Speaker 1: Welcome to the Three Stories version of The Todd Herman Show.
Story number one the left inverted animal Farm and no
one noticed. Story number two is woke, the natural extension
of feminized institutions. And story number three the Dictator of
Canada wants to edit the sermons of Christian pastors or something.
We'll talk about this with the help of God Almighty.
Speaker 2: The Todd Herman Show is one hundred percent disapproved by
big pharma, technocrats and tyrants everywhere. From the high mountains
of Free American Here's the Emerald City EXI todd Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made in These
are the times through which God has decided we shall live.
So if you are, I guess below the age of
fifty five, maybe you're not as familiar with animal farm
as those of us who grew up in a time
where we actually studied this in school. And it's a
book by George Orwell. And Orwell was a leftist, but
Orwell was most of all an anti authoritarian. He warned
of a world's where the government became so powerful that
it gave you everything it felt you needed. Therefore it
could take everything you'd ever want to have. Everything from you,
where it controlled every speech, every memory. People remember nineteen
eighty four where governments employees sat around in a great,
big factory disappearing news so that a war never happened
because there was no memory of it, therefore it never occurred,
or disappearing the biogracies of biographies of people that in
that there was big brother in your house. Literally there
was a screen that watched you while you watched it.
And in the case of Animal Farm, he took animals
as the characters and he created a very very famous phrase,
all animals are equal, some are just more equal than others.
And it was a tale that warns against once again
big government. Now his fear came from the right. He
didn't see left leaning authoritarianism, but Orwell's writings indicate that
he was warning very much about the left that we
see today. This is the nineteen fifty four trailer from
when the movie was more faithful to the book. I
can't that sounds. They used that sound for so many movies. So, oh,
where's the opening sounds? I love the way he characterizes
the pigs.
Speaker 3: Okay, here we go.
Speaker 4: Yeah, there's a cartoon with a difference.
Speaker 1: Cartoon with the difference.
Speaker 4: Ranked cartoon film.
Speaker 1: Okay, that's it's made in England. That's the difference that
matters because or was very English. I love that accusatory
pig and the pigs and dogs are partnering. By the way,
this is not on accidents. You know what partnership can
pigs and dogs have? Well, look in a color revolution.
They're all partners until they're not until what are the
animals rises above the others theme.
Speaker 3: Of Pallas and Bachelor.
Speaker 4: It has been acclaimed by New York and London critics alike.
It tells a compelling story for every adult. Yet it's
assuredly a film that every.
Speaker 1: Child can enjoy it. And we used to again watch
this in school and we were always taught that this
is one of the dangers of big government. So it
had been manor Farm, and now it's all of a
sudden animal farm because the rooster doesn't know how to
spell an end. These apparently dyslexic rosters are come and
visit animal farm.
Speaker 4: We're all animals are equal, but some are more equal
than apples.
Speaker 5: Meet.
Speaker 4: It's quite extraordinary. Inhabitants the wise underwishflow Majo.
Speaker 1: So there's a revolution in this and it's a fight
against authoritarianism. It's a fight against government. And the lesson
was government and how government excess leads to these circumstances.
That was the lesson, the underwriting lesson of this. So
it's been updated. It's been updated in a most bizarre way.
And I'll show you this in just a second. There's
a bizarre thing that's going on in this country as
doctors here have become aware of the fact that RENEW
Healthcare in port of art to Mexico exists. Now there
are other stem cell places. You could go to Argentina,
you could go to Brazil, you could go to the
Middle East where they do what RENEW does, but not
as well. And it's really interesting. The more that I
talk about RENEW, I'll meet people who will say, oh,
you know, I got stem cells? Sare it just happened
the other day? The gym guy said, Hey, aren't you
the YouTube guy? No, but I have shows on YouTube.
So I heard you talking about stem cells. I got
them in Spokane. No you don't, Oh yeah I do.
No you don't. Here's the difference. I said, you who
provided you the stem cells? I don't know what was
the health of the people who provided the umbilical cords
or placentis. I don't know. Did it come from placentas
or bilical cords, I don't know. Did it use the
aborted tissue of fetuses? I hope not. Oh okay, Well,
in port of Art to Mexico they used donor cells.
That's illegal United States. They know the people from whom
they get the placentas and the biblical cords. They only
use the umbilical cords and only the Whartons jelly portion
in the biblical cords, and they monitor the health of
the women during and after pregnancy and the baby. They
reject eighty percent, sometimes ninety percent of the cells they receive,
to which you might say, well, how did they stay business?
