
Speaker 2: our farm, I just haven't given the last couple of
Speaker 2: weeks there's been We're now amalgamating with a larger group
Speaker 2: of people here in Kelowna, not far and we've established
Speaker 2: a ton of new relationships and we are actually going
Speaker 2: to level up our whole operation. We're leasing land at
Speaker 2: no cost and we're getting free labor.
Speaker 1: That's a hell of a deal.
Speaker 2: It's like it's a dream deal. And I always told
Speaker 2: my wife, I said, you know, we just got to
Speaker 2: keep getting better every day, every year. We got to
Speaker 2: just keep getting better to be more proficient, and one
Speaker 2: day somebody that that somebody will come along and notice
Speaker 2: our value. And that's really what's happened. I think, you know,
Speaker 2: as time goes here, growers are going to become very
Speaker 2: important in our society, and we're starting to see it now.
Speaker 2: And you know, we are truly blessed.
Speaker 1: Honestly, if I had a ton of land and no
Speaker 1: time to actually work it, I would give people the
Speaker 1: access to it to grow what they want as long
Speaker 1: as I was also fed.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and that's me. We've got I don't know how
Speaker 2: many acres. It's at least seventy acres now through the
Speaker 2: people that we've just affiliated with, and they're just basically
Speaker 2: doing hay and keeping the operations going because there's land
Speaker 2: tax and alur status that you know, you're supposed to
Speaker 2: achieve a certain amount of money to keep and and
Speaker 2: so this is a great opportunity for our farm. You
Speaker 2: can find us at hills have Acre Farms on Facebook
Speaker 2: if you want to know what's going on there. We're
Speaker 2: going to start releasing some information as to what's going
Speaker 2: on Now that I've had some final confirmations and conversations
Speaker 2: with these guys, it looks like we're moving forward there
Speaker 2: next year. And so man, I'm just.
Speaker 1: I almost recognize you. When I was look at the
Speaker 1: missing link when you popped up, I was like, hey,
Speaker 1: there's no that's a bulgin yeah picture.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a long time ago. So let's end her there,
Speaker 2: all right. But I do encourage everybody to go and
Speaker 2: finish reading this article here Scientific Management, especially the conclusion
Speaker 2: where we show where we show brand Eyes actually infiltrating
Speaker 2: the Taylor Society and how he influences all of these
Speaker 2: major players. These guys actually like the Gant chart. These
Speaker 2: are things that we use in construction sites today. These
Speaker 2: are big names, big inventors of things like the slide rule.
Speaker 2: So here's the Fascist or the Fascies on the cover
Speaker 2: of the Principles of Scientific Management. So we opened this
Speaker 2: show talking about Mussolini and his connection to Frederick Winslow
Speaker 2: Taylor and wanting a picture of him in exchange for
Speaker 2: a picture of himself Mussolini, and we can see that
Speaker 2: ingrained into the cover of the nineteen eleven and the
Speaker 2: nineteen thirteen one is a fascies.
Speaker 1: It's always nice when you're the biggest fan of somebody
Speaker 1: who's the biggest fan of you changing each other's pictures.
Speaker 2: Right, And so they all point to Taylorism as an
Speaker 2: essential aspect to the control of their own societies, and
Speaker 2: even William William Jennings on ABC News went into Taylorism
Speaker 2: Frederick Winslow Taylor's life and said that Taylorism is one
Speaker 2: of the most influential isms of the twentieth century, and
Speaker 2: hardly anybody knows what it is. And so scientific management
Speaker 2: coined by this US Supreme Court justice that founded Israel
Speaker 2: with the Balfour Declaration and the establishment of the Palestine
Speaker 2: Economic Corporation, working in hands with Rothschild. So maybe next
Speaker 2: show we can finish off maybe what we're talking about
Speaker 2: with the Taylor Society and then get into his Zionist
Speaker 2: frankest connections.
