Speaker 1: This is Dan Kaplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. Yeah, and the
Speaker 1: American Way is winning now, particularly since election Day, since
Speaker 1: Inauguration Day, has taken off like a rocket, and there's
Speaker 1: something to celebrate each and every day. Glad you hear
Speaker 1: the work far from finished obviously, right, Colorado for example,
Speaker 1: still deep blue and lots to be done here, but
Speaker 1: very encouraging now. I do think we're at tipping point
Speaker 1: in American history, and of course it's not guaranteed have
Speaker 1: to keep it going, but Trump doing his part, so
Speaker 1: we'll enjoy.
Speaker 2: All of that together. Quick view at the show today.
Speaker 3: I've got to sink my teeth into this whole idea
Speaker 3: of birthright citizenship, because the idea that the Founders ever
Speaker 3: would have intended that virtually anybody who just happens to
Speaker 3: be born in America is now an American citizen and
Speaker 3: a citizen of the state in which they.
Speaker 2: Were born is crazy.
Speaker 3: There's no way that's what the founders intended, and so
Speaker 3: we'll talk about the federal court. I believe it was
Speaker 3: a federal Court judge out of Seattle who today enjoined
Speaker 3: put on hold, you know, President Trump's executive order on
Speaker 3: birthright citizenship, saying no, we're not going to do that
Speaker 3: anymore in America.
Speaker 2: And it was expected that a court somewhere would put
Speaker 2: it on hold.
Speaker 3: But that's fine, because we needed to get to the
Speaker 3: US Supreme Court. Yes, I wish President Trump's order would
Speaker 3: simply be honored by everybody and upheld because I think
Speaker 3: he is clearly President Trump is correct, but as a
Speaker 3: practical matter, it needs to get to this US Supreme Court,
Speaker 3: which I believe, without any doubt will say no, the
Speaker 3: US Constitution does not provide for automatic birthright citizenship, particularly
Speaker 3: for children who are born to somebody here illegally. So well,
Speaker 3: we'll get into that in some real depth. But when
Speaker 3: you step back and really look at it, it's kind
Speaker 3: of a crazy idea, right that our founders would have
Speaker 3: intended that first, Why in the world would you do that? Obviously,
Speaker 3: the Fourteenth Amendment was solely one hundred percent focused on
Speaker 3: writing one of the worst wrongs in world history, slavery.
Speaker 3: And it was focused on making sure that people who
Speaker 3: had been enslaved in this nation, that black people who'd
Speaker 3: been enslaved in this nation, what would be citizens of
Speaker 3: the United States of America. There's no rational argument out
Speaker 3: there that our founders intended when they passed the fourteenth
Speaker 3: Amendment to somehow say, yeah, anybody here illegally from any country. Hey,
Speaker 3: if you can get a child born here, they're automatically
Speaker 3: US citizens. There's no rational basis for believing that was
Speaker 3: their intent. So anyway, we'll break it down in more detail,
Speaker 3: and now is the time to do it right. That
Speaker 3: it's a real issue and it's tracking toward the US
Speaker 3: Supreme Court. The big question is how quickly. Let's hope,
Speaker 3: very quickly, but much more to talk about today. What
Speaker 3: a joyous day in America, not just because a good
Speaker 3: thing was done by President Trump in pardoning the pro
Speaker 3: life activist who had been convicted wrongfully politically motivated by
Speaker 3: the Biden administration. Some in prison, including a young African
Speaker 3: American mother with young children. But so part of it
Speaker 3: is celebrating that the right thing has now been done.
Speaker 3: The other part of it is celebrating that this very
Speaker 3: evil practice in America is in the process of being corrected.
Speaker 3: And what I mean by the evil practice is.
Speaker 2: Unequal treatment under the law.
Speaker 3: And that is what, more than I'd say anything else,
Speaker 3: retins the very existence of America. I mean, we're founded
Speaker 3: around the idea of equal treatment under the law. And
Speaker 3: you look at this Biden administration, you look at the left,
Speaker 3: you look at the left in Colorado and their commitment
Speaker 3: to unequal treatment under the law that Hey, if you're
Speaker 3: a conservative, we're going to look for a way to
Speaker 3: throw you in jail. And if you haven't violated any crime,
Speaker 3: then we're going to convict you anyway.
Speaker 2: And if you've done things.
Speaker 3: That we would not even charge a liberal for, well
Speaker 3: we're going to charge you and we're going to sentence
Speaker 3: you to the maximum.
Speaker 2: And if you happen to.
Speaker 3: Be part of the favored political class and you spout
Speaker 3: the quote right ideas meaning lefty ideas, well, then we're
Speaker 3: not even going to think of charging you, let alone
Speaker 3: convicting you, let alone sentencing you the same way we
Speaker 3: sentence conservatives.
Speaker 2: So when we talk about threats.
