Speaker 1: You know, a world of deceit. Telling the truth is
Speaker 1: a revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. As the
Speaker 1: clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the twenty third of October
Speaker 1: of Our Lord twenty twenty five. Well, today we're going
Speaker 1: to talk about.
Speaker 2: Our president who thinks that he's greater than Washington Lincoln,
Speaker 2: but we're also going to take a look at the
Speaker 2: war and of course they were both associated with some
Speaker 2: very important wars. He's he's doing everything he can to
Speaker 2: be a fourth turning president, whether it's Washington, Lincoln or FDR.
Speaker 2: Only one of those turned outright. We're going to take
Speaker 2: a quick break and we'll be right back. Well, before
Speaker 2: we get into what Trump is up to is a
Speaker 2: never ending circus, isn't it in a very dangerous one.
Speaker 2: Before we get into that, we'll talk about one thing
Speaker 2: they does right, and that is the climate stuff. This
Speaker 2: is how bad things have gotten in the EU where
Speaker 2: they have gone full on board with net zero beyond ridiculous.
Speaker 2: EU automakers are purchasing carbon credits from Chinese ev makers
Speaker 2: in order to avoid EU climate change finds. So think
Speaker 2: about this. They are not allowed to make internal combustion engines.
Speaker 2: Those are going to be outlawed pretty soon and there
Speaker 2: are penalties for it, and if you make them, you
Speaker 2: have to buy credits, carbon credits. They're having to buy
Speaker 2: them from their competitors in the EV market. So what's
Speaker 2: the chance that they're going to be able to make
Speaker 2: a transition to evs. I think the chance is a
Speaker 2: net zero. They're just going to shut down and de
Speaker 2: industrialize Europe. They're pretty far along that path already in
Speaker 2: terms of power generation, and you can't have manufacturing if
Speaker 2: you don't have power generation. Manufacturing will be done by
Speaker 2: highly automated factories, and the key thing in that is
Speaker 2: going to be power. It already is when you're talking
Speaker 2: about very energy intensive things like making steel and automobiles.
Speaker 2: So this is a total insanity europeas finds associated with
Speaker 2: the production of gasoline powered engines if the auto company
Speaker 2: doesn't hit targets for the sales of evs. So what
Speaker 2: they want to do is to give money to their
Speaker 2: Chinese competitors who are making evs and who are making
Speaker 2: evs with the cheapest, dirtiest power available. I mean, they're
Speaker 2: the EPA And all this climate stuff started with protecting
Speaker 2: the environment It was all initially about air pollution that
Speaker 2: you could see, that you could smell, and then it
Speaker 2: transitioned into shutting everything down on the basis of emissions.
Speaker 2: After they cleaned everything up, they didn't stop there. They
Speaker 2: had a new mission. They wanted to shut down all
Speaker 2: power and not aligned with what the globalist one to do.
Speaker 3: And this is perfectly in line with the climate change
Speaker 3: treaties that give China everything just to pay your Chinese competitors.
Speaker 2: That's right, and so it is good that Trump is
Speaker 2: pushing back against that. As we're talking about yesterday, the
Speaker 2: UN pushing very hard to have a global tax on
Speaker 2: shipping and again justified by the climate mcguffin. They need
Speaker 2: to have a global tax, that they're going to have
Speaker 2: a global government, and they need to have a global
Speaker 2: tax to pay themselves to pay for an army that
Speaker 2: they want to have. Those are all things that you do.
Speaker 2: So this is you have to have a global problem
Speaker 2: in order to have a global government. So they manufacture
Speaker 2: this problem, and it's good that Trump is pushing back against.
Speaker 2: That's the only thing that I can see in the
Speaker 2: registration that is good. Frankly, seriously, the only thing we
Speaker 2: have a ev bus that was pulled after a fire here.
Speaker 4: We had called twas a bit inconveniencing, but it's okay.
Speaker 5: Thousands of students throughout Quebec were unable to get the
Speaker 5: bus to school Friday morning, as about twelve hundred Lion
Speaker 5: electric buses have been temporarily removed from the roads for
Speaker 5: a full inspection after one of their electric school buses cut.
Speaker 2: Wow, look at that Tuesday in most it's a great
Speaker 2: name for electric bus company Lion.
Speaker 5: This meant that many parents in the province in dis
Speaker 5: misspelled it the area had to either walk or drive
Speaker 5: their children to school here at Hampstead Elementary.
Speaker 4: Was it really so bad because it's for the Gundovaakades,
Speaker 4: so it's okay. If they are servicing or whatever they're
Speaker 4: doing with their buses.
Speaker 2: Well Canadian access it'll be most it is a.
Speaker 6: Bit inconvenient India Edman.
Speaker 7: We don't know.
Speaker 2: Actually, the problem is that we don't know how many
Speaker 2: days it will take now.
Speaker 5: The school bus that caught on fire on Tuesday was
Speaker 5: near Jean Talon Street and Victoria Avenue in Cotonje. The
Speaker 5: driver noticed an unusual odor and immediately pulled over to
Speaker 5: evacuate the five children on board. Transport Canada is investigating
Speaker 5: the fire. The Montreal Fire Department confirmed to City News
Speaker 5: that as of Friday morning, the cause is still undetermined,
Speaker 5: but have established that the batteries were not involved. We
Speaker 5: need to ensure the management.
Speaker 8: Incident might not click happen again.
Speaker 5: In a written response to City News, Transco, a company
Speaker 5: that uses Lion Electric buses to transport children to school
Speaker 5: on the island of Montreal, says that all of their
Speaker 5: fleet have been inspected and we'll undergo a second round
Speaker 5: of inspections following an assessment request. They add that after
Speaker 5: identifying a wiring issue, all affected Lion Electric and Diesel
Speaker 5: buses have been removed from service and that no buses
Speaker 5: will return to service until a permanent solution from Lion
Speaker 5: and Transport Canada is in place.
Speaker 9: The reliability issues of this vehicle has been something that's
Speaker 9: been plagued since day one for us.
Speaker 5: The owner and operator for Transport Scholar Elite and Ottuboost Beaconsfield,
Speaker 5: two other school transportation companies in the Montreal area, says
Speaker 5: that they recently canceled an order for twenty line electric
Speaker 5: school buses after having encountered reliability issues with their current
Speaker 5: fleet of eight.
Speaker 9: We have one of our vehicles down currently and they
Speaker 9: don't even know how to diagnose the problem. During two vehicles,
Speaker 9: we can even begin to figure out what's frow months each.
Speaker 2: It is not clear.
Speaker 5: The problem is the school buses to be inspected and
Speaker 5: put back into service. While an inconvenience for certain parents,
Speaker 5: some who we spoke to said that they understood the
Speaker 5: importance of taking the time for these inspections.
Speaker 4: They would say, do they don't. I know, they'll come
Speaker 4: up with the best solid shot. Of course, the kid
Speaker 4: safety comes.
Speaker 2: First in Hampstead. Get no idea what you said?
Speaker 6: City news kids SEFTI you come first?
Speaker 2: Okay?
Speaker 3: Well a very thick Canadian accent.
Speaker 2: If they say the batteries are not involved in that fire,
Speaker 2: if you see that fire, they would be lion and
Speaker 2: swell l I O N. They felt the other way,
Speaker 2: that's the really the lion bus that's out there. The
Speaker 2: other thing, costs of these things are astronomical. They can't
Speaker 2: even begin to guess what's wrong with it. Right, this
Speaker 2: is not ready, but it's being forced down our throats
Speaker 2: and it is truly a dumpster fire. And the European
Speaker 2: companies like Jaguar, you know who just did their their
Speaker 2: they're pink recently. You know, this is another thing actually
Speaker 2: coming from Jaguar. This is maybe you know, you can
Speaker 2: have electronic bus, that electrical bus with battery that catch fire.
Speaker 2: Maybe it'll be friendly because it'll have a face like
Speaker 2: Thomas a tank engine and and eyes that look at you.
Speaker 2: Look at this, it's it's got eyes to make it
Speaker 2: more friendly. They put a face on it and in
Speaker 2: that nice and look at the eyes looking at the
Speaker 2: person there. Hello, I'm here to carry you. Isn't that great?
Speaker 2: That's what Jaguar has become. That's a Jaguar, folks. This
Speaker 2: how do we get to the point of idiocracy? And
Speaker 2: how did we get there so quickly? You know, it
Speaker 2: was just ten years ago, in twenty fifteen, the Jaguar
Speaker 2: was leaning into its role as the villain car in
Speaker 2: the Bond films. Have you ever noticed Talian Hollywood movies?
Speaker 2: All the it's a played by prince and all the
Speaker 2: villain's cars were Jaguars. I don't think you're gonna get
Speaker 2: a Jaguar, that little car with the eyes that are
Speaker 2: rolling around.
Speaker 10: I'm more focused, more precise, always one step ahead.
Speaker 2: For a serven style, an eye for detail, an eye
Speaker 2: for details.
Speaker 10: Stiff upper lip is key, and we will drive Jaguars.
Speaker 2: Oh yes, it's good to be bad. See that's why
Speaker 2: Europe sees itself. But in reality, this is what Europe is.
Speaker 2: It's a little Johnny cab with the roving eyes and
Speaker 2: they're picking a fight with Ukraine because they still think
Speaker 2: they're the bad guys in a Bond show. But this
Speaker 2: is this is what they really are. And I think
Speaker 2: it's going to be. Yeah, we talked about a dumpster fire.
Speaker 2: That's going to be really truly the dumpster fire.
Speaker 3: Oh no, I think that makes kind of the perfect
Speaker 3: villain car. Like I could see that thing just running
Speaker 3: people down with the coldest uncaring expression. That's a level
Speaker 3: beyond like the Stephen King cars.
Speaker 2: That's yeah, not even Christine Well ev car companies buy
Speaker 2: Chinese car company carbon credits to avoid being fined by
Speaker 2: the EU. Yeah, the EU, it's just it's assessing fines
Speaker 2: and taxes. It began as a way for them to
Speaker 2: have a common market. That's the way it was sold
Speaker 2: to people. And so be very careful that we understand
Speaker 2: what all this stuff is about. We understand that was
Speaker 2: what NAFT was about, what USMCA was all about. It's
Speaker 2: all about the Trialotal Commission and making doing consolidation. First economically,
Speaker 2: that's why they call it the World Economic Forum. They
Speaker 2: come at you first with money and that's the way
Speaker 2: they conquer people. Now the guns come later. The Chinese
Speaker 2: car companies can then use the carbon credit revenue to
Speaker 2: subsidize lower priced Chinese evs into the European car market,
Speaker 2: thereby undercutting the European EV car companies. Except it began
Speaker 2: long before that. If you go back to the twenty fifteen,
Speaker 2: right about the time they did that bond commercial there,
Speaker 2: that was when the hammer really fell. It's taken about
Speaker 2: ten years to see the effect of it. But that
Speaker 2: was a Paris Climate Accord saying that you've got to
Speaker 2: putting mandates for reduction of energy use on Western countries Europe,
Speaker 2: US and others. And of course we were never part
Speaker 2: of that treaty. Trump pretended that it had been legitimately entered,
Speaker 2: and he pretended that he had to leave it under
Speaker 2: the conditions that were there. But there's absolutely no way
Speaker 2: that well, you know, for the Trump model, he doesn't
Speaker 2: want to push back against the authority of the president.
Speaker 2: You see, it was important for him to pretend that
Speaker 2: Obama and John Kerry could put us into a treaty
Speaker 2: without the Senate as required by the Constitution, because Trump
Speaker 2: is about first and foremost about a unitary executive, that
Speaker 2: we have a king, that we have someone who can
Speaker 2: do whatever he wishes and there's not any need to
Speaker 2: get any permission from the Constitution and legislative bodies. He
Speaker 2: just does as he wishes. So he wasn't going to
Speaker 2: push back against that. He pretended that we were in it,
Speaker 2: so he had to stay in it for the entire
Speaker 2: four years. That was clearly a clause that was put
Speaker 2: in for the American government that was there. Now this
Speaker 2: time around, after he got back in the second time,
Speaker 2: he only had to stay in for a year. So
Speaker 2: this is he's still playing by the rules as if
Speaker 2: the president can put us into a treaty. But that's
Speaker 2: the thing that basically killed it for the Western companies
Speaker 2: to de industrialize them was the twenty fifteen Paris Climate Accord.
Speaker 2: Because China does not have to have any reductions, China
Speaker 2: and India were allowed to continue to expand had no
Speaker 2: restrictions on how dirty their power plants could be either,
Speaker 2: and so they've been given an advantage on energy as
Speaker 2: well as on labor costs. And now the EU is
Speaker 2: out there penalizing anybody that doesn't buy the kind of
Speaker 2: cars that were designed to be made and sold by China.
Speaker 2: This whole thing has been you want to talk about
Speaker 2: bond villains. I mean they're the ones who put this
Speaker 2: whole thing through. The bond villains who are shutting down Jaguar,
Speaker 2: actually the green flagship Beyond Meat. I've got an update
Speaker 2: to this. I talked about this. It was just last
Speaker 2: week on the sixteenth, though, we had Beyond Meat falling
Speaker 2: to under a dollar. I think it went down to
Speaker 2: fifty cents. It had at stock, had been at two
Speaker 2: hundred and thirty five dollars in twenty nineteen, and it
Speaker 2: crashed to less than one dollar. And we were all
Speaker 2: celebrating that yesterday because that's Bill Gates's company and it's
Speaker 2: like good, glad to see him losing that money. However,
Speaker 2: amongst other things have been happening this week that are
Speaker 2: kind of strange, and we to talk about a strange week.
Speaker 2: Gold drops a little bit, I mean, still way up,
Speaker 2: but Beyond Meat had a rally where stock went up
Speaker 2: by one thousand percent. This is strange the times that
Speaker 2: we live in are I went up more than one
Speaker 2: thousand percent after hit the new low last week. But
Speaker 2: of course, you know we need to get down to
Speaker 2: fifty cents. It's pretty easy to have big gains, isn't
Speaker 2: it when your stock used to be two hundred thirty five?
Speaker 2: Shares of Beyond Meat surged sixty three percent yesterday to
Speaker 2: around five dollars and eighty cents, so it stock hit
Speaker 2: an all time enter day low of fifty on October sixteenth,
Speaker 2: capping what was a seventy five percent decline on the
Speaker 2: week after the company announced its creditors had accepted a
Speaker 2: debt swat swap that would substantially dilute shareholders. See this
Speaker 2: is what I mean when you have Wall Street, when
Speaker 2: you're talking about what's going on with the large agricultural
Speaker 2: companies versus the small and medium sized farmers. It's corporations.
Speaker 2: If it's somebody like con Agra or Archer Daniel Midland,
Speaker 2: they operate on Wall Street. They can be literally bankrupt,
Speaker 2: they can lose money for decades, and they can continue
Speaker 2: to sell their story on Wall Street, and they can
Speaker 2: essentially conjure up money out of nowhere just on the
Speaker 2: basis of stories. And so that's what we see going
Speaker 2: on here. They are bankrupt, nobody wants their product, but
Speaker 2: they can still keep them alive on Wall Street. And
Speaker 2: you can still have a thousand percent gain if you
Speaker 2: jump in on this thing. That's why. That's how they
Speaker 2: keep raising the money, because they make it into a casino.
Speaker 2: So one trader named Dmitri some nickkin have been pushing
Speaker 2: Beyond Meats stock on Reddit after announcing that he had
Speaker 2: acquired a four percent steak. He was bullish on Beyond
Speaker 2: Meats debt movement, suggesting a YouTube video under the name
Speaker 2: cabybara stocks.
Speaker 3: Can you really call these people's stakeholders if it's Beyond Meat.
Speaker 2: That's right? Yeah, yeah, they'll be the only ones who'll
Speaker 2: be holding steaks. The rest of you will be eating
Speaker 2: zee bugs, but they'll be holding steaks. Consumer demand has
Speaker 2: declined in recent years, with sales down twenty percent last quarter.
Speaker 2: Sales have plummeted by more than seventy percent year over year.
Speaker 2: Other plant based meat firms have dropped as demand has softened,
Speaker 2: including Unreal Food, Sun milk noops and open tastes, among
Speaker 2: others beyond meat. The IPO came in twenty nineteen, quickly
Speaker 2: became a penny stock after trading at around two and
Speaker 2: thirty dollars during its peak. Is briefly heralded by Bank
Speaker 2: of America analysts as among its Reddit stocks to watch.
Speaker 2: So there you go. This is the partnership back and
Speaker 2: forth of big financial people taking advantage of the greater
Speaker 2: fools that are out there. And then this essay from
Speaker 2: a guy who was very involved in the climate cult
Speaker 2: and has now recanted at least the catastrophic panic that
Speaker 2: was part of it. He still believes in global warming.
Speaker 2: He hasn't grown up completely. He can now walk and
Speaker 2: say Mama and Papa. So this is this guy was
Speaker 2: the story was put out. Originally they thought that it
Speaker 2: was William Nordhouse, who was really big in the climate movement,
Speaker 2: but turned out it was his nephew Ted, who said,
Speaker 2: he said, I no longer believe this hyperbole. Why I
Speaker 2: stopped being a climate catastrophist, and why so many climate
Speaker 2: pragmatists can't quit catastrophism. And of course when we were
Speaker 2: in the UK in two thousand and two thousand and one.
Speaker 2: That was the whole Gaya thing was just everywhere. It
Speaker 2: was in the museums, especially the Children's Museum. It was
Speaker 2: on somebody had left behind a science magazine, a British
Speaker 2: science magazine, and James Lovelock was on the cover and
Speaker 2: it was all about his Gaia theory, which is based
Speaker 2: on Greek mythology. Guya was Mother Earth. That's why when
Speaker 2: you hear all these Hollywood actors and actresses talking about
Speaker 2: Mother Earth, there is angry with us. I mean, they're
Speaker 2: really serious. This is not a margarine commercial from the seventies.
Speaker 2: They're really serious. They anthropomorphized the Earth. And when we
Speaker 2: went to the Children's Museum that had a loop playing.
Speaker 2: While you guys were playing, we were watching the loop
Speaker 2: and I was filming it. Someday I'm going to find
Speaker 2: that on one of the videotapes and I'll play it
Speaker 2: for all of you. It was just astounding. But what
Speaker 2: it said was the Earth was this living, conscious, sentient entity,
Speaker 2: right they projected onto it like it was Ai or something,
Speaker 2: and humans were a virus and so you know, we've
Speaker 2: got to do a virus is got to kill him.
Speaker 2: And it was just really sinister. Well, James Lovelock, who
Speaker 2: put out the gaia theory, has now recanted. He's not
Speaker 2: even doesn't believe in global warming.
Speaker 6: I believe anyway as the Earth is just some guy, you.
Speaker 2: Know, Northouse said. My former colleague Tyler Norris observed that
Speaker 2: over the years my views about climate risk have evolved substantially.
Speaker 2: Norris posted a screenshot of a page from the book
Speaker 2: Breakthrough where Michael Schellenberger and I argue that if the
Speaker 2: world kept burning fossil fuels at current rates, catastrophe was
Speaker 2: virtually a sure over the next fifty years. If we
Speaker 2: continue to burn as much coal and oil as we've
Speaker 2: been burning, the heating of the earth will cause the
Speaker 2: sea levels to rise, the Amazon to collapse, Well, Amazon
Speaker 2: collapse this week, but anyway, online according to scenarios commissioned
Speaker 2: by the Pentagon, Yeah, there we go. Sold to us
Speaker 2: another Why it'll trigger a series of wars over basic
Speaker 2: resources like food. Norse is right. I no longer believe
Speaker 2: this hyperbole. Yes, the world will continue to warm as
Speaker 2: long as we keep burning fossil fuels. He still believes
Speaker 2: that myth and sea levels will rise about nine inches
Speaker 2: over the last century, perhaps another two or three feet
Speaker 2: over the course of the rest of the century, but
Speaker 2: the rest of it not so much. And of course
Speaker 2: there's been a string of people who have said, Okay,
Speaker 2: I believe in global warming, and even if this man
Speaker 2: make global warming, like you said, it's what's a big deal, right,
Speaker 2: sea level goes up a little bit, it gets a
Speaker 2: little bit warmer, we grow food more, things like that,
Speaker 2: And that's where this guy is now, he says. For
Speaker 2: a long time, even after I'd come to terms with
Speaker 2: the fundamental disconnect between what climate advocates were saying about
Speaker 2: extreme events and the role that climate change could conceivably
Speaker 2: be playing, I held on to the possibility of catastrophic
Speaker 2: climate futures based upon uncertainty. The string, as they say,
Speaker 2: is in the tail, meaning so called fat tales and
Speaker 2: the climate risk distribution. These are tipping points at similarly
Speaker 2: low probability, But like the supposed collapse of the Amazon,
Speaker 2: once you look more closely at these risks, they don't
Speaker 2: add up to catastrophic outcomes for humanity. A lot of
Speaker 2: people have been saying that a lot of people have
Speaker 2: been saying, so what if everything that you're saying is true,
Speaker 2: it doesn't kill us. It doesn't destroy the earth. If
Speaker 2: it changes of the climate changes, we adapt to it.
Speaker 2: And when you look at this stuff about the Amazon
Speaker 2: collapsing all the ready, we've been told the coral resource,
Speaker 2: and course that's not true either. We're told that all
Speaker 2: the glaciers are going to be gone by twenty nineteen,
Speaker 2: on and on and on. Everything they have told us
Speaker 2: is a lie.
Speaker 3: And of course he just blatantly asserts that, yes, the
Speaker 3: sea levels have risen what was it, nine inches in
Speaker 3: recent years. Meanwhile, you can look at things like the
Speaker 3: several thousand year old Roman tidle baves that are still
Speaker 3: functioning exactly the same way, tons of places around the
Speaker 3: world where the tide clearly has not changed in thousands
Speaker 3: of years. They just look at a few places that
Speaker 3: have sunk, and then they say, oh, look, well the
Speaker 3: sea levels are rising.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah, sea level is as you point out,
Speaker 2: is that the land that is going down or is
Speaker 2: it the sea that is rising up? Yeah, it all
Speaker 2: depends on your perspective. It's all relative and it can
Speaker 2: all be dealt with. And the sea is not rising.
Speaker 2: And so now with all this stuff, these people and
Speaker 2: we should be reminded that they can't even predict the weather.
Speaker 2: They pretend to predict the weather. And so you see
Speaker 2: this story everywhere the Mirror, the heavy snow is going
Speaker 2: to bury New Yorkers this winter, with one hundred inches expected.
Speaker 2: How in the world could they possibly know that. Remember
Speaker 2: back when RF Kate Junior was at about two thousand
Speaker 2: and nine or something said our children will never see snow.
