Speaker 1: Hello everybody, Good morning, greetings and salutations. Happy Tuesday. Let
me tell you what's coming up on the show. Trump's
team had a gigantic signal fail. We're talking about that.
Jasmine and are Spider Lashes go on another tirade, twenty
three ae meters files for bankruptcy, and Canada sucks.
Speaker 2: All that.
Speaker 1: So much more coming up on the show today.
Speaker 3: I am both hired.
Speaker 4: How do you acting like you speak for the people
of the fate of Indiana or the city of Indianapple.
Speaker 5: You do not think for me or anyone I know.
Speaker 1: That was the YouTube jerk Jerk You guys, make sure
that you're subscribed to this podcast. Please do that. If
you haven't done that already, I don't know what you're
doing with your life.
Speaker 3: But subscribe. Just click the subscribe line and tell your friends.
Speaker 1: Also, you can see all the Chicks stuff and at www.
Dot Chicks on the right dot com slash links. You, guys,
guess what we're doing. Guess what we're doing today. You'll
never guess what we're doing today. We have a really,
really great interview lined up for you, guys, and it
is with the one and the only Tell them Jenny
we're talking to Scott Jenning's day and it will be
out on Saturday. Am I correct about that? We'll be
Saturday or is she going to do less?
Speaker 5: You know, unless there's something that we discussed that it's
super time sensitive. Okay, it would be it would be
Saturday that the interview comes out.
Speaker 1: Okay, yes, So we are talking to Scott Jennings. Finally
we snagged that guy. So we're very excited about that,
and we have a couple like really cool interviews coming
up in the next.
Speaker 6: Couple of weeks.
Speaker 1: So yeah, Scott was a good get. It was a
really good get about that. Yeah, so you guys stay
tuned for that. We'll tell you all about it and
then you can look for that sometime this week.
Speaker 5: Okay, it's happening, and I plan on being only mildly inappropriate.
Speaker 1: So everybody, like, everybody's like, that's why mock an extra
fancy day. She showered, She showered, especially showered, and look.
Speaker 3: I have jewelry on which I normally I don't.
Speaker 1: I did today, did my hair for you today, like
washed myself.
Speaker 3: So yeah, we're pretty stoked.
Speaker 5: It's going to be good stuff, good times, good stuff indeed,
and there's we got a lot to get you today,
and listen. If you are a person that cannot criticize
your own side when they screw up, you're probably not
going to enjoy today's show.
Speaker 1: You guys.
Speaker 5: I have never I told Daisy this morning, I have
never felt so gas lit by my own freaking party
than I do today. With the reaction by some of
the higher ups to the signal.
Speaker 3: Debacle, uh huh. And it's a bad one, you guys.
Speaker 5: It's a bad mess up, and people just need to
own that that is a bad mess up and not.
Speaker 3: Come up with all.
Speaker 1: The White House is already admitted to it.
Speaker 5: People are still trying to say this is a setup
and it's a it's no, it is sorry, but like.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm sorry. I think that people are just so
used to winning at this point that this was a
slip up. It was an f up. It was a
slip up, and so people are like, wait a second,
what Yeah, yeah, And I'm sure Trump is pissed about
it too, you know, behind clo.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and he should be because, as we also were
talking about in pre show, Trump is not somebody that
tolerates sloppiness, and that is probably the best thing that
you can say about the signal debacle is that it
was sloppy. Right now, if you have absolutely no idea
what we're talking about.
Speaker 3: Don't worry. We're going to catch You're going to tell
you all the way up up.
Speaker 5: Okay, yeah, we're going to catch you all the way up.
But we also have to catch you all the way
up on the fact that All Familypharmacy dot Com slash
chicks is your go to, especially for medications that, by
the way, you guys remember during the high to COVID
how big pharma and basically like the government kind of
work together to silence any doctors that were saying, hey,
it seems like i reme ivermectin and hydroxychlork win are
kind of working to help with some of these severe
COVID systems. Maybe we should be using these easily available,
long standing, longtime drugs that we've known about forever instead
of like throwing people.
Speaker 3: On ventilators and then they were squelched.
Speaker 5: You guys all remember that this is I mean, this
is not that long ago, and so now there's like
this what's the word, there's like this there's like a
taboo almost on those medications. That's left over from that time.
But they are really really helpful medication, and that's one
of the things that All Family Pharmacy dot Com slash
chicks has, in addition to all kinds of antibiotics that
you may want for your family to just have on
hand in case somebody falls ill in some way that
requires antibiotics.
Speaker 3: So very very.
Speaker 5: Easy way to get your meditations. All you have to
do is visit All Familypharmacy dot Com slash chicks. When
you use code chicks ten, you will get ten percent
off entire order Allfamilypharmacy dot Com slash all. Right, before
we get into the signal stuff, we do need to
touch on just a couple of really really quick other headlines,
one of which is super interesting and it caused a
lot of discussion between me and you, me and my husband,
me and other friends of mine that I was just
like so curious to find out everybody's take about the
fact that RFK is trying to potentially ban pharmaceutical ads
on TV. And this is super interesting to me. The
United States and New Zealand are the only countries that
allow this, Okay, every other country in the world says
absolutely not, no pharma ads.
Speaker 3: What are your thoughts?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I guess I'm just so used to it.
I used to work in pharma. I worked in pharma
for a long time, so I'm just used to it.
Speaker 7: Man.
Speaker 1: They have marketing budgets. They spent a lot, they do
a lot lot of money on marketing, right, So it's
just it's very interesting. I honestly, I don't care either way.
I don't really care. I think that I think it
would be a step in the right direction when it
comes to, you know, our country getting healthier.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, I mean marketing budgets. How about you just
reduce the price of drugs by that much?
Speaker 1: Yeah, you're absolutely right. Now, I think I think you're
right about that. So I'm and that's coming from somebody
who worked in the industry, so I think it would
be it would be fine if they did that.
Speaker 5: It's interesting because you know, conservatives are typically like the
freedom of speech, and these are Why shouldn't they be
able to say what.
Speaker 3: They want and advertise what they want.
Speaker 5: I guess I have very conflicted feelings on this, and
I feel like I'm fine with them except on news
station totally. Then I worry that there's a conflict where
there is a Compiser is like a.
Speaker 3: Huge, big time sponsor of Fox News.
Speaker 5: Is Fox News going to report fairly when there's a
Peiser problem?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean I think we saw I probably would
have answered you differently before COVID, and now that we've
lived through COVID, I'm like, oh damn. There was some
like just some shady stuff going on there. Obviously we
saw that happen. So a lot of people were bought
and paid for by people, like I say, people by
companies like Pfizer. So you know, when you see a
news channel sponsored by Piser, they're not going to say
anything bad about Pfizer. Why would they do that. It's
the hand that feeds them exactly. So yeah, I think
that the ban on this on television, especially new channels,
you know, like the people who are giving you your information,
it's probably.
Speaker 6: A good idea.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, like maybe leave it to where there's
I don't know, pharma ads during reruns of Friends or
something where it's not like.
Speaker 1: Or the super Bowl. They can pay for a super Bowl.
They want to do an ozembic ad on the super Bowl,
that's fine, but maybe not during you know, news news
channel update in like news updates or whatever. I just
feel like it there is there is a conflict of
interest there.
Speaker 5: But if this happens, Liz Wheeler put out a tweet
that I want you to read to everybody about what
this will look like that was super interesting. Here is
what Liz Wheeler had to say about this potential band
go ahead.
Speaker 1: If reports are true, and I pray that they are,
that RFK Junior is going to ban big pharma ads
on TV, A massive society earthquake is about to happen.
On two fronts. Number one, the corporate media will fail.
You will watch before your very eyes as highly paid
msm anchors are fired, networks panic and some shutdown and
paychecks aren't. The entire business of the mainstream media is
a fake business. It's artificially propped up by massive ad
dollars from pharma ads. Not because of the return on
investment that pharmacyes peddling their drugs on TV, but rather
because of why pharma buys so many TV ads in
the first place, which is to prevent reporting on pharma corruption.
That's true, I mean she's right. Accordingly, when the gravy
chain of pharma ad dollars to TV networks stops. We
will suddenly see reporting on the corruption of big pharma, drugs, vaccines,
medical associations like AAP and AMA, and government regulation agencies
like CDC and FDA. Reporting that was previously prohibited because
the ad money Pharma paid networks, it was really just
a payoff for silence. Also true, Farma knew they didn't
sell drugs off those commercials. It was a money laundering
scheme to keep reporters silent about the abuses coming out
of pharma. Even Roger Ailes once admitted he didn't let
his people on Fox report negatively on Pharma because it
would destroy their bottom line. If reports are true, and
I pray they are, that RFKNI is going to ban
pharma as on TV. The double revolution of big Pharma
and MSM is about to begin. Can't wait, Yeah, buy CNN.
I mean, she has some valid points, very good points here.
She's absolutely right. It'll totally restructure our news and the
way that it's delivered and the way that we receive it.
Speaker 3: I mean, this is this is, this is going to
shake some stuff up.
Speaker 8: I like it.
Speaker 1: I just I like the shaking that's happening. I like it.
Speaker 3: See, you're all about the disruption.
Speaker 1: I'm a disruptor, Yes, I'm all about it.
Speaker 5: Well, speaking of disruptions, here's one more headline that we're
going to talk about real quickly before we get to
the signal story, and that is that there is a
new lawsuit happening by some victims families from October seventh.
That the lawsuit has been brought on behalf of American
family members of victims of October seventh and Israeli Columbia
students against some of the Fellows studenttudents at Colombia, including
Ma Mood Khalil, that that they they contributed and knew
about October seventh, And one of the biggest pieces of
information that supports their lawsuit is that literally moments before
the October seventh attack started, the Colombia SJP, that Organization
for Palestinians Students for Justice of Palestinians or whatever activated
They're a long dormant Instagram account and they were like.
Speaker 3: We're been stay tuned for some exciting updates. This was
literally minutes before the attack.
Speaker 1: Unfreaking believable. Is it true that that Ma Mood Khalil,
Dude is like thirty years old?
Speaker 3: Is he really?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 3: I guess that tracks he looks like older. I heard
that students.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I heard that yesterday. He's thirty. It's like, what
are you doing at a school?
Speaker 6: What do you do?
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but what I know you can. I know
you can be any age in college. But seriously, dude,
like you're thirty, you're thirty.