Speaker 3: To America, that this unequal treatment under the law is
Speaker 3: probably the most toxic threat out there. And we saw
Speaker 3: it on full display when it came to the persecution
Speaker 3: of pro lifers, because you would have liberals engaging in
Speaker 3: all of this different type of criminal conduct, they'd never
Speaker 3: even think of charging them. By the way, you want
Speaker 3: to look at a local example, Ryan, unless I miss something,
Speaker 3: and I admit i've I've been very busy in my
Speaker 3: law practice preparing for trial. But unless I miss something,
Speaker 3: whoever burned down the Life Choice's pregnancy center.
Speaker 2: Up in northern Colorado.
Speaker 3: I think they're still happily prancing around out there free,
Speaker 3: aren't they.
Speaker 2: While we've had.
Speaker 3: Grandma's and young moms imprisoned by the Biden administration for
Speaker 3: protesting at abortion clinics. So are you telling me that
Speaker 3: the Biden administration, with the vast resources and immense talent
Speaker 3: in dj it, couldn't track down whoever lit up that
Speaker 3: pregnancy center to protest the fall of Roe? Are you
Speaker 3: really telling me that not a chance, They just didn't
Speaker 3: want to. They clearly didn't want to. And that's what
Speaker 3: I mean by unequal treatment under the law is you
Speaker 3: cannot be out there prosecuting your political opponents for things
Speaker 3: you will not prosecute your political allies for you can't
Speaker 3: do that. That destroys America. That is unequal treatment under
Speaker 3: the law. But that's exactly what we've had under the
Speaker 3: Biden administration. So ding dong, the witch is dead on
Speaker 3: that one. Because you want to talk about how scary
Speaker 3: We were talking about it the other day, right, Ryan,
Speaker 3: that witch from the Wizard of Oz, How scary she was,
Speaker 3: how remarkable there was for a movie produced back in
Speaker 3: the Stone Age.
Speaker 2: But you want to talk about the.
Speaker 3: Wicked Witch threatening America. Yeah, that that wicked witch is.
Speaker 2: Unequal treatment under the law.
Speaker 3: And that's what the left was all about, you know,
Speaker 3: prosecute conservatives for things they never prosecute liberals for, and
Speaker 3: then max sentences, max punishment. A nation can't exist that way.
Speaker 3: A nation can't continue that way. So once again American
Speaker 3: people and Donald Trump's saving us from that. But will
Speaker 3: it be long term depends on what happens after this term.
Speaker 3: Right have we ever seen Ryan, You're too young to
Speaker 3: have long term perspective, But have we ever seen any
Speaker 3: president get off to this fastest start?
Speaker 4: No, not at all, not even close, Not even Trump
Speaker 4: the first time around. Oh yeah, the first time around,
Speaker 4: God love them. I mean that was a blank show right.
Speaker 3: I mean, God love him for winning and saving the country,
Speaker 3: but you've got Amarosa running around the right White House. Scaramucci,
Speaker 3: it was wild, wild West, a lot of clowns and
Speaker 3: amazing he was able to accomplish what he did in
Speaker 3: the face of the coup attempt and everything else. But
Speaker 3: now they're coming in like a machine. That's why again,
Speaker 3: I know we're beating a dead horse here, but this
Speaker 3: second term is going to be so much more productive
Speaker 3: than a consecutive second term would have been because he's
Speaker 3: had all this time to think about you know, what
Speaker 3: he would do if he got that chance. So it's
Speaker 3: going to be amazing. And uya never anything close to
Speaker 3: this fast start.
Speaker 2: So that's all on the agenda to day.
Speaker 3: Do want to kick around now that the President's confirm
Speaker 3: that he's about to release, we're.
Speaker 2: Told the rest of them.
Speaker 3: We'll see if anything's held back, and that's something will
Speaker 3: be I'm not saying nefariously, but you know the remaining
Speaker 3: JFK assassination files rfk MLK assassination files.
Speaker 2: And I got to tell you I'm a young man,
Speaker 2: but I.
Speaker 3: Vividly, vividly like it was thirty seconds ago. Remember each
Speaker 3: of those days, each of those moments when I found out,
Speaker 3: and I can't wait to dig into all of that stuff.
Speaker 2: What do you think it's going to show.
Speaker 5: It's hard to know. We don't know what we don't know.
Speaker 4: At this point, I think hopefully it'll confirm or subside
Speaker 4: any of the conspiracy theories. And they are vast out there,
Speaker 4: as you are well aware, Dan, and you lived through it.
Speaker 4: You were a very young boy when it happened, but
Speaker 4: you know everything that happened in the aftermath, and it
Speaker 4: was filling a void of information. And that's what happens.
Speaker 4: People are going to kind of make up their own
Speaker 4: details if they're not provided them by this government that
Speaker 4: we've grown to distrust.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that's a remarkable thing just in my short lifetime,
Speaker 3: is as a boy growing up and then a young man,
Speaker 3: there being an awful lot of trust for government. Not
Speaker 3: totally blind and all that, but put an awful lot
Speaker 3: of trust for government to the point now where I
Speaker 3: think anybody who just kind of largely trusts government on
Speaker 3: its face is crazy, right, And what a transformation in America.