They culture the cells that meet their quality standards, so
there's more of them. Consequently, these cells that destroy inflammation,
that rebuild muscle, tendon, cartilage, bone, all the tissues can
go to work solving things as diverse as direct all
dysfunction without the pumps or the pills or the surgeries.
Things like arthritis that you've been told you're just gonna
have to live with back conditions where you've been told
you have to have surgery you may not have to
have surgery or even things as serious as traumatic brain
injury or ALS. Now ALS doesn't they can't cure that,
but they have doubled the woman's lifetime, and they predicted
the next few months they're going to have a cure
for diabetes based on these stem cells. So if you're
being told it's pills or it's surgery, or just gonna
have to deal with this, stop, go find the real
stem cells. Go to renew r E n u E
dot Healthcare. Tell the me a part of the Todd
Herman show Family renew r E nue dot Healthcare. So
I became alerted to this when someone shared with me.
Animal Farm is written up in Wikipedia. It says there
was a twenty twenty five movie. I didn't know that.
It's an adventure comedy produced and directed by Andy Serkis okay,
Now I got worried, and written by Nicholas Stroller. Now
I got worried. It stars Seth Rogers uh oh or
Seth Rogan uh oh, and Woody Harrelson, who actually lives
his belief. Give him some credit, he actually does live
a zero carbon lifestyle, so at least he's sincere. Actually
has good ideas about food, but wacky liberal Steve buscemi oh,
Glenn Close uh oh, and Kieran Culkin. I don't know
anything about Curen, just his brother man mcaulay Culchin.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: It's the adaptation of the George Orwell novella, following the
nineteen fifty four animated film and this nineteen ninety five
live action. So here's the update, loosely following parts of
the novella. Loosely, it serves as an allegory for consumer
x sess and corporate corruption in the twenty first century,
and introduces new characters, such as a pignot named Lucy
who serves as the audience surrogate. No one watched this film.
My friend and producer Alex Overall is an expert on film,
and he didn't even hear of the film. It's an
allegory about consumerism. Orwell spoke nothing about consumerism. Orwell's concern
was governmentism. In fact, in each of his works, consumerism
doesn't exist. One of the things that happens in the
movie nineteen eighty four is they go to a place
where they can buy a cake and actual bread to
have a picnic. When Winston the main character doesn't understand
you're being spied on there as well. So this is
how this has been updated. It's a three D version
of the movie, and the the the villain. Guess what
the villain looks like. Looks like a drunken white old
man with a bottle of royal crown next to him.
That's obviously a real crown. Well this is this AI
as well done.
Speaker 3: Hey, I'm.
Speaker 1: That's see okay. AI freaks me that you can do
this and create that pig with AI. That freaks me out.
I see the walls moving a little bit. A film
by Terrence Fung. How come I can't be fun?
Speaker 3: Be fun? We are tired of being used by him.
We must act, and act immediately. I suggest we get
him out. You box the power hours of this.
Speaker 1: Far by the way the horse's beautiful blue eyes.
Speaker 3: Go back and draine your strength until nothing is left
but bones. You daisy man steals your milk from your children,
devours your flesh consideracy. Greed is endless, and he is
never satisfied. I dream of a day in England where
no hoof is.
Speaker 1: Bound and it's consumerism the enemy. So this new film,
the twenty twenty twenty five film, and this is how
Grock writes it up. This is the AI attached to Twitter,
so it's AI reviewing AI. Animal Farm is a twenty
twenty five computer animated adventure comedy film directed and produced
by Andy Serkis We've Got That screenplay by Nick Rosola
We Got That, adapting Orwell's nineteen forty five aligorical novella
of the same name, which critiques the Russian Revolution and
the rise of Stalinism throughout the story of farm animals
overthrowing their human owner to establish a gee gallon tarian
society that devolves into tyranny. Nothing about consumerism, They're all
in and the glorious revolution. In the I find out
that there are some All animals are equal, some are
more equal than others. The film features an ensemble voice
and cast, including what we Got That Seth Rogan. Premiering
at the Anise International Animation Festival in June nine, twenty
twenty five, The production emphasizes visual effects, leveraging circuses motion
capture expertise, but receive mixed reviews for transforming Oral's bleak
political satire into a family oriented narrative with comedic interludes,
including scatological humor, which concludes feces. Of course, their critics argue,
dilutes the sources on flinching examination of power and corruption
and ideological betrayal. The ideological betrayal is this The animals
all rise up together in the glorious revolution, where everything
is going to be egalitarian. Everything's going to be equal,
dog and pig and hoarse and chicken alike, until some
people become party or some animals become party leaders, and
they're the very special extra equal animals. The other animals
are just normal equal. In other words, it's exactly how
communist revolutions always roll out. They inverted animal farm and
praise God, no one really noticed. Story number two. So
is woke? Is this actually an extension or natural extension
of feminized institutions? I always give credit where credits due.