Speaker 5: And you're just dirty one, Like you're just you're being
a nuisance essentially, and you're just hating on the country
that gave you inexplicably a green card.
Speaker 1: So yeah, people are correcting me. Thirty one. That's even better.
You're in your thirties, Like, okay, I know people are
like grad school. Yeah, but come on, grad school really? Yeah?
Did you really? Okay?
Speaker 6: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Also, before we get into the signal stuff, I promised
this is last thing and then we really are going
to get into the signal stuff. So Praguer You, we
have partnered with Praguer You to try to get everybody
up to speed on their civics. Okay, So they're doing
a really cool thing right now where they are offering
a prize of ten thousand dollars just for completing a
civics test that has ten questions, which is reminiscent of
the kind of civics test that people take when they're
trying to be citizens of the United States.
Speaker 3: So a lot of legal.
Speaker 5: Immigrants know these questions inside and out because they had
they had to know them in order to get in
the country. Unfortunately, lots of our kids today, lots of
adults today, have no idea about just basic civics.
Speaker 3: And so they're doing this.
Speaker 5: They're doing this this chance to win a sweepstakes essentially,
so you don't have to buy anything. You do have
to be eighteen or older, and you can see all
the official rules at PragerU dot com. But essentially you
just can take this quiz. I'll show you what the
website looks like. It says, can you pass the US
Citizenship Test? And let me just see what it looks
like when you hit.
Speaker 3: Take the quiz. Can you see that? No, it was
a pockcapt so yeah.
Speaker 1: I can see I can see the initial page right right.
Speaker 5: So essentially, once you get started, it'll ask you some questions.
For example, just to give you an example, like how
many years does a Senate term last? Things like that
like who was the like the main author of the
Declaration of Independence, some of the basic questions that every
American should know, and you don't even have to like
guess them all correctly.
Speaker 3: There's still a little window you just have to pass, okay,
which I.
Speaker 5: Think means get six out of ten questions correct and
then you have a chance to win ten thousand dollars.
Speaker 3: So why would you not do this? It's like, it's
it five minutes.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, there's the link seventy six. Can you
give us a link there?
Speaker 5: It is right there, yes, brager you dot com slash chicks,
and so get on it, take it and see if
you win ten thousand dollars.
Speaker 3: We would be so excited if it was somebody in
our audience.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, would be amazing. Yeah. I know, high
school should teach civics, but they don't do that anymore.
Maybe when when education has returned to the States, maybe
they'll start doing that again.
Speaker 3: Exactly exactly.
Speaker 5: So if you want a chance to win the ten
grand just go to prager youu dot com.
Speaker 3: Slash chicks, and then you'll you can take the quiz immediately,
but like wait until the end of the show.
Speaker 5: Okay, Yeah, like maybe open it and then just kind
of have it open until the end of the show.
If you are not caught up with what happened, we
will catch you up.
Speaker 3: No worries about that at all.
Speaker 5: So, first of all, this broke when I saw this
tweet from Yasher Ali who said breaking, Jeffrey Goldberg, the
editor in chief of The Atlantic, was accidentally included in
a signal group chat with top Trump administration officials where
top secret war plans related to Yemen were shared. And
then I hope that everybody has read that article in full,
because a lot of people who were just looking at
the headlines immediately started making excuses, how this is, this
isn't real, this is a setup, this is.
Speaker 3: There were so many excuses. It was ridiculously if.
Speaker 1: You read it, you can still make excuses if you're like, oh, yeah,
it's true. I want to take accountability for what happened.
I'm still asking the question, Cheryl, how does that happen?
It's really it's because if you've ever used signal, because
I used to work in a company that, like the
C suite, we would all use signal, and you think
it's very, very secure, and I guess in theory it
kind of is. But our government should not be using signal.
Speaker 5: Well, I mean, maybe they should, but they're not careful
about it. And so, like I've even seeing somebody say
this is fake news from the Atlantic has already confirmed it.
Speaker 3: It's the stuff that makes me crazy.
Speaker 5: People are unwilling to accept that sometimes our side screws up,
and this is.
Speaker 3: One of those times.
Speaker 5: Okay, so the article title said, the Trump administration accidentally
texted me its war plans. If you read the whole
If you read the whole thing, you'll understand it was
Mike Waltz, national security advisor, who invited Jeffrey Goldberg to
this group and that and this. The group included jd Vance,
Pete Hegseth, Marco Rubio like everybody and anybody. Scott Vessn't
oddly was also part of this group, Teller, even Miller, everybody,
And so Jeffrey Goldberg initially thought this cannot be real,
Like I'm totally being punked right now. This is obviously
not the real people from the White House. This will
never happen. And so he's just like reading all these
texts that just a couple hours before we hit the
houthies we're talking about how in a couple hours we're
gonna hit the Hoothies.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 5: So it literally laid out everything that was about to
happen on March fifteenth, the day that we attacked the Hoothies,
And so he knew because of this group text two
hours before the attack actually happened. This is all super bad, okay,
And so there's just simply no excuse for how wrong
this is. And naturally the backlash was swift and immediate.
Some people just shouldn't have been talking about it, like
Tim Walls saying Pete Hegseth texting out war plans like
invites to.
Speaker 3: A frat party.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he may not want to.
Speaker 5: Joey Johns was like, you should sit this one out,
like your deployment to Iraq.
Speaker 1: That is so great. I love it. That is awesome.
Speaker 5: But there were other people on our side of the
aisle who were recognizing this is bad. So Marina Meedvin said,
the fact that our government officials were in a Signal
group chat does not surprise me. What shocks me is
that there was open access for anyone to add members,
even though Signal has options to designate that control to
only one or some admins, and that Mike Waltz was
foolish enough to add a.
Speaker 3: Reporter from the Atlantic to the group chat.
Speaker 5: And on top of that, even though signal notifies the
group when new members are added, somehow none of the
eighteen members realized that a reporter was randomly added and
kept on talking like it's no big deal that some
unknown number was added. And now all of this is out.
We're just lucky it didn't get out publicly earlier and
ruin the plans. I hope they learn from.
Speaker 3: This error and quickly.
Speaker 1: You know, this is like the whole time yesterday, I'm
thinking to myself, the federal government should be ahead of
the private sector. They're not. They're way freaking far behind,
right and everything, as evidenced by what dog is found
just in their audit. They're so far behind technologically. But
they should be far ahead. They should have something, some
sort of a communication something that is so far ahead us.
The pleabs, you know, I want them. I want them
to have like some sort of spy communication thing that
they use that's super extra secret and nobody else has. Yeah,
that's so locked down. What does my tax money go
to if it doesn't go to something like, oh, that's right,
it goes to trans mice, it goes to see if
mice are trans that's what it's good. It shouldn't be
doing that. It should be going so that these people
are not in freaking signal. Now, granted, they should be
talking about this step in person ideally, but we are
in twenty twenty five, right, I mean, and we're in
the year twenty twenty five where they should be able
to talk about this stuff via some sort of a
group chat, but it should not be signaled.
Speaker 5: It should or if it is, they should be a
pack of a lot more careful. I mean, this was
a big, big mess up. And of course Democrats are pouncing.
They're already talking about having hearings about this and like
insisting that they basically the entire cabinet should resign, which
is of course ridiculous, but it does give it gives
huge fodder to the Democrats, and they're not entirely wrong.
We would be losing our shit if this was Democrats,
we would be absolutely losing our shit, and we should
be because it's a big mess up. Mayor Pete saying,
from an operational security perspective, this is the highest level
of fuck up imaginable. These people cannot keep America that's safe.
Speaker 1: And now that is where I get really pissed though,
because literally, okay, it was a huge mistake, but the
mistakes of this administration are held to a completely different
standard of the one of the ones of the last
a minute. That guy was shitting his pants every day
and didn't even know where he was. So don't talk
to me about the highest level of f up imaginable, Pete,
not not being able to keep the American people safe.
For you kidding me. That president wasn't even the president.
There are other people when it, So don't talk to
me about being able to keep the American people safe
when you guys let in twenty million illegals and get
all sorts of other stuff to f up our national security.
Take all the seats, Pete on human.
Speaker 5: He's making all the rounds on all the top, sure,
I mean they are.
Speaker 3: It's just it's wild.
Speaker 1: Because he wants to run for president. Want a piece
of crap? This guy is how South been doing, Pete.
I cannot these people, I mean, never waste a tragedy, right,
never waste an f up. The one time we screw
up these people like grab it. Of course they're going
to grab it because we're held to a different standard.
That's what pisses me off. We are. Yeah, granted, it's
a screw up. It's a huge screw up. We should
have had no, we had no business being on signal none.
Speaker 5: Well, it's exactly. Signal has been used by previous administrations.
In fact, it was already like preloaded on the government
phones that they were all given when they you know
when they But but yeah, to be fair, like they've
got Elon now, can Elon just create them a new
messaging system.
Speaker 1: It doesn't mean it's right. There's a lot of they've
been put in files in like freaking like case. Doesn't
mean it's right just because we've been doing it for eons.
There's a lot of stuff that the federal government has
been doing that is not right technologically, and it's not
up to par. Signal is one of them I used it.
It's not secure. I mean it's like people will say
it's more secure than say like Yahoo Messenger, right, right, Okay,
that's great, but obviously it's not. Because a reporter got
a hold of it, you accidentally said they.
Speaker 5: Were invited, they were invited by one of these people.
It could because to be fair, it is end to
end encrypted platforms, so security, it has it, but it's
only as secure as the people using it make it.
Speaker 3: So this could have been secure.
Speaker 5: People are saying that they think that Jeff Goldberg because
his initials are JG. There's some people speculating, well, maybe
they invited JG. Thinking it was Jamison Greer, who is
one of the trade people that theoretically could have been invited.
I don't It's not a super high level position, so
I'm not sure why they would have included Jamison Greer.
But maybe there was a trade issue that they wanted
to have included. I don't know.
Speaker 3: But whatever the reason, it's still a huge mess up.
And that's that problem.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And when our.
Speaker 3: Side of the aisle, I just I feel so guess.
Speaker 5: Lit by so many people because our side of the
aisle is so much more interested in being right that
they're not willing.
Speaker 3: To just own that this is a mess up, you
know what I mean. And it's like that makes it
look so much worse to me.
Speaker 1: I mean, and when he left, now, you know, when
you guys are in a chat and you leave the group, chat.