Speaker 3: Hopefully Trump will will help to start to write some
Speaker 3: of that in a healthy way. You never want an
Speaker 3: irrational trust. You never want an unearned trust. You want
Speaker 3: to get to the point where government's doing it so
Speaker 3: right that they've earned your trust.
Speaker 2: Eight five to five four.
Speaker 3: Zero five A two five five text d A N
Speaker 3: five seven seven through nine. Take a shot at all
Speaker 3: of that, And there's much more ahead in the show
Speaker 3: today as well, but let's start with that. It seems
Speaker 3: like it seems I could make for a segment or
Speaker 3: two write birthright citizenship, that the pardoning of the pro
Speaker 3: life activist. And then, by the way, do you really
Speaker 3: think the Biden administry couldn't figure out who burned down
Speaker 3: that pregnancy center up in northern Colorado that the day
Speaker 3: after Row was struck down?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Right, eight five five for zero five eight two five
Speaker 3: five the number. What do you think these soon to
Speaker 3: be released files will show about who really was behind
Speaker 3: the murders of JFK, MLK and RFK.
Speaker 2: You're on the Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 6: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 7: To port all immigrants here illegally. I will note the
Speaker 7: ABC News Paul ask about undocumented immigrants, so we have
Speaker 7: slightly different questions, but these were all taken within the
Speaker 7: last month. And there's real uniformity here. That's what I
Speaker 7: really think.
Speaker 2: You see.
Speaker 7: You see real uniformity all immigrants who are here illegally
Speaker 7: fifty five percent of the New York Times, Marquette sixty
Speaker 7: four percent, CBS News fifty seven percent, ABC News with
Speaker 7: a slightly different question fifty six percent.
Speaker 2: So what you're seeing essentially.
Speaker 7: Here is very clear indication that a majority of Americans,
Speaker 7: in fact, when they're asked this one question, which I
Speaker 7: believe gets that the underlying feelings, do in fact want
Speaker 7: the port all immigrants who are here illegally.
Speaker 2: There's no arguing with.
Speaker 7: These different numbers because they're all essentially the same across
Speaker 7: four different posters.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that's MSNBC. Boy, I would love to see
Speaker 3: a Colorado pole on that. What do you think a
Speaker 3: Colorado pole on that would say?
Speaker 4: Just slight correction that it was CNN for Harry Enton, so,
Speaker 4: oh my bad, rather than MSBC. He's on with Kate Bolden.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 4: Here in Colorado, I think our numbers would be below
Speaker 4: the national average.
Speaker 2: Which I guess, pick a number, any number.
Speaker 4: Forty eight percent would favor the deportation of criminal aliens.
Speaker 3: Yeah, You're probably right, but still seismic landscape shifting. And
Speaker 3: this goes back to the point I made yesterday. I
Speaker 3: won't belabor it because I made it yesterday and I'll
Speaker 3: probably make it again tomorrow, which is that John Hickenlooper
Speaker 3: is vulnerable in Colorado when he votes against the Lake
Speaker 3: and Riley.
Speaker 2: I think about that.
Speaker 3: You've got a liberal network with a national poll uniformity
Speaker 3: across four poles, a strong ority of Americans want to
Speaker 3: deport everybody here illegally, and then the number slightly.
Speaker 2: Lower, i'd bet in Colorado.
Speaker 3: But then you got John Higginlooper, who votes against a
Speaker 3: bill that would have just said you deport the folks
Speaker 3: here illegally who've committed other crimes that, combined with other things,
Speaker 3: I think he is now vulnerable in Colorado. Eight five
Speaker 3: five forour zero five eight two five five the number.
Speaker 3: And while I don't think that strong national sentiment against
Speaker 3: illegal immigration is necessarily going to affect the US Supreme Court,
Speaker 3: I think the US Supreme Court would do this anyway.
Speaker 3: I do believe the US Supreme Court is going to
Speaker 3: loudly and clearly, as soon as the case gets there,
Speaker 3: say no, there is no birthright citizenship in America. It's
Speaker 3: madness to think the Founders ever intended that somebody here illegally,
Speaker 3: if they had a child born on American soil, would
Speaker 3: then have an American citizen.
Speaker 2: No, no way. The Founders intended that, I.
Speaker 4: Have a question from your legal perspective and just knowledge
Speaker 4: of this issue law, et cetera. So, if somebody's here illegally,
Speaker 4: a couple, and they have a baby, and their claim
Speaker 4: is that the child's born here, they're American. Okay, I'm
Speaker 4: going to walk you through a scenario. I want you
Speaker 4: to respond to it. A foreign national, not a citizen
Speaker 4: of this country, travels to the United States, does so
Speaker 4: legally with a passport. A pregnant woman is on this flight,
Speaker 4: goes to labor as they land, goes to an American hospital, delivers.