Speaker 2: We've played that over and over again. But now we're
Speaker 2: going to see one hundred inches of snow. There's absolutely
Speaker 2: no way they can know any of this. This is
Speaker 2: like predicting the number of hurricanes in the season. They
Speaker 2: don't know that either. And so this is a story
Speaker 2: that was done by the Mirror, left wing environmentalists, picked
Speaker 2: up by the Drudge Report, pushed around and when you
Speaker 2: look at their source for all this stuff, it's coming
Speaker 2: from the Old Farmer's Almanac. This was Benjamin Franklin's marketing
Speaker 2: trick that he did on people in terms of predicting
Speaker 2: what the weather was going to be like half a
Speaker 2: year in advance. According to the Climate Addiction Center, there
Speaker 2: is a seventy one percent chance that La Nina will
Speaker 2: influence the climate between October and December the al Nina
Speaker 2: Southern oscillation is a natural recurring climate cycle, with La
Speaker 2: Nina representing the cold phase. So they're Nino and Nina.
Speaker 2: So one is they're like the Ying and Yang, cold
Speaker 2: and hot. We're gonna take a quick break, but before
Speaker 2: we do, get somebody's comments here about.
Speaker 6: The climate North American house hippo, thank you very much.
Speaker 6: So since the beginning of time, man has yearned to
Speaker 6: destroy the sun the concerate at least. Yes, how dare
Speaker 6: that wretched yellow ball in the sky exert its will
Speaker 6: upon me? Is pecs?
Speaker 2: Oh? Wait?
Speaker 6: Fear is the common denominator in globalist tactics, from climate change,
Speaker 6: global boiling, et cetera. Something's always going wrong and someone
Speaker 6: always has to give up their freedom to stop it.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 6: The real octospook thick Canadian accent there, loll that's right,
Speaker 6: A true, a true Canadian.
Speaker 3: It was literally every one of the parents they interviewed.
Speaker 6: Yeah, they interviewed three, and three of them are not Canadian.
Speaker 2: Two Canadians. That's why you're paying property taxes that are
Speaker 2: so high. You got to educate the world.
Speaker 6: That's why you can't afford to live anywhere.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and they'll be driven there on electric buses with
Speaker 3: very unstable.
Speaker 6: Batteries, and then they'll be the ones driving the electric.
Speaker 2: It literally costs ten times as much as a diesel bus,
Speaker 2: and they don't last and they catch fire. But oh,
Speaker 2: it's not the battery. What you just said, you don't
Speaker 2: know what's going on is it's not the battery. And
Speaker 2: one thing I know is that you got a fire
Speaker 2: like that. I think the battery is involved. If it
Speaker 2: wasn't involved to start with, it would be involved later
Speaker 2: intensify it.
Speaker 6: Steve says, Canadians quote unquote l O l soylent Goy,
Speaker 6: she's probably an English teacher. Turned to a page Brandon Bennett.
Speaker 6: Why do they hate their children so much to send
Speaker 6: them to school? And a lot of people they don't
Speaker 6: see anything else as a viable alternative. They went to school,
Speaker 6: their parents went to school. They just see that as
Speaker 6: the It's.
Speaker 2: What we always do. It's just what you do.
Speaker 6: You know, you send your kids to school because if
Speaker 6: you don't, you know, they're not going to be socialized,
Speaker 6: they're going to be weirdos, They're going to have all
Speaker 6: kinds of different There's this really huge fear that has
Speaker 6: been put into people of you know, you homeschool your
Speaker 6: kid and all of a sudden you have a weirdo
Speaker 6: and they'll never have any friends. You'll never you know,
Speaker 6: they'll never live a normal life like you.
Speaker 11: Yeah, I'm a bit of a weirdo. I'm a bit
Speaker 11: of a weirdo. I had an Indian teacher. That was
Speaker 11: a very uncommon thing back then. I had the Indian
Speaker 11: teacher for a calculus and I still remember mister Mukerje
Speaker 11: you say.
Speaker 2: But I got in and it's like, what was that
Speaker 2: he just said? But it was math, so it wasn't
Speaker 2: too bad. It wasn't English.
Speaker 6: Though today will be studying but that gotto textbooks. North
Speaker 6: American house Hippo says, I put up a DK video
Speaker 6: on YouTube that's gotten thousands of views and hundreds of
Speaker 6: comments and likes, so it is possible to break the algorithm,
Speaker 6: at least until they catch on.
Speaker 2: Well, thank you for doing that. Yeah, maybe we do.
Speaker 6: Need to set up a YouTube channel while we.
Speaker 2: There's some kind of a gorilla thing. We have to
Speaker 2: get another computer as well as on the internet somewhere else,
Speaker 2: because I'm sure they've got us marked for both of
Speaker 2: those things.
Speaker 6: Have to keep a VPN on permanently, or you know,
Speaker 6: have someone that's in a different state upload the files. Yeah,
Speaker 6: I have to think about that.
Speaker 2: They're very good at shutting stuff down. That's where Google
Speaker 2: was abovely a search engine. Now they're designed to keep
Speaker 2: people off. But yeah, and we should try that. Thank
Speaker 2: you so much for doing that. Yes, you appreciate it.
Speaker 6: With the excuse me, Natlander, this is just the beginning
Speaker 6: of the problems with the evs.
Speaker 2: That's right. The problem though is that they're shutting down
Speaker 2: all manufacturing and industrialization and there's absolutely no way that
Speaker 2: we can compete with China. The killer thing that they
Speaker 2: added to the China price of intellectual property, theft, currency, manipulation,
Speaker 2: slave labor. The killer thing that they've added to all
Speaker 2: that now is this huge advantage and the price of
Speaker 2: energy by changing making electricity so expensive, power so expensive
Speaker 2: in the UK, that shut down the steel plants, the
Speaker 2: last of them, and other things like that without them
Speaker 2: having to do a direct mandate to shut them down.
Speaker 2: They just do it indirectly. They can't compete.
Speaker 6: Jerry al Atallo failure to change the summer air in
Speaker 6: your EV's tires to winter air, along with missing muffler
Speaker 6: bearing oil changes often results in fires. That's right. I'm
Speaker 6: pretty sure if you don't change your headlight fluid that
Speaker 6: can cause some issues as well.
Speaker 2: You guys need to tell the lie bus company covering
Speaker 2: them on the right track, you know, take the blinker fluid.
Speaker 3: So it's really amazing that they have that fire where
Speaker 3: you know, the entire thing is engulfed in flames and say, oh,
Speaker 3: the battery had nothing to do with this.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, an EV is really a much much simpler,
Speaker 2: far simpler than the internal combustion engine thing, especially with
Speaker 2: all the emission controls that they added to it. And
Speaker 2: so you know, it's generally going to be the motor,
Speaker 2: I mean, not the motor of the battery. It's not
Speaker 2: going to be the motor, and motor's not going to
Speaker 2: catch fire. It could be the battery. We've seen it
Speaker 2: over and over.
Speaker 6: What else on that vehicle is there to even catch fire?
Speaker 2: Yeah, the copper wires, they don't spontaneously combusted.
Speaker 6: There aren't too many copper wires left if the crackheads
Speaker 6: get hold of it. I wonder if Canada has as
Speaker 6: big a problem with the homeless as we do here
Speaker 6: North American House hippo. When I was around nine or ten,
Speaker 6: I was riding on the Toronto trolley bus that caught fire.
Speaker 6: All the driver had to do was get out, pull
Speaker 6: the poles off the overhead wire, and the smoke stopped.
Speaker 6: That won't work with an electric bus. Yeah, there's no
Speaker 6: putting there's no putting out a lithium battery fire until
Speaker 6: you have some serious capabilities. Got to fully submerge those suckers,
Speaker 6: and even then got to keep them submerged. The real
Speaker 6: Octospook truth is we are in a period of carbon
Speaker 6: dioxide starvation of plants. Optimal is two to three xs
Speaker 6: of now and higher for optimum plant growth and health.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's the thing that concerns me about all this
Speaker 2: carbon sequestration. It's like, man, these people are trying to
Speaker 2: jew engineer the earth here and make it so that
Speaker 2: we can't grow food.
Speaker 6: There. Stated aims are always the exact opposite of their
Speaker 6: actual goals. If they say they're trying to feed the planet,
Speaker 6: they're trying to starve the planet. Yes, Soil and Goy
Speaker 6: says we need to block out the sun and cause
Speaker 6: greater vitamin ded efficiencies in people. The resulting increase in
Speaker 6: bone can answer, will save the planet. Dude, we have
Speaker 6: Mark Young twelve. If those who fear climate change don't
Speaker 6: first discuss geoengineering, they're not serious. Soil and gooy. Why
Speaker 6: the hell would negative eugenesis want to save humanity from
Speaker 6: climate change?
Speaker 2: Anyway?
Speaker 6: You'd think more people would look at that and go,
Speaker 6: wait a minute, this seems to be a conflict of interest.
Speaker 2: Well, we're going to take a quick break and when
Speaker 2: we come back, we're going to talk about Trump. He
Speaker 2: is about to write himself a two hundred and thirty
Speaker 2: something million dollar check. And he said, it's funny how
Speaker 2: I'm the one who can do I can pay myself.
Speaker 2: And this is happening as we have to shut down
Speaker 2: the mini government.
Speaker 6: I have a small loan of a million dollars.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's going to give himself a quarter of a
Speaker 2: billion dollars. Here is we have to shut down the
Speaker 2: government because they don't have enough money. We'll be right back.
Speaker 12: Making sense. Comment again. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 12: If you like the.
Speaker 13: Eagles on, it doesn't away the cars and Huey Lewis
Speaker 13: and the news. They say the hotter you'll love the
Speaker 13: Classic Hits Channel at APS Radio, download our app or
Speaker 13: listen now at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 2: All right, welcome back, and we have as we're going
Speaker 2: to break last sight. I said a quarter of a million.
Speaker 2: It is a quarter of a billion that he's got
Speaker 2: two hundred and thirty million dollars and one Republican senator, who,
Speaker 2: by the way, has already had his fight with Trump
Speaker 2: and so he's not running again. Tom Tillis has said
Speaker 2: he's going to retire because he did not vote for
Speaker 2: the big beautiful bill I think was where the point
Speaker 2: of contention was, and so he is now free to criticize,
Speaker 2: unlike the other sick offense that were there. Although ram
Speaker 2: Paul has been pretty good about criticizing Trump on the
Speaker 2: Venezuela thing, and the anger from Trump is escalating towards
Speaker 2: both Thomas Massey and ram Paul, both from Kentucky. Kentucky
Speaker 2: better watch their back. They're going to get invaded pretty
Speaker 2: soon here, I think. Anyway, Tom Tillis and Mediaite has
Speaker 2: the story here. They say he's from South Carolina. He's
Speaker 2: from North Carolina. He ripped Trump on Wednesday of the
Speaker 2: terrible optics. That's his term of chasing two hundred and
Speaker 2: thirty million dollars a taxpayer money, and his report bid
Speaker 2: to sue the Justice Department for past legal battles. The
Speaker 2: New York Times reported on Tuesday that Trump had filed
Speaker 2: a lawsuit over the years long investigations into him during
Speaker 2: Biden's term. You had Merrick Garland, you had special counsel
Speaker 2: Jack Smith. They brought two major cases against Trump, one
Speaker 2: concerning his alleged retention of classified documents and another over
Speaker 2: efforts to overturn the twenty twenty election. And so again,
Speaker 2: all of this stuff we saw for what it was.
Speaker 2: We said, you know, criticize him for something that's real.
Speaker 2: It's a target rich environment. You had to make stuff
Speaker 2: up to criticize or to impeach Donald Trump. You got
Speaker 2: plenty of real things, but they pick these phony things
Speaker 2: because they wanted to put him in office. And by
Speaker 2: doing this kind of phony law fair they basically put
Speaker 2: him in the presidency. They gave him a pass on
Speaker 2: debating anyone. And we have an interesting story coming up
Speaker 2: about a Republican candidate who couldn't get the Democrat candidate
Speaker 2: to debate, so he created an AI model of the
Speaker 2: Democrat and he debated the Democrat. Now that's a good one.
Speaker 2: I think that at least you get them to come
Speaker 2: back and say no, I wouldn't have said that, you know,
Speaker 2: so you can maybe get them to comment on policy
Speaker 2: one way or the other. But you know, Trump should
Speaker 2: be grateful that they did all this stuff and put
Speaker 2: him in because it all benefited him and we all
Speaker 2: knew that. And you had people who were Democrats who
Speaker 2: were not part of the Democrat machine at the time.
Speaker 2: So people like James Carvill and many others saying you're
Speaker 2: going to put him in office, you know, you're making
Speaker 2: a hero out of him. Does on people because they
Speaker 2: see this is nonsense that's out there. And I was
Speaker 2: saying the same thing too. I'm not a Democrat, but
Speaker 2: the Democrat machinery, controlled by the same people that control
Speaker 2: the Republican machinery, wanted Trump in, so they were doing that.
Speaker 2: Carvel was on the outside free to say it, and
Speaker 2: now Tillis is on the outside of the Republican machine,
Speaker 2: he's free to say what the real issue is about this.
Speaker 2: So a journalist asked about the lawsuit, and Tillis said,
Speaker 2: it's terrible optics, particularly right now we're talking about a
Speaker 2: quarter of a billion dollars transferring maybe to the president
Speaker 2: when we're in a shutdown posture because we supposedly don't
Speaker 2: have enough money. The journalists followed up said should Trump
Speaker 2: Trump drop the ask? Tillis replied, I think right now
Speaker 2: is really bad timing for this. We had cent Bill
Speaker 2: Cassidy and John Corner also both asked about this, but
Speaker 2: they want to run again for office, and so they
Speaker 2: were afraid to say anything that'd be critical of Trump.
Speaker 2: Everybody knows what this looks like. Trump knows what it
Speaker 2: looks like. He's just so greedy he doesn't care. So
Speaker 2: Tillis is openly clashed with Trump on the Big Beautiful Bill,
Speaker 2: which is why he's having to retire now. So Trump
Speaker 2: just laid out the bare absurdity of John Roberts catastrophic decision,
Speaker 2: says an analysis from a writer on mother Jones. Another
Speaker 2: leftist site. Reporter Pima Levy describes how Trump can make
Speaker 2: the decision to demand that the Justice Department pay him
Speaker 2: two hundred and thirty million dollars of taxpayer money. Quote,
Speaker 2: because thanks to the Supreme Court's recent decisions, the executive
Speaker 2: branch can basically be described as a king that colossal
Speaker 2: cash transfer that Trump is requesting can happen due to
Speaker 2: the High Court opinions from Roberts, in which the Court
Speaker 2: has shifted the fundamental structure of the American government, such
Speaker 2: as federal agencies, including the Justice Department, are mere extensions
Speaker 2: of the president's will. The reality is that Roberts set
Speaker 2: the ground work for Trump's latest shakedown. The absurdity of
Speaker 2: the decision was laid bare on Tuesday. The president gets
Speaker 2: to pay himself hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer
Speaker 2: dollars tax payer money because he controls all executive branch
Speaker 2: personnel and all the decisions, and there's probably nothing anyone
Speaker 2: can do about it, wrote Levy. Congress could and should
Speaker 2: pass a law prohibiting such payments, and dare the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court to shut it to strike it down. But this
Speaker 2: Congress is not going to do anything like that. Trump
Speaker 2: must to be compensated after the investigations of Russia involvement
Speaker 2: and interference in the twenty sixteen election and his alleged
Speaker 2: mishandling of classified documents. Now that he's back in the
Speaker 2: White House, Trump plans to make the government pay. He
Speaker 2: grasps the fact that he has the absolute power to
Speaker 2: do it. He even admitted it. This is what Trump said.
Speaker 2: He said, well, with the country, it's interesting because I'm
Speaker 2: the one that makes the decisions. He said in the
Speaker 2: Oval office on Tuesday, following questions about the payments that
Speaker 2: he'd requested. He said, that decision will have to go
Speaker 2: across my desk. It's awfully strange to make a decision
Speaker 2: where I'm paying myself. So basically, he's just going to
Speaker 2: write himself a check out of the Treasury because he's
Speaker 2: a king. Trump is seeking to move forward with a
Speaker 2: ten billion dollar lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal of
Speaker 2: the Epstein birthday book story. You know, first he came
Speaker 2: out and he said, you just made that up. That
Speaker 2: doesn't exist. I never did anything like that. It's a
Speaker 2: complete lie. And then the actual book was released by
Speaker 2: the committee investigating by the Democrats who are investigating it,
Speaker 2: and you could see that it was exactly as the
Speaker 2: Wall Street Journal had described. But rather than dropping the lawsuit,
Speaker 2: he's going to continue with it because you know, a
Speaker 2: lot of people a leak at to say, well, it's
Speaker 2: only fair that Trump gets two hundred thirty million dollars
Speaker 2: because he paid a lot of legal fees to defend himself,
Speaker 2: and he did. But I look at that as just
Speaker 2: the cost of becoming president, because that ridiculous law fair
Speaker 2: that they came against him was the best thing that
Speaker 2: ever happened to him. And so, but if lawfair is wrong,
Speaker 2: why is Trump doing it to the Wall Street Journal
Speaker 2: and to other organizations for what they have reported? Lawyers
Speaker 2: for Trump are asking for a federal judge in Florida
Speaker 2: to deny a request by the Wall Street Journal and
Speaker 2: its parent companies to dismiss a ten billion dollar defamation
Speaker 2: lawsuit or the papers reporting about the body letter allegedly
Speaker 2: penned by Trump that appeared in a birthday book for
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein. Look, Wall Street Journal didn't defame Trump, it
Speaker 2: defined him. The big difference between defamation and definition. And
Speaker 2: Trump is further clarifying what he is with all of
Speaker 2: his actions here. In a court filing late on Monday,
Speaker 2: Trump's lawyers argued that the July article the surrounding coverage
Speaker 2: were a quote deliberate smear campaign designed to damage Trump's reputation.
Speaker 2: Don't talk about Epstein, okay, and don't mention to anybody
Speaker 2: that Epstein was Trump's best friend for over fifteen years.
Speaker 2: That would be a smear campaign. And you can't even
Speaker 2: acknowledge that he hung out with him, and he pretends
Speaker 2: that he doesn't even know who Gleaine Max. I haven't
Speaker 2: heard that name in a long time. I heard it
Speaker 2: the other day. Yeah, maybe I do something with that.
Speaker 2: So he is going to do something with that.
Speaker 3: Also, are they even debating whether it's real or are
Speaker 3: they just saying that posting accurate things is a deliberate
Speaker 3: smear campaign against Trump.
Speaker 2: Well, that's exactly the point when he talks about it.
Speaker 2: What he's really upset about now is he's shifted. At
Speaker 2: first he said that's all made up, that didn't happen.
Speaker 2: Now that people can see that it's real, he's now saying,
Speaker 2: you put that on the front page because your intention
Speaker 2: was to smear me politically, and that's why I'm suing
Speaker 2: you for ten billion dollars. So it has to do
Speaker 2: with the fact that it's on the front page. It's
Speaker 2: like the other law suit that he's got going on,
Speaker 2: which is clearly was an op ed piece. It was
Speaker 2: an opinion piece. But he was upset. He said, they
Speaker 2: put that on the front page. You can you can
Speaker 2: have an opinion, and you can have an opinion that
Speaker 2: opposes Trump, but not in his mind.
Speaker 3: So depend now there's a legally mandated what is it,
Speaker 3: fifth page now where they have to put any negative
Speaker 3: story about Trump, even if it's true, it can't be
Speaker 3: the front page.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah, we didn't have that clarified in the
Speaker 2: first Amendment. That's how many pages back and how far
Speaker 2: down on the website you can you're allowed to put
Speaker 2: your articles Uphe.
Speaker 6: What size text are you allowed to use?
Speaker 2: Right? Yeah, you got that really large font for a headline.
Speaker 2: You can't have that either. Dependents did not publish the
Speaker 2: article on the front page of the Wall Street Journal
Speaker 2: based on a mirror harmless joke between friends, So that
Speaker 2: appears to be what the issue is. You put it
Speaker 2: on the front page again. First he claimed it didn't exist.
Speaker 2: Now he's upset because it was on the front page.
Speaker 2: It was a smear. Last month, the House Oversight Committee
Speaker 2: released records from Epstein's estate that included a copy of
Speaker 2: a birthday book with the alleged letter from Trump. The
Speaker 2: newspaper had described exactly. Trump continued to argue that the
Speaker 2: letter is fake and that the signature of the letter
Speaker 2: is not his Well, he is a joke. It's not
Speaker 2: a joke between friends. Everybody sees what Trump is. Everybody
Speaker 2: knows what he did for fifteen years, and even Maga
Speaker 2: can see it, and they're starting to get upset about it.
Speaker 6: It's also we're still dealing with the continual revisions of
Speaker 6: the story. Oh, he never knew Jeffrey Epstein. Oh he
Speaker 6: knew him. But they weren't close. Okay, they were close friends. Okay,
Speaker 6: they were close friends, and they've written each other letters. Okay,
Speaker 6: he was a white hat pedophile. He was just in
Speaker 6: there to get news for us. They can't pick a story.
Speaker 6: It flip flops depending on who is telling it and
Speaker 6: what day of the week it is.
Speaker 2: And if you again, the guy who was his name
Speaker 2: is Michael Wolfe. I think the guy who Trump set
Speaker 2: for interviews with this guy for biographies. They did very
Speaker 2: negative biographies. And of course Michael wolf also interviewed Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 2: and according to Michael wolf he said that Epstein said
Speaker 2: that he had introduced Milania to Trump. And you can
Speaker 2: see that they were a foursome for quite you know,
Speaker 2: several different times. You can see pictures of them hanging
Speaker 2: out together. Well, Milania is suing people for billions of
Speaker 2: dollars if they report what Michael Wolfe reported. But the
Speaker 2: real the dog that didn't bark or the wolf that
Speaker 2: didn't hallow, is the fact that she has not sued
Speaker 2: Michael wolf He is the source of all this. Is
Speaker 2: she afraid that if she sues him, that he's going
Speaker 2: to produce the tapes as part of discovery. Is that
Speaker 2: she's not suing Michael wolf because she doesn't want discovery
Speaker 2: to show that what he said is true, that maybe
Speaker 2: she was one of Epstein's girls. Anyway, Mike Johnson has
Speaker 2: had what the opponents are calling an own goal. In
Speaker 2: other words, he scored against himself, crippling the GOP's shutdown message.
Speaker 2: What are they talking about? Well, I mentioned a few
Speaker 2: days ago that the attorney general in Arizona said she
Speaker 2: was going to sue. She's a Democrat. She said she
Speaker 2: was going to sue Mike Johnson if he didn't swear
Speaker 2: in this newly elected congresswoman from Arizona. Her father was
Speaker 2: the congressman there. He died of a heart attack earlier
Speaker 2: this year. That had special election. She won the special election,
Speaker 2: and she would be the final vote, that they need
Speaker 2: to force the release of all the information that's being
Speaker 2: hidden about Epstein and that the Congress has, and he
Speaker 2: wants to stop that. And so Mike Johnson's refusal to
Speaker 2: seat a newly elected Democrat is hindering the GOP's shutdown message.