My friend and producer Alex Overall, drew this to my
attention and sent me a fascinating article called the Great Feminization.
And in this article, a woman describes the idea that
woke is actually an extension of the feminization of institutions.
Her name is Helen Andrews. She's the author of Boomers
The Men and Women Who promise freedom and delivered disaster.
And she makes some generalizations in this and I shared
this with my wife and she said, oh, it doesn't
describe me as No, it doesn't describe you at all.
You're not this way at all. You're not at this
this feminist this this feminist way of arguing or thinking,
that's not who you are. And you know, probably plenty
of women hard as well. But there is a through
line here and it makes a certain bit of sense
when you examine the thought processes if you want to
call that of say, groups like trans Tifa. So this
is a so called trans tifa who showed up at
the house of a woman, and this is in Modesta, California,
or Santa Rosa. And she was simply saying that men
should not compete against women in sports. That's all she said.
And this is with the Santa Rosa Junior College. She's
concerned about this so called trans tifa shows up at
her house. Now, just pay attention to the style of
argument here and that will present to you this piece
on the great feminization. At the end of the day,
are so I was going.
Speaker 6: To vollow you because there's a man playing on the
Santa ROSA volleyball team, And do you guys think that's
fair to have a male body on a women's college
volleyball team?
Speaker 3: Depends? Are they better than anyone else?
Speaker 6: It doesn't matter? Oh that doesn't matter. Why the way way?
Speaker 1: Why would it matter?
Speaker 6: If if they're performing any better than any of the
assigned female at birth individuals who are who are working,
who are playing with them, then what is mind?
Speaker 3: You?
Speaker 1: This is at her house. They show up at her house.
Now you tell me if you hear any logic of
what this guy is saying. She just simply said, should
men or people with male bodies compete against females?
Speaker 3: Concurrent?
Speaker 1: Why even have divisions in sports?
Speaker 2: Why haven't divided? That's a question.
Speaker 3: What are you talking about?
Speaker 1: You look like you don't care about women's volleyball?
Speaker 6: Are you watching women's volleyball every day? Are you like?
Speaker 4: Actually, what's really you play?
Speaker 2: Just?
Speaker 3: What's ford field? Baseball?
Speaker 1: Soccer? What distance did you run in track and fields?
Speaker 6: Are like, I did not run very well? What was
your time in the four hundred? Honestly, it's not something
I have thought about.
Speaker 1: No, that's because you've never did it. I'm sorry, But
if you ran track and fields. You know what distance
you're ran. If you're ran the four hundred, you know
what your time was. So there's no through Lene, there's
no logic. The simply woman asks should people with male bodies?
She's being PC should people with male bodies be allowed
to compete against females with female bodies? And there's no logic.
It's simply feeling. I don't feel like this is right.
It doesn't feel kind to me. I don't feel like
I'm being the moral person that I can stand up
and be proud of. I don't feel that way. So
get to this piece on the great feminization and how
she defends her idea that woke may well be an
extension of the feminization of academia and other institutions will
do that in a second. I don't know that finance
has yet been feminized. I don't know that. I know
that there is an effort to do that. I know
that there's some great and successful financial thinkers who are women.
And I know though that finance is going to be
aised that's already happening. Did you know that the Electronic
Trading Foundations, you know that's ETFs. Do you know that
there are now more ETFs than stocks. Just think about this,
there are more ETFs than stocks. Many of those ETFs
are run now through AI. AI is making investment decisions
at the same time as AIS making hiring and firing decisions.
No AI is being employed to do this. There are
now AIS that will go through a company's staff and
look for ways to cut AIS. AIS are cutting staffs
in software, the cutting staffs in licensing and legal. These
are three hundred and fifty four hundred thousand dollars per
year jobs that are disappearing. This is going to have
an effect act it already is on our economy. When
AI starts to make decisions about loans. There's been AIS
that they want to use in juries instead of a jury,
and AI instead of a judge in AI. So, my
friend Zach Abraham, chief investment Officer Capital Management, is doing
a very very special free live webinar is AI a bubble.
He's going to do a review preview of twenty twenty
five and twenty twenty six how AI is going to
affect the market. And he's really going to take a
critical look at Bulwark's value investing, like what does that
mean to invest in value at a time of a
potential AI bubble. How are they doing it? How's it performing?