Speaker 5: Is that baby an American?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 5: The why not?
Speaker 2: Well, the reason being, I say no.
Speaker 3: If the Constitution's correctly interpreted right now under current law, yes,
Speaker 3: But but no, And here's why, because they're not subject
Speaker 3: to the jurisdiction thereof right under the meaning, under the
Speaker 3: meaning intended by the Founders. If you look back historically,
Speaker 3: what the Founders meant by this subject to the jurisdiction
Speaker 3: thereof language, was undivided loyalty to this nation. And if
Speaker 3: somebody is a citizen of another country, if somebody's.
Speaker 2: Here illgally, that is not the case.
Speaker 4: And if I reverse engineer it, John McCain was not
Speaker 4: born in this country. He was born in the Panama
Speaker 4: Canal zone. His father served in the military and was
Speaker 4: stationed there. And of course John McCain is an American,
Speaker 4: but that's the reverse scenario, and we acknowledge that his
Speaker 4: parents are Americans, delivered birth to John McCain, and even
Speaker 4: though he wasn't born in this country, he was an
Speaker 4: American citizen, right, And.
Speaker 2: So it just brings us back to the idea.
Speaker 3: And this is part of the Golden age I think
Speaker 3: that we're entering into right now with this Trump victory,
Speaker 3: and that is this opportunity to just step back. It's
Speaker 3: like the spell's been broken and enough people can now
Speaker 3: see the utter goofiness of so many things that have
Speaker 3: been beat into people as somehow political or legal gospel.
Speaker 3: The ultimate utter goofiness of thinking there's more than two genders, right,
Speaker 3: I mean, just nonsense like that, the goofiness of thinking
Speaker 3: that oh yeah, the Founders intended that if somebody here
Speaker 3: illegally has a child who's born here, they're automatically an
Speaker 3: American citizen. No, why in the world would the Founders
Speaker 3: ever do that. Why in the world would the Founders
Speaker 3: ever invite that problem incentivize illegal immigration.
Speaker 2: Nobody in the right mind would do that.
Speaker 3: Now, listen, if people want to have a separate public
Speaker 3: policy debate and argue that that should be the law
Speaker 3: of the land made by Congress, knock yourself out. But
Speaker 3: you aren't going to get many people who agree, right,
Speaker 3: because it's madness.
Speaker 4: Do you think, Dan, that Trump signed that executive order
Speaker 4: with the explicit intent that it would be challenged and
Speaker 4: brought to the Supreme Court so that Scotus would decide
Speaker 4: on it.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, and it's brilliant.
Speaker 3: I tell you, I don't want to get all wonky now,
Speaker 3: and you already know this, But one of the most
Speaker 3: encouraging things is when you start to look into these
Speaker 3: executive orders.
Speaker 2: This is not like something written on the back of
Speaker 2: a napkin at McDonald's.
Speaker 3: You know, these are really well thought out, very well written,
Speaker 3: put together type executive orders.
Speaker 2: The ones I've been able to see any substance on
Speaker 2: at this.
Speaker 3: Point, and it goes to your point, Ryan, that that
Speaker 3: this is part of a very carefully crafted strategy to
Speaker 3: get certain issues that they knew would be opposed and
Speaker 3: joined by this court, or that get them to the
Speaker 3: US Supreme Court as quickly as possible, while we've got
Speaker 3: a court that actually interprets the law rather than legislates.
Speaker 3: And so it's a very very well thought out plan.
Speaker 3: And I won't get into the weeds on this because
Speaker 3: it would be too hard to follow. Meaning this on
Speaker 3: a radio show, we get into too many layers that
Speaker 3: to get boring. But the executive order that Trump put
Speaker 3: together on DEI is legally brilliant. It's so carefully put together,
Speaker 3: it is very very well thought out, and it is
Speaker 3: a very very high likelihood of legal success.
Speaker 2: And being upheld.
Speaker 3: So I'm just telling you that these people have been
Speaker 3: working hard, they're smart, they're organized, and their.
Speaker 2: Positioned to win eight five two, five to five.
Speaker 3: The number text DN five seven seven thirty nine will
Speaker 3: get to some text as well. I'd love to hear
Speaker 3: somebody call and make the argument for birthrights citizenship, and
Speaker 3: I understand that people will need jerk just go to
Speaker 3: the first line of the fourteenth Amendment. Hey, if you're
Speaker 3: born in the US and you're subject to the jurisdiction
Speaker 3: thereof you're a US citizen. And I know everybody reverts
Speaker 3: back to that argument, but as a matter of law,
Speaker 3: it does not end there. As a matter of constitutional interpretation,
Speaker 3: you have to look at the true intent. You have
Speaker 3: to look at what those words actually meant at the time.