Everybody can see that you left the group chat. Everybody
can see that this guy left the group chat. And
at that point they should have been like, oh, oh shit,
because he left the group chat, and it was like
so and so whatever. This guy's name is, jag whatever, Goldberg,
Jeff Goldberg left the group chat. I mean I would
have been like if I were jad Vance or if
I were Tulsa Gabbard or any of the people that
were in the group chat, would have been like, oh
my god. He's been in the group chat this whole time,
for the past couple of days, and he's heard and
he's watched everything that we've written. He is a reporter
for the Atlantic, Oh my god, and it's so not
friendly to Trump at R And they didn't do anything,
and they ignored it. And instead of ignoring it, what
they should have done is they should have called that
guy and said we effed up, like the like Bradley
Cooper in the Hangover, we effed up, and we got
we got to figure out what to do about this, okay,
And they didn't do that. They didn't do it.
Speaker 5: So Joe Berg even emailed after like to like he
gets off and he immediately emails his contacts at the
White House, going hey, I was included on this, and like,
you guys probably need to check. Oh, nobody seemed to care.
In fact, Trump was surprised by this news yesterday, which
also looks bad.
Speaker 3: We'll get to that in a minute.
Speaker 5: But to the point about how our side always wants
to make excuses, here's a great example of that. Will Caine,
God bless him. What he tried to the way that
he tried to rationalize this was so unimaginably stupid to
me that I just couldn't believe it, he said. The
biggest takeaway on this story, yes there's concerns about this
all going down on signal and accidentally outing the reporter,
is how thoughtful, collaborative and honest all these people were
in their deliberation. I mean, that's great that their conversation
was really thoughtful. Kind of not the point here, you
know what I mean, Like, that's not really the point.
Speaker 1: I don't know, I cut. Actually, I'm okay with I
think that's a valid point to make in all of this.
I do respect that point, because there's nothing there was.
When I look at the actual conversation, I was like, okay,
if I can see into a conversation about, you know,
dropping bombs on people, that it really was a very
thoughtful and thorough conversation between the leaders, like it should
not have been. I mean, granted, they screwed up by
allowing a reporter in there, but if you look at
the conversation and he does have a point, I'm gonna
I'm gonna let that point stand because it really was
and they were prayerful, and they were thoughtful, and they
were deliberate. It wasn't just a I don't give a crap,
let's just drop some bombs on these people. Whatever I mean,
it was, it was, I'll get I will, okay.
Speaker 5: But is that something totally give or is that just
a baseline expectation that we should have of.
Speaker 3: These cabinet members.
Speaker 5: It should be better be thoughtful, they better be collaborative.
Speaker 1: Perhaps, But I guarantee you, in past administrations, if you
would have seen into some of the group chats, you
wouldn't have seen that.
Speaker 3: I'm sure that's true.
Speaker 1: But we've never had an opportunity to see that. So
I mean, I I will take that as a positive
from this. I'll do it. I'll take it all right.
Speaker 5: I mean if there's got to be a positive, then
that would definitely.
Speaker 1: See what we take it?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 5: Positive then okay, So about I don't know, like four
or five o'clock is when you know, reporters were starting
to demand questions from the White House, from the State Department,
from everybody.
Speaker 3: They wanted to get to the bottom of this.
Speaker 5: And Tammy Bruce, who I like and respect a lot,
did not sound great in her presser when when dealing
with this question, here is Tampa, Well.
Speaker 9: Why was the cabinet secretaries in the National Security Cabinet
discussing a potential military operation on signal which is a
public app and why didn't they notice a phone number
that was not part of their group? And how concerned
is the secretary about the implications of this?
Speaker 10: Well, I have two very short things to say to you.
First is that we will not comment on the secretary's
deliberative conversations, and secondly that you should contact the White House.
Speaker 9: But in this in this regard, this was a very
extensive series.
Speaker 11: Of conversations involving, you know, a very important military action,
and the Secretary of State is the leader of foreign policy.
Speaker 9: Shouldn't he have an opinion about this?
Speaker 10: Well? From this podium. I'm not going to comment and
never would I comment in any framework the secretary's deliberative
conversations in any regard.
Speaker 6: All right, are you are? You guess I'm not.
Speaker 10: I've said it twice and I appreciate your persistence. That's
why you're who you are.
Speaker 6: But I won't be commenting on.
Speaker 10: That particular framework.
Speaker 6: All right, Daphne, go ahead.
Speaker 1: I also want to point out that that Tammy Bruce
is a lesbian and Trump was supposed to hate gay people. Again,
It's true. It's yet another gay person that's working for
Trump in the State Department, and that blows that narrative
out of the water yet again.
Speaker 3: I mean, that could have been handled better.
Speaker 1: Probably Listen, I look at it this way. Twenty four
hours is gonna blow over?
Speaker 5: This is I don't know, man, if they're gonna like
demand hearings and stuff, I don't know how.
Speaker 1: This blows over whatever. I just I honestly think it's
gonna I think it's gonna blow.
Speaker 5: The happiest person in the world right now is Chuck Schumer,
because like Chuck Schumer is like you know what I mean,
like all the heat is off again.
Speaker 1: I can go back on my book tour Woo. Yeah.
Speaker 5: So again, the White House was informed about this immediately.
Jeff Jeff Goldberger, whatever his name is. The reporter immediately
notified the White House after he realized that he was included,
and when Trump was asked about it, whoever was notified
at the White House clearly didn't let Trump in on this,
because this.
Speaker 3: Is how he responded to the present.
Speaker 12: Your reaction to the story of The Atlantic that said
that some of your top cabinet officials and aids have
been discussing very sense of material from signal and included
an Atlantic reporter for that. What is your response to that?
Speaker 13: In our opinion, I don't know anything about it. I'm
not a big fan of The Atlantic. It's to me
it's a magazine that's going out of business. I think
it's not much of a magazine. But I know nothing
about it. You're saying that they had what.
Speaker 12: They were using signal to oordate on sets of materials and.
Speaker 14: Having to do with what, having to do with what?
What were they talking about?
Speaker 15: Whose?
Speaker 13: Who did you mean? The attack or the hood is well,
it couldn't have been very effective, because the attack was
very effective. I can tell you that I don't know
anything about it. You're telling me about it for the
first time.
Speaker 5: So that happened, and then it just got worse, okay,
because then we're gonna hear from Mike Johnson, We're gonna
hear from Pete Hegseeth, who I think was the worst
of the worst when it came to responding about this,
and then we'll hear about like what's gonna happen from here,
because we need to.
Speaker 3: Talk about that too. But first we need to talk
about we got the best testimonial look at this.
Speaker 5: So we got this email from Jennifer A who said, Hi, chicks,
let's talk about dog.
Speaker 1: Now she's sicken years old. She's happening, she said.
Speaker 5: We started Miley on rough Greens about six months ago
and have seen some remarkable changes. She no longer eats
crap sticks, mult dirt anything in the backyard because I
think her body is no longer craving some sort of
vitamin or missing mineral. When she goes outside, she actually
makes it off the porch and sniffs around like a
normal dog because she now has more energy to do so.
And the most interesting change is that her fur has
gotten darker again. A lot of her gray is now
black again.
Speaker 3: Is this a proof of chicks? Because I could save
a lot of money.
Speaker 1: I was just gonna say, can I start eating it?
I should do that.
Speaker 5: Being that she's fifteen, we know our days with her
are numbered, but we're so happy to have found rough
Greens as it has really put a spring back in
her little old lady dogs. Step I love you, jerks
and enjoy spending every morning with y'all.
Speaker 3: And here is her little Nogo.
Speaker 1: Look at her, she's got little who she.
Speaker 3: Does have those.
Speaker 5: Fantastic testimonial. Of course, right now you should be trying
to take advantage of the Rough Greens ninety day challenge
for yourself. See if your dog or cat, they of
course have me Algreens too. See if they love themselves
some rough Greens. I can almost guarantee that they will.
It's so tasty and it makes their dry kibble come
to life. You can get a free Jumpstart trial bag
you just cover shipping by going to rough Chicks dot
com r u f F chicks dot com. And then,
of course don't forget to use code.
Speaker 3: Here's my job.
Speaker 5: Tube officials Top tom officials transmitting classifying war plans on
unsecured channels.
Speaker 16: Listen the administration, as I understand, I just was with
the President in the Oval Office just now. The administration
is addressing what happened. Apparently in an Indian burdened phone
number made it onto that thread.
Speaker 12: Uh.
Speaker 16: They're going to track that down and make sure that
it doesn't happen again. What what you did see, though,
I think was top level officials doing their their job,
doing it well and executing on a on a plan
with precision. That mission was a success. No one was
jeopardized because of it. Were grateful for that. But they will, certainly,
I'm sure, to make sure that doesn't happen. But I'm look,
I'm not gonna uh, I'm not going to characterize what happened. Clearly.
I think the administration has acknowledged it was a mistake
and they'll tighten up and make sure it doesn't happen again.
Speaker 17: I don't, of course, you can say about it.
Speaker 1: No, No, I think Walt should. I think Wall should
be disciplined for sure, because he's the one that invited
the guy onto the thread, and so he should should be.
I mean, if it were a private sector thing, if
I because I used it I used it at a
company in the c suite. And if I would have
invited somebody that was outside of the company into a
company discussion or into a c suite discussion where we
were talking about really sensitive things, I mean I would
have been fired. I would have been fired from that company,
just without question. So I look at this and I'm
kind of like, what, he's not going to be held accountable.
You should be freaking ball that he should all, especially.
Speaker 5: Because he's now on record saying he has no idea
how this happened, right, which is worse, Like you are
the national security advisor. If anybody's going to know how
it happened, it better be using it.
Speaker 1: Right, I know. Like it's just I mean, I worked
in comms and I and I knew like how to
do that stuff. If you're a security guy, freaking know
how to do it, Like that's listen.
Speaker 5: I'm sure then this guy, oh, he's probably great at
most aspects of the job.
Speaker 3: Again, was an f up that you have to do
something about.
Speaker 1: And then communication calms is part of security, Hello, god
it is. It's so stupid. It's just really stupid. So
he needs to be held accountable. I hope Trump holds
him accountable. I don't think haig Set did anything wrong.
I think haig Set is probably trying to cover everybody's
asses today.
Speaker 3: Including his own for sure.
Speaker 5: I mean because he was desperately uncomfortable and when he
was asked about it getting off a plane in Hawaii,
which will have in a second. But first, here's Jesse
Waters just like being total captain downplay about it in
the most hilarious way.