Speaker 2: His fear of the possible release of the Epstein files
Speaker 2: is a self inflicted wound, showing that there is a
Speaker 2: fire wherever Sepstein smoke is really I think, and also
Speaker 2: I guess we could say this is the streissand effect
Speaker 2: writ large everything that Trump is doing in terms of
Speaker 2: his panic to cover up about Epstein. I mean, they
Speaker 2: obviously never understood the metaphor of the Streiss in effect.
Speaker 2: You know, the more you try to cover up something
Speaker 2: like that publicly, the more the people are convinced there's
Speaker 2: something there. I'm convinced there is. The Republican Party's message
Speaker 2: to voters that the government shutdown has no end in sight.
Speaker 2: Is the fault of Democrats being muddled by House Speaker
Speaker 2: Mike Johnson, whose refusal to seat a newly elected Democrat
Speaker 2: is sucking up all the oxygen in the room. According
Speaker 2: to a journalists politicos Jonathan Martin said Johnson is handcuffing
Speaker 2: his own parties attacks on the Democrats by not swearing
Speaker 2: in Arizona's at Elita Grijalva. I guess this way pronounce
Speaker 2: her name, who was elected to fill her late father's
Speaker 2: seat in the House. Arizona's attorney general is now suing
Speaker 2: the speaker for dragging his feet. Martin noted that Johnson's
Speaker 2: fears about the possible release of the Epstein files with
Speaker 2: Grihalva being the deciding vote, it's complicating getting the government
Speaker 2: back to work. He said, I mean this is about
Speaker 2: at least in part, the Epstein files. Republicans know that
Speaker 2: she is the decisive vote here and would be able
Speaker 2: to release that. This is also just reflective, It seems
Speaker 2: to me of an own goal. It's a reminder that
Speaker 2: he's keeping the house out and that something at a
Speaker 2: moment of the shutdown that I think a lot of
Speaker 2: that is contributing, I think to why the Republicans are
Speaker 2: faring so poorly in the polls. Well, look, we alreadys
Speaker 2: saw when this began to come around, even before they
Speaker 2: had the votes. Mike Johnson was so afraid of it
Speaker 2: that he shut down Congress a week earlier. I mean
Speaker 2: they already were taking off their August reset. They take
Speaker 2: off essentially the entire month of August added another week
Speaker 2: to it, so this would not come up to a vote,
Speaker 2: even though it was likely that they didn't have the
Speaker 2: votes to make this thing pass. And so not only
Speaker 2: has he drawn more attention to this, not only has
Speaker 2: he shown that as a Trump sickophant, he is absolutely
Speaker 2: desperate to keep this covered up, but he has now
Speaker 2: made it possible for this thing to pass because by
Speaker 2: kicking the ball down the road, now they have another
Speaker 2: representative who is going to vote for that they would
Speaker 2: have been one vote short. So Arizona issuing the US
Speaker 2: House Speaker Johnson actually over the delay in swearing in
Speaker 2: this Democrat, Grijalva, if I'm pronouncing her name correctly. The
Speaker 2: state of Arizona on Tuesday sued she's fifty four. She
Speaker 2: won special election, as I said, after her father died
Speaker 2: March of a heart attack. Johnson has said that he
Speaker 2: will swear her in when the House returns, but has
Speaker 2: kept lawmakers out of Washington for more than a month,
Speaker 2: saying they'll not return until the Senate passed. This is
Speaker 2: a measure to end the ongoing government shutdown. This case
Speaker 2: is about whether someone duly elected to the House who
Speaker 2: indisputably meets the constitutional qualifications of the office, maybe denied
Speaker 2: her rifle office simply because the Speaker has decided to
Speaker 2: keep the House out of regular session, said the Arizona
Speaker 2: Attorney General. She argued that the US Constitution does not
Speaker 2: grant Johnson the authority to thwart the people's choice. But again,
Speaker 2: it's a stupid decision, especially because this is inevitable, it's
Speaker 2: going to eventually happen. You know, he's just minding himself
Speaker 2: a little bit of time. Is he trying to stall this,
Speaker 2: hoping that there's going to be a war that will
Speaker 2: swamp the news about this. Maybe, you know before if
Speaker 2: they stall long enough, we could start the war with
Speaker 2: Venezuela and nobody paying any attention, he claims. He says, well,
Speaker 2: we run the house. She has no jurisdiction. We're following
Speaker 2: the precedent. She's looking for national publicitying apparently she's gotten
Speaker 2: some good luck with that. Well, the reality is is
Speaker 2: that he is not following the precedent. He has sworn
Speaker 2: people in under the same circumstances. In the past, Grihova
Speaker 2: has vowed, once sworn in, to provide the final signature
Speaker 2: needed to release the Epstein files that the Trump administration
Speaker 2: is desperate to hide Arizona. In this lawsuit, accused Johnson
Speaker 2: of delaying her swearing in to prevent her from signing
Speaker 2: on to this bill. Johnson cannot continue to disenfranchise the
Speaker 2: entire district, is what they're saying on this. Well, you know,
Speaker 2: this is just part of the disgusting partisan politics that
Speaker 2: are there. Marjorie Taylor Green has had enough of it.
Speaker 2: She's one of the few Republicans three Republican women in
Speaker 2: addition to Thomas Massey, who would vote to release this.
Speaker 2: Here's what she had to say about this corrupt two
Speaker 2: party system.
Speaker 14: And I'm so disgusted with Washington, d C. I hate politics.
Speaker 14: The two party system is extremely broken. It is failing
Speaker 14: all of us. And when I look at you know,
Speaker 14: here goes another one hundred billion dollars to Ukraine or
Speaker 14: thirty billion dollars to Israel, but yet nobody can afford
Speaker 14: health insurance premiums. And then I'm getting yelled at by Republican.
Speaker 14: My Republican colleagues for saying.
Speaker 15: That out loud.
Speaker 14: I'm like, this is insane, Yeah it is.
Speaker 2: And that's the end of the tape there. I was
Speaker 2: waiting for him to say something, but the.
Speaker 6: Tape and nothing from Tim Tillon. Tim Dillon today, thank you.
Speaker 2: Well. I agree with O one hundred percent on that.
Speaker 2: And just to show how petty Trump is, you know,
Speaker 2: he's going to continue this law fair against the Wall
Speaker 2: Street Journal. He's got a lawsuit against the New York
Speaker 2: Times because of not that piece that they dared to
Speaker 2: put on the first page, but also against as part
Speaker 2: of that fifteen billion dollar lawsuit. He's also thrown in
Speaker 2: Penguin Books because of a Pulitz surprise winning book about
Speaker 2: Donald Trump calling him lucky loser and how he squandered
Speaker 2: his father's fortune. So that really got him upset. But
Speaker 2: the thing that's getting him really upset right now is
Speaker 2: an obsession is South Park. They've done some very crude,
Speaker 2: disgusting jokes because it's South Park, that's all, but that's
Speaker 2: what they do. They've done a lot of crude and
Speaker 2: disgusting stuff with Donald Trump getting Satan pregnant and all
Speaker 2: the rest of this stuff and making fun of Trump's
Speaker 2: tiny body parts. So they recently aired this episode and
Speaker 2: now they have been put on their programs have been delayed,
Speaker 2: and so they're saying, well, it's Trump going to get
Speaker 2: us kicked off like he got Jimmy It Jimmy Kimmel
Speaker 2: kicked off. Yeah, And so he's working behind the scenes,
Speaker 2: they say, to have South Park pulled from the air
Speaker 2: after the animated.
Speaker 6: And it's used to assassinate people. Apparently we've fallen to
Speaker 6: such an extent where the president has to have a
Speaker 6: public beef with some cartoon creators. Yeah, you think he
Speaker 6: could just call in the CI and be like, all right,
Speaker 6: we're gonna take care of him I don't want to
Speaker 6: see him ever again.
Speaker 9: Get him out of here.
Speaker 2: Well, he's pretty close to that. I mean, you know,
Speaker 2: we had part of the impeachment stuff about Richard Nixon
Speaker 2: was the fact that he had an enemy's list. He'd
Speaker 2: been putting together these enemies lists and let's find out
Speaker 2: what we can do take these people down. Trump has
Speaker 2: actually created a public committee to do this. He's gone
Speaker 2: public with this. He can do all the stuff that
Speaker 2: Nixon was impeached for. He can do it publicly and
Speaker 2: nothing happens to him. It's truly amazing. So anyway, South
Speaker 2: Park is the next one that he wants to get canceled,
Speaker 2: and so they mocked him, showed him allegedly naked and
Speaker 2: other things like that, as they point out, that's what
Speaker 2: south Park does. It's a disgusting program. But Trump working
Speaker 2: behind the scenes is something that sounds very realistic because
Speaker 2: South Park is run by Paaramount and who just bought
Speaker 2: Pairmount Trump's friends, the Ellison family. You know, Larry Ellison
Speaker 2: was the guy there on the first day of office
Speaker 2: US selling the Stargate thing, MR and A plus artificial intelligence.
Speaker 2: And now Larry Ellison's son, I guess that would be
Speaker 2: Larry Ellison, Ellison's son, Larryson. Yeah, there you go. Well,
Speaker 2: he's got his daddy's money and he's out there creating
Speaker 2: a media empire. He's buying up and getting control of
Speaker 2: the Ellison family is getting control of TikTok because of
Speaker 2: the government's maneuvering against TikTok. He bought up Paramount and
Speaker 2: actually Viacom, which holds Paramount and CBS and many other
Speaker 2: properties that are out there, and so they're getting massive
Speaker 2: media companies across many different types of platforms. So this
Speaker 2: is a whole new vector of consolidation and centralization of
Speaker 2: media control. And so I think it probably is since
Speaker 2: they're closely allied, since Trump made sure that Ellison is
Speaker 2: going to have a seat at the table on TIKO talk,
Speaker 2: that there probably is some truth to this, that this
Speaker 2: will likely be happening.
Speaker 3: And apparently Trump didn't learn anything from the Epstein cover up,
Speaker 3: getting a ton of attention to the Epstein stuff. Yeah,
Speaker 3: where Okay, if he wants to cover up who the
Speaker 3: pedophiles are, perhaps he is one of the pedophiles. So
Speaker 3: now he's trying to cover up South Park's small penis joke.
Speaker 2: Well, this is the thing that he's doing. There's a
Speaker 2: pattern of the behavior here, isn't there? Right, he doesn't
Speaker 2: like it, it's embarrassing, he can't take a joke. Or
Speaker 2: maybe there's something you know, early true, which I think
Speaker 2: there is with the Epstein stuff. Absolutely, But by coming
Speaker 2: after Jimmy Kimmel, coming after South Park and then trying
Speaker 2: to keep these Epstein documents covered up, what he's doing
Speaker 2: is just making all these things bigger again. It's the
Speaker 2: stressand effect that he just cannot help himself. Episode three
Speaker 2: of the current season was recently unexpectedly delayed this week,
Speaker 2: fueling speculation that of White House pressure over at airing.
Speaker 2: A source close to the production claimed Trump has been
Speaker 2: fuming about the way South Park portrayed him. He's convinced
Speaker 2: the writers are obsessed with humiliating him and is now
Speaker 2: trying to use back channel pressure to make sure the
Speaker 2: show does not survive. He wants to do Jimmy Kimmel
Speaker 2: on him. Another insider said the President hates being made
Speaker 2: fun of, especially about his body and about his genitals,
Speaker 2: so this crossed the line. I think any criticism of
Speaker 2: Trump crosses the line with him. That's why you just
Speaker 2: had Tom tollis that we began with. He's not running
Speaker 2: for Senate again simply because he refused to vote for
Speaker 2: Trump's bill. He didn't make fun of Trump, he didn't
Speaker 2: ridicule him with satire. Satire is even worse. The delay
Speaker 2: of episode three has sent shockwaves through the writer's room.
Speaker 2: Everyone is braced to the possibility the plug could be
Speaker 2: pulled altogether. And of course they didn't just stop with Trump.
Speaker 2: They also made fun of JD. Vance and all this.
Speaker 2: They made fun of Christinome portraying her as a puppy
Speaker 2: killer whose surgically altered face slides off, and Vice President
Speaker 2: jad Vance was portrayed as a sidekick that was doing
Speaker 2: disgusting things for Satan, and both of them replied publicly
Speaker 2: se Vance did it the right way. He came back
Speaker 2: with his own sarcasm. He said, well, I guess I
Speaker 2: finally made it. They made fun of me on South Park.
Speaker 2: That's the way to shut these things down. Instead, Trump
Speaker 2: is going to come on with guns blazing and make
Speaker 2: heroes out of these disgusting people.
Speaker 6: You get upset about something people say about you online,
Speaker 6: all that does is let people know, Oh it works.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's going.
Speaker 3: To help south Park, same as he only helped Jimmy Kennell.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's going to make them huge, and I don't
Speaker 2: want to see them huge. I don't like south Park.
Speaker 2: I think they're disgusting.
Speaker 6: Reason that the best advice someone can give you when
Speaker 6: you're dealing with stuff on the internet is don't feed
Speaker 6: the trolls. No matter how much you think you're going
Speaker 6: to win, no matter how easy you think the dunk is,
Speaker 6: all they want is your time and attention. It doesn't
Speaker 6: matter you can blow them out of the argument out
Speaker 6: of the water with your argument. You can be right
Speaker 6: in all the ways that matter, but if you respond,
Speaker 6: you lose. It's that simple.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, that's the thing with Trump is that
Speaker 2: he's so easily controlled. He has no self control. So anyway,
Speaker 2: the thing that I thought was interesting was these the
Speaker 2: guy who's make a lot of money. They had a
Speaker 2: one and a half billion dollar deal with Paramount to
Speaker 2: develop south Park episodes and films through twenty twenty seven.
Speaker 2: So these guys are going to be paid about two
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty million a year. But Trump is going
Speaker 2: to write himself a check from the government for two
Speaker 2: hundred and thirty million right there. So that's a quotment
Speaker 2: to what they're getting paid for an entire season for
Speaker 2: them and everybody else that was there. Another source claim
Speaker 2: for Trumpet's personal it always is he's never forgiven late
Speaker 2: night hosts for laughing at him, and he sees south
Speaker 2: Park is even more damaging because it appeals to young viewers.
Speaker 2: After Kimmel's cancelation, insiders believe that Trump feels emboldened because
Speaker 2: he didn't learn anything at all from it.
Speaker 6: Does south Park cater to young viewers. At this point,
Speaker 6: it's been on the air over twenty years now.
Speaker 2: I can't imagine who would watch that garbage.
Speaker 6: I imagine it's got to be most I never saw.
Speaker 2: Him more than a couple of seconds of it. Those
Speaker 2: enough to make me disgust it and turn it off.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I know, like a lot of people in my
Speaker 6: generation were obsessed with it and we were growing up.
Speaker 6: But I go to imagine it's mostly Gen X and millennials.
Speaker 6: I doubt zoomers are super into south Park.
Speaker 2: Who knows he wants to make an example of the
Speaker 2: show and he wants to scare other people. That's the
Speaker 2: whole thing. He thinks he can intimidate people, and so
Speaker 2: that is even more important to him than his public
Speaker 2: image or showing people that he can't take a joke. Well,
Speaker 2: this is an op ed piece from Klinn Ken Klippenstein,
Speaker 2: and he said he went to the rallies because he
Speaker 2: wanted to see what was going on there. In his
Speaker 2: opinion is that No Kings is about a lot more
Speaker 2: than just hating Trump. And this is why I think
Speaker 2: it's very danger that the Republicans for their purpose are
Speaker 2: dangerously wrong, and for our purpose, they're dangerously wrong. There
Speaker 2: are real issues here with what is being done. And
Speaker 2: his take on this was that Americans were rejecting the
Speaker 2: national security state, rejecting the federalization of police, the militarization
Speaker 2: of police, and that type of thing. And so he
Speaker 2: shows a picture of somebody holding up a sign, are
Speaker 2: you NSPM seven compliant? And again that is executive order
Speaker 2: from Trump, though we talked about last week, and so
Speaker 2: it's not even about the issue. It's about the federalization
Speaker 2: of police and the militarization of police issue. I agree
Speaker 2: with him on the immigration stuff. I think people that
Speaker 2: are here illegally need to go home. One of the
Speaker 2: things that they can do to facilitate that is to
Speaker 2: stop giving them money. Has Trump stopped that? No, It's
Speaker 2: just like that example the guy who got the one
Speaker 2: hundred and thirty dollars ticket because he didn't have his
Speaker 2: identity papers on him and I said, well, I can't,
Speaker 2: I've got the identity papers, and I let him go,
Speaker 2: but then they hit him with his fine. He goes,
Speaker 2: I can't afford that. I'm living in government paid housing.
Speaker 2: I don't have a job. Now we'll go home instead.
Speaker 2: They're going to keep that going well. The major media
Speaker 2: focused on crowd size and potential violence I never materialized.
Speaker 2: The New King's protests had another message. Millions of Americans
Speaker 2: reject the entire framework of the national security state. Protesters
Speaker 2: I talked to expressed opposition to more than just the
Speaker 2: president and trump Ism, but to the entire national security apparatus,
Speaker 2: the FBI, ICE, Homeland Security, the National Guard, and the military.
Speaker 2: This one doesn't see a savior this time in this protest,
Speaker 2: they said. Unlike the other protests in his first term,
Speaker 2: this protest did not see a savior in the FBI
Speaker 2: or even in the Democrat Party. Instead, they're putting their
Speaker 2: faith in ordinary people like themselves. Seven million plus Americans
Speaker 2: gathered with homemade signs and costumes, rejecting the relentless threat
Speaker 2: mongering and some domestic terrorism enemy from within talk. That's
Speaker 2: what I think is really dangerous, And like I said,
Speaker 2: I would, you know, that's what I would show up
Speaker 2: to protest. I don't want to go to the extent.
Speaker 2: These people that he talked to laughed about the fact
Speaker 2: that of Antifi. Many of them said, I don't even
Speaker 2: know what antifi is. They're going to embrace it because
Speaker 2: Trump criticized it, but they see the troops being moved in.
Speaker 2: It's the real issue there. So I said, you know,
Speaker 2: the problem is that Trump makes Jimmy Kimmel South Park
Speaker 2: ANTIFA look good by comparison by the reactions that he
Speaker 2: has to them, and so that's the real issue here.
Speaker 2: And he believed that was the case as well, he said.
Speaker 2: The major theme that came across, he said, I interviewed
Speaker 2: dozens of protesters in the Capitol Building in Madison, Wisconsin.
Speaker 2: The major theme came across was the utter mockery of
Speaker 2: the government's warnings about antifah and domestic terrorists in general.
Speaker 2: Are you going to say that we're all enemies within
Speaker 2: because we don't agree with your policy? Okay, well, that's
Speaker 2: why they started wearing these I am antifas shirts, is
Speaker 2: to make fun of Trump saying that anybody that disagrees
Speaker 2: with him as a domestic terrorist. That's why they were
Speaker 2: doing that. It's all a boogieman, said one protester about antifah.
Speaker 2: This is all fantasy, said another. When I asked protesters
Speaker 2: about antifah, I expected nervous throat clearing, self censorship. Instead,
Speaker 2: people just laugh. Many of them even embrace the term,
Speaker 2: saying that if antiphah means anti fascism, then I am
Speaker 2: anti faw. So again, this is Antifah is real. I've
Speaker 2: shown pictures, you know. Mark Hall gave me some pictures
Speaker 2: because he spent some time in Germany as a lawyer,
Speaker 2: and he gave me pictures from the nineteen thirties. They
Speaker 2: haven't even changed their logo. So you had at the time,
Speaker 2: you had the Nazis, and then you had the communists
Speaker 2: organize themselves and the banner and the flag of Antiphah,
Speaker 2: which is still being used by these people. They haven't
Speaker 2: even changed it. So it's a very long history of
Speaker 2: these people who are radical, violent communists that are out there,
Speaker 2: and these people don't know what that means. And Trump
Speaker 2: is basically, at least to these people, he's making them
Speaker 2: look like victims. They're not victims. They're evil. And that's
Speaker 2: the problem I have with it. Trump is making people
Speaker 2: that are doing evil stuff, He's making them look good.
Speaker 2: They get to stand there with the First Amendment and
Speaker 2: talk about how they're with the Constitution because Trump is
Speaker 2: so obviously opposing it. Even the silly costumes, as many
Speaker 2: explained to me, We're a rejection of the fear that
Speaker 2: people that felt the federal government's trying to spread anything
Speaker 2: from antifa to immigration. What are they going to do
Speaker 2: arrest the unicorn? Said? One protester said, there's some frogs,
Speaker 2: there's some lobsters. That's kind of what we were going for.
Speaker 2: Whimsical fun, they said. Whimsical is a good word for
Speaker 2: the menagerie of critters and attendance. Most common were frogs,
Speaker 2: and that was a nod to the costumed frog protester
Speaker 2: in Portland, Oregon, who became a cause celeb when an
Speaker 2: ICE officer carefully sprayed tear gas into his costumes air intake.
Speaker 2: Opening video of the incident quickly went viral, becoming a
Speaker 2: symbol of the wanton cruelty of ICE and a shorthand
Speaker 2: for the national security state's ridiculous fear of seemingly everything
Speaker 2: gassing a fraud. Really eat too fast? Try to boil
Speaker 2: that frog turned up to eat with a pepper spray. Well,
Speaker 2: you know, it's kind of interesting. I think both the
Speaker 2: left and the right now have frog mascots. They got
Speaker 2: Peppy the frog on the right, and now these people
Speaker 2: have the Portland frog. They got pepper sprayed, pepper spray
Speaker 2: and peppy.
Speaker 6: I guarantee you somebody is going to do this to
Speaker 6: a friend, Like wait a minute, you can pepper spray
Speaker 6: the air intake of a costume. This is going to
Speaker 6: happen to somebody on Halloween because their friends are terrible.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm, I says frog marching immigrants and protesters around.
Speaker 2: So the protesters responded with a frog march of their
Speaker 2: own to show how absurd it all is. Far from
Speaker 2: the paranoia and feared that I thought Trump's designation of
Speaker 2: antifom as terrorists would engender. I saw protesters of all ages,
Speaker 2: from teenagers to the elderly, embrace the word. Now. Now
Speaker 2: he's going to make it, you know, make this a
Speaker 2: great thing. My personal favorite was a sign that was
Speaker 2: worn by a woman identifying as anti faw A U
Speaker 2: N t I E and a man wearing a sign
Speaker 2: that said I am Antifa, Come and get me. We
Speaker 2: are Antifa bees, said one professor, as a group of
Speaker 2: women who are dressed like bees. Most people don't even
Speaker 2: know what that means, said another, before be interjected, we
Speaker 2: don't even know what it means. See that's the point.
Speaker 2: This isn't realize.