Speaker 3: But could anybody call the show, Ryan, Could anybody call
Speaker 3: this show and actually make a coach and argument in
Speaker 3: favor of an.
Speaker 2: Actual public policy?
Speaker 3: But yeah, if somebody just manages to get here illegally
Speaker 3: and have a child born here, they're automatically a US citizen, Right,
Speaker 3: Could anybody even hypothetically put together an argument in favor
Speaker 3: of that?
Speaker 5: Doubtful.
Speaker 2: I don't think anybody ever could. So I think this
Speaker 2: is going to get to Scotus.
Speaker 3: Let's hope it's rocket docketed, because it needs to be
Speaker 3: hit five.
Speaker 2: To five for zero five eight two five five the numbers.
Speaker 3: So when we come back, give you my thoughts, now
Speaker 3: that the rest of these files about to be released,
Speaker 3: what really happened with these assassinations of these three great Americans?
Speaker 3: M OKJFKRFK, you're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 6: You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 8: And then finally he repeated his claim that he says,
Speaker 8: I think under Biden, we had probably the highest inflation
Speaker 8: in US history. Yes, it was high, about a forty
Speaker 8: year high at one point in twenty twenty two. Never
Speaker 8: close to the all time record of more than twenty
Speaker 8: percent decades past.
Speaker 3: You know it's your time, right when that's the best
Speaker 3: CNN can do fact checking you.
Speaker 2: Oh, Trump said highest inflation ever. No, No, just highest
Speaker 2: inflation in the last forty years. I mean, this is such.
Speaker 3: A wonderful time and lots of reasons to believe it's
Speaker 3: going to continue. Eight five to five for zero five
Speaker 3: A two five five text D an five seven, seven
Speaker 3: through nine.
Speaker 2: If you just joined us, thank you. We've got some
Speaker 2: really interesting stuff going.
Speaker 3: We're talking about the goofiness of thinking the founders ever
Speaker 3: intended that somebody born in America appearance here illegally would
Speaker 3: automatically be a citizen. Obviously the Founders didn't intend that,
Speaker 3: and we think this Supreme Court is going to strike
Speaker 3: it down. So we're talking about that. And then as well,
Speaker 3: now that Trump's going to release the rest of or
Speaker 3: much of it mlkjfkrfk assassination files, what do you think
Speaker 3: that's going to show. We haven't talked much about it
Speaker 3: on this program, but i'd really like to today and
Speaker 3: the don't want to get to one of the most
Speaker 3: striking moments on Inauguration Day in the address when President
Speaker 3: Trump said that God saved him and God saved him
Speaker 3: to make America great again.
Speaker 2: So I want to get your reaction to that.
Speaker 3: As we've talked about on the show before, I personally
Speaker 3: believe none of us can know for sure until we
Speaker 3: hopefully have the chance to meet God face to face,
Speaker 3: whether in fact he saved Trump, but I believe he did.
Speaker 3: And then the second question, did he did God save
Speaker 3: Trump to make America great again? Or did God save
Speaker 3: Trump for some other reasons. So we'll get in all
Speaker 3: that fun stuff, but in the meantime, let's go up
Speaker 3: to beautiful Fort Collins.
Speaker 2: Talk to Bob. You're on the Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome Bob,
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 9: I was calling.
Speaker 10: And this story is a little older, but back in
Speaker 10: the nineties, when I was working in Southern California law enforcement,
Speaker 10: I came upon a situation where I was in a
Speaker 10: found myself in a home that had no furniture in
Speaker 10: the living room but about twelve or fifteen identical baths
Speaker 10: and that, which you know, obviously was very odd and
Speaker 10: it didn't appear to be any kind of normal daycare setup.
Speaker 2: But when did you visit?
Speaker 10: Rhy Oh?
Speaker 2: Sorry, go ahead.
Speaker 10: My friend through investigation, found out that this home was
Speaker 10: set up to cater to wealth South Korean women who
Speaker 10: would fly in pregnant to the Los Angeles, stay here,
Speaker 10: have their baby, no intent to stay. Apparently we just
Speaker 10: wanted a dual citizenship for their child to avoid I
Speaker 10: guess mandatory military service.
Speaker 2: Yeah, great point, and thanks for passing that along.
Speaker 3: Which just goes back to the obvious, right, It is
Speaker 3: just utter madness to think the Founders intended the fourteenth
Speaker 3: Amendment to mean that you could do something like that,
Speaker 3: or that somebody who came here illegally would then have
Speaker 3: their child automatically be an American citizen. Why in the
Speaker 3: world would the Founders pretty serious cats ever incentify that.
Speaker 3: But you don't even have to get to that, right, Bob,
Speaker 3: because there is no doubt what the Founders were up
Speaker 3: to they were focused on slavery. The fourteenth Amendment was
Speaker 3: all about slavery, was all about saying, these fellow human
Speaker 3: beings who happened to be black, you know, who were
Speaker 3: brought here to be slaves or the children of those
Speaker 3: brought here to be slaves. No, they are American citizens.