Speaker 18: Start a group text, you're adding people, and you accidentally
add the wrong person. All of a sudden, your aunt
Mary knows all your.
Speaker 3: Rocket plans for the party.
Speaker 18: Well, that kind of happened today with the Trump administration.
Mike Waltz was putting together a group chat on sick
an encrypti app with the Secretary of Defense, the VP,
and a bunch of other national security officials to collaborate
on whether to strike Iranian proxies in Yemen who keep
firing missiles and shutting down shipping. Well, National Security Advisor
Mike Waltz accidentally added a reporter to the group text,
and not a good reporter, Jeffrey Goldberg from the Atlantic,
one of the biggest foaks artists around. Well, he heard
some things he probably shouldn't have but could have been
a wee bit of a security breach. But it's not
like they home brewed a server and then bleached it right,
kept classified documents in their garages next to their corvette.
I'm sure it won't happen again.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree with him. I totally agree. Like of course,
like the Pete Buddha judges are like, oh my god,
this is the worst thing ever. It's like, have you
lived through like the past administrations, because we've been there. Hello, Pete,
calmed down, calm your tits, dude, go chess speed. I
can't well.
Speaker 5: Here is how Pete Hegseth responded to questions about it.
Speaker 3: When he landed in Hawaii yesterday.
Speaker 19: Information about war plans against the Houthis and Yemen was
shared with a journalist in the Atlantic and where those
details classified.
Speaker 20: So you're talking about a deceitful and highly discredited so
called journalists who's maybe a procession of pedaling hoaxes time
and time again, to include the I don't know the
hoaxes of Russia Russia, Russia, or the fine people on
both sides hopes or suckers and losers hopes. So This
is the guy that pedals in garbage.
Speaker 3: This is what he does.
Speaker 20: I would love to comment on the Houthi campaign because
of the skill and courage of our troops. I've monitored
very closely from the beginning, and you see, we've been
managing four years of deferred maintenance under the Trump administration.
Our troops, our sailors were getting shot at as target,
our ships couldn't sail through, and when they did choose
back it was purely defensively or at shacks and Yemen.
President Trump said no more. We will re establish de terrence,
we will open freedom of navigation, and we will ultimately
decimate the Houthis, which is exactly what we're doing as
we speak. From the beginning, overwhelmingly, why.
Speaker 3: Those details shared on signal?
Speaker 19: And how did you learn that a journalists was privy
to the targets, the types of weapons used.
Speaker 20: I've heard, I've heard it was characterized nobody was texting
war plans. And that's all I have to say about that.
Speaker 14: Thank you, So I appreciate it xactly.
Speaker 1: Okay, So if I were in charge of comms this,
I would have been like, Okay, this is how you
answer this. You you answer first with the good stuff,
which is what he said, kind of in a roundabout way.
I would have been like, talk about the precision of
your people and talk about how great they are, and say,
you know what, it's just really unfortunate that we accidentally
sent it sent, you know, invitation to this jerk of
a guy, and that this stuff got out there, and
we regret, we regret that, and it won't happen again.
It would have been, So that's how I would have
handled that. I wish if if I just wish I
could have told him to do that, because if you
would have done that, I think it would have been
a nicer answer, because then it's like you start with
the positive and then you go, but we kind of
screwed that one thing up and then you know what
I mean, it won't happen again.
Speaker 5: And instead he like denigrates the reporter, which to me
makes it that much.
Speaker 1: Right, and that was the first thing yet day then
maybe it's.
Speaker 3: Even worse that you guys invited him in.
Speaker 1: But like, you don't lead with that, you don't lead
with it with that the cops he's doing it.
Speaker 5: I mean, Caroline Love, it has got to be freaking
out and I am sure that you know, when a
pressor today, she'll be masterful. I would expect, but these
guys are not masterful at it. And there is question
were their war plans discussed, because it sounds like there were,
whether they were super classified, I don't know. Jeffrey Goldberg
left a lot out of his article because he felt
a responsibility to keep some of it under wraps, and he,
of course is now making the rounds too, and was
asked to respond to beat hegsep characterization of the conversation here.
Speaker 2: He is, I'm going to be responsible here and not
disclose the things that I read and saw. I will
describe them to you. The specific time of a future attack,
specific targets, including human targets meant to be killed in
that attack, weapons systems, even even weather reports. You know
that the government is I don't know why hexcepth was
sharing it with everybody, I mean, the precise detail, and
then and then a long section on sequencing. This is
going to happen, then that is going to happen, After
that happens, This happens, then that happens, and then we
go and find out if it worked. I mean, you know,
he can say that it wasn't a war plan, but uh.
Speaker 11: It was.
Speaker 2: It was a minute by minute accounting of what was
about to happen.
Speaker 1: Okay, well, I don't like that guy. I don't like him.
I don't like that he's there. I don't like it.
But now let's just live and learn that this will
never happen again.
Speaker 5: That's true, like that, I would never this would be
a serious, like wake up call to a whole lot
of people.
Speaker 1: I guarantee you. Elon is like, let's find a whole
other gaggle of nerds to find program that will be
locked the freak down.
Speaker 5: Yes. Yes, sometimes people get so ridiculously bent on protecting
our side that the conspiracy theories rage. This was the
one that cracked me up the most, so Joey Manarino saying,
if you believe for one minute that Pete hag Seth,
Marco Rubio, Mike Waltz, and Jade Vance randomly and accidentally
added this most rapidly anti Trump journalist to a national
security group chat, you're definitely the mark. These are some
of the most competent people in the country, and you
believe they would just screw.
Speaker 3: Up like this, It's not possible.
Speaker 5: This is called media strategy, and Trump is famous for.
Speaker 3: Stuff like this. Okay, how do you even what is happening?
Speaker 1: And there's so many people in here there like move on,
move on, move on.
Speaker 3: They can't take it.
Speaker 5: They cannot deal with criticism of our own side. They
just cannot deal. And I'm sorry, but it has to
be done. Like otherwise we would not be honest. And
that's one thing we're always We could just not cover it.
Speaker 3: Which that's disonest.
Speaker 1: It's just stupid that.
Speaker 5: Were I swear, okay, but last thing and then we
will move on. And that is not Jenny weigh in
on this. I was so curious and anxious to see
how he would talk about it because Scott is a
pr guy. He obviously has a job on CNN, which
is to defend Republicans, right, and so I was very
curious to see how he would defend this. And he
did some degree, but it was in a way and
it's not just because I'm kind of in love with him.
Speaker 3: He did it in a way that.
Speaker 5: Was not as egregiously ridiculous as what you just saw
from Pete Hegseth. For example, he actually brings up some
points which I thought these are fair, these are valid.
It's still a mistake, but maybe it's not quite as
horrendous as we.
Speaker 1: Think it is.
Speaker 3: Anyway, here is scat Jenny all Right.
Speaker 21: Moments ago, Caitlin Collins was reporting on her show Scott
that there is shot inside the White House that this
chat was texted. Did Jeffrey goldblerg are you shocked?
Speaker 19: Well?
Speaker 7: Sure, I mean it's a shocking thing. And you know,
they've admitted that it was a mistake and admitted that
it's authentic, so they're owning up to it. I think
they're still, based on what I've heard tonight, trying to
figure out how it happened. I'm not sure the National
Security Advisor Walls even knows Goldberg. In fact, I don't
believe he does him and has never met him. I
did learn a few things in some of my conversations,
if you're interested. One is that the signal program was
preloaded on a number of devices and agency computers in
this circuit when they got there, so in their view,
was already in use number two. In some of the messages,
they talk about needing to go to the high side computers,
which is the classified system, So they clearly were knowing
there was a line on what you could discuss in
a chat like this versus classified system. Number three, there
is a dispute over whether the term war plans is
being exaggerated.
Speaker 18: And number four, Look, I love the policy.
Speaker 7: It's well executed. We've got a thoughtful policy discussion going on,
and we did what the Biden administration would not do
stop these people from harassing our shipping lanes and our
boats and our navy. So go on the Trump administration
for reversing a bad thought.
Speaker 3: So a while triumph.
Speaker 21: And I will note that Pete Hexit does not agree
with you that it's all authentic. He went and attack
Jeffrey Goldbergen.
Speaker 3: I mean that was a masterful PR answer right there.
Speaker 1: Uh huh. He's good at that. He's a PR guy.
Speaker 3: He's a PR guy.
Speaker 5: I wish that he had been talking to all of
those guys and saying what you say right by the way,
Kevin Jones has been blocked because you don't get to
tell us what to do. Like, it's fine if you're
mad that we're saying things he's saying. He was saying,
you can say what you're going to say, but don't
spend thirty minutes on it, and you don't get to
tell us how to run the show.
Speaker 3: That's I draw the line.
Speaker 1: Just start your own show. I'm sure. I'm sure three
people will watch it. We'll be excited to hear about
how that goes for you.
Speaker 5: All Right, let's get to some good news, because there
was a Cabinet meeting yesterday and it was so great.
You guys, all the Cabinet secretaries were giving their updates,
particularly about DOGE and all of the.
Speaker 3: Massive fraud waste abuse that they're finding, and.
Speaker 5: It it's just so good, you know what I mean,
Like every single agency working with Elon and uncovering stuff
that is going to end up saving us just piles
and piles of money, and that is a great, great thing.
Howard Lutnik was one of the folks to kick it off,
and he was talking about the importance, of course, of
the tariffs coming on April second.
Speaker 22: So exciting is April second is just around the corner,
and that's American Liberation Day.
Speaker 14: That's the day when.
Speaker 22: The rest of the world starts to treat America with respect,
and your leadership understanding how the rest of the world
treats us and what balance and what fair Trade finally
is going to be is going to take care of America.
It's going to launch the external revenue service to start
to build the path and prestige of America back. And
I'm honored to be helping you on that course.
Speaker 3: I love him. He's such a happy guy.
Speaker 1: Totally. Do you have the Hyundai stuff? Did you get?
Did you because we didn't talk about that in pre
show the Hundai stuff yesterday he was Trump did a
press conference with Hyundai people.
Speaker 3: Oh, that they're bringing manufacturing here.
Speaker 1: Right, and it's like there's an investment that they're making
a five point eight billion It's like apparently this will
be the first steel mill Hyundai has ever done in America.