Speaker 6: This is the level of political discourse that you get
Speaker 6: in America. Yeah, we're antifabes. What does that mean? We
Speaker 6: don't know what's antifa. I don't know who knows. It
Speaker 6: could be anything around for a century.
Speaker 2: All they know is.
Speaker 6: That Trump doesn't like it, and since they hate Trump
Speaker 6: with reason, they're antifa.
Speaker 2: Now, Yeah, that's all it takes for all a threat
Speaker 2: that's right, or all a threat about public safety. The
Speaker 2: federal government hasn't offered a clear definition either of what
Speaker 2: any So there you go.
Speaker 6: And to be fair, they make it purposefully obtuse and complex.
Speaker 6: They make it so there's no real structure. There are different,
Speaker 6: you know, sets and cells of these groups scattered all
Speaker 6: across in different cities and states in the US, and
Speaker 6: they make it difficult to sus it out and nail
Speaker 6: it down what it is. But we all know what
Speaker 6: we're talking about when we say antifa. It's just like
Speaker 6: I know when I see it. It's very easy to
Speaker 6: point at these people and go, that's Antifa. Whether they
Speaker 6: identify as such, we know what we're talking about. They're
Speaker 6: a communist Marxist radical that will use any means necessary
Speaker 6: to get their agenda. Passed and getting bogged lence. Yeah,
Speaker 6: and getting bogged down most of time in a debate
Speaker 6: of well, what is antifa? Is simply a way of
Speaker 6: wasting your time from someone who's disingenuous.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, it's always been. You see those guys in
Speaker 3: the masks with the bricks and the flags all in black,
Speaker 3: those are Antifa, the violent ones. It's been pretty obvious
Speaker 3: up until now. They can pull back and say, well,
Speaker 3: everyone's antieva, they're against fascism. And Trump is just going
Speaker 3: to play right into that again.
Speaker 2: He goes out there and he's like, well, if you're
Speaker 2: not with me, you're a domestic terrorist, you know. And
Speaker 2: then he uses a label antipha. And so that's why
Speaker 2: it is blowing up the way it is. And that's
Speaker 2: what I thought was an interesting insight to this. But
Speaker 2: he's got a couple more here. He said he attended
Speaker 2: the original Note King's protest in April, and he said
Speaker 2: I wrote about it, and he gave a link to it.
Speaker 2: He said, not only was this one much larger, but
Speaker 2: the vibe was much different. Gone were the NATO flags
Speaker 2: and the mass produced signs to crying. The Doge cuts
Speaker 2: into federal agencies. You see, that was a symbol of
Speaker 2: its AstroTurf when you had that in the first one,
Speaker 2: and that's why this one is not. You know, the
Speaker 2: Republicans are trying to reassure themselves that this is all
Speaker 2: just paid for by Soros disaster turf. That's why it's different.
Speaker 2: These people may not know what, but they do know
Speaker 2: that they don't want to have gangs of massed, armored
Speaker 2: federal troops on the ground and their city. Particularly striking
Speaker 2: this time was seeing people who weren't Republicans but were
Speaker 2: pissed off at the federal government. See, this used to
Speaker 2: be what we did. Trump has got everybody doing role reversal.
Speaker 2: Now now we're cheering the federal government. Now we're cheering
Speaker 2: the police state. It used to be that we were
Speaker 2: upset because Obama was pushing the police state, the militarization
Speaker 2: of the police, And now the people who did documentaries
Speaker 2: against that, like Alex Jones, who did four police state documentaries,
Speaker 2: is now cheering Trump, cheering him in his Latin American wars. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's where we've won all of our wars. Let's go
Speaker 2: have another one so we can win one. It's insane
Speaker 2: It's like a sports event to them. So now, these
Speaker 2: people were not Republicans, but they were angry at the
Speaker 2: federal government, especially those belonging to the National security apparatus,
Speaker 2: he said. One protester said, whatever happened to states' rights?
Speaker 2: He said, this is the kind of stuff that Republicans
Speaker 2: would always talk about. We never needed it before. We
Speaker 2: definitely don't need the military deployed now in our states.
Speaker 2: We didn't ask for it, said another protester. You can't
Speaker 2: really make real change except at the state level, he says,
Speaker 2: For as long as I could remember, states' rights as
Speaker 2: a concept seemed little more than code for conservatives. And
Speaker 2: now the conservatives have abandoned this, and they have abandoned
Speaker 2: the Tenth Amendment as well. Even local law enforcement didn't
Speaker 2: seem to buy the hype about domestic terror threat posed
Speaker 2: by anti Vaon. He talks about how relaxed the people were.
Speaker 2: So again, when we look at how conservatives have abandoned
Speaker 2: the idea of what they call states rights, which I
Speaker 2: always call states powers. They don't have rights, they're not
Speaker 2: human beings, but they've abandoned that, along with fiscal conservatism,
Speaker 2: free speech, all the rest of these things. They even
Speaker 2: make excuses for Trump when he does gun control by
Speaker 2: executive order. Why because now they are a personality cult
Speaker 2: following a New York City Democrat who has been corrupt
Speaker 2: from the beginning. Increasingly nonpartisan skepticism of the FEDS isn't
Speaker 2: just an anecdote. It's poll after poll this year showing
Speaker 2: creating approval, especially among Democrats for institutions like ice, FBI, CIA,
Speaker 2: the police, even the military. The glib take would be,
Speaker 2: but they just hate these agencies because Trump is in office.
Speaker 2: But during his first term, Democrats loved agencies like the FBI.
Speaker 2: Remember Bob Muller or Daddy Muller as many liberals call him, Well,
Speaker 2: Muller time has long since passed. Gone is the liberal
Speaker 2: undercurrent that the FBI or that uniformed military was going
Speaker 2: to save the country from Trump. Today these institutions are
Speaker 2: seen as tools of repression and enemies of free speech,
Speaker 2: which in fact they are. And now what Trump is
Speaker 2: doing is he's there to get people to trust these
Speaker 2: institutions that don't deserve to be trusted. And what I
Speaker 2: think is funny is that even though he puts in
Speaker 2: people like cash Betel Dan Bongino and RFK Jr. To
Speaker 2: to get you to trust these institutions. Why would anybody
Speaker 2: trust those guys in the first place. The protest did
Speaker 2: not have one thing in common with the one in April,
Speaker 2: or did have one thing in common, and that was
Speaker 2: frustration with the Democrat Party. One woman said, laughing. They
Speaker 2: are completely ineffective. It's a joke, said another. Their leadership
Speaker 2: needs to go. So they're just as upset with the
Speaker 2: Republican with a Democrat Party as we are with the
Speaker 2: Republican Party. That is a joke. The Democrat Party's approval
Speaker 2: rating is that its lowest in recorded history, with a
Speaker 2: majority of Democrats wanting its entire leadership to be replaced. No, Kings,
Speaker 2: wasn't just a protest against Trump, as the mainstream media
Speaker 2: have lazily asked it. It was a demonstration against a
Speaker 2: national security neurosis that he is trying and failing to excite,
Speaker 2: not out of some partisan reflex that's just to support
Speaker 2: the Democrats and to oppose Trump. Americans in large part
Speaker 2: just do not believe that there is an enemy within.
Speaker 2: And again it's now the Republicans who have a partisan reflex.
Speaker 2: Is now the Republicans who are abandoning all principles, and
Speaker 2: Ted Cruz still doesn't get it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, this graph is amazing how it shows the right
Speaker 3: is far more trusting of these horrific organizations than the left.
Speaker 2: Now, yeah, exactly, It truly is amazing. And they trust
Speaker 2: them because of Trump, and you know, the left is
Speaker 2: not trusting them because of what Trump's actions are doing
Speaker 2: prenominantly because as he pointed out, they trusted them in
Speaker 2: the first term. So as the US headed for another
Speaker 2: civil war, well, you know, we actually should see this
Speaker 2: film twenty twenty four film, The Civil War that came
Speaker 2: out last year. I know that this guy doesn't have
Speaker 2: a very good track record. We don't have to watch
Speaker 2: the whole thing. We'll probably get the gist of it
Speaker 2: if it's really bad. Kind of like the King David
Speaker 2: thing that was on. Was it Netflix or something? Turned
Speaker 2: that thing off before we were two minutes into it.
Speaker 2: This is ridiculous. So anyway, but he did Civil War
Speaker 2: last year, and he said he thought it was a
Speaker 2: warning about what can happen in the US if the
Speaker 2: country did not confront its growing divisions. Some felt the
Speaker 2: director was being overloin sensational, but he didn't care he said,
Speaker 2: I think civil war is just an extension of a situation,
Speaker 2: and the situation is polarization and the lack of limiting
Speaker 2: forces on polarization. He said, it's a warning about what
Speaker 2: could happen when violence erupts between neighbors. And that's what
Speaker 2: is so dangerous about this. I mean, that's another vector
Speaker 2: of this. It's not just violating the Constitution, violating Possecomtists
Speaker 2: Tattus Act, which was there for a very good reason.
Speaker 2: You know, Trump is pushing us into a civil war.
Speaker 2: He compared himself, and we're going to get into that next.
Speaker 2: He compared himself to Washington and to Lincoln. He thinks
Speaker 2: he's better than they are. I guess he is. If
Speaker 2: he can start a war, if he can get the
Speaker 2: country polarized even before the war starts, like it is
Speaker 2: right now, you know, if he can push us into
Speaker 2: that civil war, I guess he's even better. John Brennan
Speaker 2: has now been hit with a criminal referral over the
Speaker 2: Steel Dossier lies. And you know, you look at this,
Speaker 2: here's this article. Here, look at that. Who's that guy
Speaker 2: right next to him, James Clapper? What did they not
Speaker 2: do with James Clapper? They did never, they never came
Speaker 2: after him for lying to Congress that was a crime.
Speaker 2: And I talked about that for the longest time. He
Speaker 2: did that in twenty thirteen, just about a month or
Speaker 2: two before we had the snowed documents that leaked out.
Speaker 2: And Ron Widen, so are you spying on Americans without
Speaker 2: search warrant? Well, Senator, not intentionally, No, not intentionally, sir.
Speaker 2: And and I played the clip many times. Michael Hayden
Speaker 2: went to Washington Lee University and he gave a speech
Speaker 2: and behind him over his shoulder is like this all
Speaker 2: seeing eye that they put up as a poster to
Speaker 2: advertise his speech. And so Michael Hayden had been the
Speaker 2: head of the CIA in the NSA, said, I blame
Speaker 2: Ron Wyden. He knew what we were doing. In other words,
Speaker 2: he knew we were doing that, spying on people without
Speaker 2: a warrant, in violation of the Constitution and in violation
Speaker 2: of the Faiza Act as well. And so he said
Speaker 2: he knew it, His staff knew it. All those senators
Speaker 2: and their staff knew that we were doing Why did
Speaker 2: he put him on the spot like that? And again
Speaker 2: he was put on the spot because he had legal jeopardy.
Speaker 2: He could be charged with lying to Congress, But it
Speaker 2: is something that is far more important, I think than
Speaker 2: the line that we're done here. I mean, these guys
Speaker 2: were lying about the Steel dossier. They were lying about
Speaker 2: a lot of different things that affected Trump. But I
Speaker 2: think that and you could argue that that affects all
Speaker 2: the people. If you're going to have a criminal organization
Speaker 2: like the CIA that can go in and operate in
Speaker 2: terms of soft coups like that, that is important. It
Speaker 2: needs to be punished, but it needs to be punished
Speaker 2: as a rule of law, and to help establish the
Speaker 2: rule of law, maybe we should punish them when they
Speaker 2: establish coups against the Constitution and against the due process
Speaker 2: of the Fourth Amendment that can come after us and
Speaker 2: spy on us without a warrant. Wouldn't that have been
Speaker 2: a good thing to do. Now the Republicans are doing it.
Speaker 2: Why because these guys not because they violate the Constitution.
Speaker 2: They're doing it because they are enemies of Trump. That's
Speaker 2: why they're doing this. So this is something that's put
Speaker 2: out by grandstanding Jim Jordan, who typically doesn't ever do anything.
Speaker 2: He just holds his committee hearings, And now he's going
Speaker 2: to come after him for committing perjury. The statute the
Speaker 2: limitations has expired for James Clapper, that expired in twenty eighteen.
Speaker 2: No senator ever filed a criminal referral over James Clapper
Speaker 2: lining to everybody, even though he was immediately shown to
Speaker 2: be a liar by the Snowden leaks. But now they
Speaker 2: have filed a criminal referral again. Jim Jordan, who's doing this?
Speaker 2: In a five page referral letter, Jordan argues that Brennan's
Speaker 2: sworn testimony on May eleventh, twenty twenty three, conflicted with
Speaker 2: the declassified records that the Committee says that they now
Speaker 2: show that dossier was not only reviewed by the CIA,
Speaker 2: but also included via an annex in the Intelligence Committee's assessment.
Speaker 2: So he said, according to the law eighteen US Code
Speaker 2: makes it a crime to knowingly willfully make materially false
Speaker 2: statements to Congress, which is what James Clapper did, and
Speaker 2: they never cared. Brennan told lawmakers that the CIA was
Speaker 2: not involved at all with the dot CIA. However, and
Speaker 2: in subsequent documents they have now proof that they were.
Speaker 2: But we were told that they were not spying on people,
Speaker 2: but then with all the documents that were released by
Speaker 2: Ed Snowden, we saw that they were and of course
Speaker 2: we knew that they were interesting that you know, you've
Speaker 2: had these other liars, because that's what the CIA does.
Speaker 2: Remember Mike Kompeo said, I went to West Point. We
Speaker 2: were told we don't lie, cheater, steal, or support people
Speaker 2: to do it. And he says, then I went to
Speaker 2: the CIA. We got classes on doing all that stuff.
Speaker 2: And I've said many times, and they got classes on coups,
Speaker 2: they have classes on assassinations, they have classes on how
Speaker 2: they can start wars. And that's precisely what Gena Haskell did.
Speaker 2: Trump pointed out when he was running as a candidate
Speaker 2: in twenty sixteen. He said the weapons of mass destruction
Speaker 2: that the Iraq war was based on were all lies.
Speaker 2: He knew that, and yet he put the woman who
Speaker 2: brought those lies forward, who got those lies from torturing
Speaker 2: people illegally, took those lies and sold a war. He
Speaker 2: made her head of the CIA his entire term. POMPEII
Speaker 2: was technically the head of the CIA, but she was
Speaker 2: number two, and she was doing everything there. And then
Speaker 2: after a couple of years Pompeio steps down and Gina
Speaker 2: Haswell becomes a number one. But I think she was
Speaker 2: running the place the entire time, and so he has
Speaker 2: supported the woman who not only lied but also lied
Speaker 2: us into a war and nothing happened to her. James Clapper,
Speaker 2: who lies about spying on Americans, nothing happened to him.
Speaker 2: But now they're coming to Brennan. And I'm not playing
Speaker 2: a whataboutism game. I'm not saying that Brennan needs to
Speaker 2: get a pass. I'm saying it's disgusting that they haven't
Speaker 2: done any of this stuff before. And I think that
Speaker 2: although he needs to be punished for this, that this
Speaker 2: is very minor compared to what Gina Haspital lied about.
Speaker 2: It's very minor compared to even what James Clapper led about.
Speaker 2: And it's not being done as a way to establish
Speaker 2: a rule of law. It's not being done to abolish
Speaker 2: the CIA, which is what really should happen. It's being
Speaker 2: done to show that you don't mess with Trump. That's
Speaker 2: the purpose of this exercise. Jordan claims that Brennan personally
Speaker 2: overruled CIA analysts who raised concerns about the dossier's reliability,
Speaker 2: quoting an internal exchange attributed Brennan, which he allegedly said, yes,
Speaker 2: but doesn't it ring true? Doesn't this feel true? According
Speaker 2: to Brennan, my bottom line is that I believe the
Speaker 2: information warrants inclusion in the report. The referral calls Brennan's
Speaker 2: lies material and part of a pattern of Brennan's willingness
Speaker 2: to lie to Congress, pointing to Brennan's earlier twenty seventeen
Speaker 2: House Intelligence Committee appearance in which he said the dossier
Speaker 2: was not in any way used in the Intelligence community's assessment.
Speaker 2: And so throughout this article they referred to that the
Speaker 2: Intelligence community's assessment that is called the ICA. So the
Speaker 2: CIA had an ICA. I think that's humorous, that the
Speaker 2: Intelligence community assessment. In his part, Brennan was consistently defending
Speaker 2: the ICA's core conclusion that Moscow intervened in twenty sixteen. Ultimately,
Speaker 2: according to the documents declassified by the Trump administration, the
Speaker 2: decision to incorporate information from the Steele, DOTSA and the
Speaker 2: ICA was jointly made by the directors of the CIA
Speaker 2: and the FBI. And again, they should go to jail.
Speaker 2: They should go to jail for perjury. They should go
Speaker 2: to jail for trying to do a soft coup. But
Speaker 2: I think lying us into the Iraq War was a
Speaker 2: bigger crime, and I know that Trump rewarded her for
Speaker 2: doing that, made her head of the CIA. And when
Speaker 2: we look at the fact that the whole reason we
Speaker 2: have the FISA Act is because the CIA and the
Speaker 2: NSA from their inception, have been illegally spying on Americans.
Speaker 2: That was the key thing about the Church Committee hearings. Instead,
Speaker 2: what they made it about was the heart attack, guns
Speaker 2: and the attempted assassinations and all the coups that they
Speaker 2: had done. But quite frankly, all of that was wrong
Speaker 2: and it should be punished, but especially the violation of
Speaker 2: the Constitution in terms of spying on Americans. They came
Speaker 2: up with the FIS Act. They used the fires Act
Speaker 2: then to give themselves legal cover to do whatever they
Speaker 2: wished to spy on mister and missus Verizon, as Ran
Speaker 2: Paul put it so the House Judiciary Committee Jim Jordan
Speaker 2: so now referring CIA Director John Brennan to the Department
Speaker 2: of Justice for perjury prosecution. Brendan falsely denied, says Jonathan Turley.
Speaker 2: He's got three lives that he breaks down. Line number one,
Speaker 2: Brendan falsely denied that the CIA relied on the discredited
Speaker 2: Steele dossier and drafting the post election Intelligence Community Assessment.
Speaker 2: So I guess that's a much bigger deal than lying
Speaker 2: as to the Iraq war or telling us that they're
Speaker 2: not spying on all Americans. Line number two worse. Still,
Speaker 2: under questioning from Jordan, Brennan said, the CIA opposed including
Speaker 2: the dossier into the assessment, but they didn't. And here's
Speaker 2: the third big lie that they want to put him
Speaker 2: in jail for. During an Intelligence Committee hearing in May
Speaker 2: two thousand and seven, Jordan alledged that Brennan falsely asserted
Speaker 2: that the Steele dossier was not in any way used
Speaker 2: on as a basis for the Intelligence Committee assessment that
Speaker 2: was done. Trey Gowdy, another grand Standard, elicited the perjuris
Speaker 2: statement in his questioning. And so those are the three lies.
Speaker 2: And again I ask you, you know, yes he should
Speaker 2: go to jail for that. I'm not playing what about
Speaker 2: isn't I'm just saying, can't we get rid of the CIA?
Speaker 2: And I say it's just and these people are such
Speaker 2: crooks and we need to do this in a way
Speaker 2: that re establishes the rule of law rather than the
Speaker 2: power of Trump. So Switzerland has gone to war against
Speaker 2: free speech. And it was just a week or two
Speaker 2: ago that in a referendum you had slightly more than
Speaker 2: fifty percent of the people voted to have digital ID
Speaker 2: in Switzerland. Switzerland has, like everyone else, lost its way.
Speaker 2: A man was jailed for claiming that skeletons reveal your gender,
Speaker 2: which is a fact. This has been a fact for
Speaker 2: a very long time. And so because he said that,
Speaker 2: the Swiss government is sending him to jail because that
Speaker 2: was hate speech directed against LGBT. When it comes to
Speaker 2: free speech, Switzerland has declared war on anyone who challenges
Speaker 2: certain orthodox positions, including gender policies rights Jonathan Early. This guy,
Speaker 2: Emmanuel brunus Holtz is about to start a ten day
Speaker 2: prison stent due to his voice in skepticism about claims
Speaker 2: that skeletons are transgender. There's very little coverage of the story.
Speaker 2: Free speech cases are often downplayed by European media, so
Speaker 2: we only have limited information coming from a few conservative sides,
Speaker 2: he said. In twenty twenty two, he responded to a
Speaker 2: Facebook post by the Swiss National Council member on the controversy,
Speaker 2: Some including academics in the US, are now claiming that
Speaker 2: you can really cannot gauze the sects of individuals from
Speaker 2: the skeletons, but you can the wind instrument repair man.
Speaker 2: That's what he did. He repaired wind instruments. Thought that
Speaker 2: such claims were unfounded, and he posted a comment that said,
Speaker 2: if you dig up LGBT people after two hundred years,
Speaker 2: you will only find men and women based on their skeletons.
Speaker 2: Everything else is mental illness promoted through school curriculum. So
Speaker 2: brunus Holtz then received a knock on his door from
Speaker 2: the police and a prosecution letter for engaging in hate
Speaker 2: speech and for quote publicly belittling unquote comments made based
Speaker 2: on sexual orientation. Under the Swiss Criminal Code. He was
Speaker 2: convicted and fined five hundred Swiss Francs court actually convicted him,
Speaker 2: then another court upheld the conviction. He was ordered to
Speaker 2: pay a fine or go to jail. He refused to
Speaker 2: pay the fine, so now he is going to jail
Speaker 2: simply for expressing his views, which by the way, are true.
Speaker 2: This is when government censors information. It's typically true information,
Speaker 2: true information that they want to lie to you about
Speaker 2: censorship is violence, censorship is lies. He's now going to
Speaker 2: jail for simply expressing his view, and.
Speaker 3: Let's remember this story next time. They're all about trust
Speaker 3: the science, and we have to censor information so that
Speaker 3: anti science people don't spread it.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right. So, as Turley said, he spoke
Speaker 2: in Berlin at a conference. He said, this is only
Speaker 2: the latest example of how free speech is in free
Speaker 2: fall in Europe, he said. When he was in Berlin,
Speaker 2: he spoke at the World Forum, where European leaders gathered
Speaker 2: in one of the most strikingly anti free speech conferences
Speaker 2: I've ever attended. This year's forum embraced the slogan a
Speaker 2: new World Order with the European Values. He says that
Speaker 2: new World order is based on an aggressive anti free
Speaker 2: speech platform that's been enforced for years by the European Union. Well,
Speaker 2: it's been enforced as well by Israel. Here in the
Speaker 2: United States. They want to shut down any speech that
Speaker 2: they don't want heard, and typically it's because of speech
Speaker 2: is true. If it was not true, would be easy
Speaker 2: for them to push back against it and to disprove it. Nevertheless,
Speaker 2: he said, I mean a few brave people of free
Speaker 2: speech advocates and groups still struggling to restore this indispensable
Speaker 2: right to their countries. By going to jail, brunus Holtz
Speaker 2: is bringing needed attention to the crackdown on free speech
Speaker 2: in that country. Despite the disgraceful role of the courts
Speaker 2: in this effort, citizens like brunus Holt show but the
Speaker 2: cause of free speech is still alive in Europe. It
Speaker 2: will come back eventually. It may get really, really dark,
Speaker 2: and it may last. The darkness may last for a
Speaker 2: very long time, but eventually people are going to want
Speaker 2: to be free. That is the human spirit, and that
Speaker 2: is what these people are so against. It's why we
Speaker 2: look could be a skinner of the name of his
Speaker 2: book was Beyond Freedom and Dignity. People don't want to
Speaker 2: be treated like animals. They may be able to get
Speaker 2: away with this for seventy or eighty years or even longer,
Speaker 2: but eventually people will rise up and revolution against this
Speaker 2: attack on our freedom and dignity. So what have we
Speaker 2: got here, Travis?