Speaker 3: They were born here, their parents are subject to the jurisdiction,
Speaker 3: meaning that their exclusive loyalty was to the United States
Speaker 3: of America. That's clearly what the founders intended. So thanks
Speaker 3: for that example, my friend. It helps point out the
Speaker 3: absurdity of the other argument. A five to five for
Speaker 3: thank you, my friend, A five for zero five A
Speaker 3: two five five text d An five seven, seventh through nine.
Speaker 3: And the reason we're talking about it today is the
Speaker 3: good news is that as expected, I mean, Trump executive
Speaker 3: order very appropriate, Trump's right. It was certainly expected it
Speaker 3: would be challenged in court, and that's somewhere a federal
Speaker 3: court judge would enjoin put on hold the executive order.
Speaker 2: That's happened.
Speaker 3: So the good news is that now hopefully it can
Speaker 3: get fast tracked to the US Supreme Court. Might take longer,
Speaker 3: but hopefully gets to this US Supreme Court, which actually
Speaker 3: interprets law rather than legislates, and once and for all
Speaker 3: we can get this cleared up the right way.
Speaker 2: And then, which means.
Speaker 3: The Constitution does not provide automatic birthright citizenship.
Speaker 2: And then if folks think that should.
Speaker 3: Be the public policy of America, then convince Congress. And
Speaker 3: I imagine we'll be able to convince Congress much more
Speaker 3: quickly to make Ryan the owner of every major league
Speaker 3: team in every sport, right, because no sane Congress would.
Speaker 2: Make that the policy of this nation. If you could be.
Speaker 3: Ryan, if you could be the owner of any team
Speaker 3: in all of sports, what would it be?
Speaker 5: Oh, that's a great question.
Speaker 4: Probably the Tigers, because I know the most about baseball,
Speaker 4: and I think i'd be able to have most knowledge
Speaker 4: of that sport and the players in it.
Speaker 2: M Yeah, it seems like a boring choice to me,
Speaker 2: but what what? What do I know? My friend?
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'd rather see you take over the Lions because
Speaker 3: they obviously needs somehow help.
Speaker 2: I've not had a chance yet to.
Speaker 3: Express my condolences there, but I really felt bad for
Speaker 3: you when.
Speaker 2: You know what it reminded me of.
Speaker 3: And I text, and I won't name drop, but I
Speaker 3: text a friend of mine who was a star in
Speaker 3: the Broncos back in those days. It reminded me of
Speaker 3: that horrible Bronco loss to Jacksonville. The look the year
Speaker 3: it looked like the Broncos were tracking for the Super Bowl. Yeah,
Speaker 3: and it was just it gutted all of us in
Speaker 3: the city. But it's at the stage for those back
Speaker 3: to back Super bowls somself.
Speaker 2: There. See what happens with your allions. Let me get
Speaker 2: to some of these text.
Speaker 3: Dan, mother is legal citizen, father is not a poor
Speaker 3: child and father.
Speaker 2: No, no, no, no no.
Speaker 3: If a mother is a US citizen and that baby
Speaker 3: is born to the mother, that baby's a US citizen
Speaker 3: because listen, come back to the fourteenth Amendment. All persons
Speaker 3: born or naturalized in the United States and subject to
Speaker 3: the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States. Now
Speaker 3: naturalized means in Congress controls these laws. Right, Okay, what
Speaker 3: are the laws that say when you're a citizen and
Speaker 3: the laws you're born to an American citizen, you're a citizen.
Speaker 3: So no, if that baby doesn't matter that the father
Speaker 3: may be here illegally. The mother's an American citizen, the
Speaker 3: baby's an American citizen. But if you've got if you've
Speaker 3: got parents who are here illegally, or one parent here
Speaker 3: illegally gives birth to the child, the other parents not
Speaker 3: an American citizen in some other country.
Speaker 2: No, our constitution.
Speaker 3: I understand the current interpretation is that our constitution says
Speaker 3: that child's an American citizen. But that's a misread of
Speaker 3: our constitution. And I don't think there's any credible argument
Speaker 3: that the founders actually intended that with the fourteenth Amendment.
Speaker 2: Let's get back to some more of our text.
Speaker 3: I'm really surprised, Ryan, we don't have some calls and
Speaker 3: text on JFK, MLK and RFK assassinations and beliefs as
Speaker 3: to what actually happened. Now that Trump's going to release
Speaker 3: those records, maybe people are just waiting for the records.
Speaker 2: But I would have to ask you this.
Speaker 3: Does anybody really believe And if so, you'll have to
Speaker 3: tell me why that Oswald just came up with this
Speaker 3: on his own and did it all on his own
Speaker 3: with the assassination of JFK.
Speaker 2: And why would anybody.
Speaker 3: Believe that given everything we've seen and heard already and
Speaker 3: not having even seen this secret stuff yet.