I know they're having a great year right now, so
what does twenty twenty six look like. They'll also talk
about how Zach and his team are constantly looking for
ways to lower our risk and give us the retirement
we need to have. This is a free live webinar.
You have to do its register to attend, so go
right now to Know Your Risk podcast dot Com. That's
Know Your Risk Podcast dot com. This is coming up
of November twentieth at three third Pacific, Know Your Risk
Podcast dot Com. Investment advisory services are for their Trek
Financial LLC and sec Regiter Investment Advisor. Investments involve risk
and are not guaranteed pastformaces and guarantee future results Trek
twenty five. That's two five to two. So there's been
a changeover in institutions. New York Times editorial staff became
majority female in twenty eighteen, and some of the editorial
tone began to change. So these stories that were less
based upon even a kernel of fact and much more
on feelings. And the author of this piece writes this,
the same trajectory can be seen in many professions, a
pioneering generation of women in the nineteen sixties nineteen seventies,
increasing female representation through the nineteen eighties and nineties, and
gender parody finally arriving at least in younger cohorts in
the twenty tens or twenty. In nineteen seventy four, only
ten percent of New York Times reporters were female. The
New York Times staff became majority female in twenty eighteen,
and today the female share is fifty five percent. Medical
schools became majority female in twenty nineteen. Women became a
majority of the college educated workforce nationwide. In twenty nineteen,
women became a majority of the college instructors in twenty
twenty three. Women are not yet a majority of the
managers in America, but they might be soon. They're now
forty six percent. So the timing fits woke. This arose
around the same time that many important institutions tipped demographically
from majority male to female. The substance fits as well.
Everything you think of as wokeness involves prioritizing the feminine
over the masculine, empathy over rationality. Let's go back to
that video. Should people with male bodies be allowed to
compete against people with female bodies. I don't know, are
they doing a bad job? Well, why should we even
have separation of the classes? Now, that's a good question.
Safety of a risk. We are a society that is
maniacally risk adverse. We had for the first time, we
were blessed to have a bunch of kids combined Halloween
because we kind of live up on a mountain and
I was kind of we were in bed, like pretty
late and knocked at the door and I went out
and the kids were walking away from them.
Speaker 3: I said, hey, hey, we're here.
Speaker 1: Here's candy. And then I realized there's four cars out there.
Some adults drove their kids around in cars, apparently looking
for houses with Christmas lights and risk adverse cohesion over competition.
Other writers who have proposed their own version of the
great feminization thesis, such as Noah Carroll or Wineguard and
Corey Clark, who looked at feminization's effects on academia, offer
survey data showing sex differences in political value our values.
One survey, for example, from that seventy one percent of
men said protecting free speech was more important than preserving
a cohesive society, and fifty nine percent of women said
the opposite. So she goes on to talk about communication styles.
Now this is a generalization, but if you look at
the way organizations like The New York Times are politicized,
that medical schools politicized, that academia is politicized, of course
there's going to be a self selection biased here. The
generalization is this, women communicate to communicate, to emote, to vent.
This is a generalization. Men tend to communicate to solve
a problem. A generalization, but it holds true if you
look at overall behavior patterns. If a man has a
problem with a man, the man is very likely to
go to the man and say, bro, I got a problem. Women,
on the other hands, tend to go behind the scenes.
They tend to speak behind backs. The mean girl phenomena
Woke has a lot of mean girl in it, she
writes in this piece, men tend to be better at
compartmentalizing than women, and woke this was, in many ways
a society wide failure to compartmentalize. Tradition, the individual doctor
might have opinions on the political issue of the day
that he would regard it as his professional duty to
keep those opinions out of the examination room. Now that
medicine has become more feminized, doctors wore pins and lanyards
expressing views on controversial issues from gay rights to gaza.
They even bring the credibility of the profession to bear
on political fads, as when doctors said Black Lives matter,
protests could continue in violation of COVID lockdowns because racism
was the so called public health emergency. So the case
that she makes here is that it's the feminization of institutions,
and then the leadership and institutions, and then the communications
style of women overall the generalization that has led to woke.
There is no rationale, there's no logic. It's all emoting,
it's all feeling, and it's all communicating to be heard.
And it reaches the ultimate extension where woke forces you
to listen, even though there's no reason for the communication
other than to yell or In Hitler, and hence we
see the rise of the wine mom antifa, there's a
reason that God invented man and women. He didn't just
invent one sex. We in evangelical Christian circles view the
male and female sex as complementary to one another, not egalitarian.