This is the difference between him and previous presidents. Basically
the differenttry Conservatives and liberals at this point, right, we
are not the same, Like that Hyundai is coming here
and they're going to be American jobs, and it's like
America first. And that is the kind of stuff. Like
Trump is out there making deals and so you'd like
when it comes to the tariff stuff, when it comes
to companies, like he's bringing jobs here. He wants industry
to be here. He wants manufacturing to be here. That's
that's what he wants, which is completely awesome. And this
is the kind of stuff that presidents before him did
not give a crap about that, and he does because
he understands America first, America first.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and that's not the first company to say that
they're investing huge amounts of money in America. I mean,
this seems to be a trend now. And that actually
kind of shot the markets up yesterday. That and the
fact that President Trump also kind of seemed to back
off of the severity of some of the tariffs.
Speaker 3: He actually said it in the funniest way.
Speaker 5: He said, because some of these companies are tariffing US
at like two hundred and thirty five percent, you know,
for a certain good or service.
Speaker 3: And so Trump was like.
Speaker 5: I would be embarrassed to do a reciprocal tariff of
that amount.
Speaker 3: It's embarrassing. And I just thought, and the markets love that.
The market's absolutely rallied because of that, totally.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: And you know, the waste for an abuse that they'
uncovering some of it is just mind blowing. So Doug
Bergham also announced that he found an eight hundred and
thirty million dollar contract for a survey. When you hear
the details about this, you are just going to be
so mad.
Speaker 3: Look at this.
Speaker 23: There was a Federal Consulting Group, which was a group
inside of Interior, but it was managing contracts from many
different agencies that flowed through here. One of those contracts
was for to do surveys of individuals. Eight hundred and
thirty million dollars for surveys, and so part of the
question was, hey, could we actually see the surveys, And
then the surveys came back and it was a survey
was like eight and a half by eleven sheet of
paper with ten questions like anyone's you know, child in
junior high could have put together or AI could have
done for free eight and thirty million dollars. So that's
one one that we've stopped. And that contract was going
out after you were inaugurated, sir, So it was jumping
out a fraud.
Speaker 14: Yeah, it's a fraud.
Speaker 1: It is fraud. It is fraud on the American people.
And this is the kind of stuff that Democrats want
to keep going.
Speaker 5: Eight one hundred and thirty million dollars for a one
page survey.
Speaker 1: Right, Oh my god, I know, and they're like, oh
my god, Elon's stealing from people. Are you being kidding me?
I can't. And that's just one of like a good
jillion things that they're doing to steal from the America.
They are thieves, thieves. It's all a big grift.
Speaker 3: Goh is it?
Speaker 1: Ever?
Speaker 5: Lee's Elden also talked about that NGO that Stacy Abrams
ran and how much money they're now taking away from
that NGO and from her, and how much she got
the year before last compared to last year from Biden.
Speaker 3: It's it's just, oh my gosh, it's just an absolute
it is.
Speaker 5: It is so vile, and I'm just so happy all
of these cabinet secretary are aligned about getting rid of
this crap.
Speaker 3: Here is Lee.
Speaker 14: It's all over twenty two billion dollars worth of contracts,
two billion dollars going to this NGO that Stacy Abrams
was tied to. They received only one hundred dollars in
twenty twenty three, and then the Biden administration gave them
two billion dollars. The director of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction
Fund saw his former employer get five billion dollars twenty
billion dollars went to just eight NGOs and they're all
passed throughs. And then they were giving it to other entities,
many of them were passed throughs. And what you have
is all these extra middlemen. They're taking their cut, and
the tax payents are getting screwed. They're losing out on
all this hard earned money. They can't afford to have
the federal government waste. The partnership with Doge and Elon
Musk has been incredible at EPA. Their team is very talented.
We wouldn't have been able to do it without them.
And of course this mandate from President Trump to make
sure we identify every penny, whether we're saving fifty thousand dollars,
five million dollars, or twenty two billion dollars, we will
not rest until every last penny is saved. Thank you,
mister President, for the opportunity to do this for the
American public.
Speaker 1: It's just gross stacy. If somebody said, now I know
how Stacy Abrams has made all of her Mondey, Yeah,
I've always wondered that too.
Speaker 3: Now we know she's just.
Speaker 5: Like stolen a billion dollars, just steals.
Speaker 1: It from the American people. People are commies man.
Speaker 5: And then freaking Jamal Bowman calls elon a thief, Chris,
this is why the lawsuits need to go go beef
in a Nazi.
Speaker 1: He called in.
Speaker 3: Okay, dude, it's worth two hundred and.
Speaker 1: Eighty five is it two or eighty five billion? Is
that what it is? I lose track. He's so rich.
I can't he's rich as balls. I can't keep track
how much money he has. He doesn't need our he
doesn't need our money. He doesn't need it. But you
know who does, Stacy Abrams, she needs it, apparently.
Speaker 5: Christy Nome was there also, obviously, and gave a date
about the border here.
Speaker 4: She is literally has almost one hundred percent operational control
of the border, which means that our country is secure
and that we know who's coming into this country and
that they love our country and they want to help
keep it great into the future. We are in the
month of March. The last couple of weeks increased our
deportations by fifty percent, so.
Speaker 3: We're now not even just getting the worst of the
worst out.
Speaker 4: We're making sure that there's consequences for being here and
committing crimes in our communities, and where the numbers are
continuing to.
Speaker 3: Escalate and to go up, Sir.
Speaker 4: This next week, I'm headed this week, I'm headed down Dale, Salvador.
I'll be in the prison where we sent TDA members.
I'll be meeting with the President and also Columbia and
Mexico and talking about building these relationships so that we
can continue to get people out of this country that
don't belong here and take them home.
Speaker 1: Love that.
Speaker 5: That's one thing that doesn't hardly even get recognition is
the fact that our border is essentially secure now yep.
Speaker 1: In eight weeks, yep, like all that the border crossings
in Texas are down, what like ninety seven percent something
like that. That's a big deal.
Speaker 3: It's a huge deal.
Speaker 5: It's a huge, huge deal. Now, are we closer to
ending this whole rush of Ukraine War?
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 5: It's there's going to be a lot of hiccups with that, obviously.
But again, Trump, I feel like, is the only person
that can make any kind of headway on this. And
Marco Rubio was there to give an update as.
Speaker 24: In, first of all, I think the American people should
be proud that we have a president that's promoting peace.
In the end of conflict on this planet. This is
a war that's gone on for three years, as you
pointed out that, as you've rightly pointed out, would have
never happened had you been president. But now it's here
and it needs to be brought to an end. There
is no military solution to this war. It has to
enter negotiation. And there's only one leader in the world
that's capable of bringing the two sides to a table,
and that's our president, the President of the United States,
President Trump, and that's what he's done. And so today,
even as we speak, we have teams on the ground
in Saudi Arabia, a meeting with the respective sides and
the hopes of making progress towards this outcome that we
all want to see. And and I think that the country
owes you great that a gratitude, and the world really
because I mean, you're the only leader in the planet
that can bring the two sides together to bring an
end to this conflict. And that's what you've done, and
you've done it despite you know, impediments from other countries
and others who maybe have different opinions about how this
should go. But ultimately, I think that the only chance
we have for peace is to the president's leadership, and
you've shown that and we hope it'll bear fruit and
today will hopefully be one step more in that direction.
Speaker 1: It'd come a long way, haven't they, the two of them, Yeah,
they have that's right too. Have come a long way
from little is it? Little Marco? Little Marco Little Marco
and now they're like BFFs Marcos Chicken ass. I mean,
I just I like to see it, you know what
I mean to see that?
Speaker 3: That was that was some nice.
Speaker 1: Pats for Trump. I like it a lot.
Speaker 3: And then Elon.
Speaker 5: Elon was there at the meeting because he was actually
getting updates from everyone about DOGE and how they're all
kind of working in their departments, and he was talking
about small business loans and how much fraud he has
uncovered with small business loans going to children, like eighty
like one hundred thousand dollars small business loan in the
name of a nine month old baby.
Speaker 3: What you didn't get that happening?
Speaker 1: You didn't get that when you were nine months old?
What's wrong with you?
Speaker 14: Guys?
Speaker 1: You didn't apply for that? They're under you're underachievers. What
you are? I guess?
Speaker 3: So, but that is really happening. Here's Elon.
Speaker 17: The case of Forward was with a small business administration
where they were hanging out loans, a three hundred and
thirty million dollars worth of loans to people under the
age of eleven. I think the youngest, Kelly, was a
nine month year old who got a hundred loan. That's
a very precocious baby.
Speaker 5: You were talking about here.
Speaker 1: Think that I can't baby, it's like baby Elon.
Speaker 5: That's the only way it would make sense is if
it was Elon as a baby.
Speaker 1: A racket, Mommy, I can't.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 5: By the way, did you see that he was wearing
a hat that said Trump was right about everything?
Speaker 1: I knew it. I know, so great.
Speaker 5: And then meanwhile we have idiots like Harry Sisson, and
I think he's. The guy that he's talking to is
Dean Withers, who's also awful, but in this case he's
at least giving Elon props where they're due. Harry Sisson
calling Elon incompetent is like next level just.
Speaker 3: Comedy, right, Like this is crazy, but that is what
he does. That's my dad.
Speaker 1: I think that's my dad.
Speaker 15: I think he's the most impressive human being in the
way I think that Elon mus accomplished. No, I think
he's accomplished some really impressive things, and he's really good
at some things. When it comes to politics like this,
this guy is like he is incompetent. He's incompetent politically,
and it's incredibly like he goes on these rants about
immigration and he just totally misrepresents and misinterprets data. It's
it's so it's concerning how somebody is so successful and
with so much influence can be so wrong on politics.
Speaker 25: I don't know.
Speaker 3: I think anyone who criticizes.
Speaker 6: He called him daddy or did you say dad's his dad?
Speaker 3: Daddy's sexual his dad, he's.
Speaker 6: Father, father, father, figure mosque Like I.
Speaker 15: Love my dad, but if I could like have another dad,
I would hope it's Elon.
Speaker 6: Like what's his son's name?
Speaker 3: X E A eleven?
Speaker 6: I may not see his kids. He doesn't talk to
one of them.
Speaker 3: Well, one of them is like super woke.
Speaker 6: Yeah, what's the woke one. He said that he feels.
Speaker 19: Like who goes to a rich private school in la
and explains, abou daddy's money.
Speaker 15: They're trans and so Elon Musk says that the woke
mind virus stole them from them, which is the stupidest.
That's just like, that's just like evading accountability and saying
I wasn't.