Speaker 6: We got a lot of comments. Buld says, no Trump
Speaker 6: files a lawsuit, no fake news. He says, Trump loves
Speaker 6: court and Trump is flat out he's in flat out
Speaker 6: lie mode. Now he doesn't even care, that's right, Audi
Speaker 6: m r R.
Speaker 2: And again, you know, he portrays himself as a victim.
Speaker 2: It says, I need to write myself a check for
Speaker 2: two hundred and thirty five million dollars from the taxpayers,
Speaker 2: and for what for lawfair? For unjust, law fair? And
Speaker 2: yet he's doing at the same time, he's doing it
Speaker 2: and coming after the Wall Street Journal when they've been
Speaker 2: proven correct and what they said about the Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 2: birthday wishes.
Speaker 6: Audi m r R. The more that they try to
Speaker 6: suppress the Epstein files, the more they validate why we
Speaker 6: believe that they are all complicit.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 6: And of course, even if they get the votes to
Speaker 6: say release it, do you really think the FBI will
Speaker 6: release the files?
Speaker 2: They're no, But they do have some information that they've
Speaker 2: gotten from the committee, has that they've gotten from the
Speaker 2: seeing people and family and things like that. That's the
Speaker 2: other point is I think that a lot of this
Speaker 2: stuff has already been destroyed. I mean it's already been
Speaker 2: made public that they had people working on about a
Speaker 2: thousand people working on these files twenty four to seven
Speaker 2: around the clock, looking for any reference to Trump to
Speaker 2: get rid of it. So that is a big part
Speaker 2: of it. But there's other things. There's the financial records
Speaker 2: where they could find people that were paying Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 2: that would indicate that they're being blackmailed, and those would
Speaker 2: be the people that would be involved in raping these women,
Speaker 2: and that needs to be investigated. But the fact they
Speaker 2: want to shut this all down just shows you that
Speaker 2: Trump is not only personally involved, but he is protecting
Speaker 2: the people who are in the club with him, just
Speaker 2: like he's protecting Javier Malay. He will suffer all kinds
Speaker 2: of criticism, and he knows what he's doing to the farmers,
Speaker 2: and he knows it's going to get people upset. But
Speaker 2: he's doing everything he can to help Haviar Malai doing
Speaker 2: nothing for the American farmers, and he's willing to weather
Speaker 2: that criticism because Haavey Malai is one of his friends.
Speaker 2: They're in the club together, the club that you're not in.
Speaker 6: It's gonna call the Rose Gardens. Every painting in the
Speaker 6: New Ballroom, the longer you look at it, the more
Speaker 6: the person in it looks like Epstein. Very spooky, very spooky. Indeed,
Speaker 6: Shelley A. Even if the demon Rats win, they will
Speaker 6: never tell the truth about Epstein, culled eugenics, money laundering,
Speaker 6: child draft ging experiments, and the rest. That's another thing,
Speaker 6: just these no Kings protests. There's no good people involved now,
Speaker 6: the leftists, if they were to gain power, if they
Speaker 6: were to indulge their fantasies and whims like the right
Speaker 6: is right now, it'd be far worse. Just it's important
Speaker 6: to remember these people are not your friends. If you
Speaker 6: support them, they will knife you in the back instantaneously.
Speaker 2: They again you, Yeah, we need to we need not
Speaker 2: sign up for the lesser to evils. We need to
Speaker 2: oppose evil. That's just the bottom line.
Speaker 3: And with all these Democrats pushing for the Epstein release,
Speaker 3: let's not forget that this happened under Biden Epstein's arrest,
Speaker 3: and they could have done something then when they actually
Speaker 3: had a chance to actually affect things. But now that
Speaker 3: they are, you know, being held back from it, now
Speaker 3: they have the chance to virtue signal.
Speaker 2: I think it happened. It happened under Biden's I think
Speaker 2: it happened under Obamas. Maybe he was, you know, the
Speaker 2: charges are brought against him and original, Yeah, he was
Speaker 2: the second time it happened, it was all Bill Barr
Speaker 2: who came in there. Of course, Bill Barr's got connections
Speaker 2: with Epstein. Epstein's had a job at a very elite
Speaker 2: school that Bill Barr's dad ran, and so Epstein was
Speaker 2: working for Bill Barr's dad at a very early age.
Speaker 2: Don't tell me that the Bar family doesn't have some
Speaker 2: connection to this stuff either, because then as soon as
Speaker 2: Bill Barr, who again was George HW. Bush's right hand
Speaker 2: man and rebuilding the CIA after the church hearings had
Speaker 2: damaged their reputation and so forth, he was his right
Speaker 2: hand man at the CIA, and Bush made him the
Speaker 2: youngest attorney general. Then Trump makes some attorney general again
Speaker 2: and he starts doing all kinds of CIA stuff like
Speaker 2: we we've got to get rid of this Epstein guy
Speaker 2: one way or the other. And so before you know it,
Speaker 2: Epstein's back in jail, and before you know it, he's
Speaker 2: been suicided. According to them, whatever happened.
Speaker 6: Box O's also South Park is going to be more
Speaker 6: famous than ever and they're going to roast Trump ten
Speaker 6: thousand percent more.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they will find a platform somewhere. I mean, maybe
Speaker 2: they've got to produce the stuff on their own. They'll
Speaker 2: do it, and it is really going to blow up
Speaker 2: in his face.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean it's you can already generate essentially an
Speaker 3: entire Self Park episode with Sora. That was a story
Speaker 3: I saw where they're banning it because people were basically
Speaker 3: doing exactly that. They would just put together a bunch
Speaker 3: of these clips.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, I can't imagine a worst waste of time
Speaker 2: making South Park ai slop.
Speaker 3: I mean it's very simplistic animation.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I bet it's a very simplistic show.
Speaker 6: Rico nine seventeen says it's political satire. Guard Goldsmith, good
Speaker 6: to see you. Guard says, if Trump is successful for
Speaker 6: you South Park, they'll be grabbed up elsewhere and become
Speaker 6: even bigger. It's on a lord one three three seven.
Speaker 6: Trump is giving legitimacy to a group that is real Marxist,
Speaker 6: talking about Antiva Wait to Go. Trump, the average show
Speaker 6: is going to see these Marxists as victims.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right. It works to their advantage. Like
Speaker 2: we're talking about, even the Left doesn't know who these
Speaker 2: people are, and Trump is making them victims and heroes
Speaker 2: out of what he's doing just like you did with
Speaker 2: Jimmy Kimmell. It's disgusting.
Speaker 6: He's a he goes about things in the worst possible way.
Speaker 6: You know, if you want to be a dictator, at
Speaker 6: least I used to have the decency to finish what
Speaker 6: you start. If you're going to clear Antifa a terrorist organization,
Speaker 6: which these people are a bunch of degenerate losers that
Speaker 6: want the worst possible outcomes for you and your family.
Speaker 6: They're not anyone that anyone should identify with. I want
Speaker 6: to be that clear. You should at least have the
Speaker 6: decency to come in and put the boot down hard.
Speaker 6: You should erase them from existence. Not a chance of
Speaker 6: oh well i'm Antifa. No, you need to make if
Speaker 6: you're going to do this. I'm not advocating saying they should,
Speaker 6: but he if he's going to do it, he should
Speaker 6: at least go no half measures.
Speaker 2: The way I see a lot of these people who
Speaker 2: are putting on these Antifa shirts, they don't really know
Speaker 2: what Antifa is. They don't know about the century old
Speaker 2: history with these people. It's like somebody continuing to call
Speaker 2: you a Nazi over and over again, and you're not
Speaker 2: a Nazi, and so you go out and put on
Speaker 2: a Hitler mustache. That doesn't help anything. It is that
Speaker 2: kind of reaction. Yeah, exactly, it's that kind of reaction.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I'm Hitler. Well I just don't it. I
Speaker 2: don't care.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 2: It's like, no, you don't. You don't want to make
Speaker 2: common cause with Antifa or the Nazis either one town of.
Speaker 6: Lord in three three seven. These leftists only hate Trump
Speaker 6: because the TV told them so. They don't hate Trump
Speaker 6: for any real reason. They are just lazy minded crowd followers.
Speaker 6: That's the way I feel when I see the left
Speaker 6: talking about how they dislike police. It's like, well, I
Speaker 6: do as well, but I have legitimate reasons for it.
Speaker 6: I'm not one of these mush minded losers that simply
Speaker 6: hate because they've been told to North American house hippo
Speaker 6: responding to his son of the Lord. After everything Trump
Speaker 6: gave them in twenty twenty, you'd think they'd have built
Speaker 6: shrines and statues dedicated to him by now.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Audi m r R.
Speaker 6: If people in government are spinning a civil war narrative,
Speaker 6: then that means they want a civil war? Why martial law?
Speaker 6: I boost again? Who are the teams in the Civil War,
Speaker 6: and how do identify who is who? There's my team
Speaker 6: and there's everyone else's. My team is right, everyone else's
Speaker 6: is wrong.
Speaker 2: That's what you kind of an American? Are you?
Speaker 6: That's what I'm an American? Are you down of Lord?
Speaker 2: Three?
Speaker 6: Three seven? Also, don't watch that twenty twenty twenty twenty
Speaker 6: four civil War movie. It's got gay stuff in it.
Speaker 2: Oh really, I guess if as a movie that came
Speaker 2: out last year, it's gotta have LGBT in it, or
Speaker 2: wouldn't get green light.
Speaker 6: Yeah, it's by A twenty four and I hate A
Speaker 6: twenty four. It's a production company. It is a production
Speaker 6: company for the biggest pseudo intellectual fools on the planet.
Speaker 6: Oh wow, it's another slow burned thriller where Trauma was
Speaker 6: the real bad guy all along. If I have one
Speaker 6: more horror movie turn out to be about trauma, I'm
Speaker 6: gonna start something. I'm coming to your house, directors.
Speaker 2: This is why person asked me last week, you know
Speaker 2: what's my favorite movie? And Karen said, if you hadn't
Speaker 2: said Briden predjust would you watch over and over again
Speaker 2: in the hospital And even after we've come home we
Speaker 2: put it on the background, so I was gonna come
Speaker 2: in and call you out on it. But that's the
Speaker 2: thing I don't when you look at these these movies,
Speaker 2: they just followed this little a few little plot points
Speaker 2: to just keep recycling over and over again. You got
Speaker 2: some guy who used to be some super soldier or whatever.
Speaker 2: Now he's retired for a quiet life, but somebody's kidnapped
Speaker 2: his daughter and he's going to make them pay, and
Speaker 2: he's going to take out the entire organization. It's just
Speaker 2: a pretense for violence and revenge and all the rest
Speaker 2: of the stuff. And I'm sick of the violence and
Speaker 2: the revenge. I'm sick of all of this stuff that
Speaker 2: Hollywood glorifies and makes movies out of. I don't want
Speaker 2: to spend my time watching. And I think it's ugly.
Speaker 2: And it's just like the monster movies. So as a kid,
Speaker 2: the monster movies or things like slow moving Mummy with
Speaker 2: one arm and he's dragging a leg, but he's always
Speaker 2: able to catch everybody, right, And you had, you know,
Speaker 2: Frankenstein and dragging the wolf Man, and those were fun
Speaker 2: because they were.
Speaker 6: I liked it when they met Kaed Stello.
Speaker 2: That's right. They were fun because they were these imaginary creatures,
Speaker 2: and they were just just a monster that you know,
Speaker 2: you could you could run from, and for a little kid,
Speaker 2: that was a fun thing. But then the horror genre
Speaker 2: got really dark and evil. It got satanic, it got vicious.
Speaker 2: They started doing the movies from the slasher's perspective, and
Speaker 2: you know, long ago I got rid of the horror stuff,
Speaker 2: and I don't like to see even action films anymore
Speaker 2: because they all fall into that category, or they fall
Speaker 2: into the category of you know, we got a just
Speaker 2: war here, and we're gonna go, you know, kill a
Speaker 2: bunch of people. And I just I'm sick and tired
Speaker 2: of the killing and of the violence and the stuff
Speaker 2: that's being sold to us by Hollywood, and it's all
Speaker 2: just a pretense to have that, and they just keep
Speaker 2: recycling these same stories again. So I'm might whether they
Speaker 2: have something that looks like a beautiful painting that's going on.
Speaker 2: If I happened to catch it and it's got some
Speaker 2: nice music in the background, I don't even care about
Speaker 2: the plot of Yeah, I don't even care about the
Speaker 2: plot of Pride and Prejudice. I just listened to the
Speaker 2: music that's there.
Speaker 6: North American House hippo, thank you very much, two of
Speaker 6: Trump's three wives or European. Just goes to show immigrants
Speaker 6: will do the jobs Americans refuse to perform.
Speaker 2: That's a great joke.
Speaker 6: There are some jobs that the price is just not
Speaker 6: worth it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Hi, and you're gotta pay him like an h
Speaker 2: to one bvs. One hundred thousand dollars a year at minimum.
Speaker 2: I'm sure they made a lot more than that. Yeah,
Speaker 2: so they mand it buried on a golf course, that's true. Yeah,
Speaker 2: the nineteenth hole high boost.
Speaker 6: This country only has one direction, revolutionary war, not civil Yeah,
Speaker 6: North American house hippo, all of them. Yeah. So Ice
Speaker 6: caught a suburban Chicago cop who was an illegal. Somebody
Speaker 6: left a comment, good to see Ice finally going after
Speaker 6: the gangs, Hi boost. I could see the US being
Speaker 6: a complete and out of collapse in persons versus persons
Speaker 6: with food shortages. But that ain't a civil war, that
Speaker 6: is civil unrest. GDP three point thirty. Brennan is a
Speaker 6: true pos behind all of the CIA torture.
Speaker 2: Yes he is.
Speaker 6: The CIA is filled up with bad ombres, bad individuals.
Speaker 2: I'm glad you know, look, you know that he's been
Speaker 2: involved in assassinations and murders and all the rest of stuff.
Speaker 2: Even if you don't send him to prison for that.
Speaker 2: It's like they sent Dennis Haster to speak of the House,
Speaker 2: who was a pedophile rapist, and that's why they picked
Speaker 2: him to run for congressmans, why they made him to
Speaker 2: speak of the House for the longest amount of time.
Speaker 2: They sent him to jail for something that I don't
Speaker 2: think should even be a crime. He made withdrawals, and
Speaker 2: he did it in a way to avoid attention from
Speaker 2: the bank. They sent him to jail for that, not
Speaker 2: for being a pedophile. And again, if they wanted to
Speaker 2: fix it, they could easily. They could remove the statute
Speaker 2: of limitations for pedophilia, which is incredibly and ridiculously short.
Speaker 2: In most cases, it's only like two or three years.
Speaker 2: And the kids just can't even come to terms with
Speaker 2: it in that amount of time. So again, you know, yeah,
Speaker 2: send him to jail. Just we know that if he
Speaker 2: was part of that criminal intelligence agency, they's got a
Speaker 2: long rap sheet that people don't even know about.
Speaker 6: Audi m R. The guy who was targeted for saying
Speaker 6: the fact about skeleton gender, was attacked because he is
Speaker 6: exposing their Baphomet agenda. Tell the truth and they will
Speaker 6: come after.
Speaker 2: You exposed the Sculpton's in the closet, right.
Speaker 6: And the ground. Yeah, tofi a tire in seventeen seventy six.
Speaker 6: All these agencies and orgs should be broken up, decentralized
Speaker 6: and absorbed by the states. Yes, they've gotten too big.
Speaker 6: Certainly's no reason for the FBI to exist none whatsoever. Yeah,
Speaker 6: the states all have their own individualized investigation bureau.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you've got every state. You got the Texas Borough
Speaker 2: of Investigation, You've got Tennessee. I don't know if it's
Speaker 2: in Texas. It might be the Texas Rangers that one
Speaker 2: riot one ranger through that function. But yeah, every state's
Speaker 2: got that, and you don't need to have a federal one.
Speaker 6: Gustav Sheban Stephen Europe will Europe does not have free
Speaker 6: speech at all. They will say that they do, but
Speaker 6: redefine the language to mean it is free speech so
Speaker 6: long as the state agrees.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, exactly.
Speaker 3: It's hate speech is the test of freek.
Speaker 6: Speech, David. Not only are beef producers and farmers struggling.
Speaker 6: A barrel of oil was four hundred last year, and
Speaker 6: it's now over two thousand dollars for the combines and fertilizers,
Speaker 6: up over six hundred percent from last year. Wow Junk
Speaker 6: Silver says I thought Civil War was a great film.
Speaker 6: Give it a chance, says, watch the movie, then comment
Speaker 6: on it. I have had a lot of people say
Speaker 6: that Civil War was a good movie. I've been burned
Speaker 6: by A twenty four before, but from what I've seen,
Speaker 6: it seems to be the best movie they've produced, unless
Speaker 6: there's something.
Speaker 2: Well, I'm just curious to see what their take on
Speaker 2: it was. I'd seen some quotes from it, never did
Speaker 2: go back and look at it.
Speaker 6: But anyway, shield your eyes, as the militarization of cities
Speaker 6: is clearly a pretext for some kind of civil unrest.
Speaker 2: I absolutely agree. We're going to take a quick folks,
Speaker 2: quick break, folks, and we'll be right back.
Speaker 16: Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet, Laos, your annual Global Risk
Speaker 16: Report makes for a stunning and sobering reader for the
Speaker 16: global business community. The top concern for the next two
Speaker 16: years is not conflict or climate. It is disinformation and misinformation,
Speaker 16: followed closely by polarization within our societies.
Speaker 1: In a world of deceit Telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 12: You are listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 7: Here's a little song I ought you might want to
Speaker 7: hear in your pod.
Speaker 2: You'll own nothing and be happy.
Speaker 7: I got no cash, I got no car, not twenty
Speaker 7: four booster shots in your arm.
Speaker 2: Own nothing to be happy.
Speaker 7: You can't even buy it in the store because of
Speaker 7: your low social credit score. Own nothing, Be happy. You
Speaker 7: will own nothing and be happy. Be happy at Eat
Speaker 7: the Bugs.
Speaker 8: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 8: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 8: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 8: And I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 8: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 8: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But
Speaker 8: he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
Speaker 8: American suckers can buy me some. At the Davidknightshow dot com.
Speaker 8: You should be able to buy me several hundred. Those
Speaker 8: amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd wear
Speaker 8: something other than green military cosplay to my various.
Speaker 6: Gallas and social events.
Speaker 8: If you want to save on shipping, just put it
Speaker 8: in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from
Speaker 8: the USA.
Speaker 2: All right, and we're back, and I'm going to talk
Speaker 2: a little bit about Ted Cruz here before we do this,
Speaker 2: to remind you of what the militarized police are really
Speaker 2: going to look like. They're going to be heavily armored.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, their arms will be metal.
Speaker 2: That is what's going to happen with that. This is
Speaker 2: Trump's fantasy of what he wants to do with America.
Speaker 2: And it's not just him. This is the this is
Speaker 2: the people who control our bipartisan system. They're going to
Speaker 2: have militarized police forces going to be robotic.
Speaker 17: This is the Mily friend O of the same staves, the.
Speaker 18: No sense.
Speaker 17: Russ I'll never look get to your.
Speaker 11: Okay, alry On saying crisis and we're going to straighten
Speaker 11: that one.
Speaker 19: By what they're saying, you're trying to take over the
Speaker 19: republic and this is going to be a major part
Speaker 19: for some of the people in this room.
Speaker 15: That's a war too, It's.
Speaker 2: A war from within.
Speaker 19: I told Pete we should use some of these dangerous
Speaker 19: cities as training grounds for our military.
Speaker 18: And you fits what.
Speaker 5: So sad.
Speaker 2: Just rely.
Speaker 18: Also strange.
Speaker 17: Better just re read.
Speaker 20: H Welcome back folks real quickly.
Speaker 6: I want to remind you that it's support from listeners
Speaker 6: and viewers like you that keeps the show running. If
Speaker 6: you like support the show, there's multiple ways you can
Speaker 6: do that and get a David Night dot news and
Speaker 6: see all the ways there. Subscribe Star dot com forward
Speaker 6: slash David Night is a great way to do that.
Speaker 6: We appreciate all the people that are on subscribe Star.
Speaker 6: We cannot thank them enough. They keep the show going.
Speaker 6: So subscribe Star dot com forward slash the David Night
Speaker 6: Show is a great way to support us. Another great
Speaker 6: way is through our sponsors. Homestead Products dot Shop is
Speaker 6: our newest sponsor. They're currently having a sale on their
Speaker 6: organic juniper salve. You can go to Homestead Products dot
Speaker 6: shop and if you search juniper, they have three different options.
Speaker 6: What's on sale right now is the juniper salve. It's
Speaker 6: good for your skin. It has some antimicrobial properties, help
Speaker 6: skin healing and that.
Speaker 2: Sort of stuff. They have the best product. I really
Speaker 2: like that, you know, I like the tumbleweed firestarter and
Speaker 2: things like that. The hand, which is a previous so
Speaker 2: all they had. But this is just a natural save
Speaker 2: that you can use. And again, when you look at
Speaker 2: the properties that are in natural products, it's just amazing
Speaker 2: the healing powers that are there. And he does it
Speaker 2: in a way that does not involve chemicals. So they
Speaker 2: do it naturally and organically. The way they put it
Speaker 2: through there so that you can get to the unmasked
Speaker 2: and unadulterated aspects of these different natural products that God
Speaker 2: has put out there.
Speaker 6: And when you look at the ingredients on their Juniper South,
Speaker 6: it is dried juniper berries, bees wax, and avocado oil.
Speaker 6: It's not got random junk fillers in it. It's not
Speaker 6: got cheap oils in there.
Speaker 2: It's high quality and you can pronounce all the words.
Speaker 6: You're not getting something that's methyl, pegilated, nothing, none like that.
Speaker 6: It's all natural. It's all good stuff made to marrit Erica.