Speaker 5: If I may just to throw this out there, I
Speaker 5: do believe James R.
Speaker 2: Olreay, give me a break.
Speaker 3: I mean, I'm not saying he wasn't involved with the
Speaker 3: idea that he was acted alone.
Speaker 4: Really, as per Lee Harvey Oswald, he was very delusional,
Speaker 4: if I am correct, he also served in our military.
Speaker 6: He also had.
Speaker 4: Sympathies to the Soviet Union communists him and may have
Speaker 4: thought he was doing a favor for the Soviets in
Speaker 4: his deluded mind that there would be motivation for him
Speaker 4: to do this in a very delusions of grandeur kind
Speaker 4: of way.
Speaker 2: So why did Jeck Ruby kill him? And how did
Speaker 2: Jack Ruby get access to him?
Speaker 4: Again, the simplified explanation would be Jack Ruby was a completely.
Speaker 5: He was a devastated American. He loved JFK.
Speaker 4: He was a patriot and thought he was doing the
Speaker 4: right thing for his country by taking Oswald out.
Speaker 5: I'm not saying I believe that.
Speaker 3: I'm just saying, startingbody, a patriot who loves this country
Speaker 3: thinks they're doing a service to the country by taking
Speaker 3: Oswald out, by.
Speaker 5: Killing JFK's assassin.
Speaker 3: Yeah, right, But anybody would know the service to the
Speaker 3: country would be getting to the bottom of who was
Speaker 3: now with Oswald, I know, was the saying, I appreciate
Speaker 3: the way your mind works, Ryan, and I do, and
Speaker 3: I understand the point that you're making. I'm just saying that,
Speaker 3: you know, I'm an evidence based guy. Followed, I don't
Speaker 3: buy that Oswald acted alone. Just my personal conclusion. Maybe
Speaker 3: what we'll see in these files it'll be released, Well,
Speaker 3: we'll tell me. Oh no, it's pretty clear Oswald acted alone.
Speaker 3: What why do you think? But I'm not expecting that.
Speaker 3: Why do you think they've sat on the files? And
Speaker 3: Sir Hans, Sir Han, anybody believe he acted alone?
Speaker 2: I don't know. What.
Speaker 3: Why do you think they've sat on these classified files
Speaker 3: all these years?
Speaker 2: Republicans and Democrats?
Speaker 4: Yeah, well Pompeo is the one, and Trump named him
Speaker 4: in the interview with Hannity last night that convinced him
Speaker 4: not to release them. Of course, Pompeo was the one
Speaker 4: time director of the CIA. There's something about the CIA
Speaker 4: detail there, Dan that they either knew something or should
Speaker 4: have known something, or maybe Oswald was on their radar
Speaker 4: and they failed to act and they allowed him to
Speaker 4: kill the president. And it's embarrassing for them. That's kind
Speaker 4: of the vibe I'm going with, But that's just a
Speaker 4: working theory.
Speaker 3: Okay, Hey, when we come back, we'll keep talking about this.
Speaker 3: We'll keep talking about birthright citizenship and why it's so
Speaker 3: clear that that's not what the founders handed why I'm
Speaker 3: confident this US Supreme Court will make it clear that
Speaker 3: that should not be the law of the land, or
Speaker 3: at least not the correct constitutional interpretation. If Congress wants
Speaker 3: to go ahead and do it, they can knock theirselves out.
Speaker 3: Be anybody knows Congress won't do that. And then come
Speaker 3: back to that sound of the president Saint God's saved
Speaker 3: him to make America great again?
Speaker 2: Do you agree? And why you're on the Dan Capitla Show.
Speaker 6: And now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 11: Over the past eight years, I have been tested and
Speaker 11: challenged more than any president in our two hundred and
Speaker 11: fifty year history, and I've learned a lot along the way.
Speaker 5: The journey to reclaim.
Speaker 11: Our republic has not been an easy one. That I
Speaker 11: can tell you. Those who wish to stop our cause
Speaker 11: have tried to take my freedom and indeed to take
Speaker 11: my life. Just a few months ago, in a beautiful
Speaker 11: Pennsylvania field and assassin's bullet rip through my ear. But
Speaker 11: I felt then and believe even more so now that
Speaker 11: my life was saved for a reason. I was saved
Speaker 11: by God to make America great again.
Speaker 10: Wow.
Speaker 3: Just one of those chills moment, Thank you, Ryan, Just
Speaker 3: one of those chills moment for me, for me, kind
Speaker 3: of the personal highlight of the inaugural address, and I
Speaker 3: thought there were many. But I do believe that. As
Speaker 3: I said at the time, personally I do believe. I
Speaker 3: can't prove it. I can't even be certain right until
Speaker 3: hopefully we all get a chance to have a conversation
Speaker 3: with God face to face, but yeah, strongly personally believe
Speaker 3: that God did save Trump. There then you get to
Speaker 3: the and the reasons why we've already discussed, right and
Speaker 3: you're probably familiar with those, But then we get to
Speaker 3: the second question, why did he save Trump? Did God
Speaker 3: save Trump so that Trump would be elected president and
Speaker 3: make a Marria great again? My personal belief, and this
Speaker 3: is just one guy, but my personal belief is some really,
Speaker 3: really really confident that God did save Trump.