Speaker 1: I love it. That sounds a great place to go
Speaker 1: from here, and so we'll just call it next Wednesday,
Speaker 1: We'll go with eight am.
Speaker 2: Yep, I could do earlier. I can do seven am
Speaker 2: if that works for you. But yep, I think.
Speaker 1: It's only because I had to jet out. But I
Speaker 1: think the regular schedule for as eight to ten, so
Speaker 1: we'll try to do it for that. I'll market all right,
Speaker 1: and now I'll send you to like when I get
Speaker 1: back here from San Diego. It was really great to
Speaker 1: talk to you again. It's always a pleasure, man. I
Speaker 1: always get fired up and excited about our talks because
Speaker 1: it's nice. It's nice when you can play off somebody,
Speaker 1: like you know, it's like it's like the details are
Speaker 1: all fitting together, like, oh, I got this piece, I
Speaker 1: got this piece, and you're developed and you're showing the
Speaker 1: whole almost the whole picture. I'm like, but I got
Speaker 1: this piece here. It's just perfect. It's perfect. How it's
Speaker 1: not every time?
Speaker 2: And I think that they did this to us. This
Speaker 2: is how they gained our control through the cybernetics movement
Speaker 2: and the interdisciplinary crossover. They got all of these scientific
Speaker 2: experts together, their own realm of expertise, and then presented
Speaker 2: it to everybody else. And they were doing that same thing. Oh,
Speaker 2: that would help us establish this and so that's really
Speaker 2: the cybernetic revolution.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and you know, I'm glad that you're talking about
Speaker 1: that because maybe you and I can discuss potential collaboration
Speaker 1: on Book two is going to be called Priestcraft's Singularity,
Speaker 1: the Sorcerer and the Sorcery and the Sorcerers, or the
Speaker 1: science and the Sorcery, right, and that's going to be
Speaker 1: talking about you know, cybernetics and all the other stuff
Speaker 1: to transhumanism, how it you know, where it came from.
Speaker 1: And it's going to be a pretty in depth. So
Speaker 1: maybe we can maybe we can collaborate on the I
Speaker 1: have a enterta that thought for sure, Yeah, okay, man uh,
Speaker 1: And then I would direct you to the Future Perfect
Speaker 1: Part two, the Cybernetic Revolution Future Perfect Part two.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Is that on the Bulletproof pub landing page. It's
Speaker 2: just a little further down.
Speaker 1: It's oh yea yeah, yeah, yeah, yep, yep, yeah.
Speaker 2: But there's a two parter that shows that the League
Speaker 2: of Nations is really the origins of the u N
Speaker 2: and it's actually pacifists that creates.
Speaker 1: Pacifism is what was killing Germany.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and the Cybernetic Revolution and the Paris Peace Conference
Speaker 2: or the Treaty of Resites specifically, the greatest sellowed in
Speaker 2: human history is what Batesman said. So this is a
Speaker 2: critical aspect to absolutely cool.
Speaker 1: Thank you for putting in that direction. I'll be checking
Speaker 1: that out as I rolled today. Good day, sir.
Speaker 2: One last thing, yeah, cybernetics. The entire story is here, cybernetics,
Speaker 2: the Macy conferences, So stere you towards that, Klaus Pious,
Speaker 2: Yeah about really incredible source.
Speaker 1: I touched on briefly in my book about Macy too,
Speaker 1: and yeah, that's pretty interesty stuff.
Speaker 2: That's the origins of the cybernetic revolution, actually, the progression
Speaker 2: that goes into rock. Yeah, that was.
Speaker 1: I think he gave them. I think he then gave
Speaker 1: them land too. I think Rockefeller was handed out land
Speaker 1: to all these six psychodyass Sure all right, man, it
Speaker 1: was really good talking to you, and I'll see you
Speaker 1: next Wednesday. Thanks for everybody tune in tomorrow. You known
Speaker 1: every other day after that too, so I will. I'll
Speaker 1: be there later, guys, Thank you, sir. Right extreme extreme