Speaker 6: Homestead Products dot shop. Juniper Berry Sell is on sale
Speaker 6: and you can get ten percent off all their products
Speaker 6: with promo code night So Homestead Products dot Shop, we
Speaker 6: really do appreciate their support. And of course once again
Speaker 6: it is their juniper Berry sell that is on sale.
Speaker 6: You can go check it out for yourself.
Speaker 2: Now, I said earlier that Ted Cruz doesn't really get
Speaker 2: what is going on here either. Certainly, I think the
Speaker 2: vast majority of Republicans don't understand what's going on with
Speaker 2: this no Kings thing. That's why I thought that guy's take,
Speaker 2: even though you know, he's got a different perspective on
Speaker 2: all this. He's from a different tribe, so he sees
Speaker 2: this stuff with a different worldview. I think a lot
Speaker 2: of the things that he pointed out there in his interviews,
Speaker 2: being there on site, I think we're valid observations. Ted
Speaker 2: Cruz is begging the GOP to take quote the political
Speaker 2: peril seriously. Well, I think the problem is that the
Speaker 2: peril is more than just political. All they care about
Speaker 2: is the politics. All they care about is staying in office,
Speaker 2: and that is a real key problem of this two
Speaker 2: party system, as MTG was pointing out. But the real
Speaker 2: peril is this militarized peril of a federal militarized police,
Speaker 2: and we should take that seriously, and they should also
Speaker 2: take seriously the frustration that people have with that. But
Speaker 2: the GOP and the Nudge News and the MAGA influencers
Speaker 2: are basically I kind of break it down in four
Speaker 2: different narratives that they got about this. Number one, don't
Speaker 2: worry about it. They just hate Trump, and these people
Speaker 2: are just crazy. They're crazy. They're a bunch of old boomers.
Speaker 2: That's number two. They're a bunch of old boomers and hippies.
Speaker 2: Or this is all AstroTurf. It's all being paid for
Speaker 2: by Soros. As he pointed out, there's a very different situation.
Speaker 2: There's a bunch of professionally printed, pre printed signs that
Speaker 2: were handed out at previous note King's rally. This one
Speaker 2: was different. People are making up their own signs, and
Speaker 2: they're making up signs that they knew what they were
Speaker 2: talking about. They knew about Trump's executive order about label
Speaker 2: people domestic terrorists, and then of course you know the
Speaker 2: label of joining in with Trump, and just all these
Speaker 2: people who oppose this, they're all just a bunch of
Speaker 2: communists and anti vas So we can just dismiss them.
Speaker 2: And if the police run their car into the crowd,
Speaker 2: I voted for that. That's the usual thing that we
Speaker 2: see from these people. So I think the problem is
Speaker 2: is that the Conservatives, in terms of selling this police brutality,
Speaker 2: in terms of selling an armed, massed federal police force.
Speaker 2: It doesn't feel like it has to obey the law,
Speaker 2: doesn't need to identify itself, for get a search warrant.
Speaker 2: Once they do that, folks, they are selling the rope
Speaker 2: that will hang them and us. That's the reality. And
Speaker 2: we'll be hung by the next killery that comes to
Speaker 2: office because they will have established this precedent. You know,
Speaker 2: it was Obama who said that we were She called
Speaker 2: us deplorable. He said, we're bitter clingers. Trump called us
Speaker 2: non essential. D see the bipartisan aspect of this, and
Speaker 2: so there was a good up ed piece an American
Speaker 2: reformer by timon Klein, and he said, if you can
Speaker 2: keep what what is a republic? And he says, you know,
Speaker 2: we all know the quote about Benjamin Franklin. When they
Speaker 2: came out of the Constitutional Convention, an aged, gout ridden
Speaker 2: Benjamin Franklin was asked by a woman, Miss Elizabeth Powell
Speaker 2: of Philadelphia, what do we got a republic? A republic
Speaker 2: or monarchy? And he said a republic if you can
Speaker 2: keep it right. So what is it that is a republic?
Speaker 2: He said. Franklin just finished his final address for the convention,
Speaker 2: given his ill health, he had James Wilson had to
Speaker 2: read it for him, and the speech was a recitation
Speaker 2: of Polybius. So the new nation was not immune to
Speaker 2: regime cycles, It was not immune to a law of history,
Speaker 2: and it would end in despotism if the people ever
Speaker 2: fail all to maintain requisite virtue. Oh do we ever
Speaker 2: talk about that? All we have? We don't have virtue
Speaker 2: in our country. Of course, as we get to it
Speaker 2: is when people virtue signal, isn't it? A licentious people
Speaker 2: is the strong chastening hand of despotism. It's what's the
Speaker 2: solution to a licentious people? And what does he mean
Speaker 2: by that? You know, we typically think of licentious. We
Speaker 2: typically think of people like trumpet Epstein who out they're conducting,
Speaker 2: you know, sexual licentiousness, But they also meant by licentious,
Speaker 2: they meant just any kind of profligate behavior. You know,
Speaker 2: it could be licentious spending, right, It doesn't necessarily have
Speaker 2: to have a sexual connotation with it. But we have
Speaker 2: just become a soft people who don't care about virtue,
Speaker 2: who don't care about responsibility, and don't want any consequences.
Speaker 2: But the consequence when you have a licentious people, the
Speaker 2: consequence is always going to be despotism, and that's what
Speaker 2: we're starting to see now. So Franklin was not very
Speaker 2: confident in his fellow Americans. He was not a believer
Speaker 2: in American exceptionalism. For Franklin, republic did refer to a
Speaker 2: form of government he never although he never used the
Speaker 2: word in his speech, but it was clearly entailed more
Speaker 2: than mere constitutional structure and procedure. John Adams spoke more
Speaker 2: about it. He said that the only good government is republican,
Speaker 2: and a republic is an empire of laws, not an
Speaker 2: empire of men. And this is what concerns me. We've
Speaker 2: had a lot of rubicons that have been crossed already,
Speaker 2: but this is a big rubicon when we just dispense
Speaker 2: with the rule of law, and we dispense with all
Speaker 2: of these different branches of government that were meant to
Speaker 2: check and counterbalance each other, and we put all power
Speaker 2: in the presidency and allowed Trump to rule by eating
Speaker 2: whenever he puts out. First, puts out an edict of
Speaker 2: a emergency, which is now just a formality backed up
Speaker 2: by a lie, and then he issues his executive orders
Speaker 2: as dictates. So he said, the best form of government
Speaker 2: is one that is contrived to secure an impartial and
Speaker 2: exact execution of laws. Some why of these people swear
Speaker 2: to a public constitution as a condition of their office?
Speaker 2: So Adams said, virtue and simplicity of manners are indispensably
Speaker 2: necessary in a republic among all orders and degrees of men.
Speaker 2: But there is so much rascality, so much venality, and
Speaker 2: so much corruption, so much avarice and ambition, that I
Speaker 2: sometimes doubt whether there is public virtue enough to support
Speaker 2: a republic. He said, there's two vices that are most
Speaker 2: detectably predominant in every part of America that I've yet seen,
Speaker 2: which are incompatible with a republic. And those two things,
Speaker 2: he said, are civility and flattery. Why would he pick that, Well,
Speaker 2: because he's in politics, and because in their day they
Speaker 2: had people like Mike Johnson as well, who are servile flatterers.
Speaker 2: And that's what the GOP has become. And that's a
Speaker 2: sad thing to witness, but it's not unexpected when you
Speaker 2: have a when the people have turned into a personality
Speaker 2: cult around someone who has no virtue that we can identify.
Speaker 2: I can't see any virtue in any aspect of Trump's life,
Speaker 2: whether it is profligate sexual activity or profligate spending activity,
Speaker 2: and of course his inability to be able to control himself.
Speaker 2: He doesn't have any insights, He has no principles. The
Speaker 2: great fear of Adams was that that America lacked kings actually,
Speaker 2: or as Carlile Carlisle would call them, able men. So
Speaker 2: they talk about a king as being somebody who had
Speaker 2: a kind of He means that in this sense, is
Speaker 2: somebody who was someone that you would look up to,
Speaker 2: that you would respect, someone of virtue. And that's why
Speaker 2: you know, when people look at America, we don't have
Speaker 2: anyone who is up to the job of being a king. Dewy.
Speaker 2: Trump has demanded the two hundred thirty million dollars for
Speaker 2: this Russian witch hunt, which I think, in and of itself,
Speaker 2: says so much about his character. It truly is amazing.
Speaker 2: And he doesn't, as I said before, he doesn't just
Speaker 2: have an enemy's list like Nixon did. He's actually got
Speaker 2: a formal public committee to go after his enemies that
Speaker 2: he's made a list of the Reuters, says The Exclusive.
Speaker 2: A wide ranging group of US officials is pursuing Trump's
Speaker 2: fight against his enemies against what he calls his deep state.
Speaker 2: And yet the deep state, I think we now have
Speaker 2: a definition for it. It's anybody that is a personal
Speaker 2: enemy of Trump. A group of dozens of officials from
Speaker 2: across the federal government, including US intelligence officers, has been
Speaker 2: helping to steer Trump's dry for retribution against his perceived enemies,
Speaker 2: according to the government records and a source familiar with
Speaker 2: the effort. Yeah, I've said so many times. I'll say
Speaker 2: it again. It's the law that should be powerful, not Trump.
Speaker 2: It's the law that should be strengthened, not Trump. But
Speaker 2: that's the purpose of him going after his enemies. And
Speaker 2: it is called the inter Agency Weaponization Working Group. It's
Speaker 2: drawn from officials at the White House, the Office of
Speaker 2: the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA, the Justice and
Speaker 2: Defense Departments, the FBI, Homeland Security, the IRS, and the FCC.
Speaker 2: Because he's got to go after programs that he doesn't
Speaker 2: like either, right. Pam Bondy and Director of National Intelligence
Speaker 2: Tulsea Gabbart earlier this year announced groups within their organizations
Speaker 2: that would be doing this. But now they have a
Speaker 2: large conspiracy to go after Trump's enemies. I think that
Speaker 2: is incredibly dangerous. It's incredibly unconstitutional, and it is where
Speaker 2: we are at this very dangerous time. Let's talk a
Speaker 2: little bit about what's going on in terms of the
Speaker 2: Venezuelan War and the peace prize that he would like
Speaker 2: to get. Tucker Carlson got very upset when he was
Speaker 2: at a Turning Point USA event. He was a speaker
Speaker 2: that was on the chair answering questions from the audience
Speaker 2: like Charlie Kirk would do, and he had a guy
Speaker 2: get up and ask him some questions. And I'll play
Speaker 2: that for you here by the way, looking at the
Speaker 2: time here, we're going to have Tony's going to join
Speaker 2: us tomorrow. I'm sure a lot of you were expecting
Speaker 2: Tony to join us at ten thirty. We've got a
Speaker 2: couple of interviews tomorrow, and Charlie is going to be
Speaker 2: with us tomorrow on the show. But here's Tucker Carlson
Speaker 2: at the Turning Point event and he gets asked a
Speaker 2: question by a student about what is going on and
Speaker 2: have things really improved under Trump?
Speaker 21: So I kind of just don't see a lot of
Speaker 21: change between you know, the Biden administration and now the
Speaker 21: Trump point and foreign policy. You know, we're still giving
Speaker 21: a shit ton of money to like Israel and Ukraine.
Speaker 21: Nothing is happening, you know, if the war has not stopped.
Speaker 21: He promised it be done in a day, and it's
Speaker 21: I don't know how many months, eight months or something
Speaker 21: like that.
Speaker 18: It's a long time.
Speaker 21: Your dad was in the CIA, And I was wondering,
Speaker 21: does our government even want war to stop? Do they
Speaker 21: want complex the end? It seems like we have a
Speaker 21: difference of interest where we're getting told one thing and
Speaker 21: the other is happening, and I feel like there's not
Speaker 21: enough communication between different sects of government, and I just
Speaker 21: I really think the deep state's controlling everything and we
Speaker 21: have no can.
Speaker 22: Well let me let me just let me let me
Speaker 22: start at uh. You know, obviously you probably sense that
Speaker 22: I agree with a lot of that. Obviously my father
Speaker 22: out of it. I'm gonna have to kick your ass,
Speaker 22: which I could do, by the way, if if you
Speaker 22: bring him up again, because he was.
Speaker 18: A wonderful man whatever.
Speaker 22: You know, he did for a living, so I really
Speaker 22: do hate that. But leaving that aside, and don't test me, son,
Speaker 22: I hate to say I agree with a lot of
Speaker 22: what I think you probably know I agree with a
Speaker 22: lot of what you've said, and it's enormously frustrating. It's shocking, actually,
Speaker 22: and I do know I'm not shilling. I just happened
Speaker 22: to know some of the people who work in the
Speaker 22: administration who are people who agree with you strongly. I
Speaker 22: think most Trump voters agree with you. That's why they
Speaker 22: voted for Donald Trump in the first place. And you know,
Speaker 22: no pointless wars was not just a thing he said
Speaker 22: at one campaign stop. It was a pillar of his
Speaker 22: campaigns and of MAGA itself. I mean, what is MAGA.
Speaker 22: There's a mad scramble, particularly since Charlie's passing, to define
Speaker 22: what this is and to read some people out of
Speaker 22: the movement.
Speaker 18: You're not MAGA. Well, what is MAGA? Well, MAGA is
Speaker 18: five things.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 22: Mega is America first, which means Americans should put no
Speaker 22: country before America.
Speaker 18: American interests come first.
Speaker 22: That's not a crazy idea. No pointless wars, period and
Speaker 22: by pointless, I mean wars fought on behalf of an
Speaker 22: ideology or another nation are totally unacceptable. They weaken this country.
Speaker 22: Wars fought because somebody running a country is bad.
Speaker 18: Okay, it is bad.
Speaker 22: You're telling me a world leader's bad all right, Yeah, no,
Speaker 22: it's impoverb You know, it's dramatically weakened this country social fabric,
Speaker 22: it's treasury. It's killed so many Americans, and it's really
Speaker 22: weakened America's position globally. So no pointless wars bring back
Speaker 22: American jobs, right of meaningful jobs.
Speaker 18: You know, the call.
Speaker 22: Centers who moved to South Asia. AI's crushing the lawyers.
Speaker 22: What do Americans do for a living? Like, think deeply
Speaker 22: about that and work to make work a reality for people.
Speaker 22: I mean, you allre I assume still in college, wait
Speaker 22: till you graduate? You know, I have a child who
Speaker 22: just graduated college. Once a week, I'm like, how many
Speaker 22: of your friends, these are all like smart, pretty affluent,
Speaker 22: kind of connected, you know, cute girls.
Speaker 18: How many of your friends have jobs in New York City?
Speaker 18: Four out of ten.
Speaker 22: That's a disaster, actually, and someone needs to be thinking
Speaker 22: about that deeply. In the promise of MAGA was that
Speaker 22: somebody would. And then, of course immigration, like you have
Speaker 22: to control who comes in and out of your country
Speaker 22: or else you're not a country.
Speaker 18: And I know that.
Speaker 2: And then how do you do that? That's the question
Speaker 2: right again, It isn't just to say this is the
Speaker 2: end that we want here, but exactly how are you
Speaker 2: going to do that? So I thought it was kind
Speaker 2: of interesting, said, no pointless wars. How about if we
Speaker 2: have no unjust wars, no wars that aren't justified, and
Speaker 2: then we have to define what that means. Pointless is like, well,
Speaker 2: I don't want personal vendettas out there as part of that.
Speaker 2: Bring back jobs, that's kind of a nebulous thing. How
Speaker 2: do we bring back jobs? And is that the role
Speaker 2: of government? I think the role of government is what
Speaker 2: we should be looking at. Instead of saying, bring back jobs,
Speaker 2: Let's say let's get rid of government opposition to the
Speaker 2: free market. Let's get rid of government obstacles to people
Speaker 2: being able to conduct business freely and unfettered. That's the reality.
Speaker 2: This government regulation that is our biggest problem. And again,
Speaker 2: as the government all always does when it creates the problem,
Speaker 2: when it is the problem, it points to somebody in
Speaker 2: a foreign country, it says, they're your problem. And it's
Speaker 2: really more than anything else, it's government regulations that are
Speaker 2: shutting down our society, making it so that we can't
Speaker 2: get jobs and the rest of this. But Glenn Greenwall
Speaker 2: responding to the beginning of that question, he said, it's
Speaker 2: basically guaranteed that if you do a Q and A
Speaker 2: with young MAGA types, they will voice their anger that
Speaker 2: the US continues to finance Israel and wars like Ukraine,
Speaker 2: just as we saw in last night's TPUSA. He said,
Speaker 2: the issue is generationally lost for the bipartisan DC class,
Speaker 2: and he's right about that. And I thought it was
Speaker 2: interesting that Tucker got angry about the guy mentioning that
Speaker 2: his dad worked for the CIA, but he didn't say
Speaker 2: that his dad did not work for the CIA. He
Speaker 2: said he was a great guy. Whatever he did for
Speaker 2: a living, Yeah, it was so.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he's working for that gang at Chrug Deeler's destabilizing
Speaker 3: countries and all that, but he was a great person
Speaker 3: at home. You just didn't see that side of him
Speaker 3: when he was, you know, pushing drugs or doing whatever
Speaker 3: that he does in the CIA.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah, whatever he does, if he you know,
Speaker 2: he covers up and sells the lies to the people
Speaker 2: who do all that stuff, whatever he does for a living,
Speaker 2: you know, he was a great dad. So again, this
Speaker 2: has sold out audience of thousands as part of the
Speaker 2: comeback tour, I guess the Resurrection tour of Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 2: Tucker fielded questions from liberals and conservatives regarding a variety
Speaker 2: of controversial subjects, including abortion and Trump at Indiana University,
Speaker 2: and when it got on the topic of the CIA again,
Speaker 2: he says, you know, whatever he did for a living, well,
Speaker 2: I guess you know when we look at that, if
Speaker 2: you create lies and narratives to support the people who
Speaker 2: do these types of things, even if you're not doing it,
Speaker 2: I think you have some culpability for that. His father
Speaker 2: ran Voice of America as director of Voice of America
Speaker 2: during the Reagan years, and of course he was made
Speaker 2: an ambassador by George H. W. Bush. There is no evidence,
Speaker 2: says The Daily Mail, that his father was ever employed
Speaker 2: by the CIA, although Tucker has said in previous interviews
Speaker 2: that his father quote worked in conjunction with the agency
Speaker 2: at some point in his career, and Tucker did not
Speaker 2: deny it. He just said, you know, whatever he did.
Speaker 2: Tucker himself, of course, applied to the CIA was rejected.
Speaker 2: I guess they figured that he'd be far more use
Speaker 2: in mainstream media selling their lives, which he did until
Speaker 2: he got fired by Fox, he would not push back
Speaker 2: against the pandemic or the vaccine, and he sold their
Speaker 2: lives about nine to eleven for the longest time. Now
Speaker 2: he's going to make some kind of a nine to
Speaker 2: eleven documentary to try to redeem himself. I guess what.
Speaker 3: Lands Yeah, he applied for the CIA and was quote
Speaker 3: unquote rejected.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Uh, you know, it's kind of interesting. You know,
Speaker 2: you see a lot of people. As I've said before,
Speaker 2: how many people do you know that have family members
Speaker 2: in the CIA. I've known too, Alex and Tucker, and
Speaker 2: it's interesting that Tucker's got a brother called named Buckley.
Speaker 2: I don't know if that happened before after he got
Speaker 2: into the Voice of America stuff. But the other CIA
Speaker 2: family I know, the Jones Is they've got a Buckley
Speaker 2: as well. I don't know if there's anything to it,
Speaker 2: just I see Buckley. The Buckley that I think of
Speaker 2: is William F. Buckley, who was an apologist for the
Speaker 2: CIA ran National Review and came after the John Birch Society.
Speaker 2: It's not something that I would that would kind of
Speaker 2: contaminate that name as far as I was concerned, unless
Speaker 2: I was a fan of the CIA, which I am
Speaker 2: not well. Trump also said that he's got Lincoln and
Speaker 2: Washington beat as president, that he had this to say.
Speaker 19: So, we did the Presidential Walk of Fame from the
Speaker 19: Great George Washington all the way to well, I think
Speaker 19: we have to rate him above me, so less than great,
Speaker 19: less than George. Somebody went up there, they say, you're
Speaker 19: the third best president in the unit. This was untelevision's
Speaker 19: third best and they said, who are the first?
Speaker 2: Who?
Speaker 19: George Washington and Abraham Lincoln? And I got extremely angry
Speaker 19: at this man.
Speaker 9: You know, you can't.
Speaker 19: It's gonna be it's gonna be tough to beat mister Senator,
Speaker 19: It's gonna be John. It's gonna be very tough to
Speaker 19: beat Washington and Lincoln.
Speaker 2: But we're gonna give it a try.
Speaker 19: Right, Hey, they didn't put out eight Wars nine coming,
Speaker 19: all right, and the ninth is coming, believe it or not?
Speaker 2: Yeah, please applaud. Yeah, they didn't stop eight Wars. The
Speaker 2: ninth one is coming. Well, neither did he. But this
Speaker 2: guy is amazing, isn't it how obsessed he is. We're
Speaker 2: getting the Peace Prize. I mean, every time he talks anymore,
Speaker 2: that's about that. You know, he's one of the things
Speaker 2: that he could have said, Well, you know, he got
Speaker 2: George Washington. I have to say, you know, he's greater
Speaker 2: than I was. These people think, But you know I
Speaker 2: got one thing over George Washington. George Washington can tell
Speaker 2: a lie, and I'm really good at that. I'm the best.
Speaker 2: Nobody better than me.
Speaker 3: You should be saying that he's the only person that's
Speaker 3: killed possibly more Americans than Lincoln.