Speaker 2: And I believe that God saved Trump in order.
Speaker 3: To spare America because America is the world's greatest hope,
Speaker 3: pride for freedom, religious liberty, defeat evil, keep the world
Speaker 3: relatively free, expand freedom. I do believe, like the Founders believed,
Speaker 3: that there was divine intervention to help the Founders win
Speaker 3: America's freedom. So I share the founder's view. So my
Speaker 3: personal belief, God saved Trump in.
Speaker 2: Order to.
Speaker 3: Preserve America in the sense that in order to prevent
Speaker 3: America from being torn asunder internally, and can you even imagine,
Speaker 3: and I'll throw that out there for your thoughts and
Speaker 3: your text, et cetera, what America would have looked like
Speaker 3: the moment after had God forbid that assassin succeeded in
Speaker 3: the Butler field. But I think personally, yeah, God saved
Speaker 3: Trump in order to spare America from being torn asunder
Speaker 3: like that, but then to give Americans the opportunity to
Speaker 3: make that choice, because that personally my belief is that
Speaker 3: God's all about free will, and that's why there are
Speaker 3: bad things in the world. He gives us the free
Speaker 3: will to do right or wrong. So I think Americans
Speaker 3: were then given the free will, that opportunity to elect
Speaker 3: Trump or not, and by electing him, they have accomplished
Speaker 3: all of these great things, as JFK said, Right, wasn't
Speaker 3: it the last line?
Speaker 2: Ryan? You would know this, you know all this stuff.
Speaker 2: Wasn't it the.
Speaker 3: Last line of JFK's inaugural address. Now, let God's work
Speaker 3: on Earth truly be our own. I think that was
Speaker 3: the last line, which is why JFK would be thrown
Speaker 3: out of the Democratic Party today. Right, he couldn't be
Speaker 3: elected dog catcher in the far left, secular Democratic Party today.
Speaker 3: But that was the last line of his inaugural address.
Speaker 3: And I think I think God spared Trump in that
Speaker 3: Butler field, so the Americans would then have that choice
Speaker 3: free will. Americans made the right choice, and now there's
Speaker 3: a real chance for God's work to truly be our
Speaker 3: own in this country, and we've been saved from the
Speaker 3: far left, secular, anti Christian, anti religion, anti faith forces
Speaker 3: that were controlling this country, many of them obviously. Colorado's
Speaker 3: still deep blue, but more work to come. Eight five
Speaker 3: to five for zero five eight two five to five
Speaker 3: the number of thoughts on that, my educated friend.
Speaker 4: Well, we can turn to the callers too, Mike and
Speaker 4: Lakewood has a thought on the Kennedy assassination.
Speaker 2: Does does he? Well? Thank you for directing me to
Speaker 2: my text. I'm remote today.
Speaker 3: As you may have guessed from this, Let's go in
Speaker 3: fact to Mike and Lakewood are on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 9: Welcome Mike, Hi, Ryan Indian, Thanks for taking my call. Ryan.
Speaker 9: Instead of watching JFK tonight, watch a documentary that's available
Speaker 9: on YouTube called JFK The Smoking Gun. Dan, Have you
Speaker 9: had a chance to watch that?
Speaker 2: No, but I haven't seen Gone with the Wind.
Speaker 9: Okay, just dip your interest. This is a documentary by
Speaker 9: an Australian detective that blew the Warrant Commission out of
Speaker 9: the water completely. He didn't believe. It turns out that
Speaker 9: back in the day, CBS I believe conducted an experiment
Speaker 9: with a handful of shooters trying to recreate the motor key.
Speaker 9: None of the shooters were able to get off three
Speaker 9: rounds in the same amount of time until their second
Speaker 9: or third try. One of the shooters after that did
Speaker 9: some ballistics testing. So the first shot was a myths
Speaker 9: a ricochet, the second shot was the magic bullet. The
Speaker 9: third shot was fired out of an AR fifteen by
Speaker 9: the United States Secret Service. In a follow up, Car.
Speaker 3: And Mike appreciate appreciate the call, my friend. That the
Speaker 3: music means we've got a bail now. What's the name
Speaker 3: of that video.
Speaker 9: Again, JFK the Smoking Gun.
Speaker 2: Thank you, my friend. We'll left to bail here.
Speaker 3: The reason we're talking about all this now is is
Speaker 3: Trump has ordered that classified information on the JFK MLKRFK
Speaker 3: assassinations be released. What do you think it's going to
Speaker 3: show back in a flash. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.