God loves us both equally. He simply has different roles
for us. One of the things that goes unmentioned in
this article which should be mentioned is the extension of
women's role from primarily in the house raising kids. And
I know that's wildly controversial. Trad wife is communism. It's
white supremacy to now being the majority of staff in
medical institutions, in graduate schools, and soon to be in management.
That is not what God foresaw. Isn't it weird? When
we go outside of God's plans, things seem to break down.
How could that possibly be true? Story number three? So,
if I understand this correctly, there is an effort in
Canada to do something that was literally a work of fiction,
literally a work of fiction, and they're planning it. There's
a liberal minister in the House of Lords in Canada
who on October thirty, twenty twenty five, said something in
defense of going after the Bible as hate speech. This
could give the Prime Minister of Canada the ability to
ban certain things from church sermons. And you'll hear this
for yourself in a second. And this bears an insane
comparison to a movie called Disciples in the Moonlight and
this is put out by Angel Studios. You can go
to angel dot COM's slash Sherman and watch this. It's
a story of some Disciples who are smuggling Bibles. And
I know some people look at that plotlin and go, wait,
that's preposterous in America. Right, Well, this is North America.
The smuggling Bibles. Why because it's been outlawed the whole Bible. Yeah,
I mean the real Bible. But the government has published
a Truth Bible that is removed bothers, some phrases. You
can preach all you want from the Truth Bible. That
could never happen in America. You're right, Well wait, you're not.
Because they ban God from government schools. They are tried
to ban kids from praying government schools. So this is
actually happening at Canada. And I'll show you this killed
in a second. Here you can go watch this film
Disciples in the Moonlight, which I've seen and really enjoyed,
particularly how they smuggle the Bibles incredibly clever, and how
they betray how they portrayed the Disciples as imperfect people
doing God's will. Go to angel dot com slash Herman.
That's Angel dot com slash hermen and watch the Saples
in the moonlight and join the Angel Guild, because then
you're not just watching and being passive, you're actually empowering
brave Christian filmmaking like this to be made. Angel dot
com slash Hermit. So this guy's name is Mark Miller
House Lord's October thirty, twenty twenty five. He's questioning someone
about hate speech, and he's talking about the use of
the Bible.
Speaker 5: Let's watch just to use the chair's prorogative for two
seconds to ask a follow up question, mister Ross, and
as despicable and as unlawful. I believe the statements made
by mister Shukowie were and would be if they were
stated again. We don't know why the prosecution chose not
to continue with the charges, and perhaps it is to
mister Fortane's point. I just want to dig in a
bit about the concept of good faith, mister Ross. In Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Romans,
there's other passages. There's clear hatred towards, for example, homosexuals.
I don't know how to understand how the concept of
good faith could be invoked if someone were literally invoking
a passage from in this case the Bible, but there
are other type religious texts that say the same thing,
and somehow CONTs say that this is good faith. I mean,
clearly there are situations in these texts where these statements
are hateful. They should not be used to invoke or
be a defense, and there should perhaps be discretion for
prosecutors to press charges. I just want to understand what
your notion of good faith is in this context where
there are clearly passages in religious texts that are clearly hateful.
Speaker 1: So Mark Miller is the chair of the President, the
Honorable Mark Miller House Lords and good faith. If you're
saying something a good faith and someone interprets it as hateful,
you have a good faith defense. I didn't mean to
be hateful, all right, you can use this as a defense.
I was acting good faith. What he's saying here is
if you're giving a sermon and you're quoting any portion
of the Bible criticized this same sex activity, which is
the entire Bible. May not every single line is about
same sex activity, but from Genesis through Revelation, there is
no instance where the Bible says that same sex activity
is okay, or where fornication is okay, or where adulter
is okay, it never happens. So if you're a pastor
in Canada and you are reading from the Holy Bible,
God's Word, you do not have a good faith defense.
How this rolls out in Canada can be this. Since
there is no defense of good faith, prosecutors should be
allowed to prosecute people for speaking from the Bible, and
the Prime Minister should then be able to use those
prosecutions as precedents to go out to the Christian churches
and to say this passage and this passage and this
passage will be prosecuted if you speak then in public.
Now again you could say this can't happen. I would
remind you that in England there are people who have
done time in jail for being one hundred yards away
from an abortion clinic, having their back turned to the
abortion clinic and praying silently. They've been fined because so
called police officers have asked them, are you praying yes silently?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 1: In Angel Studios was making a work of fiction. I
would love to talk to the filmmakers. Maybe we can
work that out, because I don't think they knew how
close to today they really are, and if they did,
God bless them even more. This is the Todd Hermann Show.
Please go, be well, be strong, be kind, and please
make every for it to walk in the light of
christm