Speaker 2: That's right, Yeah, that's that's true. Yeah, Lincoln was all
Speaker 2: about war, wasn't he. The moment came when Trump began
Speaker 2: to brag about his tacky walk of Fame, which he says,
Speaker 2: you know, goes back and ends with him right there,
Speaker 2: and he's got a portrait of an auto pen where
Speaker 2: Biden's face would have been. He knowed that line of
Speaker 2: presidents goes to Washington to himself sadly conceded that he
Speaker 2: would have to be behind Washington. But then he dropped
Speaker 2: his most famous lie about ending eight wars, and again
Speaker 2: several wars that he claims to have ended, including the
Speaker 2: DRC in Rwanda conflict and the Israel Hamas conflict still
Speaker 2: erupt in violence, and the other quote unquote wars such
Speaker 2: as Serbia, Kosovo, Egypt and Ethiopia were never wars in
Speaker 2: the first place, and when you look at the one
Speaker 2: with Armenia Azerbaijan, he was one of the officials from
Speaker 2: one of those two countries was openly caught on a
Speaker 2: hot mic laughing about Trump, claiming that he had made
Speaker 2: peace there and so they're mocking him for that. The
Speaker 2: Rose Garden speech was intended to celebrate the demolition of
Speaker 2: the White House East Wing to make room for his
Speaker 2: massive two hundred million dollar ballroom, before evolving into embellishments
Speaker 2: about his accomplishments and his attacks on his enemies. You
Speaker 2: know he's going to get He's going to write himself
Speaker 2: a check for more than that grand ballroom is costing. Right,
Speaker 2: He's going to write himself a check for two hundred
Speaker 2: and thirty million dollars. He is. I guess you call
Speaker 2: him a fabuloust, right. He not just doesn't tell lies,
Speaker 2: but he tells grand lies and grand fables. I guess
Speaker 2: that's one of the things that got him to commute
Speaker 2: the sentence of George Santos. I guess he can identify
Speaker 2: with that guy, just like he's looking at commuting the
Speaker 2: sentence of the Diddler what was his name, P Diddy? Yeah,
Speaker 2: p Diddy, Yeah again. You know, he identifies with these
Speaker 2: sexual predators, sexual predators like Diddy and Maxwell, so probably
Speaker 2: give them some pardons as well, just like he identifies
Speaker 2: with the grand liar George Santos. So. Trump is beating
Speaker 2: the drums of war for direct action in Venezuela. A
Speaker 2: lot of people are talking about this, and Rand Paul
Speaker 2: is saying quite a bit about this as well. He's
Speaker 2: been very vocal in his opposition to it, and it
Speaker 2: has drawn the ire, of course of Donald Trump, because
Speaker 2: we can see that he has already committed to this war,
Speaker 2: and he's openly talking about the fact that he has
Speaker 2: done a CIA finding and going to apply the CIA
Speaker 2: to Venezuela. As one person who used to work for
Speaker 2: the CIA said, you don't typically talk about that because
Speaker 2: a it puts the CIA people in danger. And number two,
Speaker 2: they won't always have plausible deniability doing everything in secret.
Speaker 2: They want to not have that pointed to them. But
Speaker 2: this is what Rampaul had to say about Trump in Venezuela.
Speaker 15: Number One, there is no fentanyl made in Venezuela, not
Speaker 15: just a little bit. There's none being made in Venezuela.
Speaker 15: These are outboard boats that in order for them to
Speaker 15: get to Miami would have to stop and refuel twenty times.
Speaker 15: They're all likely going to Trinidad and Tobago, which is
Speaker 15: an island right off of the coast of Venezuela. So
Speaker 15: there's a lot of reasons to be worried about this,
Speaker 15: but number one is the broader principle of when can
Speaker 15: you kill people indiscriminately when you were at war. That's
Speaker 15: why when we declare war, it's supposed to be done
Speaker 15: by Congress. It's supposed to be thoughtful, it's supposed to
Speaker 15: be debated, and we're not supposed to do it willy nilly.
Speaker 15: And then when you have war, you just kill people
Speaker 15: in the war zone, and even then there are rules
Speaker 15: of engagement. But interdicting drugs has always been a criminal activity,
Speaker 15: in a criminal, anti crime sort of activity, where we
Speaker 15: don't just summarily execute people, we actually present evidence and
Speaker 15: convict them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but they've called it a war now for fifty
Speaker 2: plus years, and so I guess it's time that we
Speaker 2: just you know, they've been gradually moving in this direction
Speaker 2: with military's police and no knock drug rades and such
Speaker 2: like that they can steal your property with civil asset forfeiture.
Speaker 2: They don't even charge you with a crime. They charge
Speaker 2: your property with a crime and then say now you've
Speaker 2: got to sewis to get it back. If they can
Speaker 2: take your property, then you don't have any rights as
Speaker 2: a human being. They've already dehumanized you to a large
Speaker 2: degree if they can just take your property on a whim.
Speaker 2: And so it's just a kind of a logical progression
Speaker 2: really that if you can take people's property, at some
Speaker 2: point you're going to say that I can do the
Speaker 2: equivalent of civilizset forfeiture with their life. You're going to
Speaker 2: forfeit your life if you're doing something that I even
Speaker 2: suspect is an issue. And again, the reason that they
Speaker 2: steal this property and don't charge people of the crime
Speaker 2: is because it's done on suspicion. They know that they
Speaker 2: don't that a crime wasn't committed, or they know that
Speaker 2: they don't have evidence that they could convict somebody, so
Speaker 2: they go ahead and punish them without doing that. We've
Speaker 2: operated under these systems of mil Tri's police, no knock
Speaker 2: raids and the civiliseet forfeiture for so long, we've been
Speaker 2: conditioned to accept the next step in this. And that's
Speaker 2: why I see people that are out there saying, great,
Speaker 2: I voted for this, That's right, you did. You should
Speaker 2: be ashamed of yourself. You don't even have the integrity
Speaker 2: to be ashamed. So Rand Paul said, well, Trump didn't
Speaker 2: invite me to the GOP lunch, and this is happening,
Speaker 2: I guess because he's speaking against Trump just murdering people.
Speaker 2: And that's what this is, is simply murder. It's a crime.
Speaker 2: The Trump gang, well, the Trump gang invaded Kentucky. Next
Speaker 2: because he put up on X he posted a picture
Speaker 2: of him setting with Thomas Massey, who Trump also hates
Speaker 2: because Massey has opposed his profligate spending and has opposed
Speaker 2: his wars. And so Paul and Massey, both of them
Speaker 2: from Kentucky said. Paul said, I actually wasn't invited to
Speaker 2: the White House lunch today, but that's okay, he said. Instead,
Speaker 2: we're having a Liberty Caucus lunch. Thomas Massey and I
Speaker 2: and Trump posted Republican senators in the Rose Garden that's
Speaker 2: where he was speaking, to express his appreciation after the
Speaker 2: chamber advanced dozens of nominees and to present a united front.
Speaker 2: As the government shut down drags and it's fourth week.
Speaker 2: At one point, Trump marveled at the audience, he said,
Speaker 2: noting that only one senator was not there. He didn't
Speaker 2: name the senator, but he said, we're just missing one person.
Speaker 2: You'll never guess who that is. He automatically votes know
Speaker 2: on everything he thinks it's good politics. It's not good politics. Well, yeah,
Speaker 2: you should just rubber stamp whatever Trump wants to do.
Speaker 2: If you want to be successful in politics. That's the
Speaker 2: way you get ahead in the Republican Party. You just
Speaker 2: rubber stamp everything that comes from Trump. Well, ram Paul
Speaker 2: has said many things. He said, it is a recipe
Speaker 2: for chaos. After being called by Trump a nasty little guy,
Speaker 2: ram Paul responded to Trump's nasty little guy insult by
Speaker 2: doubling down in his position about the administration breaking the
Speaker 2: law where their strikes alleged drug smuggling votes in the Caribbean.
Speaker 2: He was on with Puer Morgan. As you saw, he said,
Speaker 2: I enjoy the President's company and personality despite our personal
Speaker 2: the personal insults, He said, I don't take it too seriously.
Speaker 2: I've known Trump for over a decade. I've played golf
Speaker 2: with them a couple dozen times. I actually enjoy his
Speaker 2: company and his personality most of the time. But it
Speaker 2: doesn't mean that I'm going to be a rubber stamp
Speaker 2: or agree with everything. He blasted his own party and
Speaker 2: argued that he received pushback on things that shouldn't be
Speaker 2: considered to be weird, like passing a balanced budget and
Speaker 2: reducing the debt. Paul argued that there's no legal basis
Speaker 2: for the president's strikes. He called it a summary execution
Speaker 2: without legal process. We don't blow butt boats off of
Speaker 2: the coast of Miami because twenty five percent of the
Speaker 2: time suspicion is wrong, and we shouldn't do that in
Speaker 2: Venezuela either, As he pointed out, I mentioned it yesterday.
Speaker 2: He said that when the Coastguard does stop people and
Speaker 2: inspected me, he said, twenty five percent of the time
Speaker 2: those that they suspect of being of smuggling drugs or
Speaker 2: not smuggling drugs. So if we're just going to blow
Speaker 2: up every large boat that has a big engine on
Speaker 2: it and say that's a drug drug runner, then twenty
Speaker 2: five percent of the time we're going to be killing
Speaker 2: innocent people. He said, We're not at war, so this
Speaker 2: is just a summary execution. As he pointed out, these
Speaker 2: small boats outboard motor boats are two thousand miles away
Speaker 2: from the US. They would have to refuel, as he
Speaker 2: pointed out twenty times, in order to get there. He goes,
Speaker 2: this is just summary execution. Everyone gets a trial because
Speaker 2: sometimes the system gets it wrong. Even the worst of
Speaker 2: the worst in our country get due process. The bottom
Speaker 2: line is that execution without process is not justice. Blowing
Speaker 2: up foreign ships is a recipe for chaos, and it
Speaker 2: is a recipe for training your government that they don't
Speaker 2: have to follow the law. And we've been doing that
Speaker 2: on a variety of issues for my entire life. And
Speaker 2: this is getting worse and worse. It's like a metastasizing cancer.
Speaker 2: Trump slammed Paul as a nasty little guy. I said,
Speaker 2: whatever happened to Senator Rampaul? He was never great, but
Speaker 2: he went really bad. I got him elected twice. Well, actually,
Speaker 2: that's a patently absurd lie. Ram Paul was already a
Speaker 2: senator when he was running for president in twenty sixteen
Speaker 2: against Trump, and Trump knows that Trump didn't get him
Speaker 2: elected prior to twenty sixteen. So he's a nasty little guy,
Speaker 2: much like Congressman Thomas Massey, also known as Ram Paul Junior,
Speaker 2: also of Kentucky, which I won three times in massive landslides.
Speaker 2: Sick wackos refused to vote for our great Republican Party.
Speaker 2: Blah blah blah. It's pathetic. And yet we've had yet
Speaker 2: another vote blown up again. This one was in the Pacific.
Speaker 2: It killed two people, and the lead from WND disgusted
Speaker 2: me because what they did was they took some of
Speaker 2: the quotes that people had on social media. One of
Speaker 2: them said, yeah, all those outboard motors on that boat.
Speaker 2: I guess these quote unquote fishermen have to do that
Speaker 2: because they're going after the really fast fish. That's what
Speaker 2: this is. Not about that, And it is so petty
Speaker 2: and so typical of the kind of rhetoric that we've
Speaker 2: seen from the left when they talk about, well, you
Speaker 2: don't need to have a gun that has that many
Speaker 2: bullets at it, right, you don't need a magazine of
Speaker 2: that size. Are you that bat of shot when you
Speaker 2: go deer hunting that you got to shoot up everything inside? No,
Speaker 2: it's not about that. They'll also say, well, you don't
Speaker 2: need an AR fifteen to go hunting and so forth.
Speaker 2: Well you don't need to have a speedboat to be
Speaker 2: out on the ocean. And if the government, the US
Speaker 2: government blows you up in a speedboat, you deserve it.
Speaker 2: You probably were a criminal because you had a boat
Speaker 2: with too many engines on it, just like you're a
Speaker 2: criminal if you've got a certain type of gun. Right, So,
Speaker 2: Worst Secretary Pete Hegseth posted the video of the exploding boat.
Speaker 2: This is the thing that I find so amazing. These
Speaker 2: people are committing crimes, crimes as defined by our own
Speaker 2: government and constitution, and crimes as defined by international law,
Speaker 2: and yet they boast about it. They put it out
Speaker 2: on social media. And you know, when I look at
Speaker 2: Pete heiseth. There was an article that had him was
Speaker 2: talking about him in Christian nationalism. He's become the face
Speaker 2: of Christian nationalism for the left, and they were talking
Speaker 2: about the fact that he was there with Doug Wilson,
Speaker 2: who I interviewed Doug Wilson once over a book that
Speaker 2: was published by Canon Pressed. I thought was really good.
Speaker 2: I got him on to talk about the book. But
Speaker 2: you know, I like what Doug Wilson does in the
Speaker 2: sense of politics and religion. He challenges these assumptions, these
Speaker 2: false assumptions that say that we're going to have a
Speaker 2: values neutral society. You can't have that. It's going to
Speaker 2: be somebody's values. And he's very good at pointing that out.
Speaker 2: And he will say provocative things in order to challenge
Speaker 2: the left, but he does it with humor and he
Speaker 2: backs it up in an argument. Is not what Pete
Speaker 2: Hegseth is doing. And you know the unfortunate thing is
Speaker 2: I told Karen when I saw the article, I said,
Speaker 2: this is going to be it was about Christian nationalism
Speaker 2: and Pete Hegseth, I said, this is going to be
Speaker 2: about Doug Wilson. Sure enough, pull up the article. The
Speaker 2: first two words are Doug Wilson. You're gonna be careful
Speaker 2: who you align yourself with, because the problem is is
Speaker 2: that what Pete Hegseth is doing is not Christian. It
Speaker 2: may be nationalism, but it is not Christian. This kind
Speaker 2: of blowing people out of the water without any kind
Speaker 2: of justification is unjustified, and it is not obeying his
Speaker 2: oath to the law, and it is not what Christians
Speaker 2: should support, and unfortunately, you know, he's going to have
Speaker 2: that albatross of what Pete Hegseth is doing because of
Speaker 2: the connection that's there at a church that's in Washington.
Speaker 2: So this person from I think it was from the
Speaker 2: Atlantic went to the church because it was being planted
Speaker 2: by some people who were affiliated with Doug Wilson. They
Speaker 2: put a church in Washington, and Pete Headseth was part
Speaker 2: of getting that move there, and they went there to
Speaker 2: see what was being talked about as well as to
Speaker 2: try to talk to Pete Hegseth, but they were not
Speaker 2: allowed to talk to him. But anyway, she goes off
Speaker 2: on this whole rant about what Doug Wilson is about
Speaker 2: and got a lot of it wrong, and people are
Speaker 2: going to get the wrong impression about this. It's just
Speaker 2: like they're getting the wrong impression about antiphab because Trump
Speaker 2: what Trump is saying about it. They get the wrong
Speaker 2: impression about what Christianity is about as well because of
Speaker 2: the actions of people who are saying I'm for Christian nationalism.
Speaker 2: This vessel was quote known by our intelligence said heg
Speaker 2: Seth to be involved in illicit narcotics smuggling, was transiting
Speaker 2: along a known narco trafficking transit out and carrying narcotics, Well,
Speaker 2: this would be the type of thing they'd get you
Speaker 2: pulled over that kind of profiling. And as ram Paul
Speaker 2: pointed out, when we do that, twenty five percent of
Speaker 2: the time were wrong and so it wasn't known because
Speaker 2: you didn't have due process. That's one of the things
Speaker 2: that ram Paul said was that if you're going to
Speaker 2: kill somebody, you've got to at least know their name.
Speaker 2: If you don't even know their name, how can you
Speaker 2: know the facts that they have broken a law. And
Speaker 2: I have to say, the people who are cheering all
Speaker 2: this stuff, even if these people were known to be
Speaker 2: smuggling these drugs, they are still entitled to due process.
Speaker 2: How would you feel if the coastguard pulls over a boat,
Speaker 2: searches it, finds some drug contraband and just lines everybody
Speaker 2: up on the side of the boat and machine guns.
Speaker 2: Would that be justified. So they don't even go that
Speaker 2: far in this and these people are cheering it, shame
Speaker 2: on them. Marco Rubia on Wednesday voice support for the action,
Speaker 2: saying bottom line, these are drug boats. If people want
Speaker 2: to stop seeing drug boats blown up, then stop sending
Speaker 2: drugs to the US. This is this is eight year
Speaker 2: old type of rhetoric that's coming out of these people.
Speaker 2: And so then WND started posting the comments that were
Speaker 2: on x Why do all these peaceful, simple fishermen have
Speaker 2: sixty thousand dollars plus and motors on their fishing boats.
Speaker 2: That is clearly a bunch of poor fishermen just trying
Speaker 2: to feed their families. Seriously, everyone knows that you need
Speaker 2: three outboard motors to catch the really fast fish. Why
Speaker 2: do we have a government that can do whatever it
Speaker 2: wishes and you think that it's not going to do
Speaker 2: that to you At some point in time, you never
Speaker 2: know if we're going to set up a system of
Speaker 2: declaring anybody that we point the finger at and say
Speaker 2: you are a domestic terrorist. Now I can execute you.
Speaker 2: So the same thing that Trump is doing when he
Speaker 2: says we've got an emergency. We've got an emergency about trade,
Speaker 2: we've got an emergency about co it. Now I can
Speaker 2: do anything I want. They can say we got an emergency,
Speaker 2: and I'm going to designate who the terrorists are. Oh,
Speaker 2: by the way, that's you. Now, I've been put on
Speaker 2: too many lists by the government by both Democrats and
Speaker 2: Republicans to not realize what this is about. And these
Speaker 2: fools who voted for this, who are cheering this kind
Speaker 2: of stuff, were involved with January the sixth, or they
Speaker 2: at least saw innocent people getting swept up in that
Speaker 2: January the sixth stuff. They pointed to them and said,
Speaker 2: you're a domestic terrorist. This was an insurrection. Those are false.
Speaker 2: You should never take this stuff at face value. We
Speaker 2: have to have restrictions on the government and a shame
Speaker 2: on WND for pushing this kind of stuff. So congrats, bro,
Speaker 2: we get it. You are killing random people without evidence
Speaker 2: of a crime, and then you're posting the kill cam
Speaker 2: as if it's a highlight reel. Said another, This administration
Speaker 2: is not one of peace. It is a typical regime
Speaker 2: change administration looking out for the neocons. Well, I agree
Speaker 2: with that comment. You're going to provide any evidence, arrest
Speaker 2: and try them like civilized countries do, or you're just
Speaker 2: going to kill whoever you please, same as every other
Speaker 2: warmongering regime in the American Empire. That's right, but then
Speaker 2: you have the people say keep going. Americans voted for this.
Speaker 2: I voted for this. They say, well, even if you
Speaker 2: were carrying drugs, even if they went through the due
Speaker 2: process and convicted them, there is no death penalty for that.
Speaker 2: There's only one drug associated death penalty that's there, and
Speaker 2: it has never been used by the federal government, and
Speaker 2: it's not for this kind of activity. So all of
Speaker 2: this is a phony war. All of this is as
Speaker 2: phony as the Canadian fentanyl epidemic that we were told.
Speaker 2: And of course you had people like Jack by Soviet
Speaker 2: who went to the Order, who went to this quiet
Speaker 2: little town at the border of the US and Canada, said, look,
Speaker 2: you know, there's no police dogs, there's no fence here.
Speaker 2: Anybody can walk anywhere they want to go in that
Speaker 2: horrible We've got freedom, We've got freedom for Canadians and Americans.
Speaker 2: How could we ever tolerate something like that? Jack? But
Speaker 2: Soviet is another one of these people like Tucker Carlson,
Speaker 2: who's been heavily involved in the intelligence community and been
Speaker 2: groomed and promoted by Alex Jones to become a large
Speaker 2: figure in his own right. So Trump has unleashed the
Speaker 2: CIA in Venezuela, now authorizing the CIA for direct operation
Speaker 2: inside of the country, a Freethought Project has a Phillip Garaldy,
Speaker 2: who used to be with the CIA, talks about how
Speaker 2: surprising it is to see this being done openly. Usually
Speaker 2: everything is a secret, you know, national security. That's why
Speaker 2: they created this kind of stuff. They created the veil
Speaker 2: of national security so they could do criminal, unethical, illegal
Speaker 2: things and not have to and hide it from people.
Speaker 2: It's always been about that. So Coumban administration is ramping
Speaker 2: up their military presence near Venezuela with bombers, navy warships,
Speaker 2: nuclear submarine. This is about going in and taking over
Speaker 2: the country. A bipartisan bill in the Senate would block
Speaker 2: Trump from going to war with Nezuela. This is introduced
Speaker 2: by Senators Ran Paul, Tim Kaine, and Adam Schiff. That's
Speaker 2: going to get Trump really angry. That's why Rand Paul
Speaker 2: was not He's got a bill to stop his war,
Speaker 2: and he did it with Adam Schiff. Again, Trump is
Speaker 2: making the worst of the worst. Look good, Tim Kain,
Speaker 2: the Hillary Clinton running mate, and Adam Schiff, of all things,
Speaker 2: require congressional authorization before the US went to war with Venezuela,
Speaker 2: which is the right thing to do. So South American's kine.
Speaker 3: A bill to require the President to get the.
Speaker 2: Approval of the call the Constitution.
Speaker 12: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I thought we already had that in law already.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. We have the Constitution and they swear
Speaker 2: to uphold it. But then you occasionally have to put
Speaker 2: out another bill that says and oh, we really mean
Speaker 2: it this time, you know. So this is the I
Speaker 2: guess we really mean at this time resolution. So they said,
Speaker 2: Americans don't want to send there. This is Tim Kaine statement,
Speaker 2: Americans don't want to send their sons and daughters into
Speaker 2: more wars, especially wars that carry a serious risk of
Speaker 2: significant destabilization and of massive new waves of migration into
Speaker 2: our hemisphere. Well, that's another way to look at it.
Speaker 2: You go into war torn Venezuela, what's going to be
Speaker 2: the next thing. You're going to wind up having the
Speaker 2: country flooded with Venezuela and refugees that we have created.
Speaker 2: Paul said that the American people do not want to
Speaker 2: be dragged into endless war with Venezuela without public debate
Speaker 2: or vote. We had to defend what the Constitution demands
Speaker 2: deliberation before war. The resolution was introduced on October seventeen
Speaker 2: will force a vote within ten days, meaning that it
Speaker 2: could happen as early as next week. What is that
Speaker 2: like next Tuesday, twenty seventh. Americans can contact their senators
Speaker 2: and urge them to support it is Senate Joint Resolution
Speaker 2: SJ Resolution ninety SJ Resolution ninety if you call him
Speaker 2: and ask him to support that. The bill comes as
Speaker 2: US continues escalating its military campaign in the Caribbean by
Speaker 2: bombing even more alleged boats drug running votes. Earlier this month,
Speaker 2: Theate voted on a bill that would have prevented more
Speaker 2: US strikes on boats without congressional approval, but it failed
Speaker 2: by a vote of forty eight to fifty one. Paul
Speaker 2: was only one of two Republicans who supported the measure,
Speaker 2: as he has been very critical of the bombing campaign.
Speaker 2: He said this week that the extra judicial executions at
Speaker 2: sea quote go against all of our tradition. You really
Speaker 2: need to know someone's name, at least you need to
Speaker 2: have to accuse them of something. As I said before,
Speaker 2: this is the civil asset forfeiture of life, because you
Speaker 2: don't have to know somebody's name or accuse them of
Speaker 2: anything to steal their property. Under the drug war, well,
Speaker 2: I guess now we've reached the point where you can
Speaker 2: take their life without knowing their name or accusing them
Speaker 2: of any wrongdoing, let alone convicting them of it. And
Speaker 2: even if you were to convict them of it, there
Speaker 2: is no law that says we get to kill people
Speaker 2: for that. So Free Thought Project says, brace yourself. There
Speaker 2: is another regime change war that is coming, and all
Speaker 2: this is happening. Well, Trump the most double minded person
Speaker 2: I've ever seen in history. He's boasting about this Venezuelan action,
Speaker 2: threatening anybody who opposes them. At the same time he
Speaker 2: keeps talking about getting the Nobel Peace Prize. It's the
Speaker 2: strangest thing that is. He's an absolute idiot, comments Jim's seven.