Speaker 2: A good way.
Speaker 3: How old is Elon's child.
Speaker 6: I don't know, he's like said at a young age.
He's like filder.
Speaker 1: Wait did he say that that's just like saying I
wasn't a good father? Is that what he said? M hmm, Okay,
So is he saying that bad parenting leads to trand
is that is that? Did he draw a correlation there
between bad parenting.
Speaker 3: And to interpret Harry's system?
Speaker 1: Right, I'm just wondering so, But but I mean what
I can infer from that is that he thinks that
it is a social contagion sort of just but I mean,
I could I could go on a I could try
to connect dots there and take something out of that
that he probably doesn't want me to take out of it,
that it's parenting or social contagent rather than something that
they're inherently born with.
Speaker 5: That kid of Elon's is a complete nut job. Here
is a recent TikTok or whatever video that they posted.
Speaker 3: This was a boy.
Speaker 1: This is Elon's kid.
Speaker 5: Yeah, this was a boy that now lives as a
as a girl as to the extent that he thinks
he can.
Speaker 26: And he's icky all of your political beliefs, kill everyone
now condone first degreemer advocate cannibalism, eat ship, filter a
my politics, felth is my life, take whatever you like.
Speaker 1: Yeah that person is meant kid. Yeah and I listen
and no wonder, no wonder. He he basically that was
the impetus for him switching. I think that was like
he that's where he started turning. Is he was like
they stole my boy. Yeah, the woke mind virus stole
my boy. And now I'm starting to turn. And that's
where he took a turn right. And I don't blame him.
Speaker 3: I don't either.
Speaker 25: Man.
Speaker 27: If anything is gonna make the light right, yeah, I
don't blame him.
Speaker 3: We got to talk about.
Speaker 1: Jasmine Jazz, Jasmine her giants with their giant spider eyes.
Speaker 3: She's so she's just a garbage person.
Speaker 1: It's an act. That is a total act. But all
of the all of the this is just it's an act.
Speaker 28: I don't know.
Speaker 5: I kind of feel like when she's not doing that,
that's the act. You know what I mean you think
you think I think she turned on her professionalism to
get elected and now she's just letting loose really and
as being the ghetto trash that she.
Speaker 1: Is, I think that she was. It's kind of like
she was. I think she was raised and it's kind
of like AOC. AOC was raised in the suburbs. And
then she's like, I'm you know, AOC from the Bronx
or whatever. She's It's like, no, you're actually not. You're not.
You're from a upper like upper class suburb is where
you're from. And I think that Jasmine is the same
she was.
Speaker 5: She definitely grew up wealthy or at least you know,
private school, didn't she mm hmmm.
Speaker 1: Yeah, she's not ghetto. She just uses that as a
it's a it's all a big ploy to do to
get what like, to get to get it votes from
people who are Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and it probably works. I mean, it probably works.
Speaker 1: It's worked so far. Yeah.
Speaker 5: I didn't realize, because this interview is actually a few
days old. We've played other pieces of it, but I
did not realize that she pulled the same nonsense as
Tim Walls when she said that she's glad that the
Tesla stock is tanking, which, by the way, it's not.
It was up twenty points yesterday or twelve points or
something twenty overall from it's low. But the fact that
a United States congresswoman is joyful about an American stock
tanking is psychotic, like that should not be said out loud,
and yet here she was, so, yeah.
Speaker 29: I'm excited to see that Elon Less that his money
as it relates to Tesla. Well, Tesla's tanking right now,
and I'm okay with that.
Speaker 1: She's okay with that. She's okay with an American success
story tanking.
Speaker 3: That's anti American.
Speaker 1: It is anti American. She's a what do you expect,
they're all comedies. They want American success stories to fail.
Speaker 3: Yeah, because she doesn't.
Speaker 5: He's not on the right side, and therefore she doesn't
want an American company to succeed.
Speaker 1: He's not the right he's not the right kind of billionaire,
right exactly.
Speaker 3: She was also in an interview. I don't know who
these gentlemen are, but she was in an.
Speaker 5: Interview where they asked, Hey, what kind of legislation are
you working on? Because that's your job is to legislate
and craft up some laws that are supposed to help
your constituents.
Speaker 3: How is that going? Here's what she said.
Speaker 30: It's about this session, some of your goals. Is there
anything you're trying to pass? How much of it is
going on offense? How much of it is going on defense?
Trying to stop the Republicans trying to pass?
Speaker 28: Uh?
Speaker 29: No, you know, I should probably be a better politician
and tell you, yes, we've got all this amazing legislation.
I can absolutely imagine Donald Trump's finance a law, and
that I'm just I'm just not gonna lae. I think
that right now it is about preserving our basics and
getting back some of the norms, the norms that make
sure that people have food on the table, the norms
that make sure that people aren't going through any extra
layer of stress when it comes to figuring out education
for their kids. So right now, I can tell you that, unfortunately,
I am not working towards very much that I would
consider being the progress train. I am working to make
sure that I can minimize the regress train right now.
And I think and I hope that my district appreciates
that I am being honest with them.
Speaker 1: Yes, she's a minimalist, you guys, she's a that's a translation.
I'm not doing.
Speaker 3: Shit except like little videos on Instagram or whatever.
Speaker 1: Did you know I thought that she has three cars?
I mean, I know that seems just let me tell
you what they are. One of them is a twenty
twenty Lincoln Continental, which is like around what fifty grand?
Another is a twenty twenty five Mercedes Benz G Class,
which runs around one hundred grand, and then the other
is an Audi Q three. I think that's like around
I'm a forty five afty grant. Who do you do that?
How do you have three cars? I mean, if this,
I don't know if it's true.
Speaker 3: She has a lot of homes too. She owns a
lot of real estate.
Speaker 1: Really I didn't know that. I just yeah, But if
it's true, it tracks right. I don't Public servitude is
like it pays you, guys, really pays a lot. Man.
She's an opportunist. She's a race baiting opportunist. Grifter is
what she is. When the guy asks her what are
you doing, and she's like, she can talk in a
circle and say, I'm not doing anything except for taking
money from people in my district. I'm not taking I'm
not doing anything, and she can say that in a
way that is like crafty.
Speaker 5: Born politician, Oh my gosh, and a terrifying one because
of how I really just dumb she is to just
keep getting elected.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and listen, I don't know like what she did
before she was a congress person. I mean, she was
a lawyer, obviously, and so you know, I'm sure she
made plenty of money at being a lawyer.
Speaker 3: So I don't begrudge her the cars.
Speaker 5: But it's just I kind of the fact that she
openly says I kind of do.
Speaker 1: I kind of do because she's because she's no longer
a lawyer, she's making money off of the She's she
is grifting the American people. She's not doing her job.
She's totally not doing her.
Speaker 3: She's being very open about the fact that she's not
doing her job.
Speaker 1: And right, and she's she is making money now just
like AOC they all make money off the American people.
It is a grift. She's going to get rich off
of us. So I do begrudge it. I do begrudge
the fact that she's probably gonna have three cars and
a bunch of homes and all that, because that's the
goal for these people. They get into politics so they
can get rich and powerful. That's what it is. So
I do begrudge that, actually I do. It's not because
she's a good lawyer. It's because she's a good grifter.
That's why.
Speaker 5: Well, she also is calling for violence, don't, no matter
how much she tries to deny it, and no matter
you know, remember when we played that little clip of
her in that Zoom call which was to organize for
this Saturday, the Tesla takedown, and it's said on the
little Chiron non violent protest. But every time she talks,
she's like talking about taking Elon down or you know,
otherwise talking about violence against people that she doesn't agree with.
One of those people being Ted Cruz. I'm not sure
why she went after him so hard, but this is
when she turns real ghetto in that same interview.
Speaker 3: And also violence, punch.
Speaker 1: I think you punch.
Speaker 29: I think you're okay.
Speaker 6: You you okay with punching.
Speaker 29: You know, I think, And I love Colin, and I
think towards the end he started to punch a little harder.
Speaker 1: But like it's sad ruse.
Speaker 29: I mean, like this dude has to be knots over
the head like hard right, like there is no niceties
with him, like at all, Like you you go clean
off on him, right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, when they like when they go low y'all. Wow.
Speaker 5: And then she released I think it was an Instagram
video or maybe TikTok, I don't know, but she released
like a four and a half minute long video yesterday
talking about all kinds of stuff.
Speaker 25: Mick.
Speaker 5: You know, she's mad that Pam Bondi is coming after her.
She's mad about the whole signal thing. She's talking about
all of it, and she's just such trash the drama.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 29: Number one I only found out yesterday that uh, the
Attorney General for the United States is that she wanted
to come for me. But the fact that you literally
are going to plan enemy attacks on a signal chat
and then you don't even know who's in the signal
chat and then y'all want to come in us and
act like people of color are.
Speaker 1: The problems are there?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 1: My god?
Speaker 29: Like baby, you probably need a good black woman in
the room who can check you and tell you that,
first of all, you shouldn't be doing this shit on
signore anything else. But y'all still mad about Hillary's servers?
Speaker 28: Is that?
Speaker 1: Is that what I hear?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: So anyway, literally.
Speaker 29: I don't know if like the home boy was drunk
at the time that he was sending these messages or what,
but clearly this administration is not ready for prime time.
Speaker 1: Okay, so now it's now people are drunk.
Speaker 3: And how does this relate to black women?
Speaker 25: I don't.
Speaker 1: I have no idea. Between her and her other Democrat friends,
It's like they're on drugs, they're drunk, they're Nazis and
they're stealing. Okay, I think you're going it and fascists
and that's right, and fascist don't forget start suing, man,
just start suing. And then everything has to do with
the melanin content and her skin always I don't.
Speaker 5: Care good and it's not necessarily working on other black women.
There are plenty of black women, black men who think
she's garbage and who don't buy the crap that she's selling.
Speaker 3: Here's one of them right now.
Speaker 28: So we have a United States representative by the name
of Jasmine Crockett that's getting her fifteen minutes of fame
for bashing Trump every chance she gets that after learning
that dog who is headed by Elon Musk. That's doing
a phenomenal job if I may ad in just a
month's time finding massive fraud, waste, and abuse of our
tax dollars and stated that we could potentially be getting
a five thousand dollar refund. Crockett stated that we are
not in the business of giving away free money, and
I don't know what Americans would do.
Speaker 1: With the extra five thousand dollars.
Speaker 28: Well, maybe you don't know what Americans would do with
the extra five thousand dollars because the party that you
sent up for speaking on behalf and promoting has been
stealing it from us, spending enough trains on transgender parties
and transgender animal research and practically lundering it. But y'all
don't want to talk about that.
Speaker 13: Now.
Speaker 1: Were she busy fun on your Mercedes Jazz?
Speaker 5: Oh my gosh, she is awful and it's so nice
to see that she's not convincing people because because because
black women with class don't want any part of that. Yeah,
and Pam Bondi is not done with her. So we
played the clip of her yesterday kind of saying, Jasmine
needs to watch herself because she is promoting violence and
she is still On.
Speaker 3: She's still watching her.
Speaker 1: With Pam.
Speaker 5: I never know if she's just more bark than bite bite.
She seems a little more barkie than bitey. Yeah, I
really wish she'd start biting. Yeah, I want to see
some actual biting that like breaks the skin.
Speaker 3: You know what I mean?
Speaker 1: Did you know whose bit is? Christy? Naham, She'll yeah,
she's biting. I mean she'll kill dogs. Man, She'll bite.
She's gonna bite, you know, just push out there.
Speaker 3: She's she does have the bite to back up the bar.
Speaker 5: But I mean, at least for now, Pam does have
a very nice bar.
Speaker 8: Yeah, Sean, it is. And you know, after she said
that about Elon, she said, well, I didn't mean violence,
but however, your words have consequences. And what happened after
she said that about Elon Musk she's a Texan in
her in her own home state. After she said that,
this morning, three explosive devices were found in Austin, Texas.
So she needs to unequivocally denounce the violence. She must
apologize immediately, not only to all Texans, but to our country,
to the American shareholders of TUSLA, because she is promoting violence.
And then you showed the clip of what she said
about Senator Cruz. I believe she probably will be censured
by Congress for saying that. You know, people don't learn.
She's using her public persona, her public platform, to increase
her followers, to increase her significance, and she is threatening
lives safety.
Speaker 3: You know when she did.
Speaker 8: This at Tesla Sean, people's lives are in danger. This
is America. We're in a free country and she's yet
encouraging this violence in our country. Think of all the
lives that could have been jeopardized in Texas just today
by her words and what she's done. But she didn't
stop with that. She continued on with Senator Cruz. She
has to apologize immediately and denounce the violence.
Speaker 1: I mean, for that to be fair. As a Texan,
we don't claim Austin. We don't. It's like did a
whole other country there in Austin, you know what I mean,
how the weirdos live there. No offense anybody that lives
in Austin. But just saying, you know what I'm saying,
you know what I'm saying. But yeah, she's I mean,
she shouldn't get away with this. It's she and She'll
constantly get on a camera and be like, oh, I'll,
you know, speak out against the violence of Jay Sixers, right,
Yet we need to take we need to take you know,
all these people down, Elon and Ted Cruz and all
these people. I mean, she's constantly inciting violence, constantly and.
Speaker 3: Then trying to pretend that she doesn't.
Speaker 1: She needs to be held accountable. And I honestly think
that she's starting to freak out a little bit. That's
why she you see her on the screen law saying,
I don't know what she's talking about. Pam Bondi's coming
after me. I think she's starting to freak out a
little bit about the fact that she is going to
be held accountable for this stuff.
Speaker 3: I hope so, I hope.
Speaker 1: So she needs to be But Pam BONDI needs to
she needs to bite more than just bark.
Speaker 3: Moving on to this is.
Speaker 5: Just it's just such a ridiculous display of more waste
of our tax dollars. This is in Colorado. There is
a state rep by the name of Amy Pascal.
Speaker 3: Not sure if I'm.
Speaker 5: Pronouncing her last name right, but in any case, this
was during a session, a legislative session. This is how
this Democrat Colorado State Rep. Decided to spend her time.
She was caught playing a coloring game during debate on
a gun control bill. This and like, it looks like
an absolutely infantile, juvenile game.
Speaker 1: It's any game is infantile. At this point, she should
be doing her freaking job.
Speaker 3: This is on taxpayers dime, right.
Speaker 1: This is why we pay in the big bucks, you guys,
so they can color ridiculous. I swear, I'm glad she's
getting a pension too, all sorts of datements and I
have to pay for my own retirement. I My blood
boiled when I see the shit. Oh my god.
Speaker 3: It's infuriating.
Speaker 1: And people will defend it. People will be like, people
will defend it, well, don't you like do stuff on
the company dime? Like don't you do you know, don't
you I don't know, play solitaire. I'm sure people in
the private sector play solitaire and they do this and
they do that. People will defend it, and I'm like, no, no,
oh my god, you don't get to do that. The
American taxpayer is paying that broad salary and she's just
doing it out in the open, like, yeah, it doesn't
even matter. She has no shame. What about That's what's
so infuriating. Nothing nothing's going to happen to her either,
you know, nothing will happen, Nothing will happen at all.
She'll continue to get all the same perks and benefits
that she gets. And not only that, but it was
during a discussion about gun control, like something super serious
like that, and she's just like, I have no interest.
Oh my god, I need to color this cartoon. Okay, wow, yeah, yikes.
Speaker 5: Also, everyone's favorite tiny little terrorist is back, Greta Thunberg,
who remember when she was all about climate change. She
doesn't give two craps about climate change anymore. She is
all about Palestine dials. Yeah, that's her big thing. And
she was doing, like I guess, a parade where she
had like a megaphone and she's wanting to do a
call and answer type of chant. And I can't imagine
how awful it must have been to be like right
behind her or around her listening to this level of
scre reach up.
Speaker 31: The paper, that's show me what's show me what them
up to say? Listen I say when I say must,
we must?
Speaker 3: What when I say freedom?
Speaker 1: You say, I don't know?
Speaker 3: She Okay, is she all right? She has never been okay?
Speaker 6: Wow?
Speaker 3: Or alright?
Speaker 1: She's not aging well either.
Speaker 3: You know, she's what like twenty at top?
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe twenty. Yeah, she's looking like she's healthy.
Speaker 3: She okay, probably not? Probably not. Democrats are not okay
in general. In fact, there is now a new uh movement.
I don't know what else to call it.
Speaker 5: But you're gonna see, you're gonna start seeing a lot
of videos about this on on whatever social media platforms
you see videos on. But there's something called the silent riot.
I don't know what it is or how.
Speaker 3: It works, but everyone is talking about it. Behold, we
will not be silent.
Speaker 1: The silent riot has begun. I don't get it. I
don't either. I don't.
Speaker 24: We will not be silent.
Speaker 3: The silent riot has begun.
Speaker 1: That doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 3: It doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 28: Not be silent.
Speaker 6: The silent riot has begun.
Speaker 1: Why are they all saying? Right, I surprise there, we
will not be silent? Nice filter.
Speaker 3: The silent riot has begun.
Speaker 1: Okay, but like how but if it's a silent riot,
that means you need an STFU.
Speaker 5: The silent riot, Like you either need to be silent
or rioting right, it's it's a Nazee moron.
Speaker 1: Jump, I get it.
Speaker 6: We will not be silent?
Speaker 1: What is that?
Speaker 6: Is that?
Speaker 1: What is that? I don't know.
Speaker 16: We will not be silenced.
Speaker 6: The silent riot has begun?
Speaker 3: Then why are you still talking right.
Speaker 2: At all?
Speaker 3: Like I've never seen.
Speaker 1: A quiet Democrat?
Speaker 6: Yeah, you just don't listen anymore.
Speaker 1: I love her, love her, I totally love her. The
whole time. I was like, I don't get it. If
you're silent, then shouldn't you be silent? A side riot
cannotes that you're gonna just shut the f up?
Speaker 3: But then also riot right, Like, so what is what's
the what does that look like?
Speaker 5: You?
Speaker 1: That's what you did?
Speaker 5: It's just I mean, it has begun, so you would
think we would know what it is.
Speaker 3: But I have no idea.
Speaker 1: When you're in elementary school, like your kids are little,
and you're like, let's play the quiet game, and.
Speaker 3: That's what what you do with your kids.
Speaker 1: You see how long they can be quiet? Don't last
very long. But that's I guess democrats, because Democrats are
in fact toddlers. Yeah, they are streamed toddlers. I know
it's mean toddlers. You guys.
Speaker 5: They mean to toddlers, but they are toddlers anyway, get
ready for all that started rioting. Okay, gun you guys,
it has a gun.
Speaker 1: It's a band.
Speaker 32: Quiet riot, Okay, Okay, So now we need to talk
just a little bit about twenty three and me because
they are filing for bankruptcy, which means that I think
they have fifteen million.
Speaker 5: People's DNA on hand and potentially it's up for grabs,
like it could be sold to a pharma company, it
could be sold to an overseas company.
Speaker 3: It could be sold to nefarious people.
Speaker 1: But they don't do what That's what. I don't know
the thing, Okay, Like I I don't. I've never used
twenty three in me and I know people are freaking
out if they did that. No, I did ancestry. I'm
a big ancestry person. Okay, but I don't. I didn't
do twenty three and me. But I like, and it could.
It's so funny because there's one it tells you all
sorts of like genetic predispositions. And I saw one woman
saying that she went into deleted data and she was like,
I totally overlooked the fact that it tells me, I'm
predisposed to dog allergies and now I want to kill myself.
And so she's so upset. She's more upset about that
than the data preach. But I I need to understand
what it is they're going to. Everybody's freaking out about this.
They're literally losing their minds. And I get it. I
totally get I get it, But I also don't get it.
What are they gonna do with it?
Speaker 19: What?
Speaker 5: I have a clip from twenty twenty two, So this
is before obviously the whole bankruptcy issue came into play,
but there were concerns about privacy issues and maybe this
guy there's a panel that's talking about how that data
could be used. Maybe this will shed a little bit
of light on it. We'll listen and see weapons.
Speaker 25: Under development and developed to that are designed to target
specific people. Right, That's what this is. Where you can
actually take someone's DNA, take you know, their medical profile,
and you can target a biological weapon that will kill
that person or take them off the battlefield or make
them inoperable.
Speaker 1: So you can't have a.
Speaker 25: Discussion about this without talking about privacy in commercial data,
in the protection of commercial data, because expectations of privacy
have degraded over the last twenty years. You know, young
folks actually have very little expectation of privacy. That's what
the polling and the data show. And people will very
rapidly spit into a cup and send it into twenty
three and meters and get really interesting data about their background.