Speaker 6: Thank you very much, you appreciate the sport says Trump
Speaker 6: being the best pres is equivalent to Beyonce being country
Speaker 6: Artist of the Year.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I think she's posing to be something that doesn't
Speaker 2: really fit her. And of course we know that Trump
Speaker 2: is the biggest rhino ever of all time.
Speaker 6: Beyonce is I saw that picture of her, and I
Speaker 6: just I'm not intimately familiar with what Beyonce looks like
Speaker 6: at any given time, but I just have this vague idea.
Speaker 6: Oh you know, she's a black woman. I saw that.
Speaker 6: She's like, this is a white woman. This is a
Speaker 6: white woman. She has turned herself into a white woman.
Speaker 6: The blonde hair, the bleached skin. You have tried to
Speaker 6: make yourself white.
Speaker 3: The Michael Jackson, she got that same skin problem exactly.
Speaker 6: She's got the vitalago North American house Tipo. Movies are
Speaker 6: now nothing more than glorified cartoons. CGI and now AI crap.
Speaker 6: It's become really bad. I'm not a CGI hater hater.
Speaker 6: I think it has its time and place. You can
Speaker 6: use it for certain things, but when you're using it
Speaker 6: to construct the entire movie, everything just feels kind of
Speaker 6: weightless and yah, it's like a video game. Yeah, the
Speaker 6: good use of CGI again. I'm gonna plug one of
Speaker 6: my favorite movies, something like Pacific Rim. Giant mex Versus
Speaker 6: Giant Monsters. You can't go wrong, lots of fun, Pacific Rim,
Speaker 6: great movie.
Speaker 2: Well, I like AI for memes, but it's another level
Speaker 2: over doing photoshop or something like that. They're going to
Speaker 2: try and make it illegal because it is very effective
Speaker 2: and powerful. You'll never take Yeah, it'd be illegal for us,
Speaker 2: just like the Alfred Hitchcock thing, right, that's covered under
Speaker 2: satire and your fair use. But of course all the
Speaker 2: lawyers that I talked to you said, you can't afford
Speaker 2: to fight this, that you can't win even though you're
Speaker 2: in the right with this type of stuff. And Trump
Speaker 2: knows that. That's why he's doing his lawfare against New
Speaker 2: York Times against Wall Street Journal. But I think he's
Speaker 2: going to get his comeuppance in those two because they're
Speaker 2: gonna they've got the money to fight him on this,
Speaker 2: and he doesn't have a leg to stand on. It's
Speaker 2: just the same kind of political persecution that he suffered unfairly,
Speaker 2: and he's now going to do that to other people.
Speaker 2: This is why we keep spiraling down as a society.
Speaker 2: Everybody does this, what about ism, It's just well, they
Speaker 2: did it, so now we're going to do it. So
Speaker 2: we're going to take that precedent and we're going to
Speaker 2: build on it. And it's just constantly spiraling and ratcheting down.
Speaker 6: Christian constitutional conservative Trumpney to band south Park is similar
Speaker 6: to China's banning Winnie the Pooh film after comparison suppreciated
Speaker 6: President Ji.
Speaker 2: I got to say, though South Park is a lot
Speaker 2: more offensive than winning the home Yeah, oh bother.
Speaker 6: Karen Garpenter twenty seven. Of course, you can find Karring
Speaker 6: Carpenter on Knights of the Storm during their program as well.
Speaker 6: Check out Nights of the Storm dot com for more
Speaker 6: info and impartial and exact execution of law sounds like
Speaker 6: AI Defy Tyrants seventeen seventy six. The government's divide and
Speaker 6: conquer plan has worked perfectly. Both sides are demanding a
Speaker 6: tyrannical king to punish the other side, and the rest
Speaker 6: of us who aren't fooled by the government are caught
Speaker 6: in the middle. There's very few of us, you see.
Speaker 6: The problem is one of the main issues is the
Speaker 6: other side does need to be punished. So I'm of
Speaker 6: the opinion personally, yeah, the left does need a spanking,
Speaker 6: Like we need to take these people out back and
Speaker 6: give them a little bit of a whooping and be like,
Speaker 6: you don't get to do this again. No more industrial
Speaker 6: murder of babies, no more trans in kids. And if
Speaker 6: you try this again, there's gonna be some serious consequences.
Speaker 6: You don't just get to murder, you know, a few
Speaker 6: million babies and go all right, we can be friends.
Speaker 6: We can we'll put it beside us. No, No, it.
Speaker 2: All matters how you do it, though the means that
Speaker 2: you use is very important, very important.
Speaker 3: I think, like going forward, it should be made illegal.
Speaker 3: Same with things like these anti thought riots in the past,
Speaker 3: they should have been arrested the people that were actually
Speaker 3: causing the violence. They didn't want to do that so
Speaker 3: that they could create the anti thought problem.
Speaker 2: Yeah, what Trump is doing in terms of his narrative
Speaker 2: about these cities being on fire and all the rest
Speaker 2: of this stuff, it's like that was actually five years ago.
Speaker 2: That was true five years ago, and when it was
Speaker 2: true five years ago, he did nothing about it. Now
Speaker 2: here he is five years later, knew that he didn't
Speaker 2: do anything about it for whatever reason, and now he's
Speaker 2: going to pretend he's going to litigate that as if
Speaker 2: it was happening now. It's like, no, it's a we
Speaker 2: don't have a time machine. It's back to the future.
Speaker 6: Sadly, no matter how fast we go, we're not going
Speaker 6: to see anything serious.
Speaker 3: And as for Karen Carpenter's comment a moment ago about
Speaker 3: an impartial execution of law, sounds like AI. The problem
Speaker 3: is the AI is going to do whatever the programmers
Speaker 3: set it to do. AI isn't rule by you know,
Speaker 3: a perfectly impartial things. They're going to try and make
Speaker 3: it out to be it's ruled by the programmers who
Speaker 3: you aren't going to see. It's ruled by the people
Speaker 3: that are maintaining it.
Speaker 2: Yes, it's an illusion, and but that's going to be
Speaker 2: the illusion that they sell. And it's going to be
Speaker 2: easy to do it. When we see that the humans
Speaker 2: that have been running the government are so obviously biased
Speaker 2: in partisan in what they do, people are going to
Speaker 2: clamor for that, thinking that they're going to get objectivity.
Speaker 2: They're not going to get it.
Speaker 3: Ted Dune had a great line about that. I can't
Speaker 3: remember exactly how it was phrased, but you know they
Speaker 3: had in their world building how ais were made illegal
Speaker 3: and building an AI could get your planet nuked from orbit,
Speaker 3: and there was something like in the past people built
Speaker 3: machines to offload their thinking, to to be ruled by
Speaker 3: those that told the machines what to do. It was
Speaker 3: well praised. I'm sorry, I'll look it up.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's fine. Yeah, And of course there's a large
Speaker 2: group of people that have come together to say we
Speaker 2: need to stop AI. At this point, and it's across
Speaker 2: a lot of different very well known influencers and anything
Speaker 2: out there trying to stop it. I don't think they're
Speaker 2: going to stop it. The reality is is that you
Speaker 2: can use government for some things, but it's insufficient for
Speaker 2: most issues. Just like with a drug war, it wouldn't
Speaker 2: be nice if we could just prohibit these drugs and
Speaker 2: make them go away, but it doesn't work that way.
Speaker 2: The real world does not work that way. You can't
Speaker 2: put an edict out there and say, well, I don't
Speaker 2: like guns, so we're just gonna make all the guns vanish. Now,
Speaker 2: none of that stuff works. All of these and tractical
Speaker 2: problems that we have, whether it's drug addiction or what's
Speaker 2: happening with AI and these other things, they are all
Speaker 2: spiritual problems. And if we have lost our connection to
Speaker 2: what is virtually to what is, and we don't care
Speaker 2: about virtue, we don't care about a standard of morality,
Speaker 2: and we have thrown God out of our country and
Speaker 2: out of our institutions, there isn't going to be any
Speaker 2: way that we're going to save it. With a government
Speaker 2: that is going to come in with guns drawn, that's
Speaker 2: just going to add to the problem son of.
Speaker 6: Lord one three three seven. No one accepted into the
Speaker 6: CIA can be good.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't trust people.
Speaker 6: Hi, Boost just say it. Tucker Trump did a rug
Speaker 6: pull on all of his voters. Come on, Tucker, you
Speaker 6: can say it. Say it, Tucker, say it. Southern Citizen
Speaker 6: Trump was allowed to be installed to make people think
Speaker 6: elections are real.
Speaker 2: Yeah, get them to trust the institutions. And we've heard
Speaker 2: that over and over again. Hear from RFK Junior. You know,
Speaker 2: I'm here to restore trust in the institutions, Telsey Gabbart,
Speaker 2: I'm here to restore trusting. So she's there to get
Speaker 2: you to trust the CIA, the NSA and FBI and
Speaker 2: institutions like that. And he's there to get you to
Speaker 2: trust the CDC and the FDA, those those Elk. That's
Speaker 2: what trust Crump is about. He's about a building a
Speaker 2: fake trust.
Speaker 3: And that's also what banning these AI things would accomplish.
Speaker 3: There's the only thing that can discredit the government with
Speaker 3: an AI video generator is a good guy with an
Speaker 3: AI video generators, they'll try and build trust in these videos.
Speaker 3: While they will have the tools to create whatever they want.
Speaker 2: They a bad AI generator with a good AI generator exactly.
Speaker 6: I like that land Southern citizen read that one Kingdom
Speaker 6: law responding a ton of Lord. Yeah, you're right about
Speaker 6: them not wanting good people in the CI. I know
Speaker 6: a woman whose son left the CI back in the
Speaker 6: sixties because he couldn't do what they wanted him to do,
Speaker 6: which was against his conscience.
Speaker 2: They do the same thing with the military too, kicking
Speaker 2: people out left and right. Yeah, a lot of people
Speaker 2: talking about you know, look at this guy who he
Speaker 2: got put in this position of being had a Southern
Speaker 2: command and he left this job, this Admiral Halsey, only
Speaker 2: one year into what is typically a three year thing.
Speaker 2: It's like, what's going on with that? Did he feel
Speaker 2: like he was being set up with these war crimes
Speaker 2: as you're not on board with this? Did he criticize
Speaker 2: it and they gave him an option to resign quietly
Speaker 2: and they wouldn't make a big deal out of it.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 6: Tucker shadow Boxer says Tucker should reveal the truth about
Speaker 6: COVID injections that I would believe him. Yeah, or Building
Speaker 6: seven even perhaps what is.
Speaker 3: Popular and everyone knows about it, then he'll get out
Speaker 3: in front of it.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah, now that they've completely put in the
Speaker 2: police and surveillance state and even run the second shoe
Speaker 2: to drop, which is all the COVID stuff off at
Speaker 2: nine to eleven. Now Tucker's going to do a documentary
Speaker 2: about nine to eleven, and I imagine there's going to
Speaker 2: be a lot of fence sitting on that. I mean,
Speaker 2: he actively shut down people who wanted to come on
Speaker 2: his He would invite them on just so he could
Speaker 2: mock them. He wouldn't show the and I've played the
Speaker 2: clip for you.
Speaker 6: I don't know if you can show that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, can't show that, can't show that. Well, I brought
Speaker 2: the clip and he'd say, all these people they just ask,
Speaker 2: you know, what is the melting point of steel? And
Speaker 2: all this. Well they had a point in terms of
Speaker 2: asking that and asking why three buildings follow their own
Speaker 2: footprint when only two of them were hit.
Speaker 6: The thing that always gets me is you'll ask what's
Speaker 6: the melting point of steel and they'll go, oh, well
Speaker 6: it was weakened. So yeah, if it's weakened, then the
Speaker 6: building is going to go mm hmm over like this.
Speaker 6: It's not going to collapse straight down into its footprint.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we've seen pictures.
Speaker 6: Now it's amazing to me, how stupid. I'm sorry i
Speaker 6: interrupt you, but it's how stupid so many people are,
Speaker 6: how they are incapable of following the trail of logic.
Speaker 6: Just if it's weakened, what happens? Does steel collapse like this?
Speaker 2: No? No, no, it just disappears vaporizes. Yeah, we've seen
Speaker 2: pictures of buildings that have burned for several days that
Speaker 2: were steel framed, and like you're saying, Travis, they were bent, okay,
Speaker 2: but they didn't fall.
Speaker 6: It's you know, it starts to warp the frame, they
Speaker 6: start to move.
Speaker 2: It burned everything except for the steel frame. Steel frame
Speaker 2: is still there and it moves over a little bit.
Speaker 2: But you know, again, none of this stuff makes any sense.
Speaker 2: It's just like the magic bullet of the JFK assassination.
Speaker 6: Maybe it was actually the magic bullet that took down
Speaker 6: Building seven. It was still bouncing around. Yeah, it made
Speaker 6: its way from Dallas up to New York.
Speaker 3: There was a debunking thing. I think it was done
Speaker 3: by MythBusters where they had a steel bar directly over
Speaker 3: a fire of jet fuel and then just left that
Speaker 3: for a while. And then it bends in the middle
Speaker 3: of the Oh look look see it's proved. It's just
Speaker 3: we've debunked it.
Speaker 6: I'm debugging.
Speaker 3: I'm going to debunk as though. You know, the focused
Speaker 3: heat causing a slight bend proves it.
Speaker 6: Yeah, it's amazing how many midwits and morons watched MythBusters
Speaker 6: and they're like, well, I'm basically an engineer. Now I
Speaker 6: have my degree from TV. Thank you very much, minute
Speaker 6: man Militia. This guy Tucker is good at seeming articulate
Speaker 6: into eligent, but he hasn't said a damn thing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it'll kind of set on the fence. Well, I
Speaker 2: don't know what they'd say about that.
Speaker 6: Anytime you listen to a politician or a professional news
Speaker 6: anchor talk, you come away with that sort of feeling.
Speaker 6: They'll ask them a simple yes or no question, and
Speaker 6: they spend ten minutes and they say neither yes nor no.
Speaker 2: That's right. So you get those jobs and keep them.
Speaker 6: GDP thre three point thirty. Trump has done more to
Speaker 6: further the deep state agendas than any Democrat could even
Speaker 6: dream of defy tyrants seventeen seventy six. Tucker is proof
Speaker 6: that even controlled op can say the right things.
Speaker 2: That's right. Everyone, Well, yeah, you have to say the
Speaker 2: right things or to be the controlled op that's a
Speaker 2: key part of it. You tell the truth for a
Speaker 2: long time, and then when it becomes really important, then
Speaker 2: they activate you. Right, it's like a sleeper cell.
Speaker 6: It's time for all good men to come to the
Speaker 6: aid of the party.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's like, you know, the old things that
Speaker 2: they would have during the Cold War. They talk about, well,
Speaker 2: we're going to send some Soviet agents and they're going
Speaker 2: to you know, this married couple is going to come
Speaker 2: and live as Americans in the US for quite a while,
Speaker 2: and then at some point you activated. But now, I
Speaker 2: don't know if any of that was real, if that
Speaker 2: was just a Hollywood thing, but I can imagine stuff
Speaker 2: like that would be real. And so you know, they're
Speaker 2: going to do all the right things and be model
Speaker 2: citizens until that day they want to turn them into saboteurs.
Speaker 2: And that's the way the controlled opposition stuff works. That's
Speaker 2: why when people say, well, look at all the stuff
Speaker 2: that he told us that was true, and look at
Speaker 2: how he woke me up and all the rest of stuff,
Speaker 2: and it's like yeah, and then what do you do
Speaker 2: when the chips were down in twenty twenty, when they
Speaker 2: really brought this thing in and the other shoe for
Speaker 2: the police surveillance state dropped. What did he do then?
Speaker 2: Maybe that was his purpose to gain your trust so
Speaker 2: he could stab you in the back. He'd get behind
Speaker 2: you so I could stamby in the back.
Speaker 6: Audi, Mr r says Americans, our country is in trouble. Trump,
Speaker 6: Argentina is dang. It's dang. Got to focus on Argentina first.
Speaker 6: Jerry Alatallo, George Washington Farewell address in proportion. As the
Speaker 6: structure of government gives force to public opinion, it is
Speaker 6: essential that public opinion should be enlightened.
Speaker 3: Yes, and that's why they built the government schools to
Speaker 3: enlighten it.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 6: Any dark agent, Yeah, that's one of those things. Just
Speaker 6: the average American should not wield any power. They absolutely
Speaker 6: should not be given any say in anything. They're too stupid,
Speaker 6: they are dangerous, should not be empowered. Southern citizen Ronald
Speaker 6: Reagan was the biggest cocaine dealer in the world. Well,
Speaker 6: of course he had the Gucci belt. You've seen the pictures.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, when you look at the fact that
Speaker 2: they're the CIA, and you know Ron Contra and all
Speaker 2: the rest of the stuff. You know, during the crack
Speaker 2: cocaine they created it. They did that to fund their
Speaker 2: war in Central America. So yeah, you're absolutely.
Speaker 6: Right, Southern Citizen, good user name. All while Reagan's wife
Speaker 6: pushed just Say No to Drugs campaign.
Speaker 2: Just say No to war, just say no to just
Speaker 2: say no.
Speaker 6: To Nancy Reagan. Yeah, Audi m R. R. Tucker's response
Speaker 6: to the c comment was a classic reaction from a deceiver,
Speaker 6: anger when confronted with the truth.
Speaker 2: And classically evasive. You know, he was a great dad.
Speaker 2: Whatever he did for a living right, so did not
Speaker 2: deny it. He did not did not deny it, did
Speaker 2: not agree with it directly. But you know, well, whatever
Speaker 2: he did, you know, don't you say another thing about him,
Speaker 2: or I'm going to kick your butt.
Speaker 3: Your father was CIA. I'm sorry, I can love. I
Speaker 3: can neither confirm nor deny that accusation.
Speaker 2: Being the offspring is CAI. I know exactly what to say.
Speaker 6: Yeah, GDP through three thirty. CI has controlled the media
Speaker 6: for decades. Trump made a CIA controlled parade on TV
Speaker 6: long before he ran for the potus puppet position. Defy
Speaker 6: tire in seventeen seventy six. Without the War on drugs,
Speaker 6: there would be no drug cartels, drug traffickers, or drug dealers.
Speaker 2: That's right. We wouldn't have civil wants at for for sure.
Speaker 2: This absurd fiction of charging inanimate objects with crime and
Speaker 2: never charging their owners and then telling the owners, well,
Speaker 2: if you want to get it back, you'll have to
Speaker 2: take civil action. You'll have to sue us to get
Speaker 2: your property back because your property has committed a crime.
Speaker 6: Defy tyrants, seventeen seventy six. CIA smuggles drugs into America.
Speaker 6: Whistle blowers prove it, that's right, you can. Gary Webb
Speaker 6: was the guy that broke a lot of that, talked
Speaker 6: about it, got killed for it. There's the movie with
Speaker 6: Jeremy Renner, Shoot the Messenger, and there's just lots of
Speaker 6: documentation articles about that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, very good movie.
Speaker 6: Yeah, is a good movie.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Unfortunately, I think they got the ending wrong. I
Speaker 2: don't think that he committed suicide. He was not distressed.
Speaker 2: He had put his life back together again. He was
Speaker 2: fighting back and you see the sober and over again.
Speaker 2: He was very balanced. He had come on he'd done
Speaker 2: an interview with Alex and he was a very balanced person.
Speaker 2: He was not, you know, mentally distressed or anything like that.
Speaker 2: I mean he had been in the past, but he
Speaker 2: had overcome that. And so yeah, he.
Speaker 6: Was starting to win. He was starting to be recognized.
Speaker 2: That's right. I had been vindicated in all this stuff,
Speaker 2: and he was rebuilding his life and you know, advancing
Speaker 2: in terms of journalism and that type of thing. And
Speaker 2: then he supposedly commits suicide. He didn't do it when
Speaker 2: the chips were down. Yeah, they when it was succeeding.
Speaker 6: Waits right until it would be ridiculous, well more ridiculous.
Speaker 6: Defy tyrants, war on drugs, war on terror, war on COVID, CONVID,
Speaker 6: all bs. So called wars are wars on freedom.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and wars on the American people. Yeah. And they're
Speaker 2: at war with the Constitution. That's why I had Trump
Speaker 2: burning the Constitution and his apocalypse. Now get up that
Speaker 2: he put himself in. Let's start with that.
Speaker 6: Jersey Boy eighty nine, The Jersey Boys. Those are the
Speaker 6: guys that do that. Oh what didn't I that's them right.
Speaker 2: Well, that was that was the name of the play
Speaker 2: they put together. Yeah, okay, yeah.
Speaker 6: Jersey Boy eighty nine, Thank you very much. Says David,
Speaker 6: would you interview Jimmy from Brooklyn? Extremely informed and it
Speaker 6: is called into big conservative radio shows for forty years
Speaker 6: about the fake collapse of the Soviet Union and of
Speaker 6: the book I mentioned.
Speaker 2: So we'll take a look at it.
Speaker 6: Yeah, Jimmy from Brooklyn.
Speaker 2: I assume I don't know how to find him. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it might be.
Speaker 6: More than one Jimmy in Brooklyn. I saw that Curtis
Speaker 6: siewa rage quit off of w ABC, which is a
Speaker 6: big channel. I mean it's the ABC News that's there
Speaker 6: in New York. He had one of his co hosts
Speaker 6: was telling him he needed to drop out of the race.
Speaker 6: You know, I don't know much about Curtis Sleiewe, but
Speaker 6: he seems to be a person who is who has integrity.
Speaker 2: He really believes what he says he believes. I don't
Speaker 2: think according to the polls, if polls are right, he
Speaker 2: doesn't have a chance. But you know, people in New
Speaker 2: York are going to get Mom Danny, and they're going
Speaker 2: to get him good and hard. And I think it's
Speaker 2: exactly what welcome to hell. He's got you for four years,
Speaker 2: that's what they want, so what they deserve, and it's
Speaker 2: going to be a lesson to everybody else to watch
Speaker 2: what happens there. Thank you joining us. Have a good
Speaker 2: day the common man. They created common Core and dumbed
Speaker 2: down our children. They created common past, track and control us.
Speaker 2: They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 2: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 2: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 2: created in the image of God. That is what we
Speaker 2: have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Speaker 2: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 2: to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 2: It's time to turn that around and expose what they
Speaker 2: want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
Speaker 2: find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Speaker 2: Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
Speaker 2: please keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com