Speaker 1: And guess what.
Speaker 25: Their DNA is now owned by a private company and
can be sold off without with very little intellectual property
protection or a privacy protection, and we don't have legal
and regulatory regimes to deal with that. So we have
to have an open and public discos and this is
going to have to be a political discussion about what
does the protection of healthcare information, DNA information, and your
data look like because that data is actually going to
be procured and collected by our adversaries for the development
of these systems.
Speaker 1: I need to understand tangibly what they're going to do.
If you are going to tell me that my government
is going to create some sort of a bio weapon
to target me specifically, I'm going to say bullshit. They
can't even create something that's like signal that's more secure.
I'm sorry, I'm just I'm not It's fine if you
want to believe that, you go ahead and believe that.
But I just don't think my government is capable of
doing that to me specifically. It seems like a lot
of work and they can't even get my post office.
Takes a month to get a freaking letter to me.
Speaker 3: Okay, but what about China?
Speaker 1: Okay, okay, whatever, But listen, by the time they do this,
I'll be dead, you know what I mean. I just
I'm not as concerned. I am all about privacy. I
get it, I totally get it. But I am just
not as concerned about this as I think other people are.
And everybody's like mRNA and bioweapons. They already can make bioweapons.
You guys ever heard of COVID. We all were locked
down for like three years. I mean, I just I'm
not as paranoid as other people are about this. I'm
just not. I don't, okay whatever.
Speaker 5: I keep seeing all the headlines that say there is
a way to get your data deleted or whatever, and
that you should be doing it now before the bankruptcy
goes through.
Speaker 1: So if you've.
Speaker 3: Done twenty three and meters, then just like check into that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, check in totally do that, but if they could
create a clone of me, that would be awesome because
I need to be to clean my house. So if
somebody knows if they're going to do that, let's do it.
I got a clone of me, would be great. I'm
all for it.
Speaker 3: And I don't think that's what they want to do.
Speaker 1: I have things that need to be done around here
and I don't have the time to do it.
Speaker 5: I kind of feel like it could be potentially a
big deal. I mean, I can't pretend I under stand
all the ins and outs of it, but it does
seem like I just wouldn't want this company having my DNA.
I've never done one of those tests, and so I
don't worry about it, but like I would worry a
little bit. If you're not worried about TikTok, so why
are you worried about this?
Speaker 1: You know what I mean?
Speaker 5: Because that's your DNA, Like that's your actual your entire
makeup is you know what I mean?
Speaker 3: Like it's your entire everything that's about.
Speaker 2: That's what.
Speaker 1: But that's the thing. I don't know. People are like
it's a big deal, but how like somebody needs to
explain to me how like I understand, nothing is private anymore. Actually,
you're right, nothing is right. So how is this any
different than like data? I don't understand how it's any
different than.
Speaker 5: I guess just from the like the but like what
he said with the bioweapon possibilities, and they already talketing.
Speaker 3: They already have that capability.
Speaker 1: Everybody has that capability. Now everybody, we're all you know
what I mean, They're the only thing that is in
taxes and death inevitable, you know what I mean. It's
like it's just there's there's all sorts of crazy stuff
that can happen to us. I'm just not afraid of
this stuff as everybody. And Dolly is a great point.
If you've ever done blood work, I mean they your
blood is I just your fingerprints, your everything is out
there everything. So I don't know people are so freaking
out about this. I just don't know.
Speaker 5: If it's something it's a private company, it's not like
it's not under the protections, for example, that your medical
information is under related.
Speaker 1: Do you really think that your medical information is that protected?
Do you really think absolutely not? We just talked for
a half hour this morning about signal. Okay, but you're right,
it's probably super protected by our government. I'm sure.
Speaker 27: I just I don't.
Speaker 3: I'm just listen.
Speaker 5: You're going to see a lot of headlines over the
next several days that you need to go to twenty
three and meters and get your data deleted, because I
guess that that's that's the thing that you're entitled to do,
and you're able to do, so do it, and you
can do it.
Speaker 1: You guys do it.
Speaker 6: That's right.
Speaker 5: We have something I use one from yesterday over on PayPal.
Barbara Geiler said me a love taught me that you
can support Republicans in other states more importantly, to cross
the color line. I credit the chicks with guiding me
to great politicians that need our help across the country,
who represent the people in federal roles. She was a
great one that has gone all too soon. God bless
her soul and her family.
Speaker 1: Really sad about her. I'm really really sad ab her.
I was thinking about her a lot yesterday. Yeah, and
I'm so very grateful we had the opportunity to talk
to her early on and she was saying she was
a light you know. Yeah, that was.
Speaker 3: Our first major interview.
Speaker 1: It really was and she gave it to us, and
she was just a dear, sweet lady and just really
accomplished and just I don't believe.
Speaker 3: We figured out how to even do that.
Speaker 1: I don't know how he did it either, and I
don't know why she said, Yes, Yeah, she just was
a remarkable lady.
Speaker 3: She really was.
Speaker 5: Over on Venmo's, Susette Paramore said, what do you think
Obama is doing with all his free time now that
he's not running the country. Probably trying to figure out
ways that he can Yeah, I'm guessing that's my guess.
Audrey Krause five says, no way, Scott Jenny's dreams come true.
Speaker 3: Will you be purring in front of him?
Speaker 1: Lol?
Speaker 3: Absolutely.
Speaker 1: She told me that if we do an interview with him,
I have to purr at least one. For sure, I'm
going to be perring this morning an hour.
Speaker 5: Judy Flood said, good morning, chicks. They really messed up
with the signal emails. Yes they did, indeed.
Speaker 3: Minnesota Solar Baby.
Speaker 5: Says, ban pharma ads and stop doctors from getting kickbacks
from pushing them.
Speaker 1: Oh, they get them. They get a lot of kickbacks.
Speaker 5: Yeap, and Osuki says silent riot is that like mostly
peaceful protests.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, actually.
Speaker 5: I saw a comment somebody said that they have a
child actually that's participating in the silent riot. And what
it means is they are taking their money out of
any right wing institution. They're not spending money with any
right wing stores. I guess that's what it means.
Speaker 1: Oh, so didn't they try that for a day? Look
a couple of weeks ago, didn't they do that like
the day of like they weren't going to spend any money,
and then we were all like, and then we all
went and spent.
Speaker 3: It was like a Friday that they did that. Yeah,
and I don't remember hearing that anything bad happened.
Speaker 1: Nothing bad happened. We know they're just going to do
it forever. I guess. Yeah, good luck with not buying
anything on Amazon exactly.
Speaker 5: And by the way, really quickly, before you get to
your thank yous, just a shout out to Osuki because
she also sent me a very sweet card and check
for Ella and that was unnecessary and very much appreciated.
Speaker 3: Osuki.
Speaker 1: Thanks, oh Suki, I know you're so dear.
Speaker 3: Thank you, very nice, very nice.
Speaker 1: Okay, right now, Curio twenty three, it's adorable thing mack
swooning ever Scott Jennings, she is, she's kind of in love,
as she said, GC. Shoot, as some of your biggest
fans will be representing COFTR in the Bahamas. We're going
to miss your interview with Scott Jennings. We'll have plenty
to binge on when we get back with y'all could
join us. God, I wish we were in the Bahamas too.
Amazing GC QC. You guys need major pictures on an
insider's page and locals. Rachel Ray, I passed the test,
never took Civics in high school, just a government class
at a small school that actually cared what we learned.
Good for you, I hope you would be awesome. Robin
die Goldberg is the editor of The Atlantic. Yes, he's
the editor. I thought we said she other Maybe we
said I don't know if we said she chief editor,
but yeah, he is. I don't know. You may be correct.
We probably needed to be corrected. Kim Fournier tobacco ads
on TV banned one one seventy one. Yes, so banning
like RX ads. Yep, yeah, I agree. Kira the Corner guests,
who's going to be in South Carolina this afternoon, Kiera.
Speaker 3: Enjoy your visit to South Carolina.
Speaker 1: Exactly, Kira, the corner just went, why you gotta Venezuela
for me?
Speaker 3: Please?
Speaker 1: Venezuela. I said that that's what AOC used to say.
Actually she didn't say like that. She'd be like Venezuela,
why the why the bee? I don't know. Because she's ethnic,
you know, she has to say it in that accent.
Aaron ournerm Pam Bondi is a lying liar who lies.
She won't hold ghetto girl to account. She won't release
any more Epstein files. She gave some bat poppies to
People Magazine and Binders for a photo op. Meh, take
my money. Okay.
Speaker 3: I know a lot of people are disappointed with Pam.
Speaker 1: I think Gates would have been better, but he you know,
he had a podcast. You know.
Speaker 3: I'm waiting for her to redeem herself any minute now.
Speaker 1: It's happening, right, Jenny Lunsford Elon teach security to the
Cabinet seventy eight today. Okay, Andrea Viola Bondi needs to
be removed. She has done absolutely nothing. Bondie Patel Bongino
are busy with social media, TV and podcasts, do your
effing job or GTFO.
Speaker 3: See people are losing patients.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Brian Bremley regarding the Silent Riot and the immortal
words of Yosemite Sam shut the shutting up.
Speaker 3: Ffs.
Speaker 1: Jenny O mostly ignored that snow White influencer pass like
I do with Disney until that b when I'll pro
Palestine in her co star space Galga Dot Yet former
IDF soldier, I don't think you want to do that.
Done with the insufferable snot hope she gets canceled missed. Yes,
I guess yesterday is what she was trying to say.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think we talked about it yesterday or or
on Friday.
Speaker 1: I think it was. I think yesterday we brought it up.
But she apparently that movie is tanking. They're not doing
at all thanking. Yeah, I know, right, Karma, Penny Perdeau,
Silent Riot is an economic movement only spending money and
time in friendly businesses. Love you jerks and jerk family. Also,
my last name is pronounced Perdue, not per Perdue, not
per Doe. I'm sorry, Penny Purdue. I'm sorry Purdue, not
per Doe. Well, you need to take the O out
of your name. I know, because it looks like Perdau.
It is confusing. It doesn't look like the college Purdue,
you know. So I'm sorry, Penny. I apologize for mispronouncing
your name. All Right, you guys, bring it in. It's Tuesday.
We're gonna go. We're gonna go talk to Scott Jenny
in about forty five minutes.
Speaker 3: You guys, have a great Tuesday.
Speaker 1: We'll talk to you tomorrow.
Speaker 3: Hi, everybody,